正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Yuval Noah Harari, speaking at the WEF: "Control of data might enable human elites to do something even more radical than just build digital dictatorships." "By hacking organisms, elites may gain the power to re-engineer the future of life itself." "If indeed we succeed in hacking and engineering life,...

202,306 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

11 条评论

MarCam50 的头像
MarCam501 年前

I put this guy right up there with Bill Gates and George Soros. All three hate humanity and would love to destroy what God has created because their strongest drive is pride. They hate God and disrespect his creation.

A Cathleen 的头像
A Cathleen1 年前

Blockade @wef Globalist are communist

SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simple 的头像
SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simple1 年前

Quantum computers can break today’s encryption in seconds.🔑 Quantum tech will reshape our digital lives. Governments & hackers are preparing for the quantum era. How about you?🛡️ Don’t get left behind!🧠 Cybersecurity Dictionary for Everyone can help:

Lightmsngr 的头像
Lightmsngr1 年前

You people have a sick and unnatural obsession with playing God. And no matter how much you believe you are God or can improve greatly on His design-you will NEVER achieve this goal. Why? Because you cannot create a soul. Only God can.

Killing America 的头像
Killing America1 年前

Yuval Noah Harari isn’t narcissistic or anything is he?

Henrik Bentzen 的头像
Henrik Bentzen1 年前

Dear Elon, build a spaceship to these deluded monsters and send them on a one way trip to Jupiter. Supply them with food and oxygen enough to last a lifetime, WE are not monsters, like some.

PixiRebel 🇺🇸 的头像
PixiRebel 🇺🇸1 年前

atheism + fascism + technology yikes

Festivus96 的头像
Festivus961 年前

That dude is pure evil.

Christian Frasti Majorana 的头像
Christian Frasti Majorana1 年前

He is dangerous for our democracy.

George D. W. 的头像
George D. W.1 年前

All I see is a shaved head saying words of another’s agenda.

TonyBmnti 的头像
TonyBmnti1 年前

Fuck Off you piece of shit.

相关视频

“The theory of intelligent design holds that there are certain features of life in the universe that are best explained as a product of a creative intelligence.” “The digital code that’s stored in the DNA.” “Patterns in the fossil record.” “The presence of nanomachinery inside life.” Stephen C. Meyer just sat down with me to break down the theory of intelligent design: This theory holds that certain features of life appear to be the “product of a creative intelligence, rather than a strictly undirected physical or material process, such as, in the biological realm, natural selection acting on random mutations.” “All these things are things that we think are best explained because a creative intelligence has played a role in the origin and history of life.” “We have phenomena like the fine-tuning of the initial arrangement of matter and energy at the beginning of the universe and the fine-tuning of the laws and constants of physics.” “The basic parameters of physics fall within very narrow ranges or tolerances outside of which, not only life, but even basic chemistry, would be impossible.” Meyer’s new documentary, The Story of Everything, explored the evidence that humanity and our universe are not the product of random evolution, but that we were created by a designer. “We look at the evidence for the beginning of the universe, and with it, the very real possibility that we’re looking at evidence of a creation event.” “We also look at the discovery of fine-tuning.” “And we look at the interior of the cell and the discoveries of the miniature machinery and the digital code that makes the proteins that make the machines and make everything else inside living cells.” Stephen C. Meyer

Jan Jekielek

19,003 次观看 • 3 个月前

WEF Advisor Yuval Noah Harari’s Chilling Vision: "Useless Eaters" & The End of Human Dignity Yuval Noah Harari, the influential WEF advisor and globalist philosopher, has once again revealed the elite’s dystopian vision for humanity. His message is clear: If you’re not part of the "intelligent design" of technocratic overlords, you’re obsolete—worse than a slave, worse than a serf. You’re meaningless. Harari’s solution for the "left behind"? Drugs and video games. Keep the masses pacified, docile, and disconnected from reality while the elites reshape the world without them. No need for exploitation—just irrelevance. No need for oppression—just engineered despair and dependency. But it gets darker. Harari’s real vision is a digitally enslaved humanity, where survival depends on being plugged into the network—the IBM Cloud, the Microsoft Cloud, the all-seeing AI grid. Disconnected? You won’t just be left behind—you’ll cease to matter. This isn’t speculation. It’s the WEF’s playbook: A world where "you will own nothing and be happy," where human value is determined by your utility to the system. Those who resist? Redundant. Expendable. "Useless eaters." The Truth They Won’t Say Out Loud Harari’s rhetoric is a soft eugenics for the digital age—a world where the elite decide who matters and who doesn’t. No God, no morality, no inherent human dignity—just cold, algorithmic control. But humanity is waking up. We reject this techno-feudalism. We refuse to be digitally serfs in their machine. The future doesn’t belong to the WEF, to Harari, or to their Silicon Valley overlords. It belongs to those who refuse to be erased.

Camus

75,703 次观看 • 11 个月前

We are moving with exponential speed into the Intelligent Age. The #IntelligentAge is not just characterized by artificial intelligence. It will overturn the logic of the industrial world: 1️⃣ Intelligence Replaces Energy as the Primary Source of Power The Industrial Age was built on coal, oil, and electricity. The Intelligent Age is built on artificial intelligence and data. Power no longer belongs to those who control resources but to those who control algorithms. 2️⃣ The End of Standardization Industrial society worshipped uniformity. Assembly lines shaped economies and minds. The Intelligent Age destroys sameness. Personalization at scale becomes the norm. Mass production gives way to mass individuality. 3️⃣ The Collapse of Linear Thinking Industrial logic was linear: extract, produce, distribute. The Intelligent Age is nonlinear, adaptive, self-learning. Static systems will fail. Only intelligent ecosystems will survive. 4️⃣ The Redefinition of Work Machines once replaced muscles. Now they challenge cognition. Entire professions will disappear. New ones will emerge overnight. Work will not be stable - it will be continuously reinvented. 5️⃣ Trust Becomes the Ultimate Currency In the Industrial Age, capital was scarce. In the Intelligent Age, intelligence scales infinitely - but trust does not. Societies that lose trust will lose stability. 6️⃣ Sovereignty Is Transformed Industrial power strengthened nation-states. Intelligent systems ignore borders. Cybersecurity, AI, quantum networks operate globally. Governance must evolve or become irrelevant. 7️⃣ Hierarchies Will Be Challenged Industrial institutions centralized authority. The Intelligent Age distributes influence through platforms and networks. Leadership without legitimacy will collapse. 8️⃣ Education Becomes Permanent Infrastructure The Industrial model educated once for a lifetime of work. The Intelligent Age requires lifelong reskilling. Learning becomes the backbone of economic survival. 9️⃣ GDP Is No Longer Enough Industrial success was measured in output. The Intelligent Age will measure resilience, adaptability, sustainability, and collective intelligence. Growth without systemic intelligence becomes fragility. 🔟 The Ultimate Shift: From External Expansion to Inner Evolution The Industrial Age expanded outward - territory, factories, markets. The Intelligent Age forces inward evolution - ethical judgment, responsibility, cognitive maturity. Technology advances faster than moral frameworks. This gap defines our era.

Klaus Schwab

143,139 次观看 • 5 个月前

✅Explanation of Meaning (by parts): 1. “Why does the world exist? It just does, without a cause” : The author begins with a fundamental existential question about the world’s existence, asserting that it exists without a discernible cause. This rejection of a purposeful origin suggests a view of the Universe as inherently uncaused, challenging traditional notions of a deliberate creation. 2. “Could it not have existed? Yes” : The author acknowledges the contingency of existence, proposing that the world’s existence is not necessary. This opens the possibility that nothingness could have prevailed, emphasizing the arbitrary nature of the Universe’s presence. 3. “Could it have existed in a primitive form, such that intelligent beings never came to be? Yes” : The author further explores alternative scenarios, suggesting that the world could have existed in a simpler state, devoid of conditions for intelligent life. This highlights the fragility of the circumstances that led to intelligence, reinforcing the theme of contingency. 4. “So why does it indeed possess the property of birthing intelligent worlds?” : The author questions why the Universe has the specific capacity to produce intelligent beings, probing the unique conditions that enable such complexity. This shifts focus to the remarkable emergence of intelligence as a defining feature of our world. 5. “It just does, on its own, an absolutely random property” : The author concludes that this capacity is a random attribute, not driven by purpose or design. The emergence of intelligent worlds is portrayed as a chance occurrence, inherent to the Universe’s nature without external causation. 6. “without which neither we nor these questions would exist” : The author underscores the significance of this random property, noting that without it, neither humanity nor the ability to ponder these existential questions would exist. This ties the randomness of the Universe to our own existence and curiosity. 🗝️Main Idea (refined version): The author posits that the world exists without cause, a random phenomenon that could have been absent or existed without intelligent life. Its ability to birth intelligent worlds is an arbitrary property, devoid of purpose, yet critical to our existence and capacity to question reality. This perspective challenges us to confront the contingency of our presence in the Universe, recognizing that our ability to reflect on existence stems from a fortuitous alignment of cosmic conditions. Embracing this randomness invites humility and curiosity, urging us to explore our place in a Universe shaped by chance rather than design, and to find meaning in the fleeting opportunity of intelligent life.

Zafar Mirzo | Quotes

1,706,903 次观看 • 1 年前

The next frontier in protein design will not be defined by structure alone, but by the capacity to engineer motion as a first-class principle of function. This is because dynamics is where the real biology lives. Foundational work by Karplus, Levitt & Warshel made clear that chemistry cannot be understood without motion, mechanism, and scale. Gō, Brooks & others showed that proteins possess characteristic collective motions - low-frequency normal modes that capture how whole molecules bend, breathe, and fluctuate. Frauenfelder then sharpened the picture further: proteins are not static objects occupying a single minimum, but dynamic ensembles traversing rugged energy landscapes. And yet the modern AI revolution in protein science has been, above all, a revolution in structure. In our new paper in Matter, Bo Ni and I ask a different question: not what structure will this sequence adopt? but what sequence will realize a prescribed pattern of motion? VibeGen inverts the conventional design paradigm. Rather than treating dynamics as a consequence to be analyzed after the fact, it makes dynamics the design objective from the outset. Using a language diffusion model with two cooperating agents - a designer that proposes sequences and a predictor that critiques them against the target motion profile - the system converges on de novo proteins with tailored vibrational behavior. One of the most intriguing results is a form of functional degeneracy - distinct sequences and distinct folds can satisfy the same target dynamical specification. For a given functional pattern of motion, evolution may have sampled only a small region of the physically realizable design space. The space of viable molecular mechanics may be far larger than the repertoire biology happened to discover. We have made "vibe" into a cultural metaphor - something intuitive, affective, subjective. But at the molecular scale, vibe is not metaphor: It is physics. For a protein, the vibe is the pattern of motion itself; the fluctuations, resonances, and collective displacements that determine what the molecule can do.

Markus J. Buehler

89,757 次观看 • 3 个月前