ะ—ะฐะณั€ัƒะทะบะฐ ะฒะธะดะตะพ...

ะะต ัƒะดะฐะปะพััŒ ะทะฐะณั€ัƒะทะธั‚ัŒ ะฒะธะดะตะพ

ะะฐ ะณะปะฐะฒะฝัƒัŽ

๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—น๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜† ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฏ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—ฝ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐˜€, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ถ๐—ปโ€ฆ.. #SpearCorps sappers connect across treacherous terrain, hostile weather and inhospitable conditions, for there is no gap too wide, no mountain too high and no mission impossible!!! #IndianArmy ADG PI - INDIAN...

Spearcorps's profile picture

SpearCorps.IndianArmy

125,606 subscribers

29,369 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 2 ะปะตั‚ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

ะšะพะผะผะตะฝั‚ะฐั€ะธะธ: 10

ะคะพั‚ะพ ะฟั€ะพั„ะธะปั youth of kashmir ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ
youth of kashmir ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ2 ะปะตั‚ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

Jai hind ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ

ะคะพั‚ะพ ะฟั€ะพั„ะธะปั Kaafir
Kaafir2 ะปะตั‚ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

Great going

ะคะพั‚ะพ ะฟั€ะพั„ะธะปั ๊ฏ‚๊ฏจ๊ฏŒ๊ฏฅ๊ฏก ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ
๊ฏ‚๊ฏจ๊ฏŒ๊ฏฅ๊ฏก ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ2 ะปะตั‚ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

Where are you against the SoO militants #Kuki_HmarMilitants #KukiNarcoTerrorist

ะคะพั‚ะพ ะฟั€ะพั„ะธะปั Vikram
Vikram2 ะปะตั‚ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

#Proud

ะคะพั‚ะพ ะฟั€ะพั„ะธะปั Satish Dwivedi
Satish Dwivedi2 ะปะตั‚ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

Desh badal Raha hai Aage badh raha hai

ะคะพั‚ะพ ะฟั€ะพั„ะธะปั Bai
Bai2 ะปะตั‚ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

Great

ะคะพั‚ะพ ะฟั€ะพั„ะธะปั sm
sm2 ะปะตั‚ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

Proud of you SC IA

ะคะพั‚ะพ ะฟั€ะพั„ะธะปั Vijay Jaysurya
Vijay Jaysurya2 ะปะตั‚ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

@SilentRed70015 #Good job

ะคะพั‚ะพ ะฟั€ะพั„ะธะปั Raj Veer
Raj Veer2 ะปะตั‚ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

@SilentRed70015 Ohh yest

ะคะพั‚ะพ ะฟั€ะพั„ะธะปั Malemsana Ningombam
Malemsana Ningombam2 ะปะตั‚ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

Why did Indian army sent it's most useless unit into manipur? The reason for saying: Manipur's situation, especially why Army and AR stand and watch.

ะŸะพั…ะพะถะธะต ะฒะธะดะตะพ

This is outrageous. A 37-year-old high school physics teacher was arrested and dragged out of a city commission meeting in Kansas for ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด in support of opposing a new data center. In the video you can hear one of the city commissioners call on the man to be arrested. ๐—˜๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ผ๐—ณ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐˜†โ€™๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—น๐—น๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐—ณ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜€๐—ผ ๐—บ๐˜‚๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฝ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐˜† ๐˜„๐—ถ๐—น๐—น ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ. This is not only a violation of the first amendment, but it exposes that there really is no democracy in this country. That if people go through the โ€œapproved channelsโ€ to make their voice heard they will still be arrested. ๐—œ๐˜ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐˜†๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—บ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ผ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ฝ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฏ๐˜† ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜†๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—น๐˜‚๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป.

Power to the People โ˜ญ๐Ÿ•Š

351,931 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 2 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

๐——๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐——๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—บ. "Meet Mili Yabi! From remote Sarli village, #ArunachalPradesh where opportunities are scarce, she dared to dream big and worked tirelessly to secure admission at Sainik School East Siang! Thanks to #IndianArmy special coaching and her family's support. She's proof that with courage, determination and guidance, no goal is too distant! "เคฎเคฟเคฒเคฟเค เคฎเคฟเคฒเฅ€ เคฏเคพเคฌเฅ€ เคธเฅ‡! #ArunachalPradesh เค•เฅ‡ เคฆเฅ‚เคฐเคฆเคฐเคพเคœเคผ เค—เคพเค‚เคต เคธเคฐเคฒเฅ€ เคธเฅ‡ เค†เคจเฅ‡ เคตเคพเคฒเฅ€ เคฎเคฟเคฒเฅ€ เคจเฅ‡ เคตเคนเคพเค‚ เค•เฅ€ เคธเฅ€เคฎเคฟเคค เค…เคตเคธเคฐเฅ‹เค‚ เค•เฅ‡ เคฌเคพเคตเคœเฅ‚เคฆ เคฌเคกเคผเคพ เคธเคชเคจเคพ เคฆเฅ‡เค–เคพ เค”เคฐ เค•เคกเคผเฅ€ เคฎเฅ‡เคนเคจเคค เค•เคฐเค•เฅ‡ เคธเฅˆเคจเคฟเค• เคธเฅเค•เฅ‚เคฒ เคˆเคธเฅเคŸ เคธเคฟเคฏเคพเค‚เค— เคฎเฅ‡เค‚ เคฆเคพเค–เคผเคฟเคฒเคพ เคชเคพเคฏเคพเฅค เคฏเคน เคธเค‚เคญเคต เคนเฅ‹ เคชเคพเคฏเคพ #IndianArmy เค•เฅ€ เคตเคฟเคถเฅ‡เคท เค•เฅ‹เคšเคฟเค‚เค— เค”เคฐ เค‰เคจเค•เฅ‡ เคชเคฐเคฟเคตเคพเคฐ เค•เฅ‡ เคธเคนเคฏเฅ‹เค— เคธเฅ‡เฅค เคฎเคฟเคฒเฅ€ เค‡เคธ เคฌเคพเคค เค•เฅ€ เคœเฅ€เคคเฅ€-เคœเคพเค—เคคเฅ€ เคฎเคฟเคธเคพเคฒ เคนเฅˆเค‚ เค•เคฟ เคธเคพเคนเคธ, เคฆเฅƒเคขเคผ เคธเค‚เค•เคฒเฅเคช เค”เคฐ เคธเคนเฅ€ เคฎเคพเคฐเฅเค—เคฆเคฐเฅเคถเคจ เคธเฅ‡ เค•เฅ‹เคˆ เคญเฅ€ เคฒเค•เฅเคทเฅเคฏ เคฆเฅ‚เคฐ เคจเคนเฅ€เค‚ เคนเฅ‹เคคเคพ!! ADG PI - INDIAN ARMY EasternCommand_IA MyGov Arunachal Pradesh PRO Defence, Manipur, Nagaland & South Arunachal Facebook- Instagram-

SpearCorps.IndianArmy

10,401 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 1 ะณะพะด ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

โ€œ๐—ง๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐˜€ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ต๐˜‚๐—น, ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐˜‚๐—บ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜." A mountaineering expedition to the formidable Mount Trishul (7,120 m) by the #CorpsOfEngineers was ceremonially flagged off at the Bengal Engineer Group & Centre, #Roorkee. Lt Gen Anindya Sengupta, GOC-in-C #CentralCommand, along with Lt Gen Vikas Rohella, Engineer -in-Chief, Lt Gen SS Dahiya, Colonel Commandant, Bengal Sappers & Military Survey;, handed over the Expedition Flag to the Team Leader, marking the beginning of a demanding journey into the Garhwal Himalayas. The expedition team, comprising experienced Officers, JCOs and Other Ranks, has undergone rigorous acclimatisation, physical conditioning and specialised mountaineering training to negotiate extreme altitude, technical terrain and unpredictable Himalayan weather. Interacting with the team, the Army Commander commended their physical fitness, mental resilience and esprit de corps, highlighting how mountaineering sharpens leadership, endurance, discipline and calculated risk-taking, qualities vital for operational readiness in high-altitude terrain. Carrying forward the proud mountaineering legacy of the Sappers, the team now sets its sights on Trishul, where every step will test resolve and every height will demand courage. "๐—ข๐—ป๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐Ÿณ,๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€, ๐—ข๐—ป๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ต๐˜‚๐—น." #IndianArmy #SuryaCommand #BengalSappers #MountTrishul #Mountaineering #Adventure #GarhwalHimalayas #MissionTrishul ADG PI - INDIAN ARMY PRO Defence Lucknow PRO Defence Prayagraj PIB India HQ IDS PRO & Spokesperson, MoD, Dehradun Region Uttar Bharat

SuryaCommand_IA

13,497 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 23 ะดะฝะตะน ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

Recently, pictures of Jyothi Yarraji receiving her gold medal went viral. Not because of the race. Not because she became Indiaโ€™s fastest woman in the 100m hurdles. But because of ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐˜€๐˜๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฑ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ. An almost empty stadium. No roaring crowd. No packed stands. No national celebration. Just silence. And that silence says far more about us than it does about her. ๐—•๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜† ๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด? Weโ€™ve seen this pattern again and again. In India, sports ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐—ผ๐—ณ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ด๐—ด๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฝ, even when Indian athletes perform at the highest level. That is why, just days earlier, massive crowds had gathered simply to catch a ๐—ด๐—น๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—น ๐— ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ถ. But ask those same people about the state of Indian football, or ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ฎ ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐˜„ ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€, and most would have no idea. The same holds true for hockey, archery, athletics, and dozens of other sports in India. ------------------------ This is what ๐—”๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜†๐—ฎ ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜ often points out: everything ultimately ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ป ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐˜‚๐—ฎ๐—น. As individuals, we donโ€™t know where to put our money, ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป,or what is truly worth celebrating. And this ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜„๐˜€ ๐˜‚๐—ฝ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜† ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€, our systems, our leaders, and even our stadiums. Our politicians, too, are merely a reflection of who we are. That is why change has to begin with the ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜. Change is always inside-out. Outside-in never works, ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป. Real change will always originate from within.

PrashantAdvait Foundation

19,290 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 9 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

AGโšก๏ธDAO x MegaReachXYZ are fusing forces to reshape creator programs + organic #Web3 engagement. Builders, creators, meme coin devs, gamers, artists, reply guys, degens.. ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—–๐—›/๐—”๐—š๐——๐—”๐—ข ๐—ท๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜„ ๐—›๐—ค. Donโ€™t fade this alpha: ๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿผ ๐Ÿ‘ˆ๐Ÿผ ๐Ÿ”บ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜…๐˜-๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—น: โ–ช๏ธ100% organic missions โ–ช๏ธCard/crypto payments โ–ช๏ธEarn, reinvest, grow Itโ€™s a flywheel for creators + communities. Projects get traction. Creators get paid. No fluff! just value. ๐—”๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ? @Mehdi0x1 - ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ, ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น. ๐Ÿ”บ ๐—–๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜? (โณ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ) โ–ช๏ธ ๐Ÿณ๐Ÿฌ% ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—บ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—บ (yes, from day one). โ–ช๏ธRef link = 10% cut from every mission your invites launch. And itโ€™s just getting started: ๐Ÿ”นDegen Mode: 1-click, winner-takes-all chaos (Already #LIVE) ๐Ÿ”นThreads Utility: post offers, approve drafts, pay instantly, no middlemen, no grind (Drops #SOON) AGโšก๏ธDAO is helping push this creator economy live, fast, clean, unstoppable. ๐Ÿ”บ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐— ๐—ข๐—™๐—ข ๐—ก๐—™๐—ง ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—”๐—šโšก๏ธ๐——๐—”๐—ข + MegaReachXYZ. ๐˜๐˜„๐—ผ ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€, ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜†๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—บ. From now on, weโ€™re building as one. MOFOs unlock: โ–ช๏ธUp to ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿฌ% ๐—ผ๐—ณ๐—ณ missions + packs โ–ช๏ธBigger discounts with rarity โ–ช๏ธEvent boosts, multipliers, real utility โ–ช๏ธPart of the mint funds new tools + dev infrastructure on Reach. ๐Ÿ”‘ ๐Œ๐Ž๐…๐Ž๐ฌ ๐š๐ซ๐ž๐งโ€™๐ญ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐œ๐จ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ข๐›๐ฅ๐ž๐ฌ! ๐“๐ก๐ž๐ฒโ€™๐ซ๐ž ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐ค๐ž๐ฒ ๐ญ๐จ ๐จ๐ฐ๐ง๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฌ๐ฒ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ž๐ฆ And the vision? ๐—–๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜€-๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป. Thereโ€™s real potential for us to expand onto chains like Ronin or Abstract, while staying grounded on Base. AGโšก๏ธDAO is opening that door, ๐˜€๐—ผ ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐—น๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐˜€. Discord ๐Ÿ”— in my bio, Join now to get all the benefits early! ๐Ÿค Hope you enjoy the video! thanks for watching! ๐Ÿฅ‚

Alpha ๐Ÿ”บ

34,322 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 1 ะณะพะด ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

๐Ÿ›ฃ๏ธ "๐—™๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฏ๐˜† ๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜, ๐——๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ฏ๐˜† ๐—ฃ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฒ."๐Ÿ๏ธโ„๏ธ ๐—ฆ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜†๐—ฎ ๐—ค๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—˜๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฑ Brace yourself for a journey like no other! The Surya Quest Motorcycle Expedition, in colloboration Royal Enfield, is ready to roar across the majestic Himalayan spine from #Dehradun, # Shimla, #Sumdo, #Kaza, #Leh. This expedition isnโ€™t just a ride, itโ€™s a mission of courage, care & camaraderie, tracing the high-altitude lifelines guarded by our soldiers. Watch - as warriors in olive green and riders in black, ride shoulder-to-shoulder, showcasing the synergy of steel, spirit and service. ๐ŸŽฌ Stay tuned as the full story of grit, horsepower on gravel and hearts beating for the nation, unfolds shortly in next 10 days. #IndianArmy #SuryaCommand #SuryaQuest #RideWithPride #GuardiansOfNorthernBorders #SuryaCommand #AdventureWithPurpose ADG PI - INDIAN ARMY PRO Defence Lucknow PRO Defence Prayagraj PIB India HQ IDS PRO & Spokesperson, MoD, Dehradun Region Uttar Bharat Royal Enfield

SuryaCommand_IA

32,253 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 1 ะณะพะด ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

This is Colonel Rajesh Pawar (Retired). Recently, during a podcast, he claimed that the 'Sarva Dharma Sthal' was established within Army cantonments merely to facilitate promotions and garner fame for senior officers. Oh, you fool! Do you not realize that people of all faiths reside in India and that the Army comprises regiments representing various religious backgrounds? For Example The JAKLI and JAK RIF Regiments, the soldiers are predominantly Muslim; yet, even in those regiments, there is no mosque-only a 'Sarva Dharma Sthal.' The Madras Regiment - Where the soldiers are Christian - there is no church, but rather a 'Sarva Dharma Sthal.' Similarly, The Sikh Regiment there is no Gurudwara, but a 'Sarva Dharma Sthal.' And - most notably - in your own 19 RAJ RIF where the entire unit consists of Hindus, there is no temple; instead, there stands a 'Sarva Dharma Sthal.' As the saying goes, the Commanding Officer is the true 'King' of his unit. Instead of spouting this nonsense here, why didn't you raise these questions while you were still in the service - specifically, why the name of your unit's most sacred shrine wasn't changed back then? After all, during your service, you were working for the country. Now that your resettlement hasn't worked out, you are undermining the very national army that brought you to the position you hold today; in other words, you are biting the very hand that fed you. Intresting Bio Place of Birth:Haryana. School Education: Sainik School Kunjpura, Karnal. Training:NDA Khadakwasla, Pune & IMA Dehradun. Army Service:Served in the Indian Army for over 20 years. Excellence in Sports : Consistently excelled in equestrian sports, swimming and physical fitness. Kargil War:Led military operations on treacherous mountain peaks as a Company Commander during the 1999 Kargil War. 1 PARA SF & SFF: Participated in numerous special and high-risk operations alongside the 1 PARA SF and the Special Frontier Force. CIOPs: Possesses extensive experience in counter-terrorism operations across Kashmir, Manipur, Assam, Nagaland and Arunachal Pradesh. Women's Safety: Following the 'Nirbhaya' incident, he contributed significantly to providing self-defense training to thousands of girls and women. Post-Retirement:International Reported from Ukraine, the Israel-Hamas conflict zone, the Iran-Israel region, and other global conflict zones. Podcasts & CommentarShares candid and incisive views on geopolitics, national security, military reforms and defense policies across various podcasts. Rajesh Pawar ADG PI - INDIAN ARMY Aditya Raj Kaul Panther๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ Abhinav Lt Gen DP Pandey Lt Col Sushil Singh Sheoran, Veteran ThE EcHo BrEaKeRs

Mr BundelKhandi

43,537 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 4 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—ก๐—š ๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ง โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€ 1/2 โƒ๐Ÿ“Œ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ธ ๐—›๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜† ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ข๐—ณ๐—ณ ! ๐—™๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฆ๐—ถ๐˜… ๐—ฌ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜€, the Nation was Systematically gaslit by a Fake, Twisted Narrative, Calculated Silence of the Investigation Agencies, Sold out Media Houses spreading misinformation & Psyops and a Compromised Investigation designed to Bury the Truth behind the Mรผrdรซrs of Sushant Singh Rajput & Disha Salian. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ข๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป of Republic tv, exposing explosive Details frm medical personnel who performed Sushant's autopsy in Cooper Hospital, along with the Bombay High Court's scathing order, pulling up the initial police probe for glaring discrepancies in the Disha Salian Case, ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—˜๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—˜๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜†๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—บ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ฐ๐˜ ๐—ฎ ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ "๐—–๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—–๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜." โƒ๐Ÿ“Œ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—”๐—ป๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ผ๐—บ๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ฎ ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ-๐—จ๐—ฝ The details coming from Mr. Roop Kumar Shah, the mortuary attendant from inside the Cooper Hospital postmortem room, ๐—ฆ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—˜๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—ฆ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—ช๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—œ๐—ป ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ข๐—ณ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—–๐—น๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜(๐—ก๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ): ๐Ÿ“๐—™๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€ & ๐—ฃ๐—ต๐˜†๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ท๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€: How does an Official, Rushed, Bogus, Stealthy Closure Report reconcile testimonies pointing to ๐˜€๐˜๐˜‚๐—ป ๐—ด๐˜‚๐—ป ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐˜€, ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ท๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฏ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฝ๐—ต๐˜†๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฎ with a convenient, pre-packaged suicide/ "no foul play" Narrative? ๐Ÿ“๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—–๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€: ๐—ช๐—›๐—ฌ was the Crucial Videography of the Postmortem Deliberately Banned during crucial procedures? ๐—ช๐—›๐—ข gave the orders to rush through the postmortem under the cover of darkness, while keeping the vital cโ‚น!me scenes unexamined for hrs/ days? ๐Ÿ“๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€: The Systematic Delay in processing evidence in Disha Salianโ€™s case, coupled with the refusal to register an FIR for six long years, was NEVER an administrative oversight... ๐—œ๐—ง ๐—ช๐—”๐—ฆ ๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—•๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—”๐—ง๐—˜ ๐—œ๐—ก๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—œ๐—ง๐—จ๐—ง๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—ฆ๐—”๐—•๐—ข๐—ง๐—”๐—š๐—˜. โƒ๐Ÿ“Œ ๐—ง๐—ผ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—•๐—œ: ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ "๐—–๐—น๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—•๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜‚" ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป To the Agency entrusted with the Faith of 1.4 Billion People: ๐—ฌ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ฆ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜†โ— ๐Ÿ“By rushing to file Closure Reports while Ignoring Expert Medical Opinions, Key Witness Accounts and Glaring Physical Evidence, the CBI turned a Premier Investigative Agency into a Shield For the Powerful. ๐Ÿ“You Did Not Investigate A Cโ‚น! me... You Orchestrated An Exit Strategy For The Perpetrators. โ—When Investigative Agencies Ignore Raw Forensic Red Flags, They Cease To Serve Justice...They Serve The Cabal ! โƒ๐Ÿ“Œ๐—ง๐—ผ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ "๐—–๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—–๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜" ๐—•๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ & ๐—”๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ด๐˜† ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐—ง๐—ผ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜†, ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฎ ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐—–๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜€, ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด "๐—ฆ๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜†๐—ฎ ๐— ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ ๐—๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ" ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€: A PROCEDURAL SUPPRESSION is NOT an Exoneration. A COMPROMISED PROBE is NOT a Certificate Of Innocence. You #Shamelessly Paraded Fake Narratives, Celebrated Prematurely & Demanded Apologies From Thise Fighting For Justice & Accountability ๐—•๐—จ๐—ง ๐—ฌ๐—ข๐—จ ๐—–๐—”๐—ก๐—ก๐—ข๐—ง ๐—ช๐—›๐—œ๐—ง๐—˜๐—ช๐—”๐—ฆ๐—› ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—จ๐—ง๐—› ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฅโ— โƒ๐Ÿ“ŒWhen the Judiciary itself steps in to point out Unexplainable Delays, Missing Blood Evidence, Fabricated Panchnamas and Deliberate Suppression Of Facts, YOUR "CLEAN CHIT" ILLUSION CRUMBLES INTO DUST. โƒ๐Ÿ“ŒNO FORGIVENESS โ— โƒ๐Ÿ“Œ NO MOVING ONโ— โƒ๐Ÿ“Œ๐—ง๐—ผ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฃ๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐˜๐—ผ "๐— ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—ข๐—ป" ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ถ๐—ฟ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜: ๐™’๐™€ ๐™’๐™„๐™‡๐™‡ ๐™‰๐™Š๐™ ๐™ˆ๐™Š๐™‘๐™€ ๐™Š๐™‰! ๐—ช๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐—น๐—น ๐—ก๐—ข๐—ง ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—š๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜! #JusticeForSushantSinghRajput #JusticeForDishaSalian.

๐‘จ๐‘ฏ๐’‚๐’‘๐’‘๐’š๐‘บ๐’๐’–๐’

78,418 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 19 ะดะฝะตะน ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

๐ŸŽฌWHAT IS THIS SCARYNESS??? 1. โ˜‘๏ธ A person who claimed to be a lawyer in Beijing, ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ผ ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ, posted a video sharing his observations. This person stated that they had once lived in Building No. 15, while Yu Menglong passed away in Building No. 18. According to her, the window design there includes a tall frame and sturdy protective grilles. If someone had suddenly jumped out, there would certainly have been signs of damage, yet none were found at the scene. She also emphasized that: - The windows in the apartment open inward rather than outward, making it very difficult for someone to accidentally fall out from a loss of balance. - The height of the window makes the idea of "being drunk and accidentally falling" nearly impossible. - Even under the hypothesis of an intentional suicide, "๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฑ ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—น๐—น ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป", which she found even more illogical. After Yu Menglong's death, many people questioned why the neighbors on the night of the incident remained silent none called the police or spoke out to clarify what happened. This only fueled suspicions of an "๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ธ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ". 2.โœ”๏ธ One of the reasons why Song Yiren became the subject of speculation was that she once lived in the same building as Yu Menglong. This was revealed through photos the actress herself had shared on social media. Some online users even pointed out that the room where Yu Menglong fell had a ceiling lamp identical to the one seen in Song Yiren's photos. A wave of rumors then spread, claiming that Song Yiren had also attended the party with Yu Menglong and then she fled to Japan after the incident. ๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฌ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ 3๐—ฟ๐—ฑ ๐—ณ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—•๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด 18, ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฌ๐˜‚ ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ด๐—น๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ 5๐˜๐—ต ๐—ณ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด. 3.๐Ÿ“ž A brave female lawyer publicly said in the video that she was willing to represent this case for free. However, this action had to pay a high price: the female lawyer disappeared and was suspected of being banned and silenced. ๐Ÿ‘‰ speak up to help Yu Menglong's family prepare the proceedings. 4.โ™Ÿ๏ธ Silence anyone who voices opinions about the case and claims it's fabricated or challenges the police from celebrities to ordinary people. ๐—จ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ "๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด" ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜„ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜๐˜€, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ. 5. โšซ๏ธ A police officer who wanted to question and reinvestigate the case (not from the Chaoyang precinct) was also disciplined and dismissed from his position. 6.๐ŸŒซ๏ธ ๐—˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฌ๐˜‚ ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ด๐—น๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฎ. For example, his music releases, song links, MVs, and event posts on Weibo none of the links can be accessed anymore, even though they were part of his professional work. His name has also been removed from film and television projects. 7.โž• People from outside who wanted to come to Beijing to speak up and demand justice were also advised not to go. They were warned that if they did, it would be very dangerous - they might never be seen again. โ€ผ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‘‰ Blacklist๐Ÿ–ค #ไบŽๆœฆๆœงๅขœๆจ“ไบ‹ไปถ #YuMenglongFallingEvent #justiceforyumenglong #ไบŽๆœฆ่ƒงๅ ๆฅผ #YuMenglong #ไบŽๆœฆ่ƒง #AlanYu #YuMenglong #JusticeforYuMenglong #YuMenglongไบŽๆœฆ่ƒง #ไบŽๆœฆ่ƒง

๋ฏธ๋‚˜๋ฌธ๐ŸŒ™ ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ

155,048 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 11 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

TOPIC #107: PI NETWORK IS A STABLE COIN? -WHO DECIDES PI FULLY OM FIXED VALUE? Dear GCV army, I hope you are all doing great! First of all, I would like to express my sincere gratitude for all your hard work. Many of you have achieved significant milestones, and itโ€™s evident that you are making a great difference. Our influence has grown significantly, with an increasing number of social media posts and YouTubers publicly supporting us. I can see that more and more people are beginning to understand why we advocate for GCV. Today's meeting aims to alleviate any doubts you may have, allowing you to relax and feel confident as we embark on our historic journey together. I will answer the questions Iโ€™ve received and address some important issues we need to focus on to maintain our community's efficiency, particularly regarding our Generals, which will be the topic next weekend. I put the questions I received here. "A question addressed to Ms. Doris Yin in the emergency meeting 1โ€“ In light of the rapidly changing global circumstances and the increasing discussion about stablecoins backed by U.S. Treasury bonds, how do you see the future role of the Pi Network in this context? And what practical steps should the GCV army take now to accelerate this path? 2_ There are those who promote the idea that the price of Pi is what appears in the market (currently around $0.49) and compare it to the price of GCV within the ecosystem (314,159 Pi = 1 good or service). They say if Piโ€™s price rises to $2, it means that the value within The ecosystem is approximately 2 million dollars. With sincere appreciation and discipline." This is from the Arab head of GCV Ambassador Mr. Mohammed. Another question: "Hello, my Global Ambassador, I am Ateba Joseph, Ecological Ambassador in Cameroon And a member of the GCV army, I am delighted to exchange with you. Regarding the meeting with the GCV army on Sunday, July 27, 2025.. Here is my concern: A few days ago, a correspondence indicated that Pi is not or is not yet a stable coin. Upon reading this information, we have provided many explanations to help the pioneers understand this. I hope you will focus more on this statement to further strengthen our understanding of the subject. Thank you for taking my concerns into consideration" Thank you for the above questions; my answers are below. The first question concerns stablecoins. Many pioneers are hoping that Pi can be recognized by the U.S. government as a stablecoin. I wrote an article on this in May. On July 18, 2025, President Trump signed the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act (the GENIUS Act) into law. This legislation establishes a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins and marks the first federal legislation on digital assets enacted since President Trump issued an executive order aimed at making the U.S. the โ€œcrypto capital of the world.โ€ U.S.-issued stablecoins are expected to become the primary means of dollar transactions globally, especially in emerging markets with unstable local currencies. The sponsors of the GENIUS Act estimate that by 2030, stablecoin issuers may collectively become the largest holders of U.S. Treasuries, surpassing foreign central banks. From this, we can see that U.S. stablecoins must maintain reserves backing outstanding payment stablecoins on a one-to-one basis, consisting only of specified assets, including U.S. dollars and short-term Treasury securities. It is clear that the Pi Network will not take this path, as it is not part of our plan. A stablecoin is essentially a digital representation of the U.S. dollar. All stablecoin issuers do not create a new currency; rather, itโ€™s akin to purchasing chips at a casino โ€“ you must use U.S. dollars to buy those chips. However, Pi is a completely new currency. It does not need to be backed up by U.S. dollars or U.S. Treasuries to be used. If that were the case, we wouldnโ€™t need to establish an ecosystem or have a three-year enclosed mainnet. I previously mentioned the possibility of Pi being an algorithmic stablecoin since only algorithmic stablecoins do not need to be backed by U.S. dollars. However, algorithmic stablecoins have faced significant failures in the past. The collapse of the Terra (LUNA) cryptocurrency resulted in a loss of at least $40 billion in market capitalization, with estimates reaching as high as $60 billion. TerraUSD (UST), an algorithmic stablecoin, lost its peg to the U.S. dollar, contributing to its overall collapse. The new stablecoin legislation recently passed through the Senate effectively ties the U.S. Treasury to crypto, as it essentially bets the governmentโ€™s cash flow on digital tokens and market speculation. This legislation requires stablecoins to be backed by short-term Treasury bills, generating an estimated $2โ€“$3 trillion in new demand for government debt, which is nearly half the current size of the T-bill market. On paper, this looks beneficial, but in reality, it creates a circular feedback loop: crypto demand fuels stablecoins, stablecoins buy T-bills, and T-bills fund government deficits. The government becomes reliant on speculative capital flows. Thus, we should understand why the U.S. government will not support the Pi Network as a stablecoin, as they require stablecoin issuers to buy T-bills and can no longer trust algorithmic stablecoins. So, what is the future of the Pi Network as a currency? From my perspective, Pi is already listed on exchange markets. It cannot be classified as a security because it is mined freely and is not an ICO. Instead, it should be categorized as a commodity, similar to Bitcoin and ETH. When a currency is listed for trading on an exchange, its price is determined by the balance of supply and demand. However, Pi is a currency in its own right; it has inherent value from Pi holders -Pioneers. Historically, currency has served as a medium of exchange. A medium of exchange is a widely accepted item for buying goods and services in an economy. It facilitates transactions by eliminating the need for a barter system, where goods are directly exchanged for other goods. In modern economies, money (such as currency) serves as the primary medium of exchange. **Functions of Money:** One of the core functions of money is to serve as a medium of exchange, enabling the smooth transfer of value between buyers and sellers, thereby simplifying trade and economic activity. **Examples:** In modern economies, this typically includes currency (paper money, coins) or digital money. In specific historical contexts, other items, such as cigarettes in prisoner-of-war camps, have also served as mediums of exchange. **Importance of Acceptance:** For a medium of exchange to function effectively, it must be widely accepted and trusted within the relevant community. **Not the Same as a Payment Method:** While credit cards and checks are used for payments, they do not serve as mediums of exchange themselves. Therefore, stablecoin is not a new currency. It is more likely to have a credit card or check character. It is a USD digital status. From the analysis presented, we can draw the following conclusions: The current price of Pi on the exchange market primarily serves as a temporary measure to facilitate broad expansion. While this is not our primary objective, it constitutes a strategic approach towards achieving our mission. To gain a clearer perspective, we must adopt a higher-level view of the overall vision for the Pi Network. The mission and vision of Pi Network clearly articulate that it is not intended to function as a commodity for sale, nor is it meant to be an investment vehicle or a speculative security. Instead, it is crucial to recognize that Pi is designed to be a medium of exchangeโ€”a new form of currency. As pioneers in this venture, we have the unique opportunity to acquire Pi through free mining. However, it is important to note that the current mining rate is relatively slow. To overcome this limitation and to further our goal of mass adoption, it is essential for more individuals to join the Pi Network and participate in holding Pi. One efficient way to accelerate this process is by allowing Pi to be traded on the exchange market, which can result in rapid and widespread adoption. Since Pi can be mined for free, a lower price could make it more accessible to a larger number of people. It's important to focus on our primary goal during this pre-full Open Mainnet (OM) phase: mass adoption, rather than aiming for high prices, which many pioneers expected. Some pioneers want to sell when the price increases, but if too many sell, it could undermine our goal of achieving mass adoption. This scenario is reminiscent of historical instances when shells served as currencyโ€”readily accessible from the sea or buy from the village market. For shells to function effectively as currency, a collective effort was needed to hold and circulate them within the village. If only a select few individuals possess the shells, the currency lacks the necessary circulation to sustain an economy. Hence, our goal should not be centered on achieving a high price; instead, we should strive to make Pi more affordable so that a greater number of individuals can acquire and hold it, thereby fostering a thriving economic ecosystem. Of course, the rising price will build up merchants' confidence to accept it as payment. This is why we refer to it as a buyback campaign, which aims to achieve mass adoption and foster ecosystem confidence. As Pi evolves into a currency, the question of its value becomes pertinent. Given that it is a new currency, its value is not immediately clear. This presents an opportunity for us, the pioneers, to play a crucial role in defining it. The determination of Pi's value is not the responsibility of a central authority such as CT, the government, or the exchange. Instead, it will emerge from a decentralized consensus within the community, which collectively owns Pi. This concept is akin to ancient times when the value of shells was not determined by the sellers. Rather, the value was derived from the collective agreement of the village that utilized them as currency. I hope this elaboration clarifies the distinction between value and price, enabling a deeper understanding of the foundational principles that drive our mission with Pi Network. Pi represents a groundbreaking innovationโ€”a revolution that is poised for long-term economic development on a global scale, rather than perpetuating cycles of plunder and exploitation. By harnessing the power of blockchain technology, Pi empowers ordinary individuals, which creates an inherent conflict of interest with the U.S. government in the short term. Should the U.S. government endorse the Pi Network, it raises questions about the viability of U.S. treasuries and who would ultimately purchase them. Consequently, the government may prioritize support for stablecoins backed by the U.S. dollar and U.S. Treasury securities, as this can help alleviate the U.S. government's issues with limited demand. However, I previously mentioned the potential for Pi to emerge as an algorithmic stablecoin. At that time, the Genius Bill had not yet been enacted. If the Pi Network gains acceptance from the U.S. government, its growth could become rapid and expansive, leading to widespread adoption in other nations. This path would position Pi as a legitimate currency in nearly every country, contingent upon certain conditions. For instance, if the price of Pi in the exchange market can align with the GCV, this could be achieved through a buyback mechanism involving 10 million pioneers. Such a scenario would indicate that Pi differs significantly from past algorithmic stablecoin failures, presenting a compelling case for the U.S. government to view Pi as a low-risk asset. However, it presents a significant challenge to be collectively reached by pioneers, and there are other conditions that we cannot achieve in a short time. While it might appear that Pi Network conflicts with the U.S. dollar or stablecoins in the short term, it has the potential to address the broader issue of overprinting currency, which has plagued the U.S. and many other nations. This would benefit international trade by alleviating concerns about currency appreciation or depreciation in international transactions. The global economy indeed requires a super sovereign currencyโ€”one that ensures stability for future generations and fosters lasting peace and prosperity. To comprehend Pi as a currency, it is crucial to recognize that we must cultivate long-term value by generating GCV data. In the short term, our focus needs to be on establishing a robust exchange market and decentralized applications (DApps) to drive mass adoption. If this is understood, there should be no need to feel discouraged by the current low price of Pi. The true value of Pi as a currency derives not from the exchange market, trading platforms, or governmental endorsement, but rather from our community's collective efforts and engagement. You might wonder how a government could adopt Pi, given that it does not take the form of a stablecoin. I would counter with the example of Bitcoin, which has thrived even in environments where many countries have imposed bans. Currently, Pi is transitioning from its traditional commodity status to being recognized as a currency, meaning governmental awareness of Pi Network is still in development. As such, existing regulations generally pertain to older forms of cryptocurrency rather than our innovative approach. Our branding as a digital currency, rather than a cryptocurrency, is intentional. Dr. Nicolas has expressed concerns that many aspects of conventional cryptocurrencies pose challenges to government frameworks and public trust, often leading to economic harm rather than benefit. Our commitment to Know Your Customer (KYC) and Know Your Business (KYB) protocols distinguishes us by mitigating money laundering risks and protecting Pi holders from speculative practices. Many businesses face bankruptcy or closure because consumers lack the disposable income to engage in spending. Imagine how Pi could enable those businesses to survive and thriveโ€”people could utilize Pi to make purchases and easily convert it into fiat currency to sustain operations, thereby preserving many jobs. The function in our wallet that allows users to "buy" Pi is not merely a feature; it represents a vision for the future where conversion to fiat currency can happen immediately, without dependency on third-party exchanges. Moving forward, we can establish a fixed rate (the GCV) for conversions. Once larger institutions and prominent companies recognize the low-risk profile of joining Pi Network due to its GCV stability, we can expect a considerable influx of participants seeking to gain a competitive advantage. You may ask how companies would finance the purchase of Pi at GCV rates. This is an insightful question. My perspective is that the demand for Piโ€™s stable value will inherently incentivize investments. Much like why individuals purchase stablecoins for their convenience in facilitating cross-border transactions, Pi will appeal to consumers and businesses alike, particularly because we are leveraging Web 3.0 blockchain technology, AI-driven platforms, and a rich ecosystem of decentralized applications (DApps). We are cultivating a loyal customer base that recognizes the value of this innovation. We understand that high-net-worth individuals seek safe investment opportunities. While U.S. treasury bonds currently represent a secure asset class, they are not without risk. Therefore, if Pi Network can maintain a limited supply coupled with blockchain technology and a consistent GCV, it is plausible that affluent investors would allocate a portion of their capital to acquire Pi. This would lead to fiat inflows whenever there is increased demand for Pi, establishing an equilibrium between Pi and fiat currencies. This interplay is why I believe DApps are critically significant. We need broader usage of Pi in real-world applications. I hope my analysis has helped clarify why the price of Pi should not overly concern us. Buying Pi to hold onto it allows pioneers to accumulate more, while building merchant confidence is essential to kickstart the ecosystem. Merchants will be motivated to see Piโ€™s price appreciation since this removes the risks for DApps and service providers who depend on exchange market prices. A rise in demand for Pi will subsequently reduce its supply, which is beneficial for price increases. I look forward to discussing Pi GCV army management in another session. Thank you for your time. Letโ€™s continue striving for greatness together. Doris Yin ๐Ÿชท๐Ÿชท๐Ÿชท Founder, Global GCV Movement Disclaimer: This speech is intended solely for educational purposes within the GCV community. The views and content shared here represent my personal perspective and are part of the GCV movement, but do not reflect the official position of the Pi Core Team (PCT). Pi Network represents a new revolution, meaning there is no existing example for us to follow and no guiding manual. As Dr. Fan mentioned, we cannot predict what will happen around the next corner. Therefore, we must practice and forge our own path. As more people traverse this journey, the road will become clearer.

Doris Yin ไธœๆ–น็ดซ่Žฒ๐Ÿชท

17,742 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 1 ะณะพะด ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ $NWBO ๐——๐—–๐—ฉ๐—ฎ๐˜…-๐—Ÿ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐˜† ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—™๐——๐—” ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐˜† ๐˜„๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜€๐—บ ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ต๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜†. ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐˜ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฒ. #DCVax-L is a vaccine made for each patient from their own dendritic cells, the immune cells that teach the rest of the immune system what to attack, loaded with their own tumor. It treats #glioblastoma, the deadliest brain cancer. An American company developed it, yet Americans have to go to Europe to get it. #DCVaxForBraelyn The FDA has spent the past year writing down how it wants to judge treatments like this one. The core evidence it asks for already exists. One question decides this: can the FDA evaluate DCVax-L for approval under the plausible mechanism framework, on the evidence already generated? Read against every document the agency has published on the framework, the answer is yes. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐˜€ 1. File the biologics license application (BLA) and ask the FDA's biologics center (CBER) for review under the plausible mechanism framework. A BLA is not another trial. It is the dossier the FDA decides on, and the framework changes what counts as sufficient inside it. The framework itself needs no new statute and no special designation. A sponsor asks for it. 2. Ask for full approval on survival, with no new randomized trial. The completed phase 3 is the pivotal study. Mechanism, a related product, a related stage of the disease and independent natural history are the confirmatory evidence. A registry of every treated patient supplies the follow-up. 3. Open access alongside the filing. An expanded access treatment protocol does not have to wait for the BLA; it can begin 30 days after the FDA receives it. Filing the BLA satisfies Right to Try's application condition. ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—™๐——๐—” ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ป Nov 2025, NEJM, Prasad and Makary: the plausible mechanism framework. Five questions. Built for cell and gene therapies first, and available for common diseases, particularly those "for which there are no proven alternative treatments." Feb 2026, NEJM: one adequate and well-controlled study plus confirmatory evidence is the FDA's default basis for approval. Feb 2026 draft guidance: an externally controlled study against a well-characterized natural history can be the pivotal study. Confirmatory evidence includes mechanism, target engagement and "exposure-response on biomarkers and clinical outcomes." The product can target "a well-characterized downstream or compensatory mechanism with a clear mechanistic rationale." June 2026 draft guidance: six conditions under which an external control supports effectiveness. The plausible mechanism framework named as an example of FDA regulatory flexibility in critical settings. "Even small effects may be clinically meaningful when the effect is on survival or irreversible morbidity." Why it exists: to bring regulatory flexibility to individualized therapies where the conventional model does not fit. The guidance names gene and RNA therapies, then says "the general concepts may apply to other types of individualized therapies": therapies that target "a specific pathophysiologic abnormality serving as the root cause of a disease." The FDA's own announcement: the guidance "leaves open the potential that this framework may apply to additional tailored therapeutics provided they directly address the underlying specific cause of the disease." The framework is not a new approval standard. It is how the FDA reads evidence under the standard that already exists. That is exactly why it can be asked for today. ๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐—ด๐—น๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฎ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ No proven alternative: recurrent GBM has no established standard of care. Of 400+ trials since 2005, only one phase 3 in newly diagnosed and none in recurrent disease had shown a survival benefit. High and predictable mortality: the exact case FDA regulations name for historical controls, "certain malignancies." Life-threatening in the regulation's own terms: a disease "where the end point of clinical trial analysis is survival." Individualized: a different product for every patient, made from their own cells and their own tumor, aimed at the root cause, the broken instruction layer. Orphan designation in the US and Europe. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น ๐˜€๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐˜† ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฒ 331 patients, 94 sites, randomized, double blind. 64 of 99 placebo patients crossed over at recurrence, so survival was measured against 2,006 contemporaneous matched control patients from 15 randomized trials. Newly diagnosed: 19.3 vs 16.5 months, HR 0.80, p=.002. Alive at 5 years: 13.0% vs 5.7%. Recurrent: 13.2 vs 7.8 months, HR 0.58, p<.001. That is a 42% lower risk of death. The benefit widened over time, and it was largest in the patients who fare worst. Why no second trial? The completed trial, the crossover and the survival evidence make the case, and the FDA's June guidance names the ethical stake: after "a substantial decrease in mortality," a second trial "would generally present significant ethical concerns." ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜†๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜€ The phase 3 paper named its own limitation: without patient-level control data, "propensity score matching could not be performed." The critics named the missing methods: "propensity score matching or inverse probability weighting." In 2026 Northwest obtained individual patient data from three independent randomized trials and had independent statisticians run exactly those two methods. Propensity score matching pairs each DCVax-L patient with control patients who had the same prognostic profile, so like is compared with like. Presented at BNOS in July 2026; peer-reviewed publication is the next step. Propensity score matching: HR 0.69 to 0.77. Median survival +3.4 to +6.3 months. p .004 to .027. The original cohort-level analysis showed +2.8. When the matching got finer, the benefit got bigger. The survival advantage held under both patient-level methods and was larger than the original cohort-level estimate. Northwest reports sensitivity analyses for hidden confounding; the published paper should give the values. The method has been tested in this exact disease. In May 2026, the INSIGhT investigators replaced their own randomized control arm with propensity-matched external controls. For three drugs that had failed randomized testing, the method also found no benefit: HR 1.00, 0.93, 0.88. "Carefully matched external controls" produced "treatment effect estimates that were similar" to the randomized analyses. The method did not invent a benefit. Applied to DCVax-L, it found one. And the authorship closes the loop. In 2023, Dana-Farber statisticians Rahman, Ventz and Trippa wrote that they were "not aware of independent validations of these analytic methods in a GBM trial context." Rahman and Trippa are the senior authors of the 2026 INSIGhT validation. The critics asked for patient-level data and a validated method. By 2026 both existed. That supports the method the DCVax-L reanalysis used; publishing that analysis in full is step one. And it is the form a BLA requires: FDA guidance says applications "must include" patient-level data for the external control arm. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—™๐——๐—”'๐˜€ ๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜… ๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—น, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ 1. Well-defined natural history: 2,006 controls from 15 randomized trials. 2. Very similar populations: 14 prespecified criteria, chosen by an independent firm, validated against all 15 source trials, now matched patient by patient. 3. Similar treatments: in newly diagnosed disease, surgery, radiation and temozolomide in both groups. 4. Objective endpoint: death. 5. Comparable start: survival from randomization after radiotherapy in both groups. Drop the two control trials that admitted early progressors: HR still 0.80. 6. An effect too large to be bias: five-year survival more than doubled, HR 0.58 at recurrence, and the effect grew when matching tightened. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜€๐—บ ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฎ, ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ The FDA's five elements, quoted exactly from its February 2026 draft guidance ( lines 26 to 32), each answered: 1. "Identifying a specific genetic, cellular, or molecular abnormality with a clear connection between specific alteration and disease indication." (line 26) โœ“ Met: in GBM, the dendritic cells that should teach T cells what to attack are overridden by suppressive immune cells. A tumor never presented for attack grows unopposed. 2. "Developing a therapy that targets the underlying or proximate pathogenic biological alterations." (line 28) โœ“ Met: DCVax-L supplies the patient's own dendritic cells, loaded with their own tumor and prepared outside the suppressive tumor environment, to restore tumor-directed T-cell instruction. 3. "Relying on a well-characterized natural history of the disease in an untreated population." (line 30) โœ“ Met: 2,006 controls from 15 randomized trials, patient-level data from three more, no time-trend in survival 2012 to 2022. 4. "Confirming that the target was successfully drugged or edited or both." (line 31) โœ“ Platform evidence documented; product-specific bridge required. After DC vaccination, cytotoxic T cells increased inside the tumor, and infiltration correlated with survival (P = 0.047); T cell infiltration in the UCLA vaccine-first arm. The FDA is open to confirmation "for a subset of patients"; the BLA should supply DCVax-L's own immune-monitoring results and the bridge to these studies. 5. "Demonstrating improvement in clinical outcomes or course." (line 32) โœ“ Met: longer survival, five-year survival more than doubled, a bigger benefit under patient-level matching. The eight considerations attached, each answered: 1. An individualized therapy aimed at "a specific pathophysiologic abnormality" 2. A "compensatory mechanism with a clear mechanistic rationale" 3. Substantial evidence from "a single adequate and well-controlled clinical investigation with confirmatory evidence" 4. A natural history that lets the effect be "reasonably distinguished from natural variability" 5. An improvement not attributable to "alternative treatments or natural variability" 6. Prespecified analysis plans 7. A reason a new RCT is not feasible 8. A product that "can be manufactured to regulatory quality standards," made for every phase 3 patient: manufacturing experience documented, US CMC review required 13 of 13, every one in the FDA's own words, every one answered from the record, every open step named. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ, ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—™๐——๐—”'๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ป ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€ Mechanism: in the DCVax-Direct phase 1 (a different product: activated dendritic cells injected into diverse solid tumors), more IL-8 and IL-12p40 from each patient's cells went with longer survival, p=0.023 and 0.024. Exposure-response, in the FDA's words. Related product: UCLA's 46-patient randomized phase 1 trial of its own tumor lysate DC vaccine, at EANO this Friday. Both arms got the vaccine; the order was randomized. Vaccine first, 555 days. Checkpoint first, 271. HR 0.32. The order matters: priming before checkpoint release more than doubled median survival. Across the class, a 2024 meta-analysis of seven dendritic cell vaccine trials, 3,619 patients, found HR 0.71 for survival, "indicating a true-positive result." Related indication: the FDA's own example is "a different stage of the same disease." DCVax-L worked at both stages. Independent natural history: national cancer registries, separate from the trial controls, as the guidance requires. Real-world data is expressly allowed. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—บ๐˜€, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ Three published critiques set out the case against the trial. Each point, answered from the record: Endpoint switched to survival? Progression could not be read: 256 of 494 scans needed adjudication. The critics agree: progression-free survival "is not an adequate endpoint for immunotherapy studies because of the phenomenon of pseudoprogression." Survival is the "gold standard," in their words. Cohort-level controls? The critics named the fix: propensity score matching or inverse probability weighting on patient-level data. That is exactly what 2026 did, and the benefit grew. Never validated in GBM? Two of the critics who raised it led the 2026 study showing patient-level external controls reproduce randomized results. Selection? Dropping the control trials that admitted early progressors changed nothing, as above. The benefit was larger in patients with more residual tumor, the opposite of what selection would produce. IDH, a tumor mutation linked to longer survival? Tested centrally in every DCVax-L patient. The gap is in the older control trials. Chosen after the fact? An independent firm, prespecified criteria, validation as above. Then a larger effect against different trials at the patient level. Company author? Data held by independent CROs, analyzed by independent statisticians. Run another trial? The completed program, crossover and survival evidence make a repeat unnecessary; the FDA's guidance names the ethical concern; the BLA documents why a new randomized design is not feasible or ethical. ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜‚๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด The framework also requires that the product "can be manufactured to regulatory quality standards." DCVax-L was made for every patient in a 94-site phase 3, and in 2023 the UK regulator licensed the Sawston facility for commercial manufacturing, with products that "may be exported globally." A UK license is not US approval: FDA inspection and the potency assay go on the table at the pre-BLA meeting. ๐—•๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ธ Longer survival in a disease with no proven alternative at recurrence. 2,151 doses, 5 serious events even possibly related, no autoimmunity, no cytokine storm. It is the patient's own immune system, with one broken link rebuilt. A repair, judged the way a repair should be judged. ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—™๐——๐—” ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜„๐˜€ Right to Try covers a product that has completed phase 1, is in active development and not on hold, and has an application on file. Filing the BLA satisfies the application condition; the others must still hold at that time. Patients must have a life-threatening disease, have exhausted approved treatments, be unable to join a trial and consent, and the manufacturer must choose to provide it. No separate FDA approval of each case. Build the program before filing. An expanded access treatment protocol (21 CFR 312.320) requires completed trials, active pursuit of approval and phase 3 evidence. The trials are complete and the phase 3 is published, so it does not have to wait for the BLA. Treatment can begin 30 days after the FDA receives the protocol, absent a hold. The usual reason a manufacturer holds back is risk: a serious event in a very sick patient gets blamed on the product. The FDA answered that in its April 2026 guidance: it "does not intend to deny, delay, or refuse to approve" a BLA "based solely on an adverse event occurring in the context of expanded access use," and "is not aware of any instances" where one prevented approval. Access is the bridge. Approval is the destination. This is not new for DCVax-L: it has been provided under Germany's hospital exemption and the UK Specials pathway. ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ธ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—น, ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐—ฎ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜† ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜† The framework's guidance: approval is traditional or accelerated "depending on the endpoints used." Survival is the endpoint, so the request is traditional, full approval, with no confirmatory-trial requirement. The FDA can still require postmarketing studies, and the framework's authors named the tool: "collecting real-world evidence to confirm continued preservation of efficacy." A registry of every treated patient, designed before approval. If accelerated approval becomes the route, the regenerative medicine advanced therapy (RMAT) statute lets post-approval requirements be met through registries and "postapproval monitoring of all patients treated with such therapy prior to approval." Every patient treated under Right to Try or expanded access counts. ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜…๐˜ Northwest has pursued the UK first. Its application there has been under review since late 2023, and in July 2026 the UK regulator confirmed it "remains under its initial regulatory review, has not been refused." The US filing is the step that remains. 1. Publish the patient-level reanalysis. 2. Lock in the patient-level control data rights the FDA requires. 3. Report the central IDH results and publish the phase 3 immune data. 4. Request RMAT designation now. FDA must answer within 60 days. 5. File the treatment protocol and build the Right to Try program. 6. Pre-BLA meeting with CBER: plausible mechanism review, six external-control tests answered, manufacturing and potency package. 7. File the BLA with priority review. 8. Build the registry. Approving DCVax-L this way would be the framework's proof beyond genetic disease: an individualized cell therapy, aimed at the root cause of the deadliest brain cancer, carried by a completed phase 3. A win for patients first. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด. ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐˜ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฒ. Disclosure: long $NWBO. Commentary on published and presented data and public FDA documents. Not medical, legal, regulatory or investment advice. DCVax-L is investigational and not approved in the US. Regulatory strategy is the sponsor's decision.

Andrew Caravello, DO

46,627 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 6 ะดะฝะตะน ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

GM GM GM ! (เน‘โœชแ†บโœชเน‘)/โค๏ธ ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—จ๐—ง๐—›๐Ÿ”ฅ โœจ๐…๐ˆ๐‘๐’๐“ โ€” A BIG shoutout to ๐—•๐—•๐—ก๐—ข$ & ๐—œ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ก๐— ๐—ข๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—˜ for the dopest song of ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ“! ๐ŸŽฌ๐—š๐—ผ ๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐˜€๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ & ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐—ผ๐˜„ them, see the full-quality video โ€” links at the end of this article. โ›ฉ๏ธ๐—œ๐˜'๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ธ ๐˜€๐—ผ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐—ธ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐—ธ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜„๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ผ ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜'๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐Ÿ”ป โ™ฆ๏ธAs I mentioned before, I really donโ€™t understand how people keep falling for these infoFi scams and other post-grinding projects. ๐Ÿ”ธIโ€™m talking about Loudio, P33lio, Yapyo, Fukyo โ€” you know them all. You all get RUGGED every time but still keep doing it. ๐Ÿ”ธDo you really think Spermify ( you all know who Iโ€™m referring to ) or other web3 brands give a shit if you lose money, time, and effort? Of course not โ€” but you should. ๐Ÿ”ธAnd hereโ€™s why๐Ÿ”ป ~ ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—–๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ง: The top 10 โ€œinfluencersโ€ you see as web3 gods are not grinding like you โ€” they are paid per post. I know because I was offered the same. Also, they are not real influencers โ€” real influencers charge thousands of $$$ per post and do not shill anything. ~ They donโ€™t give a shit because they get paid upfront. But you shill daily for nothing โ€” and the worst part is, you shill to your own community and followers. Do you even realize how many people lose money because you donโ€™t think about what youโ€™re doing? ~ What if you had to pay back every person in your community who invested in what you shilled and then lost everything? ~ ๐—š๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ช ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—™๐—ž ๐—จ๐—ฃ ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง ๐—•๐—˜๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—ก๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐—ช๐—›๐—”๐—ง ๐—ฌ๐—ข๐—จ ๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ง. Iโ€™m referring to people who have communities that actually follow their calls and post โ€” not just simple creators shilling anything. โ™ฆ๏ธIf you ever see me launch another NFT project or a coin, know that I guarantee your money back if youโ€™re not satisfied. No shady shit โ€” Senpai never toys with peopleโ€™s funds! โ™ฆ๏ธYouโ€™ll rarely see me post anything, because I donโ€™t post bullshit. I donโ€™t want to harm anyoneโ€™s wallet, so I prefer to REFUSE the $$$ โ€” no matter the amount! โ™ฆ๏ธ Youโ€™ll see people saying they never engage in drama โ€” yet all their posts are nothing but attention-seeking drama. Donโ€™t believe me? Just look around. โ™ฆ๏ธ Youโ€™ll see โ€œsmartโ€ mofos claiming other people arenโ€™t organic. Mferโ€ฆ NOTHING in web3 is organic. Not a single post. All the comments are in exchange for something โ€” whether from influencers or projects. They just talk shit coz their accounts & persona are nothing and they are lazy to work for it! โ™ฆ๏ธThereโ€™s a lot of FUD regarding girls in web3. While some girls are real gamers or content creators, keep in mind that literally 95% are managed by dudes โ€” even if the photos or videos are real. Also, notice how many of the girls you guys goon over in web3 today just removed all their booty photos after they got followers & attention, or deleted all the photos with themselves. If anyoneโ€™s curious, DM me โ€” there are peeps that have all their sexy pics, even if they deleted them. ๐Ÿ”ธNow they claim to be gamer influencers, but we also have proof that theyโ€™re completely managed by dudes ( literally the guys confessing they do everything for them ). Iโ€™m not saying all web3 females are fake, but just donโ€™t get fooled bros, ur talking to guys not girls. ๐Ÿ’ฎ๐—œ๐—ณ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚โ€™๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ผโ€™๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐˜€ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ช๐—ฒ๐—ฏ3, ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—น๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚. ๐—ž๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ ๐—ฝ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด โ€” ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ฑ๐—ผ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜†๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฎ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ป, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐Ÿงก โ™ฆ๏ธWhy do I make these posts? Because someone has to, so people donโ€™t get scammed, rugged, and so on! โ™ฆ๏ธIf youโ€™re a bit confused, go read my other posts๐Ÿ”ป ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ โ™ฆ๏ธIf you see Senpai post something, you know itโ€™s legit. โ™ฆ๏ธIf you disagree with what I said, then Iโ€™m sorry โ€” the truth always hurts. I probably touched your little attention-whore soft spot, and thatโ€™s why youโ€™ll never have the balls to post the truth like some of us. Youโ€™re too afraid to harm your perfect ๐—™๐—”๐—ž๐—˜ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—ง๐—”๐—ง๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก! โ™ฆ๏ธ BROKIES DO IT FOR THE B!TCHES! โ™ฆ๏ธ LEGENDS HAVE B!TCHES TO DO IT FOR THEM! โ™ฆ๏ธ I CAN RETIRE JUST WITH MY WRISTโœจโŒš๏ธโœจ โ™ฆ๏ธ SENPAI WILL NOT SHILL YOUR RUGS MOFOS! ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐—๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฎ ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ & ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฝ๐—ต๐—ฎ: ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฏ2 ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—น๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐˜ $10๐—ธ ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜† ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐• ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜. ๐—ช๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฝ ๐—ช๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐Ÿ”ฅ ๐ŸŒธ๐‘ฐ ๐’‰๐’๐’‘๐’† ๐’š๐’๐’– ๐’†๐’๐’‹๐’๐’š๐’†๐’… ๐’•๐’‰๐’Š๐’” ๐’๐’Š๐’•๐’•๐’๐’† ๐’‘๐’๐’”๐’• & ๐’š๐’๐’– ๐’˜๐’Š๐’๐’ ๐’‰๐’‚๐’—๐’† ๐’‚ ๐’๐’๐’—๐’†๐’๐’š ๐’˜๐’†๐’†๐’Œ๐’†๐’๐’… ๐’‚๐’‰๐’†๐’‚๐’…๐Ÿ’œ ๐ŸŽฌ๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—•๐—ฆ๐—–๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—•๐—˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—•๐—•๐—ก๐—ข$: ๐ŸŽฌ๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—•๐—ฆ๐—–๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—•๐—˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—œ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ก๐— ๐—ข๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—˜: โญ๏ธ๐˜๐Ž๐” ๐‚๐€๐ ๐…๐ˆ๐๐ƒ ๐€๐‹๐‹ ๐“๐‡๐„๐ˆ๐‘ ๐’๐Ž๐‚๐ˆ๐€๐‹๐’ ๐“๐‡๐„๐‘๐„โญ๏ธ

๐ŸŒธ๐’๐„๐๐๐€๐ˆ ๅ…ˆ่ผฉ๐Ÿœ

304,968 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 1 ะณะพะด ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

5 Years in Crypto & 4 Years in Content Creation, Hereโ€™s How Iโ€™ve Grown In 2019, I was just a clueless college kid trying to change the AR/VR industry. I skipped college placements and grinded hackathons to find support for my idea. (Clip from those college days below!) Why AR/VR? After joining engineering college, one thing became clear: India is a rat race, best case scenario: life will force you into a stable growth trajectory, if you want asymmetrical growth, think outside the box. Pursue areas where there is no crowd maybe youโ€™ll fail, or maybe youโ€™ll change an industry. In 2020, we hit the jackpot. With Covid there was No more college to waste our time, we grew our startup, built a prototype, and sharpened our skills by freelancing AR/VR projects. By the end of 2020, we were so skilled that companies across India were flying us out to help with their projects. We were earning โ‚น2L/month each in our final semester of college. Our startup, Hovar, had 8 employees. Every single one went on to land 20+ LPA jobs after college. Most were just in their 2nd year when we hired them. In 2020, we got paid in Crypto for the first time. Thatโ€™s when my crypto journey began, passive at first, since the startup kept me busy. In 2021, I had to move to Bangalore for a compulsory college internship. Hovar was paying me โ‚น2L/month for just 3 hours of work daily, but I saw no future in AR/VR. Appleโ€™s headset was delayed, and interest in the industry was dying. It was time to say goodbye to the comfy โ‚น2L/month and find a new industry. Coincidentally, the crypto bull market had just begun. I searched YouTube and realized there was hardly any reliable, to the point source of up to date crypto education. That was the gap I needed. I started winding down Hovar and focused on content creation, while still working 9โ€“6 at the office and grinding on personal projects till 2 AM every day. In April 2021, the second wave of COVID hit. I got lucky Youtube took off. Crypto was looking like a legit career. Hovar was gone, but now I had a full time job in Bangalore and a growing youtube channel. By October 2021, I took another leap. I quit my job to focus fully on content with daily lives, this was with less than 45K subs. Another BIG RISK! My only backup was 6 months of emergency fund. After November 2021, the crypto markets crashed. Money dried up, trading became impossible, and I had to take big losses just to save my portfolio. That phase taught me a lot about risk management and how it is easy to make profits in crypto but how hard it is to keep those profits. 2022 was a nightmare. Nobody was watching my videos. Crypto markets were a dumpster fire. I decided to double down, went deep into the space, made a plan to rebuild my portfolio, and invested everything I had. In 2023, the markets started to recover. My portfolio turned green. 2022, Bear markets had taught me lessons that many 2024 batch students are only learning now. I was consistently making profits with a locked in trade setup system (still use it today). My channel crossed 100K subs. It was time for the next step. I never got comfortable neither with Hovar, nor with my job, nor as a content creator. Building distribution had one goal: Build your own product. I began searching for what to build. Tried smaller services for crypto investors, but they couldnโ€™t scale. Indians werenโ€™t keen on crypto beyond niche group chats. Indian exchanges sucked. Billion-dollar giants existed, yet the experience was awful. I thought regulations were the reason but no. They had just grown too fast in 2021, and their tech wasnโ€™t built to scale. Thatโ€™s why Indian exchanges stutter compared to Bybit or Binance. But was this a problem worth solving? Not really, with heavily funded players and a tight knit ecosystem of people. I floated the idea of building my own exchange. Everyone said it was a terrible idea: bad regulations, no banking support, zero chance of funding, and most importantly why would an influencer, who could easily make 50โ€“70% profits from exchange referrals, work this hard to build an exchange? It was indeed a huge risk. I would lose referral income (the main way influencers make money), burn through my savings, and go against giants. I passed. Risk seemed too high. But the audience changed my mind. Hundreds of comments daily complained about Indian exchanges withdrawal issues, trading engines failing during high volume, no real education beyond half-baked YouTube videos, and more. These problems were tough but solvable. Now I just needed the right people to build with people who wouldnโ€™t second-guess the mission. In 2024, WazirX got hacked. Everyone realized Indian exchanges were not safe. The government wouldnโ€™t help. A gap was forming. I had moved to Dubai, to meet passionate builder to help me build an exchange or at least show me a path and finally, after 6 months felt confident enough to start Fedhabit. Moved back to Banglore after 6 months, Announced the exchange to public in Jan 2025, now weโ€™ve come a long way. It took a lot of effort: finding scalable tech, hiring people crazy enough to go against Goliaths with me, securing FIU registration, and finding a bank bold enough to take a chance on us. What a ride. With FedHabit Alpha successfully concluded, just a few steps remain before launch. And Iโ€™m told thatโ€™s when the real struggle begins. Letโ€™s keep grinding. There is no gain without pain.

Neel Kukreti

26,438 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 1 ะณะพะด ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

$NWBO #๐——๐—–๐—ฉ๐—ฎ๐˜…-๐—Ÿ: ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—˜๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฃ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐˜€ A short, plain-language reading of the survival evidence for DCVax-L in #glioblastoma, and what it means under the MHRAgovuk guideline on external control arms. ๐Ÿ“Š ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜: ๐—ช๐—›๐—”๐—ง ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—™๐—ข๐—จ๐—ก๐——, ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—ช๐—›๐—ฌ ๐—œ๐—ง ๐— ๐—”๐—ง๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฆ DCVax-L more than doubled five-year survival, and the benefit is durability: a subset gets lasting disease control and simply stays alive. ๐Ÿ’‰ ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ด ๐—ถ๐˜€ DCVax-L is a personalized cancer vaccine for glioblastoma, the deadliest form of brain cancer and a designated orphan disease. It is a living drug: its active ingredient is the patient's own immune cells, primed with proteins from that patient's surgically removed tumor, so the immune system learns to attack the cancer. Unlike a chemical drug that is metabolized and cleared, it switches on a living immune response that keeps working long after the injection. Glioblastoma comes back in almost everyone: even with the full standard of surgery, radiation, and temozolomide chemotherapy, most patients live under two years, and only about one in twenty reaches five. DCVax-L is given on top of that standard care, not in place of it: every patient in the trial received surgery, radiation, and temozolomide, and the vaccine was added to it, so the comparison measures what the vaccine adds. For two decades, nearly every new drug tried in this disease has failed. That is the backdrop against which any positive result must be judged. ๐Ÿ“ˆ ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ In a Phase 3 trial of 331 patients, those who received DCVax-L lived longer. At the median the gain looks modest, about three months (19.3 versus 16.5). The number that matters sits at the far end of the survival curve: more than twice as many vaccine patients were alive at five years, 13.0% versus 5.7%, and a few reached ten years in a disease that usually kills within three. In patients whose tumor had already returned, the effect was larger still, cutting the risk of death by about 42%. ๐Ÿ‘ฅ ๐—˜๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฝ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ, ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜ The benefit was not confined to the easy cases. Of the six prespecified subgroups the trial examined, every single one favored DCVax-L, and there was no group in which it did worse than standard care. The largest gains came in patients whose tumors carry MGMT methylation, who reached a median survival of 30.2 months from randomization against 21.3 for the controls. But even the hardest-to-treat patients, whose tumors lack that methylation, resist standard chemotherapy, and carry the worst prognosis in this disease, still came out ahead with the vaccine, at a hazard ratio of 0.93. A treatment that helps across the whole population, and helps most where the biology is most favorable, is acting like a real drug. ๐Ÿ“‰ ๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐˜€๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜† That five-year number is the whole story, and the median buries it. Almost every treatment that ever helped in glioblastoma did the same modest thing: it slid the survival curve a few months to the right, then let it fall back. Doubling five-year survival is different in kind. A three-month gain at the median cannot, by itself, double the fraction alive at five years. The only shape that produces both numbers is a split: most patients get the small delay the median measures, while a subset gets durable disease control that lasts for years, well past where glioblastoma should have ended them. That subset is the long tail of the curve, and it is where the benefit lives. A median ignores extremes, the way a town's median income tells you nothing about its millionaires. The real story is not a longer delay; it is that a meaningful share of patients simply stay alive. ๐Ÿงฌ ๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ด๐˜† ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ The tail is not luck. It is what this biology is built to produce. The vaccine carries proteins from the patient's own tumor, so it aims the immune system at whatever that tumor is made of, not a fixed short list of targets. And it amplifies: one trained immune cell drives many others that multiply into cancer-killers. Andres Salazar, the neurologist who developed poly-ICLC into the clinical adjuvant given with the vaccine, puts it in a line: you start the fire, and you keep it burning. A response like that does not produce a one-time bump. It builds and widens over time. What matters is not just that a response forms, but what kind. Dendritic cells are the immune system's master switch for that, the cells that set what kind of attack the body mounts, and this vaccine is built from them. It drives what immunologists call a type 1 polarized response: an interferon-driven, cytotoxic program aimed squarely at the tumor. That direction comes from the vaccine itself; the poly-ICLC adjuvant given with it drives the same interferon program and sustains it. That is the active ingredient, and it has been measured. In UCLA studies of this approach, the patients whose immune systems mounted the strongest interferon response lived the longest. The response also spreads. In a different cancer, a vaccine carried on this same poly-ICLC adjuvant drove more than 70% of a patient's cancer-killing T cells to target proteins that were never in the vaccine: the immune system outgrew its original targets and went after the rest of the tumor on its own. This is called epitope spreading, and it is not particular to one tumor; it is what this kind of response does, and it is the kind of response DCVax-L builds. That breadth is the likeliest thing separating the long-term survivors from everyone else, a response that breaks past its targets and clears the disease rather than one that stays caged and stops. There is even a tell in who benefits most: the effect is largest in tumors whose biology builds up more mutations under chemotherapy, and more mutations mean more targets for a whole-tumor vaccine to find. The same logic explains what the vaccine is not, and what it does not need. Checkpoint inhibitors, the drugs that release the immune system's brakes, have failed on their own in glioblastoma because there was no active response to release; the vaccine supplies that response first. That makes the vaccine the natural foundation for combination therapy. Combining it with its poly-ICLC adjuvant, made by Oncovir, has already shown meaningful survival gains in a published analysis. In the pivotal trial, the vaccine's proven benefit came added on top of standard chemotherapy and radiation; the newer question is how much the immune response can carry on its own. A UCLA trial is now testing that in patients whose tumors have returned, adding #Keytruda (pembrolizumab), the checkpoint antibody from $MRK, in a regimen built entirely around the immune response with no chemotherapy or radiation in it at all. Its interim survival curve shows the shape the biology predicts. In the arm given the vaccine and Keytruda together after surgery, the curve does not fall away but flattens into a plateau, with roughly 65% of patients still alive well past the point where recurrent glioblastoma kills nearly everyone. That plateau is the signature of a response that took hold and lasted, the type 1 attack forming durable immune memory so that once the disease is controlled it stays controlled. That is where this points, and where it is already arriving, a treatment that works through the response itself, one that could in time lean less on the harsh radiation and chemotherapy that have defined glioblastoma care and barely moved its survival. These are interim results, from Prins, Cloughesy, and Liau at UCLA. ๐Ÿ” ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง ๐—ง๐—ช๐—ข: ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—œ๐—ง ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—Ÿ? The trial was randomized, an independent experiment shows the outside comparison is trustworthy, and every separate check points the same way. ๐Ÿค” ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ท๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ต๐˜† ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ธ So much for what happened; the harder question is whether to believe it. The trial has the feature critics attacked: it could not keep a normal placebo group, because patients assigned to placebo were allowed, by design and by medical ethics, to switch to the vaccine once their cancer returned, and almost all did. That erased the internal comparison, so survival was measured against closely matched patients from other completed trials, an approach called an external control, which critics argued could tilt toward the vaccine. What the objection misses is where the randomization went. This was a randomized, blinded trial. The patients who got the vaccine were assigned to it at random, not hand-picked, so the treated group is an ordinary slice of the trial population, not a favorable one. The crossover removed the placebo group but never touched how patients were assigned. That leaves exactly one place for bias to enter, the outside comparison group, which is precisely what the next checks test. โœ… ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ต๐˜† Before trusting a scale to weigh something unknown, you confirm it reads zero with nothing on it. That is what the calibration does, and it is the strongest part of the case. A separate, independent randomized trial called INSIGhT was run through the very same external-control method, and it gave two answers. First, three experimental drugs that had already failed were run through it, and it correctly found nothing (hazard ratios of 1.00, 0.93, and 0.88): the method does not manufacture a benefit where none exists. Second, INSIGhT's external controls were set head to head against its own randomized internal controls, and they were statistically indistinguishable. In this disease, an external control reproduces the answer a real randomized control would have given, and because that trial belonged to a different group, no one can say a sponsor graded its own work. The one place bias could enter, the control side, is the one place an independent randomized experiment certified as clean. There is a deeper fit worth naming, and it is what makes the two halves of this case one. The same instrument that reported those three failures as failures reads the vaccine as a success, and the biology says why: those drugs could not hold a tumor this varied, and the vaccine builds the broad, lasting response that finally does. One method, opposite readings, and one mechanism behind both. The statistics and the biology are not two arguments. They are the same argument seen twice. ๐Ÿƒ ๐—ช๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ป ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ'๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ฟ? A natural worry is that the outside comparison was arranged after the fact to flatter the vaccine. The trial was built to prevent that. The patients to compare against, and the rules for matching them, were fixed in writing before anyone saw results, and an independent firm, not the company, chose the comparison trials against those rules. The trial also switched its main measure partway through, from delaying tumor growth to overall survival, but that was not a maneuver: immune treatments cause a harmless swelling that mimics tumor growth on scans and made the growth measure unreliable, and the switch was made while everyone was still blinded. Three further checks point the same way. Survival in this disease has not improved over the years the comparison spans, so same-era controls are sound. When the borrowed controls were tested directly, the comparison came out conservative rather than flattering. And the controls were counted from the same point in the disease as the vaccine patients, so neither side got a head start. Where the comparison can err, it errs against the drug. ๐Ÿ”ฌ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—น ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜†๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฟ, ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ ๐˜€๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฟ The first comparison used whole groups. A sharper one became possible once patient-level records from three other trials could be obtained, pairing each vaccine patient with controls matched on the traits that drive survival in glioblastoma, above all MGMT methylation status, matched exactly, plus age, sex, extent of surgery, residual disease, and performance status. When the comparison got sharper, the benefit grew in every one of these analyses. The original cohort-level estimate was 2.8 months. Patient-level matching across the three trials put the gain between 3.4 and 6.3 months, and a method that weights patients rather than pairing them put it between 3.4 and 4.3, with several of the matched comparisons roughly doubling the original figure. The hazard ratio moved the same way, from 0.80 to between 0.69 and 0.77. The direction matters. A real effect blurred by crude matching gets clearer when the matching improves, while a biased one tends to shrink. It got stronger. ๐Ÿ•ต๏ธ ๐—›๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—บ๐˜‚๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜† A fair question is how much hidden bias it would take to erase the result. Statisticians measure that with the E-value, and here a hidden factor would have to be about as strong as age is on survival, would also have to drive who received the vaccine, and would have to have escaped the decades of research that mapped every known risk factor in this disease. A second, independent check, Rosenbaum's Gamma, comes at it from the other side, asking how large an unseen imbalance between matched patients it would take to break the result, and it reaches the same verdict. Every factor strong enough to matter was already matched. A hidden one that clears that bar is not plausible. ๐Ÿ”’ ๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜‚๐—น๐˜ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ The strongest point is not any single result. It is that a hidden bias big enough to explain the effect away would have to produce the same answer in every independent test at once: โ€ข The independent randomized calibration trial. โ€ข Three separate comparison trials, drawn from different studies. โ€ข Two different statistical methods that handle the data in different ways. โ€ข A separate pooled analysis of other dendritic-cell vaccine trials. โ€ข The internal math of the survival curve, which points to the same result (about 0.71 at five years) that the patient matching found. And it would have to fall in the exact direction the biology predicted before any data existed: a slow, widening benefit concentrated in long-term survivors. A single hidden factor that could forge all of that at once is not a hidden factor. It is a coincidence that does not happen. ๐Ÿฉบ ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง ๐—ง๐—›๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—˜: ๐—ช๐—›๐—”๐—ง ๐—œ๐—ง ๐— ๐—˜๐—”๐—ก๐—ฆ The drug is nearly free of harm, the evidence fits an established and approved regulatory path, and what remains unrun changes nothing about the case. ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜† Two things decide whether a real effect reaches patients: whether the drug is safe enough to use, and whether regulators will accept the evidence. The first is settled. Across 2,151 doses, only five serious side effects were even possibly related to the vaccine, with no autoimmunity and no cytokine storm. It is made once, in about eight days, then stored and given as a simple injection. When a treatment barely harms, the benefit needed to justify it falls, and the benefit here clears that lower bar easily. โณ ๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฎ ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—น๐˜† ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜„ A reasonable person asks why the sharper analysis appeared in 2026 and not in 2023. The answer is access, not choice. The patient-level analysis was written into the trial's plan from the start, to run if and when the data could be obtained. The company tried and could not get it in 2023, because the trials that held it had not released it; it became available later through a data-sharing repository, on the data owners' timeline, not the company's. The stronger analysis was always the plan. It was waiting on data that other parties control. ๐Ÿ”„ ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜€๐—ผ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ The vaccine helped not only newly diagnosed patients but also those whose tumor had already come back, and there the effect was the largest seen anywhere in the trial. In that group, median survival ran 13.2 months from recurrence against 7.8 for the controls. The separation opened immediately, with 90.6% of vaccine patients alive at six months against 64.0% of controls, and the lead held to the later marks, where survival more than doubled: 20.7% against 9.6% at two years, 11.1% against 5.1% at two and a half. These are the original cohort-level results, already published. The high-resolution patient-level matching that was applied to the newly diagnosed group has not yet been done here, for a practical reason: it needs patient records from other recurrent-cancer trials, held by a European research organization that shares them through its own formal request. Obtaining them is a routine next step, not an obstacle, and the newly diagnosed experience suggests the sharper analysis would only make the recurrent result stronger. The approval case rests on the newly diagnosed evidence, so nothing important depends on this step; it would simply sharpen a result that is already the strongest in the trial. ๐Ÿ›๏ธ ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—น Regulators do not treat an external control as a first choice, but the MHRA's guideline allows it in exactly this situation: a severe disease where a placebo trial is not ethical or feasible, and an effect large enough to interpret despite the design. The guideline even gives its own worked example of an acceptable external control, and it reads almost like a description of this trial: a rare disease, no ethical placebo, same-era standard-of-care controls, an objective survival endpoint, and an effect too large to blame on bias. DCVax-L fits on every count, and it was the first medicine ever to receive the MHRA's Promising Innovative Medicine designation, which asks essentially the same questions. The newly diagnosed case carries the decision on its own evidence, and regulators weigh that evidence against the disease it treats: in a cancer this lethal, with nothing better on offer, the question is whether the benefit is large, clear, and consistent enough to act on, and a benefit of this size, pointing the same way from every direction, is. ๐Ÿ“œ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ External controls are not a novelty invented for this drug. Over the past two decades they have factored into roughly forty-five drug approvals by the United States regulator, each granted under the conditions that apply here: a serious or rare disease, a placebo that would be unethical, and high unmet need. Regulators do not grant this lightly. They grant it when the disease is serious, its course is predictable and objectively measured, and the effect is large. Glioblastoma meets all three. The named cases cover every part of this disease's profile. Defibrotide, for a life-threatening transplant complication, was approved on a propensity-score comparison to a historical control, the same kind of method used here. Blinatumomab, for an aggressive relapsed leukemia, is the precedent for a fast-killing cancer, cleared by both the United States and European regulators. Cerliponase alfa is the precedent for a fatal brain disease, cleared by both agencies on treated patients versus a matched natural-history group. Glioblastoma is both at once, a fast-killing cancer of the brain, read by the same method, so no part of its profile lacks a close approved precedent. And on the one axis that governs how far an external-control result can be trusted, DCVax-L goes beyond all three. Each of those drugs was tested in a single-arm trial, with no randomization at all. DCVax-L began as a randomized trial and became an external-control comparison only when ethics consumed its placebo group. It sits in that tradition, and at the top of it. ๐ŸŽฏ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜๐˜๐—ผ๐—บ ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ This began as a randomized trial. Medical ethics forced it into an external-control comparison. Every independent way of checking it, on different data and different math, points the same direction, and the biology predicted that direction in advance. The first analysis did not overstate the vaccine's effect. Read with the right tools, it understated it.

Andrew Caravello, DO

11,406 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 2 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

Elon Musk just sat in JP Morgan's headquarters and explained the next 20 years in one conversation. Most people will clip the IPO headline and move on. Here is what they will miss. SpaceX lists on Nasdaq on June 12 under ticker SPCX. $135 per share. 555 million shares. $75 billion raise. $1.77 trillion valuation. The largest IPO in the history of financial markets, surpassing Saudi Aramco by more than double. But the IPO is not the story. The IPO is the funding mechanism for the story. Starlink V3 satellites are 10 to 20 times more capable than the current constellation. Each one is too large for any rocket except Starship. Starship carries 50 per mission. V3 delivers 100 times the bandwidth at half the latency. Musk's stated goal is over 100,000 V3 satellites in orbit. That is not a communications upgrade. That is a full replacement of global internet infrastructure from space. Then there is the part nobody is covering. SpaceX is building AI data centres in orbit. Solar power plus radiators plus laser links connecting directly to Starlink, which penetrates cloud cover and reaches the ground regardless of weather. The moon play goes further. Low gravity. No atmosphere. Rail guns launching AI data centres into deep space. Solar panels manufactured from moon materials. Target: 1,000 terawatts of AI compute from lunar orbit versus approximately 1 terawatt achievable from Earth. That is a 1,000x compute expansion that does not require a single permit on the ground. Then there is the chip problem, which nobody is solving fast enough. Musk stated it directly: there is not a single high-volume computer memory fab operating in the United States right now. Zero. The Terafab he is building in New York is not optional. It is the missing piece the entire AI compute race depends on. Now connect everything. Starlink V3 provides the bandwidth backbone AI and robotics require. Space-based data centres provide compute that cannot be built fast enough on the ground. The Terafab provides the chips both need. Grok and xAI provide the software layer running across all of it. The $75 billion IPO funds the next decade of buildout. Morningstar currently values SpaceX at $780 billion, roughly 48% below the IPO target. They call xAI a material threat of value destruction. The bears are reading the balance sheet. The bulls are reading who controls the rails of the AI economy in 2035. xAI spent $7.72 billion in Q1 2026 alone and posted a $2.47 billion operating loss in the same period. That number will concern a lot of people at the roadshow. It will not concern the people who understand what is being built. When the Union Pacific was laying track to California, nobody lived there yet, either. The people who understood this before will not need to explain themselves later.

2xnmore

14,481 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 3 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

The Enemy Within: An American Muslim Claims - The U.S. is the Enemy of Islam By: Ofer Binshtok Sheikh Ahmad Musa Jibril, whose many followers rely on his vast and profound knowledge of Islam, positions the United Statesโ€”his birthplace and country of citizenshipโ€”as an enemy of Muslims. He asserts that the West, led by the U.S., fundamentally opposes Sharia and Tawhid, listing it alongside Israel and Russia as part of a hostile coalition against Islamโ€™s victory. To him, Islam views the U.S. as an enemy, and every believing Muslim must recognize this. "The army of the Jews is a stoneโ€™s throw away with tanks and planes, waging war alongside the U.S.," he says, yet emphasizes: "They achieve a stunning, lightning-speed victory"โ€”a clear allusion to the conquest of Damascus and the fall of Assad through Jihad. He declares Jihad as "the central pillar" of Islam, rejecting any permanent treaty with disbelievers like the U.S., who "will never accept Sharia," as it negates the struggle to impose Allahโ€™s laws. Citing verses such as "And fight them until there is no more fitnah" (Al-Anfal 8:39), he permits only temporary truces. Jibril sees the victory over Assad as a step in the Jihad to establish Sharia, paving the way to defeat the U.S. and Israelโ€”Islamโ€™s primary enemies. Details of His Criminal Acts: In 2004, Jibril was convicted in Detroit, alongside his father, on 42 serious charges: conspiracy, bank fraud, mail fraud, money laundering, tax evasion, and possession of firearms and ammunition as a felon. The prosecution uncovered a sophisticated scheme involving the destruction of his properties to collect insurance money, resulting in losses of about $400,000. A mail carrier identified mail sent to over 80 aliases, and fake voter registration cards under fictitious names were found at his sisterโ€™s home. Sentenced to 6.5 years in a maximum-security prison in Terre Haute, Indiana ("Guantanamo North"), he was released in 2012 and ordered to pay $250,000 in restitution. These crimes reveal a pattern of criminal behavior that aligns with his views. Background: Sheikh Ahmad Musa Jibril is an Islamic-American preacher, a graduate of the University of Medina in Sharia, and holder of a law degree from Michigan. He gained prominence through his lectures on Tawhid and Jihad, attracting numerous followers who admire his deep knowledge, though he sparked controversy after his 2004 conviction. His words are seen as influential among Jihad supporters via social media. Part Two: Implications for the U.S. and the Historical Dimension Muslims in the U.S. who adopt Jibrilโ€™s worldview pose a cunning and dangerous internal threat lurking within American society. With his profound knowledge, he makes it clear this is a religious duty for every believer, backed by commands like "And fight them until there is no more fitnah (non-Muslims)" (Al-Anfal 8:39) and "Slay the Mushrikun (non-Muslims) wherever you find them" (Al-Tawbah 9:5), perfectly aligning with Jihadโ€™s practical actions. They live in the U.S. but are loyal to a vision aiming to topple it from withinโ€”part of a 1,400-year Islamic colonialist campaign that began with Muhammadโ€™s sword, conquering Persia, Byzantium, and Spain, replacing entire cultures with Sharia. For them, the U.S. is a future battlefield, continuing a patient tradition that waited centuries to seize "infidel" lands. Americaโ€™s internal security faces a severe threatโ€”not immediate, but as part of a long, calculated historical process that Jibril and his followers represent. They exploit democratic freedoms to grow stronger and plan, just as Islam waited before Constantinople fell in 1453. The victory over Assad proves their plan is in motion, and the U.S. is a future target that could take decades or centuriesโ€”a strategy that reshaped the world over 1,400 years and, in their view, will succeed again. Chapter on Additional Supporting References: As stated in Quran 8.39: "...fight them until disbelief (non-Muslims) disappears and the whole Dean (way of life) is for Allah alone...(for Islam)โ€ As stated in Quran 9.5: โ€œ...kill the Mushrikun (non-Muslims) wherever you find themโ€ฆ" Al-Bukhari: "To wage war against Allah means to reject faith in Him." As stated in Quran 2.191: "The sin of disbelief in Allah is greater than committing murder." - The concept of Jihad as defined by Sharia law. 09.0 JIHAD (0: Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada, signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad, "We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad." The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as: (1) "Fighting is prescribed for you" (Koran 2:216); (2) "Slay them wherever you find them" (Koran 4:89); (3) "Fight the idolators utterly" (Koran ); and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari and Muslim that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said: "I have been commanded to fight people until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah"; and the hadith reported by Muslim, "To go forth in the morning or evening to fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and everything in it." Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally attended, some twenty seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent others to fight. himself remaining at Medina, and these were forty-seven in number.) THE OBLIGATORY CHARACTER OF JIHAD 09.1 Jihad is a communal obligation (def: c3.2). When enough people perform it to successfully accomplish it, it is no longer obligatory upon others (0: the evidence for which is the Prophet's saying (Allah bless him and give him peace), "He who provides the equipment for a soldier in jihad has himself performed jihad," and Allah Most High having said: "Those of the believers who are unhurt but sit behind are not equal to those who fight in Allah's path with their property and lives. Allah has preferred those who fight with their property and lives a whole degree above those who sit behind. And to each. Allah has promised great good" (Koran 4:95). If none of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there was a possibility of having performed it. In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims. The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: 09.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, "Jihad is a communal obligation," meaning upon the Muslims each year. The second state is when non-Muslims invade a Muslim country or near to one, in which case jihad is personally obligatory (def: c3.2) upon the inhabitants of that country, who must repel the non-Muslims with whatever they can). 09.2 jihad is personally obligatory upon all 'those present in the battle lines (A: and to flee is an enormity (dis: pH)) (0: provided one is able to fight. If unable, because of illness or the death of one's mount when not able to fight on foot, or because one no longer has a weapon, then one may leave. One may also leave if the opposing non-Muslim army is more than twice the size of the Muslim force). 09.3 Jihad is also (0: personally) obligatory for everyone (0: able to perform it, male or female, old or young) when the enemy has surrounded the Muslims (0: on every side, having entered our territory, even if the land consists of ruins, wilderness, or mountains, for non-Muslim forces entering Muslim lands is a weighty matter that cannot be ignored, but must be met with effort and struggle to repel them by every possible means. All of which is if conditions permit gathering (A: the above-mentioned) people, provisioning them, and readying them for war. If conditions do not permit this, as when the enemy has overrun the Muslims such that they are unable to provision or prepare themselves for war, then whoever is found by a non-Muslim and knows he will be killed if captured is obliged to defend himself in whatever way possible. But if not certain that he will be killed, meaning that he might or might not be, as when he might merely be taken captive, and he knows he will be killed if he does not surrender, then he may either surrender or fight. A woman too has a choice between fighting or surrendering if she is certain that she will not be subjected to lin indecent act if captured. If uncertain that she will be safe from such an act, she is obliged to fight, and surrender is not permissible). Source: Reliance of the Traveller - Revised Edition. The Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law 'Umdat al-Salik by Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri (d. 769/1368) in Arabic with Facing English Text, Commentary, and Appendices. Edited and Translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller. Amana publications-Beltsville. Maryland U.S.A. Page 599-601. [CERTIFICATION OF AL-AZHAR] IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, MOST MERCIFUL AND COMPASSIONATE al-Azhar Islamic Research Academy. General Department for Research, Writing, and Translation. Mr, Nuh Ha Mim Keller. Amman, Jordan. Peace be upon you, and the mercy of Allah and His blessings. To commence: In response to the request you have submitted concerning the examination of the English translation of the book 'Umdat al-salik wa 'uddat alnasik by Ahmad ibn Naqib in the Shafi'i school of jurisprudence, together with appendices by Islamic scholars on matters of Islamic law, tenets of faith, and personal ethics and character: we certify that the above-mentioned translation corresponds to the Arabic original and conforms to the practice and faith of the orthodox Sunni Community (Ahl al-Sunna wa al-Jama'a). There is no objection to printing it and circulating it. The stamping of the pages of the above-mentioned work with the seal of the department has been completed. May Allah give you success in serving Sacred Knowledge and the religion. Peace be upon you, and the mercy of Allah and His blessings. Composed on 26 Rajab 1411 A.H.l11 February 1991 A.D. General Director of Research, Writing, and Translation Fath Allah Ya Sin Jazar [signed] Muhammad 'Umar Muhammad 'Umar [signed] Seal of al-Azhar [stamped] General Department for Research, Writing, and Translation. - Can Islam live in true peace with the infidels? No. By: Ofer Binshtok Only Hudna (truces), a temporary ceasefire, is made because Islam is in a weak position against the infidels. Hudna buys Islam time until its power overcomes the infidels, and then it will exterminate them, in accordance with Allahโ€™s commands from the Quran and Muhammad. *According to Muhammad, Bukhari 1765, the earth belongs to Allah and his messenger, to Islam: Bukhari 1765: "โ€ฆThe Messenger of Allah (๏ทบ) said: I want this... - He said to them (the same words) the third time (and on getting the same reply) he added: You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostleโ€ฆ" * According to Allah, from Qur'an 47.35, Allah commands the believers, do not seek peace when your hand is uppermost: Qur'an 47.35: "โ€ฆSo do not weaken and call for peace while you are superiorโ€ฆ" * When Islam is in a position of weakness against the infidels, they have a holy command from Allah from the Quran and Muhammad to lie to the infidels to buy time: Muhammad in Bukhari hadith 3029: Allah's Messenger (๏ทบ) called,: "War is deceit". Muhammad in Hadith Sahih, in Tirmidhi 1939: โ€œLying in time of warโ€. The message from Quran 3.28: Permission to lie to disbelievers as a defense, when Islam is in a state of weakness. Taqiyya. The message from Quran 16.106: "...Whoever disbelieves in [i.e., denies] Allฤh after his belief...except for one who is forced [to renounce his religion] while his heart is secure in faith..." * Indeed, Islam is in a constant state of war against the infidels: โ€œIslam is in an eternal state of war against heresy and disbelieversโ€. Quran 9.29 begins with: โ€œFight those who do not believe in Allah...โ€ The message is also from Quran 8.39 Fight the disbelievers until only Islam will exists in the world. Quran 9.123 begins with: "O you who believe, fight those disbelievers who are near you..." The message is also from Hadith Bukhari 25: "Fight the disbelievers until they all convert to Islam and only then will their lives and property be protectedโ€ฆ" * In 628 AD, Muhammad moved towards Mecca with an army of 1,400 warriors, a force that was not strong enough to face the mechanical army of the Quraysh tribe. This is why he signed the Hudna Treaty of Hudaybiya, a temporary 10-year ceasefire with the Quraish tribe. An agreement that was considered humiliating for him since he was forbidden to sign it while mentioning his status as a prophet and messenger of Allah. But Muhammad saw this agreement as a victory that gave him time to break the Quraysh's defense agreements with third parties (Bukhari 2731-2732). Which indeed allowed him a year later, in 629, to also attack the Jews of Khaibar. * According to Sharia law, hudna is a temporary ceasefire agreement for ten years; this is the only agreement that Muslims are allowed to sign with the infidels: * TRUCES (Hudna) 09.16 (O: As for truces, the author does not mention them. In Sacred Law truce means a peace treaty with those hostile to Islam, involving a cessation of fighting for a specified period, whether for payment or something else. The scriptural basis for them includes such Koranic verses as: (1) "An acquittal from Allah and His messenger..." (Koran 9:1); (2) "If they incline towards peace, then incline towards it also" (Koran 8:61); as well as the truce which the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made with Quraysh in the year of Hudaybiya, as related by Bukhari and Muslim. Truces are permissible, not obligatory. The only one who may effect a truce is the Muslim ruler of a region (or his representative) with a segment of the non-Muslims of the region, or the caliph (o25) (or his representative). When made with other than a portion of the non-Muslims, or when made with all of them, or with all in a particular region such as India or Asia Minor, then only the caliph (or his representative) may effect it, for it is a matter of the gravest consequence because it entails the nonperformance of jihad, whether globally or in a given locality, and our interests must be looked after therein, which is why it is best left to the caliph under any circumstances, or to someone he delegates to see to the interests of the various regions. There must be some interest served in making a truce other than mere preservation of the status quo. Allah Most High says, "So do not be fainthearted and call for peace, when it is you who are the uppermost" (Koran ) Interests that justify making a truce are such things as Muslim weakness because of lack of numbers or materiel, or the hope of an enemy becoming Muslim, for the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made a truce in the year Mecca was liberated with Safwan ibn Umayya for four months in hope that he would become Muslim, and he entered Islam before its time was up. If the Muslims are weak, a truce may be made for ten years if necessary, for the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made a truce with Quraysh for that long, as is related by Abu Dawud. It is not permissible to stipulate longer than that, save by means of new truces, each of which does not exceed ten years. The rulings of such a truce are inferable from those of the non-Muslim poll tax (def: 011); namely, that when a valid truce has been effected, no harm may be done to non-Muslims until it expires. * In 630 AD, Muhammad's power increased; he broke the agreement with Quraish and moved towards Mecca with about 10 thousand warriors and conquered it. The Quraish tribe converted to Islam, and Muhammad abolished the religious tolerance that existed in Mecca. With his own hands, he began to destroy the 360 holy sites for the different religions that lived there in mutual tolerance and harmony. He abolished this tolerance and left only the Islamic holy site. * Quran 8.58, in fact, allows Muslims to cancel any contract for "fearโ€ that the other party will break it. Not because the other party violated the agreement, but only out of fear. So signing an agreement with Islam is basically meaningless. Quran 8.58: "If you are afraid of the treachery of some of your allies, you may disregard your treaty with them. God does not love the treacherous ones." In conclusion: As a religious command, from Allah, from the Quran, from Muhammad, and from Sharia law: * Islam is in a constant state of war against the infidels, until it destroys them. * When Islam is weak, the believers are commanded to obtain a hudna (temporary ceasefire) so that they can gain strength that will surpass the strength of the infidels. * There is no meaning in signing an agreement with Islam since they are allowed to violate it at any moment. * When the power of the believers exceeds the power of the infidels, the believers are ordered to abandon the Hudna agreement and destroy the infidels. - A Muslim must be loyal only to the Islamic Ummah By: Ofer Binshtok The identity of the Muslim is solely to be a part of the global Islamic Ummah, without any connection to a nation-state or to another culture that is not the Islamic Ummah. The idea of independent Islamic nation-states contradicts the Islamic idea as it is found in the Quran and Muhammad's Sunnah. A Muslim, wherever he is in the world, is part of the Islamic Ummah. A Ummah that should be ruled by a caliph through Sharia law. Islam is a global political-religious worldview of a world without borders. The existing Islamic nation-states are actually an act of heresy. A disbeliever who converts to Islam must completely break away from his former identity, become part of the Islamic Ummah, and serve its purposes personally. Every Muslim, wherever he is, is personally obligated to act so that the Islamic Ummah will be establishedโ€”that is to say, to collapse every nation-state that exists in the world so that the Islamic Ummah will replace it. The fact that the idea of Ummah is included in the central motif of the Quran is evidence of the vital significance of this concept. In Islamic terminology, the term "Ummah" refers to the religious community, also known as the Islamic holy community. This is the primary interpretation of the phrase found in the Quran. Quran 5.51: "O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as Auliyรขโ€™ (friends, protectors, helpers), they are but Auliyรขโ€™ of each other. And if any amongst you takes them (as Auliyรขโ€™), then surely he is one of them. Verily, Allรขh guides not those people who are the Zรขlimรปn (polytheists and wrong-doers and unjust)." Quran 2.143 "Thus, have We made of you an Ummat justly balanced, that ye might be witnesses over the nations, and the Messenger a witness over yourselves; and We appointed the Qibla to which thou wast used, only to test those who followed the Messenger from those who would turn on their heels (From the Faith). Indeed it was (A change) momentous, except to those guided by Allah. And never would Allah Make your faith of no effect. For Allah is to all people Most surely full of kindness, Most Merciful." Quran 3.104 "Let there be one nation of you, calling to good, and bidding to honour, and forbidding dishonour; those are the prosperers." Quran 3.110 "You are the best nation produced [as an example] for mankind. You enjoin what is right and forbid what is wrong and believe in Allah. If only the People of the Scripture had believed, it would have been better for them. Among them are believers, but most of them are defiantly disobedient." Quran 16.92 "And be not like her who undoes the thread which she has spun after it has become strong, by taking your oaths a means of deception among yourselves, lest a nation may be more numerous than another nation. Allah only tests you by this [i.e who obeys Allah and fulfills Allah's Covenant and who disobeys Allah and breaks Allah's Covenant]. And on the Day of Resurrection, He will certainly make clear to you that wherein you used to differ [i.e. a believer confesses and believes in the Oneness of Allah and in the Prophethood of Prophet Muhammad SAW which the disbeliever denies it and that was their difference amongst them in the life of this world]." Tafsir Al-Qurtubi, volume 1, page 649: Muhammad said, "The earth was made a mosque for me." Sahih al-Bukhari, 3167: "The Prophet said, "If you embrace Islam, you will be safe. You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle." - Islamic Conquests Throughout History

Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - ืขื•ืคืจ ื‘ื™ื ืฉื˜ื•ืง

122,846 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 1 ะณะพะด ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

My Letter to Aaron Rodgers I'm writing this letter because I've slowly realized how difficult it is to impact change in the world. It requires influential people to see the paradigm shift. Recently you were asked by executive producer Al Dukes about Malaysian Airlines Flight 370. You responded indicating you were familiar with the videos. I understand your skepticism. Those videos aren't what anyone expected. It's frankly too much for most people to accept. The videos represent the largest conspiracy in history, the theft of a Boeing 777 and the suppression of gravitational manipulation. Where this science and technology leads is to Free Energy. I want you to know I'm just a normal guy who saw two videos, investigated them, the missing plane, and discovered we really are hiding 'magical' technology from the world. In a situation this profound you have to start by proving the lie. In this case it's the false narrative we've been sold on by the media of the missing plane. This was not pilot suicide and the United States knows exactly what happened. Planes don't crash without leaving massive debris fields. There was over 1000lbs of foam seat cushions and not one was found. The pilot didn't practice the route, the simulator data flightpath was of MH150 to Jeddah the pilot was scheduled to fly on Feb 4th. The simulator data was ruled not suspicious. The pilot was categorically ruled out by all parties including the officials, family, and friends. Florence De Changy got his medical records from his family and confirmed there were no red flags. Where the plane was lost from radar there was still five radars in range from three different countries, Indonesia, Thailand, and India. None of these countries have ever made their data publicly available. As you pointed out, Rolls Royce and Boeing also know what happened to this plane as Rolls Royce engine data transmits frequent updates. Rolls Royce has never made their data publicly available either. The United States military has a global persistent surveillance system known as SBIRS, the Space-Based Infrared System by Lockheed Martin. There's no possible way this system would not have seen the debris field of a Boeing 777 in the ocean. The military also has a system called SOSUS, the sound surveillance system which is a global network of acoustic detectors that can even pinpoint a tiny submersible implosion. Remember when the Navy heard the Titan sub pop and didn't say anything for five days? There's no evidence the plane crashed in the South Indian Ocean. There's also acoustic detectors in Diego Garcia and Western Australia both of which should have heard the plane crash in the SIO, yet a recent study by Cardiff University found no detections during the duration of the suspected flightpath. One candidate detection was found on one hydrophone almost an hour after the plane would have run out of fuel. Over the Horizon Radar can see for thousands of miles by bouncing signals off the ionosphere. Both Pine Gap and Diego Garcia should have been able to track the plane from take off to crash. The plane also flew directly past Cobra Gold/Cope Tiger military exercises between Thailand and the United States in the Andaman Sea. We're supposed to believe they weren't tracking a rogue plane? Why did the United States give up the search for MH370 after just a month? Ghyslain Wattrelos, French father and husband, was told by an intelligence source that the Americans know what happened and there were two AWACS (radar planes) in the area. As for the debris that was found, I believe that is from MH370. However, there's not enough debris to confirm a plane crashed and the debris washed up on the wrong continent. Drift modeling was done and the bulk of the debris should have washed up in Australia. It's actually impossible based on the currents for the debris to have shown up on mainland Africa in just one year. If you look at a map a much better location for the debris to have entered the water is the Maldives. The only reason we think the plane even went into the South Indian Ocean (SIO) is the Inmarsat satellite pings who has connections to US intelligence. The raw telemetry data was not released until March 27th, 2014, eight days after the satellite video was uploaded on youtube. This is important because there's coordinates in the satellite video that indicate the Nicobar islands, the same location the plane is believed to have turned into the SIO. What really happened to MH370 is an emergency event related to the 487lbs of dangerous lithium ion batteries onboard. This even is supported by at least 20 witnesses and the flightpath. Mike McKay saw the plane on fire briefly for a few seconds from his oil rig, nine witnesses along the coast heard loud noises as the same time, eight fishermen who saw it flying low ten minutes later, a man on the coast who saw it on fire, and Katherine Tee, who saw the plane in the Nicobar Islands an hour later glowing orange, with dark smoke coming out of the back of it, flying low and descending. Why did the Malaysian Minister of Defense say they didn't send up jets to track the plane because they knew it was commercial and not hostile? The only way they could know that is if they had communication with the plane. They simply didn't release all the communications publicly. China intercepted a communication from the US Navy that was only reported in the China Times of the plane disintegrating and attempting an emergency ditching, consistent with Katherine Tee's sighting and the MH370 videos. I spoke with Billie Vincent recently, former security director for the FAA. In 2014 even before the batteries were known to be on the plane he had deduced that a fire emergency event was the most likely scenario. He suspected this because of similar incidents such as UPS Flight 6 where the same thing happened. One pilot was knocked out from the smoke and they couldn't land because they couldn't see. The plane ended up crashing. Dr. Victor Ettel is an expert on the science and manufacturing of lithium ion batteries and he too is on the record theorizing that the battery fire could have knocked out the people on the plane. Expert Clive Irving agreed and said that MH370's turnback was consistent with the pilots trying to find the nearest airport. Lithium ion batteries were later banned as cargo from passenger planes. Why cover up a fire event? The MH370 videos are why. Just like how you are skeptical, those videos are not something the public is ready to accept even in 2024, let alone in 2014. I had a hard time accepting it until I spoke to government related engineers and started reading scientific papers. It's all real and it's hidden in plain sight. I'm not sure if the fire was an accident and we were trying to save the high value passengers, the 20 Freescale Semiconductor engineers connected to US Aerospace and Defense, or if it was a counter-espionage operation from the start. I expect the reason why we teleported the plane is multi-purposed. Retain the passengers if alive, retain sensitive cargo, and send a message to our adversaries. Don't F with us. Even if China/Russia knew there's nothing they could possibly say. No one would believe them. China leaked satellite imagery a few days after the plane went missing and it looks just like three orbs around a larger object. They also hacked Malaysia the day after the plane went missing and stole classified information about the plane. We have two military videos in perfect synchronization from two completely different angles without a discrepancy on a single frame. The videos corroborate the overall fire event. We see the plane flying low, descending, with smoke coming out of the back of it. We see a heat signature in the belly of the plane where the smoke is presumably coming out of the AC heat exhaust ports near the landing gear. Lieutenant Commander Edward C. Lin leaked the videos. The case against him is shrouded in secrecy and the sentence he got after a plea deal is disproportionate to the charges. The timeframe of his service with the spy plane squadron VPU-2 Wizards is damning, within one month of the plane going missing. His lawyer said the classified information in question is available on the internet and he was caught with flight manifests that include search and rescue code names. The science of the orbs is everything that ufo lore claims exists. Gravity manipulation, mass reduction, warp drives, wormholes, and zero-point energy. I was surprised to learn they're all directly connected by the same science. Spacetime is not empty. It is filled with energy in an equilibrium state. 'Gravity' is just an induced phenomenon based on relative energy densities. If you reduce the equilibrium state of the energy densities in a localized region you produce 'negative energy.' That's what the dark lines in front of the orbs are doing. That's why the orbs are simply falling into the geodesic path they're creating for themselves, and exhibit zero inertia. This is subluminal warp drive. The orbs are also showing characteristics of magnetic monopoles, which is why we see the odd shaped heat signature. They are made of plasma and we're looking at low energy nuclear reactions, also known as cold fusion. The field that creates the spherical region is the non-radiating barrier of the magnetic field. The zap itself is an endothermic event, an absorption of energy. That's why it's black and cold in the thermal drone video. As far as I know this is the first ever endothermic event on video. Just like folding a piece of paper and making a hole, this plane is 'teleporting' to a different location in Spacetime, faster than the speed of light from the observer's prospective. For the people going through the wormhole, it's like going through a doorway. Based on the plane flying East in the satellite video and the right hand rule in electrical engineering, the vector of travel for the plane is backwards, to the West. A fire suppression device washed up in the Maldives a few weeks after the plane disappeared and 15-20 islanders on a small island saw the plane in the early morning hours on the day of the disappearance. It's extremely suspicious that this evidence was dismissed without investigation. The only logical place to hide a the plane is at US military base Diego Garcia, isolated from all major landmasses, out of radar range, and not open to commercial traffic. This base is extremely secretive. There's people who accidentally washed ashore there a few years ago and they've not been allowed to leave. I could keep going. The satellite video is a Citrix remote terminal session logged into the real satellite database. The orbs displace the smoke trails with accurate fluid dynamics in the satellite video. There's a ton more evidence and it all points to the MH370 videos being the authentic true story of what happened to the plane. I don't want people to blindly believe me. I want them to make up their own minds based on the evidence. The only thing I can do is show people the door, they must walk through it for themselves. The videos and the science will be proven to be real with the passage of time. Science like this cannot be hidden forever. It is a discovery, not an invention. The scary question is, "why are we hiding it?" For that, I've reached a dark conclusion. This technology will lead to the eradication of our civilization. With this technology we can extract endless energy directly from the zero-point fluctuations. 'Free' energy. We can produce weapons of unfathomable destructive capability including a black hole. I push for disclosure because I want the world to understand the risks and choose our own fate.

Ashton Forbes

106,781 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 2 ะปะตั‚ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

A wild bobcat. Cold, open water. A body that was never built for this. This is an animal that can kill a deer. The water was about to beat it anyway. Watch the video first. Then read on. What happens in the final seconds is the reason I can't stop thinking about it. . Some clips you watch. Some clips you feel in your chest for an hour afterward. This is the second kind, and I want to explain exactly why, because once you understand what you are actually looking at, you will never watch it the same way again. This is a long one. Every section ends with something that makes the next one worth it. Stay with me. . 01 // THE COLDEST MATH IN THE WILD Let's start with something nobody tells you about water. Water is a thief. It pulls heat out of a living body up to 25 times faster than air at the same temperature. Not a little faster. Twenty-five times. It is the reason a cold day is uncomfortable and a cold swim is an emergency. Now put that math on an animal wearing a fur coat. Fur works because of what is trapped inside it: air. Thousands of tiny pockets of warm air held against the skin. The air is the insulation. The hair is just the scaffolding that holds it in place. Soak that coat and the air is gone. What was a winter jacket becomes a wet towel wrapped around the body. It is heavy. It drags. It bleeds heat at the exact moment the animal can least afford to lose it. And swimming is not free. A cat does not swim the way an otter swims. Otters are engineered for it: dense waterproof fur, webbed feet, a body shaped like a torpedo. A bobcat is engineered for something completely different. Every stroke burns fuel it does not have, while every second in the water drains the fuel it already has. That is the trap. Heat goes out. Energy goes out. Nothing comes in. In humans, the first minute in cold water triggers what physiologists call the cold shock response: a gasp reflex, a spike in heart rate, panicked breathing. Then comes the slow part, where muscles and nerves cool down and stop doing what you tell them. Animals do not get an exemption from physics. Bodies are bodies. Survival experts who study cold water use a simple frame for humans, the 1-10-1 rule. One minute to get your breathing under control after the initial shock. Ten minutes of meaningful muscle function before your limbs start refusing orders. About an hour before hypothermia becomes the real threat to life. Now shrink the body. A smaller body has more surface area for its mass, which means it sheds heat faster. Those human numbers are a generous best case. For a 20-pound animal, the clock runs quicker. So when you see a wild animal in water it did not choose, you are not looking at a swimmer. You are looking at a countdown. Here is the part that should bother you: the animal does not know it is a countdown. It only knows that it has to keep moving, and that stopping is not an option, and that there is nothing solid anywhere. Hold that thought. Because the next thing I am going to tell you is why this particular animal is the last one you would expect to be in that position. . 02 // THE "BIG HOUSE CAT" LIE Somewhere along the way, someone decided a bobcat is basically a large housecat with attitude. Somebody was wrong. Let's do the numbers. A typical house cat weighs 8 to 10 pounds. Most adult bobcats land somewhere between 15 and 30 pounds, with big males pushing past that. That is two to three times the mass, and none of it is soft. It is wire and spring: long hind legs built to launch, shoulders built to hold, claws that retract and reset like a trap. By widely cited estimates, a bobcat can cover roughly 10 feet in a single leap. That is not a pounce. That is a projectile. It hunts the way the best hunters do: by being patient past the point where patience seems reasonable. It picks a spot. It goes still. It waits, sometimes for a very long time, until the world arranges itself into a single clean opportunity. Then it ends the situation in a second. Rabbits and hares are the staple. Mice, voles, squirrels, birds. But here is the detail that changes how people talk about them: bobcats have been documented taking down deer, animals much larger than themselves, particularly in harsh winters when deer are weakened. Think about what that means. This is a creature that routinely wins fights against animals that outweigh it. It has ear tufts that scientists still argue about. It has a ruff of fur around the face like a lion in miniature. It has a stubby tail, four to seven inches long, that gave the animal its name. It has a spotted coat that is essentially camouflage for dappled light, and, useful fact, the spot pattern is different from one animal to the next, which is how researchers identify individuals on trail cameras. And it has a voice. Purrs, hisses, growls, and a night scream that has been mistaken for a human in distress by people who did not know what they were hearing. So this is who we are talking about. Not a pet. Not a pushover. One of the most efficient small predators on the continent. Which is what makes the situation in this video so strange. Because everything I just told you about strength, speed and pride goes quiet when the ground disappears. . 03 // THE ANIMAL YOU HAVE PROBABLY WALKED PAST Here is a fact that should feel a little unsettling. Bobcats are one of the most widespread wild cats in North America. Their range stretches across the lower 48 states, into southern Canada, and down into Mexico. Forests, swamps, deserts, mountains, the ragged edges of suburbs. They are adaptable in a way that very few predators are. And yet most people, including people who have lived their entire lives near them, have never seen one. That is not an accident. Bobcats are solitary, shy, and mostly active around dawn and dusk. They live in the margins. They move through your world at times you are not looking, and they have made avoiding you into an art form. A bobcat's entire survival strategy is to see you first and never be seen. Which means any video of one, let alone a close, unhurried, unguarded look at one, is rare. Wildlife photographers wait years for angles like this. Researchers set up cameras and come back to empty memory cards. Now think about what it takes for a wild bobcat and a human being to end up in the same small space, with the animal not running. The animal has to be in a situation where running is no longer possible. That should give you chills. Because it is not a heartwarming meeting. It is what happens when a very proud animal has run out of options. And what happens next is the part that does not add up, which is exactly where the next section starts. . 04 // THE PART THAT DOES NOT ADD UP Predators do not do calm. A wild animal's nervous system is a hair trigger. When something big and unfamiliar closes in, the body floods with adrenaline and cortisol, and the decision tree is short: fight, flee, or freeze. Every instinct it has been born with says a large, upright, two-legged creature is the most dangerous thing in the environment. So when a wild animal is calm around humans, there are only a few explanations, and none of them is "it decided to trust us." Sometimes the animal is habituated, meaning it has lived near people so long it has stopped treating them as a threat. Sometimes the animal is so depleted, cold, hurt or exhausted that its body has quietly shut down the option to fight. Biologists have a name for one version of this: tonic immobility, a kind of involuntary freeze in which an animal goes still and unresponsive when escape seems impossible. And sometimes it is a mix of all of it, in ways science is still working out. Here is the line I want you to remember, because it will save you from a lot of bad internet takes: Do not confuse calm with consent. Stillness is not friendship. A quiet animal is not a tame animal. And some of the most dramatic moments in wildlife rescue come not from the fight, but from the moment the body stops fighting and everyone has to figure out what that actually means. There is even a documented condition, capture myopathy, in which the sheer stress of being restrained can damage a wild animal's muscles and organs badly enough to kill it, sometimes hours or days after the event, with no visible wound at all. Handling stress is a real cause of death in wildlife work. That is why professionals move slowly, keep things dark and quiet, and treat every second of contact like it costs something. Which means that in a situation like this, the difference between a good outcome and a tragic one can be invisible to the naked eye. That is what makes the footage so tense to watch if you know what to look for. And I am going to tell you exactly what to look for. But not yet. First I need you to understand how unlikely it was that anyone was there at all. . 05 // NATURE HAS NO AUDIENCE Almost everything that happens in the wild happens unwatched. Think about that for a second. Billions of small emergencies, every single day. Animals slipping, trapped, lost, starving, stranded. A fawn separated from its mother. A bird with a broken wing. A predator that misjudged a jump by an inch. Almost none of it is ever witnessed by anyone. No camera. No rescuer. No witness. It simply happens, and then it stops, and the world continues as if nothing occurred. For a rescue to happen, a chain of things has to line up. Somebody has to be in the right place. Somebody has to be looking in the right direction. Somebody has to notice a small, wet, dark shape in a huge moving surface, and understand what it is. Somebody has to decide to act rather than say "huh" and keep going. And somebody has to actually know how to help without making it worse. Break any single link and the story ends before it starts. Every viral rescue video you have ever seen is a chain like that, where all the links happened to hold. I think that is why these clips hit differently than almost anything else online. They are not just proof that an animal survived. They are proof that the chain can hold. That in a world that mostly does not look, sometimes someone does. The cold math says this animal had little time. The odds say nobody should have been there. And yet. I keep circling that "and yet." . QUICK PAUSE Before we go deeper, a small experiment. Without scrolling back up, answer this in your head: how long was the animal in that water before anyone noticed? Got a number? Now hold it loosely. The truth about time in a moment like this is that it never feels like what it is. Seconds stretch. Minutes vanish. Nobody in a crisis has an accurate clock. Keep your number. We will come back to it. . 06 // WHY YOUR BRAIN CANNOT SCROLL PAST THIS Let's zoom out, because this is the part that fascinates me professionally. In 2012, two Wharton researchers, Jonah Berger and Katherine Milkman, studied thousands of New York Times articles to figure out what makes online content spread. Their finding was not what most people expected. Positivity helped, but what mattered even more was how much physical arousal a piece of content produced. Awe, anger and anxiety, all high-arousal emotions, made people share. Sadness, which is low-arousal, made people stop. Now look at a clip like this through that lens. It has anxiety: will the animal make it? It has awe: this is a wild predator, close enough to see the texture of its fur. It has relief, and something bigger than relief. Psychologist Jonathan Haidt has a word for that bigger thing: elevation. It is the warm, expanding feeling you get when you witness someone behaving with unexpected goodness. It is the emotion that makes people want to be better, to call their mother, to do something kind. It is exactly the kind of emotion that makes people hit share before they have even finished watching. And then there is the mechanism behind the hook itself. In 1994, the behavioral economist George Loewenstein described what he called the information gap theory of curiosity: curiosity is the discomfort of noticing a gap between what you know and what you want to know. The bigger the gap, and the closer you feel to closing it, the harder it is to look away. That is what I did in the first three lines of this post. I gave you a wild animal, a disaster, and an unanswered question. Your brain has been carrying that open loop ever since. You cannot un-notice it. You can only close it. That is not a trick. It is how attention has worked since the first campfire story. The only difference now is that the campfire fits in your pocket and never goes out. There is one more thing, and it may be the most important one. Animals do not perform. They cannot posture for a camera, hide their fear behind a joke, or spin the story afterward. Their reactions are uncut. In an internet made mostly of people curating themselves, a wild animal reacting honestly to a moment is about as authentic as content gets. And in a feed that is ninety percent outrage, ten percent ads, and the occasional argument about sandwiches, a clip that is about competence and kindness feels like finding cold water in a desert. So no, it is not weird that you cannot look away. It would be weirder if you could. . 07 // 15 BOBCAT FACTS THAT CHANGE HOW YOU SEE THE CLIP You now know what the water does and what the animal is. Here is the rest of the file, fast. 1. The scientific name is Lynx rufus. "Rufus" means reddish. The animal has been carrying a color-coded label for centuries. 2. It is the most common wild cat in North America, which makes how rarely people see one even more remarkable. 3. Bobcats are ambush hunters, not chasers. They win by patience, not by endurance. Long chases are not their thing, and long swims are definitely not their thing. 4. Yes, bobcats can swim, and they do it when they have to: crossing rivers, fleeing danger, following prey. But it is a tool of last resort, not a hobby. 5. Kittens are born in spring, usually in litters of two to four, and the mother raises them alone. Dad is not part of the picture. 6. A kitten's eyes open at around a week and a half old. It will stay with its mother for most of its first year before heading off to find a territory of its own. 7. Young bobcats leaving home can travel dozens of miles looking for a place to settle. That means young animals are the ones most likely to end up somewhere unfamiliar, in situations nothing in their short lives prepared them for. 8. Bobcats mark territory with scent, scrapes and scratched trees. Their world is written in a language we mostly cannot read. 9. When they cannot finish a meal, they often cover the leftovers with leaves, snow or debris and come back for it later. Forward planning, from a cat. 10. They climb trees and use them for escape and lookout. If a bobcat ever wanted to get out of a situation, vertical was its first idea. 11. Their ear tufts are still debated. Camouflage? Hearing? Communication? Nobody has a definitive answer, and I love that. 12. Bobcat and Canada lynx are cousins, not twins. Lynx have longer ear tufts, bigger paws for snow, and a fully black-tipped tail. A bobcat's tail is black only on top of the tip, like someone dipped a paintbrush and stopped halfway. 13. Coat color changes by region. Desert animals run pale and sandy. Northern animals run darker and grayer. Same species, different wardrobe. 14. A bobcat is not closely related to a cougar. It belongs to the Lynx genus. The cougar belongs to another. When people call it a "baby mountain lion," a biologist somewhere loses a year of their life. 15. In the wild, life is often short and hard. Many bobcats do not make it to ten years old. In captivity, they can live far longer. Which tells you what the wild costs, every single day, on top of everything else. Fifteen facts. One conclusion. Every one of these facts describes an animal built to survive. Which is exactly why watching one in trouble is so hard to forget. . 08 // SIX MYTHS ABOUT WILD CATS AND WATER Since we are here, let's clear up some things. MYTH 1: All cats hate water. FALSE. Tigers swim. Jaguars swim. Fishing cats literally dive for a living. The idea that cats are universally water-averse comes from house cats, and even that is a generalization. Plenty of wild cats are comfortable in water. It is not fear of water. It is that most cats do not choose it unless there is a reason. MYTH 2: If an animal can swim, it is safe in water. FALSE. Being able to swim and being able to survive in water are two different skills. Temperature, distance, current, exhaustion and time all matter. A strong swimmer can lose to cold long before it loses to drowning. MYTH 3: A tough predator does not need help. FALSE. Toughness is not immunity. Predators die of exposure, injury and exhaustion all the time. Being at the top of a food chain does not mean being at the top of every situation. MYTH 4: A calm wild animal is a friendly wild animal. FALSE. We covered this. Calm can mean cold, tired, hurt or in shock. It does not mean safe to touch. MYTH 5: Wild cats attack people constantly. FALSE. It is the opposite. Bobcats avoid people so well that many humans go a lifetime without seeing one. Encounters that end badly are extremely rare, and most involve an animal that is sick, cornered or handled. MYTH 6: Rescue is easy. FALSE. Rescue is the visible five percent. Underneath it are timing, knowledge, restraint, risk and an enormous amount of luck. Six myths. Not one of them survives contact with the footage. . 09 // THE SECOND HALF OF EVERY RESCUE Here is something the clips never show you. Getting the animal out is the first half of the story. The second half is quieter, slower, and matters just as much. When a wild animal ends up in professional hands, the priorities are almost the opposite of what your instincts tell you. Warmth, calm, darkness and silence come first. Then a medical check for injuries, dehydration and hypothermia. Then, if all goes well, recovery in a space where the animal sees as little of humans as possible. Yes, as little as possible. Good rehabilitators deliberately avoid cuddling, talking to, or bonding with wild patients, because an animal that gets comfortable around people is an animal that struggles to survive once it goes back out there. The goal is never a rescued pet. The goal is a released predator. And when it is possible, animals are often returned to the area where they were found, because that is the territory they know: the routes, the hiding places, the food, the neighbors. So the real happy ending of a wildlife rescue is not a hug. It is a door opening, and an animal walking through it without looking back. Hold on to that image. It will matter in a minute. . 10 // PLEASE DO NOT TRY THIS I am going to be blunt, because the comment section will not be. Every time a clip like this goes viral, thousands of people write some version of "I would have grabbed it too" or "I want to keep it." Please do not. A wild bobcat is not a pet. It is a wild predator with claws, teeth, and a nervous system built to treat contact as an attack. Even a small, exhausted, seemingly docile animal can injure a person badly in a fraction of a second. Bites and scratches from wildlife can carry infection. Rabies in bobcats is uncommon, but it is real, and that is not a gamble you take on a hunch. And as we covered, the danger runs both ways. The stress of being handled can hurt or kill a wild animal even when nobody meant it any harm. In many places it is also illegal to keep or transport wild animals without permits, which means the well-intentioned rescuer can end up in a legal mess and the animal can end up worse off. So what should you do if you ever find a wild animal in trouble? Keep your distance. Keep noise and movement low. Do not try to pick it up, feed it, or warm it up yourself. Call your local wildlife agency, animal control, or a licensed wildlife rehabilitator, and follow their instructions. They do this for a living. They know what the animal needs, and what it does not. Love wildlife the right way: at a distance, with respect, and through the phone number of someone qualified. The best rescue stories are the ones where the animal gets to go back to being wild. Which brings me to the ending. . 11 // HOW TO WATCH THIS VIDEO Here is my one request. Do not watch it on autopilot. Before you press play, decide what you think is going to happen. Make a prediction, honestly. Then watch, and see how wrong you were. Keep your eyes on the animal, not on the people. Watch the eyes. Watch the ears. Watch the moment the animal has to decide what it wants to do. Wildlife tells you everything if you know where to look, and it does not lie. Pay attention to the way the whole tone of the clip shifts as it goes on. The first seconds and the last seconds feel like two entirely different films. And carry these five questions with you while it plays: Why is a predator this strong not fighting? What does an animal like this actually feel in a moment like that? How many other animals never get this chance? What would you have done in that spot, honestly? And what is the very last thing the bobcat does? Only one of those has an answer you can see with your own eyes. And remember the door I mentioned, the one that opens and the animal that does not look back? Keep that picture in your head while you watch. See how close reality gets to it. And stay to the last frame. There is a reason I told you the ending matters. A second watch will show you things the first one hides. . 12 // THE THREE RULES EVERY WILDLIFE PROFESSIONAL LIVES BY If you spent a week with people who do this work for a living, you would hear the same three ideas over and over. Rule one: the animal comes before the story. Good professionals never put a camera ahead of the patient. The best footage in the world is worthless if it costs the animal something. Rule two: distance is a form of kindness. The closer you get, the more stress you add. The most respectful thing you can do for a wild animal is usually to do less, from farther away, and let it be what it is. Rule three: success means the animal does not need you anymore. Not gratitude. Not a bond. Not a photo with a cute caption. Success is independence. Notice how that flips the usual story. In most human stories, success is being needed. In wildlife, success is being forgotten. . 13 // IF YOU ONLY REMEMBER FIVE LINES Screenshot this if you want to. I would. 1. Water steals heat 25 times faster than air, and a wet coat stops working. 2. A bobcat is an ambush predator with the strength of an animal twice its size, and none of that helps when the ground disappears. 3. Do not confuse calm with consent. 4. Almost everything in nature happens unwatched. That is why the times someone looks matter so much. 5. The best ending to a wild rescue is an animal that walks away on its own. . 14 // THE REAL REASON I POSTED THIS We spend a lot of time online being told the world is getting worse. Sometimes it is. But there is another truth underneath, one that rarely trends: in a random moment, on an ordinary day, with no cameras and no audience and nothing to gain, someone looked, someone cared, and something wild got another chance. Remember the number you guessed earlier, the seconds or minutes in that water? It turns out it does not matter. What matters is that somebody noticed at all. That is the whole post. Not a miracle. Not a spectacle. Just a small, stubborn piece of evidence that the chain can hold. If it moved you even a little, that is not weakness. That is the part of you that still works. If this landed for you, here is what to do: Reply with one word for how you felt watching it. Just one. I read them. Repost it for the person in your life who says they do not care about animals. Watch what happens to their face. Bookmark this thread-that-is-not-a-thread for the next time your feed makes you tired of everything. And follow me if you want more clips that make you feel something real, plus the stories behind them, without the fluff. One last thing. You made it to the bottom of a very long post. That means something. It means you are the kind of person who stays for the ending. Now go back to the video, press play, and stay for the last frame. P.S. If you scrolled straight to the bottom to see how this ends: the video is attached to this post. The ending is in the video. Nothing I write can replace it, and I would not want it to. P.P.S. Drop your prediction in the replies before you press play: what does the bobcat do in the very last seconds? Then come back after and tell me how wrong, or how right, you were. I will pin my favorite.

Earth Unveiled

58,188 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 8 ะดะฝะตะน ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

NATO's defense planning is not keeping up with the Russian threat. The problem is that NATO is mainly building forces for a possible future war, while Russia is already waging one in the present. This is where the Alliance's weak points show up: slow decision-making, blurred authorities, an expensive interception model, lengthy procurement processes, and slow responses to the adversary's new tactics. Russian violations of NATO airspace have already become a regular tool of pressure and a way to test the Alliance's response system. On 10 September 2025, Poland recorded 19 entries by Russian drones into its airspace and invoked Article 4, after which NATO launched Eastern Sentry; on 19 September, three Russian MiG-31s remained in Estonian airspace for more than ten minutes. In 2026, incidents continued in Poland, Germany, Romania and the Baltics. NATO is still responding with one-off actions to a systemic and regular provocation. It needs to shift to a permanent regime: pre-agreed rules of engagement, a joint command chain, a common air picture, and the authority to rapidly destroy military unmanned aerial vehicles without a separate political decision. The system must also distinguish real threats from false signals much better and rely on cheap interception means - electronic warfare, guns, SHORAD and interceptor drones costing around $15,000, and in the longer term $2-5,000 - while reserving expensive Patriot, SAMP/T and fighter aircraft for more complex targets. Simply intercepting drones is not enough. Russia must be punished - every confirmed deliberate incident should automatically trigger a pre-agreed package of consequences: additional sanctions, new restrictions on the shadow fleet, reinforcement of air defenses on the eastern flank, a greater military presence, or extra assistance to Ukraine. If NATO remains only in interception mode, Russia will not stop. Russia deliberately operates precisely in this grey-zone interval. On 14 September 2026, a Russian frigate fired two flares in the direction of a Danish military helicopter in international waters. Denmark called the behavior dangerous and deliberate, but the incident did not create a political crisis of Article 5 level. For Moscow, such operations are cheap and useful: they reveal reaction times, rules of engagement, command behavior and the threshold beyond which allies are prepared to move from protest to a forceful response. Even a drone that destroyed nothing can successfully accomplish a military task. It can force the activation of a radar, the scrambling of fighters, the disclosure of an air-defense position, the closure of an airport, the testing of a command algorithm, or reveal exactly who has the authority to authorize engagement. In July 2026, the IISS assessed it as highly likely that Russia had conducted a coordinated campaign of 144 UAV incidents across roughly a dozen European countries between August 2024 and February 2026. NATO still does not dare to treat such actions as a single campaign and breaks them down into separate legal and administrative cases. Russia, by contrast, plans all of this centrally as one operation. NATO's legal framework is also being rebuilt only after the threat has become permanent. Romania only in 2025 adopted Law No. 73/2025, which explicitly allows the destruction of unmanned aerial vehicles that illegally use its airspace. In July 2026, Baltic Air Policing had to be converted into Baltic Air Defence, expanding the mission from identification and escort to threat neutralization. This is a reaction, not anticipatory planning. The economics of interception remains one of the weakest points of European defense. A cheap Russian Geran or Gerbera drone can force the scramble of a fighter or the use of a missile that costs many times more than the target itself. This can be accepted and tolerable with isolated incidents. With dozens and hundreds of targets, such a model exhausts stocks faster than the adversary expends its own resources. That is why allies have started purchasing systems such as Merops with interceptors at roughly $15,000 each. Ukrainian experience already shows that even this price can be too high for a mass war, so the market is moving towards interceptors at $2โ€“5,000. European air defense is still insufficiently adapted to a mass cheap aerial threat. For real resilience, a dense lower tier of cheap sensors, passive detection, electronic warfare, guns, interceptor drones and SHORAD is needed. Expensive medium- and long-range systems must be preserved for more complex targets - cruise and ballistic missiles, aircraft and high-speed strike systems. The summit in Ankara in 2026 showed that NATO has finally recognized this problem. Allies announced more than $40 billion in investments in counter-UAS over five years and a plan to roughly quintuple the number of trained drone operators by the end of 2027. These are large figures, but they also illustrate the scale of the lag. Speed remains the most serious structural gap. The NATO Defense Planning Process operates on four-year cycles, and short-term planning formally covers a period of up to six years. After capability targets are set, states still have to insert the money into budgets, conduct procurements, conclude contracts and wait for production. Russian drones, like Russian tactics, change within a few weeks. Drones are constantly being improved. In 2026, Russia increased the use of jet-powered strike drones from roughly 450 in June to almost 2,850 in August. This is a tempo that the classic European procurement system cannot match. European states are still trying to procure some rapidly evolving technologies through procedures created for large long-term programs. For a tank, a frigate or a fighter, lengthy certification is inevitable. For an FPV, an electronic-warfare system, software, an AI module, a cheap sensor or an interceptor drone, a multi-year cycle means the army may receive a system that is already obsolete. Ukraine has had to grant hundreds of military units the right to procure drones, EW, counter-UAS and communications equipment directly, shortening some procedures to months and weeks. NATO and European states need to do something similar. Despite the fact that modern war is a drone war, tanks have not lost their significance, and Russian military policy confirms this. According to internal documents of Uralvagonzavod analyzed by ISW, the enterprise plans to increase T-90 production by approximately 80% by 2028 relative to 2024. Russia learns quickly and simultaneously strengthens the protection of armored vehicles against FPVs, develops electronic warfare, drones, artillery and long-range strikes. It adapts old systems, embedding them into a battlefield denser with sensors, drones and electronic warfare. That is why the number of tanks, aircraft or ships is no longer a good enough indicator of real combat capability. A tank without drone reconnaissance, electronic warfare, counter-UAS, engineering support, protected communications, artillery and a repair system quickly becomes an easy target. A Patriot without a cheap lower air-defense tier risks expending expensive missiles on secondary targets. Military capability increasingly depends on whether the entire system works, not on the quantity of individual platforms. At sea, the same deficit has already appeared around undersea infrastructure and the shadow fleet. In 2025, NATO Task Force X-Baltic tested more than 70 aerial, surface and underwater unmanned systems. In 2026, eight allies decided to accelerate their procurement. The reason is that there are not enough ships to continuously control thousands of kilometers of cables, pipelines, ports and sea routes. What is needed is constant cheap surveillance, automatic anomaly detection and rapid response. The shadow fleet creates an even more serious problem for NATO, because Russia uses civilian infrastructure for military purposes. The IISS considers it probable that some Russia-linked commercial vessels are used as platforms for launching, recovering or supporting drones. Such vessels often sail under foreign flags, have opaque ownership and formally do not belong to the Russian military. NATO's industrial problem is even more serious than the technological one. In a long war, what matters is not how many systems are in stock on day one, but how many can be produced, repaired and replaced every month. Russia is converting its economy to a model of sustained military production and is simultaneously creating mass production of cheap systems. The official Russian target envisages approximately 130,000 large UAVs per year by 2030. Europe remains significantly stronger economically, but this advantage guarantees nothing if it is not translated into serial production of weapons, ammunition, sensors, interceptors and spare parts. The next two to three years therefore remain a dangerous transitional period. The European roadmap envisages initial capability of the European Drone Defence Initiative and Eastern Flank Watch by the end of 2026, full capability of EDDI by the end of 2027, and full functionality of Eastern Flank Watch only by the end of 2028. Russia is already conducting drone operations, jamming navigation, intensifying its military presence at sea and using civilian and semi-civilian channels for pressure. Moscow has at least two years during which it can continue testing a system that is still being rebuilt. ๐Ÿ“น: NATO Steadfast Deterrence-2026 military exercises

Anton Gerashchenko

74,884 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 13 ะดะฝะตะน ะฝะฐะทะฐะด