Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

ที่พีคกว่าคือตอน transition ฉากนี้คือ long take ทั้งหมด เอาผ้าดำคลุมคฤหาสน์ไว้ให้เป็นตอนกลางคืนแล้วพอเปลี่ยนฉากเป็นกลางวันก็กระตุกผ้าดำออก แต่ที่อึ้งไปกว่านั้นคือนักแสดงเปลี่ยนมู้ดกันต่อเนียนกริบ แววตาญดาคือที่สุด! ชื่นชมทีมงาน ตากล้อง และนักแสดงทุกคนมากๆ #สืบสันดาน

978,313 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

1 Yorum

แชร์แต่ของดี profil fotoğrafı
แชร์แต่ของดี2 yıl önce

ดีจริง

Benzer Videolar

Robinhood CEO: In the future there will be no distinction between crypto and traditional finance “I think that crypto technology has so many advantages over the traditional way we’re doing things that in the future there will be no distinction. It’s kind of how technology itself was viewed as a sector of the economy for a very long time… I think crypto will go through the same transition where we’re still thinking about it in its own bucket but eventually everything will be on-chain in some form or another and the distinction will disappear.” Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev explains why this transition is taking so long: “I think the challenge with traditional finance — particularly on the infrastructure layer — is they have a lot of stakeholders, and if you think about where they generate the bulk of their revenue, it’s not from crypto-related initiatives. And a lot of these stakeholders, because they’re quite big, are going to be resistant and slower to adopt technologies. They’re going to be late adopters. They’re going to wait until it’s proven before adopting it, and that’s why we [Robinhood] have had to do greater vertical integration than we would normally want to do in TradFi. We acquired Bitstamp. We have our own exchange. And we have our own chain because I don’t think — to be at the frontier of crypto — you can rely on traditional infrastructure providers. I think they’ll get there eventually but it will take a very long time.” Ethereum will be the global settlement layer for this new financial system, and ETH will be its money. ETH is the base pair for trading on The Robinhood Chain, the highest volume asset, and the gas token to pay for blockspace. Source: TOKEN2049 (Oct 2025)

Etherealize

131,745 görüntüleme • 27 gün önce

🇻🇪 At today’s Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on U.S. actions in Venezuela, Marco Rubio and Rand Paul clashed over how the U.S. justifies the military operation that kidnapped Nicolás Maduro from Venezuela. Rubio defended the mission as a law‑enforcement style action when asked whether the operation was an act of war, saying, “We just don't believe that this operation comes anywhere close to the constitutional definition” — even as critics argue the bombing, capture of a foreign head of state, and blockade clearly resemble an act of war. The administration insists there’s no war and no occupation, despite ongoing military and naval involvement. Paul pressed the point: if a foreign power did the same to the U.S. — bombing air defenses, capturing a president, and blockading the country — of course it would be considered an act of war. Rubio refused to concede that. Senators also pressed the secretary on the White House's long-term vision for Venezuela. Sen. Murphy asked about a timeline for a "democratic transition" but Rubio did not take a firm position, only committing to updating Congress on progress on U.S. priorities in the coming months while also walking back his recent threats of future military action against interim President Delcy Rodríguez. Rubio insisted that Trump reserves the right to act in the case of an imminent attack, repeatedly offering the hypothetical of an Iran-built a drone factory inside Venezuela as an acceptable justification for a new attack. Rubio insisted that the focus of the U.S. in the South American country right now is "stabilization, recovery, and transition" and not regime change, adding, "We should not confuse stabilization with transition."

Drop Site

13,077 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Erin Friday says that in states like California, parents risk losing their children if they refuse to transition them. She broke down to me how Child Protective Services can take children and strip parents of their rights once a child enters the system. “I have evidence of school counselors telling children how to use Child Protective Services to get away from their parents who refuse to capitulate and call them another gender.” “Once that child then gets into the crosshairs of Child Protective Services, the child can be taken and placed in a temporary foster care family.” “During that interim, the parents are being investigated.” “They can be investigated just from not calling their child a male or female name, whichever the child wants.” “There are foster care bill of rights in many of the blue states.” “Those bill of rights require that the child be housed based on gender identity… not their sex.” “So we take a child and put them in a very vulnerable position.” “The Bill of Rights also allows the child to get sex-rejecting interventions.” “You don’t need consent from the parents anymore.” “You get child and government consent to cross sex hormones, puberty blockers, name change.” “Parents essentially lose their parental rights to the government as long as those parents refuse to transition their children.” “These children are taught also to make false claims of abuse, not just emotional abuse, but physical abuse.” “The parents can’t even go to the press about what is happening to their child.” Erin Friday, Esq.

Jan Jekielek

13,429 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Why the Gender Critical movement as it presently stands will never receive broad support: Gender criticality is about centering biological sex over the concept of gender being detached from sex, right? It's about not wanting men in women's spaces... right? And it's also about preventing childhood transition out of an abundance of caution of risks and regret. ... and there won't be broad public support for that blend of policy cocktail because the majority of people have at least a shred of compassion for the gender dysphoric ... -- --- -- At Genspect, I met a women (who I will call Megan) who I later learned was transgender. I had no idea. She passed perfectly convincingly as though she were female, and only those whom she wished to disclose her sex to had any idea that she was biologically male at all. Megan and I left the conference Sunday evening and spent the night (and the early morning) chatting while driving aimlessly around downtown Denver. I realized in that chat just how different hers and my Genspect experiences were. Everything negative encounter I experienced, Megan did not. While many were very uncomfortable with my presence, they were quick to welcome Megan. While some were expressive in their fear I was using the women's washroom (which I did not, for those who care), Megan was present in those spaces with no concern expressed by anyone. ... and in the aftermath of the conference, one of our photos insulted and demeaned, while the other's disappeared as the unremarkable conference attendee she was.... This is a problem that should concern us all, because the embodiment of someone like Megan at Genspect is the strongest argument for why gender dysphoric individuals desperately wish to transition young. We need to face the reality that, I didn’t receive my Genspect experience because I am trans, I got it because I am non-passing trans. I got it because I was not a child when I transitioned, I was 28 years old. That’s a chilling reality to face for those who wish to argue to abolish childhood medical transition. I want to be able to say stopping childhood medical transition is a good thing. Really, I do. I want to tell the 10 year old dysphoric boy and his mother who are navigating this complex domain that waiting is better. That undergoing an unobstructed male puberty, a process through which many boys will find their childhood feelings of dysphoria subsist entirely, is the prudent thing to do. That mother and son need to know that biology is real and that you can’t change your sex. They need to hear that comorbidities exist, as does social contagion, and that it’s in their best interest to take every possible precaution to rule out these possibilities at the hazard of lifelong regret from irreversible damage. Those conversations are not happening and they should be. There’s no excuse not to be having it. I want to say that there’s little downside to waiting until adulthood to transition… But I need to tell them the entire truth: that the bestowal of dignity and kindness will be much sparser when left to transition as an adult. We need to make clear that while the risk of transition as a kid is infertility and regret, the risk of transition as an adult is also regret, along with many more surgeries undertaken in a desperation to try fruitlessly to reverse the masculinization of the jawbone and the forehead, the nose and the voice. For large hands and a long face, there’s no solution to those at the present. To be completely transparent, I would need to tell that mother and her 10 year old son that, should it come to it, he probably won’t pass as an adult transitioner, and that when he fails to convincingly present to the world as adequately feminine—as a woman if you will—he will be labeled a clown, an appropriator of womanhood, a pedophilic threat to our children, and a human unworthy of love. -- --- -- You want to ban childhood transition — create space for gender non-conforming males. You want to hold rigidly to our gendered society—you are pushing gender dysphoric individuals who seek childhood transition even more desperately.

Julia Malott

402,650 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Here’s Lue Elizondo being asked about the possibility of a catastrophic event or natural disaster occurring in the next 10 years or so. He says, 'Yes, I've heard about it, I'm aware of it, but I'm not able to have that conversation.' Luis Elizondo knows about the cyclical event and spiritual reality, and I've seen that he acknowledges this indirectly in his book as well. People quickly jumped to conclusions about John Ramirez and his 2027 event, but they need to realize that this is a dynamic situation involving the pole shift and the events triggered by these changes, such as extreme weather, geophysical activities, etc., leading to a major geophysical event. The mainstream refers to this as 'human-driven climate change consequences,' but that is a lie. You can't pinpoint the exact date; it's similar to doctors estimating how long a terminally ill patient has to live. The patient may outlive the estimate, or the situation could take a turn and result in an earlier death. Another date that UFO Twitter frequently mentions is Chris Bledsoe's date in 2026, but that could signify the beginning of something, rather than the main event. For example, the Yuga cycles, which last 12,000 years, have a transition period between the Yugas. Perhaps we are in that transition period. In my opinion, the transition period began in 2012 with the end of the Maya calendar, and since then, we can observe the world descending more and more into chaos. You can find another date related to the end of the Kali Yuga and the transition period, which corresponds with catastrophic events and the appearance of the spiritual UAP phenomenon, in the book 'Yuga Shift: The End of the Kali Yuga & The Impending Planetary Transformation' by Bibhu Dev Misra. His date is the spring equinox of 2025. Again, we are in the process of a geomagnetic excursion, during which the Earth's magnetic field is decreasing. During this time, the veil is thinning, and we will finally see the ultimate reality. Isaac Newton calculated the date to be 2060... I will leave two more videos in the comments where journalist Leslie Kean, who covers the UAP topic, and billionaire Robert Bigelow, who investigated UAPs and has shifted his attention to the afterlife, discuss this event.

Open Minded Approach

111,243 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The American-owned battery manufacturer Lyten has agreed to take over Northvolt's operations. Northvolt looks set to have a new owner. This is the result of hard work over a long period of time. This agreement, if approved by the Swedish Inspectorate of Strategic Products, will further strengthen trans-Atlantic relations and increase Sweden’s and EU’s independence and resilience. Work to find a new owner has been led by the bankruptcy trustee, Mr Mikael Kubu. The government has been in close contact with him, Business Sweden and other relevant parties to support the work in finding a new and long-term owner. Working as a team, both privately and publicly, strongly benefit the spirit of "Team Sweden". I have had many fruitful meetings over the past few months and have been in contact with representatives from Lyten for some time. But one of the most memorable meetings that stands out is when I visited Skellefteå - when Northvolt had just filed for bankruptcy - and met with many worried employees. Their sadness – but also pride to have been part of the Northvolt journey – has stuck with me. I therefore sincerely hope today's announcement brings new opportunities for all people affected by the bankruptcy. It is vital for Sweden and the EU that we have battery production in Europe. It strengthens competitiveness, levels the playing field in relation to Chinese players and increases our resilience. The government has been clear that we must have battery production in Europe, it is good for the industry's transition, and it creates jobs.

Ebba Busch

25,907 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce