ๆญฃๅจๅ ่ฝฝ่ง้ข...
่ง้ขๅ ่ฝฝๅคฑ่ดฅ
๐ฅ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฅ ๐ฅ๐๐ ๐๐-๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐!๐ฅ ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ, ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ถ๐ป๐๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐, & ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐๐๐ฒ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐. ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฒ๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐ฒ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐จ๐จ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐! ๐ฅ Team Bharat is hitting the streets once again to fight for justice, dignity, and fairness. We will not stay silent while political... show more
29,079 ๆฌก่ง็ โข 23 ๅฐๆถๅ โขvia X (Twitter)
48 ๆก่ฏ่ฎบ
Your Team Bharat invites you to join us and protest. Our ๐ก๐ข๐ก-๐ก๐๐๐ข๐ง๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ก๐๐ฆ: ๐ ๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐น๐ถ๐บ๐ถ๐ป๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐ถ๐ป๐พ๐๐ถ๐ฟ๐ before any FIR is registered under the SC/ST Act ๐ ๐ก๐ข ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป in the private sector ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ, ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ถ๐ป๐๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐, & ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป for IIT Bombay Prof. Suryanarayana Doolla! Are you with us ?
เคญเคพเค เคเฅ เคฌเฅเคฒ เคฐเคนเฅ เคนเฅ เคเคธ เคชเคฐ เคเคฟเคเฅ เคฐเคนเคจเคพ เคฌเคฆเคฒเคจเคพ เคฎเคค เคเคพเคนเฅ เคเคฟเคคเคจเฅ เคญเฅ เคฐเคพเคเคจเฅเคคเคฟ เคฎเคนเคคเฅเคตเคพเคเคพเคเคเฅเคทเคพ เคฏเคพ เคฎเคเคฌเฅเคฐเฅ เคธเคพเคฎเคจเฅ เคเค เฅค
Yes
โค๏ธ
๐ Wonder why you do it โ fight for people day in day out You are well settled and have done remarkably well in life โ why do all this thankless social work? And why at great personal risk โ more power and health to you brother.
Love u. We are TEAM BHARAT
Totally in support of Team Bharat & for the safeguard and upliftment of our country. Great going ๐๐ผ๐๐ผ
Grateful Team Bharat
We support you sir tell us if you need anything ๐ชฌ
Team Bharat wants you on the streets with us
Sure sir if I will be there I will surely join team Bharat on streets ๐ชฌ
Grateful โค๏ธ from Team Bharat
I'm with you in all the above mentioned 3 demands ๐๐๐
Grateful โค๏ธ gratitude from Team Bharat
E20 drama finished ? ๐๐๐๐๐
This man is utterly insentive and ignorant towards injustice imposed on SC ST. His every action and words spoken against BJP and RSS is hoax. Its reverse psychology trick which RSS usually uses. This man starter speaking on Ethanol but now he suddenly opposed rights of SC ST?
My dear friend: all I say is please have a preliminary inquiry before filing an FIR under the SC ST act so that genuine SC ST citizens get justice.... Lots of love
My dear friend, Your experience regarding SC ST matters is none. You are not even on the receiving end of the caste atrocities or caste discrimination first hand. Your takes are infact boosting the shield to the caste criminals. There's no fair inquiry till date. Think.
@tehseenp Abe gandwe shant ho jaa , mdrchod kyu apni m@@ chuda raha
@tehseenp Who are you Minati Panigrahi? Poonawala's dog? Jab do bade baat kar rahe ho toh kutto ne bhonkna nahi chaiye. Tehseen aur mein civilized argument kar rahe hai. Tu hi khud aakar hamare saamne jhuk raha hai. Fir naa kehna, do opposite opinions waalo ne saath mein aake teri maari.
เค เคฌ เคชเคพเคเคฟเคธเฅเคคเคพเคจเฅ เคนเคฟเคเคฆเฅเคเค เคเฅ เคฎเคพเคฎเคฒเฅ เคฌเคพเคค เคเคฐเฅเคเคเฅเฅค เคฏเฅ เคธเคฌ เคตเคนเฅ เคนเคฟเคเคฆเฅ เคฎเฅเคธเฅเคฒเคฟเคฎ เคนเฅ เคเคฟเคจเคเฅ เคตเคเคน เคธเฅ เคฆเฅเคถ เคเฅเคฒเคพเคฎ เคนเฅเค เคฅเคพเฅค เคเคฐ เคคเคนเคธเฅเคจ เคคเฅเคฎ เคเฅเคตเคฒ เคฐเฅเค เคชเคพ เคธเคเคคเฅ เคนเฅ เคธเคตเคฐเฅเคฃเฅ เคเฅ เคชเคเฅเคท เคฎเฅเค เคฌเฅเคฒเคเคฐ เฅค เคฒเฅเคเคฟเคจ เคฏเคพเคฆ เคฐเคเคจเคพ,เคเคพเคคเคเคเคฟเคฏเฅเค เคเคพ เคเคฒเคพเค เคเคฟเคฏเคพ เคเคพเคเคเคพเฅค เคธเคฎเคฏ เคเคพ เคเคจเฅเคคเคเคพเคฐ เคเคฐเฅเคเฅค
I will support @tehseenp even for any political post if he stands for what is right in all issues concerning india as he has done so far.
Support Team Bharat!
Great Work Tehseen
Team Bharat is hitting the streets for you.
Thanks for taking up the issue and raising our concerns. Forever grateful. God bless.๐
Team Bharat stands with u
Absolutely no compromising ๐๐ป๐๐ป
๐ซถ๐ซถ๐ซถ๐๐
Perhaps if you cared about the state of our nation half as much as you care about exploiting every opportunity for yourself, your career might have at least failed for a better reason.
Unreasonable demand tbh
เคคเคนเคธเฅเคจ เคเคฌ เคธเฅ เคถเคนเคเคพเคฆ เคเฅ เคญเคพเคทเคพ เคฌเฅเคฒเคจเฅ เคฒเคเฅ เคนเฅ
He also needs belt treatment like his brother got....๐คก
Ama yaar, tumhare E-20 wala matter kaha gaya?
Why not ask to abolish the SC st act altogether ?
We want to make developed nation it only happens when these rules are reform as per citizen of India...No reservation in private sector
เคงเคจเฅเคฏเคตเคพเคฆ เคคเคนเคธเฅเคจ เคญเคพเค ๐๐๐
Penalty for filing fake FIR, especially "Modi ki Guarantee act", no payment disbursement on filing FIR under this act especially when there are SCST courts which are free for them. Taxpayers money is not for such leakages. If at all, pay expenses directly, why fund them?
Talks should be about 1. parallel GC Act 2. introducing creamy layer in SC/ST category. 3. Having minimum cut off of 80% marks in competitive exams and if reserved candidates fail to secure that, resrved seats be converted to open seats
Luv u bro we r with u on this matter
We will make our bharat great again ๐ซถ
Ye alag he hai dono bhai
BJP is asking to show your papers, now I am convinced that BJP is doing the right thing.
Who is giving reservation in private sectors? Kin logo ke against protest karna hai bhai?
๐
Absolutely ๐ฏ
เค เคฐเฅ เคฏเคพเคฐ เคคเฅเคฎ เคเคคเคจเคพ เค เคเฅเคเคพ เคเคพเคฎ เคเฅเคธเฅ เคธเฅเค เคธเคเคคเฅ เคนเฅ เคนเคพเคฒเคพเคเคเคฟ เค เคเฅเคเคพ เคเคพเคฎ เคนเฅ เคเคฐเคคเฅ เคฐเคนเฅ เคญเคพเคเคถเฅเคเฅเคฐเคฟเคฏเคพ
๐ฅ You never spoke about discrimination which faced by Dalits tribal marginalised section of the society
!["You just hate Hichilema": The dramatic fall of Zambia's president By Sishuwa Sishuwa Hakainde Hichilema stood in the queue to becoming President of Zambia for 15 years before voters finally removed him from it in August 2021. This demonstrates how badly the man wanted this job. But it has taken him only five years in office to display his unfitness for the role. When it comes to the bigger national issues, such as safeguarding our cherished democracy, getting the best out of Zambiaโs mineral wealth, respecting the constitution and the rule of law, fighting corruption beyond rhetoric, genuine promotion of national unity and equitable distribution of appointments to public service positions, sorting out the cost-of-living crisis and the deplorable conditions of life for most Zambians, Hichilema has lamentably failed. In fact, I would go as far as saying that the President has become a clear and present danger to Zambiaโs economy, to our democracy, our constitutional order, our nationhood and its 'One Zambia Nation' foundation, and to the lives of ordinary Zambians. Voting Hichilema out of office will be the highest expression of patriotism. As I have previously stated, I am convinced that Hichilema will lose the election on 13 August. The only thing that can save him from defeat is pre-ballot death (of any candidate) or industrial scale vote-rigging. I really hope that we Zambians will never again elect a lying, tribal, corrupt, unpatriotic, vindictive, hypocritical, lawless, and undemocratic scumbag. In addition to his policy failures on major issues of public concern, one reason why Hichilema is losing the election (unless he rigs it on an industrial scale) is because of having extremist supporters, mostly Zambezi supremacists, who dismiss legitimate criticism of his leadership actions as hate speech and consequently enable his continued failure to be receptive to criticism, to reflect on the feedback provided by the governed, and to change for the better. When citizens (be it the Catholic Bishops, opposition parties, civic actors, or ordinary Zambians like me) raise governance concerns, they do so in the spirit of accountable democratic governance. They do not do so because they hate the president as a person, hate his ethnic identity, or hate where he was born. I insist that a better Zambia is possible but we wonโt get it if we treat criticism of presidential leadership failure as expression of hate. Unfortunately, even Hichilema himself has embraced this warped thinking that any criticism of his leadership actions is hate speech. This attitude has deprived him of the much needed feedback on his leadership performance and capacity to listen to divergent views, consequently impoverishing his presidency. We must embrace the unfamiliar, eschew haste in passing judgement, and be more tolerant and understanding. These qualities are especially essential to those in public leadership roles. I once raised concern that we seem to have prepared different standards for this president compared to those who came before him. If a leader can only provide five hours of electricity to the people in a day, they have failed. If a leader can only increase the cost of living, they have failed. If a leaderโฆI can go on. In addition to denying the president the benefit of legitimate public feedback on his performance, misconstruing criticism as hate makes it look like the responsibility of holding our public leaders to account falls on those who either love him or hail from the region where the president does not come from. If his supporters and Tongas, Lozis and Zambians from Northwestern Province join in calling out the wrongs of Hichilema, he will no longer play the tribal card of reducing all criticism of his leadership to ethnic hatred. In the uncritical minds of some of the president's supporters, I criticise Hichilema because I hate him! Most of the individuals who hold this view are people who repeatedly criticise me on this platform, even when their criticism is quite often devoid of reason or substance. I do not think those who criticise me do so because they hate me. I think they criticise me, even if I hold no elected public office, simply because they have a different take, different opinions, on things. Why is it so hard to apply the same logic to my criticism of an elected public leader like Hichilema who is accountable to us, the public? I have been providing regular political commentaries on Zambian affairs since 2009. Why was my much stronger criticism of Hichilema's predecessors, namely Rupiah Banda, Michael Sata, and Edgar Lungu, not considered hatred of these individual leaders? In fact, many of the individuals who today accuse me of harbouring hatred for Hichilema were people who were very happy with my much stinging criticism of the leadership failures of his predecessors. When I called Sata a tribalist and undemocratic leader who did not listen to advise, and provided evidence in support of my conclusions, they were happy to cheer me on, even as Sata's supporters said I was bitter and a Hichilema supporter. When I called Lungu a tribalist and corrupt leader, and provided evidence in support of my conclusions, they were happy to cheer me on, even as Lungu's supporters said I was bitter and petitioned the police to arrest me for sedition. Some of Hichilema's supporters, as part of the enjoyment of their exercise of the right to free expression, even insult me, call me names, or outrightly declare that they dislike me. Of course I would prefer content-based discussion, but if the best that anyone's mind can do is to insult me, I will consider their actions as part of the right to free expression. I recognise that people have the right to dislike me, to call me names, to wish me whatever they desire, to feel however they want about me. I have no problem with all this. I do not speak to be liked or secure the validation of anyone. I speak to express myself and I respect the right of other people to do the same. As I have repeatedly stated, free speech is not just for the people or thoughts we like or agree with; it is also for people we despise and opinions that we do not support. The important point is not the position I take on a given issue of public interest. It is the reasoning advanced in support of said position. If I say Hichilema is a lying, tribal, corrupt, unpatriotic, vindictive, hypocritical, lawless, and undemocratic scumbag, what is important is not simply this description; it is the reasons and evidence I have adduced in support of this conclusion. Anyone is welcome to challenge my conclusions or evidence, to say "I disagree with your argument for this and that reason." What I totally reject is the idea that criticism of a president's leadership actions amounts to hate; it does not. If I point out that Hichilema is failing to ensure adequate ethnic diversity in public appointments and provide evidence in support of this assertion, anybody else is welcome to demonstrate weakness in my stated point of view. If I point out that Hichilema is a compulsive liar and provide evidence in support of this assertion, anybody else is welcome to demonstrate weakness in my stated point of view. If I point out that Hichilemaโs fight against corruption is a sham and provide evidence in support of this assertion, anybody else is welcome to demonstrate weakness in my stated point of view. If I point out that Hichilema is a compulsive liar and provide evidence in support of this assertion, anybody else is welcome to demonstrate weakness in my stated point of view. If I point out that Hichilema has eroded Zambiaโs democracy and provide evidence in support of this assertion, anybody else is welcome to demonstrate weakness in my stated point of view. If I point out that Hichilema has failed to reduce the cost of living, as per his campaign promise, and provide evidence in support of this assertion, anybody else is welcome to demonstrate weakness in my stated point of view. If I point out that Hichilema (working in cohort with his friend Situmbeko Musokotwane) has facilitated the extraction of the countryโs mineral wealth by multinational corporations without ensuring sufficient returns in revenue collection for Zambia and provide evidence in support of this assertion, anybody else is welcome to demonstrate weakness in my stated point of view. If I point out that Hichilema has failed toโฆand provide evidence in support of this assertion, anybody else is welcome to demonstrate weakness in my stated point of view. Simply dismissing my criticism as an expression of my alleged hatred for Hichilema is most unhelpful. Those who do so are depriving me the opportunity to learn what I do not know and Hichilema the opportunity to adjust his leadership style and change for the better. While I do not hesitate to share my opinions on matters of public concern, I also retain the intellectual integrity of one who is willing to abandon their point of view if its weakness can be shown. I have repeatedly stated that I harbour no hatred against Hichilema. What I hate is his bad leadership, whose meaning I have explained in the article below. There is no constitutional democracy in the world that requires citizens to love their elected leaders. Loving individuals is the responsibility of their spouses and family members. Once these individuals step up to hold elective public office, we owe them one thing: accountability or feedback on their performance. No elected public leader or their supporter should burden me or another person with any demand for affirmation or affection. In a functioning democracy, the duty of citizens is to hold their elected leaders to account so that they deliver basic services and do not undermine accountable democratic governance. This is what I have been doing across different administrations, including this one. As early as December 2021, when I analysed Hichilma's first 100 days in office, I raised governance concerns of his leadership in the hope that he could address them so that they do not grow into bigger problems. He did not listen. In 2022, when he was celebrating one year in office, I raised governance concerns of his leadership in the hope that he could address them so that they do not grow into bigger problems. He did not listen. In 2023, I raised governance concerns of his leadership in the hope that he could address them so that they do not grow into bigger problems. He did not listen. In 2024, I raised governance concerns of his leadership in the hope that he could address them so that they do not grow into bigger problems. He did not listen. In fact, as did his predecessor in 2021 in response to my criticism of the abuse of state institutions to fix critics and opponents, the president asked his supporters to report me to the police for alleged hate speech against him! In 2025, I raised governance concerns of his leadership in the hope that he could address them so that they do not grow into bigger problems. He did not listen. This year and for the many reasons that I shared in the interview on the link below, Hichilema is losing the election because he did not listen to criticism that we, as citizens, raised about his performance. He is also losing the election because of his extremist supporters who, in addition to a wilful but harmful failure to hold him to account, dismiss legitimate criticism of his leadership from other people as hate speech. What a pity! What a wasted opportunity! I have just read a story on a ruling party platform casually dismissing Global Witness's report that "Ahead of Zambia's general election...First Quantum Minerals and its associates have been running a decades-long covert influence campaign distorting the copper-rich nation's democracy" and that the Canadian firm has "become his [Hichilema's] largest funder in the upcoming 2026 election after pledging up to $50 million in support." The report adds that "FQM has reaped enormous benefits: major changes to Zambia's tax regime have save the company $771 million between 2022 and 2025, and it has been shielded from legal scrutiny." Rather than interrogating these grave concerns, the publisher, the Zambian Watchdog which is run from State House, is treating the issue so casually when Global Witness, a very credible international outlet, raises serious corruption and governance allegations. In January 2019, I raised questions about Hichilema's relationship with foreign mining firms, but was told by his supporters that I just hate him. Today, we are ere. The net result is that Hichilema, who in opposition politics had positioned himself as the reformist leader Zambia needed to reclaim its democracy, eliminate corruption, unite the country, and set it on the path to economic recovery, has, in power, turned out to be nearly everything he detested about his predecessor and, in some cases, much worse. Under his watch, corruption has thrived on a massive scale, the economy is a shambles, ethnic divisions have worsened, Zambiaโs previously principled foreign policy has been shredded into something unrecognisable, and democracy is essentially non-existent. The man who was expected to lead reform has instead transitioned into an aspiring despot. Unless he rigs the election, or eliminates his main rival, Zambians should prepare for a new administration after 13 August. Many voters have reached a point of no return and it is too late for Hichilema to change their mind. A combination of failure to listen and the "you just hate Hichilema" brigade has destroyed his once promising presidency. I see many people expressing surprise at the huge turnout at Brian Mundubile's rallies. What they miss is that the turnout reflects the revulsion against Hichilema rather than genuine support for Brian. Even if Brian was not there, voters would have rallied behind another candidate through which to express their opposition to Hichilema as a result of his major policy failures. As early as 2023, wen I noticed Hichilema's direction of travel, I warned that the greatest opposition that he and the UPND face is a politically alert and informed citizenry, not an opposition party: โThe biggest opposition that Hichilema faces is the people, particularly if he fails to lower the cost of living and tackle the huge unemployment outside the health and education sectors. They can stop opposition rallies like Edgar Lungu and the PF tried to do but if Zambians would have decided in a year or two that Hichilema must go at the next election, there is nothing that he can do to stop them....Even if Hichilema tries to, he cannot stop the peopleโs will. Even if he succeeds in killing the PF and in his manoeuvres to block his main political opponents from running in 2026, another platform and another candidate to serve as the outlet of opposition will be found. The voters will support any visionary patriot they see as better placed to be used as the vehicle for removing Hichilema just like they chose him as the vehicle for removing Lungu. Please tell himโ. Hichilema did not listen. Again. This continued failure to listen prompted my conclusion two years later that "Many Zambians may not know yet who they will vote for in the 2026 presidential election, but they already know who they wonโt vote for." The truth is that I tried to warn Hichilema in good time and at different points that he was heading in the wrong direction. The President, dripping with arrogance, did not listen. Think of it this way. A bus (representing a political party in power) is transporting passengers (active citizens) from Intercity terminus (2021, being the departure point of where we did not want to be anymore) to Nakonde (2026, being the arrival point of destination before subsequently deciding whether to book the same bus for the return trip). After leaving Intercity, some passengers notice that the bus is heading towards Livingstone (a wrong destination that takes us back to before 2021). A few of us (active citizens) decide to stand up (holding the leader to account) and confront both the driver (the president) and his conductor (Minister of Finance), demanding an explanation for why we are heading to Livingstone when we were promised that we woud be taken to Nakonde. Other passengers, mainly those who came from the ethnic group of the driver and conductor, defended the duo even before it could respond to our concerns. They repeatedly told us that "You just hate the driver. Please sit down!" One or two relatives of the conductor joined in support, saying the "The driver and the conductor are excellent and one of them has even won awards for stellar performance on his duties, including his remarkable capacity to understand direction of travel"! That is how some passengers kept quiet. I kept on talking, especially after we reached Choma in the hope that if we turned atthat point, we woudl not wast more time. I talked because I could not get off the bus at undesigned stations, so the only solution was to appeal to the driver to change course. I explained that it would be an act of extreme irresponsibility on my part as an active passenger to wait until the bus has reached Livingstone before holding the driver to account about the direction of travel. That is why I tried to warn the driver that we were headed in the wrong direction. Unfortunately, other passengers said we should just sit back comfortably, enjoy the ride which included some morsels of food delivered by the bus, and trust the driver because other drivers before him were much worse. In the end, we arrived in Livingstone, our undesired destination. Just when we were arriving, we saw another bus, loading passing from there directly to Nakonde. The driver, upon realising the cost of his failure to listen and the disappointment in the eyes of the passengers, urged everyone to sit down, promising that he would take us to Nakonde if we give him more time. With the exception of those who came from the driver's ethnic group and the auxiliary ones, most passengers, who had shown great faith in his driving skills by paying (voting) the fare for the bus as their mode of transport from Intercity to Nakonde, have left the bus for the other. These include those who had adopted silence during the journey after realising that the driver, aided by the choir mentioned, was not a listening kind. As I write this post, the alternative bus is almost full. The same passengers who accused those of us who, along the way, advised the driver to change course, of harbouring hatred for the driver are now wondering why nearly everyone is leaving the bus we came with for an alternative one that is promising to take us directly to Nakonde. One of the driver's supporters, reiterating the driver's earlier appeal that we should stick to the bus that brought us to Livingstone, just shouted at us a moment ago: "The alternative bus will take you to a wrong destination. Its driver cannot be trusted; just stick to this one because you won't have to pay a new fare". The supporter is overlooking the point that we are already at a wrong destination, the current driver has betrayed our trust, and that we would rather repose our trust in another person. It is not good to remain on a bus, driven by a person who does not listen, out of the fear that an alternative one might be driven by someone who could be worse. Let us try the alternative bus. If its driver takes us to a wrong destination, we will disembark from the bus we are about to jump onto, as we have done before, and find another one until we reach Nakonde. For me and other active passengers, such has been the the current driver's betrayal of our trust that we have reached a point of no return. We cannot trust this driver anymore, especially that when we tried to correct him, no one explained to us why our concerns were unfounded. We were just told that we hate hate the driver or his ethic group or or the province where he comes from. Recently, Dr Lee Habasonda, a lecturer in political science at the University of Zambia, told Reuters (watch the video clip on the link below) that electoral success is a matter of thresholds โ of grievances, feelings, frustrations, etc. Leeโs view is that once a certain threshold or tipping point has been reached, "no matter your manifesto, ideology, lies" or whatever those in power do or say, the voters will "decide to change government" because they would have reached a point of no return. Emotionally, many Zambian voters, including some that I know who voted for Hichilema in 2021, have passed that threshold where no matter what Hichilema or UPND does, these voters will reject him. This is because the threshold, or the point of no return, has been reached. As Lee argued, those in power "may say we have already won this election when they campaign but the political coalitions and realignment" suggest otherwise. When the opposition wins next month, we will need to advise them to get non-sycophants at State House and in the critical posts in the civil service. It is important that they understand that unless there is a clear shift away from the harmful culture we have raised concerns about, we will be compelled to challenge them with the same resolve we previously applied to both the PF and UPND governments. On my part, I promise that I will always be on the side of the people. You will not find me in government even after the election. Once Hichilema is out of office, I will leave him alone and my attention will shift to holding to account the next set of public leaders. As I made clear in 2021, I am content serving as an academic and I will work, as part of my civic duty, to hold the new Government to account as I did with previous Governments. I am not available for or interested in any form of government job. For now, Iet me continue listening to the attached song. Chalo chesu.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2078449842368483816/amplify_video_thumb/2078427007344427008/img/tCO3n_fY3sOVQlej.jpg)
