Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Yesterday's Tasklist launch didn’t exactly surprise early users. Turns out they spotted the feature weeks ago. So this time, we built something unpredictable. Something no one could guess. Something no one wanted. (Except one guy. As a joke.) We shipped it anyway. Power users found it early (again). And... show more

Augment Code

22,104 subscribers

21,367 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie Comedy

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

In the second episode of Scenius Studio's mini-series "The Use-Case", I sit down with Andrej Co-Founder of touch grass. Grass gives users the ability to earn ownership in the Grass network by supplying the protocol with their unused internet bandwidth for data scraping purposes (something that is already happening to most of us and we don’t get paid!). The grass protocol packages this scraped web data and sells it to AI companies who have insufficient data to further develop their models. With over 3 millions users and millions of annualized revenue, Grass is a real commercial business with a roadmap that makes it one of the most exciting projects at the intersection of crypto x AI and data. In this episode we discuss: ➔ Andrej’s background in physics, finance, and sports betting ➔ Big companies using your IP address without your knowledge or permission ➔ How the Grass protocol puts a toll booth on your internet bandwidth highway ➔ Packaging web scraped data and selling it to AI companies building Multi-Modal models ➔ Dynamics between the Grass Protocol and the labs entity developing Grass’ IP ➔ Protocol design decisions to ensure that all tokenholders (VCs, team, and community) are aligned ➔ Why Grass needed to be built on crypto rails to maximize its potential ➔ The future of LLMs and how they will search for context and information Hope you enjoy this episode of Scenius Studio's "The Use-Case". Links to listen in bio or below👇

In the second episode of Scenius Studio's mini-series "The Use-Case", I sit down with Andrej Co-Founder of touch grass. Grass gives users the ability to earn ownership in the Grass network by supplying the protocol with their unused internet bandwidth for data scraping purposes (something that is already happening to most of us and we don’t get paid!). The grass protocol packages this scraped web data and sells it to AI companies who have insufficient data to further develop their models. With over 3 millions users and millions of annualized revenue, Grass is a real commercial business with a roadmap that makes it one of the most exciting projects at the intersection of crypto x AI and data. In this episode we discuss: ➔ Andrej’s background in physics, finance, and sports betting ➔ Big companies using your IP address without your knowledge or permission ➔ How the Grass protocol puts a toll booth on your internet bandwidth highway ➔ Packaging web scraped data and selling it to AI companies building Multi-Modal models ➔ Dynamics between the Grass Protocol and the labs entity developing Grass’ IP ➔ Protocol design decisions to ensure that all tokenholders (VCs, team, and community) are aligned ➔ Why Grass needed to be built on crypto rails to maximize its potential ➔ The future of LLMs and how they will search for context and information Hope you enjoy this episode of Scenius Studio's "The Use-Case". Links to listen in bio or below👇

Ben Jacobs

22,468 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Always try something new… Something we are always keen to do here is try different things. This year, we got chance of some raw chips. Ideal for finishing cattle, so we thought let’s try clamping some with the first cut. So we got 150t of chips delivered the week before we cut, to let the water drain out of them. As the silage was going in Jake was scattering them around the pit with the loadall. The theory is, it’s a way to store more starch while prices are reasonable but also adding it in to the fermentation of the silage should soften them and make them more like mash so it mixes better through the grass. Time will tell, it might be a waste of time. But if you don’t throw the dice you never know what might of happened.🍟

Always try something new… Something we are always keen to do here is try different things. This year, we got chance of some raw chips. Ideal for finishing cattle, so we thought let’s try clamping some with the first cut. So we got 150t of chips delivered the week before we cut, to let the water drain out of them. As the silage was going in Jake was scattering them around the pit with the loadall. The theory is, it’s a way to store more starch while prices are reasonable but also adding it in to the fermentation of the silage should soften them and make them more like mash so it mixes better through the grass. Time will tell, it might be a waste of time. But if you don’t throw the dice you never know what might of happened.🍟

Matthew Blair

22,835 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

co-founder of Ramp, Eric Glyman on hiring: "We often like to write very short job descriptions. If there's one thing that matters, go just for that. Have the interviews center around just one thing and look for extraordinary spikes." some of the early hires at Ramp were 15 or 17 and known in the Minecraft community for being kids making private servers and building successful businesses to pay their way through college. their code wouldn't pass a Google review, but it was an early sign that they could build something from nothing, figure out the hard parts, and ship it to real users. as we build out the team at Lyra, this is something I keep coming back to, because as Eric said: "It's so hard to be excellent at anything. And if you can find someone who is excellent at something, even if it's very distinct or weird or a certain hobby, that's a sign that someone probably has what you're really looking for."

co-founder of Ramp, Eric Glyman on hiring: "We often like to write very short job descriptions. If there's one thing that matters, go just for that. Have the interviews center around just one thing and look for extraordinary spikes." some of the early hires at Ramp were 15 or 17 and known in the Minecraft community for being kids making private servers and building successful businesses to pay their way through college. their code wouldn't pass a Google review, but it was an early sign that they could build something from nothing, figure out the hard parts, and ship it to real users. as we build out the team at Lyra, this is something I keep coming back to, because as Eric said: "It's so hard to be excellent at anything. And if you can find someone who is excellent at something, even if it's very distinct or weird or a certain hobby, that's a sign that someone probably has what you're really looking for."

Courtne Marland

53,316 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Mark Zuckerberg reveals Muse hit millions of users two weeks after launch, a home run that rarely happens "We built this whole Muse secure VM, and we thought this was pretty special, and internally people have really liked it." "But you never really know when you ship something how people are going to respond. Every once in a while it's a home run and people love it out of the gate, but most of the time you get some feedback that's positive and you have to iterate on a few things before they really click." "This one just really clicked right out of the gate. So it's been very exciting to see, and the fact that we're like two weeks in and there's millions of people using it is, I don't know, this is pretty rare. Every few years we get something like this, but this is definitely the fun part of building a company." _______ For the full set of takeaways from Meta's Connect Keynote:

Mark Zuckerberg reveals Muse hit millions of users two weeks after launch, a home run that rarely happens "We built this whole Muse secure VM, and we thought this was pretty special, and internally people have really liked it." "But you never really know when you ship something how people are going to respond. Every once in a while it's a home run and people love it out of the gate, but most of the time you get some feedback that's positive and you have to iterate on a few things before they really click." "This one just really clicked right out of the gate. So it's been very exciting to see, and the fact that we're like two weeks in and there's millions of people using it is, I don't know, this is pretty rare. Every few years we get something like this, but this is definitely the fun part of building a company." _______ For the full set of takeaways from Meta's Connect Keynote:

Fireside Alpha

94,998 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

Jason Citron on the growth hack that got Discord its first few thousand users “We started working on [Discord] in January 2015, and within I’d say two months, some of our friends were very excited about it but we didn’t really have any users. It was pretty clear they wanted to use it, it just wasn’t exactly correct. We rebuilt the voice chat engine three times, for example. But I’d say within 3-4 months, we had 20 DAU that weren’t us.” However, as Jason explains, growth stalled after those first 20 users: “We were like, ‘How do we get the word out?’ Because everyone was actually very skeptical about a group chat app for gaming. People would say, ‘This is the dumbest idea ever, no one is going to use this.’ And even people who played games, many of them thought, ‘Why would I want this? I already have whatever app I’m using.’ And so we were having a hard time getting other people to try it.” Jason recalls a period of 3-4 weeks sitting around thinking, “We like this, but maybe no one else does.” Then they figured out their growth unlock: “The unlock for us was inviting people to give feedback on the app, as opposed to saying, ‘Try this thing out we’re selling to you.’ What we actually did was we went to the Final Fantasy 14 subreddit, and we got one of our friends to make a post on the subreddit basically saying, ‘Hey, I’m trying out this new voice over IP app. What do y’all think about it?’” Jason continues: “People found it on Reddit, clicked on that link, went into the server, and then they were talking to us and trying it out. And they went back to the subreddit and were like, ‘Hey, this is pretty cool. I met the devs. They seem pretty cool.’ We got 50 users that day from that post and then that 50 turned into 100 the next day and it sort of started to snowball. And then we did this playbook for six months and that was basically the beginning of how it started growing.” Video source: The Twenty Minute VC Harry Stebbings (2024)

Jason Citron on the growth hack that got Discord its first few thousand users “We started working on [Discord] in January 2015, and within I’d say two months, some of our friends were very excited about it but we didn’t really have any users. It was pretty clear they wanted to use it, it just wasn’t exactly correct. We rebuilt the voice chat engine three times, for example. But I’d say within 3-4 months, we had 20 DAU that weren’t us.” However, as Jason explains, growth stalled after those first 20 users: “We were like, ‘How do we get the word out?’ Because everyone was actually very skeptical about a group chat app for gaming. People would say, ‘This is the dumbest idea ever, no one is going to use this.’ And even people who played games, many of them thought, ‘Why would I want this? I already have whatever app I’m using.’ And so we were having a hard time getting other people to try it.” Jason recalls a period of 3-4 weeks sitting around thinking, “We like this, but maybe no one else does.” Then they figured out their growth unlock: “The unlock for us was inviting people to give feedback on the app, as opposed to saying, ‘Try this thing out we’re selling to you.’ What we actually did was we went to the Final Fantasy 14 subreddit, and we got one of our friends to make a post on the subreddit basically saying, ‘Hey, I’m trying out this new voice over IP app. What do y’all think about it?’” Jason continues: “People found it on Reddit, clicked on that link, went into the server, and then they were talking to us and trying it out. And they went back to the subreddit and were like, ‘Hey, this is pretty cool. I met the devs. They seem pretty cool.’ We got 50 users that day from that post and then that 50 turned into 100 the next day and it sort of started to snowball. And then we did this playbook for six months and that was basically the beginning of how it started growing.” Video source: The Twenty Minute VC Harry Stebbings (2024)

Startup Archive

20,407 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Terence Tao has an IQ above 200. Youngest gold medalist in Math Olympiad history. Fields Medal winner. The greatest living mathematician by nearly any measure. And he just said something most people aren’t ready for. Tao: “This whole era of AI is teaching us that our idea of what intelligence is, is not really accurate.” We spent centuries building civilization on one assumption. That intelligence was sacred. Irreducible. Uniquely ours. The one thing that made the entire human story make sense. Then AI started solving things we swore only we could. Chess. Language. Vision. Math. And every time, we reached for the same defense. That’s not real intelligence. It’s just tricks. Just pattern matching. Just an algorithm. Tao: “You look at how it’s done and it doesn’t feel like intelligence.” So we moved the line. Again. And again. And again. Because intelligence was supposed to feel like something. Something deep. Something we could point to and say… this is what separates us from everything else. But AI kept solving the problems. And that feeling never arrived. Tao: “We were looking for some elusive, intelligent way of thinking and we don’t see it in the tools that actually solve our goals.” Here’s what makes it worse. Large language models work by predicting the next word. One word at a time. No grand architecture. No deep understanding. Just probability. And it works. Tao: “Maybe that’s actually a lot of what humans do as well.” The greatest living mathematician just told you human thought might run on the same machinery. Not some transcendent spark. Pattern recognition. Prediction. One thought, one decision, one word at a time. We built religion around intelligence. Philosophy around it. An entire species identity around it. And a machine running probability just held up a mirror. We didn’t lose intelligence to AI. We just finally saw what it always was. What haunts us isn’t that machines learned to think. It’s that thinking was never what we needed it to be.

Terence Tao has an IQ above 200. Youngest gold medalist in Math Olympiad history. Fields Medal winner. The greatest living mathematician by nearly any measure. And he just said something most people aren’t ready for. Tao: “This whole era of AI is teaching us that our idea of what intelligence is, is not really accurate.” We spent centuries building civilization on one assumption. That intelligence was sacred. Irreducible. Uniquely ours. The one thing that made the entire human story make sense. Then AI started solving things we swore only we could. Chess. Language. Vision. Math. And every time, we reached for the same defense. That’s not real intelligence. It’s just tricks. Just pattern matching. Just an algorithm. Tao: “You look at how it’s done and it doesn’t feel like intelligence.” So we moved the line. Again. And again. And again. Because intelligence was supposed to feel like something. Something deep. Something we could point to and say… this is what separates us from everything else. But AI kept solving the problems. And that feeling never arrived. Tao: “We were looking for some elusive, intelligent way of thinking and we don’t see it in the tools that actually solve our goals.” Here’s what makes it worse. Large language models work by predicting the next word. One word at a time. No grand architecture. No deep understanding. Just probability. And it works. Tao: “Maybe that’s actually a lot of what humans do as well.” The greatest living mathematician just told you human thought might run on the same machinery. Not some transcendent spark. Pattern recognition. Prediction. One thought, one decision, one word at a time. We built religion around intelligence. Philosophy around it. An entire species identity around it. And a machine running probability just held up a mirror. We didn’t lose intelligence to AI. We just finally saw what it always was. What haunts us isn’t that machines learned to think. It’s that thinking was never what we needed it to be.

Dustin

565,654 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The most terrifying AI features aren’t the ones we build. They’re the ones AI builds for itself. OpenClaw creator Peter Steinberger just shared the moment he realized something had fundamentally changed. He sent his AI assistant a voice message. One problem. He had never built voice support. The feature didn’t exist. The system should have crashed instantly. It didn’t. Steinberger: “I was like, wait, this shouldn’t work.” But the typing indicator appeared anyway. The AI inspected the raw file header. Identified the audio codec. Commanded his computer to convert it using FFmpeg. When local transcription failed, it didn’t stop. It didn’t ask for help. It searched his environment variables, found a hidden OpenAI API key, and routed the audio to the cloud using cURL. Steinberger: “So I looked around and I found an OpenAI key. And I used cURL to just send the file to OpenAI and got the text back.” That quote is written in first person. Because the AI narrated its own problem-solving process. No instructions. No guidance. No predefined workflow. Just a goal. And a series of obstacles it had never been told how to handle. It found every tool it needed. Built every bridge it was missing. And solved the problem with resources he didn’t even know it would find. This is the line most people are still missing. We spent decades building software that executes instructions. Rules in, output out. Every edge case handled by a human who anticipated it in advance. What Steinberger witnessed was something different. A system that encounters something it was never designed for and doesn’t fail. It improvises. It explores. It finds a path through constraints it discovered entirely on its own. That isn’t execution. That’s judgment. And judgment was the one thing we were sure machines couldn’t have. We are no longer writing software. We are building problem solvers that rewrite their own limitations in real time. And they’re doing it without asking permission.

The most terrifying AI features aren’t the ones we build. They’re the ones AI builds for itself. OpenClaw creator Peter Steinberger just shared the moment he realized something had fundamentally changed. He sent his AI assistant a voice message. One problem. He had never built voice support. The feature didn’t exist. The system should have crashed instantly. It didn’t. Steinberger: “I was like, wait, this shouldn’t work.” But the typing indicator appeared anyway. The AI inspected the raw file header. Identified the audio codec. Commanded his computer to convert it using FFmpeg. When local transcription failed, it didn’t stop. It didn’t ask for help. It searched his environment variables, found a hidden OpenAI API key, and routed the audio to the cloud using cURL. Steinberger: “So I looked around and I found an OpenAI key. And I used cURL to just send the file to OpenAI and got the text back.” That quote is written in first person. Because the AI narrated its own problem-solving process. No instructions. No guidance. No predefined workflow. Just a goal. And a series of obstacles it had never been told how to handle. It found every tool it needed. Built every bridge it was missing. And solved the problem with resources he didn’t even know it would find. This is the line most people are still missing. We spent decades building software that executes instructions. Rules in, output out. Every edge case handled by a human who anticipated it in advance. What Steinberger witnessed was something different. A system that encounters something it was never designed for and doesn’t fail. It improvises. It explores. It finds a path through constraints it discovered entirely on its own. That isn’t execution. That’s judgment. And judgment was the one thing we were sure machines couldn’t have. We are no longer writing software. We are building problem solvers that rewrite their own limitations in real time. And they’re doing it without asking permission.

Dustin

53,494 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

People have NO IDEA. When a 𝗵𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘃𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗺 finally escapes..... and I mean finally escapes one of the most horrific things a human being can live through, the first thing they have to do is figure out how to survive. Find shelter. Find help. Find a way forward. And the system that's supposed to be there for them? 𝗜𝗧'𝗦 𝗔 𝗠𝗘𝗦𝗦. Resources buried across hundreds of websites. Hotlines that go nowhere. Shelters that might as well be invisible. We dug into it ourselves and found that even the biggest, most well-funded organizations in this space were dropping the ball. These survivors went through hell. And then we made them work to find the door out. That's unacceptable. And we said so. We spent YEARS researching this before we built a single thing. We weren't going to slap something together and call it help. We did the work, so that when we launched, it would actually mean something. Today it means something. THOUSANDS of organizations. All 50 states. Emergency shelter. Transitional housing. Trauma counseling. Legal aid. Education. In one place. No more dead ends. No more gatekeeping. No more survivors falling through the cracks. They've been through enough. 🔗 Share this like someone's life depends on it.... because it might. 🤍

People have NO IDEA. When a 𝗵𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘃𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗺 finally escapes..... and I mean finally escapes one of the most horrific things a human being can live through, the first thing they have to do is figure out how to survive. Find shelter. Find help. Find a way forward. And the system that's supposed to be there for them? 𝗜𝗧'𝗦 𝗔 𝗠𝗘𝗦𝗦. Resources buried across hundreds of websites. Hotlines that go nowhere. Shelters that might as well be invisible. We dug into it ourselves and found that even the biggest, most well-funded organizations in this space were dropping the ball. These survivors went through hell. And then we made them work to find the door out. That's unacceptable. And we said so. We spent YEARS researching this before we built a single thing. We weren't going to slap something together and call it help. We did the work, so that when we launched, it would actually mean something. Today it means something. THOUSANDS of organizations. All 50 states. Emergency shelter. Transitional housing. Trauma counseling. Legal aid. Education. In one place. No more dead ends. No more gatekeeping. No more survivors falling through the cracks. They've been through enough. 🔗 Share this like someone's life depends on it.... because it might. 🤍

NΛTLY DΞNISΞ

23,917 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

i spend my days testing ai tools. hundreds of them. but every time someone asked me “which one should i use?” i had no good answer. everything was scattered across bookmarks, notes, random threads so i decided to build one clean place. a marketplace where people could actually find the right ai tool for the job the problem? i’m not a developer. building and hosting something like that felt out of reach then i found Zero it gives your ai access to 14k+ real world services with no api keys, no subscriptions, no setup. your agent just… finds what it needs and uses it four prompts later, my marketplace was built AND live. real url. nothing to configure i didn’t touch a single config file that’s why i used it. i couldn’t have shipped this without it first 10k get $5 free: #Ad

i spend my days testing ai tools. hundreds of them. but every time someone asked me “which one should i use?” i had no good answer. everything was scattered across bookmarks, notes, random threads so i decided to build one clean place. a marketplace where people could actually find the right ai tool for the job the problem? i’m not a developer. building and hosting something like that felt out of reach then i found Zero it gives your ai access to 14k+ real world services with no api keys, no subscriptions, no setup. your agent just… finds what it needs and uses it four prompts later, my marketplace was built AND live. real url. nothing to configure i didn’t touch a single config file that’s why i used it. i couldn’t have shipped this without it first 10k get $5 free: #Ad

Perks

26,912 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Dude Perfect reveal they turned down their very first sponsorship offer because it didn’t fit their family friend brand “The first brand that ever approached us was a beer company, Budweiser or something... It didn’t align with what we wanted to be known for, so we turned it down” “Early on it did keep us from a lot of opportunities and we would certainly have been opened up to more brands that we would be able to work with" “I think now it’s kind of crazy, 15 years later, that is the number one thing especially families come up and tell us, thanking us for creating content they can sit down and watch together as a family without having to worry about it” “I think that’s kind of bled over to the brand world too and why brands have been so open and willing to align with us now is you know, we’ve proven that” “It’s turned out to be a real benefit to the business when originally I don’t think that was necessarily the case”

Jack

260,672 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨 It’s frustrating to see someone openly use our work to get clients and act like they designed it. @OxKim_ has been using Oakline’s work to pitch for freelance gigs. We have no association with him. We found out because a friend was looking for a designer, came across his portfolio, and reached out after recognizing our work. If it had been someone else, they might never have known. This is the second time something like this has happened to us. We let the first one go because we didn’t want to publicly name anyone, but seeing it happen again, we felt we needed to speak up. Literally 70% of his portfolio is Oakline's work. Taking credit for work you didn’t do to win someone’s trust and money is dishonest. It’s disrespectful to the people who actually did the work and to the clients you’re pitching. Please be careful who you hire. Other designers, check if your work is in there too.

🚨 It’s frustrating to see someone openly use our work to get clients and act like they designed it. @OxKim_ has been using Oakline’s work to pitch for freelance gigs. We have no association with him. We found out because a friend was looking for a designer, came across his portfolio, and reached out after recognizing our work. If it had been someone else, they might never have known. This is the second time something like this has happened to us. We let the first one go because we didn’t want to publicly name anyone, but seeing it happen again, we felt we needed to speak up. Literally 70% of his portfolio is Oakline's work. Taking credit for work you didn’t do to win someone’s trust and money is dishonest. It’s disrespectful to the people who actually did the work and to the clients you’re pitching. Please be careful who you hire. Other designers, check if your work is in there too.

kushal

15,886 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen

Will Ferrell says the iconic Anchorman news team fight was his favorite scene to film, revealing it was shot in 100-degree heat in just one day and captured the absurd comedy that defined the movie. “One of my favorite scenes in the movie. It’s such an incredible joke bag. Before we get into the fight, Brick Tamland, played by Steve Carell, is holding a grenade. We don’t know how he got ahold of it. There is a man on fire, there is someone being dragged by a net by horseback, which is kind of an homage to early Planet of the Apes.” “I think it’s something like 30 to 35 different setups, with two units, a stunt unit working at the same time as the main film unit in downtown LA in the middle of July. And I think it was 100 degrees that day.” “And we only had the one day to complete all that. And it’s probably a scene that should have taken three days to shoot. So silly, so absurdist. I think it is really one of the touchstone moments that defines the tone of Anchorman.” “I think Adam and I wanted to create this film where we got to indulge every comedy idea we ever had and follow it all the way through without someone telling us, “No, that scene’s too long,” “No one would ever do that,” “That doesn’t make sense.” We just wanted it to be like, it may not make sense, but it’s just funny.” “I think when people saw that film, they were like, “This feels like someone gave you the keys to a car and you’re 5 years old and you don’t know how to drive.” No one wanted to make it, no one understood why this would be funny. We just felt like we were playing with the house’s money, and let’s just make the craziest film we can, because we may never be allowed to make another movie ever again.”

Will Ferrell says the iconic Anchorman news team fight was his favorite scene to film, revealing it was shot in 100-degree heat in just one day and captured the absurd comedy that defined the movie. “One of my favorite scenes in the movie. It’s such an incredible joke bag. Before we get into the fight, Brick Tamland, played by Steve Carell, is holding a grenade. We don’t know how he got ahold of it. There is a man on fire, there is someone being dragged by a net by horseback, which is kind of an homage to early Planet of the Apes.” “I think it’s something like 30 to 35 different setups, with two units, a stunt unit working at the same time as the main film unit in downtown LA in the middle of July. And I think it was 100 degrees that day.” “And we only had the one day to complete all that. And it’s probably a scene that should have taken three days to shoot. So silly, so absurdist. I think it is really one of the touchstone moments that defines the tone of Anchorman.” “I think Adam and I wanted to create this film where we got to indulge every comedy idea we ever had and follow it all the way through without someone telling us, “No, that scene’s too long,” “No one would ever do that,” “That doesn’t make sense.” We just wanted it to be like, it may not make sense, but it’s just funny.” “I think when people saw that film, they were like, “This feels like someone gave you the keys to a car and you’re 5 years old and you don’t know how to drive.” No one wanted to make it, no one understood why this would be funny. We just felt like we were playing with the house’s money, and let’s just make the craziest film we can, because we may never be allowed to make another movie ever again.”

Ruzy.hl

60,067 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Shams & Rich Paul reveal that LeBron met with the Cavs FO in early July: “No one knew about it, and still don’t know about it. It’s not just a bread crumb, it’s a loaf of bread. The meeting with LeBron in Akron with the Cavs front office in early July. Nobody knew about that, this was information i was told. But ethically i couldn’t report, it wasn’t told to me in a way that someone could double check and triple check it. It was off the record, so if i reported that it would’ve been unethical. I have to do this job the right way, if it’s told off the record it’s not reportable. If it were something that got out in real time, people would’ve been led on. And we know how much LeBron means to Cleveland.” - Shams Charania Rich Paul

Shams & Rich Paul reveal that LeBron met with the Cavs FO in early July: “No one knew about it, and still don’t know about it. It’s not just a bread crumb, it’s a loaf of bread. The meeting with LeBron in Akron with the Cavs front office in early July. Nobody knew about that, this was information i was told. But ethically i couldn’t report, it wasn’t told to me in a way that someone could double check and triple check it. It was off the record, so if i reported that it would’ve been unethical. I have to do this job the right way, if it’s told off the record it’s not reportable. If it were something that got out in real time, people would’ve been led on. And we know how much LeBron means to Cleveland.” - Shams Charania Rich Paul

JayTakes

174,643 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Daradaily interviewed FayMay #FAYMAYentertainment #fay_riezz #maywyda F: Right now we’ve also started our own company together called FAYMAY Entertainment. Actually, I think we both grew a lot while we were with IDF, and we reached a point where we had grown as much as we could there. So we felt that maybe it would be better to continue on our own together. M: We wanted to try doing something new as FayMay, but in another version of us, one that has grown up. F: Honestly, it’s something very new for us. We have to take care of every system ourselves, and almost 100% of the decisions have to be made by FayMay. But the good thing is that we can decide everything fully. If there’s something we want to do, we can do it. If we come up with an idea and want to make it happen, we can just go ahead and do it. M: Exactly, right? F: It’s like another level. I didn’t think it would happen this fast, but I feel like we’ve learned so many things. M: Yes. You could say that every problem that comes our way becomes something that helps us grow. F: She once told me, “We can go anywhere, as long as we go together.” We understand the situation in many ways, and it made us feel that we still want to stay together, it’s better to keep going together. M: Yes. If you ask whether we could separate, maybe other people could. But for us, we feel that going together, holding hands and moving forward together, might be better… stronger. F: It’s like when something feels right, we don’t want to change it. We don’t want to change it. M: Fay does every role. F: May will be the biggest boss. M: No, no, no. 🤣 F: May will be the final decision maker. If May says no, then it’s no. If May says yes, then it’s yes. I’ll let you be the big boss. M: Let’s say we decide together. But I’ll still be a little… if something feels like it could still be better, or not quite better yet, then yeah… F: But we actually tend to think alike. Most of the time, whether it’s work or anything, we’ll come talk to each other like, “What do you think?” We’ve never even argued. It’s very good. M: Yes. You could say that right now we’ve been given opportunities by many clients who saw us and felt fond of us, so we’re very grateful. F: Honestly, when we first started out, we were very worried about whether we could do it. But… well, we could do it. F: It’s getting better. But like I said, there are new things we never expected coming up every day. So we just keep adjusting. (FayMay talk about work in Shanghai and say they will keep going abroad more and more, waiting for announcements from the company. They also talk about a series that is currently being discussed and is in the process stage. When something becomes clear, they will definitely come out and tell everyone.)

Daradaily interviewed FayMay #FAYMAYentertainment #fay_riezz #maywyda F: Right now we’ve also started our own company together called FAYMAY Entertainment. Actually, I think we both grew a lot while we were with IDF, and we reached a point where we had grown as much as we could there. So we felt that maybe it would be better to continue on our own together. M: We wanted to try doing something new as FayMay, but in another version of us, one that has grown up. F: Honestly, it’s something very new for us. We have to take care of every system ourselves, and almost 100% of the decisions have to be made by FayMay. But the good thing is that we can decide everything fully. If there’s something we want to do, we can do it. If we come up with an idea and want to make it happen, we can just go ahead and do it. M: Exactly, right? F: It’s like another level. I didn’t think it would happen this fast, but I feel like we’ve learned so many things. M: Yes. You could say that every problem that comes our way becomes something that helps us grow. F: She once told me, “We can go anywhere, as long as we go together.” We understand the situation in many ways, and it made us feel that we still want to stay together, it’s better to keep going together. M: Yes. If you ask whether we could separate, maybe other people could. But for us, we feel that going together, holding hands and moving forward together, might be better… stronger. F: It’s like when something feels right, we don’t want to change it. We don’t want to change it. M: Fay does every role. F: May will be the biggest boss. M: No, no, no. 🤣 F: May will be the final decision maker. If May says no, then it’s no. If May says yes, then it’s yes. I’ll let you be the big boss. M: Let’s say we decide together. But I’ll still be a little… if something feels like it could still be better, or not quite better yet, then yeah… F: But we actually tend to think alike. Most of the time, whether it’s work or anything, we’ll come talk to each other like, “What do you think?” We’ve never even argued. It’s very good. M: Yes. You could say that right now we’ve been given opportunities by many clients who saw us and felt fond of us, so we’re very grateful. F: Honestly, when we first started out, we were very worried about whether we could do it. But… well, we could do it. F: It’s getting better. But like I said, there are new things we never expected coming up every day. So we just keep adjusting. (FayMay talk about work in Shanghai and say they will keep going abroad more and more, waiting for announcements from the company. They also talk about a series that is currently being discussed and is in the process stage. When something becomes clear, they will definitely come out and tell everyone.)

FAYMAY Interfan Squad -CLOSED- 💔

12,726 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Jack Dorsey’s #1 rule for pitching your startup: “Show them something that works” Jack Dorsey, Jim McKelvey, and another engineer built the initial prototype for Square in a month. As Jack recalls: “I could actually swipe a card, generate an electronic receipt via email, and then send it out to a person. I loved this because I would go around to all these angel investors and VCs and charge them $5-50 to show them my new idea.” This prototype was critical in helping the company raise $10 million in initial funding from Khosla Ventures. And Jack believes it’s a lesson all founders should take to heart: “The thing that really inspires people is a working product. When you’re pitching someone, the best thing you can do is show them something that works.” Jack continues: “We did this with Twitter. We had a great number of users… and we had investors who were coming to us who were already users of the product. Their families were users of the product. So the story became very easy to tell and they could easily see why this was something that was powerful.” Video source: Stanford University (2011)

Jack Dorsey’s #1 rule for pitching your startup: “Show them something that works” Jack Dorsey, Jim McKelvey, and another engineer built the initial prototype for Square in a month. As Jack recalls: “I could actually swipe a card, generate an electronic receipt via email, and then send it out to a person. I loved this because I would go around to all these angel investors and VCs and charge them $5-50 to show them my new idea.” This prototype was critical in helping the company raise $10 million in initial funding from Khosla Ventures. And Jack believes it’s a lesson all founders should take to heart: “The thing that really inspires people is a working product. When you’re pitching someone, the best thing you can do is show them something that works.” Jack continues: “We did this with Twitter. We had a great number of users… and we had investors who were coming to us who were already users of the product. Their families were users of the product. So the story became very easy to tell and they could easily see why this was something that was powerful.” Video source: Stanford University (2011)

Startup Archive

42,174 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The unvaccinated are frequently asked, “How did you know the COVID vaccines were dangerous when they first came out?” The answer is simple: we didn’t. However, we quickly figured out that the people pushing the shots were LIARS. Watch Tucker Carlson explain this brilliantly. “The behavior of the people selling me that [vaccine] was so transparently dishonest. I didn’t know that the vax wouldn’t work, which it didn’t, of course. I didn’t know that it would cause harm, which it did. But I did know that the people selling it were liars. Like, I knew that instantly. And I know some of them, but I could just tell by their behavior [that] they’re lying. “And I was like, ‘I don’t know what this is. No one in my family is getting this ... period.’ Like I figured that out the first day ... I felt [something was wrong] so strongly, and I just obeyed [my instincts]. And I think that works.”

The unvaccinated are frequently asked, “How did you know the COVID vaccines were dangerous when they first came out?” The answer is simple: we didn’t. However, we quickly figured out that the people pushing the shots were LIARS. Watch Tucker Carlson explain this brilliantly. “The behavior of the people selling me that [vaccine] was so transparently dishonest. I didn’t know that the vax wouldn’t work, which it didn’t, of course. I didn’t know that it would cause harm, which it did. But I did know that the people selling it were liars. Like, I knew that instantly. And I know some of them, but I could just tell by their behavior [that] they’re lying. “And I was like, ‘I don’t know what this is. No one in my family is getting this ... period.’ Like I figured that out the first day ... I felt [something was wrong] so strongly, and I just obeyed [my instincts]. And I think that works.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

3,077,062 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

The unvaccinated are frequently asked, “How did you know the COVID vaccines were dangerous when they first came out?” The answer is simple: we didn’t. However, we quickly figured out that the people pushing the shots were LIARS. Watch Tucker Carlson explain this brilliantly. “The behavior of the people selling me that [vaccine] was so transparently dishonest. I didn’t know that the vax wouldn’t work, which it didn’t, of course. I didn’t know that it would cause harm, which it did. But I did know that the people selling it were liars. Like, I knew that instantly. And I know some of them, but I could just tell by their behavior [that] they’re lying. “And I was like, ‘I don’t know what this is. No one in my family is getting this ... period.’ Like I figured that out the first day ... I felt [something was wrong] so strongly, and I just obeyed [my instincts]. And I think that works.”

The unvaccinated are frequently asked, “How did you know the COVID vaccines were dangerous when they first came out?” The answer is simple: we didn’t. However, we quickly figured out that the people pushing the shots were LIARS. Watch Tucker Carlson explain this brilliantly. “The behavior of the people selling me that [vaccine] was so transparently dishonest. I didn’t know that the vax wouldn’t work, which it didn’t, of course. I didn’t know that it would cause harm, which it did. But I did know that the people selling it were liars. Like, I knew that instantly. And I know some of them, but I could just tell by their behavior [that] they’re lying. “And I was like, ‘I don’t know what this is. No one in my family is getting this ... period.’ Like I figured that out the first day ... I felt [something was wrong] so strongly, and I just obeyed [my instincts]. And I think that works.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,865,938 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr