Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

"Your Excellency, I would like to state with complete clarity that this MoU does not mention ballistic missiles. It was never on the table, it was never on the agenda, and the Iranian side never wanted to discuss it. That is not an impression; it is a fact. Therefore,...

GovtofPakistan's profile picture

Government of Pakistan

3,313,189 subscribers

25,255 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

JUST IN: Pakistan’s PM Shehbaz Sharif on the MOU & Irans ballistic missiles: “This MOU does not mention ballistic missiles. It was never on the table; it was never on the agenda. Iran's side never wanted to even discuss about it.”
0:56

JUST IN: Pakistan’s PM Shehbaz Sharif on the MOU & Irans ballistic missiles: “This MOU does not mention ballistic missiles. It was never on the table; it was never on the agenda. Iran's side never wanted to even discuss about it.”

Sulaiman Ahmed

35,865 views • 1 month ago

🇮🇷🇵🇰🇺🇸⚡️– Pakistan’s Prime Minister, Shehbaz Sharif: This MoU does not mention ballistic missiles. It was never on the table; it was never on the agenda. Iran's side never wanted to even discuss about it.
0:29

🇮🇷🇵🇰🇺🇸⚡️– Pakistan’s Prime Minister, Shehbaz Sharif: This MoU does not mention ballistic missiles. It was never on the table; it was never on the agenda. Iran's side never wanted to even discuss about it.

MonitorX

55,429 views • 1 month ago

BREAKING: Pakistani Prime Minister confirms that Iran's Missile Program will not be discussed with the Americans "This MoU does not mention ballistic missiles. Iran's side never wanted to even discuss about it"
0:29

BREAKING: Pakistani Prime Minister confirms that Iran's Missile Program will not be discussed with the Americans "This MoU does not mention ballistic missiles. Iran's side never wanted to even discuss about it"

Daily Iran News

28,644 views • 1 month ago

🇵🇰 Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif contradicts himself on whether Iran’s ballistic missile program is part of the U.S.-Iran negotiations. Video below shows Sharif telling Pakistan’s parliament that the 60-day U.S.-Iran negotiations would address Iran’s ballistic missile program and resolve the issue “in a manner that ensures lasting global peace.” But while hosting Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian today (linked post), he points out: “This MoU does not mention ballistic missiles. It was never on the table; it was never on the agenda. Iran’s side never wanted to even discuss about it.”
0:42

🇵🇰 Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif contradicts himself on whether Iran’s ballistic missile program is part of the U.S.-Iran negotiations. Video below shows Sharif telling Pakistan’s parliament that the 60-day U.S.-Iran negotiations would address Iran’s ballistic missile program and resolve the issue “in a manner that ensures lasting global peace.” But while hosting Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian today (linked post), he points out: “This MoU does not mention ballistic missiles. It was never on the table; it was never on the agenda. Iran’s side never wanted to even discuss about it.”

Drop Site

44,951 views • 1 month ago

Prime Minister of Belgium Bart De Wever on frozen Russian assets: ◾️The Russian assets will remain immobilized until the end of the war. ◾️Let me be very clear about this. If it were up to me, every single euro of that money would be used for reparations and for the reconstruction of Ukraine. I would be very sad to see even one euro returned to Moscow. ◾️We also have to face a difficult truth: not all European countries are equally pro-Ukrainian. At some point, some may say they no longer want to prolong sanctions. If that happens, the assets would have to be released immediately. ◾️We are not at war with Russia. Europe is not at war with Russia. ◾️You cannot simply confiscate money — that is an act of war, and it should not be underestimated. It has never happened in history. Even during the Second World War, immobilized assets were never confiscated.
0:42

Prime Minister of Belgium Bart De Wever on frozen Russian assets: ◾️The Russian assets will remain immobilized until the end of the war. ◾️Let me be very clear about this. If it were up to me, every single euro of that money would be used for reparations and for the reconstruction of Ukraine. I would be very sad to see even one euro returned to Moscow. ◾️We also have to face a difficult truth: not all European countries are equally pro-Ukrainian. At some point, some may say they no longer want to prolong sanctions. If that happens, the assets would have to be released immediately. ◾️We are not at war with Russia. Europe is not at war with Russia. ◾️You cannot simply confiscate money — that is an act of war, and it should not be underestimated. It has never happened in history. Even during the Second World War, immobilized assets were never confiscated.

Anton Gerashchenko

272,458 views • 6 months ago

What is Netanyahu expected to say to the president? The main problem with the ballistic-missile story is that the Iranians have caught on to the daylight—the gap—between Israel and the United States. What happened here is that Donald Trump gave his word and then broke it. "We will not allow Iran to have nuclear weapons." But he didn’t talk about conventional weapons—the ballistic missiles that threaten Israel. They threaten Israel to such an extent that Netanyahu himself, in a video announcing to the Israeli people that he was launching Operation Nation of Lions, said that two existential threats had developed. The nuclear threat—you’ve known about for years—but also the threat of thousands of ballistic missiles. What has happened since then? The Iranians are not acting at all on the nuclear front, as far as we know. They have not even extracted the enriched material buried underground. But they are very much intensifying their experiments with ballistic missiles. Either because they think it is threatening, or because, as Netanyahu says, it is an existential threat to Israel. We also have a race between the number of their missiles and the number of our missiles—and let’s say that both countries need to recover on this issue. Let’s ask the question now, and here I don’t have an answer. When Netanyahu goes to Washington to talk to Trump about this, is he talking to him about a combined attack—which seems a bit far-fetched to me, because the Americans really have no intention of getting involved in a conventional weapons conflict anywhere in the world; otherwise they would never get out of it—or is he content to give Israel permission to attack on its own, with the U.S. providing a defensive umbrella? One. Two, it should also be said, in this context, that there is a big debate in the Israeli cabinet and at the top about whether it is possible to launch an attack every six months. You cannot—unlike the nuclear project—you cannot eliminate the Iranian ballistic threat. Is it sustainable to come every six months, eight months, and launch another round, which includes them firing at us, all the flights leaving Israel, and all the implications for the economy? There is no decision in Israel. There is no decision in the U.S. that's what they will discuss.
1:46

What is Netanyahu expected to say to the president? The main problem with the ballistic-missile story is that the Iranians have caught on to the daylight—the gap—between Israel and the United States. What happened here is that Donald Trump gave his word and then broke it. "We will not allow Iran to have nuclear weapons." But he didn’t talk about conventional weapons—the ballistic missiles that threaten Israel. They threaten Israel to such an extent that Netanyahu himself, in a video announcing to the Israeli people that he was launching Operation Nation of Lions, said that two existential threats had developed. The nuclear threat—you’ve known about for years—but also the threat of thousands of ballistic missiles. What has happened since then? The Iranians are not acting at all on the nuclear front, as far as we know. They have not even extracted the enriched material buried underground. But they are very much intensifying their experiments with ballistic missiles. Either because they think it is threatening, or because, as Netanyahu says, it is an existential threat to Israel. We also have a race between the number of their missiles and the number of our missiles—and let’s say that both countries need to recover on this issue. Let’s ask the question now, and here I don’t have an answer. When Netanyahu goes to Washington to talk to Trump about this, is he talking to him about a combined attack—which seems a bit far-fetched to me, because the Americans really have no intention of getting involved in a conventional weapons conflict anywhere in the world; otherwise they would never get out of it—or is he content to give Israel permission to attack on its own, with the U.S. providing a defensive umbrella? One. Two, it should also be said, in this context, that there is a big debate in the Israeli cabinet and at the top about whether it is possible to launch an attack every six months. You cannot—unlike the nuclear project—you cannot eliminate the Iranian ballistic threat. Is it sustainable to come every six months, eight months, and launch another round, which includes them firing at us, all the flights leaving Israel, and all the implications for the economy? There is no decision in Israel. There is no decision in the U.S. that's what they will discuss.

Amit Segal

273,898 views • 7 months ago

In the middle of war, the world still does not recognize the antisemitism targeting #Israel. The Jewish state is at war with Islamist #Iran regime. Normally, the two sides should sit face-to-face and sort out their differences, end the war. BUT Iran refuses to recognize the very existence of Israel, and wants it annihilated (if it could). Anchor on Shams TV (Kurdish Iraqi) got all worked up when I suggested that Israel must be given a seat at the table of the negotiations to end the Israel Iran war. Why is Iran nuclear Israel's business? "Ms. Enas," I said, "this is why: It takes an Iranian missile an hour to get to America (if Iran gets the tech). It takes only seven minutes, as we see on our screens today, for an Iranian missile to reach Israel. Therefore, an Iranian nuke is an existential threat to Israel, but not to America, and that's why, Israel should be at the table."
2:45

In the middle of war, the world still does not recognize the antisemitism targeting #Israel. The Jewish state is at war with Islamist #Iran regime. Normally, the two sides should sit face-to-face and sort out their differences, end the war. BUT Iran refuses to recognize the very existence of Israel, and wants it annihilated (if it could). Anchor on Shams TV (Kurdish Iraqi) got all worked up when I suggested that Israel must be given a seat at the table of the negotiations to end the Israel Iran war. Why is Iran nuclear Israel's business? "Ms. Enas," I said, "this is why: It takes an Iranian missile an hour to get to America (if Iran gets the tech). It takes only seven minutes, as we see on our screens today, for an Iranian missile to reach Israel. Therefore, an Iranian nuke is an existential threat to Israel, but not to America, and that's why, Israel should be at the table."

Hussain Abdul-Hussain

11,381 views • 1 year ago

Egypt's President Sisi at the opening of Octagon state HQ in new Egyptian capital: There was a day when the Constitutional Court was besieged. And another day, the Council of Ministers was besieged. And on another day, they threatened the Ministry of Defense. And on another day, they besieged the Media Production City. It was imperative for the State to move out of the capital, and for this situation not to happen again. I am speaking with utmost frankness here. The State must move out of the capital so that this scenario is never repeated. The evil-doers and the terrorists will not stop. And God helps us, but we must also take the necessary precautions. Therefore, the State could no longer remain there. The parliament will not be there, the cabinet will not be there, and the Ministry of Defense will not be there, as it used to be. No, that is over. No one can ever do that in Egypt again.
1:36

Egypt's President Sisi at the opening of Octagon state HQ in new Egyptian capital: There was a day when the Constitutional Court was besieged. And another day, the Council of Ministers was besieged. And on another day, they threatened the Ministry of Defense. And on another day, they besieged the Media Production City. It was imperative for the State to move out of the capital, and for this situation not to happen again. I am speaking with utmost frankness here. The State must move out of the capital so that this scenario is never repeated. The evil-doers and the terrorists will not stop. And God helps us, but we must also take the necessary precautions. Therefore, the State could no longer remain there. The parliament will not be there, the cabinet will not be there, and the Ministry of Defense will not be there, as it used to be. No, that is over. No one can ever do that in Egypt again.

Clash Report

284,235 views • 27 days ago

Last year I met with Prime Minister @Netanyahu to discuss Iran. Let’s be crystal clear: the Iranian regime doesn’t want peace — it wants power, destruction, and death. Iran must never be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon. Not now. Not ever.
0:36

Last year I met with Prime Minister @Netanyahu to discuss Iran. Let’s be crystal clear: the Iranian regime doesn’t want peace — it wants power, destruction, and death. Iran must never be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon. Not now. Not ever.

Rep. David Kustoff

14,982 views • 1 year ago

SITREP IRAN: I said it in 2016 but nobody wanted to heed the warnings. Iran is the most dangerous threat in the Middle East, and it always has been. Ballistic missile capabilities with global reach. Iran was a designated state sponsor of terrorism (the regime still is). While Washington was debating talking points back then, the Iranian leadership was on the ground in Iraq, acting as field commanders in active combat zones killing American Soldiers. I said it then, and I will say it now: The region could not stabilize with Iranian leadership directing battles on Iraqi soil (never mind directing all their other surrogates—Hamas, HZ, Houthis). We had a responsibility to draw that line, but we failed to (and like it or not, here we are again). Everything unfolding in the Middle East today traces back to decisions that were never made and warnings that were never heeded. I was not wrong in 2016. It doesn’t mean what we’re doing now will work (I pray it does). War is a very complex and very uncertain human endeavor. The truth does not expire. It just gets more expensive to ignore. Donald J. Trump JD Vance
1:41

SITREP IRAN: I said it in 2016 but nobody wanted to heed the warnings. Iran is the most dangerous threat in the Middle East, and it always has been. Ballistic missile capabilities with global reach. Iran was a designated state sponsor of terrorism (the regime still is). While Washington was debating talking points back then, the Iranian leadership was on the ground in Iraq, acting as field commanders in active combat zones killing American Soldiers. I said it then, and I will say it now: The region could not stabilize with Iranian leadership directing battles on Iraqi soil (never mind directing all their other surrogates—Hamas, HZ, Houthis). We had a responsibility to draw that line, but we failed to (and like it or not, here we are again). Everything unfolding in the Middle East today traces back to decisions that were never made and warnings that were never heeded. I was not wrong in 2016. It doesn’t mean what we’re doing now will work (I pray it does). War is a very complex and very uncertain human endeavor. The truth does not expire. It just gets more expensive to ignore. Donald J. Trump JD Vance

General Mike Flynn

177,155 views • 4 months ago

Back on with Erin Burnett. It is not tolerable to let Iran inflict economic terrorism on the world economy via control of the Strait of Hormuz. Iranian fatwas are not worth the paper they're written on. Iran can never have nuclear weapons or ballistic missiles. Donald J. Trump knows that.
5:18

Back on with Erin Burnett. It is not tolerable to let Iran inflict economic terrorism on the world economy via control of the Strait of Hormuz. Iranian fatwas are not worth the paper they're written on. Iran can never have nuclear weapons or ballistic missiles. Donald J. Trump knows that.

Michael Eisenberg

28,716 views • 4 months ago

🚨 IRAN: THE TALKS WERE ALWAYS A LIE — EVIL DOESN’T NEGOTIATE The negotiations were doomed from the start. You cannot negotiate with a terrorist Islamic dictatorship that: – Massacres its own people by the tens of thousands – Builds ballistic missiles, not peace – Chants death to Israel and America – Funds terror proxies across the region This regime does not want reform. It does not want compromise. It survives on fear, blood, and lies. Appeasement only buys them time — time to kill more Iranians, to threaten their neighbors, to tighten the noose on an entire nation. There comes a moment when diplomacy becomes complicity. That moment is now. It’s time to stop pretending this is a government. It’s time to stand with the Iranian people — not their oppressors. You can’t negotiate with evil. You end it.
0:22

🚨 IRAN: THE TALKS WERE ALWAYS A LIE — EVIL DOESN’T NEGOTIATE The negotiations were doomed from the start. You cannot negotiate with a terrorist Islamic dictatorship that: – Massacres its own people by the tens of thousands – Builds ballistic missiles, not peace – Chants death to Israel and America – Funds terror proxies across the region This regime does not want reform. It does not want compromise. It survives on fear, blood, and lies. Appeasement only buys them time — time to kill more Iranians, to threaten their neighbors, to tighten the noose on an entire nation. There comes a moment when diplomacy becomes complicity. That moment is now. It’s time to stop pretending this is a government. It’s time to stand with the Iranian people — not their oppressors. You can’t negotiate with evil. You end it.

Jim Ferguson

54,167 views • 5 months ago

Indian Ambassador to Russia Vinay Kumar says, "The first outcome of the visit is that there is full understanding of the threat that terrorism emanating from Pakistan poses to the larger international community, not only India. Second, there is a complete understanding that this threat needs to be tackled... It has been stated by Russian officials yesterday that the fight has to be joined, and there is unflinching support for the fight against terrorism. There is also an understanding that it cannot be business as usual and that there is a need to take a tough stand. While we all want this problem to be resolved through political and diplomatic means, India has the right to defend itself if Pakistan does not stop using terrorism as a state policy."
1:20

Indian Ambassador to Russia Vinay Kumar says, "The first outcome of the visit is that there is full understanding of the threat that terrorism emanating from Pakistan poses to the larger international community, not only India. Second, there is a complete understanding that this threat needs to be tackled... It has been stated by Russian officials yesterday that the fight has to be joined, and there is unflinching support for the fight against terrorism. There is also an understanding that it cannot be business as usual and that there is a need to take a tough stand. While we all want this problem to be resolved through political and diplomatic means, India has the right to defend itself if Pakistan does not stop using terrorism as a state policy."

Aditya Raj Kaul

118,780 views • 1 year ago

Iran's Rejects Temporary Ceasefires With America, Says Keep Washington EXHAUSTED Hamid-Reza Haji-Babai, Deputy Speaker of the Iranian Parliament: We should NEVER be in a ceasefire with America. It does not mean we don't negotiate, but we should not accept the ceasefire-and-war duality. We should NOT allow America to attack whenever it wants and withdraw whenever it wants. We must keep America EXHAUSTED, keep it on its feet, not let it rest. From the start we will never reach an understanding with America. America's demands cannot be reconciled with the demands of the great Iranian nation.
2:21

Iran's Rejects Temporary Ceasefires With America, Says Keep Washington EXHAUSTED Hamid-Reza Haji-Babai, Deputy Speaker of the Iranian Parliament: We should NEVER be in a ceasefire with America. It does not mean we don't negotiate, but we should not accept the ceasefire-and-war duality. We should NOT allow America to attack whenever it wants and withdraw whenever it wants. We must keep America EXHAUSTED, keep it on its feet, not let it rest. From the start we will never reach an understanding with America. America's demands cannot be reconciled with the demands of the great Iranian nation.

Ryan Rozbiani

14,852 views • 4 days ago

Levin: This MOU is intentionally silent about ballistic missiles. Iran is a free to manufacture thousands and thousands more of them. There is no limit on its ability to produce them. Despite all of the denials, the MOU is a massive cash cow to the Iranian regime. We will give the regime $24 billion that we have been withholding from them. The regime will now control the Strait of Hormuz—nothing stops it from controlling it—and will be able charge whatever it wishes after 60 days.
2:07

Levin: This MOU is intentionally silent about ballistic missiles. Iran is a free to manufacture thousands and thousands more of them. There is no limit on its ability to produce them. Despite all of the denials, the MOU is a massive cash cow to the Iranian regime. We will give the regime $24 billion that we have been withholding from them. The regime will now control the Strait of Hormuz—nothing stops it from controlling it—and will be able charge whatever it wishes after 60 days.

Acyn

116,161 views • 1 month ago

NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “Will the United States pick the next leader of Iran, or will the Iranian people pick the next leader?” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC): “No. I talked to the Crown Prince. He’s got some ideas about transition. There will be no American boots on the ground. This is not Iraq. This is not Germany. This is not Japan. We’re going to free the people up from the terrorist regime. And the goal is not only to help the Iranian people to chart a new destiny, to make sure no matter who takes over in Iran, no matter who it is, no matter who the people pick, they cannot become the largest state sponsor of terrorism. They can’t fuel Hezbollah, the Houthis, and Hamas. They can’t have ballistic missiles. They can’t have a nuclear weapon. They will be out of the terrorism business. So the people will pick. As to the people, choose wisely. We want to be your friend. We’d like to have a good relationship with you going forward, but that is up to you.”
0:52

NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “Will the United States pick the next leader of Iran, or will the Iranian people pick the next leader?” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC): “No. I talked to the Crown Prince. He’s got some ideas about transition. There will be no American boots on the ground. This is not Iraq. This is not Germany. This is not Japan. We’re going to free the people up from the terrorist regime. And the goal is not only to help the Iranian people to chart a new destiny, to make sure no matter who takes over in Iran, no matter who it is, no matter who the people pick, they cannot become the largest state sponsor of terrorism. They can’t fuel Hezbollah, the Houthis, and Hamas. They can’t have ballistic missiles. They can’t have a nuclear weapon. They will be out of the terrorism business. So the people will pick. As to the people, choose wisely. We want to be your friend. We’d like to have a good relationship with you going forward, but that is up to you.”

RedWave Press

588,126 views • 5 months ago

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan: I want to make it very clear that Israel’s actions in Syria should not first be presented or identified within the perspective of Turkish security concerns. It is violating the territorial integrity and sovereignty of a nation-state called Syria, and it is occupying it. It is a major national security threat for Syria, just as it is a national security threat for Lebanon, the West Bank, and Gaza. Therefore, I think all the Arab countries, the Muslim countries, the regional countries, the Europeans, and everybody else should come together and confront this policy.
1:02

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan: I want to make it very clear that Israel’s actions in Syria should not first be presented or identified within the perspective of Turkish security concerns. It is violating the territorial integrity and sovereignty of a nation-state called Syria, and it is occupying it. It is a major national security threat for Syria, just as it is a national security threat for Lebanon, the West Bank, and Gaza. Therefore, I think all the Arab countries, the Muslim countries, the regional countries, the Europeans, and everybody else should come together and confront this policy.

Clash Report

69,591 views • 2 months ago

.Secretary Marco Rubio on the deadly missile attack on Kyiv: "It is horrible that those missiles landed. What is even worse is there are people today who were alive yesterday that are not alive today because this war continues. The President wants to stop it, and everyone should be thanking the President for being a peacemaker."
1:15

.Secretary Marco Rubio on the deadly missile attack on Kyiv: "It is horrible that those missiles landed. What is even worse is there are people today who were alive yesterday that are not alive today because this war continues. The President wants to stop it, and everyone should be thanking the President for being a peacemaker."

Trump War Room

61,645 views • 1 year ago

🇺🇦 Zelensky: At the heart of Russia’s war against Ukraine is the false claim that Ukraine does not exist, that it is supposedly part of Russia. It is not just a matter of history, not just politics or ideology. This is the basis of their goal – to completely wipe Ukraine off the face of the earth. And not just Ukraine. Russia has repeatedly openly stated that it wants to control all its neighbors. It wants to decide what security should be in Europe and whether it should exist at all. Russia has spread its idea of ​​war all the way to Syria and Africa. This is truly a global threat. It is important that many in the world perceive it as such – as a global threat.
0:55

🇺🇦 Zelensky: At the heart of Russia’s war against Ukraine is the false claim that Ukraine does not exist, that it is supposedly part of Russia. It is not just a matter of history, not just politics or ideology. This is the basis of their goal – to completely wipe Ukraine off the face of the earth. And not just Ukraine. Russia has repeatedly openly stated that it wants to control all its neighbors. It wants to decide what security should be in Europe and whether it should exist at all. Russia has spread its idea of ​​war all the way to Syria and Africa. This is truly a global threat. It is important that many in the world perceive it as such – as a global threat.

MAKS 25 🇺🇦👀

13,932 views • 3 months ago