Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
You can’t make this up Minnesota Democrats are requesting studies on “The benefits of shoplifting” Minnesota State Representative Krista Knudsen exposes “Today in the Labor Committee, Representative Dave Pinto requested a study for the benefits of shoplifting” She says they were discussing how to stop organized shoplifting in Minnesota,... show more
356,229 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)
27 Kommentare
They couldn't make it any clearer who their base is & who they hope to appeal to
It’s always this 👇
@Melissa20732 All anyone has to do is look at Oakland California to see how well unchecked shoplifting works duhhhhhh hahaha 😂
@ksides81
👇👇👇👇👇
I weep for our society
I feel like I’m living in a South Park episode.
You think they are insane, crazy, batshit. Nope, they are acting rationally. Because so many people have swallowed all their other insane policies without pushing back, hell, why not convince people that crime is ok. They want criminals on the street. That is their policy. It keeps High IQ, High Moral, conscientious people chasing their tails. They need the crime. The purpose is to always have problems to point at. It is to always point at something that needs funding. Plus it drains your spirit and your energy, so you can't point it in their direction. It is on purpose. It is with intent.
You can’t make this stupid shut up! 20 years ago, this would have been a Saturday Night Live skit!
womp womp
Hmmmm… so what’s next? Democrats discussing the benefits of: Suicide Infanticide Race baiting Anti-semitism Violent protests Terrorism Revolution Arson Voter Fraud Dictatorships in Blue states Cannibalism 🤔
@StephanieMersm3
@latebird1 Leftist have pushed and pushed this boundary to the point of absolutes absurdity.
Benefits? What hellhole universe are we now in?
🤣Minnesota Democrats want a study of the benefits of theft, while they have a massive fraud case study right there?!!!
Krista Knudsen dropping the receipts like a boss. Drain the swamp in MN too!
The implication is they're testing how far they can push the narrative that crime is a social good.
WOW. literally living amongst some CRAZY lunatics. this is OFF the charts. mind blowing how FKG RETARDED some people are.
The number one benefit of shoplifting is the businesses either lock up normal items and frustrate their customers or they close the business in that area and move. I guess it depends on who's benefit you're talking about? I love how the politicians criticize companies when they move from high crime areas but those same politicians refuse to support law enforcement. Another reason the average American hates politicians!
And I’d be shocked to find that anyone said to Pinto: ” Are you nuts?” This is how nutty ideas gain traction. Everyone collegially nods while only thinking what should be said. The smackdown of lunacy needs to happen immediately!
Reset the counter, fellas.
Th cycle of liberal gaslighting: 1. It’s not happening 2. It’s happening but it’s just a little bit 3. It’s happening but it’s good for you — You Are Here
Every day I read dumb stuff and think, damn, it can't get any more stupid. And every day I am proven wrong!
There's no need to do studies. Social experiments starting in the 1700s and continuing up through modern Communist/socialist attempts prove that two foundational pillars of society are division of labor with a market or market like exchange and a merit based reward status system. Those experiments repeatedly show that no society above Dunbar in-group limits and first degree proxy trust limits (~1500 to ~3000 people total) cannot function at all without all six merit trust pillars. Few societies even within those population limits function at all without those two pillars, with the vast majority either instituting those pillars again, or dissolving. The remarkably small number of societies that do not dissolve or institute those pillars, stall and stagnate with no growth or innovation. Human wetware is not capable of high trust dynamics beyond those limits. Not even with fission fusion hacks. The five of six outliers that appear to defy this paradigm, exist only within a specific narrow set of parameters that incorporated a genuine fission fusion external existential threat, a strong myth/narrative of delayed reward, and social contract with a limited time or sunset clause on the temporary extreme conditions. Bayesian priors update to prevent perpetuate threat paradigms, normalizing conditions with diminishing returns as "fatigue" builds. Violating the existing myth/narrative to eliminate the reward/status system by legislating a top down inversion of bottom social order is a direct and blatant violation of the social contract we arguably agree to when we participate in the society. That breach of contract breaks social order, destroys trust in the system, and will result in significant social collapse. Beyond that, capitalism isn't some arbitrary ideology. It's a social hack to achieve fairness in low trust situations. Something socialism lacks any ability to do, instead attempting to impose regulation as a substitute. But, govt cannot enforce regulation in every situation, and especially after it's credentialing has most merit. Trust erodes and factionalism reverts to tribalism. What where seeing from Democrats, is encouraging tribalism as an attack on trust social systems to impose regulation control without trust or merit. It's cooked to failure because it's not capable of fulfilling the intended role.
Are these clowns on a mission to see who can come up with the most brain-numbing idiocy??
Good grief. People vote for these politicians. 🤦♂️
Whay we need here in Minnesota is to vote the .@MinnesotaDFL out of office and return our once great state back to common sense and restore the moral compass. The lunatics have been running the asylum for far to long.
