Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨🚨🚨𝐁𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠: 𝐏𝐨𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐯𝐫𝐞 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐅𝐔𝐂𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐀𝐍𝐍𝐈𝐇𝐈𝐋𝐀𝐓𝐄𝐃 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐌𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐤 𝐂𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐲 52-31 𝐢𝐧 𝐁𝐫𝐮𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐍𝐞𝐰 𝐒𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐭 𝐏𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠 After Over a Year of Elite Grift Ottawa, Canada – After 14 brutal months of Mark Carney as Prime Minister, a new street poll with actual random Canadians in multiple cities has delivered a... savage beatdown. Pierre Poilievre leads Mark Carney 52% to 31%. That lonely 31%? Mostly the one sad Liberal auntie in a Vancouver yoga studio whispering “Carney” between oat milk lattes before ranting about fascism. Everyone else — Tim Hortons lines, Alberta welders, suburban dads, prairie truckers — went hard for Poilievre. No donor phone banks. No pre-screened activists. Just real humans on the street who’ve lived through 14+ months of Davos-Goldman climate banker sermons, carbon tax pain, housing hell, private jet hypocrisy… and watching their 5-foot-nothing PM suck at hockey worse than a participation trophy. Street Poll Results (Highest to Lowest): • Conservative (Poilievre): 52% • Liberal (Carney): 31% • NDP: 9% • Bloc: 5% • Green: 2% • PPC: 1% Liberal war rooms are melting down: “Unscientific! Bring back our donor circle-jerk polling!” Carney — the tiny technocrat saviour who gets bodied by weekend beer-league defencemen and needs a booster seat at the G7 table — is getting torched worse than his own carbon credits. Real Canadians finally saw the 5’6” globalist try to skate on the national ice and realized he can’t even clear the neutral zone without tripping over his own Davos talking points. The contrast is brutal: Carney spent over a year listening to Bay Street and Davos while falling down in shinny. Poilievre just heard from the people actually paying the bills… and playing real hockey. Copes incoming: “Bad sample,” “They’re just angry,” “Explain Carney’s genius better… while he hides behind the net.” Too late. The Laurentian bubble is toast. Poilievre is surging. Tiny Carney is cooked. Game over. 🇨🇦 #PoilievrePM 🔈🔈🔈show more

Satire Squad HQ

59,154 subscribers

37,544 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Pierre Poilievre Declares War on Red Tape and Liberal Decay in Osoyoos There was a moment in Osoyoos, British Columbia, this week when you could feel the tectonic plates of Canadian politics shift. Pierre Poilievre didn’t just give a campaign speech—he delivered a declaration of war. Not against a rival party, not against a foreign power, but against the bloated, self-sustaining bureaucracy that has buried this country in red tape, crushed small business, and handed our economic sovereignty to Washington. And he did it with names, numbers, and fire. Standing beside Conservative candidates Helena Konanz and Dan Albas—real people with skin in the game—Poilievre laid out the most aggressive anti-regulation, pro-prosperity plan Canada has seen in a generation. This wasn’t “efficiency.” It wasn’t “modernization.” It was a full-scale rollback of the federal state. A 25% cut to red tape within two years. A “two-for-one” regulation kill rule: for every new rule, two must die. A dollar-value offset: $1 of new administrative cost must be matched by $2 in cuts. And for once, someone’s watching the swamp: the Auditor General will audit compliance. No tricks. No loopholes. No gluing rulebooks together to fake progress like the Liberals did. Real cuts, enforced in public, with consequences. Now compare that to what the Liberals have done. Under Justin Trudeau and now Mark Carney, the number of federal rules has exploded—149,000 and counting. That’s 20,000 more than a decade ago, with $51 billion in annual compliance costs for small businesses. It’s not just inefficiency. It’s economic sabotage. And who benefits from that sabotage? The United States. Poilievre didn’t dance around it—he hit it head-on. President Trump has said he prefers the Liberals in power. Why? Because they’re weak. Because they keep Canadian oil in the ground and Canadian dollars flowing south. “Trump supports the Liberals because he wants Canada to stay weak,” Poilievre said. “I want the opposite. I want to bring it home.” The press tried to corner him—tried to paint him as “too Trump-like.” The irony, of course, is that Trump has openly rejected him, because unlike Trudeau and Carney, Poilievre is not for sale. And then came the attacks on Aaron Gunn. The media paraded misinformation accusations that Gunn denied the impact of residential schools. Poilievre didn’t flinch. He called it out for what it was: misinformation. He defended his candidate. He stood for truth, not Twitter mobs. And he flipped the narrative: if you want prosperity and dignity for First Nations, give them control over resources, revenue, and jobs—not slogans. Then came the issue of interprovincial trade, where Poilievre again showed he’s living in the real world. Local wineries in the Okanagan are shipping their product to the U.S. because it’s easier than selling across provincial lines. Under the Liberals, it's harder to trade within Canada than with foreign nations. That’s not a federation—that’s a farce. Poilievre promised to tear down the internal barriers the Laurentian elite have protected for decades. The CBC? He torched it. Not with culture war talking points, but with precision. It’s become an overfunded, Toronto-centric mouthpiece for the Liberal Party, sucking up $1.5 billion a year to produce less local coverage than ever. Mark Carney just promised another $150 million with no plan to pay for it. Poilievre called it what it is: “a morbidly obese Liberal government—on steroids.” And he’s right. Carney hasn’t named a single Liberal expenditure he’d reverse. Not one. He’s offering the same broken promises, wrapped in fancier language, from the same corrupt team. Poilievre, on the other hand, laid out a detailed plan to: Eliminate the GST on new homes and Canadian-made cars. Cut income taxes by 15%. Abolish the capital gains tax on money reinvested in Canada. Fast-track LNG projects on the West Coast. Repeal every anti-energy, anti-growth law passed by Trudeau’s swamp. He didn’t ask for permission. He promised results. He’s not trying to manage the decline. He’s here to stop it. Final Thoughts I’ve been watching these press conferences like a normal person, which means with my jaw somewhere on the floor. On one side, you’ve got Pierre Poilievre, actually talking about numbers, policies, things that, you know—exist in the real world. On the other side? You’ve got Mark Carney, Trudeau’s old economic braintrust, grinning like a Bond villain, promising to “invest” another $150 million into the CBC—because apparently, $1.5 billion a year isn’t enough to produce wall-to-wall Liberal talking points and a half-hour panel on white fragility. Carney calls it “public broadcasting.” Let’s call it what it is: state propaganda—funded by you, weaponized against you. And this is the guy who’s being sold to Canadians as the adult in the room? The savior? Mark Carney—the guy who’s spent the last decade not in Canada, but lecturing Canadians from London, New York, and climate finance panels in Geneva? He’s not some neutral economist. He’s a gold-plated Davos swamp rat who literally helped engineer the economic disaster we’re now living through—and now he wants to be rewarded with the keys to the kingdom? This man flew in from Glasgow—no joke—where he was pushing his net-zero snake oil to a bunch of unelected bureaucrats who couldn’t find Fort McMurray on a map if their Tesla battery depended on it. And what’s he proposing now? Keep Bill C-69, the law that strangled Canadian energy, killed pipeline after pipeline, and handed America control over our oil wealth. Keep the law that says: If you want to build anything in this country, you better ask permission from 14 departments and Greta Thunberg’s cousin first. Oh, and while he’s at it, don’t expect a single dollar of waste to be cut. Not one. Carney hasn’t named a single Liberal program he’d reduce. Not the CBC. Not the bloated bureaucracy. Not even the social engineering schemes buried deep in your child’s classroom. So let’s spell it out: Mark Carney is Trudeau without the TikTok. Same worldview. Same smugness. Same ideology. Except now he’s dressed it up in Oxford accents and finance jargon and thinks you’re too dumb to notice. He talks about “fighting climate change,” but never mentions the carbon imports from China. He talks about “building the future,” while propping up the same agencies that couldn’t build a bus stop on time. He talks about “standing up to Trump,” while literally keeping in place the laws that give Trump control over our energy, our jobs, our investment. And we’re supposed to believe he’s the serious one? No. What he is—is the avatar of managed decline. The velvet glove of the same iron fist that’s been throttling Canadian prosperity for ten years. Poilievre sees it, and he’s naming it. That’s why the media hate him. That’s why the Liberals fear him. And that’s why Donald Trump doesn’t want him elected—because he won’t roll over like Carney will. So again—this is not a normal election. It’s not Liberal vs. Conservative. It’s not progressive vs. populist. It’s elite decay vs. national revival. Poilievre doesn’t want to “manage” this slow-motion collapse. He wants to rip the duct tape off the pipes, shut down the bureaucracy, and start building again. He didn’t ask for permission. He didn’t host a panel. He promised results. And when he says “Canada First,” it’s not some borrowed slogan. It’s a warning to the swamp: Your time is up. Carney is decline dressed as competence. Poilievre is the first sign of life this country has had in a decade. So yeah, Pierre Poilievre chose defiance. Now it’s your turn.

Dan Knight

47,215 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

EXCLUSIVE: I went to Bermuda to find the money Mark Carney hid from the CRA Until a few weeks ago, Mark Carney was the chairman of Brookfield Asset Management, a massive corporation that manages more than a trillion dollars. It truly spans the globe — just like Carney himself, who has three passports and was a board member of the World Economic Forum. Carney is our prime minister now, though Canadians hardly know him. But one thing is becoming clear: he went to great lengths to make sure Brookfield paid as little tax in Canada as possible. Carney personally led two massive Brookfield investments into green energy, totalling $25 billion. But he didn't headquarter that company in Canada, or the U.S., or anywhere they were actually building solar panels or wind turbines. No, he headquartered them in Bermuda — at 73 Front Street, the same address as a bike rental shop. What's going on there? Well, I decided to fly down and go to that bike shop and ask, and we've made a short documentary about it. As you can see, the Bermuda address is just a shell company, a front. Or as a child would say, a lie. According to legend, the Bermuda Triangle is a place where ships and even airplanes disappear. I don't know about that, but Bermuda is definitely a place where oligarchs like Carney make billions of dollars disappear, to evade the Canada Revenue Agency and other tax collectors. They're being sued right now by the CRA for breaking the law. But even if they're right — even if they've found a way to game the system, legally — is that ethical conduct from the man who has become our prime minister? The only thing more gross than that, is how easily Carney has been able to pay off the regime media, including a $150 million election bribe to the CBC state broadcaster. You can believe that if it were Pierre Poilievre stashing money in a tax haven, the CBC would be camped out at the bike shop around the clock. Why does Carney still refuse to sell his Brookfield stock? When was the last time he spoke with Brookfield? Will Brookfield continue to get huge contracts from the Canadian government? Will Carney shut down the CRA’s lawsuit against Brookfield? Good questions — but not ones you’ll ever hear the CBC ask. I promise, we’ll keep at it, though. REPORT by Ezra Levant 🍁🚛:

EXCLUSIVE: I went to Bermuda to find the money Mark Carney hid from the CRA Until a few weeks ago, Mark Carney was the chairman of Brookfield Asset Management, a massive corporation that manages more than a trillion dollars. It truly spans the globe — just like Carney himself, who has three passports and was a board member of the World Economic Forum. Carney is our prime minister now, though Canadians hardly know him. But one thing is becoming clear: he went to great lengths to make sure Brookfield paid as little tax in Canada as possible. Carney personally led two massive Brookfield investments into green energy, totalling $25 billion. But he didn't headquarter that company in Canada, or the U.S., or anywhere they were actually building solar panels or wind turbines. No, he headquartered them in Bermuda — at 73 Front Street, the same address as a bike rental shop. What's going on there? Well, I decided to fly down and go to that bike shop and ask, and we've made a short documentary about it. As you can see, the Bermuda address is just a shell company, a front. Or as a child would say, a lie. According to legend, the Bermuda Triangle is a place where ships and even airplanes disappear. I don't know about that, but Bermuda is definitely a place where oligarchs like Carney make billions of dollars disappear, to evade the Canada Revenue Agency and other tax collectors. They're being sued right now by the CRA for breaking the law. But even if they're right — even if they've found a way to game the system, legally — is that ethical conduct from the man who has become our prime minister? The only thing more gross than that, is how easily Carney has been able to pay off the regime media, including a $150 million election bribe to the CBC state broadcaster. You can believe that if it were Pierre Poilievre stashing money in a tax haven, the CBC would be camped out at the bike shop around the clock. Why does Carney still refuse to sell his Brookfield stock? When was the last time he spoke with Brookfield? Will Brookfield continue to get huge contracts from the Canadian government? Will Carney shut down the CRA’s lawsuit against Brookfield? Good questions — but not ones you’ll ever hear the CBC ask. I promise, we’ll keep at it, though. REPORT by Ezra Levant 🍁🚛:

Rebel News

292,620 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Rebel reporters forced to leave Carney event by police! “C” is for Carney and “C” is for censorship and “C” is for cops! After being invited to cover a Mark Carney rally in Kitchener, Rebel News staffers were promptly escorted out by law enforcement. Bingemans Conference Centre in Kitchener, Ont., was the venue for the latest Mark Carney rally. We were keen to attend and hopefully get an opportunity to scrum Mr. Carney. After all, we have so many unanswered questions for our unelected Prime Minister. Shockingly – in a good way – a Liberal Party staffer escorted us into the venue, bypassing the lineup of attendees in order to invite us to register at the media table. Indeed, if it seemed too good to be true, that’s because it WAS too good to be true. Within a few minutes. all hell broke loose as handsy Liberal staffers and security guards and RCMP officers demanded we leave the premises or face trespassing charges. No reason was given for our expulsion – which has been par for the course when it comes to Liberal events this past decade. But we thought with a new sheriff in town, things would be different. Last year in Davos, Switzerland, Carney – while en route to attending a World Economic Forum shindig – told Rebel News Commander Ezra Levant that he was a supporter of press freedom. This was in response to the brutal assault and false arrest of David Menzies at the hands of RCMP officer Greg Dumouchel. But some 14 months later, Carney is singing a different tune. Now he routinely bars independent media from covering his events. Why would that be? Maybe because he can’t control us like he controls the mainstream media, which is now funded by the Liberal Party of Canada? Such a shame. Because as previously mentioned, we had so many queries for the censorious Carney. Such as: What’s the deal with that photo of him rubbing shoulders with Ghislaine Maxwell, the recruiter of young women for “Epstein Island”? Did Mr. Carney visit that island? Why won’t he divulge all of his financial holdings? Is it because Carney could be in a conflict of interest as PM, approving legislation that would benefit companies he has ties to? Why has he basically pilfered every policy plank for the Pierre Poilievre Conservatives, from axing the carbon tax – well, sort of – to promising to cut the GST for new home buyers? (There’s one promise noticeably missing though: that he would revoke Justin Trudeau’s egregious gun grab.) Why is he proud to be labeled an “elitist” and a “globalist”? And how would that improve life for everyday Canadians? Why does Carney present himself as an “outsider”, yet he doesn’t like to be reminded that he was Justin Trudeau’s financial advisor for the past five years? Why has he welcomed Sean Fraser back to the party – a man Pierre Poilievre describes as both the worst immigration minister and the worst housing minister in the history of Canada? Why did he ominously state the following: “[Something] my government is going to do is use all of the powers of the federal government, including the emergency powers of the federal government, to accelerate the major projects that we need in order to build this economy and take on the Americans.” How many days did Carney reside in Canada last year? Does he even have a Canadian residence now? If the U.S. is indeed an existential threat to Canada, why has he not arranged a meeting with President Trump? Alas, the globalist/elitist has no time whatsoever to answer these queries. And escorts us from venues under threat of criminal charges. Bottom line: we used to say that the more we learn about Mark Carney the more one is reminded of that lyric from the classic Who song, Won’t Get Fooled Again. Namely: “Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.” We now want to revise that line. How does this sound: “Meet the new boss, potentially way worse than the old boss.” And given that the old boss was Justin Trudeau, wow, that’s saying a mouthful…

Rebel reporters forced to leave Carney event by police! “C” is for Carney and “C” is for censorship and “C” is for cops! After being invited to cover a Mark Carney rally in Kitchener, Rebel News staffers were promptly escorted out by law enforcement. Bingemans Conference Centre in Kitchener, Ont., was the venue for the latest Mark Carney rally. We were keen to attend and hopefully get an opportunity to scrum Mr. Carney. After all, we have so many unanswered questions for our unelected Prime Minister. Shockingly – in a good way – a Liberal Party staffer escorted us into the venue, bypassing the lineup of attendees in order to invite us to register at the media table. Indeed, if it seemed too good to be true, that’s because it WAS too good to be true. Within a few minutes. all hell broke loose as handsy Liberal staffers and security guards and RCMP officers demanded we leave the premises or face trespassing charges. No reason was given for our expulsion – which has been par for the course when it comes to Liberal events this past decade. But we thought with a new sheriff in town, things would be different. Last year in Davos, Switzerland, Carney – while en route to attending a World Economic Forum shindig – told Rebel News Commander Ezra Levant that he was a supporter of press freedom. This was in response to the brutal assault and false arrest of David Menzies at the hands of RCMP officer Greg Dumouchel. But some 14 months later, Carney is singing a different tune. Now he routinely bars independent media from covering his events. Why would that be? Maybe because he can’t control us like he controls the mainstream media, which is now funded by the Liberal Party of Canada? Such a shame. Because as previously mentioned, we had so many queries for the censorious Carney. Such as: What’s the deal with that photo of him rubbing shoulders with Ghislaine Maxwell, the recruiter of young women for “Epstein Island”? Did Mr. Carney visit that island? Why won’t he divulge all of his financial holdings? Is it because Carney could be in a conflict of interest as PM, approving legislation that would benefit companies he has ties to? Why has he basically pilfered every policy plank for the Pierre Poilievre Conservatives, from axing the carbon tax – well, sort of – to promising to cut the GST for new home buyers? (There’s one promise noticeably missing though: that he would revoke Justin Trudeau’s egregious gun grab.) Why is he proud to be labeled an “elitist” and a “globalist”? And how would that improve life for everyday Canadians? Why does Carney present himself as an “outsider”, yet he doesn’t like to be reminded that he was Justin Trudeau’s financial advisor for the past five years? Why has he welcomed Sean Fraser back to the party – a man Pierre Poilievre describes as both the worst immigration minister and the worst housing minister in the history of Canada? Why did he ominously state the following: “[Something] my government is going to do is use all of the powers of the federal government, including the emergency powers of the federal government, to accelerate the major projects that we need in order to build this economy and take on the Americans.” How many days did Carney reside in Canada last year? Does he even have a Canadian residence now? If the U.S. is indeed an existential threat to Canada, why has he not arranged a meeting with President Trump? Alas, the globalist/elitist has no time whatsoever to answer these queries. And escorts us from venues under threat of criminal charges. Bottom line: we used to say that the more we learn about Mark Carney the more one is reminded of that lyric from the classic Who song, Won’t Get Fooled Again. Namely: “Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.” We now want to revise that line. How does this sound: “Meet the new boss, potentially way worse than the old boss.” And given that the old boss was Justin Trudeau, wow, that’s saying a mouthful…

Rebel News

22,010 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Question Period : Barrett vs. Carney Clash Over Offshore Investments Ottawa, May 29, 2025 – On the very first day of the 45th Parliament, Canadians witnessed a spectacle that was as revealing as it was disturbing. Conservative MP Michael Barrett stood up and did what any responsible representative should do: he asked Prime Minister Mark Carney to come clean about his offshore investments and potential conflicts of interest. But instead of facing the music, Carney pulled a classic elitist maneuver—he hid behind his House Leader, who delivered a canned response full of platitudes and devoid of substance. This wasn't just a missed opportunity for transparency; it was a calculated evasion. Carney, the former banker who helped Brookfield Asset Management establish funds in Bermuda and the Cayman Islands, is now Canada's Prime Minister. And when pressed about whether any of his investments were previously held in tax havens, he couldn't even muster the courage to answer for himself. Instead, he let a subordinate deflect with talk of "stringent ethics guidelines" and "economic priorities." Meanwhile, Canadians are struggling to afford basic necessities, and they deserve to know if their leader is playing by the same rules—or any rules at all. Barrett—one of the few people in Ottawa actually doing his job—didn’t hold back. As Shadow Minister for Ethics and Accountable Government, he called out Prime Minister Mark Carney for what appears to be a massive financial shell game. The accusation? That Carney, during his time as a high-flying executive at Brookfield Asset Management, helped funnel billions into offshore tax havens—Bermuda, the Caymans, you name it—and then conveniently tucked those assets away in a so-called “blind trust” right before stepping into public office. Barrett’s message was simple and devastating: “Canadians are lined up at food banks in record numbers. They can’t pay their rent, but they are paying their taxes.” Meanwhile, the guy running their government may have spent years helping billionaires avoid paying theirs. Barrett demanded straight answers: Were any of Carney’s current holdings, now supposedly out of sight, previously parked in these offshore tax shelters? And what exactly was he sitting on when he walked into that first cabinet meeting? The allegations stem from Carney’s role as chairman of Brookfield from 2020 to January 2025, where he co-chaired funds worth $25 billion registered in Bermuda and a $5 billion fund in the Cayman Islands, according to CBC News reports. These arrangements, which reportedly allowed Brookfield to avoid $5.3 billion in taxes, have drawn scrutiny amid Canada’s economic challenges, including rising food bank usage and housing affordability issues. In response, the Liberal government House Leader defended Carney, dismissing Barrett’s questions as “hypotheticals and conjured scenarios.” “The Prime Minister has followed all the rules even before they were required,” the House Leader stated, emphasizing that Carney’s blind trust complies with Canada’s “stringent ethics guidelines.” The response pivoted to the government’s agenda, citing efforts to create “the strongest economy in the G7,” reduce taxes, and build new homes, while accusing the opposition of “digging dirt on day one.” The House Leader’s retort, “Shame on them,” drew murmurs of support from Liberal benches. Undeterred, Barrett doubled down, arguing that Canadians “don’t want an explanation on how to bend over backwards to fit through ethical loopholes.” He called for assurance that Carney’s actions go “above just the basic minimum standard,” referencing a decade of perceived Liberal ethical lapses. “Can he stand up and assure Canadians that none of the funds he had previously were held in offshore tax havens?” Barrett asked, pressing for specifics on Carney’s financial holdings. The Liberal response reiterated Carney’s compliance, with the House Leader asserting, “Canada has among the most stringent ethics guidelines in the world… The Prime Minister is busy creating opportunity for Canada, standing up in a trade war against the United States.” The deflection, focusing on economic priorities and dismissing the opposition’s probe as a distraction, left Barrett’s core questions unanswered, fueling Conservative claims of evasion. This entire exchange isn’t just about one question or one day—it’s part of a much larger and very necessary effort by Conservatives to expose something Canadians are starting to see with painful clarity: Mark Carney is not one of them. He’s not scraping to make rent. He’s not standing in a food bank line. He’s not worried about carbon taxes or grocery bills. He’s a Davos man, parachuted into the Prime Minister’s Office by the same Liberal elite that gave us Justin Trudeau. Different face. Same contempt. Barrett’s takedown of Carney over offshore tax havens hit a nerve, and rightly so. According to Canadians for Tax Fairness, this country loses a jaw-dropping $30 billion every year to offshore tax avoidance. That's money that working Canadians pay so the elite can squirrel away their wealth in places like Bermuda and the Cayman Islands. And Carney? He helped orchestrate it. As a top dog at Brookfield Asset Management, he didn’t just benefit from the system—he helped design it. And if that wasn’t enough, under his leadership, Brookfield moved its headquarters from Toronto to New York. In the middle of growing trade tensions with President Trump’s America. That’s not leadership—it’s betrayal. And how does Carney justify all this? With the most nauseating phrase in the English language: “It was legal.” Oh, well, as long as the loopholes were big enough to drive a luxury yacht through, I guess we’re fine. He claims these “tax-efficient” strategies helped pensioners and that his blind trust protects him from conflicts. Right. Because what better way to gain public trust than hiding your financial interests in a vault and telling voters, “Just trust me”? Barrett and the Conservatives aren't buying it—and neither should you. They're calling for real reform, tougher disclosure rules, and an end to the wink-wink, nudge-nudge ethics games that the Liberals have been playing for a decade. Carney delayed his financial disclosures during his leadership run? Of course he did. That’s not transparency. That’s strategy. And Canadians know it. Even the so-called experts are noticing the shift. One analyst noted Barrett’s attacks are landing with voters because they’re the ones who are actually suffering. Meanwhile, the Liberals want to pivot to their so-called “economic wins.” Great. Tell that to the family paying $7 for lettuce or the trucker trying to fuel his rig with gas prices through the roof. As Parliament gets underway, we’re heading into a full-blown war over ethics and economic justice. And the question for Carney is simple: Is he going to answer for his record—or is he going to keep hiding behind the same smug Liberal arrogance that Canadians are sick and tired of? The people are watching. The mask is off. And Mark Carney has a choice: come clean—or be dragged into the sunlight.

Question Period : Barrett vs. Carney Clash Over Offshore Investments Ottawa, May 29, 2025 – On the very first day of the 45th Parliament, Canadians witnessed a spectacle that was as revealing as it was disturbing. Conservative MP Michael Barrett stood up and did what any responsible representative should do: he asked Prime Minister Mark Carney to come clean about his offshore investments and potential conflicts of interest. But instead of facing the music, Carney pulled a classic elitist maneuver—he hid behind his House Leader, who delivered a canned response full of platitudes and devoid of substance. This wasn't just a missed opportunity for transparency; it was a calculated evasion. Carney, the former banker who helped Brookfield Asset Management establish funds in Bermuda and the Cayman Islands, is now Canada's Prime Minister. And when pressed about whether any of his investments were previously held in tax havens, he couldn't even muster the courage to answer for himself. Instead, he let a subordinate deflect with talk of "stringent ethics guidelines" and "economic priorities." Meanwhile, Canadians are struggling to afford basic necessities, and they deserve to know if their leader is playing by the same rules—or any rules at all. Barrett—one of the few people in Ottawa actually doing his job—didn’t hold back. As Shadow Minister for Ethics and Accountable Government, he called out Prime Minister Mark Carney for what appears to be a massive financial shell game. The accusation? That Carney, during his time as a high-flying executive at Brookfield Asset Management, helped funnel billions into offshore tax havens—Bermuda, the Caymans, you name it—and then conveniently tucked those assets away in a so-called “blind trust” right before stepping into public office. Barrett’s message was simple and devastating: “Canadians are lined up at food banks in record numbers. They can’t pay their rent, but they are paying their taxes.” Meanwhile, the guy running their government may have spent years helping billionaires avoid paying theirs. Barrett demanded straight answers: Were any of Carney’s current holdings, now supposedly out of sight, previously parked in these offshore tax shelters? And what exactly was he sitting on when he walked into that first cabinet meeting? The allegations stem from Carney’s role as chairman of Brookfield from 2020 to January 2025, where he co-chaired funds worth $25 billion registered in Bermuda and a $5 billion fund in the Cayman Islands, according to CBC News reports. These arrangements, which reportedly allowed Brookfield to avoid $5.3 billion in taxes, have drawn scrutiny amid Canada’s economic challenges, including rising food bank usage and housing affordability issues. In response, the Liberal government House Leader defended Carney, dismissing Barrett’s questions as “hypotheticals and conjured scenarios.” “The Prime Minister has followed all the rules even before they were required,” the House Leader stated, emphasizing that Carney’s blind trust complies with Canada’s “stringent ethics guidelines.” The response pivoted to the government’s agenda, citing efforts to create “the strongest economy in the G7,” reduce taxes, and build new homes, while accusing the opposition of “digging dirt on day one.” The House Leader’s retort, “Shame on them,” drew murmurs of support from Liberal benches. Undeterred, Barrett doubled down, arguing that Canadians “don’t want an explanation on how to bend over backwards to fit through ethical loopholes.” He called for assurance that Carney’s actions go “above just the basic minimum standard,” referencing a decade of perceived Liberal ethical lapses. “Can he stand up and assure Canadians that none of the funds he had previously were held in offshore tax havens?” Barrett asked, pressing for specifics on Carney’s financial holdings. The Liberal response reiterated Carney’s compliance, with the House Leader asserting, “Canada has among the most stringent ethics guidelines in the world… The Prime Minister is busy creating opportunity for Canada, standing up in a trade war against the United States.” The deflection, focusing on economic priorities and dismissing the opposition’s probe as a distraction, left Barrett’s core questions unanswered, fueling Conservative claims of evasion. This entire exchange isn’t just about one question or one day—it’s part of a much larger and very necessary effort by Conservatives to expose something Canadians are starting to see with painful clarity: Mark Carney is not one of them. He’s not scraping to make rent. He’s not standing in a food bank line. He’s not worried about carbon taxes or grocery bills. He’s a Davos man, parachuted into the Prime Minister’s Office by the same Liberal elite that gave us Justin Trudeau. Different face. Same contempt. Barrett’s takedown of Carney over offshore tax havens hit a nerve, and rightly so. According to Canadians for Tax Fairness, this country loses a jaw-dropping $30 billion every year to offshore tax avoidance. That's money that working Canadians pay so the elite can squirrel away their wealth in places like Bermuda and the Cayman Islands. And Carney? He helped orchestrate it. As a top dog at Brookfield Asset Management, he didn’t just benefit from the system—he helped design it. And if that wasn’t enough, under his leadership, Brookfield moved its headquarters from Toronto to New York. In the middle of growing trade tensions with President Trump’s America. That’s not leadership—it’s betrayal. And how does Carney justify all this? With the most nauseating phrase in the English language: “It was legal.” Oh, well, as long as the loopholes were big enough to drive a luxury yacht through, I guess we’re fine. He claims these “tax-efficient” strategies helped pensioners and that his blind trust protects him from conflicts. Right. Because what better way to gain public trust than hiding your financial interests in a vault and telling voters, “Just trust me”? Barrett and the Conservatives aren't buying it—and neither should you. They're calling for real reform, tougher disclosure rules, and an end to the wink-wink, nudge-nudge ethics games that the Liberals have been playing for a decade. Carney delayed his financial disclosures during his leadership run? Of course he did. That’s not transparency. That’s strategy. And Canadians know it. Even the so-called experts are noticing the shift. One analyst noted Barrett’s attacks are landing with voters because they’re the ones who are actually suffering. Meanwhile, the Liberals want to pivot to their so-called “economic wins.” Great. Tell that to the family paying $7 for lettuce or the trucker trying to fuel his rig with gas prices through the roof. As Parliament gets underway, we’re heading into a full-blown war over ethics and economic justice. And the question for Carney is simple: Is he going to answer for his record—or is he going to keep hiding behind the same smug Liberal arrogance that Canadians are sick and tired of? The people are watching. The mask is off. And Mark Carney has a choice: come clean—or be dragged into the sunlight.

Dan Knight

34,769 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The Carney Files: Exposing the new globalist golden boy, Mark Carney From his connections to Epstein associates, his role at Brookfield Asset Management, and the World Economic Forum, Canadians have a lot to learn about globalist golden boy, Mark Carney. The fix is in. Canada’s next prime minister was just anointed behind closed doors in a questionable leadership race. Trudeau's usefulness has run its course. He's not cute anymore. The elites have moved on, and they’ve chosen their new golden boy: Mark Carney. That’s why we’re launching The Carney Files — your one-stop shop for everything the establishment and the legacy media don’t want you to know about the next to sit on the Liberal throne. Because while the mainstream press is polishing their puff pieces, we’re doing what they refuse to — exposing the real Mark Carney. And trust me, there’s a lot to expose. This isn’t just some mild-mannered banker turned politician. Carney was the man whispering in Trudeau's ear for the last five years. All those things the Liberals did to us? That was him — lockdowns; tax hikes; overspending; electric vehicle mandates. Carney is Trudeau 2.0, but more dangerous. He’s the handpicked globalist successor to Trudeau, a man whose loyalties don’t lie with Canada, but with the unelected power brokers who pull the strings from Davos at the World Economic Forum, and the UN. Remember? He's a self-described European, with three citizenships. We’re talking about a man who has spent his entire career pushing the very policies that have gutted the middle class — from his time at the Bank of Canada, to his role at the Bank of England, to his non-stop advocacy for extreme carbon taxation under the guise of “climate action.” And let’s not forget his cozy connections to some very unsavory characters. Does Ghislaine Maxwell ring a bell? Oh yeah, Carney's got tangential ties to her, too. The very same woman who helped Jeffrey Epstein run one of the most disgusting criminal operations in modern history. But good luck hearing that on CBC or CTV. They won’t touch it. Too busy protecting their next meal ticket. And then there’s his manifesto, Values — a book that reads less like a personal philosophy and more like an instruction manual for a globalist coup. In it, Carney lays out his plan for a so-called “moral economy,” where unelected bureaucrats, not free markets, dictate how you live, how you work, and how much you pay for basic necessities. It’s a carbon tax fever dream wrapped in Orwellian doublespeak. But wait, there’s more. Carney has his own major conflicts of interest — the kind the legacy media would be all over if he had a Conservative label next to his name. Let’s talk about Brookfield Asset Management. Carney was vice-chair at Brookfield, a global investment giant that made a fortune off green energy subsidies — while conveniently opposing pipelines in Canada. But here’s the kicker: while Carney was telling Canadians that oil and gas was a dead industry, Brookfield was busy funding pipelines in the Middle East. That’s right — Carney had no problem helping bankroll fossil fuel expansion overseas while helping crush Canadian energy jobs at home. And it doesn’t end there. Carney also played games with Brookfield’s head office relocation timeline, shifting narratives about when and why they moved their corporate headquarters to the United States. One minute, it’s staying in Canada. The next, it’s heading south. And yet, this is the guy who wants to dictate our economy? Who wants to tell us what industries are “moral” and which ones need to be shut down? He tells us he's about saving Canadian jobs while moving them to the U.S. The hypocrisy is astounding. And here’s where it gets even worse — Carney is already willing to mislead Canadians to avoid accountability. He knows he can’t handle real scrutiny, so instead of answering tough questions, he simply shuts out the only people willing to ask them. Independent journalists are being barred from his events, blocked from getting credentials, and denied access to ask the real questions that the legacy media refuses to touch. Because let’s face it — Carney doesn’t want to be challenged. He doesn’t want to be asked about his WEF loyalties, his conflicts of interest, or his blatant hypocrisy. He wants a coronation, not an election. And the establishment media? They’re more than happy to help him get one. But here’s the thing. None of this is a secret. The information is out there, but the media refuses to touch it. Why? Because Pierre Poilievre has promised to defund them, and they’re terrified. Terrified that Canadians might actually learn the truth about the Liberal Party’s latest Frankenstein experiment before it’s too late. So, if you want to know who really runs this country — who’s pulling the strings, who’s writing the playbook, and who’s about to step in as Trudeau’s heir — then you won’t want to miss this campaign. Because this isn’t just about another Liberal leader. This is about the survival of Canada as we know it. And if we don’t fight back now, we might not get another chance.

The Carney Files: Exposing the new globalist golden boy, Mark Carney From his connections to Epstein associates, his role at Brookfield Asset Management, and the World Economic Forum, Canadians have a lot to learn about globalist golden boy, Mark Carney. The fix is in. Canada’s next prime minister was just anointed behind closed doors in a questionable leadership race. Trudeau's usefulness has run its course. He's not cute anymore. The elites have moved on, and they’ve chosen their new golden boy: Mark Carney. That’s why we’re launching The Carney Files — your one-stop shop for everything the establishment and the legacy media don’t want you to know about the next to sit on the Liberal throne. Because while the mainstream press is polishing their puff pieces, we’re doing what they refuse to — exposing the real Mark Carney. And trust me, there’s a lot to expose. This isn’t just some mild-mannered banker turned politician. Carney was the man whispering in Trudeau's ear for the last five years. All those things the Liberals did to us? That was him — lockdowns; tax hikes; overspending; electric vehicle mandates. Carney is Trudeau 2.0, but more dangerous. He’s the handpicked globalist successor to Trudeau, a man whose loyalties don’t lie with Canada, but with the unelected power brokers who pull the strings from Davos at the World Economic Forum, and the UN. Remember? He's a self-described European, with three citizenships. We’re talking about a man who has spent his entire career pushing the very policies that have gutted the middle class — from his time at the Bank of Canada, to his role at the Bank of England, to his non-stop advocacy for extreme carbon taxation under the guise of “climate action.” And let’s not forget his cozy connections to some very unsavory characters. Does Ghislaine Maxwell ring a bell? Oh yeah, Carney's got tangential ties to her, too. The very same woman who helped Jeffrey Epstein run one of the most disgusting criminal operations in modern history. But good luck hearing that on CBC or CTV. They won’t touch it. Too busy protecting their next meal ticket. And then there’s his manifesto, Values — a book that reads less like a personal philosophy and more like an instruction manual for a globalist coup. In it, Carney lays out his plan for a so-called “moral economy,” where unelected bureaucrats, not free markets, dictate how you live, how you work, and how much you pay for basic necessities. It’s a carbon tax fever dream wrapped in Orwellian doublespeak. But wait, there’s more. Carney has his own major conflicts of interest — the kind the legacy media would be all over if he had a Conservative label next to his name. Let’s talk about Brookfield Asset Management. Carney was vice-chair at Brookfield, a global investment giant that made a fortune off green energy subsidies — while conveniently opposing pipelines in Canada. But here’s the kicker: while Carney was telling Canadians that oil and gas was a dead industry, Brookfield was busy funding pipelines in the Middle East. That’s right — Carney had no problem helping bankroll fossil fuel expansion overseas while helping crush Canadian energy jobs at home. And it doesn’t end there. Carney also played games with Brookfield’s head office relocation timeline, shifting narratives about when and why they moved their corporate headquarters to the United States. One minute, it’s staying in Canada. The next, it’s heading south. And yet, this is the guy who wants to dictate our economy? Who wants to tell us what industries are “moral” and which ones need to be shut down? He tells us he's about saving Canadian jobs while moving them to the U.S. The hypocrisy is astounding. And here’s where it gets even worse — Carney is already willing to mislead Canadians to avoid accountability. He knows he can’t handle real scrutiny, so instead of answering tough questions, he simply shuts out the only people willing to ask them. Independent journalists are being barred from his events, blocked from getting credentials, and denied access to ask the real questions that the legacy media refuses to touch. Because let’s face it — Carney doesn’t want to be challenged. He doesn’t want to be asked about his WEF loyalties, his conflicts of interest, or his blatant hypocrisy. He wants a coronation, not an election. And the establishment media? They’re more than happy to help him get one. But here’s the thing. None of this is a secret. The information is out there, but the media refuses to touch it. Why? Because Pierre Poilievre has promised to defund them, and they’re terrified. Terrified that Canadians might actually learn the truth about the Liberal Party’s latest Frankenstein experiment before it’s too late. So, if you want to know who really runs this country — who’s pulling the strings, who’s writing the playbook, and who’s about to step in as Trudeau’s heir — then you won’t want to miss this campaign. Because this isn’t just about another Liberal leader. This is about the survival of Canada as we know it. And if we don’t fight back now, we might not get another chance.

Rebel News

48,158 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🇨🇦 Poilievre should push immigration issue 'with a vengeance': Ezra Levant 🍁🚛 With a new poll showing the Liberals and Conservatives in a near tie among voter support, Ezra Levant says Pierre Poilievre needs to make fixing Canada's broken immigration system his party's top priority. A new poll from Abacus Data has found voters are split almost evenly among their support for the Liberals (41%) and Conservatives (40%). While Prime Minister Mark Carney has a slight edge on Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre in favourability ratings, the largest gap between respondents was on the issue of immigration and refugees. For the 24% of respondents who placed immigration among their top three current issues, 59% felt the Poilievre Conservatives were the party best equipped to address the problem. On Tuesday's episode of The Ezra Levant Show, Ezra said the Conservatives need to target immigration as an issue, giving them an avenue to tap into a topic that is top of mind for many Canadians. “Carney's position is a fringe position, is an extreme position,” Ezra explained, referring to the 18% of respondents who said they trusted the Liberal leader most to deal with immigration. Canada's immigration system is the most out of control “in the world” after a decade first under Justin Trudeau, now under Carney — “which is precisely why the regime media calls Poilievre's position fringe and extreme and racist.” Ezra suggested Poilievre needs to say, “what so many Canadians are saying quietly to each other, that immigration is out of control and it needs to be stopped” instead of “continuing the unfortunate tradition of being scared of his own shadow.” Elections will have divisive issues either way, argued Ezra. “Poilievre can let the media choose the controversy,” he said, like letting the press focus on which leader has the most disdain for U.S. President Donald Trump. “Or Poilievre can choose the controversy that suits him best,” Ezra went on, “by outlining a very strong immigration policy of kicking out frauds, deporting those who have no right to be here and imposing cultural values tests on foreign extremists, letting Canadians get entry level jobs instead of temporary foreign workers.” Canada's mainstream media would “freak out” over this, he added, which would serve more like an ad for Poilievre, “spreading the word that Poilievre means deportations.” But the general public, “certainly not anyone under 50,” has little regard for the legacy media's pundits. “This poll shows us two things, don't dump Poilievre just because the Liberals don't like him,” Ezra said. “The second thing it shows is, Poilievre should come back with a vengeance on immigration and link to everything from crime to health-care waiting lines to overspending to traffic. That's one policy the Liberals will never co-opt.”

🇨🇦 Poilievre should push immigration issue 'with a vengeance': Ezra Levant 🍁🚛 With a new poll showing the Liberals and Conservatives in a near tie among voter support, Ezra Levant says Pierre Poilievre needs to make fixing Canada's broken immigration system his party's top priority. A new poll from Abacus Data has found voters are split almost evenly among their support for the Liberals (41%) and Conservatives (40%). While Prime Minister Mark Carney has a slight edge on Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre in favourability ratings, the largest gap between respondents was on the issue of immigration and refugees. For the 24% of respondents who placed immigration among their top three current issues, 59% felt the Poilievre Conservatives were the party best equipped to address the problem. On Tuesday's episode of The Ezra Levant Show, Ezra said the Conservatives need to target immigration as an issue, giving them an avenue to tap into a topic that is top of mind for many Canadians. “Carney's position is a fringe position, is an extreme position,” Ezra explained, referring to the 18% of respondents who said they trusted the Liberal leader most to deal with immigration. Canada's immigration system is the most out of control “in the world” after a decade first under Justin Trudeau, now under Carney — “which is precisely why the regime media calls Poilievre's position fringe and extreme and racist.” Ezra suggested Poilievre needs to say, “what so many Canadians are saying quietly to each other, that immigration is out of control and it needs to be stopped” instead of “continuing the unfortunate tradition of being scared of his own shadow.” Elections will have divisive issues either way, argued Ezra. “Poilievre can let the media choose the controversy,” he said, like letting the press focus on which leader has the most disdain for U.S. President Donald Trump. “Or Poilievre can choose the controversy that suits him best,” Ezra went on, “by outlining a very strong immigration policy of kicking out frauds, deporting those who have no right to be here and imposing cultural values tests on foreign extremists, letting Canadians get entry level jobs instead of temporary foreign workers.” Canada's mainstream media would “freak out” over this, he added, which would serve more like an ad for Poilievre, “spreading the word that Poilievre means deportations.” But the general public, “certainly not anyone under 50,” has little regard for the legacy media's pundits. “This poll shows us two things, don't dump Poilievre just because the Liberals don't like him,” Ezra said. “The second thing it shows is, Poilievre should come back with a vengeance on immigration and link to everything from crime to health-care waiting lines to overspending to traffic. That's one policy the Liberals will never co-opt.”

Rebel News

12,366 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Mark Carney touched down in Victoria this week to unveil what the Liberal press calls a “bold” vision for Canada’s economy. But what Canadians actually got was a highly choreographed lecture—long on buzzwords, short on substance—from a man who’s spent more time in central bank boardrooms than in any place real Canadians live. He talked about housing, forestry, and tariffs, but what he was really selling was more Ottawa, more control, and more of the same Liberal rot that’s been strangling this country for the last decade. Carney stood in front of a prefab timber facility—symbolism so on-the-nose it could’ve come from a PMO PowerPoint—and made his pitch. To his right stood Jill McKnight. To his left? None other than Gregor Robertson, the man who helped transform Vancouver into the most unaffordable housing market on Earth. That’s the braintrust. That’s who’s going to solve the housing crisis now. The same people who created it. Carney wants to create a federal housing authority—Build Canada Homes—a $25 billion bureaucracy to build modular, mass timber housing across the country. He calls it “ambitious.” What it is, is a central planner’s fantasy. We’ve heard it before. Big public fund. Big promises. Bigger disaster. It ends the same every time: with consultants billing millions while shovels collect dust. While pitching his timber-driven housing revival, Carney took a jab at Pierre Poilievre—mocking his calls to cut taxes and red tape as “slogans.” As if letting Canadians keep more of their own money is beneath him. As if streamlining regulation is some unserious gimmick, instead of the only way to get anything built in this country. But here’s the joke: while Carney was sneering about tax cuts, the Liberal government quietly dropped the carbon tax on home heating to zero. The very tax they claimed was essential to saving the planet. The one they dragged provinces through court over. Now it’s gone—temporarily, politically—because they’re tanking in the polls. Not repealed. Not reformed. Just dialed down to win votes. And don’t worry, the industrial carbon tax? That’s still in place. That gets passed down to consumers in the form of higher prices on everything from fuel to food. Carney calls that “the better model.” When it came time to defend past comments about Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and Ontario Premier Doug Ford, which he made during a fundraiser in Richmond last week—where he mocked the idea of sending Smith to negotiate with the U.S.—Carney brushed it off as “light-hearted.” As if belittling provinces fighting for their industries is all in good fun. As if economic decline is a joke. It would be funny if it weren’t so offensive. Alberta’s energy industry is on the line. Ontario’s manufacturing base is under siege. And this guy, who’s never run a province or balanced a budget outside of a spreadsheet, is cracking jokes like it’s a Netflix roast. And while the press didn’t push him on it in Victoria, Carney’s already gone on the record at another recent presser to say he won’t repeal Bill C-69—the single most destructive piece of legislation to Canada’s energy and infrastructure development. He says it’s the “right framework.” That’s all you need to know. He wants to unlock forestry, speed up housing, and expand construction—but he won’t touch the laws that actively prevent all of that. Carney says he wants to work with provinces. What he means is make them ask for permission. He says he wants to partner with industry. What he means is tax them, regulate them, and funnel the profits to climate consultants and think tanks in Ottawa. And as for being a new face? He’s surrounded by the same crew. Chrystia Freeland’s economic advisors. Marco Mendicino—the same guy who misled Parliament on national security. And Trudeau? He’s still in the background, backing this banker in a fresh suit to keep the Liberal regime on life support. Carney says this country needs leadership. What it needs is a clean break. He says he wants to bring people together. What he means is bring them to heel. The housing crisis. The affordability crisis. The productivity collapse. These weren’t accidents. These were decisions—made by the same machine that now wants you to believe its latest frontman is the solution. The Liberals burned the house down. Now they want your vote to hold the hose. If you can’t afford a home, if your energy bill is unbearable, if your job is gone—it’s because of the people still standing behind Mark Carney. If you vote Liberal, you’re not voting for change. You’re voting for decay. You’re voting to reward failure. Don’t fall for it. Vote blue. And let’s bring it home.

Mark Carney touched down in Victoria this week to unveil what the Liberal press calls a “bold” vision for Canada’s economy. But what Canadians actually got was a highly choreographed lecture—long on buzzwords, short on substance—from a man who’s spent more time in central bank boardrooms than in any place real Canadians live. He talked about housing, forestry, and tariffs, but what he was really selling was more Ottawa, more control, and more of the same Liberal rot that’s been strangling this country for the last decade. Carney stood in front of a prefab timber facility—symbolism so on-the-nose it could’ve come from a PMO PowerPoint—and made his pitch. To his right stood Jill McKnight. To his left? None other than Gregor Robertson, the man who helped transform Vancouver into the most unaffordable housing market on Earth. That’s the braintrust. That’s who’s going to solve the housing crisis now. The same people who created it. Carney wants to create a federal housing authority—Build Canada Homes—a $25 billion bureaucracy to build modular, mass timber housing across the country. He calls it “ambitious.” What it is, is a central planner’s fantasy. We’ve heard it before. Big public fund. Big promises. Bigger disaster. It ends the same every time: with consultants billing millions while shovels collect dust. While pitching his timber-driven housing revival, Carney took a jab at Pierre Poilievre—mocking his calls to cut taxes and red tape as “slogans.” As if letting Canadians keep more of their own money is beneath him. As if streamlining regulation is some unserious gimmick, instead of the only way to get anything built in this country. But here’s the joke: while Carney was sneering about tax cuts, the Liberal government quietly dropped the carbon tax on home heating to zero. The very tax they claimed was essential to saving the planet. The one they dragged provinces through court over. Now it’s gone—temporarily, politically—because they’re tanking in the polls. Not repealed. Not reformed. Just dialed down to win votes. And don’t worry, the industrial carbon tax? That’s still in place. That gets passed down to consumers in the form of higher prices on everything from fuel to food. Carney calls that “the better model.” When it came time to defend past comments about Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and Ontario Premier Doug Ford, which he made during a fundraiser in Richmond last week—where he mocked the idea of sending Smith to negotiate with the U.S.—Carney brushed it off as “light-hearted.” As if belittling provinces fighting for their industries is all in good fun. As if economic decline is a joke. It would be funny if it weren’t so offensive. Alberta’s energy industry is on the line. Ontario’s manufacturing base is under siege. And this guy, who’s never run a province or balanced a budget outside of a spreadsheet, is cracking jokes like it’s a Netflix roast. And while the press didn’t push him on it in Victoria, Carney’s already gone on the record at another recent presser to say he won’t repeal Bill C-69—the single most destructive piece of legislation to Canada’s energy and infrastructure development. He says it’s the “right framework.” That’s all you need to know. He wants to unlock forestry, speed up housing, and expand construction—but he won’t touch the laws that actively prevent all of that. Carney says he wants to work with provinces. What he means is make them ask for permission. He says he wants to partner with industry. What he means is tax them, regulate them, and funnel the profits to climate consultants and think tanks in Ottawa. And as for being a new face? He’s surrounded by the same crew. Chrystia Freeland’s economic advisors. Marco Mendicino—the same guy who misled Parliament on national security. And Trudeau? He’s still in the background, backing this banker in a fresh suit to keep the Liberal regime on life support. Carney says this country needs leadership. What it needs is a clean break. He says he wants to bring people together. What he means is bring them to heel. The housing crisis. The affordability crisis. The productivity collapse. These weren’t accidents. These were decisions—made by the same machine that now wants you to believe its latest frontman is the solution. The Liberals burned the house down. Now they want your vote to hold the hose. If you can’t afford a home, if your energy bill is unbearable, if your job is gone—it’s because of the people still standing behind Mark Carney. If you vote Liberal, you’re not voting for change. You’re voting for decay. You’re voting to reward failure. Don’t fall for it. Vote blue. And let’s bring it home.

Dan Knight

19,424 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Pancakes, Politics, and Poilievre: Tory leader WOWS with latest speech at Calgary Stampede Welcoming Carney to his “first” stampede, the former MP did not waste time making snide remarks at his expense. After campaigning several weeks in central Alberta, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre made a pit stop at the Calgary Stampede. Prime Minister Mark Carney also made an appearance. “Thank you Calgary. It's great to be home. It's great to be back for the ‘greatest outdoor show on earth,’” commenced Poilievre with his opening remarks. Welcoming Carney to his “first” stampede, the former MP did not waste time making snide remarks at his expense. “He [Carney] had to do the customary thing and flip some pancakes,” Poilievre said. “He thought he would be great at it because in his trade talks with Trump, he's had so much experience flip-flopping.” The venue erupted into a barrage of laughter. “It didn't go as planned,” continued Poilievre. “One of the pancakes got broken in half, and the other one splattered everywhere…. He couldn't figure out whether to put his elbows up or down.” Again, the venue erupted with a roaring applause. Poilievre, a Calgary-native and University of Calgary alumni, pivoted to discuss his childhood. “Calgary, and Heritage Park, taught me values of hard work, freedom, and family, which my wife Anna and I instill in our children. Growing up here, delivering the Calgary Sun, and playing hockey, shaped me.” He proceeded to thank Damien Kurek, the former Conservative MP for Battle River-Crowfoot, who stepped down so Poilievre could seek his return to Parliament. Poilievre lost Carleton, his seat for two decades, due to declining Conservative votes, population growth, and redistribution, leading to a Liberal win. “Though we lost the last election, we gained 25 seats and 2.25 million votes. We won debates on inflation, housing, natural resources, crime, drugs, and the carbon tax.” Now, with a byelection set for August 18, the Tory leader has not taken his second chance for granted, campaigning nonstop the past several weeks to reconnect with his base. “If elected in Battle-River Crowfoot, I'll use my platform to advocate for Western Canada, ending unfair treatment from Ottawa,” he said. “We need alliances with other provinces—British Columbia for LNG, Manitoba for oil shipments, and Quebec—to nationalize our country and empower provinces.” He then took jabs at the National Energy Program, implemented by Pierre Elliott Trudeau, whose attacks on Alberta forced the Poilievre family to lose their home, blaming rising inflation and interest rates. “This experience motivated me to enter politics, standing with leaders like Preston Manning, Stockwell Day, Stephen Harper, and Ralph Klein, and carrying on Peter Lougheed's tradition to fight for Alberta's oil and gas, farmers, low taxes, and a smaller federal government,” Poilievre said to supporters in the crowd. “Fighting for these values is never easy,” he continued. “Building Alberta and Canada was hard, but we don't back down. We dust ourselves off and gallop forward.” “Let's fight for our freedom, our families, Alberta, and Canada. I am ready. Are you ready to join me? Let's do it for the country.”

Pancakes, Politics, and Poilievre: Tory leader WOWS with latest speech at Calgary Stampede Welcoming Carney to his “first” stampede, the former MP did not waste time making snide remarks at his expense. After campaigning several weeks in central Alberta, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre made a pit stop at the Calgary Stampede. Prime Minister Mark Carney also made an appearance. “Thank you Calgary. It's great to be home. It's great to be back for the ‘greatest outdoor show on earth,’” commenced Poilievre with his opening remarks. Welcoming Carney to his “first” stampede, the former MP did not waste time making snide remarks at his expense. “He [Carney] had to do the customary thing and flip some pancakes,” Poilievre said. “He thought he would be great at it because in his trade talks with Trump, he's had so much experience flip-flopping.” The venue erupted into a barrage of laughter. “It didn't go as planned,” continued Poilievre. “One of the pancakes got broken in half, and the other one splattered everywhere…. He couldn't figure out whether to put his elbows up or down.” Again, the venue erupted with a roaring applause. Poilievre, a Calgary-native and University of Calgary alumni, pivoted to discuss his childhood. “Calgary, and Heritage Park, taught me values of hard work, freedom, and family, which my wife Anna and I instill in our children. Growing up here, delivering the Calgary Sun, and playing hockey, shaped me.” He proceeded to thank Damien Kurek, the former Conservative MP for Battle River-Crowfoot, who stepped down so Poilievre could seek his return to Parliament. Poilievre lost Carleton, his seat for two decades, due to declining Conservative votes, population growth, and redistribution, leading to a Liberal win. “Though we lost the last election, we gained 25 seats and 2.25 million votes. We won debates on inflation, housing, natural resources, crime, drugs, and the carbon tax.” Now, with a byelection set for August 18, the Tory leader has not taken his second chance for granted, campaigning nonstop the past several weeks to reconnect with his base. “If elected in Battle-River Crowfoot, I'll use my platform to advocate for Western Canada, ending unfair treatment from Ottawa,” he said. “We need alliances with other provinces—British Columbia for LNG, Manitoba for oil shipments, and Quebec—to nationalize our country and empower provinces.” He then took jabs at the National Energy Program, implemented by Pierre Elliott Trudeau, whose attacks on Alberta forced the Poilievre family to lose their home, blaming rising inflation and interest rates. “This experience motivated me to enter politics, standing with leaders like Preston Manning, Stockwell Day, Stephen Harper, and Ralph Klein, and carrying on Peter Lougheed's tradition to fight for Alberta's oil and gas, farmers, low taxes, and a smaller federal government,” Poilievre said to supporters in the crowd. “Fighting for these values is never easy,” he continued. “Building Alberta and Canada was hard, but we don't back down. We dust ourselves off and gallop forward.” “Let's fight for our freedom, our families, Alberta, and Canada. I am ready. Are you ready to join me? Let's do it for the country.”

Rebel News

11,682 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Looks like Carney’s fake support is finally cracking. A new Liaison Strategies poll just dropped and the numbers tell the real story: Liberals at 41%, Conservatives at 35%. The gap narrowed from 9 points to just 6. That’s the first real movement in months — and it’s moving the wrong way for the guy who was supposed to be untouchable. Carney’s approval rating has slipped from a stratospheric 65%+ down to 56%. His disapproval is holding steady around 36%. The honeymoon is officially over. Meanwhile Pierre Poilievre is still underwater (39% favorable, 48% unfavorable), but even with the floor crossings, Senate defections, and internal noise the Conservatives are closing the gap. That tells you everything about how brittle Carney’s “support” really was. This wasn’t organic love. It was media hype, a bought majority via floor crossers, and desperate fear-mongering about the “big bad orange man.” The second reality started creeping in — stagnant per-capita growth, technical recession earlier this year, ballooning deficits, and the same old Liberal chaos — the numbers started moving. The elbows-up crowd can scream “it’s just one poll” all they want. But when the guy who was sold as the economic genius and Trump whisperer starts bleeding support this fast, it’s a warning sign. Canadians are waking up. Slowly, but they’re waking up. The fake majority and the fake honeymoon both have an expiration date. #cdnpoli #Carney #LiberalFail #Poilievre

Looks like Carney’s fake support is finally cracking. A new Liaison Strategies poll just dropped and the numbers tell the real story: Liberals at 41%, Conservatives at 35%. The gap narrowed from 9 points to just 6. That’s the first real movement in months — and it’s moving the wrong way for the guy who was supposed to be untouchable. Carney’s approval rating has slipped from a stratospheric 65%+ down to 56%. His disapproval is holding steady around 36%. The honeymoon is officially over. Meanwhile Pierre Poilievre is still underwater (39% favorable, 48% unfavorable), but even with the floor crossings, Senate defections, and internal noise the Conservatives are closing the gap. That tells you everything about how brittle Carney’s “support” really was. This wasn’t organic love. It was media hype, a bought majority via floor crossers, and desperate fear-mongering about the “big bad orange man.” The second reality started creeping in — stagnant per-capita growth, technical recession earlier this year, ballooning deficits, and the same old Liberal chaos — the numbers started moving. The elbows-up crowd can scream “it’s just one poll” all they want. But when the guy who was sold as the economic genius and Trump whisperer starts bleeding support this fast, it’s a warning sign. Canadians are waking up. Slowly, but they’re waking up. The fake majority and the fake honeymoon both have an expiration date. #cdnpoli #Carney #LiberalFail #Poilievre

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

26,725 görüntüleme • 29 gün önce

OP-ED : The Notwithstanding Clause Is How We Save Canada—from the People Who Broke It If you listen to the Canadian media—most of whom could be replaced by cardboard cutouts of Mark Carney—you’d think Pierre Poilievre is preparing to burn the Charter of Rights and Freedoms on the front steps of Parliament. He’s been accused of authoritarianism, of threatening democracy, even of “undermining the rule of law.” What’s his crime? He wants to use a constitutional tool—the Notwithstanding Clause—to stop mass murderers from gaming the parole system and walking free. Let’s back up, because this isn’t hysteria. This is strategy. And it starts with a court decision. In 2022, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in R v. Bissonnette that judges can no longer impose consecutive parole ineligibility periods on people convicted of multiple murders. Their logic? It violated Section 12 of the Charter—protection against “cruel and unusual punishment.” Under this ruling, someone who murders six people can apply for parole after 25 years, the same as someone who murdered one. Let’s be clear: that wasn’t a fluke. It wasn’t a clerical error. It was a judicial statement that mass murder should not carry a heavier penalty than single homicide. It’s insane. And it’s now the law. Poilievre has said plainly what most Canadians are thinking: no more. His platform includes restoring consecutive parole ineligibility for multiple murderers—using Section 33 of the Charter, the Notwithstanding Clause, to override the Supreme Court's ruling. That clause, by the way, wasn’t invented by some right-wing populist—it was authored during the patriation of the Constitution by Allan Blakeney, Peter Lougheed, and, yes, Pierre Elliott Trudeau himself. It was written to give elected governments the final word when courts lose the plot. So when Liberal insiders like Mark Carney call Poilievre’s move “dangerous,” let’s be honest about what they’re really saying. They're not worried about your rights. They're worried about their power. Let’s talk about Carney. Carney is the Liberal establishment personified. A man who has never been elected to anything, but acts like the nation owes him its premiership. A former central banker, an unelected global bureaucrat, a Davos man through and through. And now, the man parachuted in by the Liberal Party to rescue it from the wreckage of Justin Trudeau. Mark Carney says the use of the Notwithstanding Clause in this case is a “threat to democracy.” This is the same Mark Carney who, in 2022, wrote an op-ed in The Globe and Mail calling the Freedom Convoy “sedition.” He supported the invocation of the Emergencies Act against peaceful protestors. He said, “You can’t have liberty without order,” as Trudeau’s government froze bank accounts without charges or trials, targeted working-class Canadians, and abused financial institutions to silence dissent. You want to talk about civil liberties? That was the real violation. Carney didn’t object to that. He didn’t call it “dangerous.” He supported it. And he supports Bills C-11 and C-18, which hand the federal government the power to control what Canadians see, post, and share online. These are the Trudeau government’s censorship bills—sold as “support for Canadian content,” but in reality, giving the CRTC the authority to prioritize or bury content based on government-set criteria. Censorship? Government-controlled financial punishment? Total silence when bail laws are gutted and criminals walk free? Mark Carney has no problem with any of that. But when Pierre Poilievre wants to keep Paul Bernardo—a man who raped, tortured, and murdered teenage girls—from applying for parole every two years, now it’s a civil liberties emergency? Let’s be clear: Paul Bernardo is not some abstract example. He’s not theoretical. He’s a real person, a real monster. His crimes are so depraved they defy description. He was sentenced to life in prison for the murders of Leslie Mahaffy and Kristen French, and he was behind the “Scarborough Rapist” attacks on at least 14 other women. And yet, under Canada’s current law, he gets to apply for parole every two years. The families of his victims are forced to prepare victim impact statements and re-live the trauma again and again. That’s the system the Liberals built. That’s the legacy Poilievre wants to overturn. And they’re terrified, because with one constitutional stroke—one Notwithstanding Clause—he can. He can restore sentences that reflect justice. He can return power from unelected judges to elected lawmakers. He can protect victims instead of appeasing criminals. And most dangerously—for them—he can show Canadians that this decaying, dysfunctional, upside-down system can actually be fixed. That’s why they’re panicking. Because Poilievre isn’t threatening the rule of law. He’s threatening the rule of them. The Notwithstanding Clause doesn’t destroy democracy. It saves it. It gives voice to the people when institutions lose sight of the public interest. It exists for moments like this—when killers get a second chance and victims don’t. So when Carney and his media allies start foaming at the mouth over “tyranny,” remember this: it’s not about rights. It’s about the swamp defending itself. Because once Canadians realize the Notwithstanding Clause can be used to take back their streets, their justice system, and their country from people like Mark Carney, they’ll wonder why it wasn’t used sooner. This election, Canadians are being handed a rare opportunity—not just to vote for a different government, but to reclaim the country from the institutions and elites who hollowed it out. For years, the Liberals have ruled through back channels: unelected judges, unaccountable regulators, international bankers like Mark Carney. They’ve told you crime is compassion, censorship is safety, and freedom is dangerous. And if you dared to disagree, they froze your bank account and silenced your voice. Now, with the Notwithstanding Clause, Pierre Poilievre is threatening to unwind it all. Not with riots. Not with chaos. With a legal tool, written into the Constitution by the very people now pretending it’s a threat. He’s not dismantling democracy. He’s using it. He’s not a danger to the country. He’s the first serious chance to save it. Because if we don’t have the right to keep mass murderers in prison… If we don’t have the right to protect our kids, our streets, and our speech… Then what do we really have left? Canada is at a crossroads. One path leads to more decay, more lies, and more of the same. The other leads out of the swamp. You know the path. You know who’s on it. And you know exactly who to vote for.

OP-ED : The Notwithstanding Clause Is How We Save Canada—from the People Who Broke It If you listen to the Canadian media—most of whom could be replaced by cardboard cutouts of Mark Carney—you’d think Pierre Poilievre is preparing to burn the Charter of Rights and Freedoms on the front steps of Parliament. He’s been accused of authoritarianism, of threatening democracy, even of “undermining the rule of law.” What’s his crime? He wants to use a constitutional tool—the Notwithstanding Clause—to stop mass murderers from gaming the parole system and walking free. Let’s back up, because this isn’t hysteria. This is strategy. And it starts with a court decision. In 2022, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in R v. Bissonnette that judges can no longer impose consecutive parole ineligibility periods on people convicted of multiple murders. Their logic? It violated Section 12 of the Charter—protection against “cruel and unusual punishment.” Under this ruling, someone who murders six people can apply for parole after 25 years, the same as someone who murdered one. Let’s be clear: that wasn’t a fluke. It wasn’t a clerical error. It was a judicial statement that mass murder should not carry a heavier penalty than single homicide. It’s insane. And it’s now the law. Poilievre has said plainly what most Canadians are thinking: no more. His platform includes restoring consecutive parole ineligibility for multiple murderers—using Section 33 of the Charter, the Notwithstanding Clause, to override the Supreme Court's ruling. That clause, by the way, wasn’t invented by some right-wing populist—it was authored during the patriation of the Constitution by Allan Blakeney, Peter Lougheed, and, yes, Pierre Elliott Trudeau himself. It was written to give elected governments the final word when courts lose the plot. So when Liberal insiders like Mark Carney call Poilievre’s move “dangerous,” let’s be honest about what they’re really saying. They're not worried about your rights. They're worried about their power. Let’s talk about Carney. Carney is the Liberal establishment personified. A man who has never been elected to anything, but acts like the nation owes him its premiership. A former central banker, an unelected global bureaucrat, a Davos man through and through. And now, the man parachuted in by the Liberal Party to rescue it from the wreckage of Justin Trudeau. Mark Carney says the use of the Notwithstanding Clause in this case is a “threat to democracy.” This is the same Mark Carney who, in 2022, wrote an op-ed in The Globe and Mail calling the Freedom Convoy “sedition.” He supported the invocation of the Emergencies Act against peaceful protestors. He said, “You can’t have liberty without order,” as Trudeau’s government froze bank accounts without charges or trials, targeted working-class Canadians, and abused financial institutions to silence dissent. You want to talk about civil liberties? That was the real violation. Carney didn’t object to that. He didn’t call it “dangerous.” He supported it. And he supports Bills C-11 and C-18, which hand the federal government the power to control what Canadians see, post, and share online. These are the Trudeau government’s censorship bills—sold as “support for Canadian content,” but in reality, giving the CRTC the authority to prioritize or bury content based on government-set criteria. Censorship? Government-controlled financial punishment? Total silence when bail laws are gutted and criminals walk free? Mark Carney has no problem with any of that. But when Pierre Poilievre wants to keep Paul Bernardo—a man who raped, tortured, and murdered teenage girls—from applying for parole every two years, now it’s a civil liberties emergency? Let’s be clear: Paul Bernardo is not some abstract example. He’s not theoretical. He’s a real person, a real monster. His crimes are so depraved they defy description. He was sentenced to life in prison for the murders of Leslie Mahaffy and Kristen French, and he was behind the “Scarborough Rapist” attacks on at least 14 other women. And yet, under Canada’s current law, he gets to apply for parole every two years. The families of his victims are forced to prepare victim impact statements and re-live the trauma again and again. That’s the system the Liberals built. That’s the legacy Poilievre wants to overturn. And they’re terrified, because with one constitutional stroke—one Notwithstanding Clause—he can. He can restore sentences that reflect justice. He can return power from unelected judges to elected lawmakers. He can protect victims instead of appeasing criminals. And most dangerously—for them—he can show Canadians that this decaying, dysfunctional, upside-down system can actually be fixed. That’s why they’re panicking. Because Poilievre isn’t threatening the rule of law. He’s threatening the rule of them. The Notwithstanding Clause doesn’t destroy democracy. It saves it. It gives voice to the people when institutions lose sight of the public interest. It exists for moments like this—when killers get a second chance and victims don’t. So when Carney and his media allies start foaming at the mouth over “tyranny,” remember this: it’s not about rights. It’s about the swamp defending itself. Because once Canadians realize the Notwithstanding Clause can be used to take back their streets, their justice system, and their country from people like Mark Carney, they’ll wonder why it wasn’t used sooner. This election, Canadians are being handed a rare opportunity—not just to vote for a different government, but to reclaim the country from the institutions and elites who hollowed it out. For years, the Liberals have ruled through back channels: unelected judges, unaccountable regulators, international bankers like Mark Carney. They’ve told you crime is compassion, censorship is safety, and freedom is dangerous. And if you dared to disagree, they froze your bank account and silenced your voice. Now, with the Notwithstanding Clause, Pierre Poilievre is threatening to unwind it all. Not with riots. Not with chaos. With a legal tool, written into the Constitution by the very people now pretending it’s a threat. He’s not dismantling democracy. He’s using it. He’s not a danger to the country. He’s the first serious chance to save it. Because if we don’t have the right to keep mass murderers in prison… If we don’t have the right to protect our kids, our streets, and our speech… Then what do we really have left? Canada is at a crossroads. One path leads to more decay, more lies, and more of the same. The other leads out of the swamp. You know the path. You know who’s on it. And you know exactly who to vote for.

Dan Knight

21,237 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Another election? Carney appears to enter campaign mode Prime Minister Carney is “a bit of a sinister jerk,” said Sheila Gunn Reid, cautioning she “wouldn't put it past him” to throw a wrench in Alberta's push for independence by “calling an election to derail it.” Mark Carney was asked if he was entering into campaign mode during a Monday press event at a grocery store. While there, the prime minister announced a new Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit, giving taxpayers a rebate on some food items. As he took questions, Carney was asked whether he was preparing for another election, given the Liberals may sense an opportunity to secure a majority in the House of Commons. On Monday's Rebel Roundup livestream, hosts Sheila Gunn Reid and David Menzies weighed in on whether Canadians should expect a snap election less than a year after Carney's narrow victory over Pierre Poilievre and the Conservatives. “I don't want to hear from the global bankster about affordability,” said Sheila, noting “Canada has the highest inflation in the G7.” Carney's rebate “is to give people more GST money — get rid of the GST altogether. Get rid of it on everything if you're concerned about affordability,” she stated. Better yet, Canada could stop sending tax dollars to “places like Ukraine” since it “drives inflation” here at home, she continued. “But no, (Carney's) standing in front of avocados that people can scarcely afford, telling them that he's going to make the cost of cookies more affordable, because that's the stuff that GST is on, by the way.” Could there be an election in the calendar year of 2026, wondered David. “I think that he's a bit of a sinister jerk, and I wouldn't put it past him throwing a wrench in an Alberta referendum campaign by calling an election to derail it,” replied Sheila. “Because then Albertans would be forced to choose between staving off some sort of Liberal sweep or leaving.”

Another election? Carney appears to enter campaign mode Prime Minister Carney is “a bit of a sinister jerk,” said Sheila Gunn Reid, cautioning she “wouldn't put it past him” to throw a wrench in Alberta's push for independence by “calling an election to derail it.” Mark Carney was asked if he was entering into campaign mode during a Monday press event at a grocery store. While there, the prime minister announced a new Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit, giving taxpayers a rebate on some food items. As he took questions, Carney was asked whether he was preparing for another election, given the Liberals may sense an opportunity to secure a majority in the House of Commons. On Monday's Rebel Roundup livestream, hosts Sheila Gunn Reid and David Menzies weighed in on whether Canadians should expect a snap election less than a year after Carney's narrow victory over Pierre Poilievre and the Conservatives. “I don't want to hear from the global bankster about affordability,” said Sheila, noting “Canada has the highest inflation in the G7.” Carney's rebate “is to give people more GST money — get rid of the GST altogether. Get rid of it on everything if you're concerned about affordability,” she stated. Better yet, Canada could stop sending tax dollars to “places like Ukraine” since it “drives inflation” here at home, she continued. “But no, (Carney's) standing in front of avocados that people can scarcely afford, telling them that he's going to make the cost of cookies more affordable, because that's the stuff that GST is on, by the way.” Could there be an election in the calendar year of 2026, wondered David. “I think that he's a bit of a sinister jerk, and I wouldn't put it past him throwing a wrench in an Alberta referendum campaign by calling an election to derail it,” replied Sheila. “Because then Albertans would be forced to choose between staving off some sort of Liberal sweep or leaving.”

Rebel News

12,917 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Last night, in a massive warehouse just outside Edmonton, something extraordinary happened. Fifteen thousand Canadians showed up—not for a concert, not for a protest, but for a political rally. For one reason: to hear Pierre Poilievre speak. But the real shock? The man who introduced him. Stephen Harper—the most successful Conservative prime minister in a generation—took the stage to deliver a blistering endorsement of Poilievre, and a scathing indictment of the Liberal regime. He didn’t mince words. Harper said what every Canadian knows but no one in the press gallery will admit: this country needs change—desperately. And he didn’t hedge. He didn’t qualify. He didn’t say “both parties have made mistakes.” No. Harper made it clear: this crisis—soaring costs, collapsing standards, vanishing jobs, growing division—it wasn’t created by Donald Trump. It was made right here. In Ottawa. By three terms of Liberal government and the Prime Minister who wants a fourth. “These were not created by Donald Trump… They were created by the policies of three Liberal terms—policies the present Prime Minister supported.” That’s as blunt as Harper gets. And it should be a headline on every newspaper in the country. But it won’t be. Because it hits too close to home for the elite class that’s spent nearly a decade covering for Trudeau’s failures. Harper pointed out that the Liberals and their media allies are now trying to blame everything on geopolitics. Blame Trump. Blame supply chains. Blame COVID. Blame war. Blame anything but themselves. Because the truth? They can’t run on their record—so they’re running from it. What is that record? Exploding debt Collapsing GDP per capita A federal bureaucracy that punishes work and rewards compliance A housing market that’s locked out an entire generation And an energy sector that’s been handed over to the Americans while Canadians sit unemployed on world-class resources And now, as Mark Carney floats in with his $180 million CBC top-up and another round of green buzzwords, Harper reminded everyone: they’ve had their shot. Three terms. And they blew it. He warned Canadians not to fall for the same routine again. Not to fall for the same slogans. Not to fall for the polished elites promising “solutions” to the very problems they created. He reminded Canadians that while the Liberals talk about “fighting Trump,” they’re really just using the U.S. as a scapegoat for their own failures. And what did Harper offer instead? A rallying cry to seize this moment—not as an excuse—but as an opportunity to rebuild a truly independent Canada. “The challenge from the United States… should not be another excuse for Liberal failure. It should be a historic opportunity.” But the line that hit hardest? It was personal. Harper reminded everyone that he’s the only person alive who actually led Canada through the global financial crisis. That little swipe at Mark Carney—you could feel the building rumble. Carney wants credit for crisis leadership? Harper was running the country when the global economy was imploding. He knows what real leadership looks like—and he said flatly that Pierre Poilievre is the only one on the stage today who’s shown it. Stephen Harper stood up and told the country what it needs to hear: Pierre Poilievre is ready to lead. Not because of branding. Not because he’s a “fresh face.” Not because some elite committee in Ottawa thinks it’s his turn. No—because he earned it. Harper laid it out plainly. Poilievre started in the back row. He built his career not on media hype or party privilege, but on policy work, persistence, and a rock-solid conservative vision. He wasn’t parachuted in. He wasn’t picked by insiders. He clawed his way up with substance. “Pierre is not new to this. He’s been on the national scene for more than two decades. He has been in cabinet. He has been in opposition. He’s a serious policy-maker. A leader who has grown through experience.” That’s what Stephen Harper said. And you could hear the crowd erupt when he said it. Because Canadians are desperate—desperate—for someone who doesn’t just play politics, but actually understands the fight. Someone who knows how Parliament works. Someone who has taken on the gatekeepers—and won. And Harper wasn’t just praising Poilievre’s résumé. He called him what the man actually is: an ideas-driven, battle-tested leader who has spent his entire career pushing back against the smug, bloated, bureaucratic class that now defines Ottawa. “Pierre has always been guided by conservative values… smaller government, fiscal responsibility, and making this country work for those who do the work.” Imagine that. A politician who talks about work—and means it. Harper could’ve stayed silent. He’s done the job. He’s earned his peace. But he stepped into that warehouse in Nisku for one reason: to make it clear that this is Pierre’s moment—and Canada can’t afford to miss it. “He is our leader. And he is the next Prime Minister of Canada.” That wasn’t hyperbole. That was a warning shot to the Liberal machine. A message to the Laurentian elite, the smug consultants, the CBC newsrooms, and every Davos-friendly banker currently circling Ottawa like vultures: your time is up. Stephen Harper didn’t back Pierre out of nostalgia. He backed him because he sees a real, competent, fearless leader—someone who knows that you don’t fix this country by managing the decline. You stop the decline. Pierre Poilievre isn’t Trudeau with a different haircut. He’s the anti-Trudeau. He’s not trying to be liked by the press gallery. He’s trying to restore the country. And if you want a Prime Minister who understands the value of work, who believes in the dignity of the individual, who will cut the red tape, slash the taxes, fire the gatekeepers, and take Canada back from the bureaucratic swamp—Harper made it clear: There is only one choice. Pierre Poilievre.

Last night, in a massive warehouse just outside Edmonton, something extraordinary happened. Fifteen thousand Canadians showed up—not for a concert, not for a protest, but for a political rally. For one reason: to hear Pierre Poilievre speak. But the real shock? The man who introduced him. Stephen Harper—the most successful Conservative prime minister in a generation—took the stage to deliver a blistering endorsement of Poilievre, and a scathing indictment of the Liberal regime. He didn’t mince words. Harper said what every Canadian knows but no one in the press gallery will admit: this country needs change—desperately. And he didn’t hedge. He didn’t qualify. He didn’t say “both parties have made mistakes.” No. Harper made it clear: this crisis—soaring costs, collapsing standards, vanishing jobs, growing division—it wasn’t created by Donald Trump. It was made right here. In Ottawa. By three terms of Liberal government and the Prime Minister who wants a fourth. “These were not created by Donald Trump… They were created by the policies of three Liberal terms—policies the present Prime Minister supported.” That’s as blunt as Harper gets. And it should be a headline on every newspaper in the country. But it won’t be. Because it hits too close to home for the elite class that’s spent nearly a decade covering for Trudeau’s failures. Harper pointed out that the Liberals and their media allies are now trying to blame everything on geopolitics. Blame Trump. Blame supply chains. Blame COVID. Blame war. Blame anything but themselves. Because the truth? They can’t run on their record—so they’re running from it. What is that record? Exploding debt Collapsing GDP per capita A federal bureaucracy that punishes work and rewards compliance A housing market that’s locked out an entire generation And an energy sector that’s been handed over to the Americans while Canadians sit unemployed on world-class resources And now, as Mark Carney floats in with his $180 million CBC top-up and another round of green buzzwords, Harper reminded everyone: they’ve had their shot. Three terms. And they blew it. He warned Canadians not to fall for the same routine again. Not to fall for the same slogans. Not to fall for the polished elites promising “solutions” to the very problems they created. He reminded Canadians that while the Liberals talk about “fighting Trump,” they’re really just using the U.S. as a scapegoat for their own failures. And what did Harper offer instead? A rallying cry to seize this moment—not as an excuse—but as an opportunity to rebuild a truly independent Canada. “The challenge from the United States… should not be another excuse for Liberal failure. It should be a historic opportunity.” But the line that hit hardest? It was personal. Harper reminded everyone that he’s the only person alive who actually led Canada through the global financial crisis. That little swipe at Mark Carney—you could feel the building rumble. Carney wants credit for crisis leadership? Harper was running the country when the global economy was imploding. He knows what real leadership looks like—and he said flatly that Pierre Poilievre is the only one on the stage today who’s shown it. Stephen Harper stood up and told the country what it needs to hear: Pierre Poilievre is ready to lead. Not because of branding. Not because he’s a “fresh face.” Not because some elite committee in Ottawa thinks it’s his turn. No—because he earned it. Harper laid it out plainly. Poilievre started in the back row. He built his career not on media hype or party privilege, but on policy work, persistence, and a rock-solid conservative vision. He wasn’t parachuted in. He wasn’t picked by insiders. He clawed his way up with substance. “Pierre is not new to this. He’s been on the national scene for more than two decades. He has been in cabinet. He has been in opposition. He’s a serious policy-maker. A leader who has grown through experience.” That’s what Stephen Harper said. And you could hear the crowd erupt when he said it. Because Canadians are desperate—desperate—for someone who doesn’t just play politics, but actually understands the fight. Someone who knows how Parliament works. Someone who has taken on the gatekeepers—and won. And Harper wasn’t just praising Poilievre’s résumé. He called him what the man actually is: an ideas-driven, battle-tested leader who has spent his entire career pushing back against the smug, bloated, bureaucratic class that now defines Ottawa. “Pierre has always been guided by conservative values… smaller government, fiscal responsibility, and making this country work for those who do the work.” Imagine that. A politician who talks about work—and means it. Harper could’ve stayed silent. He’s done the job. He’s earned his peace. But he stepped into that warehouse in Nisku for one reason: to make it clear that this is Pierre’s moment—and Canada can’t afford to miss it. “He is our leader. And he is the next Prime Minister of Canada.” That wasn’t hyperbole. That was a warning shot to the Liberal machine. A message to the Laurentian elite, the smug consultants, the CBC newsrooms, and every Davos-friendly banker currently circling Ottawa like vultures: your time is up. Stephen Harper didn’t back Pierre out of nostalgia. He backed him because he sees a real, competent, fearless leader—someone who knows that you don’t fix this country by managing the decline. You stop the decline. Pierre Poilievre isn’t Trudeau with a different haircut. He’s the anti-Trudeau. He’s not trying to be liked by the press gallery. He’s trying to restore the country. And if you want a Prime Minister who understands the value of work, who believes in the dignity of the individual, who will cut the red tape, slash the taxes, fire the gatekeepers, and take Canada back from the bureaucratic swamp—Harper made it clear: There is only one choice. Pierre Poilievre.

Dan Knight

218,945 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Mark Carney defends Liberal MP who promoted kidnapping of Conservative rival for CCP bounty Mark Carney, the Liberal establishment's globalist golden boy and heir to the Trudeau throne, is standing firm behind embattled MP Paul Chiang—even after Chiang was caught encouraging the kidnapping of his Conservative rival, Joe Tay, in service of a Chinese Communist Party bounty. Yes, really. Chiang, the Liberal MP for Markham–Unionville, stands accused of encouraging individuals to abduct Tay and hand him over to Chinese officials for a $1 million bounty tied to Tay’s outspoken criticism of Beijing’s human rights abuses. If this sounds like something out of a bad Cold War thriller, it isn’t. It’s just another day in Carney's Canada. When asked by reporters on Monday morning about Chiang’s role in promoting transnational repression, Carney brushed it off as a “learning opportunity.” According to Carney, Chiang will remain on as a Liberal candidate. This, from the man Liberals pitch as the “grown-up in the room.” Mr. World Bank. The adult Trudeau’s cabinet never had. And now, he’s green-lighting one of his MPs shilling for the Chinese Communist Party’s hit list. Chiang attempted to put out the fire with a social media “apology,” claiming he reached out to Tay to make amends. But Tay isn’t buying it. Tay added he’s been in contact with the RCMP over safety concerns—even before Chiang’s disturbing comments came to light. Let’s not downplay what’s at stake here: Canadian citizens have been executed in China in recent years. Chiang was effectively suggesting that Tay be handed over to a regime with blood on its hands. And Chiang didn’t suggest just any place to drop Tay off—he pointed to the same Chinese consulate in Toronto where diplomats were previously caught intimidating Conservative MP Michael Chong over his criticism of Beijing. Meanwhile, the so-called “Foreign Interference Commission” continues to shield the names of 11 parliamentarians implicated in CCP influence operations. And thanks to the Liberals proroguing Parliament for their leadership swap, none of the commission’s recommendations have been implemented ahead of this election. All of this is happening while Elections Canada is now providing private security to threatened candidates. A shocking but unsurprising development in a country where a Liberal MP can promote foreign-sponsored abductions with zero consequences. Let’s cut the nonsense: if a Freedom Convoy supporter had suggested kidnapping Chrystia Freeland and turning her over to Russia, the regime would have unleashed a crackdown so brutal, the illegally invoked Emergencies Act would look like a picnic. But Chiang? Nothing. Not even a slap on the wrist. The message is clear: if you're a Liberal MP promoting foreign dictatorship tactics, the Liberal Party will protect you. Mark Carney will praise you. And the media will memory-hole you. REPORT by Sheila Gunn Reid:

Mark Carney defends Liberal MP who promoted kidnapping of Conservative rival for CCP bounty Mark Carney, the Liberal establishment's globalist golden boy and heir to the Trudeau throne, is standing firm behind embattled MP Paul Chiang—even after Chiang was caught encouraging the kidnapping of his Conservative rival, Joe Tay, in service of a Chinese Communist Party bounty. Yes, really. Chiang, the Liberal MP for Markham–Unionville, stands accused of encouraging individuals to abduct Tay and hand him over to Chinese officials for a $1 million bounty tied to Tay’s outspoken criticism of Beijing’s human rights abuses. If this sounds like something out of a bad Cold War thriller, it isn’t. It’s just another day in Carney's Canada. When asked by reporters on Monday morning about Chiang’s role in promoting transnational repression, Carney brushed it off as a “learning opportunity.” According to Carney, Chiang will remain on as a Liberal candidate. This, from the man Liberals pitch as the “grown-up in the room.” Mr. World Bank. The adult Trudeau’s cabinet never had. And now, he’s green-lighting one of his MPs shilling for the Chinese Communist Party’s hit list. Chiang attempted to put out the fire with a social media “apology,” claiming he reached out to Tay to make amends. But Tay isn’t buying it. Tay added he’s been in contact with the RCMP over safety concerns—even before Chiang’s disturbing comments came to light. Let’s not downplay what’s at stake here: Canadian citizens have been executed in China in recent years. Chiang was effectively suggesting that Tay be handed over to a regime with blood on its hands. And Chiang didn’t suggest just any place to drop Tay off—he pointed to the same Chinese consulate in Toronto where diplomats were previously caught intimidating Conservative MP Michael Chong over his criticism of Beijing. Meanwhile, the so-called “Foreign Interference Commission” continues to shield the names of 11 parliamentarians implicated in CCP influence operations. And thanks to the Liberals proroguing Parliament for their leadership swap, none of the commission’s recommendations have been implemented ahead of this election. All of this is happening while Elections Canada is now providing private security to threatened candidates. A shocking but unsurprising development in a country where a Liberal MP can promote foreign-sponsored abductions with zero consequences. Let’s cut the nonsense: if a Freedom Convoy supporter had suggested kidnapping Chrystia Freeland and turning her over to Russia, the regime would have unleashed a crackdown so brutal, the illegally invoked Emergencies Act would look like a picnic. But Chiang? Nothing. Not even a slap on the wrist. The message is clear: if you're a Liberal MP promoting foreign dictatorship tactics, the Liberal Party will protect you. Mark Carney will praise you. And the media will memory-hole you. REPORT by Sheila Gunn Reid:

Rebel News

65,791 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Mark Carney’s Mark Carney Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero is a festering swamp of lies and corruption, a grotesque monument to his staggering incompetence that’s crumbled into a pile of steaming wreckage. The US House Judiciary Committee ripped it apart with an investigation that hit like a sledgehammer, dropping their June 2024 report "Climate Control: Exposing the Decarbonization Collusion in ESG Investing" to brand GFANZ a "climate cartel" guilty of antitrust violations so blatant they could’ve choked the life out of honest businesses. Carney, the slimy ringmaster, got hauled in with his stooge Mary Schapiro in February 2024, forced to squirm as regulators peeled back the curtain on his crooked plot to bully companies into his net-zero pipe dream. Subpoenas had been stacking up since November 2023, a clear sign the reek of his collusion was too rancid to ignore, and by December 2024, the probe was still clawing at GFANZ’s guts, exposing Carney as the fraud he is. The collapse came fast and hard, a humiliating smackdown that left Carney’s grand vision in the dirt where it belongs. Big banks—JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, Citi, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley—bolted from the Net-Zero Banking Alliance between December 2024 and January 2025, flipping Carney the bird as they ditched his sinking ship. Before that, insurance titans Munich Re and Zurich had already hightailed it in 2023 and 2024, fed up with the legal quicksand and governance trainwreck he couldn’t steer clear of. This wasn’t some hiccup; it was a full-blown implosion, a neon sign flashing “failure” over Carney’s head as his so-called climate crusade turned into a laughingstock. He didn’t just drop the ball—he torched it, leaving a trail of ash and a stench that’ll linger for years. Then there’s the knife he stuck in Canada’s back, proving he’s as treacherous as he is inept. While playing climate savior, this creep oversaw Brookfield’s head office jumping ship to New York, a move the National Post in February 2025 slammed as “selling out Canada” to line his own pockets. The Dorchester Review piled on, calling him an elitist thug who’d already screwed over taxpayers with his income trust tax debacle in past roles—classic Carney, screwing the little guy while preening for the cameras. His fingerprints are all over these disasters, a legacy of betrayal and bungling that shows he’s got no business leading anything, let alone a country. When the heat got too much, Carney pulled his signature coward move—cutting and running from GFANZ in January 2025 just as the banks bailed and the investigation tightened its grip. He slunk off to chase Canada’s PM gig, leaving his climate scam in ruins and dodging the mess he made like the spineless weasel he is. This isn’t a leader; it’s a con artist in a suit, a walking catastrophe who’s left nothing but broken trust and a pile of garbage where his big ideas once stood. Every step he’s taken with GFANZ reeks of arrogance and deceit, a masterclass in how to tank a cause and stab your own people in the back while you’re at it.

Vote Canada

50,724 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Pierre Poilievre said the quiet part out loud: businesses in Canada don’t need Temporary Foreign Workers—they just want them, because they’ll work for less. That’s it. No mystery. No labor shortage. Just greed. And the Liberals, under Mark Carney, are happy to oblige. So here’s the story. Booster Juice—advertises a job paying $36 an hour. Not bad for blending fruit. And who do they say it’s for? A Temporary Foreign Worker. Not a Canadian kid trying to pay tuition. Not a young person stuck at home because rent is unaffordable. Nope. A foreign worker. Are we really supposed to believe no Canadian teenager would pour frozen strawberries into a blender for thirty-six bucks an hour? Please. That’s more than most trades apprentices make. But under Mark Carney’s Liberals, Canadian youth don’t even get the chance. They’re cut out by design. And that’s the point. This isn’t about “labor shortages.” That’s the line the media repeats while nodding obediently. The truth is simpler: corporations don’t want to pay Canadians a fair wage, so the Liberals hand them a pipeline of cheap, desperate labor from abroad. It’s exploitation dressed up as policy. And the Liberal elites love it. Carney, Trudeau’s banker-turned-prime-minister, promised to be different. He’s worse. In just six months, he’s blown past his own cap on TFW permits—105,000 already issued. Keep that up, and Canada will import over 200,000 low-wage workers this year. Meanwhile, youth unemployment is 14.6%—the highest since the late 1990s. If you were trying to design a system to crush Canadian kids, you couldn’t do better. But don’t worry. Carney will tell you this is all very sophisticated. Globalization. Free markets. Necessary labor mobility. The kind of word salad elites recite while your rent doubles and your job disappears. The reality? It’s a scam. A scam for corporations, by corporations, with Liberals in Ottawa playing concierge. Poilievre called it what it is: scrap the program. Canadian jobs for Canadian workers. Period. Because if a Booster Juice gig at $36 an hour is “unfit” for a Canadian student, then nothing is. And the fact they said it out loud tells you everything about the contempt these people have for their own citizens. They don’t even bother to hide it anymore.

Pierre Poilievre said the quiet part out loud: businesses in Canada don’t need Temporary Foreign Workers—they just want them, because they’ll work for less. That’s it. No mystery. No labor shortage. Just greed. And the Liberals, under Mark Carney, are happy to oblige. So here’s the story. Booster Juice—advertises a job paying $36 an hour. Not bad for blending fruit. And who do they say it’s for? A Temporary Foreign Worker. Not a Canadian kid trying to pay tuition. Not a young person stuck at home because rent is unaffordable. Nope. A foreign worker. Are we really supposed to believe no Canadian teenager would pour frozen strawberries into a blender for thirty-six bucks an hour? Please. That’s more than most trades apprentices make. But under Mark Carney’s Liberals, Canadian youth don’t even get the chance. They’re cut out by design. And that’s the point. This isn’t about “labor shortages.” That’s the line the media repeats while nodding obediently. The truth is simpler: corporations don’t want to pay Canadians a fair wage, so the Liberals hand them a pipeline of cheap, desperate labor from abroad. It’s exploitation dressed up as policy. And the Liberal elites love it. Carney, Trudeau’s banker-turned-prime-minister, promised to be different. He’s worse. In just six months, he’s blown past his own cap on TFW permits—105,000 already issued. Keep that up, and Canada will import over 200,000 low-wage workers this year. Meanwhile, youth unemployment is 14.6%—the highest since the late 1990s. If you were trying to design a system to crush Canadian kids, you couldn’t do better. But don’t worry. Carney will tell you this is all very sophisticated. Globalization. Free markets. Necessary labor mobility. The kind of word salad elites recite while your rent doubles and your job disappears. The reality? It’s a scam. A scam for corporations, by corporations, with Liberals in Ottawa playing concierge. Poilievre called it what it is: scrap the program. Canadian jobs for Canadian workers. Period. Because if a Booster Juice gig at $36 an hour is “unfit” for a Canadian student, then nothing is. And the fact they said it out loud tells you everything about the contempt these people have for their own citizens. They don’t even bother to hide it anymore.

Dan Knight

77,786 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Mark Carney appoints two Hamas supporters to his council on antisemitism Mark Carney gave a speech about the antisemitic crime wave in Canada — but he has refused to do anything about it. He won't expel the hundreds of Iranian agents operating on Canadian soil. He won't direct the RCMP and CSIS to dismantle the pro-Hamas street gangs shooting at schools and synagogues. He won't screen new immigrants for antisemitic views. What he will do is set up a council to study the problem — as if the only thing standing between Jewish Canadians and safety is a lack of sufficient studies. But here is where it gets genuinely hard to believe. This new antisemitism council has exactly one Jewish member: Liberal Senator Marc Gold, a loyal Carney ally who can be counted on to never say a cross word about the prime minister. But Carney also appointed two genuine antisemites to the very council tasked with rooting it out. The first is Omar Alghabra. Before entering federal politics, Alghabra served as president of the Canadian Arab Federation — an organization whose government funding was eventually cut off because of its own antisemitism. While in office, Alghabra personally lobbied the federal government to legalize Hamas and Hezbollah, seeking their removal from Canada's list of designated terrorist organizations. He socializes with notorious Holocaust deniers. He is a vocal advocate for boycotting and sanctioning Israel. When then-Toronto police chief Bill Blair visited Israel, Alghabra said Blair should have been fired for making the trip. He has been photographed alongside Firas Najim, a prominent Iranian activist operating in Toronto. The second antisemite is a radical lawyer named Avnish Nanda, who specializes in representing Islamists and antisemites. One of his cases was just atrocious: you might remember that pro-Hamas extremists set up an illegal encampment at the University of Alberta, designed to humiliate and intimidate Jewish students and staff. When the university tried to clear away those hateful trespassers, Nanda sued the university, trying to stop them from being removed. The prime minister's office released the full council membership on June 1st. The names are there in black and white. Alghabra and Nanda are definitely experts in antisemitism, but not in a good way. We can’t let this slide. Rebel News has launched an emergency petition demanding that Carney immediately remove Alghabra and Nanda from the council. You can sign it and send a direct letter of protest to the prime minister at Rebel News is also deploying its billboard truck to ensure that Canadians across the country know exactly who Carney has put in charge of the antisemitism file. Consider donating to help us cover the costs of putting this council in the spotlight. REPORT by Ezra Levant 🍁🚛:

Mark Carney appoints two Hamas supporters to his council on antisemitism Mark Carney gave a speech about the antisemitic crime wave in Canada — but he has refused to do anything about it. He won't expel the hundreds of Iranian agents operating on Canadian soil. He won't direct the RCMP and CSIS to dismantle the pro-Hamas street gangs shooting at schools and synagogues. He won't screen new immigrants for antisemitic views. What he will do is set up a council to study the problem — as if the only thing standing between Jewish Canadians and safety is a lack of sufficient studies. But here is where it gets genuinely hard to believe. This new antisemitism council has exactly one Jewish member: Liberal Senator Marc Gold, a loyal Carney ally who can be counted on to never say a cross word about the prime minister. But Carney also appointed two genuine antisemites to the very council tasked with rooting it out. The first is Omar Alghabra. Before entering federal politics, Alghabra served as president of the Canadian Arab Federation — an organization whose government funding was eventually cut off because of its own antisemitism. While in office, Alghabra personally lobbied the federal government to legalize Hamas and Hezbollah, seeking their removal from Canada's list of designated terrorist organizations. He socializes with notorious Holocaust deniers. He is a vocal advocate for boycotting and sanctioning Israel. When then-Toronto police chief Bill Blair visited Israel, Alghabra said Blair should have been fired for making the trip. He has been photographed alongside Firas Najim, a prominent Iranian activist operating in Toronto. The second antisemite is a radical lawyer named Avnish Nanda, who specializes in representing Islamists and antisemites. One of his cases was just atrocious: you might remember that pro-Hamas extremists set up an illegal encampment at the University of Alberta, designed to humiliate and intimidate Jewish students and staff. When the university tried to clear away those hateful trespassers, Nanda sued the university, trying to stop them from being removed. The prime minister's office released the full council membership on June 1st. The names are there in black and white. Alghabra and Nanda are definitely experts in antisemitism, but not in a good way. We can’t let this slide. Rebel News has launched an emergency petition demanding that Carney immediately remove Alghabra and Nanda from the council. You can sign it and send a direct letter of protest to the prime minister at Rebel News is also deploying its billboard truck to ensure that Canadians across the country know exactly who Carney has put in charge of the antisemitism file. Consider donating to help us cover the costs of putting this council in the spotlight. REPORT by Ezra Levant 🍁🚛:

Rebel News

10,801 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce