Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

𝐈𝐧 𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟑, 𝐒𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐤𝐡 𝐉𝐚𝐟𝐚𝐫 𝐌𝐚𝐡𝐦𝐨𝐮𝐝 𝐀𝐝𝐚𝐦 )رحمه الله) 𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐤𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐟𝐞𝐞𝐥 𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐬𝐚𝐢𝐝 𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐚𝐲. He highlighted a reality many Muslims recognize, in Nigeria and around the world: we are often pushed into a constant state of defense. Accusations come one after another: “Islam doesn’t give... women rights.” “Islam is extreme.” “Islam is harsh.” And so we respond. We explain. We clarify. We defend. But he warned that remaining perpetually on the defensive distracts us from a greater responsibility; to confidently and wisely invite others to Islam. Islam is not defined merely as “peace,” as it is often reduced to in modern discourse. The word Islam means total submission to the will of Allah ﷻ; a complete and conscious surrender of one’s desires, actions, and life to the Creator. To say “I am Muslim” is to say: I submit fully to Allah. I do what He commands and refrain from what He forbids. Sheikh Jafar (رحمه الله) also challenged a common narrative: the portrayal of Islam as inherently aggressive. He pointed to history — particularly the battles of Badr and Uhud — emphasizing that the early Muslim community faced persecution, expulsion, and armed pursuit. The Prophet ﷺ & his companions were forced from Makkah, migrated seeking peace, and were pursued to the outskirts of Madinah. The Battle of Badr itself took place near Madinah after hostile forces advanced toward them. His broader point was about perspective: history is often told by those who control the narrative. Yet global history is filled with devastating wars, colonization, and mass civilian casualties carried out by powerful nations — from Hiroshima and Nagasaki to Algeria, Iraq, Gaza & beyond, the Christian West has killed tens of millions of innocent Muslims, either during colonization or modern day imperialism. Still, Islam is frequently singled out as uniquely violent. Whether one agrees with every framing or not, his message was clear: Muslims should not internalize narratives that constantly place them on trial. Instead, they should understand their faith deeply, represent it with integrity, and engage the world with confidence, knowledge, and wisdom. Nearly two decades later, his words still provoke reflection. May Allah have mercy on him and grant us clarity, balance, and steadfastness.show more

𝐃𝐫 𝐀𝐛𝐮𝐛𝐚𝐤𝐚𝐫 𝐇𝐢𝐝𝐢𝐦𝐚

133,843 subscribers

48,374 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Sanat Haberler & Politika Eğitim

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

33 Yorum

Saidu Muhammad Habibu profil fotoğrafı

Saidu Muhammad Habibu7 ay önce

That's why as much as we appreciate the efforts of those defending The Deen,we should also learn to ignore those ignorant islamophobes and promote Islam as it is. As long as we are on the defensive,we will hardly progress

Asi AM profil fotoğrafı

Asi AM7 ay önce

At this point I won't be surprised if there was an external involvement in Sheikh's Assassination... because he enlightened the masses about the great Satan .. America and Israel....

abdulrazak profil fotoğrafı

abdulrazak7 ay önce

Instead, we are left with fighting ourselves from different sections (Akidah) of Islamic religion with hatred. Allah ya kikan malam da rahama

Bint Muhammadu Faransa profil fotoğrafı

Bint Muhammadu Faransa7 ay önce

Jazakumullah khairan. This reminder consoles my troubled heart. The times and events are disturbing. May we all be focused, "keep our eyes on the ball" .

Abdullahi Abdulhadi profil fotoğrafı

Abdullahi Abdulhadi7 ay önce

Allah yajikan sheikh Jaafar Mahmoud Adam. He knew so much, and that was a problem to those that Assassinated him. An barmu da malamai yan Muslim Muslim ticket, wasunsu sunsan gaskiya Amma baza su fadama mabiyansu ba.

J profil fotoğrafı

J7 ay önce

Allah ya saka ma Baba chinedu da Malam Ashaka. Jiya Evangelist Usman Ibrahim ya musulunta a Sultan Bello. Malam Ashaka suka kawo shi

Mailafia Imran 🇳🇬 profil fotoğrafı

Mailafia Imran 🇳🇬7 ay önce

We have been subjected to the defensive, it have never come to my senses until now, May Allah bless Malam with Jannatul Firdausi

North profil fotoğrafı

North7 ay önce

Sadly Most Northerners are just Muslims not by practice 💔 Till WE ALL COLLECTIVELY GO BACK to the TRUE TEACHINGS OF AL-FURQAN AND HADITH Hope WE ALL COLLECTIVELY DO

MUH4MM4D H4F1Z L4W4L profil fotoğrafı

MUH4MM4D H4F1Z L4W4L7 ay önce

May Allah SWA Have Mercy On Mallam's Soul... Ameen Thumma Ameen... What A Great Scholar He Was...

Bashir Sambo profil fotoğrafı

Bashir Sambo7 ay önce

Words on marble, may Allah grant His mercies on sheikh Ja'afar.

Yusuf Tukur, PhD profil fotoğrafı

Yusuf Tukur, PhD7 ay önce

Allahumma Aameen. Over two decades ma.

Kamilu Zayyan Ibrahim profil fotoğrafı

Kamilu Zayyan Ibrahim7 ay önce

Allahu Akbar 🤍 Allah y jikan malan

Anonymous profil fotoğrafı

Anonymous7 ay önce

Ja'afar wasn't assassinated until he told all what Allah assigned him to told. May Allah forgive him.

Khaleel88 profil fotoğrafı

Khaleel887 ay önce

Shaykh Adam. ja'far is a rare gem from among the scholars of his time till date. RahimahuLlah

Umma Ahmad profil fotoğrafı

Umma Ahmad7 ay önce

May Allah have mercy on Sheikh Ja’far and grant him Jannah. He said it all.

Munir Musa profil fotoğrafı

Munir Musa7 ay önce

Allaah ya jikan Mallam, ya gafarta mai, ya sa ya huta, ya kyautata makwanci. Duk abin da Mallam ya fada daidai ne, sai ma abin da ya karu. Allaah ya kare addinin sa musulumci, ya kuma kare musulmai duk inda suke, Amin.

ICON CARS profil fotoğrafı

ICON CARS7 ay önce

@abbah_makarfi ALLAH ya jikan mallam wanam haka yake

Leviakane'ev profil fotoğrafı

Leviakane'ev7 ay önce

We are always on the defensive.

Rabiu Adoibrahim profil fotoğrafı

Rabiu Adoibrahim7 ay önce

Allah ya karawa Mallam rahama

Malay profil fotoğrafı

Malay7 ay önce

Wannan 👆 gaskiya ne

Faisal Labaran umar profil fotoğrafı

Faisal Labaran umar7 ay önce

Allah yajikan malam

Auwal Ahmad profil fotoğrafı

Auwal Ahmad7 ay önce

Very intelligent person

Salim Zakari profil fotoğrafı

Salim Zakari7 ay önce

Allah ya jikan Mallam yayi mishi Rahama

Abbas A Tukur Esq profil fotoğrafı

Abbas A Tukur Esq7 ay önce

@Chinade_B Ameen yaa Hayyu yaa Qayyoom

emaymines profil fotoğrafı

emaymines7 ay önce

Allah saka da gidan aljannah ya mallam 🤲

Rayyan Sa'ad Sani profil fotoğrafı

Rayyan Sa'ad Sani7 ay önce

Allah ubangiji yajikan malam

D.Y=Abubakar profil fotoğrafı

D.Y=Abubakar7 ay önce

Allah yajikan malan jafar

Aysheert J. Gunda Esq profil fotoğrafı

Aysheert J. Gunda Esq7 ay önce

Aameen yaa Rabb

Ahmad Kargi Ahmad profil fotoğrafı

Ahmad Kargi Ahmad7 ay önce

Indeed Malam will never be forgotten in our Heart. May Almighty Allah grant him the highest rank in Jannah

N.B.A.K.O profil fotoğrafı

N.B.A.K.O7 ay önce

Thank you, May Allah Bless you.

Tahir Assalafy🇳🇬 profil fotoğrafı

Tahir Assalafy🇳🇬7 ay önce

Allah Ya jikan malam da Rahama

bambo abdulazeez profil fotoğrafı

bambo abdulazeez7 ay önce

Aameen

Ansar ✨ profil fotoğrafı

Ansar ✨7 ay önce

Allah Ya saka da alkhairi

Benzer Videolar

In one of his public speeches, NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani admitted that Islam and the Prophet Muhammad guide his policies as a Muslim mayor. He glorified Islam as a pro-mass migration religion and stated: “Islam is built on migration.” What he forgot to mention is that the Prophet Muhammad migrated from place to place — and after each migration, he waged war, conquered territories, and beheaded Jews and Christians who refused to submit to Islam. This is not a religion of peace. This is a political doctrine of a cult.

In one of his public speeches, NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani admitted that Islam and the Prophet Muhammad guide his policies as a Muslim mayor. He glorified Islam as a pro-mass migration religion and stated: “Islam is built on migration.” What he forgot to mention is that the Prophet Muhammad migrated from place to place — and after each migration, he waged war, conquered territories, and beheaded Jews and Christians who refused to submit to Islam. This is not a religion of peace. This is a political doctrine of a cult.

Liza Rosen

623,465 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Amen! France's Eric Zemmour Tells it Like it is... 'Qur'an Orders Muslims to Conquer Territories, to Islamize Populations, and the Entire World' “Islam is a Totalitarian Religion” "I don’t think that’s terrorism; I think it’s jihadism. Jihad is the conquest of a territory by Islam, by violent means, prescribed by the Qur’an." "There are people who attack populations of infidels to turn them into subjects of Allah." "Islam functions according to a binary framework: there is what they call the Dar al-Islam and the Dar al-Harb, that is, the world of Islam and the world of war. And Dar al-Salam. Yes, Dar al-Islam is the same thing. Dar al-Salam is the world of peace. But it is the world of Islam because we have peace only when we are converted and have submitted to Islam and submitted to Allah. It’s the same thing: Islam means submission and it has the same roots as Salam. Because we don’t have peace, except through submission. Islam" Read the article at RAIR here:

Amen! France's Eric Zemmour Tells it Like it is... 'Qur'an Orders Muslims to Conquer Territories, to Islamize Populations, and the Entire World' “Islam is a Totalitarian Religion” "I don’t think that’s terrorism; I think it’s jihadism. Jihad is the conquest of a territory by Islam, by violent means, prescribed by the Qur’an." "There are people who attack populations of infidels to turn them into subjects of Allah." "Islam functions according to a binary framework: there is what they call the Dar al-Islam and the Dar al-Harb, that is, the world of Islam and the world of war. And Dar al-Salam. Yes, Dar al-Islam is the same thing. Dar al-Salam is the world of peace. But it is the world of Islam because we have peace only when we are converted and have submitted to Islam and submitted to Allah. It’s the same thing: Islam means submission and it has the same roots as Salam. Because we don’t have peace, except through submission. Islam" Read the article at RAIR here:

Amy Mek

231,259 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

☪️ Dave Chappelle’s journey to Islam is a remarkable story of faith and spiritual discovery. As a teenager in Washington, D.C., Chappelle became curious about Islam after spending time around Muslims at a local pizza shop. Their kindness, outlook on life, and devotion sparked questions that eventually led him to explore the faith more deeply. He embraced Islam in 1998 and has since spoken about how his faith influences the way he sees the world. Chappelle has described Islam as a beautiful and unifying faith, rooted in the belief in one merciful Creator and sharing spiritual connections with other Abrahamic traditions. Despite being deeply connected to his faith, he has generally kept his religion private, explaining that he did not want his personal flaws to be associated with the beauty of Islam. A journey of questions, reflection and ultimately faith. 🤍☪️ May Allah keep him steadfast and guide him to what is pleasing to Him. Ameen. 🤲 #Islam #RevertToIslam

☪️ Dave Chappelle’s journey to Islam is a remarkable story of faith and spiritual discovery. As a teenager in Washington, D.C., Chappelle became curious about Islam after spending time around Muslims at a local pizza shop. Their kindness, outlook on life, and devotion sparked questions that eventually led him to explore the faith more deeply. He embraced Islam in 1998 and has since spoken about how his faith influences the way he sees the world. Chappelle has described Islam as a beautiful and unifying faith, rooted in the belief in one merciful Creator and sharing spiritual connections with other Abrahamic traditions. Despite being deeply connected to his faith, he has generally kept his religion private, explaining that he did not want his personal flaws to be associated with the beauty of Islam. A journey of questions, reflection and ultimately faith. 🤍☪️ May Allah keep him steadfast and guide him to what is pleasing to Him. Ameen. 🤲 #Islam #RevertToIslam

Revert_Journey☪️🤍

27,672 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

Imam Tawhidi is a clear disbeliever. He insults and belittles the Prophet ﷺ, his wives, and his friends. He doesn’t even believe in the Afterlife, as evidenced in his debate with Daniel Haqiqatjou Why is he the head of the “Global Imams Council”? Why is this apostate allowed to speak on behalf of Islam, when it’s clear that he’s a disbeliever? It’s extremely important that Muslims watch out for the secret apostates among us. They will pretend to be Muslim, while seeking to undermine Islam from within. Tawhidi is one of the clearest examples of a disbeliever pretending to be a Muslim.

Imam Tawhidi is a clear disbeliever. He insults and belittles the Prophet ﷺ, his wives, and his friends. He doesn’t even believe in the Afterlife, as evidenced in his debate with Daniel Haqiqatjou Why is he the head of the “Global Imams Council”? Why is this apostate allowed to speak on behalf of Islam, when it’s clear that he’s a disbeliever? It’s extremely important that Muslims watch out for the secret apostates among us. They will pretend to be Muslim, while seeking to undermine Islam from within. Tawhidi is one of the clearest examples of a disbeliever pretending to be a Muslim.

OJ Smoke

55,363 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

South West Muslim Ummah kindly watch this video. This is my message to Yoruba speaking Muslims in Nigeria. A few months ago, during the disagreement over the date for the beginning of Ramadan, many Muslims from the South West on social media criticized and disrespected the Sultan of Sokoto simply because they disagreed with his position and opinion. In the midst of that debate, some non-Muslims from South West also joined in criticizing and insulting the Sultan. Today, there are reports of controversy surrounding a Masquerade festival in Ibadan, with some people saying that women should not come to our during the event because see the Masquerade is a taboo for women . My point is not that Muslims should cut ties with their non-Muslim family members or neighbors. Islam encourages kindness, justice and good relations with everyone. Rather, my point is that when it comes to matters of religion, Muslims should avoid allowing disagreements to divide the Ummah and should respect one another even when they hold different opinions. 1. The Muslims of the past dedicated themselves to preaching Islam with wisdom, patience and good character. Through their efforts, many people accepted Islam and passed it down from one generation to another. 2. Many Muslims today have moved away from that legacy. Instead of strengthening unity, we often argue among ourselves, create divisions, disrespect one another and sometimes even speak against centers of Islamic learning and communities that played significant roles in spreading Islamic knowledge. 3. Muslims today should remember that continued division only weakens the Ummah. We should learn to accept legitimate differences, respect one another, and unite upon the core teachings of Islam. A united Muslim community is better able to preserve Islamic knowledge and pass it on to future generations. If you allow kuffar to cut relationship between Muslim of the North and the Muslim South, the grandchildren of those kuffār who were left yesterday will form alliance with other religious and ensure they destroy your born and unborn Muslim children and erase true Islam from Muslim them. May Allah unite the hearts of the Muslims, increase us in wisdom and guide us to what is best. Amin.

South West Muslim Ummah kindly watch this video. This is my message to Yoruba speaking Muslims in Nigeria. A few months ago, during the disagreement over the date for the beginning of Ramadan, many Muslims from the South West on social media criticized and disrespected the Sultan of Sokoto simply because they disagreed with his position and opinion. In the midst of that debate, some non-Muslims from South West also joined in criticizing and insulting the Sultan. Today, there are reports of controversy surrounding a Masquerade festival in Ibadan, with some people saying that women should not come to our during the event because see the Masquerade is a taboo for women . My point is not that Muslims should cut ties with their non-Muslim family members or neighbors. Islam encourages kindness, justice and good relations with everyone. Rather, my point is that when it comes to matters of religion, Muslims should avoid allowing disagreements to divide the Ummah and should respect one another even when they hold different opinions. 1. The Muslims of the past dedicated themselves to preaching Islam with wisdom, patience and good character. Through their efforts, many people accepted Islam and passed it down from one generation to another. 2. Many Muslims today have moved away from that legacy. Instead of strengthening unity, we often argue among ourselves, create divisions, disrespect one another and sometimes even speak against centers of Islamic learning and communities that played significant roles in spreading Islamic knowledge. 3. Muslims today should remember that continued division only weakens the Ummah. We should learn to accept legitimate differences, respect one another, and unite upon the core teachings of Islam. A united Muslim community is better able to preserve Islamic knowledge and pass it on to future generations. If you allow kuffar to cut relationship between Muslim of the North and the Muslim South, the grandchildren of those kuffār who were left yesterday will form alliance with other religious and ensure they destroy your born and unborn Muslim children and erase true Islam from Muslim them. May Allah unite the hearts of the Muslims, increase us in wisdom and guide us to what is best. Amin.

Onigbari of Ilorin

12,282 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

It's Good To Be Anti-Islam... but not anti-Muslim. 'Islam is an ideology—a set of ideas. It is not defined by what any individual Muslim wants it to be, but by what it inherently is. No ideology is above critique—particularly one that explicitly seeks political and social dominance over every person on the planet. Additionally, ideologies are not entitled to human rights; these rights apply to individuals. As an ideology, Islam is not necessarily entitled to equal respect and acceptance. Ideas do not carry equal moral weight. The feelings or the number of those who believe do not make an idea true or good. Bad ideas should be challenged before they lead to bad consequences. Islam is not simply a belief about God. The word 'Islam' means submission. It is a set of rules that define a social hierarchy where Muslims submit to Allah, women submit to men, and all non-Muslims submit to Islamic rule. Since we do not live in a Muslim country—where censorship, intimidation, and brute force are used to protect Islam from intellectual analysis—we are still somewhat free to openly exercise our right to debate the merits of the Islamic value system against Western Liberalism. Consider the following questions: Are men really superior to women as the Quran says? Are women intellectually inferior as Muhammad taught? Does propagating material that curses people of other religions amidst random calls to violence create a better social environment? Is it right to keep women as sex slaves merely because the Quran permits this practice in numerous places? Should atheists and homosexuals have to choose between the noose or an outward profession of faith in Allah? Is conformity superior to freedom? Yes, there are Muslims who take issue with these aspects of Islamic theology, but that doesn't change what Islam is. Do not confuse the ideology with the individual. Do not draw conclusions about Islam based on the Muslims that you know, whether they are terrorists or humanitarians. Islam must be understood based on what it is, as presented objectively in the Quran, Hadith, and Sira (biography of Muhammad)." Thank you to the amazing Pat Condell, who released this video ten years ago. #Respect

It's Good To Be Anti-Islam... but not anti-Muslim. 'Islam is an ideology—a set of ideas. It is not defined by what any individual Muslim wants it to be, but by what it inherently is. No ideology is above critique—particularly one that explicitly seeks political and social dominance over every person on the planet. Additionally, ideologies are not entitled to human rights; these rights apply to individuals. As an ideology, Islam is not necessarily entitled to equal respect and acceptance. Ideas do not carry equal moral weight. The feelings or the number of those who believe do not make an idea true or good. Bad ideas should be challenged before they lead to bad consequences. Islam is not simply a belief about God. The word 'Islam' means submission. It is a set of rules that define a social hierarchy where Muslims submit to Allah, women submit to men, and all non-Muslims submit to Islamic rule. Since we do not live in a Muslim country—where censorship, intimidation, and brute force are used to protect Islam from intellectual analysis—we are still somewhat free to openly exercise our right to debate the merits of the Islamic value system against Western Liberalism. Consider the following questions: Are men really superior to women as the Quran says? Are women intellectually inferior as Muhammad taught? Does propagating material that curses people of other religions amidst random calls to violence create a better social environment? Is it right to keep women as sex slaves merely because the Quran permits this practice in numerous places? Should atheists and homosexuals have to choose between the noose or an outward profession of faith in Allah? Is conformity superior to freedom? Yes, there are Muslims who take issue with these aspects of Islamic theology, but that doesn't change what Islam is. Do not confuse the ideology with the individual. Do not draw conclusions about Islam based on the Muslims that you know, whether they are terrorists or humanitarians. Islam must be understood based on what it is, as presented objectively in the Quran, Hadith, and Sira (biography of Muhammad)." Thank you to the amazing Pat Condell, who released this video ten years ago. #Respect

Amy Mek

108,430 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Islam is waging an ongoing war of about 1,350 years to conquer Europe. The spiritual leader of tens, if not hundreds of millions of Sunnis Muslims, openly, above all platform, wrote it and spoke about it and Europe does not understand. "The Return of Islam to Europe and the Conquest of Rome" Source: "Auspices Of The Ultimate Victory Of Islam" (page21-22) Doha, Shawwal 1416 A.H. March 1996 A.D. By: Yusuf al-Qardawi; (1926 – 2022) From amongst these auspices is the hadith that Imam Ahmad reported in his Musnad on the authority of Abu Qabîl, who said, “We were with ‘Abdullâh bin ‘Amr bin Al-‘Âs (may Allah be pleased with him) when he was asked, ‘Which of the two cities is to conquered first, Constantinople or Rome?’ Upon which ‘Abdullâh called for a sealed trunk, and he got a book out of it, and then he said: Whilst we were around the Messenger of Allah (may Allah bless him and grant him peace) writing down, The Messenger of Allah (may Allah bless him and grant him peace) was asked, ‘Which of the two cities is to be conquered first, Constantinople or Rome? And he (the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace) answered, ‘The city of Heraclius will be conquered first!’” Rome is the metropolis of Italy today, and Constantinople is now Istanbul. What can be grasped from the posed question is that the companions (may Allah be pleased with them all) knew beforehand that Islam would conquer the two cities, and their people would embrace Islam, but they just wanted to know which of the two cities would precede the other, thus he (the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace) answered them by saying that the city of Heraclius – that is Constantinople – would be conquered first. That prophecy was fulfilled at the hands of the ambitious Ottoman youth, Muhammad bin Murâd, aged twenty-three, who was known through history by Muhammad the Conqueror. Thus, Constantinople was conquered in the ninth century A.H. [fifteenth century A.D.], precisely on Tuesday 20th of Jumada I 857 A.H. (29 May –1453 A.D.). Thus, remains the second part of the glad tidings to be fulfilled: the conquest of Rome, through which Islam will enter Europe once again after it was forced out of it twice: once from Andalusia and the other from the Balkan states. Most probably this conquest will be through the power of word and pen, not through swords and spears, for the world will open its arms and heart to Islam, after being overburdened by the philosophies (ideologies) of materialism and positivism, and will appeal for assistance from heavens, and guidance from Allah, thus it will find none but Islam a rescuer. The peaceful conquest (victory) has its origins in Islam, for Allah, The Most Exalted, has called the Hudaibiyah Peace Treaty a conquest, even a ‘manifest victory’, and on that occasion Surat Al-Fath was revealed in which Allah, all praise be to Him, says: The noble Qur’anic verse says what means: “Verily, We have given you (O Muhammad) a manifest victory.” (Al-Fath, 48: 1) Thereupon, the Companions asked the Messenger of Allah (may Allah bless him and grant him peace) saying, ‘Is it a conquest (victory), O Messenger of Allah?’ And he (the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace) answered, ‘Yes, it is a conquest (victory).’

Islam is waging an ongoing war of about 1,350 years to conquer Europe. The spiritual leader of tens, if not hundreds of millions of Sunnis Muslims, openly, above all platform, wrote it and spoke about it and Europe does not understand. "The Return of Islam to Europe and the Conquest of Rome" Source: "Auspices Of The Ultimate Victory Of Islam" (page21-22) Doha, Shawwal 1416 A.H. March 1996 A.D. By: Yusuf al-Qardawi; (1926 – 2022) From amongst these auspices is the hadith that Imam Ahmad reported in his Musnad on the authority of Abu Qabîl, who said, “We were with ‘Abdullâh bin ‘Amr bin Al-‘Âs (may Allah be pleased with him) when he was asked, ‘Which of the two cities is to conquered first, Constantinople or Rome?’ Upon which ‘Abdullâh called for a sealed trunk, and he got a book out of it, and then he said: Whilst we were around the Messenger of Allah (may Allah bless him and grant him peace) writing down, The Messenger of Allah (may Allah bless him and grant him peace) was asked, ‘Which of the two cities is to be conquered first, Constantinople or Rome? And he (the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace) answered, ‘The city of Heraclius will be conquered first!’” Rome is the metropolis of Italy today, and Constantinople is now Istanbul. What can be grasped from the posed question is that the companions (may Allah be pleased with them all) knew beforehand that Islam would conquer the two cities, and their people would embrace Islam, but they just wanted to know which of the two cities would precede the other, thus he (the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace) answered them by saying that the city of Heraclius – that is Constantinople – would be conquered first. That prophecy was fulfilled at the hands of the ambitious Ottoman youth, Muhammad bin Murâd, aged twenty-three, who was known through history by Muhammad the Conqueror. Thus, Constantinople was conquered in the ninth century A.H. [fifteenth century A.D.], precisely on Tuesday 20th of Jumada I 857 A.H. (29 May –1453 A.D.). Thus, remains the second part of the glad tidings to be fulfilled: the conquest of Rome, through which Islam will enter Europe once again after it was forced out of it twice: once from Andalusia and the other from the Balkan states. Most probably this conquest will be through the power of word and pen, not through swords and spears, for the world will open its arms and heart to Islam, after being overburdened by the philosophies (ideologies) of materialism and positivism, and will appeal for assistance from heavens, and guidance from Allah, thus it will find none but Islam a rescuer. The peaceful conquest (victory) has its origins in Islam, for Allah, The Most Exalted, has called the Hudaibiyah Peace Treaty a conquest, even a ‘manifest victory’, and on that occasion Surat Al-Fath was revealed in which Allah, all praise be to Him, says: The noble Qur’anic verse says what means: “Verily, We have given you (O Muhammad) a manifest victory.” (Al-Fath, 48: 1) Thereupon, the Companions asked the Messenger of Allah (may Allah bless him and grant him peace) saying, ‘Is it a conquest (victory), O Messenger of Allah?’ And he (the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace) answered, ‘Yes, it is a conquest (victory).’

Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - עופר בינשטוק

1,385,912 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Shaykh Yasir Qadhi mentions here another category of non-Muslim who rejects Islam. According to him, such people are distinct from the kuffār who recognize Islam as true but reject it out of arrogance, and also from those who are too lazy to look into Islam, which he considers another type of arrogance. This category consists of non-Muslims who sincerely evaluate and study Islam but may have some sort of hang-up over a particular issue (say, an aspect of Islamic jurisprudence, for example) that simply does not resonate with them and ultimately prevents them from embracing Islam as their religion. Yasir Qadhi says that they were sincere in their evaluation but nevertheless fell short. If such a person dies without embracing Islam, then, according to Yasir Qadhi, they have died upon a path of kufr. We cannot make duʿāʾ for them or ask God to forgive them, but we can hope that Allah will have mercy on them. He therefore makes a distinction between explicitly making duʿāʾ for them and simply hoping for Allah’s mercy. Shaykh Yasir Qadhi emphasizes that the only path acceptable to God is Islam (Willful submission to the guidance of the Creator)

Shaykh Yasir Qadhi mentions here another category of non-Muslim who rejects Islam. According to him, such people are distinct from the kuffār who recognize Islam as true but reject it out of arrogance, and also from those who are too lazy to look into Islam, which he considers another type of arrogance. This category consists of non-Muslims who sincerely evaluate and study Islam but may have some sort of hang-up over a particular issue (say, an aspect of Islamic jurisprudence, for example) that simply does not resonate with them and ultimately prevents them from embracing Islam as their religion. Yasir Qadhi says that they were sincere in their evaluation but nevertheless fell short. If such a person dies without embracing Islam, then, according to Yasir Qadhi, they have died upon a path of kufr. We cannot make duʿāʾ for them or ask God to forgive them, but we can hope that Allah will have mercy on them. He therefore makes a distinction between explicitly making duʿāʾ for them and simply hoping for Allah’s mercy. Shaykh Yasir Qadhi emphasizes that the only path acceptable to God is Islam (Willful submission to the guidance of the Creator)

Akbar Zab

15,597 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Wherever the truth about Islam is told, Islam retreats. Accept the lies, whitewash it, and Islam advances. It is a very simple mechanism. 9/11 was an act of Islamic jihad, no different from what Muhammad and his companions did to the tribes across Arabia, no different from what Muslims did to the Levant, Egypt, North Africa, Persia, and India. Muslims fought Israel not because of Sykes-Picot, but because Israel was a non-Muslim state on land that had been converted to Islam by conquest. Muhammad was a warlord who beheaded children and took women as sex slaves. This is the truth, and children must learn it.

Wherever the truth about Islam is told, Islam retreats. Accept the lies, whitewash it, and Islam advances. It is a very simple mechanism. 9/11 was an act of Islamic jihad, no different from what Muhammad and his companions did to the tribes across Arabia, no different from what Muslims did to the Levant, Egypt, North Africa, Persia, and India. Muslims fought Israel not because of Sykes-Picot, but because Israel was a non-Muslim state on land that had been converted to Islam by conquest. Muhammad was a warlord who beheaded children and took women as sex slaves. This is the truth, and children must learn it.

Dan Burmawi

21,284 görüntüleme • 23 gün önce

Medical graduates of Aleppo University in Syria, chanting: “We are coming, Jew, we will make your blood flow like rivers.” Of course, Gaza has nothing to do with this. This is what Muhammad taught them when he promised that the Muslims will kill the Jews to the last one, and what Muhammad himself did to the Jews of the Arabian Peninsula. Intelligence and a medical degree do not override Islam. A Muslim who takes Islam seriously, and that is most Muslims, may never participate in jihad himself, but he will support it wholeheartedly.

Medical graduates of Aleppo University in Syria, chanting: “We are coming, Jew, we will make your blood flow like rivers.” Of course, Gaza has nothing to do with this. This is what Muhammad taught them when he promised that the Muslims will kill the Jews to the last one, and what Muhammad himself did to the Jews of the Arabian Peninsula. Intelligence and a medical degree do not override Islam. A Muslim who takes Islam seriously, and that is most Muslims, may never participate in jihad himself, but he will support it wholeheartedly.

Dan Burmawi

383,728 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

A dialogue between a Muslim and an atheist: Muslim: There are over 1.8 billion Muslims in the World, and soon we'll overcome the Infidels. Atheist: The 1.8 billion include Ahmadis & Qadiyanis? Muslim: No, Ahmadi Qadiyanis dogs have got nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: How about those Barelvis visiting graves and worshipping the dead? ; they Muslim: Barelvis are infidels. They have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: What do you think of ISIS? The majority of them are Sunnis? Muslim: They have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: How about Shias, following 12 Imams, offering prayers differently, bathing in blood, and calling names to Abu Bakr & Umar? Muslim: Shia Kafirs have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: In a newspaper, there was a headline about an Imam raping a 5-year-old boy and later killing him by hanging with a fan? Muslim: These prayer leaders are bringing a bad name to Islam, they have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: There is another sect that denies all the Hadiths and follows nothing but Quran, known as Parvezis? Muslim: Parvezi followers have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: I heard that Prophet Muhammad married Ayesha when she was 6 and he was 53? Muslim: These are all fabricated Ahadith. Atheist: But these are in the books of Ahadith compiled by Imam Bukhari, Imam Muslim, and considered correct by Ahl-e-Hadith? Muslim: Ahl e Hadith have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: Taliban are killing people in Afghanistan and Pakistan, not allowing girls education, taking up jobs, going to public parks, and never allowing them in public without shuttlecock burqas. Muslim: They are Deo-Bandi Kharjis; they are the agents of India, Israel, and America - they have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: How about those mystic Sufi saints. Muslim: The sufis don’t follow Islam by the book and hold beliefs that lead to infidelity. Thus, they have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: What is your opinion about liberal & progressive Muslims? Muslim: They have gone astray; they include seculars that have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: How about the Saudi Salafi & Wahhabi groups? Muslims: They are extremists and Jihadists; they have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: What do you think of killing non-Muslims? Muslim: Islam is a religion of peace; killings have no place in Islam. Atheist: But Jihad is ordered in the Quran in apparent words? Muslim: It has nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: But Jihad is the 6th Pillar of Islam. Muslim: Islam has 5 pillars only. Atheist: Saudi Prince MBS is on an Islam moderation drive, allowed concerts, and says hadith was written 250 years after Mohammed, and most are false. Muslim: MBS is an American and Israeli agent and has nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: Is it true that Abbasid Abd Al Malik invented Islam and the Quran, and Mohammed did not exist in history? Muslim: Abbasids were descendants of Yazid and were kafirs and had nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: You mean to say Islam has nothing to do with Islam? Muslim: You kaffirs will never understand Islam.

A dialogue between a Muslim and an atheist: Muslim: There are over 1.8 billion Muslims in the World, and soon we'll overcome the Infidels. Atheist: The 1.8 billion include Ahmadis & Qadiyanis? Muslim: No, Ahmadi Qadiyanis dogs have got nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: How about those Barelvis visiting graves and worshipping the dead? ; they Muslim: Barelvis are infidels. They have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: What do you think of ISIS? The majority of them are Sunnis? Muslim: They have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: How about Shias, following 12 Imams, offering prayers differently, bathing in blood, and calling names to Abu Bakr & Umar? Muslim: Shia Kafirs have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: In a newspaper, there was a headline about an Imam raping a 5-year-old boy and later killing him by hanging with a fan? Muslim: These prayer leaders are bringing a bad name to Islam, they have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: There is another sect that denies all the Hadiths and follows nothing but Quran, known as Parvezis? Muslim: Parvezi followers have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: I heard that Prophet Muhammad married Ayesha when she was 6 and he was 53? Muslim: These are all fabricated Ahadith. Atheist: But these are in the books of Ahadith compiled by Imam Bukhari, Imam Muslim, and considered correct by Ahl-e-Hadith? Muslim: Ahl e Hadith have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: Taliban are killing people in Afghanistan and Pakistan, not allowing girls education, taking up jobs, going to public parks, and never allowing them in public without shuttlecock burqas. Muslim: They are Deo-Bandi Kharjis; they are the agents of India, Israel, and America - they have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: How about those mystic Sufi saints. Muslim: The sufis don’t follow Islam by the book and hold beliefs that lead to infidelity. Thus, they have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: What is your opinion about liberal & progressive Muslims? Muslim: They have gone astray; they include seculars that have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: How about the Saudi Salafi & Wahhabi groups? Muslims: They are extremists and Jihadists; they have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: What do you think of killing non-Muslims? Muslim: Islam is a religion of peace; killings have no place in Islam. Atheist: But Jihad is ordered in the Quran in apparent words? Muslim: It has nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: But Jihad is the 6th Pillar of Islam. Muslim: Islam has 5 pillars only. Atheist: Saudi Prince MBS is on an Islam moderation drive, allowed concerts, and says hadith was written 250 years after Mohammed, and most are false. Muslim: MBS is an American and Israeli agent and has nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: Is it true that Abbasid Abd Al Malik invented Islam and the Quran, and Mohammed did not exist in history? Muslim: Abbasids were descendants of Yazid and were kafirs and had nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: You mean to say Islam has nothing to do with Islam? Muslim: You kaffirs will never understand Islam.

Imtiaz Mahmood

157,538 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

"Can Islam live in true peace with the infidels?" No. (In addition to the explanation provided in this post, the linked video features Shaykh Ahmad Musā Jibrīl explaining it.) By: Ofer Binshtok Only Hudna (truces), a temporary ceasefire, is made because Islam is in a weak position against the infidels. Hudna buys Islam time until its power overcomes the infidels, and then it will exterminate them, in accordance with Allah’s commands from the Quran and Muhammad. *According to Muhammad, Bukhari 1765, the earth belongs to Allah and his messenger, to Islam: Bukhari 1765: "…The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: I want this... - He said to them (the same words) the third time (and on getting the same reply) he added: You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle…" * According to Allah, from Qur'an 47.35, Allah commands the believers, do not seek peace when your hand is uppermost: Qur'an 47.35: "…So do not weaken and call for peace while you are superior…" * When Islam is in a position of weakness against the infidels, they have a holy command from Allah from the Quran and Muhammad to lie to the infidels to buy time: Muhammad in Bukhari hadith 3029: Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) called,: "War is deceit". Muhammad in Hadith Sahih, in Tirmidhi 1939: “Lying in time of war”. The message from Quran 3.28: Permission to lie to disbelievers as a defense, when Islam is in a state of weakness. Taqiyya. The message from Quran 16.106: "...Whoever disbelieves in [i.e., denies] Allāh after his belief...except for one who is forced [to renounce his religion] while his heart is secure in faith..." * Indeed, Islam is in a constant state of war against the infidels: “Islam is in an eternal state of war against heresy and disbelievers”. Quran 9.29 begins with: “Fight those who do not believe in Allah...” The message is also from Quran 8.39 Fight the disbelievers until only Islam will exists in the world. Quran 9.123 begins with: "O you who believe, fight those disbelievers who are near you..." The message is also from Hadith Bukhari 25: "Fight the disbelievers until they all convert to Islam and only then will their lives and property be protected…" * In 628 AD, Muhammad moved towards Mecca with an army of 1,400 warriors, a force that was not strong enough to face the mechanical army of the Quraysh tribe. This is why he signed the Hudna Treaty of Hudaybiya, a temporary 10-year ceasefire with the Quraish tribe. An agreement that was considered humiliating for him since he was forbidden to sign it while mentioning his status as a prophet and messenger of Allah. But Muhammad saw this agreement as a victory that gave him time to break the Quraysh's defense agreements with third parties (Bukhari 2731-2732). Which indeed allowed him a year later, in 629, to also attack the Jews of Khaibar. * According to Sharia law, hudna is a temporary ceasefire agreement for ten years; this is the only agreement that Muslims are allowed to sign with the infidels: * TRUCES (Hudna) 09.16 (O: As for truces, the author does not mention them. In Sacred Law truce means a peace treaty with those hostile to Islam, involving a cessation of fighting for a specified period, whether for payment or something else. The scriptural basis for them includes such Koranic verses as: (1) "An acquittal from Allah and His messenger..." (Koran 9:1); (2) "If they incline towards peace, then incline towards it also" (Koran 8:61); as well as the truce which the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made with Quraysh in the year of Hudaybiya, as related by Bukhari and Muslim. Truces are permissible, not obligatory. The only one who may effect a truce is the Muslim ruler of a region (or his representative) with a segment of the non-Muslims of the region, or the caliph (o25) (or his representative). When made with other than a portion of the non-Muslims, or when made with all of them, or with all in a particular region such as India or Asia Minor, then only the caliph (or his representative) may effect it, for it is a matter of the gravest consequence because it entails the nonperformance of jihad, whether globally or in a given locality, and our interests must be looked after therein, which is why it is best left to the caliph under any circumstances, or to someone he delegates to see to the interests of the various regions. There must be some interest served in making a truce other than mere preservation of the status quo. Allah Most High says, "So do not be fainthearted and call for peace, when it is you who are the uppermost" (Koran ) Interests that justify making a truce are such things as Muslim weakness because of lack of numbers or materiel, or the hope of an enemy becoming Muslim, for the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made a truce in the year Mecca was liberated with Safwan ibn Umayya for four months in hope that he would become Muslim, and he entered Islam before its time was up. If the Muslims are weak, a truce may be made for ten years if necessary, for the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made a truce with Quraysh for that long, as is related by Abu Dawud. It is not permissible to stipulate longer than that, save by means of new truces, each of which does not exceed ten years. The rulings of such a truce are inferable from those of the non-Muslim poll tax (def: 011); namely, that when a valid truce has been effected, no harm may be done to non-Muslims until it expires. * In 630 AD, Muhammad's power increased; he broke the agreement with Quraish and moved towards Mecca with about 10 thousand warriors and conquered it. The Quraish tribe converted to Islam, and Muhammad abolished the religious tolerance that existed in Mecca. With his own hands, he began to destroy the 360 holy sites for the different religions that lived there in mutual tolerance and harmony. He abolished this tolerance and left only the Islamic holy site. * Quran 8.58, in fact, allows Muslims to cancel any contract for "fear” that the other party will break it. Not because the other party violated the agreement, but only out of fear. So signing an agreement with Islam is basically meaningless. Quran 8.58: "If you are afraid of the treachery of some of your allies, you may disregard your treaty with them. God does not love the treacherous ones." In conclusion: As a religious command, from Allah, from the Quran, from Muhammad, and from Sharia law: * Islam is in a constant state of war against the infidels, until it destroys them. * When Islam is weak, the believers are commanded to obtain a hudna (temporary ceasefire) so that they can gain strength that will surpass the strength of the infidels. * There is no meaning in signing an agreement with Islam since they are allowed to violate it at any moment. * When the power of the believers exceeds the power of the infidels, the believers are ordered to abandon the Hudna agreement and destroy the infidels. Source: Youtube - The Ruling on Normalization Treaties | Shaykh Ahmad Musā Jibrīl (حفظه الله)

"Can Islam live in true peace with the infidels?" No. (In addition to the explanation provided in this post, the linked video features Shaykh Ahmad Musā Jibrīl explaining it.) By: Ofer Binshtok Only Hudna (truces), a temporary ceasefire, is made because Islam is in a weak position against the infidels. Hudna buys Islam time until its power overcomes the infidels, and then it will exterminate them, in accordance with Allah’s commands from the Quran and Muhammad. According to Muhammad, Bukhari 1765, the earth belongs to Allah and his messenger, to Islam: Bukhari 1765: "…The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: I want this... - He said to them (the same words) the third time (and on getting the same reply) he added: You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle…" According to Allah, from Qur'an 47.35, Allah commands the believers, do not seek peace when your hand is uppermost: Qur'an 47.35: "…So do not weaken and call for peace while you are superior…" * When Islam is in a position of weakness against the infidels, they have a holy command from Allah from the Quran and Muhammad to lie to the infidels to buy time: Muhammad in Bukhari hadith 3029: Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) called,: "War is deceit". Muhammad in Hadith Sahih, in Tirmidhi 1939: “Lying in time of war”. The message from Quran 3.28: Permission to lie to disbelievers as a defense, when Islam is in a state of weakness. Taqiyya. The message from Quran 16.106: "...Whoever disbelieves in [i.e., denies] Allāh after his belief...except for one who is forced [to renounce his religion] while his heart is secure in faith..." * Indeed, Islam is in a constant state of war against the infidels: “Islam is in an eternal state of war against heresy and disbelievers”. Quran 9.29 begins with: “Fight those who do not believe in Allah...” The message is also from Quran 8.39 Fight the disbelievers until only Islam will exists in the world. Quran 9.123 begins with: "O you who believe, fight those disbelievers who are near you..." The message is also from Hadith Bukhari 25: "Fight the disbelievers until they all convert to Islam and only then will their lives and property be protected…" * In 628 AD, Muhammad moved towards Mecca with an army of 1,400 warriors, a force that was not strong enough to face the mechanical army of the Quraysh tribe. This is why he signed the Hudna Treaty of Hudaybiya, a temporary 10-year ceasefire with the Quraish tribe. An agreement that was considered humiliating for him since he was forbidden to sign it while mentioning his status as a prophet and messenger of Allah. But Muhammad saw this agreement as a victory that gave him time to break the Quraysh's defense agreements with third parties (Bukhari 2731-2732). Which indeed allowed him a year later, in 629, to also attack the Jews of Khaibar. * According to Sharia law, hudna is a temporary ceasefire agreement for ten years; this is the only agreement that Muslims are allowed to sign with the infidels: * TRUCES (Hudna) 09.16 (O: As for truces, the author does not mention them. In Sacred Law truce means a peace treaty with those hostile to Islam, involving a cessation of fighting for a specified period, whether for payment or something else. The scriptural basis for them includes such Koranic verses as: (1) "An acquittal from Allah and His messenger..." (Koran 9:1); (2) "If they incline towards peace, then incline towards it also" (Koran 8:61); as well as the truce which the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made with Quraysh in the year of Hudaybiya, as related by Bukhari and Muslim. Truces are permissible, not obligatory. The only one who may effect a truce is the Muslim ruler of a region (or his representative) with a segment of the non-Muslims of the region, or the caliph (o25) (or his representative). When made with other than a portion of the non-Muslims, or when made with all of them, or with all in a particular region such as India or Asia Minor, then only the caliph (or his representative) may effect it, for it is a matter of the gravest consequence because it entails the nonperformance of jihad, whether globally or in a given locality, and our interests must be looked after therein, which is why it is best left to the caliph under any circumstances, or to someone he delegates to see to the interests of the various regions. There must be some interest served in making a truce other than mere preservation of the status quo. Allah Most High says, "So do not be fainthearted and call for peace, when it is you who are the uppermost" (Koran ) Interests that justify making a truce are such things as Muslim weakness because of lack of numbers or materiel, or the hope of an enemy becoming Muslim, for the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made a truce in the year Mecca was liberated with Safwan ibn Umayya for four months in hope that he would become Muslim, and he entered Islam before its time was up. If the Muslims are weak, a truce may be made for ten years if necessary, for the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made a truce with Quraysh for that long, as is related by Abu Dawud. It is not permissible to stipulate longer than that, save by means of new truces, each of which does not exceed ten years. The rulings of such a truce are inferable from those of the non-Muslim poll tax (def: 011); namely, that when a valid truce has been effected, no harm may be done to non-Muslims until it expires. * In 630 AD, Muhammad's power increased; he broke the agreement with Quraish and moved towards Mecca with about 10 thousand warriors and conquered it. The Quraish tribe converted to Islam, and Muhammad abolished the religious tolerance that existed in Mecca. With his own hands, he began to destroy the 360 holy sites for the different religions that lived there in mutual tolerance and harmony. He abolished this tolerance and left only the Islamic holy site. * Quran 8.58, in fact, allows Muslims to cancel any contract for "fear” that the other party will break it. Not because the other party violated the agreement, but only out of fear. So signing an agreement with Islam is basically meaningless. Quran 8.58: "If you are afraid of the treachery of some of your allies, you may disregard your treaty with them. God does not love the treacherous ones." In conclusion: As a religious command, from Allah, from the Quran, from Muhammad, and from Sharia law: * Islam is in a constant state of war against the infidels, until it destroys them. * When Islam is weak, the believers are commanded to obtain a hudna (temporary ceasefire) so that they can gain strength that will surpass the strength of the infidels. * There is no meaning in signing an agreement with Islam since they are allowed to violate it at any moment. * When the power of the believers exceeds the power of the infidels, the believers are ordered to abandon the Hudna agreement and destroy the infidels. Source: Youtube - The Ruling on Normalization Treaties | Shaykh Ahmad Musā Jibrīl (حفظه الله)

Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - עופר בינשטוק

313,880 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

In generations to come, Islam will destroy Christianity in Western Europe. Just as he destroyed Christianity and Judaism in the Middle East in about 1,400 years since it was founded. This is one of the tactics that Islam uses to take over the world: Quran 4.100 “Whoever emigrates for the sake of Allah will find much refuge and abundance in the earth, and whoever forsakes his home, a refugee for Allah and his messenger, and death overtakes him, his reward is then obligatory upon Allah. Allah is always forgiving, merciful.” *Here the Qur’an states the cardinal importance of “emigration for the cause of Allah,” that is, moving to a new land with the intention of bringing Islam to it. See also 4:66 and 4:89. The primary pattern for emigrants in Islamic tradition is the Hijra, Muhammad’s move from Mecca to Medina, where for the first time he became a political and military leader. It is “obligatory” for Allah to reward emigrants; this is one of the Qur’an’s few promises of reward for specific actions (see also 9:111). Continue to let Islam into the Western world with welcome and friendship. Continue to respect Islam and eventually it will do to you what Muhammad did in the 7th century to those who welcomed him in the city of Medina. He completely destroyed the host culture. Sheikh Assim Al Hakeem:

In generations to come, Islam will destroy Christianity in Western Europe. Just as he destroyed Christianity and Judaism in the Middle East in about 1,400 years since it was founded. This is one of the tactics that Islam uses to take over the world: Quran 4.100 “Whoever emigrates for the sake of Allah will find much refuge and abundance in the earth, and whoever forsakes his home, a refugee for Allah and his messenger, and death overtakes him, his reward is then obligatory upon Allah. Allah is always forgiving, merciful.” *Here the Qur’an states the cardinal importance of “emigration for the cause of Allah,” that is, moving to a new land with the intention of bringing Islam to it. See also 4:66 and 4:89. The primary pattern for emigrants in Islamic tradition is the Hijra, Muhammad’s move from Mecca to Medina, where for the first time he became a political and military leader. It is “obligatory” for Allah to reward emigrants; this is one of the Qur’an’s few promises of reward for specific actions (see also 9:111). Continue to let Islam into the Western world with welcome and friendship. Continue to respect Islam and eventually it will do to you what Muhammad did in the 7th century to those who welcomed him in the city of Medina. He completely destroyed the host culture. Sheikh Assim Al Hakeem:

Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - עופר בינשטוק

2,460,664 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

How many more people must be killed before non-Muslims admit we have a major Jihad problem? Islam isn't hijacked by extremists - it is what inspires them. The ideology that flew planes into the World Trade Center in the U.S., killed innocent Australians in a mall, and murdered over 1200 innocent Israelis is one and the same. In 2014, Geert Wilders tried to warn Australians of the threat of Islam during a television interview on ABC Lateline, Australia; he said... "Look how in societies today where Islam is dominant and prominent, how any non-Islamic person, whether it's a Christian or an apostate or a woman or a critical journalist, how they are treated. This is in a very bad way, often with the death penalty or imprisonment or all those kind of terrible things." Due to an enormous influx of people from Islamic countries in the last decades, he continued, Dutch society has changed and worsened so that, "unfortunately, non-Western immigrants, often Muslims, are over-represented in statistics of crime, of dependency on social benefits, that we have honor killings, that we have genital mutilation, that we have streets where women with headscarves and burqas are not the exception anymore. And that it's getting worse... What I'm trying to do when I visit your beautiful country, Australia is warn Australians that even though it might not be the case today, learn from the mistakes that we made in Europe: be vigilant and look at Islam for what it really is. Islam is not a religion of peace. Islam is a totalitarian ideology. The best example is that if any person, any Muslim, wants to leave Islam, then the penalty is death. It is not even allowed to leave it." Wilders made clear that he was not threatening or attacking anyone for a religious or ethnic identity: "I have nothing against the people. I have nothing against the Indonesian people or the Arab people or the Muslim people. I'm talking about the ideology. And indeed, as long as a country has a culture, a religion, an ideology where Islam is dominant, it will never be a democracy. It's also happening in Indonesia. Look at how they treat Christians in Indonesia or how they treat Christians in any other country where Islam is dominant."..."Why is it not possible to build a church in Saudi Arabia, where, as we in the Netherlands, have almost 500 mosques being built; why is it not possible to buy or sell a Bible in any Muslim or most of the Muslim countries, whereas we can buy a Koran here on every street corner? This is the exact example of the fact that Islam is an intolerant society." Wilders emphasized that there is no moderate or non-moderate Islam, but there are moderate and non-moderate Muslims: "As a matter of fact, the majority of the Muslims living in our society are moderate people. But don't make the mistake that even though there are moderate and radical Muslims that there is a moderate or a radical Islam. There is only one Islam, and that is a totalitarian ideology that has no room for anything but Islam. You see it once again in any country in the world where Islam is dominant."

How many more people must be killed before non-Muslims admit we have a major Jihad problem? Islam isn't hijacked by extremists - it is what inspires them. The ideology that flew planes into the World Trade Center in the U.S., killed innocent Australians in a mall, and murdered over 1200 innocent Israelis is one and the same. In 2014, Geert Wilders tried to warn Australians of the threat of Islam during a television interview on ABC Lateline, Australia; he said... "Look how in societies today where Islam is dominant and prominent, how any non-Islamic person, whether it's a Christian or an apostate or a woman or a critical journalist, how they are treated. This is in a very bad way, often with the death penalty or imprisonment or all those kind of terrible things." Due to an enormous influx of people from Islamic countries in the last decades, he continued, Dutch society has changed and worsened so that, "unfortunately, non-Western immigrants, often Muslims, are over-represented in statistics of crime, of dependency on social benefits, that we have honor killings, that we have genital mutilation, that we have streets where women with headscarves and burqas are not the exception anymore. And that it's getting worse... What I'm trying to do when I visit your beautiful country, Australia is warn Australians that even though it might not be the case today, learn from the mistakes that we made in Europe: be vigilant and look at Islam for what it really is. Islam is not a religion of peace. Islam is a totalitarian ideology. The best example is that if any person, any Muslim, wants to leave Islam, then the penalty is death. It is not even allowed to leave it." Wilders made clear that he was not threatening or attacking anyone for a religious or ethnic identity: "I have nothing against the people. I have nothing against the Indonesian people or the Arab people or the Muslim people. I'm talking about the ideology. And indeed, as long as a country has a culture, a religion, an ideology where Islam is dominant, it will never be a democracy. It's also happening in Indonesia. Look at how they treat Christians in Indonesia or how they treat Christians in any other country where Islam is dominant."..."Why is it not possible to build a church in Saudi Arabia, where, as we in the Netherlands, have almost 500 mosques being built; why is it not possible to buy or sell a Bible in any Muslim or most of the Muslim countries, whereas we can buy a Koran here on every street corner? This is the exact example of the fact that Islam is an intolerant society." Wilders emphasized that there is no moderate or non-moderate Islam, but there are moderate and non-moderate Muslims: "As a matter of fact, the majority of the Muslims living in our society are moderate people. But don't make the mistake that even though there are moderate and radical Muslims that there is a moderate or a radical Islam. There is only one Islam, and that is a totalitarian ideology that has no room for anything but Islam. You see it once again in any country in the world where Islam is dominant."

Amy Mek

209,358 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

"The concept of peace with non-Muslims does not exist in Islam" By: Ofer binshtok. Quran 8.61 actually calls for peace with non-Muslims. It ranks 75th in the order of revelation. "And if they incline to peace, then incline to it [also] and rely upon Allah. Indeed, it is He who is the Hearing, the Knowing." However, in contradiction, Quran 47.35 actually commands not to make peace with non-Muslims when you have the upper hand. It ranks 95th in the order of revelation. "So do not weaken and call for peace while you are superior; and Allah is with you and will never deprive you of [the reward of] your deeds." Quran 2.106 resolves the contradiction by declaring that any later commandment abolishes the earlier commandment. "We do not abrogate a verse or cause it to be forgotten except that We bring forth [one] better than it or similar to it. Do you not know that Allah is over all things competent?" As a result, Quran 47.35 is the binding commandment. Therefore, peace with non-Muslims is a concept that does not exist in Islam, as Dr. Tareq Al-Suwaidan explains. The speaker is: Dr. Tareq Al-Suwaidan, He is currently among the most prominent jihadists. He belongs to the Muslim Brotherhood ideologically. A highly intelligent and educated person. He is well-versed in Sharia law, the history of Jihad, the Quran, and Muhammad's Sunnah.

"The concept of peace with non-Muslims does not exist in Islam" By: Ofer binshtok. Quran 8.61 actually calls for peace with non-Muslims. It ranks 75th in the order of revelation. "And if they incline to peace, then incline to it [also] and rely upon Allah. Indeed, it is He who is the Hearing, the Knowing." However, in contradiction, Quran 47.35 actually commands not to make peace with non-Muslims when you have the upper hand. It ranks 95th in the order of revelation. "So do not weaken and call for peace while you are superior; and Allah is with you and will never deprive you of [the reward of] your deeds." Quran 2.106 resolves the contradiction by declaring that any later commandment abolishes the earlier commandment. "We do not abrogate a verse or cause it to be forgotten except that We bring forth [one] better than it or similar to it. Do you not know that Allah is over all things competent?" As a result, Quran 47.35 is the binding commandment. Therefore, peace with non-Muslims is a concept that does not exist in Islam, as Dr. Tareq Al-Suwaidan explains. The speaker is: Dr. Tareq Al-Suwaidan, He is currently among the most prominent jihadists. He belongs to the Muslim Brotherhood ideologically. A highly intelligent and educated person. He is well-versed in Sharia law, the history of Jihad, the Quran, and Muhammad's Sunnah.

Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - עופר בינשטוק

42,158 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Is this Islam? .. People are telling me that this has nothing to do with Islam .. They say that this is an innovation made up by The Shia Muslims MY REPLY .. (1) In Sunni hadith books and traditions, it is clearly mentioned that the Prophet Mohammad (as) cried and mourned for his grandson Imam Hussain (as) .. So, therefore, it is the sunnah of the Prophet (as) to cry and mourn for Imam Hussain (as) .. There is no set way of mourning .. People mourn in different ways according to their customs and culture .. And it is all okay, unless it turns into something haram and forbidden (a sin) (2) .. In The Quran (42:23) Allah (swt) orders us to love the Prophet’s family .. When someone you love gets murdered in such a way, you will not mourn and cry for them? (3) .. In The Quran (51:29) Sarah smacked herself and Allah (swt) did not say that she did something wrong or forbidden .. Allah (swt) did not say that she did an evil thing .. If there was any issues whatsoever, Allah (swt) in His infinite wisdom and knowledge would have said something right there and then Side note - When i converted to Islam, i had a look at both Sunni and Shia .. It was very clear to me that Shia Islam is the True Islam .. I consider sunni’s as Muslims .. but I encourage them not to follow blindly and to do more research with an open heart

Is this Islam? .. People are telling me that this has nothing to do with Islam .. They say that this is an innovation made up by The Shia Muslims MY REPLY .. (1) In Sunni hadith books and traditions, it is clearly mentioned that the Prophet Mohammad (as) cried and mourned for his grandson Imam Hussain (as) .. So, therefore, it is the sunnah of the Prophet (as) to cry and mourn for Imam Hussain (as) .. There is no set way of mourning .. People mourn in different ways according to their customs and culture .. And it is all okay, unless it turns into something haram and forbidden (a sin) (2) .. In The Quran (42:23) Allah (swt) orders us to love the Prophet’s family .. When someone you love gets murdered in such a way, you will not mourn and cry for them? (3) .. In The Quran (51:29) Sarah smacked herself and Allah (swt) did not say that she did something wrong or forbidden .. Allah (swt) did not say that she did an evil thing .. If there was any issues whatsoever, Allah (swt) in His infinite wisdom and knowledge would have said something right there and then Side note - When i converted to Islam, i had a look at both Sunni and Shia .. It was very clear to me that Shia Islam is the True Islam .. I consider sunni’s as Muslims .. but I encourage them not to follow blindly and to do more research with an open heart

The Hezb of Allah

65,760 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Loyalty and Disavowal: The Principle of Al-Wala' Wal-Bara' Prayer: Non-Stop Hate Indoctrination - The smile is just a mask, hatred is a duty: Why they are forbidden to love us, even if we are their family. By: Ofer Binshtok 1. The Shahada, "There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is His messenger," is the direct and central foundation for the principle of al-wala' wa al-bara': loyalty to Muslims and absolute hatred toward every non-Muslim. According to Islam, anyone who is not a Muslim is an enemy of Allah and His Prophet. Therefore it is a duty for every Muslim to hate that person, cut all ties with them, and regard them as an absolute enemy. This is not a matter of personal opinion or feeling. It is a binding command that requires active hostility in practice. The Shahada is not recited only once in a lifetime. It is repeated in every one of the five daily prayers during the Tashahhud. This turns each prayer into a daily tool of indoctrination that plants the duty of hatred in the Muslim and retrains him day after day to see the world as divided between Muslims and non-Muslims. What is called prayer is in fact ongoing, institutionalized training in hatred. 2. This principle, once rooted in the Shahada and reinforced daily through prayer, breaks down into two clear and binding components: - Wala' (Loyalty): Arises from love for Allah. It drives Muslims to cultivate closeness, offer support, and provide protection to those who follow His path. This manifests in tangible acts such as defending the faith, aiding fellow Muslims, and honoring their shared commitment. - Bara' (Disavowal): Stems from the rejection of disbelief. It leads to active opposition, distance, and enmity toward those who oppose Allah or His message. This principle allows no gray area: anyone who is not a Muslim hates Allah and His Prophet and must therefore be the absolute enemy of every Muslim. These principles are not mere sentiments but demand practical commitment in both speech and deeds. 3. Quranic Evidence: Alliances and Relationships The Quran provides explicit guidance on maintaining loyalty to Muslims while dissociating from non-Muslims. It warns against prioritizing alliances with non-Muslims: - Prohibition of Alliances: The Quran warns against prioritizing alliances with non-Muslims over fellow Muslims, stating that such actions sever one’s connection with Allah, unless done cautiously for self-preservation (Taqiyya; Quran 3:28). - Jews and Christians: The Quran leaves no loophole: true friendship or alliance with a Jew or Christian equals outright kufr that takes one out of Islam (Quran 5:51). Full stop. - Defining True Love: True love for Allah is demonstrated by following Muhammad. Turning away aligns one with those Allah disapproves of (Quran 3:31-32). - Condition for Contact: Muslims are urged to avoid ties with those who desire them to abandon their faith, unless the non-Muslims embrace Allah’s path (Quran 4:89). 4. Faith Over Family The doctrine places loyalty above biological kinship: - Betrayal of Faith: Muslims are instructed not to take non-Muslims as allies, even if they are close relatives, if they oppose Allah and Muhammad (Quran 60:1). - Parental Ties: Muslims are commanded not to prioritize familial ties with non-Muslim parents or siblings over their faith (Quran 9:23). - The Reward: True Muslims do not harbor affection for those who oppose Allah, even if they are kin. In return, Allah strengthens their hearts with faith (Quran 58:22). - The Obligation of Hatred: If your father or brother is a non-Muslim, you are obliged to hate him and sever all emotional ties with him as long as he persists in his disbelief. Any love toward him is a sin that nullifies faith. 5. The Example of Ibrahim (Abraham) The ultimate model for Bara' (Disavowal) is found in Prophet Ibrahim’s declaration to his people: “We disassociate ourselves from you and what you worship besides Allah. Enmity and hatred have arisen between us until you believe in Allah alone.” (Quran 60:4) 6. Clarifications from the Sunnah The traditions of Prophet Muhammad reinforce these teachings with explicit instructions: - The Strongest Bond: The Prophet explicitly defined the core of faith, stating: "The strongest bond to faith is to take the believers (Muslims) as allies and friends for the sake of Allah, to treat unbelievers (non-Muslims) as enemies for the sake of Allah, to love for the sake of Allah and hate for the sake of Allah." (Jalal al-Din al-Suyuti, Sahih Al-Jami as-Saghir 2539). - The Oath: Muhammad instructed a companion to swear an oath to offer sincere guidance to Muslims while refraining from forming close bonds with non-Muslims. - Active Solidarity: Scholars explain that Wala' entails defending Muslims and upholding their honor, while Bara' requires concrete opposition, rejecting false ideologies and avoiding cooperation with Islam's opponents. 7. The Two Parties: Allah vs. Satan The doctrine creates a binary worldview: - The Party of Allah: The Muslims. Those guided from darkness to light (Quran 2:257). They strive for Allah’s cause and are promised victory in both intellectual debates and physical struggles (Quran 6:112, 37:173). - The Party of Satan: The non-Muslims and all those who oppose Allah and His messenger. They lead others into darkness. The Quran urges Muslims to confront the allies of Satan, describing their strategies as ultimately weak (Quran 4:76). 8. Modern Application and Threats Enemies of Islam, whether atheists, secularists, proponents of contradictory ideologies, or simply non-Muslims, are viewed as seeking to erode Muslim identity. - Deceptive Concepts: Ideas such as "universal brotherhood" or the separation of church and state are seen as tools to weaken the Muslim community. - Equality vs. Hierarchy: Calls for equality that ignore differences in beliefs or ideologies are considered a direct challenge to Al-Wala' Wal-Bara'. 9. Conclusion This doctrine of absolute loyalty to fellow Muslims and unyielding enmity toward non-Muslims is not a later scholarly invention. It is rooted directly in the Shahada. The Shahada is the declaration of faith that every Muslim repeats in every one of the five daily prayers. Through this constant repetition prayer itself becomes daily indoctrination that reinforces the duty of hatred toward non-Muslims and the rejection of any alignment with them. Muslims are commanded to hold this conviction without compromise. The Quran and the Sunnah of Muhammad make it explicit. True submission to Allah demands complete allegiance solely to Muslims and active unrelenting hostility toward non-Muslims. Any Muslim who shows mercy, sympathy, or cooperation with non-Muslims violates this principle and becomes a disbeliever himself. According to classical Sharia his blood then becomes permissible. This is not extremism. It is pure faith exactly as Allah and His Prophet commanded. By enforcing this total separation Muslims fulfill their complete submission to Allah and keep their identity pure and uncontaminated by non-Muslim influence.

Loyalty and Disavowal: The Principle of Al-Wala' Wal-Bara' Prayer: Non-Stop Hate Indoctrination - The smile is just a mask, hatred is a duty: Why they are forbidden to love us, even if we are their family. By: Ofer Binshtok 1. The Shahada, "There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is His messenger," is the direct and central foundation for the principle of al-wala' wa al-bara': loyalty to Muslims and absolute hatred toward every non-Muslim. According to Islam, anyone who is not a Muslim is an enemy of Allah and His Prophet. Therefore it is a duty for every Muslim to hate that person, cut all ties with them, and regard them as an absolute enemy. This is not a matter of personal opinion or feeling. It is a binding command that requires active hostility in practice. The Shahada is not recited only once in a lifetime. It is repeated in every one of the five daily prayers during the Tashahhud. This turns each prayer into a daily tool of indoctrination that plants the duty of hatred in the Muslim and retrains him day after day to see the world as divided between Muslims and non-Muslims. What is called prayer is in fact ongoing, institutionalized training in hatred. 2. This principle, once rooted in the Shahada and reinforced daily through prayer, breaks down into two clear and binding components: - Wala' (Loyalty): Arises from love for Allah. It drives Muslims to cultivate closeness, offer support, and provide protection to those who follow His path. This manifests in tangible acts such as defending the faith, aiding fellow Muslims, and honoring their shared commitment. - Bara' (Disavowal): Stems from the rejection of disbelief. It leads to active opposition, distance, and enmity toward those who oppose Allah or His message. This principle allows no gray area: anyone who is not a Muslim hates Allah and His Prophet and must therefore be the absolute enemy of every Muslim. These principles are not mere sentiments but demand practical commitment in both speech and deeds. 3. Quranic Evidence: Alliances and Relationships The Quran provides explicit guidance on maintaining loyalty to Muslims while dissociating from non-Muslims. It warns against prioritizing alliances with non-Muslims: - Prohibition of Alliances: The Quran warns against prioritizing alliances with non-Muslims over fellow Muslims, stating that such actions sever one’s connection with Allah, unless done cautiously for self-preservation (Taqiyya; Quran 3:28). - Jews and Christians: The Quran leaves no loophole: true friendship or alliance with a Jew or Christian equals outright kufr that takes one out of Islam (Quran 5:51). Full stop. - Defining True Love: True love for Allah is demonstrated by following Muhammad. Turning away aligns one with those Allah disapproves of (Quran 3:31-32). - Condition for Contact: Muslims are urged to avoid ties with those who desire them to abandon their faith, unless the non-Muslims embrace Allah’s path (Quran 4:89). 4. Faith Over Family The doctrine places loyalty above biological kinship: - Betrayal of Faith: Muslims are instructed not to take non-Muslims as allies, even if they are close relatives, if they oppose Allah and Muhammad (Quran 60:1). - Parental Ties: Muslims are commanded not to prioritize familial ties with non-Muslim parents or siblings over their faith (Quran 9:23). - The Reward: True Muslims do not harbor affection for those who oppose Allah, even if they are kin. In return, Allah strengthens their hearts with faith (Quran 58:22). - The Obligation of Hatred: If your father or brother is a non-Muslim, you are obliged to hate him and sever all emotional ties with him as long as he persists in his disbelief. Any love toward him is a sin that nullifies faith. 5. The Example of Ibrahim (Abraham) The ultimate model for Bara' (Disavowal) is found in Prophet Ibrahim’s declaration to his people: “We disassociate ourselves from you and what you worship besides Allah. Enmity and hatred have arisen between us until you believe in Allah alone.” (Quran 60:4) 6. Clarifications from the Sunnah The traditions of Prophet Muhammad reinforce these teachings with explicit instructions: - The Strongest Bond: The Prophet explicitly defined the core of faith, stating: "The strongest bond to faith is to take the believers (Muslims) as allies and friends for the sake of Allah, to treat unbelievers (non-Muslims) as enemies for the sake of Allah, to love for the sake of Allah and hate for the sake of Allah." (Jalal al-Din al-Suyuti, Sahih Al-Jami as-Saghir 2539). - The Oath: Muhammad instructed a companion to swear an oath to offer sincere guidance to Muslims while refraining from forming close bonds with non-Muslims. - Active Solidarity: Scholars explain that Wala' entails defending Muslims and upholding their honor, while Bara' requires concrete opposition, rejecting false ideologies and avoiding cooperation with Islam's opponents. 7. The Two Parties: Allah vs. Satan The doctrine creates a binary worldview: - The Party of Allah: The Muslims. Those guided from darkness to light (Quran 2:257). They strive for Allah’s cause and are promised victory in both intellectual debates and physical struggles (Quran 6:112, 37:173). - The Party of Satan: The non-Muslims and all those who oppose Allah and His messenger. They lead others into darkness. The Quran urges Muslims to confront the allies of Satan, describing their strategies as ultimately weak (Quran 4:76). 8. Modern Application and Threats Enemies of Islam, whether atheists, secularists, proponents of contradictory ideologies, or simply non-Muslims, are viewed as seeking to erode Muslim identity. - Deceptive Concepts: Ideas such as "universal brotherhood" or the separation of church and state are seen as tools to weaken the Muslim community. - Equality vs. Hierarchy: Calls for equality that ignore differences in beliefs or ideologies are considered a direct challenge to Al-Wala' Wal-Bara'. 9. Conclusion This doctrine of absolute loyalty to fellow Muslims and unyielding enmity toward non-Muslims is not a later scholarly invention. It is rooted directly in the Shahada. The Shahada is the declaration of faith that every Muslim repeats in every one of the five daily prayers. Through this constant repetition prayer itself becomes daily indoctrination that reinforces the duty of hatred toward non-Muslims and the rejection of any alignment with them. Muslims are commanded to hold this conviction without compromise. The Quran and the Sunnah of Muhammad make it explicit. True submission to Allah demands complete allegiance solely to Muslims and active unrelenting hostility toward non-Muslims. Any Muslim who shows mercy, sympathy, or cooperation with non-Muslims violates this principle and becomes a disbeliever himself. According to classical Sharia his blood then becomes permissible. This is not extremism. It is pure faith exactly as Allah and His Prophet commanded. By enforcing this total separation Muslims fulfill their complete submission to Allah and keep their identity pure and uncontaminated by non-Muslim influence.

Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - עופר בינשטוק

23,166 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce