Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

12,304 views โ€ข 7 days ago โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

14 Comments

@ConspiracyFly's profile picture
@ConspiracyFly7 days ago

๐Ÿซก

โค Craziest Info Out There โค ๐Ÿซก๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฒ's profile picture
โค Craziest Info Out There โค ๐Ÿซก๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฒ7 days ago

That is soooo crazy cool! My boys go nuts when I say stuff like I think "mythology" is true and our current "reality" is fake AF ๐Ÿ˜” but ofc i bring it up again everytime the opportunity arises ๐Ÿคฃ

E2J's profile picture
E2J7 days ago

If you take a screenshot and read the pages, it tells you that theyโ€™re imaginary beings not real animals that lived.

A Living Woman's profile picture
A Living Woman7 days ago

So interesting!

Grace's profile picture
Grace7 days ago

So interesting cheers

Brandon Thought's profile picture
Brandon Thought6 days ago

As a trained historian with a degree in history, I look at the orthodox narrative and see fundamental logistical flaws. People in the early 1800s were dealing with extreme scarcity. They simply did not have the time, parchment, vellum, or printing resources to produce elaborate, expensive natural history volumes only to casually insert ten pages of pure folklore for amusement. Every page cost real labor and hard materials. The mainstream narrative insists these accounts are pure fiction, yet completely ignores the physical reality of how information was preserved back then. I was labeled fringe and pushed out of academia for pointing this out, but the real absurdity lies with an establishment that ignores practical logic and hijacks our real history.

Steve โœจ Raรฉlien RaรซLyx โœจ's profile picture
Steve โœจ Raรฉlien RaรซLyx โœจ6 days ago

La science savante de 1818 connaissait la mรฉthode empirique, mais l'รฉdition populaire compilait sans opรฉrer de tri. En recyclant les rรฉcits anciens non vรฉrifiรฉs d'Aristote, ces ouvrages confondaient science et traditions textuelles, livrรฉs ainsi sans aucun contrรดle รฉditorial.

bravo_fanatic!๐Ÿ’ฏ's profile picture
bravo_fanatic!๐Ÿ’ฏ6 days ago

Great find

Devianboy's profile picture
Devianboy6 days ago

It literally says this in the introductionโ€ฆwhy you lie? โ€œand that fabulous animals, which never existed but in the fanciful imagination of poets and romancers, had usurped a place among real beingsโ€

Isuru Sampath's profile picture
Isuru Sampath6 days ago

1818. Hmm

Rob Hadley's profile picture
Rob Hadley6 days ago

Unless the chapter is titled mythical animals

Steve โœจ Raรฉlien RaรซLyx โœจ's profile picture
Steve โœจ Raรฉlien RaรซLyx โœจ6 days ago

The scholarly science of 1818 knew the empirical method, but popular publishing compiled without filtering. By recycling Aristotle's unverified ancient accounts, these works confused science and textual traditions, thus delivered without any editorial control.

Groves,Jack's profile picture
Groves,Jack6 days ago

Why democrats wanting to get rid of these old books

GIGERHR's profile picture
GIGERHR7 days ago

Read the legend above the pictures: fictional...fabulous...imagination...and so on

Related Videos