正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
من الذاكرة كي لا ننسى… ولن ننسى. إحدى أكثر المسرحيات ظلامًا في تاريخ المعارضة السورية كانت تمثيل إصابات بالكيماوي وتقديمها للإعلام العالمي كوثيقة إدانة، بهدف واحد: إسقاط النظام السابق. للتذكير، الضربات الكيماوية جاءت مباشرة بعد تهديد باراك أوباما للنظام السوري آنذاك بأن أي استخدام للسلاح الكيماوي ضد الشعب سيعني... show more
0 条评论
暂无评论
原始帖子的评论将显示在这里
相关视频
1:06
Sensitive content
🔥 فضيحة من العيار الثقيل‼️ المستشار السابق لأسامة بن لادن والحالي للجولاني أحمد موفق زيدان ظهر عبر قناة العربية مبرراً مجازر الساحل السوري بقوله: “معقول بعد ضرب 82 ألف برميل متفجر و217 ضربة كيماوية أن تدخل الفصائل المسلحة للساحل بعد التحرير دون قيامها بمذابح ومجازر؟!” 🔴 هذا ليس تحليلاً سياسياً بل تبرير علني للإبادة الجماعية، واعتراف صريح بأن المجازر كانت قراراً منظماً وليست مجرد تجاوزات. 📌 المعنى القانوني: •تبرير المجازر = تحريض مباشر على جرائم حرب. •الحديث يؤكد أن ما جرى في الساحل السوري تم بأوامر ممنهجة. •المسؤولية لا تقع فقط على الفصائل المسلحة، بل أيضاً على كل من غطى أو برّر هذه الجرائم. 📢 إن هذا الفيديو وثيقة دامغة يجب أن تُعتمد أمام: •الأمم المتحدة UN •مجلس حقوق الإنسان UN_HRC •مجلس الأمن UNSC •المحكمة الجنائية الدولية ICC •المنظمات الحقوقية (HRW، Amnesty International) 🔴 إذا لم يتحرك المجتمع الدولي، فإن الصمت = شراكة في الجريمة. دماء العلويين الطائفة الكريمة في الساحل السوري ستبقى شاهداً على خذلان العدالة وتقاعس الضمير العالمي. 🔥 A scandal of the highest order Former advisor to Osama bin Laden and current advisor to Jolani, Ahmad Mowafaq Zaidan, appeared on Al Arabiya justifying the massacres of the Syrian coast, stating: “After 82,000 barrel bombs and 217 chemical strikes, is it reasonable for armed factions to enter the coast after ‘liberation’ without committing massacres?!” 🔴 This is not political analysis but an explicit justification of genocide — an admission that the massacres were systematically ordered, not random excesses. 📌 Legal implications: •Justifying massacres = direct incitement to war crimes. •Confirms that coastal massacres were carried out under organized orders. •Responsibility extends to the factions involved and to anyone who covered or justified these atrocities. 📢 This video is a damning piece of evidence that must be presented to: •United Nations (UN) •Human Rights Council (UN_HRC) •UN Security Council (UNSC) •International Criminal Court (ICC) •Human rights organizations (HRW, Amnesty International) 🔴 If the world fails to act, silence = complicity. The blood of the Alawite noble sect in the Syrian coast will remain a testimony to global justice betrayed. #سوريا #الساحل_السوري #مجازر_الساحل #ابادة_علوية #الابادة_الجماعية_العلوية_2025 #الهولوكوست_العلوي #حماية_الأقليات #محاكمة_الجولاني_الارهابي_الدولي #StopAlawiteGenocide #SyriaMassacres #WarCrimes #CrimesAgainstHumanity #UN #UN_HRC #UNSC #ICC #HRW #AmnestyInternational #EU #StateDept #francediplo_EN #FCDOGovUK
Syrian Witness شاهد سوري
197,883 次观看 • 1 年前
1:02
Sensitive content
‼️الله يعزك مثل ما عززتنا يا أبو محمد… الله يرحم الداية التي أنجبتك!! هكذا استقبل بعض السوريين ومعهم الأميركيون الإرهابي الجولاني، القاعدي والداعشي، وقائد جبهة النصرة الإرهابية التي بات اسمها “هيئة تحرير الشام”. المستقبلون، وغالبيتهم من الطائفة السنية المعتدلة، يرفعون السؤال الكبير: بماذا أعزكم هذا الإرهابي؟ هل بتفتيت الجغرافيا السورية؟! أم بتحريض الشعب على بعضه البعض؟! هل بتكفير معظم الطوائف الدينية وإباحة دمها؟ أم بزرع الخوف وانعدام الأمن في كل زاوية من سوريا؟! هل بتهميش الطبقة المتعلمة والمثقفة، واستبدالها بجهلاء لم يكملوا حتى الصف الخامس، لا يملكون سوى دورة شريعة في إدلب؟! بأي عزٍّ تتغنون؟! أن يصبح لسوريا رئيس “سني” فقط؟! أهذا هو معيار الكرامة عندكم؟! أي عزٍّ هذا الذي يُصنع على أكتاف قاتلٍ ومرتكبٍ للفتن؟! وأي كرامة في أن يُرفع شأن من باع الوطن ومزّق نسيجه؟! May God grant you the same honor you gave us, Abu Muhammad… and may God have mercy on the midwife who delivered you!! This is how some Syrians, along with the Americans, welcomed Jolani — the Qaeda affiliate, the ISIS follower, and the leader of Jabhat al-Nusra, now rebranded as “Hayat Tahrir al-Sham.” The crowd, mostly from the moderate Sunni community, raises the big question: What honor has this terrorist brought you? Was it by fragmenting Syrian geography?! By inciting the people against one another?! By declaring most religious sects as infidels and permitting their blood to be shed? By planting fear and stripping away security in every corner of Syria?! By marginalizing the educated and experienced, and replacing them with the ignorant — people who never finished even fifth grade, armed only with a shallow religious course in Idlib?! What kind of honor do you boast about?! That Syria should simply have a “Sunni” president?! Is that your measure of dignity?! What honor is built on the shoulders of a killer and a sower of discord?! And what dignity lies in glorifying someone who sold the homeland and tore apart its social fabric?! #سوريا #الجولاني #هيئة_تحرير_الشام #الطائفة_السنية_المعتدلة #الامن_العام_الارهابي #توثيق #مجازر_الساحل #Syria #Jolani #HTS #ModerateSunniCommunity #SyriaMassacres #StopAlawiteGenocide #CrimesAgainstHumanity
Syrian Witness شاهد سوري
21,459 次观看 • 11 个月前
![Operation Odyssey Dawn: The End of Libya and the Destruction of Europe /📄 On February 15th, during the Obama presidency, the US launched a war on Libya through covert means. Using the Soros network and the city of Benghazi, a bridgehead for the destruction of the entire country, the US ran the most intense propaganda and psychological campaign in history. I must mention that this PSYOP was so intense that yours truly initially fell for it, something I will likely not forgive myself for. I honestly thought Ghaddafi had suddenly went insane, mainly because I had a low opinion of his past antics and I thought the fall of the Mubarak regime was favourable to the world. The right wing supported this war, as they wanted to see more Arab nations destroyed in favour of Israel. The left wing? They were the most disgraceful. All of them sold Libya down the rive and aligned with the "rebels". As John McCain would later reveal, they were just a cutout used for US special forces. Many of the people that now fashion themselves as being against Israel were instrumental in the murder of Libya as a nation. They just never talk about it anymore, but I hope the guilt destroys them one day. The propaganda followed a typical Soros formula. It began with "peaceful protestors", then "Ghaddafi is killing his own people", then "rebels and transitional governments" and finally "air support/no fly zone required". It happened so quickly that it was bewildering for a nation that had remained stable for decades and was the richest in the world in terms of being debt free. Libya had the brightest future of all the countries in Africa and in many senses in the entire world including Asia and Europe. It's perhaps for that reason that Libya was betrayed by almost everyone. The Arab League was the first and the most unprecedented in its dastardly action. There was never a unanimous against Libya, Syria and Algeria had vetoed action against Libya. This was a rule in that body of 22 nations, but it was forced through anyway. This became UNSC resolution 1973. Neither Russia nor China vetoed this bill. France under the covertly Jewish president Sarkozy (who had once claimed that all of Europe must become a mixed race, publicly), led the charge, bombing Libya before an agreed upon ceasefire deadline. Even Palestine* voted against Libya. It seemed the entire world was in agreement about Libya over a complete lie created by the United States and Israel. The world thought Ghaddafi was unpopular but nothing could be further from the proof. It was the most bastardly thing the world would do, and in a sense, for what was done to Libya the entire world deserves to be destroyed. China had to move 75 companies out of Libya, and 36,000 Chinese workers, losing North Africa in one single month. The Chinese chickened out and didn't protect Libya, and this eventually led to the downfall of the Hu Jintao technocratic regime. The reports of 10s of thousands dying in Libya were lies, amplified by videos uploaded on YouTube and Twitter. It was a full production of lies where rabid Arab youths would destroy their own nation for some pocket money from Soros. Browns would repeat these lies and cash in on them, pretending to be oppressed while being the oppressors of their own people. In a sense calling it oppression is a moral failing -- it was a murder, of an entire nation. You see, the bombing campaign was not merely counter-force. NATO (which had quickly run out of ammunition days into the war) and the US aimed to kill the nation itself with counter-value attacks. Power stations were destroyed. The worst crime was Libya's water: Ghaddafi's Great Man-Made River, a 2800km artificial river project, was bombed until it was damaged. Then the factories that were repairing it throughout the war were destroyed. NATO still denies this crime but anyone can confirm it. Tripoli was taken before the war was over, but Ghaddafi's forces never stopped fighting. The operation launched on Tripoli was called Mermaid Dawn, or Operation Sirens (according to Pepe Escobar). The reason for the naming will be made clear soon, for now let's continue with the chronology of the war and the crimes to follow. Ghaddafi's hometown of Sirte wasn't merely bombed to dust, it was literally salted with the water of the Mediterranean sea. The reason why Sirte was flooded with salt water and destroyed was because NATO couldn't take it using ground forces. Ghaddafi's sons and their special forces were putting up a perfect defence in this city with its underground facilities filled with enough weapons to fight for an entire decade. But Ghaddafi failed to account for the possibility that he would lose the air and sea, and didn't create a run off system that would allow water to leave the bunkers. Losing in Sirte, Ghaddafi was ready to surrender, but NATO wanted him dead. They wanted even the possibility of Libya rising again to be removed from any person's mind. So they murdered him in the most brutal and disgusting manner. He died a martyr for his nation, yet the brown filth who murdered him didn't deserve a martyr, they deserved annihilation. No crime that could be done, other than the use of nuclear weapons, was done to Libya. If you understood what kind of country was destroyed (watch the attached video it will break your heart) you will see what a crime this was, for a world filled with the filthiest nations and their filthiest people (almost everywhere) to come together to destroy the one country with a chance at a debt free existence... how should the world pay for this crime? As it were, the punishment and the crime came together as a single package within the war. In any case in 2011, it was claimed the war was over, but the war continues today as the nation is split into three. In the remains of the outskirts of Sirte, the "rebels" and "peaceful protestors" would use chemical weapons to kill other tribes. They then transported these weapons to Syria where they were used in a false flag to implicate the Syrian Arab Army and Assad. As the dust settled around Libya, Europe would quickly be haunted by one of Ghaddafi's last warnings: If he falls Europe will become Black. Name of Operations Reveal Intent With Libya destroyed, the remains of the country would quickly become a rampart for economic "refugees" -- African browns, blacks and other unwanted people flooding into Europe to r*pe, pillage and steal its wealth. You would think that this was an unintended consequence of the war, but ... the names of the operation reveal the exact intent of those who planned it, namely Obama and Sarkozy: the target was Europe itself. For this plan to work, there could be no country where Libya was, it had to be destroyed so that no one could control the Mediterranean sea. Libya, and later Syria, were the modern day Troys. Troy protected the Mediterranean civilizations from Asia. It's fall happened almost simultaneously with the rise of the sea peoples. Homer's Odyssey speaks of the ruin the Mycenaeans and other factions of proto-Greek states after their war on Troy. It was a pyrrhic victory and all that remained of rich civilizations destroyed by the sea peoples. Is it any wonder that that the Pentagon chose to call it Operation Odyssey Dawn? They claim it's completely random -- which by the way is a lie -- but then, in the later chapters of Odyssey, sirens aka mermaids would appear. How can they also accidentally call the sacking of Tripoli Operation Mermaid Dawn/Operation Sirens? The intent was clear and the results also. Due to the fall of Libya and now the similarly catastrophic destruction of Syria, more than 5 million Asians and Africans have been flowing into Europe illegally. I would say even more "legally" using this inflow as a disguise. Europe is being destroyed using the most potent chain reaction known to mankind: foreigners multiplying in your own country and eating away at its boundaries and interiors. Today all right wing parties allow uncontrolled mass migration through "legal" means. All left wing parties, in addition to this "legal" migration also disguise their action as charitable through the flow of illegal migration. People all over Europe complain and hate the flow of migrants. I do too -- but let's be honest about something. These inflows wouldn't have been possible with the "original sin" of destroying Libya. Nothing has been done to make amends and atone for what was done to Libya. If anything Libya is being destroyed more and more every day and the fire is spreading. Sudan voted against Ghaddafi. Today the UAE flows masses of weapons from Libya into Chad to be used to destroy Sudan. Hamas lied about Ghaddafi. Now its leadership has been wiped out and Gaza is rubble. China abandoned Ghaddafi. Now its economy is held under a double sided siege with the US (and Israel which it still supports). Russia abandoned Ghaddafi at the drop of the hat. Now Russia's infrastructure is facing countervalue attacks and its military has been facing ruthless counterforce attacks from NATO. The Arabs which conspired against Libya are all going to be destroyed soon as all waterways into their countries are closed by Iran. Iran itself, which lied about Ghaddafi (over his own "original sin" -- the murder and disappearance of Musa Sadr), is hanging on by a thread and is being betrayed by those on its interior. But what will happen next to the US and Europe for what they've done to Libya? It doesn't take a genius to guess, and only the nations that refused to participate are ironically doing fine. Poland, on April 2011, refused to join the coalition against Libya. Today, that nation is the greatest success in Europe and has the lowest problem with unwanted invasive species (migrants). Germany pretended to be against the war as well, but was the main source of weapons and ammunition against Libya. As we face the abyss of societal collapse, it's important to remember our own crimes against peace which destroyed a peaceful and successful nation. The very least we can all do is spread the word, not only about the crime itself, but the victim. The beautiful country, Libya, that was completely destroyed by our participation in a PSYOP and inaction against the criminals who run our nations. On my part, after witnessing how quickly the mass formation psychosis, which I unfortunately participated in at least in words written on BBSes of the old internet, my own choice of atonement was ensuring this kind of war never happens to another country again. It is for that reason I had turned my attention to Syria back in 2011. What will you do? /End [* As an aside, it wasn't just the PLO. Hamas would then condemn Ghaddafi and the Palestinian supporters would join its chorus. Later, seeing the "success" in Libya, Hamas decided to join the war against Syria and didn't just provide words but material and ideological support against the country. I commented at the time (2012) that we will soon see Gaza reduced to rubble as a result of this immoral act.]](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2086018930104266914/amplify_video_thumb/2085960215539970048/img/TJvchAmiJMxM4mdq.jpg)
![Absolutely masterful interview on Gaza of Dominique De Villepin, former Prime Minister of France, who famously led France's opposition to the Iraq war and who, IMHO is the best diplomat the West has produced in decades. This is so important, so incredibly well argued, that I decided to translate it in full: "Hamas has set a trap for us, and this trap is one of maximum horror, of maximum cruelty. And so there's a risk of an escalation in militarism, of more military interventions, as if we could with armies solve a problem as serious as the Palestinian question. There's also a second major trap, which is that of Occidentalism. We find ourselves trapped, with Israel, in this western bloc which today is being challenged by most of the international community. [Presenter: What is Occidentalism?] Occidentalism is the idea that the West, which for 5 centuries managed the world's affairs, will be able to quietly continue to do so. And we can clearly see, even in the debates of the French political class, that there is the idea that, faced with what is currently happening in the Middle East, we must continue the fight even more, towards what might resemble a religious or a civilizational war. That is to say, to isolate ourselves even more on the international stage. This is not the way, especially since there's a third trap, which is that of moralism. And here we have in a way the proof, through what is happening in Ukraine and what is happening in the Middle East, of this double standard that is denounced everywhere in the world, including in recent weeks when I travel to Africa, the Middle East, or Latin America. The criticism is always the same: look at how civilian populations are treated in Gaza, you denounce what happened in Ukraine, and you are very timid in the face of the tragedy unfolding in Gaza. Consider international law, the second criticism that is made by the global south. We sanction Russia when it aggresses Ukraine, we sanction Russia when it doesn't respect the resolutions of the United Nations, and it's been 70 years that the resolutions of the United Nations have been voted in vain and that Israel doesn't respect them. [Presenter: Do you believe that the Westerners are currently guilty of hubris?] Westerners must open their eyes to the extent of the historical drama unfolding before us to find the right answers. [Presenter: What is the historical drama? I mean, we're talking about the tragedy of October 7th first and foremost, right?] Of course, there are these horrors happening, but the way to respond to them is crucial. Are we going to kill the future by finding the wrong answers... [Presenter: Kill the future?] Kill the future, yes! Why? [Presenter: But who is killing whom?] You are in a game of causes and effects. Faced with the tragedy of history, one cannot take this 'chain of causality' analytical grid, simply because if you do you can't escape from it. Once we understand that there is a trap, once we realize that behind this trap there has also been a change in the Middle East regarding the Palestinian issue... The situation today is profoundly different [from what it was in the past]. The Palestinian cause was a political and secular cause. Today we are faced with an Islamist cause, led by Hamas. Obviously, this kind of cause is absolute and allows no form of negotiation. On the Israeli side, there has also been a development. Zionism was secular and political, championed by Theodor Herzl in the late 19th century. It has largely become messianic, biblical today. This means that they too do not want to compromise, and everything that the far-right Israeli government does, continuing to encourage colonization, obviously makes things worse, including since October 7th. So in this context, understand that we are already in this region facing a problem that seems profoundly insoluble. Added to this is the hardening of states. Diplomatically, look at the statements of the King of Jordan, they are not the same as six months ago. Look at the statements of Erdogan in Turkey. [Presenter: Precisely, these are extremely harsh statements...] Extremely worrying. Why? Because if the Palestinian cause, the Palestinian issue, hasn't been brought to the forefront, hasn't been put on stage [for a while], and if most of the youth today in Europe have often never even heard of it, it remains for the Arab peoples the mother of all battles. All the progress made towards an attempt to stabilize the Middle East, where one could believe... [Presenter: Yes, but whose fault is it? I have a hard time following you, is it Hamas's fault?] But Ms. Malherbe, I am trained as a diplomat. The question of fault will be addressed by historians and philosophers. [Presenter: But you can't remain neutral, it's difficult, it's complicated, isn't it?] I am not neutral, I am in action. I am simply telling you that every day that passes, we can ensure that this horrific cycle stops... that's why I speak of a trap and that's why it's so important to know what response we are going to give. We stand alone before history today. And we do not treat this new world the way we currently do, knowing that today we are no longer in a position of strength, we are not able to manage on our own, as the world's policemen. [Presenter: So what do we do?] Exactly, what should we do? This is where it is essential not to cut off anyone on the international stage. [Presenter: Including the Russians?] Everyone. [Presenter: Everyone? Should we ask the Russians for help?] I'm not saying we should ask the Russians for help. I'm saying: if the Russians can contribute by calming some factions in this region, then it will be a step in the right direction. [Presenter: How can we proportionally respond to barbarism? It's no longer army against army.] But listen, Appolline de Malherbe, the civilian populations that are dying in Gaza, don't they exist? So because horror was committed on one side, horror must be committed on the other? [Presenter: Do we indeed need to equate the two?] No, it's you who are doing that. I'm not saying I equate the faults. I try to take into account what a large part of humanity thinks. There is certainly a realistic objective to pursue, which is to eradicate the Hamas leaders who committed this horror. And not to confuse the Palestinians with Hamas, that's a realistic goal. The second thing is a targeted response. Let's define realistic political objectives. And the third thing is a combined response. Because there is no effective use of force without a political strategy. We are not in 1973 or in 1967. There are things no army in the world knows how to do, which is to win in an asymmetrical battle against terrorists. The war on terror has never been won anywhere. And it instead triggers extremely dramatic misdeeds, cycles, and escalations. If America lost in Afghanistan, if America lost in Iraq, if we lost in the Sahel, it's because it's a battle that can't be won simply, it's not like you have a hammer that strikes a nail and the problem is solved. So we need to mobilize the international community, get out of this Western entrapment in which we are. [Presenter: But when Emmanuel Macron talks about an international coalition…] Yes, and what was the response? [Presenter: None.] Exactly. We need a political perspective, and this is challenging because the two-state solution has been removed from the Israeli political and diplomatic program. Israel needs to understand that for a country with a territory of 20,000 square kilometers, a population of 9 million inhabitants, facing 1.5 billion people... Peoples have never forgotten that the Palestinian cause and the injustice done to the Palestinians was a significant source of mobilization. We must consider this situation, and I believe it is essential to help Israel, to guide... some say impose, but I think it's better to convince, to move in this direction. The challenge is that there is no interlocutor today, neither on the Israeli side nor the Palestinian side. We need to bring out interlocutors. [Presenter: It's not for us to choose who will be the leaders of Palestine.] The Israeli policy over recent years did not necessarily want to cultivate a Palestinian leadership... Many are in prison, and Israel's interest - because I repeat: it was not in their program or in Israel's interest at the time, or so they thought - was instead to divide the Palestinians and ensure that the Palestinian question fades. This Palestinian question will not fade. And so we must address it and find an answer. This is where we need courage. The use of force is a dead end. The moral condemnation of what Hamas did - and there's no "but" in my words regarding the moral condemnation of this horror - must not prevent us from moving forward politically and diplomatically in an enlightened manner. The law of retaliation is a never-ending cycle. [Presenter: The "eye for an eye, tooth for tooth".] Yes. That's why the political response must be defended by us. Israel has a right to self-defense, but this right cannot be indiscriminate vengeance. And there cannot be collective responsibility of the Palestinian people for the actions of a terrorist minority from Hamas. When you get into this cycle of finding faults, one side's memories clash with the other's. Some will juxtapose Israel's memories with the memories of the Nakba, the 1948 catastrophe, which is a disaster that the Palestinians still experience every day. So you can't break these cycles. We must have the strength, of course, to understand and denounce what happened, and from this standpoint, there's no doubt about our position. But we must also have the courage, and that's what diplomacy is... diplomacy is about being able to believe that there is light at the end of the tunnel. And that's the cunning of history; when you're at the bottom, something can happen that gives hope. After the 1973 war, who would have thought that before the end of the decade, Egypt would sign a peace treaty with Israel? The debate shouldn't be about rhetoric or word choice. The debate today is about action; we must act. And when you think about action, there are two options. Either it's war, war, war. Or it's about trying to move towards peace, and I'll say it again, it's in Israel's interest. It's in Israel's interest!"](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1718201487132885246/amplify_video_thumb/1718102257437458432/img/nm5gd_FnM_-fNIJb.jpg)
![REVEALED: Israeli spy agency Mossad sold Donald Trump a plot to instantly take out Iran—but it had one fatal flaw. And that one little mistake has put the United States firmly in the crosshairs of a war it cannot win—and is creating global panic over oil prices. . The top secret dossier, sold to the US by Mossad director David Barnea had a clear argument, that we can summarize as a four part narrative. One: A network of fake “Iranian NGOs” in the west would circulate a story that Iran had massacred 30,000 or more peaceful protesters, The story would be spread in order to manufacture consent for the west to launch a war against Iran. Two: The Americans would demand to have negotiations with the Iranians to distract them, by having them focusing on peace plans. Three: During this distraction, the US and Israeli air forces would then launch an attack that would take out the entire government of Iran, leaving all seats of power empty—including the peace negotiators. Four: Radical extreme opposition members in Iran, cultivated by Mossad, the CIA, and the NED, would then take control of the country—and install US puppet Reza Pahlavi as a proxy for Washington and Tel Aviv. . IT WORKED. AT FIRST And you know what? Every part of that plan worked perfectly. Except there was one key detail they had got wrong. And that brought the whole edifice crashing down. . ONE: DEMONIZING IRAN The story really starts in January. Mossad and the CIA worked with radical opposition members in Iran to launch a coup at the start of January in which armed men destroyed 700 shops, 305 ambulances and buses, 414 civil service buildings and 750 banks. [SEE VIDEO] They attacked 350 mosques, which is very strange for supposedly Muslim rioters– but they attacked not one synagogue. This was a major insurrection in which people on all sides lost their lives, with more than 3,000 dead after the coup was put down. But this armed coup was repackaged by fake NGOs in the west as a massacre of at least 30,000 peaceful protesters - or maybe 50,000 or 70,000 - by “the regime”. Mossad wanted the fake number to be more than the actual number of people the IDF killed in Gaza. This part worked perfectly. Here’s Time magazine [video] reporting that 30,000 died. Most of the western media supported this. Not one of them reported that the funding for these NGOs could be traced back to western political propaganda groups such as the NED, a CIA spin-off group. . TWO: FAKE PEACE NEGOTIATIONS Part Two of the plan also went better than they could have hoped for. The Americans not only successfully held "peace negotiations", but the Iranians actually made multiple concessions, giving Washington virtually everything it wanted. So the Americans could simply have proceeded with those and got what they wanted anyway. But the US and Israel decided to go ahead with Part Three anyway. (More 'fun'?) . THREE: KILLING GOVERNMENT LEADERS And you know what? That also worked perfectly, from beginning to end – in a surprise, unprovoked attack, the US and Israel killed not just the leader, but 40 members of the Iranian government. Now just imagine the outrage if any country took out the entire government of the UK or Germany or Canada or Australia. The world’s media would be writing editorials about it for years, literally years. . FOUR: THE PUPPET The Mossad-CIA plot was going exactly as planned. All they needed to do was achieve part four: the transfer of power to a US Juan Guaidó figure—a man already selected and waiting in the wings. The western media found supporters of the opposition in Iran to film expressing happiness, and tried to pretend that this was “all” the Iranians. But this was clearly not true. The vast majority of Iranians, including people involved in the violent protest of January, were horrified. . FATAL FLAW Now here’s where the fatal error showed up. Mossad’s plan failed to take into account one thing. There had been a change of attitude last year. Between June the 13th and the 24th of 2025, Israel attacked Iran, killing nuclear scientists, politicians and civilians, as well as members of the armed forces. That was also, clearly an illegal, unprovoked attack. No western leader cared—but the people of Iran, all the political parties, did care. They were outraged. Why are Israel and the United States allowed to just murder people in other countries and get away it? Support for the Iranian government rose dramatically. Mossad assumed that because their contacts, the extreme radical members of the opposition groups, still opposed the government, that many Iranians did. But that just was not true. The Iranians in general had become far more supportive of their government, and opposed to the US and Israel, than Mossad believed. . IRANIANS UNITED Donald Trump told the Iranian people that it was now over to you – signalling that part four should go ahead: a takeover by people allied to Washington and Tel Aviv. But it didn’t happen. So part four of the plan did not work. The Iranians drew together and fought back. Under United Nations law, they had full legal rights to respond to an illegal attack. They made defensive forays to take out the military bases around the gulf which were attacking them, and they closed the Strait of Hormuz. Trump was horrified and furious – not with the Iranians but with Netanyahu and Barnea, the Mossad chief. And this explains why he kept making contradictory statements – he kept saying things that implied the war would be over very quickly, as the original plan said, while also acknowledging that the opposite was true. Remember how he used the phrase “short term excursion”. He also said the war would last four days only. And he also said the war was “already over”. And so on. So we can see that the plan, as sold to him, was a quick in-and-out operation, just as it had been in Venezuela – so that was what he had in his head. . IF YOU SHOOT THE KING… Netanyahu, deeply embarrassed to have helped sell a war to Trump that had spiralled out of control, went into hiding—he was so deep undercover that rumours circulated that said he was dead. For Mossad and the CIA, the plot failed. There’s an ancient saying that all plotters know. “If you are going to shoot at the king, you better kill the king.” What the US and Israel did was shoot the leadership of Iran. But they failed to kill the leadership of Iran. So now they are in trouble. And you know what? I don’t think there is any sympathy for them.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2039179026221412863/amplify_video_thumb/2039176773934718976/img/hQ3kr3u-DgesZ2RN.jpg)
![GENERAL PLAN OST SPEECH - FULL TEXT Many people in the West don't know Poles were victims of the Germans, and in fact, some people even think the Polish nation collaborated. So let's put that to rest; Magnus Brechtken, in his book Political and Transitional Justice in Germany, Poland, and the Soviet Union from the 1930s to the 1950s, states that Polish collaboration was .1 percent, Which means cooperation is not worth mentioning. Almost everyone knows about the Final Solution of the Jews, which began almost two years into the war, but there was a Final Solution meant for the Poles. This was called General Plan Ost, the eventual extermination of the Poles, something that was to be extremely horrific and prolonged. Some other aspects of the War many Westerners don't know is that Poles were the first victims of the war and that Poland was invaded virtually simultaneously as the Soviets and Germans collaborated. .The Germans invaded on September 1st, and the Soviets on September 17th in their agreement to take over Poland, the Molotov Ribbentrop pact. It was soon stated by these nations that "Neither party will allow on its territory any Polish agitation that affects the other country's territory. Both shall liquidate such agitation on their territories in embryo and shall inform each other about expedient measures to accomplish this." And they started doing this immediately by trying to exterminate any leadership; the Soviets deported an estimated over 1.5 million Polish citizens, also with the help of some non-Polish citizens, into Siberia, with many perishing and the murder of 22 thousand Polish officers and the Germans striking the intelligentsia as well with AB actions and more, and also the persecution of the church. This would not be enough, though, because the Germans' plan was the ultimate disposal of the Poles altogether. In the annexed lands, the goal was complete "Germanization" to assimilate the territories politically, culturally, socially, and economically into the German Reich through whatever means necessary. This was through lebensraum to fulfill Hitler and Himmler's goal for the German people, which meant "living space," meaning no room for Polish people. For the first two years of the war in German-occupied Poland, Poles were being murdered at a 9:10 higher ratio than Jews, and Poles were even wearing the Star of David or hiding in the ghetto to avoid roundups. Although when the Jews did become the victims when the Final Solution began, Poles took every action necessary to warn the world repeatedly, to no avail. The Polish government-in-exile, Jan Karski, and Witold Pilecki are just a few that tried to get the word out to the West, but no one cared or did anything, including many Jews. In fact, it was also in Poland that Poles, their whole families, and often the whole village faced the death penalty for aiding a Jew in any manner – this meant even giving a Jew water. There must be a reason for this, it’s because Poles were so overwhelmingly helpful to the Jews that the Germans had to put in draconian punishments. Here are some examples why this decree became necessary: On July 3rd, 1941, Gazeta Czestochowska, an official German newspaper published in Polish, complained; "The cases multiply, when Polish peasants, impelled by dangerous sympathy for the Jewish rabble, smuggle products into the ghetto and sell them at even cheaper prices than to their own Polish brethren. Such persons are warned of severe measures against them."' In October 1941, the German county supervisor in Krasnik remarked with angry incredulity: "according to my observations, the enforcement of this decree [forbidding the Jews to leave the Jewish quarter] is absolutely necessary because in my entire two years of duty in the East I have never experienced a situation where the Jews wander in such a (free) manner from one locality to another as I have observed here." In January 1942, the Germans again voiced their anger about the fact that there was no negative reaction on the part of Poles toward Jewish beggars. Poland even had their own group dedicated to saving Jews, Zegota, and could save up to 40 -50 thousand lives; in total, it is estimated that Poles aided 3 million Jews in some fashion even though they faced these risks. So we must recall that Hitler outlined his plans for the Poles in his Olbersalzberg speech in August 1939 "Accordingly, I have placed my death's-head formation in readiness…with orders to send to death mercilessly and without compassion, men, women and children of Polish derivation and language," he added. "Only thus shall we gain the living space] we need. Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?" These quotes reflect the hateful Nazi ideology of the German people, and they should be seen as reprehensible and morally repugnant. We should also remember that many Germans who followed this regime were never punished and believed this philosophy to their core. The extermination of the Polish intelligentsia was beginning, which was to be the outcome for the rest of the Poles. This would have been completed if the Germans had the workforce and the resources. Author Isabel Heinemann points out that physical extermination was an unambiguous implication of this plan. She comments, "Although none of the plans made it explicit, it is evident that for the racial experts, mass death posed a necessary condition for the entire Germanization process." There were some implications for "resettlement," but that was just code for eliminating the Poles in time. Ultimately the plan demanded, over ten years, the extermination, expulsion, and enslavement of most or all Poles. What was meant by expulsion and enslavement meant being brutally worked to death. "techniques of genocide were neither so quick nor perhaps so simple as outright mass extermination, yet they were far crueler and equally effective." States Heineman. Indeed General Plan Ost was a prolonged genocide. The Polish outnumbered the Jews, and do not think for a moment the Germans would not have committed mass murder of the Polish IF THEY COULD NOT. Hans Frank, the General Governor of German-occupied Poland, stated ""The Polish nation is not worthy of life and should be destroyed." And Himmler echoed Hitler when he said, "All Poles will disappear from the world. It is essential that the great German people should consider it as its major task to destroy all Poles." That was essentially what the Germans had planned for the Polish; that they would disappear from the world, and their major task was to destroy them.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1669382438881984516/ext_tw_video_thumb/1669381367602241536/pu/img/i1BWoJIlt_RRYV3F.jpg)
