Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

𝐕𝐃𝐇: 𝐓𝐑𝐔𝐌𝐏 𝐈𝐒 𝐒𝐄𝐍𝐃𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐕𝐀𝐍𝐂𝐄 𝐀 𝐌𝐄𝐒𝐒𝐀𝐆𝐄 Victor Davis Hanson is reading Trump's body language — and what he sees is a president recalibrating his inner circle in real time. VDH starts by giving Vance his due. In 2024, Vance "𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘮 𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘢," destroyed everyone he debated, and... made Walz look like "𝘢 𝘣𝘶𝘧𝘧𝘰𝘰𝘯 𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘴" — all with surgical calm. His attitude toward opponents was almost generous: "𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦. 𝘐 𝘥𝘰𝘯'𝘵 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘩𝘶𝘳𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶." Formidable. But that was the campaign. Then came governing. Iran. Venezuela. Cuba. None of it was MAGA orthodoxy. The strikes took out Iran's nuclear facilities and its supreme leader. The Venezuela operation grabbed Maduro right out from under his Cuban bodyguards with zero American d∗aths. Bold, decisive — and exactly the kind of engagement that puts Vance in 𝐚𝐧 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧. As VDH explains it, Vance knows Trump values "𝘭𝘰𝘺𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘺, 𝘭𝘰𝘺𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘺, 𝘭𝘰𝘺𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘺, 𝘭𝘰𝘺𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘺, 𝘭𝘰𝘺𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘺" above everything. But his power base — Tucker, Don Jr., Tucker's son on his own staff, the people who got him the VP nomination — are the ones most opposed to the foreign engagements. Trump acknowledged the rift publicly, telling reporters he and Vance are 𝐩𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐨𝐩𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐝𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐭 on Iran (ABC News). To his credit, Vance handled it well — "𝘐𝘵'𝘴 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘢𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘦, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘴 𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘪𝘵'𝘴 𝘶𝘱 𝘵𝘰 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘣𝘰𝘥𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘪𝘵 𝘢𝘴 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘧𝘶𝘭 𝘢𝘴 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘣𝘭𝘦." But the tension is real. Meanwhile, enter 𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐧. VDH's nickname is perfect. Panama problem? Send Rubio. Vance blew things up with Zelensky and the Europeans? Send Rubio to play good cop. Personable, speaks Spanish, popular — and Trump is heaping praise on him. When reporters asked about a disagreement with Vance, Trump was notably lukewarm. Then he pivoted to Rubio: "𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘤𝘰 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘩𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺." That contrast isn't accidental. That's Trump's antennas telling the room where the loyalty ledger stands. Then VDH turns to Tucker — and this part stings. Hanson was on Tucker's show for years and never heard any of what Tucker is saying now. There's an internet compilation of Tucker's own past statements where he was "𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘺 𝘪𝘯 𝘧𝘢𝘷𝘰𝘳 𝘰𝘧 𝘣𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘷𝘪𝘨𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘵" against radical Islam and Iran. Now he's calling Trump's Iran decision 𝐚𝐛𝐬𝐨𝐥𝐮𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐠𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐥 and claiming that when you demand unconditional surrender, it historically leads to mass r∗pe of the defeated population (Mediaite). Trump's response was blunt: Tucker is 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐌𝐀𝐆𝐀. VDH dismantles Tucker's premise with a single example. America demanded unconditional surrender from Japan. Douglas MacArthur served as pro-consul for eight years. There was no mass r∗pe by Americans. Tucker's claim doesn't survive contact with the most obvious parallel in modern history. The message VDH is decoding is clear: Vance needs to divorce himself from the extremist voices, recommit to Trump's agenda as executed — not as debated on podcasts — and prove that loyalty runs both ways. If he doesn't, the man Trump keeps calling the greatest Secretary of State in history is right there. 𝐑𝐞𝐬𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐮𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐤 𝐫𝐡𝐞𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐜. 𝐀𝐥𝐰𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞.show more

M.A. Rothman

93,624 subscribers

701,094 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika Eğitim

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

𝗩𝗗𝗛 𝗢𝗡 𝗧𝗨𝗖𝗞𝗘𝗥, 𝗩𝗔𝗡𝗖𝗘, 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗥𝗜𝗙𝗧: 𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗠𝗣 𝗜𝗦 𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗗𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗔 𝗠𝗘𝗦𝗦𝗔𝗚𝗘 Victor Davis Hanson watched Tucker for years. Had him on his show. Says he never heard any of what Tucker is saying now — in fact, he has seen the old clips. Tucker was formidably pro-vigilance against radical Islam and Iran. His current position is almost pro-Islam by comparison. On Tucker's unconditional surrender comment — VDH takes it seriously enough to rebut it properly. Tucker argued that unconditional surrender historically leads to mass rape of the defeated. VDH's response: America demanded unconditional surrender from Japan. MacArthur governed as pro-consul for eight years. There was no mass rape. Americans who committed rape were executed. The Soviets mass-raped their way across Berlin — not us. Tucker's insinuation that American soldiers would be given license to r*pe is an insult to the United States military. On the Vance-Rubio dynamic: VDH sees Trump's antenna going up. It was J.D., J.D., J.D. — now it's Marco, the fireman. Send Rubio to Panama. Send Rubio to repair Vance's Zelensky blowup. Marco is personable, speaks Spanish, and is the ultimate utility player. Trump is signaling to J.D. — and to the MAGA base — that loyalty to the movement requires divorcing yourself from the extremist agents. Tucker calling the Iran operation evil while American pilots are flying missions over Tehran is not a position a Vice President of the United States can be associated with. The growing antisemitism on the right is new, VDH says. It wasn't there a few years ago. He traces it partly to a cohort of disaffected young men who correctly identify that DEI and globalization failed them — and who are being directed by grifters toward conspiratorial anti-Jewish frameworks to sharpen the message. Eighty percent of what Tucker and Candace say is empirical. Then they add: 𝘐'𝘮 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘴𝘢𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨. And in that "just saying" is always a core about Jews and Israel. That's dangerous. VDH says so plainly. (36:49) MAGA Rift and Tucker Fallout

𝗩𝗗𝗛 𝗢𝗡 𝗧𝗨𝗖𝗞𝗘𝗥, 𝗩𝗔𝗡𝗖𝗘, 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗥𝗜𝗙𝗧: 𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗠𝗣 𝗜𝗦 𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗗𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗔 𝗠𝗘𝗦𝗦𝗔𝗚𝗘 Victor Davis Hanson watched Tucker for years. Had him on his show. Says he never heard any of what Tucker is saying now — in fact, he has seen the old clips. Tucker was formidably pro-vigilance against radical Islam and Iran. His current position is almost pro-Islam by comparison. On Tucker's unconditional surrender comment — VDH takes it seriously enough to rebut it properly. Tucker argued that unconditional surrender historically leads to mass rape of the defeated. VDH's response: America demanded unconditional surrender from Japan. MacArthur governed as pro-consul for eight years. There was no mass rape. Americans who committed rape were executed. The Soviets mass-raped their way across Berlin — not us. Tucker's insinuation that American soldiers would be given license to r*pe is an insult to the United States military. On the Vance-Rubio dynamic: VDH sees Trump's antenna going up. It was J.D., J.D., J.D. — now it's Marco, the fireman. Send Rubio to Panama. Send Rubio to repair Vance's Zelensky blowup. Marco is personable, speaks Spanish, and is the ultimate utility player. Trump is signaling to J.D. — and to the MAGA base — that loyalty to the movement requires divorcing yourself from the extremist agents. Tucker calling the Iran operation evil while American pilots are flying missions over Tehran is not a position a Vice President of the United States can be associated with. The growing antisemitism on the right is new, VDH says. It wasn't there a few years ago. He traces it partly to a cohort of disaffected young men who correctly identify that DEI and globalization failed them — and who are being directed by grifters toward conspiratorial anti-Jewish frameworks to sharpen the message. Eighty percent of what Tucker and Candace say is empirical. Then they add: 𝘐'𝘮 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘴𝘢𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨. And in that "just saying" is always a core about Jews and Israel. That's dangerous. VDH says so plainly. (36:49) MAGA Rift and Tucker Fallout

M.A. Rothman

143,921 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Let me remind you what they actually ran on. 👇🏼 No forever wars. No interventionism. Peace candidates. That was the whole pitch. Am I making that up? No. We all watched it. Now let’s talk about Vance. He leaked his disagreement with Trump on the Iran strikes to CBS News. He did it because he’s positioning himself for 2028 and he needs to create daylight between himself and this decision. But here’s the problem. Where was Vance on Venezuela? Not in the situation room. Not at Mar-a-Lago where the actual decisions were being made. In my opinion Vance is on the outs. Whether you like it or not. Rubio is in — for now. But that’s the thing about Trump world. Nobody stays in forever. That’s the lesson. That’s always the lesson. Unless your last name is Trump or you married into the family — you are one bad news cycle away from exile. In Trump world you go in fast and you go out faster.

Let me remind you what they actually ran on. 👇🏼 No forever wars. No interventionism. Peace candidates. That was the whole pitch. Am I making that up? No. We all watched it. Now let’s talk about Vance. He leaked his disagreement with Trump on the Iran strikes to CBS News. He did it because he’s positioning himself for 2028 and he needs to create daylight between himself and this decision. But here’s the problem. Where was Vance on Venezuela? Not in the situation room. Not at Mar-a-Lago where the actual decisions were being made. In my opinion Vance is on the outs. Whether you like it or not. Rubio is in — for now. But that’s the thing about Trump world. Nobody stays in forever. That’s the lesson. That’s always the lesson. Unless your last name is Trump or you married into the family — you are one bad news cycle away from exile. In Trump world you go in fast and you go out faster.

Anthony Scaramucci

97,180 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Trump’s Coalition Includes Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly — Deal With It! “It was Megyn Kelly and Tucker Carlson and Joe Rogan" that made the Trump Coalition. Vice President J.D. Vance appeared on Megyn Kelly’s show today and laid out the broad coalition that delivered victory to President Donald Trump and himself. “Look, the coalition that made Donald Trump the president of the United States and JD Vance, the vice president of the United States, people have to remember this,” Vance said. “It was Megyn Kelly and Tucker Carlson and Joe Rogan. It was also Mark Levin. It was also a lot of people like John Podhoretz who wanted a more aggressive foreign policy.” Vance made clear that the Republican Party must remain a big tent even when members disagree. “What I think is important, I’m never going to say that John Podhoretz is not welcome in the Republican party. He is,” he continued. “But just as he’s disappointed right now, sometimes other people are going to be disappointed at other times. You can’t just quit politics because the leader of a country of 330 million people.” This is crazy talk by Vance, it flies in the face a true conservatism.

Trump’s Coalition Includes Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly — Deal With It! “It was Megyn Kelly and Tucker Carlson and Joe Rogan" that made the Trump Coalition. Vice President J.D. Vance appeared on Megyn Kelly’s show today and laid out the broad coalition that delivered victory to President Donald Trump and himself. “Look, the coalition that made Donald Trump the president of the United States and JD Vance, the vice president of the United States, people have to remember this,” Vance said. “It was Megyn Kelly and Tucker Carlson and Joe Rogan. It was also Mark Levin. It was also a lot of people like John Podhoretz who wanted a more aggressive foreign policy.” Vance made clear that the Republican Party must remain a big tent even when members disagree. “What I think is important, I’m never going to say that John Podhoretz is not welcome in the Republican party. He is,” he continued. “But just as he’s disappointed right now, sometimes other people are going to be disappointed at other times. You can’t just quit politics because the leader of a country of 330 million people.” This is crazy talk by Vance, it flies in the face a true conservatism.

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

14,035 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

For Those That Don’t Understand Donald Trump’s VP Pick Being JD Vance, Here’s Why “He’s a brilliant pick” “Absolutely brilliant pick by Donald Trump to select JD Vance as his vice presidential candidate, his running mate, when he sworn into office on January 20, 2025. Now look, I know there's a lot of people who are hand ringing and don't understand the pick, but I'm here to tell you JD Vance checks a ton of boxes. More boxes than anybody else that was being looked at. And there's two things about JD Vance that nobody else brings to the table. JD Vance understands what it means to grow up in a severely depressed part of the country. He understands what modern American families deal with living paycheck to paycheck. He grew up in that environment, trying to figure out how to make your money last as long as your month does. He gets it. He made his money himself. He understands the impact of addiction on society because it ripped through his family. But the thing about JD Vance is this guy is wicked smart, and he's an incredible debater, and he knows his stuff. You put him on a stage with Kamala cackling Harris, and you watch what he does to her. He's gonna expose to the entire world how inept and unqualified Kamala Harris is, not only to be vice president, but to be president if Joe Biden were to be reelected because he ain't making it a full 4 year term. But the thing that you have to remember about JD Vance is 8 years ago, he was a never Trumper. And I know that sounds like a bad thing, and the media is gonna harp on that, but you wait until you hear JD Vance explain why he's not a never Trumper anymore and how he's gonna speak to that change that he had by watching Donald Trump keep his promises and perform exactly the way he said he was gonna perform. And as a matter of fact, do for this country what he promised to do. That's what changed JD Vance's mind. He's talked about it. He's been open about it. Donald Trump is an actions guy, and JD Vance responded to that. And I think most Americans just want to be able to believe that their candidate is gonna keep their promises. And when you put someone like JD Vance on a stage or in front of a microphone or in front of a camera, and he explains how Donald Trump changed his mind through his actions and his performance, that's gonna speak to a lot of the people that are still sitting on the fence trying to decide whether or not Donald Trump is the right candidate for them. This pick was the best pick that Donald Trump has made so far. Well done.”

For Those That Don’t Understand Donald Trump’s VP Pick Being JD Vance, Here’s Why “He’s a brilliant pick” “Absolutely brilliant pick by Donald Trump to select JD Vance as his vice presidential candidate, his running mate, when he sworn into office on January 20, 2025. Now look, I know there's a lot of people who are hand ringing and don't understand the pick, but I'm here to tell you JD Vance checks a ton of boxes. More boxes than anybody else that was being looked at. And there's two things about JD Vance that nobody else brings to the table. JD Vance understands what it means to grow up in a severely depressed part of the country. He understands what modern American families deal with living paycheck to paycheck. He grew up in that environment, trying to figure out how to make your money last as long as your month does. He gets it. He made his money himself. He understands the impact of addiction on society because it ripped through his family. But the thing about JD Vance is this guy is wicked smart, and he's an incredible debater, and he knows his stuff. You put him on a stage with Kamala cackling Harris, and you watch what he does to her. He's gonna expose to the entire world how inept and unqualified Kamala Harris is, not only to be vice president, but to be president if Joe Biden were to be reelected because he ain't making it a full 4 year term. But the thing that you have to remember about JD Vance is 8 years ago, he was a never Trumper. And I know that sounds like a bad thing, and the media is gonna harp on that, but you wait until you hear JD Vance explain why he's not a never Trumper anymore and how he's gonna speak to that change that he had by watching Donald Trump keep his promises and perform exactly the way he said he was gonna perform. And as a matter of fact, do for this country what he promised to do. That's what changed JD Vance's mind. He's talked about it. He's been open about it. Donald Trump is an actions guy, and JD Vance responded to that. And I think most Americans just want to be able to believe that their candidate is gonna keep their promises. And when you put someone like JD Vance on a stage or in front of a microphone or in front of a camera, and he explains how Donald Trump changed his mind through his actions and his performance, that's gonna speak to a lot of the people that are still sitting on the fence trying to decide whether or not Donald Trump is the right candidate for them. This pick was the best pick that Donald Trump has made so far. Well done.”

Wall Street Apes

728,866 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

‘Trump tried to FIRE J.D. Vance after everything that Vance said was proven right about the Iran war.‘ —Trump’s Former Lawyer Robert Barnes ‘This was about in April and May, after everything that Vance had said would happen happened in Iran, and everything Trump pretended was going to happen didn’t happen. And so the first reaction of Trump was not, “hey, I should have listened to him.” It was how annoyed he was that Vance was right and Trump was wrong. Then at that point he would actually ask people, “Can I fire the Vice President? Why can’t I fire the Vice President?” Because he’s become power mad. Trump doesn’t see himself as having any peer among prior presidents, nor any peer among contemporary leaders. And he wants to be treated that way by Vance. And Vance doesn’t treat him that way. Vance gives him honest feedback, which has been strongly opposed to this entire Iranian war all the way through. He tried to get him out the first time. And Trump kept rug-pulling every deal Vance got done, such that the Iranians no longer have any confidence at all that Trump can get anything done, just like the Russians have no confidence that Trump can get anything done. Because anytime Vance gets a deal done, Trump rug-pulls… But he’s been very assertive. He’s the only one restraining Trump at all, because everybody else, he has a cabinet of cowards and sycophants around him that are afraid to challenge him, afraid to question him, afraid to contest what he does. It took Vance twisting arms to get Caine to be more blunt about the lack of weapons that we have defensively and offensively to continue to fight the kinetic conflict with Iran on the same basis we did in the first 38 days. So yeah, it shows you where Trump’s mind is, that the only rational, sane person in the room is the one he would like to fire if he could. Constitutionally, he can’t.’ —Robert Barnes on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview below in the quoted post below 👇

‘Trump tried to FIRE J.D. Vance after everything that Vance said was proven right about the Iran war.‘ —Trump’s Former Lawyer Robert Barnes ‘This was about in April and May, after everything that Vance had said would happen happened in Iran, and everything Trump pretended was going to happen didn’t happen. And so the first reaction of Trump was not, “hey, I should have listened to him.” It was how annoyed he was that Vance was right and Trump was wrong. Then at that point he would actually ask people, “Can I fire the Vice President? Why can’t I fire the Vice President?” Because he’s become power mad. Trump doesn’t see himself as having any peer among prior presidents, nor any peer among contemporary leaders. And he wants to be treated that way by Vance. And Vance doesn’t treat him that way. Vance gives him honest feedback, which has been strongly opposed to this entire Iranian war all the way through. He tried to get him out the first time. And Trump kept rug-pulling every deal Vance got done, such that the Iranians no longer have any confidence at all that Trump can get anything done, just like the Russians have no confidence that Trump can get anything done. Because anytime Vance gets a deal done, Trump rug-pulls… But he’s been very assertive. He’s the only one restraining Trump at all, because everybody else, he has a cabinet of cowards and sycophants around him that are afraid to challenge him, afraid to question him, afraid to contest what he does. It took Vance twisting arms to get Caine to be more blunt about the lack of weapons that we have defensively and offensively to continue to fight the kinetic conflict with Iran on the same basis we did in the first 38 days. So yeah, it shows you where Trump’s mind is, that the only rational, sane person in the room is the one he would like to fire if he could. Constitutionally, he can’t.’ —Robert Barnes on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview below in the quoted post below 👇

Going Underground

108,453 görüntüleme • 17 gün önce

We don't have CORONATIONS in this country. TPUSA wants to crown JD Vance, but there WILL be a primary in 2028 because there are always primary elections. History has shown us that the voters in America ultimately decide. I like JD Vance. I get along with JD Vance and have always been supportive of JD Vance since he was selected as President Trump’s VP. But, JD has a massive problem, and his name is Tucker Qatarlson Tucker Carlson. You cannot campaign to be President of the US if you cozy up to a man who claims the Trump administration captured Maduro to "spread homosexuality” and that Sharia Law is good for society. Tucker's fanboys are spreading LIES that influencers are being "paid" to attack JD. The reality is, the people pushing these lies are IN BED with Omeed Malik, the same Islamist donor backing Tucker Carlson. JD needs to save himself and his campaign now by distancing himself from this toxic force, or he will lose the base and Marco Rubio will be the GOP nominee for President in 2028. If a lot of the people around JD truly cared about him having success in 2028 as opposed to just monetizing their access, they would tell him this brutal honest truth like I have. This is the truth. It’s not an attack. It’s the uncensored truth. Truth isn’t an attack. Truth is love.

We don't have CORONATIONS in this country. TPUSA wants to crown JD Vance, but there WILL be a primary in 2028 because there are always primary elections. History has shown us that the voters in America ultimately decide. I like JD Vance. I get along with JD Vance and have always been supportive of JD Vance since he was selected as President Trump’s VP. But, JD has a massive problem, and his name is Tucker Qatarlson Tucker Carlson. You cannot campaign to be President of the US if you cozy up to a man who claims the Trump administration captured Maduro to "spread homosexuality” and that Sharia Law is good for society. Tucker's fanboys are spreading LIES that influencers are being "paid" to attack JD. The reality is, the people pushing these lies are IN BED with Omeed Malik, the same Islamist donor backing Tucker Carlson. JD needs to save himself and his campaign now by distancing himself from this toxic force, or he will lose the base and Marco Rubio will be the GOP nominee for President in 2028. If a lot of the people around JD truly cared about him having success in 2028 as opposed to just monetizing their access, they would tell him this brutal honest truth like I have. This is the truth. It’s not an attack. It’s the uncensored truth. Truth isn’t an attack. Truth is love.

Laura Loomer

170,959 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

🔴 Look, my entire theory is based on the following: 1. We know that Alex Bruesewitz (and his team) controls the Trump accounts. 2. Trump is being lied to. We already know he was misbriefed about Tucker Carlson (Laura Loomer corrected that), and I believe the same thing is happening again. That's why, in his Truth Social posts, Trump keeps arguing against straw men that completely miss the actual political debate. Trump seems to think that: - opposition to the deal is coming only from "Dumocrats", - that critical voices are merely claiming he lost the war (that's not what this is about), - that critics are upset about taxpayer money going to the regime (not true, only MTG said that, and her account is/was run by Bruesewitz), - that America doesn't have the stomach to see it through, even though he wanted to move forward (most critics are opposing the deal), etc. Trump's Truth Social posts read like those of someone who does not know who is opposing the deal or why they are opposing it. 3. Bruesewitz is an obvious liar, master manipulator, and professional political gaslighter. He and his friends (Anna Paulina Luna, Donald Trump Jr., and Jack Posobiec) invented an Israeli bot campaign without presenting any evidence and continue to push it relentlessly - simply to discredit anyone critical of Vance and the deal. Bruesewitz goes as far as using questionable polls, smearing accounts as Israeli bots, and may even have played a role in a large number of them being suspended all at once. 4. And then there's this: in an interview from last year, Bruesewitz explained that during the election campaign, it was his job to monitor reactions and comments under Trump's posts and brief the president on the political mood at the time. If Alex is still the one doing that, then my conclusion is simple: he is almost certainly misrepresenting the real opposition to Vance and this deal when briefing Trump. Someone, please, needs to get to the bottom of this.

🔴 Look, my entire theory is based on the following: 1. We know that Alex Bruesewitz (and his team) controls the Trump accounts. 2. Trump is being lied to. We already know he was misbriefed about Tucker Carlson (Laura Loomer corrected that), and I believe the same thing is happening again. That's why, in his Truth Social posts, Trump keeps arguing against straw men that completely miss the actual political debate. Trump seems to think that: - opposition to the deal is coming only from "Dumocrats", - that critical voices are merely claiming he lost the war (that's not what this is about), - that critics are upset about taxpayer money going to the regime (not true, only MTG said that, and her account is/was run by Bruesewitz), - that America doesn't have the stomach to see it through, even though he wanted to move forward (most critics are opposing the deal), etc. Trump's Truth Social posts read like those of someone who does not know who is opposing the deal or why they are opposing it. 3. Bruesewitz is an obvious liar, master manipulator, and professional political gaslighter. He and his friends (Anna Paulina Luna, Donald Trump Jr., and Jack Posobiec) invented an Israeli bot campaign without presenting any evidence and continue to push it relentlessly - simply to discredit anyone critical of Vance and the deal. Bruesewitz goes as far as using questionable polls, smearing accounts as Israeli bots, and may even have played a role in a large number of them being suspended all at once. 4. And then there's this: in an interview from last year, Bruesewitz explained that during the election campaign, it was his job to monitor reactions and comments under Trump's posts and brief the president on the political mood at the time. If Alex is still the one doing that, then my conclusion is simple: he is almost certainly misrepresenting the real opposition to Vance and this deal when briefing Trump. Someone, please, needs to get to the bottom of this.

diana bloom

75,740 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Victor Davis Hanson on Vance, Rubio, and 2028 Ambitions! "What was unique about the Holocaust was there was a systematic ideological effort... around 6 million out of roughly 8 million total, were Jewish people, targeted specifically." ~ VDH Victor Davis Hanson offered a candid assessment of the future political trajectories of JD Vance and Marco Rubio within the Republican Party. He asserted that it is an "ironclad reality" that JD Vance will not serve as vice president under Donald Trump for four years and then simply pivot to serve another four years under Marco Rubio. "JD Vance is not going to be vice president for four years under Donald Trump and then turn around and say I have four more years under Marco Rubio. It's just not going to happen. I'm sorry," Hanson stated. Instead, he predicted that Vance is positioned to run for president himself, and if he fails to secure the nomination, he would not accept a vice-presidential slot under Rubio. Hanson flipped the scenario, noting that "Rubio can be picked by Vance and he can say you can serve for eight years like George HW Bush and then you can come in." He pointed out that Rubio remains young enough, in his late 50s, to potentially run in his early 60s. Hanson praised both figures highly, describing them as "very good" and effective communicators. "They're both very good with the media. They're both very good on the issues," he said. Hanson then turned to a specific critique of Vance, highlighting what he sees as a shortcoming in how the vice president addressed Holocaust Remembrance Day. Hanson noted that Vance spoke "quite movingly about the tragedy of the Holocaust but he didn't mention the Jewish people." While acknowledging that around a million and a half non-Jews were also killed, Hanson emphasized the unique nature of the Holocaust. He explained that the systematic, ideological effort targeted non-combatant civilians; pulled from every country, ally or enemy of the Third Reich. Creating an industrialized extermination through death camps, German engineering, crematoria, and methods like Zyklon B gas. "What was unique about the Holocaust was there was a systematic ideological effort to take citizens that were not combatants and pull them out of every different country... and then find an industrial way of killing them," Hanson said. Hanson contrasted this with other World War II deaths, such as those among Russians or Chinese, which occurred mostly in combat or as collateral damage from bombing. "Yes, but these were mostly in combat situations or collateral damage through bombing etc.," he noted. In the Holocaust, the majority of the civilian victims, around 6 million out of roughly 8 million total, were Jewish people, targeted specifically because of their ethnic background, religion, and perceived success in European society. "The majority of them were Jewish people who were selected because of their ethnic background and religion and traditional role in European society as being very successful, competent, good citizens," Hanson concluded. "And that has to be the lesson of the Holocaust."

Victor Davis Hanson on Vance, Rubio, and 2028 Ambitions! "What was unique about the Holocaust was there was a systematic ideological effort... around 6 million out of roughly 8 million total, were Jewish people, targeted specifically." ~ VDH Victor Davis Hanson offered a candid assessment of the future political trajectories of JD Vance and Marco Rubio within the Republican Party. He asserted that it is an "ironclad reality" that JD Vance will not serve as vice president under Donald Trump for four years and then simply pivot to serve another four years under Marco Rubio. "JD Vance is not going to be vice president for four years under Donald Trump and then turn around and say I have four more years under Marco Rubio. It's just not going to happen. I'm sorry," Hanson stated. Instead, he predicted that Vance is positioned to run for president himself, and if he fails to secure the nomination, he would not accept a vice-presidential slot under Rubio. Hanson flipped the scenario, noting that "Rubio can be picked by Vance and he can say you can serve for eight years like George HW Bush and then you can come in." He pointed out that Rubio remains young enough, in his late 50s, to potentially run in his early 60s. Hanson praised both figures highly, describing them as "very good" and effective communicators. "They're both very good with the media. They're both very good on the issues," he said. Hanson then turned to a specific critique of Vance, highlighting what he sees as a shortcoming in how the vice president addressed Holocaust Remembrance Day. Hanson noted that Vance spoke "quite movingly about the tragedy of the Holocaust but he didn't mention the Jewish people." While acknowledging that around a million and a half non-Jews were also killed, Hanson emphasized the unique nature of the Holocaust. He explained that the systematic, ideological effort targeted non-combatant civilians; pulled from every country, ally or enemy of the Third Reich. Creating an industrialized extermination through death camps, German engineering, crematoria, and methods like Zyklon B gas. "What was unique about the Holocaust was there was a systematic ideological effort to take citizens that were not combatants and pull them out of every different country... and then find an industrial way of killing them," Hanson said. Hanson contrasted this with other World War II deaths, such as those among Russians or Chinese, which occurred mostly in combat or as collateral damage from bombing. "Yes, but these were mostly in combat situations or collateral damage through bombing etc.," he noted. In the Holocaust, the majority of the civilian victims, around 6 million out of roughly 8 million total, were Jewish people, targeted specifically because of their ethnic background, religion, and perceived success in European society. "The majority of them were Jewish people who were selected because of their ethnic background and religion and traditional role in European society as being very successful, competent, good citizens," Hanson concluded. "And that has to be the lesson of the Holocaust."

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

13,844 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

🚨Tucker Carlson, for the first time, opens up about his “trajectory” over the past three years - to, of all people, Hunter Biden. Tucker describes Trump being raided in 2023 as proof that Trump was an outsider “being actually persecuted by the uniparty.” Therefore, he concluded, “he is their sincere opponent.” This, Tucker says, led him to throw his full support behind Trump: “I thought I can have an effect.” He claims that “my goal from that moment until February 28th , I don’t want to go to war with Iran.” An effort, he calims to valiantly preserve the “post-war order” - an order Tucker himself calls “ridiculous” and has openly sought to undermine. Yet Tucker now says his ultimate failure was a wake-up call: a lesson in his own limitations and the hubris of believing he could meaningfully change American foreign policy. Conveniently leaving out is his full-throated effort to promote Qatar as an American ally, his insistence that Islam poses no threat to America, and his broader campaign to demonize not only Israel and Zionism, but Judaism itself, supporters of the Jewish state, and Jews more broadly. Also absent is his argument that America should cede its position of global primacy and accommodate China, Iran, and Russia as equal powers in what he has described as a “New World Order.” And then there is Tucker’s newfound humility. Claiming to have been humbled by the limitations of his own influence - just days after releasing an episode in which he all but proclaims that he has the program to save America. The scariest part of it all is that Tucker genuinely appears to believe what he says.

🚨Tucker Carlson, for the first time, opens up about his “trajectory” over the past three years - to, of all people, Hunter Biden. Tucker describes Trump being raided in 2023 as proof that Trump was an outsider “being actually persecuted by the uniparty.” Therefore, he concluded, “he is their sincere opponent.” This, Tucker says, led him to throw his full support behind Trump: “I thought I can have an effect.” He claims that “my goal from that moment until February 28th , I don’t want to go to war with Iran.” An effort, he calims to valiantly preserve the “post-war order” - an order Tucker himself calls “ridiculous” and has openly sought to undermine. Yet Tucker now says his ultimate failure was a wake-up call: a lesson in his own limitations and the hubris of believing he could meaningfully change American foreign policy. Conveniently leaving out is his full-throated effort to promote Qatar as an American ally, his insistence that Islam poses no threat to America, and his broader campaign to demonize not only Israel and Zionism, but Judaism itself, supporters of the Jewish state, and Jews more broadly. Also absent is his argument that America should cede its position of global primacy and accommodate China, Iran, and Russia as equal powers in what he has described as a “New World Order.” And then there is Tucker’s newfound humility. Claiming to have been humbled by the limitations of his own influence - just days after releasing an episode in which he all but proclaims that he has the program to save America. The scariest part of it all is that Tucker genuinely appears to believe what he says.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

32,040 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce

🔴 I listen to the pro-regime side a lot. That means I do not just painfully listen through hours of what the regime lobbyists talk about in podcasts and interviews, but also to what the Woke Right says. I listen to their lies and try to get an understanding of the truth. Remember: Propaganda is always a mix of both. I listen to projection, deflection, and try to detect which accusation is a confession. Sometimes it's one word. Between two hours of coordinated propaganda, the truth seems to slip through. One word that caught my attention, that nobody else listening to this might have caught. In his recent interview with Russian agent "America is a cancer," Elizabeth Lane (or whatever her real name is), Tucker has a moment where he talks about how disappointed he is that he couldn't deliver on his (assigned) job: to prevent Trump, through his personal relationship and manipulation, from starting a war with the Islamic Republic. Tucker failed, and he is still not over it. He has talked about it multiple times and always displays how this personal failure gets to him. Then Tucker explains what he thinks Trump's plan or vision was when he started the war: kill the Ayatollah, the regime would collapse, and then a pro-Western leader - he corrects himself, "king or something" - would be in Iran. You tell me who Tucker was referring to when describing Trump's vision for a free Iran. I take from this detail the following things: ▪️Trump is aware of the Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi's popularity and massive political base inside Iran. He is aware that a free Iran after elections will include the Crown Prince leading Iran. And he was counting on that part of the equation when he started the war to be the outcome. ▪️All of the noise the regime lobby made up - that Trump called him the "loser prince," that Trump doesn't like the Crown Prince, doesn't take him seriously - we all knew that it was regime propaganda, but I want to reiterate that it was, and continues to be, all just lies. ▪️The part that remains open in my head to this day is: what changed? How did people inside the White House (Vance including regime lobbyists as Vance's friends and advisers) change Trump's mind? Regarding the rest, here is my assessment: ▪️Everything they describe here that the pro-Iran side is doing (vs. the pro-regime side they are both on) is what THEY are doing themselves. They had placed certain "operatives" in Trump's orbit, and they thought they could control/manipulate Trump and put him in The Truman Show. ▪️They did fail in part. Trump did and does listen to people like the late Lindsey Graham, Mark R. Levin, and Laura Loomer. They keep naming these people specifically over and over again. They hate that they can't get rid of them. They are all glad that Lindsey Graham is no longer with us. ▪️They do mention Charlie Kirk as well - as part of "their allegiance". I could write a novel about how I think all of this fits together, what truly happened and what didn't. I did write a long text explaining it, but I deleted it again. It's a different topic for a different time. I'll just repeat the obvious: Nobody has profited politically more from Charlie's death than the Woke Right. And again: Russia, the regime, and the Woke Right are all joining forces to get Tyler Robinson to walk free. Nobody is trying harder to save the man who killed Charlie by blaming everyone else (especially Israel) for his death. They put the deflection campaign out there one hour after his death (narrative control). ▪️There is one part of the interview where the Russian agent talks about how you can control Trump (anyone, for that matter) by the intel you present him with and the decisions that person makes based on that intel. I agree with her 100%. It is what I've been saying the entire time: This is a war of information, with some people surrounding Trump telling him the truth and these people surrounding Trump manipulating him in favor of saving the regime. ▪️Tucker emphasizes again how mad he is that he/they can no longer feed Trump false intel ("he lives in a biosphere where no new information comes in"). Their frustration about losing this power to some degree is a good sign. ▪️Tucker also put Marco Rubio on that list of people he considers problematic. After naming Mark Levin, he directly names Rubio. My observation is that they left Rubio out of their 'campaign of taking people down' until they saw that Vance was losing support and Rubio was gaining it instead. Now the regime's media is producing LEGO videos targeting Rubio. The Woke Right will, this is my guess, start escalating its attacks against Rubio moving forward. ▪️Why? Because they are all politically united and aligned behind the following things: 1. blaming Israel for everything, 2. making Vance (their guy) president in 2028, and 3. saving the Islamic Republic.

🔴 I listen to the pro-regime side a lot. That means I do not just painfully listen through hours of what the regime lobbyists talk about in podcasts and interviews, but also to what the Woke Right says. I listen to their lies and try to get an understanding of the truth. Remember: Propaganda is always a mix of both. I listen to projection, deflection, and try to detect which accusation is a confession. Sometimes it's one word. Between two hours of coordinated propaganda, the truth seems to slip through. One word that caught my attention, that nobody else listening to this might have caught. In his recent interview with Russian agent "America is a cancer," Elizabeth Lane (or whatever her real name is), Tucker has a moment where he talks about how disappointed he is that he couldn't deliver on his (assigned) job: to prevent Trump, through his personal relationship and manipulation, from starting a war with the Islamic Republic. Tucker failed, and he is still not over it. He has talked about it multiple times and always displays how this personal failure gets to him. Then Tucker explains what he thinks Trump's plan or vision was when he started the war: kill the Ayatollah, the regime would collapse, and then a pro-Western leader - he corrects himself, "king or something" - would be in Iran. You tell me who Tucker was referring to when describing Trump's vision for a free Iran. I take from this detail the following things: ▪️Trump is aware of the Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi's popularity and massive political base inside Iran. He is aware that a free Iran after elections will include the Crown Prince leading Iran. And he was counting on that part of the equation when he started the war to be the outcome. ▪️All of the noise the regime lobby made up - that Trump called him the "loser prince," that Trump doesn't like the Crown Prince, doesn't take him seriously - we all knew that it was regime propaganda, but I want to reiterate that it was, and continues to be, all just lies. ▪️The part that remains open in my head to this day is: what changed? How did people inside the White House (Vance including regime lobbyists as Vance's friends and advisers) change Trump's mind? Regarding the rest, here is my assessment: ▪️Everything they describe here that the pro-Iran side is doing (vs. the pro-regime side they are both on) is what THEY are doing themselves. They had placed certain "operatives" in Trump's orbit, and they thought they could control/manipulate Trump and put him in The Truman Show. ▪️They did fail in part. Trump did and does listen to people like the late Lindsey Graham, Mark R. Levin, and Laura Loomer. They keep naming these people specifically over and over again. They hate that they can't get rid of them. They are all glad that Lindsey Graham is no longer with us. ▪️They do mention Charlie Kirk as well - as part of "their allegiance". I could write a novel about how I think all of this fits together, what truly happened and what didn't. I did write a long text explaining it, but I deleted it again. It's a different topic for a different time. I'll just repeat the obvious: Nobody has profited politically more from Charlie's death than the Woke Right. And again: Russia, the regime, and the Woke Right are all joining forces to get Tyler Robinson to walk free. Nobody is trying harder to save the man who killed Charlie by blaming everyone else (especially Israel) for his death. They put the deflection campaign out there one hour after his death (narrative control). ▪️There is one part of the interview where the Russian agent talks about how you can control Trump (anyone, for that matter) by the intel you present him with and the decisions that person makes based on that intel. I agree with her 100%. It is what I've been saying the entire time: This is a war of information, with some people surrounding Trump telling him the truth and these people surrounding Trump manipulating him in favor of saving the regime. ▪️Tucker emphasizes again how mad he is that he/they can no longer feed Trump false intel ("he lives in a biosphere where no new information comes in"). Their frustration about losing this power to some degree is a good sign. ▪️Tucker also put Marco Rubio on that list of people he considers problematic. After naming Mark Levin, he directly names Rubio. My observation is that they left Rubio out of their 'campaign of taking people down' until they saw that Vance was losing support and Rubio was gaining it instead. Now the regime's media is producing LEGO videos targeting Rubio. The Woke Right will, this is my guess, start escalating its attacks against Rubio moving forward. ▪️Why? Because they are all politically united and aligned behind the following things: 1. blaming Israel for everything, 2. making Vance (their guy) president in 2028, and 3. saving the Islamic Republic.

diana bloom

16,535 görüntüleme • 17 gün önce

This is one of Tucker's most explosive interviews about Trump, Iran, and who is actually in control of the U.S He said Trump was pressured into a war he didn't want, knew it was a bad idea, understood it could wreck his presidency and blow up the global economy... and did it anyway. Not because he was fooled or misinformed, but because he couldn't stop it. Think about what that means. Trump spent years campaigning against forever wars. If he understood the risks of attacking Iran, hated the idea of another Middle East disaster, and yet ended up there anyway, then the story isn't about Trump. It's about the forces that were able to move him so far away from his campaign promises and values. And Tucker goes there. He talks about the donors, Netanyahu, the pressure Trump was put under, and how he changed after the Butler shooting. He also talks about why he believes he'll eventually be silenced. And then, right in the middle of the interview, Trump posts that peace may finally be on the table. So the whole conversation suddenly becomes something bigger: Can Trump still break free? Can he actually walk away? Or was the moment everyone voted for in 2024 already lost long ago? Whether you agree with Tucker or not, this isn't some recycled Fox News talking-point session. This is asking a question that almost nobody in mainstream politics is willing to ask: If the most powerful man in the world can't do what he wants, then who the hell is actually in charge? Tucker Carlson, TCN

This is one of Tucker's most explosive interviews about Trump, Iran, and who is actually in control of the U.S He said Trump was pressured into a war he didn't want, knew it was a bad idea, understood it could wreck his presidency and blow up the global economy... and did it anyway. Not because he was fooled or misinformed, but because he couldn't stop it. Think about what that means. Trump spent years campaigning against forever wars. If he understood the risks of attacking Iran, hated the idea of another Middle East disaster, and yet ended up there anyway, then the story isn't about Trump. It's about the forces that were able to move him so far away from his campaign promises and values. And Tucker goes there. He talks about the donors, Netanyahu, the pressure Trump was put under, and how he changed after the Butler shooting. He also talks about why he believes he'll eventually be silenced. And then, right in the middle of the interview, Trump posts that peace may finally be on the table. So the whole conversation suddenly becomes something bigger: Can Trump still break free? Can he actually walk away? Or was the moment everyone voted for in 2024 already lost long ago? Whether you agree with Tucker or not, this isn't some recycled Fox News talking-point session. This is asking a question that almost nobody in mainstream politics is willing to ask: If the most powerful man in the world can't do what he wants, then who the hell is actually in charge? Tucker Carlson, TCN

Mario Nawfal

1,098,385 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Victor Davis Hanson just fired back at Jen Psaki’s attacks on Vice President JD Vance and his wife Usha. What he exposed goes far beyond simple political jabs. They’re TERRIFIED that the MAGA movement isn’t tied to just one man...it could continue long into the future. “They thought when he was selected as vice president, he brought nothing to the ticket because Ohio was going to be won, he was a White male, there was no diversity, but they didn’t really appreciate that he’s one of the best explicators of the MAGA agenda.” “He eviscerated the media every time he got on television. He was a real force multiplier of the Trump ticket.” “And they’re afraid of him.” “And now they’re thinking, you know, we were betting on MAGA is inseparable from Trump. He was the sun, and without him there will be no sunlight.” “And then people like Rubio and JD Vance come along and they think, oh my God, this thing could go on and on and on with this new populist Republican Party.” “And they’re terrified of it, and so they feel that maybe she’s too sophisticated for this Appalachian-born Vance or whatever, but they’re terrified that MAGA will go beyond Donald Trump.” “I think they should be terrified, because I think it will.”

Victor Davis Hanson just fired back at Jen Psaki’s attacks on Vice President JD Vance and his wife Usha. What he exposed goes far beyond simple political jabs. They’re TERRIFIED that the MAGA movement isn’t tied to just one man...it could continue long into the future. “They thought when he was selected as vice president, he brought nothing to the ticket because Ohio was going to be won, he was a White male, there was no diversity, but they didn’t really appreciate that he’s one of the best explicators of the MAGA agenda.” “He eviscerated the media every time he got on television. He was a real force multiplier of the Trump ticket.” “And they’re afraid of him.” “And now they’re thinking, you know, we were betting on MAGA is inseparable from Trump. He was the sun, and without him there will be no sunlight.” “And then people like Rubio and JD Vance come along and they think, oh my God, this thing could go on and on and on with this new populist Republican Party.” “And they’re terrified of it, and so they feel that maybe she’s too sophisticated for this Appalachian-born Vance or whatever, but they’re terrified that MAGA will go beyond Donald Trump.” “I think they should be terrified, because I think it will.”

Overton

410,356 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Donald Trump’s obsession with lecturing Jews on how we should vote is disgusting and dangerous. American Jews aren’t your props, Mr. President. This is his first time doing it since the explosion of far-right antisemitism, so his audacity must be called out. I'm not saying that Trump is an antisemite, and I don't believe he is one; that's JD Vance who said that Trump "could be the next Hitler." I'm not saying that; I am saying that he's a plain and simple narcissist who, like everything else in his life, exploits Jews to his benefit but doesn't care about them. Trump normalized and empowered a cesspool of hateful crackpots who, in the name of freedom of speech, pushed antisemitism into the mainstream. JD Vance is officially the zookeeper, petting all the animals and ensuring they are being treated nicely and handled with care, and if someone says something like, "Hey, those animals are dangerous," he blames us Jews, but it was Trump who opened the cage. His moody relationship with Netanyahu is not what makes him pro- or anti-Jewish. To me it's more of a factor that he can't fully denounce and disavow Holocaust deniers and Hitler fanboys like Nick Fuentes, full stop. This isn't about free speech; no one asked to have Fuentes jailed, but his hateful views shouldn't be normalized or treated as cute opinions. We all see on an hourly basis how Trump deals with someone he REALLY doesn't approve of. Moving the embassy doesn’t buy absolution for empowering people who want us gone. Steve Bannon at TPUSA's America Fest last month literally used the "embassy move" as a reason why he should be listened to when he vouches for Tucker and other crackpots because "you can't get a better defender of Israel than Steve Bannon. In the White House, I'm the one that pushed initially hard to move the embassy to Jerusalem." Please spare me the “most pro-Israel and pro-Jewish president ever” talking points. He's the most "pro-Trump president ever," solely focused on his interests. He won't denounce the most significant cancer of hate in America, Tucker Carlson, because "he's nice to me," but he'll have 2am Truth Social explosions at Tucker if he says something mean about him. Once Tucker apologizes to him, all is good. It's all about him. After Oct. 7, the most horrific day on the Jewish calendar since the Holocaust, President Biden traveled to Israel and spoke about the relationship of the U.S. and Israel and not about himself. This is because he saw it as a relationship between two allied countries, and that's what it is. Trump sees it as a relationship between himself and how much Israel's PM will kiss his ring. He repeatedly said after Oct. 7 how bad it is for Bibi, not for the people of Israel, for Bibi, because that's what he sees—how Bibi treats him. He was still furious at him for congratulating Biden on winning the election; it's all about him. Bibi must travel to Mar-a-Lago, create bogus Israel peace prizes, and say, "You're the best president," just as I tell my toddler, "You're the best boy." When Biden had his issues with Bibi, he kept making it clear again and again to the people of Israel that he and Bibi disagree currently, but even if it's out in the open, he'll help protect them from Iran if necessary, and he did. After Oct. 7, Biden spoke to Jewish leaders from his heart about how he takes his family to visit Auschwitz to teach them about the Holocaust. I have never heard him demand that Jews vote in a specific way. Trump despicably told parents of hostages who were captured in Gaza that their kids were captured because of Biden and how great he is. I listened to Trump on the first anniversary of Oct 7; all he spoke about was him, himself, and Donald Trump. And that, if not for the rigged elections, it would have never happened. My point is that Trump is a master in manipulating people's minds; he does the big moves to create headlines, hoping everyone buys it, and then demands publicly absolute loyalty. Enough.

Donald Trump’s obsession with lecturing Jews on how we should vote is disgusting and dangerous. American Jews aren’t your props, Mr. President. This is his first time doing it since the explosion of far-right antisemitism, so his audacity must be called out. I'm not saying that Trump is an antisemite, and I don't believe he is one; that's JD Vance who said that Trump "could be the next Hitler." I'm not saying that; I am saying that he's a plain and simple narcissist who, like everything else in his life, exploits Jews to his benefit but doesn't care about them. Trump normalized and empowered a cesspool of hateful crackpots who, in the name of freedom of speech, pushed antisemitism into the mainstream. JD Vance is officially the zookeeper, petting all the animals and ensuring they are being treated nicely and handled with care, and if someone says something like, "Hey, those animals are dangerous," he blames us Jews, but it was Trump who opened the cage. His moody relationship with Netanyahu is not what makes him pro- or anti-Jewish. To me it's more of a factor that he can't fully denounce and disavow Holocaust deniers and Hitler fanboys like Nick Fuentes, full stop. This isn't about free speech; no one asked to have Fuentes jailed, but his hateful views shouldn't be normalized or treated as cute opinions. We all see on an hourly basis how Trump deals with someone he REALLY doesn't approve of. Moving the embassy doesn’t buy absolution for empowering people who want us gone. Steve Bannon at TPUSA's America Fest last month literally used the "embassy move" as a reason why he should be listened to when he vouches for Tucker and other crackpots because "you can't get a better defender of Israel than Steve Bannon. In the White House, I'm the one that pushed initially hard to move the embassy to Jerusalem." Please spare me the “most pro-Israel and pro-Jewish president ever” talking points. He's the most "pro-Trump president ever," solely focused on his interests. He won't denounce the most significant cancer of hate in America, Tucker Carlson, because "he's nice to me," but he'll have 2am Truth Social explosions at Tucker if he says something mean about him. Once Tucker apologizes to him, all is good. It's all about him. After Oct. 7, the most horrific day on the Jewish calendar since the Holocaust, President Biden traveled to Israel and spoke about the relationship of the U.S. and Israel and not about himself. This is because he saw it as a relationship between two allied countries, and that's what it is. Trump sees it as a relationship between himself and how much Israel's PM will kiss his ring. He repeatedly said after Oct. 7 how bad it is for Bibi, not for the people of Israel, for Bibi, because that's what he sees—how Bibi treats him. He was still furious at him for congratulating Biden on winning the election; it's all about him. Bibi must travel to Mar-a-Lago, create bogus Israel peace prizes, and say, "You're the best president," just as I tell my toddler, "You're the best boy." When Biden had his issues with Bibi, he kept making it clear again and again to the people of Israel that he and Bibi disagree currently, but even if it's out in the open, he'll help protect them from Iran if necessary, and he did. After Oct. 7, Biden spoke to Jewish leaders from his heart about how he takes his family to visit Auschwitz to teach them about the Holocaust. I have never heard him demand that Jews vote in a specific way. Trump despicably told parents of hostages who were captured in Gaza that their kids were captured because of Biden and how great he is. I listened to Trump on the first anniversary of Oct 7; all he spoke about was him, himself, and Donald Trump. And that, if not for the rigged elections, it would have never happened. My point is that Trump is a master in manipulating people's minds; he does the big moves to create headlines, hoping everyone buys it, and then demands publicly absolute loyalty. Enough.

David Schwartz

253,272 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Tucker Carlson’s Muslim Brotherhood mouthpiece friend Cenk Uygur is now attacking Marco Rubio. Cenk hates Trump and has accused Trump of being a “pedophile protector”. Cenk also hates Jews and openly celebrated news that white Christians are being replaced by immigrants from the third world. You see, Tucker is friends with JD Vance and Tucker is worried Marco will run for President in 2028. So Tucker has all of his buddies out in full force lying about Marco Rubio, accusing him of “working for Israel” and saying things like “Marco Rubio is hopeless.” All of Tucker’s previous guests have been attacking President Trump and Marco Rubio all day. Remind me again… who was sitting with President Trump today when he struck Iran? Oh yah. Marco Rubio. Marco Rubio Remember weeks ago I told you there would soon be a shadow campaign attacking Rubio to try to discredit him? It’s arrived. Every time Tucker opens his mouth, he harms his “friends”.

Tucker Carlson’s Muslim Brotherhood mouthpiece friend Cenk Uygur is now attacking Marco Rubio. Cenk hates Trump and has accused Trump of being a “pedophile protector”. Cenk also hates Jews and openly celebrated news that white Christians are being replaced by immigrants from the third world. You see, Tucker is friends with JD Vance and Tucker is worried Marco will run for President in 2028. So Tucker has all of his buddies out in full force lying about Marco Rubio, accusing him of “working for Israel” and saying things like “Marco Rubio is hopeless.” All of Tucker’s previous guests have been attacking President Trump and Marco Rubio all day. Remind me again… who was sitting with President Trump today when he struck Iran? Oh yah. Marco Rubio. Marco Rubio Remember weeks ago I told you there would soon be a shadow campaign attacking Rubio to try to discredit him? It’s arrived. Every time Tucker opens his mouth, he harms his “friends”.

Laura Loomer

235,671 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

'Larijani was killed after he lost his status as the main candidate for the leadership of the transition period,' — CNN host Amanpour. 'What's even worse for the US and Israel, even analysts on their side are now actually saying that it is Iran that is currently driving the situation. And we don't see any end to it. At least from the American side, it is believed that there is no way out of this situation, because everything is in the hands of the IRGC. Larijani was the Speaker of Parliament for many years, he is very close to the IRGC, was close to the former Supreme Leader. He was considered a preferred figure for the transition period. If they were looking for someone with whom they could agree, then in September last year, that is, about six months ago, he was the main candidate. But then in February this year, that is, about a month ago, he lost this status and became a target, as he took, as expected, a tough stance in response to the actions of the US and Israel after the start of the war. And this again raises the question: what is the plan of Israel and Trump, except to continue the bombings and, as the targets are exhausted, to increasingly approach strikes on civilian objects? And the number of civilian victims continues to grow.' - SK

'Larijani was killed after he lost his status as the main candidate for the leadership of the transition period,' — CNN host Amanpour. 'What's even worse for the US and Israel, even analysts on their side are now actually saying that it is Iran that is currently driving the situation. And we don't see any end to it. At least from the American side, it is believed that there is no way out of this situation, because everything is in the hands of the IRGC. Larijani was the Speaker of Parliament for many years, he is very close to the IRGC, was close to the former Supreme Leader. He was considered a preferred figure for the transition period. If they were looking for someone with whom they could agree, then in September last year, that is, about six months ago, he was the main candidate. But then in February this year, that is, about a month ago, he lost this status and became a target, as he took, as expected, a tough stance in response to the actions of the US and Israel after the start of the war. And this again raises the question: what is the plan of Israel and Trump, except to continue the bombings and, as the targets are exhausted, to increasingly approach strikes on civilian objects? And the number of civilian victims continues to grow.' - SK

Zlatti71

15,270 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Was President Trump wrong to castigate the podcasters? I explore the division on the right on the latest episode of Restoring Order. (0:30) The ongoing anti-Trump demoralization op (2:03) Why Trump's refugee policies are excellent (9:31) Do we live in ziohell, as some claim? (13:57) A quick rundown on Trump's immigration wins so far (17:30) Trump excoriates the podcasters (19:31) Is Brigitte Macron actually more attractive than Candace? (22:55) Tucker implies Trump is the anti-Christ (30:46) Is it cool to wear a hat that says "low IQ"? In the second half of the show (available to subscribers, link in reply), I read Tucker's response to Trump. I argue that conspiracy theories about Trump being blackmailed by Israel cause people to lose sight of the real dynamics at play. I then take a look at a few polls that suggest that Tucker is becoming less popular among Republicans. What does that mean, given that his audience is bigger than ever? Later, I examine what Candace, Megyn, and Alex were saying about Trump before he admonished them. Toward the end of the show, I consider JD Vance's future. He wants these big names to support his 2028 run, but he needs to be able to say Trump 47 was a success. How should Vance navigate this schism? Tune in to find out.

Was President Trump wrong to castigate the podcasters? I explore the division on the right on the latest episode of Restoring Order. (0:30) The ongoing anti-Trump demoralization op (2:03) Why Trump's refugee policies are excellent (9:31) Do we live in ziohell, as some claim? (13:57) A quick rundown on Trump's immigration wins so far (17:30) Trump excoriates the podcasters (19:31) Is Brigitte Macron actually more attractive than Candace? (22:55) Tucker implies Trump is the anti-Christ (30:46) Is it cool to wear a hat that says "low IQ"? In the second half of the show (available to subscribers, link in reply), I read Tucker's response to Trump. I argue that conspiracy theories about Trump being blackmailed by Israel cause people to lose sight of the real dynamics at play. I then take a look at a few polls that suggest that Tucker is becoming less popular among Republicans. What does that mean, given that his audience is bigger than ever? Later, I examine what Candace, Megyn, and Alex were saying about Trump before he admonished them. Toward the end of the show, I consider JD Vance's future. He wants these big names to support his 2028 run, but he needs to be able to say Trump 47 was a success. How should Vance navigate this schism? Tune in to find out.

Patrick Casey

51,137 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Trump just turned on Netanyahu, and Alex Jones argues the shift is real, but the reasons behind it are darker and more dangerous than almost anyone is saying... In this conversation, Alex makes his case that Trump was manipulated into the war with false intelligence promising the Iranian regime would collapse in 4 days, and that once it backfired on the economy and his midterm numbers, he started hunting for an exit ramp that Israel keeps blocking. He points to JD Vance, Tulsi Gabbard, and Joe Kent warning against the war from the start, and to the 2027 NDAA provision merging the US and Israeli militaries as the line that finally snapped. The part that will get the most attention is his theory on the leverage. Alex doesn't think Trump is simply blackmailed over Epstein. His more provocative claim is that Trump tied himself into that network for power and survival, and is now enraged that the people he partnered with refuse to take orders. He also gets into Ben-Gvir's "all of Lebanon must burn" rhetoric, the positioning of Marco Rubio as the next pro-Israel favorite, and his fear of a major provocation designed to keep America in the war. His warning is one I keep hearing: a cornered Likud is at its most dangerous, and Israel is gambling everything on keeping the US in this fight. Alex Jones

Trump just turned on Netanyahu, and Alex Jones argues the shift is real, but the reasons behind it are darker and more dangerous than almost anyone is saying... In this conversation, Alex makes his case that Trump was manipulated into the war with false intelligence promising the Iranian regime would collapse in 4 days, and that once it backfired on the economy and his midterm numbers, he started hunting for an exit ramp that Israel keeps blocking. He points to JD Vance, Tulsi Gabbard, and Joe Kent warning against the war from the start, and to the 2027 NDAA provision merging the US and Israeli militaries as the line that finally snapped. The part that will get the most attention is his theory on the leverage. Alex doesn't think Trump is simply blackmailed over Epstein. His more provocative claim is that Trump tied himself into that network for power and survival, and is now enraged that the people he partnered with refuse to take orders. He also gets into Ben-Gvir's "all of Lebanon must burn" rhetoric, the positioning of Marco Rubio as the next pro-Israel favorite, and his fear of a major provocation designed to keep America in the war. His warning is one I keep hearing: a cornered Likud is at its most dangerous, and Israel is gambling everything on keeping the US in this fight. Alex Jones

Mario Nawfal

777,390 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨Nick Fuentes says he was told he would be DESTROYED because he is a problem for JD Vance becoming President! “This guy is being foisted upon us! I've never seen anything like this ever. First of all, this administration is not doing so hot. Let's get that straight. The war in Ukraine is still going on. The war in the Middle East is about to get started again. We don't have mass deportations. We don't have a wall. The economy is not going so great. Epstein files just came out because Congress made you release them. And yet everyone is telling us already you've got to vote for J.D. Vance. Well, time out. This administration is not going well. And HE is the Vice President! We're not even a year in. They already want us voting in the next one! Think about how crazy that is. It's not even a year in. It is 2025 still and they’ve already got us thinking we got to vote in 2828. It's 2025 and you SUCK! This administration sucks! So not only do you already want us thinking about the next one. This one isn't even going well! You think we're ready for more? We're not even finished with this! And this is a pile of shit! We've been eating shit for a year and they're ready to blow through any kind of a primary. Trump has been on the ballot three times. It's unprecedented in modern history that you have something like this. Trump was on the ballot in ‘16, ‘20 and ‘24. ‘28 is the first Republican election since 2012 that Trump was not on the ballot. It should be wide open for us to decide where we're going to go after this. And not only are they telling us, well, you got to get ready to vote again in the next cycle. They're telling us a decision has been made already! It's Vance! Turning Point is telling us. Tucker is telling us. Elon is telling us. Everyone is already telling us Vance is the guy. No one shills for JD Vance more than Tucker Carlson. And that's really weird. Turning Point. Erika has crowned Vance the next President. They've all crowned him next president. WHO EVEN IS THIS GUY? Before he was VP, he was a Senator for two years. Before that, he was a Never Trumper. Before that, his name wasn't even Vance! It was Hamill. He didn't even start going by Vance until 2014. WHOLE EVEN IS THIS GUY? Okay. This administration blows. Get ready to vote for the next one! And we already have a nominee! Even though it's the first time in 16 years we're going to have a wide open primary. And it's going to be this guy that no one even knows who he is. And if you don't like that, well, you're a problem to be eliminated, which is effectively what they've told me.”

🚨Nick Fuentes says he was told he would be DESTROYED because he is a problem for JD Vance becoming President! “This guy is being foisted upon us! I've never seen anything like this ever. First of all, this administration is not doing so hot. Let's get that straight. The war in Ukraine is still going on. The war in the Middle East is about to get started again. We don't have mass deportations. We don't have a wall. The economy is not going so great. Epstein files just came out because Congress made you release them. And yet everyone is telling us already you've got to vote for J.D. Vance. Well, time out. This administration is not going well. And HE is the Vice President! We're not even a year in. They already want us voting in the next one! Think about how crazy that is. It's not even a year in. It is 2025 still and they’ve already got us thinking we got to vote in 2828. It's 2025 and you SUCK! This administration sucks! So not only do you already want us thinking about the next one. This one isn't even going well! You think we're ready for more? We're not even finished with this! And this is a pile of shit! We've been eating shit for a year and they're ready to blow through any kind of a primary. Trump has been on the ballot three times. It's unprecedented in modern history that you have something like this. Trump was on the ballot in ‘16, ‘20 and ‘24. ‘28 is the first Republican election since 2012 that Trump was not on the ballot. It should be wide open for us to decide where we're going to go after this. And not only are they telling us, well, you got to get ready to vote again in the next cycle. They're telling us a decision has been made already! It's Vance! Turning Point is telling us. Tucker is telling us. Elon is telling us. Everyone is already telling us Vance is the guy. No one shills for JD Vance more than Tucker Carlson. And that's really weird. Turning Point. Erika has crowned Vance the next President. They've all crowned him next president. WHO EVEN IS THIS GUY? Before he was VP, he was a Senator for two years. Before that, he was a Never Trumper. Before that, his name wasn't even Vance! It was Hamill. He didn't even start going by Vance until 2014. WHOLE EVEN IS THIS GUY? Okay. This administration blows. Get ready to vote for the next one! And we already have a nominee! Even though it's the first time in 16 years we're going to have a wide open primary. And it's going to be this guy that no one even knows who he is. And if you don't like that, well, you're a problem to be eliminated, which is effectively what they've told me.”

Chris Nelson 🏝️🇺🇸

113,276 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

🚨 BREAKING: Vice President JD Vance is now heading to Switzerland for negotiations with Iran, and this is exactly the kind of high-stakes moment where the world is about to see whether peace through strength is just a slogan from Washington or a real strategy being executed by the Trump White House. JD is not walking into this as some weak diplomat desperate to get a photo-op and call it history, he is walking in as part of an administration that understands Iran cannot be rewarded for threats, delays, nuclear leverage, proxy chaos, or the same old games that embarrassed America for years. This is the difference with 47. Trump sends serious people to the table, keeps the pressure in place, protects Israel, pushes for peace, and makes it clear that America is not there to beg Iran for cooperation while they test the limits of the world. If Iran wants a deal, they need to prove it with action, verification, and compliance. If they want to play games, then they should understand the leverage is not on their side anymore. JD Vance heading to Switzerland tells me this is getting real, and now the whole world is watching to see if the Trump team can bring home a deal that stops the chaos without surrendering an inch of American strength. 🇺🇸🔥

🚨 BREAKING: Vice President JD Vance is now heading to Switzerland for negotiations with Iran, and this is exactly the kind of high-stakes moment where the world is about to see whether peace through strength is just a slogan from Washington or a real strategy being executed by the Trump White House. JD is not walking into this as some weak diplomat desperate to get a photo-op and call it history, he is walking in as part of an administration that understands Iran cannot be rewarded for threats, delays, nuclear leverage, proxy chaos, or the same old games that embarrassed America for years. This is the difference with 47. Trump sends serious people to the table, keeps the pressure in place, protects Israel, pushes for peace, and makes it clear that America is not there to beg Iran for cooperation while they test the limits of the world. If Iran wants a deal, they need to prove it with action, verification, and compliance. If they want to play games, then they should understand the leverage is not on their side anymore. JD Vance heading to Switzerland tells me this is getting real, and now the whole world is watching to see if the Trump team can bring home a deal that stops the chaos without surrendering an inch of American strength. 🇺🇸🔥

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

81,356 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce