Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

... What? Rep Pinto (D-St. Paul): "Yesterday, there was a presentation from a group seeking to change how we address organized retail theft... It would have been good to make sure that they would study the benefit of shoplifting and of retail theft because perhaps people are relying on... show more

MN House GOP Rapid Response

9,112 subscribers

72,513 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика Образование

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 Minnesota State Representative Dave Pinto (D) just said they should be studying the benefits of shoplifting and retail theft. “Perhaps people are relying on that.” Absolutely insane.

🚨 Minnesota State Representative Dave Pinto (D) just said they should be studying the benefits of shoplifting and retail theft. “Perhaps people are relying on that.” Absolutely insane.

Dustin Grage

186,635 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Head coach Dave Aranda's full quote on what he would say to frustrated fans: "We’ve got a bunch of really, really good people in the program that are doing everything they can to get wins and to make it an entertaining product for the fans. It means so much when there are fans there and there’s a home-field environment. I look at the guys that are on our team right now, who have been through so much and are such quality football — really good football players — more than that, but just quality people. They’re the type of people that maybe some of the people who are talking about them knew them better, would be all for them, and support them no matter what. I think for them, to have it where their work is being rewarded with people that got their back in a critical game would be cool, but I understand what you’re saying. I can definitely see that."

Head coach Dave Aranda's full quote on what he would say to frustrated fans: "We’ve got a bunch of really, really good people in the program that are doing everything they can to get wins and to make it an entertaining product for the fans. It means so much when there are fans there and there’s a home-field environment. I look at the guys that are on our team right now, who have been through so much and are such quality football — really good football players — more than that, but just quality people. They’re the type of people that maybe some of the people who are talking about them knew them better, would be all for them, and support them no matter what. I think for them, to have it where their work is being rewarded with people that got their back in a critical game would be cool, but I understand what you’re saying. I can definitely see that."

Baylor Bears on SicEm365

13,292 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

"It's a violating feeling when folks come in and are stealing, and doing those kinds of things..." Washington state is #1 in the US for retail theft, costing local consumers and businesses somewhere in the region of $3 Billion a YEAR! That is why it was such a shock to everyone left, right, and center that Gov. Ferguson VETO'd a recently created Retail Theft Task Force, that was actually starting to make progress. And Bob Ferguson's BS claim that the $500k cost was 'too much for the $80 Billion budget'...it is simply salt in the wound. Drew Mikkelsen🥯 | KING 5 News 'Governor's veto of retail theft funding alarms business owners' Article:

"It's a violating feeling when folks come in and are stealing, and doing those kinds of things..." Washington state is #1 in the US for retail theft, costing local consumers and businesses somewhere in the region of $3 Billion a YEAR! That is why it was such a shock to everyone left, right, and center that Gov. Ferguson VETO'd a recently created Retail Theft Task Force, that was actually starting to make progress. And Bob Ferguson's BS claim that the $500k cost was 'too much for the $80 Billion budget'...it is simply salt in the wound. Drew Mikkelsen🥯 | KING 5 News 'Governor's veto of retail theft funding alarms business owners' Article:

Future 42

12,754 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Mikaela Loach, "I thought the best way to create change in this world was to become a doctor" Mikaela Loach - It’s Not That Radical 📖🇵🇸 "When I was on the wards I noticed people were sick, not just because of disease, but because of the social conditions they're living in, their housing, their poverty.. People would be sick because of these social reasons" "We would do the important job of making sure they could survive for longer: medication, treating them.. Then sending them back out into the environment that made them sick.. So they'd just come back a few months later with similar issues" "What Wes Streeting is saying about addresisng waiting lists by using unused private health capacity doesn't make sense as it would be NHS doctors that would be used" "We have a very sick nation and we need to stop them getting sick in the first place. And the way we do that is to build a robust social care system. And stop continuing policies that push people into sickness"

Mikaela Loach, "I thought the best way to create change in this world was to become a doctor" Mikaela Loach - It’s Not That Radical 📖🇵🇸 "When I was on the wards I noticed people were sick, not just because of disease, but because of the social conditions they're living in, their housing, their poverty.. People would be sick because of these social reasons" "We would do the important job of making sure they could survive for longer: medication, treating them.. Then sending them back out into the environment that made them sick.. So they'd just come back a few months later with similar issues" "What Wes Streeting is saying about addresisng waiting lists by using unused private health capacity doesn't make sense as it would be NHS doctors that would be used" "We have a very sick nation and we need to stop them getting sick in the first place. And the way we do that is to build a robust social care system. And stop continuing policies that push people into sickness"

Farrukh

333,719 просмотров • 2 лет назад

"We're going to dump them [on the Falklands]? Good luck with that, with the people that already live on that island, we'll see how they take to it. "There's something poisonous about the way we talk about these people… they are some of the most vulnerable people on God's Earth. "They would have escaped war, they would have escaped torture, and they would have escaped – even if they're not actually refugees and fail in their claim – a degree of poverty that was so severe that, unlike you or I, they chose to get on a boat for a very dangerous journey."

"We're going to dump them [on the Falklands]? Good luck with that, with the people that already live on that island, we'll see how they take to it. "There's something poisonous about the way we talk about these people… they are some of the most vulnerable people on God's Earth. "They would have escaped war, they would have escaped torture, and they would have escaped – even if they're not actually refugees and fail in their claim – a degree of poverty that was so severe that, unlike you or I, they chose to get on a boat for a very dangerous journey."

Harry Lambert

81,841 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

You can’t make this up Minnesota Democrats are requesting studies on “The benefits of shoplifting” Minnesota State Representative Krista Knudsen exposes “Today in the Labor Committee, Representative Dave Pinto requested a study for the benefits of shoplifting” She says they were discussing how to stop organized shoplifting in Minnesota, and Democrats instead requested a study to see if they could find the benefits of shoplifting “There are no benefits to shoplifting for the people that are being shoplifted from. I have no idea what else to say. I'm shocked —- Who benefits from shoplifting? The criminals”

You can’t make this up Minnesota Democrats are requesting studies on “The benefits of shoplifting” Minnesota State Representative Krista Knudsen exposes “Today in the Labor Committee, Representative Dave Pinto requested a study for the benefits of shoplifting” She says they were discussing how to stop organized shoplifting in Minnesota, and Democrats instead requested a study to see if they could find the benefits of shoplifting “There are no benefits to shoplifting for the people that are being shoplifted from. I have no idea what else to say. I'm shocked —- Who benefits from shoplifting? The criminals”

Wall Street Apes

355,871 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Indyref 2014 was rigged, most of it happened in plain sight. Sara Salyers of Salvo.Scot explains how. "In a consultative referendum, an opinion poll, there's no contract, there's no actual requirement, which David Cameron did point out, to abide by the results of that referendum. "So they did not then set it up in the way that a proper constitutional referendum would have been set up according to international standards to begin with. "The people who would be voting in that referendum would be people who had a stake in the future of the nation whose future they were voting on. "We had every boy and his dog able to vote. So people who hadn't been in Scotland for, you know, more than maybe a few months, basically, all these people had a vote on the future of Scotland as an independent nation, which is, if you just think about it, think how absurd that is, people with no stake. "Now, had that been serious, you know, a real referendum, that we were going to be allowed to have a chance of winning, they would have applied international standards, they would have used something like the new Caledonia franchise, which is a really solid. "And it doesn't exclude people who've moved into Scotland. It isn't just ethnic Scots, it's, you know, it's people who have a genuine stake, interest in the future of that nation. That franchise, it shouldn't be a council... local council franchise, it should be one that reflects the stakeholders, who are the real stakeholders, and that's what that needs to be. That it wasn't, should have told us everything. "Then we had the Edinburgh Agreement, and the Edinburgh Agreement said that there was a Purdah period, during which no new policies were to be announced. There was no... you know, all the campaigning would go on and then it stops. You can rehearse the arguments and everything that's been put forward, but nothing new should be introduced. "Well, we got 'The Vow', 'Devo Max', less than two days before the vote. 'If you vote No, you will get this'. Of course, that did not deliver, but it completely breached the Edinburgh Agreement. "Well, what the sad afterwards was, 'Well, there's no evidence that it altered people's minds. Of course it did. Of course it told people, 'Well, if you don't want to go all the way to independence, we could have,' I think Gordon Brown said, 'it would be almost a federal relationship,' you know, blah, blah, blah. "And that that meant people could say, 'Well, if we're afraid of what will happen, afraid of being pulled out of the European Union, we'd like a lot more power, but we were not sure about a total break...'. Well, of course, then they voted No. "Then you also had the media. And in a properly run referendum, according to international rules, you make sure it's 50-50, that people get both sides of the argument, absolutely equally. "There was a full study done, and it took one guy, Glasgow University lecturer in particular, to go through everything and come back and say, 'Look, it was over 70%, 'No' media coverage', and that also breaches international standards. "So we didn't have any possibility of a fair referendum. And that wasn't coincidental. And had there been any kind of vote tampering, say, with the postal vote, because it was only consultative and there was no actual, therefore fraud, it makes it nearly impossible to get a judicial review. "And there is no way, no matter what they have said, no matter what they have told us, 'Get a majority of members elected to Westminster' and that 'You don't need a referendum', or if 'Scotland wants to leave, then it has the right to do so'. No matter what the British State has said, that was never true." Sara Salyers on the @untribalpol @TheScotCongress

Indyref 2014 was rigged, most of it happened in plain sight. Sara Salyers of Salvo.Scot explains how. "In a consultative referendum, an opinion poll, there's no contract, there's no actual requirement, which David Cameron did point out, to abide by the results of that referendum. "So they did not then set it up in the way that a proper constitutional referendum would have been set up according to international standards to begin with. "The people who would be voting in that referendum would be people who had a stake in the future of the nation whose future they were voting on. "We had every boy and his dog able to vote. So people who hadn't been in Scotland for, you know, more than maybe a few months, basically, all these people had a vote on the future of Scotland as an independent nation, which is, if you just think about it, think how absurd that is, people with no stake. "Now, had that been serious, you know, a real referendum, that we were going to be allowed to have a chance of winning, they would have applied international standards, they would have used something like the new Caledonia franchise, which is a really solid. "And it doesn't exclude people who've moved into Scotland. It isn't just ethnic Scots, it's, you know, it's people who have a genuine stake, interest in the future of that nation. That franchise, it shouldn't be a council... local council franchise, it should be one that reflects the stakeholders, who are the real stakeholders, and that's what that needs to be. That it wasn't, should have told us everything. "Then we had the Edinburgh Agreement, and the Edinburgh Agreement said that there was a Purdah period, during which no new policies were to be announced. There was no... you know, all the campaigning would go on and then it stops. You can rehearse the arguments and everything that's been put forward, but nothing new should be introduced. "Well, we got 'The Vow', 'Devo Max', less than two days before the vote. 'If you vote No, you will get this'. Of course, that did not deliver, but it completely breached the Edinburgh Agreement. "Well, what the sad afterwards was, 'Well, there's no evidence that it altered people's minds. Of course it did. Of course it told people, 'Well, if you don't want to go all the way to independence, we could have,' I think Gordon Brown said, 'it would be almost a federal relationship,' you know, blah, blah, blah. "And that that meant people could say, 'Well, if we're afraid of what will happen, afraid of being pulled out of the European Union, we'd like a lot more power, but we were not sure about a total break...'. Well, of course, then they voted No. "Then you also had the media. And in a properly run referendum, according to international rules, you make sure it's 50-50, that people get both sides of the argument, absolutely equally. "There was a full study done, and it took one guy, Glasgow University lecturer in particular, to go through everything and come back and say, 'Look, it was over 70%, 'No' media coverage', and that also breaches international standards. "So we didn't have any possibility of a fair referendum. And that wasn't coincidental. And had there been any kind of vote tampering, say, with the postal vote, because it was only consultative and there was no actual, therefore fraud, it makes it nearly impossible to get a judicial review. "And there is no way, no matter what they have said, no matter what they have told us, 'Get a majority of members elected to Westminster' and that 'You don't need a referendum', or if 'Scotland wants to leave, then it has the right to do so'. No matter what the British State has said, that was never true." Sara Salyers on the @untribalpol @TheScotCongress

ScotNews

21,466 просмотров • 1 год назад

Police break up a multi-million dollar retail theft ring accused of targeting Shoppers Drug Marts "Hamilton Police adding that many of the people arrested here were already wanted or facing charges for similar crimes." "What we noticed was these individuals would commit a theft, they would be arrested, they would get released on bail and then they would do the same thing." "And it was a repetitive cycle over and over and over." -Staff Sergeant Shane Coveyduck "Police added that most of the accused had only been in Canada for a year and a half." And politicians wonder why people are cynical about immigration, crime and the court system 🤦‍♂️

Police break up a multi-million dollar retail theft ring accused of targeting Shoppers Drug Marts "Hamilton Police adding that many of the people arrested here were already wanted or facing charges for similar crimes." "What we noticed was these individuals would commit a theft, they would be arrested, they would get released on bail and then they would do the same thing." "And it was a repetitive cycle over and over and over." -Staff Sergeant Shane Coveyduck "Police added that most of the accused had only been in Canada for a year and a half." And politicians wonder why people are cynical about immigration, crime and the court system 🤦‍♂️

cbcwatcher

83,090 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Angelina Jolie Has Finally Woken Up To The Fact The United Nations & Governments Are Run By Heartless Criminals There’s No Accountability For Crimes “If There’s A Business Interest Involved” “That is the biggest that is the most disheartening thing of I think we we or I thought at least even 20 years ago when I started to work internationally that there was this I in my head, some weird idea of good guys. You know? Some idea of those whether it be certain countries or certain people's maybe it was this holdover from World War 2 and this thought that this was, like so that the lines were clear and that there was going to be these human rights goals laid out and that there would be things stood up for, and that if these things weren't done, there would be pushback, and these were the and I really thought that's what it was. I even thought that's what the United Nations was… And I thought, okay. There's a there's some lines in the sand. There's some understanding. We're gonna grow and fight for improvements in these areas. And and to watch to watch and understand more and more how it's just simply that's not what it is. That's not the world. The world is not these are human rights. It is these are human rights sometimes for these people, maybe sometimes for these people, never for these people. Yeah. It's food aid, 6% for these people, 50% for these people, it's justice for these people, but not these people. Accountability for this crime, but not that crime if there's business interest. And this is truly the ugly state of of so much of the world that we are just becoming more and more aware of for just about every I mean, I don't know any countries that are are clean of it and, um, and willing to hold a line really consistently hand on behalf of the of human rights and laws”

Angelina Jolie Has Finally Woken Up To The Fact The United Nations & Governments Are Run By Heartless Criminals There’s No Accountability For Crimes “If There’s A Business Interest Involved” “That is the biggest that is the most disheartening thing of I think we we or I thought at least even 20 years ago when I started to work internationally that there was this I in my head, some weird idea of good guys. You know? Some idea of those whether it be certain countries or certain people's maybe it was this holdover from World War 2 and this thought that this was, like so that the lines were clear and that there was going to be these human rights goals laid out and that there would be things stood up for, and that if these things weren't done, there would be pushback, and these were the and I really thought that's what it was. I even thought that's what the United Nations was… And I thought, okay. There's a there's some lines in the sand. There's some understanding. We're gonna grow and fight for improvements in these areas. And and to watch to watch and understand more and more how it's just simply that's not what it is. That's not the world. The world is not these are human rights. It is these are human rights sometimes for these people, maybe sometimes for these people, never for these people. Yeah. It's food aid, 6% for these people, 50% for these people, it's justice for these people, but not these people. Accountability for this crime, but not that crime if there's business interest. And this is truly the ugly state of of so much of the world that we are just becoming more and more aware of for just about every I mean, I don't know any countries that are are clean of it and, um, and willing to hold a line really consistently hand on behalf of the of human rights and laws”

Wall Street Apes

658,860 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Dangote: “We didn’t want to go into retail. It was during the time we were building this refinery that they sold Mobil, AP, and Oando. We could have bought them, the three of them didn’t cost 500 million. “If we knew this was going to happen, maybe we would have done it the other way. But we didn’t want to be called a monopoly, that’s why we left that side. Restrict ourselves to production, they will become our customers, and we will have a nice party together. But if they are looking for fights, I have been fighting all my life.”

Dangote: “We didn’t want to go into retail. It was during the time we were building this refinery that they sold Mobil, AP, and Oando. We could have bought them, the three of them didn’t cost 500 million. “If we knew this was going to happen, maybe we would have done it the other way. But we didn’t want to be called a monopoly, that’s why we left that side. Restrict ourselves to production, they will become our customers, and we will have a nice party together. But if they are looking for fights, I have been fighting all my life.”

Imran Muhammad

642,328 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

"a characterist of yours that you wish people knew about?" 🆑️: i'm not sure... i guess we are in a position that many people look at us just because we are visible. so maybe the fact that i'm respectful to everybody, i think it would be good to look at

"a characterist of yours that you wish people knew about?" 🆑️: i'm not sure... i guess we are in a position that many people look at us just because we are visible. so maybe the fact that i'm respectful to everybody, i think it would be good to look at

clara

20,748 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Alexander Mercouris (Alexander Mercouris): One of the reasons that these stereotypes and themes about Russia have been so long-lived is that they have never been confronted in the West. People have never come out and said that these are manifestations of Russophobia, a type of racism; that this way of depicting Russians, stereotyping them, is essentially racist. And for that reason, since they’re never confronted in that way, people just go on repeating them. But if there’s ever a proper, sustained political decision to confront it, to expose it as a type of racism, then I think it would collapse very quickly. And at that point, by the way, we would be moving beyond Russophobia, and that’s the moment when perhaps a real rapprochement with the Russians can take place.

Alexander Mercouris (Alexander Mercouris): One of the reasons that these stereotypes and themes about Russia have been so long-lived is that they have never been confronted in the West. People have never come out and said that these are manifestations of Russophobia, a type of racism; that this way of depicting Russians, stereotyping them, is essentially racist. And for that reason, since they’re never confronted in that way, people just go on repeating them. But if there’s ever a proper, sustained political decision to confront it, to expose it as a type of racism, then I think it would collapse very quickly. And at that point, by the way, we would be moving beyond Russophobia, and that’s the moment when perhaps a real rapprochement with the Russians can take place.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

23,065 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Joe Rogan reveals to Tom Segura the one thing about January 6th that still disturbs him over five years later. ROGAN: “Here’s what’s f*cked...” “For sure...there were government people that were rabble-rousers.” “There were people that were trying to get people to go into the Capitol.” “That’s a fact. How many?” “They call them ‘agent provocateurs.’ So there’s people that your tax dollars pay that were trying to get people to commit crimes.” “We don’t know how many...” SEGURA: “We don’t know. Yeah.” ROGAN: “And supposedly, no, they were just there to monitor. Really?” “Okay, but we know that people have done that in the past, where they encourage people to commit crimes.” “And we do know that there was some knowledge that this was going to happen and that they wanted it to happen.” “They wanted it to happen exactly that way, and they encouraged people to do it so they could make it look like Donald Trump is a real threat and keep him from running for reelection again.”

Joe Rogan reveals to Tom Segura the one thing about January 6th that still disturbs him over five years later. ROGAN: “Here’s what’s f*cked...” “For sure...there were government people that were rabble-rousers.” “There were people that were trying to get people to go into the Capitol.” “That’s a fact. How many?” “They call them ‘agent provocateurs.’ So there’s people that your tax dollars pay that were trying to get people to commit crimes.” “We don’t know how many...” SEGURA: “We don’t know. Yeah.” ROGAN: “And supposedly, no, they were just there to monitor. Really?” “Okay, but we know that people have done that in the past, where they encourage people to commit crimes.” “And we do know that there was some knowledge that this was going to happen and that they wanted it to happen.” “They wanted it to happen exactly that way, and they encouraged people to do it so they could make it look like Donald Trump is a real threat and keep him from running for reelection again.”

Overton

460,432 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Who is Really in Charge? If 70M people chose who was to lead the nation based on a platform of removing people who broke the law, what right do people who disagree have to stop or impede them from doing that? Protesting is certainly your right and something most if not all of us believe should be protected. However, stopping the will of the people because you've rallied enough people who disagree is not. It seemed pretty obvious that this wasn't going to be easy, but I'm confused how people who wanted the nation to have laws that are enforced would now suggest it needs to stop because of a series of tragic outcomes that could have been avoided. If the admin was more honest and transparent about these situations, tensions would be lowered. Yet they lie, post hype edits and seemingly make the situation worse. I still want people who broke the law to be handled and removed from our nation. If we just turn on something we wanted because a financed group of agitators causes enough of a fuss, then it will only encourage them to act the same way the next time they disagree with something most of us want.

Who is Really in Charge? If 70M people chose who was to lead the nation based on a platform of removing people who broke the law, what right do people who disagree have to stop or impede them from doing that? Protesting is certainly your right and something most if not all of us believe should be protected. However, stopping the will of the people because you've rallied enough people who disagree is not. It seemed pretty obvious that this wasn't going to be easy, but I'm confused how people who wanted the nation to have laws that are enforced would now suggest it needs to stop because of a series of tragic outcomes that could have been avoided. If the admin was more honest and transparent about these situations, tensions would be lowered. Yet they lie, post hype edits and seemingly make the situation worse. I still want people who broke the law to be handled and removed from our nation. If we just turn on something we wanted because a financed group of agitators causes enough of a fuss, then it will only encourage them to act the same way the next time they disagree with something most of us want.

Bobby Sauce

10,668 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO) previously stated that "the one thing that we have been able to confirm, without a shadow of a doubt, is that there is a deep state, there are these special access programs and they're violating the law ... we hear that consistently from people that are the whistleblowers, we hear it consistently from the Inspector General for the Department of Defense and from intel... they think if I don't know about it, it must not exist."

Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO) previously stated that "the one thing that we have been able to confirm, without a shadow of a doubt, is that there is a deep state, there are these special access programs and they're violating the law ... we hear that consistently from people that are the whistleblowers, we hear it consistently from the Inspector General for the Department of Defense and from intel... they think if I don't know about it, it must not exist."

Disclosure Party

25,933 просмотров • 1 год назад

Baier: I just got off the phone with the president…. I asked, “what you are saying is you know there is somebody on the ground in Iran that is going to rise up?” He said, “yeah, I feel there is. I feel that and some of them are no longer with us to be honest because it was 49 leaders that were taken out. That was going to take four weeks we thought to get rid of the Iranian leadership and it is always, you know, if they hide, it is a lot longer than four weeks. They would have been hiding. We were shocked when we heard what was going on. We knew exactly what was happening… they are talking about using people now that nobody ever heard of—even they don't know. They are using people, studying people to be the leader that even they don't know who they are. Can you believe that?” I said it's a tough succession plan in Iran. He said, “49 leaders is deep. It's very deep. When they met, they met for breakfast. They assumed it was good for a lot of reasons. Number one they didn't think we knew. You never attack in the morning having to do with wind and sun and a lot of things. It was amazing that we knew everything we knew.”

Baier: I just got off the phone with the president…. I asked, “what you are saying is you know there is somebody on the ground in Iran that is going to rise up?” He said, “yeah, I feel there is. I feel that and some of them are no longer with us to be honest because it was 49 leaders that were taken out. That was going to take four weeks we thought to get rid of the Iranian leadership and it is always, you know, if they hide, it is a lot longer than four weeks. They would have been hiding. We were shocked when we heard what was going on. We knew exactly what was happening… they are talking about using people now that nobody ever heard of—even they don't know. They are using people, studying people to be the leader that even they don't know who they are. Can you believe that?” I said it's a tough succession plan in Iran. He said, “49 leaders is deep. It's very deep. When they met, they met for breakfast. They assumed it was good for a lot of reasons. Number one they didn't think we knew. You never attack in the morning having to do with wind and sun and a lot of things. It was amazing that we knew everything we knew.”

Acyn

1,065,464 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

AOC: But there are a lot of folks who talk about change in leadership that don't necessarily articulate what their direction is. And so I would say that it's important we talk pretty specifically about the kind of changes that we want, because there are a lot of people in this country, and there are a lot of forces and lobbyists that want the Democratic party to become even more pro-corporate than it is. And so when I talk about change, I talk about orienting the Democratic party to be unabashedly working class and to orient itself around working class Americans

AOC: But there are a lot of folks who talk about change in leadership that don't necessarily articulate what their direction is. And so I would say that it's important we talk pretty specifically about the kind of changes that we want, because there are a lot of people in this country, and there are a lot of forces and lobbyists that want the Democratic party to become even more pro-corporate than it is. And so when I talk about change, I talk about orienting the Democratic party to be unabashedly working class and to orient itself around working class Americans

Acyn

46,493 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Rep. Thomas Massie: "I've heard [Trump] recently say [the Epstein 'sex trafficking ring'] is a hoax. But if it's a hoax, his attorney general fell for it, his FBI director fell for it, his vice president fell for it, and even his own sons fell for it." This clip of Massie (Thomas Massie), a former engineer and the United States representative for Kentucky's 4th congressional district, is taken from an episode of the Children’s Health Defense series Financial Rebellion posted to Rumble on August 14, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So the Epstein files and that whole sex trafficking ring, that's, exposing that is emblematic of what Trump promised, or the promise that he projected when he was elected. That there's always been this group of rich and powerful and politically connected people that have been outside of the reach of the judicial system. If they get in trouble, they just buy off a judge or buy off a witness and move on. And we were told, or led to believe that that would be exposed, that Trump was going to be the bull in the china shop and expose these rich elites who've been beyond the law. "And, you know, I've heard him recently say it's a hoax. But if it's a hoax, his attorney general fell for it, his FBI director fell for it, his vice president fell for it, and even his own sons fell for it. If it's a hoax, because they all promised that this would be revealed. Even after the election, we were still being promised that this sex ring would be revealed and the things that the government knows about it would be shown to the American people. But that's not happening. And when it became apparent that this is a massive cover up, I decided that I could. I, realized I could introduce legislation and force it to the floor for a vote. "Politics is the art of the doable. And this wasn't doable. A year ago, there weren't enough Democrats who would get on board. But now, I don't care how they get to the foot of the altar, as long as they get there. Foot of the cross. But some of these Democrats are seeing the light now that it's not their president who's in the White House. And some of them are very sincere, like my co-sponsor, Ro Khanna, who's having this press conference with me on September 3rd. There's this parliamentary procedure in the House rules that's been there forever that says if you can get 218 signatures, people physically have to sign the document. "You can bring any bill to the floor of the House of Representatives for a vote. You bypass the committee where it's died, you bypass the speaker, who may not want it, because he's trying to protect people from taking a vote that would expose their preferences. And maybe if they vote the wrong way, which they might be inclined to do because they have donors who want them to vote the wrong way, then they would draw the ire of their constituents. "But suffice it to say, I think I'm going to get 218 signatures, because I think every Democrat will sign this and I've already got 12 co-sponsors on the actual legislation to release all of the Epstein material. And I can get into why we won't run into the same problem that the president ran into when he said, pretty please, mother, may I, will the judge release the grand jury transcripts? That's not what we're doing. We are saying the DOJ has evidence that they submitted to the grand jury, and we are by law compelling them to release that evidence, all of the evidence. We're not going to the judicial branch of government. We're going to the executive branch and saying, you have to release this with my legislation."

Rep. Thomas Massie: "I've heard [Trump] recently say [the Epstein 'sex trafficking ring'] is a hoax. But if it's a hoax, his attorney general fell for it, his FBI director fell for it, his vice president fell for it, and even his own sons fell for it." This clip of Massie (Thomas Massie), a former engineer and the United States representative for Kentucky's 4th congressional district, is taken from an episode of the Children’s Health Defense series Financial Rebellion posted to Rumble on August 14, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So the Epstein files and that whole sex trafficking ring, that's, exposing that is emblematic of what Trump promised, or the promise that he projected when he was elected. That there's always been this group of rich and powerful and politically connected people that have been outside of the reach of the judicial system. If they get in trouble, they just buy off a judge or buy off a witness and move on. And we were told, or led to believe that that would be exposed, that Trump was going to be the bull in the china shop and expose these rich elites who've been beyond the law. "And, you know, I've heard him recently say it's a hoax. But if it's a hoax, his attorney general fell for it, his FBI director fell for it, his vice president fell for it, and even his own sons fell for it. If it's a hoax, because they all promised that this would be revealed. Even after the election, we were still being promised that this sex ring would be revealed and the things that the government knows about it would be shown to the American people. But that's not happening. And when it became apparent that this is a massive cover up, I decided that I could. I, realized I could introduce legislation and force it to the floor for a vote. "Politics is the art of the doable. And this wasn't doable. A year ago, there weren't enough Democrats who would get on board. But now, I don't care how they get to the foot of the altar, as long as they get there. Foot of the cross. But some of these Democrats are seeing the light now that it's not their president who's in the White House. And some of them are very sincere, like my co-sponsor, Ro Khanna, who's having this press conference with me on September 3rd. There's this parliamentary procedure in the House rules that's been there forever that says if you can get 218 signatures, people physically have to sign the document. "You can bring any bill to the floor of the House of Representatives for a vote. You bypass the committee where it's died, you bypass the speaker, who may not want it, because he's trying to protect people from taking a vote that would expose their preferences. And maybe if they vote the wrong way, which they might be inclined to do because they have donors who want them to vote the wrong way, then they would draw the ire of their constituents. "But suffice it to say, I think I'm going to get 218 signatures, because I think every Democrat will sign this and I've already got 12 co-sponsors on the actual legislation to release all of the Epstein material. And I can get into why we won't run into the same problem that the president ran into when he said, pretty please, mother, may I, will the judge release the grand jury transcripts? That's not what we're doing. We are saying the DOJ has evidence that they submitted to the grand jury, and we are by law compelling them to release that evidence, all of the evidence. We're not going to the judicial branch of government. We're going to the executive branch and saying, you have to release this with my legislation."

Sense Receptor

24,701 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад