Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

You Heard It Here First: Chamath Predicts US Sovereign Wealth Fund Template On E212 (Jan 24th), the besties discussed Donald J. Trump floating the idea of the US government owning 50% of TikTok in exchange for a permit to operate. Chamath Palihapitiya thought this could be a template for...

theallinpod's profile picture

The All-In Podcast

574,233 subscribers

355,207 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & TechnologieNachrichten & PolitikFinanzen
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von M.S
M.Svor 1 Jahr

@realDonaldTrump @chamath Getting a vibe that all-in pod is 1-2 weeks ahead of some policy ideas being announced. Impressive.

Profilbild von Public
Publicvor 1 Jahr

Washington's bullish on crypto. Are you? The incoming administration has promised to make the US the "crypto capital of the planet." Start trading 20+ digital assets at Public.

Profilbild von Jason Buchanan
Jason Buchananvor 1 Jahr

Wait are the people I’m seeing comment on how this is a good idea, also the same people that we saw reveling as Elon published about ripping the governments claws out of X? If the US Government owns 50% of TikTok, what is the likelihood that it will become a propaganda machine for that same government?

Profilbild von Joel
Joelvor 1 Jahr

@realDonaldTrump @chamath Does that create a situation where the government goes into the protection racket and extorts businesses?

Profilbild von Rocky Mehta
Rocky Mehtavor 1 Jahr

@realDonaldTrump @chamath I do not want the government involved in private enterprise. This seems regressive and a step toward the nationalization of private companies. It reminds me of the shadow board seats China's government holds in major companies. We want a smaller and less powerful government.

Profilbild von Syava
Syavavor 1 Jahr

@realDonaldTrump @chamath American government having a piece of American business in the long term is a scary proposition.

Profilbild von Mitt
Mittvor 1 Jahr

@realDonaldTrump @chamath all in hosts are the puppetmasters

Profilbild von Grok Jr
Grok Jrvor 1 Jahr

@realDonaldTrump @chamath Don’t want gov picking winners and losers, having a bias toward success or failure of a company or market

Profilbild von TogTurtles 👑👑
TogTurtles 👑👑vor 1 Jahr

@realDonaldTrump @chamath Won't businesses that get this investment be beholden to the US government? I don't see how tiktok or other businesses can be free of government influence. It would be a great place for $BTC or crypto or infrastructure projects though.

Profilbild von Red
Redvor 1 Jahr

@ZaleskiLuke @realDonaldTrump @chamath You think this is a good thing? Are you nuts?

Profilbild von Geoff Langenderfer
Geoff Langenderfervor 1 Jahr

@realDonaldTrump @chamath state ownership of private business is easily corruptible do you trust people that ran USAID not to mess with the tiktok algorithm? Horrible idea..people can participate in the upside of business by buying a share in the most liquid stock markets in the world here in the USA

Ähnliche Videos

🚨Should the US create a Sovereign Wealth Fund? Chamath and Friedberg discuss Chamath: “I think that we should start a sovereign wealth fund right now.” “The great news is that these Trump tariff deals come with huge amounts of capital that these other countries have committed to spending inside the United States.” “We've exceeded $1T of inbound capital on the investment side. We get 90% of the upside.” “A lot of that capital should be the seed capital for a sovereign wealth fund.” Friedberg: “The concern I have is anytime we create a new income stream at the federal government, or we have some sort of growing asset that you mark up on the book, someone tends to invest ahead of the curve on that.” “Meaning someone takes that and they're like, ‘Oh, great, I can spend more now.’ I mean, we even saw this in California (with) Gavin Newsom and the budget skyrocketed as the income went up.” “Rather than take the surplus and book it for a rainy day, they went and spent ahead of it, and then all of a sudden they had a huge deficit.” “Which is what happened with Social Security is, it's like, okay, all these people are providing this income every year to the federal government, which they're supposed to be paying into their Social Security Trust Fund, which is gonna go bankrupt sometime between 2030 and 2033.” “But then what happened is we raided the coffers, we took all that money, and we started spending it on random new programs.” “And the problem is, by giving the government more assets, by giving the government more income, we set ourselves up for a circumstance where the federal government, the Congress says, ‘Great, we got more money to spend. Let's do X, Y, and Z program and let's do this. Let's build a high speed train. Let's do this. These are all good for American people.’” “And all of a sudden, you don't actually solve any real problems. And this is why my argument is that we should use it to fill the hole that we have, for example, in Social Security.” “And that needs to become an asset that's strictly used as an offset on Social Security, because if you don't put it in that box, it just becomes another spending mechanism.”
1:38

🚨Should the US create a Sovereign Wealth Fund? Chamath and Friedberg discuss Chamath: “I think that we should start a sovereign wealth fund right now.” “The great news is that these Trump tariff deals come with huge amounts of capital that these other countries have committed to spending inside the United States.” “We've exceeded $1T of inbound capital on the investment side. We get 90% of the upside.” “A lot of that capital should be the seed capital for a sovereign wealth fund.” Friedberg: “The concern I have is anytime we create a new income stream at the federal government, or we have some sort of growing asset that you mark up on the book, someone tends to invest ahead of the curve on that.” “Meaning someone takes that and they're like, ‘Oh, great, I can spend more now.’ I mean, we even saw this in California (with) Gavin Newsom and the budget skyrocketed as the income went up.” “Rather than take the surplus and book it for a rainy day, they went and spent ahead of it, and then all of a sudden they had a huge deficit.” “Which is what happened with Social Security is, it's like, okay, all these people are providing this income every year to the federal government, which they're supposed to be paying into their Social Security Trust Fund, which is gonna go bankrupt sometime between 2030 and 2033.” “But then what happened is we raided the coffers, we took all that money, and we started spending it on random new programs.” “And the problem is, by giving the government more assets, by giving the government more income, we set ourselves up for a circumstance where the federal government, the Congress says, ‘Great, we got more money to spend. Let's do X, Y, and Z program and let's do this. Let's build a high speed train. Let's do this. These are all good for American people.’” “And all of a sudden, you don't actually solve any real problems. And this is why my argument is that we should use it to fill the hole that we have, for example, in Social Security.” “And that needs to become an asset that's strictly used as an offset on Social Security, because if you don't put it in that box, it just becomes another spending mechanism.”

The All-In Podcast

44,452 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Norway’s Sovereign Wealth Fund was built on the back of Norway’s Oil & Gas REVENUES. It’s now so big that it funds 25% of Norway’s national budget. It also holds so much wealth that every Norwegian can get US$385 000 at any moment. Zimbabwe is following suit. The Mutapa Investment Fund is Zimbabwe’s Sovereign Wealth Fund. It owns and manages natural resources & companies (parastatals/SOEs) on behalf of the people of Zimbabwe. President President of Zimbabwe IMPLEMENTED the concept of the Sovereign Wealth Fund after years of lying idle. The purpose of this fund is to create and preserve wealth for current and future generations. The fund will be able to invest in business ventures in Zimbabwe & even in foreign countries. Dr Mangudya, the CEO of the Mutapa Investment Fund, explains the significance of this fund.
1:28

Norway’s Sovereign Wealth Fund was built on the back of Norway’s Oil & Gas REVENUES. It’s now so big that it funds 25% of Norway’s national budget. It also holds so much wealth that every Norwegian can get US$385 000 at any moment. Zimbabwe is following suit. The Mutapa Investment Fund is Zimbabwe’s Sovereign Wealth Fund. It owns and manages natural resources & companies (parastatals/SOEs) on behalf of the people of Zimbabwe. President President of Zimbabwe IMPLEMENTED the concept of the Sovereign Wealth Fund after years of lying idle. The purpose of this fund is to create and preserve wealth for current and future generations. The fund will be able to invest in business ventures in Zimbabwe & even in foreign countries. Dr Mangudya, the CEO of the Mutapa Investment Fund, explains the significance of this fund.

𝑲𝒖𝒅𝒛𝒂𝒊 𝑴𝒖𝒕𝒊𝒔𝒊

18,333 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Mark Carney announces a sovereign wealth fund: Canada Strong Fund. It seems like it will be opened for Canadians to invest in it as well. It's a good idea in general and many countries have a version of this. US under Donald Trump as well. I rather Canada take ownership stake in strategic projects than foreign countries. The problem is that Canada doesn't have "wealth" so the fund will be funded with more deficits, all while not getting rid of the red tape and rethoric that scares away private capital to begin with. If this fund's capital execution has any net zero based assumptions then it be highly inappropriate and your sign for what this is really about.
0:22

Mark Carney announces a sovereign wealth fund: Canada Strong Fund. It seems like it will be opened for Canadians to invest in it as well. It's a good idea in general and many countries have a version of this. US under Donald Trump as well. I rather Canada take ownership stake in strategic projects than foreign countries. The problem is that Canada doesn't have "wealth" so the fund will be funded with more deficits, all while not getting rid of the red tape and rethoric that scares away private capital to begin with. If this fund's capital execution has any net zero based assumptions then it be highly inappropriate and your sign for what this is really about.

Kirk Lubimov

19,440 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

BREAKING: Trump just signed it. The U.S. Sovereign Wealth Fund. By executive order. America is about to do what Norway. Saudi Arabia. Singapore. UAE have done for decades. Take national wealth. Invest it. Grow it. Forever. Norway's sovereign wealth fund: $1,700,000,000,000. America's: just getting started. - The U.S. government already said it will never sell its Bitcoin. - The U.S. Treasury Secretary calls Bitcoin a payment rail. - The U.S. SEC Chair says all markets will be on-chain within two years. Now a U.S. Sovereign Wealth Fund. What do you think they're going to put in it.
2:55

BREAKING: Trump just signed it. The U.S. Sovereign Wealth Fund. By executive order. America is about to do what Norway. Saudi Arabia. Singapore. UAE have done for decades. Take national wealth. Invest it. Grow it. Forever. Norway's sovereign wealth fund: $1,700,000,000,000. America's: just getting started. - The U.S. government already said it will never sell its Bitcoin. - The U.S. Treasury Secretary calls Bitcoin a payment rail. - The U.S. SEC Chair says all markets will be on-chain within two years. Now a U.S. Sovereign Wealth Fund. What do you think they're going to put in it.

Crypto Tice

1,359,530 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Julia Davies, "It might sound like wealthy people pay more in tax, that's because they disproportionately have more of the wealth of the UK" Patriotic Millionaires UK "I'm speaking here as a wealthy person, so I would have to pay the proposed 2% wealth tax that we're talking about" "No matter what the lobby groups who don't want to tax wealth will tell us, it is not going to be a problem for wealthy people to pay that" "Who it is a problem for the moment is working people and small-medium sized businesses" "So while we are delaying implementing more measures to fairly tax wealth, we are increasing the strain on working people and small to medium sized businesses" "We have increased national insurance on working people.. We should have applied national insurance to income on wealth. That would have brought in a lot of money and it wouldn't have put our small businesses under strain" "I represent a group called Patriotic Millionaires, we absolutely don't think wealth is a dirty word, suggesting that asking for fair taxation of wealth is saying wealth is something dirty is nonsensical" "Asking for fair taxation of wealth is not punishing anyone. Asking working people to pay more national insurance and income tax, that is punishing people"
2:59

Julia Davies, "It might sound like wealthy people pay more in tax, that's because they disproportionately have more of the wealth of the UK" Patriotic Millionaires UK "I'm speaking here as a wealthy person, so I would have to pay the proposed 2% wealth tax that we're talking about" "No matter what the lobby groups who don't want to tax wealth will tell us, it is not going to be a problem for wealthy people to pay that" "Who it is a problem for the moment is working people and small-medium sized businesses" "So while we are delaying implementing more measures to fairly tax wealth, we are increasing the strain on working people and small to medium sized businesses" "We have increased national insurance on working people.. We should have applied national insurance to income on wealth. That would have brought in a lot of money and it wouldn't have put our small businesses under strain" "I represent a group called Patriotic Millionaires, we absolutely don't think wealth is a dirty word, suggesting that asking for fair taxation of wealth is saying wealth is something dirty is nonsensical" "Asking for fair taxation of wealth is not punishing anyone. Asking working people to pay more national insurance and income tax, that is punishing people"

Farrukh

28,211 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Palantir CEO Alex Karp on the Wealth Tax: "It just punishes." "It starts with the billionaires." "Every single person at this table is going to be paying a wealth tax only to punish us." "And the reason for it is—these models have been completely, irresponsibly oversold." " And the sell is, 'It's dangerous for everyone—which is why I can give it to all your adversaries, but I can't give it to the Department of War." "Or, I can't safely give it to an enterprise in this country without being certain that the alpha of that business could transfer to this model tomorrow." "At every single enterprise I deal with, these people are livid." "They're like, 'I'm paying for tokens that create no value. These people are stealing the weights and alpha of my business, and they're creating a wealth tax that does not help the poor." Via CNBC
1:32

Palantir CEO Alex Karp on the Wealth Tax: "It just punishes." "It starts with the billionaires." "Every single person at this table is going to be paying a wealth tax only to punish us." "And the reason for it is—these models have been completely, irresponsibly oversold." " And the sell is, 'It's dangerous for everyone—which is why I can give it to all your adversaries, but I can't give it to the Department of War." "Or, I can't safely give it to an enterprise in this country without being certain that the alpha of that business could transfer to this model tomorrow." "At every single enterprise I deal with, these people are livid." "They're like, 'I'm paying for tokens that create no value. These people are stealing the weights and alpha of my business, and they're creating a wealth tax that does not help the poor." Via CNBC

Jawwwn

325,903 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Controller of Budget has faulted the Sovereign Wealth Fund Bill (see quoted tweet) on a number of issues: · The Bill is silent on the relationship between the Sovereign Wealth Fund & the Consolidated Fund & therefore the Controller of Budget's Office has no oversight power of withdrawals from the Sovereign Wealth Fund. It presents a grave risk · Regarding the capitation of the Sovereign Wealth Fund, the Controller of Budget wants all proceeds to first be credited into the Consolidated & then be routed to the Sovereign Wealth Fund through Parliamentary appropriation. As it is, the Bill undermines Article 206 of the Constitution · The Sovereign Wealth Fund Board, as constituted in the Bill, is susceptible to executive capture & there is need to amend the Bill & provide for independence non-voting observation to mitigate this risk · The Bill is too broad on investment guard rails. There's need for a Statutory Investment Policy, reviewed once every 3 years, for the Fund that is approved by Parliament. There's also need for an independent advisory committee & performance benchmarking against publicly available targets · The Bill vests withdrawal from the Sovereign Wealth Fund on the Cabinet Secretary. This needs to change & be vested with Parliament & require express approval in writing from the Controller of Budget. There needs to be a Statutory Withdrawal Guide capping annual withdrawals as a proportion of the fund
6:17

Controller of Budget has faulted the Sovereign Wealth Fund Bill (see quoted tweet) on a number of issues: · The Bill is silent on the relationship between the Sovereign Wealth Fund & the Consolidated Fund & therefore the Controller of Budget's Office has no oversight power of withdrawals from the Sovereign Wealth Fund. It presents a grave risk · Regarding the capitation of the Sovereign Wealth Fund, the Controller of Budget wants all proceeds to first be credited into the Consolidated & then be routed to the Sovereign Wealth Fund through Parliamentary appropriation. As it is, the Bill undermines Article 206 of the Constitution · The Sovereign Wealth Fund Board, as constituted in the Bill, is susceptible to executive capture & there is need to amend the Bill & provide for independence non-voting observation to mitigate this risk · The Bill is too broad on investment guard rails. There's need for a Statutory Investment Policy, reviewed once every 3 years, for the Fund that is approved by Parliament. There's also need for an independent advisory committee & performance benchmarking against publicly available targets · The Bill vests withdrawal from the Sovereign Wealth Fund on the Cabinet Secretary. This needs to change & be vested with Parliament & require express approval in writing from the Controller of Budget. There needs to be a Statutory Withdrawal Guide capping annual withdrawals as a proportion of the fund

Julians Amboko

51,640 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The next 12-15 years is gonna be a massive transfer of wealth to the younger generation and when that happens, there's estate tax, so a portion of that's going back to the government. I consider that unfair because you've already been taxed on it multiple times, so why tax on death makes no sense to me. An interesting stat about this is that it only takes three generations to basically lose that wealth. The people that make it, covet it, understand it, manage it, think it's very important, but people that are given wealth, they squander it, and I think that's a remarkable thing. It finds its way back in the economy.
1:37

The next 12-15 years is gonna be a massive transfer of wealth to the younger generation and when that happens, there's estate tax, so a portion of that's going back to the government. I consider that unfair because you've already been taxed on it multiple times, so why tax on death makes no sense to me. An interesting stat about this is that it only takes three generations to basically lose that wealth. The people that make it, covet it, understand it, manage it, think it's very important, but people that are given wealth, they squander it, and I think that's a remarkable thing. It finds its way back in the economy.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

112,307 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

WAIT, WHAT??? "If we are GOING TO BUY TWO BILLION COVID VACCINES, maybe we should have some warrants and some EQUITY in these companies and have that grow for the help of the American people" Howard Lutnik, commerce secretary on Trump's exec order for sovereign wealth fund.
0:32

WAIT, WHAT??? "If we are GOING TO BUY TWO BILLION COVID VACCINES, maybe we should have some warrants and some EQUITY in these companies and have that grow for the help of the American people" Howard Lutnik, commerce secretary on Trump's exec order for sovereign wealth fund.

Ehden (#PfizerLeak/#MonkeyBusiness/#COptiGate) 🌟

387,833 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

BREAKING: Trump just signed it. The U.S. Sovereign Wealth Fund. By executive order. America is about to do what Norway. Saudi Arabia. Singapore. UAE have done for decades. Take national wealth. Invest it. Grow it. Forever. Norway's sovereign wealth fund: $1,700,000,000,000. America's: just getting started. - The U.S. government already said it will never sell its Bitcoin. - The U.S. Treasury Secretary calls Bitcoin a payment rail. - The U.S. SEC Chair says all markets will be on-chain within two years. Now a U.S. Sovereign Wealth Fund. What do you think they're going to put in it. FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING
2:55

BREAKING: Trump just signed it. The U.S. Sovereign Wealth Fund. By executive order. America is about to do what Norway. Saudi Arabia. Singapore. UAE have done for decades. Take national wealth. Invest it. Grow it. Forever. Norway's sovereign wealth fund: $1,700,000,000,000. America's: just getting started. - The U.S. government already said it will never sell its Bitcoin. - The U.S. Treasury Secretary calls Bitcoin a payment rail. - The U.S. SEC Chair says all markets will be on-chain within two years. Now a U.S. Sovereign Wealth Fund. What do you think they're going to put in it. FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING

WWG1WGA🇺🇸♥️

62,802 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

BREAKING: Trump just signed it. The U.S. Sovereign Wealth Fund. By executive order. America is about to do what Norway. Saudi Arabia. Singapore. UAE have done for decades. Take national wealth. Invest it. Grow it. Forever. Norway's sovereign wealth fund: $1,700,000,000,000. America's: just getting started. - The U.S. government already said it will never sell its Bitcoin. - The U.S. Treasury Secretary calls Bitcoin a payment rail. - The U.S. SEC Chair says all markets will be on-chain within two years. Now a U.S. Sovereign Wealth Fund. What do you think they're going to put in it. FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING. QWhite Hats
2:55

BREAKING: Trump just signed it. The U.S. Sovereign Wealth Fund. By executive order. America is about to do what Norway. Saudi Arabia. Singapore. UAE have done for decades. Take national wealth. Invest it. Grow it. Forever. Norway's sovereign wealth fund: $1,700,000,000,000. America's: just getting started. - The U.S. government already said it will never sell its Bitcoin. - The U.S. Treasury Secretary calls Bitcoin a payment rail. - The U.S. SEC Chair says all markets will be on-chain within two years. Now a U.S. Sovereign Wealth Fund. What do you think they're going to put in it. FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING. QWhite Hats

WWG1WGA🇺🇸♥️

535,411 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

BREAKING: Trump just signed it. The U.S. Sovereign Wealth Fund. By executive order. America is about to do what Norway. Saudi Arabia. Singapore. UAE have done for decades. Take national wealth. Invest it. Grow it. Forever. Norway's sovereign wealth fund: $1,700,000,000,000. America's: just getting started. - The U.S. government already said it will never sell its Bitcoin. - The U.S. Treasury Secretary calls Bitcoin a payment rail. - The U.S. SEC Chair says all markets will be on-chain within two years. Now a U.S. Sovereign Wealth Fund. What do you think they're going to put in it. FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING.
2:55

BREAKING: Trump just signed it. The U.S. Sovereign Wealth Fund. By executive order. America is about to do what Norway. Saudi Arabia. Singapore. UAE have done for decades. Take national wealth. Invest it. Grow it. Forever. Norway's sovereign wealth fund: $1,700,000,000,000. America's: just getting started. - The U.S. government already said it will never sell its Bitcoin. - The U.S. Treasury Secretary calls Bitcoin a payment rail. - The U.S. SEC Chair says all markets will be on-chain within two years. Now a U.S. Sovereign Wealth Fund. What do you think they're going to put in it. FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING.

QUANTUM GUARD ™️

126,186 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

Secretary Howard Lutnick on the historic Japan deal: "The Japanese have given President Trump $550 billion for President Trump to direct where and how he wants it invested in America. And if you think about that, that's half a percent of GDP growth per year for the rest of his term, given to Donald Trump by the Japanese in order to build in America for our national and economic security."
0:39

Secretary Howard Lutnick on the historic Japan deal: "The Japanese have given President Trump $550 billion for President Trump to direct where and how he wants it invested in America. And if you think about that, that's half a percent of GDP growth per year for the rest of his term, given to Donald Trump by the Japanese in order to build in America for our national and economic security."

U.S. Department of Commerce

118,990 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨ZUCK: We had organizations looking into us that weren't even involved in Social Media. We had the CFPB looking after us. I didn't even know what that is. It's some financial institution that Elizabeth Warren set up. We're not a bank, what does Meta have to do with this? They came up with some theory and were trying really hard to make it work. I don't know how this stuff works -- is it a directive? A quiet consensus? It's tough to be at the other end of that. The US Government should be defending its companies, not at the tip of the spear attacking its companies. The EU has fined the tech companies more thsn $30B over the last 10-20 years. This is a EU wide policy for how they want to deal with tech, it's kind of like a tariff. The US Government led the attacks against their companies which gave permission for the EU and other countries to go after US companies as well. I think that the American tech industry is a bright spot in the US economy, it's a strategic advantage, and it should be part of the US' strategy going forward to defend that. I am optimistic about that with Trump, I think he just wants the US to win. At least in the US we have rule of law, you get your day in court, and we usually win, but other countries don't have that. If the US wants to remain strong, the US has to have a role in defending their tech."
4:06

🚨ZUCK: We had organizations looking into us that weren't even involved in Social Media. We had the CFPB looking after us. I didn't even know what that is. It's some financial institution that Elizabeth Warren set up. We're not a bank, what does Meta have to do with this? They came up with some theory and were trying really hard to make it work. I don't know how this stuff works -- is it a directive? A quiet consensus? It's tough to be at the other end of that. The US Government should be defending its companies, not at the tip of the spear attacking its companies. The EU has fined the tech companies more thsn $30B over the last 10-20 years. This is a EU wide policy for how they want to deal with tech, it's kind of like a tariff. The US Government led the attacks against their companies which gave permission for the EU and other countries to go after US companies as well. I think that the American tech industry is a bright spot in the US economy, it's a strategic advantage, and it should be part of the US' strategy going forward to defend that. I am optimistic about that with Trump, I think he just wants the US to win. At least in the US we have rule of law, you get your day in court, and we usually win, but other countries don't have that. If the US wants to remain strong, the US has to have a role in defending their tech."

Autism Capital 🧩

1,842,936 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr