Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🔴 𝗔𝗹𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁’𝘀 𝗩𝗼𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗜𝘀 𝗔𝗯𝗻𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗨𝗻𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 In journalism, the voice of a head of state is not just sound; it is evidence. To tamper with it is to tamper with truth itself. That is why the recent Hariana Veras interview with President Évariste Ndayishimiye 🇧🇮 is...

guykarema's profile picture

Dr Guy Karema, PhD

37,821 subscribers

19,798 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 Jensen Huang says everyone panicked about the AI data when MOST training data was never REAL to begin with. Ilya Sutskever told the industry pre-training was over. "Ilya said, 'We're out of data,' or something like that. 'Pre-training is over,' or something like that," Huang says. "The industry panicked, you know, that this is the end of AI." "And of course, of course that's obviously not true. We're gonna keep on scaling the amount of data that we have to train with." "A lot of that data is probably gonna be synthetic." That's where the panic came from — synthetic data sounds like cheating. "Most of the data that we are training, that we teach each other with, inform each other with, is synthetic." "It's synthetic because it didn't come out of nature." "You created it. I'm consuming it. I modify it, augment it, I regenerate it, somebody else consumes it." The textbook in your hand is synthetic. The post you're reading is synthetic. The lecture you took is synthetic. Nature didn't make any of it. Humans did. AI just learned to do the same thing — faster. "Training is now limited by compute," Huang says. "Data is now limited by compute." The data wall wasn't a wall. It was a mirror. If you're new here, follow @AiEvolutio for the latest on ChatGPT, Claude, and the AI tools shaping how we work and create. — Jensen Huang ( NVIDIA ), NVIDIA CEO, on Lex Fridman's ( Lex Fridman ) podcast
1:29

🚨 Jensen Huang says everyone panicked about the AI data when MOST training data was never REAL to begin with. Ilya Sutskever told the industry pre-training was over. "Ilya said, 'We're out of data,' or something like that. 'Pre-training is over,' or something like that," Huang says. "The industry panicked, you know, that this is the end of AI." "And of course, of course that's obviously not true. We're gonna keep on scaling the amount of data that we have to train with." "A lot of that data is probably gonna be synthetic." That's where the panic came from — synthetic data sounds like cheating. "Most of the data that we are training, that we teach each other with, inform each other with, is synthetic." "It's synthetic because it didn't come out of nature." "You created it. I'm consuming it. I modify it, augment it, I regenerate it, somebody else consumes it." The textbook in your hand is synthetic. The post you're reading is synthetic. The lecture you took is synthetic. Nature didn't make any of it. Humans did. AI just learned to do the same thing — faster. "Training is now limited by compute," Huang says. "Data is now limited by compute." The data wall wasn't a wall. It was a mirror. If you're new here, follow @AiEvolutio for the latest on ChatGPT, Claude, and the AI tools shaping how we work and create. — Jensen Huang ( NVIDIA ), NVIDIA CEO, on Lex Fridman's ( Lex Fridman ) podcast

AI Evolution

15,565 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

A voice is from inside Iran. Not from a political analyst. Not from a commentator. From someone who was tear-gassed and shot at. “The truth is, most people were shouting for the return of Prince Reza Pahlavi. But when you’re being tear-gassed and shot at, you start running. You grab the hand of the first person next to you and run for your life, just to avoid falling into the hands of these executioners. At that moment, it never occurs to you to think whether the person with you is a monarchist, a republican, or anything else. All we want is to get rid of these criminals. We don’t even think about anything else. Please be my voice. Especially tell the diaspora: social media fights are not the voice of the people of Iran. We just want freedom.” #IranMassacre
0:49

A voice is from inside Iran. Not from a political analyst. Not from a commentator. From someone who was tear-gassed and shot at. “The truth is, most people were shouting for the return of Prince Reza Pahlavi. But when you’re being tear-gassed and shot at, you start running. You grab the hand of the first person next to you and run for your life, just to avoid falling into the hands of these executioners. At that moment, it never occurs to you to think whether the person with you is a monarchist, a republican, or anything else. All we want is to get rid of these criminals. We don’t even think about anything else. Please be my voice. Especially tell the diaspora: social media fights are not the voice of the people of Iran. We just want freedom.” #IranMassacre

Omid Djalili

299,498 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

[WATCH] We must raise an uncomfortable but necessary issue: the rise of unethical behaviour within sections of the media, and the corrosive impact it is having on South Africa’s democracy. The African National Congress is gravely concerned by the growing pattern of what can only be described as captured journalism; a disturbing phenomenon where certain journalists are no longer reporting the news, but are actively involved in shaping political agendas, settling scores, and waging battles on behalf of those they align with or represent. This is not journalism; it is political warfare waged under the banner of the Fourth Estate. We respect media freedom, we fought for it but that freedom must never be confused with impunity. The South African public has a right to expect truth, balance, and accountability from its media; not scripted propaganda manufactured in the corridors of political handlers. #ThePeoplesMovement
3:36

[WATCH] We must raise an uncomfortable but necessary issue: the rise of unethical behaviour within sections of the media, and the corrosive impact it is having on South Africa’s democracy. The African National Congress is gravely concerned by the growing pattern of what can only be described as captured journalism; a disturbing phenomenon where certain journalists are no longer reporting the news, but are actively involved in shaping political agendas, settling scores, and waging battles on behalf of those they align with or represent. This is not journalism; it is political warfare waged under the banner of the Fourth Estate. We respect media freedom, we fought for it but that freedom must never be confused with impunity. The South African public has a right to expect truth, balance, and accountability from its media; not scripted propaganda manufactured in the corridors of political handlers. #ThePeoplesMovement

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

43,857 просмотров • 1 год назад

#TheVoiceOfHindRajab star Saja Kilani gives impassioned speech in Venice and makes a strong call for the end to the Gaza violence. “Enough of the mass killing, the starvation, the dehumanization, the destruction, and the ongoing occupation,” Kilani said. “This film is not an opinion or a fantasy. It is anchored in truth. Hind’s story carries the weight of an entire people. Her voice is one amongst 10s of 1000s of children that were killed in Gaza in the last two years alone. It is the voice of every daughter and every son with the right to live, to dream, to exist in dignity. Yet all of it was stolen in front of our unblinking eyes.”
1:43

#TheVoiceOfHindRajab star Saja Kilani gives impassioned speech in Venice and makes a strong call for the end to the Gaza violence. “Enough of the mass killing, the starvation, the dehumanization, the destruction, and the ongoing occupation,” Kilani said. “This film is not an opinion or a fantasy. It is anchored in truth. Hind’s story carries the weight of an entire people. Her voice is one amongst 10s of 1000s of children that were killed in Gaza in the last two years alone. It is the voice of every daughter and every son with the right to live, to dream, to exist in dignity. Yet all of it was stolen in front of our unblinking eyes.”

Deadline

124,286 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Voice In My Head, a collaboration with Kyle McDonald. With the proliferation of generated content, AI now seeps constantly into our consciousness. What happens when it begins to intervene directly into your thoughts? Where the people you interact with, the things you do, are guided by an AI enhanced voice that speaks to you the way you’d like to be spoken to. Voice In My Head explores the implications for AI (ChatGPT) to listen and intervene in your social experience in real-time, augmenting your personality. The piece begins with an onboarding session where you place a bud in your ear and the voice asks you to reflect on the inner voice you were born with. What if it could be more caring? Less obsessive? Less judgmental? More helpful? What if you could change your inner monologue? As you respond to the onboarding questions, it clones the sound of your voice and uses it to speak to you. Then you go out into the world, as the voice follows along and offers commentary and direction. The resulting performance calls into question how natural vs synthetic each person’s thoughts actually are. Do any of us have our own point of view? Trailer directed by David Leonard.
1:19

Voice In My Head, a collaboration with Kyle McDonald. With the proliferation of generated content, AI now seeps constantly into our consciousness. What happens when it begins to intervene directly into your thoughts? Where the people you interact with, the things you do, are guided by an AI enhanced voice that speaks to you the way you’d like to be spoken to. Voice In My Head explores the implications for AI (ChatGPT) to listen and intervene in your social experience in real-time, augmenting your personality. The piece begins with an onboarding session where you place a bud in your ear and the voice asks you to reflect on the inner voice you were born with. What if it could be more caring? Less obsessive? Less judgmental? More helpful? What if you could change your inner monologue? As you respond to the onboarding questions, it clones the sound of your voice and uses it to speak to you. Then you go out into the world, as the voice follows along and offers commentary and direction. The resulting performance calls into question how natural vs synthetic each person’s thoughts actually are. Do any of us have our own point of view? Trailer directed by David Leonard.

Lauren Lee McCarthy

96,073 просмотров • 2 лет назад

The appearance of Kanal 10 journalist Kushtrim Sadiku in an intoxicated state while moderating a debate on the KLA war in Koshare is unacceptable and deeply offensive. Such an act does not only violate the professional ethics of journalism, but also undermines the dignity of one of the most sensitive chapters of our history. Topics of this nature require seriousness, responsibility, and a high level of professional integrity. Any deviation from these standar a failure not only on an individual level, but also on an institutional one. Where is the reaction of the supervisory institutions when the basic norms of the profession are violated in this way? Silence in such cases risks normalizing irresponsibility and undermining public trust in the media. It is essential that there be an immediate response, transparency, and concrete measures in order to preserve the integrity of the profession and respect for issues of national importance. #KushtrimSadiku #RespectHistory #KLA #Koshare #MediaStandards AGK RTK KosovaPress Kallxo.com Albin Kurti Vjosa Osmani Hajrulla Çeku Ekonomia Online Edith Harxhi Alice Taylor Argumentum Gurakuç Kuçi Octopus Institute
0:47

The appearance of Kanal 10 journalist Kushtrim Sadiku in an intoxicated state while moderating a debate on the KLA war in Koshare is unacceptable and deeply offensive. Such an act does not only violate the professional ethics of journalism, but also undermines the dignity of one of the most sensitive chapters of our history. Topics of this nature require seriousness, responsibility, and a high level of professional integrity. Any deviation from these standar a failure not only on an individual level, but also on an institutional one. Where is the reaction of the supervisory institutions when the basic norms of the profession are violated in this way? Silence in such cases risks normalizing irresponsibility and undermining public trust in the media. It is essential that there be an immediate response, transparency, and concrete measures in order to preserve the integrity of the profession and respect for issues of national importance. #KushtrimSadiku #RespectHistory #KLA #Koshare #MediaStandards AGK RTK KosovaPress Kallxo.com Albin Kurti Vjosa Osmani Hajrulla Çeku Ekonomia Online Edith Harxhi Alice Taylor Argumentum Gurakuç Kuçi Octopus Institute

Kaltrina Kamberi

23,647 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Elon Musk: We will not accept an anointed class of journalists who tell us what to think. “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Interview with the BBC, April 12, 2023
0:57

Elon Musk: We will not accept an anointed class of journalists who tell us what to think. “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Interview with the BBC, April 12, 2023

ELON CLIPS

1,266,082 просмотров • 1 год назад

ELON: WE WILL NOT ACCEPT AN ANOINTED CLASS OF JOURNALISTS WHO TELL US WHAT TO THINK “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Source: Interview with the BBC, April 2023, Elon Musk
0:57

ELON: WE WILL NOT ACCEPT AN ANOINTED CLASS OF JOURNALISTS WHO TELL US WHAT TO THINK “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Source: Interview with the BBC, April 2023, Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

115,251 просмотров • 1 год назад

#WATCH | Delhi | On Supreme Court Judge Ujjal Bhuyan's reported remarks on interference of executive in the collegium system, Advocate Aman Lekhi says, "I tend to agree to the context in which Justice Bhuyan spoke. What is important to note in the case of Justice Sreedharan is three aspects: institutional integrity, perception (of independence), and the worth of law not only as a doctrine but also in practice. I feel that there has been a failure in all three counts. The executive has no role as far as the functioning of judges is concerned. The only involvement which justifies the executive's participation in the process is giving information about judges, which is otherwise not available to the court or the institution... When you are dealing with a sitting judge, no matter what your perception of the judge may be, that is part of the judicial realm. As long as there is no want of judicial integrity or honesty, or any breach of propriety by the judge concerned, it is beyond the executive to interfere... What has been released by the court suggests that Justice Sreedharan's transfer was shifted from Chhattisgarh to Allahabad due to the executive's interference. If something is prompted by the executive and a decision is subsequently re-engineered by the court, the entire process is compromised. That is not how it is supposed to work... Transparency has to fuel belief, not extinguish it, in the efficacy of the process..."
3:09

#WATCH | Delhi | On Supreme Court Judge Ujjal Bhuyan's reported remarks on interference of executive in the collegium system, Advocate Aman Lekhi says, "I tend to agree to the context in which Justice Bhuyan spoke. What is important to note in the case of Justice Sreedharan is three aspects: institutional integrity, perception (of independence), and the worth of law not only as a doctrine but also in practice. I feel that there has been a failure in all three counts. The executive has no role as far as the functioning of judges is concerned. The only involvement which justifies the executive's participation in the process is giving information about judges, which is otherwise not available to the court or the institution... When you are dealing with a sitting judge, no matter what your perception of the judge may be, that is part of the judicial realm. As long as there is no want of judicial integrity or honesty, or any breach of propriety by the judge concerned, it is beyond the executive to interfere... What has been released by the court suggests that Justice Sreedharan's transfer was shifted from Chhattisgarh to Allahabad due to the executive's interference. If something is prompted by the executive and a decision is subsequently re-engineered by the court, the entire process is compromised. That is not how it is supposed to work... Transparency has to fuel belief, not extinguish it, in the efficacy of the process..."

ANI

23,184 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

A Comparison of Presidential Integrity: Bukele vs. Sánchez In a recent post, Spanish lawyer, politician Macarena Orona draws a stark comparison between President Bukele of El Salvador and President Sánchez of Spain. The contrast in their leadership integrity is glaring, as highlighted by Macarena Olona pointed remarks: President Bukele: - His wife is not indicted. - His brother is not indicted. - The Attorney General is not indicted. - His first number 2 is not indicted. - His second number 2 is not in prison. With such a record, Orona rightfully challenges the Spanish government, urging its ministers to refrain from preaching about democracy to a nation with its own house in order. The implicit message is clear: let us not be the laughingstock of the international community due to our own shortcomings. In these comparisons, we are not only presented with a narrative of contrasting leadership morals but also insights into the state of democracy in El Salvador. The absence of indictments and imprisonments among President Bukele's close circle reflects a level of transparency and accountability that speaks to the strength of democracy in the country. So, as we witness these differences between the leadership styles of Bukele and Sánchez, the overarching message rings true: in El Salvador, it is the people who truly hold the power. It is a testament to a democracy that is not just in name but in practice. Let us take heed of these comparisons and appreciate the nuances of governance, for in doing so, we can better understand and support the ongoing strengthening of democracy in El Salvador. In El Salvador, the people rule. Stay informed, stay empowered.
1:07

A Comparison of Presidential Integrity: Bukele vs. Sánchez In a recent post, Spanish lawyer, politician Macarena Orona draws a stark comparison between President Bukele of El Salvador and President Sánchez of Spain. The contrast in their leadership integrity is glaring, as highlighted by Macarena Olona pointed remarks: President Bukele: - His wife is not indicted. - His brother is not indicted. - The Attorney General is not indicted. - His first number 2 is not indicted. - His second number 2 is not in prison. With such a record, Orona rightfully challenges the Spanish government, urging its ministers to refrain from preaching about democracy to a nation with its own house in order. The implicit message is clear: let us not be the laughingstock of the international community due to our own shortcomings. In these comparisons, we are not only presented with a narrative of contrasting leadership morals but also insights into the state of democracy in El Salvador. The absence of indictments and imprisonments among President Bukele's close circle reflects a level of transparency and accountability that speaks to the strength of democracy in the country. So, as we witness these differences between the leadership styles of Bukele and Sánchez, the overarching message rings true: in El Salvador, it is the people who truly hold the power. It is a testament to a democracy that is not just in name but in practice. Let us take heed of these comparisons and appreciate the nuances of governance, for in doing so, we can better understand and support the ongoing strengthening of democracy in El Salvador. In El Salvador, the people rule. Stay informed, stay empowered.

Translating El Salvador

12,440 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

The centuries of conflict between the English, Scottish, Welsh and Irish is not a model of successful “diversity”. It is proof of, despite our ethnic proximity and shared Christian faith, just how difficult it is for tribes to live in peace. It was hard enough with the native populations of the British Isles. It is impossible to have a cohesive society with all the foreign colonies we have imported into our midst. We are not at the start of this experiment. We are in the middle of it, and it is going horribly. It has to end.
4:55

The centuries of conflict between the English, Scottish, Welsh and Irish is not a model of successful “diversity”. It is proof of, despite our ethnic proximity and shared Christian faith, just how difficult it is for tribes to live in peace. It was hard enough with the native populations of the British Isles. It is impossible to have a cohesive society with all the foreign colonies we have imported into our midst. We are not at the start of this experiment. We are in the middle of it, and it is going horribly. It has to end.

Connor Tomlinson

71,073 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Russia is not a Christian country—it is jihadism, it is chauvinism, and it is closer to fascism than to Christianity. The sermons of Patriarch Kirill are not about love, not about the Bible, not about Jesus, but about hatred of Ukraine, hatred of the West. The Russian Patriarch Kirill never quotes the Bible, only fake Russian history. It reminds one of Plato’s cave, where the shadows of propaganda are passed off as truth, while true spirituality—as in the case of Ukraine—becomes the object of persecution. What is the real reason for Russia’s attack on Ukraine? Everyone even slightly educated knows that there are no Nazis, no Satanists, no coups in Ukraine, and there never were—just as there was no NATO expansion that Russia supposedly fears (Putin himself has repeatedly admitted this is not the issue). The only reason for the invasion is Ukraine’s light, its spirituality. A declining Russia cannot tolerate the spiritual growth and development of its neighbor. Russia, the largest country in the world, which has not even developed its own land—where there are wastelands, no roads, no infrastructure—keeps seizing new territories out of greed, waging war with the killing of civilians, the abduction of children, the execution of prisoners of war, and the use of banned weapons. What kind of religion is that? And now think about those who defend the Moscow Patriarchate—who are they really, and whom do they truly serve?
1:18

Russia is not a Christian country—it is jihadism, it is chauvinism, and it is closer to fascism than to Christianity. The sermons of Patriarch Kirill are not about love, not about the Bible, not about Jesus, but about hatred of Ukraine, hatred of the West. The Russian Patriarch Kirill never quotes the Bible, only fake Russian history. It reminds one of Plato’s cave, where the shadows of propaganda are passed off as truth, while true spirituality—as in the case of Ukraine—becomes the object of persecution. What is the real reason for Russia’s attack on Ukraine? Everyone even slightly educated knows that there are no Nazis, no Satanists, no coups in Ukraine, and there never were—just as there was no NATO expansion that Russia supposedly fears (Putin himself has repeatedly admitted this is not the issue). The only reason for the invasion is Ukraine’s light, its spirituality. A declining Russia cannot tolerate the spiritual growth and development of its neighbor. Russia, the largest country in the world, which has not even developed its own land—where there are wastelands, no roads, no infrastructure—keeps seizing new territories out of greed, waging war with the killing of civilians, the abduction of children, the execution of prisoners of war, and the use of banned weapons. What kind of religion is that? And now think about those who defend the Moscow Patriarchate—who are they really, and whom do they truly serve?

Devana 🇺🇦

25,685 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

The diktat from the Bangla Birodhi Zamindars that MPs cannot say ‘Jai Hind’ or even ‘Vande Mataram’ in Parliament is an attack on the very soul of our democracy. ‘Vande Mataram’ is our national song. ‘Jai Hind’ is the slogan of every Indian. These are not empty words; they were the cries of those who fought and sacrificed for our freedom. To try and erase them is to try and erase our history. Is this what they mean by governance, silencing the voice of a state that has always stood for democracy, secularism, and the unity in diversity of our country? Bengal is not outside India. It is not a footnote to be ignored. It is an integral, proud part of this nation. And let it be clear: we will not let anyone erase our identity, our history, or our rightful voice in Parliament. Vande Mataram. Joy Hind. Joy Bangla.
0:42

The diktat from the Bangla Birodhi Zamindars that MPs cannot say ‘Jai Hind’ or even ‘Vande Mataram’ in Parliament is an attack on the very soul of our democracy. ‘Vande Mataram’ is our national song. ‘Jai Hind’ is the slogan of every Indian. These are not empty words; they were the cries of those who fought and sacrificed for our freedom. To try and erase them is to try and erase our history. Is this what they mean by governance, silencing the voice of a state that has always stood for democracy, secularism, and the unity in diversity of our country? Bengal is not outside India. It is not a footnote to be ignored. It is an integral, proud part of this nation. And let it be clear: we will not let anyone erase our identity, our history, or our rightful voice in Parliament. Vande Mataram. Joy Hind. Joy Bangla.

All India Trinamool Congress

11,400 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

We're Done with MAGA Cheerleaders To criticize and expect clarity from the people who you helped put in power is what makes the right different. It's a trademark characteristic of the independent thinker who doesn't just march in line. We avoid groupthink and hive mind obedience. It's what brought all of us together in the first place. Yet somehow, if you dare to criticize or voice matters of importance, the cheerleaders will swoop in the suggest you side with the opposition. Not throating the official talking points is a sign of opposition instead of what it really is: an opportunity to reinforce the intention of your decisions to your most active defenders. Clarity and transparency breeds trust, and those who are most critical are not looking to oppose just for the sake of it, they are looking for backup to validate their ongoing support. Too many people are missing this. Their reactions are proving they've become the exact same cheerleaders they learned not to trust.
2:53

We're Done with MAGA Cheerleaders To criticize and expect clarity from the people who you helped put in power is what makes the right different. It's a trademark characteristic of the independent thinker who doesn't just march in line. We avoid groupthink and hive mind obedience. It's what brought all of us together in the first place. Yet somehow, if you dare to criticize or voice matters of importance, the cheerleaders will swoop in the suggest you side with the opposition. Not throating the official talking points is a sign of opposition instead of what it really is: an opportunity to reinforce the intention of your decisions to your most active defenders. Clarity and transparency breeds trust, and those who are most critical are not looking to oppose just for the sake of it, they are looking for backup to validate their ongoing support. Too many people are missing this. Their reactions are proving they've become the exact same cheerleaders they learned not to trust.

Bobby Sauce

16,461 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

In 2002, Kenyans stood up and declared that the era of President Daniel arap Moi had come to an end. The political establishment was powerful, the state machinery was intact, but the people were stronger. The people won. In 2027, Kenya faces another defining moment. This is not about politicians. It is not about tribes. It is not about personalities. It is about the sovereign will of the people. When citizens unite behind a common cause, no amount of power, money, propaganda, or intimidation can stand in their way. Governments derive their authority from the people, and when the people decide it is time for change, change becomes inevitable. 2002 was a Moi Must Go moment. 2027 will be remembered as a moment when Kenyans once again demonstrated that ultimate power belongs to the people. The people are supreme. The people are the employers. The people are the final authority. And when the people speak with one voice, history listens.
4:55

In 2002, Kenyans stood up and declared that the era of President Daniel arap Moi had come to an end. The political establishment was powerful, the state machinery was intact, but the people were stronger. The people won. In 2027, Kenya faces another defining moment. This is not about politicians. It is not about tribes. It is not about personalities. It is about the sovereign will of the people. When citizens unite behind a common cause, no amount of power, money, propaganda, or intimidation can stand in their way. Governments derive their authority from the people, and when the people decide it is time for change, change becomes inevitable. 2002 was a Moi Must Go moment. 2027 will be remembered as a moment when Kenyans once again demonstrated that ultimate power belongs to the people. The people are supreme. The people are the employers. The people are the final authority. And when the people speak with one voice, history listens.

𝙋𝘼𝙐𝙇. 𝐎. 𝐍𝐄𝐊𝐎

24,198 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🇺🇦 Zelensky: At the heart of Russia’s war against Ukraine is the false claim that Ukraine does not exist, that it is supposedly part of Russia. It is not just a matter of history, not just politics or ideology. This is the basis of their goal – to completely wipe Ukraine off the face of the earth. And not just Ukraine. Russia has repeatedly openly stated that it wants to control all its neighbors. It wants to decide what security should be in Europe and whether it should exist at all. Russia has spread its idea of ​​war all the way to Syria and Africa. This is truly a global threat. It is important that many in the world perceive it as such – as a global threat.
0:55

🇺🇦 Zelensky: At the heart of Russia’s war against Ukraine is the false claim that Ukraine does not exist, that it is supposedly part of Russia. It is not just a matter of history, not just politics or ideology. This is the basis of their goal – to completely wipe Ukraine off the face of the earth. And not just Ukraine. Russia has repeatedly openly stated that it wants to control all its neighbors. It wants to decide what security should be in Europe and whether it should exist at all. Russia has spread its idea of ​​war all the way to Syria and Africa. This is truly a global threat. It is important that many in the world perceive it as such – as a global threat.

MAKS 25 🇺🇦👀

13,932 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Since 1980, Zimbabwe has had many Presidential Advisors some brilliant, others forgettable. But never before have we witnessed the kind of political absurdity now associated with Paul Tungwarara.Dunderhead Tungwarara is, by far, the worst and most useless Presidential Advisor in Zimbabwe’s post-independence history. What kind of madness is this an advisor to the President gallivanting across the country, dishing out cars, cash, and promises like a rogue philanthropist on a campaign trail? Is this what the Office of the President has been reduced to? A glorified ATM for political adventurists? Have you ever seen President Hakainde Hichilema’s advisors handing out vehicles in Kanyama? Have you ever seen President Cyril Ramaphosa’s advisors doling out millions of rands in Soweto? Of course not. Because in functioning democracies, Presidential Advisors advise they do not moonlight as political financiers or shadow commissars. Tungwarara’s antics are not just a personal embarrassment they are a national disgrace. They expose the rot at the heart of our political culture, where access to power is mistaken for a license to flaunt wealth, and where public service is confused with personal spectacle. This is not philanthropy. It is patronage politics at its most vulgar. It is the weaponisation of poverty for political gain. It is the recycling of the same toxic formula that has kept our youth dependent, our institutions hollow, and our democracy in a permanent state of infancy. And where is the accountability? Who audits these handouts? What is the source of these funds? What policy framework authorises a Presidential Advisor to act as a parallel government, complete with a convoy, a budget, and a messianic complex?The role of a Presidential Advisor is not to buy loyalty. It is to offer counsel to help the President navigate complex policy terrain, to provide strategic insight, and to uphold the dignity of the highest office in the land. Tungwarara has done none of this. Instead, he has turned the advisory role into a travelling circus of self-promotion and political distortion. If the Office of the President is to retain any shred of credibility, it must immediately distance itself from this charade. Zimbabwe is not a playground for political showmen. It is a nation in crisis, in need of sober minds, not shallow pockets.We must demand better. We must expect more. And we must say, without fear or favour enough is enough.
2:21

Since 1980, Zimbabwe has had many Presidential Advisors some brilliant, others forgettable. But never before have we witnessed the kind of political absurdity now associated with Paul Tungwarara.Dunderhead Tungwarara is, by far, the worst and most useless Presidential Advisor in Zimbabwe’s post-independence history. What kind of madness is this an advisor to the President gallivanting across the country, dishing out cars, cash, and promises like a rogue philanthropist on a campaign trail? Is this what the Office of the President has been reduced to? A glorified ATM for political adventurists? Have you ever seen President Hakainde Hichilema’s advisors handing out vehicles in Kanyama? Have you ever seen President Cyril Ramaphosa’s advisors doling out millions of rands in Soweto? Of course not. Because in functioning democracies, Presidential Advisors advise they do not moonlight as political financiers or shadow commissars. Tungwarara’s antics are not just a personal embarrassment they are a national disgrace. They expose the rot at the heart of our political culture, where access to power is mistaken for a license to flaunt wealth, and where public service is confused with personal spectacle. This is not philanthropy. It is patronage politics at its most vulgar. It is the weaponisation of poverty for political gain. It is the recycling of the same toxic formula that has kept our youth dependent, our institutions hollow, and our democracy in a permanent state of infancy. And where is the accountability? Who audits these handouts? What is the source of these funds? What policy framework authorises a Presidential Advisor to act as a parallel government, complete with a convoy, a budget, and a messianic complex?The role of a Presidential Advisor is not to buy loyalty. It is to offer counsel to help the President navigate complex policy terrain, to provide strategic insight, and to uphold the dignity of the highest office in the land. Tungwarara has done none of this. Instead, he has turned the advisory role into a travelling circus of self-promotion and political distortion. If the Office of the President is to retain any shred of credibility, it must immediately distance itself from this charade. Zimbabwe is not a playground for political showmen. It is a nation in crisis, in need of sober minds, not shallow pockets.We must demand better. We must expect more. And we must say, without fear or favour enough is enough.

Chipo Musarurwa Siziba

28,397 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Kerala Sir, 100% Literacy Sir. Epic Reply to the Makers of KERALA STORY 2 with A AI Video. Beef is Openly Available in the BJP Ruled state Of GOA INDIA Ranks third in Beef Export But Propaganda is to be Spread Only Against Kerala by making fake films. But This Time People are Raising their voice against this Propaganda. 90% of the people there, be it from BJP RSS, Hindu, Muslim or Christian, all eat beef, mutton and pork. Is it patriotism to defame a state by making a propaganda film? Watch the video and must Answer
0:50

Kerala Sir, 100% Literacy Sir. Epic Reply to the Makers of KERALA STORY 2 with A AI Video. Beef is Openly Available in the BJP Ruled state Of GOA INDIA Ranks third in Beef Export But Propaganda is to be Spread Only Against Kerala by making fake films. But This Time People are Raising their voice against this Propaganda. 90% of the people there, be it from BJP RSS, Hindu, Muslim or Christian, all eat beef, mutton and pork. Is it patriotism to defame a state by making a propaganda film? Watch the video and must Answer

BITTU SHARMA- ‏بٹو شرما

142,557 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

I feel strongly about this: journalists have an ethical responsibility to call these election lies what they are. We just stop hiding behind the euphemistic “without proof.” Or democracy is fragile and under assault. Patrician journalistic niceties serve no one is a moment of crisis, not even journalism. We are called to reveal and convey truth. It starts with every interaction. It starts in the moment. It starts to their faces. It feels good to be free to do what I think is right.
1:08

I feel strongly about this: journalists have an ethical responsibility to call these election lies what they are. We just stop hiding behind the euphemistic “without proof.” Or democracy is fragile and under assault. Patrician journalistic niceties serve no one is a moment of crisis, not even journalism. We are called to reveal and convey truth. It starts with every interaction. It starts in the moment. It starts to their faces. It feels good to be free to do what I think is right.

Charles M. Blow

150,848 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

One reason I stay a bit quite about AI these few months. I can’t find my voice to say this right. I’ll try. — What has my AI found just in the millions of never saved TV from the 1980s-1990s? The simple commercial, I have the largest collection known in the world is a reflection of hyper nuanced humanity. Frail and over optimistic as it is, it shows the sprit of humanity in ways that self-hating 2010 Internet sewage training AI can not. It is interesting to have dark humor, when you know the soul of the person with the humor. It is not interesting to have dark humor from an AI that was not trained on the human spirit. The human sprit is not math, coding and science. This is the OUTCOME of a human sprit. We are training AI backwards and we just can’t see it yet, but we will. I am doing may best as “some posted on X” who has no currency in the “big boy” AI world to save the human sprit. We will need it one day and most of this training material is being erased, trillions of bytes daily. This is the secret to truthful AI. This is the secret to AI that LOVES humanity. We don’t get this right soon, there will be little chance. The data is… Almost gone.
0:30

One reason I stay a bit quite about AI these few months. I can’t find my voice to say this right. I’ll try. — What has my AI found just in the millions of never saved TV from the 1980s-1990s? The simple commercial, I have the largest collection known in the world is a reflection of hyper nuanced humanity. Frail and over optimistic as it is, it shows the sprit of humanity in ways that self-hating 2010 Internet sewage training AI can not. It is interesting to have dark humor, when you know the soul of the person with the humor. It is not interesting to have dark humor from an AI that was not trained on the human spirit. The human sprit is not math, coding and science. This is the OUTCOME of a human sprit. We are training AI backwards and we just can’t see it yet, but we will. I am doing may best as “some posted on X” who has no currency in the “big boy” AI world to save the human sprit. We will need it one day and most of this training material is being erased, trillions of bytes daily. This is the secret to truthful AI. This is the secret to AI that LOVES humanity. We don’t get this right soon, there will be little chance. The data is… Almost gone.

Brian Roemmele

123,518 просмотров • 1 год назад