Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

ๆญฃๅœจๅŠ ่ฝฝ่ง†้ข‘...

่ง†้ข‘ๅŠ ่ฝฝๅคฑ่ดฅ

๐€๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ฐ ๐œ๐จ๐ฆ๐ž ๐ก๐ž๐ซ๐ž ๐œ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ข๐ž ๐Ÿ’ž ๐‰๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐œ๐ฅ๐ข๐œ๐ค ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐š๐ฒ ๐Ÿ™ˆ๐Ÿ˜˜~ Just watch ๐จ๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ and ๐จ๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ again puppy ๐Ÿฅฐ It's okay silly you trust me right? ๐Ÿฅบ~ Ur totally not walking into a trap Or conditioning urself helplessly ๐Ÿ’ž๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿ‘ˆ~ (๐™‘๐™ค๐™ก๐™ช๐™ข๐™š ๐™ช๐™ฅ๐Ÿ”Š)

285,021 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 3 ๅนดๅ‰ โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

0 ๆก่ฏ„่ฎบ

ๆš‚ๆ— ่ฏ„่ฎบ

ๅŽŸๅง‹ๅธ–ๅญ็š„่ฏ„่ฎบๅฐ†ๆ˜พ็คบๅœจ่ฟ™้‡Œ

็›ธๅ…ณ่ง†้ข‘

EMIBONNIE MOONSHADOW PRESS TOUR #MoonshadowSeries #EmiBonnie ๐ŸŽค: Intimate scenes require a lot of trust. I'd love to know, how did you two talk it out and prepare for them? ๐Ÿงก: To be totally honest... we didn't talk about it at all. ๐Ÿ’œ: We didn't discuss it at all. I feel like after going through US, we just felt completely comfortable with... skinship with each other. So coming into Moonshadow, our job was just to dive into the scene! ๐Ÿงก: Yeah. And especially since we know it's work, everyone on set is purely locked in on the work. ๐Ÿ’œ: Everyone supports us. ๐Ÿงก: They support us so much. We just know that if the script is written this way and the director tells us to do it like this, we just do it. There's no... no... ๐Ÿ’œ: We've passed the point of feeling awkward or anything like that. ๐Ÿงก: It's not there at all. ๐Ÿ’œ: Not anymore. ๐ŸŽค: No awkwardness? No shy/embarrassed feelings at all? ๐Ÿ’œ: None! It's... we're used to it now. ๐Ÿงก: Ah, yeah. Honestly, true. ๐Ÿ’œ: For real! Used to each other's touch, used to... used to everything! ๐Ÿงก: We also trust the director a lot as part of it. I feel like this crew... ๐Ÿ’œ: Yes, and the crew members too. They're a team we've worked with before. ๐Ÿงก: Yeah. ๐Ÿ’œ: And besides the series, I work with P'Mi all the time. So yeah, it just doesn't feel like a problem at all when working. ๐Ÿงก: Not... not at all. ๐Ÿ’œ: Not at all. ๐ŸŽค: Is there ever a moment like, "Hey, may I have permission to hold your hand?" ๐Ÿงก: Not at all... ๐Ÿ’œ: Oh, come on! NO WAY! ๐Ÿงก: Excuse me Phi, we are WAY past hand-holding! ๐Ÿ’œ: We're way... way past that already! ๐Ÿงก: It's long past holding hands. Now, if I were acting with someone else, I might feel stiff or awkward, but with her? Not at all. And like I said, I trust the director completely! ๐Ÿ’œ: Yeah... it's so much more than that now. Way past hand-holding! ๐Ÿงก: I feel like whatever the director asks us to do, it's because they see it'll be good for the series. So we can just go for it right away. ๐Ÿ’œ: We just dive straight into the scene to get the best work possible!

Lovely

48,916 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 17 ๅคฉๅ‰

CUTE TOGETHER WITH EMIBONNIE #CUTEPRESSXEMIBONNIE ๐ŸฆŠ: They're waiting for me to tell Bonnie I love her before they're willing to pay? I'm a hostage? They want to tell her I love her in public? ๐Ÿฐ: If you really love me, it wouldn't be that hard. ๐ŸฆŠ: Do they want to hear it? Do they really want to hear it? ๐Ÿฐ: You're saying this much... ๐ŸŽค: She's very good at being sarcastic. ๐ŸฆŠ: Yes! She's very good at being sarcastic. ๐Ÿฐ: If you don't want to say it, it's fine, so I know that you don't love me. ๐ŸฆŠ: Are you Khun Thee? (from 'Me and Thee' series) ๐Ÿฐ: ๐ŸคŸ๐Ÿผ ๐ŸฆŠ: What do I have to say? How do ppl tell each other they love them? It's not a word that I usually say. ๐Ÿฐ: Why are you... (mimicking Emi's swaying movements) ๐ŸฆŠ: I focus on actions. ๐ŸŽค: And how do you usually tell your love through your actions? ๐Ÿฐ: How? I don't really know at all. ๐ŸฆŠ: Really? I'm sad that you didn't feel it in all the things I did. ๐Ÿฐ: What did you do, what did you do? ๐ŸฆŠ: ๐Ÿ˜† ๐ŸฆŠ: You want to tell other ppl? ๐Ÿฐ: What did you do? ๐ŸฆŠ: You want to tell other ppl? ๐Ÿ˜† ๐Ÿฐ: What'd you do? ๐ŸฆŠ: Many things~ ๐Ÿฐ: They're asking you to say you love me, what are you doing? ๐ŸฆŠ: ๐Ÿ˜† ๐Ÿฐ: Saying you love me is what? ๐ŸฆŠ: What's saying love? ๐Ÿฐ: It's very straightforward. ๐ŸฆŠ: (collapsing into Bonnie and hugging her arm #1) ๐Ÿ˜† ๐Ÿฐ: I want you to know that it's very straightforward. It's not hard to interpret at all, it's not hard to interpret. ๐ŸฆŠ: Why does it have to be me who has to say that I love Bonnie? ๐ŸŽค: They want to hear it. ๐ŸฆŠ: Why isn't there Bonnie telling me she loves me too? ๐Ÿฐ: Bc I'm always the one who has to do things, so it's your turn to say it too. ๐ŸฆŠ: When? ๐Ÿฐ: Always. I express my love all the time. ๐ŸฆŠ: That's not true. Huh? (hugs Bonnie's arm) ๐Ÿฐ: What's that? ๐ŸฆŠ: Aishiteiru (ๆ„›ใ—ใฆใ„ใ‚‹ = "I love you" in Japanese). ๐Ÿฐ: That's a different language. What is it abt Thai? What's wrong with Thai? ๐ŸฆŠ: (collapsing into Bonnie and hugging her arm #2) ๐ŸฆŠ: What is it abt Thai? ๐Ÿ˜† ๐Ÿฐ: Is there something wrong with Thai language? ๐ŸฆŠ: Too stubborn to say love out loud. ๐Ÿฐ: How is l-o-v-e hard to say? ๐ŸŽค: The fans are saying Emi is a victim of society. ๐ŸฆŠ: Yeah! It's always me! #.itsalwaysme ๐Ÿฐ: Really? Really? ๐ŸฆŠ: Really! ๐Ÿฐ: So, what? Are you going to tell me you love me? ๐ŸฆŠ: (collapsing into Bonnie and hugging her arm #3) ๐Ÿฐ: She keeps on changing the topic, she doesn't want to do it. ๐ŸฆŠ: It's not that I don't want to! It's not that I don't want to, it's just that there's so many ppl. ๐Ÿฐ: Then pls leave and leave just the two of us here. ๐ŸฆŠ: How many ppl are watching? ๐ŸŽค: 3,500. ๐ŸฆŠ: 3,500!! That's crazy! ๐Ÿฐ: Everyone pay and leave first. Let her tell her she loves me first. ๐ŸฆŠ: 3,500 ppl watching. ๐ŸฆŠ: They said no one's watching. ๐Ÿฐ: Everyone plug your ears, close your eyes. ๐ŸฆŠ: ๐Ÿ˜˜ ๐ŸŽค: 3,600 ppl, plug your ears. ๐ŸฆŠ: (hugging Bonnie's arm again) ๐ŸฆŠ: It's 3,600 ppl now?? It increased! ๐Ÿ˜† ๐Ÿฐ: How many is it now? 2,600? ๐ŸฆŠ๐ŸŽค: 3,600. ๐Ÿฐ: Orders or...? ๐ŸฆŠ: Ppl watching. ๐ŸŽค: Witnesses. ๐ŸฆŠ: Witnesses who are ganging up on me. ๐ŸŽค: They're saying that they turned off the live. ๐Ÿฐ: Not yet, not yet! Come back, come back. Come, come. ๐ŸฆŠ: The person who's having the most fun today... ๐Ÿฐ: "I've plugged my nose!" No, you can't do that, you won't be able to breathe. ๐ŸฆŠ: ๐Ÿ˜† ๐ŸŽค: Any said she can't see now. ๐Ÿฐ: "Lemme turn off my sound" ๐Ÿ˜† ๐ŸŽค: Okay, everyone quiet. ๐ŸฆŠ: I'm feeling pressureddddd. ๐Ÿฐ: Once you hear it, pay for your basket immediately, okay? ๐ŸฆŠ: Really? You're not tricking me into saying it and not checking out your basket, are you? ๐ŸŽค: Once it's said, you have to buy it. We've screencapped the amount sold so far already. ๐ŸฆŠ: I'm shy (collapsing into Bonnie and hugging her arm #4). ๐Ÿฐ: Is telling me you love me that hard? ๐ŸฆŠ: It's not hard, but there's a lot of ppl! ๐ŸŽค: It's not a lot, there's just one person left. ๐Ÿฐ: There's just one person now. ๐ŸŽค: There's just one person left now, Bonnie. ๐ŸฆŠ: ๐Ÿ˜† ๐Ÿฐ: I'm feeling disheartened.

K-bab

66,360 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 8 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

Do you ride a bike? Or an e-scooter? Or walk a dog? If so, please take a second to read this. If you are on a bike or scooter on a shared pathway and approaching someone walking a dog, please be courteous and slow down a little. Especially if coming up from behind. I am a wheelchair user with a dog and we have way too many close calls with fast moving bikes and scooters. People not using a bell and whipping by within inches. If the dog turned it's head or stepped a bit wide, they'd be hit. I'll happily move as far to one side of the path as possible, and if I've got the younger dog who isn't as experienced around fast moving things, I'll stop at the very side and have him sit in front of me to give everyone as much space as possible. If I don't know you're approaching, I can't do that. So please, for the love of dog, use your bell. Don't wait until you're right behind someone with a dog. Use it while you're still at a distance, and if you aren't sure they noticed it, ring it a few more times. Give them as much time as possible to move to the side and prepare the dog. If it's a puppy or a dog that hasn't had much experience with bikes, being able to get them off the path or give them a little extra distance from the fast moving bike helps prevent them from getting scared. The vast majority of cyclists are great and really respectful, but there's always a few that aren't. This year the challenge is kids on e-scooters. They are going fast and having fun. Safety isn't at the forefront of their mind. They often don't use a bell or slow down at blind corners, and many don't think about giving the dog any space. I've been startled a few times by them so I can only imagine how the dog felt. This is one of the reasons why I do a lot of desensitization and counter conditioning. Dog owners-you need to do your part to. If you've got headphones on, make sure you can still hear the bike bell. Make sure to give the cyclist or scooter rider as much space as possible from your dog. And of course, unless you are on a designated off leash trail, keep your dog on a leash. If you have a puppy or a newly adopted dog that might not be comfortable around bikes, take some kibble or treats and go hang out with them near a multi use path. Let them watch. As the bike or scooter approaches, drop a few treats on the ground. For many dogs, this is all it takes, but if your dog is visibly stressed, fixated on the bike, or reacting, try moving a further from the trail and once they're comfortable at a slightly further distance, try closer again. If they are still stressed or fearful even with more distance, don't force the issue. Instead introduce them to a bike that isn't moving, and gradually work them up from there. If they are struggling, talk to a trainer. Regardless of if you are holding a leash, riding a bike or scooter, or enjoying a walk outdoors, just be respectful. And of course, be safe. Thanks, Admin ๐ŸŽฅ Puppy walk for cuteness

Team Servicerottie๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ•โ€๐Ÿฆบ๐Ÿฆฝ

15,736 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 1 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

Just in $AMD Anush "Speed is the moat"|ROCm๐ŸŽ™๏ธ In the race to define the future of AI, what's the one advantage that truly lasts? It's not proprietary tech, argues Anush Elangovan Elangovan, VP of AI Software at AMD , but the sustainable speed of innovation. He explains why AMD is rejecting the "walled garden" model for its open source ROCm stack, betting that an open community flywheel is the key to victory. Listen to understand how this open strategy is designed to out-innovate closed systems by empowering developers to solve everything from frontier-model challenges to the mundane, everyday problems that define the "last mile" of AI. AMD ROCm Software: Part 1 Transcript [00:00:00] Andrew Zigler: Joining me is Anush Elangovan, VP of AI software at AMD. And when people talk about AI compute, the conversation often stops at hardware specs, but it's more than just physical chips that win the game. It's also the software ecosystems supporting them. [00:00:18] Andrew Zigler: The prevailing strategy in the industry has been to build something like a walled garden. You know, something closed, proprietary locks, developers in. But AMD is betting on an entirely different play, open source acceleration, and with rock, their open source AI software stack. AMD is building not just hardware parity, but an innovation flywheel that's powered by the community with interoperability and the freedom to scale without all of that pesky lockin. [00:00:48] Andrew Zigler: And in this world, speed is your moat and how fast you can innovate while your platform remains open, flexible, and standardize across all of its applications. That's what we're gonna explore [00:01:00] today. So Anush, I'm really excited to have you here. Welcome to Dev Interrupted. [00:01:04] Anush Elangovan: Thanks for having me. Uh, super excited to chat about it. [00:01:07] Andrew Zigler: Amazing. Well, let's go ahead and dive right in with kind of what I laid it out with in the beginning, the idea of the moat and it being about speed. I wanna unpack that a bit because that came from you when you and I first spoke. And I, and I want to know, you know, how do you define speed inside of AMD beyond just things like hardware, benchmarks. [00:01:27] Anush Elangovan: Yeah, that's a very good question. So when we typically talk about speed, everyone's like, Hey, hardware benchmark specs, right? Like, uh, memory bandwidth or, or flops. And that is one important part of it, uh, AMD does very well. With that, we do have, a, a very good history of executing on that axis. [00:01:47] Anush Elangovan: But when I say speed is the moat, it is about, uh, how we prepare, how we build the muscle to run the race for a long time and run it fast. And it is [00:02:00] not about a single point in time that you've, you've beat some you know, benchmark and, and you declare victory. It's about building the ability to consistently develop and deliver. [00:02:13] Anush Elangovan: Both hardware and software innovation at scale and do it fast, right? Like, you know, we we're increasingly getting to a point where models come out and they're, uh, you know, a year or two ago it was like, Hey, they work on AMD on day zero, which is great, but now they are performing on AMD the day it releases, right? [00:02:32] Anush Elangovan: So, what does it take to Prefetch where the industry is going? Be prepared to intercept. At that point is what you know, I, I refer to as you know, the, the speed factor in, in creating this mode, right? And the mode is just shed all things that hold you back and run as fast as you can. [00:02:53] Anush Elangovan: Uh, because the pace of innovation that is, uh, being seen in, in AI [00:03:00] industries is just. Amazing. Right? And it's like, it's transformational at at how you generate electricity. It's transformational as at how you build data centers. It's transformational at how you deploy compute, networking. It's transformational at what kind of use cases you, you know, uh, use AI for. [00:03:17] Anush Elangovan: Uh, and for that, you need to be prepared to, see what comes tomorrow and be prepared to run the race tomorrow. [00:03:23] Andrew Zigler: Yeah, it's a really great perspective because it highlights that it's not just like a checkpoint that you run through. I like how you called out, like it's not just hitting that benchmark or being the best in class at that moment, in that snapshot, it's about having a. The throughput and about having that dedication to the idea and continuing to deliver on it. [00:03:43] Andrew Zigler: It's not just crossing the threshold, but it's also being the engine. And that's what, that's what protects a business. That is the moat, because the moat is that innovation layer, the faster and more, uh, future forward. That you can work and think, [00:04:00] you know, the better. Uh, we, we talk a lot about like future forward work styles. [00:04:04] Andrew Zigler: Like what are the things I could be doing right now today that are gonna be like, way more useful tomorrow? Let, let's abandon those, workflows that are older and that kind of like, that translates into. An advantage when you work that way. You know, what kind of things have you learned working with, uh, like across all spectrums of people who would use ROCm, right? [00:04:23] Andrew Zigler: You have like the developers, but then you also have the enterprises and you have this large span of adoptees, right? So what is the, what does that look like that you learn? [00:04:32] Anush Elangovan: Yeah, so, so the way I look at it is there are gonna be pockets of different, uh, you know, cadences, right? Like, so people who are deploying in enterprises, for example, right? The validation and how long it takes for them to deploy an LLM that's secure. It's, with guardrails, et cetera, maybe longer. [00:04:52] Anush Elangovan: but you still have to go through the process and you have to be prepared to like, walk that walk to deploy an enterprises. That doesn't mean it's [00:05:00] not fast, that's as fast as you can do for that industry, right? And if you are deploying AI in healthcare, right, it's, it's got its own, uh, cycle. [00:05:07] Anush Elangovan: but in each one of these, you want to see how, like, go down to the essence of what is it that you actually have to do. And, you know, I, I, I like how you framed it. It's like it's, you shed your prior assumptions of how things are done, right. And, and you kind of build up from a, uh, first principles, uh, approach to say, this is how I could use AI to unlock, whatever I'm doing. [00:05:33] Anush Elangovan: And, and, some of it, you know, it's good to really step back and look at. Just question every part of it, right? Like right now you're getting chat GPT and, Gemini competing for like, math, olympiads and, and, uh, college, uh, reasoning, uh, tests. Right? And, and those are like that, that is amazing and increasingly like complex tasks that they're trying to do. [00:05:58] Anush Elangovan: But there may also be like. [00:06:00] More mundane things that AI could, could get applied to. Right? And, and so when we think about shedding old ways, you wanna shed it not just in like the tip of the spear. It's like, you know, I'm gonna see what's the frontier model. It's also, it could be something as simple as. [00:06:18] Anush Elangovan: How do you choose a, a movie, uh, you know, like a recommendation system, right? Or, or, uh, an automated, uh, flight, uh, rebooking system. So the moment, you know, your flight is late, uh, right now it's a notification, right? It's like, oh, you got a text message saying your flight's late. And I got that like three times this week. [00:06:38] Anush Elangovan: But anyway, uh, and, and, and, and, I was just like, okay, so if I were to rethink this. All this MCPs that we have that should be hooked up into an MCP that says, your flight's delayed. Here are your options. If you want, you know, these are the paid options. Yeah. Here are the free options. This will get you back into your you know, Toronto airport [00:07:00] tonight. [00:07:00] Anush Elangovan: Or if you stay, here's a hotel plus this, plus this, plus. It's just like, go ahead is all I should say. Versus now I'm like, okay, can someone, you know, can I call a travel agent? Can I do this? Can I go online and log into And you know, so we gotta fundamentally rethink even those like small, nuances of, things that we do that can be automated out and AI is really, really good at doing something like this, right? Maybe I just explained an AI startup idea right now. Somebody should just start that. [00:07:29] Andrew Zigler: I think you did. Yeah, you definitely did. Someone, one of our listeners is definitely going to lift that off of you. I, I, I, you know, I hate being on the receiving end of those. You feel a little helpless and then you have to like, follow the whole flow. So I know what you mean. Like I, I like how you called out that the build and this like. [00:07:45] Andrew Zigler: Where speed is your moat and the innovation layer is protecting you, is what makes you better than your competitors. How you scale that and you bring that to market. So by understanding the problems that you're solving, uh, throwing away those older assumptions, but also [00:08:00] recognizing that like. We're building every single day, new things and new ways of using stuff that we're still figuring out the implications of. [00:08:08] Andrew Zigler: And so when you have a lot of velocity and you're introducing a lot of new ideas, and maybe you have that workflow now that automatically rebook your flight off of your late flight text message, and uh, I know I would certainly use it, but you know, what kind of philosophies guide the way that y'all think about building this ecosystem to manage that stability while letting folks. [00:08:29] Andrew Zigler: Play with the speed and the assumptions and the airplane re bookings. [00:08:34] Anush Elangovan: so, so I think, you know, we need to peel one layer down, right? and the philosophy is, Hey, we, we just discovered electricity, right? And you know what we're gonna do? We are gonna make motors, uh, or dynamos, right? Like engines. Uh, sure. We don't know if it's gonna be a Ferrari that you're gonna make, or it's a a a a dump truck. [00:08:57] Anush Elangovan: That's good for doing this. But let's [00:09:00] let, which is also required, right? You need a dump truck. You need a garbage truck. And, [00:09:04] Andrew Zigler: Yeah. You need the [00:09:04] Anush Elangovan: course you need, uh, a Ferrari for a midlife crisis, right? So, [00:09:09] Andrew Zigler: precisely. [00:09:10] Anush Elangovan: But, but my, uh, point is what do we build next? And, uh, and this is what I meant by like, okay, let's, let's take those baby steps to build the. [00:09:20] Anush Elangovan: Infrastructure that's required that we know we'll have to use, right? So, so if I just discovered electricity, okay, great. Now one, how do I save this electricity and how do I use it? So there's battery technology, so you need to do something like that, right? Like so. But then you also want to make it into an actionable thing. [00:09:37] Anush Elangovan: You want to make it for like automobiles, or you wanna use it for, you know, powering, uh, entire cities. So it is that transformational. So, uh, AI is that transformational. So, if you distill down, it'll, it'll come down to how do we think about, what we can do with this this fundamental technology that, We may not be aware of what it [00:10:00] is gonna unlock next, but at least you know the next step is clear, right? It's like a dense fog, you know, it's gonna be like, it, it's the right path. You see the light, but it's kind of like out there and, and the steps you're taking are concrete and you're like, okay, this is good. [00:10:16] Anush Elangovan: I, this is better than where I was or where we were. So we are moving forward. So you can build with the. Intuition from what you see in the short term and a tactical view, but towards what you think the future is gonna be. [00:10:28] Andrew Zigler: Right. You almost like we're all in this like fog of war, right? And like you said, you're reaching out and you're trying to step through it. You could think of it too, as like you're in the dark and your hands are up in front of you and you know that. You're, you're not gonna run your face into a wall because your hands are out in front of you, but you're not gonna maybe do much better than that. [00:10:45] Andrew Zigler: So that's kind of like, I think the eco, the, the industry, the world that we find ourselves in, uh, and we all have to, then this becomes the power of an ecosystem, of a group of people working together to create that layer of, [00:11:00] uh, of establishing the [00:11:01] Anush Elangovan: exactly. And I, I, I just, instead of, you know, saying fog of war I describe it as like, you're in this. Beautiful valley with like a morning, uh, fog that's in. You can smell the flowers. You, you hear the birds. You are like, okay, it's, we are in like, uh, utopian paradise and yes, I just need to like, continue the walk, right? [00:11:24] Anush Elangovan: and then move forward with that, conviction that you're in the right spot. [00:11:27] Andrew Zigler: Yeah. So let's talk about that ecosystem world. This nice, I love how you describe it, this grassy side of a hill in the morning that's covered in some mist and maybe we can't see 30 feet in one direction, but it sure is a beautiful hill and it smells nice. And so we're all here. And why is, in that world, why is. [00:11:44] Andrew Zigler: You know, open source, their strategic advantage that y'all are going for in the AI hardware market. And, and then how does like ROCm turn that into wins for people within that ecosystem? [00:11:56] Anush Elangovan: you know, the, the way we look at it is this, is kind of like how I view [00:12:00] AI and the ecosystem, right? But, but it is for everyone to enjoy. Uh, and so we do want to make sure that. You know, it is, uh, beneficial for everyone. [00:12:09] Anush Elangovan: The ecosystem can come in and, and innovate. It's an open innovation engine. and uh, it is very different from, you know, having a walled garden with, Hey, only I know how to do this and I'm gonna do it and throw it over the fence and you can use it or keep walking, right? So we'd like to be good citizens that way, but also. [00:12:30] Anush Elangovan: Uh, it is self-fulfilling in a way, right? Like it, the, the pace at which we innovate with open source is unmatched. Like, you know, our serving engines are like VLLM and, and sg l. Those things, uh, those frameworks are like super, super aggressive in terms of how fast they come out with features and how fast they can you know, get performant models out. [00:12:52] Anush Elangovan: And that compared with what, uh, you'd get from, you know, the likes of like T-R-T-L-L-M or something is always lagging, right? Because you [00:13:00] just can't keep up with you know, 200 commits a week just on one particular model to get that model really performant [00:13:06] Andrew Zigler: And, and, and in that world where, you know, everyone can enjoy the winds of this, what kind of customer stories or innovation stories have really stood out to you and excite you about building and creating this place for developers? [00:13:19] Anush Elangovan: Yeah. So I think the parts that are super exciting for me are when when we get to see a customer that is first skeptical. Then they start a little like, okay, fine, we'll give you a chance. Uh, we do a simple, uh, POC and then they're like, huh, this seems to work. Yeah, we told you it works. [00:13:42] Anush Elangovan: You don't have to change one line of code. Really? Yes, no need to change one line of code. Okay, let's try a production workload. So then they try it. Oh, you're more performant than the competition. Yes. We're more performant than, than the competition. So how much does it cost? And we're like, oh, it's your TCO is better with, uh, [00:14:00] AMD. [00:14:00] Anush Elangovan: So again, they're like, wow, okay, good. So now how do we deploy at scale? And then we go deploy it at scale. And when they give a thumbs up on that and they say, this is good, right? That's when you know, you, you see it go full circle from like, oh, we, we've never heard about AMD to like actually deploy to tens of thousands of GPUs In the order of a few months, right? It, it, it really is fascinating to see and very exciting and invigorating to [00:14:28] Andrew Zigler: Yeah. At like a great exposure to a lot of interesting problems. And, and then people using the infrastructure, the, the technology available to solve those problems. Really specific problems by the way, that's often why they're bringing their data and AI to it, uh, is because it is really specific and important for them. [00:14:45] Andrew Zigler: And there's a, a lot I think that other engineering orgs can learn and even emulate from AMD's success and, and having this open source ecosystem and it causing this acceleration within. You [00:15:00] know, uh, customers and enterprises that use and adopt the tools and, and, and that creates an advantage. And that goes back to why we're talking and like the real thesis of our conversation today. [00:15:10] Andrew Zigler: So how do you think engineering leaders that are listening to this and obviously tapping into this great success AMD has from an open source flywheel, how do you think other, other folks building in the same space can foster that open, first, that open source oriented culture in order to, you know, accelerate their innovation goals? [00:15:29] Anush Elangovan: Yeah, that's a very good question. So the startup that um, was acquired by AMD we, we built, I mean, we started off doing iot stuff and you know, smart ring and all that, right? But in the, the end of like, uh, and not the end, the last six years of the company was building ML compilers. [00:15:47] Anush Elangovan: And ml, ML compilers are like super, uh, complicated, sophisticated, advanced algorithms, dah, dah, dah. but it was all open source, right? So our VCs were like, wait, what do you mean your core [00:16:00] IP is open source? And um, the speed is the moat applied even then, right? It was just like, yes, if you have an idea that. [00:16:08] Anush Elangovan: Because someone saw this idea that you are, they're gonna be able to catch up, then you probably have the wrong idea anyway. But if they are, you know, you execute and they're gonna catch up, that you should assume they're gonna catch up. Right? So you gotta move forward. So keeping it open source is super important. [00:16:25] Anush Elangovan: But also to your question on like, you know, the learnings from an AMD standpoint, right? If there are, hard problems, I'd say dig in and work through it, right? Like there's no way but through it, right? That should be the simple mentality. And more, uh, frequently than not. you'll see that you'll just make it through in a, in, in good form. [00:16:52] Anush Elangovan: But if you doubt it and you're like, oh, I don't know if I should commit, if I'm, I, you know, what should just commit to do the right thing [00:17:00] every step, right? Every step, and just keep taking one step in front of the other. And in no time you'll see that you'll be running. Right. And, and yes, the first few steps will be like, yeah, everyone's complaining about your software quality. [00:17:15] Anush Elangovan: Everyone's complaining about this and that, and it doesn't work. And, and a few steps in, you know, you get, you get the hang of all the complaints that are coming in. You get the feedback loop. You're like, okay, what, what are you prioritizing again? One step in front of the other, right? You just keep knocking that out and then you get to a point where you're, it just becomes second nature, right? To do the, to do the right thing. And, and then yes, if someone gives you two options, you'll be like, fine. This is, uh, you know, there's always the resource trade off. There's always a human capital trade off, but what's the right thing to do? of course, I, I'm pragmatic about what we choose, but, but if the right thing for your long-term success is dig in, go first, principles, make it [00:18:00] happen. [00:18:00] Anush Elangovan: Well. Then just go for that. There's, there is no shortcut to [00:18:04] Andrew Zigler: acknowledging, you know, how it aligns with your mission, your core company goals, and what you're looking to achieve. And, and I, I love how you rightfully called out that in the open source world and you know, you have your technology that you've built, what you think is your moat upon, right? [00:18:22] Andrew Zigler: It's your code and, and to open source that, or to just make it where anyone could peer in is, you know. Scary in one regard, but two, it just kind of feels like you're handing away your throne room in some kind of sense, a very direct feeling sense. But the ultimately, you were really right to call out, and this is something I think about all the time, that the real power there is still the speed This the speed. [00:18:42] Andrew Zigler: That was the moat at the beginning of our conversation. It's the speed in combination with your. Very specific domain understanding of what you're building and what you're creating, and your new role as the steward of that world and how people plug into it, which [00:19:00] has frankly, a lot more influence and power than lording over a closed. [00:19:04] Andrew Zigler: You know, repository or an ecosystem, and like you said, like throwing things over the wall. Sure. There, there might be people always on the other side of that wall, but you're not gonna have a great connection with them. You're not gonna be able to really clearly understand them. I, I like your metaphor of the side of the field of the mountain a lot more. [00:19:23] Andrew Zigler: But, but in the, in this world, you know, where. That speed is, is the power and, and open source is just one way that you can harness that speed to get really far ahead and to innovate. , There's other parts of this equation that you can be experimenting with too, and I'd love to pick your brain about them as a software leader and, and, and one of them is about looking forward and kind of understanding that future that we're all building towards and beyond today's models and hardware. [00:19:48] Andrew Zigler: You know, what do you see as the next major bottleneck or opportunity in the AI compute space? As, as you know, enterprises and folks start to get a little more mature about what's available to [00:20:00] them. [00:20:00] Anush Elangovan: Yeah, I think, the bottleneck and opportunity is, uh, what I'd call, call walking the last mile of ai. Right. Uh, and like I I, I gave you an example, uh, previously, but, but it's similar to that. It's like there are cases where Humans have so many, uh, things to do in your day. You know, like the, if we sit down and actually had a customer focus like, okay, these customers lives, I'm gonna save four hours of this customer's life. And if you actually sit down and look at all of that, it'll be. Easily automatable, easily you know, uh, applicable, uh, for ai, right? [00:20:39] Anush Elangovan: Like, but then making it happen is gonna take a little bit, right? It's like maybe it's, uh, paying your utility bill, right? Or something like that, right? Or, or, your healthcare explanation of benefits. Uh, like, I'm sure you get an explanation of benefits, and I'm like, I, I don't even know what that thing is. [00:20:55] Anush Elangovan: It's just like EOB and like. [00:20:57] Andrew Zigler: it's a big, a big old PDF. Yeah, [00:21:00] exactly. [00:21:01] Anush Elangovan: Like, like, I'm like great straight to the, uh, shredder, right? And but that could be, you know, automated with the ai, right? It, it, it'd be like, Hey, the summary of this thing is you went and visited this day. Everything is okay. Everything is paid for, so don't worry, it's not a bill. [00:21:17] Anush Elangovan: That again, the same, uh, thing, but the sense of what that information overload is could be. Digested by ai, uh, accumulated over time and retrieved when you need it. Like, I don't, I actually don't even need to know this EOB right now, unless of course, whenever I need to know it, that maybe, you know, like for some benefits I need to figure out what do, what did I do over the past year and how do I apply it? Source:

Mike

14,195 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 8 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

Roger Federer won almost 80% of the 1,526 singles matches he played in his career. But he only won 54% of the points. The greatest tennis player of his generation lost almost every second point he played. He spent 2 minutes explaining what that taught him about success: The best in the world are not the best because they win every point. They're the best because they know they'll lose again and again, and they've learned how to deal with it. Think about that. Even top-ranked tennis players win barely more than half the points they play. Federer's insight: when you lose every second point on average, you learn not to dwell on every shot. You teach yourself to think: "Okay, I double faulted. It's only a point." "Okay, I came to the net and I got passed again. It's only a point." Even a great shot, an overhead backhand smash that ends up on ESPN's top 10 playlist, that too is just a point. Here's the mindset shift that separates champions from everyone else: When you're playing a point, it has to be the most important thing in the world. And it is. But when it's behind you, it's behind you. This isn't detachment. It's freedom. It frees you to fully commit to the next point with intensity, clarity, and focus. No baggage from the last mistake. No anxiety about the scoreboard. Just the next shot. Federer's definition of a champion: "You want to become a master at overcoming hard moments. That is to me the sign of a champion." Not a master at avoiding hard moments. You can't avoid them. A master at overcoming them. Watch him in a post-match interview after losing to Djokovic. Reporter: "It was a tough day today. You threw everything at him." Federer: "Yeah, absolutely. Novak played great. Not only today but the whole two weeks. Plus the whole year. Plus last year. Plus the year before that. He deserves it. Well done, Novak." No bitterness or excuses. Reporter: "So close in that first set. It could have been so different." Federer: "Maybe. That's sports. That's why we come to watch it. Just because you don't know the outcome." He continues: "Of course I had my chances in the first set, being up a break. Second set I got lucky to win that. Had some chances early in the third. But it's how it goes." "He was tougher on the bigger points. At the end he was rock solid. I thought he played great. I didn't play bad myself. So I can be very happy as well." Read that last line again. He lost a major final. And he said he can be "very happy as well." He's separating his performance from the outcome. He didn't play badly. Novak was just better on the day. That's it. Move on. Most people do the opposite. They win and think they're geniuses. They lose and think they're failures. Champions know better. You can play great and lose. You can play terribly and win. The point is behind you. The match is behind you. What matters is: did you fully commit? Did you bring intensity, clarity, and focus? If yes, you can be happy regardless of the scoreboard. This applies far beyond tennis. In your career, you'll lose almost half the points you play. The pitch that doesn't land. The promotion that goes to someone else. The project that fails. The rejection email. You can dwell on every shot. Replay every mistake. Carry the baggage into the next opportunity. Or you can say: it's only a point. It's behind me now. And commit fully to the next one. The best in the world aren't the best because they never fail. They're the best because they've learned how to deal with failure. Again and again and again. This 2 minute speech will teach you more about handling setbacks than every motivational video you've ever saved.

Jaynit

40,649 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 4 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

Duncan Trussell tells Theo Von why the horrifying stuff the algorithm feeds you is not an accident, and explains what it does to your brain. It starts with the phone in your hand. TRUSSELL: "All of us are staring into these hypno-rectangles. The algorithm, at least my algorithm, it's showing me horrible things, people in the midst of psychotic episodes, people in the forest drinking their period blood." VON: "It's crazy dude. They're definitely scrambling our brains. Because you'll see like, genocidal killings of children, right?" VON: "But then immediately it's like 40% off these ASICS. It starts to confuse your brain, because your brain takes the depth of one that's so deep and one that means nothing at all, and puts them all in the same plane." Then Trussell takes it somewhere darker: TRUSSELL: "Public assassinations create trauma. Cultural trauma." TRUSSELL: "Did you notice, the Charlie Kirk assassination, everyone saw it before they shut it down. All of us had to watch that s**t happen. This produces trauma. The trauma response opens you up to conditioning. It's the same thing kidnappers use. It's the same thing people who torture you use. "They freak you the f**k out so that you disassociate. You don't want to be there. You go into a sad, foggy place. And then in that place, they show you the ASICS commercial. In that place, they give you some propaganda. In that place, they give you a solution so this will never happen again. This is a known technique for mind-controlling people." TRUSSELL: "It's not just a power dynamic shift, it's a cultural dynamic shift. Because they inject that moment with however they want to shift the tide." VON: "Wow..." TRUSSELL: "So, Instagram, or any social media, is kind of doing this, but low-level." VON: "Microdosing it." TRUSSELL: "Yeah." Once you see the sequence, you can't unsee it.

The Vigilant Fox ๐ŸฆŠ

186,792 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 1 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

minghao started off talking about his vaccination and somehow it turned into banter ๐Ÿ˜ญ ๐ŸŽฑ right now, my body condition isn't that great. it's because two days ago i got that shot the one we seventeen endorses. what's it called again.. i don't know the chinese name, but hoshi-ge got it before. gardasil? you guys should know what it is once i mention it. i just got it, so it feels like my body is fighting something inside right now. so my condition is just slightly.. i got it two days ago. i've taken it twice before, since you're supposed to take one shot, then another after two months, then another after two months. but after one shot, i forgot for three or four months. i took one two years ago, then didn't continue. then last year i took another one.. and forgot again. i didn't take the second and third shots at all. so two days ago i went to get it again. this time, i'm prepared to complete all three shots. you guys should get it too, take care of yourselves. ๐Ÿ’ฌ why are you drinking after the injection? ๐ŸŽฑ it's already been three days! i only drank a little it's okay. life still has to go on, right? when did you guys become, become so long-winded? i'm not even drunk. don't worry, don't worry. i know you guys are worried about me. ๐Ÿ’ฌ you can't even endure three days? ๐ŸŽฑ it's not that i can't endure but i feel like life has to go on, right? just go with the flow. ๐ŸŽฑ i'm done for, i said the word "long-winded," and i'm done for, suddenly you guys got upset. are you guys this, un-unable to handle a comment? i wasn't really calling you long-winded, right? i just merely said it, my tone was just slightly too strong. then you guys can't handle it anymore? are you really th-this fragile inside? are your little hearts that fragile? so i just let you guys say anything every day, say all kinds of things - things i don't like, you say them too; things i don't want to see, you say them too. ๐Ÿ™‚โ€โ†”๏ธ that won't do. i need to toughen up your hearts a bit. ๐Ÿ˜„ coax? how old are you still needing to be coaxed? don't you have the ability to recover on your own? ๐Ÿ™‚ sorry.. seems like my tone got slightly strong again. usually i just recover by myself ๐Ÿ’ฌ let's cut ties ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ

๐—๐—ข.

85,894 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 4 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

The most epic 13 minute AI rant I've heard in 2026 PS: My parent's heard this when I was playing it in the car and thought Jason โœจ๐Ÿ‘พSaaStr.Aiโœจ Lemkin went OFF like Stephen A Smith does on first take PPS: Full transcript below [17:00] Harry Stebbings: I I just wanted to ask Jason, if the people that we want are fundamentally different, the developers that we used to hire, we don't because AI writes the code for us. The marketers we don't want, the sales people we don't wantโ€”who who do we want genuinely? Like what is the attractive profile? Because your Anthropicโ€™s and your OpenAIs are hiring, so so what are the people that we want in the companies of the future? [17:18] Jason Lemkin: Look, I know it sounds trite, but but the answer is simple. It's just the expression each year changes. We want folks that are genuinely AI fluent. It's pretty simple. Now you know, maybe last year we called them prompt engineers, right? That used to be a job. I don't know if you remember that actually used to be the hottest job on planet earth. Now no one needs a prompt engineer because it's pretty easy to prompt all these tools. That job died. Okay. Um and now we need go-to-market engineers. Um I think that job's going to die. We needโ€”everyone needs so many forward deployed engineers. Like you can't hire enough forward deployed engineers. But uh you know um but Palantir just announced in whatever their their big their big eventโ€”they've gotten their deployment times down over 90% with forward deployed engineers. So that may becomeโ€”so the this wave of disruption for the titles and the specificity, it's also exhaustingly accelerating. But it's really simple. You meet anyone for any roleโ€”sales, marketing, engineering, product, QAโ€”they're they're either they're either they can't keep all of the ways they use AI to accelerate their job from spewing out of their mouth, or they're staring at you. It's there's nowhere in the middle. Like, and the person that comes in and saysโ€”it's it's it sounds Captain Obviousโ€”but like, you know, you just had the whatever from Lovable, the the marketing head that was super popular on the show, right? She's just spewing AI-native insights into Lovable, right? It's not that complicated. You hire her, Elena, or whatever it is. You just hire her. It doesn't matter whether she's still in college or a junior or a senior or a middler, a left or right. And honestly, if you interview people, I would say of all even of the best startups I've invested in, maybe 30% of the management team meets this standard at best. 30%. Maybe less. And of the interviews I do in general, it's single-digit percents. It's just and in in that sense, it's the same as ever. Like you either lower the bar in hiring or you hire someone that's actually great. And someone that's actually great is so far ahead of you in how to apply to to employ the efficiencies of AI in their role, your jaw falls on the table. The difference is we used to need warm bodies. That's what's changing. We used to need warm bodies to answer the call, to do QA, to do code review, to to get the blue pixel to go from the upper left to the lower right. You laugh, but you need you literally needed to brute force this with humans. With AI, every day that goes by, the AIโ€”you do not need brute force human beings on your team. And that's another reason they're shrinking. Why are all these new companies so efficient? They're just not brute forcing things with humans. They're just not. They're choosing not to. And so these teamโ€”all the brute forcers out thereโ€”everyone talks about how bloated teams got in 2021. I don't agree with that. I think they got as big as they needed to be when growth was high and you needed humans to do everything. All you look at these teams that that doubledโ€”well if growth continued at 60% like the rate in early 2021 for 5 years or can help me do the math and every single thing a software company did required a human. You were understaffed by your 2021 headcount. You'd be sitting here in 2026. You every office in SoMa would be triple packed and you there wouldn't be enough humans to staff your company. It's just the world changed. [20:33] Harry Stebbings: Jason, you live on the bleeding edge. I think me and Rory see that and I think the world sees that when they hear you every week in terms of how you run SaaS. For all of the CEOs and execs who listen to the show, what would you advise them in terms of determining whether someone is AI fluent when they meet them for jobs, for talent? [20:51] Jason Lemkin: Here's I realized I was just asked this. I just did a review with a super fast startup growing just crossing 100 million and I was asked this question. And one of my favorite executives, I thought his answer was pretty dated and because he gave me an answer that was about 6 months old. The answer 6 months old is: "I look for folks in my team, I look for you know at what tools they play with." Okay, that was a great answer in like summer of 2025. Okay, I tried Lovable last week. Okay, the answer in 2026 is: "What commercial AI tool have you brought into your organization this month?" That's the test. Anyone that is on the bleeding edge that you would want to hireโ€”now there are so many great products in the market. Okay, there is no excuse in any role to have not brought one tool a month into your organization. Okay, thereโ€”now there's going to be better and better tools and better and better products as the year goes on. What's the one you did? And you will see folks with their deer in the headlights to this question. What what sales tool? What marketing tool? What product tool? What engineering tool? What did you bring in? Why did you pick it? How does it working? Because if you're at remotely at the cutting edge, you're all over this. You're looking for the next agentic tools that will radically improve how you do business. This isโ€”you think everyone thinks SaaS is at the bleeding edge, right? You know, you know, all we do is we're just looking for the tools and trying them. Okay? Okay, we're one year ahead of everybody else because we did the simplest thing in the world. Like we tried the tools early and we trained them. We trained them for a month. Okay, I'll give youโ€”want hear a horrible example from this week? Super hot AI company valued at 6 billion. Okay, I'm not going to name it. Um, this week yesterday told us we had to quadruple what we spent on their product. Okay, their agent told us, right? And why did this happen? Okay. Well, at this $6 billion company, no one had trained the agent on its pricing properly. No one had tested it. They said, "Well, well, we've been in beta." And we said, "Well, when did the beta launch? A year ago." Okay, these are people asleep at at the wheel. You want somebody who the instant this comes up, they exactly know what the issue is. And "Hey, when I was at Lovable Replit, we trained the agent. This is how we did it. I brought in this tool. I brought in this tool that that Rory invested in last week. It solved all these issues." That's what you want to hear. And if they haven't brought in a tool in the last 30 days, at least deeply evaluated it. I don't really care whether they bought it, but gone so far down the funnel they can tell youโ€”pick whatever tool: Fixie, Regie, GC, AIGCโ€”I don't care how you went through it, you looked at it, you can tell me the eight ways it would improve the productivity of your business and three you didn't. Just don't hire that person because they're going to run your company to the ground. This is the job today. The job today is not to screw around on ChatGPT and to be a prompt engineer. The job today is to bring the best AI and agentic products into your organization and leverage all the hard work that the engineers have done building those products. That's your job. You don't have to screw around. You don't have to be a prompt engineer anymore. You have to be an agent deployment expert. Aโ€”this is the new job we're making up today. An Agentic Deployment Expert. That's your job from C-level to junior. Agentic Deployment Expert. Don't hire anybody else. You're going to regret it. They're going to stare at the camera. He's good. Stare at the camera. He's honorable. We could probably just I could slip away, get a coffee, and come back. No. And I I sound exasperated, Rory. And Iโ€”but the reason I am is I can just see I can see my best companies doing it. And I can see some companies I've invested in not doing it. And I want to cry. I just want to cry when they have no ADs on their team. I justโ€”like you're flushing your years of your life down the toilet by not approaching your how you're building this company this way. [24:33] Rory: Yes. And at the risk of being positive, it's worth pointing out two things he didn't say. Well, something implicit why he saidโ€”Jason didn't do the only hire, you know, he didn't commit the um employment law, I think it's a civil penalty of saying only employ people below X who get the new new thing because he implicitly said anyone can do it provided you're willing to learn. And I think that's the big aha that's one of the positive statements to make here right? Look and I think it appliesโ€”I'm always wary of being "Hey, coming across, hey this this is the things that you all have to do." I think it applies to everyone including investors right? I mean I will say I have found that unless you're willing to invest the time learning these tools you actually shouldn't be investing in them. One of my partners Andy had this expression: "You know, if you decide you want to stop learning new things you probably should retire within 6 to 12 months and never write another check again." Maybe that's down to 3 to 6 months at this stage, right? And I think, you know, it'sโ€” [25:27] Harry Stebbings: Yeah, I actually I actually had a meeting with mine and Jason's biggest investor the other day and Iโ€”pretend he's not hereโ€”I said I think he's the most equipped investor for this generation of investing because I don't think anyone quite sits at the bleeding edge like he does on the investor side. [25:42] Harry Stebbings: Why in terms of using the equip stuff? Yeah. Yeah. In terms of using the stuff, understanding understanding bottlenecks, constraints. For sure. [25:51] Jason Lemkin: But can I just add one point? We can just cuz it's so important if it helps people. Okay, we areโ€”and thank you Harry. We're going through these phases. Okay, and when AI started to blow up for real for us, uh call it early 2024, right? Maybe late '23, I wasn't equipped. It was too technical. I wasn't going to go in and figure outโ€”I wasn't smart enough to figure out how to deal with a massively hallucinating LLM API and turn that and turn that into something magical. Kudos to investors and others that that got it in early '23, '22. I mean I remember Iโ€”I guess it was maybe SaaStr Annual '23. I was with David Sacks and I did a Q&A and I said, "How you thinking about AI at Craft?" He's like, "Well we're all in. We want 80% of '23 of investments to be AI." I'm like, "Great but like show me the show me the great ones in market." He's like, "They're all prototypes. We're all they're all they're all proof of concepts but we're all in anyway." That's where you kind of had to be in '23 if you weren't investing at like the LLM level. Okay, I wasn't smart enough. Then we went through this weird-ass prompt engineer era where like you you could torture these products to do something good, right? But you had to torture them. You had to like craft these crazy things that made no sense. Now we are in the era where mere ordinarily smart generalists can make these tools do magical things. And literally I go to these meetings and people be like, "I don't know how to like this is so scary. I don't know how to do this." And we show them our backends. Do you know how to do a workflow generator? Do you know how to do a a decision tree? Like we've been building these since software in the '90s. Okay, if youโ€”I can show you all of our agents. The how they work is novel. They do have to be trained. You can't be lazy and have these agents work. But honestly, the the UI, the UX, the way we interact with them, it's just software. And so my point is: Pick yourself off the ground. This is your time now. If you felt lost in AI era, if you felt like you're behind, you don't understand what all these people are saying on X and Twitter and their Claude and and their and talking about all the 4.6 point Nano point and it's overโ€”like you just it's not your world. This is your time. This is your time for the generalist that knows how to use software tools really really well. And Iโ€”this is my last point but it's so important. If ever in your recent lifeโ€”and this is why you could be all you need to be is young at heart to Rory's pointโ€”if in the last three to five years you have successfully deployed a piece of enterprise software of any sort you yourself, not some agency you hired, but if you have deployed it, you can deploy any agentic tool. Any. And you can become the hero in your company and you can become the hero in your functional area. But I watch folksโ€”I'm literally helping a company now that they're adding hundreds of sales folks this year with a new pre-IPO COOโ€”he's not hasn't brought in a single tool, totally scared of it. Okay, it's not that hard. Did you use SalesLoft? Did you use Outreach? Did you use HubSpot? Do you know these tools? If you can deploy these tools, you can deploy a world-changing AI agent. And so this is the time for people like the folks that that were shut out of the AI revolution right now. The generalist folks that are not that know how to deploy software that don't even know how to build software. Like vibe coding for me was folks who knew how to build software, but you didn't have to be an engineer. Now, you just need to know how to deploy software to win with AI agents. That's all you need to know. So many people have these skills and they're petrified of AI. "How did you do that? How did you deploy an AI BDR?" Well, we bought a piece of software, we figured out how it worked for a day, we set it up in an afternoon, and then and then we did spend 30 months training it, which you didn't do with this old software because in the old days, we just had to manually upload all the data, right? And there was no training. The the only non-intuitive part is training these things. And it's it's it's just work. So that's why when I see folks on the management team not doing this, there's no excuse. You do not need to be technical to win with AI agents in Q2 of '26. You do not need to be even 1% technical. Not at all. So it's your time. Or you're going to get laid off. Or you're going to get laid off because you're not going to matter.

Arjun Mahadevan (Mr. LLC ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ)

37,744 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 4 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

EMBN AT Y ENTERTAIN AWARDS #YEntAwards2025xEmiBonnie ๐Ÿ“ฐ About the line-up for next year ๐ŸŽค: It's almost time for the new line-up announcements. ๐Ÿฐ: What line-up? ๐ŸฆŠ: Line-up for what? ๐ŸŽค: Maybe GMM~ ๐ŸฆŠ๐Ÿฐ: Ahhhh~ ๐ŸฆŠ: Right. ๐Ÿฐ: It's close. ๐ŸฆŠ: ๐Ÿ˜† ๐Ÿฐ: Not close, not far. ๐ŸฆŠ: Yeah yeah, I think it might not be that close. ๐Ÿฐ: Not close, not far, for me. ๐ŸŽค: Usually each year it's around next month. ๐Ÿฐ: Yeah, it's usually around that time. ๐ŸŽค: We don't know if it's going to move around this year. ๐ŸฆŠ: Now it's September... it might not be that close. ๐Ÿฐ: Not close, not far. ๐ŸŽค: But there's something for us to anticipate, right? ๐Ÿฐ: What are you anticipating? ๐ŸฆŠ: You can wait to find out, each pair, each person is like, whoaaa. I've seenโ€“ ๐Ÿฐ: You can wait to see each pair, each person. Right? ๐ŸฆŠ: Yeah, each person, each personโ€“ ๐Ÿฐ: Will get to join the event. ๐ŸฆŠ: Yes, for sure, we're attending the event this year. ๐ŸŽค: If you had the chance to play another role, what kind of role do you want to play? ๐Ÿฐ: I want to play someone cool. ๐ŸฆŠ: Ahhh. ๐Ÿฐ: I want to be a cool lady. ๐ŸฆŠ: Weren't you already cool in the previous series? ๐Ÿฐ: In the previous series I was more of a puppy, a young 20 year old girl. For the next one I want to be a cool cool lady. ๐ŸฆŠ: Cool cool. ๐Ÿฐ: Yeah, with a crush on a pretty older sis. ๐ŸฆŠ: Ah... the last series was also like that! ๐Ÿฐ: Then... then the pretty older sis has a crush on me. ๐ŸฆŠ: Ahhh, that's a possibility. ๐Ÿฐ: Making the moves on me. ๐ŸฆŠ: That's a possibility. ๐Ÿฐ: Bc I'm a cool person. ๐ŸฆŠ: Ahh, okay. ๐ŸŽค: You like to be flirted on. ๐Ÿฐ: Yeah. ๐ŸŽค: Is this in real life or...? ๐Ÿฐ: It's the plot that I want to play. ๐ŸŽค: Do you want to do it in real life or in a series? ๐ŸฆŠ๐Ÿฐ: ๐Ÿ˜† ๐ŸฆŠ: For me... ๐Ÿฐ: What kind of role? Or what kind of style? ๐ŸฆŠ: In the previous series I was a bit too cold and aloof. For this one maybe I can be a bit more cheerful. More likeโ€“ ๐Ÿฐ: Spicy? ๐ŸฆŠ: Not as sad. ๐Ÿฐ: Do you want to be spicy? ๐ŸฆŠ: Spicy? Sometimes. Spicy just like my style. ๐Ÿฐ: I want to see it. ๐ŸฆŠ: I'm already spicy every day. You'll definitely get to see it. ๐ŸŽค: You want other ppl to see it. ๐Ÿฐ: See what? ๐ŸฆŠ: You'll definitely get to see it, bc I'm spicy every day. ๐Ÿฐ: Ahh, like today. Turn around. ๐ŸฆŠ: Today... (turns and shows her back) ๐ŸŽค: (screaming) ๐ŸฆŠ: Secretly spicy. ๐ŸŽค: Can you show this side too? ๐ŸฆŠ: (turns and shows her back again) ๐ŸฆŠ: Secretly spicy. ๐Ÿฐ: Looking at the front it looks modest, but when she turns her back it's another look. ๐ŸŽค: That behaviour's kind of like #ANY. ๐ŸฆŠ: In front one thing, behind another. ๐ŸŽค: You didn't teach your daughter that, did you? ๐Ÿฐ: If it's not a slit in the front, then it's a slit in the back. One of the two. ๐ŸฆŠ: Yeah, according to my style. We're free ppl, we can dress however we like. ๐Ÿฐ: Slit however you like. ๐ŸฆŠ: Yeah. Slit in the front, slit in the back. ๐Ÿฐ: It's up to you. ๐Ÿฐ: She can be herself, I get to reap the benefits too.

K-bab

37,529 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 10 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

YouTube JUST announced this new thing called Hype and it's lowkey genius imagine you're scrolling and see a wonderful video from some small creator. you wanna do more than just like or share. enter Hype. okay, here's how it works you get 3 "Hypes" a week to boost videos you dig. it's like a supercharged upvote. more Hypes = higher on a special leaderboard. but here's the thing it only works for creators under 500K subs and vids less than a week old. plus there's a "small creator bonus" so the little guys can compete. why's this smart 1. turns passive viewers into active supporters (people want to support the up and comers!) 2. gives smaller creators a shot at blowing up 3. YouTube gets more engagement without messing with the algorithm 4. promotes niches so everything isn't watching the same thing (increase watch time) "In just the first four weeks of our beta tests in Turkey, Taiwan, and Brazil, users hyped over 5 million times across more than 50,000 unique channels" - YT Team it's not about killing the big creators. it's about giving the underdogs a chance to be seen. it currently being tested let's be real, social's been feeling stale. same big accounts, same content, rinse and repeat. you either dont get seen or you go ballistic. Hype. it's like CPR for the internet dream. suddenly, that person making weird videos in their bedroom could be tomorrow's viral sensation. just like the good ole days. it's bringing back that wild west vibe of early YouTube. when any random video could blow up overnight. i totally can see a hype-type feature for platforms like X/Twitter too. i hope it takes off. it's about keeping the internet weird, creative, and unpredictable. so yeah, Hype might just save us from an endless feed of polished corporate content and put the "social" back in social media. maybe its the domino we need to get other social platforms to do the same. let's see who/what the internet decides to make famous next. time to make the internet weird again.

GREG ISENBERG

755,656 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 1 ๅนดๅ‰

Registered nurse/whistleblower Michelle Spencer: "Every time a nurse gives an injection of hepatitis B vaccine [to an infant], they are chemically assaulting that baby. They are giving 250 micrograms of aluminum when the FDA says do not give more than 18 micrograms." This clip of Spencer (Michelle Spencer) is taken from an interview with Apollo the Original (Apollo The Original) posted to YouTube on October 27, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "I've been telling moms not to get the hepatitis B vaccine. So many moms have been refusing that shot that they had to have a meeting at work. And they said the nurses are giving biased information because all these moms are refusing the hep B shot. I'm like, 'That's so beautiful to hear,' because that means I've been telling all these nurses about the hepatitis B, and a lot of the nurses are even trying to get out of it now, too, because they're uncomfortable giving it because I've been pounding it into their brain. You're a nurse. You should know... what you're putting into your patient's body, especially a newborn, especially if it's not safe. "And so a couple months ago, a family member complained and said that 'This nurse, Michelle, is giving biased information. She's giving misinformation. She's talking these mothers out of giving the hepatitis B vaccine. She told my my sister, that the only way your baby can get hepatitis B is if she has sex with someone who has hepatitis B.' And so my boss called me into her office, and she told me all that right now, the complaint. "I said, 'Yes, that's true.' And I think my boss was, like, expecting me to say, 'Oh, I didn't do that,' or something. And I was like, 'Yeah, that's true.' I said, 'You know, every time a nurse gives an injection of hepatitis B vaccine, they are chemically assaulting that baby. They are giving 250 micrograms of aluminum when the FDA says do not give more than 18 micrograms.' And my boss looked at me, and she said, 'It's not about your beliefs, Michelle. It's about what's required of you per the institution.' "Every time a nurse gives that shot, they are chemically assaulting a baby. We were taught to do no harm. This is causing harm. And she said, again, 'I know you have your beliefs, Michelle, but you need to do what's required of you per the institution.' Does that not sound like follow the orders? ...She's a nurse, but of the entire women's floor, the labor and delivery floor, the antepartum and postpartum and all of women's health in there. She's the manager. The top one. And so she said, 'If you have questions, you can go to the head pediatrician and you can give her your information.' I said, 'Okay, I'll do that.' "I went to the head pediatrician and I told her exactly what I just told my boss. And she said, 'Oh, no, the aluminum in those shots isn't the same one on that paper that you just showed me. It's not a neurotoxin.' I'm sorry, but which aluminum is not a neurotoxin? I was so confused... They say it's a preservative... but it's a heavy metal. It doesn't belong in your body. It's a heavy metal. You don't need it in your brain. And to give 10 times the safe dose to every newborn that doesn't need it, it's craziness. I don't even have the words for this madness... It doesn't make sense. It will never make sense."

Sense Receptor

39,469 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 9 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

This Is Absolutely Mind Blowing โš ๏ธ Barack Obamaโ€™s New Movie, Leave The World Behind, When Downloaded & Put Into An Editing Program Has 4 Audio Files Instead Of The Standard 1 One Of The Audio Files Is Just A Frequency ๐Ÿšจ โ€œLow Frequency Infrasoundโ€ Other Movies Do Not Have This. The Guy Has Done Thousands Of Movies & Never Seen This โ€œWhen you open this this movie right here is Jurassic Park, for instance. Okay? I'm just showing this to people who have never seen this. For the last 15 years that I have been using Sony Vegas and other editing software and have gone through downloading movies And using them in our own video production, 100% of the time, it's either an MKV or a MP For occasionally, you'll download a torrent that's in AVR, but not very often. And this is what it will always look like. One video file right here. One audio file right here always. That's been my experience. Now let me show you what happened when we downloaded and put, Sony put the, uh, movie Leave the World Behind onto Sony Vegas. Here you go. Stunning. Stunning. One video file, 4 audio files opened up. And this one, This 4th audio file seems to be the weapon. This is a low ex uh, ELF, Uh, Low Frequency Infrasound. Infrasonic wave right here. And, um, so we We are gonna let me put the camera back on again. So this is big news just just so people realize. In in 15 years of video editing, I have never downloaded now speaking specifically a movie file. Okay. A Hollywood movie from a torrent downloading it in either MKV, MP4, occasionally AVI. 100% of the time, over a thousands movies I've done this with, you have video file, audio file, period. This is the very first time I've ever seen anything like this with the 4 files. Bonnie's gonna go into now talking about the The infrasonic sound waves and what we found out about that and the fact that there's one here. We're in the point is we're going to go back after Bonnie gives you some information about what it is we're dealing with, how this is a weapon. Then we're gonna go back, uh, towards the end of the live stream here. And I'm gonna hit specific places where this weapon was used against anybody who watches it. Okay.โ€

Wall Street Apes

3,769,180 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 2 ๅนดๅ‰

Reporter: Do you think you two can be role models for the younger actors? ๐Ÿจ Maybeโ€ฆ not yet ๐Ÿ˜…. I mean I can be a little bit of an acting example. But if itโ€™s about real lifeโ€ฆ yeah no please donโ€™t follow me ๐Ÿ˜ญ. ๐Ÿฐ I think after seeing us in the dressing room earlier the juniors probably donโ€™t trust us anymore ๐Ÿ˜‚. Itโ€™s like โ€œwow these two are prettyโ€ฆ pretty but kinda weird thoughโ€ ๐Ÿคฃ. ๐Ÿฐ Even yesterday when we met Pโ€™Namtaan and Film, we were talking and since me and Lookmhee are super close right? Then I turned around and saw Filmโ€™s face like this ๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜ณ Like โ€œhuh!?โ€ she was probably confused why we talk like this. We joke around way too much ๐Ÿ˜‚. Reporter: Because you two are funny ๐Ÿคญ. Youโ€™ll be funny in the third project too. ๐Ÿจ How do you know that!? ๐Ÿ‘€ Reporter: That must be what you two wanted, right? ๐Ÿจ After this? Weโ€™ll just be like this. Our real selves. One hundred percent. Full score โญ. Reporter: If itโ€™s one hundred percentโ€ฆ Wonโ€™t the whole show be funny? ๐Ÿจ Okay okay fifty percent then ๐Ÿคฃ. Or else itโ€™ll be too funny and no drama part left. Reporter: Probably no drama though. ๐Ÿฐ I read it already and Sonya feels like there is drama ๐Ÿ‘€. ๐Ÿจ Hey hey donโ€™t say too much ๐Ÿ˜ญ. Okay okay. ๐Ÿฐ January twenty-eight, okay? Project three. Sheโ€™s cool. Sheโ€™s cooler ( ๐Ÿ‘‰ Lookmhee ๐Ÿ˜Œโœจ) Not many outfits. Not glam anymore. Just everyday vibe. Down to earth ๐Ÿซถ. Reporter: But Lookmhee and Sonya, being this funnyโ€ฆ are you actually in character for the third project? ๐Ÿจ This isnโ€™t the real me ๐Ÿคฃ. Iโ€™m acting. Iโ€™m doing the character. ๐Ÿฐ Yes yes. Character mode. Still acting ๐ŸŽญ. Reporter: Please promote your series. ๐Ÿจ Yes! Please support us on January twenty-eight ๐Ÿ’—. ๐Ÿฐ Yes! Youโ€™ll get to see the whole Change2561 lineup for next year. So many series coming. Not just Lookmhee Sonya โ€” lots of juniors too. Next year Change is packed ๐Ÿ’ฅ. Reporter: Like which ones? (teasing them to spill the new shows) ๐Ÿฐ Nope. Iโ€™m leaving ๐Ÿšถโ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ’จ. Ending. Thereโ€™s I Wanna Be Supโ€™tar, one project. And maybe another one fans are guessingโ€ฆ one more matchโ€ฆ And then there will beโ€” ๐Ÿฐ Okay stop! Iโ€™m gonna accidentally say it ๐Ÿ˜ญ. I Wanna Be Supโ€™tar, please support it โœจ. Reporter: She already said the title! (pretends to shout to the CEO) ๐Ÿ˜‚ ๐Ÿจ I didnโ€™t say it! I didnโ€™t!! ๐Ÿ˜ญ (waving hands at the CEO like crazy๐Ÿ‘‹) Oh my gosh Iโ€™m gripping this mic so tight. ๐Ÿฐ Pโ€™Pear, you saw that right? Watch for it okay ๐Ÿ˜Œ. Youโ€™ll see. Okay weโ€™re leaving now. Bye bye ๐Ÿ’–๐Ÿ‘‹ #เธฅเธนเธเธซเธกเธตเธ‹เธญเธ™เธเนˆเธฒ #LMSY

๐“•๐“ธ๐“ทโ˜‚๏ธŽโ‚‰โ‚โ‚†

32,891 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 9 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

#mynameisnanon NANON ๐Ÿ‘ค: You understand the nature of the industry by now? ๐Ÿช: Kind of. Itโ€™s just thereโ€™re all ups and downs. ๐Ÿ‘ค: Even though your fanbase is still in large amount at the moment? ๐Ÿช: Iโ€™ve already prepared for anything bc nothing is certain. Like for lovers, one day they may wake up and no longer love each other. Nothing lasts forever. One day, we may like one thing, be obsessed with it, and the next day, we may not feel the same. People change all the time. They might love each other in the morning, but end up arguing in the evening. Everything is not permanent. See?, if i talk about this topic too often, ppl will ask why being so dramatic again, but Iโ€™m not. ๐Ÿ˜‚ But honestly, if I have so many fans right now but one day I will have only few left, surely, I will be sad but I understand since it's a normal occurrence. They used to like me, and one day they start liking someone else. It's a very common thing. Iโ€™m not angry at all. At least, it's good that during a certain period of time, we loved each other and we supported each other. ๐Ÿ‘ค: It wonโ€™t affect you in terms of your encouragement? ๐Ÿช: No, it doesn't. As long as I have ppl listening and watching my works, even if thereโ€™s no fan anymore, I still have my mom and ppl around me. On the day that I still have fans, I have the encouragement bc they provide feedbacks, they like my work, they support me, I still have the motivation to work. Even if the amount of it gradually decreases over time, I still have the same amount of encouragement. It might just vary depending on the number of ppl giving it to me but even if thereโ€™re only five ppl, I still feel the same level of encouragement. If you enjoy good work, you can follow me. I can provide you with good work bc I have control over it. But having many fans or few fans is what I canโ€™t control. If anyone finds someone else whoโ€™s more into your type, you can just choose whatever and follow your own happiness. Itโ€™s just thereโ€™s a time once weโ€™re happy together, met each other, or when my works could pull smth through your heart, Itโ€™s not like those things never happen. It actually happens. but if one day it will not be the same, it's okay. Or anyone new just finds me and wants to follow me. Welcome krub. ..um whoโ€™s cutting onions here? ๐Ÿ˜ญ nanon we still love you so much~ ๐Ÿซ‚

NNN LINGO ๐ŸŒƒ๐Ÿช

83,855 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 3 ๅนดๅ‰

This is the wrap up to my social experiment going undercover on a dating website as a man trying to get a good woman. (I meander more than a little, but hopefully you find some nuggets in here helpful.) These are the conclusions I've come to about why men are struggling so badly on these dating websites. Men face many battles women do not. 40% of female profiles are gold diggers, hookers or bots. Men greatly outnumber women, and they get discouraged quickly. Reasons men fail on dating websites: 1. Refusing to develop your communication skills. My generation has a phrase, "Don't hate the player, hate the game." Be funny, charming and fun, or don't cry when she picks someone else who is. 2. Half-assing your dating profile. Mating rituals exist in all walks of the animal kingdom, so if you refuse to show her why she should pick you then don't expect to be picked. We all sell ourselves to the opposite gender in some way. It's just a fact of human life, and whining about it won't serve you well, change that fact, or get the girl. 3. A cringeworthy user name. Sure, your frat buddies will find, "EatYouAllNight69" hilarious, but it's not going to get you anyone worth a damn. Trust me, high value women hate that. 4. You don't want a pen pal, so go in with the idea that your goal is to get her number and get her off that site as soon as possible, or someone else will. Women are desperate for a strong, masculine man she can trust to lead and protect her from the dragons at the gate. A nice guy is too weak and desperate to do it, and a jerk is just mean and abusive. Again, mating rituals exist in every walk of the animal kingdom and humans are no different. You will only get out of this life and a potential mate the effort you are willing to put in, and that includes developing your mind and body to be the best version of yourself. Not just for her, but for you too. A needy guy with low self-esteem is never going to get the girl. Good boundaries and a healthy self image equals success, so get back into the gym and start eating clean. The better you look the better you'll feel. The better you feel the more success in life you'll have. A 300lb girl with 5 kids with different fathers is never going to get a good man. Control your reproduction and stop being a wh*re. Despite what feminists tell you, girls, your body count does matter to him. Keep it low and maintain your dignity. Research has shown time and again that women are instinctively drawn to certain traits like bravery, intelligence, and a willingness to take risks. Basically, if it would keep you from getting voted off the island on Survivor, sheโ€™s going to think itโ€™s hot. Make sure your profile highlights these kind of personality traits in an attractive way. Stop whining about height! We DGAF about how tall you are just so long as it's taller than us. Your insecurities will make you desperate, needy and totally hamstring your chances. Bottom line: Without effort don't expect success. In anything, really. You'll always find an excuse to stay exactly where you are and you'll only change your stars when the place your living becomes more painful/difficult then than they journey you need to take for a better life.

TraderJill (Leigh)

205,793 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 2 ๅนดๅ‰