🚨 𝗜’𝗹𝗹 𝗕𝗲 𝗙𝗶𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘁 𝗪𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗖𝗥𝗜𝗖. NikNanos.DataHound.KeynoteSpeaker, CRIC, the Canadian Research Insights Council sets standards for Canada’s public-opinion research industry. 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗮𝗿𝗱𝘀 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗖𝗥𝗜𝗖 𝗶𝘁𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗳. 𝗦𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗜𝗜.𝟰: CRIC’s Principles of Professional Practice, says researchers must not knowingly make, or “𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗶𝘁𝗹𝘆... 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗶𝘁,” interpretations inconsistent with the available data Yet you told CTV that Poilievre being chosen by 15% of Canadians, while Conservative support was roughly twice that, “means” half of Conservative supporters don’t think he can beat Carney. 🚨𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁?🚨 𝗦𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗜.𝗗.𝟯: CRIC’s responsibility guidelines to the public says members must correct factual misrepresentations or distortions, including those made by sponsors or clients. 𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗼𝗰𝗰𝘂𝗿 𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗹𝘆, 𝗖𝗥𝗜𝗖 𝘀𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗼 𝗯𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗱𝗲 𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗹𝘆, 𝗶𝗻 𝗮𝘀 𝘀𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗮𝗿 𝗮 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝘂𝗺 𝗮𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲. 🔴𝗖𝗧𝗩 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗹. CTV then described “none” as the “top choice,” Harper as the “closest contender,” and Poilievre as “followed by,” 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗮 𝗺𝘂𝗹𝘁𝗶-𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗹𝗮𝗽. You were there. Why didn’t you clarify or correct that framing? Please explain how this complies with the standards you once helped oversee. 𝗜’𝗹𝗹 𝗯𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘁 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗖𝗥𝗜𝗖 𝗮𝘀𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗦𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗜𝗜.𝟰 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗜.𝗗.𝟯. With respect, Vespershow more

Vesper

25,530 subscribers

分享 下载