Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🔴 لا تُغضب السوري… إذا غضب، خرج من قلبه كل ما كتمه! في مشهد متداول، يظهر أحد المواطنين في نوبة غضب أمام شرطي مرور أو شخصٍ بجانبه، وهو يصرخ قائلًا: “نريد بشار الأسد، وليس مثل هذا الواحد!” في إشارةٍ إلى الجولاني. مشهدٌ يلخّص ما وصل إليه الشارع السوري من...

NemesisSYR_'s profile picture

NEMESIS – نيميسس

23,958 subscribers

189,461 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

ЮморНовости и политикаОбразование
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🔴 مسرحية جديدة من حكومة الجولاني… ضحية تُحوَّل إلى ورقة دعائية! في مشهد يختصر الانحطاط، خرجت وزيرة الجولاني هند قبوات بمسرحية اتصال مع ذوي الفتاة روان أسعد، التي تعرضت للاغتصاب على يد عناصر تابعين لوزارة دفاع الجولاني أو داخليته. الفتاة العلوية الكريمة اعتُبرت “سبية” بمنظور العصابة الحاكمة ومرتزقتها، لتُستغل قضيتها في لعبة إعلامية بائسة، بينما الحقيقة أنها ضحية جريمة شنيعة. ذوو الفتاة، الذين لا حول لهم ولا قوة، أُجبروا على تمثيل المشهد كاملاً أمام الكاميرات، وهم يدركون أن أي اعتراض يعني تلفيق التهم لهم أو حتى اختفاؤهم عن الوجود، كما حصل مع حالات كثيرة مشابهة. Another Jolani government charade… a victim turned into propaganda! In a scene that epitomizes moral decay, Jolani’s minister Hind Qobwat staged a phone call with the family of Rawan Asaad, a young woman raped by members of Jolani’s Ministry of Defense or Interior. The honorable Alawite victim was labeled a “slave” in the eyes of this ruling gang and its mercenaries, her tragedy exploited for a hollow media performance while the reality remains that she is a victim of a heinous crime. Her powerless family was forced to play along with the staged scene, fully aware that any objection could mean fabricated charges or even their disappearance — as has happened to many others before them. #سوريا #الجولاني #هند_قبوات #روان_اسعد #اغتصاب #الطائفة_العلوية #توثيق #جريمة #Syria #Jolani #HindQobwat #RawanAsaad #Rape #AlawiteCommunity #Documentation #Crime
1:52

🔴 مسرحية جديدة من حكومة الجولاني… ضحية تُحوَّل إلى ورقة دعائية! في مشهد يختصر الانحطاط، خرجت وزيرة الجولاني هند قبوات بمسرحية اتصال مع ذوي الفتاة روان أسعد، التي تعرضت للاغتصاب على يد عناصر تابعين لوزارة دفاع الجولاني أو داخليته. الفتاة العلوية الكريمة اعتُبرت “سبية” بمنظور العصابة الحاكمة ومرتزقتها، لتُستغل قضيتها في لعبة إعلامية بائسة، بينما الحقيقة أنها ضحية جريمة شنيعة. ذوو الفتاة، الذين لا حول لهم ولا قوة، أُجبروا على تمثيل المشهد كاملاً أمام الكاميرات، وهم يدركون أن أي اعتراض يعني تلفيق التهم لهم أو حتى اختفاؤهم عن الوجود، كما حصل مع حالات كثيرة مشابهة. Another Jolani government charade… a victim turned into propaganda! In a scene that epitomizes moral decay, Jolani’s minister Hind Qobwat staged a phone call with the family of Rawan Asaad, a young woman raped by members of Jolani’s Ministry of Defense or Interior. The honorable Alawite victim was labeled a “slave” in the eyes of this ruling gang and its mercenaries, her tragedy exploited for a hollow media performance while the reality remains that she is a victim of a heinous crime. Her powerless family was forced to play along with the staged scene, fully aware that any objection could mean fabricated charges or even their disappearance — as has happened to many others before them. #سوريا #الجولاني #هند_قبوات #روان_اسعد #اغتصاب #الطائفة_العلوية #توثيق #جريمة #Syria #Jolani #HindQobwat #RawanAsaad #Rape #AlawiteCommunity #Documentation #Crime

NEMESIS – نيميسس

16,332 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

هل تتذكّرون تفجير فرع المرور في مدينة حلب؟ كان ذلك في عام ٢٠١٥، يوم اهتزّت المدينة على دوي انفجار ضخم، وسقط العشرات من الشهداء والجرحى. حينها، لم تنتظر قناة الجزيرة القطرية تحقيقًا أو دليلًا، سارعت كعادتها لاتهام النظام السوري، ونسجت روايتها الجاهزة سلفًا. واليوم… بعد عشر سنوات، يخرج علينا ضابط مخابرات تركي متقاعد، ويسرب تسجيلات تُظهر المنفذ الحقيقي للتفجير: أحد عناصر جبهة النصرة، التابعة آنذاك لـ”الرئيس المؤقت” لسوريا… الجولاني! نعم، الجولاني الذي كان يذبح على الهوية… هو نفسه من يترأس اليوم سلطة الأمر الواقع، ويحكم شعبًا باسم “التحرير”. ومع كل هذا، لا تزال الأبواق نفسها تلوك الأكاذيب ذاتها… وقريبًا جدًا… سيتبيّن أن بشار “بريء من كل التهم”. فقط انتظروا بقية الأتراك حتى يبلغوا التقاعد. الصبر مفتاح “العدالة المعلّبة”… Do you remember the bombing of the traffic branch in Aleppo? It was 2015 — a massive blast tore through the city, leaving dozens dead and wounded. Back then, Al Jazeera wasted no time. No investigation. No evidence. Just another headline blaming the Syrian regime. Now, ten years later, a retired Turkish intelligence officer leaks footage revealing the real perpetrator: a member of Jabhat al-Nusra, the group led by Syria’s so-called “interim president”… Jolani. Yes, the same Jolani who once slaughtered civilians… is now “ruling” Syria and caring for his “people”. And yet… the same old voices keep repeating the same tired lies. Soon enough… Bashar will be declared innocent of all charges. We’re just waiting on the rest of the Turks… to retire. Justice™ takes its time. #سوريا #حلب #تفجير_فرع_المرور #جبهة_النصرة #الجولاني #الجزيرة #سوريا_2025 #العدالة_المؤجلة #HTSCrimes #JolaniCrimes #WarCrimes #CrimesAgainstHumanity #AlJazeera #SyriaFiles
1:40

هل تتذكّرون تفجير فرع المرور في مدينة حلب؟ كان ذلك في عام ٢٠١٥، يوم اهتزّت المدينة على دوي انفجار ضخم، وسقط العشرات من الشهداء والجرحى. حينها، لم تنتظر قناة الجزيرة القطرية تحقيقًا أو دليلًا، سارعت كعادتها لاتهام النظام السوري، ونسجت روايتها الجاهزة سلفًا. واليوم… بعد عشر سنوات، يخرج علينا ضابط مخابرات تركي متقاعد، ويسرب تسجيلات تُظهر المنفذ الحقيقي للتفجير: أحد عناصر جبهة النصرة، التابعة آنذاك لـ”الرئيس المؤقت” لسوريا… الجولاني! نعم، الجولاني الذي كان يذبح على الهوية… هو نفسه من يترأس اليوم سلطة الأمر الواقع، ويحكم شعبًا باسم “التحرير”. ومع كل هذا، لا تزال الأبواق نفسها تلوك الأكاذيب ذاتها… وقريبًا جدًا… سيتبيّن أن بشار “بريء من كل التهم”. فقط انتظروا بقية الأتراك حتى يبلغوا التقاعد. الصبر مفتاح “العدالة المعلّبة”… Do you remember the bombing of the traffic branch in Aleppo? It was 2015 — a massive blast tore through the city, leaving dozens dead and wounded. Back then, Al Jazeera wasted no time. No investigation. No evidence. Just another headline blaming the Syrian regime. Now, ten years later, a retired Turkish intelligence officer leaks footage revealing the real perpetrator: a member of Jabhat al-Nusra, the group led by Syria’s so-called “interim president”… Jolani. Yes, the same Jolani who once slaughtered civilians… is now “ruling” Syria and caring for his “people”. And yet… the same old voices keep repeating the same tired lies. Soon enough… Bashar will be declared innocent of all charges. We’re just waiting on the rest of the Turks… to retire. Justice™ takes its time. #سوريا #حلب #تفجير_فرع_المرور #جبهة_النصرة #الجولاني #الجزيرة #سوريا_2025 #العدالة_المؤجلة #HTSCrimes #JolaniCrimes #WarCrimes #CrimesAgainstHumanity #AlJazeera #SyriaFiles

NEMESIS – نيميسس

23,949 просмотров • 1 год назад

‼️الله يعزك مثل ما عززتنا يا أبو محمد… الله يرحم الداية التي أنجبتك!! هكذا استقبل بعض السوريين ومعهم الأميركيون الإرهابي الجولاني، القاعدي والداعشي، وقائد جبهة النصرة الإرهابية التي بات اسمها “هيئة تحرير الشام”. المستقبلون، وغالبيتهم من الطائفة السنية المعتدلة، يرفعون السؤال الكبير: بماذا أعزكم هذا الإرهابي؟ هل بتفتيت الجغرافيا السورية؟! أم بتحريض الشعب على بعضه البعض؟! هل بتكفير معظم الطوائف الدينية وإباحة دمها؟ أم بزرع الخوف وانعدام الأمن في كل زاوية من سوريا؟! هل بتهميش الطبقة المتعلمة والمثقفة، واستبدالها بجهلاء لم يكملوا حتى الصف الخامس، لا يملكون سوى دورة شريعة في إدلب؟! بأي عزٍّ تتغنون؟! أن يصبح لسوريا رئيس “سني” فقط؟! أهذا هو معيار الكرامة عندكم؟! أي عزٍّ هذا الذي يُصنع على أكتاف قاتلٍ ومرتكبٍ للفتن؟! وأي كرامة في أن يُرفع شأن من باع الوطن ومزّق نسيجه؟! May God grant you the same honor you gave us, Abu Muhammad… and may God have mercy on the midwife who delivered you!! This is how some Syrians, along with the Americans, welcomed Jolani — the Qaeda affiliate, the ISIS follower, and the leader of Jabhat al-Nusra, now rebranded as “Hayat Tahrir al-Sham.” The crowd, mostly from the moderate Sunni community, raises the big question: What honor has this terrorist brought you? Was it by fragmenting Syrian geography?! By inciting the people against one another?! By declaring most religious sects as infidels and permitting their blood to be shed? By planting fear and stripping away security in every corner of Syria?! By marginalizing the educated and experienced, and replacing them with the ignorant — people who never finished even fifth grade, armed only with a shallow religious course in Idlib?! What kind of honor do you boast about?! That Syria should simply have a “Sunni” president?! Is that your measure of dignity?! What honor is built on the shoulders of a killer and a sower of discord?! And what dignity lies in glorifying someone who sold the homeland and tore apart its social fabric?! #سوريا #الجولاني #هيئة_تحرير_الشام #الطائفة_السنية_المعتدلة #الامن_العام_الارهابي #توثيق #مجازر_الساحل #Syria #Jolani #HTS #ModerateSunniCommunity #SyriaMassacres #StopAlawiteGenocide #CrimesAgainstHumanity
1:02

Sensitive content

‼️الله يعزك مثل ما عززتنا يا أبو محمد… الله يرحم الداية التي أنجبتك!! هكذا استقبل بعض السوريين ومعهم الأميركيون الإرهابي الجولاني، القاعدي والداعشي، وقائد جبهة النصرة الإرهابية التي بات اسمها “هيئة تحرير الشام”. المستقبلون، وغالبيتهم من الطائفة السنية المعتدلة، يرفعون السؤال الكبير: بماذا أعزكم هذا الإرهابي؟ هل بتفتيت الجغرافيا السورية؟! أم بتحريض الشعب على بعضه البعض؟! هل بتكفير معظم الطوائف الدينية وإباحة دمها؟ أم بزرع الخوف وانعدام الأمن في كل زاوية من سوريا؟! هل بتهميش الطبقة المتعلمة والمثقفة، واستبدالها بجهلاء لم يكملوا حتى الصف الخامس، لا يملكون سوى دورة شريعة في إدلب؟! بأي عزٍّ تتغنون؟! أن يصبح لسوريا رئيس “سني” فقط؟! أهذا هو معيار الكرامة عندكم؟! أي عزٍّ هذا الذي يُصنع على أكتاف قاتلٍ ومرتكبٍ للفتن؟! وأي كرامة في أن يُرفع شأن من باع الوطن ومزّق نسيجه؟! May God grant you the same honor you gave us, Abu Muhammad… and may God have mercy on the midwife who delivered you!! This is how some Syrians, along with the Americans, welcomed Jolani — the Qaeda affiliate, the ISIS follower, and the leader of Jabhat al-Nusra, now rebranded as “Hayat Tahrir al-Sham.” The crowd, mostly from the moderate Sunni community, raises the big question: What honor has this terrorist brought you? Was it by fragmenting Syrian geography?! By inciting the people against one another?! By declaring most religious sects as infidels and permitting their blood to be shed? By planting fear and stripping away security in every corner of Syria?! By marginalizing the educated and experienced, and replacing them with the ignorant — people who never finished even fifth grade, armed only with a shallow religious course in Idlib?! What kind of honor do you boast about?! That Syria should simply have a “Sunni” president?! Is that your measure of dignity?! What honor is built on the shoulders of a killer and a sower of discord?! And what dignity lies in glorifying someone who sold the homeland and tore apart its social fabric?! #سوريا #الجولاني #هيئة_تحرير_الشام #الطائفة_السنية_المعتدلة #الامن_العام_الارهابي #توثيق #مجازر_الساحل #Syria #Jolani #HTS #ModerateSunniCommunity #SyriaMassacres #StopAlawiteGenocide #CrimesAgainstHumanity

Syrian Witness شاهد سوري

21,459 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

🔴 هذا الفيديو برسم المجتمع الدولي والمنظمات الحقوقية.. نطالب بإرسال لجان تحقيق دولية مستقلة للتحقيق في المجازر المرتكبة بحق الأقليات السورية، على يد عصابات ومرتزقة الجولاني، أو كما يسميه البعض: أحمد الشرع. 🔻 هذا الشاهد هو أحد الناجين من تفجير كنيسة مار إلياس، ويروي تفاصيل دقيقة عن الجريمة، من لحظة دخول المنفذ إلى لحظة التفجير. ونؤكد: لا نريد تحقيقًا بإشراف الجولاني ومرتزقته، لأننا جرّبنا هذا سابقًا في مجازر الساحل السوري، ولم تظهر نتائج حتى اليوم… لأن المجرم كان هو القاضي… وهو المحقق… وهو من يقرر إغلاق الملف. 🔴 نناشد مجلس الأمن الدولي بتحمّل مسؤولياته، وتشكيل لجنة محايدة، لأن دم الأبرياء لا يجب أن يُمحى ببيان أو “تحقيق داخلي”.. 🔴 This Video Is a Message to the International Community and Human Rights Organizations We call for the immediate deployment of independent international investigation teams to look into the massacres committed against Syrian minorities at the hands of Jolani’s militias and mercenaries, or as some still call him—Ahmad Al-Sharaa. 🔻 The person in this video is a direct eyewitness to the bombing of Mar Elias Church, providing detailed testimony about the crime—from the bomber’s entry to the moment of the explosion. And we say clearly: We do not want an investigation supervised by Jolani and his men, because we’ve seen this before—during the Syrian coastal massacres—and to this day, no findings have been released… Because the criminal was the judge, the investigator, and the one who closed the case. 🔴 We urge the United Nations Security Council to take responsibility and form an impartial investigative committee. The blood of innocent civilians cannot be erased by a press statement or a “local investigation.” #Syria #MarElias #Jolani #AhmadAlSharaa #ChurchBombing #JusticeIsComing #ProtectMinorities #CoastalMassacres #InternationalCommunity #UNSecurityCouncil #WarCrimesDocumentation #سوريا #مار_إلياس #الجولاني #أحمد_الشرع #تفجير_كنيسة #العدالة_قادمة #حماية_الأقليات #مجازر_الساحل #المجتمع_الدولي #مجلس_الأمن #توثيق_جرائم_الحرب #UN #UN_HRC #eu_eeas #StateDept #francediplo_EN #FCDOGovUK #ISIS #Trump #StopAlawiteGenocide #StopAlawiteGenocideInSyria #The_Alawite_Holocaust_in_Syria #محرقة_العلويين_في_سوريا #الابادة_الجماعية_العلوية_2025 #محاكمة_الجولاني_الارهابي_الدولي #التهجير_جريمة #حماية_الأقليات #الساحل_السوري #الجولاني_سفاح_سوريا #تسقط_حكومة_الجولاني_الأرهابية #أوقفوا_الإبادة_الطائفية #ابادة_علوية #الشرع_من_دون_شرعية #الهولوكوست_العلوي #الجولاني_ليس_رئيسي #استقلال_الساحل_السوري #مجزرة_الساحل Donald J. Trump Donald J. Trump CNN CNNPolitics Agence France-Presse Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office UK Prime Minister European External Action Service - EEAS 🇪🇺 EU in Syria UN in Syria UN Human Rights U.S. Embassy Syria Department of State جامعة الدول العربية وزارة الخارجية 🇸🇦 محمد بن سلمان بن عبد العزيز (Informal) HH Sheikh Mohammed Elon Musk Mazloum Abdî مظلوم عبدي Joe Wilson 🇺🇸 Pamela Geller 🇮🇱 Dr Walid Phares Kaja Kallas Liz Throssell Michael Ohnmacht محمد علي الحسيني Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸
1:30

🔴 هذا الفيديو برسم المجتمع الدولي والمنظمات الحقوقية.. نطالب بإرسال لجان تحقيق دولية مستقلة للتحقيق في المجازر المرتكبة بحق الأقليات السورية، على يد عصابات ومرتزقة الجولاني، أو كما يسميه البعض: أحمد الشرع. 🔻 هذا الشاهد هو أحد الناجين من تفجير كنيسة مار إلياس، ويروي تفاصيل دقيقة عن الجريمة، من لحظة دخول المنفذ إلى لحظة التفجير. ونؤكد: لا نريد تحقيقًا بإشراف الجولاني ومرتزقته، لأننا جرّبنا هذا سابقًا في مجازر الساحل السوري، ولم تظهر نتائج حتى اليوم… لأن المجرم كان هو القاضي… وهو المحقق… وهو من يقرر إغلاق الملف. 🔴 نناشد مجلس الأمن الدولي بتحمّل مسؤولياته، وتشكيل لجنة محايدة، لأن دم الأبرياء لا يجب أن يُمحى ببيان أو “تحقيق داخلي”.. 🔴 This Video Is a Message to the International Community and Human Rights Organizations We call for the immediate deployment of independent international investigation teams to look into the massacres committed against Syrian minorities at the hands of Jolani’s militias and mercenaries, or as some still call him—Ahmad Al-Sharaa. 🔻 The person in this video is a direct eyewitness to the bombing of Mar Elias Church, providing detailed testimony about the crime—from the bomber’s entry to the moment of the explosion. And we say clearly: We do not want an investigation supervised by Jolani and his men, because we’ve seen this before—during the Syrian coastal massacres—and to this day, no findings have been released… Because the criminal was the judge, the investigator, and the one who closed the case. 🔴 We urge the United Nations Security Council to take responsibility and form an impartial investigative committee. The blood of innocent civilians cannot be erased by a press statement or a “local investigation.” #Syria #MarElias #Jolani #AhmadAlSharaa #ChurchBombing #JusticeIsComing #ProtectMinorities #CoastalMassacres #InternationalCommunity #UNSecurityCouncil #WarCrimesDocumentation #سوريا #مار_إلياس #الجولاني #أحمد_الشرع #تفجير_كنيسة #العدالة_قادمة #حماية_الأقليات #مجازر_الساحل #المجتمع_الدولي #مجلس_الأمن #توثيق_جرائم_الحرب #UN #UN_HRC #eu_eeas #StateDept #francediplo_EN #FCDOGovUK #ISIS #Trump #StopAlawiteGenocide #StopAlawiteGenocideInSyria #The_Alawite_Holocaust_in_Syria #محرقة_العلويين_في_سوريا #الابادة_الجماعية_العلوية_2025 #محاكمة_الجولاني_الارهابي_الدولي #التهجير_جريمة #حماية_الأقليات #الساحل_السوري #الجولاني_سفاح_سوريا #تسقط_حكومة_الجولاني_الأرهابية #أوقفوا_الإبادة_الطائفية #ابادة_علوية #الشرع_من_دون_شرعية #الهولوكوست_العلوي #الجولاني_ليس_رئيسي #استقلال_الساحل_السوري #مجزرة_الساحل Donald J. Trump Donald J. Trump CNN CNNPolitics Agence France-Presse Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office UK Prime Minister European External Action Service - EEAS 🇪🇺 EU in Syria UN in Syria UN Human Rights U.S. Embassy Syria Department of State جامعة الدول العربية وزارة الخارجية 🇸🇦 محمد بن سلمان بن عبد العزيز (Informal) HH Sheikh Mohammed Elon Musk Mazloum Abdî مظلوم عبدي Joe Wilson 🇺🇸 Pamela Geller 🇮🇱 Dr Walid Phares Kaja Kallas Liz Throssell Michael Ohnmacht محمد علي الحسيني Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸

Syrian Witness شاهد سوري

48,071 просмотров • 1 год назад

🔴 أصبح سجن صيدنايا الأشهر عالميًا، ليس بسبب الحقائق وحدها، بل بسبب القصص الكوميدية والمختلقة التي فُبركت عنه..! من قصة “المكبس” التي اعترف أصحابها لاحقًا بكذبها، إلى حكاية طفل قيل إنه بعمر العشر سنوات يفتقد والده منذ 14 عامًا!! مرورًا برواية مريض جاء من لبنان للمعالجة في سوريا، ليُقال لاحقًا إنه خرج من صيدنايا وعليه آثار مرض بسبب التعذيب… لا أحد ينكر أن هناك انتهاكات وقعت داخل هذا السجن، لكن ما يحدث اليوم في سجون الجولاني أشد قسوة، ومع ذلك لا يجرؤ أحد أن ينطق بحرف واحد عنها.. الفرق أن صيدنايا تحوّل إلى مادة لتلفيق الروايات وصناعة الدعاية، بينما سجون الجولاني بقيت خارج الضوء. الكذب والتدليس والنفاق قد يحققون ضجيجًا إعلاميًا، لكنهم لا يبنون وطنًا، ولا يحققون عدالة. Sednaya Prison has become globally infamous not only for real incidents, but for the fabricated, almost comical stories invented about it. From the tale of the “meat grinder,” later admitted as false, to the absurd claim of a ten-year-old boy missing his father for 14 years! Even the story of a patient who came from Lebanon for treatment in Syria was twisted into: “He was released from Sednaya carrying marks of torture.” No one denies that violations did take place inside this prison, but what is happening now in Jolani’s prisons is even harsher — and yet no one dares to speak a word about it. The difference is that Sednaya became a stage for fabricated tales and propaganda, while Jolani’s prisons remain in the dark. Lies, manipulation, and hypocrisy may create media noise, but they do not build a country, nor do they deliver justice. #سوريا #صيدنايا #سجون #الجولاني #انتهاكات #توثيق #Syria #Sednaya #Prisons #Jolani #Violations #Documentation
1:28

🔴 أصبح سجن صيدنايا الأشهر عالميًا، ليس بسبب الحقائق وحدها، بل بسبب القصص الكوميدية والمختلقة التي فُبركت عنه..! من قصة “المكبس” التي اعترف أصحابها لاحقًا بكذبها، إلى حكاية طفل قيل إنه بعمر العشر سنوات يفتقد والده منذ 14 عامًا!! مرورًا برواية مريض جاء من لبنان للمعالجة في سوريا، ليُقال لاحقًا إنه خرج من صيدنايا وعليه آثار مرض بسبب التعذيب… لا أحد ينكر أن هناك انتهاكات وقعت داخل هذا السجن، لكن ما يحدث اليوم في سجون الجولاني أشد قسوة، ومع ذلك لا يجرؤ أحد أن ينطق بحرف واحد عنها.. الفرق أن صيدنايا تحوّل إلى مادة لتلفيق الروايات وصناعة الدعاية، بينما سجون الجولاني بقيت خارج الضوء. الكذب والتدليس والنفاق قد يحققون ضجيجًا إعلاميًا، لكنهم لا يبنون وطنًا، ولا يحققون عدالة. Sednaya Prison has become globally infamous not only for real incidents, but for the fabricated, almost comical stories invented about it. From the tale of the “meat grinder,” later admitted as false, to the absurd claim of a ten-year-old boy missing his father for 14 years! Even the story of a patient who came from Lebanon for treatment in Syria was twisted into: “He was released from Sednaya carrying marks of torture.” No one denies that violations did take place inside this prison, but what is happening now in Jolani’s prisons is even harsher — and yet no one dares to speak a word about it. The difference is that Sednaya became a stage for fabricated tales and propaganda, while Jolani’s prisons remain in the dark. Lies, manipulation, and hypocrisy may create media noise, but they do not build a country, nor do they deliver justice. #سوريا #صيدنايا #سجون #الجولاني #انتهاكات #توثيق #Syria #Sednaya #Prisons #Jolani #Violations #Documentation

NEMESIS – نيميسس

29,458 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

⛔ #سوريا #إدلب في مشهدٍ صادمٍ جديد، خرجت زوجات الإرهابي الملقب “أبو دجانة التركستاني” مع أولاده أمام أحد السجون للمطالبة بإطلاق سراحه بعد اعتقاله من قبل ما يُسمّى “الأمن العام”. اللافت أنّهن لم يكتفين بالاحتجاج بالكلام، بل انهالنَ على باب السجن بالحجارة، مع شتائم ولعنات علنية، وكأنهن فوق كل القوانين! السؤال البديهي هنا: من منح هؤلاء هذه الجرأة وهذه الحصانة؟! ولو أنّ أمًّا سورية مكلومة ذهبت لتطالب بخروج ابنها من المعتقل وفعلت الشيء نفسه، هل كانت ستعود إلى بيتها أم إلى القبر؟! ⛔ #Syria #Idlib In yet another shocking scene, the wives of the terrorist known as “Abu Dujana al-Turkistani” appeared with his children outside a prison demanding his release after he was detained by the so-called “General Security.” Not only did they shout in protest, but they also hurled stones at the prison gates, cursing and shouting as if they were untouchable. The obvious question: Who gave them such boldness and protection? If a grieving Syrian mother had done the same to demand her son’s release, would she have gone back home — or ended up in a grave? #سوريا #إدلب #الامن_العام_الارهابي #HTSCrimes #JolaniCrimes #StopAlawiteGenocide #HumanRights #Syria
0:29

⛔ #سوريا #إدلب في مشهدٍ صادمٍ جديد، خرجت زوجات الإرهابي الملقب “أبو دجانة التركستاني” مع أولاده أمام أحد السجون للمطالبة بإطلاق سراحه بعد اعتقاله من قبل ما يُسمّى “الأمن العام”. اللافت أنّهن لم يكتفين بالاحتجاج بالكلام، بل انهالنَ على باب السجن بالحجارة، مع شتائم ولعنات علنية، وكأنهن فوق كل القوانين! السؤال البديهي هنا: من منح هؤلاء هذه الجرأة وهذه الحصانة؟! ولو أنّ أمًّا سورية مكلومة ذهبت لتطالب بخروج ابنها من المعتقل وفعلت الشيء نفسه، هل كانت ستعود إلى بيتها أم إلى القبر؟! ⛔ #Syria #Idlib In yet another shocking scene, the wives of the terrorist known as “Abu Dujana al-Turkistani” appeared with his children outside a prison demanding his release after he was detained by the so-called “General Security.” Not only did they shout in protest, but they also hurled stones at the prison gates, cursing and shouting as if they were untouchable. The obvious question: Who gave them such boldness and protection? If a grieving Syrian mother had done the same to demand her son’s release, would she have gone back home — or ended up in a grave? #سوريا #إدلب #الامن_العام_الارهابي #HTSCrimes #JolaniCrimes #StopAlawiteGenocide #HumanRights #Syria

Syrian Witness شاهد سوري

274,667 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

When Judge Napolitano asked me on his show how Syria ended up with Abu Mohammed al-Jolani as its “president,” I could almost hear the cognitive dissonance on the other side of the screen. How does a man who was once the emir of al-Qaeda in Syria, a co-founder of ISIS by any reasonable historical reading of his trajectory, become Washington’s chosen man in Damascus? For me, the answer is not a mystery. It is the logical end of a dirty war that began not with Syrian protesters in 2011, but in an American-run prison camp in Iraq years earlier. And if anyone still suspected this was “just a conspiracy theory,” a former CIA officer – John Kiriakou, who went to prison for exposing CIA torture – has now said publicly what many of us have long argued: Jolani is, in all likelihood, a CIA asset. Let’s start with the timeline, because the timeline alone already screams “intelligence operation.” Abu Mohammed al-Jolani was in a CIA-run prison in Iraq – Camp Bucca – alongside another familiar name: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. Both men were released in early 2011. “Coincidentally,” that is exactly when the regime-change war in Syria begins. Within weeks, Baghdadi goes on to lead what becomes ISIS, and Jolani crosses into Syria to found Jabhat al-Nusra – officially al-Qaeda’s franchise in my country. Washington designates Nusra a terrorist organization. The UN follows suit. On paper, Jolani is the enemy. The State Department even slaps a $10 million bounty on his head. But bounties are cheap. Cruise missiles are expensive. And for over a decade, while the US flattened cities in Iraq and Syria allegedly to fight “terrorism,” it somehow never found the time, or the coordinates, to seriously target Jolani or his core command structure, even though he controlled large swaths of Syrian territory from Aleppo countryside all the way to Idlib. Because Jolani and his men were fighting the one government Washington had already decided must go: the Syrian state under Bashar al-Assad. This is where Operation Timber Sycamore comes in: a multi-billion-dollar CIA covert program that funneled weapons, money, and training to so-called “rebels” in Syria. They were sold to Western audiences as “moderate opposition.” On the ground, those moderates were a disappearing species. What existed in reality were hardline Salafi-jihadist factions, with Nusra at the top of the food chain. The Free Syrian Army (FSA) was the mask, the logo on the paperwork, the brand name you could sell to Congress and CNN. The real muscle on the ground was Jolani’s men and other takfiri groups, who did the actual fighting, took the actual territory, and imposed their version of rule. Weapons went “to the moderates.” The moderates magically handed them to al-Qaeda. Everyone in Washington pretended to be surprised. No one stopped the pipeline. Over the years, the mask slipped. US officials themselves began to speak of Jolani as something more than just a former enemy. James Jeffrey, Washington’s former envoy to Syria, openly called Jolani “an asset” for US strategy – not my word, his. Robert Ford, the former US ambassador to Syria, has publicly admitted that he personally worked with Jolani to “take him out of the world of terrorism” and polish him into a politician. Think about what that means: the same US that claims to be fighting an endless war against al-Qaeda quietly devotes diplomatic energy to rehabilitating the Syrian branch of al-Qaeda into a partner, a useful strongman, a future head of state. I said on the show, and I repeat it here: I believe Jolani was recruited in Camp Bucca. The timeline makes no sense otherwise. You don’t walk out of an American-run prison and, weeks later, magically have the networks, the money, the arms, and the logistical capacity to found al-Qaeda in Syria, right at the moment when Washington and its allies need a battering ram against Damascus. Recently, former CIA director David Petraeus even sat with Jolani and told him, “Your success is our success.” What more do people need? A signed employment contract? But let’s assume, for a moment, that you still think this is a stretch. Enter John Kiriakou. Kiriakou is not a YouTuber chasing clicks. He is a former CIA officer who went to prison because he exposed the torture program and named the torturers. His loyalty is clearly not to the Agency’s PR department. Recently, on Unfettered Speech, he described the Jolani situation bluntly. Here is the essence of what he said, which Judge Napolitano played on air: -The “new president” of Syria is a former al-Qaeda member and a co-founder of ISIS. -This same man is welcomed at the White House. -Senior US officials, including the Assistant Secretary of State for the Near East, travel to meet him. -President Trump suddenly lifts sanctions on Syria as Jolani consolidates power, prompting Syrians – desperate and exhausted – to dance in the streets. The only thing that makes sense is that Jolani is a CIA asset, per Kiriakou’s. When a former CIA officer who has already sacrificed his career and freedom to tell the truth looks at the pattern and says, “This is our guy,” it is not a conspiracy theory anymore. Now, you may ask, why would the United States and its allies back such a man? The answer lies in what Syria used to be, and what it has now been turned into. Before this war, Syria, for all its flaws, was a horizontally integrated state. People identified themselves as Syrian first and then Armenian, Druze, Christian, Alawite, Sunni, Shi’a, Kurdish, and so on. The state’s foreign policy aligned with Iran and Hezbollah, supported Palestinian factions, and kept a real deterrent posture toward Israel. For Washington and Tel Aviv, this was unacceptable. The goal was not “democracy”; that word is just wrapping paper. The real objective was to remove a government allied with Iran and replace it with a fragmented landscape: a weak central authority in Damascus, surrounded by sectarian cantons and warlord enclaves, all dependent on foreign patrons. Jolani is perfect for this role. For Israel, he brings vertical division. A man with a long al-Qaeda pedigree ruling Syria is a nightmare for minorities: Christians, Druze, Alawites, Shi’a, many Kurds, and other smaller communities. They will not accept al-Qaeda rule. So they retreat into their own militias, their own cantons, their own de facto mini-states, exactly in line with old Israeli strategic doctrines like the Yinon Plan, which openly advocated fragmenting neighboring states along sectarian lines. On the ground, we already see it: -Druze militias running their own affairs in the south with quiet Israeli backing. -Kurdish forces in the northeast under US protection, managing their own autonomous zone. -Alawites discussing an autonomous coastal enclave. -Christians living in silence and fear. You don’t need formal borders on a map to balkanize a country. When I, as a Syrian of Armenian origin, stop thinking of myself as Syrian first and start thinking purely as Armenian, when I instinctively fear my neighbor because he is from another sect, the balkanization has already happened in the mind. For Washington, Jolani is equally “useful.” He has promised to normalize relations with Israel, to open Syria’s markets to Western capital, and to hand over the country’s resources from the hydrocarbons east of the Euphrates to the gas fields under the Mediterranean to American and allied companies. A 24-million-person country reduced to a reconstruction market: $300 billion worth of contracts, infrastructure projects, and “investments.” But for investors to feel safe, they need a strongman in Damascus who can project the illusion of stability while remaining utterly dependent on foreign protection. That strongman, in their design, is Abu Mohammed al-Jolani. But Jolani is not acting alone. Around him is a constellation of Western intelligence veterans and “conflict resolution” NGOs acting as intermediaries. British MI6 circles, under figures like Jonathan Powell – former chief of staff to Tony Blair – are central in managing this process. Powell runs an organization called Inter Mediate, which specializes in “talking to armed groups.” Behind the humanitarian language lies political engineering. One of Inter Mediate’s operatives, a woman named Clare Haigh, is now said to have an office inside the Syrian presidential palace, advising Jolani on how to talk, how to dress, how to handle journalists, how to sell himself as a reformed jihadist turned statesman. And then there is Qatar. Ahmed Zaidan – once Osama bin Laden’s favorite journalist, photographed sipping tea with him and broadcasting his tapes on Al Jazeera – is now a personal adviser to Jolani. Make it make sense. An al-Qaeda emir, handled by US and British intelligence veterans, advised by bin Laden’s favorite media man, massaged by Western PR consultants, welcomed in Washington, and crowned in Damascus as “president.” If you wrote this as fiction, an editor would tell you it’s too on the nose. Since Jolani took power through an international and regional deal that pushed Assad aside, over 11,000 people have been killed. Many of them are from the very minorities the West loves to mention in speeches but abandons in practice. Videos circulate of his fighters asking terrified villagers at gunpoint, “Are you Muslim or not?” and executing those who give the “wrong” answer, including Druze and Alawites who are not recognized as “true Muslims” by their extremist ideology. Christians, who had already suffered massive emigration between 2011 and 2024, are being squeezed further. They have no organized armed force, no foreign sponsor. They are expected either to live under the mercy of an al-Qaeda-bred regime or to leave the land of their ancestors. This is what Washington’s “asset management” looks like in human terms. If you are an American reading this, you might be tempted to say: “This cannot be. My government would never knowingly empower al-Qaeda.” But it already has, repeatedly. From Afghanistan in the 1980s, when US intelligence backed the Mujahideen (and, indirectly, their Arab foreign fighter allies), to Libya and Syria in the last decade, where jihadist factions were instrumentalized against secular or nationalist governments, the pattern is clear. The names and acronyms change. The logic does not. The same establishment that lectures the world on “democracy” and “human rights” is perfectly willing to install a man like Jolani as the ruler of one of the oldest civilizations on earth, as long as he delivers strategic gains: -breaking the Iran–Syria–Hezbollah axis; -fragmenting Syria into weak, controllable pieces; -opening its resources and markets to Western and Gulf capital; -and giving Israel unprecedented strategic depth and security. Everything else – the massacres, the ethnic cleansing, the collapse of national identity, the destruction of ancient communities – is treated as collateral damage. I am often asked what Syria will look like in five or ten years. I wish I could answer with optimism. Right now, the forces pushing to turn my country into a permanent vassal state – ruled by a former al-Qaeda emir, policed by foreign intelligence, exploited by foreign capital – are incredibly strong. But nothing in this region is permanent. People who come to power by cutting off other people’s heads often lose their own. If there are still sane voices left in Western politics – people like Tulsi Gabbard 🌺, whom I mentioned on air – they must at least recognize this insanity: backing an al-Qaeda emir as “our man in Damascus” is not just immoral; it is ultimately self-destructive. Syria does not need Jolani. The West does not need Jolani. There are Syrians who can have friendly relations with the United States without being former al-Qaeda commanders, without murdering their own people, without turning an ancient nation into a laboratory for extremist social engineering. The question is not whether such alternatives exist. They do. The question is whether Washington and its allies want a sovereign, stable Syria, or whether they prefer a shattered, cantonized carcass kept alive just enough for the next “asset” to feed on.
22:55

When Judge Napolitano asked me on his show how Syria ended up with Abu Mohammed al-Jolani as its “president,” I could almost hear the cognitive dissonance on the other side of the screen. How does a man who was once the emir of al-Qaeda in Syria, a co-founder of ISIS by any reasonable historical reading of his trajectory, become Washington’s chosen man in Damascus? For me, the answer is not a mystery. It is the logical end of a dirty war that began not with Syrian protesters in 2011, but in an American-run prison camp in Iraq years earlier. And if anyone still suspected this was “just a conspiracy theory,” a former CIA officer – John Kiriakou, who went to prison for exposing CIA torture – has now said publicly what many of us have long argued: Jolani is, in all likelihood, a CIA asset. Let’s start with the timeline, because the timeline alone already screams “intelligence operation.” Abu Mohammed al-Jolani was in a CIA-run prison in Iraq – Camp Bucca – alongside another familiar name: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. Both men were released in early 2011. “Coincidentally,” that is exactly when the regime-change war in Syria begins. Within weeks, Baghdadi goes on to lead what becomes ISIS, and Jolani crosses into Syria to found Jabhat al-Nusra – officially al-Qaeda’s franchise in my country. Washington designates Nusra a terrorist organization. The UN follows suit. On paper, Jolani is the enemy. The State Department even slaps a $10 million bounty on his head. But bounties are cheap. Cruise missiles are expensive. And for over a decade, while the US flattened cities in Iraq and Syria allegedly to fight “terrorism,” it somehow never found the time, or the coordinates, to seriously target Jolani or his core command structure, even though he controlled large swaths of Syrian territory from Aleppo countryside all the way to Idlib. Because Jolani and his men were fighting the one government Washington had already decided must go: the Syrian state under Bashar al-Assad. This is where Operation Timber Sycamore comes in: a multi-billion-dollar CIA covert program that funneled weapons, money, and training to so-called “rebels” in Syria. They were sold to Western audiences as “moderate opposition.” On the ground, those moderates were a disappearing species. What existed in reality were hardline Salafi-jihadist factions, with Nusra at the top of the food chain. The Free Syrian Army (FSA) was the mask, the logo on the paperwork, the brand name you could sell to Congress and CNN. The real muscle on the ground was Jolani’s men and other takfiri groups, who did the actual fighting, took the actual territory, and imposed their version of rule. Weapons went “to the moderates.” The moderates magically handed them to al-Qaeda. Everyone in Washington pretended to be surprised. No one stopped the pipeline. Over the years, the mask slipped. US officials themselves began to speak of Jolani as something more than just a former enemy. James Jeffrey, Washington’s former envoy to Syria, openly called Jolani “an asset” for US strategy – not my word, his. Robert Ford, the former US ambassador to Syria, has publicly admitted that he personally worked with Jolani to “take him out of the world of terrorism” and polish him into a politician. Think about what that means: the same US that claims to be fighting an endless war against al-Qaeda quietly devotes diplomatic energy to rehabilitating the Syrian branch of al-Qaeda into a partner, a useful strongman, a future head of state. I said on the show, and I repeat it here: I believe Jolani was recruited in Camp Bucca. The timeline makes no sense otherwise. You don’t walk out of an American-run prison and, weeks later, magically have the networks, the money, the arms, and the logistical capacity to found al-Qaeda in Syria, right at the moment when Washington and its allies need a battering ram against Damascus. Recently, former CIA director David Petraeus even sat with Jolani and told him, “Your success is our success.” What more do people need? A signed employment contract? But let’s assume, for a moment, that you still think this is a stretch. Enter John Kiriakou. Kiriakou is not a YouTuber chasing clicks. He is a former CIA officer who went to prison because he exposed the torture program and named the torturers. His loyalty is clearly not to the Agency’s PR department. Recently, on Unfettered Speech, he described the Jolani situation bluntly. Here is the essence of what he said, which Judge Napolitano played on air: -The “new president” of Syria is a former al-Qaeda member and a co-founder of ISIS. -This same man is welcomed at the White House. -Senior US officials, including the Assistant Secretary of State for the Near East, travel to meet him. -President Trump suddenly lifts sanctions on Syria as Jolani consolidates power, prompting Syrians – desperate and exhausted – to dance in the streets. The only thing that makes sense is that Jolani is a CIA asset, per Kiriakou’s. When a former CIA officer who has already sacrificed his career and freedom to tell the truth looks at the pattern and says, “This is our guy,” it is not a conspiracy theory anymore. Now, you may ask, why would the United States and its allies back such a man? The answer lies in what Syria used to be, and what it has now been turned into. Before this war, Syria, for all its flaws, was a horizontally integrated state. People identified themselves as Syrian first and then Armenian, Druze, Christian, Alawite, Sunni, Shi’a, Kurdish, and so on. The state’s foreign policy aligned with Iran and Hezbollah, supported Palestinian factions, and kept a real deterrent posture toward Israel. For Washington and Tel Aviv, this was unacceptable. The goal was not “democracy”; that word is just wrapping paper. The real objective was to remove a government allied with Iran and replace it with a fragmented landscape: a weak central authority in Damascus, surrounded by sectarian cantons and warlord enclaves, all dependent on foreign patrons. Jolani is perfect for this role. For Israel, he brings vertical division. A man with a long al-Qaeda pedigree ruling Syria is a nightmare for minorities: Christians, Druze, Alawites, Shi’a, many Kurds, and other smaller communities. They will not accept al-Qaeda rule. So they retreat into their own militias, their own cantons, their own de facto mini-states, exactly in line with old Israeli strategic doctrines like the Yinon Plan, which openly advocated fragmenting neighboring states along sectarian lines. On the ground, we already see it: -Druze militias running their own affairs in the south with quiet Israeli backing. -Kurdish forces in the northeast under US protection, managing their own autonomous zone. -Alawites discussing an autonomous coastal enclave. -Christians living in silence and fear. You don’t need formal borders on a map to balkanize a country. When I, as a Syrian of Armenian origin, stop thinking of myself as Syrian first and start thinking purely as Armenian, when I instinctively fear my neighbor because he is from another sect, the balkanization has already happened in the mind. For Washington, Jolani is equally “useful.” He has promised to normalize relations with Israel, to open Syria’s markets to Western capital, and to hand over the country’s resources from the hydrocarbons east of the Euphrates to the gas fields under the Mediterranean to American and allied companies. A 24-million-person country reduced to a reconstruction market: $300 billion worth of contracts, infrastructure projects, and “investments.” But for investors to feel safe, they need a strongman in Damascus who can project the illusion of stability while remaining utterly dependent on foreign protection. That strongman, in their design, is Abu Mohammed al-Jolani. But Jolani is not acting alone. Around him is a constellation of Western intelligence veterans and “conflict resolution” NGOs acting as intermediaries. British MI6 circles, under figures like Jonathan Powell – former chief of staff to Tony Blair – are central in managing this process. Powell runs an organization called Inter Mediate, which specializes in “talking to armed groups.” Behind the humanitarian language lies political engineering. One of Inter Mediate’s operatives, a woman named Clare Haigh, is now said to have an office inside the Syrian presidential palace, advising Jolani on how to talk, how to dress, how to handle journalists, how to sell himself as a reformed jihadist turned statesman. And then there is Qatar. Ahmed Zaidan – once Osama bin Laden’s favorite journalist, photographed sipping tea with him and broadcasting his tapes on Al Jazeera – is now a personal adviser to Jolani. Make it make sense. An al-Qaeda emir, handled by US and British intelligence veterans, advised by bin Laden’s favorite media man, massaged by Western PR consultants, welcomed in Washington, and crowned in Damascus as “president.” If you wrote this as fiction, an editor would tell you it’s too on the nose. Since Jolani took power through an international and regional deal that pushed Assad aside, over 11,000 people have been killed. Many of them are from the very minorities the West loves to mention in speeches but abandons in practice. Videos circulate of his fighters asking terrified villagers at gunpoint, “Are you Muslim or not?” and executing those who give the “wrong” answer, including Druze and Alawites who are not recognized as “true Muslims” by their extremist ideology. Christians, who had already suffered massive emigration between 2011 and 2024, are being squeezed further. They have no organized armed force, no foreign sponsor. They are expected either to live under the mercy of an al-Qaeda-bred regime or to leave the land of their ancestors. This is what Washington’s “asset management” looks like in human terms. If you are an American reading this, you might be tempted to say: “This cannot be. My government would never knowingly empower al-Qaeda.” But it already has, repeatedly. From Afghanistan in the 1980s, when US intelligence backed the Mujahideen (and, indirectly, their Arab foreign fighter allies), to Libya and Syria in the last decade, where jihadist factions were instrumentalized against secular or nationalist governments, the pattern is clear. The names and acronyms change. The logic does not. The same establishment that lectures the world on “democracy” and “human rights” is perfectly willing to install a man like Jolani as the ruler of one of the oldest civilizations on earth, as long as he delivers strategic gains: -breaking the Iran–Syria–Hezbollah axis; -fragmenting Syria into weak, controllable pieces; -opening its resources and markets to Western and Gulf capital; -and giving Israel unprecedented strategic depth and security. Everything else – the massacres, the ethnic cleansing, the collapse of national identity, the destruction of ancient communities – is treated as collateral damage. I am often asked what Syria will look like in five or ten years. I wish I could answer with optimism. Right now, the forces pushing to turn my country into a permanent vassal state – ruled by a former al-Qaeda emir, policed by foreign intelligence, exploited by foreign capital – are incredibly strong. But nothing in this region is permanent. People who come to power by cutting off other people’s heads often lose their own. If there are still sane voices left in Western politics – people like Tulsi Gabbard 🌺, whom I mentioned on air – they must at least recognize this insanity: backing an al-Qaeda emir as “our man in Damascus” is not just immoral; it is ultimately self-destructive. Syria does not need Jolani. The West does not need Jolani. There are Syrians who can have friendly relations with the United States without being former al-Qaeda commanders, without murdering their own people, without turning an ancient nation into a laboratory for extremist social engineering. The question is not whether such alternatives exist. They do. The question is whether Washington and its allies want a sovereign, stable Syria, or whether they prefer a shattered, cantonized carcass kept alive just enough for the next “asset” to feed on.

Kevork Almassian

177,007 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

كي لا ننسى… ولن ننسى هؤلاء الأطفال الذين سقطوا في مجازر الساحل السوري لم يكونوا مقاتلين، ولم يكونوا طرفًا في أي نزاع. لكنهم وُصِموا بعبارة “فلول النظام” وقُتلوا بدمٍ بارد فقط لأنهم ينتمون إلى بيئة مستهدفة، إلى طائفة كريمة أراد المتطرفون إبادتها باسم الثورة والدين زورًا. هؤلاء ليسوا أرقامًا ولا سطورًا من الماضي. هم شهداء السابع من آذار 2025، ذُبحوا على يد جماعات تكفيرية متطرفة، جاءت تحمل مشروعًا طائفيًا دمويًا لا يشبه سوريا ولا شعبها. واليوم، الجلاد نفسه — الجولاني ومرتزقته — يقدّم ما يسميه “تحقيقًا” لتبرئة نفسه وإعادة كتابة الجريمة برواية مفبركة. تحقيق بلا عدالة، ولا شرعية، ولا ضمير. نحن نرفض هذه المهزلة. ونطالب بـ تحقيق دولي عاجل، مستقل، شفاف، بعيدًا عن أي تدخل من الجناة أو سلطاتهم. دم الشهداء أمانة في أعناقنا، وقضيتهم ليست شأنًا محليًا، بل جريمة ضد الإنسانية، تُدين من قتل، ومن صمت، ومن تواطأ. Lest We Forget… and We Will Not Forget The children who fell in the Syrian coastal massacres were not fighters. They were not part of any conflict. But they were branded as “remnants of the regime” and executed in cold blood simply because they came from a targeted community, from a noble sect that extremist militants sought to erase — falsely in the name of revolution and religion. They are not numbers. They are not forgotten lines in history. They are the martyrs of March 7, 2025 — slain by sectarian jihadist groups who brought with them a bloody project of extermination that has nothing to do with Syria or its people. And today, the butcher himself — Jolani and his militias — offers what he calls an “investigation” to clear himself and rewrite the crime in a fabricated narrative. An investigation with no justice, no legitimacy, and no conscience. We categorically reject this farce. We demand an urgent, independent, and transparent international investigation, free from any interference by the perpetrators or their authorities. The blood of the martyrs is a sacred trust. Their case is not a local issue, but a crime against humanity — one that condemns not only the killers, but also those who were silent, those who justified, and those who colluded. #مجزرة_الساحل #مجازر_الساحل_السوري #الابادة_العلوية #الابادة_الجماعية_العلوية_2025 #الطائفة_العلوية_الكريمة #الجولاني_الارهابي #الامن_العام_الارهابي #لجنة_تقصي_الحقائق #جريمة_ضد_الانسانية #سوريا #توثيق #حماية_الأقليات #SyrianCoastalMassacres #StopAlawiteGenocide #CrimesAgainstHumanity #JolaniCrimes #HTSCrimes #JolaniIsAGlobalTerrorist #AlawitePersecution #SyriaMassacres #IndependentInvestigation #MinorityProtection #UN #UNSC #UN_HRC #EU #HRW #AmnestyInternational #InternationalCriminalCourt #SaveSyria #JusticeForSyria
1:53

كي لا ننسى… ولن ننسى هؤلاء الأطفال الذين سقطوا في مجازر الساحل السوري لم يكونوا مقاتلين، ولم يكونوا طرفًا في أي نزاع. لكنهم وُصِموا بعبارة “فلول النظام” وقُتلوا بدمٍ بارد فقط لأنهم ينتمون إلى بيئة مستهدفة، إلى طائفة كريمة أراد المتطرفون إبادتها باسم الثورة والدين زورًا. هؤلاء ليسوا أرقامًا ولا سطورًا من الماضي. هم شهداء السابع من آذار 2025، ذُبحوا على يد جماعات تكفيرية متطرفة، جاءت تحمل مشروعًا طائفيًا دمويًا لا يشبه سوريا ولا شعبها. واليوم، الجلاد نفسه — الجولاني ومرتزقته — يقدّم ما يسميه “تحقيقًا” لتبرئة نفسه وإعادة كتابة الجريمة برواية مفبركة. تحقيق بلا عدالة، ولا شرعية، ولا ضمير. نحن نرفض هذه المهزلة. ونطالب بـ تحقيق دولي عاجل، مستقل، شفاف، بعيدًا عن أي تدخل من الجناة أو سلطاتهم. دم الشهداء أمانة في أعناقنا، وقضيتهم ليست شأنًا محليًا، بل جريمة ضد الإنسانية، تُدين من قتل، ومن صمت، ومن تواطأ. Lest We Forget… and We Will Not Forget The children who fell in the Syrian coastal massacres were not fighters. They were not part of any conflict. But they were branded as “remnants of the regime” and executed in cold blood simply because they came from a targeted community, from a noble sect that extremist militants sought to erase — falsely in the name of revolution and religion. They are not numbers. They are not forgotten lines in history. They are the martyrs of March 7, 2025 — slain by sectarian jihadist groups who brought with them a bloody project of extermination that has nothing to do with Syria or its people. And today, the butcher himself — Jolani and his militias — offers what he calls an “investigation” to clear himself and rewrite the crime in a fabricated narrative. An investigation with no justice, no legitimacy, and no conscience. We categorically reject this farce. We demand an urgent, independent, and transparent international investigation, free from any interference by the perpetrators or their authorities. The blood of the martyrs is a sacred trust. Their case is not a local issue, but a crime against humanity — one that condemns not only the killers, but also those who were silent, those who justified, and those who colluded. #مجزرة_الساحل #مجازر_الساحل_السوري #الابادة_العلوية #الابادة_الجماعية_العلوية_2025 #الطائفة_العلوية_الكريمة #الجولاني_الارهابي #الامن_العام_الارهابي #لجنة_تقصي_الحقائق #جريمة_ضد_الانسانية #سوريا #توثيق #حماية_الأقليات #SyrianCoastalMassacres #StopAlawiteGenocide #CrimesAgainstHumanity #JolaniCrimes #HTSCrimes #JolaniIsAGlobalTerrorist #AlawitePersecution #SyriaMassacres #IndependentInvestigation #MinorityProtection #UN #UNSC #UN_HRC #EU #HRW #AmnestyInternational #InternationalCriminalCourt #SaveSyria #JusticeForSyria

Syrian Witness شاهد سوري

13,167 просмотров • 1 год назад

🔥 فضيحة من العيار الثقيل‼️ المستشار السابق لأسامة بن لادن والحالي للجولاني أحمد موفق زيدان ظهر عبر قناة العربية مبرراً مجازر الساحل السوري بقوله: “معقول بعد ضرب 82 ألف برميل متفجر و217 ضربة كيماوية أن تدخل الفصائل المسلحة للساحل بعد التحرير دون قيامها بمذابح ومجازر؟!” 🔴 هذا ليس تحليلاً سياسياً بل تبرير علني للإبادة الجماعية، واعتراف صريح بأن المجازر كانت قراراً منظماً وليست مجرد تجاوزات. 📌 المعنى القانوني: •تبرير المجازر = تحريض مباشر على جرائم حرب. •الحديث يؤكد أن ما جرى في الساحل السوري تم بأوامر ممنهجة. •المسؤولية لا تقع فقط على الفصائل المسلحة، بل أيضاً على كل من غطى أو برّر هذه الجرائم. 📢 إن هذا الفيديو وثيقة دامغة يجب أن تُعتمد أمام: •الأمم المتحدة UN •مجلس حقوق الإنسان UN_HRC •مجلس الأمن UNSC •المحكمة الجنائية الدولية ICC •المنظمات الحقوقية (HRW، Amnesty International) 🔴 إذا لم يتحرك المجتمع الدولي، فإن الصمت = شراكة في الجريمة. دماء العلويين الطائفة الكريمة في الساحل السوري ستبقى شاهداً على خذلان العدالة وتقاعس الضمير العالمي. 🔥 A scandal of the highest order Former advisor to Osama bin Laden and current advisor to Jolani, Ahmad Mowafaq Zaidan, appeared on Al Arabiya justifying the massacres of the Syrian coast, stating: “After 82,000 barrel bombs and 217 chemical strikes, is it reasonable for armed factions to enter the coast after ‘liberation’ without committing massacres?!” 🔴 This is not political analysis but an explicit justification of genocide — an admission that the massacres were systematically ordered, not random excesses. 📌 Legal implications: •Justifying massacres = direct incitement to war crimes. •Confirms that coastal massacres were carried out under organized orders. •Responsibility extends to the factions involved and to anyone who covered or justified these atrocities. 📢 This video is a damning piece of evidence that must be presented to: •United Nations (UN) •Human Rights Council (UN_HRC) •UN Security Council (UNSC) •International Criminal Court (ICC) •Human rights organizations (HRW, Amnesty International) 🔴 If the world fails to act, silence = complicity. The blood of the Alawite noble sect in the Syrian coast will remain a testimony to global justice betrayed. #سوريا #الساحل_السوري #مجازر_الساحل #ابادة_علوية #الابادة_الجماعية_العلوية_2025 #الهولوكوست_العلوي #حماية_الأقليات #محاكمة_الجولاني_الارهابي_الدولي #StopAlawiteGenocide #SyriaMassacres #WarCrimes #CrimesAgainstHumanity #UN #UN_HRC #UNSC #ICC #HRW #AmnestyInternational #EU #StateDept #francediplo_EN #FCDOGovUK
1:06

Sensitive content

🔥 فضيحة من العيار الثقيل‼️ المستشار السابق لأسامة بن لادن والحالي للجولاني أحمد موفق زيدان ظهر عبر قناة العربية مبرراً مجازر الساحل السوري بقوله: “معقول بعد ضرب 82 ألف برميل متفجر و217 ضربة كيماوية أن تدخل الفصائل المسلحة للساحل بعد التحرير دون قيامها بمذابح ومجازر؟!” 🔴 هذا ليس تحليلاً سياسياً بل تبرير علني للإبادة الجماعية، واعتراف صريح بأن المجازر كانت قراراً منظماً وليست مجرد تجاوزات. 📌 المعنى القانوني: •تبرير المجازر = تحريض مباشر على جرائم حرب. •الحديث يؤكد أن ما جرى في الساحل السوري تم بأوامر ممنهجة. •المسؤولية لا تقع فقط على الفصائل المسلحة، بل أيضاً على كل من غطى أو برّر هذه الجرائم. 📢 إن هذا الفيديو وثيقة دامغة يجب أن تُعتمد أمام: •الأمم المتحدة UN •مجلس حقوق الإنسان UN_HRC •مجلس الأمن UNSC •المحكمة الجنائية الدولية ICC •المنظمات الحقوقية (HRW، Amnesty International) 🔴 إذا لم يتحرك المجتمع الدولي، فإن الصمت = شراكة في الجريمة. دماء العلويين الطائفة الكريمة في الساحل السوري ستبقى شاهداً على خذلان العدالة وتقاعس الضمير العالمي. 🔥 A scandal of the highest order Former advisor to Osama bin Laden and current advisor to Jolani, Ahmad Mowafaq Zaidan, appeared on Al Arabiya justifying the massacres of the Syrian coast, stating: “After 82,000 barrel bombs and 217 chemical strikes, is it reasonable for armed factions to enter the coast after ‘liberation’ without committing massacres?!” 🔴 This is not political analysis but an explicit justification of genocide — an admission that the massacres were systematically ordered, not random excesses. 📌 Legal implications: •Justifying massacres = direct incitement to war crimes. •Confirms that coastal massacres were carried out under organized orders. •Responsibility extends to the factions involved and to anyone who covered or justified these atrocities. 📢 This video is a damning piece of evidence that must be presented to: •United Nations (UN) •Human Rights Council (UN_HRC) •UN Security Council (UNSC) •International Criminal Court (ICC) •Human rights organizations (HRW, Amnesty International) 🔴 If the world fails to act, silence = complicity. The blood of the Alawite noble sect in the Syrian coast will remain a testimony to global justice betrayed. #سوريا #الساحل_السوري #مجازر_الساحل #ابادة_علوية #الابادة_الجماعية_العلوية_2025 #الهولوكوست_العلوي #حماية_الأقليات #محاكمة_الجولاني_الارهابي_الدولي #StopAlawiteGenocide #SyriaMassacres #WarCrimes #CrimesAgainstHumanity #UN #UN_HRC #UNSC #ICC #HRW #AmnestyInternational #EU #StateDept #francediplo_EN #FCDOGovUK

Syrian Witness شاهد سوري

197,883 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

The Modern Day Tatar Invasion carried out by the Syrian Ministry of Defense forces under the so-called Jolani government has targeted wheat silos in Sweida in a deliberate campaign of starvation. All crossings have been sealed, and any attempt to deliver food, medical, or humanitarian aid has been brutally blocked. What injustice is this? What level of criminality? What kind of government does this … and why are nations still granting them legitimacy? Sweida is dying of hunger and thirst under a suffocating siege, with water and electricity cut off for days. The coastal region is choking in darkness, famine, and isolation. No medicine. No flour. No way out. No way in. The only sound is the sound of collapse. Where is human conscience? Where is international law? Declare these regions disaster zones immediately. Strip this regime of its legitimacy. Return its leaders to where they belong: behind bars, as internationally wanted criminals. Is “stability” still more important than human lives? Has international legitimacy been reduced to a façade maintained through iron and fire? Has crime been granted the shield of sovereignty, simply because it aligns with your interests? Sweida is being silently exterminated. The coast is slowly starved to death. And you watch. You analyze. You issue empty, ineffective statements. هجوم تتار العصر الحديث قوات وزارة الدفاع السورية التابعة لحكومة الجولاني على صوامع القمح في السويداء، يأتي في سياق خنق ممنهج لتجويع السكان بعد إغلاق جميع المداخل ومنع مرور أي مساعدات غذائية أو طبية أو إنسانية. أيّ ظلمٍ هذا؟ أيّ إجرامٍ هذا؟ أيّ حكومةٍ هذه؟ ولماذا لا تزال الدول تمنحهم الشرعية؟ السويداء تموت من الجوع والعطش، تحت حصار خانق، وانقطاعٍ مستمر للماء والكهرباء. الساحل يختنق في الظلمة والجوع والعزلة. لا دواء، لا طحين، لا خروج، لا دخول، ولا صوت إلا صوت الانهيار. أين الضمير الإنساني؟ أين القانون الدولي؟ أعلنوا هذه المناطق مدنًا منكوبة فورًا. اسقطوا الشرعية عن هذه الحكومة المجرمة. أعيدوهم إلى مكانهم الطبيعي: خلف القضبان، كمجرمين مطلوبين دوليًا. هل ما زال الاستقرار أهم لديكم من حياة الناس؟ هل اختُزلت الشرعية الدولية في واجهة شكلية تحكم بالحديد والنار؟ هل باتت الجريمة تُمنح غطاء السيادة، فقط لأنها لا تعارض مصالحكم؟ السويداء تُباد بصمت، والساحل يُجَوَّع بهدوء. وأنتم تراقبون، تحلّلون، وتصدرون بيانات قلقة بلا أثر. Department of State President Donald J. Trump U.S. Embassy Syria European Commission Josep Borrell Fontelles Israel Foreign Ministry Benjamin Netanyahu - בנימין נתניהו EU in Syria Office of Congressman Abe Hamadeh ماهر شرف الدين مجازر السويداء || sweida massacres Secretary Antony Blinken The White House Mossad Commentary الموساد بالعربي Israel Defense Forces إيدي كوهين אדי כהן 🇮🇱 Dr Walid Phares Wahid Yazbk وحيد يزبك Sebastian Gorka DrG #SaveSweida #LiftTheSiege #EndStarvation #SyriaInDisaster #NoLegitimacyForKillers
2:07

The Modern Day Tatar Invasion carried out by the Syrian Ministry of Defense forces under the so-called Jolani government has targeted wheat silos in Sweida in a deliberate campaign of starvation. All crossings have been sealed, and any attempt to deliver food, medical, or humanitarian aid has been brutally blocked. What injustice is this? What level of criminality? What kind of government does this … and why are nations still granting them legitimacy? Sweida is dying of hunger and thirst under a suffocating siege, with water and electricity cut off for days. The coastal region is choking in darkness, famine, and isolation. No medicine. No flour. No way out. No way in. The only sound is the sound of collapse. Where is human conscience? Where is international law? Declare these regions disaster zones immediately. Strip this regime of its legitimacy. Return its leaders to where they belong: behind bars, as internationally wanted criminals. Is “stability” still more important than human lives? Has international legitimacy been reduced to a façade maintained through iron and fire? Has crime been granted the shield of sovereignty, simply because it aligns with your interests? Sweida is being silently exterminated. The coast is slowly starved to death. And you watch. You analyze. You issue empty, ineffective statements. هجوم تتار العصر الحديث قوات وزارة الدفاع السورية التابعة لحكومة الجولاني على صوامع القمح في السويداء، يأتي في سياق خنق ممنهج لتجويع السكان بعد إغلاق جميع المداخل ومنع مرور أي مساعدات غذائية أو طبية أو إنسانية. أيّ ظلمٍ هذا؟ أيّ إجرامٍ هذا؟ أيّ حكومةٍ هذه؟ ولماذا لا تزال الدول تمنحهم الشرعية؟ السويداء تموت من الجوع والعطش، تحت حصار خانق، وانقطاعٍ مستمر للماء والكهرباء. الساحل يختنق في الظلمة والجوع والعزلة. لا دواء، لا طحين، لا خروج، لا دخول، ولا صوت إلا صوت الانهيار. أين الضمير الإنساني؟ أين القانون الدولي؟ أعلنوا هذه المناطق مدنًا منكوبة فورًا. اسقطوا الشرعية عن هذه الحكومة المجرمة. أعيدوهم إلى مكانهم الطبيعي: خلف القضبان، كمجرمين مطلوبين دوليًا. هل ما زال الاستقرار أهم لديكم من حياة الناس؟ هل اختُزلت الشرعية الدولية في واجهة شكلية تحكم بالحديد والنار؟ هل باتت الجريمة تُمنح غطاء السيادة، فقط لأنها لا تعارض مصالحكم؟ السويداء تُباد بصمت، والساحل يُجَوَّع بهدوء. وأنتم تراقبون، تحلّلون، وتصدرون بيانات قلقة بلا أثر. Department of State President Donald J. Trump U.S. Embassy Syria European Commission Josep Borrell Fontelles Israel Foreign Ministry Benjamin Netanyahu - בנימין נתניהו EU in Syria Office of Congressman Abe Hamadeh ماهر شرف الدين مجازر السويداء || sweida massacres Secretary Antony Blinken The White House Mossad Commentary الموساد بالعربي Israel Defense Forces إيدي كوهين אדי כהן 🇮🇱 Dr Walid Phares Wahid Yazbk وحيد يزبك Sebastian Gorka DrG #SaveSweida #LiftTheSiege #EndStarvation #SyriaInDisaster #NoLegitimacyForKillers

Sally Obeid

26,442 просмотров • 1 год назад

Imagine having a running business, with the ability to repay £7,000 per month towards debt which suggests his total income is substantial, perhaps £15,000 to £20,000 per month yet having no shortage of stock, and Hamza still claims this fundraiser is eligible for Zakat? Hamza's Den, according to his own admission, has £162,000 worth of debt. Previously, the total debt was stated to be £50,000. If he doesn’t realise, he is required to pay Zakat on that stock at retail price meaning any debt he claims essentially gets cancelled out. Business or commercial debt is not deductible from your Zakatable assets. If it were, no wealthy person would ever pay Zakat. By that logic, most Muslims with mortgages would claim Zakat eligibility simply because they’re £200,000 in debt, even if their house is worth half a million. I might as well start a GoFundMe myself! The exact nature of his debt is not fully disclosed. How much of it is business-related, personal, or interest-based? Debts are typically split between long-term and short-term. If you have a long-term debt that extends beyond one year, only the portion due within the next 12 months is deductible not the entire sum. We know, based on his own admission, that he’s been in debt for over 10 years. So how is he Zakat eligible? Dr. Yusuf Al-Qaradawi رحمه الله states: الديون نوعان: ديون طويلة الأجل، فالدولة أحياناً تعطي بعض الناس لبناء مسكن على أن يسدده في عشرين أو ثلاثين سنة، والدين مثلاً مليون ريال أو مليون درهم، هذا الدين الطويل لا يمنع الزكاة وإلا فإن الإنسان سيظل إلى ما شاء الله من السنين، يكون عنده مال ويقول أنا مدين بمثله أو بأكثر منه. إنما يُسقِط هذا الدَين الزكاة في قسطه السنوي، كأن يكون عليه في الشهر 2000 درهم، وفي السنة 24000 درهم يمنع الزكاة بمقدار 24000 درهم، أما الدين طويل الأجل لا يمنع الزكاة، أما الديون قصيرة الأجل فهي تمنع الزكاة، ما لم يكن قاصداً أنه يستدين ليمنع الزكاة، فيلجأ إليها كحيلة حتى لا يدفع الزكاة، وهو ليس في حاجة إلى الدَين،فهنا يعامل بنقيض قصده، أما إن كان مديناً بأكثر مما يملك أو لم يبق له نصاب أو أكثر من نصاب، فلا زكاة عليه حتى يقضي هذا الدين، إذا كان دينًا قصير الأجل. والله أعلم.
0:45

Imagine having a running business, with the ability to repay £7,000 per month towards debt which suggests his total income is substantial, perhaps £15,000 to £20,000 per month yet having no shortage of stock, and Hamza still claims this fundraiser is eligible for Zakat? Hamza's Den, according to his own admission, has £162,000 worth of debt. Previously, the total debt was stated to be £50,000. If he doesn’t realise, he is required to pay Zakat on that stock at retail price meaning any debt he claims essentially gets cancelled out. Business or commercial debt is not deductible from your Zakatable assets. If it were, no wealthy person would ever pay Zakat. By that logic, most Muslims with mortgages would claim Zakat eligibility simply because they’re £200,000 in debt, even if their house is worth half a million. I might as well start a GoFundMe myself! The exact nature of his debt is not fully disclosed. How much of it is business-related, personal, or interest-based? Debts are typically split between long-term and short-term. If you have a long-term debt that extends beyond one year, only the portion due within the next 12 months is deductible not the entire sum. We know, based on his own admission, that he’s been in debt for over 10 years. So how is he Zakat eligible? Dr. Yusuf Al-Qaradawi رحمه الله states: الديون نوعان: ديون طويلة الأجل، فالدولة أحياناً تعطي بعض الناس لبناء مسكن على أن يسدده في عشرين أو ثلاثين سنة، والدين مثلاً مليون ريال أو مليون درهم، هذا الدين الطويل لا يمنع الزكاة وإلا فإن الإنسان سيظل إلى ما شاء الله من السنين، يكون عنده مال ويقول أنا مدين بمثله أو بأكثر منه. إنما يُسقِط هذا الدَين الزكاة في قسطه السنوي، كأن يكون عليه في الشهر 2000 درهم، وفي السنة 24000 درهم يمنع الزكاة بمقدار 24000 درهم، أما الدين طويل الأجل لا يمنع الزكاة، أما الديون قصيرة الأجل فهي تمنع الزكاة، ما لم يكن قاصداً أنه يستدين ليمنع الزكاة، فيلجأ إليها كحيلة حتى لا يدفع الزكاة، وهو ليس في حاجة إلى الدَين،فهنا يعامل بنقيض قصده، أما إن كان مديناً بأكثر مما يملك أو لم يبق له نصاب أو أكثر من نصاب، فلا زكاة عليه حتى يقضي هذا الدين، إذا كان دينًا قصير الأجل. والله أعلم.

Bro Hajji

11,382 просмотров • 1 год назад

Trump has done a complete 180 on everything he claimed to stand for. It doesn’t matter whether he’s scared, manipulated, acting on his own, or all of the above the outcome is the same. He has betrayed every principle and every single person who helped put him in power. The very people who carried him to where he is. He turned on them. Not just domestically, but internationally, look at the way he treated Orban. He forgets that Viktor Orban was a lone voice in Europe supporting him when everyone else was laughing at him and calling him a crazy orange man. Europeans hated him. Orban was his main supporter in Europe and the way he has treated Orban is just ugly, nothing more. Now he’s cozy with people like Lindsey Graham to the point where Graham is arranging meetings between him and people like the President of Finland. Let that sink in. He can scream ''I’m MAGA they are not,'' like a five-year old, but the truth is MAGA was never built by him, it was built around him. And now he’s completely betrayed what it was supposed to stand for. He’s insulted allies, betrayed partners and escalated tensions with adversaries burning bridges in every direction. And now, here we are again, he’s starting to echo the same tired neocon narrative we've heard for years ''Russia, Russia, Russia.'' It may not be as blatant yet, but give it a few weeks and we’ll be right back to blaming Russia for everything. What makes it even more crazy is that he himself was once the target of the entire Russiagate saga. I’ve seen stupidity before but this is on another level. This isn’t just more of the same, it’s something entirely new. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again the government is a reflection of the people. And right now, we have a narcissism problem in this country. We rank at the top when it comes to that disorder. What’s the core trait of a narcissist? Look at Donald Trump a textbook case. No empathy. Someone dies, and there’s no weight to it. His comment after Charles' death was disgusting. He talks about bombing people with this disturbing sense of excitement ‘we bomb the hell out of them’ like it’s a performance. The worst part is how easily this situation could have been handled. Ayatollah was old and sick he only had a few years left. There was a real opportunity for a deal. Trump blew it when he started bombing Iran in the middle of the negotiations. Twice! We keep ignoring reality. Israel is one of the most cunning and deceptive countries in the world. This is a state that secretly developed nuclear weapons and hid them from its own so-called ‘closest ally,’ the United States. This is a country that has spied on U.S. offices, blamed others for its actions and has has killed American soldiers and journalists. If we were honest and actually calculated which country has caused more harm to U.S. interests Iran or Israel, Israel would likely be far ahead. That’s not opinion, that’s a fact. Iran didn’t just become an enemy out of nowhere. We played a major role in creating that hostility from overthrowing Mossadegh to installing the Shah, whose regime imprisoned and brutalized its own people and we supported and backed him knowing he was a dictator. Now we have the audacity to tell Iranian people that they should get rid of their dictator and we can help by bombing them. You can't make this shit up! Are you kidding me? And there are still idiots who actually buy this. Iran has largely operated from a defensive position ever since. We label them terrorists, but from their perspective, they’ve been preparing for survival building regional influence and proxy networks because they fear exactly what history suggests, that they could be targeted next with bombs or even a nuke! In 2007, Wesley Clark said that the Pentagon had a plan to attack Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran. We ended up doing much of that, one by one. Well, guess what, if I’m Iran, watching this and hearing a high-ranking Pentagon official say my country is on that list, and then I see each country on that list get taken down one by one, who here wouldn’t at least think about building a nuclear weapon for defensive purposes? When you know one of the biggest and strongest militaries in the world is planning to invade you someday, and they’re openly talking about it, what would you do? All of you geniuses who think Iran is the problem, honestly, which one of you wouldn’t consider building a bomb in that situation? And that’s without even getting into the role of countries like Israel and the influence they may have on pushing the United States toward these actions. If your argument is that Iran has a dictatorial regime, then you are a hypocritl. The United States installed a dictator in Iran themselves and overthrew a democratic leader and even after that the CIA said they had no problem with Ayatollah, in fact they said it would be 'good for us'.Then they got caught selling weapons to Iran. If the argument is - 'they’re building a nuclear weapon,' then the obvious question is: why? Why would they feel the need to? Maybe it has something to do with Wesley Clark, Iraq and many more?!.. So let’s be real, anyone who says Iran has no right to want a nuclear weapon is either being dishonest or just flat out stupid. Do I want them to have a nuke? No. But do they feel justified in wanting one? Absolutely! Put yourself in their position. You know the history you know what the CIA did to your country. Then you hear a high-level figure like Wesley Clark talk about a plan to take out seven countries in five years, including yours. You watch those countries get hit one after another and you are no position to stand against the US and actually win that war without taking great amount of casualties. What conclusion are you supposed to draw from that? At that point, it’s not crazy it's strategic! Any country in that situation would start thinking exactly about that, I know I would have if I was in that situation. Wouldn’t you? It’s not hard to understand why a country might see nuclear capability as a deterrent when it feels threatened by stronger military powers and some absolutely psychotic states like Israel. And let’s be realistic, Iran would never use a nuke against the United States, any use of nuclear weapons against us would mean their complete annihilation. Iran is many things but it’s not that suicidal, they don’t want to end their existence, they want their country to endure. The question is which country then would they use the nukes if they are ever put in that position? There’s only one country and that’s Israel not the US and Honestly I do not see how is that my problem at all? Do you? I mean it maybe Miriam Adelson's problem but it's not my problem. Most of Iran’s hostile actions came after the U.S. helped overthrow its government and backed a dictator for decades! So this narrative that Iran has been hostile to the us needs seriously clarification to why? Any regime would be hostile to you when you overthrow their democratic leader and instal a dictator that makes people miserable. After the revolution, Iran became openly hostile to the U.S for A REASON! The reason is the CIA and the corporate America nothing else.
1:00

Trump has done a complete 180 on everything he claimed to stand for. It doesn’t matter whether he’s scared, manipulated, acting on his own, or all of the above the outcome is the same. He has betrayed every principle and every single person who helped put him in power. The very people who carried him to where he is. He turned on them. Not just domestically, but internationally, look at the way he treated Orban. He forgets that Viktor Orban was a lone voice in Europe supporting him when everyone else was laughing at him and calling him a crazy orange man. Europeans hated him. Orban was his main supporter in Europe and the way he has treated Orban is just ugly, nothing more. Now he’s cozy with people like Lindsey Graham to the point where Graham is arranging meetings between him and people like the President of Finland. Let that sink in. He can scream ''I’m MAGA they are not,'' like a five-year old, but the truth is MAGA was never built by him, it was built around him. And now he’s completely betrayed what it was supposed to stand for. He’s insulted allies, betrayed partners and escalated tensions with adversaries burning bridges in every direction. And now, here we are again, he’s starting to echo the same tired neocon narrative we've heard for years ''Russia, Russia, Russia.'' It may not be as blatant yet, but give it a few weeks and we’ll be right back to blaming Russia for everything. What makes it even more crazy is that he himself was once the target of the entire Russiagate saga. I’ve seen stupidity before but this is on another level. This isn’t just more of the same, it’s something entirely new. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again the government is a reflection of the people. And right now, we have a narcissism problem in this country. We rank at the top when it comes to that disorder. What’s the core trait of a narcissist? Look at Donald Trump a textbook case. No empathy. Someone dies, and there’s no weight to it. His comment after Charles' death was disgusting. He talks about bombing people with this disturbing sense of excitement ‘we bomb the hell out of them’ like it’s a performance. The worst part is how easily this situation could have been handled. Ayatollah was old and sick he only had a few years left. There was a real opportunity for a deal. Trump blew it when he started bombing Iran in the middle of the negotiations. Twice! We keep ignoring reality. Israel is one of the most cunning and deceptive countries in the world. This is a state that secretly developed nuclear weapons and hid them from its own so-called ‘closest ally,’ the United States. This is a country that has spied on U.S. offices, blamed others for its actions and has has killed American soldiers and journalists. If we were honest and actually calculated which country has caused more harm to U.S. interests Iran or Israel, Israel would likely be far ahead. That’s not opinion, that’s a fact. Iran didn’t just become an enemy out of nowhere. We played a major role in creating that hostility from overthrowing Mossadegh to installing the Shah, whose regime imprisoned and brutalized its own people and we supported and backed him knowing he was a dictator. Now we have the audacity to tell Iranian people that they should get rid of their dictator and we can help by bombing them. You can't make this shit up! Are you kidding me? And there are still idiots who actually buy this. Iran has largely operated from a defensive position ever since. We label them terrorists, but from their perspective, they’ve been preparing for survival building regional influence and proxy networks because they fear exactly what history suggests, that they could be targeted next with bombs or even a nuke! In 2007, Wesley Clark said that the Pentagon had a plan to attack Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran. We ended up doing much of that, one by one. Well, guess what, if I’m Iran, watching this and hearing a high-ranking Pentagon official say my country is on that list, and then I see each country on that list get taken down one by one, who here wouldn’t at least think about building a nuclear weapon for defensive purposes? When you know one of the biggest and strongest militaries in the world is planning to invade you someday, and they’re openly talking about it, what would you do? All of you geniuses who think Iran is the problem, honestly, which one of you wouldn’t consider building a bomb in that situation? And that’s without even getting into the role of countries like Israel and the influence they may have on pushing the United States toward these actions. If your argument is that Iran has a dictatorial regime, then you are a hypocritl. The United States installed a dictator in Iran themselves and overthrew a democratic leader and even after that the CIA said they had no problem with Ayatollah, in fact they said it would be 'good for us'.Then they got caught selling weapons to Iran. If the argument is - 'they’re building a nuclear weapon,' then the obvious question is: why? Why would they feel the need to? Maybe it has something to do with Wesley Clark, Iraq and many more?!.. So let’s be real, anyone who says Iran has no right to want a nuclear weapon is either being dishonest or just flat out stupid. Do I want them to have a nuke? No. But do they feel justified in wanting one? Absolutely! Put yourself in their position. You know the history you know what the CIA did to your country. Then you hear a high-level figure like Wesley Clark talk about a plan to take out seven countries in five years, including yours. You watch those countries get hit one after another and you are no position to stand against the US and actually win that war without taking great amount of casualties. What conclusion are you supposed to draw from that? At that point, it’s not crazy it's strategic! Any country in that situation would start thinking exactly about that, I know I would have if I was in that situation. Wouldn’t you? It’s not hard to understand why a country might see nuclear capability as a deterrent when it feels threatened by stronger military powers and some absolutely psychotic states like Israel. And let’s be realistic, Iran would never use a nuke against the United States, any use of nuclear weapons against us would mean their complete annihilation. Iran is many things but it’s not that suicidal, they don’t want to end their existence, they want their country to endure. The question is which country then would they use the nukes if they are ever put in that position? There’s only one country and that’s Israel not the US and Honestly I do not see how is that my problem at all? Do you? I mean it maybe Miriam Adelson's problem but it's not my problem. Most of Iran’s hostile actions came after the U.S. helped overthrow its government and backed a dictator for decades! So this narrative that Iran has been hostile to the us needs seriously clarification to why? Any regime would be hostile to you when you overthrow their democratic leader and instal a dictator that makes people miserable. After the revolution, Iran became openly hostile to the U.S for A REASON! The reason is the CIA and the corporate America nothing else.

ELIZABETH LANE

34,350 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🔴 في تطور خطير… جوناي يلدز يكشف حقيقة خطف النساء العلويات كسَبَايا “نعم، سبايا… ولن أتراجع عن هذا الوصف” — هكذا بدأ جوناي يلدز، العلوي من لواء إسكندرون، الذي فاوض الخاطفين شخصيًا ودفع فدية لتحرير الشابة حلا نورس إبراهيم، التي تعرضت لتعذيب وحشي شمل حلق شعرها وحواجبها لإجبارها على الزواج من رجل سني، في محاولة لإخفاء الجريمة. حلا ليست الوحيدة: 4 نساء من الطائفة العلوية الكريمة، بينهن 3 قاصرات، تم تزويجهن قسريًا بعد تهديد وتعذيب أهلهن. لكن الفضيحة لا تقف عند الخاطفين، بل تشمل أيضًا شركاء في الوطن من إعلاميين وساسة ومؤثرين عملوا على تشويه الحقيقة وتسخيفها للحفاظ على “سمعة المذهب”، متسترين على جرائم شرف تُرتكب باسم الدين والمقاومة. جوناي يلدز قالها بصراحة: “ما ارتُكب بحق نسائنا لم يفعله يزيد بن معاوية، ولا حتى بشار الأسد… وإذا لم يكن هذا سبيًا، فماذا يكون؟” 🛑 لا عذر بعد اليوم… الصمت خيانة، والتاريخ لن يرحم. 🔴 A Dangerous Revelation… Gunay Yildiz Exposes the Enslavement of Alawite Women “Yes—enslavement, and I will not retract that word.” With these words, Gunay Yildiz, an Alawite from the Iskenderun region, broke his silence in a live video on Facebook. He personally negotiated with the kidnappers and paid the ransom to free Hala Nours Ibrahim, who was subjected to brutal torture—including the shaving of her head and eyebrows—to force her into marrying a Sunni man, in an effort to hide the crime. But Hala wasn’t the only victim: Four women from the honorable Alawite sect, including three minors, were forcibly married after their families were threatened and tortured. The scandal extends beyond the kidnappers—journalists, influencers, and politicians from within the country participated in distorting the truth and trivializing the issue, all to protect the image of their sect. Gunay Yildiz stated clearly: “What was done to our women hasn’t been done by Yazid ibn Muawiyah, nor even by Bashar al-Assad… and if this isn’t enslavement, then what is?” 🛑 No more excuses. Silence is betrayal—and history will not be kind. #UN #UN_HRC #eu_eeas #StateDept #francediplo_EN #FCDOGovUK #ISIS #Trump #StopAlawiteGenocide #StopAlawiteGenocideInSyria #The_Alawite_Holocaust_in_Syria #محرقة_العلويين_في_سوريا #الابادة_الجماعية_العلوية_2025 #محاكمة_الجولاني_الارهابي_الدولي #التهجير_جريمة #حماية_الأقليات #الساحل_السوري #الجولاني_سفاح_سوريا #تسقط_حكومة_الجولاني_الأرهابية #أوقفوا_الإبادة_الطائفية #ابادة_علوية #الشرع_من_دون_شرعية #الهولوكوست_العلوي #الجولاني_ليس_رئيسي #استقلال_الساحل_السوري #مجزرة_الساحل Donald J. Trump Donald J. Trump CNN CNNPolitics Agence France-Presse Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office UK Prime Minister European External Action Service - EEAS 🇪🇺 EU in Syria UN in Syria UN Human Rights U.S. Embassy Syria Department of State جامعة الدول العربية وزارة الخارجية 🇸🇦 محمد بن سلمان بن عبد العزيز (Informal) HH Sheikh Mohammed Elon Musk Mazloum Abdî مظلوم عبدي Joe Wilson 🇺🇸 Pamela Geller 🇮🇱 Dr Walid Phares Kaja Kallas Liz Throssell Michael Ohnmacht محمد علي الحسيني はうはう
2:38

🔴 في تطور خطير… جوناي يلدز يكشف حقيقة خطف النساء العلويات كسَبَايا “نعم، سبايا… ولن أتراجع عن هذا الوصف” — هكذا بدأ جوناي يلدز، العلوي من لواء إسكندرون، الذي فاوض الخاطفين شخصيًا ودفع فدية لتحرير الشابة حلا نورس إبراهيم، التي تعرضت لتعذيب وحشي شمل حلق شعرها وحواجبها لإجبارها على الزواج من رجل سني، في محاولة لإخفاء الجريمة. حلا ليست الوحيدة: 4 نساء من الطائفة العلوية الكريمة، بينهن 3 قاصرات، تم تزويجهن قسريًا بعد تهديد وتعذيب أهلهن. لكن الفضيحة لا تقف عند الخاطفين، بل تشمل أيضًا شركاء في الوطن من إعلاميين وساسة ومؤثرين عملوا على تشويه الحقيقة وتسخيفها للحفاظ على “سمعة المذهب”، متسترين على جرائم شرف تُرتكب باسم الدين والمقاومة. جوناي يلدز قالها بصراحة: “ما ارتُكب بحق نسائنا لم يفعله يزيد بن معاوية، ولا حتى بشار الأسد… وإذا لم يكن هذا سبيًا، فماذا يكون؟” 🛑 لا عذر بعد اليوم… الصمت خيانة، والتاريخ لن يرحم. 🔴 A Dangerous Revelation… Gunay Yildiz Exposes the Enslavement of Alawite Women “Yes—enslavement, and I will not retract that word.” With these words, Gunay Yildiz, an Alawite from the Iskenderun region, broke his silence in a live video on Facebook. He personally negotiated with the kidnappers and paid the ransom to free Hala Nours Ibrahim, who was subjected to brutal torture—including the shaving of her head and eyebrows—to force her into marrying a Sunni man, in an effort to hide the crime. But Hala wasn’t the only victim: Four women from the honorable Alawite sect, including three minors, were forcibly married after their families were threatened and tortured. The scandal extends beyond the kidnappers—journalists, influencers, and politicians from within the country participated in distorting the truth and trivializing the issue, all to protect the image of their sect. Gunay Yildiz stated clearly: “What was done to our women hasn’t been done by Yazid ibn Muawiyah, nor even by Bashar al-Assad… and if this isn’t enslavement, then what is?” 🛑 No more excuses. Silence is betrayal—and history will not be kind. #UN #UN_HRC #eu_eeas #StateDept #francediplo_EN #FCDOGovUK #ISIS #Trump #StopAlawiteGenocide #StopAlawiteGenocideInSyria #The_Alawite_Holocaust_in_Syria #محرقة_العلويين_في_سوريا #الابادة_الجماعية_العلوية_2025 #محاكمة_الجولاني_الارهابي_الدولي #التهجير_جريمة #حماية_الأقليات #الساحل_السوري #الجولاني_سفاح_سوريا #تسقط_حكومة_الجولاني_الأرهابية #أوقفوا_الإبادة_الطائفية #ابادة_علوية #الشرع_من_دون_شرعية #الهولوكوست_العلوي #الجولاني_ليس_رئيسي #استقلال_الساحل_السوري #مجزرة_الساحل Donald J. Trump Donald J. Trump CNN CNNPolitics Agence France-Presse Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office UK Prime Minister European External Action Service - EEAS 🇪🇺 EU in Syria UN in Syria UN Human Rights U.S. Embassy Syria Department of State جامعة الدول العربية وزارة الخارجية 🇸🇦 محمد بن سلمان بن عبد العزيز (Informal) HH Sheikh Mohammed Elon Musk Mazloum Abdî مظلوم عبدي Joe Wilson 🇺🇸 Pamela Geller 🇮🇱 Dr Walid Phares Kaja Kallas Liz Throssell Michael Ohnmacht محمد علي الحسيني はうはう

NEMESIS – نيميسس

36,420 просмотров • 1 год назад

💥 LAP Alert 💥 "I did this sort of spy thing where I changed hotel rooms and I changed taxis. I was making sure I wasn’t followed." ~Knapp Is Lacatski Lying to Us About the Craft and Breaching the Hull? ~ "If not for that [2017 NYT] story about AATIP and the problems that [Lacatski] saw with it, he would never have mentioned [AAWSAP]...I don't think, ever." ~Knapp (So, in other words...thank you from the UFO community, to the NYT, for getting it wrong? 🙂) ~ Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Should we listen to Dr. James Lacatski on UFOs, on the fact, or the idea, that our government has at least one, he's admitted, and we breached the hull? Should we listen to him, George?" George Knapp: "I know a lot of people have noticed that he's talked about his role in counterintelligence as part of the AAWSAP program. And because they equate counterintelligence with lies, false info., cover stories, misdirection. Aha! He's putting out a bunch of false info. a decade after he retired from government service." (I saw one person suggest that, and I thought it was a questionable take...) Grant Lavac: "Given that Dr. James Lacatski was the 'counterintelligence coordinator' for AAWSAP, how much confidence can we invest in the veracity of his public statements that 'at least one recovered craft of unknown origin, a flying machine with no wings, no engine, no fuel, and no fuel tanks' is in the possession of the US government and that they had 'breached the hull' of the UFO? In the context of the counterintelligence value of UAP/UFO, his comments in this most recent interview on WEAPONIZED (edited for brevity) only raise more questions for me." ~~~ Knapp: "A, it's not [Lacatski]. He's not out there beating the bushes. He's talked to us, but that's pretty much it. He's telling the full story as much as he can in a series of books. And I was co-author on two of those, not on this one. And, you know, I remember the first time I met him, it was in 2018." ~ (In April of 2019, Knapp shared that story, minus Lacatski's name, at UFO MegaCon. Knapp in 2019: "I thought today I would share with you, sort of the informational foundation that I’ve acquired. So, one year ago, I made this trip to Washington, D.C. at the invitation of Senator Harry Reid. It was St. Patrick’s Day, 2018 and I already knew a little bit about AATIP and AAWSAP and what they’ve been studying and where the money came from and how the program was created. I did this sort of spy thing where I changed hotel rooms and I changed taxis. I was making sure I wasn’t followed. And if there was ever actually, anybody following me, they must have thought I looked ridiculous because it was way over the top. "But I ended up having to meet with Senator Reid and some other people who were directly involved in these programs and they gave me a download. And I thought I knew a lot about these programs when I went there and realized that I only knew a little tiny bit. The purpose of this was to learn about these programs. We all know about AATIP, but in reality, there was something before that. "I sat down for a couple of hours with Senator Reid and other people whose names, they don’t want to be known. They brought me up to speed on how AATIP was created. How its predecessor was under way for a number of years. It coexisted for a long time. People in this room. People who investigate this topic may have suspected for a long time that there was some kind of a program that still existed. We’ve all heard that Project Bluebook was the end. 1969 it ended and the government was done with UFOs. They closed up shop. And the reason they closed it down is because there was no evidence that it involved national security. "And we all knew that was baloney because of the stories that we’ve seen that are really well documented. For example, UFOs over nuclear missile bases. UFO encounters with the military installations and atomic facilities. Things of that sort the have been well documented over the years. There are cases that involved national security. So at the end of Blue Book, of course, this memo said, alright, any cases involving national security will continue to be investigated in the regular way. Well, what the heck was the regular way? We didn’t know. Well now we do know. At least a little bit of it." (Project Blue Book was shut down in December of 1969, but a few months earlier, in October, we had the Bolender memo, which noted that "reports of UFOs which could affect national security should continue to be handled through the standard Air Force procedure designed for this purpose." What standard Air Force procedure? The regular way? Where did those cases go? We still don't know what Bolender was referring to in that memo.) ~ Knapp in 2019: "And one of the regular ways was this program called AATIP. So I went on this trip. [and] I learned this stuff about AATIP. I had known a lot about it before but I got this briefing about this alphabet soup of different programs, how they began and what they studied. December 2017, the New York Times breaks this story about AATIP. Now, I had known about it for a long time because I lived in Las Vegas. I knew Bob Bigelow. I knew Harry Reid. We’d talk about UFO stuff and what was going on. "So when I was told the New York Times was gonna break the story, I’m kind ticked off about it. Because hey, I’ve been sitting on this for a long time. Why don’t I get to break the story? And they had to, one after another, gently remind me, 'You know. You’re not the New York Times.' Which I had to admit! It was true. And if I had done the story, the Times had said that they weren’t going to do it if somebody else breaks it. So, if I had done it, it’d be another story from a UFO reporter. "The New York Times did it and they changed everything. Because they did it, wider organizations did it. Some of them took shots at the New York Times because The Times got the story and they didn’t. But that story was accurate, to a degree. But the story that it told was not the full story. AATIP, that we know about…the AATIP that studies nuts and bolts saucers…case of UFOs that have encounters with military units such as the USS Nimitz, that is studied by a group of people, Lue Elizondo was the head of it. "It’s not so much a program as it was a loose network of intelligence officials in different agencies, including the Air Force and the Navy, CIA, DIA, DARPA…there might be a couple of other agencies. But a case would come in from any one of their units [and] it would be shared with this group of people, analysis would be done, evidence would be looked at and then stashed in a draw and nobody ever sees it. It’s not passed up the chain of command. "In 2007, that changed. One of the guys (Lacatski. ~Joe 2025) I met with in this meeting in Washington is the one who changed it. He had been in the same position that Lue Elizondo had been in. And his name is just not out there. He grew frustrated with what was happening with the phenomenon and he suspected that UFOs flying around the sky, buzzing our military units every once in a while, is not the full story. Even if you could solve that part of the mystery it wouldn’t solve the bigger part of the picture. "So he grew interested in Skinwalker Ranch and he had read the (Knapp/Kelleher – 'Hunt For The Skinwalker') book. And after he read it, he called up Bob Bigelow and said…actually, he wrote him a letter and said, 'Hey, can I go to the ranch…go look around? I’m with the DIA.' Bigelow says, 'Come on out to Las Vegas and I’ll take you there.' And that’s what happened. He flew to Las Vegas. They flew on Bigelow’s jet. They went to the ranch. "This guy’s not there fifteen minutes and he has an experience. And I’m not gonna go into detail. I’m hoping that he’s going to maybe come forward at some point and describe his experience. But it was just for him. Of all the people in this room, in the encounter, he was the only one who could see it. He’s the only one who had an angle on this thing that appeared. And he’s pretending that he’s not seeing it but it’s right out of the corner of his eye. And he doesn’t say anything until he leaves the ranch. And he gets off and he asks Bigelow if he had seen it. And he had not. The other people who had been in the room had not seen it. "He flies back to Las Vegas, goes back to Washington, D.C. and looks up Harry Reid and tells him about it. Now Reid had some experience in these matters that I’ll get into in a little bit. But as a result of that conversation, Reid, who had an interest in UFOs and had maintained that interest over many years – and I can attest to that personally – called in a couple of his friends in the Senate – Daniel Inouye and Ted Stevens. They had a conversation in a secure room and they decided to provide some funding for a much broader study. Something that looked at…beyond flying saucers, that looked at other paranormal aspects…supernatural aspects that we would not normally associate with aliens or ETs. Assuming that that’s what this is, which I’m not sure anyone knows for sure. And that is how AAWSAP was born. The Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program." ~~~ Knapp Yesterday: "The only reason [Lacatski] came forward, he was ticked off about how AATIP had been described in major media reports, and no mention had been given to the actual, real program. That one that had a $22 million budget, lasted 27 months, and which put together the biggest UFO data warehouse in history, that had written all these papers that still have not been released." (In the most-recent interview (Part 1) with Weaponized, Lacatski let it fly with his issues related to the 2017 NYT article: "The initial reporting...by the New York Times story in 2017 was totally inaccurate. Contrary to what some people claim, the authors knew my name and position at AAWSAP, yet never attempted to contact me. Likewise, the The Washington Post. POLITICO (laughs) contacted me within hours after the articles were published in the free publications, asking for my opinion. They knew my name, they had my phone number. Why didn't they contact me [beforehand]?" ~Dr. James Lacatski on Weaponized ~ Knapp: "So, Jim was a counterintelligence guy for AAWSAP, but in this role. He wasn't putting out cover stories or lies, he didn't put out anything. The world didn't hear that AAWSAP existed until years later, at least by that name. There was one statement made to the press about that program. It was by Robert Bigelow, whose company, BAASS, got the contract. A week after he signed it, he came on with me on Coast to Coast AM and said, 'We got this program dealing with UFOs, we have an unnamed partner, and we're excited to get going.' That was it. "Jim Lacatski wasn't putting out PR releases about AAWSAP. There was nothing. That was the last thing anybody said until the New York Times did the AATIP story, and then Jim Lacatski felt the real story was being covered up. If not for that story about AATIP and the problems that he saw with it, he would never have mentioned this. I don't think ever." (Well, then, thank you to the NYT journalists and editors for pissing off Lacatski!) Knapp: "You'll recall, AAWSAP, at the time that things went downhill, that the funding was moved away, they were trying to make it into a SAP, a Special Access Program. And if it had happened, we probably would never have heard of it. If it had happened, Lue Elizondo would have been the counterintelligence guy for AAWSAP, that he had already talked to Lacatski. "But Lacatski is not proclaiming the greatness of the program. He's not out there beating the bushes on podcasts and newscasts, other than with us, and he never put out in counterintelligence. His role, counterintelligence, meant something different for AAWSAP. The thing that DIA had told him was, 'Look, you know, it's not a rogue program. I know it gets weird into some of the phenomena that was at Skinwalker Ranch and other places. We don't care. Here's what we care about: Don't let the secret out. We don't want to see this on the front page of the Washington Post. We want it kept secret.' (John Greenewald was one person questioning whether AAWSAP was actually a prosaic program and Lacatski just decided to go rogue with a foray into UFOs and the paranormal.) Greenewald Tweet: "Did the U.S. government really sanction this, and if so, is this really how it was run? Or was this a rogue operation by a select few on the inside playing with Uncle Sam's coffers?" (Greenewald was quote tweeting a Greenstreet hit-piece video on AAWSAP. In his interview on Weaponized aired over the past few weeks, Lacatski said that former Deputy Director of AARO, Tim Phillips, also used the "rogue" word when describing AAWSAP. Did DIA really not know what AAWSAP was about? Did Lacatski go rogue and turn a program that was supposed to look at prosaic, advanced technology into one that studied UFOs and the paranormal? Here's an exchange from the 2023 interview Knapp and Corbell did with Lacatski and Colm Kelleher.) Kelleher: "The critical part of AAWSAP that we tried to convey in 'Skinwalkers at the Pentagon,' was that there were two fundamental, parallel tracks that AAWSAP ran on. The first one was the examination of UFO performance. And, you know, the UFO performance part was getting all of the data from eyewitnesses, plus deploying sensors into the field, in order to gather data on the performance of UFOs. That was track number one. And track number two was: What effects do UFOs have on humans? That was a parallel track that, from the get go, AAWSAP decided, unambiguously, to run both tracks in parallel. We documented psychological effects, and then we also documented paranormal effects." Lacatski: "Anything can be said on the internet it seems, factual or not. Well, one thing that is not factual is, DIA knew what it was getting into in regard to both aspects that Colm just described to you. And let me end my statement right here. We had no choice but to pursue both aspects." (That was a poor way of him saying: The claim that DIA was unaware of AAWSAP looking into all aspects of UFOs, including the paranormal, is NOT true.) Lacatski: "I want to emphasize something I said on my first and only interview. It was a closed program. It operated very similar to a SAP. The director, the director of analysis, and my office chief...and, of course, division chief, knew about this program. No one else did. Now, I was also protected by the stovepipe nature of that. I did not have to address political-type questions. I was insulated, but they were, too. There was no one else. People in the surrounding cubicles didn't know. Nothing was purposely being hid. It was a closed, stovepipe system, and it needed to be. It needed to be operated that way." ~~~ Knapp: "And so, Jim Lacatski took it on himself, put it in his own hands. He and Colm Kelleher interviewed all these people who applied for the jobs, the 50 full-time positions that they staffed, in a matter of months. They did background checks, they required security clearances for all those people, and they were worried about leaks. They didn't want information to get out. "They also were concerned about espionage by foreign players, by foreign companies, things of that sort. And some of that really did happen. As Jim has shared with us, there were a couple of phones that were transmitters that were found inside Bigelow Aerospace, inside the Bigelow, uh, facilities, and it was very alarming because they weren't sure who was doing it. I think they think it was a foreign government. I'm not going to say which one, uh, they suspected the most." (Lacatski said that the phones in question were made in China.) Knapp: "But, and then they also found weird frequencies emanating from Skinwalker Ranch. That's not strange, and there's a lot of unusual stuff that happens there, but it was some sort of a an espionage program that they believed was was not only looking at the ranch, but also at BAASS. "That was his primary concern. He was worried that the story gets out, because secrecy was of paramount interest to the heads of DIA and he's worried about the information getting out to the public. Because once it happened, then the knives come out in the Pentagon and within the intelligence community, which is kind of what happened. A memo was sent from Harry Reid's office, let other people know that AAWSAP existed, and that's when things started getting problematic." Corbell: "The bugging thing. So, it's not just like Bigelow Aerospace was tapped with something, he said, specifically, AAWSAP, right? So they were looking at that new UFO program. And I don't know how public this is, but he did say it was - not just him, other people have all said - it was multiple nations, multiple, different devices from those phones. And he also said that they worked with FBI, they had FBI liaisons looking at the ranch property, and also at Bigelow Aerospace. "Because, remember, they were supposed to receive a transfer of materials. That's why they reverse, reverse engineered (laughs), you know, they built everything to be able to hold SCIF-capable and material-capable property at that classification level. So, look, I think if we pull it back, the whole idea is, James Lacatski made a statement at some point that he was, you know, head of, or part of, or running the counterintelligence for AAWSAP. But his point was to keep AAWSAP itself secret from foreign nations. So then he has to keep it secret from the U.S. He did it. He did a great job. They actually kept it secret. That doesn't mean he's going out and creating false information to the public like he's been accused of. "So, should we listen to Jim Lacatski? That was like, you know, the main question. Oh, one second. He also identified that there is currently a counter-programming, counterintelligence operation going on to the American public, but not against the American public, by AARO." (In other words, spread misinformation to the American public so they can advance their goal of misinforming and confusing our adversaries who are always listening. National security! IMO, that's only acceptable if we're talking specifics related to propulsion, technology and weapons that can be used to give us a leg up on said adversaries. But everything else should come out and be made public. We shouldn't be told a bunch of lies about information we paid for and that could, potentially, give us some clarity about our species and other lifeforms on this planet.) Corbell: That was so clear in our interview with him that he said that, you know, 'Look, they're acting this way. They are telling you lies about AAWSAP and what happened.' And that's why he said, 'My books, I'm a government employee. This was paid by taxpayers. I'm trying to give you information.' And that's what his books are. "So it's clear from these rounds of interviews that we just had with Dr. Lacatski that he supports a controlled UFO disclosure. He made that very clear. So should we listen to what he has to say? I mean, he was a big dog, right, George?" Knapp: "He was the head of the largest U.S. government-funded UFO investigation in history, that we know of. He worked with Colm Kelleher, who was the boots-on-the-ground guy in Las Vegas. He worked with Jay Stratton. Stratton's role in the development of AAWSAP has not been really fully explored, but he's got a book coming out at some point, once it gets through the DOPSR process. But then we'll get additional information to buttress what Lacatski has said."
7:17

💥 LAP Alert 💥 "I did this sort of spy thing where I changed hotel rooms and I changed taxis. I was making sure I wasn’t followed." ~Knapp Is Lacatski Lying to Us About the Craft and Breaching the Hull? ~ "If not for that [2017 NYT] story about AATIP and the problems that [Lacatski] saw with it, he would never have mentioned [AAWSAP]...I don't think, ever." ~Knapp (So, in other words...thank you from the UFO community, to the NYT, for getting it wrong? 🙂) ~ Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Should we listen to Dr. James Lacatski on UFOs, on the fact, or the idea, that our government has at least one, he's admitted, and we breached the hull? Should we listen to him, George?" George Knapp: "I know a lot of people have noticed that he's talked about his role in counterintelligence as part of the AAWSAP program. And because they equate counterintelligence with lies, false info., cover stories, misdirection. Aha! He's putting out a bunch of false info. a decade after he retired from government service." (I saw one person suggest that, and I thought it was a questionable take...) Grant Lavac: "Given that Dr. James Lacatski was the 'counterintelligence coordinator' for AAWSAP, how much confidence can we invest in the veracity of his public statements that 'at least one recovered craft of unknown origin, a flying machine with no wings, no engine, no fuel, and no fuel tanks' is in the possession of the US government and that they had 'breached the hull' of the UFO? In the context of the counterintelligence value of UAP/UFO, his comments in this most recent interview on WEAPONIZED (edited for brevity) only raise more questions for me." ~~~ Knapp: "A, it's not [Lacatski]. He's not out there beating the bushes. He's talked to us, but that's pretty much it. He's telling the full story as much as he can in a series of books. And I was co-author on two of those, not on this one. And, you know, I remember the first time I met him, it was in 2018." ~ (In April of 2019, Knapp shared that story, minus Lacatski's name, at UFO MegaCon. Knapp in 2019: "I thought today I would share with you, sort of the informational foundation that I’ve acquired. So, one year ago, I made this trip to Washington, D.C. at the invitation of Senator Harry Reid. It was St. Patrick’s Day, 2018 and I already knew a little bit about AATIP and AAWSAP and what they’ve been studying and where the money came from and how the program was created. I did this sort of spy thing where I changed hotel rooms and I changed taxis. I was making sure I wasn’t followed. And if there was ever actually, anybody following me, they must have thought I looked ridiculous because it was way over the top. "But I ended up having to meet with Senator Reid and some other people who were directly involved in these programs and they gave me a download. And I thought I knew a lot about these programs when I went there and realized that I only knew a little tiny bit. The purpose of this was to learn about these programs. We all know about AATIP, but in reality, there was something before that. "I sat down for a couple of hours with Senator Reid and other people whose names, they don’t want to be known. They brought me up to speed on how AATIP was created. How its predecessor was under way for a number of years. It coexisted for a long time. People in this room. People who investigate this topic may have suspected for a long time that there was some kind of a program that still existed. We’ve all heard that Project Bluebook was the end. 1969 it ended and the government was done with UFOs. They closed up shop. And the reason they closed it down is because there was no evidence that it involved national security. "And we all knew that was baloney because of the stories that we’ve seen that are really well documented. For example, UFOs over nuclear missile bases. UFO encounters with the military installations and atomic facilities. Things of that sort the have been well documented over the years. There are cases that involved national security. So at the end of Blue Book, of course, this memo said, alright, any cases involving national security will continue to be investigated in the regular way. Well, what the heck was the regular way? We didn’t know. Well now we do know. At least a little bit of it." (Project Blue Book was shut down in December of 1969, but a few months earlier, in October, we had the Bolender memo, which noted that "reports of UFOs which could affect national security should continue to be handled through the standard Air Force procedure designed for this purpose." What standard Air Force procedure? The regular way? Where did those cases go? We still don't know what Bolender was referring to in that memo.) ~ Knapp in 2019: "And one of the regular ways was this program called AATIP. So I went on this trip. [and] I learned this stuff about AATIP. I had known a lot about it before but I got this briefing about this alphabet soup of different programs, how they began and what they studied. December 2017, the New York Times breaks this story about AATIP. Now, I had known about it for a long time because I lived in Las Vegas. I knew Bob Bigelow. I knew Harry Reid. We’d talk about UFO stuff and what was going on. "So when I was told the New York Times was gonna break the story, I’m kind ticked off about it. Because hey, I’ve been sitting on this for a long time. Why don’t I get to break the story? And they had to, one after another, gently remind me, 'You know. You’re not the New York Times.' Which I had to admit! It was true. And if I had done the story, the Times had said that they weren’t going to do it if somebody else breaks it. So, if I had done it, it’d be another story from a UFO reporter. "The New York Times did it and they changed everything. Because they did it, wider organizations did it. Some of them took shots at the New York Times because The Times got the story and they didn’t. But that story was accurate, to a degree. But the story that it told was not the full story. AATIP, that we know about…the AATIP that studies nuts and bolts saucers…case of UFOs that have encounters with military units such as the USS Nimitz, that is studied by a group of people, Lue Elizondo was the head of it. "It’s not so much a program as it was a loose network of intelligence officials in different agencies, including the Air Force and the Navy, CIA, DIA, DARPA…there might be a couple of other agencies. But a case would come in from any one of their units [and] it would be shared with this group of people, analysis would be done, evidence would be looked at and then stashed in a draw and nobody ever sees it. It’s not passed up the chain of command. "In 2007, that changed. One of the guys (Lacatski. ~Joe 2025) I met with in this meeting in Washington is the one who changed it. He had been in the same position that Lue Elizondo had been in. And his name is just not out there. He grew frustrated with what was happening with the phenomenon and he suspected that UFOs flying around the sky, buzzing our military units every once in a while, is not the full story. Even if you could solve that part of the mystery it wouldn’t solve the bigger part of the picture. "So he grew interested in Skinwalker Ranch and he had read the (Knapp/Kelleher – 'Hunt For The Skinwalker') book. And after he read it, he called up Bob Bigelow and said…actually, he wrote him a letter and said, 'Hey, can I go to the ranch…go look around? I’m with the DIA.' Bigelow says, 'Come on out to Las Vegas and I’ll take you there.' And that’s what happened. He flew to Las Vegas. They flew on Bigelow’s jet. They went to the ranch. "This guy’s not there fifteen minutes and he has an experience. And I’m not gonna go into detail. I’m hoping that he’s going to maybe come forward at some point and describe his experience. But it was just for him. Of all the people in this room, in the encounter, he was the only one who could see it. He’s the only one who had an angle on this thing that appeared. And he’s pretending that he’s not seeing it but it’s right out of the corner of his eye. And he doesn’t say anything until he leaves the ranch. And he gets off and he asks Bigelow if he had seen it. And he had not. The other people who had been in the room had not seen it. "He flies back to Las Vegas, goes back to Washington, D.C. and looks up Harry Reid and tells him about it. Now Reid had some experience in these matters that I’ll get into in a little bit. But as a result of that conversation, Reid, who had an interest in UFOs and had maintained that interest over many years – and I can attest to that personally – called in a couple of his friends in the Senate – Daniel Inouye and Ted Stevens. They had a conversation in a secure room and they decided to provide some funding for a much broader study. Something that looked at…beyond flying saucers, that looked at other paranormal aspects…supernatural aspects that we would not normally associate with aliens or ETs. Assuming that that’s what this is, which I’m not sure anyone knows for sure. And that is how AAWSAP was born. The Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program." ~~~ Knapp Yesterday: "The only reason [Lacatski] came forward, he was ticked off about how AATIP had been described in major media reports, and no mention had been given to the actual, real program. That one that had a $22 million budget, lasted 27 months, and which put together the biggest UFO data warehouse in history, that had written all these papers that still have not been released." (In the most-recent interview (Part 1) with Weaponized, Lacatski let it fly with his issues related to the 2017 NYT article: "The initial reporting...by the New York Times story in 2017 was totally inaccurate. Contrary to what some people claim, the authors knew my name and position at AAWSAP, yet never attempted to contact me. Likewise, the The Washington Post. POLITICO (laughs) contacted me within hours after the articles were published in the free publications, asking for my opinion. They knew my name, they had my phone number. Why didn't they contact me [beforehand]?" ~Dr. James Lacatski on Weaponized ~ Knapp: "So, Jim was a counterintelligence guy for AAWSAP, but in this role. He wasn't putting out cover stories or lies, he didn't put out anything. The world didn't hear that AAWSAP existed until years later, at least by that name. There was one statement made to the press about that program. It was by Robert Bigelow, whose company, BAASS, got the contract. A week after he signed it, he came on with me on Coast to Coast AM and said, 'We got this program dealing with UFOs, we have an unnamed partner, and we're excited to get going.' That was it. "Jim Lacatski wasn't putting out PR releases about AAWSAP. There was nothing. That was the last thing anybody said until the New York Times did the AATIP story, and then Jim Lacatski felt the real story was being covered up. If not for that story about AATIP and the problems that he saw with it, he would never have mentioned this. I don't think ever." (Well, then, thank you to the NYT journalists and editors for pissing off Lacatski!) Knapp: "You'll recall, AAWSAP, at the time that things went downhill, that the funding was moved away, they were trying to make it into a SAP, a Special Access Program. And if it had happened, we probably would never have heard of it. If it had happened, Lue Elizondo would have been the counterintelligence guy for AAWSAP, that he had already talked to Lacatski. "But Lacatski is not proclaiming the greatness of the program. He's not out there beating the bushes on podcasts and newscasts, other than with us, and he never put out in counterintelligence. His role, counterintelligence, meant something different for AAWSAP. The thing that DIA had told him was, 'Look, you know, it's not a rogue program. I know it gets weird into some of the phenomena that was at Skinwalker Ranch and other places. We don't care. Here's what we care about: Don't let the secret out. We don't want to see this on the front page of the Washington Post. We want it kept secret.' (John Greenewald was one person questioning whether AAWSAP was actually a prosaic program and Lacatski just decided to go rogue with a foray into UFOs and the paranormal.) Greenewald Tweet: "Did the U.S. government really sanction this, and if so, is this really how it was run? Or was this a rogue operation by a select few on the inside playing with Uncle Sam's coffers?" (Greenewald was quote tweeting a Greenstreet hit-piece video on AAWSAP. In his interview on Weaponized aired over the past few weeks, Lacatski said that former Deputy Director of AARO, Tim Phillips, also used the "rogue" word when describing AAWSAP. Did DIA really not know what AAWSAP was about? Did Lacatski go rogue and turn a program that was supposed to look at prosaic, advanced technology into one that studied UFOs and the paranormal? Here's an exchange from the 2023 interview Knapp and Corbell did with Lacatski and Colm Kelleher.) Kelleher: "The critical part of AAWSAP that we tried to convey in 'Skinwalkers at the Pentagon,' was that there were two fundamental, parallel tracks that AAWSAP ran on. The first one was the examination of UFO performance. And, you know, the UFO performance part was getting all of the data from eyewitnesses, plus deploying sensors into the field, in order to gather data on the performance of UFOs. That was track number one. And track number two was: What effects do UFOs have on humans? That was a parallel track that, from the get go, AAWSAP decided, unambiguously, to run both tracks in parallel. We documented psychological effects, and then we also documented paranormal effects." Lacatski: "Anything can be said on the internet it seems, factual or not. Well, one thing that is not factual is, DIA knew what it was getting into in regard to both aspects that Colm just described to you. And let me end my statement right here. We had no choice but to pursue both aspects." (That was a poor way of him saying: The claim that DIA was unaware of AAWSAP looking into all aspects of UFOs, including the paranormal, is NOT true.) Lacatski: "I want to emphasize something I said on my first and only interview. It was a closed program. It operated very similar to a SAP. The director, the director of analysis, and my office chief...and, of course, division chief, knew about this program. No one else did. Now, I was also protected by the stovepipe nature of that. I did not have to address political-type questions. I was insulated, but they were, too. There was no one else. People in the surrounding cubicles didn't know. Nothing was purposely being hid. It was a closed, stovepipe system, and it needed to be. It needed to be operated that way." ~~~ Knapp: "And so, Jim Lacatski took it on himself, put it in his own hands. He and Colm Kelleher interviewed all these people who applied for the jobs, the 50 full-time positions that they staffed, in a matter of months. They did background checks, they required security clearances for all those people, and they were worried about leaks. They didn't want information to get out. "They also were concerned about espionage by foreign players, by foreign companies, things of that sort. And some of that really did happen. As Jim has shared with us, there were a couple of phones that were transmitters that were found inside Bigelow Aerospace, inside the Bigelow, uh, facilities, and it was very alarming because they weren't sure who was doing it. I think they think it was a foreign government. I'm not going to say which one, uh, they suspected the most." (Lacatski said that the phones in question were made in China.) Knapp: "But, and then they also found weird frequencies emanating from Skinwalker Ranch. That's not strange, and there's a lot of unusual stuff that happens there, but it was some sort of a an espionage program that they believed was was not only looking at the ranch, but also at BAASS. "That was his primary concern. He was worried that the story gets out, because secrecy was of paramount interest to the heads of DIA and he's worried about the information getting out to the public. Because once it happened, then the knives come out in the Pentagon and within the intelligence community, which is kind of what happened. A memo was sent from Harry Reid's office, let other people know that AAWSAP existed, and that's when things started getting problematic." Corbell: "The bugging thing. So, it's not just like Bigelow Aerospace was tapped with something, he said, specifically, AAWSAP, right? So they were looking at that new UFO program. And I don't know how public this is, but he did say it was - not just him, other people have all said - it was multiple nations, multiple, different devices from those phones. And he also said that they worked with FBI, they had FBI liaisons looking at the ranch property, and also at Bigelow Aerospace. "Because, remember, they were supposed to receive a transfer of materials. That's why they reverse, reverse engineered (laughs), you know, they built everything to be able to hold SCIF-capable and material-capable property at that classification level. So, look, I think if we pull it back, the whole idea is, James Lacatski made a statement at some point that he was, you know, head of, or part of, or running the counterintelligence for AAWSAP. But his point was to keep AAWSAP itself secret from foreign nations. So then he has to keep it secret from the U.S. He did it. He did a great job. They actually kept it secret. That doesn't mean he's going out and creating false information to the public like he's been accused of. "So, should we listen to Jim Lacatski? That was like, you know, the main question. Oh, one second. He also identified that there is currently a counter-programming, counterintelligence operation going on to the American public, but not against the American public, by AARO." (In other words, spread misinformation to the American public so they can advance their goal of misinforming and confusing our adversaries who are always listening. National security! IMO, that's only acceptable if we're talking specifics related to propulsion, technology and weapons that can be used to give us a leg up on said adversaries. But everything else should come out and be made public. We shouldn't be told a bunch of lies about information we paid for and that could, potentially, give us some clarity about our species and other lifeforms on this planet.) Corbell: That was so clear in our interview with him that he said that, you know, 'Look, they're acting this way. They are telling you lies about AAWSAP and what happened.' And that's why he said, 'My books, I'm a government employee. This was paid by taxpayers. I'm trying to give you information.' And that's what his books are. "So it's clear from these rounds of interviews that we just had with Dr. Lacatski that he supports a controlled UFO disclosure. He made that very clear. So should we listen to what he has to say? I mean, he was a big dog, right, George?" Knapp: "He was the head of the largest U.S. government-funded UFO investigation in history, that we know of. He worked with Colm Kelleher, who was the boots-on-the-ground guy in Las Vegas. He worked with Jay Stratton. Stratton's role in the development of AAWSAP has not been really fully explored, but he's got a book coming out at some point, once it gets through the DOPSR process. But then we'll get additional information to buttress what Lacatski has said."

Joe Murgia

56,558 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Analyzing Episode 55. Season 2 aka The Violence of Alignment If I visualize CihAl's journey for this season, a spiral tightening its rings comes to mind. There's always one problem after another, spiking in intensity and reaction. And, the weight of it is reflected in both Alya's increasingly somber demeanor. But, here's the thing. In every new problem, there's an echo of the old one, which leaves one with an inevitable feeling of deja vu - for the audience and the characters. We'll get to why towards the end of this analysis. For now, on we go. We kick off epi 55 with Cihan being introduced to Meryem *cough* dishrag *cough* by Sadakat. And what follows is a breakdown of her story with Cihan listening. However, when Meryem recounted her past woes, I focused less on her words and more on Cihan's words and expression. And what follows is a masterclass in the difference between sympathy and empathy. Kudos to Ozan Akbaba for portraying the difference. I couldn't help but compare the situation to when Cihan is listening to Alya's account of her past. With Alya, Cihan leans forward, barely moving. He listens, but his face tends to reflect his own emotion and mirrors Alya's at times - in other words, he's living those events with her. When he talks, his voice drops lower, but more importantly, there's a gentle softness meant to soothe. With Meryem, Cihan's body language is a tad more detached. When he's leaning forward in the seat, his hands are extended in front of him, clasped together, creating space. Then he leans back, one arm extended on the table, the other on his thigh. Again, there's this feel of distance. His voice remains soft, but there's no tenderness. He's not trying to alleviate, rather he's simply listening. Don't get me wrong, it's not like the guy doesn't feel bad for her, because what she relates shouldn't be experienced by anyone. But empathy goes beyond sympathy. Empathy is when you hurt with the one who's hurting. And that difference, to me, is clear between the two scenes. Long story short, when he's heard what Meryem's gone through, he offers to help get her out of prison because he feels responsible in part for her misfortunes. He says it's his 'duty' to help her. Here's what's interesting: when Meryem says his kindness and heart haven't changed, he gets uncomfortable. And after that, he's the one to get up from the chair, signaling the end of the conversation. Like he wants to get out of there, because some part of him that's not stupidly male understands Meryem's still attached to him, but he has no interest in that whatsoever. His method of saying goodbye is a handshake, again, a testament to his aloofness. And when Meryem hugs him, his hands remain at their sides; the man could have been a pillar. So, while he speaks not of Alya, the one time he takes her name, he drives the message across that 'she's no one ordinary' and 'tread carefully'. Honestly, I don't think he wants to talk about Alya to Meryem. Not because Alya's not important, but because Alya is too important. The part of his life that Alya represents is his alone, and he's very possessive about sharing that with anyone. To him, Meryem is a past that exists, but one that he would erase if he had the choice, because it hurts Alya. And that's pretty much the whole feel of this conversation. He wants to help Meryem, but he also wants her gone because her presence is a source of discomfort to Alya. Speaking of discomforts, the next scene I want to talk about is when the massive turd, who happens to be Alya's ex-husband, goes to the hospital to threaten her some more. Seriously, this character is a step short of absolute psycho. He's incapable of true emotion, just like his mother. Anyway, when Alya is explaining why she hasn't moved out yet, the zombie's eyes zero in on her wedding band. And, of course, being who he is, he absolutely ignores the topic of Deniz, his own flesh and blood, and instead, wants the ring gone because it symbolizes Alya's love and attachment to Cihan. Thankfully, Cihan arrives in time to push away the zombie and to hear Alya proclaim that while Boran has the power to use her son and distance her from Cihan physically, he has no power over her heart and who reigns over it. Now, think back to that conversation where Deniz wants her to pick between Cihan and himself. And Cihan says Deniz's throne (or place) in her heart is so secure, he's happy to live in the shadow of that throne. While Alya smiles at Cihan's response, she also looks miserable later at the thought of not being able to tell Cihan that things aren't exactly so. However, I think she manages to get her point across in this scene without even realizing it. Because while she may make sacrifices for her son, no amount of blackmail, pain, or hurt can remove Cihan's love from her heart. Now, I don't know about you, but that sounds almost like an equal footing. The only difference is that she's bound to protect her son, because, unlike Cihan, he can't protect himself. And that's what leads Cihan to later tell Alya that her words are etched across his heart, and that he's never felt that loved by anyone. Curiously enough, this scene also brings the spotlight on two other details: Alya's 'anka' side and the wedding ring. Both of which will feature rather greatly, in the coming episodes, I think. Now, there's a rumor going around that Alya will take off her wedding ring. And, I don't know, the fact that Cihan's almost preening at Alya, still wearing the ring, and Alya saying 'I couldn't take it off' tells me that's not what's going to happen. For some reason, I'm beginning to get the vibes of a showdown of trust in the same vein as episode 27. Now you may argue that Cihan actually tells Alya about Mine's pregnancy in that episode, but CihAl have had a long journey since then. Alya has seen Cihan choose her over Boran with her own eyes. She's seen the lengths the man has gone to for her and Deniz. So, yes, she might be pissed about something or the other related to Meryem in future episodes, but her taking off the ring seems not within her character somehow. But hey, that's just me, and I could be wrong. Anyway, the final scene I want to talk about is, of course, the ending. Everyone kept focusing on why Cihan allowed Meryem to hold his hands, but I focused on his words. Because he very clearly tells Meryem that he's no longer in love with her, that he's moved on, and that she should not hang about in the hopes of that ever changing. In his own way, Cihan is quite ruthless here. He draws a line, but his words are designed not to hurt, because he's not an ahole. He just wants dishrag to understand that even the thought of Alya being hurt pains him more now than anything else. And, he's not very kind to people who try to hurt Alya. It's a disclosure and warning, but in the form of steel wrapped in satin. Now, let's go back to the beginning for a bit, where I mentioned spiraling events. See, I somehow thought that those vows Cihal took 'savaşta, bedelde, kararda, kaderde, aşkta' were linear levels. That they'd clear them one by one and get to love. But when you see the overall structure of their journey in this season, it's not linear at all. Because all those things have existed in one form or another since ep 29. There's always an element of all of these conditions in every episode. Which is why we keep thinking, wait a minute, we've been here before. But as I said, the spiral is tightening itself. With every episode, the stakes are raised higher, and CihAl are pushed a little bit closer to the edge. Almost like the deep breath before the plunge. And here’s where things get interesting. Because what feels like repetition is not actually stagnation, it’s confrontation deferred, coming back sharper each time. Every cycle brings them back to the same point. Their love deepens, fear follows, a decision is made in the name of protection, and that decision creates distance instead of resolution. Which brings me back to the vows - savaşta, bedelde, kararda, kaderde, aşkta. I was wrong to think of them as steps. They’re not something Cihan and Alya are moving towards; they’re something CihAl are already inside of. Every episode is them living those vows in real time. But with every new episode, the pressure mounts, like music builds to a crescendo. And yet, within all of that, aşk remains. Not as a reward at the end of the journey. But as the one thing that refuses to disappear, no matter how many times everything else goes wrong. And maybe that's why episode 55 feels the way it does. It creates the illusion that everything is falling apart, yet again, when in reality, everything is being forced into alignment. Something is moving all the pieces on the chessboard for an ultimate showdown. And the process gets more violent by the minute. Cihan hides the truth because he thinks love needs protection. Alya experiences that same act as distance, almost betrayal. Meanwhile, Boran and Sadakat keep pushing, and Meryem drops like a freaking bomb at the worst possible moment. Suddenly, everything that could have remained unsaid, unresolved, or postponed is dragged into the open. This has all the hallmarks of a breaking point. Note, I said breaking point, not breakdown. Because, unlike breakdowns, breaking points are used for revelations. I guess what I'm trying to say is things are headed towards alignment, not just for the overall story, but also CihAl's journey individually. Because Cihan and Alya also keep repeating their mistakes. Their growth requires something along the lines of a push, too. So, we have war, sacrifice, decisions, fate, and love, all coming to a head. And while there are plenty of reasons to feel ominous, I personally don't. The story is no longer about them loving each other - we're well past that. It’s about whether they can finally stand in that love openly and without any fear. Because everything is pushing them toward a breaking point, not to destroy them, I think, but to shape them into who they need to be. And if there’s one thing CihAl have proven since day one, it’s this - they don’t fall apart under pressure, they grow stronger, and they survive the impossible. #CihAl #UzakŞehir
2:51

Analyzing Episode 55. Season 2 aka The Violence of Alignment If I visualize CihAl's journey for this season, a spiral tightening its rings comes to mind. There's always one problem after another, spiking in intensity and reaction. And, the weight of it is reflected in both Alya's increasingly somber demeanor. But, here's the thing. In every new problem, there's an echo of the old one, which leaves one with an inevitable feeling of deja vu - for the audience and the characters. We'll get to why towards the end of this analysis. For now, on we go. We kick off epi 55 with Cihan being introduced to Meryem *cough* dishrag *cough* by Sadakat. And what follows is a breakdown of her story with Cihan listening. However, when Meryem recounted her past woes, I focused less on her words and more on Cihan's words and expression. And what follows is a masterclass in the difference between sympathy and empathy. Kudos to Ozan Akbaba for portraying the difference. I couldn't help but compare the situation to when Cihan is listening to Alya's account of her past. With Alya, Cihan leans forward, barely moving. He listens, but his face tends to reflect his own emotion and mirrors Alya's at times - in other words, he's living those events with her. When he talks, his voice drops lower, but more importantly, there's a gentle softness meant to soothe. With Meryem, Cihan's body language is a tad more detached. When he's leaning forward in the seat, his hands are extended in front of him, clasped together, creating space. Then he leans back, one arm extended on the table, the other on his thigh. Again, there's this feel of distance. His voice remains soft, but there's no tenderness. He's not trying to alleviate, rather he's simply listening. Don't get me wrong, it's not like the guy doesn't feel bad for her, because what she relates shouldn't be experienced by anyone. But empathy goes beyond sympathy. Empathy is when you hurt with the one who's hurting. And that difference, to me, is clear between the two scenes. Long story short, when he's heard what Meryem's gone through, he offers to help get her out of prison because he feels responsible in part for her misfortunes. He says it's his 'duty' to help her. Here's what's interesting: when Meryem says his kindness and heart haven't changed, he gets uncomfortable. And after that, he's the one to get up from the chair, signaling the end of the conversation. Like he wants to get out of there, because some part of him that's not stupidly male understands Meryem's still attached to him, but he has no interest in that whatsoever. His method of saying goodbye is a handshake, again, a testament to his aloofness. And when Meryem hugs him, his hands remain at their sides; the man could have been a pillar. So, while he speaks not of Alya, the one time he takes her name, he drives the message across that 'she's no one ordinary' and 'tread carefully'. Honestly, I don't think he wants to talk about Alya to Meryem. Not because Alya's not important, but because Alya is too important. The part of his life that Alya represents is his alone, and he's very possessive about sharing that with anyone. To him, Meryem is a past that exists, but one that he would erase if he had the choice, because it hurts Alya. And that's pretty much the whole feel of this conversation. He wants to help Meryem, but he also wants her gone because her presence is a source of discomfort to Alya. Speaking of discomforts, the next scene I want to talk about is when the massive turd, who happens to be Alya's ex-husband, goes to the hospital to threaten her some more. Seriously, this character is a step short of absolute psycho. He's incapable of true emotion, just like his mother. Anyway, when Alya is explaining why she hasn't moved out yet, the zombie's eyes zero in on her wedding band. And, of course, being who he is, he absolutely ignores the topic of Deniz, his own flesh and blood, and instead, wants the ring gone because it symbolizes Alya's love and attachment to Cihan. Thankfully, Cihan arrives in time to push away the zombie and to hear Alya proclaim that while Boran has the power to use her son and distance her from Cihan physically, he has no power over her heart and who reigns over it. Now, think back to that conversation where Deniz wants her to pick between Cihan and himself. And Cihan says Deniz's throne (or place) in her heart is so secure, he's happy to live in the shadow of that throne. While Alya smiles at Cihan's response, she also looks miserable later at the thought of not being able to tell Cihan that things aren't exactly so. However, I think she manages to get her point across in this scene without even realizing it. Because while she may make sacrifices for her son, no amount of blackmail, pain, or hurt can remove Cihan's love from her heart. Now, I don't know about you, but that sounds almost like an equal footing. The only difference is that she's bound to protect her son, because, unlike Cihan, he can't protect himself. And that's what leads Cihan to later tell Alya that her words are etched across his heart, and that he's never felt that loved by anyone. Curiously enough, this scene also brings the spotlight on two other details: Alya's 'anka' side and the wedding ring. Both of which will feature rather greatly, in the coming episodes, I think. Now, there's a rumor going around that Alya will take off her wedding ring. And, I don't know, the fact that Cihan's almost preening at Alya, still wearing the ring, and Alya saying 'I couldn't take it off' tells me that's not what's going to happen. For some reason, I'm beginning to get the vibes of a showdown of trust in the same vein as episode 27. Now you may argue that Cihan actually tells Alya about Mine's pregnancy in that episode, but CihAl have had a long journey since then. Alya has seen Cihan choose her over Boran with her own eyes. She's seen the lengths the man has gone to for her and Deniz. So, yes, she might be pissed about something or the other related to Meryem in future episodes, but her taking off the ring seems not within her character somehow. But hey, that's just me, and I could be wrong. Anyway, the final scene I want to talk about is, of course, the ending. Everyone kept focusing on why Cihan allowed Meryem to hold his hands, but I focused on his words. Because he very clearly tells Meryem that he's no longer in love with her, that he's moved on, and that she should not hang about in the hopes of that ever changing. In his own way, Cihan is quite ruthless here. He draws a line, but his words are designed not to hurt, because he's not an ahole. He just wants dishrag to understand that even the thought of Alya being hurt pains him more now than anything else. And, he's not very kind to people who try to hurt Alya. It's a disclosure and warning, but in the form of steel wrapped in satin. Now, let's go back to the beginning for a bit, where I mentioned spiraling events. See, I somehow thought that those vows Cihal took 'savaşta, bedelde, kararda, kaderde, aşkta' were linear levels. That they'd clear them one by one and get to love. But when you see the overall structure of their journey in this season, it's not linear at all. Because all those things have existed in one form or another since ep 29. There's always an element of all of these conditions in every episode. Which is why we keep thinking, wait a minute, we've been here before. But as I said, the spiral is tightening itself. With every episode, the stakes are raised higher, and CihAl are pushed a little bit closer to the edge. Almost like the deep breath before the plunge. And here’s where things get interesting. Because what feels like repetition is not actually stagnation, it’s confrontation deferred, coming back sharper each time. Every cycle brings them back to the same point. Their love deepens, fear follows, a decision is made in the name of protection, and that decision creates distance instead of resolution. Which brings me back to the vows - savaşta, bedelde, kararda, kaderde, aşkta. I was wrong to think of them as steps. They’re not something Cihan and Alya are moving towards; they’re something CihAl are already inside of. Every episode is them living those vows in real time. But with every new episode, the pressure mounts, like music builds to a crescendo. And yet, within all of that, aşk remains. Not as a reward at the end of the journey. But as the one thing that refuses to disappear, no matter how many times everything else goes wrong. And maybe that's why episode 55 feels the way it does. It creates the illusion that everything is falling apart, yet again, when in reality, everything is being forced into alignment. Something is moving all the pieces on the chessboard for an ultimate showdown. And the process gets more violent by the minute. Cihan hides the truth because he thinks love needs protection. Alya experiences that same act as distance, almost betrayal. Meanwhile, Boran and Sadakat keep pushing, and Meryem drops like a freaking bomb at the worst possible moment. Suddenly, everything that could have remained unsaid, unresolved, or postponed is dragged into the open. This has all the hallmarks of a breaking point. Note, I said breaking point, not breakdown. Because, unlike breakdowns, breaking points are used for revelations. I guess what I'm trying to say is things are headed towards alignment, not just for the overall story, but also CihAl's journey individually. Because Cihan and Alya also keep repeating their mistakes. Their growth requires something along the lines of a push, too. So, we have war, sacrifice, decisions, fate, and love, all coming to a head. And while there are plenty of reasons to feel ominous, I personally don't. The story is no longer about them loving each other - we're well past that. It’s about whether they can finally stand in that love openly and without any fear. Because everything is pushing them toward a breaking point, not to destroy them, I think, but to shape them into who they need to be. And if there’s one thing CihAl have proven since day one, it’s this - they don’t fall apart under pressure, they grow stronger, and they survive the impossible. #CihAl #UzakŞehir

CocoLoco

21,061 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад