Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Your degree wouldn't impress Plato. He was a warrior who could kill you with their bare hands. Modern education forgot this. And that's why it fails. While we're producing fragile academics, the Greeks were creating elite leaders. By 18, every "intellectual" in ancient Greece was: • A trained horseman...

19,166 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Devan Rohrich
Devan Rohrichvor 1 Jahr

“You disagree with my theory? How about I rip your head off and you try to stop me?” Vitalism at its finest…

Profilbild von Alex Petkas - Cost of Glory
Alex Petkas - Cost of Gloryvor 1 Jahr

I got your logos right here buddy

Profilbild von Rob S.
Rob S.vor 1 Jahr

Is this bait? Socrates is known to have served in battle as a hoplite but not likely as a commander. There’s scant evidence of Plato having done anything as a soldier other than his mandatory commitments as an Athenian. Aristotle is not known to been involved in fighting at all.

Profilbild von Nikolias Goninus
Nikolias Goninusvor 1 Jahr

Very well said. The return of the philosopher kings is upon us, though.

Profilbild von ArsenalGreek13
ArsenalGreek13vor 1 Jahr

Listening to Lysander right now.

Profilbild von Alex Petkas - Cost of Glory
Alex Petkas - Cost of Gloryvor 1 Jahr

my man!

Profilbild von Matt Walton
Matt Waltonvor 1 Jahr

Been not impressing people my whole life why should Plato be any different

Profilbild von Morgio Zoroger 🇺🇸
Morgio Zoroger 🇺🇸vor 1 Jahr

How many people was Plato?

Profilbild von Alex Petkas - Cost of Glory
Alex Petkas - Cost of Gloryvor 1 Jahr

"I am Plato"

Profilbild von Austonian Content Farmer
Austonian Content Farmervor 1 Jahr

VIRTUS

Ähnliche Videos

This is the moment that Leader of the Islamic Republic, Khamenei.ir , issued orders that put a price on my life through the head of the Revolutionary Guards, Hossein Salami, and other high-ranking IRGC commanders you see in this video. All these men are gone now, removed from the battlefield and history. And five hitmen hired by Iran’s regime are behind bars here in America not in Tehran, not in Qom, but in U.S. custody because they plotted violence on American soil. How would you feel if you woke up one day and heard that the men who ordered the massacre of your beloved people, the men responsible for killing your friends, your neighbors, your country’s daughters and sons, were gone? Some in the West is it still confused but those who have suffered under a terrorist regime, whether in Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea, or any dictatorship, know this feeling: a tornado of grief and rage mixes in your veins until your body trembles with it. It isn’t philosophy. It isn’t politics. It is about survival. It is about death and life. I wish I could publish every single order he signed, every command that turned his soldiers into executioners and innocent people into targets. Do you understand what it means when a regime calls for your death? When every step outside your home could be the last? We don’t have the luxury of debating human rights or ideology when every dawn could be your last. We fight to live, to breathe, to raise a family, to have a normal life without fear. In the United States or Europe, if you don’t like your president, you have another option, it’s called an election, and you vote. We didn’t have that choice. I wish I could bring every Iranian woman and men who lost just one eye, every survivor, on every campus, in every capital to every American and European university. Let them stare in the faces of the privileged and say: this is what terror looks like. Again; This is not politics. This is life and death. This is about surviving. Stand with those who survived. If not now, then when?

Masih Alinejad

295,433 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

A for Almajiri Education is the foundation of any functioning economy, and Nigerians are some of the most intelligent people in other countries but with most out of school children on planet earth. As a basic human right, it is the responsibility of the whole society to not only advocate for modern curriculums that have practical and realistic value in sustaining the economy of that society in the future, but to hold their leaders accountable when they don’t invest the appropriate resources and relevance into education. This is the reason why Almajiri still exists today in 21st century, while religious education and modern education can be attained together using curriculums that are realistic and set a foundation for the future of the students and their society. Today, I taught my primary 2 students how to make a PPT using iPads. Giving presentations and using smart devices are now common in professional work places and it’s important that start giving my kids those skill sets at a young age. It will build their work ethic, confidence, realistic expectations in life and navigate them to seamlessly fit into any professional environment they find themselves in now and the future. An important teaching approach I use here is to show them less of how to do it, and just throw them into the situation to see how they can find their ways and create solutions. Only when they need help is when we show them how to do it. It makes them used to problem solving, resilience, less likely to be lazy and dependent. They themselves will be strong to initiate tackling an unknown problem and develop confidence and humility in asking for help or knowledge when they need it. Nigeria needs proper budget allocation for education and modern/designed curriculums that are useful to students and the country in the future. Vote for leaders who will enthusiastically execute these policies. If they don’t, impeach them and take any necessary action against them because they are not only destroying your economic future, but your children’s future as well. This is my idea. What must be done to fix education in Nigeria? Let’s hear from you in the comment section.

Dan Bello

170,009 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

When he said, “take the guns first, go through due process second," he was testing how far he could go. When he declared journalists the “enemy of the people,” he was testing how far he could go. When he raped a woman and inserted his finger against her will, he was testing how far he could go. When he called our military “suckers and losers” and ridiculed a tortured POW hero, he was testing how far he could go. When he called himself “the chosen one” he was testing how far he could go. When he said, “we took the freedom of speech away,” he was testing how far he could go. When he called for arresting opposition lawmakers, he was testing how far he could go. When he talked about the breasts and legs of his newly-born daughter, he was testing how far he could go. When he incited a violent insurrection against the peaceful transfer of power, he was testing how far he could go. When he called for prosecuting Americans for exercising their First Amendment rights, he was testing how far he could go. When he called himself a "very great and brave soldier" during the Vietnam War (because he avoided sexually transmitted diseases) and later took someone else's Purple Heart because he "always wanted one of these," he was testing how far he could go. When he pressured state officials to "find 11,780 votes," he was testing how far he could go. When he spewed lies about Hillary Clinton and spread conspiracy theories about a "stolen" election, he was testing how far he could go. When he deployed our military against peaceful protesters and threatens to misuse the Insurrection Act, he is testing how far he could go. When he politicized a pandemic, lied, fired scientists and closed departments responsible for managing pandemics, told us to inject bleach and take horse paste, and killed hundreds of thousands of Americans, he was testing how far he could go. When he said “women should be punished,” for having an abortion, he was testing how far he could go. When he violated the Impoundment Control Act and illegally tried to withhold nearly $400 million in Congressionally-approved military aid to Ukraine and shook down Zelenskyy, he was testing how far he could go. When he violated the Presidential Records and Espionage Acts and stole highly classified documents, lied about having them, refused to return them, and stored them in a bathroom at his resort frequented by spies, showing them off to guests without clearance, he was testing how far he could go. When he said working women "should feel nervous" about losing their jobs if they get pregnant, he was testing how far he could go. When he paid $130,000 in campaign funds to hush up the fact he boinked a porn star while his 3rd wife was pregnant with his 5th child from three different women, he was testing how far he could go. When he said he was "smarter than the generals," he was testing how far he could go. When he said we “won’t have to vote anymore” he was testing how far he could go. When he said, "windmills cause cancer," he was testing how far he could go. When he referred to himself as "king," he was testing how far he could go. When he transferred trillions in wealth to the top while working Americans struggle, he was testing how far he could go. When he ridiculed and belittled accomplished women, he was testing how far he could go. When he said there were “very fine people on both sides” after the violent white-nationalist rally in Charlottesville, he was testing how far he could go. When he said “an eye for an eye” was the Bible verse that most influenced his character, in defiance of Jesus Christ's pivotal teaching, he was testing how far he could go. When he zip-tied American children and threatened to deport American citizens, he was testing how far he could go. When he pardoned thousands of convicted terrorists who attacked our Capitol and police, he was testing how far he could go. When he praised brutal regimes and dictators, he was testing how far he could go. When he says “Trump 2028,” he is testing how far he could go. Trump’s been testing how far he could go—until we finally decide he’s gone too far. #Trump2028 GOP

Bryan Dawson🇺🇸

107,798 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Ivan Passer on the reason why 'Intimate Lighting' (1965) was banned by the communist government in Czechoslovakia for 20 years: "Interviewer: It seems inconceivable that 'Intimate Lighting' (1965), an almost plotless comedy about the everyday pleasures of life, should have been banned for 20 years. Can you explain it? Passer: I believe that the Party was worried when they saw ordinary people, with all their weaknesses and strengths, depicted on screen. I think they also preferred to be attacked directly rather than to be ignored completely. Before the clampdown, Milos and I got together to discuss how in this godforsaken country we could make good movies. We took a piece of paper and we wrote down several points like “it should be a comedy,” because the Communist Party and the censorship were more tolerant with comedies. “It should be shot outside of the studio, in the streets,” because they would not look over our shoulder that much. “We will use non actors” and “We will use natural light.” My first film, using these precepts, was a 20-minute short, 'A Boring Afternoon' (1964), about all the things that happen when, ostensibly, nothing is happening. Miroslav Ondricek, who shot it, was a soccer fan. He believed that his filming a number of matches made him more able to work with non-actors who could not be expected to hit their marks for lighting. When casting Intimate Lighting, which was about a group of friends who play music together, I had to decide whether to have actors pretending to play instruments, or musicians who I could get to act. I settled for non-actors. We were at a music school, and I literally grabbed the principal in the corridor and asked him if he would play the lead role of the cellist. At first he didn’t want to do it, but after he read the script, he said, “It’s about me.”" (Ivan Passer's interview with Ronald Bergan, Film Comment, 2016) P.S: On this day, 61 years ago, 'Intimate Lighting' (1965) was released in Czechoslovakia.

DepressedBergman

17,774 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Last week in Harrison, Arkansas, 16-year-old Brayden Anderson was with a group of friends when a gun being handled by another boy accidentally discharged. Brayden was struck and killed. The young man holding that weapon has since been charged with negligent homicide. Tomorrow, Brayden will be laid to rest. His father, Aaron, has invited everyone to Brayden’s Celebration of Life. The community. The first responders who were on scene that day. Every teenager who was in that room when Brayden was killed. Everyone. He has made it clear that there will be no hatred, no hostility and no pointing fingers. Tonight, I watched this video of Aaron saying he forgives the boy who was holding the gun. “Two lives were destroyed that day… We still have a chance to save one.” That stopped me. This man is preparing to bury his 16-year-old son, and he is worried about the boy who accidentally killed him. He knows that boy will carry this for the rest of his life, and he doesn’t want this tragedy to destroy what remains of it. I don’t know if I could do what Aaron is doing. I look at the way he is walking through the unimaginable, and I see a Christ-centered life in a way I can only dream of living one day. There is something incredibly humbling about watching someone live out the faith I profess when it costs this much. Please watch his video. And please pray. Pray for Aaron and his family as they lay Brayden to rest tomorrow. Pray for the kids who were in that room. Pray for the first responders who answered that call. And please pray for the young man who was holding that gun. Aaron is asking us to. I think we should. 🙏

SharrellAnne

120,175 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat