Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Your AI agent feels useless because it can't touch anything outside the chat window. Every harness (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, ChatGPT) needs its own MCP setup. Every tool needs its own auth flow. Switch harnesses and you rebuild the same integrations from scratch. Aident Aident AI Loadout fixes that....

11,196 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

18 Kommentare

Profilbild von Tech with Mak
Tech with Makvor 1 Monat

Now that's something very interesting! Thanks buddy.

Profilbild von Hussain Hashim | Building SundayBack
Hussain Hashim | Building SundayBackvor 1 Monat

@hasantoxr yeah, it's a pain. feels like we're stuck in integration hell sometimes. every setup is its own beast.

Profilbild von Aaliya
Aaliyavor 1 Monat

Keeping API keys in a vault while agents only access the results is a strong security model.

Profilbild von Terminal Chillness
Terminal Chillnessvor 1 Monat

This is the exact tax. Auth flows, tool wiring, the same infrastructure patterns — agents (and humans) keep re-deriving them instead of having stable, constrained capabilities they can just invoke.

Profilbild von Prasenjit Sarkar
Prasenjit Sarkarvor 1 Monat

Did they literally pic it up from my Campfire?

Profilbild von Mimu | AI Tools & News
Mimu | AI Tools & Newsvor 1 Monat

The true breakthrough is wiring tools in once and letting every agent tap into them again and again.

Profilbild von AI Mastery Guide
AI Mastery Guidevor 1 Monat

Connect once, use everywhere, that's the fix

Profilbild von hops
hopsvor 1 Monat

The integration tax is real, but execution is the next bottleneck once agents can reach tools. @fluence_project is worth watching because portable, verifiable jobs let backends move beyond a single harness or cloud account

Profilbild von Saman Ahmed
Saman Ahmedvor 1 Monat

The one setup for every harness is the part I want.

Profilbild von Kanika
Kanikavor 1 Monat

And keeping the API keys in a vault instead of handing them to the agent is a really nice touch.

Profilbild von Frankie Chan
Frankie Chanvor 1 Monat

Honestly, Loadout sounds like the solution to many agents' problems! I'd be all about connecting my top tools and letting the agent handle the plumbing.

Profilbild von Troels
Troelsvor 1 Monat

Exactly! Aident seems to be half of that equation - Wonop will be the other half once I am done building it :D

Profilbild von Gill
Gillvor 1 Monat

Centralizing all app permissions in one vault sounds pretty risky

Profilbild von Liam | AI Tools & News
Liam | AI Tools & Newsvor 1 Monat

Connecting tools once and reusing them across agents is the real win.

Profilbild von Eriks Briedis
Eriks Briedisvor 1 Monat

Auth moves fine when I switch harnesses. What I end up rewriting is the wording that gets the agent to reach for the right tool at the right moment. Same Gmail connection, different picking behaviour once Claude Code trimmed its system prompt.

Profilbild von Arsalan
Arsalanvor 1 Monat

Aident Loadout could remove a lot of MCP setup friction

Profilbild von Chad Justice
Chad Justicevor 1 Monat

The auth rebuild is the real tax, not the MCP setup itself. Every harness swap means redoing OAuth flows and token storage for tools you already had working somewhere else. Worth separating that problem from the harness problem, they don't have to be solved together.

Profilbild von Adel Bucetta
Adel Bucettavor 1 Monat

most people think mcp is just an integration, but it's a whole new system design that integrates multiple agents seamlessly

Ähnliche Videos

Every AI agent you've tried has amnesia. It does one task, forgets everything, and tomorrow you start from zero. That's not an employee. That's a temp you have to retrain every single morning. Hyperagent by Airtable is the first platform I've used that actually fixes this. Here's what got me: 1. Agents that compound. Each agent has memory. The one running today is smarter than the one you shipped three weeks ago. Same prompt, same integrations, but weeks of your judgment baked in. 2. Real deliverables, real receipts. You don't get a chat transcript. You get finished work with the cost and runtime printed right on it. A full research report for under ten bucks. Try getting that invoice from an agency. 3. A fleet, not a chatbot. Build a specialist for outreach, another for research, another for reporting. Give each one its own tools, its own memory, and its own budget cap so nothing runs away with your credits. 4. Deploy to Slack and your whole team uses the agent you built. One competitive intel agent, @ mentioned by everyone. Airtable runs its own data team this way. 5. Each agent gets its own cloud machine with a real browser and code execution. It works while you sleep. No babysitting, no local setup, no laptop that has to stay open. I put it to work in the video below. Watch what it builds. The teams treating agents as durable assets instead of one-off prompts are going to lap everyone else. This is the first tool that actually treats them that way. #ad Hyperagent

Leonard Rodman

94,961 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

THIS GUY CONNECTED HIS AI AGENTS TO HIS OBSIDIAN AND BUILT A BRAIN THAT LEARNS ON ITS OWN. HERE'S HOW TO BUILD IT Obsidian is just markdown files sitting in a folder. That turns out to be the perfect memory for an AI agent, because an agent can read and write those files directly. He wired his agents into the vault so they pull context from it, do the work, and write what they learned back. The notes aren't the point. The loop is, and it gets sharper every cycle How to build it: 1. Point an agent at your vault. The fastest way, no plugins, no API keys: open a terminal and run npx obsidian-mcp /path/to/your/vault. That exposes your Obsidian folder to Claude as a tool it can read, search, and write to. Add it to your Claude Code or Cowork config and restart 2. Confirm it can see the brain. Ask it: "list the notes in my vault and summarize what's in them." If it reads them back, the connection is live. Now it starts every task with everything the vault already holds instead of from zero 3. Give each agent one job and a write-back rule. Tell it: "research this, then save what you found as a new note in /brain with links to related notes." One agent researches, one summarizes, one plans. Each writes its output back into the vault 4. Close the loop. Add one line to every agent's instructions: "read /brain before starting, write your result back when done." Now each task leaves the vault richer, and the next run reads that before it works. It compounds instead of resetting 5. You only steer. Review what the brain produces, point it at the next thing. The agents handle the reading, writing, and connecting The edge isn't better notes. It's a brain that feeds itself, so the work gets sharper every cycle instead of starting over Bookmark this

Yarchi

58,591 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten