Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🔴 الكارما و العدالة الالهية… احد عناصر “الامن العام الارهابي” تعرّض لعضة كلب! ومنذ تلك اللحظة لم يعد يُعرف: هل هو انسان… ام “كلب”؟ مفارقة قاسية تكشف عبثية هذه الجماعة، التي امتهنت اهانة ابناء الطائفة العلوية الكريمة وتشبيههم بالكلاب فقط لانهم مختلفون عنهم… لكن عدالة السماء ادركتهم، فصاروا هم...

NemesisSYR_'s profile picture

NEMESIS – نيميسس

24,716 subscribers

12,851 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

‼️الله يعزك مثل ما عززتنا يا أبو محمد… الله يرحم الداية التي أنجبتك!! هكذا استقبل بعض السوريين ومعهم الأميركيون الإرهابي الجولاني، القاعدي والداعشي، وقائد جبهة النصرة الإرهابية التي بات اسمها “هيئة تحرير الشام”. المستقبلون، وغالبيتهم من الطائفة السنية المعتدلة، يرفعون السؤال الكبير: بماذا أعزكم هذا الإرهابي؟ هل بتفتيت الجغرافيا السورية؟! أم بتحريض الشعب على بعضه البعض؟! هل بتكفير معظم الطوائف الدينية وإباحة دمها؟ أم بزرع الخوف وانعدام الأمن في كل زاوية من سوريا؟! هل بتهميش الطبقة المتعلمة والمثقفة، واستبدالها بجهلاء لم يكملوا حتى الصف الخامس، لا يملكون سوى دورة شريعة في إدلب؟! بأي عزٍّ تتغنون؟! أن يصبح لسوريا رئيس “سني” فقط؟! أهذا هو معيار الكرامة عندكم؟! أي عزٍّ هذا الذي يُصنع على أكتاف قاتلٍ ومرتكبٍ للفتن؟! وأي كرامة في أن يُرفع شأن من باع الوطن ومزّق نسيجه؟! May God grant you the same honor you gave us, Abu Muhammad… and may God have mercy on the midwife who delivered you!! This is how some Syrians, along with the Americans, welcomed Jolani — the Qaeda affiliate, the ISIS follower, and the leader of Jabhat al-Nusra, now rebranded as “Hayat Tahrir al-Sham.” The crowd, mostly from the moderate Sunni community, raises the big question: What honor has this terrorist brought you? Was it by fragmenting Syrian geography?! By inciting the people against one another?! By declaring most religious sects as infidels and permitting their blood to be shed? By planting fear and stripping away security in every corner of Syria?! By marginalizing the educated and experienced, and replacing them with the ignorant — people who never finished even fifth grade, armed only with a shallow religious course in Idlib?! What kind of honor do you boast about?! That Syria should simply have a “Sunni” president?! Is that your measure of dignity?! What honor is built on the shoulders of a killer and a sower of discord?! And what dignity lies in glorifying someone who sold the homeland and tore apart its social fabric?! #سوريا #الجولاني #هيئة_تحرير_الشام #الطائفة_السنية_المعتدلة #الامن_العام_الارهابي #توثيق #مجازر_الساحل #Syria #Jolani #HTS #ModerateSunniCommunity #SyriaMassacres #StopAlawiteGenocide #CrimesAgainstHumanity
1:02

Sensitive content

‼️الله يعزك مثل ما عززتنا يا أبو محمد… الله يرحم الداية التي أنجبتك!! هكذا استقبل بعض السوريين ومعهم الأميركيون الإرهابي الجولاني، القاعدي والداعشي، وقائد جبهة النصرة الإرهابية التي بات اسمها “هيئة تحرير الشام”. المستقبلون، وغالبيتهم من الطائفة السنية المعتدلة، يرفعون السؤال الكبير: بماذا أعزكم هذا الإرهابي؟ هل بتفتيت الجغرافيا السورية؟! أم بتحريض الشعب على بعضه البعض؟! هل بتكفير معظم الطوائف الدينية وإباحة دمها؟ أم بزرع الخوف وانعدام الأمن في كل زاوية من سوريا؟! هل بتهميش الطبقة المتعلمة والمثقفة، واستبدالها بجهلاء لم يكملوا حتى الصف الخامس، لا يملكون سوى دورة شريعة في إدلب؟! بأي عزٍّ تتغنون؟! أن يصبح لسوريا رئيس “سني” فقط؟! أهذا هو معيار الكرامة عندكم؟! أي عزٍّ هذا الذي يُصنع على أكتاف قاتلٍ ومرتكبٍ للفتن؟! وأي كرامة في أن يُرفع شأن من باع الوطن ومزّق نسيجه؟! May God grant you the same honor you gave us, Abu Muhammad… and may God have mercy on the midwife who delivered you!! This is how some Syrians, along with the Americans, welcomed Jolani — the Qaeda affiliate, the ISIS follower, and the leader of Jabhat al-Nusra, now rebranded as “Hayat Tahrir al-Sham.” The crowd, mostly from the moderate Sunni community, raises the big question: What honor has this terrorist brought you? Was it by fragmenting Syrian geography?! By inciting the people against one another?! By declaring most religious sects as infidels and permitting their blood to be shed? By planting fear and stripping away security in every corner of Syria?! By marginalizing the educated and experienced, and replacing them with the ignorant — people who never finished even fifth grade, armed only with a shallow religious course in Idlib?! What kind of honor do you boast about?! That Syria should simply have a “Sunni” president?! Is that your measure of dignity?! What honor is built on the shoulders of a killer and a sower of discord?! And what dignity lies in glorifying someone who sold the homeland and tore apart its social fabric?! #سوريا #الجولاني #هيئة_تحرير_الشام #الطائفة_السنية_المعتدلة #الامن_العام_الارهابي #توثيق #مجازر_الساحل #Syria #Jolani #HTS #ModerateSunniCommunity #SyriaMassacres #StopAlawiteGenocide #CrimesAgainstHumanity

Syrian Witness شاهد سوري

21,459 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

كي لا ننسى… ولن ننسى هؤلاء الأطفال الذين سقطوا في مجازر الساحل السوري لم يكونوا مقاتلين، ولم يكونوا طرفًا في أي نزاع. لكنهم وُصِموا بعبارة “فلول النظام” وقُتلوا بدمٍ بارد فقط لأنهم ينتمون إلى بيئة مستهدفة، إلى طائفة كريمة أراد المتطرفون إبادتها باسم الثورة والدين زورًا. هؤلاء ليسوا أرقامًا ولا سطورًا من الماضي. هم شهداء السابع من آذار 2025، ذُبحوا على يد جماعات تكفيرية متطرفة، جاءت تحمل مشروعًا طائفيًا دمويًا لا يشبه سوريا ولا شعبها. واليوم، الجلاد نفسه — الجولاني ومرتزقته — يقدّم ما يسميه “تحقيقًا” لتبرئة نفسه وإعادة كتابة الجريمة برواية مفبركة. تحقيق بلا عدالة، ولا شرعية، ولا ضمير. نحن نرفض هذه المهزلة. ونطالب بـ تحقيق دولي عاجل، مستقل، شفاف، بعيدًا عن أي تدخل من الجناة أو سلطاتهم. دم الشهداء أمانة في أعناقنا، وقضيتهم ليست شأنًا محليًا، بل جريمة ضد الإنسانية، تُدين من قتل، ومن صمت، ومن تواطأ. Lest We Forget… and We Will Not Forget The children who fell in the Syrian coastal massacres were not fighters. They were not part of any conflict. But they were branded as “remnants of the regime” and executed in cold blood simply because they came from a targeted community, from a noble sect that extremist militants sought to erase — falsely in the name of revolution and religion. They are not numbers. They are not forgotten lines in history. They are the martyrs of March 7, 2025 — slain by sectarian jihadist groups who brought with them a bloody project of extermination that has nothing to do with Syria or its people. And today, the butcher himself — Jolani and his militias — offers what he calls an “investigation” to clear himself and rewrite the crime in a fabricated narrative. An investigation with no justice, no legitimacy, and no conscience. We categorically reject this farce. We demand an urgent, independent, and transparent international investigation, free from any interference by the perpetrators or their authorities. The blood of the martyrs is a sacred trust. Their case is not a local issue, but a crime against humanity — one that condemns not only the killers, but also those who were silent, those who justified, and those who colluded. #مجزرة_الساحل #مجازر_الساحل_السوري #الابادة_العلوية #الابادة_الجماعية_العلوية_2025 #الطائفة_العلوية_الكريمة #الجولاني_الارهابي #الامن_العام_الارهابي #لجنة_تقصي_الحقائق #جريمة_ضد_الانسانية #سوريا #توثيق #حماية_الأقليات #SyrianCoastalMassacres #StopAlawiteGenocide #CrimesAgainstHumanity #JolaniCrimes #HTSCrimes #JolaniIsAGlobalTerrorist #AlawitePersecution #SyriaMassacres #IndependentInvestigation #MinorityProtection #UN #UNSC #UN_HRC #EU #HRW #AmnestyInternational #InternationalCriminalCourt #SaveSyria #JusticeForSyria
1:53

كي لا ننسى… ولن ننسى هؤلاء الأطفال الذين سقطوا في مجازر الساحل السوري لم يكونوا مقاتلين، ولم يكونوا طرفًا في أي نزاع. لكنهم وُصِموا بعبارة “فلول النظام” وقُتلوا بدمٍ بارد فقط لأنهم ينتمون إلى بيئة مستهدفة، إلى طائفة كريمة أراد المتطرفون إبادتها باسم الثورة والدين زورًا. هؤلاء ليسوا أرقامًا ولا سطورًا من الماضي. هم شهداء السابع من آذار 2025، ذُبحوا على يد جماعات تكفيرية متطرفة، جاءت تحمل مشروعًا طائفيًا دمويًا لا يشبه سوريا ولا شعبها. واليوم، الجلاد نفسه — الجولاني ومرتزقته — يقدّم ما يسميه “تحقيقًا” لتبرئة نفسه وإعادة كتابة الجريمة برواية مفبركة. تحقيق بلا عدالة، ولا شرعية، ولا ضمير. نحن نرفض هذه المهزلة. ونطالب بـ تحقيق دولي عاجل، مستقل، شفاف، بعيدًا عن أي تدخل من الجناة أو سلطاتهم. دم الشهداء أمانة في أعناقنا، وقضيتهم ليست شأنًا محليًا، بل جريمة ضد الإنسانية، تُدين من قتل، ومن صمت، ومن تواطأ. Lest We Forget… and We Will Not Forget The children who fell in the Syrian coastal massacres were not fighters. They were not part of any conflict. But they were branded as “remnants of the regime” and executed in cold blood simply because they came from a targeted community, from a noble sect that extremist militants sought to erase — falsely in the name of revolution and religion. They are not numbers. They are not forgotten lines in history. They are the martyrs of March 7, 2025 — slain by sectarian jihadist groups who brought with them a bloody project of extermination that has nothing to do with Syria or its people. And today, the butcher himself — Jolani and his militias — offers what he calls an “investigation” to clear himself and rewrite the crime in a fabricated narrative. An investigation with no justice, no legitimacy, and no conscience. We categorically reject this farce. We demand an urgent, independent, and transparent international investigation, free from any interference by the perpetrators or their authorities. The blood of the martyrs is a sacred trust. Their case is not a local issue, but a crime against humanity — one that condemns not only the killers, but also those who were silent, those who justified, and those who colluded. #مجزرة_الساحل #مجازر_الساحل_السوري #الابادة_العلوية #الابادة_الجماعية_العلوية_2025 #الطائفة_العلوية_الكريمة #الجولاني_الارهابي #الامن_العام_الارهابي #لجنة_تقصي_الحقائق #جريمة_ضد_الانسانية #سوريا #توثيق #حماية_الأقليات #SyrianCoastalMassacres #StopAlawiteGenocide #CrimesAgainstHumanity #JolaniCrimes #HTSCrimes #JolaniIsAGlobalTerrorist #AlawitePersecution #SyriaMassacres #IndependentInvestigation #MinorityProtection #UN #UNSC #UN_HRC #EU #HRW #AmnestyInternational #InternationalCriminalCourt #SaveSyria #JusticeForSyria

Syrian Witness شاهد سوري

13,167 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🔴 ريف دمشق | حي البحدلية.. في بلدٍ تهان فيه الأرواح، أقدمت امرأة على الدفاع عن كلبٍ أطلق عليه النار عنصر من “الأمن العام الارهابي”، فأرداه قتيلًا.. وعندما احتجّت، هددها الجاني بإلقاء قنبلة!! أي وطنٍ هذا الذي صار فيه الدفاع عن حياة كائن ضعيف جريمة، والمجرم يعلو بالسلاح لا بالحق.. إلى منظمات حقوق الإنسان التي صمّت آذانها عن نداءات السوريين لشهور… لم نعد نرجو منكم شيئًا.. نوجّه نداءنا الآن إلى منظمات حقوق الحيوان، فلعلّ صراخ كائنٍ أعزل تُطلق عليه النار في شوارع سوريا يحرّك ضميرًا لم يتحرك لمقتل آلاف الأبرياء.. في بلدي يُهان الإنسان… ويُقتل الحيوان! #سوريا #حقوق_الإنسان #حقوق_الحيوان #جرائم_الأمن_العام 🔴 Damascus Countryside | Al-Bahdaliyah Neighborhood... In a country where lives are humiliated, a woman defended a dog that was shot and killed by a member of the "terrorist General Security." When she protested, the perpetrator threatened to throw a bomb!! What kind of country is this, where defending the life of a weak creature has become a crime, and criminals rise up with weapons, not with justice? To human rights organizations that have turned a deaf ear to the calls of Syrians for months... we no longer expect anything from you... We now direct our appeal to animal rights organizations. Perhaps the screams of a defenseless creature being shot in the streets of Syria will stir a conscience that has been unmoved by the killing of thousands of innocents. In my country, humans are humiliated... and animals are killed! #Syria #HumanRights #AnimalRights #PublicSecurityCrimes #UN #UN_HRC #eu_eeas #StateDept #francediplo_EN #FCDOGovUK #ISIS #Trump #StopAlawiteGenocide #StopAlawiteGenocideInSyria #The_Alawite_Holocaust_in_Syria #محرقة_العلويين_في_سوريا #الابادة_الجماعية_العلوية_2025 #محاكمة_الجولاني_الارهابي_الدولي #التهجير_جريمة #حماية_الأقليات #الساحل_السوري #الجولاني_سفاح_سوريا #تسقط_حكومة_الجولاني_الأرهابية #أوقفوا_الإبادة_الطائفية #ابادة_علوية #الشرع_من_دون_شرعية #الهولوكوست_العلوي #الجولاني_ليس_رئيسي #استقلال_الساحل_السوري #مجزرة_الساحل Donald J. Trump Donald J. Trump CNN CNNPolitics Agence France-Presse Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office UK Prime Minister European External Action Service - EEAS 🇪🇺 EU in Syria UN in Syria UN Human Rights U.S. Embassy Syria Department of State جامعة الدول العربية وزارة الخارجية 🇸🇦 محمد بن سلمان بن عبد العزيز (Informal) HH Sheikh Mohammed Elon Musk Mazloum Abdî مظلوم عبدي Joe Wilson 🇺🇸 Pamela Geller 🇮🇱 Dr Walid Phares Kaja Kallas Liz Throssell Michael Ohnmacht محمد علي الحسيني はうはう Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸
1:42

🔴 ريف دمشق | حي البحدلية.. في بلدٍ تهان فيه الأرواح، أقدمت امرأة على الدفاع عن كلبٍ أطلق عليه النار عنصر من “الأمن العام الارهابي”، فأرداه قتيلًا.. وعندما احتجّت، هددها الجاني بإلقاء قنبلة!! أي وطنٍ هذا الذي صار فيه الدفاع عن حياة كائن ضعيف جريمة، والمجرم يعلو بالسلاح لا بالحق.. إلى منظمات حقوق الإنسان التي صمّت آذانها عن نداءات السوريين لشهور… لم نعد نرجو منكم شيئًا.. نوجّه نداءنا الآن إلى منظمات حقوق الحيوان، فلعلّ صراخ كائنٍ أعزل تُطلق عليه النار في شوارع سوريا يحرّك ضميرًا لم يتحرك لمقتل آلاف الأبرياء.. في بلدي يُهان الإنسان… ويُقتل الحيوان! #سوريا #حقوق_الإنسان #حقوق_الحيوان #جرائم_الأمن_العام 🔴 Damascus Countryside | Al-Bahdaliyah Neighborhood... In a country where lives are humiliated, a woman defended a dog that was shot and killed by a member of the "terrorist General Security." When she protested, the perpetrator threatened to throw a bomb!! What kind of country is this, where defending the life of a weak creature has become a crime, and criminals rise up with weapons, not with justice? To human rights organizations that have turned a deaf ear to the calls of Syrians for months... we no longer expect anything from you... We now direct our appeal to animal rights organizations. Perhaps the screams of a defenseless creature being shot in the streets of Syria will stir a conscience that has been unmoved by the killing of thousands of innocents. In my country, humans are humiliated... and animals are killed! #Syria #HumanRights #AnimalRights #PublicSecurityCrimes #UN #UN_HRC #eu_eeas #StateDept #francediplo_EN #FCDOGovUK #ISIS #Trump #StopAlawiteGenocide #StopAlawiteGenocideInSyria #The_Alawite_Holocaust_in_Syria #محرقة_العلويين_في_سوريا #الابادة_الجماعية_العلوية_2025 #محاكمة_الجولاني_الارهابي_الدولي #التهجير_جريمة #حماية_الأقليات #الساحل_السوري #الجولاني_سفاح_سوريا #تسقط_حكومة_الجولاني_الأرهابية #أوقفوا_الإبادة_الطائفية #ابادة_علوية #الشرع_من_دون_شرعية #الهولوكوست_العلوي #الجولاني_ليس_رئيسي #استقلال_الساحل_السوري #مجزرة_الساحل Donald J. Trump Donald J. Trump CNN CNNPolitics Agence France-Presse Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office UK Prime Minister European External Action Service - EEAS 🇪🇺 EU in Syria UN in Syria UN Human Rights U.S. Embassy Syria Department of State جامعة الدول العربية وزارة الخارجية 🇸🇦 محمد بن سلمان بن عبد العزيز (Informal) HH Sheikh Mohammed Elon Musk Mazloum Abdî مظلوم عبدي Joe Wilson 🇺🇸 Pamela Geller 🇮🇱 Dr Walid Phares Kaja Kallas Liz Throssell Michael Ohnmacht محمد علي الحسيني はうはう Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸

Syrian Witness شاهد سوري

82,164 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

In a world filled with expectations of perfection, the story of Poundcake and Milkshake emerges as a gentle yet profound reminder: sometimes, the only thing a living being needs is not pity, but simply a chance to be loved in the right way. These two deaf dogs not only found their forever home, but also offered a valuable lesson about compassion and the extraordinary power of unconditional acceptance. James Coburn had once been firmly against having a dog. He and his wife, Leah, lived an active life, enjoying exploring the ocean, paddleboarding, and travelling from place to place. He worried that having a dog would tie them down and prevent them from enjoying their freedom. Then, one night, an image of Poundcake appeared on an adoption website. He was only eight months old, a deaf male dog from Texas who was waiting at a rescue shelter in Rhode Island. His tail had once been broken, and he had become accustomed to being abandoned. James submitted an application immediately, before he had even had a chance to tell his wife. He could not bear the thought that a small creature who could never understand where he was or where he would go next might have to keep facing uncertainty simply because he could not hear the sounds of the world. Poundcake came home, and everything changed. His family taught him to communicate through sign language. He became confident and happy, bringing an unexpected sense of joy into their lives. But then his close friend Dunkin moved away. Poundcake would sit by the window for hours, looking sad. At the dog park, he was often left behind because he could not hear the other dogs running off. Loneliness gradually began to find its way into his life. His family realised that Poundcake needed a companion who could understand the way he played and the way he experienced the world in silence. They decided to drive through the night for nearly 800 kilometres to bring Milkshake home. This female American Pit Bull had also been deaf since birth and had spent three long years waiting within the rescue system. She had once been placed in a programme working with inmates but was not considered a good fit. After that, she moved from one shelter and foster home to another. No one wanted to adopt her because she was “different”. When Milkshake entered her new home, she and Poundcake became friends almost immediately. They played together, slept beside each other, and did everything together. The only small moments of friction came when Milkshake wanted to keep playing while Poundcake wanted to rest. Both dogs learned to communicate with their owners through signs and gradually became an inseparable part of the family. This story is not simply about two dogs. It reveals a painful truth: living beings with differences, whether they are deaf, blind, elderly, or members of breeds burdened by prejudice, are often overlooked or even abandoned simply because they do not fit the image of “perfection” that many people expect. James once admitted that he was afraid of the responsibility and worried that he would not be capable of being a good dog owner. But Poundcake and Milkshake proved otherwise. They did not merely adapt to their new life; they encouraged their family to become more active, spend more time outdoors, and love more deeply. James and Leah’s acceptance transformed what others might have considered “flaws” into gifts. The two deaf dogs did not need words to express their affection. They used their eyes, gentle touches, and unwavering loyalty. Compassion here is not a fleeting feeling of pity. It is a conscious choice: seeing beyond differences and still opening your arms. The power of acceptance lies in the fact that it can heal both sides. Poundcake and Milkshake had grown accustomed to being abandoned, but now they knew what it meant to be loved. James had once believed he could never become a good dog owner, yet now he calls them his very soul. Their story reaches far beyond that little home. It reminds us how many people and living beings in society may still be waiting for a similar opportunity not to become perfect, but simply to live fully as they are. Poundcake and Milkshake only needed one chance. And when that chance was given at the right time and in the right way, it created a family filled with quiet laughter and a love that needed no words. Perhaps the greatest lesson is this: difference should never be a reason to turn someone away. Sometimes, all it takes is opening our hearts a little wider, and we may receive far more than we ever imagined 💗✨
0:59

In a world filled with expectations of perfection, the story of Poundcake and Milkshake emerges as a gentle yet profound reminder: sometimes, the only thing a living being needs is not pity, but simply a chance to be loved in the right way. These two deaf dogs not only found their forever home, but also offered a valuable lesson about compassion and the extraordinary power of unconditional acceptance. James Coburn had once been firmly against having a dog. He and his wife, Leah, lived an active life, enjoying exploring the ocean, paddleboarding, and travelling from place to place. He worried that having a dog would tie them down and prevent them from enjoying their freedom. Then, one night, an image of Poundcake appeared on an adoption website. He was only eight months old, a deaf male dog from Texas who was waiting at a rescue shelter in Rhode Island. His tail had once been broken, and he had become accustomed to being abandoned. James submitted an application immediately, before he had even had a chance to tell his wife. He could not bear the thought that a small creature who could never understand where he was or where he would go next might have to keep facing uncertainty simply because he could not hear the sounds of the world. Poundcake came home, and everything changed. His family taught him to communicate through sign language. He became confident and happy, bringing an unexpected sense of joy into their lives. But then his close friend Dunkin moved away. Poundcake would sit by the window for hours, looking sad. At the dog park, he was often left behind because he could not hear the other dogs running off. Loneliness gradually began to find its way into his life. His family realised that Poundcake needed a companion who could understand the way he played and the way he experienced the world in silence. They decided to drive through the night for nearly 800 kilometres to bring Milkshake home. This female American Pit Bull had also been deaf since birth and had spent three long years waiting within the rescue system. She had once been placed in a programme working with inmates but was not considered a good fit. After that, she moved from one shelter and foster home to another. No one wanted to adopt her because she was “different”. When Milkshake entered her new home, she and Poundcake became friends almost immediately. They played together, slept beside each other, and did everything together. The only small moments of friction came when Milkshake wanted to keep playing while Poundcake wanted to rest. Both dogs learned to communicate with their owners through signs and gradually became an inseparable part of the family. This story is not simply about two dogs. It reveals a painful truth: living beings with differences, whether they are deaf, blind, elderly, or members of breeds burdened by prejudice, are often overlooked or even abandoned simply because they do not fit the image of “perfection” that many people expect. James once admitted that he was afraid of the responsibility and worried that he would not be capable of being a good dog owner. But Poundcake and Milkshake proved otherwise. They did not merely adapt to their new life; they encouraged their family to become more active, spend more time outdoors, and love more deeply. James and Leah’s acceptance transformed what others might have considered “flaws” into gifts. The two deaf dogs did not need words to express their affection. They used their eyes, gentle touches, and unwavering loyalty. Compassion here is not a fleeting feeling of pity. It is a conscious choice: seeing beyond differences and still opening your arms. The power of acceptance lies in the fact that it can heal both sides. Poundcake and Milkshake had grown accustomed to being abandoned, but now they knew what it meant to be loved. James had once believed he could never become a good dog owner, yet now he calls them his very soul. Their story reaches far beyond that little home. It reminds us how many people and living beings in society may still be waiting for a similar opportunity not to become perfect, but simply to live fully as they are. Poundcake and Milkshake only needed one chance. And when that chance was given at the right time and in the right way, it created a family filled with quiet laughter and a love that needed no words. Perhaps the greatest lesson is this: difference should never be a reason to turn someone away. Sometimes, all it takes is opening our hearts a little wider, and we may receive far more than we ever imagined 💗✨

Beauty of music and nature 🌺🌺

19,337 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

Some Big Numbers To Get Excited About Regular readers will know I often write of frustration at not moving fast enough. This mission I am on is really hard and sometimes it can seem impossibly big when I am down in the weeds dealing with dog issues on a daily basis. I have to say though that writing this tonight and looking through some numbers I feel for the first time that I am starting to make some large scale progress… A Second Island 🌴🥥 I live and help the dogs on the island of Koh Samui. There is an island of equal size called Koh Phangan just across the water. You probably have heard of it as the home of the world famous Full Moon Party. They have a similar problem with street dogs. Since the the 1st May I have starting funding a wonderful foundation called PACS to sterilise dogs there. They are starting with 50 this month. This is going to stop 1000s of future puppies. A big step. 90,000 Meals Served in 2023 So Far 🥘👨‍🍳 The cooking never stops. The dogs are all starting to benefit from a consistent and healthy meal per day. All the food is prepared in a central kitchen and handed out to volunteers to feed their dogs. With 5000 meals served per week around the island it blows my mind that soon we will serve the 100,000th wholesome plate of food in 2023. It wasn’t that long ago I was driving around on my moped with a 10kg bag of dry food feeding a paltry 20 dogs per day on my own. 7 Puppies Re-Homed 🐶🏠 In the last couple of weeks there have been 25-30 puppies show up. It can be incredibly tough to find them homes but thanks to a great Thai lady I have been able to get 7 into their forever homes around the country. It has involved a lot of vet visits, 1000kms of travel and lots of expense but that is 7 dogs who have a future now who wouldn’t have made it otherwise. 2 Miracles For Lady 🙏😊 The first miracle for Lady was the fact that she got off the street and was able to start walking a little again despite her two broken hips. We’ve been getting her a lot of treatment and she is thriving. Her 2nd miracle was when a lovely newly retired gentleman called Jamie spotted her and offered Lady a forever home to live out her life right here on the island. Nobody usually wants old and sick dogs so this incredibly selfless act is the huge slice of luck that Lady deserved after all the suffering she has endured. The Best Day Of Tina’s Life 🐕🥰 Tina was used for breeding puppies. We all saw the horrendous state she was in when she was rescued. Last week she was well enough to be sterilised so as she never has to have another puppy in her life again. It might seem like a small footnote in the bigger scheme of things but it was a moment of closure for this wonderful lady who has suffered so much. She can now just focus on being a dog for for the first time in her life and sharing all the love she has to give. Tina was the 521st dog I have sterilised since starting. King Whacker Of Scotland 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿✈️ Whacker is a very special dog who was one of the first arrivals back in November. Someone had tried to kill him with a pick axe. After recovering he turned into a true gent and is the big boss at the land. I promised he would never have to go back on the streets and this week after a process to find him the right home he got the news that he will be heading to Glasgow. Long live Whacker, the King of Scotland. 125 Dogs To Be Sterilised In May ✂️🐕 I spoke about how abstract sterilising can be for many people to understand but it is what will save the most dogs from suffering. In all of 2022 I was able to do 302 dogs. In the month of May alone I have a minimum target to fund 125. In June I hope to take that to 250 dogs for the month. Not easy and very expensive but I’m putting the groundwork in place to scale this up. Nothing is more important. Little Rodney was in getting the snip last week as one of the dogs this month. 7 European Dogs 🇪🇺🛫 By the end of June there will be 7 dogs who have traveled to Europe. Lottie, Hope, King Whacker, Rodney and Moritz will join Little Squeak and Peaches who just arrived in Germany. I can’t explain how hard it is to figure all this stuff out and get the processes in place. I’m focusing on Europe now as it is the easiest for travel and paperwork but the rest of the world will happen soon too. It’s only 7 dogs but seeing them in their homes or about to travel makes me so happy and proud for them all. Progress The suffering I see on a daily basis for street dogs means that I am never really happy with the speed and progress of my mission. I just want to help them all immediately but that isn’t possible. Having said that, reading this update and knowing what else is coming in the pipeline makes me feel that I am making genuine progress. Between food, funding sterilisations, medical care and re-homing dogs I can genuinely now say I’m helping 100s of dogs per month but also stopping the suffering of 1000s in the future. As I always say I could never do any of this without the online support and good wishes of everybody on the mission with me. I don’t feel like I am alone doing this. My role is to make sure I don’t waste all the support and ensure I think of ways to move faster and execute accordingly. A lot done, a lore more to do. Big Love Niall P.S You can always support by donating here...
0:48

Some Big Numbers To Get Excited About Regular readers will know I often write of frustration at not moving fast enough. This mission I am on is really hard and sometimes it can seem impossibly big when I am down in the weeds dealing with dog issues on a daily basis. I have to say though that writing this tonight and looking through some numbers I feel for the first time that I am starting to make some large scale progress… A Second Island 🌴🥥 I live and help the dogs on the island of Koh Samui. There is an island of equal size called Koh Phangan just across the water. You probably have heard of it as the home of the world famous Full Moon Party. They have a similar problem with street dogs. Since the the 1st May I have starting funding a wonderful foundation called PACS to sterilise dogs there. They are starting with 50 this month. This is going to stop 1000s of future puppies. A big step. 90,000 Meals Served in 2023 So Far 🥘👨‍🍳 The cooking never stops. The dogs are all starting to benefit from a consistent and healthy meal per day. All the food is prepared in a central kitchen and handed out to volunteers to feed their dogs. With 5000 meals served per week around the island it blows my mind that soon we will serve the 100,000th wholesome plate of food in 2023. It wasn’t that long ago I was driving around on my moped with a 10kg bag of dry food feeding a paltry 20 dogs per day on my own. 7 Puppies Re-Homed 🐶🏠 In the last couple of weeks there have been 25-30 puppies show up. It can be incredibly tough to find them homes but thanks to a great Thai lady I have been able to get 7 into their forever homes around the country. It has involved a lot of vet visits, 1000kms of travel and lots of expense but that is 7 dogs who have a future now who wouldn’t have made it otherwise. 2 Miracles For Lady 🙏😊 The first miracle for Lady was the fact that she got off the street and was able to start walking a little again despite her two broken hips. We’ve been getting her a lot of treatment and she is thriving. Her 2nd miracle was when a lovely newly retired gentleman called Jamie spotted her and offered Lady a forever home to live out her life right here on the island. Nobody usually wants old and sick dogs so this incredibly selfless act is the huge slice of luck that Lady deserved after all the suffering she has endured. The Best Day Of Tina’s Life 🐕🥰 Tina was used for breeding puppies. We all saw the horrendous state she was in when she was rescued. Last week she was well enough to be sterilised so as she never has to have another puppy in her life again. It might seem like a small footnote in the bigger scheme of things but it was a moment of closure for this wonderful lady who has suffered so much. She can now just focus on being a dog for for the first time in her life and sharing all the love she has to give. Tina was the 521st dog I have sterilised since starting. King Whacker Of Scotland 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿✈️ Whacker is a very special dog who was one of the first arrivals back in November. Someone had tried to kill him with a pick axe. After recovering he turned into a true gent and is the big boss at the land. I promised he would never have to go back on the streets and this week after a process to find him the right home he got the news that he will be heading to Glasgow. Long live Whacker, the King of Scotland. 125 Dogs To Be Sterilised In May ✂️🐕 I spoke about how abstract sterilising can be for many people to understand but it is what will save the most dogs from suffering. In all of 2022 I was able to do 302 dogs. In the month of May alone I have a minimum target to fund 125. In June I hope to take that to 250 dogs for the month. Not easy and very expensive but I’m putting the groundwork in place to scale this up. Nothing is more important. Little Rodney was in getting the snip last week as one of the dogs this month. 7 European Dogs 🇪🇺🛫 By the end of June there will be 7 dogs who have traveled to Europe. Lottie, Hope, King Whacker, Rodney and Moritz will join Little Squeak and Peaches who just arrived in Germany. I can’t explain how hard it is to figure all this stuff out and get the processes in place. I’m focusing on Europe now as it is the easiest for travel and paperwork but the rest of the world will happen soon too. It’s only 7 dogs but seeing them in their homes or about to travel makes me so happy and proud for them all. Progress The suffering I see on a daily basis for street dogs means that I am never really happy with the speed and progress of my mission. I just want to help them all immediately but that isn’t possible. Having said that, reading this update and knowing what else is coming in the pipeline makes me feel that I am making genuine progress. Between food, funding sterilisations, medical care and re-homing dogs I can genuinely now say I’m helping 100s of dogs per month but also stopping the suffering of 1000s in the future. As I always say I could never do any of this without the online support and good wishes of everybody on the mission with me. I don’t feel like I am alone doing this. My role is to make sure I don’t waste all the support and ensure I think of ways to move faster and execute accordingly. A lot done, a lore more to do. Big Love Niall P.S You can always support by donating here...

Niall Harbison

193,838 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Abandoned and Reduced to Skin and Bones, This Dog Still Looked at a Stranger with Trust ✨ The little dog lay curled up, its ribs clearly visible beneath its skin, its fur dirty and giving off a foul smell. It had been abandoned with almost nothing left. Yet when the rescuer approached and spoke to it, its first reaction was not fear or retreat. It moved closer, looking up with clear, innocent eyes and responding with an almost unconditional friendliness. It was a moment that made many viewers stop and take notice. The story began as a straightforward rescue case. The puppy was found severely malnourished, filthy, and alone. Despite being neglected to such an extent, it still approached a stranger gently, showing no signs of defensiveness. The rescuer offered it food and spoke to it in a soft voice, and the dog responded with trust almost immediately. The question is a simple but profound one: Why does a creature treated so cruelly still have the ability to love and open its heart to someone it has never met? The answer lies partly in the nature of dogs. Unlike humans, dogs do not tend to hold grudges in the same way or dwell on them over long periods. They live largely through their instincts for attachment and their search for safety. When a new person reaches out to them, many dogs can still respond with acceptance. This is not foolishness or a lack of memory. Rather, it is a trait shaped over thousands of years of living alongside humans. They often place trust ahead of suspicion. The contrast in this story makes that even more striking. The dog's body tells the story of neglect: exposed ribs, a foul smell, and hunger written across its fragile frame. But its eyes and the way it approached the rescuer tell a different story. It was still willing to offer affection. The distance between the former owner's actions and the dog's response creates the emotional weight of the story. From a human perspective, the story also offers a thought-provoking comparison. After being hurt, people often become guarded, defensive, and reluctant to open up again. Yet a dog abandoned to the point of near death can still look at a stranger with hope in its eyes. That innocence does not mean that dogs are incapable of feeling pain. It shows that they have not learned to close their hearts in quite the same way humans sometimes do. The story also reminds us of responsibility. When a vulnerable creature is abandoned, rescuing it is not simply an act of kindness. It is also an opportunity to reflect on how we treat those who are weak and easily overlooked. Have we become too willing to turn away from lives that are no longer “convenient”? And have we retained the ability to trust and love with fewer conditions? The rescuers in the video did more than provide food. They sent a simple message: there are still people willing to stay. The dog responded with perhaps the most precious thing it still had, its gentle, innocent friendliness. The moment was quiet, but deeply moving. It showed that love does not always need to be nurtured by perfect circumstances. Sometimes, all it needs is a small opportunity to be expressed. In a world where people increasingly encounter hurt and mistrust, the image of a skeletal dog still approaching a stranger becomes a simple reminder. Perhaps there is something we can learn from animals: trust does not always need to be justified by a good past. Sometimes, when a hand reaches out in the present, the heart can still choose to open. That dog was left with almost nothing. Yet it still chose to show love. And that choice makes the story more than just a rescue. It becomes a reminder that even amid suffering, innocence can still remain 💖
1:01

Abandoned and Reduced to Skin and Bones, This Dog Still Looked at a Stranger with Trust ✨ The little dog lay curled up, its ribs clearly visible beneath its skin, its fur dirty and giving off a foul smell. It had been abandoned with almost nothing left. Yet when the rescuer approached and spoke to it, its first reaction was not fear or retreat. It moved closer, looking up with clear, innocent eyes and responding with an almost unconditional friendliness. It was a moment that made many viewers stop and take notice. The story began as a straightforward rescue case. The puppy was found severely malnourished, filthy, and alone. Despite being neglected to such an extent, it still approached a stranger gently, showing no signs of defensiveness. The rescuer offered it food and spoke to it in a soft voice, and the dog responded with trust almost immediately. The question is a simple but profound one: Why does a creature treated so cruelly still have the ability to love and open its heart to someone it has never met? The answer lies partly in the nature of dogs. Unlike humans, dogs do not tend to hold grudges in the same way or dwell on them over long periods. They live largely through their instincts for attachment and their search for safety. When a new person reaches out to them, many dogs can still respond with acceptance. This is not foolishness or a lack of memory. Rather, it is a trait shaped over thousands of years of living alongside humans. They often place trust ahead of suspicion. The contrast in this story makes that even more striking. The dog's body tells the story of neglect: exposed ribs, a foul smell, and hunger written across its fragile frame. But its eyes and the way it approached the rescuer tell a different story. It was still willing to offer affection. The distance between the former owner's actions and the dog's response creates the emotional weight of the story. From a human perspective, the story also offers a thought-provoking comparison. After being hurt, people often become guarded, defensive, and reluctant to open up again. Yet a dog abandoned to the point of near death can still look at a stranger with hope in its eyes. That innocence does not mean that dogs are incapable of feeling pain. It shows that they have not learned to close their hearts in quite the same way humans sometimes do. The story also reminds us of responsibility. When a vulnerable creature is abandoned, rescuing it is not simply an act of kindness. It is also an opportunity to reflect on how we treat those who are weak and easily overlooked. Have we become too willing to turn away from lives that are no longer “convenient”? And have we retained the ability to trust and love with fewer conditions? The rescuers in the video did more than provide food. They sent a simple message: there are still people willing to stay. The dog responded with perhaps the most precious thing it still had, its gentle, innocent friendliness. The moment was quiet, but deeply moving. It showed that love does not always need to be nurtured by perfect circumstances. Sometimes, all it needs is a small opportunity to be expressed. In a world where people increasingly encounter hurt and mistrust, the image of a skeletal dog still approaching a stranger becomes a simple reminder. Perhaps there is something we can learn from animals: trust does not always need to be justified by a good past. Sometimes, when a hand reaches out in the present, the heart can still choose to open. That dog was left with almost nothing. Yet it still chose to show love. And that choice makes the story more than just a rescue. It becomes a reminder that even amid suffering, innocence can still remain 💖

Beauty of music and nature 🌺🌺

24,431 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

Andrei Tarkovsky on Ingmar Bergman's Shame (1968): "Let us look at Bergman's Shame. The film doesn't contain a single 'actor's piece' for the performer to 'give away' the director's purpose, to play the conception of the persona, his attitude to it, to assess it in relation to the overall idea; and the latter is entirely hidden within the dynamic of the characters' lives, at one with it. The people in the film are crushed by circumstances; they act only in accordance with their situation, to which they themselves are subordinate; they make no attempt to proffer us any idea, any perspective on what is happening, or to draw any conclusion. All of that is left to the film as a whole, to the director's vision. And how superbly it is accomplished! You cannot say in simple terms who amongst them is good or bad. I could never say that von Sydow is a bad man. They are all partly good and partly bad, each in his own way. No judgements are passed, because there is no hint of tendentiousness in any of the actors, and the circumstances of the film are used by the director to explore the human possibilities which they test, and not for a moment in order to illustrate a thesis. Max von Sydow's character is developed with masterly power. He is a very good man; a musician; kind and sensitive. It turns out that he is a coward. But by no means every bold man is a good human being, and cowards are not always scoundrels. Of course, he is weak and irresolute. His wife is far stronger than he, so much so that she can overcome her fear. The hero lacks that strength. He is tormented by his own weakness, vulnerability, lack of resilience; he tries to hide, to cower in a corner, not to see and not to hear; and he does this like a child, naively and with complete sincerity. But when circumstances nevertheless force him to defend himself, he instantly turns into a scoundrel. He loses all that was best in him; but the drama and absurdity of his situation is that as he is now he becomes necessary to his wife, who, in her turn, looks to him for protection and succour instead of despising him as she always had. When he beats her about the face and says 'Get out!' she goes crawling after him. There is something here of the age-old idea of passive good and active evil; but its expression is immensely complex. At the beginning of the film the hero cannot even kill a chicken, but as soon as he has found a way of defending himself he becomes a cruel cynic. He has something of Hamlet: my view is that the Prince of Denmark perishes not as a result of the duel, when he dies physically, but immediately after the 'rat' scene, when he understands how irreversible are those laws of life which have forced him, a man of humanity and intellect, to act like the inferior people who inhabit Elsinore. Von Sydow is now a sinister character, afraid of nothing: he kills; will not raise a finger to save his fellows; pursues only his own interests. The point is that you have to be a person of great integrity to feel fear in the face of the foul necessity to kill and humiliate. And by shedding that fear and apparently acquiring courage, a person in fact loses his spiritual strength and intellectual honesty and parts from his innocence. War is the obvious catalyst for the cruel, anti-human elements in people. Bergman uses the war in this film exactly as he uses the heroine's illness in Through a Glass Darkly: to explore his view of man." — "Sculpting in Time" by Andrei Tarkovsky (translated by Kitty Hunter-Blair, 1987)
0:50

Andrei Tarkovsky on Ingmar Bergman's Shame (1968): "Let us look at Bergman's Shame. The film doesn't contain a single 'actor's piece' for the performer to 'give away' the director's purpose, to play the conception of the persona, his attitude to it, to assess it in relation to the overall idea; and the latter is entirely hidden within the dynamic of the characters' lives, at one with it. The people in the film are crushed by circumstances; they act only in accordance with their situation, to which they themselves are subordinate; they make no attempt to proffer us any idea, any perspective on what is happening, or to draw any conclusion. All of that is left to the film as a whole, to the director's vision. And how superbly it is accomplished! You cannot say in simple terms who amongst them is good or bad. I could never say that von Sydow is a bad man. They are all partly good and partly bad, each in his own way. No judgements are passed, because there is no hint of tendentiousness in any of the actors, and the circumstances of the film are used by the director to explore the human possibilities which they test, and not for a moment in order to illustrate a thesis. Max von Sydow's character is developed with masterly power. He is a very good man; a musician; kind and sensitive. It turns out that he is a coward. But by no means every bold man is a good human being, and cowards are not always scoundrels. Of course, he is weak and irresolute. His wife is far stronger than he, so much so that she can overcome her fear. The hero lacks that strength. He is tormented by his own weakness, vulnerability, lack of resilience; he tries to hide, to cower in a corner, not to see and not to hear; and he does this like a child, naively and with complete sincerity. But when circumstances nevertheless force him to defend himself, he instantly turns into a scoundrel. He loses all that was best in him; but the drama and absurdity of his situation is that as he is now he becomes necessary to his wife, who, in her turn, looks to him for protection and succour instead of despising him as she always had. When he beats her about the face and says 'Get out!' she goes crawling after him. There is something here of the age-old idea of passive good and active evil; but its expression is immensely complex. At the beginning of the film the hero cannot even kill a chicken, but as soon as he has found a way of defending himself he becomes a cruel cynic. He has something of Hamlet: my view is that the Prince of Denmark perishes not as a result of the duel, when he dies physically, but immediately after the 'rat' scene, when he understands how irreversible are those laws of life which have forced him, a man of humanity and intellect, to act like the inferior people who inhabit Elsinore. Von Sydow is now a sinister character, afraid of nothing: he kills; will not raise a finger to save his fellows; pursues only his own interests. The point is that you have to be a person of great integrity to feel fear in the face of the foul necessity to kill and humiliate. And by shedding that fear and apparently acquiring courage, a person in fact loses his spiritual strength and intellectual honesty and parts from his innocence. War is the obvious catalyst for the cruel, anti-human elements in people. Bergman uses the war in this film exactly as he uses the heroine's illness in Through a Glass Darkly: to explore his view of man." — "Sculpting in Time" by Andrei Tarkovsky (translated by Kitty Hunter-Blair, 1987)

RadiantFilm

27,723 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

When Judge Napolitano asked me on his show how Syria ended up with Abu Mohammed al-Jolani as its “president,” I could almost hear the cognitive dissonance on the other side of the screen. How does a man who was once the emir of al-Qaeda in Syria, a co-founder of ISIS by any reasonable historical reading of his trajectory, become Washington’s chosen man in Damascus? For me, the answer is not a mystery. It is the logical end of a dirty war that began not with Syrian protesters in 2011, but in an American-run prison camp in Iraq years earlier. And if anyone still suspected this was “just a conspiracy theory,” a former CIA officer – John Kiriakou, who went to prison for exposing CIA torture – has now said publicly what many of us have long argued: Jolani is, in all likelihood, a CIA asset. Let’s start with the timeline, because the timeline alone already screams “intelligence operation.” Abu Mohammed al-Jolani was in a CIA-run prison in Iraq – Camp Bucca – alongside another familiar name: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. Both men were released in early 2011. “Coincidentally,” that is exactly when the regime-change war in Syria begins. Within weeks, Baghdadi goes on to lead what becomes ISIS, and Jolani crosses into Syria to found Jabhat al-Nusra – officially al-Qaeda’s franchise in my country. Washington designates Nusra a terrorist organization. The UN follows suit. On paper, Jolani is the enemy. The State Department even slaps a $10 million bounty on his head. But bounties are cheap. Cruise missiles are expensive. And for over a decade, while the US flattened cities in Iraq and Syria allegedly to fight “terrorism,” it somehow never found the time, or the coordinates, to seriously target Jolani or his core command structure, even though he controlled large swaths of Syrian territory from Aleppo countryside all the way to Idlib. Because Jolani and his men were fighting the one government Washington had already decided must go: the Syrian state under Bashar al-Assad. This is where Operation Timber Sycamore comes in: a multi-billion-dollar CIA covert program that funneled weapons, money, and training to so-called “rebels” in Syria. They were sold to Western audiences as “moderate opposition.” On the ground, those moderates were a disappearing species. What existed in reality were hardline Salafi-jihadist factions, with Nusra at the top of the food chain. The Free Syrian Army (FSA) was the mask, the logo on the paperwork, the brand name you could sell to Congress and CNN. The real muscle on the ground was Jolani’s men and other takfiri groups, who did the actual fighting, took the actual territory, and imposed their version of rule. Weapons went “to the moderates.” The moderates magically handed them to al-Qaeda. Everyone in Washington pretended to be surprised. No one stopped the pipeline. Over the years, the mask slipped. US officials themselves began to speak of Jolani as something more than just a former enemy. James Jeffrey, Washington’s former envoy to Syria, openly called Jolani “an asset” for US strategy – not my word, his. Robert Ford, the former US ambassador to Syria, has publicly admitted that he personally worked with Jolani to “take him out of the world of terrorism” and polish him into a politician. Think about what that means: the same US that claims to be fighting an endless war against al-Qaeda quietly devotes diplomatic energy to rehabilitating the Syrian branch of al-Qaeda into a partner, a useful strongman, a future head of state. I said on the show, and I repeat it here: I believe Jolani was recruited in Camp Bucca. The timeline makes no sense otherwise. You don’t walk out of an American-run prison and, weeks later, magically have the networks, the money, the arms, and the logistical capacity to found al-Qaeda in Syria, right at the moment when Washington and its allies need a battering ram against Damascus. Recently, former CIA director David Petraeus even sat with Jolani and told him, “Your success is our success.” What more do people need? A signed employment contract? But let’s assume, for a moment, that you still think this is a stretch. Enter John Kiriakou. Kiriakou is not a YouTuber chasing clicks. He is a former CIA officer who went to prison because he exposed the torture program and named the torturers. His loyalty is clearly not to the Agency’s PR department. Recently, on Unfettered Speech, he described the Jolani situation bluntly. Here is the essence of what he said, which Judge Napolitano played on air: -The “new president” of Syria is a former al-Qaeda member and a co-founder of ISIS. -This same man is welcomed at the White House. -Senior US officials, including the Assistant Secretary of State for the Near East, travel to meet him. -President Trump suddenly lifts sanctions on Syria as Jolani consolidates power, prompting Syrians – desperate and exhausted – to dance in the streets. The only thing that makes sense is that Jolani is a CIA asset, per Kiriakou’s. When a former CIA officer who has already sacrificed his career and freedom to tell the truth looks at the pattern and says, “This is our guy,” it is not a conspiracy theory anymore. Now, you may ask, why would the United States and its allies back such a man? The answer lies in what Syria used to be, and what it has now been turned into. Before this war, Syria, for all its flaws, was a horizontally integrated state. People identified themselves as Syrian first and then Armenian, Druze, Christian, Alawite, Sunni, Shi’a, Kurdish, and so on. The state’s foreign policy aligned with Iran and Hezbollah, supported Palestinian factions, and kept a real deterrent posture toward Israel. For Washington and Tel Aviv, this was unacceptable. The goal was not “democracy”; that word is just wrapping paper. The real objective was to remove a government allied with Iran and replace it with a fragmented landscape: a weak central authority in Damascus, surrounded by sectarian cantons and warlord enclaves, all dependent on foreign patrons. Jolani is perfect for this role. For Israel, he brings vertical division. A man with a long al-Qaeda pedigree ruling Syria is a nightmare for minorities: Christians, Druze, Alawites, Shi’a, many Kurds, and other smaller communities. They will not accept al-Qaeda rule. So they retreat into their own militias, their own cantons, their own de facto mini-states, exactly in line with old Israeli strategic doctrines like the Yinon Plan, which openly advocated fragmenting neighboring states along sectarian lines. On the ground, we already see it: -Druze militias running their own affairs in the south with quiet Israeli backing. -Kurdish forces in the northeast under US protection, managing their own autonomous zone. -Alawites discussing an autonomous coastal enclave. -Christians living in silence and fear. You don’t need formal borders on a map to balkanize a country. When I, as a Syrian of Armenian origin, stop thinking of myself as Syrian first and start thinking purely as Armenian, when I instinctively fear my neighbor because he is from another sect, the balkanization has already happened in the mind. For Washington, Jolani is equally “useful.” He has promised to normalize relations with Israel, to open Syria’s markets to Western capital, and to hand over the country’s resources from the hydrocarbons east of the Euphrates to the gas fields under the Mediterranean to American and allied companies. A 24-million-person country reduced to a reconstruction market: $300 billion worth of contracts, infrastructure projects, and “investments.” But for investors to feel safe, they need a strongman in Damascus who can project the illusion of stability while remaining utterly dependent on foreign protection. That strongman, in their design, is Abu Mohammed al-Jolani. But Jolani is not acting alone. Around him is a constellation of Western intelligence veterans and “conflict resolution” NGOs acting as intermediaries. British MI6 circles, under figures like Jonathan Powell – former chief of staff to Tony Blair – are central in managing this process. Powell runs an organization called Inter Mediate, which specializes in “talking to armed groups.” Behind the humanitarian language lies political engineering. One of Inter Mediate’s operatives, a woman named Clare Haigh, is now said to have an office inside the Syrian presidential palace, advising Jolani on how to talk, how to dress, how to handle journalists, how to sell himself as a reformed jihadist turned statesman. And then there is Qatar. Ahmed Zaidan – once Osama bin Laden’s favorite journalist, photographed sipping tea with him and broadcasting his tapes on Al Jazeera – is now a personal adviser to Jolani. Make it make sense. An al-Qaeda emir, handled by US and British intelligence veterans, advised by bin Laden’s favorite media man, massaged by Western PR consultants, welcomed in Washington, and crowned in Damascus as “president.” If you wrote this as fiction, an editor would tell you it’s too on the nose. Since Jolani took power through an international and regional deal that pushed Assad aside, over 11,000 people have been killed. Many of them are from the very minorities the West loves to mention in speeches but abandons in practice. Videos circulate of his fighters asking terrified villagers at gunpoint, “Are you Muslim or not?” and executing those who give the “wrong” answer, including Druze and Alawites who are not recognized as “true Muslims” by their extremist ideology. Christians, who had already suffered massive emigration between 2011 and 2024, are being squeezed further. They have no organized armed force, no foreign sponsor. They are expected either to live under the mercy of an al-Qaeda-bred regime or to leave the land of their ancestors. This is what Washington’s “asset management” looks like in human terms. If you are an American reading this, you might be tempted to say: “This cannot be. My government would never knowingly empower al-Qaeda.” But it already has, repeatedly. From Afghanistan in the 1980s, when US intelligence backed the Mujahideen (and, indirectly, their Arab foreign fighter allies), to Libya and Syria in the last decade, where jihadist factions were instrumentalized against secular or nationalist governments, the pattern is clear. The names and acronyms change. The logic does not. The same establishment that lectures the world on “democracy” and “human rights” is perfectly willing to install a man like Jolani as the ruler of one of the oldest civilizations on earth, as long as he delivers strategic gains: -breaking the Iran–Syria–Hezbollah axis; -fragmenting Syria into weak, controllable pieces; -opening its resources and markets to Western and Gulf capital; -and giving Israel unprecedented strategic depth and security. Everything else – the massacres, the ethnic cleansing, the collapse of national identity, the destruction of ancient communities – is treated as collateral damage. I am often asked what Syria will look like in five or ten years. I wish I could answer with optimism. Right now, the forces pushing to turn my country into a permanent vassal state – ruled by a former al-Qaeda emir, policed by foreign intelligence, exploited by foreign capital – are incredibly strong. But nothing in this region is permanent. People who come to power by cutting off other people’s heads often lose their own. If there are still sane voices left in Western politics – people like Tulsi Gabbard 🌺, whom I mentioned on air – they must at least recognize this insanity: backing an al-Qaeda emir as “our man in Damascus” is not just immoral; it is ultimately self-destructive. Syria does not need Jolani. The West does not need Jolani. There are Syrians who can have friendly relations with the United States without being former al-Qaeda commanders, without murdering their own people, without turning an ancient nation into a laboratory for extremist social engineering. The question is not whether such alternatives exist. They do. The question is whether Washington and its allies want a sovereign, stable Syria, or whether they prefer a shattered, cantonized carcass kept alive just enough for the next “asset” to feed on.
22:55

When Judge Napolitano asked me on his show how Syria ended up with Abu Mohammed al-Jolani as its “president,” I could almost hear the cognitive dissonance on the other side of the screen. How does a man who was once the emir of al-Qaeda in Syria, a co-founder of ISIS by any reasonable historical reading of his trajectory, become Washington’s chosen man in Damascus? For me, the answer is not a mystery. It is the logical end of a dirty war that began not with Syrian protesters in 2011, but in an American-run prison camp in Iraq years earlier. And if anyone still suspected this was “just a conspiracy theory,” a former CIA officer – John Kiriakou, who went to prison for exposing CIA torture – has now said publicly what many of us have long argued: Jolani is, in all likelihood, a CIA asset. Let’s start with the timeline, because the timeline alone already screams “intelligence operation.” Abu Mohammed al-Jolani was in a CIA-run prison in Iraq – Camp Bucca – alongside another familiar name: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. Both men were released in early 2011. “Coincidentally,” that is exactly when the regime-change war in Syria begins. Within weeks, Baghdadi goes on to lead what becomes ISIS, and Jolani crosses into Syria to found Jabhat al-Nusra – officially al-Qaeda’s franchise in my country. Washington designates Nusra a terrorist organization. The UN follows suit. On paper, Jolani is the enemy. The State Department even slaps a $10 million bounty on his head. But bounties are cheap. Cruise missiles are expensive. And for over a decade, while the US flattened cities in Iraq and Syria allegedly to fight “terrorism,” it somehow never found the time, or the coordinates, to seriously target Jolani or his core command structure, even though he controlled large swaths of Syrian territory from Aleppo countryside all the way to Idlib. Because Jolani and his men were fighting the one government Washington had already decided must go: the Syrian state under Bashar al-Assad. This is where Operation Timber Sycamore comes in: a multi-billion-dollar CIA covert program that funneled weapons, money, and training to so-called “rebels” in Syria. They were sold to Western audiences as “moderate opposition.” On the ground, those moderates were a disappearing species. What existed in reality were hardline Salafi-jihadist factions, with Nusra at the top of the food chain. The Free Syrian Army (FSA) was the mask, the logo on the paperwork, the brand name you could sell to Congress and CNN. The real muscle on the ground was Jolani’s men and other takfiri groups, who did the actual fighting, took the actual territory, and imposed their version of rule. Weapons went “to the moderates.” The moderates magically handed them to al-Qaeda. Everyone in Washington pretended to be surprised. No one stopped the pipeline. Over the years, the mask slipped. US officials themselves began to speak of Jolani as something more than just a former enemy. James Jeffrey, Washington’s former envoy to Syria, openly called Jolani “an asset” for US strategy – not my word, his. Robert Ford, the former US ambassador to Syria, has publicly admitted that he personally worked with Jolani to “take him out of the world of terrorism” and polish him into a politician. Think about what that means: the same US that claims to be fighting an endless war against al-Qaeda quietly devotes diplomatic energy to rehabilitating the Syrian branch of al-Qaeda into a partner, a useful strongman, a future head of state. I said on the show, and I repeat it here: I believe Jolani was recruited in Camp Bucca. The timeline makes no sense otherwise. You don’t walk out of an American-run prison and, weeks later, magically have the networks, the money, the arms, and the logistical capacity to found al-Qaeda in Syria, right at the moment when Washington and its allies need a battering ram against Damascus. Recently, former CIA director David Petraeus even sat with Jolani and told him, “Your success is our success.” What more do people need? A signed employment contract? But let’s assume, for a moment, that you still think this is a stretch. Enter John Kiriakou. Kiriakou is not a YouTuber chasing clicks. He is a former CIA officer who went to prison because he exposed the torture program and named the torturers. His loyalty is clearly not to the Agency’s PR department. Recently, on Unfettered Speech, he described the Jolani situation bluntly. Here is the essence of what he said, which Judge Napolitano played on air: -The “new president” of Syria is a former al-Qaeda member and a co-founder of ISIS. -This same man is welcomed at the White House. -Senior US officials, including the Assistant Secretary of State for the Near East, travel to meet him. -President Trump suddenly lifts sanctions on Syria as Jolani consolidates power, prompting Syrians – desperate and exhausted – to dance in the streets. The only thing that makes sense is that Jolani is a CIA asset, per Kiriakou’s. When a former CIA officer who has already sacrificed his career and freedom to tell the truth looks at the pattern and says, “This is our guy,” it is not a conspiracy theory anymore. Now, you may ask, why would the United States and its allies back such a man? The answer lies in what Syria used to be, and what it has now been turned into. Before this war, Syria, for all its flaws, was a horizontally integrated state. People identified themselves as Syrian first and then Armenian, Druze, Christian, Alawite, Sunni, Shi’a, Kurdish, and so on. The state’s foreign policy aligned with Iran and Hezbollah, supported Palestinian factions, and kept a real deterrent posture toward Israel. For Washington and Tel Aviv, this was unacceptable. The goal was not “democracy”; that word is just wrapping paper. The real objective was to remove a government allied with Iran and replace it with a fragmented landscape: a weak central authority in Damascus, surrounded by sectarian cantons and warlord enclaves, all dependent on foreign patrons. Jolani is perfect for this role. For Israel, he brings vertical division. A man with a long al-Qaeda pedigree ruling Syria is a nightmare for minorities: Christians, Druze, Alawites, Shi’a, many Kurds, and other smaller communities. They will not accept al-Qaeda rule. So they retreat into their own militias, their own cantons, their own de facto mini-states, exactly in line with old Israeli strategic doctrines like the Yinon Plan, which openly advocated fragmenting neighboring states along sectarian lines. On the ground, we already see it: -Druze militias running their own affairs in the south with quiet Israeli backing. -Kurdish forces in the northeast under US protection, managing their own autonomous zone. -Alawites discussing an autonomous coastal enclave. -Christians living in silence and fear. You don’t need formal borders on a map to balkanize a country. When I, as a Syrian of Armenian origin, stop thinking of myself as Syrian first and start thinking purely as Armenian, when I instinctively fear my neighbor because he is from another sect, the balkanization has already happened in the mind. For Washington, Jolani is equally “useful.” He has promised to normalize relations with Israel, to open Syria’s markets to Western capital, and to hand over the country’s resources from the hydrocarbons east of the Euphrates to the gas fields under the Mediterranean to American and allied companies. A 24-million-person country reduced to a reconstruction market: $300 billion worth of contracts, infrastructure projects, and “investments.” But for investors to feel safe, they need a strongman in Damascus who can project the illusion of stability while remaining utterly dependent on foreign protection. That strongman, in their design, is Abu Mohammed al-Jolani. But Jolani is not acting alone. Around him is a constellation of Western intelligence veterans and “conflict resolution” NGOs acting as intermediaries. British MI6 circles, under figures like Jonathan Powell – former chief of staff to Tony Blair – are central in managing this process. Powell runs an organization called Inter Mediate, which specializes in “talking to armed groups.” Behind the humanitarian language lies political engineering. One of Inter Mediate’s operatives, a woman named Clare Haigh, is now said to have an office inside the Syrian presidential palace, advising Jolani on how to talk, how to dress, how to handle journalists, how to sell himself as a reformed jihadist turned statesman. And then there is Qatar. Ahmed Zaidan – once Osama bin Laden’s favorite journalist, photographed sipping tea with him and broadcasting his tapes on Al Jazeera – is now a personal adviser to Jolani. Make it make sense. An al-Qaeda emir, handled by US and British intelligence veterans, advised by bin Laden’s favorite media man, massaged by Western PR consultants, welcomed in Washington, and crowned in Damascus as “president.” If you wrote this as fiction, an editor would tell you it’s too on the nose. Since Jolani took power through an international and regional deal that pushed Assad aside, over 11,000 people have been killed. Many of them are from the very minorities the West loves to mention in speeches but abandons in practice. Videos circulate of his fighters asking terrified villagers at gunpoint, “Are you Muslim or not?” and executing those who give the “wrong” answer, including Druze and Alawites who are not recognized as “true Muslims” by their extremist ideology. Christians, who had already suffered massive emigration between 2011 and 2024, are being squeezed further. They have no organized armed force, no foreign sponsor. They are expected either to live under the mercy of an al-Qaeda-bred regime or to leave the land of their ancestors. This is what Washington’s “asset management” looks like in human terms. If you are an American reading this, you might be tempted to say: “This cannot be. My government would never knowingly empower al-Qaeda.” But it already has, repeatedly. From Afghanistan in the 1980s, when US intelligence backed the Mujahideen (and, indirectly, their Arab foreign fighter allies), to Libya and Syria in the last decade, where jihadist factions were instrumentalized against secular or nationalist governments, the pattern is clear. The names and acronyms change. The logic does not. The same establishment that lectures the world on “democracy” and “human rights” is perfectly willing to install a man like Jolani as the ruler of one of the oldest civilizations on earth, as long as he delivers strategic gains: -breaking the Iran–Syria–Hezbollah axis; -fragmenting Syria into weak, controllable pieces; -opening its resources and markets to Western and Gulf capital; -and giving Israel unprecedented strategic depth and security. Everything else – the massacres, the ethnic cleansing, the collapse of national identity, the destruction of ancient communities – is treated as collateral damage. I am often asked what Syria will look like in five or ten years. I wish I could answer with optimism. Right now, the forces pushing to turn my country into a permanent vassal state – ruled by a former al-Qaeda emir, policed by foreign intelligence, exploited by foreign capital – are incredibly strong. But nothing in this region is permanent. People who come to power by cutting off other people’s heads often lose their own. If there are still sane voices left in Western politics – people like Tulsi Gabbard 🌺, whom I mentioned on air – they must at least recognize this insanity: backing an al-Qaeda emir as “our man in Damascus” is not just immoral; it is ultimately self-destructive. Syria does not need Jolani. The West does not need Jolani. There are Syrians who can have friendly relations with the United States without being former al-Qaeda commanders, without murdering their own people, without turning an ancient nation into a laboratory for extremist social engineering. The question is not whether such alternatives exist. They do. The question is whether Washington and its allies want a sovereign, stable Syria, or whether they prefer a shattered, cantonized carcass kept alive just enough for the next “asset” to feed on.

Kevork Almassian

177,007 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Trump is a racist. America elected a racist, and he is a reflection of what today’s America has become. More than 80 million Americans voted for him. It is not that Trump created racists, he simply opened the door and gave them permission to be who they already were. He is a racist, and that is why, in November 2024 when he was elected, I was shocked to see black Africans celebrating and supporting this bigot. I was genuinely shocked. Again, it goes back to the issue of knowledge, or the lack of it. Our people do not read. They are fascinated by soundbites and television theatrics. Trump, the loudmouth showman on NBC shouting “You are fired,” is what excited them. They never took the time to dig deeper and understand the character, history, and worldview of the man they were cheering for from Africa. They never bothered. And this is part of the reason why Africa is in such a mess. We do not follow ideas, we do not follow values, and we are not guided by principle. Across the continent — from Zimbabwe to South Africa, Zuma included, and all the way up — we follow personalities instead of interrogating their ideas. I am glad that what is happening now is happening, because it exposes the folly. Even the Somalis in Minnesota, whose community leadership openly endorsed Donald Trump, are now living with the consequences of that decision. What he is doing to them is exactly what we warned them about. But they did not listen, just like the Africans on the continent who were twerking for Trump without understanding who or what they were supporting. Trump’s grandfather came from Germany, so by the very same logic he uses to attack others, one could easily call Trump a German. His mother came from Scotland. Yet he still has the audacity to tell Americans of Somali parentage to go back to Somalia, even though they were born in the United States and are fully American. Many of the people shouting this racist nonsense are themselves descendants of immigrants who arrived only a generation or two ago. None of them are indigenous to America. Trump has no right to question the citizenship or belonging of Americans simply because their grand parents came from Somalia, especially when his own lineage comes from Germany and Scotland. This is the clearest definition of racism. It is selective exclusion disguised as patriotism, and it exposes exactly what the world is dealing with, a racist American president who emboldens other racists while conveniently ignoring his own foreign ancestry. His decision to kick South Africa out of the G20 again is a blatantly racist act. That is why he is replacing South Africa with Poland. South Africa has a black president, it is a majority-black nation, and because he is a racist, he removed them and substituted a white country in their place. It is sickening to watch.
1:19

Trump is a racist. America elected a racist, and he is a reflection of what today’s America has become. More than 80 million Americans voted for him. It is not that Trump created racists, he simply opened the door and gave them permission to be who they already were. He is a racist, and that is why, in November 2024 when he was elected, I was shocked to see black Africans celebrating and supporting this bigot. I was genuinely shocked. Again, it goes back to the issue of knowledge, or the lack of it. Our people do not read. They are fascinated by soundbites and television theatrics. Trump, the loudmouth showman on NBC shouting “You are fired,” is what excited them. They never took the time to dig deeper and understand the character, history, and worldview of the man they were cheering for from Africa. They never bothered. And this is part of the reason why Africa is in such a mess. We do not follow ideas, we do not follow values, and we are not guided by principle. Across the continent — from Zimbabwe to South Africa, Zuma included, and all the way up — we follow personalities instead of interrogating their ideas. I am glad that what is happening now is happening, because it exposes the folly. Even the Somalis in Minnesota, whose community leadership openly endorsed Donald Trump, are now living with the consequences of that decision. What he is doing to them is exactly what we warned them about. But they did not listen, just like the Africans on the continent who were twerking for Trump without understanding who or what they were supporting. Trump’s grandfather came from Germany, so by the very same logic he uses to attack others, one could easily call Trump a German. His mother came from Scotland. Yet he still has the audacity to tell Americans of Somali parentage to go back to Somalia, even though they were born in the United States and are fully American. Many of the people shouting this racist nonsense are themselves descendants of immigrants who arrived only a generation or two ago. None of them are indigenous to America. Trump has no right to question the citizenship or belonging of Americans simply because their grand parents came from Somalia, especially when his own lineage comes from Germany and Scotland. This is the clearest definition of racism. It is selective exclusion disguised as patriotism, and it exposes exactly what the world is dealing with, a racist American president who emboldens other racists while conveniently ignoring his own foreign ancestry. His decision to kick South Africa out of the G20 again is a blatantly racist act. That is why he is replacing South Africa with Poland. South Africa has a black president, it is a majority-black nation, and because he is a racist, he removed them and substituted a white country in their place. It is sickening to watch.

Hopewell Chin’ono

45,802 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

This makes A LOT of sense. This explains why so many woman get manipulated into being liberals “George Orwell once wrote women are always and inevitably on the side of the state. He wasn't being misogynistic, he was making a psychological observation. In his view, women, particularly in their role as caregivers and moral enforcers, tend to prioritize safety and compassion over risk and freedom, and that instinct, while natural, is easily weaponized by totalitarian systems. When conformity is marketed as compassion, control is rebranded as care, the state taps into the feminine psyche to enforce ideological obedience. Now consider this: men will do almost anything to attract a mate, so when the state captures women through propaganda, redefining tyranny as empathy and compliance as virtue, men follow, especially those who can't compete in the traditional dating market, they feminize themselves and trade strength for submission. This is what evolutionary biologists call the sneaky f - strategy. Low status males mimicking feminine traits or moral positions in hopes of reproductive access. And while all of this unfolds, families disintegrate. Single motherhood, a top predictor of poverty and social dysfunction, becomes the norm. Children from single parent homes are far less likely to climb the economic ladder, and who steps in as provider and protector? Not the father, the state. But here's the kicker, the state is funded disproportionately by men, so rather than supporting the women they married and raised children with directly, men subsidize the state, which in turn provides for women through social programs. Why? Because women have been propagandized to see every relationship as a power dynamic, except one with the state, which is ironically the centralization of raw power. They've been told that to rely on a man is weakness, but to rely on a bureaucracy is empowerment. This is not progress. This is dependency with a new face. And both men and women are suffering. The childless middle aged woman and the incel are two sides of the same broken culture. A woman without her own child often directs her maternal instinct towards abstract causes, infantilizing minorities under the guise of social justice. What we are witnessing from psychologically unwell men and women is Nietzsche's concept of resentiment. Envy dressed up as morality. The strong became evil. The weak became good. Strength became tyranny. We now live in a pathologically soft society that sides even with those who harm it, where punishing crime feels unfair and victimhood is the highest virtue. Nietzsche called them the tarantulas, those who preach justice but act from bitterness. They don't want to uplift the weak, they want to drag down the strong. Orwell saw them too. Most middle aged socialists, while theoretically pining for a classist society, cling like glue to their miserable fragments of social prestige. These bitter, well educated, and affluent types don't actually care about the downtrodden. They weaponize them. The real target is success, competence, independence, because those qualities expose their own inadequacies. But the answer to pathological femininity isn't pathological masculinity. It's not swinging the pendulum too far in the other direction. The answer is balance. Masculinity and femininity are not enemies. They're symbiotic. We've simply overcorrected. We escaped a world where masculinity once tyrannized femininity only to arrive in a world where femininity is tyrannizing masculinity. We are not oppressed by patriarchy, we are being suffocated by pathological softness, envy, and resentment. And unless we recognize this imbalance, the future will not be free. It will be emotionally manipulated, morally confused, and biologically unsustainable.”
3:38

This makes A LOT of sense. This explains why so many woman get manipulated into being liberals “George Orwell once wrote women are always and inevitably on the side of the state. He wasn't being misogynistic, he was making a psychological observation. In his view, women, particularly in their role as caregivers and moral enforcers, tend to prioritize safety and compassion over risk and freedom, and that instinct, while natural, is easily weaponized by totalitarian systems. When conformity is marketed as compassion, control is rebranded as care, the state taps into the feminine psyche to enforce ideological obedience. Now consider this: men will do almost anything to attract a mate, so when the state captures women through propaganda, redefining tyranny as empathy and compliance as virtue, men follow, especially those who can't compete in the traditional dating market, they feminize themselves and trade strength for submission. This is what evolutionary biologists call the sneaky f - strategy. Low status males mimicking feminine traits or moral positions in hopes of reproductive access. And while all of this unfolds, families disintegrate. Single motherhood, a top predictor of poverty and social dysfunction, becomes the norm. Children from single parent homes are far less likely to climb the economic ladder, and who steps in as provider and protector? Not the father, the state. But here's the kicker, the state is funded disproportionately by men, so rather than supporting the women they married and raised children with directly, men subsidize the state, which in turn provides for women through social programs. Why? Because women have been propagandized to see every relationship as a power dynamic, except one with the state, which is ironically the centralization of raw power. They've been told that to rely on a man is weakness, but to rely on a bureaucracy is empowerment. This is not progress. This is dependency with a new face. And both men and women are suffering. The childless middle aged woman and the incel are two sides of the same broken culture. A woman without her own child often directs her maternal instinct towards abstract causes, infantilizing minorities under the guise of social justice. What we are witnessing from psychologically unwell men and women is Nietzsche's concept of resentiment. Envy dressed up as morality. The strong became evil. The weak became good. Strength became tyranny. We now live in a pathologically soft society that sides even with those who harm it, where punishing crime feels unfair and victimhood is the highest virtue. Nietzsche called them the tarantulas, those who preach justice but act from bitterness. They don't want to uplift the weak, they want to drag down the strong. Orwell saw them too. Most middle aged socialists, while theoretically pining for a classist society, cling like glue to their miserable fragments of social prestige. These bitter, well educated, and affluent types don't actually care about the downtrodden. They weaponize them. The real target is success, competence, independence, because those qualities expose their own inadequacies. But the answer to pathological femininity isn't pathological masculinity. It's not swinging the pendulum too far in the other direction. The answer is balance. Masculinity and femininity are not enemies. They're symbiotic. We've simply overcorrected. We escaped a world where masculinity once tyrannized femininity only to arrive in a world where femininity is tyrannizing masculinity. We are not oppressed by patriarchy, we are being suffocated by pathological softness, envy, and resentment. And unless we recognize this imbalance, the future will not be free. It will be emotionally manipulated, morally confused, and biologically unsustainable.”

Wall Street Apes

1,061,025 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I hope Americans wake up and realize that Muslims do not want to take away only your dogs. They want to take away your freedom of having dogs. It is about control and dominance. This pro-Palestinian Mamdani supporter Nerdeen Kiswani just posted that finally NYC is coming to Islam. She means Islam is taking over New York. She added that dogs definitely have a place in society but just not as indoor pets. She said like we have said all along they are unclean. She puts herself in a position to dictate what her host society in the West should look like. Then Congressman Randy Fine replied that if they force us to choose the choice between dogs and Muslims is not a difficult one. As an Iranian and a Muslim I am totally in line with this statement. He is totally right. I have been to Mecca and I own a dog myself. But then Jake Tapper the CNN guy came to the rescue screaming disgusting bigotry. Gavin Newsom said resign now you racist slob. Apparently the Governor of California is not educated enough to know that Islam is not a race. He does not seem to understand that Muslims can actually choose to be civilized respectful citizens and not dominating savages. This is not about dogs. This is not about Islam. It is about control and domination. I am Iranian. We have been through this before. Iranians are Muslims. Our Shah our king his first name was “Mohammad” Reza for God's sake. But still they managed to take power in Iran in the name of Islam. Back in 1979, Islamists had no luck until France welcomed Khomeini as a refugee. There the same exact cult the pro-Palestine leftists helped him to portray the Shah of Iran as the ultimate enemy a corrupt regime that must be annihilated. Among all Shah’s crimes being pro-West pro-US pro-Israel supportive of women's rights his worst crime was loving dogs. Not just as family members but he funded and equipped hospitals for pets. The leftists liberals Democrats corrupt elite in academia and media portrayed this monster as a freedom fighter spread lies about the Shah on BBC rioted against him. They enabled Islamists secretly gave weapons to them. They took Iran toppled the Shah through extreme violence. Now in Iran dogs are not legally allowed as pets. People still have them of course but they have to hide them and wait until dark to take them out. Because authorities not only seize them and kill them they fine them massively or punish by 70 lashes. This is the reality under Shia Islamic rule the Islamo-leftists. The issue with many Americans is that they only know Sunni Islam from 9/11. But Mamdani Khomeini Khamenei they are Shia Muslims. They play the oppressed card and use Islam as a tool for power. Mamdani's mother was partying with Bill Clinton and Jeff Bezos at Epstein place in 2009. He has been groomed to seize power behind this façade of a grassroots pro-Palestine Muslim. And just like in Iran the enablers which I call traitors are the Democrats and the corrupt elite in academia and media. So Americans please do not be naive. Do not hand your freedom to these enemies of life. Protect what you have unapologetically and fiercely. Otherwise you will have to fight to get it back just like Iranians are still fighting today. Do not think it will not happen to you. It will if you do not stand up now. Choose freedom. Do not give in to their lies. Choose dogs. Be like Congressman Randy Fine not Jake Tapper 🦅 . Share if this wakes you up. From an Iranian who lived it.
3:08

I hope Americans wake up and realize that Muslims do not want to take away only your dogs. They want to take away your freedom of having dogs. It is about control and dominance. This pro-Palestinian Mamdani supporter Nerdeen Kiswani just posted that finally NYC is coming to Islam. She means Islam is taking over New York. She added that dogs definitely have a place in society but just not as indoor pets. She said like we have said all along they are unclean. She puts herself in a position to dictate what her host society in the West should look like. Then Congressman Randy Fine replied that if they force us to choose the choice between dogs and Muslims is not a difficult one. As an Iranian and a Muslim I am totally in line with this statement. He is totally right. I have been to Mecca and I own a dog myself. But then Jake Tapper the CNN guy came to the rescue screaming disgusting bigotry. Gavin Newsom said resign now you racist slob. Apparently the Governor of California is not educated enough to know that Islam is not a race. He does not seem to understand that Muslims can actually choose to be civilized respectful citizens and not dominating savages. This is not about dogs. This is not about Islam. It is about control and domination. I am Iranian. We have been through this before. Iranians are Muslims. Our Shah our king his first name was “Mohammad” Reza for God's sake. But still they managed to take power in Iran in the name of Islam. Back in 1979, Islamists had no luck until France welcomed Khomeini as a refugee. There the same exact cult the pro-Palestine leftists helped him to portray the Shah of Iran as the ultimate enemy a corrupt regime that must be annihilated. Among all Shah’s crimes being pro-West pro-US pro-Israel supportive of women's rights his worst crime was loving dogs. Not just as family members but he funded and equipped hospitals for pets. The leftists liberals Democrats corrupt elite in academia and media portrayed this monster as a freedom fighter spread lies about the Shah on BBC rioted against him. They enabled Islamists secretly gave weapons to them. They took Iran toppled the Shah through extreme violence. Now in Iran dogs are not legally allowed as pets. People still have them of course but they have to hide them and wait until dark to take them out. Because authorities not only seize them and kill them they fine them massively or punish by 70 lashes. This is the reality under Shia Islamic rule the Islamo-leftists. The issue with many Americans is that they only know Sunni Islam from 9/11. But Mamdani Khomeini Khamenei they are Shia Muslims. They play the oppressed card and use Islam as a tool for power. Mamdani's mother was partying with Bill Clinton and Jeff Bezos at Epstein place in 2009. He has been groomed to seize power behind this façade of a grassroots pro-Palestine Muslim. And just like in Iran the enablers which I call traitors are the Democrats and the corrupt elite in academia and media. So Americans please do not be naive. Do not hand your freedom to these enemies of life. Protect what you have unapologetically and fiercely. Otherwise you will have to fight to get it back just like Iranians are still fighting today. Do not think it will not happen to you. It will if you do not stand up now. Choose freedom. Do not give in to their lies. Choose dogs. Be like Congressman Randy Fine not Jake Tapper 🦅 . Share if this wakes you up. From an Iranian who lived it.

Ida Turan 🇮🇷

128,007 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Mossad: "We create a pretend world. We are a global production company. We write the screenplay, we're the directors, we're the producers, we're the main actors. The world is our stage." If the Mossad wanted to kill Charlie Kirk because he was about to break with Zionism as Candace Owens had, which would have been a significant blow to them as he led the main conservative MAGA youth org, how would they do it? One way would be to lure him to Israel and stage his death there, with a "OMG AN IRAN-BACKED HOUTHI DRONE STRUCK HIS HOTEL ROOM". But that would instantly raise suspicions among right-wingers critical of Israel and beyond and be too on the nose. No, they would have to find an another way, where they could generate so much partisan rhetorical noise that not enough people would be able to pick up the signal to directly blame them. Now they of course know the US is littered with guns and highly impressionable mentally unstable zoomers whose lives are entirely on Discord and online. So they will set up an operation targeting these people for grooming to do the hit for them. They will of course try to get the perfect profile match, someone with a Muslim, Arab, Palestinian background would be ideal. Then a leftist, trans person, antifa, that's another good pond to fish in. But anyone will do, it's a big pool of disaffected mentally unstable zoomers, and even if you get an irony-poisoned incoherent lover of Columbine to be the one to make the actual move after you've groomed them, that will do too. Now of course they won't say they're Mossad agents, they will play the role they created in their new pretend world for this purpose. They are fellow zoomers, they are Muslim, Arab, Palestinian, trans, enby, antifa, DSA, groyper, they will adopt all the parts and play them perfectly. The world is their stage. They keep trying to light the match and get a hit on one of their many grooming operations, get one of them to actually make the move and draw up the plan and go there physically and pull the trigger. They need one of them to not just agree to it, and draw up a plan to do it, and even drive there but then decide at the last moment it's not who they are, they can't do it, and they will have to disappoint their online Discord bestie who hides behind a fake created identity to best match with them and become their soul mate, while actually being some Cohen sitting in Unit 8200 in Tel Aviv. But one of them will not stop. One of them will draw up the plan, drive to the location with a rifle, get up on the roof, and do the hit. One of them will be Tyler Robinson. The match is lit. And what do you do then? You immediately start pumping out propaganda: The entire Israeli Zionist government and lobby comes out within minutes, as if they already knew beforehand, and says it's a Muslim, it's a Palestinian, it's a KHAMAS lover, it's a leftist, it's part of the worldwide radical marxist left gay trans anti-Israel evil terrorist forces. Noise. You start producing noise, so that no one can see the signal in the chaos. That's how the Mossad would kill Charlie Kirk. Now of course we don't know for certain if they actually did this, at least not yet. But any kind of certain proof you would get for it would come out decades from now, when it no longer matters and they can do one of their archival releases like with the wells they poisoned (see buried deep in some obscure article no one reads, and only by vague general innuendo. If even that.
0:44

Mossad: "We create a pretend world. We are a global production company. We write the screenplay, we're the directors, we're the producers, we're the main actors. The world is our stage." If the Mossad wanted to kill Charlie Kirk because he was about to break with Zionism as Candace Owens had, which would have been a significant blow to them as he led the main conservative MAGA youth org, how would they do it? One way would be to lure him to Israel and stage his death there, with a "OMG AN IRAN-BACKED HOUTHI DRONE STRUCK HIS HOTEL ROOM". But that would instantly raise suspicions among right-wingers critical of Israel and beyond and be too on the nose. No, they would have to find an another way, where they could generate so much partisan rhetorical noise that not enough people would be able to pick up the signal to directly blame them. Now they of course know the US is littered with guns and highly impressionable mentally unstable zoomers whose lives are entirely on Discord and online. So they will set up an operation targeting these people for grooming to do the hit for them. They will of course try to get the perfect profile match, someone with a Muslim, Arab, Palestinian background would be ideal. Then a leftist, trans person, antifa, that's another good pond to fish in. But anyone will do, it's a big pool of disaffected mentally unstable zoomers, and even if you get an irony-poisoned incoherent lover of Columbine to be the one to make the actual move after you've groomed them, that will do too. Now of course they won't say they're Mossad agents, they will play the role they created in their new pretend world for this purpose. They are fellow zoomers, they are Muslim, Arab, Palestinian, trans, enby, antifa, DSA, groyper, they will adopt all the parts and play them perfectly. The world is their stage. They keep trying to light the match and get a hit on one of their many grooming operations, get one of them to actually make the move and draw up the plan and go there physically and pull the trigger. They need one of them to not just agree to it, and draw up a plan to do it, and even drive there but then decide at the last moment it's not who they are, they can't do it, and they will have to disappoint their online Discord bestie who hides behind a fake created identity to best match with them and become their soul mate, while actually being some Cohen sitting in Unit 8200 in Tel Aviv. But one of them will not stop. One of them will draw up the plan, drive to the location with a rifle, get up on the roof, and do the hit. One of them will be Tyler Robinson. The match is lit. And what do you do then? You immediately start pumping out propaganda: The entire Israeli Zionist government and lobby comes out within minutes, as if they already knew beforehand, and says it's a Muslim, it's a Palestinian, it's a KHAMAS lover, it's a leftist, it's part of the worldwide radical marxist left gay trans anti-Israel evil terrorist forces. Noise. You start producing noise, so that no one can see the signal in the chaos. That's how the Mossad would kill Charlie Kirk. Now of course we don't know for certain if they actually did this, at least not yet. But any kind of certain proof you would get for it would come out decades from now, when it no longer matters and they can do one of their archival releases like with the wells they poisoned (see buried deep in some obscure article no one reads, and only by vague general innuendo. If even that.

☀️👀

538,940 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

I had to take a breath yesterday for two reasons. I’ve been doing this now every day for six years because I believe that amidst these dark, deeply concerning times, the values that I learned to love about America having worked and travelled there so many times over the years remain, and have not been lost. The visceral hate on display following the victory of Zohran Mamdani in New York is palpable and made me feel physically sick. Then I watched the Pentagon briefing with Pete Hegseth veins extended in his neck, as he attacked the press in a way that was a first for me. I have never seen anything quite like it. It was deeply disturbing and very dangerous. It goes to the very core of how a narcissistic sociopath has infected the soul of a nation like a malignant cancer that is eating America alive. This is a man that is not just dangerous, but truly evil. It is chilling and at the same time unspeakably terrifying. America is being held hostage by what I can only describe as an international crime boss prepared to do ANYTHING in his quest for absolute power. It is my honest belief that if he was faced with the choice of losing power or committing genocide on immigrants in the US, he would volunteer to turn on the gas taps, that’s who he is and the world should be absolutely terrified, because faced with even being questioned on just the truth of events, he’s prepared to risk the security of millions as vengeance for having the audacity to question a pathological liar. If as seems likely, Iran moved its enriched Uranium prior to the attack, which Trump has dismissed despite numerous experts suggesting was highly likely, there is now no consideration of a renewed threat. He’s prepared to dismiss any threat so he can double down on claims he made before even initial battle damage assessments could be made. Do people understand how grossly irresponsible this is on the part of the most powerful man on earth? It does not make America safer, it is just another layer of illusion in a tapestry of lies he has woven since taking office in January. It makes NOBODY safer, it simply creates the illusion of safety. Just like the illusion of a thriving economy. It’s all lies being reinforced by a bunch of enablers and sycophants. Trump has normalised the state abduction of civilians by masked men in unmarked vehicles unprepared to identify themselves. Many of these men aren’t law enforcement officers, they are thugs employed by the state for the sole purpose of intimidation. They are not searching for the dangerous criminals they promised to seek and deport. Instead, they are going for soft targets, turning up at asylum court hearings having been advised that those attending hearings are being stripped of their right to remain at the hearings, thus changing their status, making them eligible to be deported. They are turning up to nurseries, schools farms to terrorise people whose only crime is to not be white. It is cruelty personified and his base is cheering, as children are traumatised and zip tied, women are assaulted as immigrants are hunted for sport by a bunch of racist thugs employed for the specific purpose of traumatising the immigrant population as a deterrent. It doesn’t stop there as they are taken to for profit detention centres where they are often put to work for a dollar a day, left without food or water for extended period as their human rights are trampled on for fun, to the point where some are now dying in custody. Slavery never died it just put on a new suit. I’m not American, I’m just a guy on the outside looking in, but I have to tell you America is rotting from the inside out while Democrats say ‘What can we do?”.John Lewis and MLK are turning in their graves as humanity, moral integrity and truth are withering on the vine. This is the destruction of a once force for good in real time as the world looks on in horror. The truth hurts, but it has to be said. 🎥 TikTok -
3:43

I had to take a breath yesterday for two reasons. I’ve been doing this now every day for six years because I believe that amidst these dark, deeply concerning times, the values that I learned to love about America having worked and travelled there so many times over the years remain, and have not been lost. The visceral hate on display following the victory of Zohran Mamdani in New York is palpable and made me feel physically sick. Then I watched the Pentagon briefing with Pete Hegseth veins extended in his neck, as he attacked the press in a way that was a first for me. I have never seen anything quite like it. It was deeply disturbing and very dangerous. It goes to the very core of how a narcissistic sociopath has infected the soul of a nation like a malignant cancer that is eating America alive. This is a man that is not just dangerous, but truly evil. It is chilling and at the same time unspeakably terrifying. America is being held hostage by what I can only describe as an international crime boss prepared to do ANYTHING in his quest for absolute power. It is my honest belief that if he was faced with the choice of losing power or committing genocide on immigrants in the US, he would volunteer to turn on the gas taps, that’s who he is and the world should be absolutely terrified, because faced with even being questioned on just the truth of events, he’s prepared to risk the security of millions as vengeance for having the audacity to question a pathological liar. If as seems likely, Iran moved its enriched Uranium prior to the attack, which Trump has dismissed despite numerous experts suggesting was highly likely, there is now no consideration of a renewed threat. He’s prepared to dismiss any threat so he can double down on claims he made before even initial battle damage assessments could be made. Do people understand how grossly irresponsible this is on the part of the most powerful man on earth? It does not make America safer, it is just another layer of illusion in a tapestry of lies he has woven since taking office in January. It makes NOBODY safer, it simply creates the illusion of safety. Just like the illusion of a thriving economy. It’s all lies being reinforced by a bunch of enablers and sycophants. Trump has normalised the state abduction of civilians by masked men in unmarked vehicles unprepared to identify themselves. Many of these men aren’t law enforcement officers, they are thugs employed by the state for the sole purpose of intimidation. They are not searching for the dangerous criminals they promised to seek and deport. Instead, they are going for soft targets, turning up at asylum court hearings having been advised that those attending hearings are being stripped of their right to remain at the hearings, thus changing their status, making them eligible to be deported. They are turning up to nurseries, schools farms to terrorise people whose only crime is to not be white. It is cruelty personified and his base is cheering, as children are traumatised and zip tied, women are assaulted as immigrants are hunted for sport by a bunch of racist thugs employed for the specific purpose of traumatising the immigrant population as a deterrent. It doesn’t stop there as they are taken to for profit detention centres where they are often put to work for a dollar a day, left without food or water for extended period as their human rights are trampled on for fun, to the point where some are now dying in custody. Slavery never died it just put on a new suit. I’m not American, I’m just a guy on the outside looking in, but I have to tell you America is rotting from the inside out while Democrats say ‘What can we do?”.John Lewis and MLK are turning in their graves as humanity, moral integrity and truth are withering on the vine. This is the destruction of a once force for good in real time as the world looks on in horror. The truth hurts, but it has to be said. 🎥 TikTok -

𝔗𝔯𝔲𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔰

54,535 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

As a U.S. citizen exercising my free speech, I began warning about Mike Flynn, QAnon and Russian interference in our elections starting in August 2020, during the first Trump administration. In the 4 1/2 years since, I have experienced a ruthless onslaught of attacks for my reporting, which includes “lawfare” — the intentional weaponization of the legal system as part of an effort to silence, disrupt or harm an opponent. The first lawsuit was by retired Lt. General Mike Flynn — a remarkable piece of legal propaganda that regurgitated a number of smear campaigns created by Flynn’s trolls, stalkers, and media plants, which accused me of calling him various names. It started as a $75,000 lawsuit engineered to stay in Sarasota Court. When the judge didn’t cooperate as he hoped, Flynn escalated his lawsuit to include Rick Wilson for $10 million in federal court, then added MeidasTouch for $50 million. Their crimes were acknowledging that I exist. When that failed to stop me from speaking out, Flynn had his good friend and loyal operative Kash Patel, formerly Chief of Staff in the Pentagon on J6 and slated for a hearing to be FBI Director, copycat sue me for $10 million in Nevada. Among the accusations of Kash Patel is that I called him a “chud” and a “Kremlin asset,” all of which is true.  In the last few weeks, Russian state media has said that Kash Patel is “our boy” who will be “a beaut,” “dismantle America brick by brick,” and turn the FBI into a “museum of political repression.” I have first-hand knowledge of this reality, now. As I write this, my lawyers are spending money Mike Flynn and Kash Patel know I don’t have — to punish me for the crime of telling the truth about them, and to challenge the Sullivan Rule, which protects journalists who write about “public figures,” a role Flynn and Patel pride themselves on. They know their cases will never prevail, and that I have nothing to give them if they did. But that is not the point. This is “hybrid” or “fifth generation warfare” against what they perceive as a dangerous opponent. It’s a small example of “political repression,” to quote the Russians. My rights as an American are being trampled right now. They were being trampled during the Biden Administration — because our justice system is already broken. It’s an ancient, glacial, incomprehensible mess driven by money, power and influence. It needs a reboot. Regardless, imagine what Patel and Flynn will do with the power of the federal government, not just to me, but to the nation. If they will go to these lengths to silence one guy who writes on Twitter and Substack, what will they do to media organizations, to political opponents, and to marginalized communities? When they say they want “retribution,” what they mean is they want to erase history of their own crimes. They are engaged in a massive Goebbels-like DARVO (Deny, Accuse, Reverse Victim & Offender) campaign to blame Democrats, “Russiagate” and whatever other conspiracy theories they can conjure up for crimes they committed themselves. They will now have the ability to enforce this alternate reality with the full power of the federal government. The best example of how I expect a Patel-led FBI to function is like the Stasi, the East German secret police, who implemented a program on their own people called Zersetzung. This type of “silent repression” is what they want. Everyone must play along with the alternate reality, the alternate history, they are trying to create, or be silenced — by the state. Kash Patel is a dangerous sociopath, a foreign agent, and an enemy of American democracy. If we put him in charge of the FBI, no one, anywhere, will be safe. Senator Adam Schiff Dick Durbin Senate Democrats
0:46

As a U.S. citizen exercising my free speech, I began warning about Mike Flynn, QAnon and Russian interference in our elections starting in August 2020, during the first Trump administration. In the 4 1/2 years since, I have experienced a ruthless onslaught of attacks for my reporting, which includes “lawfare” — the intentional weaponization of the legal system as part of an effort to silence, disrupt or harm an opponent. The first lawsuit was by retired Lt. General Mike Flynn — a remarkable piece of legal propaganda that regurgitated a number of smear campaigns created by Flynn’s trolls, stalkers, and media plants, which accused me of calling him various names. It started as a $75,000 lawsuit engineered to stay in Sarasota Court. When the judge didn’t cooperate as he hoped, Flynn escalated his lawsuit to include Rick Wilson for $10 million in federal court, then added MeidasTouch for $50 million. Their crimes were acknowledging that I exist. When that failed to stop me from speaking out, Flynn had his good friend and loyal operative Kash Patel, formerly Chief of Staff in the Pentagon on J6 and slated for a hearing to be FBI Director, copycat sue me for $10 million in Nevada. Among the accusations of Kash Patel is that I called him a “chud” and a “Kremlin asset,” all of which is true.  In the last few weeks, Russian state media has said that Kash Patel is “our boy” who will be “a beaut,” “dismantle America brick by brick,” and turn the FBI into a “museum of political repression.” I have first-hand knowledge of this reality, now. As I write this, my lawyers are spending money Mike Flynn and Kash Patel know I don’t have — to punish me for the crime of telling the truth about them, and to challenge the Sullivan Rule, which protects journalists who write about “public figures,” a role Flynn and Patel pride themselves on. They know their cases will never prevail, and that I have nothing to give them if they did. But that is not the point. This is “hybrid” or “fifth generation warfare” against what they perceive as a dangerous opponent. It’s a small example of “political repression,” to quote the Russians. My rights as an American are being trampled right now. They were being trampled during the Biden Administration — because our justice system is already broken. It’s an ancient, glacial, incomprehensible mess driven by money, power and influence. It needs a reboot. Regardless, imagine what Patel and Flynn will do with the power of the federal government, not just to me, but to the nation. If they will go to these lengths to silence one guy who writes on Twitter and Substack, what will they do to media organizations, to political opponents, and to marginalized communities? When they say they want “retribution,” what they mean is they want to erase history of their own crimes. They are engaged in a massive Goebbels-like DARVO (Deny, Accuse, Reverse Victim & Offender) campaign to blame Democrats, “Russiagate” and whatever other conspiracy theories they can conjure up for crimes they committed themselves. They will now have the ability to enforce this alternate reality with the full power of the federal government. The best example of how I expect a Patel-led FBI to function is like the Stasi, the East German secret police, who implemented a program on their own people called Zersetzung. This type of “silent repression” is what they want. Everyone must play along with the alternate reality, the alternate history, they are trying to create, or be silenced — by the state. Kash Patel is a dangerous sociopath, a foreign agent, and an enemy of American democracy. If we put him in charge of the FBI, no one, anywhere, will be safe. Senator Adam Schiff Dick Durbin Senate Democrats

Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸

185,703 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

HOW THE U.N. FOOLED THE WORLD ABOUT CHINA Westerners took over control of a United Nations body to claim the Chinese locked up a million or millions of people—but they had no evidence. The “MILLIONS” number was extrapolated from interviews with just 40 people, and they were not randomly selected, said Australian lawyer and researcher Jaq James from Geolaw Narratives. These clearly untrustworthy findings were then amplified by mainstream media reports quoting people from US groups paid to demonize China—with their membership and funding hidden from readers, our own research shows. The result is a massive scam on the world’s public. Four points: . 1. THEY HIDE THE NEED FOR DERADICALIZATION Point one: In mainstream reports about terrorist deradicalization efforts after the 9/11 attack, the 9/11 act of terrorism is mentioned. Same with the deradicalization efforts after the 7/7 terrorism act in London. But there were more than 130 brutal, acts of terror in China—that’s correct, more than 130 murderous acts in which large numbers of innocent people were killed by Uyghur separatists. But these are simply not mentioned in typical reports. Only the response is mentioned. By deliberately removing the huge number of acts of terror to which the Chinese are responding, western journalists make the Chinese look like they are taking arbitrary actions against the Uyghurs. Yet the truth is that they were doing what westerners also did, responding to terrorist acts. [Image shows clip of “French re-education camps” headline] You can see how unfair that is. . 2. ORIGIN OF ‘MILLION LOCKED UP’ CLAIMS Point two: The first claim that China had arbitrarily locked up a million people was exposed by independent journalists at The Grayzone, as coming from an extrapolation from just eight people. More damning still, that extrapolation came from CHRD, a notorious US-based demonization-of-China outfit funded by the US government. The second claim that million people had been locked up came from the UNOHCR, the UN's human rights office. They took interviews from just 40 people and extrapolated what they heard to claim one million people had been unfairly locked up, as Jaq James’ research shows. Ms James points out that the UN should have interviewed randomly selected individuals to get a fair picture. But by interviewing politically networked ones, they are guaranteed to get a biased image. Again, fundamentally unfair. . 3. JUSTICE AND FAIRNESS Point three: This UN department had a leader, Michelle Bachelet, known for her appetite for justice and fairness. This meant she struggled with her staff—westerners who really controlled the operation. She insisted that their report be released alongside a response from China. Here we can see two reports – one from the UN group’s staff, and the response from China. The staff report was just 48 pages long. China’s reply was 120 pages long. How many western mainstream media outlets quoted the Chinese report, or even acknowledged its existence? Zero. Not one. Not. A. Single. One. . 4. IN WHICH WE DESTROY THE FINANCIAL TIMES Point four: The mainstream media write-ups about this subject hid the truth from readers in a shockingly deceitful way. Let’s take a look at a Financial Times article, which is fairly typical. It reinforces the UN group’s dubious findings with evidence which comes from “human rights experts and activists” – in other words, people paid by the US government to demonize China. The writers do NOT provide their names, just calling them “experts”. As Kyle Feranna said in his 2024 book: “Western NGOs, ostensibly concerned with human rights, disproportion¬ately focused on alleged violations in China despite much worse abuses occurring elsewhere in the world.” In other words, they weaponize human rights as tool to use against the Chinese. . GUANTANAMO BAY Then we get a quote from “Rushan Abbas of the Campaign for Uyghurs”. The Financial Times hides from its readers the fact that Ms Abbas was at the notorious Guantanamo Bay – not as a Muslim victim, but on the US side there. And the paper hides the fact that the Campaign for Uyghurs is financed by the NED, the CIA’s regime change spin off. These are absolutely key facts which change the whole tenor of the piece – and the FT is cheerfully deceiving its paying readers by omitting them. Abbas is quoted as saying, of the UN group’s western office staff, “without them, it would not have been released”. This reinforces many reports which say that Commissioner Michelle Bachelet did not want to release such an unfair report, but her staff, mostly westerners, pushed the unfair report out on her last day. . ANONYMOUS SOURCES Then the FT feature article quotes yet another person described as “an activist” and declines to provide his or her name. Then we go to yet another unnamed “human rights” officer. And then yes, a further unnamed “human rights” officer. And then we get a quote from an unnamed “person with knowledge”. And here we have another anonymous quote – a senior European diplomat. No name. I mean, there are so many unnamed sources in this piece, it would have been rejected at any decent journalism school. . OTHER SIDE OF THE STORY Now the FT piece breezily passes over a reference to the other side of the story by quote “China and 68 other countries”. This is hilarious. So if you are a demonizer, paid by the US State Department, you can get as many column inches in the FT as you like, with your name and funding hidden. But if you are 69 actual named countries defending China, giving the other side of the story—well, they’ll just mention it in passing. . THE REAL STORY Now, right at the bottom of the article we actually have a named person – and he actually tells the real story. “Bachelet was never really in full control of her office,” said Marc Limon. Now any journalist worth their salt would realize that that is the key quote in the whole article – and they would ask – okay, if she was not in charge of that UN group, WHO WAS? But the FT writers choose not to ask that awkward question. They don’t want to know. And they definitely don’t want their readers to know. . CLOSING LINE The FT writers close the article with a line from a quote “Uyghur journalist” who actually is named. She is Nuriman Abdureshid. So the reader is left thinking – oh, so they actually did manage to discuss this with someone in Xinjiang, someone with a name and a job. But what the FT "journalists" omit to tell the paper's long-suffering readers is that Ms Nuriman Abdureshid is associated with a group called Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation, a Washington DC group which demonizes China to such an extreme extent that even other anti-China groups avoid them out of sheer embarrassment. Do I have proof that Victims of Communism is backed by the government? Well, the AI which has taken over Google tells us that Victims of Communism has received funding from the US State Department to deal with human rights issues. Here’s what happens when we look up their funding to check the details. [CLICKS LINK] “SORRY YOU HAVE BEEN BLOCKED’. Ah yes, the famous US “free speech”. . A QUESTION I’m going to close with a question. Why is the political and media class in the west working so hard to fool the world about the Chinese? Why work so hard to demonize a country that is working hard to lift itself out of starvation level poverty? What don’t they want the world to know? Could it be that China is actually doing something right? Think about that – and we may all, one day, be on the road to peace. .
9:30

HOW THE U.N. FOOLED THE WORLD ABOUT CHINA Westerners took over control of a United Nations body to claim the Chinese locked up a million or millions of people—but they had no evidence. The “MILLIONS” number was extrapolated from interviews with just 40 people, and they were not randomly selected, said Australian lawyer and researcher Jaq James from Geolaw Narratives. These clearly untrustworthy findings were then amplified by mainstream media reports quoting people from US groups paid to demonize China—with their membership and funding hidden from readers, our own research shows. The result is a massive scam on the world’s public. Four points: . 1. THEY HIDE THE NEED FOR DERADICALIZATION Point one: In mainstream reports about terrorist deradicalization efforts after the 9/11 attack, the 9/11 act of terrorism is mentioned. Same with the deradicalization efforts after the 7/7 terrorism act in London. But there were more than 130 brutal, acts of terror in China—that’s correct, more than 130 murderous acts in which large numbers of innocent people were killed by Uyghur separatists. But these are simply not mentioned in typical reports. Only the response is mentioned. By deliberately removing the huge number of acts of terror to which the Chinese are responding, western journalists make the Chinese look like they are taking arbitrary actions against the Uyghurs. Yet the truth is that they were doing what westerners also did, responding to terrorist acts. [Image shows clip of “French re-education camps” headline] You can see how unfair that is. . 2. ORIGIN OF ‘MILLION LOCKED UP’ CLAIMS Point two: The first claim that China had arbitrarily locked up a million people was exposed by independent journalists at The Grayzone, as coming from an extrapolation from just eight people. More damning still, that extrapolation came from CHRD, a notorious US-based demonization-of-China outfit funded by the US government. The second claim that million people had been locked up came from the UNOHCR, the UN's human rights office. They took interviews from just 40 people and extrapolated what they heard to claim one million people had been unfairly locked up, as Jaq James’ research shows. Ms James points out that the UN should have interviewed randomly selected individuals to get a fair picture. But by interviewing politically networked ones, they are guaranteed to get a biased image. Again, fundamentally unfair. . 3. JUSTICE AND FAIRNESS Point three: This UN department had a leader, Michelle Bachelet, known for her appetite for justice and fairness. This meant she struggled with her staff—westerners who really controlled the operation. She insisted that their report be released alongside a response from China. Here we can see two reports – one from the UN group’s staff, and the response from China. The staff report was just 48 pages long. China’s reply was 120 pages long. How many western mainstream media outlets quoted the Chinese report, or even acknowledged its existence? Zero. Not one. Not. A. Single. One. . 4. IN WHICH WE DESTROY THE FINANCIAL TIMES Point four: The mainstream media write-ups about this subject hid the truth from readers in a shockingly deceitful way. Let’s take a look at a Financial Times article, which is fairly typical. It reinforces the UN group’s dubious findings with evidence which comes from “human rights experts and activists” – in other words, people paid by the US government to demonize China. The writers do NOT provide their names, just calling them “experts”. As Kyle Feranna said in his 2024 book: “Western NGOs, ostensibly concerned with human rights, disproportion¬ately focused on alleged violations in China despite much worse abuses occurring elsewhere in the world.” In other words, they weaponize human rights as tool to use against the Chinese. . GUANTANAMO BAY Then we get a quote from “Rushan Abbas of the Campaign for Uyghurs”. The Financial Times hides from its readers the fact that Ms Abbas was at the notorious Guantanamo Bay – not as a Muslim victim, but on the US side there. And the paper hides the fact that the Campaign for Uyghurs is financed by the NED, the CIA’s regime change spin off. These are absolutely key facts which change the whole tenor of the piece – and the FT is cheerfully deceiving its paying readers by omitting them. Abbas is quoted as saying, of the UN group’s western office staff, “without them, it would not have been released”. This reinforces many reports which say that Commissioner Michelle Bachelet did not want to release such an unfair report, but her staff, mostly westerners, pushed the unfair report out on her last day. . ANONYMOUS SOURCES Then the FT feature article quotes yet another person described as “an activist” and declines to provide his or her name. Then we go to yet another unnamed “human rights” officer. And then yes, a further unnamed “human rights” officer. And then we get a quote from an unnamed “person with knowledge”. And here we have another anonymous quote – a senior European diplomat. No name. I mean, there are so many unnamed sources in this piece, it would have been rejected at any decent journalism school. . OTHER SIDE OF THE STORY Now the FT piece breezily passes over a reference to the other side of the story by quote “China and 68 other countries”. This is hilarious. So if you are a demonizer, paid by the US State Department, you can get as many column inches in the FT as you like, with your name and funding hidden. But if you are 69 actual named countries defending China, giving the other side of the story—well, they’ll just mention it in passing. . THE REAL STORY Now, right at the bottom of the article we actually have a named person – and he actually tells the real story. “Bachelet was never really in full control of her office,” said Marc Limon. Now any journalist worth their salt would realize that that is the key quote in the whole article – and they would ask – okay, if she was not in charge of that UN group, WHO WAS? But the FT writers choose not to ask that awkward question. They don’t want to know. And they definitely don’t want their readers to know. . CLOSING LINE The FT writers close the article with a line from a quote “Uyghur journalist” who actually is named. She is Nuriman Abdureshid. So the reader is left thinking – oh, so they actually did manage to discuss this with someone in Xinjiang, someone with a name and a job. But what the FT "journalists" omit to tell the paper's long-suffering readers is that Ms Nuriman Abdureshid is associated with a group called Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation, a Washington DC group which demonizes China to such an extreme extent that even other anti-China groups avoid them out of sheer embarrassment. Do I have proof that Victims of Communism is backed by the government? Well, the AI which has taken over Google tells us that Victims of Communism has received funding from the US State Department to deal with human rights issues. Here’s what happens when we look up their funding to check the details. [CLICKS LINK] “SORRY YOU HAVE BEEN BLOCKED’. Ah yes, the famous US “free speech”. . A QUESTION I’m going to close with a question. Why is the political and media class in the west working so hard to fool the world about the Chinese? Why work so hard to demonize a country that is working hard to lift itself out of starvation level poverty? What don’t they want the world to know? Could it be that China is actually doing something right? Think about that – and we may all, one day, be on the road to peace. .

Nury Vittachi

25,921 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat