Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

𝗙𝗥𝗔𝗡𝗞𝗟𝗜𝗡 𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗛𝗔𝗠 𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗠𝗣 𝗔 𝗟𝗘𝗧𝗧𝗘𝗥 𝗖𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗧𝗨𝗖𝗞𝗘𝗥 𝗖𝗔𝗥𝗟𝗦𝗢𝗡 𝗔𝗡 𝗔𝗡𝗧𝗜-𝗦𝗘𝗠𝗜𝗧𝗘 — 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗧𝗨𝗖𝗞𝗘𝗥 𝗟𝗢𝗦𝗧 𝗜𝗧 Tucker found out when Trump showed him the letter in person. He immediately tried to reach Graham. Texted back and forth with Graham's assistant all day. Graham wouldn't take the call. Tucker called... the behavior "unchristian, sneaky, and dishonest." And on the process point alone, he has a fair grievance — if you think someone holds a view that serious, confront them directly first. But here's what Tucker left out of his wounded monologue. Franklin Graham didn't write that letter in a vacuum. He built a file. In 2024, Tucker hosted revisionist historian Daryl Cooper — who argued that Churchill, not Hitler, was the chief villain of World War II and that the Nazis did not intend to k!ll Jews — and praised Cooper as "the best and most honest popular historian in America." In December 2025, Tucker dismissed polling showing conservatives view radical Islam as America's greatest threat, falsely claimed no one in the US has been k!lled by radical Islam in 24 years, and argued that persuading white Americans to fear radical Islam is "an op" run by Israel. He called American Jewish Zionists Israel's "informal employees in the United States." At Charlie Kirk's memorial service, Tucker described the crucifixion of Jesus in a way that both critics and supporters interpreted as implying Jews or Israelis were behind Kirk's ass∗ssination. He then interviewed Nick Fuentes — a self-described neo-Nazi and groyper — on his show, sitting with him for a friendly conversation about "Zionist Jews." He platformed Joe Kent, who resigned from Congress blaming "Israel and its powerful American lobby" and went on Tucker's show to insinuate Israeli involvement in Kirk's d∗ath. A study by the Jewish People Policy Institute tracking 3,000 Tucker videos found that by mid-2025, roughly 70% of his references to Israel were negative — up from 50% earlier that year — with AI sentiment analysis flagging a clear escalation toward content meeting the IHRA definition of antisemitism. Israel's Diaspora Minister called Tucker "the leading platform for fringe Holocaust deniers, conspiracy theorists, and blood libel enthusiasts who oppose the State of Israel." StopAntisemitism named him Antisemite of the Year for 2025. Tucker wants to know why Graham didn't call him first. 𝗚𝗿𝗮𝗵𝗮𝗺 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗱. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗱 𝗶𝘀 𝗲𝘅𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲. Franklin Graham is 74 years old and has spent his entire life standing with Israel and the Jewish people. When he sees something that concerns him at this level, he goes straight to the president. That's not sneaky. 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁'𝘀 𝗮 𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝘀 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿.show more

M.A. Rothman

93,222 subscribers

45,200 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika Eğitim

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🚨 EXCLUSIVE — Tucker Carlson finally (accidentally) said what he means. AIPAC is the "Jewish Lobby." This was in the context of discussing who "actually" controls America. The Jews. This is a revealing slip because Tucker has repeatedly contended that he doesn't blame "Jews," just "neocons." Of course, to avoid the "Jewish Lobby" slip, all Tucker had to do was say the name of the book — "The Israel Lobby." But this is why it’s so revealing: Tucker believes — and has believed for at least 15 years, based on my personal conversations with him — that the Christian Zionists are mostly just to blame for being controlled by the Jews. Thus, to Tucker, the "Israel Lobby" is too broad a term for describing the people he believes are "actually" in control: The Jooos. So the next time Tucker or his defenders claim that he is simply criticizing "Israel," just think back to this moment where he revealed his true beliefs.

🚨 EXCLUSIVE — Tucker Carlson finally (accidentally) said what he means. AIPAC is the "Jewish Lobby." This was in the context of discussing who "actually" controls America. The Jews. This is a revealing slip because Tucker has repeatedly contended that he doesn't blame "Jews," just "neocons." Of course, to avoid the "Jewish Lobby" slip, all Tucker had to do was say the name of the book — "The Israel Lobby." But this is why it’s so revealing: Tucker believes — and has believed for at least 15 years, based on my personal conversations with him — that the Christian Zionists are mostly just to blame for being controlled by the Jews. Thus, to Tucker, the "Israel Lobby" is too broad a term for describing the people he believes are "actually" in control: The Jooos. So the next time Tucker or his defenders claim that he is simply criticizing "Israel," just think back to this moment where he revealed his true beliefs.

Joel Mowbray

88,838 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🚨 EXCLUSIVE — On Israeli action in Gaza, Tucker Carlson said, "How is this different from what the Germans did to civilians in WWII?" Aside from the (tired) comparison, notice no "Nazis" or "Jews." When mentioning the Holocaust. It's neo-Nazi/David Duke framing, and Tucker has increasingly adopted it in recent months. Underscoring that his real concern isn't "Israel," Tucker has repeatedly discussed the Holocaust in recent months — and almost every single time, he has actively de-emphasized the centrality of Jews. Quite simply, Tucker is attempting to retell Holocaust history, but with Jews only as bit players. In conjunction with that, Tucker has largely stopped saying "Nazis" in his monologues when making references, however obliquely, to atrocities committed during the Holocaust. Tucker is smart enough not to go full David Duke and say "alleged Nazi actions," so he just avoids saying "Nazi," a word which prompts most Americans to almost reflexively think "six million." Instead, Tucker has referenced the "German government," or as he did in this clip, simply "the Germans," and always without any acknowledgement of six million Jews slaughtered. Tucker's framing is found at neo-Nazi site Stormfront, and more significantly, at Unz Review, a hotbed of Holocaust deniers — which Tucker's brother Buckley cited as his favorite "news" source during their chat earlier this year. Some coincidence. It also fits neatly with Tucker's other recent Holocaust-related comments, such as denying that Hitler had ever called for the extermination of the Jews or refusing to admit that six million Jews were murdered. Or Tucker hosting — and softly caressing — Nick "Hitler was cool" Fuentes or, just this month, Holocaust denier Owen Benjamin. Taken together, the question is no longer whether Tucker is a run-of-the-mill bigot, but rather something much darker.

🚨 EXCLUSIVE — On Israeli action in Gaza, Tucker Carlson said, "How is this different from what the Germans did to civilians in WWII?" Aside from the (tired) comparison, notice no "Nazis" or "Jews." When mentioning the Holocaust. It's neo-Nazi/David Duke framing, and Tucker has increasingly adopted it in recent months. Underscoring that his real concern isn't "Israel," Tucker has repeatedly discussed the Holocaust in recent months — and almost every single time, he has actively de-emphasized the centrality of Jews. Quite simply, Tucker is attempting to retell Holocaust history, but with Jews only as bit players. In conjunction with that, Tucker has largely stopped saying "Nazis" in his monologues when making references, however obliquely, to atrocities committed during the Holocaust. Tucker is smart enough not to go full David Duke and say "alleged Nazi actions," so he just avoids saying "Nazi," a word which prompts most Americans to almost reflexively think "six million." Instead, Tucker has referenced the "German government," or as he did in this clip, simply "the Germans," and always without any acknowledgement of six million Jews slaughtered. Tucker's framing is found at neo-Nazi site Stormfront, and more significantly, at Unz Review, a hotbed of Holocaust deniers — which Tucker's brother Buckley cited as his favorite "news" source during their chat earlier this year. Some coincidence. It also fits neatly with Tucker's other recent Holocaust-related comments, such as denying that Hitler had ever called for the extermination of the Jews or refusing to admit that six million Jews were murdered. Or Tucker hosting — and softly caressing — Nick "Hitler was cool" Fuentes or, just this month, Holocaust denier Owen Benjamin. Taken together, the question is no longer whether Tucker is a run-of-the-mill bigot, but rather something much darker.

Joel Mowbray

53,792 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🚨Tucker Carlson, for the first time, opens up about his “trajectory” over the past three years - to, of all people, Hunter Biden. Tucker describes Trump being raided in 2023 as proof that Trump was an outsider “being actually persecuted by the uniparty.” Therefore, he concluded, “he is their sincere opponent.” This, Tucker says, led him to throw his full support behind Trump: “I thought I can have an effect.” He claims that “my goal from that moment until February 28th , I don’t want to go to war with Iran.” An effort, he calims to valiantly preserve the “post-war order” - an order Tucker himself calls “ridiculous” and has openly sought to undermine. Yet Tucker now says his ultimate failure was a wake-up call: a lesson in his own limitations and the hubris of believing he could meaningfully change American foreign policy. Conveniently leaving out is his full-throated effort to promote Qatar as an American ally, his insistence that Islam poses no threat to America, and his broader campaign to demonize not only Israel and Zionism, but Judaism itself, supporters of the Jewish state, and Jews more broadly. Also absent is his argument that America should cede its position of global primacy and accommodate China, Iran, and Russia as equal powers in what he has described as a “New World Order.” And then there is Tucker’s newfound humility. Claiming to have been humbled by the limitations of his own influence - just days after releasing an episode in which he all but proclaims that he has the program to save America. The scariest part of it all is that Tucker genuinely appears to believe what he says.

🚨Tucker Carlson, for the first time, opens up about his “trajectory” over the past three years - to, of all people, Hunter Biden. Tucker describes Trump being raided in 2023 as proof that Trump was an outsider “being actually persecuted by the uniparty.” Therefore, he concluded, “he is their sincere opponent.” This, Tucker says, led him to throw his full support behind Trump: “I thought I can have an effect.” He claims that “my goal from that moment until February 28th , I don’t want to go to war with Iran.” An effort, he calims to valiantly preserve the “post-war order” - an order Tucker himself calls “ridiculous” and has openly sought to undermine. Yet Tucker now says his ultimate failure was a wake-up call: a lesson in his own limitations and the hubris of believing he could meaningfully change American foreign policy. Conveniently leaving out is his full-throated effort to promote Qatar as an American ally, his insistence that Islam poses no threat to America, and his broader campaign to demonize not only Israel and Zionism, but Judaism itself, supporters of the Jewish state, and Jews more broadly. Also absent is his argument that America should cede its position of global primacy and accommodate China, Iran, and Russia as equal powers in what he has described as a “New World Order.” And then there is Tucker’s newfound humility. Claiming to have been humbled by the limitations of his own influence - just days after releasing an episode in which he all but proclaims that he has the program to save America. The scariest part of it all is that Tucker genuinely appears to believe what he says.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

32,040 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce

On his Charlie Kirk special, Tucker Carlson on Charlie, Israel, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Tucker makes a point of noting that what he shares is backed up by text-messages and that Charlie shared these thoughts with many people. “I was shocked and sickened by the ghoulish and really repulsive reaction of…Benjamin Netanyahu to Charlie’s death… basically made it all about him and all about his country, immediately trying to take the energy, the sadness, the grief, and redirect it towards support for whatever project he’s involved in.” “I don’t think I’ve seen anything lower than [Netanyahu’s] his attempt to hijack Charlie’s memory and use it for his own political ends, particularly since what he said was untrue.” “Charlie didn’t hate Jews. He loved Jews… He loved the state of Israel… He did not like Bibi Netanyahu. He said that to me many times. He said to people around him many times, he felt that Bibi Netanyahu was a very destructive force.” “He was appalled by what was happening in Gaza. He… believed Netanyahu was using the United States to prosecute his wars for the benefit of his country, and that it was shameful and embarrassing and bad for the United States.” Tucker says that Charlie urged him to speak his mind at a Turning Point Conference about Israel. Tucker says that some Pro-Israel donors to Turning Point USA “tormented” Charlie until “the day he died.” “Two days before he died, he lost a $2 million donation because he had publicly pledged to bring me to the next Turning Point conference in December.” Tucker also slams the American Jewish Committee (AJC) for referring to Charlie as an antisemite just two months ago.

On his Charlie Kirk special, Tucker Carlson on Charlie, Israel, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Tucker makes a point of noting that what he shares is backed up by text-messages and that Charlie shared these thoughts with many people. “I was shocked and sickened by the ghoulish and really repulsive reaction of…Benjamin Netanyahu to Charlie’s death… basically made it all about him and all about his country, immediately trying to take the energy, the sadness, the grief, and redirect it towards support for whatever project he’s involved in.” “I don’t think I’ve seen anything lower than [Netanyahu’s] his attempt to hijack Charlie’s memory and use it for his own political ends, particularly since what he said was untrue.” “Charlie didn’t hate Jews. He loved Jews… He loved the state of Israel… He did not like Bibi Netanyahu. He said that to me many times. He said to people around him many times, he felt that Bibi Netanyahu was a very destructive force.” “He was appalled by what was happening in Gaza. He… believed Netanyahu was using the United States to prosecute his wars for the benefit of his country, and that it was shameful and embarrassing and bad for the United States.” Tucker says that Charlie urged him to speak his mind at a Turning Point Conference about Israel. Tucker says that some Pro-Israel donors to Turning Point USA “tormented” Charlie until “the day he died.” “Two days before he died, he lost a $2 million donation because he had publicly pledged to bring me to the next Turning Point conference in December.” Tucker also slams the American Jewish Committee (AJC) for referring to Charlie as an antisemite just two months ago.

Yashar Ali 🐘

517,714 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Tucker Carlson Tucker Carlson is lying about what Trump supporters are saying to break apart the MAGA coalition. This week, he falsely claimed that Lindsey Graham Lindsey Graham said Catholics were Nazis who supported the murder of Jews. Tucker is diving to new lows every week. This is incredibly vile, and Tucker doesn't care who gets hurt from his filth. As you can see below, Tucker claimed Lindsey Graham said "the Catholic church is... evil. It hates Jews. It’s actually pro-Nazi." But Lindsey was talking about the MULLAHS, not the Catholic Church. Outside of Candace Owens, Tucker is now the biggest liar and grifter. The biggest psyop on the Right is currently trying to strip Catholics out of the MAGA coalition in an effort to alienate Jews and evangelical Christians. That's why Tucker is pushing Chrislam, and it's why he's getting fringe priests and other so-called “Christians” to bash Evangelicals. In his rant about Lindsey Graham, he also falsely stated Lindsey said Catholics never really bought in to the proposition that the Holocaust was bad, and that murdering Jews was bad. He claimed Lindsey said Catholics are for murdering Jews. All of these lies foment anti-Semitism. As I have been saying all along, Tucker is going to get someone killed! I think that’s what he’s trying to do. This has to stop. He needs to be stopped at any means necessary.

Tucker Carlson Tucker Carlson is lying about what Trump supporters are saying to break apart the MAGA coalition. This week, he falsely claimed that Lindsey Graham Lindsey Graham said Catholics were Nazis who supported the murder of Jews. Tucker is diving to new lows every week. This is incredibly vile, and Tucker doesn't care who gets hurt from his filth. As you can see below, Tucker claimed Lindsey Graham said "the Catholic church is... evil. It hates Jews. It’s actually pro-Nazi." But Lindsey was talking about the MULLAHS, not the Catholic Church. Outside of Candace Owens, Tucker is now the biggest liar and grifter. The biggest psyop on the Right is currently trying to strip Catholics out of the MAGA coalition in an effort to alienate Jews and evangelical Christians. That's why Tucker is pushing Chrislam, and it's why he's getting fringe priests and other so-called “Christians” to bash Evangelicals. In his rant about Lindsey Graham, he also falsely stated Lindsey said Catholics never really bought in to the proposition that the Holocaust was bad, and that murdering Jews was bad. He claimed Lindsey said Catholics are for murdering Jews. All of these lies foment anti-Semitism. As I have been saying all along, Tucker is going to get someone killed! I think that’s what he’s trying to do. This has to stop. He needs to be stopped at any means necessary.

Laura Loomer

106,247 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

🇶🇦🇮🇱 QATAR PM: "AFTER STRIKE ON QATAR, TRUMP IMMEDIATELY EXPRESSED FRUSTRATION AND DISAPPOINTMENT WITH ISRAEL" Tucker points out: Why did Trump side with Qatar over Israel and tell the Israelis to apologize after the strike in Doha? Tucker asks the PM of Qatar what it felt like to see a U.S. president break with Israel in such a direct, unexpected way. The Qatari PM explains that Trump had been deeply involved in the negotiation process with Qatar, was furious when Israel carried out the strike, and immediately reached out because he believed Qatar was acting in good faith to broker a deal with Hamas at that exact moment. “Trump was very clear from the beginning since the attack, he assigned one of his advisors to reach out to us. He expressed his frustration and his disappointment from such a thing happening by Israel. He knows everything about the process, and he knows how helpful we were throughout this process. This move was shocking for him as a partner in these efforts to achieve peace in Gaza. When the strike happened, we were trying to convince Hamas to accept the offer made by Trump.” Sources: Tucker Carlson

🇶🇦🇮🇱 QATAR PM: "AFTER STRIKE ON QATAR, TRUMP IMMEDIATELY EXPRESSED FRUSTRATION AND DISAPPOINTMENT WITH ISRAEL" Tucker points out: Why did Trump side with Qatar over Israel and tell the Israelis to apologize after the strike in Doha? Tucker asks the PM of Qatar what it felt like to see a U.S. president break with Israel in such a direct, unexpected way. The Qatari PM explains that Trump had been deeply involved in the negotiation process with Qatar, was furious when Israel carried out the strike, and immediately reached out because he believed Qatar was acting in good faith to broker a deal with Hamas at that exact moment. “Trump was very clear from the beginning since the attack, he assigned one of his advisors to reach out to us. He expressed his frustration and his disappointment from such a thing happening by Israel. He knows everything about the process, and he knows how helpful we were throughout this process. This move was shocking for him as a partner in these efforts to achieve peace in Gaza. When the strike happened, we were trying to convince Hamas to accept the offer made by Trump.” Sources: Tucker Carlson

Mario Nawfal

121,242 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

I agree with Donald J. Trump — Tucker Carlson is not MAGA. First, he demanded all Jews take a DNA test to prove they are Jewish. Then he said Muslim terrorists should be able to rape and kill Americans if they’re under 18 years old. Now, Tucker has threatened a group of Jews who are beloved by everyone in the Jewish community — Chabad.org, who bring light to the world. Who do more acts of kindness in a day than most of us will do in our lives. Tucker falsely claimed they seek the destruction of Muslim holy sites, putting their safety at risk. It is clear that Tucker is not only mentally sick but is a danger to the Jewish Community and America as a whole. It is not enough for us to call out evil among Democrats. We must do it on our own side as well. Tucker Carlson needs to be excommunicated from the Republican Party.

I agree with Donald J. Trump — Tucker Carlson is not MAGA. First, he demanded all Jews take a DNA test to prove they are Jewish. Then he said Muslim terrorists should be able to rape and kill Americans if they’re under 18 years old. Now, Tucker has threatened a group of Jews who are beloved by everyone in the Jewish community — Chabad.org, who bring light to the world. Who do more acts of kindness in a day than most of us will do in our lives. Tucker falsely claimed they seek the destruction of Muslim holy sites, putting their safety at risk. It is clear that Tucker is not only mentally sick but is a danger to the Jewish Community and America as a whole. It is not enough for us to call out evil among Democrats. We must do it on our own side as well. Tucker Carlson needs to be excommunicated from the Republican Party.

Congressman Randy Fine

551,465 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

NEW Tucker Carlson: “Who cares about Islamic Jihad?” “There's no poll taken in the last year that shows that people are more concerned about the Iranian nuclear program or Islamic Jihad or some Muslim group far away than the price of peanut butter. Because the majority doesn't feel that way - and why would it? Who cares about Islamic Jihad?” Except last year, TPUSA ran a straw poll at AmFest in December with 30,000 participants who did, in fact, vote radical Islam as the greatest threat facing America. Tucker knows this because he was directly asked about it. Of course, he dismissed it as an op that “comes from the Israeli government.” So Tucker simultaneously believes Americans don't see radical Islam as a threat, but also that they do - and are being brainwashed by Israel.

NEW Tucker Carlson: “Who cares about Islamic Jihad?” “There's no poll taken in the last year that shows that people are more concerned about the Iranian nuclear program or Islamic Jihad or some Muslim group far away than the price of peanut butter. Because the majority doesn't feel that way - and why would it? Who cares about Islamic Jihad?” Except last year, TPUSA ran a straw poll at AmFest in December with 30,000 participants who did, in fact, vote radical Islam as the greatest threat facing America. Tucker knows this because he was directly asked about it. Of course, he dismissed it as an op that “comes from the Israeli government.” So Tucker simultaneously believes Americans don't see radical Islam as a threat, but also that they do - and are being brainwashed by Israel.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

34,958 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

🚨 EXCLUSIVE — Tucker Carlson DOUBLED DOWN on attacking Chabad, saying (falsely) that they support "violence against innocents." Tucker also reiterated that "at the center" of the "religious war" in Iran is "the Third Temple," adding that Chabad "is in favor of rebuilding the Third Temple." Some apology. As I had exclusively reported, Tucker on March 4 indicated that Chabad was ultimately behind the war in Iran. Tucker futher — and equally falsely — claimed that this was because Chabad was supposedly a driving force in wanting to destroy the Al Aqsa Mosque in order to rebuild Judaism's holy Temple, or beit hamikdash in Hebrew. After receiving enormous blowback for his comments, Tucker gave what his loyalists have called an apology. It was not. Tucker simply did not address his outrageous assertion that Chabad was agitating for the "destruction of one of the holiest places in Islam." As for the rest of his previous Chabad comments, he simply lied about what he had actually said, pretending as if he had merely commented on patches worn by some soldiers depicting what Tucker insists is the Third Temple. For good measure, he added in the new slander that Chabad actually supports "violence against innocents." To be clear, this is a long-running theme for Tucker over the past year, claiming that Jews, "neocons," and/or Israel have bloodlust and "get a thrill" from murdering people. Crucially, Tucker explicitly stated that it was "true" that the "Third Temple" was "at the center" of what he deemed a "religious war" in Iran. Then he had the audacity to tie it all back to Chabad, saying, "And Chabad, check their website, is in favor of rebuilding the Third Temple." Tucker, however, must not have actually checked the Chabad website. That's because the Chabad website states that the Third Temple, or beit hamikdash, can only be rebuilt by God, and only once Moshiach (or the Messiah) has come. What does the Chabad website actually say about how to usher in this divine state of being? "Perform more acts of goodness and kindness" At no point does Tucker reveal that Chabad wants the Third Temple to come not through violence, let alone war, but rather by people performing "acts of goodness and kindness." Perhaps Tucker simply can't wrap his head around this concept, which animates the very essence of Chabad. Why? Because the new Tucker is neither good nor kind.

🚨 EXCLUSIVE — Tucker Carlson DOUBLED DOWN on attacking Chabad, saying (falsely) that they support "violence against innocents." Tucker also reiterated that "at the center" of the "religious war" in Iran is "the Third Temple," adding that Chabad "is in favor of rebuilding the Third Temple." Some apology. As I had exclusively reported, Tucker on March 4 indicated that Chabad was ultimately behind the war in Iran. Tucker futher — and equally falsely — claimed that this was because Chabad was supposedly a driving force in wanting to destroy the Al Aqsa Mosque in order to rebuild Judaism's holy Temple, or beit hamikdash in Hebrew. After receiving enormous blowback for his comments, Tucker gave what his loyalists have called an apology. It was not. Tucker simply did not address his outrageous assertion that Chabad was agitating for the "destruction of one of the holiest places in Islam." As for the rest of his previous Chabad comments, he simply lied about what he had actually said, pretending as if he had merely commented on patches worn by some soldiers depicting what Tucker insists is the Third Temple. For good measure, he added in the new slander that Chabad actually supports "violence against innocents." To be clear, this is a long-running theme for Tucker over the past year, claiming that Jews, "neocons," and/or Israel have bloodlust and "get a thrill" from murdering people. Crucially, Tucker explicitly stated that it was "true" that the "Third Temple" was "at the center" of what he deemed a "religious war" in Iran. Then he had the audacity to tie it all back to Chabad, saying, "And Chabad, check their website, is in favor of rebuilding the Third Temple." Tucker, however, must not have actually checked the Chabad website. That's because the Chabad website states that the Third Temple, or beit hamikdash, can only be rebuilt by God, and only once Moshiach (or the Messiah) has come. What does the Chabad website actually say about how to usher in this divine state of being? "Perform more acts of goodness and kindness" At no point does Tucker reveal that Chabad wants the Third Temple to come not through violence, let alone war, but rather by people performing "acts of goodness and kindness." Perhaps Tucker simply can't wrap his head around this concept, which animates the very essence of Chabad. Why? Because the new Tucker is neither good nor kind.

Joel Mowbray

658,118 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Dick Carlson, Tucker's dad, loved Israel. I should know. I was with him in Israel for 10 straight days. Every bus ride, every tour, every meal. At Yad Vashem, I'll never forget what he said: "Thank God the Jews have Israel." Dick Carlson knew that Jews have faced unique threats throughout history, and that Israel was necessary to protect Jews everywhere. I know that because he told me that. Not long after we returned from Israel, I started working for FDD, where he was already. We would have lunch every month or two for years. I can say without reservation that when it comes to Israel and the Jews, Tucker Carlson is no Dick Carlson. Dick Carlson supported Israel. Dick Carlson hated Hamas. Dick Carlson called "Radical Islam" an "enemy of the United States and of the West." Dick Carlson didn't question the patriotism of Jews who supported Israel. Dick Carlson didn't hate Christians who supported Israel, not least because he was one of them. Dick Carlson didn't insist that Jews needed to take DNA tests to prove that they're actually Jews. Dick Carlson never slandered "Zionists" by saying that they "don't care about America" or accused them of having "not much of a soul." Dick Carlson, in fact, rarely used the word "Zionist," even though he worked with many of them. And, of course, he was a Zionist himself. How did Dick Carlson describe the Jewish state? "Israel is a country under siege. And it's a democracy in a part of the world where there are no democracies." If you're looking for a north star to help you understand Israel and the Muslim world, you could do a lot worse than the late, great Dick Carlson. Like, for instance, his son Tucker.

Dick Carlson, Tucker's dad, loved Israel. I should know. I was with him in Israel for 10 straight days. Every bus ride, every tour, every meal. At Yad Vashem, I'll never forget what he said: "Thank God the Jews have Israel." Dick Carlson knew that Jews have faced unique threats throughout history, and that Israel was necessary to protect Jews everywhere. I know that because he told me that. Not long after we returned from Israel, I started working for FDD, where he was already. We would have lunch every month or two for years. I can say without reservation that when it comes to Israel and the Jews, Tucker Carlson is no Dick Carlson. Dick Carlson supported Israel. Dick Carlson hated Hamas. Dick Carlson called "Radical Islam" an "enemy of the United States and of the West." Dick Carlson didn't question the patriotism of Jews who supported Israel. Dick Carlson didn't hate Christians who supported Israel, not least because he was one of them. Dick Carlson didn't insist that Jews needed to take DNA tests to prove that they're actually Jews. Dick Carlson never slandered "Zionists" by saying that they "don't care about America" or accused them of having "not much of a soul." Dick Carlson, in fact, rarely used the word "Zionist," even though he worked with many of them. And, of course, he was a Zionist himself. How did Dick Carlson describe the Jewish state? "Israel is a country under siege. And it's a democracy in a part of the world where there are no democracies." If you're looking for a north star to help you understand Israel and the Muslim world, you could do a lot worse than the late, great Dick Carlson. Like, for instance, his son Tucker.

Joel Mowbray

2,219,205 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Ted Cruz says Tucker Carlson is “the most dangerous demagogue in America.” “He hates Israel.” “He’s attacking Jews on a daily basis.” “He’s also said there’s no one on planet Earth he hates more than Christian Zionists. And he’s identified by name, me and Mike Huckabee, as the two people he hates the most.” “He had Nick Fuentes, who is an open Nazi. And by the way, I don’t use the term Nazi lightly.” “Tucker has also defended Mamdani and defended Maduro.” “Tucker hates President Trump. He opposes everything about his foreign policy, and he’s attacking President Trump on a daily basis.” “Now, he’s too chicken to actually say that. So instead of saying that he’s attacking Trump, he just has every clown who hates Trump on his show to attack his policies—but he won’t actually say the name.” What do you make of what Ted Cruz said here? In a related development, a reporter recently asked Tucker Carlson if Israel had the “right to exist.” Tucker flipped the question right back and asked her to define what “right to exist” means. And then this happened. (See post below)

Ted Cruz says Tucker Carlson is “the most dangerous demagogue in America.” “He hates Israel.” “He’s attacking Jews on a daily basis.” “He’s also said there’s no one on planet Earth he hates more than Christian Zionists. And he’s identified by name, me and Mike Huckabee, as the two people he hates the most.” “He had Nick Fuentes, who is an open Nazi. And by the way, I don’t use the term Nazi lightly.” “Tucker has also defended Mamdani and defended Maduro.” “Tucker hates President Trump. He opposes everything about his foreign policy, and he’s attacking President Trump on a daily basis.” “Now, he’s too chicken to actually say that. So instead of saying that he’s attacking Trump, he just has every clown who hates Trump on his show to attack his policies—but he won’t actually say the name.” What do you make of what Ted Cruz said here? In a related development, a reporter recently asked Tucker Carlson if Israel had the “right to exist.” Tucker flipped the question right back and asked her to define what “right to exist” means. And then this happened. (See post below)

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

257,023 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🚨ASHAMED AND HE CHANGED: Tucker Carlson🇮🇱 Tucker Carlson used to be a strong Zionist. He once defended Israel as America's most important ally in the Middle East. He slammed Hamas and Hezbollah as terrorist groups that want to wipe Israel off the map. He mocked isolationists who questioned U.S. support for the Jewish state and warned that weakening Israel would only empower radical Islam. Back then, he sounded like every other conservative: Israel is our democratic partner, a frontline defender of Western values, and we must stand with them against Iran and the jihadists. Now? He's flipped completely. He's calling Israel's war in Gaza "disgusting," pushing to cut off all U.S. aid and weapons, and platforming voices that traffic in conspiracy theories about "Jewish influence" and "foreign money." He's even downplaying threats from radical Islam while obsessing over Israel. Just like Candace Owens and others who once posed as conservative allies — they changed too. What happened? Did the "America First" crowd get to him? Did the donor money shift? Or did the mask finally slip? One Jewish State Tucker Carlson and others: Are they really "America First"... or just another set of influencers who abandoned Israel when it became inconvenient? #TuckerCarlson #CandaceOwens #ZionistNoMore #OneJewishState

🚨ASHAMED AND HE CHANGED: Tucker Carlson🇮🇱 Tucker Carlson used to be a strong Zionist. He once defended Israel as America's most important ally in the Middle East. He slammed Hamas and Hezbollah as terrorist groups that want to wipe Israel off the map. He mocked isolationists who questioned U.S. support for the Jewish state and warned that weakening Israel would only empower radical Islam. Back then, he sounded like every other conservative: Israel is our democratic partner, a frontline defender of Western values, and we must stand with them against Iran and the jihadists. Now? He's flipped completely. He's calling Israel's war in Gaza "disgusting," pushing to cut off all U.S. aid and weapons, and platforming voices that traffic in conspiracy theories about "Jewish influence" and "foreign money." He's even downplaying threats from radical Islam while obsessing over Israel. Just like Candace Owens and others who once posed as conservative allies — they changed too. What happened? Did the "America First" crowd get to him? Did the donor money shift? Or did the mask finally slip? One Jewish State Tucker Carlson and others: Are they really "America First"... or just another set of influencers who abandoned Israel when it became inconvenient? #TuckerCarlson #CandaceOwens #ZionistNoMore #OneJewishState

Reverend Jordan Wells

13,697 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Donald Trump’s obsession with lecturing Jews on how we should vote is disgusting and dangerous. American Jews aren’t your props, Mr. President. This is his first time doing it since the explosion of far-right antisemitism, so his audacity must be called out. I'm not saying that Trump is an antisemite, and I don't believe he is one; that's JD Vance who said that Trump "could be the next Hitler." I'm not saying that; I am saying that he's a plain and simple narcissist who, like everything else in his life, exploits Jews to his benefit but doesn't care about them. Trump normalized and empowered a cesspool of hateful crackpots who, in the name of freedom of speech, pushed antisemitism into the mainstream. JD Vance is officially the zookeeper, petting all the animals and ensuring they are being treated nicely and handled with care, and if someone says something like, "Hey, those animals are dangerous," he blames us Jews, but it was Trump who opened the cage. His moody relationship with Netanyahu is not what makes him pro- or anti-Jewish. To me it's more of a factor that he can't fully denounce and disavow Holocaust deniers and Hitler fanboys like Nick Fuentes, full stop. This isn't about free speech; no one asked to have Fuentes jailed, but his hateful views shouldn't be normalized or treated as cute opinions. We all see on an hourly basis how Trump deals with someone he REALLY doesn't approve of. Moving the embassy doesn’t buy absolution for empowering people who want us gone. Steve Bannon at TPUSA's America Fest last month literally used the "embassy move" as a reason why he should be listened to when he vouches for Tucker and other crackpots because "you can't get a better defender of Israel than Steve Bannon. In the White House, I'm the one that pushed initially hard to move the embassy to Jerusalem." Please spare me the “most pro-Israel and pro-Jewish president ever” talking points. He's the most "pro-Trump president ever," solely focused on his interests. He won't denounce the most significant cancer of hate in America, Tucker Carlson, because "he's nice to me," but he'll have 2am Truth Social explosions at Tucker if he says something mean about him. Once Tucker apologizes to him, all is good. It's all about him. After Oct. 7, the most horrific day on the Jewish calendar since the Holocaust, President Biden traveled to Israel and spoke about the relationship of the U.S. and Israel and not about himself. This is because he saw it as a relationship between two allied countries, and that's what it is. Trump sees it as a relationship between himself and how much Israel's PM will kiss his ring. He repeatedly said after Oct. 7 how bad it is for Bibi, not for the people of Israel, for Bibi, because that's what he sees—how Bibi treats him. He was still furious at him for congratulating Biden on winning the election; it's all about him. Bibi must travel to Mar-a-Lago, create bogus Israel peace prizes, and say, "You're the best president," just as I tell my toddler, "You're the best boy." When Biden had his issues with Bibi, he kept making it clear again and again to the people of Israel that he and Bibi disagree currently, but even if it's out in the open, he'll help protect them from Iran if necessary, and he did. After Oct. 7, Biden spoke to Jewish leaders from his heart about how he takes his family to visit Auschwitz to teach them about the Holocaust. I have never heard him demand that Jews vote in a specific way. Trump despicably told parents of hostages who were captured in Gaza that their kids were captured because of Biden and how great he is. I listened to Trump on the first anniversary of Oct 7; all he spoke about was him, himself, and Donald Trump. And that, if not for the rigged elections, it would have never happened. My point is that Trump is a master in manipulating people's minds; he does the big moves to create headlines, hoping everyone buys it, and then demands publicly absolute loyalty. Enough.

Donald Trump’s obsession with lecturing Jews on how we should vote is disgusting and dangerous. American Jews aren’t your props, Mr. President. This is his first time doing it since the explosion of far-right antisemitism, so his audacity must be called out. I'm not saying that Trump is an antisemite, and I don't believe he is one; that's JD Vance who said that Trump "could be the next Hitler." I'm not saying that; I am saying that he's a plain and simple narcissist who, like everything else in his life, exploits Jews to his benefit but doesn't care about them. Trump normalized and empowered a cesspool of hateful crackpots who, in the name of freedom of speech, pushed antisemitism into the mainstream. JD Vance is officially the zookeeper, petting all the animals and ensuring they are being treated nicely and handled with care, and if someone says something like, "Hey, those animals are dangerous," he blames us Jews, but it was Trump who opened the cage. His moody relationship with Netanyahu is not what makes him pro- or anti-Jewish. To me it's more of a factor that he can't fully denounce and disavow Holocaust deniers and Hitler fanboys like Nick Fuentes, full stop. This isn't about free speech; no one asked to have Fuentes jailed, but his hateful views shouldn't be normalized or treated as cute opinions. We all see on an hourly basis how Trump deals with someone he REALLY doesn't approve of. Moving the embassy doesn’t buy absolution for empowering people who want us gone. Steve Bannon at TPUSA's America Fest last month literally used the "embassy move" as a reason why he should be listened to when he vouches for Tucker and other crackpots because "you can't get a better defender of Israel than Steve Bannon. In the White House, I'm the one that pushed initially hard to move the embassy to Jerusalem." Please spare me the “most pro-Israel and pro-Jewish president ever” talking points. He's the most "pro-Trump president ever," solely focused on his interests. He won't denounce the most significant cancer of hate in America, Tucker Carlson, because "he's nice to me," but he'll have 2am Truth Social explosions at Tucker if he says something mean about him. Once Tucker apologizes to him, all is good. It's all about him. After Oct. 7, the most horrific day on the Jewish calendar since the Holocaust, President Biden traveled to Israel and spoke about the relationship of the U.S. and Israel and not about himself. This is because he saw it as a relationship between two allied countries, and that's what it is. Trump sees it as a relationship between himself and how much Israel's PM will kiss his ring. He repeatedly said after Oct. 7 how bad it is for Bibi, not for the people of Israel, for Bibi, because that's what he sees—how Bibi treats him. He was still furious at him for congratulating Biden on winning the election; it's all about him. Bibi must travel to Mar-a-Lago, create bogus Israel peace prizes, and say, "You're the best president," just as I tell my toddler, "You're the best boy." When Biden had his issues with Bibi, he kept making it clear again and again to the people of Israel that he and Bibi disagree currently, but even if it's out in the open, he'll help protect them from Iran if necessary, and he did. After Oct. 7, Biden spoke to Jewish leaders from his heart about how he takes his family to visit Auschwitz to teach them about the Holocaust. I have never heard him demand that Jews vote in a specific way. Trump despicably told parents of hostages who were captured in Gaza that their kids were captured because of Biden and how great he is. I listened to Trump on the first anniversary of Oct 7; all he spoke about was him, himself, and Donald Trump. And that, if not for the rigged elections, it would have never happened. My point is that Trump is a master in manipulating people's minds; he does the big moves to create headlines, hoping everyone buys it, and then demands publicly absolute loyalty. Enough.

David Schwartz

253,272 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

‼️EXPOSED: Tucker Carlson's DEVASTATING Takedown of Christian Zionism—Why He Says Mike Huckabee Is A FRAUD 👀 In a stunning interview with the New York Times, Tucker laid out a case that is so logical, so devastating, that it exposes the fraud at the heart of American foreign policy. This isn't about being anti-Israel. This is about being pro-truth, and Tucker is demanding answers to the questions they refuse to answer. 1. THE FALSE PROPHETS. Tucker's Easter message was a direct warning to Christians everywhere. He named the two false prophets he believes are leading the faithful astray: President Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu. He is arguing that blind loyalty to these men, under the guise of divine mandate, is a dangerous betrayal of Christian principles. 2. THE BRIGHT RED LINE. His opposition is simple and absolute. "Christians can never support the murder of innocents. Period." He challenged the New York Times to find the place in the Bible where Jesus says, "These people are annoying. Kill them all." It's not there. He is calling out the perversion of Christianity to justify violence and war. 3. THE UNANSWERABLE QUESTIONS. Tucker described his revealing, contentious interview with Ambassador Ambassador Mike Huckabee, where he asked two simple, logical questions that no Christian Zionist leader will answer: On what biblical basis are you making the claim that Israel has a unique right to exist? When Tucker asked about the borders laid out in Genesis, Huckabee essentially said, "Fine with me," implying a claim to the entire Middle East. To whom does this right apply? Huckabee said "the Jews," but Tucker points out that this is a theological claim that is being used to justify real-world wars and American deaths. The response to his reasonable questions? "Shut up, anti-Semite." Tucker's conclusion: "You've been exposed as a fraud and or a liar." 4. WHY THIS MATTERS TO AMERICA. This is the critical point. Tucker states he was never interested in this topic until he realized it was destroying his country. He says Israel pushed a U.S. president into a war that is "in the process of destroying the United States economy and getting Americans killed." How do they have that power? Not because of Jewish voters, Tucker argues, but because of "tens of millions of evangelical Christians who unquestioningly support Israel because they believe it's their theological duty to do so." He concludes that this theological question is the single most important issue facing America, because on it "hangs the future of the American economy and the lives of American service members." Tucker Carlson is drawing a line in the sand. He is saying that unquestioning support, based on a fraudulent theological premise, is leading America to ruin. He is demanding that Christians think for themselves and stop following false prophets into wars that are not in our interest. This is the most important monologue of the year. Share it with every Christian you know. 🇺🇸

‼️EXPOSED: Tucker Carlson's DEVASTATING Takedown of Christian Zionism—Why He Says Mike Huckabee Is A FRAUD 👀 In a stunning interview with the New York Times, Tucker laid out a case that is so logical, so devastating, that it exposes the fraud at the heart of American foreign policy. This isn't about being anti-Israel. This is about being pro-truth, and Tucker is demanding answers to the questions they refuse to answer. 1. THE FALSE PROPHETS. Tucker's Easter message was a direct warning to Christians everywhere. He named the two false prophets he believes are leading the faithful astray: President Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu. He is arguing that blind loyalty to these men, under the guise of divine mandate, is a dangerous betrayal of Christian principles. 2. THE BRIGHT RED LINE. His opposition is simple and absolute. "Christians can never support the murder of innocents. Period." He challenged the New York Times to find the place in the Bible where Jesus says, "These people are annoying. Kill them all." It's not there. He is calling out the perversion of Christianity to justify violence and war. 3. THE UNANSWERABLE QUESTIONS. Tucker described his revealing, contentious interview with Ambassador Ambassador Mike Huckabee, where he asked two simple, logical questions that no Christian Zionist leader will answer: On what biblical basis are you making the claim that Israel has a unique right to exist? When Tucker asked about the borders laid out in Genesis, Huckabee essentially said, "Fine with me," implying a claim to the entire Middle East. To whom does this right apply? Huckabee said "the Jews," but Tucker points out that this is a theological claim that is being used to justify real-world wars and American deaths. The response to his reasonable questions? "Shut up, anti-Semite." Tucker's conclusion: "You've been exposed as a fraud and or a liar." 4. WHY THIS MATTERS TO AMERICA. This is the critical point. Tucker states he was never interested in this topic until he realized it was destroying his country. He says Israel pushed a U.S. president into a war that is "in the process of destroying the United States economy and getting Americans killed." How do they have that power? Not because of Jewish voters, Tucker argues, but because of "tens of millions of evangelical Christians who unquestioningly support Israel because they believe it's their theological duty to do so." He concludes that this theological question is the single most important issue facing America, because on it "hangs the future of the American economy and the lives of American service members." Tucker Carlson is drawing a line in the sand. He is saying that unquestioning support, based on a fraudulent theological premise, is leading America to ruin. He is demanding that Christians think for themselves and stop following false prophets into wars that are not in our interest. This is the most important monologue of the year. Share it with every Christian you know. 🇺🇸

Project Constitution

73,590 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Tucker Carlson refuses to call Hamas, Hezbollah, and Houthis "terrorists." They merely "pick at Israel, hassle Israelis." Oh, and Israel is at fault! Why? Because it's "like a marriage, no party is wholly responsible... Each action provokes a reaction." This isn't even a lukewarm take. It's just a lazy regurgitation of the NY Times' favorite staple: The "cycle of violence" reporting, where Israel and Hamas are as morally equivalent as Tom & Jerry. Just like left-wing media, Tucker labels Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis "militants groups" who carry out "insurgencies." And just like left-wing media, Tucker can't even acknowledge that these terrorists "murder" Israelis. He can only bring himself to say "kill" — not the same as "murder." (Commandment is "Thou shalt not murder," not "kill.") Tucker closed his Israel-Hamas "marriage" analogy by saying that figuring out who is actually responsible can be done by "real historians... the few honest ones left." It's worth remembering that Tucker said the "most honest historian" is Darryl Cooper, who called on Trump to bomb Israel (instead of Iran) and who claims that Churchill was the real villain of World War II, not Hitler. This is what Tucker in 2026 has become.

Tucker Carlson refuses to call Hamas, Hezbollah, and Houthis "terrorists." They merely "pick at Israel, hassle Israelis." Oh, and Israel is at fault! Why? Because it's "like a marriage, no party is wholly responsible... Each action provokes a reaction." This isn't even a lukewarm take. It's just a lazy regurgitation of the NY Times' favorite staple: The "cycle of violence" reporting, where Israel and Hamas are as morally equivalent as Tom & Jerry. Just like left-wing media, Tucker labels Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis "militants groups" who carry out "insurgencies." And just like left-wing media, Tucker can't even acknowledge that these terrorists "murder" Israelis. He can only bring himself to say "kill" — not the same as "murder." (Commandment is "Thou shalt not murder," not "kill.") Tucker closed his Israel-Hamas "marriage" analogy by saying that figuring out who is actually responsible can be done by "real historians... the few honest ones left." It's worth remembering that Tucker said the "most honest historian" is Darryl Cooper, who called on Trump to bomb Israel (instead of Iran) and who claims that Churchill was the real villain of World War II, not Hitler. This is what Tucker in 2026 has become.

Joel Mowbray

34,098 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

𝗩𝗗𝗛 𝗢𝗡 𝗧𝗨𝗖𝗞𝗘𝗥, 𝗩𝗔𝗡𝗖𝗘, 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗥𝗜𝗙𝗧: 𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗠𝗣 𝗜𝗦 𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗗𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗔 𝗠𝗘𝗦𝗦𝗔𝗚𝗘 Victor Davis Hanson watched Tucker for years. Had him on his show. Says he never heard any of what Tucker is saying now — in fact, he has seen the old clips. Tucker was formidably pro-vigilance against radical Islam and Iran. His current position is almost pro-Islam by comparison. On Tucker's unconditional surrender comment — VDH takes it seriously enough to rebut it properly. Tucker argued that unconditional surrender historically leads to mass rape of the defeated. VDH's response: America demanded unconditional surrender from Japan. MacArthur governed as pro-consul for eight years. There was no mass rape. Americans who committed rape were executed. The Soviets mass-raped their way across Berlin — not us. Tucker's insinuation that American soldiers would be given license to r*pe is an insult to the United States military. On the Vance-Rubio dynamic: VDH sees Trump's antenna going up. It was J.D., J.D., J.D. — now it's Marco, the fireman. Send Rubio to Panama. Send Rubio to repair Vance's Zelensky blowup. Marco is personable, speaks Spanish, and is the ultimate utility player. Trump is signaling to J.D. — and to the MAGA base — that loyalty to the movement requires divorcing yourself from the extremist agents. Tucker calling the Iran operation evil while American pilots are flying missions over Tehran is not a position a Vice President of the United States can be associated with. The growing antisemitism on the right is new, VDH says. It wasn't there a few years ago. He traces it partly to a cohort of disaffected young men who correctly identify that DEI and globalization failed them — and who are being directed by grifters toward conspiratorial anti-Jewish frameworks to sharpen the message. Eighty percent of what Tucker and Candace say is empirical. Then they add: 𝘐'𝘮 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘴𝘢𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨. And in that "just saying" is always a core about Jews and Israel. That's dangerous. VDH says so plainly. (36:49) MAGA Rift and Tucker Fallout

𝗩𝗗𝗛 𝗢𝗡 𝗧𝗨𝗖𝗞𝗘𝗥, 𝗩𝗔𝗡𝗖𝗘, 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗥𝗜𝗙𝗧: 𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗠𝗣 𝗜𝗦 𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗗𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗔 𝗠𝗘𝗦𝗦𝗔𝗚𝗘 Victor Davis Hanson watched Tucker for years. Had him on his show. Says he never heard any of what Tucker is saying now — in fact, he has seen the old clips. Tucker was formidably pro-vigilance against radical Islam and Iran. His current position is almost pro-Islam by comparison. On Tucker's unconditional surrender comment — VDH takes it seriously enough to rebut it properly. Tucker argued that unconditional surrender historically leads to mass rape of the defeated. VDH's response: America demanded unconditional surrender from Japan. MacArthur governed as pro-consul for eight years. There was no mass rape. Americans who committed rape were executed. The Soviets mass-raped their way across Berlin — not us. Tucker's insinuation that American soldiers would be given license to r*pe is an insult to the United States military. On the Vance-Rubio dynamic: VDH sees Trump's antenna going up. It was J.D., J.D., J.D. — now it's Marco, the fireman. Send Rubio to Panama. Send Rubio to repair Vance's Zelensky blowup. Marco is personable, speaks Spanish, and is the ultimate utility player. Trump is signaling to J.D. — and to the MAGA base — that loyalty to the movement requires divorcing yourself from the extremist agents. Tucker calling the Iran operation evil while American pilots are flying missions over Tehran is not a position a Vice President of the United States can be associated with. The growing antisemitism on the right is new, VDH says. It wasn't there a few years ago. He traces it partly to a cohort of disaffected young men who correctly identify that DEI and globalization failed them — and who are being directed by grifters toward conspiratorial anti-Jewish frameworks to sharpen the message. Eighty percent of what Tucker and Candace say is empirical. Then they add: 𝘐'𝘮 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘴𝘢𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨. And in that "just saying" is always a core about Jews and Israel. That's dangerous. VDH says so plainly. (36:49) MAGA Rift and Tucker Fallout

M.A. Rothman

143,921 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Victor Davis Hanson: Stop Trying to Get Around Graham Platner’s Totenkopf Tattoo “Rather than respond to what the guy's positions are, they've just called him a Nazi for the last month because he had a tattoo that was not a swastika, but apparently was connected to the German military at some point. It's not even clear he knew that. But they've attacked the guy in his personal life. It's like they don't like him because he's not sufficiently supportive of Israel,” Tucker Carlson said of Democrat Maine Senate Candidate Graham Platner on a recent podcast interview. When Tucker says “allegedly,” that's simply not true, Tucker. It's not allegedly. It was tied directly. That particular version of a death's head is tied particularly with SS groups that slaughtered people both in the Holocaust and prisoners of war. And Graham Platner knew that, and he put it on there for a reason, Victor Davis Hanson argues on today’s edition of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words.” Victor Davis Hanson

Victor Davis Hanson: Stop Trying to Get Around Graham Platner’s Totenkopf Tattoo “Rather than respond to what the guy's positions are, they've just called him a Nazi for the last month because he had a tattoo that was not a swastika, but apparently was connected to the German military at some point. It's not even clear he knew that. But they've attacked the guy in his personal life. It's like they don't like him because he's not sufficiently supportive of Israel,” Tucker Carlson said of Democrat Maine Senate Candidate Graham Platner on a recent podcast interview. When Tucker says “allegedly,” that's simply not true, Tucker. It's not allegedly. It was tied directly. That particular version of a death's head is tied particularly with SS groups that slaughtered people both in the Holocaust and prisoners of war. And Graham Platner knew that, and he put it on there for a reason, Victor Davis Hanson argues on today’s edition of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words.” Victor Davis Hanson

The Daily Signal

46,071 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨 Scoop confirmed 🚨 During his podcast with Hunter Biden, which was released today, Tucker Carlson accused Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu - בנימין נתניהו of giving Tucker information about Hunter’s laptop and said the accusations that Hunter sexually abused minors (allegedly derived from the laptop) were planted by Israel. Of course, Tucker and Hunter provided zero evidence of this whatsoever, because it’s a complete lie that this is an Israeli op. Tucker then rushed to defend the Russians and attacked the 51 spies who lied, not for lying and saying the laptop was Russian disinformation in an effort to protect Joe Biden, but for daring to say it came from Russia. The real outrage should be over the weaponization of our intelligence communities to run interference in support of Joe Biden. Also, I know the man who gave the hard drive copy of Hunter’s laptop to Tucker. He met Tucker’s producer and spent hours with them reviewing all of the evidence at a hotel in New York. The man is not Netanyahu. He is Jewish though, which shows you Tucker thinks all Jews work for Netanyahu or that all Jews are Israeli. Tucker has lost every ounce of credibility he once had. I exposed all of this in my 2025 thread about how he ran cover for the Hunter Biden laptop. He is so obsessed with undermining President Trump that he now wants to blame the accusations against Hunter Biden on Israel. Meanwhile, Hunter Biden testified under oath himself that the laptop and its contents belong to him. Jew hate is brain rot!

🚨 Scoop confirmed 🚨 During his podcast with Hunter Biden, which was released today, Tucker Carlson accused Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu - בנימין נתניהו of giving Tucker information about Hunter’s laptop and said the accusations that Hunter sexually abused minors (allegedly derived from the laptop) were planted by Israel. Of course, Tucker and Hunter provided zero evidence of this whatsoever, because it’s a complete lie that this is an Israeli op. Tucker then rushed to defend the Russians and attacked the 51 spies who lied, not for lying and saying the laptop was Russian disinformation in an effort to protect Joe Biden, but for daring to say it came from Russia. The real outrage should be over the weaponization of our intelligence communities to run interference in support of Joe Biden. Also, I know the man who gave the hard drive copy of Hunter’s laptop to Tucker. He met Tucker’s producer and spent hours with them reviewing all of the evidence at a hotel in New York. The man is not Netanyahu. He is Jewish though, which shows you Tucker thinks all Jews work for Netanyahu or that all Jews are Israeli. Tucker has lost every ounce of credibility he once had. I exposed all of this in my 2025 thread about how he ran cover for the Hunter Biden laptop. He is so obsessed with undermining President Trump that he now wants to blame the accusations against Hunter Biden on Israel. Meanwhile, Hunter Biden testified under oath himself that the laptop and its contents belong to him. Jew hate is brain rot!

Laura Loomer

389,469 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce

Tucker Carlson admitted that his decision to interview Nicholas J. Fuentes is a fight about "what happens after Donald Trump." Tucker Carlson proceeds to slam critics of his softball Fuentes interview, saying that they "control foreign policy," and "they don't care about the United States. They do care about the U.S. Treasury... [and] Israel." In this clip from his interview with Dave Smith, Tucker claims that his critics "control" Trump's "neoconservative" foreign policy. (Not addressed is that "neocons" supposedly want endless wars, yet Trump is ending wars and sheparding peace deals.) In fact, the only resemblance to so-called neocon foreign policy one might find to Trump's is... treating Israel as a close ally of the U.S. All the while, Jewish host Dave Smith nods along as Tucker smears his critics by fusing together perhaps two of the oldest antisemitic tropes -- Jews as puppetmaster and having dual loyalties -- claiming his critics somehow "control" Trump's foreign policy and don't care about America, but DO care about Israel.

Tucker Carlson admitted that his decision to interview Nicholas J. Fuentes is a fight about "what happens after Donald Trump." Tucker Carlson proceeds to slam critics of his softball Fuentes interview, saying that they "control foreign policy," and "they don't care about the United States. They do care about the U.S. Treasury... [and] Israel." In this clip from his interview with Dave Smith, Tucker claims that his critics "control" Trump's "neoconservative" foreign policy. (Not addressed is that "neocons" supposedly want endless wars, yet Trump is ending wars and sheparding peace deals.) In fact, the only resemblance to so-called neocon foreign policy one might find to Trump's is... treating Israel as a close ally of the U.S. All the while, Jewish host Dave Smith nods along as Tucker smears his critics by fusing together perhaps two of the oldest antisemitic tropes -- Jews as puppetmaster and having dual loyalties -- claiming his critics somehow "control" Trump's foreign policy and don't care about America, but DO care about Israel.

Joel Mowbray

181,831 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Ok this is just getting to be absurd. Tucker Carlson just suggested on his most recent podcast episode that Israel is behind the attempted assassination of President Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania. He is using Joe Kent as an authority and source on this. Meanwhile, Joe Kent is a discredited leaker and liar. President Trump has repeatedly said Iran tried to assassinate him. Tucker is just making up every lie in the world and is trying to blame it on Israel. It’s reckless, and it’s created a psychosis in the public for the purpose of making people hate Jews. Tucker is such a nefarious liar and conman. It’s just disgusting. He really is dangerous because he knows he’s lying and he doesn’t care. He gets more extreme with each passing week.

Ok this is just getting to be absurd. Tucker Carlson just suggested on his most recent podcast episode that Israel is behind the attempted assassination of President Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania. He is using Joe Kent as an authority and source on this. Meanwhile, Joe Kent is a discredited leaker and liar. President Trump has repeatedly said Iran tried to assassinate him. Tucker is just making up every lie in the world and is trying to blame it on Israel. It’s reckless, and it’s created a psychosis in the public for the purpose of making people hate Jews. Tucker is such a nefarious liar and conman. It’s just disgusting. He really is dangerous because he knows he’s lying and he doesn’t care. He gets more extreme with each passing week.

Laura Loomer

317,131 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce