Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

في عالمٍ تتجاوز فيه المعرفة حدود المعلومة، وتتحوّل فيه الأفكار إلى أسواق نابضة بالحياة، تُعيد قمة المعرفة 2025 طرح الأسئلة الكبرى حول مستقبل الإنسان، واقتصاد المعرفة، والمجتمعات المستدامة. انضمّوا إلينا في دبي هذا العام، حيث تلتقي العقول لتُعيد تعريف قيمة المعرفة في العالم. سجّلوا الآن من خلال الرابط في...

133,622 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

.Naval: You define wealth in a beautiful way. You talk about wealth as a set of physical transformations that we can affect. So as a society it becomes very clear that knowledge leads directly to wealth creation for everybody. A given individual can obviously affect physical transformations proportional to the resources available to them—but much more proportional to the knowledge available to them. Knowledge is a huge force multiplier. You then define resources as the thing that you combine with knowledge to create wealth. New knowledge allows you to use new things as resources and discard old things that maybe we’re running out of. There are lots of examples of how we’ve done that in the past. For example, in energy we’ve gone from wood to coal to oil to nuclear. But then people say, “Now we’re out of ideas. Now we’re caught up. Now we’re done. There aren’t going to be new ideas, and now we have to freeze the frame and conserve what we have.” The counter to that is, “No, we’ll create new knowledge and have new resources. Don’t worry about the old ones.” Well they say, “If you’re going to have new resources, if you can’t think of them now, it’s not real.” This now gets into the realm of people demanding that if you’re going to claim that new knowledge will be created, you have to name that knowledge now. Otherwise it’s not real. But that seems like a Catch-22. David Deutsch: It does, and it’s a bad argument. I don’t want to claim that the knowledge will be created. We’re fallible; we may not create it. We may destroy ourselves. We may miss the solution that’s right under our nose, so that when the snailiens come from another galaxy and look at us, they’ll say, “How can it possibly be that they failed to do so-and-so when it was right in front of them?” That could happen. I can’t prove or argue that it won’t happen. What I always argue, though, is that we have what it takes. We have everything that it takes to achieve that. If we don’t, it’ll be because of bad choices we have made, not because of constraints imposed on us by the planet or the solar system. Naval: It will be by anti-rational memes that restrict the creation of knowledge and the growth of knowledge. David Deutsch: Maybe. Or maybe it’ll be by well-intentioned errors, which nobody could see why they were errors. Again, it doesn’t take malevolence to make mistakes. Mistakes are the normal condition of humans. All we can do is try to find them. Maybe not destroying the means of correcting errors is the heart of morality; because if there is no way of correcting errors, then sooner or later one of those will get us. Naval: Don’t destroy the means of error correction is the base of morality. I love that. I think about places like North Korea where you can’t have elections and a revolution is very difficult because the gang in charge is armed to the teeth and they’ve destroyed the means of political error correction for a long time. That is a case where humanity is trapped in a local minimum, and it’s very hard to climb out of that hole. If too much of the world falls into that mindset, then we as a species may just stagnate because we’ve lost our biggest advantage. We’ve lost our biggest discovery, which was the ability to make new discoveries.

Deutsch Explains

143,949 просмотров • 2 лет назад

I think we've been deprived of a lot more than flying cars and Mars colonies. I think civilization is currently burdened by a debilitating pessimism. Not just prophecies of doom, because they've always existed. There's something deeper. The term technological fix has become as pejorative as Luddite used to be. The aspiration for technological solutions is now widely regarded as naive. A fantasy that ignores the inevitability of missteps and side effects. And that naivety is labeled optimism. Because optimism has come to mean something like the assumption that the best will happen, or probably will. And pessimism that the worst will. They're both false as general principles. No one adopts them. They're irrationalities that people accuse each other of having. And everyone classifies themselves as somewhere in the middle. And perhaps admitting to a slight bias in one direction or the other. And therefore admitting to slight irrationality. But in fact, both ends of the spectrum and the middle are predictions of success or failure. Maybe probabilistic. Derived only from an attitude or a principle. Not from explanations of why reality should match them. And prediction without explanation is prophecy. Which is reliance on the supernatural. Which isn't a rational attitude to planning for the future. So what is? Well, here's the bad news. Conventional pessimism is right that civilization has no guaranteed future. Nor does our species. The overwhelming majority of civilizations and species that have ever existed are now extinct. Including significantly every one of our cousin species. Every species that has ever tried to survive by creating knowledge that was not in their genome. New explanatory knowledge. How to make clothes and fire and farming. And to live the new ways of life that that enabled. That is our biological niche. To survive through the exercise of creativity. And we are the last species left in that niche. For such species, stasis is not available. We conquer problems by creating knowledge or they conquer us. So there's nothing new in our situation of all sorts of existential danger. It's undeniable that the worst can happen. Because the very worst has already happened many times. So now for the good news. All those civilizations who believed that their famines and droughts and disasters were divine punishment for their wickedness or whatever. In reality, it was just that they didn't know enough about irrigation, medicine, and so on. If the ancient Athenians had known about antibiotics or just about hygiene, they could have prevented the plague that contributed to the fall of their nascent optimistic society. And if they had, then as Carl Sagan speculated, we might now be at the stars. And technology would be regulating trivialities like the planetary climate. As automatically as it's now regulating the temperature in this room. We know that's possible because of a momentous dichotomy that follows directly from the rejection of the supernatural. Namely, every transformation of physical systems that is not forbidden by laws of physics is achievable given the right knowledge. And hence, the rational attitude to the future is what I call optimism. The principle of optimism, namely that all evils are caused by lack of knowledge. That isn't a prophecy of success. It's an explanation for failure. If we fail at anything that's physically possible, it's because of some knowledge that we fail to create. Admittedly, some of the dangers that we currently foresee are themselves side effects of knowledge creation. But trying to slow that down won't help because what do you slow down? In 1900, no one could possibly have foreseen that research in pure physics into the esoteric properties of the element uranium would within 50 years become the centerpiece of everyone's existential fear. Or that another half century later, the centerpiece would be carbon dioxide. In our future too, the greatest dangers will inevitably be unforeseen. And the only type of knowledge that's capable of dealing with those is fundamental knowledge of universal regularities in nature. Any area of fundamental research could suddenly become essential to our survival. Biology, engineering. In World War II, pure mathematics was. We also need knowledge of how to structure human institutions to retain the miraculous property of keeping civilization stable under rapid change. Traditions of criticism and error correction. And we need wealth, meaning the ability to deploy technology in practice. And there's a final consideration. The world doesn't just contain optimists and pessimists and wise and unwise technology users. It contains enemies of civilization as well. And knowledge is impartial. It can be used for good or evil. But the enemies of civilization all necessarily have one thing in common. They are wrong. And so they fear error correction and truth. And that's why they resist changes in their ideas, which makes them less creative and slower to innovate. So our defense against the existential danger from malevolent uses of technology, the only defense, is speed. The good guys must use their only advantage to stay ahead. David Deutsch

Deutsch Explains

38,267 просмотров • 1 год назад

Klaus Schwab's 1:39 clip from his February 2025 speech at the World Government Summit in Dubai is resurfacing—and it's more ominous than ever in light of 2025's AI-fueled job chaos. In the address, the WEF founder coolly declares we're hurtling into an "Intelligent Age" where economies ditch farms and factories for "knowledge, data, and intelligent insights" (code for AI surveillance states and data monopolies run by Big Tech overlords). His verbatim warnings: - 50% of jobs "directly or indirectly affected" in the next 5–10 years (that's NOW—think mass layoffs in tech, finance, and beyond) - Governments must "enable" this at "lightning speed" with "infrastructure" - They "particularly have to cooperate with business" so "all stakeholders of global society work together" to "master" it What Schwab's really pitching (beyond the polished platitudes): Scrap national borders and voter will. Let unelected WEF elites, corporate giants like Google and BlackRock, and "stakeholders" (who exactly?) dictate a forced global reset. No messy democracy—just top-down "cooperation" to remake society, upend half the workforce, and centralize power under the guise of "constructive optimism." Dubai's summit? A glitzy playground for the powerful to plot while the rest scramble. Is this progress... or the velvet glove over an iron fist of techno-authoritarianism? Watch the full 1:39 clip and drop your take: Visionary or dystopian?

Camus

25,129 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

WATCH: FIRE President and CEO Greg Lukianoff's Opening Remarks to the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government on Tuesday, February 6, 2023 Chairman Jordan, Ranking Member Plaskett, and distinguished members of the select subcommittee: Good morning. My name is Greg Lukianoff, and I am the CEO of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, or “FIRE,” where I’ve worked for 23 years. FIRE is a nonpartisan, nonprofit that uses litigation, scholarship, and public outreach to defend and promote the value of free speech for all Americans. We proudly defend free speech regardless of a speaker’s viewpoint or identity, and we have represented people across the political spectrum. I’m here to address the risk AI and AI regulation pose to freedom of speech and the creation of knowledge. We have good reason to be concerned. FIRE regularly fights government attempts to stifle speech on the internet. FIRE is in federal court challenging a New York law that forces websites to “address” online speech that someone, somewhere finds humiliating or vilifying. We’re challenging a new Utah law that requires age verification of all social media users. We’ve raised concerns about the federal government funding development of AI tools to target speech including microaggressions. And later this week, FIRE will file a brief with the Supreme Court explaining the danger of “jawboning” — the use of government pressure to force social media platforms to censor protected speech. But the most chilling threat that the government poses in the context of emerging AI is regulatory overreach that limits its potential as a tool for contributing to human knowledge. A regulatory panic could result in a small number of Americans deciding for everyone else what speech, ideas, and even questions are permitted in the name of “safety” or “alignment.” I’ve dedicated my life to defending freedom of speech because it is an essential human right. However, free speech is more than that; it’s nothing less than essential to our ability to understand the world. A giant step for human progress was the realization that, despite what our senses tell us, knowledge is hard to attain. It's a never-ending, arduous, necessarily de-centralized process of testing and retesting, of chipping away at falsity to edge a bit closer to truth. It’s not just about the proverbial “marketplace of ideas”; it’s about allowing information—independent of idea or argument—to flow freely so that we can hope to know the world as it really is. This means seeing value in expression even when it appears to be wrongheaded or useless. This process has been aided by new technologies that have made communication easier. From the printing press, to the telegraph and radio, to phones and the internet: each one has accelerated the development of new knowledge by making it easier to share information. But AI offers even greater liberating potential, empowered by First Amendment principles, including freedom to code, academic freedom, and freedom of inquiry. We are on the threshold of a revolution in the creation and discovery of knowledge. AI’s potential is humbling; indeed, even frightening. But as the history of the printing press shows, attempts to put the genie back in the bottle will fail. Despite the profound disruption the printing press caused in Europe in the short term, the long-term contribution to art, science, and again, knowledge was without equal. Yes, we may have some fears about the proliferation of AI. But what those of us who care about civil liberties fear more is a government monopoly on advanced AI. Or, more likely, regulatory capture and a government-empowered oligopoly that privileges a handful of existing players. The end result of pushing too hard on AI regulation will be the concentration of AI influence in an even smaller number of hands. Far from reining in the government’s misuse of AI to censor, we will have created the framework not only to censor but also to dominate and distort the production of knowledge itself. “But why not just let OpenAI or a handful of existing AI engines dominate the space?” you may ask. Trust in expertise and in higher education—another important developer of knowledge—has plummeted in recent years, due largely to self-inflicted wounds borne of the ideological biases shared by much of the expert class. That same bias is often found baked into existing AI, and without competing AI models we may create a massive body of purported official facts that we can’t actually trust. We’ve seen on campus that attempts to regulate hate speech have led to absurd results like punishing people for simply reading about controversial topics like racism; similarly, AI programs flag or refuse to answer questions about prohibited topics. And, of course, the potential end result of America tying the hands of the greatest programmers in the world would be to lose our advantage to our most determined foreign adversaries. But with decentralized development and use of AI, we have a better chance of defeating our staunchest rivals or even Skynet or Big Brother. And it’s what gives us our best chance for understanding the world without being blinded by our current orthodoxies, superstitions, or darkest fears. Thank you for the invitation to testify and I look forward to your questions. 🎥: Weaponization Committee

FIRE

127,842 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨🚨Finally TRUMP Admits Aliens Are Among Us And Will Be Revealed July 8th 2026!🚨 A fascinating video circulating across the ET disclosure community has reignited debate about one of humanity's greatest mysteries. According Donald Trump discusses the possibility that advanced extraterrestrial craft and non-human intelligences may be real and that information regarding their existence has been hidden from the public for decades. Donald Trump discusses the existence of advanced extraterrestrial craft and the possibility that humanity may not be alone in the universe. Supporters of the disclosure movement believe that mysterious aerial phenomena, advanced craft, and reports from military personnel, intelligence officials, and whistleblowers point to a reality far bigger than most people have been told. The video presents a compelling vision of what full disclosure could look like—advanced spacecraft, contact with non-human intelligences, and a future where hidden knowledge is finally brought into the open. If these claims are true, the implications would be historic: 🛸 Humanity is not alone. 🛸 Advanced civilizations may already be observing Earth. 🛸 Revolutionary technologies could exist beyond public knowledge. 🛸 The future of disclosure may change our understanding of reality forever. Whether this represents the beginning of a new chapter in human history or another step in the ongoing disclosure debate, millions of people around the world are paying attention. The biggest question remains: 🌎 Are we finally getting closer to the truth? ⭐ Alien-Mind&Technology ☄️👽🛸 A Starseed News ET Disclosure Network #DonaldTrump #ETDisclosure #UFODisclosure #AlienDisclosure #Extraterrestrial #UFOs #NonHumanIntelligence #StarseedNews #AlienMindTechnology #TruthSeeker #ETDisclosure #UFODisclosure #Extraterrestrial #AlienNews #StarseedNews #GalacticFederation #AlienMindTechnology #Disclosure #UFOCommunity

Paul White Gold Eagle

56,265 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

إيماننا بلبنان وبشبابه لا يتزعزع، ودعمنا لهم مستمر للعام التاسع على التوالي، لأننا نؤمن بأن شباب لبنان يستحقون الوصول إلى أكبر المنصات العالمية. تُعد بطولة Microsoft Office Specialist العالمية وبطولة Adobe Certified Professional العالمية من أبرز المسابقات العالمية في المهارات الرقمية. وقد حقق وفد لبنان هذا العام لقب بطل العالم في فئة Microsoft Word 2019، إلى جانب خمسة مراكز ضمن أفضل 10 عالميًا في مسابقات Microsoft Word وPowerPoint وExcel. وهذا هو اللقب العالمي الثاني الذي يحققه لبنان، في إنجاز يؤكد أننا لا نحقق النجاح بالصدفة، بل نصنع أثرًا حقيقيًا، ونرسّخ حضور لبنان على الساحة العالمية بثبات، رغم كل التحديات. لأننا نؤمن بأن الاستثمار في شباب لبنان هو الاستثمار الحقيقي في مستقبل لبنان. Our belief in Lebanon and in its youth is unwavering. For the 9th consecutive year, we continue investing in young talent and creating pathways to the world’s biggest stages. The Microsoft Office Specialist World Championship and the Adobe Certified Professional World Championship celebrate excellence in digital skills. This year, Lebanon achieved 1 World Champion title in Microsoft Word 2019 and 5 Top 10 World Rankings across Microsoft Word, PowerPoint, and Excel. This marks the second time Lebanon has brought home a World Champion title; a milestone that reflects more than success. It proves that we are creating lasting impact, building a culture of excellence, and establishing Lebanon’s place on the global stage with consistency and confidence. Despite every challenge, our belief remains the same: when Lebanon’s youth are empowered, they don’t just compete they lead. MOS Championship Lebanon ITLS Rafik Hariri University RHU Université La Sagesse

Makhzoumi Foundation

10,578 просмотров • 25 дней назад

🧠PROFOUND: Former hedge fund manager David Rogers Webb describes how the central banks are "the true seat of power" and have aimed to "sever [us] from understanding that our minds create reality" "The mind is very powerful. And the people that are controlling this system, they are using their minds to manifest what is happening to us" "[they want us to think that] you can't know anything beyond the material world. So don't bother your pretty little head with that. Just focus on output and numbers and determinism" "But... I believe people in deep time knew that the material world is actually benevolent. The material world is not going to destroy you. What will destroy you and your family is what is created by people's minds" This clip of Webb (David Rogers Webb), who's also the author of a book dubbed The Great Taking, is taken from a FrihetsNytt interview posted to Rumble in May 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "We have been severed from understanding that our minds create reality. Beginning with Marx and dialectical materialism in the 19th century. This is very important that, prior to that, in Hegelian dialectics, the point of Hegelian dialectics was to know the truth, to know reality through argumentation. "And the understanding was that those participating in the argumentation desired to know the truth and the good and the reality. Marx could not have that. The dialectical materialism says the only good is that the material, material world. "And you can't know anything beyond the material world. So don't bother your pretty little head with that. Just focus on output and numbers and determinism. "It caused people to feel, Yeah, I can't know anything about, I'm a realist. I'm a realist. I'll be rooted in hard reality. It goes along with ideas of determinism and materialism. But the point is that, I believe people in deep time knew that the material world is actually benevolent. "The material world is not going to destroy you. What will destroy you and your family is what is created by people's minds. Now, how powerful is the mind? Literally everything [including what] we're sitting [on] in here was created by the mind. Everything we're wearing, all our surroundings. And anyone watching this, look around where you are, unless you're out in a field somewhere. "The mind is very powerful. And the people that are controlling this system, they are using their minds to manifest what is happening to us. And they're using our minds as well.... "[And] clearly the seat of power is the central banks. It's as simple as that. The Bank for International Settlements is the— On their webpage they say that they are the central bank of central banks. "So what is the Bank for International Settlements? So the City of London, probably this began in the City of London. And the Rothschilds are involved with that. "And there are other banking, ancient banking families. But, the Bank for International Settlements was formed after World War I to collect all the reparations from Germany. So they sucked all that out of Germany. "But when you think about it, what had also just happened? The collapse of the Romanov dynasty. The collapse of the— Habsburg The Habsburg Empire. The Turk Ottoman Empire collapsed. So what happened to all of that wealth? Where did that go? It just kind of disappeared. Well, it's in the— It is controlled by the people who control the central banks."

Sense Receptor

40,751 просмотров • 1 месяц назад