Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

𝐈𝐧 𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟑, 𝐒𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐤𝐡 𝐉𝐚𝐟𝐚𝐫 𝐌𝐚𝐡𝐦𝐨𝐮𝐝 𝐀𝐝𝐚𝐦 )رحمه الله) 𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐤𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐟𝐞𝐞𝐥 𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐬𝐚𝐢𝐝 𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐚𝐲. He highlighted a reality many Muslims recognize, in Nigeria and around the world: we are often pushed into a constant state of defense. Accusations come one after another: “Islam doesn’t give... women rights.” “Islam is extreme.” “Islam is harsh.” And so we respond. We explain. We clarify. We defend. But he warned that remaining perpetually on the defensive distracts us from a greater responsibility; to confidently and wisely invite others to Islam. Islam is not defined merely as “peace,” as it is often reduced to in modern discourse. The word Islam means total submission to the will of Allah ﷻ; a complete and conscious surrender of one’s desires, actions, and life to the Creator. To say “I am Muslim” is to say: I submit fully to Allah. I do what He commands and refrain from what He forbids. Sheikh Jafar (رحمه الله) also challenged a common narrative: the portrayal of Islam as inherently aggressive. He pointed to history — particularly the battles of Badr and Uhud — emphasizing that the early Muslim community faced persecution, expulsion, and armed pursuit. The Prophet ﷺ & his companions were forced from Makkah, migrated seeking peace, and were pursued to the outskirts of Madinah. The Battle of Badr itself took place near Madinah after hostile forces advanced toward them. His broader point was about perspective: history is often told by those who control the narrative. Yet global history is filled with devastating wars, colonization, and mass civilian casualties carried out by powerful nations — from Hiroshima and Nagasaki to Algeria, Iraq, Gaza & beyond, the Christian West has killed tens of millions of innocent Muslims, either during colonization or modern day imperialism. Still, Islam is frequently singled out as uniquely violent. Whether one agrees with every framing or not, his message was clear: Muslims should not internalize narratives that constantly place them on trial. Instead, they should understand their faith deeply, represent it with integrity, and engage the world with confidence, knowledge, and wisdom. Nearly two decades later, his words still provoke reflection. May Allah have mercy on him and grant us clarity, balance, and steadfastness.show more

𝐇𝐢𝐝𝐢𝐦𝐚, 𝐏𝐡.𝐃.

131,666 subscribers

48,017 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Kunst Nachrichten & Politik Bildung

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

In one of his public speeches, NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani admitted that Islam and the Prophet Muhammad guide his policies as a Muslim mayor. He glorified Islam as a pro-mass migration religion and stated: “Islam is built on migration.” What he forgot to mention is that the Prophet Muhammad migrated from place to place — and after each migration, he waged war, conquered territories, and beheaded Jews and Christians who refused to submit to Islam. This is not a religion of peace. This is a political doctrine of a cult.

In one of his public speeches, NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani admitted that Islam and the Prophet Muhammad guide his policies as a Muslim mayor. He glorified Islam as a pro-mass migration religion and stated: “Islam is built on migration.” What he forgot to mention is that the Prophet Muhammad migrated from place to place — and after each migration, he waged war, conquered territories, and beheaded Jews and Christians who refused to submit to Islam. This is not a religion of peace. This is a political doctrine of a cult.

Liza Rosen

623,465 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Amen! France's Eric Zemmour Tells it Like it is... 'Qur'an Orders Muslims to Conquer Territories, to Islamize Populations, and the Entire World' “Islam is a Totalitarian Religion” "I don’t think that’s terrorism; I think it’s jihadism. Jihad is the conquest of a territory by Islam, by violent means, prescribed by the Qur’an." "There are people who attack populations of infidels to turn them into subjects of Allah." "Islam functions according to a binary framework: there is what they call the Dar al-Islam and the Dar al-Harb, that is, the world of Islam and the world of war. And Dar al-Salam. Yes, Dar al-Islam is the same thing. Dar al-Salam is the world of peace. But it is the world of Islam because we have peace only when we are converted and have submitted to Islam and submitted to Allah. It’s the same thing: Islam means submission and it has the same roots as Salam. Because we don’t have peace, except through submission. Islam" Read the article at RAIR here:

Amen! France's Eric Zemmour Tells it Like it is... 'Qur'an Orders Muslims to Conquer Territories, to Islamize Populations, and the Entire World' “Islam is a Totalitarian Religion” "I don’t think that’s terrorism; I think it’s jihadism. Jihad is the conquest of a territory by Islam, by violent means, prescribed by the Qur’an." "There are people who attack populations of infidels to turn them into subjects of Allah." "Islam functions according to a binary framework: there is what they call the Dar al-Islam and the Dar al-Harb, that is, the world of Islam and the world of war. And Dar al-Salam. Yes, Dar al-Islam is the same thing. Dar al-Salam is the world of peace. But it is the world of Islam because we have peace only when we are converted and have submitted to Islam and submitted to Allah. It’s the same thing: Islam means submission and it has the same roots as Salam. Because we don’t have peace, except through submission. Islam" Read the article at RAIR here:

Amy Mek

231,089 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Imam Tawhidi is a clear disbeliever. He insults and belittles the Prophet ﷺ, his wives, and his friends. He doesn’t even believe in the Afterlife, as evidenced in his debate with Daniel Haqiqatjou Why is he the head of the “Global Imams Council”? Why is this apostate allowed to speak on behalf of Islam, when it’s clear that he’s a disbeliever? It’s extremely important that Muslims watch out for the secret apostates among us. They will pretend to be Muslim, while seeking to undermine Islam from within. Tawhidi is one of the clearest examples of a disbeliever pretending to be a Muslim.

Imam Tawhidi is a clear disbeliever. He insults and belittles the Prophet ﷺ, his wives, and his friends. He doesn’t even believe in the Afterlife, as evidenced in his debate with Daniel Haqiqatjou Why is he the head of the “Global Imams Council”? Why is this apostate allowed to speak on behalf of Islam, when it’s clear that he’s a disbeliever? It’s extremely important that Muslims watch out for the secret apostates among us. They will pretend to be Muslim, while seeking to undermine Islam from within. Tawhidi is one of the clearest examples of a disbeliever pretending to be a Muslim.

OJ Smoke

55,363 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

I've had a lot of DMs asking me to clarify some of the statements made about Andrew Tate and Islam. InshaAllah, I shall address these points from an Islamic standpoint to the best of my ability: Q- Is Andrew Tate "really" a Muslim? A- This is a very sensitive matter, and I advise myself and everyone not to take this question lightly. As Muslims, we are not allowed to question anyone's faith, we can only judge based on what the individual has identified himself as, so the answer is: It doesn't matter what anyone thinks of Andrew Tate, HE IS A MUSLIM BROTHER!!! Q- Did Andrew Tate make Islam cool and famous? A- No, and I don't mean that disrespectfully. However, even before Andrew Tate converted to Islam, Islam was the fastest-growing religion on the planet and still is. Islam is a faith that is bigger than all of us and cannot be made cool by anyone. That being said, we should NEVER forget that Andrew Tate's huge influence piqued the interest of many people over the world to look into Islam, and he helped many individuals find Islam, resulting in thousands of people embracing it. May Allah reward him for it🤲🏻💚 Q- Is Andrew Tate the Mahdi? A- No, Andrew Tate is not the Mahdi. As Muslims, we have hadiths from our beloved prophet (PBUH) that provide us with clear knowledge regarding this topic, and Andrew Tate does not fall into these categories. However, we must be cautious because making such claims is a serious matter that should not be taken lightly. Q- Is Andrew Tate divine? A- No, we cannot make such a claim as Muslims since it is Haram and disrespectful to the entire religion. I hope that this clarifies the issues raised for all of my Muslim and non-Muslim brothers and sisters. It is critical for us as Muslims to have strong clarity when it comes to the faith, no offense intended. And this is one of the reasons why Andrew Tate fell in love with Islam👇🏽

I've had a lot of DMs asking me to clarify some of the statements made about Andrew Tate and Islam. InshaAllah, I shall address these points from an Islamic standpoint to the best of my ability: Q- Is Andrew Tate "really" a Muslim? A- This is a very sensitive matter, and I advise myself and everyone not to take this question lightly. As Muslims, we are not allowed to question anyone's faith, we can only judge based on what the individual has identified himself as, so the answer is: It doesn't matter what anyone thinks of Andrew Tate, HE IS A MUSLIM BROTHER!!! Q- Did Andrew Tate make Islam cool and famous? A- No, and I don't mean that disrespectfully. However, even before Andrew Tate converted to Islam, Islam was the fastest-growing religion on the planet and still is. Islam is a faith that is bigger than all of us and cannot be made cool by anyone. That being said, we should NEVER forget that Andrew Tate's huge influence piqued the interest of many people over the world to look into Islam, and he helped many individuals find Islam, resulting in thousands of people embracing it. May Allah reward him for it🤲🏻💚 Q- Is Andrew Tate the Mahdi? A- No, Andrew Tate is not the Mahdi. As Muslims, we have hadiths from our beloved prophet (PBUH) that provide us with clear knowledge regarding this topic, and Andrew Tate does not fall into these categories. However, we must be cautious because making such claims is a serious matter that should not be taken lightly. Q- Is Andrew Tate divine? A- No, we cannot make such a claim as Muslims since it is Haram and disrespectful to the entire religion. I hope that this clarifies the issues raised for all of my Muslim and non-Muslim brothers and sisters. It is critical for us as Muslims to have strong clarity when it comes to the faith, no offense intended. And this is one of the reasons why Andrew Tate fell in love with Islam👇🏽

SherLate

897,724 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

It's Good To Be Anti-Islam... but not anti-Muslim. 'Islam is an ideology—a set of ideas. It is not defined by what any individual Muslim wants it to be, but by what it inherently is. No ideology is above critique—particularly one that explicitly seeks political and social dominance over every person on the planet. Additionally, ideologies are not entitled to human rights; these rights apply to individuals. As an ideology, Islam is not necessarily entitled to equal respect and acceptance. Ideas do not carry equal moral weight. The feelings or the number of those who believe do not make an idea true or good. Bad ideas should be challenged before they lead to bad consequences. Islam is not simply a belief about God. The word 'Islam' means submission. It is a set of rules that define a social hierarchy where Muslims submit to Allah, women submit to men, and all non-Muslims submit to Islamic rule. Since we do not live in a Muslim country—where censorship, intimidation, and brute force are used to protect Islam from intellectual analysis—we are still somewhat free to openly exercise our right to debate the merits of the Islamic value system against Western Liberalism. Consider the following questions: Are men really superior to women as the Quran says? Are women intellectually inferior as Muhammad taught? Does propagating material that curses people of other religions amidst random calls to violence create a better social environment? Is it right to keep women as sex slaves merely because the Quran permits this practice in numerous places? Should atheists and homosexuals have to choose between the noose or an outward profession of faith in Allah? Is conformity superior to freedom? Yes, there are Muslims who take issue with these aspects of Islamic theology, but that doesn't change what Islam is. Do not confuse the ideology with the individual. Do not draw conclusions about Islam based on the Muslims that you know, whether they are terrorists or humanitarians. Islam must be understood based on what it is, as presented objectively in the Quran, Hadith, and Sira (biography of Muhammad)." Thank you to the amazing Pat Condell, who released this video ten years ago. #Respect

It's Good To Be Anti-Islam... but not anti-Muslim. 'Islam is an ideology—a set of ideas. It is not defined by what any individual Muslim wants it to be, but by what it inherently is. No ideology is above critique—particularly one that explicitly seeks political and social dominance over every person on the planet. Additionally, ideologies are not entitled to human rights; these rights apply to individuals. As an ideology, Islam is not necessarily entitled to equal respect and acceptance. Ideas do not carry equal moral weight. The feelings or the number of those who believe do not make an idea true or good. Bad ideas should be challenged before they lead to bad consequences. Islam is not simply a belief about God. The word 'Islam' means submission. It is a set of rules that define a social hierarchy where Muslims submit to Allah, women submit to men, and all non-Muslims submit to Islamic rule. Since we do not live in a Muslim country—where censorship, intimidation, and brute force are used to protect Islam from intellectual analysis—we are still somewhat free to openly exercise our right to debate the merits of the Islamic value system against Western Liberalism. Consider the following questions: Are men really superior to women as the Quran says? Are women intellectually inferior as Muhammad taught? Does propagating material that curses people of other religions amidst random calls to violence create a better social environment? Is it right to keep women as sex slaves merely because the Quran permits this practice in numerous places? Should atheists and homosexuals have to choose between the noose or an outward profession of faith in Allah? Is conformity superior to freedom? Yes, there are Muslims who take issue with these aspects of Islamic theology, but that doesn't change what Islam is. Do not confuse the ideology with the individual. Do not draw conclusions about Islam based on the Muslims that you know, whether they are terrorists or humanitarians. Islam must be understood based on what it is, as presented objectively in the Quran, Hadith, and Sira (biography of Muhammad)." Thank you to the amazing Pat Condell, who released this video ten years ago. #Respect

Amy Mek

107,809 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Islam is waging an ongoing war of about 1,350 years to conquer Europe. The spiritual leader of tens, if not hundreds of millions of Sunnis Muslims, openly, above all platform, wrote it and spoke about it and Europe does not understand. "The Return of Islam to Europe and the Conquest of Rome" Source: "Auspices Of The Ultimate Victory Of Islam" (page21-22) Doha, Shawwal 1416 A.H. March 1996 A.D. By: Yusuf al-Qardawi; (1926 – 2022) From amongst these auspices is the hadith that Imam Ahmad reported in his Musnad on the authority of Abu Qabîl, who said, “We were with ‘Abdullâh bin ‘Amr bin Al-‘Âs (may Allah be pleased with him) when he was asked, ‘Which of the two cities is to conquered first, Constantinople or Rome?’ Upon which ‘Abdullâh called for a sealed trunk, and he got a book out of it, and then he said: Whilst we were around the Messenger of Allah (may Allah bless him and grant him peace) writing down, The Messenger of Allah (may Allah bless him and grant him peace) was asked, ‘Which of the two cities is to be conquered first, Constantinople or Rome? And he (the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace) answered, ‘The city of Heraclius will be conquered first!’” Rome is the metropolis of Italy today, and Constantinople is now Istanbul. What can be grasped from the posed question is that the companions (may Allah be pleased with them all) knew beforehand that Islam would conquer the two cities, and their people would embrace Islam, but they just wanted to know which of the two cities would precede the other, thus he (the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace) answered them by saying that the city of Heraclius – that is Constantinople – would be conquered first. That prophecy was fulfilled at the hands of the ambitious Ottoman youth, Muhammad bin Murâd, aged twenty-three, who was known through history by Muhammad the Conqueror. Thus, Constantinople was conquered in the ninth century A.H. [fifteenth century A.D.], precisely on Tuesday 20th of Jumada I 857 A.H. (29 May –1453 A.D.). Thus, remains the second part of the glad tidings to be fulfilled: the conquest of Rome, through which Islam will enter Europe once again after it was forced out of it twice: once from Andalusia and the other from the Balkan states. Most probably this conquest will be through the power of word and pen, not through swords and spears, for the world will open its arms and heart to Islam, after being overburdened by the philosophies (ideologies) of materialism and positivism, and will appeal for assistance from heavens, and guidance from Allah, thus it will find none but Islam a rescuer. The peaceful conquest (victory) has its origins in Islam, for Allah, The Most Exalted, has called the Hudaibiyah Peace Treaty a conquest, even a ‘manifest victory’, and on that occasion Surat Al-Fath was revealed in which Allah, all praise be to Him, says: The noble Qur’anic verse says what means: “Verily, We have given you (O Muhammad) a manifest victory.” (Al-Fath, 48: 1) Thereupon, the Companions asked the Messenger of Allah (may Allah bless him and grant him peace) saying, ‘Is it a conquest (victory), O Messenger of Allah?’ And he (the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace) answered, ‘Yes, it is a conquest (victory).’

Islam is waging an ongoing war of about 1,350 years to conquer Europe. The spiritual leader of tens, if not hundreds of millions of Sunnis Muslims, openly, above all platform, wrote it and spoke about it and Europe does not understand. "The Return of Islam to Europe and the Conquest of Rome" Source: "Auspices Of The Ultimate Victory Of Islam" (page21-22) Doha, Shawwal 1416 A.H. March 1996 A.D. By: Yusuf al-Qardawi; (1926 – 2022) From amongst these auspices is the hadith that Imam Ahmad reported in his Musnad on the authority of Abu Qabîl, who said, “We were with ‘Abdullâh bin ‘Amr bin Al-‘Âs (may Allah be pleased with him) when he was asked, ‘Which of the two cities is to conquered first, Constantinople or Rome?’ Upon which ‘Abdullâh called for a sealed trunk, and he got a book out of it, and then he said: Whilst we were around the Messenger of Allah (may Allah bless him and grant him peace) writing down, The Messenger of Allah (may Allah bless him and grant him peace) was asked, ‘Which of the two cities is to be conquered first, Constantinople or Rome? And he (the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace) answered, ‘The city of Heraclius will be conquered first!’” Rome is the metropolis of Italy today, and Constantinople is now Istanbul. What can be grasped from the posed question is that the companions (may Allah be pleased with them all) knew beforehand that Islam would conquer the two cities, and their people would embrace Islam, but they just wanted to know which of the two cities would precede the other, thus he (the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace) answered them by saying that the city of Heraclius – that is Constantinople – would be conquered first. That prophecy was fulfilled at the hands of the ambitious Ottoman youth, Muhammad bin Murâd, aged twenty-three, who was known through history by Muhammad the Conqueror. Thus, Constantinople was conquered in the ninth century A.H. [fifteenth century A.D.], precisely on Tuesday 20th of Jumada I 857 A.H. (29 May –1453 A.D.). Thus, remains the second part of the glad tidings to be fulfilled: the conquest of Rome, through which Islam will enter Europe once again after it was forced out of it twice: once from Andalusia and the other from the Balkan states. Most probably this conquest will be through the power of word and pen, not through swords and spears, for the world will open its arms and heart to Islam, after being overburdened by the philosophies (ideologies) of materialism and positivism, and will appeal for assistance from heavens, and guidance from Allah, thus it will find none but Islam a rescuer. The peaceful conquest (victory) has its origins in Islam, for Allah, The Most Exalted, has called the Hudaibiyah Peace Treaty a conquest, even a ‘manifest victory’, and on that occasion Surat Al-Fath was revealed in which Allah, all praise be to Him, says: The noble Qur’anic verse says what means: “Verily, We have given you (O Muhammad) a manifest victory.” (Al-Fath, 48: 1) Thereupon, the Companions asked the Messenger of Allah (may Allah bless him and grant him peace) saying, ‘Is it a conquest (victory), O Messenger of Allah?’ And he (the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace) answered, ‘Yes, it is a conquest (victory).’

Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - עופר בינשטוק

1,385,912 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

A dialogue between a Muslim and an atheist: Muslim: There are over 1.8 billion Muslims in the World, and soon we'll overcome the Infidels. Atheist: The 1.8 billion include Ahmadis & Qadiyanis? Muslim: No, Ahmadi Qadiyanis dogs have got nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: How about those Barelvis visiting graves and worshipping the dead? ; they Muslim: Barelvis are infidels. They have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: What do you think of ISIS? The majority of them are Sunnis? Muslim: They have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: How about Shias, following 12 Imams, offering prayers differently, bathing in blood, and calling names to Abu Bakr & Umar? Muslim: Shia Kafirs have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: In a newspaper, there was a headline about an Imam raping a 5-year-old boy and later killing him by hanging with a fan? Muslim: These prayer leaders are bringing a bad name to Islam, they have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: There is another sect that denies all the Hadiths and follows nothing but Quran, known as Parvezis? Muslim: Parvezi followers have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: I heard that Prophet Muhammad married Ayesha when she was 6 and he was 53? Muslim: These are all fabricated Ahadith. Atheist: But these are in the books of Ahadith compiled by Imam Bukhari, Imam Muslim, and considered correct by Ahl-e-Hadith? Muslim: Ahl e Hadith have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: Taliban are killing people in Afghanistan and Pakistan, not allowing girls education, taking up jobs, going to public parks, and never allowing them in public without shuttlecock burqas. Muslim: They are Deo-Bandi Kharjis; they are the agents of India, Israel, and America - they have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: How about those mystic Sufi saints. Muslim: The sufis don’t follow Islam by the book and hold beliefs that lead to infidelity. Thus, they have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: What is your opinion about liberal & progressive Muslims? Muslim: They have gone astray; they include seculars that have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: How about the Saudi Salafi & Wahhabi groups? Muslims: They are extremists and Jihadists; they have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: What do you think of killing non-Muslims? Muslim: Islam is a religion of peace; killings have no place in Islam. Atheist: But Jihad is ordered in the Quran in apparent words? Muslim: It has nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: But Jihad is the 6th Pillar of Islam. Muslim: Islam has 5 pillars only. Atheist: Saudi Prince MBS is on an Islam moderation drive, allowed concerts, and says hadith was written 250 years after Mohammed, and most are false. Muslim: MBS is an American and Israeli agent and has nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: Is it true that Abbasid Abd Al Malik invented Islam and the Quran, and Mohammed did not exist in history? Muslim: Abbasids were descendants of Yazid and were kafirs and had nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: You mean to say Islam has nothing to do with Islam? Muslim: You kaffirs will never understand Islam.

A dialogue between a Muslim and an atheist: Muslim: There are over 1.8 billion Muslims in the World, and soon we'll overcome the Infidels. Atheist: The 1.8 billion include Ahmadis & Qadiyanis? Muslim: No, Ahmadi Qadiyanis dogs have got nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: How about those Barelvis visiting graves and worshipping the dead? ; they Muslim: Barelvis are infidels. They have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: What do you think of ISIS? The majority of them are Sunnis? Muslim: They have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: How about Shias, following 12 Imams, offering prayers differently, bathing in blood, and calling names to Abu Bakr & Umar? Muslim: Shia Kafirs have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: In a newspaper, there was a headline about an Imam raping a 5-year-old boy and later killing him by hanging with a fan? Muslim: These prayer leaders are bringing a bad name to Islam, they have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: There is another sect that denies all the Hadiths and follows nothing but Quran, known as Parvezis? Muslim: Parvezi followers have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: I heard that Prophet Muhammad married Ayesha when she was 6 and he was 53? Muslim: These are all fabricated Ahadith. Atheist: But these are in the books of Ahadith compiled by Imam Bukhari, Imam Muslim, and considered correct by Ahl-e-Hadith? Muslim: Ahl e Hadith have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: Taliban are killing people in Afghanistan and Pakistan, not allowing girls education, taking up jobs, going to public parks, and never allowing them in public without shuttlecock burqas. Muslim: They are Deo-Bandi Kharjis; they are the agents of India, Israel, and America - they have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: How about those mystic Sufi saints. Muslim: The sufis don’t follow Islam by the book and hold beliefs that lead to infidelity. Thus, they have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: What is your opinion about liberal & progressive Muslims? Muslim: They have gone astray; they include seculars that have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: How about the Saudi Salafi & Wahhabi groups? Muslims: They are extremists and Jihadists; they have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: What do you think of killing non-Muslims? Muslim: Islam is a religion of peace; killings have no place in Islam. Atheist: But Jihad is ordered in the Quran in apparent words? Muslim: It has nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: But Jihad is the 6th Pillar of Islam. Muslim: Islam has 5 pillars only. Atheist: Saudi Prince MBS is on an Islam moderation drive, allowed concerts, and says hadith was written 250 years after Mohammed, and most are false. Muslim: MBS is an American and Israeli agent and has nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: Is it true that Abbasid Abd Al Malik invented Islam and the Quran, and Mohammed did not exist in history? Muslim: Abbasids were descendants of Yazid and were kafirs and had nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: You mean to say Islam has nothing to do with Islam? Muslim: You kaffirs will never understand Islam.

Imtiaz Mahmood

157,538 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

In generations to come, Islam will destroy Christianity in Western Europe. Just as he destroyed Christianity and Judaism in the Middle East in about 1,400 years since it was founded. This is one of the tactics that Islam uses to take over the world: Quran 4.100 “Whoever emigrates for the sake of Allah will find much refuge and abundance in the earth, and whoever forsakes his home, a refugee for Allah and his messenger, and death overtakes him, his reward is then obligatory upon Allah. Allah is always forgiving, merciful.” *Here the Qur’an states the cardinal importance of “emigration for the cause of Allah,” that is, moving to a new land with the intention of bringing Islam to it. See also 4:66 and 4:89. The primary pattern for emigrants in Islamic tradition is the Hijra, Muhammad’s move from Mecca to Medina, where for the first time he became a political and military leader. It is “obligatory” for Allah to reward emigrants; this is one of the Qur’an’s few promises of reward for specific actions (see also 9:111). Continue to let Islam into the Western world with welcome and friendship. Continue to respect Islam and eventually it will do to you what Muhammad did in the 7th century to those who welcomed him in the city of Medina. He completely destroyed the host culture. Sheikh Assim Al Hakeem:

In generations to come, Islam will destroy Christianity in Western Europe. Just as he destroyed Christianity and Judaism in the Middle East in about 1,400 years since it was founded. This is one of the tactics that Islam uses to take over the world: Quran 4.100 “Whoever emigrates for the sake of Allah will find much refuge and abundance in the earth, and whoever forsakes his home, a refugee for Allah and his messenger, and death overtakes him, his reward is then obligatory upon Allah. Allah is always forgiving, merciful.” *Here the Qur’an states the cardinal importance of “emigration for the cause of Allah,” that is, moving to a new land with the intention of bringing Islam to it. See also 4:66 and 4:89. The primary pattern for emigrants in Islamic tradition is the Hijra, Muhammad’s move from Mecca to Medina, where for the first time he became a political and military leader. It is “obligatory” for Allah to reward emigrants; this is one of the Qur’an’s few promises of reward for specific actions (see also 9:111). Continue to let Islam into the Western world with welcome and friendship. Continue to respect Islam and eventually it will do to you what Muhammad did in the 7th century to those who welcomed him in the city of Medina. He completely destroyed the host culture. Sheikh Assim Al Hakeem:

Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - עופר בינשטוק

2,453,204 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

"Can Islam live in true peace with the infidels?" No. (In addition to the explanation provided in this post, the linked video features Shaykh Ahmad Musā Jibrīl explaining it.) By: Ofer Binshtok Only Hudna (truces), a temporary ceasefire, is made because Islam is in a weak position against the infidels. Hudna buys Islam time until its power overcomes the infidels, and then it will exterminate them, in accordance with Allah’s commands from the Quran and Muhammad. *According to Muhammad, Bukhari 1765, the earth belongs to Allah and his messenger, to Islam: Bukhari 1765: "…The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: I want this... - He said to them (the same words) the third time (and on getting the same reply) he added: You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle…" * According to Allah, from Qur'an 47.35, Allah commands the believers, do not seek peace when your hand is uppermost: Qur'an 47.35: "…So do not weaken and call for peace while you are superior…" * When Islam is in a position of weakness against the infidels, they have a holy command from Allah from the Quran and Muhammad to lie to the infidels to buy time: Muhammad in Bukhari hadith 3029: Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) called,: "War is deceit". Muhammad in Hadith Sahih, in Tirmidhi 1939: “Lying in time of war”. The message from Quran 3.28: Permission to lie to disbelievers as a defense, when Islam is in a state of weakness. Taqiyya. The message from Quran 16.106: "...Whoever disbelieves in [i.e., denies] Allāh after his belief...except for one who is forced [to renounce his religion] while his heart is secure in faith..." * Indeed, Islam is in a constant state of war against the infidels: “Islam is in an eternal state of war against heresy and disbelievers”. Quran 9.29 begins with: “Fight those who do not believe in Allah...” The message is also from Quran 8.39 Fight the disbelievers until only Islam will exists in the world. Quran 9.123 begins with: "O you who believe, fight those disbelievers who are near you..." The message is also from Hadith Bukhari 25: "Fight the disbelievers until they all convert to Islam and only then will their lives and property be protected…" * In 628 AD, Muhammad moved towards Mecca with an army of 1,400 warriors, a force that was not strong enough to face the mechanical army of the Quraysh tribe. This is why he signed the Hudna Treaty of Hudaybiya, a temporary 10-year ceasefire with the Quraish tribe. An agreement that was considered humiliating for him since he was forbidden to sign it while mentioning his status as a prophet and messenger of Allah. But Muhammad saw this agreement as a victory that gave him time to break the Quraysh's defense agreements with third parties (Bukhari 2731-2732). Which indeed allowed him a year later, in 629, to also attack the Jews of Khaibar. * According to Sharia law, hudna is a temporary ceasefire agreement for ten years; this is the only agreement that Muslims are allowed to sign with the infidels: * TRUCES (Hudna) 09.16 (O: As for truces, the author does not mention them. In Sacred Law truce means a peace treaty with those hostile to Islam, involving a cessation of fighting for a specified period, whether for payment or something else. The scriptural basis for them includes such Koranic verses as: (1) "An acquittal from Allah and His messenger..." (Koran 9:1); (2) "If they incline towards peace, then incline towards it also" (Koran 8:61); as well as the truce which the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made with Quraysh in the year of Hudaybiya, as related by Bukhari and Muslim. Truces are permissible, not obligatory. The only one who may effect a truce is the Muslim ruler of a region (or his representative) with a segment of the non-Muslims of the region, or the caliph (o25) (or his representative). When made with other than a portion of the non-Muslims, or when made with all of them, or with all in a particular region such as India or Asia Minor, then only the caliph (or his representative) may effect it, for it is a matter of the gravest consequence because it entails the nonperformance of jihad, whether globally or in a given locality, and our interests must be looked after therein, which is why it is best left to the caliph under any circumstances, or to someone he delegates to see to the interests of the various regions. There must be some interest served in making a truce other than mere preservation of the status quo. Allah Most High says, "So do not be fainthearted and call for peace, when it is you who are the uppermost" (Koran ) Interests that justify making a truce are such things as Muslim weakness because of lack of numbers or materiel, or the hope of an enemy becoming Muslim, for the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made a truce in the year Mecca was liberated with Safwan ibn Umayya for four months in hope that he would become Muslim, and he entered Islam before its time was up. If the Muslims are weak, a truce may be made for ten years if necessary, for the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made a truce with Quraysh for that long, as is related by Abu Dawud. It is not permissible to stipulate longer than that, save by means of new truces, each of which does not exceed ten years. The rulings of such a truce are inferable from those of the non-Muslim poll tax (def: 011); namely, that when a valid truce has been effected, no harm may be done to non-Muslims until it expires. * In 630 AD, Muhammad's power increased; he broke the agreement with Quraish and moved towards Mecca with about 10 thousand warriors and conquered it. The Quraish tribe converted to Islam, and Muhammad abolished the religious tolerance that existed in Mecca. With his own hands, he began to destroy the 360 holy sites for the different religions that lived there in mutual tolerance and harmony. He abolished this tolerance and left only the Islamic holy site. * Quran 8.58, in fact, allows Muslims to cancel any contract for "fear” that the other party will break it. Not because the other party violated the agreement, but only out of fear. So signing an agreement with Islam is basically meaningless. Quran 8.58: "If you are afraid of the treachery of some of your allies, you may disregard your treaty with them. God does not love the treacherous ones." In conclusion: As a religious command, from Allah, from the Quran, from Muhammad, and from Sharia law: * Islam is in a constant state of war against the infidels, until it destroys them. * When Islam is weak, the believers are commanded to obtain a hudna (temporary ceasefire) so that they can gain strength that will surpass the strength of the infidels. * There is no meaning in signing an agreement with Islam since they are allowed to violate it at any moment. * When the power of the believers exceeds the power of the infidels, the believers are ordered to abandon the Hudna agreement and destroy the infidels. Source: Youtube - The Ruling on Normalization Treaties | Shaykh Ahmad Musā Jibrīl (حفظه الله)

"Can Islam live in true peace with the infidels?" No. (In addition to the explanation provided in this post, the linked video features Shaykh Ahmad Musā Jibrīl explaining it.) By: Ofer Binshtok Only Hudna (truces), a temporary ceasefire, is made because Islam is in a weak position against the infidels. Hudna buys Islam time until its power overcomes the infidels, and then it will exterminate them, in accordance with Allah’s commands from the Quran and Muhammad. According to Muhammad, Bukhari 1765, the earth belongs to Allah and his messenger, to Islam: Bukhari 1765: "…The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: I want this... - He said to them (the same words) the third time (and on getting the same reply) he added: You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle…" According to Allah, from Qur'an 47.35, Allah commands the believers, do not seek peace when your hand is uppermost: Qur'an 47.35: "…So do not weaken and call for peace while you are superior…" * When Islam is in a position of weakness against the infidels, they have a holy command from Allah from the Quran and Muhammad to lie to the infidels to buy time: Muhammad in Bukhari hadith 3029: Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) called,: "War is deceit". Muhammad in Hadith Sahih, in Tirmidhi 1939: “Lying in time of war”. The message from Quran 3.28: Permission to lie to disbelievers as a defense, when Islam is in a state of weakness. Taqiyya. The message from Quran 16.106: "...Whoever disbelieves in [i.e., denies] Allāh after his belief...except for one who is forced [to renounce his religion] while his heart is secure in faith..." * Indeed, Islam is in a constant state of war against the infidels: “Islam is in an eternal state of war against heresy and disbelievers”. Quran 9.29 begins with: “Fight those who do not believe in Allah...” The message is also from Quran 8.39 Fight the disbelievers until only Islam will exists in the world. Quran 9.123 begins with: "O you who believe, fight those disbelievers who are near you..." The message is also from Hadith Bukhari 25: "Fight the disbelievers until they all convert to Islam and only then will their lives and property be protected…" * In 628 AD, Muhammad moved towards Mecca with an army of 1,400 warriors, a force that was not strong enough to face the mechanical army of the Quraysh tribe. This is why he signed the Hudna Treaty of Hudaybiya, a temporary 10-year ceasefire with the Quraish tribe. An agreement that was considered humiliating for him since he was forbidden to sign it while mentioning his status as a prophet and messenger of Allah. But Muhammad saw this agreement as a victory that gave him time to break the Quraysh's defense agreements with third parties (Bukhari 2731-2732). Which indeed allowed him a year later, in 629, to also attack the Jews of Khaibar. * According to Sharia law, hudna is a temporary ceasefire agreement for ten years; this is the only agreement that Muslims are allowed to sign with the infidels: * TRUCES (Hudna) 09.16 (O: As for truces, the author does not mention them. In Sacred Law truce means a peace treaty with those hostile to Islam, involving a cessation of fighting for a specified period, whether for payment or something else. The scriptural basis for them includes such Koranic verses as: (1) "An acquittal from Allah and His messenger..." (Koran 9:1); (2) "If they incline towards peace, then incline towards it also" (Koran 8:61); as well as the truce which the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made with Quraysh in the year of Hudaybiya, as related by Bukhari and Muslim. Truces are permissible, not obligatory. The only one who may effect a truce is the Muslim ruler of a region (or his representative) with a segment of the non-Muslims of the region, or the caliph (o25) (or his representative). When made with other than a portion of the non-Muslims, or when made with all of them, or with all in a particular region such as India or Asia Minor, then only the caliph (or his representative) may effect it, for it is a matter of the gravest consequence because it entails the nonperformance of jihad, whether globally or in a given locality, and our interests must be looked after therein, which is why it is best left to the caliph under any circumstances, or to someone he delegates to see to the interests of the various regions. There must be some interest served in making a truce other than mere preservation of the status quo. Allah Most High says, "So do not be fainthearted and call for peace, when it is you who are the uppermost" (Koran ) Interests that justify making a truce are such things as Muslim weakness because of lack of numbers or materiel, or the hope of an enemy becoming Muslim, for the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made a truce in the year Mecca was liberated with Safwan ibn Umayya for four months in hope that he would become Muslim, and he entered Islam before its time was up. If the Muslims are weak, a truce may be made for ten years if necessary, for the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made a truce with Quraysh for that long, as is related by Abu Dawud. It is not permissible to stipulate longer than that, save by means of new truces, each of which does not exceed ten years. The rulings of such a truce are inferable from those of the non-Muslim poll tax (def: 011); namely, that when a valid truce has been effected, no harm may be done to non-Muslims until it expires. * In 630 AD, Muhammad's power increased; he broke the agreement with Quraish and moved towards Mecca with about 10 thousand warriors and conquered it. The Quraish tribe converted to Islam, and Muhammad abolished the religious tolerance that existed in Mecca. With his own hands, he began to destroy the 360 holy sites for the different religions that lived there in mutual tolerance and harmony. He abolished this tolerance and left only the Islamic holy site. * Quran 8.58, in fact, allows Muslims to cancel any contract for "fear” that the other party will break it. Not because the other party violated the agreement, but only out of fear. So signing an agreement with Islam is basically meaningless. Quran 8.58: "If you are afraid of the treachery of some of your allies, you may disregard your treaty with them. God does not love the treacherous ones." In conclusion: As a religious command, from Allah, from the Quran, from Muhammad, and from Sharia law: * Islam is in a constant state of war against the infidels, until it destroys them. * When Islam is weak, the believers are commanded to obtain a hudna (temporary ceasefire) so that they can gain strength that will surpass the strength of the infidels. * There is no meaning in signing an agreement with Islam since they are allowed to violate it at any moment. * When the power of the believers exceeds the power of the infidels, the believers are ordered to abandon the Hudna agreement and destroy the infidels. Source: Youtube - The Ruling on Normalization Treaties | Shaykh Ahmad Musā Jibrīl (حفظه الله)

Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - עופר בינשטוק

313,880 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

How many more people must be killed before non-Muslims admit we have a major Jihad problem? Islam isn't hijacked by extremists - it is what inspires them. The ideology that flew planes into the World Trade Center in the U.S., killed innocent Australians in a mall, and murdered over 1200 innocent Israelis is one and the same. In 2014, Geert Wilders tried to warn Australians of the threat of Islam during a television interview on ABC Lateline, Australia; he said... "Look how in societies today where Islam is dominant and prominent, how any non-Islamic person, whether it's a Christian or an apostate or a woman or a critical journalist, how they are treated. This is in a very bad way, often with the death penalty or imprisonment or all those kind of terrible things." Due to an enormous influx of people from Islamic countries in the last decades, he continued, Dutch society has changed and worsened so that, "unfortunately, non-Western immigrants, often Muslims, are over-represented in statistics of crime, of dependency on social benefits, that we have honor killings, that we have genital mutilation, that we have streets where women with headscarves and burqas are not the exception anymore. And that it's getting worse... What I'm trying to do when I visit your beautiful country, Australia is warn Australians that even though it might not be the case today, learn from the mistakes that we made in Europe: be vigilant and look at Islam for what it really is. Islam is not a religion of peace. Islam is a totalitarian ideology. The best example is that if any person, any Muslim, wants to leave Islam, then the penalty is death. It is not even allowed to leave it." Wilders made clear that he was not threatening or attacking anyone for a religious or ethnic identity: "I have nothing against the people. I have nothing against the Indonesian people or the Arab people or the Muslim people. I'm talking about the ideology. And indeed, as long as a country has a culture, a religion, an ideology where Islam is dominant, it will never be a democracy. It's also happening in Indonesia. Look at how they treat Christians in Indonesia or how they treat Christians in any other country where Islam is dominant."..."Why is it not possible to build a church in Saudi Arabia, where, as we in the Netherlands, have almost 500 mosques being built; why is it not possible to buy or sell a Bible in any Muslim or most of the Muslim countries, whereas we can buy a Koran here on every street corner? This is the exact example of the fact that Islam is an intolerant society." Wilders emphasized that there is no moderate or non-moderate Islam, but there are moderate and non-moderate Muslims: "As a matter of fact, the majority of the Muslims living in our society are moderate people. But don't make the mistake that even though there are moderate and radical Muslims that there is a moderate or a radical Islam. There is only one Islam, and that is a totalitarian ideology that has no room for anything but Islam. You see it once again in any country in the world where Islam is dominant."

How many more people must be killed before non-Muslims admit we have a major Jihad problem? Islam isn't hijacked by extremists - it is what inspires them. The ideology that flew planes into the World Trade Center in the U.S., killed innocent Australians in a mall, and murdered over 1200 innocent Israelis is one and the same. In 2014, Geert Wilders tried to warn Australians of the threat of Islam during a television interview on ABC Lateline, Australia; he said... "Look how in societies today where Islam is dominant and prominent, how any non-Islamic person, whether it's a Christian or an apostate or a woman or a critical journalist, how they are treated. This is in a very bad way, often with the death penalty or imprisonment or all those kind of terrible things." Due to an enormous influx of people from Islamic countries in the last decades, he continued, Dutch society has changed and worsened so that, "unfortunately, non-Western immigrants, often Muslims, are over-represented in statistics of crime, of dependency on social benefits, that we have honor killings, that we have genital mutilation, that we have streets where women with headscarves and burqas are not the exception anymore. And that it's getting worse... What I'm trying to do when I visit your beautiful country, Australia is warn Australians that even though it might not be the case today, learn from the mistakes that we made in Europe: be vigilant and look at Islam for what it really is. Islam is not a religion of peace. Islam is a totalitarian ideology. The best example is that if any person, any Muslim, wants to leave Islam, then the penalty is death. It is not even allowed to leave it." Wilders made clear that he was not threatening or attacking anyone for a religious or ethnic identity: "I have nothing against the people. I have nothing against the Indonesian people or the Arab people or the Muslim people. I'm talking about the ideology. And indeed, as long as a country has a culture, a religion, an ideology where Islam is dominant, it will never be a democracy. It's also happening in Indonesia. Look at how they treat Christians in Indonesia or how they treat Christians in any other country where Islam is dominant."..."Why is it not possible to build a church in Saudi Arabia, where, as we in the Netherlands, have almost 500 mosques being built; why is it not possible to buy or sell a Bible in any Muslim or most of the Muslim countries, whereas we can buy a Koran here on every street corner? This is the exact example of the fact that Islam is an intolerant society." Wilders emphasized that there is no moderate or non-moderate Islam, but there are moderate and non-moderate Muslims: "As a matter of fact, the majority of the Muslims living in our society are moderate people. But don't make the mistake that even though there are moderate and radical Muslims that there is a moderate or a radical Islam. There is only one Islam, and that is a totalitarian ideology that has no room for anything but Islam. You see it once again in any country in the world where Islam is dominant."

Amy Mek

209,358 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

"The concept of peace with non-Muslims does not exist in Islam" By: Ofer binshtok. Quran 8.61 actually calls for peace with non-Muslims. It ranks 75th in the order of revelation. "And if they incline to peace, then incline to it [also] and rely upon Allah. Indeed, it is He who is the Hearing, the Knowing." However, in contradiction, Quran 47.35 actually commands not to make peace with non-Muslims when you have the upper hand. It ranks 95th in the order of revelation. "So do not weaken and call for peace while you are superior; and Allah is with you and will never deprive you of [the reward of] your deeds." Quran 2.106 resolves the contradiction by declaring that any later commandment abolishes the earlier commandment. "We do not abrogate a verse or cause it to be forgotten except that We bring forth [one] better than it or similar to it. Do you not know that Allah is over all things competent?" As a result, Quran 47.35 is the binding commandment. Therefore, peace with non-Muslims is a concept that does not exist in Islam, as Dr. Tareq Al-Suwaidan explains. The speaker is: Dr. Tareq Al-Suwaidan, He is currently among the most prominent jihadists. He belongs to the Muslim Brotherhood ideologically. A highly intelligent and educated person. He is well-versed in Sharia law, the history of Jihad, the Quran, and Muhammad's Sunnah.

"The concept of peace with non-Muslims does not exist in Islam" By: Ofer binshtok. Quran 8.61 actually calls for peace with non-Muslims. It ranks 75th in the order of revelation. "And if they incline to peace, then incline to it [also] and rely upon Allah. Indeed, it is He who is the Hearing, the Knowing." However, in contradiction, Quran 47.35 actually commands not to make peace with non-Muslims when you have the upper hand. It ranks 95th in the order of revelation. "So do not weaken and call for peace while you are superior; and Allah is with you and will never deprive you of [the reward of] your deeds." Quran 2.106 resolves the contradiction by declaring that any later commandment abolishes the earlier commandment. "We do not abrogate a verse or cause it to be forgotten except that We bring forth [one] better than it or similar to it. Do you not know that Allah is over all things competent?" As a result, Quran 47.35 is the binding commandment. Therefore, peace with non-Muslims is a concept that does not exist in Islam, as Dr. Tareq Al-Suwaidan explains. The speaker is: Dr. Tareq Al-Suwaidan, He is currently among the most prominent jihadists. He belongs to the Muslim Brotherhood ideologically. A highly intelligent and educated person. He is well-versed in Sharia law, the history of Jihad, the Quran, and Muhammad's Sunnah.

Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - עופר בינשטוק

40,040 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Is this Islam? .. People are telling me that this has nothing to do with Islam .. They say that this is an innovation made up by The Shia Muslims MY REPLY .. (1) In Sunni hadith books and traditions, it is clearly mentioned that the Prophet Mohammad (as) cried and mourned for his grandson Imam Hussain (as) .. So, therefore, it is the sunnah of the Prophet (as) to cry and mourn for Imam Hussain (as) .. There is no set way of mourning .. People mourn in different ways according to their customs and culture .. And it is all okay, unless it turns into something haram and forbidden (a sin) (2) .. In The Quran (42:23) Allah (swt) orders us to love the Prophet’s family .. When someone you love gets murdered in such a way, you will not mourn and cry for them? (3) .. In The Quran (51:29) Sarah smacked herself and Allah (swt) did not say that she did something wrong or forbidden .. Allah (swt) did not say that she did an evil thing .. If there was any issues whatsoever, Allah (swt) in His infinite wisdom and knowledge would have said something right there and then Side note - When i converted to Islam, i had a look at both Sunni and Shia .. It was very clear to me that Shia Islam is the True Islam .. I consider sunni’s as Muslims .. but I encourage them not to follow blindly and to do more research with an open heart

Is this Islam? .. People are telling me that this has nothing to do with Islam .. They say that this is an innovation made up by The Shia Muslims MY REPLY .. (1) In Sunni hadith books and traditions, it is clearly mentioned that the Prophet Mohammad (as) cried and mourned for his grandson Imam Hussain (as) .. So, therefore, it is the sunnah of the Prophet (as) to cry and mourn for Imam Hussain (as) .. There is no set way of mourning .. People mourn in different ways according to their customs and culture .. And it is all okay, unless it turns into something haram and forbidden (a sin) (2) .. In The Quran (42:23) Allah (swt) orders us to love the Prophet’s family .. When someone you love gets murdered in such a way, you will not mourn and cry for them? (3) .. In The Quran (51:29) Sarah smacked herself and Allah (swt) did not say that she did something wrong or forbidden .. Allah (swt) did not say that she did an evil thing .. If there was any issues whatsoever, Allah (swt) in His infinite wisdom and knowledge would have said something right there and then Side note - When i converted to Islam, i had a look at both Sunni and Shia .. It was very clear to me that Shia Islam is the True Islam .. I consider sunni’s as Muslims .. but I encourage them not to follow blindly and to do more research with an open heart

The Hezb

65,074 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Islam. This is the text for the video: "A bullet in the head, and the kāfir (non-Muslim) is gone. They will not unite, as he – upon him be prayer and peace – said. A kāfir (non-Muslim) – his killer sends him to Hell forever. The Prophet – upon him be prayer and peace – gives glad tidings to whoever kills the criminals, to whoever kills the kāfirīn (non-Muslims). And which worship is exalted? From shedding the blood of the kāfirīn (non-Muslims)?" Quran 8.39: "...fight them until disbelief (non-Muslims) disappears and the whole Dean (way of life) is for Allah alone...(for Islam)” Quran 9.5: “...kill the Mushrikun (non-Muslims) wherever you find them…" Al-Bukhari: "To wage war against Allah means to reject faith in Him." Quran 2.191: "The sin of disbelief in Allah is greater than committing murder."

Islam. This is the text for the video: "A bullet in the head, and the kāfir (non-Muslim) is gone. They will not unite, as he – upon him be prayer and peace – said. A kāfir (non-Muslim) – his killer sends him to Hell forever. The Prophet – upon him be prayer and peace – gives glad tidings to whoever kills the criminals, to whoever kills the kāfirīn (non-Muslims). And which worship is exalted? From shedding the blood of the kāfirīn (non-Muslims)?" Quran 8.39: "...fight them until disbelief (non-Muslims) disappears and the whole Dean (way of life) is for Allah alone...(for Islam)” Quran 9.5: “...kill the Mushrikun (non-Muslims) wherever you find them…" Al-Bukhari: "To wage war against Allah means to reject faith in Him." Quran 2.191: "The sin of disbelief in Allah is greater than committing murder."

Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - עופר בינשטוק

35,680 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

In this video, there is everything but Islam, Dhikr or Taṣawwuf. In fact, there is everything that Islam prohibits in it and not a single thing that Islam permits. Those who follow these Azakiru and Azakira as they like to be called must understand that they are basically just following musicians. There is absolutely no difference between them and other musicians except maybe in their regalia or the names they chose to call themselves. They are far from Islam and their shows have absolutely no semblance to Islam. The vast majority of them are ignorant just as the people around them and their so-called Shehus who encourage them in these un-Islamic practices. They have neither the knowledge of Islam nor that of Taṣawwuf. Just vibes and dances. AstaghfiruLlah 🤲. May Allah protect us all from the evils of gatherings that desecrate the name of Allah. Āmīn.

In this video, there is everything but Islam, Dhikr or Taṣawwuf. In fact, there is everything that Islam prohibits in it and not a single thing that Islam permits. Those who follow these Azakiru and Azakira as they like to be called must understand that they are basically just following musicians. There is absolutely no difference between them and other musicians except maybe in their regalia or the names they chose to call themselves. They are far from Islam and their shows have absolutely no semblance to Islam. The vast majority of them are ignorant just as the people around them and their so-called Shehus who encourage them in these un-Islamic practices. They have neither the knowledge of Islam nor that of Taṣawwuf. Just vibes and dances. AstaghfiruLlah 🤲. May Allah protect us all from the evils of gatherings that desecrate the name of Allah. Āmīn.

𝑰𝒅𝒓𝒊𝒔 𝑨. 𝑶𝒏𝒊 PhD

14,345 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Lara Logan explains how Islam commands the “overthrow of the existing government” Muslims migrate to Lara Logan “Islam is not a religion. It's a civilization. This is a very significant difference because people think that under the First Amendment of The United States that the protection, the freedom of religion means that you have the freedom to use religion to enforce and advance a political ideology, even where it means the overthrow of the existing government. And that is not the case. Islam defines itself as a civilization, and religion is really part of that, but it is not the defining thing, and why does it matter so much? Well, because the civilization of Islam is governed by Sharia. And by that, I mean Sharia law. Right. And you cannot have Sharia law coexisting with the constitution and American law. Those two things are diametrically opposed in every single respect. They're not even vaguely tied to each other — This is so what we have allowed in The United States, we have allowed first amendment protection. — Islam is a political organization that uses the religion as a cover and as a front”

Lara Logan explains how Islam commands the “overthrow of the existing government” Muslims migrate to Lara Logan “Islam is not a religion. It's a civilization. This is a very significant difference because people think that under the First Amendment of The United States that the protection, the freedom of religion means that you have the freedom to use religion to enforce and advance a political ideology, even where it means the overthrow of the existing government. And that is not the case. Islam defines itself as a civilization, and religion is really part of that, but it is not the defining thing, and why does it matter so much? Well, because the civilization of Islam is governed by Sharia. And by that, I mean Sharia law. Right. And you cannot have Sharia law coexisting with the constitution and American law. Those two things are diametrically opposed in every single respect. They're not even vaguely tied to each other — This is so what we have allowed in The United States, we have allowed first amendment protection. — Islam is a political organization that uses the religion as a cover and as a front”

Wall Street Apes

400,395 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Sneako is not the perfect Muslim, none of us are. He will make mistakes, especially as a recent revert, some of which have been pointed out to me recently - however if we look at his journey to Islam overall, I think he is genuine in his faith. May Allah swt guide him and all of us!

Sneako is not the perfect Muslim, none of us are. He will make mistakes, especially as a recent revert, some of which have been pointed out to me recently - however if we look at his journey to Islam overall, I think he is genuine in his faith. May Allah swt guide him and all of us!

The Muslim Mum

21,543 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

""In 2023, Tinubu won election with the sweat and majority of the Muslims votes, absolutely no doubt about that. Unfortunately, based on the facts available, it is clear that the Muslims, Islam and the North are not his priority but are the victims of his leadership. All he focuses on is Lagos, and even in Lagos, his most beloved are the Christians who constitutes the greatest beneficiaries. Dear politicians, this is the truth, ALLAH ordered us to say it and we must say it as it is. I am therefore advising our clerics that this year, when you want to campaign for Bola to us this time around, don't ask us to support him because he is our brother in Islam, or he is a Muslim, don't ask us to support him because he picks a Muslim running mate, tell us exactly what development he brought to us, tell us how his leadership improves our lives, how his leadership improves our health, education, transportation or agriculture and businesses, or if he has ever fulfilled his campaign promise that he will unfailingly provide electricity if he is elected, build your campaigns based on these. And if he doesn't have all these as mentioned, then allow us to chose a better person....." - PROFESSOR MANSUR SOKOTO

""In 2023, Tinubu won election with the sweat and majority of the Muslims votes, absolutely no doubt about that. Unfortunately, based on the facts available, it is clear that the Muslims, Islam and the North are not his priority but are the victims of his leadership. All he focuses on is Lagos, and even in Lagos, his most beloved are the Christians who constitutes the greatest beneficiaries. Dear politicians, this is the truth, ALLAH ordered us to say it and we must say it as it is. I am therefore advising our clerics that this year, when you want to campaign for Bola to us this time around, don't ask us to support him because he is our brother in Islam, or he is a Muslim, don't ask us to support him because he picks a Muslim running mate, tell us exactly what development he brought to us, tell us how his leadership improves our lives, how his leadership improves our health, education, transportation or agriculture and businesses, or if he has ever fulfilled his campaign promise that he will unfailingly provide electricity if he is elected, build your campaigns based on these. And if he doesn't have all these as mentioned, then allow us to chose a better person....." - PROFESSOR MANSUR SOKOTO

Dele Momodu Ovation

115,452 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

They call it Islam, then they call it radical Islam, then they call it political Islam, then they call it Islamism! The name changing will never stop because the problem fundamentally is ISLAM! A Muslim believes in Islam and therefore a Muslim is an Islamist! Because it’s in the name Islam-ist, and to claim it is not Islam but radical Islam is philosophically shallow, historically naive, factually stupid and intellectually dishonest. It’s not radical Islam, because Islam by nature is a very very radical religion. Not all Muslims are terrorists, but most If not all terrorists are Muslim. Just in Australia, Muslims compromise 3.5% of the population, yet they contribute to 95% of terrorists attacks & convictions. Can you imagine what will happen if they get to 5% or 20% or even more? Islam is a tyrannical political ideology that pretends to be a religion! Islam is a one world order violent political system that pretends to be spiritual enlightenment!Never ever trust a Christian or Conservative influencer including Tucker Qatarson Tucker Carlson & Crazy Candy Candace Owens when they claim to be speaking, proclaiming and fighting for THE TRUTH, while they never dare to confront and tackle the biggest evil and destructive force of our time to Christianity and the world, which is Islam. Islam has been violently, aggressively and militantly targeted and conquered Christian nations for the last 1400 years and now it’s going after the Christian West across Europe, America, Australia and whatever Christian world that is left in the modern world. What team are you on and are you awake yet? 👀🇮🇱🕋✝️

They call it Islam, then they call it radical Islam, then they call it political Islam, then they call it Islamism! The name changing will never stop because the problem fundamentally is ISLAM! A Muslim believes in Islam and therefore a Muslim is an Islamist! Because it’s in the name Islam-ist, and to claim it is not Islam but radical Islam is philosophically shallow, historically naive, factually stupid and intellectually dishonest. It’s not radical Islam, because Islam by nature is a very very radical religion. Not all Muslims are terrorists, but most If not all terrorists are Muslim. Just in Australia, Muslims compromise 3.5% of the population, yet they contribute to 95% of terrorists attacks & convictions. Can you imagine what will happen if they get to 5% or 20% or even more? Islam is a tyrannical political ideology that pretends to be a religion! Islam is a one world order violent political system that pretends to be spiritual enlightenment!Never ever trust a Christian or Conservative influencer including Tucker Qatarson Tucker Carlson & Crazy Candy Candace Owens when they claim to be speaking, proclaiming and fighting for THE TRUTH, while they never dare to confront and tackle the biggest evil and destructive force of our time to Christianity and the world, which is Islam. Islam has been violently, aggressively and militantly targeted and conquered Christian nations for the last 1400 years and now it’s going after the Christian West across Europe, America, Australia and whatever Christian world that is left in the modern world. What team are you on and are you awake yet? 👀🇮🇱🕋✝️

Andrew Sedra

10,673 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🕋❌ Islam, the religion of peace does it again with a terrorist attack in Sydney Australia!! Muslim terrorists shot at thousands of Jews while celebrating Hanukkah festival, killing 12 people. Islam is not a religion of peace but a religion of death, terror and violence. These guys were not radical Muslims! They were following their prophet Muhammad Who killed everyone that got in his way. Here are some verses for you from the Quran! ❌ Qur’an 9:5 “…kill the polytheists wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them” Qur'an 47:4 “when you meet those who disbelieve , strike their necks until, when you have inflicted slaughter upon them” Qur’an 8:12 “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieved, so strike them upon the necks and strike from them every fingertip.’” There is no such thing as Islamophobia. Phobia is an irrational fear! Islamophobia is a word made up by Muslims to stop you from speaking up against Islam. Islam has a problem everywhere they go. Islam has a problem with Europe! Islam has a problem with Israel! Islam has a problem with America! Islam has a problem with Australia! Islam kills Jews! Islam kills Christians! Islam kills Hindus! Islam kills everyone that doesn’t believe! We want Jesus not Allah! We want the prophets not Muhammad! We want churches not mosques! We want the Bible not the Quran! Pray for Australia! Pray for the West! Pray for the families of the victims! 🙏🙏🙏

🕋❌ Islam, the religion of peace does it again with a terrorist attack in Sydney Australia!! Muslim terrorists shot at thousands of Jews while celebrating Hanukkah festival, killing 12 people. Islam is not a religion of peace but a religion of death, terror and violence. These guys were not radical Muslims! They were following their prophet Muhammad Who killed everyone that got in his way. Here are some verses for you from the Quran! ❌ Qur’an 9:5 “…kill the polytheists wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them” Qur'an 47:4 “when you meet those who disbelieve , strike their necks until, when you have inflicted slaughter upon them” Qur’an 8:12 “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieved, so strike them upon the necks and strike from them every fingertip.’” There is no such thing as Islamophobia. Phobia is an irrational fear! Islamophobia is a word made up by Muslims to stop you from speaking up against Islam. Islam has a problem everywhere they go. Islam has a problem with Europe! Islam has a problem with Israel! Islam has a problem with America! Islam has a problem with Australia! Islam kills Jews! Islam kills Christians! Islam kills Hindus! Islam kills everyone that doesn’t believe! We want Jesus not Allah! We want the prophets not Muhammad! We want churches not mosques! We want the Bible not the Quran! Pray for Australia! Pray for the West! Pray for the families of the victims! 🙏🙏🙏

Martin Sedra

34,178 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten