ะ—ะฐะณั€ัƒะทะบะฐ ะฒะธะดะตะพ...

ะะต ัƒะดะฐะปะพััŒ ะทะฐะณั€ัƒะทะธั‚ัŒ ะฒะธะดะตะพ

ะะฐ ะณะปะฐะฒะฝัƒัŽ

๐—ฉ๐——๐—› ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ง๐—จ๐—–๐—ž๐—˜๐—ฅ, ๐—ฉ๐—”๐—ก๐—–๐—˜, ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—™๐—ง: ๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—จ๐— ๐—ฃ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—ก๐——๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—” ๐— ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—”๐—š๐—˜ Victor Davis Hanson watched Tucker for years. Had him on his show. Says he never heard any of what Tucker is saying now โ€” in fact, he has seen the old clips. Tucker was formidably pro-vigilance against...

MichaelARothman's profile picture

M.A. Rothman

72,259 subscribers

143,921 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 5 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

ะšะพะผะผะตะฝั‚ะฐั€ะธะธ: 0

ะะตั‚ ะดะพัั‚ัƒะฟะฝั‹ั… ะบะพะผะผะตะฝั‚ะฐั€ะธะตะฒ

ะ—ะดะตััŒ ะฟะพัะฒัั‚ัั ะบะพะผะผะตะฝั‚ะฐั€ะธะธ ะธะท ะพั€ะธะณะธะฝะฐะปัŒะฝะพะณะพ ะฟะพัั‚ะฐ

ะŸะพั…ะพะถะธะต ะฒะธะดะตะพ

๐•๐ƒ๐‡: ๐“๐‘๐”๐Œ๐ ๐ˆ๐’ ๐’๐„๐๐ƒ๐ˆ๐๐† ๐•๐€๐๐‚๐„ ๐€ ๐Œ๐„๐’๐’๐€๐†๐„ Victor Davis Hanson is reading Trump's body language โ€” and what he sees is a president recalibrating his inner circle in real time. VDH starts by giving Vance his due. In 2024, Vance "๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ฎ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ข," destroyed everyone he debated, and made Walz look like "๐˜ข ๐˜ฃ๐˜ถ๐˜ง๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ช๐˜ด" โ€” all with surgical calm. His attitude toward opponents was almost generous: "๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ ๐˜บ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ท๐˜ฆ. ๐˜ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ'๐˜ต ๐˜ธ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ต ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ต ๐˜บ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ." Formidable. But that was the campaign. Then came governing. Iran. Venezuela. Cuba. None of it was MAGA orthodoxy. The strikes took out Iran's nuclear facilities and its supreme leader. The Venezuela operation grabbed Maduro right out from under his Cuban bodyguards with zero American dโˆ—aths. Bold, decisive โ€” and exactly the kind of engagement that puts Vance in ๐š๐ง ๐ข๐ฆ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐›๐ฅ๐ž ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. As VDH explains it, Vance knows Trump values "๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜บ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ต๐˜บ, ๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜บ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ต๐˜บ, ๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜บ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ต๐˜บ, ๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜บ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ต๐˜บ, ๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜บ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ต๐˜บ" above everything. But his power base โ€” Tucker, Don Jr., Tucker's son on his own staff, the people who got him the VP nomination โ€” are the ones most opposed to the foreign engagements. Trump acknowledged the rift publicly, telling reporters he and Vance are ๐ฉ๐ก๐ข๐ฅ๐จ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฉ๐ก๐ข๐œ๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐ข๐Ÿ๐Ÿ๐ž๐ซ๐ž๐ง๐ญ on Iran (ABC News). To his credit, Vance handled it well โ€” "๐˜๐˜ต'๐˜ด ๐˜ง๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ, ๐˜ฃ๐˜ถ๐˜ต ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต ๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ฌ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ข ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ, ๐˜ช๐˜ต'๐˜ด ๐˜ถ๐˜ฑ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜บ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฅ๐˜บ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ฌ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ช๐˜ต ๐˜ข๐˜ด ๐˜ด๐˜ถ๐˜ค๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ด๐˜ง๐˜ถ๐˜ญ ๐˜ข๐˜ด ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฐ๐˜ด๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฃ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ." But the tension is real. Meanwhile, enter ๐Œ๐š๐ซ๐œ๐จ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐Ÿ๐ข๐ซ๐ž๐ฆ๐š๐ง. VDH's nickname is perfect. Panama problem? Send Rubio. Vance blew things up with Zelensky and the Europeans? Send Rubio to play good cop. Personable, speaks Spanish, popular โ€” and Trump is heaping praise on him. When reporters asked about a disagreement with Vance, Trump was notably lukewarm. Then he pivoted to Rubio: "๐˜”๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜บ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜บ." That contrast isn't accidental. That's Trump's antennas telling the room where the loyalty ledger stands. Then VDH turns to Tucker โ€” and this part stings. Hanson was on Tucker's show for years and never heard any of what Tucker is saying now. There's an internet compilation of Tucker's own past statements where he was "๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฎ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ข๐˜ฃ๐˜ญ๐˜บ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ง๐˜ข๐˜ท๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜จ๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ต" against radical Islam and Iran. Now he's calling Trump's Iran decision ๐š๐›๐ฌ๐จ๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ž๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ฅ and claiming that when you demand unconditional surrender, it historically leads to mass rโˆ—pe of the defeated population (Mediaite). Trump's response was blunt: Tucker is ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐Œ๐€๐†๐€. VDH dismantles Tucker's premise with a single example. America demanded unconditional surrender from Japan. Douglas MacArthur served as pro-consul for eight years. There was no mass rโˆ—pe by Americans. Tucker's claim doesn't survive contact with the most obvious parallel in modern history. The message VDH is decoding is clear: Vance needs to divorce himself from the extremist voices, recommit to Trump's agenda as executed โ€” not as debated on podcasts โ€” and prove that loyalty runs both ways. If he doesn't, the man Trump keeps calling the greatest Secretary of State in history is right there. ๐‘๐ž๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ซ๐š๐ง๐ค ๐ซ๐ก๐ž๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐œ. ๐€๐ฅ๐ฐ๐š๐ฒ๐ฌ ๐ก๐š๐ฏ๐ž.

M.A. Rothman

701,094 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 4 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

โ€ผ๏ธEXPOSED: Tucker Carlson's DEVASTATING Takedown of Christian Zionismโ€”Why He Says Mike Huckabee Is A FRAUD ๐Ÿ‘€ In a stunning interview with the New York Times, Tucker laid out a case that is so logical, so devastating, that it exposes the fraud at the heart of American foreign policy. This isn't about being anti-Israel. This is about being pro-truth, and Tucker is demanding answers to the questions they refuse to answer. 1. THE FALSE PROPHETS. Tucker's Easter message was a direct warning to Christians everywhere. He named the two false prophets he believes are leading the faithful astray: President Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu. He is arguing that blind loyalty to these men, under the guise of divine mandate, is a dangerous betrayal of Christian principles. 2. THE BRIGHT RED LINE. His opposition is simple and absolute. "Christians can never support the murder of innocents. Period." He challenged the New York Times to find the place in the Bible where Jesus says, "These people are annoying. Kill them all." It's not there. He is calling out the perversion of Christianity to justify violence and war. 3. THE UNANSWERABLE QUESTIONS. Tucker described his revealing, contentious interview with Ambassador Ambassador Mike Huckabee, where he asked two simple, logical questions that no Christian Zionist leader will answer: On what biblical basis are you making the claim that Israel has a unique right to exist? When Tucker asked about the borders laid out in Genesis, Huckabee essentially said, "Fine with me," implying a claim to the entire Middle East. To whom does this right apply? Huckabee said "the Jews," but Tucker points out that this is a theological claim that is being used to justify real-world wars and American deaths. The response to his reasonable questions? "Shut up, anti-Semite." Tucker's conclusion: "You've been exposed as a fraud and or a liar." 4. WHY THIS MATTERS TO AMERICA. This is the critical point. Tucker states he was never interested in this topic until he realized it was destroying his country. He says Israel pushed a U.S. president into a war that is "in the process of destroying the United States economy and getting Americans killed." How do they have that power? Not because of Jewish voters, Tucker argues, but because of "tens of millions of evangelical Christians who unquestioningly support Israel because they believe it's their theological duty to do so." He concludes that this theological question is the single most important issue facing America, because on it "hangs the future of the American economy and the lives of American service members." Tucker Carlson is drawing a line in the sand. He is saying that unquestioning support, based on a fraudulent theological premise, is leading America to ruin. He is demanding that Christians think for themselves and stop following false prophets into wars that are not in our interest. This is the most important monologue of the year. Share it with every Christian you know. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

Project Constitution

73,590 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 3 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

Tucker Carlson Tucker Carlson is lying about what Trump supporters are saying to break apart the MAGA coalition. This week, he falsely claimed that Lindsey Graham Lindsey Graham said Catholics were Nazis who supported the murder of Jews. Tucker is diving to new lows every week. This is incredibly vile, and Tucker doesn't care who gets hurt from his filth. As you can see below, Tucker claimed Lindsey Graham said "the Catholic church is... evil. It hates Jews. Itโ€™s actually pro-Nazi." But Lindsey was talking about the MULLAHS, not the Catholic Church. Outside of Candace Owens, Tucker is now the biggest liar and grifter. The biggest psyop on the Right is currently trying to strip Catholics out of the MAGA coalition in an effort to alienate Jews and evangelical Christians. That's why Tucker is pushing Chrislam, and it's why he's getting fringe priests and other so-called โ€œChristiansโ€ to bash Evangelicals. In his rant about Lindsey Graham, he also falsely stated Lindsey said Catholics never really bought in to the proposition that the Holocaust was bad, and that murdering Jews was bad. He claimed Lindsey said Catholics are for murdering Jews. All of these lies foment anti-Semitism. As I have been saying all along, Tucker is going to get someone killed! I think thatโ€™s what heโ€™s trying to do. This has to stop. He needs to be stopped at any means necessary.

Laura Loomer

106,247 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 3 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

๐ŸšจTucker Carlson, for the first time, opens up about his โ€œtrajectoryโ€ over the past three years - to, of all people, Hunter Biden. Tucker describes Trump being raided in 2023 as proof that Trump was an outsider โ€œbeing actually persecuted by the uniparty.โ€ Therefore, he concluded, โ€œhe is their sincere opponent.โ€ This, Tucker says, led him to throw his full support behind Trump: โ€œI thought I can have an effect.โ€ He claims that โ€œmy goal from that moment until February 28th , I donโ€™t want to go to war with Iran.โ€ An effort, he calims to valiantly preserve the โ€œpost-war orderโ€ - an order Tucker himself calls โ€œridiculousโ€ and has openly sought to undermine. Yet Tucker now says his ultimate failure was a wake-up call: a lesson in his own limitations and the hubris of believing he could meaningfully change American foreign policy. Conveniently leaving out is his full-throated effort to promote Qatar as an American ally, his insistence that Islam poses no threat to America, and his broader campaign to demonize not only Israel and Zionism, but Judaism itself, supporters of the Jewish state, and Jews more broadly. Also absent is his argument that America should cede its position of global primacy and accommodate China, Iran, and Russia as equal powers in what he has described as a โ€œNew World Order.โ€ And then there is Tuckerโ€™s newfound humility. Claiming to have been humbled by the limitations of his own influence - just days after releasing an episode in which he all but proclaims that he has the program to save America. The scariest part of it all is that Tucker genuinely appears to believe what he says.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

32,040 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 4 ะดะฝะตะน ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

๐Ÿšจ EXCLUSIVE โ€” Tucker Carlson DOUBLED DOWN on attacking Chabad, saying (falsely) that they support "violence against innocents." Tucker also reiterated that "at the center" of the "religious war" in Iran is "the Third Temple," adding that Chabad "is in favor of rebuilding the Third Temple." Some apology. As I had exclusively reported, Tucker on March 4 indicated that Chabad was ultimately behind the war in Iran. Tucker futher โ€” and equally falsely โ€” claimed that this was because Chabad was supposedly a driving force in wanting to destroy the Al Aqsa Mosque in order to rebuild Judaism's holy Temple, or beit hamikdash in Hebrew. After receiving enormous blowback for his comments, Tucker gave what his loyalists have called an apology. It was not. Tucker simply did not address his outrageous assertion that Chabad was agitating for the "destruction of one of the holiest places in Islam." As for the rest of his previous Chabad comments, he simply lied about what he had actually said, pretending as if he had merely commented on patches worn by some soldiers depicting what Tucker insists is the Third Temple. For good measure, he added in the new slander that Chabad actually supports "violence against innocents." To be clear, this is a long-running theme for Tucker over the past year, claiming that Jews, "neocons," and/or Israel have bloodlust and "get a thrill" from murdering people. Crucially, Tucker explicitly stated that it was "true" that the "Third Temple" was "at the center" of what he deemed a "religious war" in Iran. Then he had the audacity to tie it all back to Chabad, saying, "And Chabad, check their website, is in favor of rebuilding the Third Temple." Tucker, however, must not have actually checked the Chabad website. That's because the Chabad website states that the Third Temple, or beit hamikdash, can only be rebuilt by God, and only once Moshiach (or the Messiah) has come. What does the Chabad website actually say about how to usher in this divine state of being? "Perform more acts of goodness and kindness" At no point does Tucker reveal that Chabad wants the Third Temple to come not through violence, let alone war, but rather by people performing "acts of goodness and kindness." Perhaps Tucker simply can't wrap his head around this concept, which animates the very essence of Chabad. Why? Because the new Tucker is neither good nor kind.

Joel Mowbray

658,118 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 5 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด