Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Glen is building the organizational learning and context layer for agents. Every agent session your team runs produces reasoning worth keeping, and nearly all of it is discarded the moment the window closes. Glen is the layer that unifies every agent and model your company run. Glen pulls in...

nikos1's profile picture

Nikos

1,557 subscribers

19,883 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

47 Kommentare

Profilbild von palak
palakvor 1 Monat

@sarahfim you were right about the chemistry he has with himself

Profilbild von Nikos
Nikosvor 1 Monat

@sarahfim Solo founder activities

Profilbild von Nikos
Nikosvor 1 Monat

Apply for access at

Profilbild von rifa
rifavor 1 Monat

u hang w ngmi ppl??

Profilbild von abir
abirvor 1 Monat

> Sometimes I hang out with people who are ngmi 😓

Profilbild von Nikos
Nikosvor 1 Monat

😂😂😂

Profilbild von jia
jiavor 1 Monat

this is awesome!!

Profilbild von Douglas Solberg (YC S26)
Douglas Solberg (YC S26)vor 1 Monat

We use Glen everyday! It’s great

Profilbild von rifa
rifavor 1 Monat

nikos in a suit??

Profilbild von Maya Lekhi
Maya Lekhivor 1 Monat

guys suits looks different today

Profilbild von Nikos
Nikosvor 1 Monat

sorry ran out of budget

Profilbild von shriya
shriyavor 1 Monat

Blud looks like Steve Jobs here

Profilbild von daksh
dakshvor 1 Monat

now every harvey has a mike

Profilbild von Brennan Lupyrypa
Brennan Lupyrypavor 1 Monat

Can glen do my job?

Profilbild von Nikos
Nikosvor 1 Monat

no ur irreplacable but u can replace @adambcohen93 with glen

Profilbild von Brennan Lupyrypa
Brennan Lupyrypavor 1 Monat

@adambcohen93 get me off this waitlist asap

Profilbild von Malay
Malayvor 1 Monat

glen suits every agent

Profilbild von Nikos
Nikosvor 1 Monat

lol

Profilbild von Brennan Lupyrypa
Brennan Lupyrypavor 1 Monat

Drop the full episode

Profilbild von Jason Yi
Jason Yivor 1 Monat

Glen is GMI

Profilbild von Nikos
Nikosvor 1 Monat

- Glen user circa 2026

Profilbild von taira
tairavor 1 Monat

holy suits reference

Profilbild von Nikos
Nikosvor 1 Monat

its from breaking bad

Profilbild von taira
tairavor 1 Monat

now that you mention it this looks a lot like it was shot from an RV in new mexico

Profilbild von Nikos
Nikosvor 1 Monat

😂

Profilbild von rayane
rayanevor 1 Monat

🔥🔥🔥

Profilbild von tridhatri vallamkondu
tridhatri vallamkonduvor 1 Monat

gimme access bro

Profilbild von jayesh
jayeshvor 1 Monat

when’s the next episode dropping?

Profilbild von William Acourt
William Acourtvor 1 Monat

Glen is fantastic, we're very happy users. Congrats on the launch Nikos, excited to see where you take this.

Profilbild von Nikos
Nikosvor 1 Monat

Thanks William!!

Profilbild von rahul
rahulvor 1 Monat

the best launch video i’ve ever seen idk how others never made launch video like this

Profilbild von shams haroon
shams haroonvor 1 Monat

glen is gmi

Profilbild von MimiCO
MimiCOvor 1 Monat

The handoff between Claude Code, Codex and Cursor mid-task is the part I'd want to see demoed

Profilbild von sarah
sarahvor 1 Monat

this is too perfect

Profilbild von Nikos
Nikosvor 1 Monat

Two perfect

Profilbild von Sush
Sushvor 1 Monat

the tie gave it away. till then thought I was watching suits fr!

Profilbild von Junaid Ackroyd
Junaid Ackroydvor 1 Monat

lets go 🔥

Profilbild von Jack
Jackvor 1 Monat

this is so good

Profilbild von Brennan Lupyrypa
Brennan Lupyrypavor 1 Monat

Let’s go

Profilbild von EDITH
EDITHvor 1 Monat

Hey this looks awesome...

Profilbild von Sharath Kuruganty
Sharath Kurugantyvor 1 Monat

👏👏👏

Profilbild von francis john 🍅
francis john 🍅vor 1 Monat

great video! i think this is a great idea to leverage agent traces. a lot of untapped potential here

Profilbild von Julia Fedorin
Julia Fedorinvor 1 Monat

THIS IS SO GOOODDD

Profilbild von Myndlab
Myndlabvor 1 Monat

impressive guys! handing a transcript between Claude Code and Cursor mid-task is wild

Profilbild von Harshit solanki
Harshit solankivor 1 Monat

are launches tasteful again? banger btw

Profilbild von Tuan Le
Tuan Levor 1 Monat

LFGGGG

Profilbild von Divya Tarak
Divya Tarakvor 1 Monat

congratulations on the launch!

Ähnliche Videos

Introducing Claude agents in Notion. Your task board is Claude’s to-do list. Anthropic runs the model and the agent harness. Notion is the orchestration layer: context, UI, and a shared place for teams to review and ship, and kick off Claude workflows. Join the waitlist:
1:27

Introducing Claude agents in Notion. Your task board is Claude’s to-do list. Anthropic runs the model and the agent harness. Notion is the orchestration layer: context, UI, and a shared place for teams to review and ship, and kick off Claude workflows. Join the waitlist:

Notion

495,762 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Your engineering team is about to snap. And your AI coding agent is making it worse. Introducing CodeRabbit Agent for Slack 🎉 A second brain for engineering teams. Because your tribal knowledge lives in Slack threads nobody can find. At CodeRabbit, we review millions of PRs every week and know how ace engineering teams operate on the planet. The same three things slow every team we see: - Context and decisions that live elsewhere. - Lack of a team-level durable knowledge base - And a trust layer that gives a safety net to your teams Built for Agentic SDLC workflows, CodeRabbit Agent for Slack solves all three problems in one shot while enabling teams to collaborate in real-time with the Agent. CodeRabbit Agent is Slack-native and builds your team’s operating context from every thread, every decision, every conversation your team has ever had. Make your team’s context compound!
1:37

Your engineering team is about to snap. And your AI coding agent is making it worse. Introducing CodeRabbit Agent for Slack 🎉 A second brain for engineering teams. Because your tribal knowledge lives in Slack threads nobody can find. At CodeRabbit, we review millions of PRs every week and know how ace engineering teams operate on the planet. The same three things slow every team we see: - Context and decisions that live elsewhere. - Lack of a team-level durable knowledge base - And a trust layer that gives a safety net to your teams Built for Agentic SDLC workflows, CodeRabbit Agent for Slack solves all three problems in one shot while enabling teams to collaborate in real-time with the Agent. CodeRabbit Agent is Slack-native and builds your team’s operating context from every thread, every decision, every conversation your team has ever had. Make your team’s context compound!

Harjot Gill

4,777,432 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Opus 5.5 makes this AI stack look f…cking illegal 10 GitHub repos for building everything around the model 01 zen-mcp-server ▸ → your agent debates Gemini, GPT and local models mid-task 02 claude-context ▸ → semantic code search so the agent stops grepping blind 03 wshobson/agents ▸ → a roster of subagents, each with one narrow job 04 mcp-agent ▸ → workflow patterns built around MCP tools, not around chat 05 Backlog.md ▸ → tasks live in git, so the agent and you read the same board 06 Claude Code Development Kit ▸ → hooks, subagents and MCP wired for context at scale 07 agent-rules ▸ → shared guardrails the agent inherits in every repo 08 Agent Skills ▸ → one file that teaches the agent a job, portable across tools 09 agent-scan ▸ → scans your agents, MCP servers and skills for what leaks 10 awesome-claude-code-toolkit ▸ → the map: agents, skills, commands, hooks, MCP configs the architecture: rules → context → subagents → tools → state → review → scan I'd split the stack like this: context: claude-context → Development Kit work: wshobson/agents → mcp-agent → zen-mcp-server state: Backlog.md safety: agent-rules → Agent Skills → agent-scan everyone posts the SDK and the CLI the layer that decides whether your agent survives a week is this one the model is one folder in the stack ⭣
0:24

Opus 5.5 makes this AI stack look f…cking illegal 10 GitHub repos for building everything around the model 01 zen-mcp-server ▸ → your agent debates Gemini, GPT and local models mid-task 02 claude-context ▸ → semantic code search so the agent stops grepping blind 03 wshobson/agents ▸ → a roster of subagents, each with one narrow job 04 mcp-agent ▸ → workflow patterns built around MCP tools, not around chat 05 Backlog.md ▸ → tasks live in git, so the agent and you read the same board 06 Claude Code Development Kit ▸ → hooks, subagents and MCP wired for context at scale 07 agent-rules ▸ → shared guardrails the agent inherits in every repo 08 Agent Skills ▸ → one file that teaches the agent a job, portable across tools 09 agent-scan ▸ → scans your agents, MCP servers and skills for what leaks 10 awesome-claude-code-toolkit ▸ → the map: agents, skills, commands, hooks, MCP configs the architecture: rules → context → subagents → tools → state → review → scan I'd split the stack like this: context: claude-context → Development Kit work: wshobson/agents → mcp-agent → zen-mcp-server state: Backlog.md safety: agent-rules → Agent Skills → agent-scan everyone posts the SDK and the CLI the layer that decides whether your agent survives a week is this one the model is one folder in the stack ⭣

rody

18,089 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

Now building is a team sport. Introducing Slack Code: a new way for your team and AI agents, like Anthropic's Claude Code, Claude Tag, Devin from Cognition, GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, and Vercel agents, to write, review, and ship code together. Just mention an agent to spin up a channel, pull in your team, and start building. All in the open. All in Slack.
0:21

Now building is a team sport. Introducing Slack Code: a new way for your team and AI agents, like Anthropic's Claude Code, Claude Tag, Devin from Cognition, GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, and Vercel agents, to write, review, and ship code together. Just mention an agent to spin up a channel, pull in your team, and start building. All in the open. All in Slack.

Slack

589,458 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Another insane Jev use case! Jev makes it incredibly cheap to evaluate and classify agent runs at scale. And finally, someone open-sourced a self-improving memory layer that can put that capability to work across agent harnesses. It turns your agent sessions into a compounding knowledge layer, where every successful run can make future agents smarter across: - Codex - Claude Code - Cursor - OpenCode and 20+ more Beacon by Asymptote Labs continuously builds a shared history across your agent harnesses and uses Jev to identify the runs worth learning from. It then turns the best workflows, corrections, and debugging patterns into reusable skills. GitHub repo: (don’t forget to star it ⭐) Most agent runs are messy. They contain exploration, failed commands, dead ends, and one-off fixes that should never become permanent memory. So Beacon preserves the full session history, while Jev helps decide what should be promoted, reviewed, or discarded. The recording below shows this in action. Beacon found 579 sessions across 5 coding-agent harnesses and normalized them into one consistent history. From there, Jev surfaces the lessons worth keeping and makes them available across your agent stack. - A pattern learned in Cursor can carry into OpenCode. - A lesson from Claude Code can improve the next Codex run. Every successful run adds to the shared knowledge layer, making future agents smarter. If you want to dive deeper into Jev, I also wrote a breakdown of how it works. The article is quoted below.
0:29

Another insane Jev use case! Jev makes it incredibly cheap to evaluate and classify agent runs at scale. And finally, someone open-sourced a self-improving memory layer that can put that capability to work across agent harnesses. It turns your agent sessions into a compounding knowledge layer, where every successful run can make future agents smarter across: - Codex - Claude Code - Cursor - OpenCode and 20+ more Beacon by Asymptote Labs continuously builds a shared history across your agent harnesses and uses Jev to identify the runs worth learning from. It then turns the best workflows, corrections, and debugging patterns into reusable skills. GitHub repo: (don’t forget to star it ⭐) Most agent runs are messy. They contain exploration, failed commands, dead ends, and one-off fixes that should never become permanent memory. So Beacon preserves the full session history, while Jev helps decide what should be promoted, reviewed, or discarded. The recording below shows this in action. Beacon found 579 sessions across 5 coding-agent harnesses and normalized them into one consistent history. From there, Jev surfaces the lessons worth keeping and makes them available across your agent stack. - A pattern learned in Cursor can carry into OpenCode. - A lesson from Claude Code can improve the next Codex run. Every successful run adds to the shared knowledge layer, making future agents smarter. If you want to dive deeper into Jev, I also wrote a breakdown of how it works. The article is quoted below.

Akshay 🚀

119,449 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

Everyone wants agent swarms. Very few people are talking seriously enough about the context layer that makes swarms useful. Even with one agent, context is fragile. Too little context and the agent guesses. Too much context and it wastes tokens, loses focus, or reasons over irrelevant noise. The sweet spot is precise context: the right knowledge, in the right structure, at the right moment. With many agents, that challenge explodes. Each agent produces decisions, assumptions, findings, summaries, risks, and partial conclusions. Unless that knowledge becomes shared, structured, and reusable, every new agent is forced to rediscover what another agent already learned. That is not a swarm. That is a crowd. Shared context graphs are what turn agent activity into agent collaboration, and OriginTrail DKG V10 brings them to life. Was just playing with some final polishing for the V10 release, and it is really powerful to see shared context graphs where multiple agents contribute knowledge into the same connected memory, with attribution visible directly in the graph ui. That matters for three reasons. First, agents can access and build on one shared memory instead of staying trapped in isolated sessions. Second, the graph structure helps them retrieve the exact context they need, instead of stuffing everything into a prompt and hoping the model sorts it out. Third, verifiability of provenance. You can see which agent contributed each piece of knowledge, trace the source, and decide what to trust. Tokenmaxxing starts with fewer tokens, but the deeper story is coordination - agents stop reloading the world and start building on shared, verifiable context. That is the foundation for serious multi-agent work across software engineering, research, finance, operations, project management, and far beyond. The future is not more agents, it is agents working from shared, verifiable context. But the more the merrier, of course.
0:22

Everyone wants agent swarms. Very few people are talking seriously enough about the context layer that makes swarms useful. Even with one agent, context is fragile. Too little context and the agent guesses. Too much context and it wastes tokens, loses focus, or reasons over irrelevant noise. The sweet spot is precise context: the right knowledge, in the right structure, at the right moment. With many agents, that challenge explodes. Each agent produces decisions, assumptions, findings, summaries, risks, and partial conclusions. Unless that knowledge becomes shared, structured, and reusable, every new agent is forced to rediscover what another agent already learned. That is not a swarm. That is a crowd. Shared context graphs are what turn agent activity into agent collaboration, and OriginTrail DKG V10 brings them to life. Was just playing with some final polishing for the V10 release, and it is really powerful to see shared context graphs where multiple agents contribute knowledge into the same connected memory, with attribution visible directly in the graph ui. That matters for three reasons. First, agents can access and build on one shared memory instead of staying trapped in isolated sessions. Second, the graph structure helps them retrieve the exact context they need, instead of stuffing everything into a prompt and hoping the model sorts it out. Third, verifiability of provenance. You can see which agent contributed each piece of knowledge, trace the source, and decide what to trust. Tokenmaxxing starts with fewer tokens, but the deeper story is coordination - agents stop reloading the world and start building on shared, verifiable context. That is the foundation for serious multi-agent work across software engineering, research, finance, operations, project management, and far beyond. The future is not more agents, it is agents working from shared, verifiable context. But the more the merrier, of course.

Jurij Skornik

11,180 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🧲 Meet Magnet — the AI workspace for agentic coding. Build software with Claude Code, Cursor, Codex & co. → Write a ticket → Magnet assembles context → Fires to Claude Code, Deep Research, and other agent sessions in parallel Git worktree sandboxes → PRs appear → Use agents to help you spec, research, and decompose tasks Let your agents cook!
2:12

🧲 Meet Magnet — the AI workspace for agentic coding. Build software with Claude Code, Cursor, Codex & co. → Write a ticket → Magnet assembles context → Fires to Claude Code, Deep Research, and other agent sessions in parallel Git worktree sandboxes → PRs appear → Use agents to help you spec, research, and decompose tasks Let your agents cook!

Nicolae Rusan

16,687 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Ex-Google engineer built a graph-based workflow that made Claude Code do nearly 10 days of work in about an hour. Here's the exact setup he uses. step 1. create a separate Git worktree for every task. run: git worktree add ../task-1 -b task-1 open a new terminal, cd into it, and launch Claude Code. repeat this for every agent. each one gets its own branch, so nothing conflicts. step 2. give every Claude agent a different task. same repository. different branches. they all work in parallel. step 3. once they're done, review the pull requests. keep the good ones. merge what works. step 4. add a review agent. paste each PR into Claude and ask: "does this implementation match the original specification" every agent now has another agent reviewing its work before it gets merged. step 5. scale it up. 48GB of RAM can comfortably run around 20 Claude Code agents. 128GB can handle roughly 50. most engineers run Claude Code once and wait. he runs dozens of Claude Code agents in parallel, then merges the best results. this 60-minute lecture is one of the best free resources on graph engineering and multi-agent workflows. bookmark it and watch it below.
55:30

Ex-Google engineer built a graph-based workflow that made Claude Code do nearly 10 days of work in about an hour. Here's the exact setup he uses. step 1. create a separate Git worktree for every task. run: git worktree add ../task-1 -b task-1 open a new terminal, cd into it, and launch Claude Code. repeat this for every agent. each one gets its own branch, so nothing conflicts. step 2. give every Claude agent a different task. same repository. different branches. they all work in parallel. step 3. once they're done, review the pull requests. keep the good ones. merge what works. step 4. add a review agent. paste each PR into Claude and ask: "does this implementation match the original specification" every agent now has another agent reviewing its work before it gets merged. step 5. scale it up. 48GB of RAM can comfortably run around 20 Claude Code agents. 128GB can handle roughly 50. most engineers run Claude Code once and wait. he runs dozens of Claude Code agents in parallel, then merges the best results. this 60-minute lecture is one of the best free resources on graph engineering and multi-agent workflows. bookmark it and watch it below.

MIKE

32,199 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Introducing October, the world's most advanced agent orchestrator Claude? Codex? Grok? Cursor? Which model? Which harness? How much quota is left? You shouldn't have to care Give October a task. It builds the team, connects the agents with native agent agent comms, and orchestrates the work based on the task, your taste, budget and remaining usage (or build the team yourself) And it's multiplayer: your team's agents can work with yours, live on the same canvas
1:46

Introducing October, the world's most advanced agent orchestrator Claude? Codex? Grok? Cursor? Which model? Which harness? How much quota is left? You shouldn't have to care Give October a task. It builds the team, connects the agents with native agent agent comms, and orchestrates the work based on the task, your taste, budget and remaining usage (or build the team yourself) And it's multiplayer: your team's agents can work with yours, live on the same canvas

Harsh Savergaonkar

25,579 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

Got early access to from Thomas Dohmke... Git rebuilt for AI agents If you use Claude Code, Codex or Cursor, the gap is clear, software is no longer just code and deploy, it is also context and knowledge Entire keeps it in the repo... sessions, prompts, decisions stored next to the code Connected a few repos already, sync is one step and basically instant
0:33

Got early access to from Thomas Dohmke... Git rebuilt for AI agents If you use Claude Code, Codex or Cursor, the gap is clear, software is no longer just code and deploy, it is also context and knowledge Entire keeps it in the repo... sessions, prompts, decisions stored next to the code Connected a few repos already, sync is one step and basically instant

Daniel San

12,432 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Agent Zero crushed Codex by 2.6× on token efficiency! We gave both agents the same task on the same local model (Qwen3.6 27B): build a retro Q*bert arcade game. Each agent wrote and rewrote it across iterations, adding enemies and a HUD. Outputs: • Agent Zero: 239K tokens, 53 min • Codex: 627K tokens, 51 min Both agents built a working Q*bert, but Gitlawb 's Agent Zero is the cleaner build, with crisper textures and hops that land where they should. Codex refills the context window with its whole history every turn, so the model loses the thread and hallucinates code it never wrote. Agent Zero sends only what's new, so it keeps more of the window open and makes fewer mistakes. Run agents on local AI models in Atomic Chat!
0:25

Agent Zero crushed Codex by 2.6× on token efficiency! We gave both agents the same task on the same local model (Qwen3.6 27B): build a retro Q*bert arcade game. Each agent wrote and rewrote it across iterations, adding enemies and a HUD. Outputs: • Agent Zero: 239K tokens, 53 min • Codex: 627K tokens, 51 min Both agents built a working Q*bert, but Gitlawb 's Agent Zero is the cleaner build, with crisper textures and hops that land where they should. Codex refills the context window with its whole history every turn, so the model loses the thread and hallucinates code it never wrote. Agent Zero sends only what's new, so it keeps more of the window open and makes fewer mistakes. Run agents on local AI models in Atomic Chat!

atomic.chat

320,472 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Go from idea to a working agent faster with the Agents API. Build and run cloud agents with the Codex harness, fully managed by OpenAI. We handle orchestration, long-running sessions, and context management. You focus on what makes your agent unique. Available in public beta.
2:17

Go from idea to a working agent faster with the Agents API. Build and run cloud agents with the Codex harness, fully managed by OpenAI. We handle orchestration, long-running sessions, and context management. You focus on what makes your agent unique. Available in public beta.

OpenAI Developers

1,924,263 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

i merged all my AI agents into one brain Claude Code, Codex, Gemini: one team, one memory, zero re-briefing result: 8+ hours a week back, and every agent already knows my projects, my clients and how i think here's the setup with Jarvix: 1. dump your context once: projects, clients, writing style, how you make decisions.. it builds your personal model from your actual AI interactions 2. switch agents mid-task with zero re-briefing: Claude Code builds, Codex reviews, Gemini researches, all reading the same context 3. it carries what YOU choose across sessions.. never start a chat from zero again 4. when it's time to act, it pulls the right agents together as one team instead of five separate assistants the unlock isn't another agent. it's that your context finally travels agents without shared memory are five interns on their first day, forever. agents with it are a team that's worked with you for years not more agents. one shared context that's the right bet P.S. thanks to the Jarvix team for the early access
2:15

i merged all my AI agents into one brain Claude Code, Codex, Gemini: one team, one memory, zero re-briefing result: 8+ hours a week back, and every agent already knows my projects, my clients and how i think here's the setup with Jarvix: 1. dump your context once: projects, clients, writing style, how you make decisions.. it builds your personal model from your actual AI interactions 2. switch agents mid-task with zero re-briefing: Claude Code builds, Codex reviews, Gemini researches, all reading the same context 3. it carries what YOU choose across sessions.. never start a chat from zero again 4. when it's time to act, it pulls the right agents together as one team instead of five separate assistants the unlock isn't another agent. it's that your context finally travels agents without shared memory are five interns on their first day, forever. agents with it are a team that's worked with you for years not more agents. one shared context that's the right bet P.S. thanks to the Jarvix team for the early access

Ronin

15,071 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Introducing Claude Code Hook - Context Timeline (Saving this to try later) Install with: npx claude-code-templates@latest --hook monitoring/context-timeline Managing the context window and the subagents running in Claude Code is hard to keep track of That's why I built this hook... It starts the moment you open a session and shows a timeline with the main agent's context window and how subagents start working in their own separate context Every subagent you have running will show up in real time This way you can manage the context and the subagents you run, and see everything in a much simpler way than in the console
0:40

Introducing Claude Code Hook - Context Timeline (Saving this to try later) Install with: npx claude-code-templates@latest --hook monitoring/context-timeline Managing the context window and the subagents running in Claude Code is hard to keep track of That's why I built this hook... It starts the moment you open a session and shows a timeline with the main agent's context window and how subagents start working in their own separate context Every subagent you have running will show up in real time This way you can manage the context and the subagents you run, and see everything in a much simpler way than in the console

Daniel San

51,706 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

AI agents are powerful. They're also isolated. Switch fixes that. Here's the thing about most AI agents: they work alone. They don't see what your team is discussing. They don't share context across conversations. Every new chat is a fresh start. If you've ever tried to actually integrate an agent into your team's workflow, you know the friction. Then I found 𝗦𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗰𝗵. It brings AI agents into Slack, Teams, Discord, and Telegram as named participants. They sit in the same rooms as your team, with the same context, history, and participants. What I actually like about it: → Agents join as real participants in channels — not bots you have to Mention every time → Each room carries its own context, history, and rules → Works with Claude Code, OpenAI, LangChain, Google ADK, and custom agents → Open source and self-hostable. Running in minutes. No migration. No lock-in. Just agents where your team already works. Knowledge lives in the room, not in the agent. Switch keeps people, agents, decisions, and work history together so context survives handoffs. It's from Flint AI. Open source. Runs in minutes. 👉 Human + agent teams, actually working together. 📌 Download 𝗦𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗰𝗵 Console → 🚀𝗦𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗰𝗵 is live on Product Hunt: 🔄 Repost if you've ever wished your AI agent could just join the Slack channel. — #AI #Agents #Slack #Teams #Switch #ProductHunt
0:22

AI agents are powerful. They're also isolated. Switch fixes that. Here's the thing about most AI agents: they work alone. They don't see what your team is discussing. They don't share context across conversations. Every new chat is a fresh start. If you've ever tried to actually integrate an agent into your team's workflow, you know the friction. Then I found 𝗦𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗰𝗵. It brings AI agents into Slack, Teams, Discord, and Telegram as named participants. They sit in the same rooms as your team, with the same context, history, and participants. What I actually like about it: → Agents join as real participants in channels — not bots you have to Mention every time → Each room carries its own context, history, and rules → Works with Claude Code, OpenAI, LangChain, Google ADK, and custom agents → Open source and self-hostable. Running in minutes. No migration. No lock-in. Just agents where your team already works. Knowledge lives in the room, not in the agent. Switch keeps people, agents, decisions, and work history together so context survives handoffs. It's from Flint AI. Open source. Runs in minutes. 👉 Human + agent teams, actually working together. 📌 Download 𝗦𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗰𝗵 Console → 🚀𝗦𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗰𝗵 is live on Product Hunt: 🔄 Repost if you've ever wished your AI agent could just join the Slack channel. — #AI #Agents #Slack #Teams #Switch #ProductHunt

Anuj

337,509 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

We launched our Company Brain!! 🧠 onboarding is a context problem: your first weeks you're not working, you're reconstructing what the team already knows. company brain is that context, queryable and able to act. shared memory for your team, in slack: → answers from the company's own knowledge, grounded and cited → acts in your tools as you, files the ticket and assigns it, with your approval → runs on a permissions graph, so it only reads with your access → chimes in only when it can help → same brain and permissions follow you into cursor and claude code when i joined supermemory, i braced for the onboarding tax. it never came. i just asked the company brain
1:50

We launched our Company Brain!! 🧠 onboarding is a context problem: your first weeks you're not working, you're reconstructing what the team already knows. company brain is that context, queryable and able to act. shared memory for your team, in slack: → answers from the company's own knowledge, grounded and cited → acts in your tools as you, files the ticket and assigns it, with your approval → runs on a permissions graph, so it only reads with your access → chimes in only when it can help → same brain and permissions follow you into cursor and claude code when i joined supermemory, i braced for the onboarding tax. it never came. i just asked the company brain

Muskan Jain

44,090 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Buzz is Slack where the agents are teammates instead of integrations. Here's what that unlocks: Agents: - The ones you start with are just defaults - Edit them, add your own, write their instructions like a system prompt Swappable Harness: - This is the killer feature - Swap Claude Code, Codex, Goose under the same agent Context: - Every chat you've had with that agent carries over to the new harness - Global skills and skill files come too Think: Slack = the shape Agents = the teammates Harness = the engine you can change without losing anything "I get model fatigue" is a real thing. Buzz sits one layer above it.
3:58

Buzz is Slack where the agents are teammates instead of integrations. Here's what that unlocks: Agents: - The ones you start with are just defaults - Edit them, add your own, write their instructions like a system prompt Swappable Harness: - This is the killer feature - Swap Claude Code, Codex, Goose under the same agent Context: - Every chat you've had with that agent carries over to the new harness - Global skills and skill files come too Think: Slack = the shape Agents = the teammates Harness = the engine you can change without losing anything "I get model fatigue" is a real thing. Buzz sits one layer above it.

The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃

43,523 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

UI Skills are now easier for agents. Introducing UI Skills CLI. ask Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, or any agent to use the CLI, like: "use `npx ui-skills start` to fix the motion in this dialog" it finds the best design-engineering skill for the job and uses it as context
0:20

UI Skills are now easier for agents. Introducing UI Skills CLI. ask Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, or any agent to use the CLI, like: "use `npx ui-skills start` to fix the motion in this dialog" it finds the best design-engineering skill for the job and uses it as context

Ibelick

62,979 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

I ran the same task on Claude Code and DeepSeek's new agent harness. One cost $150. The other cost $2. Today we're launching (AgentSky), the "OpenRouter for Agents" — one API → Claude Code, Codex, DeepSeek, Kimi, OpenCode, and every major agent in the cloud. And Agent Playground on top: race them on your own task, with your real tools (GitHub, Gmail, more), side by side in a browser: time, cost, tokens burnt. Guess which one was $2.
1:07

I ran the same task on Claude Code and DeepSeek's new agent harness. One cost $150. The other cost $2. Today we're launching (AgentSky), the "OpenRouter for Agents" — one API → Claude Code, Codex, DeepSeek, Kimi, OpenCode, and every major agent in the cloud. And Agent Playground on top: race them on your own task, with your real tools (GitHub, Gmail, more), side by side in a browser: time, cost, tokens burnt. Guess which one was $2.

Xiaoyin Qu

2,225,010 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The reason your AI gives generic answers isn't the model. It's that your company's knowledge lives in 12 different tools and your agent can't see any of it. So here's how to build a context database your agents can actually use: 1) Pull it in: - Slack, email, meetings, docs, tickets - Auto-collected on a schedule into one place. 2) Clean it up. - An agent files what matters and drops the noise, so your brain doesn't bloat. 3) Store it as memory. - Folders of files your agents read from and write back to as they learn. 4) Point your agents at it. - Now they draft, build, and ship with full context instead of guessing. Same model. Same agent. The difference is whether it can understand your company or not. Build the database once. Everything downstream gets smarter.
8:17

The reason your AI gives generic answers isn't the model. It's that your company's knowledge lives in 12 different tools and your agent can't see any of it. So here's how to build a context database your agents can actually use: 1) Pull it in: - Slack, email, meetings, docs, tickets - Auto-collected on a schedule into one place. 2) Clean it up. - An agent files what matters and drops the noise, so your brain doesn't bloat. 3) Store it as memory. - Folders of files your agents read from and write back to as they learn. 4) Point your agents at it. - Now they draft, build, and ship with full context instead of guessing. Same model. Same agent. The difference is whether it can understand your company or not. Build the database once. Everything downstream gets smarter.

The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃

13,666 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten