Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

You will never hear a better definition of Complementarianism than this. Allie Beth Stuckey (Allie Beth Stuckey) says that she could be a pastor since she has been gifted that way, but she chooses not to because God said so. The implication is that men and women are interchangeable... show more

Defiant Baptist

16,995 subscribers

378,706 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Bildung Comedy

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Christian girlboss Melissa Dougherty responded to three arguments against the “Share the Arrows” conference. The first was that the complementarianism on display was a theological compromise. This is actually very consistent with what ABS said in 2023 when she argued for complementarianism, that men and women are gifted in the exact same ways, but that women must choose not to exercise those gifts all the time since that’s not their role. In reality, God gives different gifts to men and women and expects both to use those gifts to the uttermost. So, in this case, women can’t teach or lead because they weren’t created to teach or lead. And that’s why the Bible commands them not to teach or lead. God does not arbitrarily give gifts and then command they not be used. Melissa never actually substantiates her view from the Bible, rather she presents complementarianism as a third way that avoids the extremes of feminism and patriarchy. But extreme ≠ wrong, sorry!

Christian girlboss Melissa Dougherty responded to three arguments against the “Share the Arrows” conference. The first was that the complementarianism on display was a theological compromise. This is actually very consistent with what ABS said in 2023 when she argued for complementarianism, that men and women are gifted in the exact same ways, but that women must choose not to exercise those gifts all the time since that’s not their role. In reality, God gives different gifts to men and women and expects both to use those gifts to the uttermost. So, in this case, women can’t teach or lead because they weren’t created to teach or lead. And that’s why the Bible commands them not to teach or lead. God does not arbitrarily give gifts and then command they not be used. Melissa never actually substantiates her view from the Bible, rather she presents complementarianism as a third way that avoids the extremes of feminism and patriarchy. But extreme ≠ wrong, sorry!

Defiant Baptist

16,347 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

.Allie Beth Stuckey responds to Chip and Joanna Gaines: “You’ve exchanged the God of Scripture for the god of self, because you think that you are better and wiser than God is.”

.Allie Beth Stuckey responds to Chip and Joanna Gaines: “You’ve exchanged the God of Scripture for the god of self, because you think that you are better and wiser than God is.”

Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey

186,191 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Allie Beth Stuckey: “The question that I want to ask you, because all of us in this room, you've got one person that needs to hear the truth of the gospel… Do you love them enough?” Allie Beth Stuckey live at WLS 2026

Allie Beth Stuckey: “The question that I want to ask you, because all of us in this room, you've got one person that needs to hear the truth of the gospel… Do you love them enough?” Allie Beth Stuckey live at WLS 2026

Turning Point USA

92,885 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Candace Owens is attacking Allie Beth Stuckey (Allie Beth Stuckey) for being a "mean girl", using her Christianity to justify her behaviour and that she wasn't actually that close to Charlie Kirk - as usual everything is PROJECTION with Candace. Candace also claimed the only reason Stuckey was going after her was because: "you are part Jewish and you are being exceedingly tribal." Stuckey responded, to this absurd attack, saying "my great-grandfather whom I never met was Jewish." So just in case people forgot amongst all the disgusting things Candace Owens has been doing, yes, she still despises Jews.

Candace Owens is attacking Allie Beth Stuckey (Allie Beth Stuckey) for being a "mean girl", using her Christianity to justify her behaviour and that she wasn't actually that close to Charlie Kirk - as usual everything is PROJECTION with Candace. Candace also claimed the only reason Stuckey was going after her was because: "you are part Jewish and you are being exceedingly tribal." Stuckey responded, to this absurd attack, saying "my great-grandfather whom I never met was Jewish." So just in case people forgot amongst all the disgusting things Candace Owens has been doing, yes, she still despises Jews.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

41,717 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

When Allie Beth Stuckey (Allie Beth Stuckey) debated 20 apostates, she made two MASSIVE errors on the marriage topic. First, Stuckey accepted her opponent’s framing of “gay people,” as if that’s an identity. There are no gay people. There are just people engaged in homosexual sin. Second, when asked about what he should do as a gay person, Allie Beth told him that it was his Christian duty to deny himself, take up his cross, and follow Jesus. She said that every person must do this, in fact, gay or straight. In actuality, what this man needs to do is repent of his homosexual thoughts, words, and deeds. Then, and only then, will he be able to follow Jesus. Stuckey never even mentions that it’s a sin, rather she empathizes (in a toxic way) with his lot in life. This is Exhibit Q why ABS should not be a culture warrior. She’s not built for this. It’s not her fault; God created her for a different purpose. But it is her fault if she continues to deny her true calling as a wife and mother.

When Allie Beth Stuckey (Allie Beth Stuckey) debated 20 apostates, she made two MASSIVE errors on the marriage topic. First, Stuckey accepted her opponent’s framing of “gay people,” as if that’s an identity. There are no gay people. There are just people engaged in homosexual sin. Second, when asked about what he should do as a gay person, Allie Beth told him that it was his Christian duty to deny himself, take up his cross, and follow Jesus. She said that every person must do this, in fact, gay or straight. In actuality, what this man needs to do is repent of his homosexual thoughts, words, and deeds. Then, and only then, will he be able to follow Jesus. Stuckey never even mentions that it’s a sin, rather she empathizes (in a toxic way) with his lot in life. This is Exhibit Q why ABS should not be a culture warrior. She’s not built for this. It’s not her fault; God created her for a different purpose. But it is her fault if she continues to deny her true calling as a wife and mother.

Defiant Baptist

74,552 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

As I predicted, Allie Beth Stuckey (Allie Beth Stuckey) stopped responding to criticism on X about her interview with Brittni De La Mora, and instead decided to reprimand all us behind her Relatapulpit. Allie did not address our substantive concerns with the conversion story. Specifically, Brittni returned to p0rn twice after having dramatic conversion experiences, and she functions as a pastor in her church and ministry. De La Mora also claims to have received direct revelation from God, an idea that Stuckey strongly disagrees with. Instead, Allie recited all of the standard talking points about how Jesus did not avoid this type of woman, that we have disdain for women like Brittni, and ultimately that we just don’t understand the gospel. This is all gaslighting, and it won’t work. It doesn’t matter what Brittni claims she heard from God. She is in rebellion against Him by cosplaying as a pastor, even if she no longer retains the title. In her public-facing role, she is a temptation for men and a terrible role model for women. Brittni needs to be out of the spotlight, and Allie should have told her so.

As I predicted, Allie Beth Stuckey (Allie Beth Stuckey) stopped responding to criticism on X about her interview with Brittni De La Mora, and instead decided to reprimand all us behind her Relatapulpit. Allie did not address our substantive concerns with the conversion story. Specifically, Brittni returned to p0rn twice after having dramatic conversion experiences, and she functions as a pastor in her church and ministry. De La Mora also claims to have received direct revelation from God, an idea that Stuckey strongly disagrees with. Instead, Allie recited all of the standard talking points about how Jesus did not avoid this type of woman, that we have disdain for women like Brittni, and ultimately that we just don’t understand the gospel. This is all gaslighting, and it won’t work. It doesn’t matter what Brittni claims she heard from God. She is in rebellion against Him by cosplaying as a pastor, even if she no longer retains the title. In her public-facing role, she is a temptation for men and a terrible role model for women. Brittni needs to be out of the spotlight, and Allie should have told her so.

Defiant Baptist

69,737 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Ross Douthat asked Allie Beth Stuckey whether Trump could do anything re: immigration policy that she would consider evil. She dodged the question. Now she is upset Christian women are posting against ICE on insta Christians, we do not have to defend state sanctioned violence.

Ross Douthat asked Allie Beth Stuckey whether Trump could do anything re: immigration policy that she would consider evil. She dodged the question. Now she is upset Christian women are posting against ICE on insta Christians, we do not have to defend state sanctioned violence.

Marissa Franks Burt

50,648 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

We are living in a time where more men are being more vocal about their feelings which many women have said they have wanted for a long time. However, some women are struggling with accepting what men have to say when it comes to them having to accept that all relationship problems are not caused by men. This is not meant to be an attack on women but many women take it as an attack and are way more interested in defending women than actually understanding what men are trying to say. It tends to be more challenging for women to emotionally regulate and to accept accountability, not because they are flawed, but because of the conditioning and training that has taught women that men are less intelligent and more than often the problem. Quality men, which there are plenty of but are often overlooked and not talked about, are tired of being blamed for everything and are no longer willing to tolerate it. They want to make it clear that most men are not like the stereotypical bs that our society teaches about men. It has been challenging because it's difficult for many women to accept because of their personal experiences from choosing and dealing with lesser quality men.

We are living in a time where more men are being more vocal about their feelings which many women have said they have wanted for a long time. However, some women are struggling with accepting what men have to say when it comes to them having to accept that all relationship problems are not caused by men. This is not meant to be an attack on women but many women take it as an attack and are way more interested in defending women than actually understanding what men are trying to say. It tends to be more challenging for women to emotionally regulate and to accept accountability, not because they are flawed, but because of the conditioning and training that has taught women that men are less intelligent and more than often the problem. Quality men, which there are plenty of but are often overlooked and not talked about, are tired of being blamed for everything and are no longer willing to tolerate it. They want to make it clear that most men are not like the stereotypical bs that our society teaches about men. It has been challenging because it's difficult for many women to accept because of their personal experiences from choosing and dealing with lesser quality men.

Tamorah Shareef Muhammad

12,430,598 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

ODIOUS ALLIE BETH STUCKEY HAS FALLEN OFF AND ALSO WHAT DOES SHE KNOW ABOUT HOW ERIKA KIRK FEELS ABOUT HER CHILDREN???? ALLIE BETH STUCKEY IS NEVER WITH HER CHILDREN, EITHER. Y’ALL GO HOME AND STOP BEING CRAZY FEMINISTS, WE NEED BIBLICAL MEN TO LEAD, NOT EITHER OF YOU OH MY GOD.

ODIOUS ALLIE BETH STUCKEY HAS FALLEN OFF AND ALSO WHAT DOES SHE KNOW ABOUT HOW ERIKA KIRK FEELS ABOUT HER CHILDREN???? ALLIE BETH STUCKEY IS NEVER WITH HER CHILDREN, EITHER. Y’ALL GO HOME AND STOP BEING CRAZY FEMINISTS, WE NEED BIBLICAL MEN TO LEAD, NOT EITHER OF YOU OH MY GOD.

Ginny Robinson

55,051 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

I have quite a few clips from Allie Beth Stuckey’s response episode. If there is continued interest, I’ll keep sharing them, but I really don’t want to beat a dead horse. Still, there are a lot of interesting things that she says, if you listen closely. First, Allie attempted to respond to the allegations that her TPUSA speech was a feminist nagging session. I say attempted, because she basically said that her definitions of “feminism” and “nagging” are different from that of her detractors. Allie can’t be a feminist, because she was just a woman standing on a stage saying true things and sharing her concerns. And it couldn’t be nagging because she got a very enthusiastic response from the crowd, the same one that paid to come see her speak. Briefly, Stuckey was acting like a feminist because she was on a stage in a teaching capacity. She was nagging because she was telling men everywhere what they had to do in order to be real men. That’s it. Very simple. Stay tuned for at least one more clip. 🫡

I have quite a few clips from Allie Beth Stuckey’s response episode. If there is continued interest, I’ll keep sharing them, but I really don’t want to beat a dead horse. Still, there are a lot of interesting things that she says, if you listen closely. First, Allie attempted to respond to the allegations that her TPUSA speech was a feminist nagging session. I say attempted, because she basically said that her definitions of “feminism” and “nagging” are different from that of her detractors. Allie can’t be a feminist, because she was just a woman standing on a stage saying true things and sharing her concerns. And it couldn’t be nagging because she got a very enthusiastic response from the crowd, the same one that paid to come see her speak. Briefly, Stuckey was acting like a feminist because she was on a stage in a teaching capacity. She was nagging because she was telling men everywhere what they had to do in order to be real men. That’s it. Very simple. Stay tuned for at least one more clip. 🫡

Defiant Baptist

16,731 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Alix Lapri reveals to Gianni Paolo and Michael Rainey Jr that she is into men and women but romantically she prefers men as women are as bad as men👀🥀 “Majority of women are the ones that end the relationships and they are just more emotional creatures, that’s why as women it is nice to tap into the more logical side so that we can learn to be logical about things, we as women could be so emotional, you gotta tap into that logical side sometimes because it would cloud your judgement”

Sensitive content

Alix Lapri reveals to Gianni Paolo and Michael Rainey Jr that she is into men and women but romantically she prefers men as women are as bad as men👀🥀 “Majority of women are the ones that end the relationships and they are just more emotional creatures, that’s why as women it is nice to tap into the more logical side so that we can learn to be logical about things, we as women could be so emotional, you gotta tap into that logical side sometimes because it would cloud your judgement”

flame⛧

35,054 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

One thing you’ll notice with complementarians in general and Allie Beth Stuckey in particular is a major focus on utilitarian arguments: “What I’m doing is working. I’m really good at it. How can you say that this is wrong?” Allie Beth concedes that men in general are more suited for the public sphere than women, but that does not mean that all men are cut out for it and that all women are not. It’s very clear that Stuckey sees herself as the exception that proves the rule. She is the unique and special snowflake that can fight the culture war as well or better than any man. As evidence, Allie cites the Jubilee episode where she debated 20 leftists cosplaying as Christians. This event really went to her head. She got near universal praise for her performance (not from me), and it’s clear that she believes that no one could have done a better job. But is that true? I question the wisdom of sending a woman into this arena, especially with so many gay men involved. This was obviously a controlled environment, but the outside world is not. A young lady that attempts to follow Stuckey’s example is putting herself in mortal danger. The chances of an interaction getting violent are insanely high. Allie holding her own (if she even did) on that show doesn’t make it right. Also, in general, I don’t believe debate shows are worthwhile at all. We’ve won the debate. We need to start acting like it. The last thing we should be doing is platforming gay slop perspectives. And finally, the passive aggression comes out. Allie does not like being told that she’s not cut out for this or that a man could do better. Just watch the last 20 seconds. You’ll see what I mean. Should I keep going? Have you been punished enough? Have I been punished enough? 🙃

One thing you’ll notice with complementarians in general and Allie Beth Stuckey in particular is a major focus on utilitarian arguments: “What I’m doing is working. I’m really good at it. How can you say that this is wrong?” Allie Beth concedes that men in general are more suited for the public sphere than women, but that does not mean that all men are cut out for it and that all women are not. It’s very clear that Stuckey sees herself as the exception that proves the rule. She is the unique and special snowflake that can fight the culture war as well or better than any man. As evidence, Allie cites the Jubilee episode where she debated 20 leftists cosplaying as Christians. This event really went to her head. She got near universal praise for her performance (not from me), and it’s clear that she believes that no one could have done a better job. But is that true? I question the wisdom of sending a woman into this arena, especially with so many gay men involved. This was obviously a controlled environment, but the outside world is not. A young lady that attempts to follow Stuckey’s example is putting herself in mortal danger. The chances of an interaction getting violent are insanely high. Allie holding her own (if she even did) on that show doesn’t make it right. Also, in general, I don’t believe debate shows are worthwhile at all. We’ve won the debate. We need to start acting like it. The last thing we should be doing is platforming gay slop perspectives. And finally, the passive aggression comes out. Allie does not like being told that she’s not cut out for this or that a man could do better. Just watch the last 20 seconds. You’ll see what I mean. Should I keep going? Have you been punished enough? Have I been punished enough? 🙃

Defiant Baptist

24,416 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

This was definitely the most interesting clip from Allie Beth Stuckey’s podcast where she defends her ministry. Specifically, she’s addresses the claim that she needs to step down so that men can lead, and she indirectly references Joel Webbon. Let me explain. Allie counters this claim by saying that the public square is not a zero sum game. Her speaking at Share the Arrows or for TPUSA is not preventing men from leading. Then she says something interesting, that her critics don’t believe that men and women are interchangeable widgets. Unplugging Stuckey from a conference isn’t going to magically draw all the women to our’s, that is. This is a direct reference to how Joel Webbon describes complementarianism. Stuckey is attempting to use his words against her critics. Honestly, it’s a good tactic. The reason it fails is that she doesn’t understand what we really want (shocker). We actually aren’t interested in sending our wives, daughters, sisters, mothers away from home to get lectured by someone about how being a wife and mother is the best thing EVAR. She really can’t see the problem with that? It’s like pulling a soldier from his post for a few days to teach him how important it is to stay alert while standing guard. Allie finishes with some passive aggressive comments, saying (paraphrase), “Maybe if you were just a better speaker and leader, more people would follow you.” Make no mistake, this woman with her faux humility has a massive ego. The mask starts to slip here, and it completely falls off in the next clip. Stay tuned. There’s more slop to come. 🫡🫡🫡🫡🫡

This was definitely the most interesting clip from Allie Beth Stuckey’s podcast where she defends her ministry. Specifically, she’s addresses the claim that she needs to step down so that men can lead, and she indirectly references Joel Webbon. Let me explain. Allie counters this claim by saying that the public square is not a zero sum game. Her speaking at Share the Arrows or for TPUSA is not preventing men from leading. Then she says something interesting, that her critics don’t believe that men and women are interchangeable widgets. Unplugging Stuckey from a conference isn’t going to magically draw all the women to our’s, that is. This is a direct reference to how Joel Webbon describes complementarianism. Stuckey is attempting to use his words against her critics. Honestly, it’s a good tactic. The reason it fails is that she doesn’t understand what we really want (shocker). We actually aren’t interested in sending our wives, daughters, sisters, mothers away from home to get lectured by someone about how being a wife and mother is the best thing EVAR. She really can’t see the problem with that? It’s like pulling a soldier from his post for a few days to teach him how important it is to stay alert while standing guard. Allie finishes with some passive aggressive comments, saying (paraphrase), “Maybe if you were just a better speaker and leader, more people would follow you.” Make no mistake, this woman with her faux humility has a massive ego. The mask starts to slip here, and it completely falls off in the next clip. Stay tuned. There’s more slop to come. 🫡🫡🫡🫡🫡

Defiant Baptist

20,534 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Allie Beth Stuckey (Allie Beth Stuckey) has the courage to say outright why conservative commentators aren’t speaking out against Candace's disgusting behaviour: they’re afraid of her. “Anyone who has ever gotten in Candace’s crosshairs knows that if you do or say something she perceives as subverting her, she will retaliate with ten times the force you approached her with. And that retaliation may involve attempts at character assassination.”

Allie Beth Stuckey (Allie Beth Stuckey) has the courage to say outright why conservative commentators aren’t speaking out against Candace's disgusting behaviour: they’re afraid of her. “Anyone who has ever gotten in Candace’s crosshairs knows that if you do or say something she perceives as subverting her, she will retaliate with ten times the force you approached her with. And that retaliation may involve attempts at character assassination.”

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

406,444 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

FLASHBACK (9/9/2019): Allie Beth Stuckey reflects on her time in college, including a lengthy period of drinking and partying. There are quite a few things to note here. First, there is zero mention of academics. For Allie, college was about making friends and possibly finding a husband. In 35 minutes of speaking about this, she never says that she should have focused more on school. Second, she blames her partying phase on a difficult breakup and really doesn’t take any responsibility for the debauchery she was involved in. It sounds very similar to modern women wanting to find themselves after being tied down by a serious relationship. Third, while Stuckey denies sleeping around in high school, there was no such denial regarding her college years. Such an omission is quite suspicious. Finally, Allie adopts the same “God fixes everything for promiscuous women” attitude that has been playing on repeat this week, including from Allie herself. If indeed she had a promiscuous phase in college, that would no doubt inform her perspective on the Ashley Sheatz story. What do you think?

FLASHBACK (9/9/2019): Allie Beth Stuckey reflects on her time in college, including a lengthy period of drinking and partying. There are quite a few things to note here. First, there is zero mention of academics. For Allie, college was about making friends and possibly finding a husband. In 35 minutes of speaking about this, she never says that she should have focused more on school. Second, she blames her partying phase on a difficult breakup and really doesn’t take any responsibility for the debauchery she was involved in. It sounds very similar to modern women wanting to find themselves after being tied down by a serious relationship. Third, while Stuckey denies sleeping around in high school, there was no such denial regarding her college years. Such an omission is quite suspicious. Finally, Allie adopts the same “God fixes everything for promiscuous women” attitude that has been playing on repeat this week, including from Allie herself. If indeed she had a promiscuous phase in college, that would no doubt inform her perspective on the Ashley Sheatz story. What do you think?

Defiant Baptist

258,752 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

FLASHBACK (10/17/2023): Allie Beth Stuckey answered the question, “What is the difference between submitting to your husband and the Patriarchy?” In this clip, she demonstrates why Paul said, “I suffer not a woman to teach.” First of all, let’s think about the question itself. Why was it asked in the first place? I submit to you that it’s because Allie’s audience knows that she is anti-Patriarchy. This has been seen in how she counter-signals patriarchal Christians in the CN movement. The questioner knows this, which is why the question was framed this way. Second, notice how when talking about submission, Allie immediately launches into what it does NOT mean. Wives should submit, but here are all the times when they don’t have to. Submission is never talked about positively, and a positive definition is never provided. My captions demonstrate this. It’s very problematic to make submission conditional, since a reviling wife can easily make up definitions of abuse and sin that get her off the hook regarding submission. Likewise, she will insist that the Patriarchy is not bad. Stuckey says this multiple times and in multiple ways. However, she will never call it good either. Allie knows that she can’t outright decry the Patriarchy because it’s in the Bible, so she gives it lip service instead. Never is there a positive definition, just like with submission. Finally, Allie gets to what’s required of men, even though that’s unrelated to the original question. With gusto, she explains positively and unconditionally what husbands must do for their wives. There are no exceptions. Christ-like love is required, regardless of the wife’s behavior. So the question is, why is a husband’s love unconditional while a wife’s submission is conditional? Some food for thought…

FLASHBACK (10/17/2023): Allie Beth Stuckey answered the question, “What is the difference between submitting to your husband and the Patriarchy?” In this clip, she demonstrates why Paul said, “I suffer not a woman to teach.” First of all, let’s think about the question itself. Why was it asked in the first place? I submit to you that it’s because Allie’s audience knows that she is anti-Patriarchy. This has been seen in how she counter-signals patriarchal Christians in the CN movement. The questioner knows this, which is why the question was framed this way. Second, notice how when talking about submission, Allie immediately launches into what it does NOT mean. Wives should submit, but here are all the times when they don’t have to. Submission is never talked about positively, and a positive definition is never provided. My captions demonstrate this. It’s very problematic to make submission conditional, since a reviling wife can easily make up definitions of abuse and sin that get her off the hook regarding submission. Likewise, she will insist that the Patriarchy is not bad. Stuckey says this multiple times and in multiple ways. However, she will never call it good either. Allie knows that she can’t outright decry the Patriarchy because it’s in the Bible, so she gives it lip service instead. Never is there a positive definition, just like with submission. Finally, Allie gets to what’s required of men, even though that’s unrelated to the original question. With gusto, she explains positively and unconditionally what husbands must do for their wives. There are no exceptions. Christ-like love is required, regardless of the wife’s behavior. So the question is, why is a husband’s love unconditional while a wife’s submission is conditional? Some food for thought…

Defiant Baptist

16,898 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

I know this is a scene from a movie but it happens. Some women get turned off by men who are gentle, caring and respectful. They prefer violent men, who would always be abusing and disrespecting them just for the “joy” it brings to them. They would be comparing you to their past and how they enjoyed being treated that way by their exes to make you feel less of a man. They never appreciate a peaceful relationship. They think that behaving that way is Masculinity but that’s wrong. Such women are lunatics and need help. Leave them before they make you do something that would end you up in prison!

I know this is a scene from a movie but it happens. Some women get turned off by men who are gentle, caring and respectful. They prefer violent men, who would always be abusing and disrespecting them just for the “joy” it brings to them. They would be comparing you to their past and how they enjoyed being treated that way by their exes to make you feel less of a man. They never appreciate a peaceful relationship. They think that behaving that way is Masculinity but that’s wrong. Such women are lunatics and need help. Leave them before they make you do something that would end you up in prison!

ELVIS SIMONS

113,399 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren