Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

You don’t have to use one model (or one provider!) for everything. With Workshop, you can combine frontier and local models in the same workflow. For example: Opus can be the main agent, and delegate specific tasks to Gemma 4 via subagents. Better quality where it matters. Better privacy,... show more

Workshop AI

2,349 subscribers

904,641 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

subagents are just recursive agents where you can apply different prompts + models depending on the task. since they’re just a primitive, Cursor cli can actually spawn subagents by calling cursor-agent in headless mode via shell commands. that’s what makes the cli so nice. you can extend it, experiment, and have a lot of fun exploring orchestration patterns. here’s one way to do it w. dynamic model selection: 1. create a subagents.mdc rule 2. drop in: ``` --- alwaysApply: true --- ALWAYS spawn subagents by running `cursor-agent -p [task] --output-format=text --force --model [model]` in the terminal. Each subagent should return a summary of the changes it made. Subagents should be used for ALL tasks You can adopt a fan-out pattern where you spawn subagents to perform parallel isolated tasks, and then fan-in the results. Use the following models: - `--model gpt-5` for reasoning, researching, and planning - `--model sonnet-4` for implementation ``` 3. start cursor cli and try it out you can also adjust the rule to be more explicit when it should use subagents, when not to, which models when etc.

subagents are just recursive agents where you can apply different prompts + models depending on the task. since they’re just a primitive, Cursor cli can actually spawn subagents by calling cursor-agent in headless mode via shell commands. that’s what makes the cli so nice. you can extend it, experiment, and have a lot of fun exploring orchestration patterns. here’s one way to do it w. dynamic model selection: 1. create a subagents.mdc rule 2. drop in: ``` --- alwaysApply: true --- ALWAYS spawn subagents by running `cursor-agent -p [task] --output-format=text --force --model [model]` in the terminal. Each subagent should return a summary of the changes it made. Subagents should be used for ALL tasks You can adopt a fan-out pattern where you spawn subagents to perform parallel isolated tasks, and then fan-in the results. Use the following models: - `--model gpt-5` for reasoning, researching, and planning - `--model sonnet-4` for implementation ``` 3. start cursor cli and try it out you can also adjust the rule to be more explicit when it should use subagents, when not to, which models when etc.

eric zakariasson

57,554 views • 11 months ago

Devin for Terminal is a local agent that works with all frontier models, including Opus 4.7, GPT 5.5, and SWE-1.6. You can switch model mid-session, or handoff to Devin in the cloud.

Devin for Terminal is a local agent that works with all frontier models, including Opus 4.7, GPT 5.5, and SWE-1.6. You can switch model mid-session, or handoff to Devin in the cloud.

Cognition

19,142,271 views • 3 months ago

Not every task needs the same model. A quick summary doesn't need the same horsepower as a deep research question — and it shouldn't cost the same either. Now, you can now easily compare models for your Custom Agent on speed, intelligence, and cost 🫡

Not every task needs the same model. A quick summary doesn't need the same horsepower as a deep research question — and it shouldn't cost the same either. Now, you can now easily compare models for your Custom Agent on speed, intelligence, and cost 🫡

Notion

32,420 views • 5 months ago

Multi-bot chat allows you to seamlessly combine the unique strengths of different bots to complete tasks. For example, using fal’s latest bots, you can generate an image and remove the background within one conversational thread for a more efficient workflow. (1/2)

Multi-bot chat allows you to seamlessly combine the unique strengths of different bots to complete tasks. For example, using fal’s latest bots, you can generate an image and remove the background within one conversational thread for a more efficient workflow. (1/2)

Poe

19,538 views • 2 years ago

I built a GPT 2 workflow that turns one image into 20 viral ads GPT image 2 is the most powerful image model out there And you can use it to scale your ads campaign with Arcads workflow Comment Arcads to get the workflow now

I built a GPT 2 workflow that turns one image into 20 viral ads GPT image 2 is the most powerful image model out there And you can use it to scale your ads campaign with Arcads workflow Comment Arcads to get the workflow now

Romain Torres

80,136 views • 3 months ago

Perplexity Computer is massively multi-model. Computer orchestrates models to run agents in parallel, leveraging Opus to match each task to the model best suited for it. In total, Computer can route work across 19 different models.

Perplexity Computer is massively multi-model. Computer orchestrates models to run agents in parallel, leveraging Opus to match each task to the model best suited for it. In total, Computer can route work across 19 different models.

Perplexity

534,569 views • 5 months ago

Tasks can now spawn async subagents that move to the background and continue working independently, even if the main agent finishes its task and becomes inactive. This lets subagents handle long-running tasks, great for monitoring logs or waiting for builds.

Tasks can now spawn async subagents that move to the background and continue working independently, even if the main agent finishes its task and becomes inactive. This lets subagents handle long-running tasks, great for monitoring logs or waiting for builds.

Claude

349,404 views • 7 months ago

Open weight models are now available in Kiro. Three open weight models are available in the IDE and CLI, so you don’t have to default to the largest model for every task. Choose the right model based on speed, cost, or long-running agentic workflows. What model would you like to see supported next? #Kiro #BuildwithKiro #AICoding

Open weight models are now available in Kiro. Three open weight models are available in the IDE and CLI, so you don’t have to default to the largest model for every task. Choose the right model based on speed, cost, or long-running agentic workflows. What model would you like to see supported next? #Kiro #BuildwithKiro #AICoding

Kiro

22,214 views • 5 months ago

🎬 Hollywood better watch out. You only need a few minutes and a single AI model to create videos like this. Here’s the full workflow + prompt so you can try it too. 🔖 Bookmark for later

🎬 Hollywood better watch out. You only need a few minutes and a single AI model to create videos like this. Here’s the full workflow + prompt so you can try it too. 🔖 Bookmark for later

Pierrick Chevallier | IA

18,965 views • 1 year ago

OpenClaw can use Autobrowse to create and iteratively improve a Skill for any workflow. In this Craigslist extraction example we found a 68% speed up and 91% cost savings in 5 iterations. Halfway through, the agent found an exposed endpoint to speed up page navigation.

OpenClaw can use Autobrowse to create and iteratively improve a Skill for any workflow. In this Craigslist extraction example we found a 68% speed up and 91% cost savings in 5 iterations. Halfway through, the agent found an exposed endpoint to speed up page navigation.

Kyle Jeong

108,724 views • 3 months ago

You can now delegate tasks to GitHub Copilot coding agent from any page on GitHub 🤖 Open the new Agents panel in one click, write a simple prompt, then hit Enter. GitHub Copilot works in the background, and opens a PR for your review. No interruptions to your workflow required. ✅

You can now delegate tasks to GitHub Copilot coding agent from any page on GitHub 🤖 Open the new Agents panel in one click, write a simple prompt, then hit Enter. GitHub Copilot works in the background, and opens a PR for your review. No interruptions to your workflow required. ✅

GitHub

113,332 views • 11 months ago

Use Your Private Models on Comfy Cloud! Continue client work safely — or generate with your experimental private models. You can now import models directly from private Hugging Face or Civitai repos. Just add your private key and model URL, and we will bring the models to your workflow! Everything you import stays 100% private to your account.

Use Your Private Models on Comfy Cloud! Continue client work safely — or generate with your experimental private models. You can now import models directly from private Hugging Face or Civitai repos. Just add your private key and model URL, and we will bring the models to your workflow! Everything you import stays 100% private to your account.

ComfyUI

17,705 views • 6 months ago

I've nearly ditched closed source models for image generation (in creative workflows). For most tasks, the cost/speed ratio doesn't justify closed models anymore. Open models have caught up on quality and I can try 15 new images in 1-2 sec. Iteration speed matters. Sharing the few models I currently use ⬇️

I've nearly ditched closed source models for image generation (in creative workflows). For most tasks, the cost/speed ratio doesn't justify closed models anymore. Open models have caught up on quality and I can try 15 new images in 1-2 sec. Iteration speed matters. Sharing the few models I currently use ⬇️

Victor M

39,333 views • 6 months ago

Quick update to the KeebWarrior add-ons. Made it so that the controllers now pivot in place so that you can better align them for straight wrists to forearms. Updated model included for all current orders. If you have one that doesn't pivot and want to update to it, send me a dm

Quick update to the KeebWarrior add-ons. Made it so that the controllers now pivot in place so that you can better align them for straight wrists to forearms. Updated model included for all current orders. If you have one that doesn't pivot and want to update to it, send me a dm

Mavercade

63,074 views • 11 months ago

HERMES AGENT NOW RUNS CLAUDE OPUS 5. NEAR FABLE 5 INTELLIGENCE. HALF THE PRICE. SELF-VERIFIES ITS OWN WORK. AVAILABLE TODAY VIA NOUS PORTAL (20% OFF ALL MODELS). Anthropic shipped Opus 5 on July 24, 2026. same $5/$25 per million tokens as Opus 4.8. but the benchmarks tell a different story. WHAT CHANGED FROM OPUS 4.8: FrontierBench v0.1: Opus 5: 43.3%. Opus 4.8: 18.7%. 2.3x jump on the same test. ARC-AGI-3: Opus 5: 30.2%. 3x better than the next closest model. beat Fable 5 on 8 out of 13 benchmarks. at half the cost ($5/$25 vs $10/$50). same price as Opus 4.8. twice the intelligence. no reason to stay on 4.8. THE SPECS: model ID: claude-opus-5 context: 1M tokens (default and maximum) max output: 128K tokens thinking: on by default effort toggle: low / medium / high per request fast mode: $10/$50, 2.5x faster knowledge cutoff: May 2026 minimum cacheable prompt: 512 tokens (was 1,024) SELF-VERIFICATION (the biggest change): Opus 5 checks its own work automatically. Anthropic says: delete your verification prompts. "include a final verification step" now causes OVER-verification because the model already does it. for Hermes /goal tasks this is a direct upgrade. the judge checks evidence. the model also checks evidence. double layer of verification without extra tokens. EFFORT TOGGLE: low: fast, cheap, routine work. medium: balanced, daily tasks. high: full reasoning, complex problems. set per request. not a global switch. matches Hermes /reasoning command: /reasoning low (routine) /reasoning high (complex) Opus 5 effort toggle + Hermes reasoning control = precise cost management per turn. WHERE OPUS 5 FITS IN HERMES: DAILY DRIVER (replaces Opus 4.8): same price. 2.3x better benchmarks. set as your main model: Desktop app / Dashboard: Models → claude-opus-5 CHIEF OF STAFF: synthesis across multiple agents. reads Kanban, prioritizes, routes tasks. self-verification catches routing errors before they cascade. COMPLEX CODING: SOTA on agentic coding benchmarks. FrontierBench 43.3% = best public model for coding. set as coder profile model. /GOAL TASKS: self-verification + completion contracts = the model proves its work AND double-checks the proof. long-horizon goals finish correctly more often. MoA AGGREGATOR: strongest synthesis model at $5/$25. pair with GPT-5.6 and Grok 4.5 as references. Opus 5 aggregates. best quality at mid-range price. presets: max-quality: reference_models: - provider: openai-codex model: gpt-5.6-sol - provider: xai model: grok-4.5 aggregator: provider: anthropic model: claude-opus-5 COMPUTER USE: near-Fable 5 quality for browser automation. at half the token cost per session. computer_use tasks burn lots of vision tokens. Opus 5 halves that bill vs Fable 5. WHAT TO KEEP OPUS 5 AWAY FROM: cron monitoring: too expensive. use DeepSeek or no_agent mode. sub-agent grunt work: use GPT-5.6 Luna ($1/$6) or DeepSeek. auxiliary tasks: use Gemini Flash. routine web extraction: use a cheap model. Opus 5 is for the turns where quality compounds. planning, synthesis, verification, complex reasoning. budget models handle everything else. NOUS PORTAL: 20% OFF ALL MODELS Nous Portal currently runs a 20% discount on all models including Opus 5. $5/$25 official → $4/$20 through Nous Portal. the cheapest way to run Opus 5 right now. hermes setup --portal select claude-opus-5 as your model. discount applies automatically. Opus 5 replaces Opus 4.8 everywhere. same price. better at everything. no tradeoff. straight upgrade. hermes update /model claude-opus-5

YanXbt

16,744 views • 13 days ago

Have a little writing app I'm cooking that's designed just for my workflow. As you zoom out, every card flips to a one line summary so you can quickly scan and eval the argument one level up. Using Ollama local models to make these so they're quick and free. So simple, so useful.

Have a little writing app I'm cooking that's designed just for my workflow. As you zoom out, every card flips to a one line summary so you can quickly scan and eval the argument one level up. Using Ollama local models to make these so they're quick and free. So simple, so useful.

Maggie Appleton

37,940 views • 1 month ago

I gave Kimi K3 and Opus 5 the exact same prompt to build a car racing game. I expected Opus 5 to take the lead. Instead, Kimi K3 finished in ~25 min for ~$8.9, while Opus 5 took 19 min and cost $14. The biggest surprise wasn’t the speed or the price. Kimi K3 built the better game. Smoother controls, better physics, and a driving experience that felt ready from the start. Opus 5 looked cleaner visually but Kimi won where it actually mattered. Nearly half the cost and the better gameplay.

I gave Kimi K3 and Opus 5 the exact same prompt to build a car racing game. I expected Opus 5 to take the lead. Instead, Kimi K3 finished in ~25 min for ~$8.9, while Opus 5 took 19 min and cost $14. The biggest surprise wasn’t the speed or the price. Kimi K3 built the better game. Smoother controls, better physics, and a driving experience that felt ready from the start. Opus 5 looked cleaner visually but Kimi won where it actually mattered. Nearly half the cost and the better gameplay.

Aman

111,571 views • 11 days ago

Claude Code's new dynamic workflow is the real deal. 🤖 Why it matters: It's not just a chain of prompts — it's an autonomous agent swarm. 1. Set model to Opus 4.8 + reasoning effort /ultracode 2. Claude detects complexity, writes orchestration script on the fly 3. Spawns a parallel fleet of coordinated subagents Operator takeaway: This is the first time I've seen an agent actually decompose and delegate autonomously without a rigid framework. Have you tried it yet? 🚀

Claude Code's new dynamic workflow is the real deal. 🤖 Why it matters: It's not just a chain of prompts — it's an autonomous agent swarm. 1. Set model to Opus 4.8 + reasoning effort /ultracode 2. Claude detects complexity, writes orchestration script on the fly 3. Spawns a parallel fleet of coordinated subagents Operator takeaway: This is the first time I've seen an agent actually decompose and delegate autonomously without a rigid framework. Have you tried it yet? 🚀

EK

197,752 views • 2 months ago

You can now ask Comet to browse for you with the new "Control browser" mode. Available now for Pro and Max subscribers. We've also updated the default browser agent model to Opus 4.6 for Max subscribers.

You can now ask Comet to browse for you with the new "Control browser" mode. Available now for Pro and Max subscribers. We've also updated the default browser agent model to Opus 4.6 for Max subscribers.

Comet

88,126 views • 6 months ago

Fable 5 comes back！It can now build playable game prototypes. I think it is actually a signal for where AI coding is going. Making a game is not just “write some code.” Even a small browser game needs: game loop；character movement；collision logic；scoring system；UI states；physics tuning；visual feedback；bug fixing；playtesting This is why game prototyping is a great test for AI models. A model cannot fake it with a pretty answer. Either the game runs, or it does not. What impressed me about Fable 5 is that it is useful for the messy middle: turning an idea into mechanics, turning mechanics into code, debugging broken interactions, and iterating until the prototype feels playable. But here is the practical part: I would not use the strongest model for every step. For game building, I would split the workflow: 1. Fable 5 for game design + architecture 2. a fast coding model for routine implementation 3. a vision-capable model for screenshot/UI feedback 4. a cheaper model for docs, test cases, and small fixes 5. fallback when latency, cost, or output quality becomes a problem That is the real AI coding stack. Not “one magic model does everything.” More like: the right model, for the right task, at the right cost, with fallback when things break. This is why I’ve been looking at ZenMux ZenMux. ZenMux gives developers one gateway to access multiple leading AI models, with OpenAI / Anthropic / Google Vertex compatible APIs, cost tracking, quality benchmarks, auto-routing, and compensation when output quality, latency, or throughput falls short. If AI can now make games, the next question is not just “which model is strongest?” It is:how do we manage the whole model workflow Fable 5 shows the creative ceiling. ZenMux is closer to the infrastructure layer you need when AI coding becomes a real production habit.

Fable 5 comes back！It can now build playable game prototypes. I think it is actually a signal for where AI coding is going. Making a game is not just “write some code.” Even a small browser game needs: game loop；character movement；collision logic；scoring system；UI states；physics tuning；visual feedback；bug fixing；playtesting This is why game prototyping is a great test for AI models. A model cannot fake it with a pretty answer. Either the game runs, or it does not. What impressed me about Fable 5 is that it is useful for the messy middle: turning an idea into mechanics, turning mechanics into code, debugging broken interactions, and iterating until the prototype feels playable. But here is the practical part: I would not use the strongest model for every step. For game building, I would split the workflow: 1. Fable 5 for game design + architecture 2. a fast coding model for routine implementation 3. a vision-capable model for screenshot/UI feedback 4. a cheaper model for docs, test cases, and small fixes 5. fallback when latency, cost, or output quality becomes a problem That is the real AI coding stack. Not “one magic model does everything.” More like: the right model, for the right task, at the right cost, with fallback when things break. This is why I’ve been looking at ZenMux ZenMux. ZenMux gives developers one gateway to access multiple leading AI models, with OpenAI / Anthropic / Google Vertex compatible APIs, cost tracking, quality benchmarks, auto-routing, and compensation when output quality, latency, or throughput falls short. If AI can now make games, the next question is not just “which model is strongest?” It is:how do we manage the whole model workflow Fable 5 shows the creative ceiling. ZenMux is closer to the infrastructure layer you need when AI coding becomes a real production habit.

Rachel🥥

61,143 views • 1 month ago