Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
๐จ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ ๐๐๐๐๐๐: ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐! 11 Goals in 16 Matches and 33 Goals in 50 Total Apps 1.8 Goal Creating Actions per 90 โจ Should He Be Called?๐ค
766,237 Aufrufe โข vor 6 Monaten โขvia X (Twitter)
0 Kommentare
Keine Kommentare verfรผgbar
Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt
![Player Profile: Khanyisa Mayo[27]๐ Position: RW/RF/CF Foot: Left Club: Kaizer Chiefs FC Kaizer Chiefs has made another bold move in adding quality to the teams attack. Khanyisa Mayo provides immediate and long-term attacking solutions for the club on the right. 1. Technical Qualities Mayo is a skillful, left-footed attacker with a profile built for modern, high-intensity attacking football. โ A very direct winger, always looking to advance play instead of recycling possession. โ Excellent at carrying the ball through pressure, breaking lines, and forcing defenders into retreat. โ His dribbling and progressive runs add verticality to the teamโs attacking structure. Shooting and Passing: โ Strong shooting range when cutting inside from the right. He provides that unpredictability to the attack with his quality to strike the ball from range. Consistently attempts to feed the box: goals, assists, and key passes. A finisher and creator between the lines. Positional Versatility: โ In a 4-3-3/4-2-3-1, his best role is as the right forward or right winger, cutting inside to shoot or combine. He can also be effective stretching play and still carry goal threat and creativity. โ As a No. 9: While not his best role, he is capable of leading the line. He uses his pace to run in behind. He can compete but lacks the physicality to hold off defenders, though his finishing is good. โ As a Second Striker[442]: A role that plays better to his strengths than as a 9. He is comfortable operating between the lines, combining with midfielders and a traditional box striker. His mobility, creativity, and shooting ability allow him to function as the link player, collecting the ball, supporting the primary striker, and creating or finishing opportunities. This ability to operate both wide and centrally makes him tactically flexible, giving Chiefs options in various attacking structures. 2. Physical Attributes โ Pace & Explosiveness: Quick acceleration makes him a constant outlet for balls in behind. โ Strength & Balance: He is strong enough to hold off fullbacks, sustaining attacking sequences under pressure โ High Intensity: Matches the tempo of Chiefsโ pressing and counter-pressing game. We do most actions with a lot of intensity, and his explosive nature will be very much welcomed in our attack. 3. Tactical Fit at Chiefs Under Coach Nabi, Chiefs are shaping into a side that plays with directness, intensity, and aggression across all phases of play: โ Pressing & Counter-Pressing: The team applies immediate pressure after losing the ball. Mayoโs speed, defensive work rate, and forward momentum align seamlessly with this system. โ High-Tempo Attacking: Chiefs donโt rely on slow possession. Attacks are vertical, sharp, and quick. Mayoโs instinct to drive forward, dribble at defenders, and attack space makes him an ideal fit. โ Attacking Personality: His ability to provide not just progression but also the final goal, final pass, and decisive action elevates Chiefsโ attacking efficiency. Mayoโs game is inherently aligned with protagonist football: high tempo, forward intent, and productivity. 4. Experiential Value โ Continental Experience: Spent a season in Algeria with CR Belouizdad, scoring 6 goals from wide positions. Notable not just for the numbers but for adapting to a challenging cultural and tactical environment. โ Tactical Growth: North African teams are disciplined and organized, with compact defenses and structured pressing. Mayo sharpened his decision-making, spatial awareness, and ability to operate against tight blocks, preparing him for high-level CAF competitions. โ Mentality: At 27, he blends maturity with hunger. His willingness to take risks reflects confidence and attacking intent. Yet to reach his peak, now is the perfect time to step up, showing the quality glimpsed at Cape Town City. Mayo joins Chiefs as both a system player and a game-changer. A top signing by the Glamour Boys! ๐](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1964381677679235203/ext_tw_video_thumb/1964381469373083648/pu/img/B9XjWtbknzBvw3Dw.jpg)
![US Education Department Contractor Overcharged Taxpayers While Spending Millions On Executive Salaries As student math and reading scores declined, the American Institute of Research charged 50% in indirect costs and paid its CEO over $2 million by alex gutentag and Michael Shellenberger Over the last few weeks, the media and Democrats have been lambasting President Donald Trump for cutting the Department of Educationโs research budget. In particular, the media criticized the Trump administration for cutting a contractorโs research into support services for students with disabilities who are nearing graduation. But itโs not clear that the research was necessary or successful, and there is already both state and federal funding aimed at helping students with disabilities to develop life skills and plans for the future. And now Public has obtained invoices showing that the Departmentโs contractor for the research in question, American Institute for Research (AIR), had significantly overcharged the Department in so-called indirect costs. The invoice is from November 18, 2024, and shows AIR billing the Department $411,961.35 for the month of October 2024. Of that money, $214,952.74 was in โtotal indirects.โ AIR charged an additional $26,950.74 as a 7% fee. The invoice shows that the cumulative amount that AIR had billed the Department of Education was $10,957,275.73, of which $4,993,376.12 was total indirects and $716,831.18 was total additional fees. A second invoice is from January 15, 2025, and shows AIR billing the Department $60,913.72 for the month of December 2024. Of that money, $29,685.23 was in total indirects. AIR charged an additional $3,985.01 as a 7% fee. The invoice shows that the cumulative amount that AIR had billed the Department of Education was $11,076,493.79, of which $5,028,446.77 was total indirects and $724,630.48 was total additional fees. In response to questions from Public, an AIR spokesperson said, โAIRโs indirect rates are similar to those of other social and behavioral research organizations and we have always abided by our approved rates. For government contractors, indirect costs include such costs as information technology, data security, and compliance and reporting.โ However, 50% in indirect fees is widely considered excessive. The National Institutes of Health recently required that its contractors lower indirect costs to 15% to reduce widespread overcharging. Indeed, when asked about the invoice, a spokesperson for the Department of Education condemned the high fees. โContracts with indirect rates over 50% take gross advantage of taxpayer dollars, perverting the reason the contracts exist โ our students,โ said Department spokesperson Madison Biedermann. โIncoming leadership will no longer allow these unacceptable terms.โ According to AIRโs IRS 990 form, the total compensation of AIRโs chief executive, David Myers, in the most recent year available, 2023, was $2,241,374. โAt the end of 2023, David Myers finished a 14-year tenure as AIRโs President and Chief Executive Officer,โ said the AIR spokesperson. โHis compensation for his final year included a retention payment. The salary for our current President and CEO is lower and in line with what other non-profit organizations of our size and type pay their chief executives.โ However, AIRโs tax forms showed that Myers earned $2,294,637 in 2022 and $1,145,400 in 2021. Jessica Heppen is the current president and CEO. In 2023, she earned $685,060 as president. Neither Heppen nor Myers responded to Publicโs request for comment. AIRโs 990 form shows other high salaries for staff and fees for board members. AIRโs Executive Vice President and Chief People Officer, earned $931,610 in 2023, and its CFO earned $1,145,400 in 2022. A member of the AIR Board, Robert Boruch, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania, received $80,250 in 2023 for just 2 hours of work per week, which is $772 per hour. While nonprofit board members typically donate their time, 14 of AIRโs board members received hundreds of dollars per hour for their service. None responded to requests by Public for comment. AIRโs fees should be considered in the broader context of declining student performance and AIRโs role to provide research that improves student performance. Today, only 31% of fourth graders and only 30% of eighth graders are reading at or above proficiency levels, according to the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). In eighth grade reading, 33% of students scored โbelow basic,โ the highest percentage recorded in the NAEPโs history. Congress established the Education Department in 1979 โto promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.โ Student performance has declined across the board over the last 10 years. While Covid school closures significantly worsened them, math and reading scores declined for fourth- and eighth-graders nationwide from 2014 to 2024. AIR appears to be partly responsible. It gave a favorable evaluation to Lucy Calkinsโ Units of Study curriculum, which used elements of the now-debunked โwhole languageโ approach to reading instead of systematic phonics instruction. Under the whole language approach, teachers taught children to memorize whole words and use guessing strategies instead of sounding out individual sounds in unfamiliar words. The failure of the whole language approach was precisely why the Department of Education hires groups like AIR. The goal of research is to discover which teaching methods work and which donโt before schools adopt them. That didnโt happen. In fact, the opposite did. The result was a whole generation of children robbed of fundamental literacy. โIt is absolutely inaccurate to say we โgave a favorable evaluationโ to Units of Study,โ said AIR. But the evaluation was clearly positive. Implementation of the curriculum, AIRโs report stated, โis associated with improvements in ELA [English Language Arts] achievement starting in the second year of implementation, and in schools that opt to continue with the approach long term, the magnitude of the effects grow larger over time.โ And even AIR noted, in its email to Public, โWe found no positive effect in the first year of implementation, then saw positive effects in subsequent years for some schools.โ Other Department contractors had much lower indirect rates. Why was AIR able to charge so much? If you're not already a subscriber, please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative reporting, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1901693316267213208/ext_tw_video_thumb/1901692814133452800/pu/img/N6mfWH6lZv0rW5jL.jpg)