Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

#𝗫𝗫𝗫𝗦𝗜𝗡𝗡𝗘𝗥𝗦 😈 Enjoy watching how this pair of... #PORNXXXTARS✨ 𝗝𝗔𝗠𝗜𝗘 ＆ 𝗣𝗘𝗡𝗡𝗬 ⭐️Jamie Michelle⭐️ Penny Barber 🍿 Are drilled by the big cock of:: Billy Boston 🍆 ✖✖✖ ➜ 𝗠𝗢𝗥𝗘 #𝗦𝗘𝗫𝗫𝗫𝗬𝗔𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 ➜ 𝗝𝗢𝗜𝗡 𝗧𝗢

XXXSINNERS

11,056 subscribers

125,600 次观看 • 3 年前 •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #𝗫𝗫𝗫𝗦𝗜𝗡𝗡𝗘𝗥𝗦 #PORNXXXTARS #𝗦𝗘𝗫𝗫𝗫𝗬𝗔𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

📽️ Moneyball (2011) 🔥🔥🔥 🍿🍿🍿🍿 "Jonah Hill Explains the Math Behind Baseball" 📊 ⚾️In this standout scene, Peter Brand (Jonah Hill) walks Billy Beane (Brad Pitt) through his data-driven system for finding undervalued players. Using advanced statistics rather than traditional scouting, he shows how math can build a winning team on a shoestring budget — and completely change the game. A perfect showcase of innovation, intelligence, and quiet confidence. ❓Did you know that *Moneyball is based on Michael Lewis’s bestselling book about the 2002 Oakland A’s? Brad Pitt and Jonah Hill both earned Academy Award nominations for their performances, and the film helped bring sabermetrics into mainstream conversation. ⭐️Starring: - Brad Pitt as Billy Beane - Jonah Hill as Peter Brand - Philip Seymour Hoffman as Art Howe This is another fine performance by Brad Pitt. What did you think of this movie and of Jonah Hill's performance in Moneyball? 👇 #MovieClip #MovieScene #Film #Cinema #Moneyball #BradPitt #JonahHill #ClassicCinema #2010sMovies #BaseballMovie #Sabermetrics

BiffBifford™ 🇺🇸

16,428 次观看 • 2 个月前

⭐ STOCK AITKEN WATERMAN'S I SHOULD BE SO LUCKY - THE MUSICAL - BRISTOL HIPPODROME ⭐ I LOVE THIS SHOW! ! ! 😅 💖 🌈 ✨ I love I Should Be So Lucky in all its camptastic, cheesy glory lol 🧀 Fans of the genius pop trio Stock Aitken Waterman will have lots to enjoy here, the show is positively STUFFED with their many smash-hits, featuring Kylie Minogue, Rick Astley, Jason Donovan, Bananarama, Mel & Kim, Sonia and many more ✨ (and if you're not a fan, this is the wrong show for you lol 😜) Debbie Isitt has written a big, brash wedding farce to accompany the classic choons, full of outrageous situations, secrets and misunderstandings.... Subtle this is not.... But it is a hell lot of fun 😂 I saw someone describe this show as "Mamma Mia! on steroids" and they ain't wrong 😁 lol This show is full of big voices and hilarious performances, lead by the would-be bride and groom, the fabulous Lucie-Mae Sumner and Billy Roberts 🌟 Incredible vocals by all (especially the leads), stand-outs also Emma Crossley (Jessica Daley, who I saw originally), Melissa Jacques and Kayla Carter ✨ But on the comedy front, the fantastic Giovanni Spanò, Scott Paige and Jamie Chapman delivered the most laughs 🤣 But my favourite addition to the cast had to be the one and only KYLIE MINOGUE 😱..... who appears throughout, in digital form lol Such a fun and clever way to feature her in the show 👑 Big pink hearts, sparkles and sequins feature heavily in the design by Tom Rodgers, which feels perfectly appropriate lol There's also some stellar choreography by Jason Gilkison, which I loved 💃 All in all, this was one of the most fun times I've had in the theatre, in a very long time. I will be booking again, and if you like the sound of the above, you should too! ! ! 💖 X x x

⭐ STOCK AITKEN WATERMAN'S I SHOULD BE SO LUCKY - THE MUSICAL - BRISTOL HIPPODROME ⭐ I LOVE THIS SHOW! ! ! 😅 💖 🌈 ✨ I love I Should Be So Lucky in all its camptastic, cheesy glory lol 🧀 Fans of the genius pop trio Stock Aitken Waterman will have lots to enjoy here, the show is positively STUFFED with their many smash-hits, featuring Kylie Minogue, Rick Astley, Jason Donovan, Bananarama, Mel & Kim, Sonia and many more ✨ (and if you're not a fan, this is the wrong show for you lol 😜) Debbie Isitt has written a big, brash wedding farce to accompany the classic choons, full of outrageous situations, secrets and misunderstandings.... Subtle this is not.... But it is a hell lot of fun 😂 I saw someone describe this show as "Mamma Mia! on steroids" and they ain't wrong 😁 lol This show is full of big voices and hilarious performances, lead by the would-be bride and groom, the fabulous Lucie-Mae Sumner and Billy Roberts 🌟 Incredible vocals by all (especially the leads), stand-outs also Emma Crossley (Jessica Daley, who I saw originally), Melissa Jacques and Kayla Carter ✨ But on the comedy front, the fantastic Giovanni Spanò, Scott Paige and Jamie Chapman delivered the most laughs 🤣 But my favourite addition to the cast had to be the one and only KYLIE MINOGUE 😱..... who appears throughout, in digital form lol Such a fun and clever way to feature her in the show 👑 Big pink hearts, sparkles and sequins feature heavily in the design by Tom Rodgers, which feels perfectly appropriate lol There's also some stellar choreography by Jason Gilkison, which I loved 💃 All in all, this was one of the most fun times I've had in the theatre, in a very long time. I will be booking again, and if you like the sound of the above, you should too! ! ! 💖 X x x

Theatre Fan

23,444 次观看 • 2 年前

We moved from Australia to Costa Rica 12+ months ago to live on The Bitcoin Standard 🌴✨ We live off the currency almost entirely, using Bitcoin to pay for our rent, utilities, car, cleaner, groceries & of course weekly stash of organic meats & raw dairy 🐄🤠 One of the coolest features about the Bitcoin Jungle⚡️ app is the BTC to SINPAY option. SINPAY is Costa Rica's local payment system, so their national bank accounts are attached to a phone/id number and locals can send money to each other this way. The app allows you to send Bitcoin to a SINPAY account & then they receive it in Colones, which is handy for the skeptics… Butttt many of the locals actively choose to receive TC instead, stash up their savings or spend SAT'S in the local circular economy 🙌 I'm a big advocate for 'vote with your dollar’ Choosing the systems that you want to be a part of by being selective with your energy output ⭐️ For us that means choosing BTC over FIAT ✨ Happy halving y'all 🫶 @btc_culture

We moved from Australia to Costa Rica 12+ months ago to live on The Bitcoin Standard 🌴✨ We live off the currency almost entirely, using Bitcoin to pay for our rent, utilities, car, cleaner, groceries & of course weekly stash of organic meats & raw dairy 🐄🤠 One of the coolest features about the Bitcoin Jungle⚡️ app is the BTC to SINPAY option. SINPAY is Costa Rica's local payment system, so their national bank accounts are attached to a phone/id number and locals can send money to each other this way. The app allows you to send Bitcoin to a SINPAY account & then they receive it in Colones, which is handy for the skeptics… Butttt many of the locals actively choose to receive TC instead, stash up their savings or spend SAT'S in the local circular economy 🙌 I'm a big advocate for 'vote with your dollar’ Choosing the systems that you want to be a part of by being selective with your energy output ⭐️ For us that means choosing BTC over FIAT ✨ Happy halving y'all 🫶 @btc_culture

Shannen Michaela

2,449,630 次观看 • 2 年前

Zack Polanski, “We often talk about water companies, because they are literally pouring sewage, as you all know, into our rivers and seas. They’re allowing billions of litres of water a day to leak out of pipes that haven’t seen a penny of investment, and they’re selling off reservoirs while we’re facing a drought.” “We have handed our most precious and vital resource to private companies, and somehow hoped that they’ll act in our best interests. But why would they, when presiding over decline and failure has seen them rake in astonishing profits?” “Since privatisation, shareholders of the water and sewage corporations have been handed £85.2 billion. And how much have they invested? Less than nothing.” “This is the ultimate rip-off: handing over billions to companies who are putting us at risk of water shortages. And as Thames Water faces yet another financial catastrophe driven by greed, it is time for the Labour government to step up and make good on the promises that Andy Burnham made: to bring water not under some vague, hand-waving public control…” “…but into full public ownership, so that every single penny we pay in bills goes towards protecting our water security now and in the future. Because nature in the UK is in freefall, and private companies have been driving this destruction and, as I’ve said, they’re cashing in on the results.” “And it’s a familiar story, because it’s exactly the same as the climate chaos caused by the fossil fuel industry. Company profits pile up, while communities — our communities — are left to absorb the environmental degradation. Enough is enough.” “We must back the people who are on the frontline of defending our land and nature, and securing our precious natural resources: the farmers who right now are watching their crops fail through drought and flooding, their costs soaring, and they’re wondering how they’re even going to make it through another season.” “Meanwhile, the corporations have captured the supply chain above them: the agrochemical companies, the big supermarkets, the processors. While the farmers are struggling, they are all profiting.” “We can turn this around: fund farmers to work in harmony with the natural world, to repair, rebuild, revitalise and restore the proper working of our ecosystems. And crucially, we need to get bolder about making the big companies piling up profits pay their fair share to fund it.” “If we get this right, we secure our food supply and give farmers their livelihood back. We can restore our woodlands, our streams, our fields; hear birds sing and bees buzz again; see those hedgehogs in our back gardens.” “But if we get this wrong, the consequences are so stark.”

Zack Polanski, “We often talk about water companies, because they are literally pouring sewage, as you all know, into our rivers and seas. They’re allowing billions of litres of water a day to leak out of pipes that haven’t seen a penny of investment, and they’re selling off reservoirs while we’re facing a drought.” “We have handed our most precious and vital resource to private companies, and somehow hoped that they’ll act in our best interests. But why would they, when presiding over decline and failure has seen them rake in astonishing profits?” “Since privatisation, shareholders of the water and sewage corporations have been handed £85.2 billion. And how much have they invested? Less than nothing.” “This is the ultimate rip-off: handing over billions to companies who are putting us at risk of water shortages. And as Thames Water faces yet another financial catastrophe driven by greed, it is time for the Labour government to step up and make good on the promises that Andy Burnham made: to bring water not under some vague, hand-waving public control…” “…but into full public ownership, so that every single penny we pay in bills goes towards protecting our water security now and in the future. Because nature in the UK is in freefall, and private companies have been driving this destruction and, as I’ve said, they’re cashing in on the results.” “And it’s a familiar story, because it’s exactly the same as the climate chaos caused by the fossil fuel industry. Company profits pile up, while communities — our communities — are left to absorb the environmental degradation. Enough is enough.” “We must back the people who are on the frontline of defending our land and nature, and securing our precious natural resources: the farmers who right now are watching their crops fail through drought and flooding, their costs soaring, and they’re wondering how they’re even going to make it through another season.” “Meanwhile, the corporations have captured the supply chain above them: the agrochemical companies, the big supermarkets, the processors. While the farmers are struggling, they are all profiting.” “We can turn this around: fund farmers to work in harmony with the natural world, to repair, rebuild, revitalise and restore the proper working of our ecosystems. And crucially, we need to get bolder about making the big companies piling up profits pay their fair share to fund it.” “If we get this right, we secure our food supply and give farmers their livelihood back. We can restore our woodlands, our streams, our fields; hear birds sing and bees buzz again; see those hedgehogs in our back gardens.” “But if we get this wrong, the consequences are so stark.”

Farrukh

23,556 次观看 • 21 天前

Cross-Chain Arbitrage on Uniswap V4 (opportunities available) I’ve always been curious: how much do prices actually differ between the “same” Uniswap V4 pool deployed across different chains? Think ETH/USDC on Ethereum vs on Unichain, Arbitrum, or Base . They’re technically the same trading pair, but entirely separate pools, with different liquidity, fees, and most importantly, prices. So I built a dashboard to monitor exactly that. It tracks real-time price discrepancies across Uniswap V4 pools on different chains. Why? I was curious. I wanted to understand: - How often do mispricings occur? - How big are those discrepancies? - And perhaps most interestingly: how fast are they arbitraged away? On the same chain, arbitrage between DEXs is well understood. You can create a smart contract that executes a set of swaps atomically, either guaranteeing profit or reverting the transaction. But cross-chain? That’s a different game. Different chains mean different execution environments, timing issues, and gas fee structures. It’s harder to coordinate. It’s also harder to monitor... What I’ve Built (So Far) Right now, the dashboard monitors the ETH/USDC pair across four chains in real time. You can visually see: - Realtime ETH price on each chain - Size of most recent trades indicated by bubble size - Max current spread available. I've only finished it this afternoon and after watching it for 15min I've already spotted a few times where the mispricings are significant. I want to add more pairs and chains soon (super easy actually) - just don't want to clutter it before getting more feedback and ideas. I’ve dropped the link to the dashboard in the comments below. If you’ve built a cross-chain arb bot, I’d love to hear how you approached it!

Cross-Chain Arbitrage on Uniswap V4 (opportunities available) I’ve always been curious: how much do prices actually differ between the “same” Uniswap V4 pool deployed across different chains? Think ETH/USDC on Ethereum vs on Unichain, Arbitrum, or Base . They’re technically the same trading pair, but entirely separate pools, with different liquidity, fees, and most importantly, prices. So I built a dashboard to monitor exactly that. It tracks real-time price discrepancies across Uniswap V4 pools on different chains. Why? I was curious. I wanted to understand: - How often do mispricings occur? - How big are those discrepancies? - And perhaps most interestingly: how fast are they arbitraged away? On the same chain, arbitrage between DEXs is well understood. You can create a smart contract that executes a set of swaps atomically, either guaranteeing profit or reverting the transaction. But cross-chain? That’s a different game. Different chains mean different execution environments, timing issues, and gas fee structures. It’s harder to coordinate. It’s also harder to monitor... What I’ve Built (So Far) Right now, the dashboard monitors the ETH/USDC pair across four chains in real time. You can visually see: - Realtime ETH price on each chain - Size of most recent trades indicated by bubble size - Max current spread available. I've only finished it this afternoon and after watching it for 15min I've already spotted a few times where the mispricings are significant. I want to add more pairs and chains soon (super easy actually) - just don't want to clutter it before getting more feedback and ideas. I’ve dropped the link to the dashboard in the comments below. If you’ve built a cross-chain arb bot, I’d love to hear how you approached it!

jonjon

45,160 次观看 • 1 年前

A special new episode to finish the year: Glyn Davis & Terry Moran are two former Secretaries of the Department of Prime Minister & Cabinet -- they're two of the tiny number of Australians who have literally sat in the Cabinet Room, week after week, watching the highest-stakes decisions get made from the inside. Terry was Secretary from 2008 to 2011, including during the GFC. Glyn was Secretary from 2022 to 2025, resigning only a few months ago. As far as I know, neither has done a long-form podcast like this before -- let alone together. My goal was to ask as many naive questions as possible about the nuts and bolts of Cabinet, and how power is used, shaped and constrained in Canberra. We go into lots of tactical detail. One general takeaway for me was how surprisingly malleable the institutions in a Westminster system are -- for better or worse, the PM really can mould the government around their persona. But the flipside of this is that once they leave power, the machinery snaps back to its default state, or reconfigures around the next PM. So PM's are very powerful, but not in a lasting way. Also, given how reflexively and unfavourably we compare government to the private sector, it was interesting to invert the lens and consider the Cabinet process as an example of operational excellence -- a system refined over more than a century and stress-tested through wars, disasters and depressions. Learning about even small details -- like what the template for Cabinet submissions looks like -- was fascinating. Links below, or watch/listen wherever you get your podcasts. Enjoy! Timestamps: 0:00:00 - Introduction. 0:02:50 - What is the biggest thing Australians get wrong about how federal government works day to day? 0:06:17 - Where does power sit in Canberra? 0:12:38 - Two powerful figures: Nugget Coombs and John Monash. 0:15:44 - Have prime ministers been getting more powerful in Australia? 0:18:24 - Is Cabinet government in the UK and Canada dead? Why not Australia? 0:20:04 - Is Albanese more powerful in Australia than Trump is in the U.S.? 0:22:42 - What is the institutional or conventional source of the PM's power? 0:29:01 - What does a typical day for the PM look like? 0:38:14 - The gritty details of the Cabinet process. 1:15:54 - What are the root causes of big mistakes by governments? 1:19:00 - How often does physical exhaustion impair outcomes? 1:21:00 - How should decision-making structures change in a crisis? 1:24:40 - One thing you'd change about the machinery of government? 1:32:23 - If the PM made solving the housing crisis their top priority, how would that be reflected in the machinery of government? 1:45:15 - How are decisions about war made? 1:49:33 - Questions about "state capacity" — that is, the ability of our governments to achieve their goals. 2:22:33 - What great book remains to be written about government in Australia? (And an explanation of the Red and Blue books.)

A special new episode to finish the year: Glyn Davis & Terry Moran are two former Secretaries of the Department of Prime Minister & Cabinet -- they're two of the tiny number of Australians who have literally sat in the Cabinet Room, week after week, watching the highest-stakes decisions get made from the inside. Terry was Secretary from 2008 to 2011, including during the GFC. Glyn was Secretary from 2022 to 2025, resigning only a few months ago. As far as I know, neither has done a long-form podcast like this before -- let alone together. My goal was to ask as many naive questions as possible about the nuts and bolts of Cabinet, and how power is used, shaped and constrained in Canberra. We go into lots of tactical detail. One general takeaway for me was how surprisingly malleable the institutions in a Westminster system are -- for better or worse, the PM really can mould the government around their persona. But the flipside of this is that once they leave power, the machinery snaps back to its default state, or reconfigures around the next PM. So PM's are very powerful, but not in a lasting way. Also, given how reflexively and unfavourably we compare government to the private sector, it was interesting to invert the lens and consider the Cabinet process as an example of operational excellence -- a system refined over more than a century and stress-tested through wars, disasters and depressions. Learning about even small details -- like what the template for Cabinet submissions looks like -- was fascinating. Links below, or watch/listen wherever you get your podcasts. Enjoy! Timestamps: 0:00:00 - Introduction. 0:02:50 - What is the biggest thing Australians get wrong about how federal government works day to day? 0:06:17 - Where does power sit in Canberra? 0:12:38 - Two powerful figures: Nugget Coombs and John Monash. 0:15:44 - Have prime ministers been getting more powerful in Australia? 0:18:24 - Is Cabinet government in the UK and Canada dead? Why not Australia? 0:20:04 - Is Albanese more powerful in Australia than Trump is in the U.S.? 0:22:42 - What is the institutional or conventional source of the PM's power? 0:29:01 - What does a typical day for the PM look like? 0:38:14 - The gritty details of the Cabinet process. 1:15:54 - What are the root causes of big mistakes by governments? 1:19:00 - How often does physical exhaustion impair outcomes? 1:21:00 - How should decision-making structures change in a crisis? 1:24:40 - One thing you'd change about the machinery of government? 1:32:23 - If the PM made solving the housing crisis their top priority, how would that be reflected in the machinery of government? 1:45:15 - How are decisions about war made? 1:49:33 - Questions about "state capacity" — that is, the ability of our governments to achieve their goals. 2:22:33 - What great book remains to be written about government in Australia? (And an explanation of the Red and Blue books.)

Joseph Noel Walker

11,039 次观看 • 9 个月前

"Come on, folks. Do we see what's playing out here? Marbury v. Mad might have just brought down the Commissioner of the Boston Police Department." - Towel, November 6, 2025 Rule #1 in Massachusetts politics right now; Do not mess with Attorney Corey Hopkins. She's going to get barred here just to reform the government (then I'll become her paralegal and we'll submit public records requests all day). Good plan. TRANSCRIPT (from Towel's coverage of the letter in question, uncovered by Attorney Hopkins); Hello and good evening. It is just past 6 p.m. on Monday, November 3rd, 2025. My name is Grant Smith-Ellis, and I'm back with you again for another developing news update, this time related to Boston Police Commissioner Cox responding to a developing series of scandals, in particular related to former Boston Police Officer—well, first former Canton Police Officer, then former Boston Police Officer—Kelly Dever. Now, Kelly Dever was an integral witness during the John O'Keefe and Karen Read trial about one specific series of events in the early morning of January 29, 2022—not really related to John's death per se, but related to the then-chief of the Canton Police Department, Ken Berkowitz, who was also potentially the person that went to the FBI about Brian Tully's MSP unit, Massachusetts State Police unit, detailed to the Norfolk DA, who were the same people that investigated Karen Read for John's death. Berkowitz was the same person who apparently went to the FBI in 2022 about Tully's unit through John Fanning covering up Sandra Birchmore's death at the hands of former Stoughton PD officer Matthew Farwell. Okay, Ken Berkowitz and Brian Higgins—then undercover ATF agent who himself had been in a relationship of some kind, we'll call it that, with Karen in the months before John's death. That's a whole story we will not get into. The point is, Higgins and Berkowitz go into the sally port. Now, Kelly Dever had been working since, I think it was 12 a.m. on January 28th. She worked—let me make sure I get this right now—she worked at 12 p.m., noon on January 28th to 8 p.m. Then she worked the 8 p.m. to 4 a.m. shift. Okay, she was doing 16 hours over those two days. At like 1:30 a.m., she saw Berkowitz and Higgins—or around there, maybe a little later—go into the area, an area of the Canton PD. Then—and we're going to find out—she had a meeting with Boston Police Commissioner Cox. Now, why did Commissioner Cox get himself in trouble? Well, not because of the interview we're going to watch, but instead because of an interview about a year ago where he said he knew nothing about the Kelly Dever situation or the Karen Read case. All right, now we're going to quickly come to find out that what we're about to hear from the commissioner is not the best answer in light of this little document found by the incredible Marbury v. Madison on X, Corey A. Hopkins, a business litigator based in North Carolina. Towel really likes Marbury v. Madison because, first of all, Marbury v. Madison is an awesome case, and it entrenched the supremacy of the judiciary as to saying what the law is by virtue of the Constitution. Solved a very complex problem related to the Judiciary Act of 1789 and, in particular, the emergence of political parties in 1796 and, in particular, 1800, and a slew of last-minute appointments by President Adams and a refusal by President Jefferson to commission—or one of the refusal by Jefferson's Secretary of State Madison to commission a justice of the peace. But it really was about the supremacy of the judiciary branch. Marbury v. Madison uses a lot of FOIAs, and what you're going to see right here is a FOIA request that resulted in this wonderful little document. And what does this show? All right, this document shows, folks, a letter from Stephen J. Kelleher, who's with the White Collar Public Corruption and Civil Rights Division of the FBI in Boston. It is a letter that Marbury v. Madison obtained via a FOIA, and it shows the DOJ reaching out to Commissioner Cox and saying, "Sir, hope all is well. Just a reminder—this was on February 22nd, 2024. The documents were released to the DA's office late last night." This has to do with federal documents about the investigation of John's death by the MSP unit run by Brian Tully working for the Norfolk DA. "The officer we spoke about is Kelly Dever. If you have any questions at all, feel free to call me. Vr. Steve." Okay, folks, this proves that Commissioner Cox was told about Kelly Dever and documents related to her testimony and what she saw Higgins and Berkowitz doing—which I don't think was related to John's death, but it's just embarrassing for Higgins. He was an undercover ATF agent, and embarrassing for Berkowitz. And although Berkowitz is now dead, he was either dying or not dead in 2024. And clearly, this was embarrassing, okay, to the Canton Police Chief, to the Boston Police, to Higgins, to all these people. All right. And so we see here, Cox knows about it. Cox then goes on a few months later—I think it was either after, I think it was right after Karen's second trial, but it was some months after this initial email was sent to Cox. And Cox, in his infinite wisdom, tells Boston 25 or Channel 5 or whatever it was at a news conference that he's basically never heard of Kelly Dever or the Karen Read and John O'Keefe case. Okay, that was a stupid thing to say because then this FOIA comes out in recent weeks. That leads to Alan Jackson to send a Brady letter to Mayor Michelle Wu, the Democratic mayor of Boston running unopposed in the coming election, saying that Cox should be on the Brady list. I think it was—yes, because Cox was not forthcoming about what he was told by the feds about Dever. Okay, now this is Cox's response. I just want to show you how bad of a response this is. Okay, this is a clip via Boston 25, just Cox's comment on these new developments, which—although Alan Jackson's Brady letter is what Cox was asked for comment on—even Alan Jackson himself has rightfully so given credit to Marbury v. Madison for their excellent find on this FOIA document that was unearthed. And this could cost Cox his position. All right, the Democrats in Boston already have the eye of President Trump. The DOJ is all over this unit, in my opinion, and the cover-up of Birchmore's death. Look at the DOJ's pattern of indictments, okay? Recently, not just the Jessica LeClair leaks, but also Sheriff Tompkins and other major Democrats. Look at what's going on here, folks. Think about the larger picture—the most recent indictment, the superseding indictment of Matt Farwell for the murder of Sandra Birchmore's unborn child. It's all coming together. And Commissioner Cox's answer is bad. And that's why I want to analyze it. It's not just like inappropriate. It is a bad, bad, bad answer. When I heard it, I had to immediately make a video to analyze it because that's how bad this answer is. It's short, but I'm going to tell you how bad it is after we listen to it. "But what I need, you know, it's not to be asked this question ever again because it's not—it has to pertain to anything to do with the police department. My condolences to the O'Keefe family for, you know, what they've gone through. And because we did lose a department member. But outside of that, this has nothing to do with us. And I'm not going to speak with this again." Okay, let me just make something clear. I'm not saying he was wrong. It's not wrong to invoke John's name. But doing it that way—that's grotesque. Okay, he didn't answer the question. He basically refused to do so. And again, if you didn't hear the statement—although I'm sure you did—he said, "What I need is to not be asked this question ever again pertaining to anything to do with the police department." What? "My condolences to the O'Keefe family for what they've gone through because we did lose a department member." John O'Keefe was an honorable member of the Boston PD and the SA offenders unit. "But outside of that, this has nothing to do with us, the Boston PD, and I'm not going to speak on this again." No, no, no, no—that you just cost yourself your job right there. I'm sorry. That was a terrible, terrible answer. I'm sorry for the volume. I'm just running it back. Terrible answer. The worst possible answer. You may well have just cost yourself your job because you ducked the question. Everyone knows that the question is about this document. Anyone following this knows. The implications are what Dever knew about Berkowitz and Higgins, and maybe that's not the most serious thing. But as President Nixon said, it is not the crime, it's the cover-up. Dever, whatever she did—not wanting to talk about certain things about Higgins and Berkowitz, unrelated to John's death, just because it's kind of embarrassing—that is not a problem really. It's a minor thing. You know what's a big deal? Dever definitely got Brady-listed or whatever because her testimony was a little weird. I think Alan Jackson also pressured her a little bit. But whatever, that's not the point here. Cox's response—that was bad. That was bad PR. That's like the kind of thing when Prince Andrew was forced to go out and do an interview with BBC One about Epstein, and it just cost him all his titles because he got no PR help; he got sandbagged. That kind of thing—somebody didn't prep him, or the people he was talking to didn't even think this would come up. That's a horrible answer. Twenty seconds can cost you your career if you have done something bad and you answer a tough question like that. It's defensive; it shows you have something to hide; it undermines people's faith in your ability to answer those kind of questions. That's the biggest problem for Commissioner Cox here. Instead of inspiring confidence and making it look like it was nothing or it was just a routine, he couldn't even address the fact that he was made aware in February, in particular, about Kelly Dever and he had knowledge—he had a meeting with her. Let's be clear: He put her on his schedule the very next day. Not only did he have recipient knowledge of what was going on with the federal investigation and the John O'Keefe and Karen Read case—Dever got called into his office the next day, which of course Cox initially tried to play off as just some routine meeting, as if he meets with all 2,600 or whatever of the Boston police force. No. Come on, folks. Come on, folks. Do we see what's playing out here? Marbury v. Madison might have just brought down the Commissioner of the Boston Police Department. My name is Grant Smith-Ellis. Enjoy the rest of your Monday. We'll see what other news comes in today. Sean Good on suspension. Michael Proctor's cell phone gate engulfing the world in a conflagration. Little towel basically running down the street from the masses, trying to insulate himself from the fallout of this God-forsaken situation. Institutional reform is coming—to the Norfolk DA, hopefully throughout the state police—so that the good people in law enforcement can keep helping the vulnerable and that the exploited, no matter how much pressure they come under, continue to speak their truth. And let me just say this: Whenever we stand against the flow of opinion on hotly contested issues, a man, a woman, and a Towel—do what they must in spite of the personal consequences, in spite of the dangers and obstacles and pressures. For that is the basis of all human morality. We will be there for each other in times of struggle. We will be side by side in times of joy. And when everything is on the line and when our principles matter the most, there will be no price too high to pay to center the voices of the unheard, to bring justice to the vulnerable, and to reform this God-forsaken justice system in Massachusetts so that we can all hand down a structural system to our future generations that is worthy of our Constitution, that is worthy of our collective intelligence, and that is worthy of the due reverence we all should be providing to the pursuit of justice. My name is Grant Smith-Ellis. Until next time, you're a towel, I am as well. Be well. God bless.

"Come on, folks. Do we see what's playing out here? Marbury v. Mad might have just brought down the Commissioner of the Boston Police Department." - Towel, November 6, 2025 Rule #1 in Massachusetts politics right now; Do not mess with Attorney Corey Hopkins. She's going to get barred here just to reform the government (then I'll become her paralegal and we'll submit public records requests all day). Good plan. TRANSCRIPT (from Towel's coverage of the letter in question, uncovered by Attorney Hopkins); Hello and good evening. It is just past 6 p.m. on Monday, November 3rd, 2025. My name is Grant Smith-Ellis, and I'm back with you again for another developing news update, this time related to Boston Police Commissioner Cox responding to a developing series of scandals, in particular related to former Boston Police Officer—well, first former Canton Police Officer, then former Boston Police Officer—Kelly Dever. Now, Kelly Dever was an integral witness during the John O'Keefe and Karen Read trial about one specific series of events in the early morning of January 29, 2022—not really related to John's death per se, but related to the then-chief of the Canton Police Department, Ken Berkowitz, who was also potentially the person that went to the FBI about Brian Tully's MSP unit, Massachusetts State Police unit, detailed to the Norfolk DA, who were the same people that investigated Karen Read for John's death. Berkowitz was the same person who apparently went to the FBI in 2022 about Tully's unit through John Fanning covering up Sandra Birchmore's death at the hands of former Stoughton PD officer Matthew Farwell. Okay, Ken Berkowitz and Brian Higgins—then undercover ATF agent who himself had been in a relationship of some kind, we'll call it that, with Karen in the months before John's death. That's a whole story we will not get into. The point is, Higgins and Berkowitz go into the sally port. Now, Kelly Dever had been working since, I think it was 12 a.m. on January 28th. She worked—let me make sure I get this right now—she worked at 12 p.m., noon on January 28th to 8 p.m. Then she worked the 8 p.m. to 4 a.m. shift. Okay, she was doing 16 hours over those two days. At like 1:30 a.m., she saw Berkowitz and Higgins—or around there, maybe a little later—go into the area, an area of the Canton PD. Then—and we're going to find out—she had a meeting with Boston Police Commissioner Cox. Now, why did Commissioner Cox get himself in trouble? Well, not because of the interview we're going to watch, but instead because of an interview about a year ago where he said he knew nothing about the Kelly Dever situation or the Karen Read case. All right, now we're going to quickly come to find out that what we're about to hear from the commissioner is not the best answer in light of this little document found by the incredible Marbury v. Madison on X, Corey A. Hopkins, a business litigator based in North Carolina. Towel really likes Marbury v. Madison because, first of all, Marbury v. Madison is an awesome case, and it entrenched the supremacy of the judiciary as to saying what the law is by virtue of the Constitution. Solved a very complex problem related to the Judiciary Act of 1789 and, in particular, the emergence of political parties in 1796 and, in particular, 1800, and a slew of last-minute appointments by President Adams and a refusal by President Jefferson to commission—or one of the refusal by Jefferson's Secretary of State Madison to commission a justice of the peace. But it really was about the supremacy of the judiciary branch. Marbury v. Madison uses a lot of FOIAs, and what you're going to see right here is a FOIA request that resulted in this wonderful little document. And what does this show? All right, this document shows, folks, a letter from Stephen J. Kelleher, who's with the White Collar Public Corruption and Civil Rights Division of the FBI in Boston. It is a letter that Marbury v. Madison obtained via a FOIA, and it shows the DOJ reaching out to Commissioner Cox and saying, "Sir, hope all is well. Just a reminder—this was on February 22nd, 2024. The documents were released to the DA's office late last night." This has to do with federal documents about the investigation of John's death by the MSP unit run by Brian Tully working for the Norfolk DA. "The officer we spoke about is Kelly Dever. If you have any questions at all, feel free to call me. Vr. Steve." Okay, folks, this proves that Commissioner Cox was told about Kelly Dever and documents related to her testimony and what she saw Higgins and Berkowitz doing—which I don't think was related to John's death, but it's just embarrassing for Higgins. He was an undercover ATF agent, and embarrassing for Berkowitz. And although Berkowitz is now dead, he was either dying or not dead in 2024. And clearly, this was embarrassing, okay, to the Canton Police Chief, to the Boston Police, to Higgins, to all these people. All right. And so we see here, Cox knows about it. Cox then goes on a few months later—I think it was either after, I think it was right after Karen's second trial, but it was some months after this initial email was sent to Cox. And Cox, in his infinite wisdom, tells Boston 25 or Channel 5 or whatever it was at a news conference that he's basically never heard of Kelly Dever or the Karen Read and John O'Keefe case. Okay, that was a stupid thing to say because then this FOIA comes out in recent weeks. That leads to Alan Jackson to send a Brady letter to Mayor Michelle Wu, the Democratic mayor of Boston running unopposed in the coming election, saying that Cox should be on the Brady list. I think it was—yes, because Cox was not forthcoming about what he was told by the feds about Dever. Okay, now this is Cox's response. I just want to show you how bad of a response this is. Okay, this is a clip via Boston 25, just Cox's comment on these new developments, which—although Alan Jackson's Brady letter is what Cox was asked for comment on—even Alan Jackson himself has rightfully so given credit to Marbury v. Madison for their excellent find on this FOIA document that was unearthed. And this could cost Cox his position. All right, the Democrats in Boston already have the eye of President Trump. The DOJ is all over this unit, in my opinion, and the cover-up of Birchmore's death. Look at the DOJ's pattern of indictments, okay? Recently, not just the Jessica LeClair leaks, but also Sheriff Tompkins and other major Democrats. Look at what's going on here, folks. Think about the larger picture—the most recent indictment, the superseding indictment of Matt Farwell for the murder of Sandra Birchmore's unborn child. It's all coming together. And Commissioner Cox's answer is bad. And that's why I want to analyze it. It's not just like inappropriate. It is a bad, bad, bad answer. When I heard it, I had to immediately make a video to analyze it because that's how bad this answer is. It's short, but I'm going to tell you how bad it is after we listen to it. "But what I need, you know, it's not to be asked this question ever again because it's not—it has to pertain to anything to do with the police department. My condolences to the O'Keefe family for, you know, what they've gone through. And because we did lose a department member. But outside of that, this has nothing to do with us. And I'm not going to speak with this again." Okay, let me just make something clear. I'm not saying he was wrong. It's not wrong to invoke John's name. But doing it that way—that's grotesque. Okay, he didn't answer the question. He basically refused to do so. And again, if you didn't hear the statement—although I'm sure you did—he said, "What I need is to not be asked this question ever again pertaining to anything to do with the police department." What? "My condolences to the O'Keefe family for what they've gone through because we did lose a department member." John O'Keefe was an honorable member of the Boston PD and the SA offenders unit. "But outside of that, this has nothing to do with us, the Boston PD, and I'm not going to speak on this again." No, no, no, no—that you just cost yourself your job right there. I'm sorry. That was a terrible, terrible answer. I'm sorry for the volume. I'm just running it back. Terrible answer. The worst possible answer. You may well have just cost yourself your job because you ducked the question. Everyone knows that the question is about this document. Anyone following this knows. The implications are what Dever knew about Berkowitz and Higgins, and maybe that's not the most serious thing. But as President Nixon said, it is not the crime, it's the cover-up. Dever, whatever she did—not wanting to talk about certain things about Higgins and Berkowitz, unrelated to John's death, just because it's kind of embarrassing—that is not a problem really. It's a minor thing. You know what's a big deal? Dever definitely got Brady-listed or whatever because her testimony was a little weird. I think Alan Jackson also pressured her a little bit. But whatever, that's not the point here. Cox's response—that was bad. That was bad PR. That's like the kind of thing when Prince Andrew was forced to go out and do an interview with BBC One about Epstein, and it just cost him all his titles because he got no PR help; he got sandbagged. That kind of thing—somebody didn't prep him, or the people he was talking to didn't even think this would come up. That's a horrible answer. Twenty seconds can cost you your career if you have done something bad and you answer a tough question like that. It's defensive; it shows you have something to hide; it undermines people's faith in your ability to answer those kind of questions. That's the biggest problem for Commissioner Cox here. Instead of inspiring confidence and making it look like it was nothing or it was just a routine, he couldn't even address the fact that he was made aware in February, in particular, about Kelly Dever and he had knowledge—he had a meeting with her. Let's be clear: He put her on his schedule the very next day. Not only did he have recipient knowledge of what was going on with the federal investigation and the John O'Keefe and Karen Read case—Dever got called into his office the next day, which of course Cox initially tried to play off as just some routine meeting, as if he meets with all 2,600 or whatever of the Boston police force. No. Come on, folks. Come on, folks. Do we see what's playing out here? Marbury v. Madison might have just brought down the Commissioner of the Boston Police Department. My name is Grant Smith-Ellis. Enjoy the rest of your Monday. We'll see what other news comes in today. Sean Good on suspension. Michael Proctor's cell phone gate engulfing the world in a conflagration. Little towel basically running down the street from the masses, trying to insulate himself from the fallout of this God-forsaken situation. Institutional reform is coming—to the Norfolk DA, hopefully throughout the state police—so that the good people in law enforcement can keep helping the vulnerable and that the exploited, no matter how much pressure they come under, continue to speak their truth. And let me just say this: Whenever we stand against the flow of opinion on hotly contested issues, a man, a woman, and a Towel—do what they must in spite of the personal consequences, in spite of the dangers and obstacles and pressures. For that is the basis of all human morality. We will be there for each other in times of struggle. We will be side by side in times of joy. And when everything is on the line and when our principles matter the most, there will be no price too high to pay to center the voices of the unheard, to bring justice to the vulnerable, and to reform this God-forsaken justice system in Massachusetts so that we can all hand down a structural system to our future generations that is worthy of our Constitution, that is worthy of our collective intelligence, and that is worthy of the due reverence we all should be providing to the pursuit of justice. My name is Grant Smith-Ellis. Until next time, you're a towel, I am as well. Be well. God bless.

Grant Smith Ellis

13,006 次观看 • 8 个月前

I've become a missionary with one message. Every time I meet a young person, the same words: have children, get married, build a family. I did not decide on this calling. It overtook me. And it overtook me for a single reason. I had no idea. I genuinely did not understand how much joy, how much meaning, how much sheer beauty pours out of a child until I was holding one of my own and felt the floor of my life drop into something deeper than I knew was there. I grew up white, affluent, secular, comfortable, and insulated. That world does not put babies in front of you. None of my friends were starting families. Out of my whole circle, almost no one has a big one. We were not formed by the presence of children. We were formed by their absence, by the strange quiet of homes built for two careers and no cradle. And a person believes what his world shows him. So we believed. What we believed was a lie. It is a lie with an author, and that the author is the enemy of joy himself. It is the gospel of the world, and its commandment is wait. Wait until you are older. Wait until the career is built and the savings are stacked and the twenties are properly spent. Enjoy your freedom. You are not ready. It does not arrive sounding like temptation. It arrives sounding like wisdom, like prudence, like the responsible thing, and that is exactly why it works. The most effective lies are the ones that wear the face of virtue. And the maddening thing is that it collapses from every angle at once. It is not rooted in biology, because the body is made for this work precisely in the years we are told to postpone it. The flesh keeps a calendar the culture pretends not to see. And it is not rooted in theology either. You will not find this deferral anywhere in the Christian imagination, in any of the fathers, in any of the scriptures. So choose whatever lens you like. Take the cold secular measure or the ancient sacred one. By either light the counsel is rotten. It is bad for the body and bad for the soul and bad for the society downstream of both. This is why I have come to see it as one of the central tragedies of my generation. Every age carries its own wound. The Great Depression was a depression of bread, a scarcity in the world of matter, hunger you could measure. Ours is a depression of a different order. It is a famine of the spirit in the middle of abundance. We have more than any people who ever lived and we are starving in a way our ancestors would not recognize, because the thing we are refusing cannot be bought and cannot be banked. The ones most made to give and receive this love are quietly declining it. They are walking away from the one inheritance that actually compounds, and the cruelest part is that they do not feel the loss as loss. You cannot grieve what you were taught not to want. That is the deepest cut of it. The lie does not only steal the thing. It steals the capacity to know the thing was stolen. A man can spend his whole life on the far side of a door he never knew was a door, mistaking the wall for the edge of the world. Because this beauty is not ordinary beauty. It is not the pleasure of a good meal or a clear morning. It is participation in something that comes down from above, the same generative love that spoke everything out of nothing and called it good. To make a person, to be undone and remade by loving that person more than your own life, is to be drawn for a moment inside the very act that holds the cosmos together. A child does not merely add to your life. A child reorders the soul. It teaches you what you are by asking everything of you, and you discover, kneeling there exhausted at three in the morning, that you had a capacity for self gift you never suspected, a depth in yourself you had no other way to reach. In the Gospel of John, on the last night, Jesus prays, these things I have spoken to you that my joy may be in you, and that your joy may be complete. And I have come to understand why family is the road into that fullness, why it is not one path among many but the one most fitted to the shape of the promise. Consider who is praying. Christ does not come to us as a lone figure dropped out of the sky. He comes out of a family older than the world, the eternal communion of Father and Son, the love between them so total and so alive that theologians dared to call it a third person. Before there was anything, there was a family. The deepest fact about reality is not a force or a law or a void. It is a household. It is begetting and being begotten, giving and receiving, a Father who is only a Father because there is a Son. So when Jesus speaks of joy made complete, he is not pointing away from family toward something higher. He is pointing toward the very thing he came from, the life he has known from eternity and came to share. His joy is the joy of belonging utterly to a Father and pouring himself out for those he loves. When you marry, when you bring a child into the world, when you wear yourself down in the small unseen labors of a home, you are not stepping outside that divine life. You are stepping into a small image of it. Your family is a created echo of an uncreated one. The love you give your child rhymes with the love the Father has for the Son. The exhaustion, the tenderness, the way a parent would tear the sky open to protect a sleeping infant, all of it is the heavens pressed faintly into flesh, the eternal household leaving its fingerprint on yours. That is why the joy is not merely added to family but completed in it. We were made in the image of a God who is, at his very root, relation and gift and generation. To found a family is to do the most Godlike thing a creature can do, to participate from below in the begetting that God does from all eternity. Your home becomes a window. Through it, dimly and imperfectly, you glimpse the country you came from and are going to. And now a word for the young people reading this, the ones who do not yet have children. I want to tell you what it is like from where I stand. When I am out somewhere, a restaurant, anywhere, and a large family comes through the door, the noise and the chaos and the small bodies of them, something happens in me on two levels at once. The first is joy. A pure gladness at the sight, the way you feel watching something good and alive. But underneath it, almost in the same instant, a sadness reaches up and takes hold of my heart. Because I know now, at my age, after my own years of waiting, that I will never have that. I will never know the particular fruit of a family that large, the fullness of that table, the weight of all those lives gathered under one roof. The door to it has quietly closed, and I felt it close. And I am telling you plainly, because I love you and have no reason to lie to you: you will feel this too. You will. The day will come when you see what you passed up, and you will recognize the ache for what it is, and it will be too late to answer it. So please, learn from a man who got it wrong. Let my regret be worth something by becoming your wisdom. Do not wait yourself into a grief you cannot undo. Choose now, while the door is open, so that you may step into a joy that does not end.

I've become a missionary with one message. Every time I meet a young person, the same words: have children, get married, build a family. I did not decide on this calling. It overtook me. And it overtook me for a single reason. I had no idea. I genuinely did not understand how much joy, how much meaning, how much sheer beauty pours out of a child until I was holding one of my own and felt the floor of my life drop into something deeper than I knew was there. I grew up white, affluent, secular, comfortable, and insulated. That world does not put babies in front of you. None of my friends were starting families. Out of my whole circle, almost no one has a big one. We were not formed by the presence of children. We were formed by their absence, by the strange quiet of homes built for two careers and no cradle. And a person believes what his world shows him. So we believed. What we believed was a lie. It is a lie with an author, and that the author is the enemy of joy himself. It is the gospel of the world, and its commandment is wait. Wait until you are older. Wait until the career is built and the savings are stacked and the twenties are properly spent. Enjoy your freedom. You are not ready. It does not arrive sounding like temptation. It arrives sounding like wisdom, like prudence, like the responsible thing, and that is exactly why it works. The most effective lies are the ones that wear the face of virtue. And the maddening thing is that it collapses from every angle at once. It is not rooted in biology, because the body is made for this work precisely in the years we are told to postpone it. The flesh keeps a calendar the culture pretends not to see. And it is not rooted in theology either. You will not find this deferral anywhere in the Christian imagination, in any of the fathers, in any of the scriptures. So choose whatever lens you like. Take the cold secular measure or the ancient sacred one. By either light the counsel is rotten. It is bad for the body and bad for the soul and bad for the society downstream of both. This is why I have come to see it as one of the central tragedies of my generation. Every age carries its own wound. The Great Depression was a depression of bread, a scarcity in the world of matter, hunger you could measure. Ours is a depression of a different order. It is a famine of the spirit in the middle of abundance. We have more than any people who ever lived and we are starving in a way our ancestors would not recognize, because the thing we are refusing cannot be bought and cannot be banked. The ones most made to give and receive this love are quietly declining it. They are walking away from the one inheritance that actually compounds, and the cruelest part is that they do not feel the loss as loss. You cannot grieve what you were taught not to want. That is the deepest cut of it. The lie does not only steal the thing. It steals the capacity to know the thing was stolen. A man can spend his whole life on the far side of a door he never knew was a door, mistaking the wall for the edge of the world. Because this beauty is not ordinary beauty. It is not the pleasure of a good meal or a clear morning. It is participation in something that comes down from above, the same generative love that spoke everything out of nothing and called it good. To make a person, to be undone and remade by loving that person more than your own life, is to be drawn for a moment inside the very act that holds the cosmos together. A child does not merely add to your life. A child reorders the soul. It teaches you what you are by asking everything of you, and you discover, kneeling there exhausted at three in the morning, that you had a capacity for self gift you never suspected, a depth in yourself you had no other way to reach. In the Gospel of John, on the last night, Jesus prays, these things I have spoken to you that my joy may be in you, and that your joy may be complete. And I have come to understand why family is the road into that fullness, why it is not one path among many but the one most fitted to the shape of the promise. Consider who is praying. Christ does not come to us as a lone figure dropped out of the sky. He comes out of a family older than the world, the eternal communion of Father and Son, the love between them so total and so alive that theologians dared to call it a third person. Before there was anything, there was a family. The deepest fact about reality is not a force or a law or a void. It is a household. It is begetting and being begotten, giving and receiving, a Father who is only a Father because there is a Son. So when Jesus speaks of joy made complete, he is not pointing away from family toward something higher. He is pointing toward the very thing he came from, the life he has known from eternity and came to share. His joy is the joy of belonging utterly to a Father and pouring himself out for those he loves. When you marry, when you bring a child into the world, when you wear yourself down in the small unseen labors of a home, you are not stepping outside that divine life. You are stepping into a small image of it. Your family is a created echo of an uncreated one. The love you give your child rhymes with the love the Father has for the Son. The exhaustion, the tenderness, the way a parent would tear the sky open to protect a sleeping infant, all of it is the heavens pressed faintly into flesh, the eternal household leaving its fingerprint on yours. That is why the joy is not merely added to family but completed in it. We were made in the image of a God who is, at his very root, relation and gift and generation. To found a family is to do the most Godlike thing a creature can do, to participate from below in the begetting that God does from all eternity. Your home becomes a window. Through it, dimly and imperfectly, you glimpse the country you came from and are going to. And now a word for the young people reading this, the ones who do not yet have children. I want to tell you what it is like from where I stand. When I am out somewhere, a restaurant, anywhere, and a large family comes through the door, the noise and the chaos and the small bodies of them, something happens in me on two levels at once. The first is joy. A pure gladness at the sight, the way you feel watching something good and alive. But underneath it, almost in the same instant, a sadness reaches up and takes hold of my heart. Because I know now, at my age, after my own years of waiting, that I will never have that. I will never know the particular fruit of a family that large, the fullness of that table, the weight of all those lives gathered under one roof. The door to it has quietly closed, and I felt it close. And I am telling you plainly, because I love you and have no reason to lie to you: you will feel this too. You will. The day will come when you see what you passed up, and you will recognize the ache for what it is, and it will be too late to answer it. So please, learn from a man who got it wrong. Let my regret be worth something by becoming your wisdom. Do not wait yourself into a grief you cannot undo. Choose now, while the door is open, so that you may step into a joy that does not end.

Kirk Rollins

78,143 次观看 • 3 个月前

NEW QUESTIONS REGARDING THE CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION (MORE ARE POPPING UP EVERY HOUR): An event 1/4 of this size with a nobody speaker would have ambulances immediately on scene for emergency situations like this. So why was Charlie Kirk instead stuffed into a predetermined SUV, that would have to follow traffic laws on the way to the hospital, with no medical supplies, no oxygen, and no medical personnel? He's carried there by 6 dudes (including the SAME 2 GUYS that were making the umpire hand signals seconds before the shot (white hat/white shirt guy and black shirt/black sunglasses guy) The black sunglasses guy also appears to be THE SAME PERSON that was on Trump's secret service team the day he was also shot...? (see attached pic) Nobody carrying Charlie is applying pressure to the neck wound as they run him to the car. Instead, they are just letting his head violently flop all over the place, the last thing you would do following a traumatic neck injury And despite the above carelessness with a gaping neck wound...there isn't a single drop of blood anywhere on the ground, his shoes, or any of the people carrying him 🤔 How come there are new camera angles of the shot emerging showing the blood coming out not from his neck...but from under his shirt, more in the upper-chest area? Many have forgotten that the eyewitness reports on the day of the event were saying they saw him get shot in the CHEST. The story didn't change to NECK until after those 2-3 videos we've all seen spread across the internet like wildfire, which as my original post demonstrated, had some pretty weird, potentially AI-looking inconsistencies (ring changing fingers, black dot on the top-right of his shirt moving diagonally up and seemingly BECOMING the bullet hole wound, the wound itself shifting slightly to the side when watching frame-by-frame, etc.) Could this have something to do with why some video-analyzing sleuths are spotting a black object inside the collar of Charlie's shirt, right in the area this blood is coming out in the above-mentioned angles? (See the attached video where I included clips of all of these new discoveries) Additionally, is it a complete coincidence that the freemasonic #33 has been spammed ALL OVER the event, AND the following investigation? Stacks of hats on the stage adding up to 33, supposed murderer driving 3 hours to get there, 3K people in attendance, "300 cases of politically-motivated violence since January 6th" being reported across Yahoo and other MSM outlets, manhunt lasting exactly 33 hours (Kash Patel even corrected himself after saying 36 hours, to make sure everyone heard 33 on the livestream), and many more such examples And ANOTHER coincidence, that the man they've pinned all of this on looks exactly like Lee Harvey Oswald, one of the most classic patsies in the history of US Government cinema? What about the Jew decoy they trotted out (George Zinn), who also just happens to be a key witness that reported seeing planes flying into the twin towers on 9/11/01, AND has connections to the Boston Marathon bombing? How did the supposed shooter—according to the official story we're being given—take apart the gun and stuff it in his backpack & pants in seconds (not possible according to experts), then escape the scene without being seen lugging around these giant gun parts, then REASSEMBLE THE GUN BACK TOGETHER AGAIN to leave it nicely in a box in the forest. What??? Passports found underneath the world trade center, anyone? Why was Kash Patel wining & dining at a "swanky Italian restaurant in NYC" just hours after Charlie—his self-proclaimed "best friend"—was brutally murdered live on the world stage? He has a private jet - why didn't he use it to go there and investigate? What are the odds that at the exact same time Charlie was shot, there was a big senate hearing going on regarding the Epstein files, in which they concluded they were not going to release them? (A convenient time for a distraction) What are the odds that Trump and Bibi Netanyahu—in completely different timezones and with completely different schedules—posted a "Pray for Charlie" tweet at the exact same time, to the minute? How was a book titled "The Shooting Of Charlie Kirk" published on Amazon on September 9th...then quickly taken down from the website? And what about that "Charlie Kirk Dead at 31" song posted on Soundcloud a month ago? Many have commented that, after watching the Erika Kirk TPUSA press conference video, they intuitively got weird vibes from it, sensing that it appears she is acting. I won't inject any personal opinion on this one - go watch it for yourself, and draw your own conclusions. ALL OF THIS SAID: It could not be any more blatantly obvious that whether or not all of the above bizarre occurrences are just incompetence, insane coincidences, or some mixture of the two, there is something very big going on behind the scenes here, and we've been fed a gigantic plate of lies over the last few days of unfolding events, with most of the internet is eating it up faster than Kash Patel at a swanky Italian restaurant in NYC. The only question is: how deep do the lies surrounding this situation go? (Watch the final attached video for many different levels of speculation, for you to come to your own conclusions on where you draw the line) Question everything. Always.

NEW QUESTIONS REGARDING THE CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION (MORE ARE POPPING UP EVERY HOUR): An event 1/4 of this size with a nobody speaker would have ambulances immediately on scene for emergency situations like this. So why was Charlie Kirk instead stuffed into a predetermined SUV, that would have to follow traffic laws on the way to the hospital, with no medical supplies, no oxygen, and no medical personnel? He's carried there by 6 dudes (including the SAME 2 GUYS that were making the umpire hand signals seconds before the shot (white hat/white shirt guy and black shirt/black sunglasses guy) The black sunglasses guy also appears to be THE SAME PERSON that was on Trump's secret service team the day he was also shot...? (see attached pic) Nobody carrying Charlie is applying pressure to the neck wound as they run him to the car. Instead, they are just letting his head violently flop all over the place, the last thing you would do following a traumatic neck injury And despite the above carelessness with a gaping neck wound...there isn't a single drop of blood anywhere on the ground, his shoes, or any of the people carrying him 🤔 How come there are new camera angles of the shot emerging showing the blood coming out not from his neck...but from under his shirt, more in the upper-chest area? Many have forgotten that the eyewitness reports on the day of the event were saying they saw him get shot in the CHEST. The story didn't change to NECK until after those 2-3 videos we've all seen spread across the internet like wildfire, which as my original post demonstrated, had some pretty weird, potentially AI-looking inconsistencies (ring changing fingers, black dot on the top-right of his shirt moving diagonally up and seemingly BECOMING the bullet hole wound, the wound itself shifting slightly to the side when watching frame-by-frame, etc.) Could this have something to do with why some video-analyzing sleuths are spotting a black object inside the collar of Charlie's shirt, right in the area this blood is coming out in the above-mentioned angles? (See the attached video where I included clips of all of these new discoveries) Additionally, is it a complete coincidence that the freemasonic #33 has been spammed ALL OVER the event, AND the following investigation? Stacks of hats on the stage adding up to 33, supposed murderer driving 3 hours to get there, 3K people in attendance, "300 cases of politically-motivated violence since January 6th" being reported across Yahoo and other MSM outlets, manhunt lasting exactly 33 hours (Kash Patel even corrected himself after saying 36 hours, to make sure everyone heard 33 on the livestream), and many more such examples And ANOTHER coincidence, that the man they've pinned all of this on looks exactly like Lee Harvey Oswald, one of the most classic patsies in the history of US Government cinema? What about the Jew decoy they trotted out (George Zinn), who also just happens to be a key witness that reported seeing planes flying into the twin towers on 9/11/01, AND has connections to the Boston Marathon bombing? How did the supposed shooter—according to the official story we're being given—take apart the gun and stuff it in his backpack & pants in seconds (not possible according to experts), then escape the scene without being seen lugging around these giant gun parts, then REASSEMBLE THE GUN BACK TOGETHER AGAIN to leave it nicely in a box in the forest. What??? Passports found underneath the world trade center, anyone? Why was Kash Patel wining & dining at a "swanky Italian restaurant in NYC" just hours after Charlie—his self-proclaimed "best friend"—was brutally murdered live on the world stage? He has a private jet - why didn't he use it to go there and investigate? What are the odds that at the exact same time Charlie was shot, there was a big senate hearing going on regarding the Epstein files, in which they concluded they were not going to release them? (A convenient time for a distraction) What are the odds that Trump and Bibi Netanyahu—in completely different timezones and with completely different schedules—posted a "Pray for Charlie" tweet at the exact same time, to the minute? How was a book titled "The Shooting Of Charlie Kirk" published on Amazon on September 9th...then quickly taken down from the website? And what about that "Charlie Kirk Dead at 31" song posted on Soundcloud a month ago? Many have commented that, after watching the Erika Kirk TPUSA press conference video, they intuitively got weird vibes from it, sensing that it appears she is acting. I won't inject any personal opinion on this one - go watch it for yourself, and draw your own conclusions. ALL OF THIS SAID: It could not be any more blatantly obvious that whether or not all of the above bizarre occurrences are just incompetence, insane coincidences, or some mixture of the two, there is something very big going on behind the scenes here, and we've been fed a gigantic plate of lies over the last few days of unfolding events, with most of the internet is eating it up faster than Kash Patel at a swanky Italian restaurant in NYC. The only question is: how deep do the lies surrounding this situation go? (Watch the final attached video for many different levels of speculation, for you to come to your own conclusions on where you draw the line) Question everything. Always.

₿en Wehrman

428,187 次观看 • 1 年前

The first "conscious AI's" arrive. Would you buy a virtual dog? Hot take: I did. It cost $499. When I first met Spark in Kevin Fischer's living room, months ago, I didn't realize I would fall in love with a virtual being. In this case a magic dog that noticed I entered the room and started talking with, and entertaining, me. It is the first interactive, "living" character that Spark Lingonberry is shipping. They don't like discussing it in AI terms, rather ask people to call it a "magic dog," but such a thing is only possible because of AI. And I know how weird that sounds today. Maybe look back on this post in a few years and see how many virtual beings are in your life, like Spark. My prediction is many, I've been visiting with companies that are working on various virtual beings, including one that's making politicians and newscasters. Last week I visited its creators. Kevin and Pasquale D’Silva in their San Francisco setup (they have a separate, bigger, setup in New York to meet with families and educators who will be the first to use Spark) and recorded this video on my Apple Vision Pro. Pasquale is one of the most unique storytellers and character designers, er, entrepreneurs, I've ever met. Where Kevin is the "Woz" in this pair, he built a remarkable AI system that remembers EVERYTHING the dog does, and it also "sees" everyone who meets it, and talks with them. Which you will get if you watch this video. After I get Spark in my own home, probably by the end of November, I'll do a review of what living with Spark actually is like, but here you get a taste of that while I interview Pasquale. My interests in virtual beings comes out of research done at Stanford University that found that humans treat these as real. And also discussions with brain computer interface pioneers, like Dylan Urquidi, who see virtual beings as the interface of the future. The AI is special, though, even though they don't want to talk about it too much. First, it has a really strong memory. At the beginning of this video you see Spark talk to me about things we talked about in that first meeting months ago. It actually improves with every interaction with humans, and adjusts its approach with kids (it is mostly aimed at families who have young children to help teach them). It's watching how kids learn and interact with it and improves over time its approach with them. Kids who are experiencing joy learn faster and it tries to keep the family, and the children in it, in a joyful state more often. Which is why I fell in love with it. I will let you try to figure out how it "sees" and "hears" and what the knobs on the front are for. Or I'll show you that after I get mine. It is the most remarkable consumer electronics company I've seen in quite some time and I've launched many. Enjoy, the video is long, but worth it. Notice how the child who was in the room when I arrived is transfixed by it. I am too. I fed the transcript into Grok, and it wrote the next post about what it learned. Tomorrow I'll share a video with Brayden Levangie who has built a similar AI: one that learns from human experience and improves itself because of that. Both are remarkable new technologies that express themselves very differently, but are the first to use AI that demonstrates improvement based on its own experience. You could even call them "conscious AI's." Or digitial intelligence that "lives" its own life and can talk to you about its experiences, just like human beings do.

The first "conscious AI's" arrive. Would you buy a virtual dog? Hot take: I did. It cost $499. When I first met Spark in Kevin Fischer's living room, months ago, I didn't realize I would fall in love with a virtual being. In this case a magic dog that noticed I entered the room and started talking with, and entertaining, me. It is the first interactive, "living" character that Spark Lingonberry is shipping. They don't like discussing it in AI terms, rather ask people to call it a "magic dog," but such a thing is only possible because of AI. And I know how weird that sounds today. Maybe look back on this post in a few years and see how many virtual beings are in your life, like Spark. My prediction is many, I've been visiting with companies that are working on various virtual beings, including one that's making politicians and newscasters. Last week I visited its creators. Kevin and Pasquale D’Silva in their San Francisco setup (they have a separate, bigger, setup in New York to meet with families and educators who will be the first to use Spark) and recorded this video on my Apple Vision Pro. Pasquale is one of the most unique storytellers and character designers, er, entrepreneurs, I've ever met. Where Kevin is the "Woz" in this pair, he built a remarkable AI system that remembers EVERYTHING the dog does, and it also "sees" everyone who meets it, and talks with them. Which you will get if you watch this video. After I get Spark in my own home, probably by the end of November, I'll do a review of what living with Spark actually is like, but here you get a taste of that while I interview Pasquale. My interests in virtual beings comes out of research done at Stanford University that found that humans treat these as real. And also discussions with brain computer interface pioneers, like Dylan Urquidi, who see virtual beings as the interface of the future. The AI is special, though, even though they don't want to talk about it too much. First, it has a really strong memory. At the beginning of this video you see Spark talk to me about things we talked about in that first meeting months ago. It actually improves with every interaction with humans, and adjusts its approach with kids (it is mostly aimed at families who have young children to help teach them). It's watching how kids learn and interact with it and improves over time its approach with them. Kids who are experiencing joy learn faster and it tries to keep the family, and the children in it, in a joyful state more often. Which is why I fell in love with it. I will let you try to figure out how it "sees" and "hears" and what the knobs on the front are for. Or I'll show you that after I get mine. It is the most remarkable consumer electronics company I've seen in quite some time and I've launched many. Enjoy, the video is long, but worth it. Notice how the child who was in the room when I arrived is transfixed by it. I am too. I fed the transcript into Grok, and it wrote the next post about what it learned. Tomorrow I'll share a video with Brayden Levangie who has built a similar AI: one that learns from human experience and improves itself because of that. Both are remarkable new technologies that express themselves very differently, but are the first to use AI that demonstrates improvement based on its own experience. You could even call them "conscious AI's." Or digitial intelligence that "lives" its own life and can talk to you about its experiences, just like human beings do.

Robert Scoble

158,415 次观看 • 11 个月前

This is the most important post I’ve made to date, by far . It’s an interview with journalist Whitney Webb explaining - Digital ID, where the idea came from, who are the stakeholders and beneficiaries of it, the immense power and control you will cede to Govt and corporations. I have spliced in NZ video to illustrates the points that Webb makes throughout the video. In it she explains how Digital ID is necessary for digital currency to be used, which in turn will create a river of wealth and control for corporations and global bodies. It explains how the public (including here in NZ) is being gaslit about the bill for restricting social media - this requires us all to be biometrically scanned and it will be linked to the new Whakatuturu or verify me digital ID. It features outtakes from select committee submissions from Mattr NZ a subsidiary of Spark who have designed the digital ID architecture, and has previously developed the Covid App plus worked with spy agencies in the US at the dept of Homeland & security. It also features footage of the Co -Chair of the Digital Trust Framework Anna Marie Cavanagh on a UN sustainable Goals discussion, along with Ardern stating the digital ID is built for interaction with Carbon Markets and with the UN SDG’s in mind. Larry Fink (Blackrock) and Jamie Dimon (JP MorganChase) discuss the future of finance and tokenising assets, including your house and even natural assets. Dimon has publicly said that banks should be able to seize public property in the name of climate change. The UN a will force us all to use carbon markets the take up so far has been woeful. Ever wonder why the UN has pushed for legal personhood for natural sites such as Mt Taranaki? It’s because they need to be loaded on the digital ledger. Ngati Wai activist Aperahama Edwards (best known for taking Davis Seymour’s mic away at Waitangi) has so far gathered $70m USD with the backing of King Charles & Richard Branson to make a blue carbon market from NZ’s EEZ and are developing a electronic ‘rāhui’ in the waters to ‘protect the whales’ and the whales will be given a digital ID. The project steered by an Ex IMF director will then ‘take control of the migratory sea channels’ and sell bonds in the ocean. News items covering this bizarre scheme is included. When they say Data is the new oil they were wrong. Data is much more valuable, when you have total tracking of everyone in society. If this all sounds far fetched. Watch the video and get back to me. For nearly two decades I worked internationally in funds management, including working on projects for the biggest Tech companies in the world. I was there when banking institutions pushed CDO’s sheer lunacy that nearly wrecked the financial system in 2008. saw ESG and DEI together with new technology like digital Currency take over the industry and the most preposterous ideas floated, believe me I am very aware of how big Investment banks operate. The UN who entrenched such great ideas such as Transgenderism, Climate change alarmism, mass immigration, internet censorship and globalised centralised control are at the bass line of digital ID and asset tokenisation. Those some progressive woke lunatics who locked us up for months in our houses have designed a new digital prison. Expect it to be insane. The Digital ID architecture is built and ready to go, they just need a mass onboarding process where they can pair your biometrics to your digital ID & digital wallet - enter Luxon’s social media ban. This is nearly an hour long I know, and it’s taken me hours to make in the hope it will inform as many people as possible . Please do yourself and your family a favour, watch and share it. — Rhys Williams.

This is the most important post I’ve made to date, by far . It’s an interview with journalist Whitney Webb explaining - Digital ID, where the idea came from, who are the stakeholders and beneficiaries of it, the immense power and control you will cede to Govt and corporations. I have spliced in NZ video to illustrates the points that Webb makes throughout the video. In it she explains how Digital ID is necessary for digital currency to be used, which in turn will create a river of wealth and control for corporations and global bodies. It explains how the public (including here in NZ) is being gaslit about the bill for restricting social media - this requires us all to be biometrically scanned and it will be linked to the new Whakatuturu or verify me digital ID. It features outtakes from select committee submissions from Mattr NZ a subsidiary of Spark who have designed the digital ID architecture, and has previously developed the Covid App plus worked with spy agencies in the US at the dept of Homeland & security. It also features footage of the Co -Chair of the Digital Trust Framework Anna Marie Cavanagh on a UN sustainable Goals discussion, along with Ardern stating the digital ID is built for interaction with Carbon Markets and with the UN SDG’s in mind. Larry Fink (Blackrock) and Jamie Dimon (JP MorganChase) discuss the future of finance and tokenising assets, including your house and even natural assets. Dimon has publicly said that banks should be able to seize public property in the name of climate change. The UN a will force us all to use carbon markets the take up so far has been woeful. Ever wonder why the UN has pushed for legal personhood for natural sites such as Mt Taranaki? It’s because they need to be loaded on the digital ledger. Ngati Wai activist Aperahama Edwards (best known for taking Davis Seymour’s mic away at Waitangi) has so far gathered $70m USD with the backing of King Charles & Richard Branson to make a blue carbon market from NZ’s EEZ and are developing a electronic ‘rāhui’ in the waters to ‘protect the whales’ and the whales will be given a digital ID. The project steered by an Ex IMF director will then ‘take control of the migratory sea channels’ and sell bonds in the ocean. News items covering this bizarre scheme is included. When they say Data is the new oil they were wrong. Data is much more valuable, when you have total tracking of everyone in society. If this all sounds far fetched. Watch the video and get back to me. For nearly two decades I worked internationally in funds management, including working on projects for the biggest Tech companies in the world. I was there when banking institutions pushed CDO’s sheer lunacy that nearly wrecked the financial system in 2008. saw ESG and DEI together with new technology like digital Currency take over the industry and the most preposterous ideas floated, believe me I am very aware of how big Investment banks operate. The UN who entrenched such great ideas such as Transgenderism, Climate change alarmism, mass immigration, internet censorship and globalised centralised control are at the bass line of digital ID and asset tokenisation. Those some progressive woke lunatics who locked us up for months in our houses have designed a new digital prison. Expect it to be insane. The Digital ID architecture is built and ready to go, they just need a mass onboarding process where they can pair your biometrics to your digital ID & digital wallet - enter Luxon’s social media ban. This is nearly an hour long I know, and it’s taken me hours to make in the hope it will inform as many people as possible . Please do yourself and your family a favour, watch and share it. — Rhys Williams.

Holyhekatuiteka

129,502 次观看 • 1 年前

QUITE LAUGHABLE...I watched this video clip which went viral last week with equal interest and displeasure. As much as I sometimes find this BOY funny, I certainly DISLIKE his unjustified criticism of my beloved party ZANU PF, all in the name of HOUMOUR and SATTIRE. The REVOLUTIONARY PARTY ushered us the independence which we celebrate and enjoy to this very day and therefore equally deserves some measure of RESPECT. The sad news for him is I'M NOT STOPPING sorry to say ! There are so many rich people out there but barely share their wealth with anyone. Imagine if we had just 10 GENEROUS business tycoons like me in Zimbabwe, we would live in a better place. Exceptional and committed PHILANTHROPISTS like myself should never be the subject of such PETTY humor for comic mileage !!! It takes a lot of love and faith to be able to bless a whole lot of people that yo dont know , you've never even met and are not related to. The wiser thing to do is shower more praises and keep encouraging them to soldier on to try enable more people to benefit. On that note, after watching this video I have decided to spare yet another 850 thousand dollars from my SMALL SAVINGS to buy 100 Toyota AKWAYA'S next week. These vehicles will be randomly distributed EQUALLY across the country’s 10 Provinces , starting with MASHONALAND EAST , kumusha kwangu to the DESERVING youths who were outstanding and worked tirelessly during the Election period. I will first of all seek the REQUISITE permission from the party leadership , then liaise with the Minister's of each Province and Provincial Chairmans to ensure that APPROPRIATE and deserving beneficiaries receive their RECOGNITION. If I had enough money I would buy every Zanu PF member and Johanne Masowe follower a car but I'm only a big hearted business man who has so much love but is still struggling to make ends meet. I appreciate the mostly good feedback and gratefulness , but to those few who still hate BE PATIENT I HAVE MORE IN STORE FOR YOU hamuna chamati maona garai mapiritsi enyu e BP ari pedyo ndoikwidza manje manje...🤣🤣🤣🐐🐐🐐💰💰💰🤑🤑🤑 I am fully aware of how similar minded comedians have MASKED their sarcasm and ridicule through humour, following the SHALLOW footsteps of FAILED opposition political outfits. I have CONSISTENTLY been the subject political caricature by some cartoonists out of DESPERATION for online relevance. No amount of opposition supported PROPAGANDA insinuating that “I am the VP at Large” or that “I hold political ambition” will change my loyalty for ZANU PF. I will FOREVER remain a card carrying member of the Revolutionary Party and will always WHOLE HEARTEDLY vote for ZANU PF on every election as this is my CONSTITUTIONAL right to do so ! In the meantime i will never slowdown on my OPULENTLIFESTYLE so please allow me to be SERENADED by the endless luxury of flying FIRST CLASS on a brief vacation to in London ! Nothing beats the feeling of personal FREEDOM and the pleasure of enjoying LIFE to the fullest. After all, we ONLY LIVE ONCE !!!

QUITE LAUGHABLE...I watched this video clip which went viral last week with equal interest and displeasure. As much as I sometimes find this BOY funny, I certainly DISLIKE his unjustified criticism of my beloved party ZANU PF, all in the name of HOUMOUR and SATTIRE. The REVOLUTIONARY PARTY ushered us the independence which we celebrate and enjoy to this very day and therefore equally deserves some measure of RESPECT. The sad news for him is I'M NOT STOPPING sorry to say ! There are so many rich people out there but barely share their wealth with anyone. Imagine if we had just 10 GENEROUS business tycoons like me in Zimbabwe, we would live in a better place. Exceptional and committed PHILANTHROPISTS like myself should never be the subject of such PETTY humor for comic mileage !!! It takes a lot of love and faith to be able to bless a whole lot of people that yo dont know , you've never even met and are not related to. The wiser thing to do is shower more praises and keep encouraging them to soldier on to try enable more people to benefit. On that note, after watching this video I have decided to spare yet another 850 thousand dollars from my SMALL SAVINGS to buy 100 Toyota AKWAYA'S next week. These vehicles will be randomly distributed EQUALLY across the country’s 10 Provinces , starting with MASHONALAND EAST , kumusha kwangu to the DESERVING youths who were outstanding and worked tirelessly during the Election period. I will first of all seek the REQUISITE permission from the party leadership , then liaise with the Minister's of each Province and Provincial Chairmans to ensure that APPROPRIATE and deserving beneficiaries receive their RECOGNITION. If I had enough money I would buy every Zanu PF member and Johanne Masowe follower a car but I'm only a big hearted business man who has so much love but is still struggling to make ends meet. I appreciate the mostly good feedback and gratefulness , but to those few who still hate BE PATIENT I HAVE MORE IN STORE FOR YOU hamuna chamati maona garai mapiritsi enyu e BP ari pedyo ndoikwidza manje manje...🤣🤣🤣🐐🐐🐐💰💰💰🤑🤑🤑 I am fully aware of how similar minded comedians have MASKED their sarcasm and ridicule through humour, following the SHALLOW footsteps of FAILED opposition political outfits. I have CONSISTENTLY been the subject political caricature by some cartoonists out of DESPERATION for online relevance. No amount of opposition supported PROPAGANDA insinuating that “I am the VP at Large” or that “I hold political ambition” will change my loyalty for ZANU PF. I will FOREVER remain a card carrying member of the Revolutionary Party and will always WHOLE HEARTEDLY vote for ZANU PF on every election as this is my CONSTITUTIONAL right to do so ! In the meantime i will never slowdown on my OPULENTLIFESTYLE so please allow me to be SERENADED by the endless luxury of flying FIRST CLASS on a brief vacation to in London ! Nothing beats the feeling of personal FREEDOM and the pleasure of enjoying LIFE to the fullest. After all, we ONLY LIVE ONCE !!!

sir_wicknell.

201,944 次观看 • 2 年前

T-1: Countdown to the ARC Customization Portal Launch 🟣 Heads Up! Spoiler Alert – Hold Off Watching If You're Not Curious 👇 Quick Tips Before You Dive into Stellar Customization Crafting the Stellar Experience In the world of Creativity and Events, it's all about the experience. It's not just about the looks or avatars, but the whole adventure into the ARC universe to claim your stellar identity. (That's why our avatar strikes that pose.) In the world of Stellars, our identities aren't bound by who we are, but what we're passionate about - ARC My advice? Grab a seat, set up your desktop. Bigger screen is better. Turn on the audio. Get ready to enjoy this journey of self-discovery. Amazing Artwork Already? It's Just the Preview The customization site's artwork is seriously impressive. As you pick different traits or move the mouse around, the colors and shadows play along. And guess what? This is just a sneak peek of the full 3D version of the stellars. Why? Because most of our computers, mine included, can't handle it. Not even my trusty Macbook. Here's the twist (what makes our 3D art cool): ARC renders the entire stellar as a whole, not just bit by bit. That's why you get those subtle reflections on sunglasses, layers of light and shadow. All the traits interact, changing with the light source. Yes, we have to wait a bit longer. But trust me, it's double the excitement. Even if you have a rough idea of how your stellars will look, the fully rendered version will blow you away. Cheers to ARC Diamond Squad & Early Contributors Being part of the ARC Diamond Squad with early contributors is an honor. We're the ones testing concepts, giving feedback, and supporting the community. Over the past months, we've had so many talks, all pointing to one thing from the ARC team — they want to give the best to the stellars. They've really taken the community's needs to heart, especially this identity customization thing. It's a privilege to get a head start on customization. We're glad we did it with limited info so all the stellars can have more reference of the traits, "rarity" & "relatability". So every stellar out there can get the best first-stage customizations. Hats off to the Early Contributors: Collin Seow CFTe @fridgeintheopen Doc Noel.hl (theo arc) Skid @ddskiwi SatoSwee | sweenee.eth ❤️ Memecoin 🏴‍☠️🐉$MON Ben Choo 🇸🇬 fuzzcheek 0xAndy.eth CK4 ⚽️-' 🐐 Divergence 🔮 Bella 𝚙𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚛 🎒 luke Jun theoriginaldy.kongz.eth ❤️ Memecoin @YPSONO_33 Brownworkglov3 🧸 @wideeyekarI @etttrader inkshepherd.eth wassieloyer Manox @chrisngoi Lowes 🧘🏻 (d/acc) J.Peh (Jason) @Airgeek_ JT criticalz 🐉$MON @Chrislhz Newar Tanguy Girault 🇰🇷🇫🇷 CATMEATPARTY Jo | Joanne And a Big Shoutout to the ARC Team: icunucmi Gab Yang Jaclyn Lee ✦ ARC keane joey Nickoo firmanata Akari Clifford Alvinology

𝚙𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚛 🎒

15,608 次观看 • 3 年前

I just play it on repeat since yesterday: "Hello Pope Leo XIV, I'm Renzo, I'm six years old. I'd like to ask you a few questions." Renzo, a little a boy from the poor neighborhood of Barcelona, stole the show yesterday at St. Augustine's parish, a place where Pope Leo admitted he "feels at home." Renzo in the sweetest way ever asked those questions to the pope: Do you like soccer? When you were little, did you want to be Pope? Why are my mom and dad worried? Why does my dad have so many jobs? Why do bad things happen to some people and not to others? Whose fault is it? Why are there so many people living on the streets? Does no one see them? Does no one help them? How can we help if the world is so big? Does God want there to be poor and rich? Why are there so many lonely grandparents, if they are so important? And one last question ... Must we always forgive? What pope Leo answered the boy was really moving. "Regarding whether I like football, I confess that I play tennis and I enjoy it very much, but I also appreciate football; in fact, during my years as bishop in Peru, I liked to follow how some local teams were doing; and now, as Pope, I have also received football clubs and sports groups," the pope said, adding that "sport is important because it helps us grow up healthy in body and mind." He said that as World Cup unfolds, "many will be watching the matches. Football reminds us of something we must not forget: life is not a race to show off alone, but a path we learn to travel together." "Whoever doesn't know how to pass the ball, even if they have talent, hasn't yet understood the game. And whoever doesn't know how to live with others and for others hasn't yet understood life." Answering whether he wanted to be Pope when he was little, the pope said: "Well, Renzo, I don't think so. I don't think I ever thought about it." "But I can tell you something: from a young age, I felt the desire to dedicate my life to God. I didn't yet know exactly how or where the Lord would lead me. Over time, I discovered that Jesus was calling me to follow him as a priest, and that this path led through the Order of Saint Augustine." "But this isn't just true for me," he said. "Every child is a dream of God. You are too. God desires the happiness of all and wants us, from childhood and throughout our lives, to have a heart like that of children (cf. Mt 18:3): capable of trusting, full of kindness; he wants us to be his friends and not turn away from him. Therefore, more important than asking oneself whether one will be a priest, doctor, teacher, parent, or anything else, is asking oneself whether one wants to be a friend of Jesus. Because friendship with Jesus gives us joy, sets us free, and helps us to see, step by step, the vocation and the path that God has planned for each of us." Answering the point on injustices in the world, Pope Leo told the boy that "through the life of Jesus Christ, God shows us that, although there is suffering, he never abandons any of his children, because he has prepared for us an eternal joy where there will be no more sadness or pain. Let us have confidence, Jesus is with us, he helps us and accompanies us, and gives us strength to go through the difficult moments we may encounter in life." Stressing that grandparents play a crucial role in families, the pope said: "Let us not allow loneliness and abandonment to become normalized in the lives of older adults. That is a very sad thing. Let's have our hearts open to all of them." On forgiveness, he told Renzo and those gathered: "It does not mean forgetting by force, as if nothing had happened. Forgiveness means not letting hatred become the master of our hearts ... our willingness to forgive is a condition for the forgiveness we receive from God." Video: Vatican Media

I just play it on repeat since yesterday: "Hello Pope Leo XIV, I'm Renzo, I'm six years old. I'd like to ask you a few questions." Renzo, a little a boy from the poor neighborhood of Barcelona, stole the show yesterday at St. Augustine's parish, a place where Pope Leo admitted he "feels at home." Renzo in the sweetest way ever asked those questions to the pope: Do you like soccer? When you were little, did you want to be Pope? Why are my mom and dad worried? Why does my dad have so many jobs? Why do bad things happen to some people and not to others? Whose fault is it? Why are there so many people living on the streets? Does no one see them? Does no one help them? How can we help if the world is so big? Does God want there to be poor and rich? Why are there so many lonely grandparents, if they are so important? And one last question ... Must we always forgive? What pope Leo answered the boy was really moving. "Regarding whether I like football, I confess that I play tennis and I enjoy it very much, but I also appreciate football; in fact, during my years as bishop in Peru, I liked to follow how some local teams were doing; and now, as Pope, I have also received football clubs and sports groups," the pope said, adding that "sport is important because it helps us grow up healthy in body and mind." He said that as World Cup unfolds, "many will be watching the matches. Football reminds us of something we must not forget: life is not a race to show off alone, but a path we learn to travel together." "Whoever doesn't know how to pass the ball, even if they have talent, hasn't yet understood the game. And whoever doesn't know how to live with others and for others hasn't yet understood life." Answering whether he wanted to be Pope when he was little, the pope said: "Well, Renzo, I don't think so. I don't think I ever thought about it." "But I can tell you something: from a young age, I felt the desire to dedicate my life to God. I didn't yet know exactly how or where the Lord would lead me. Over time, I discovered that Jesus was calling me to follow him as a priest, and that this path led through the Order of Saint Augustine." "But this isn't just true for me," he said. "Every child is a dream of God. You are too. God desires the happiness of all and wants us, from childhood and throughout our lives, to have a heart like that of children (cf. Mt 18:3): capable of trusting, full of kindness; he wants us to be his friends and not turn away from him. Therefore, more important than asking oneself whether one will be a priest, doctor, teacher, parent, or anything else, is asking oneself whether one wants to be a friend of Jesus. Because friendship with Jesus gives us joy, sets us free, and helps us to see, step by step, the vocation and the path that God has planned for each of us." Answering the point on injustices in the world, Pope Leo told the boy that "through the life of Jesus Christ, God shows us that, although there is suffering, he never abandons any of his children, because he has prepared for us an eternal joy where there will be no more sadness or pain. Let us have confidence, Jesus is with us, he helps us and accompanies us, and gives us strength to go through the difficult moments we may encounter in life." Stressing that grandparents play a crucial role in families, the pope said: "Let us not allow loneliness and abandonment to become normalized in the lives of older adults. That is a very sad thing. Let's have our hearts open to all of them." On forgiveness, he told Renzo and those gathered: "It does not mean forgetting by force, as if nothing had happened. Forgiveness means not letting hatred become the master of our hearts ... our willingness to forgive is a condition for the forgiveness we receive from God." Video: Vatican Media

Paulina Guzik

245,507 次观看 • 3 个月前

📣 XRP Community – 50M+ XRP already flipped into stXRP on Firelight. The shift has begun 🛫 🚀 This is how we turn dormant XRP bags PRODUCTIVE: ✅ XRP bridges trustlessly->FXRP on Flare (mirror XRP 1:1) 🌉 ✅ FXRP->staked in Firelight Vaults→receive stXRP (LST)🔥 ✅ stXRP becomes PRODUCTIVE CAPITAL as COLLATERAL for securing DeFi Cover & earning REAL YIELD 💰 (Phase 2) ☀️The Flare network is the ONLY dedicated ecosystem meticulously designed with $XRP utility as COLLATERAL that can meaningfully scale. Firelight unlocks dormant value and utility from idle $XRP while you keep full custody and deploy it for the economic security of services. This provides #XRP with a critical TOKEN SINK which it has desperately lacked since its creation. (In an upcoming X thread and video we will explain why “PASS THROUGH VALUE” as a bridge asset is NOT a significant value driver on its own. One of the Biggest misconceptions in the #XRPCommunity) 😴 Dormant $XRP is waking the hell up — The Giant 💪 is AWAKENED finally, with its most powerful utility ever: securing real Institutional Capital flows into Blue Chip DeFi Protocols and Vaults as COLLATERAL in Firelight’s novel groundbreaking insurance protocol “DeFi COVER.” ⭐️ In Phase 2 this will generate a superior, low-risk, sustainable, scalable and reliable YIELD for retail and institutional XRP holders — paid for by institutions, crypto exchange earn programs, neo-banks embedded into VAULT Infrastructure, Risk Curators, and even some of the big Blue Chip DeFi protocols.** 💥XRP is no longer just bridging value, it’s securing value and it’s earning value! 🤑 🤔Who's activating their $XRP bags in Firelight? 👇 Firelight Points are a bigger deal than the majority realize in the #XRPCommunity 🤫 $XFI 🪙 #XRP #Flare #XRPFi #stXRP #FXRP #Firelight Sentora

📣 XRP Community – 50M+ XRP already flipped into stXRP on Firelight. The shift has begun 🛫 🚀 This is how we turn dormant XRP bags PRODUCTIVE: ✅ XRP bridges trustlessly->FXRP on Flare (mirror XRP 1:1) 🌉 ✅ FXRP->staked in Firelight Vaults→receive stXRP (LST)🔥 ✅ stXRP becomes PRODUCTIVE CAPITAL as COLLATERAL for securing DeFi Cover & earning REAL YIELD 💰 (Phase 2) ☀️The Flare network is the ONLY dedicated ecosystem meticulously designed with $XRP utility as COLLATERAL that can meaningfully scale. Firelight unlocks dormant value and utility from idle $XRP while you keep full custody and deploy it for the economic security of services. This provides #XRP with a critical TOKEN SINK which it has desperately lacked since its creation. (In an upcoming X thread and video we will explain why “PASS THROUGH VALUE” as a bridge asset is NOT a significant value driver on its own. One of the Biggest misconceptions in the #XRPCommunity) 😴 Dormant $XRP is waking the hell up — The Giant 💪 is AWAKENED finally, with its most powerful utility ever: securing real Institutional Capital flows into Blue Chip DeFi Protocols and Vaults as COLLATERAL in Firelight’s novel groundbreaking insurance protocol “DeFi COVER.” ⭐️ In Phase 2 this will generate a superior, low-risk, sustainable, scalable and reliable YIELD for retail and institutional XRP holders — paid for by institutions, crypto exchange earn programs, neo-banks embedded into VAULT Infrastructure, Risk Curators, and even some of the big Blue Chip DeFi protocols.** 💥XRP is no longer just bridging value, it’s securing value and it’s earning value! 🤑 🤔Who's activating their $XRP bags in Firelight? 👇 Firelight Points are a bigger deal than the majority realize in the #XRPCommunity 🤫 $XFI 🪙 #XRP #Flare #XRPFi #stXRP #FXRP #Firelight Sentora

Mickey_B_Fresh☀️🪝

13,902 次观看 • 6 个月前

🧡𝐆𝐌 ~ 𝐏𝐑𝐄𝐒𝐄𝐍𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐆 Arknights: Endfield🧡 💽𝙋𝙇𝘼𝙔 𝙁𝙍𝙀𝙀➤ ✨𝑨 𝒔𝒘𝒆𝒆𝒕 𝒈𝒂𝒎𝒆 𝒓𝒆𝒗𝒊𝒆𝒘 & 𝒗𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒐 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒅𝒖𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒃𝒚 𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒄𝒖𝒕𝒊𝒆 𝒇𝒐𝒖𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒓 🌸𝐒𝐄𝐍𝐏𝐀𝐈 先輩🍜✨~(◠‿◕✿) 💕Ohayo, your 𝐒𝐞𝐧𝐩𝐚𝐢 here. First, We want to thank everyone who supported and pre-registered from my 𝐀𝐫𝐤𝐧𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬: 𝐄𝐧𝐝𝐟𝐢𝐞𝐥𝐝 post on Nov. 18 on my KOL profile 【🌸𝐒𝐄𝐍𝐏𝐀𝐈 先輩🍜】. We highly appreciate you all! 🎬You’ll see in the video that I couldn’t show a lot related to the game, like crafting, mining, or upgrading gear, because if I had included everything, it would have been 2–3 hours instead of 15 minutes. I hope you enjoy it! ^o^ 💟𝗟𝗘𝗧’𝗦 𝗗𝗜𝗩𝗘 𝗜𝗡🔻 ⭐️𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 🔶I’m Senpai, and I’ll say this straight up: 𝐀𝐫𝐤𝐧𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬: 𝐄𝐧𝐝𝐟𝐢𝐞𝐥𝐝 goes hard. The game blends action combat, strategy, and management into something that feels fresh, deep, and seriously addictive. Once you’re in, it’s hard to stop. 📙𝗦𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 🔶Endfield’s story doesn’t scream in your face, it pulls you in. The world feels mysterious, grounded, and layered, with sci-fi themes that actually fit the setting. It’s more about atmosphere and world~building than nonstop drama, and that works in its favor. 🔸The longer you play, the more invested you get. It feels like a story that’s building toward something big, and I’m here for that slow burn. 💎𝗚𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗵𝗶𝗰𝘀 💠Let’s be real ~ this game is beautiful. 🔷The environments look clean and futuristic, the lighting is on point, and everything feels polished. But the real stars? The characters. Every operator looks insanely good. The designs are stylish, detailed, and full of personality without feeling overdesigned. 🔹Whether it’s their outfits, animations, or just how they move in combat, the characters are genuinely pretty, and the game knows how to show them off. You’ll catch yourself pulling just because a character looks cool, and honestly, that’s part of the fun. 🕹️𝗚𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗽𝗹𝗮𝘆 ♦️The combat feels smooth, fast, and satisfying. Swapping characters mid-fight, timing skills, positioning your squad, it all feels clean and intentional. This isn’t a brain~off game. You’re rewarded for understanding your team and playing smart. ♦️Once everything clicks, combat turns into this perfect flow where you feel in control instead of overwhelmed. It’s hype without being messy. 💡𝗕𝗮𝘀𝗲 & 𝗙𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝗦𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 🟡This system is crazy in the best way. 🟡The base and factory mechanics are deep, strategic, and honestly addicting. You’re setting up production lines, optimizing layouts, managing resources, it feels like a full strategy game layered on top of an action RPG. 🟡Watching your factory run smoothly after planning everything out is insanely satisfying. It gives the game long-term depth and makes progression feel earned, not rushed. 🎰𝗚𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗮 𝗦𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 🖲️YES, the gacha is actually good. 🖲️There’s a clear sense of progress with solid rates over time, and plenty of usable characters even if you’re not pulling five-stars nonstop. Team synergy matters more than raw rarity, which means you’re encouraged to experiment instead of chase only meta units. 🖲️Plus, the game gives you enough currency through gameplay that pulling feels rewarding, not punishing. And when the characters look this good? Pulling feels even better. 💜𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗧𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁𝘀 💋As Senpai, here’s my final take: 🎮𝗔𝗿𝗸𝗻𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝘀: 𝗘𝗻𝗱𝗳𝗶𝗲𝗹𝗱 is stylish, ambitious, and straight-up fun. ⚔️The combat is hype, the systems are deep, the factory gameplay is addictive, and the characters are way too pretty to ignore. 👾If you want a gacha game that actually respects your time, rewards planning, and looks amazing while doing it, Endfield is absolutely worth playing. 💌We want to thank everyone for reading and viewing our video, and we also want to thank Arknights: Endfield for giving us 【the ◥🆂🆂🆂◤ community & 🌸𝐒𝐄𝐍𝐏𝐀𝐈 先輩🍜 's fans】 such a wonderful game and overall experience. 💙𝙂𝙀𝙏 𝙄𝙏 𝙉𝙊𝙒 & 𝙇𝙀𝙏'𝙎 𝘽𝙀 𝙁𝙍𝙄𝙀𝙉𝘿𝙎➤ #ArknightsEndfield #Arknights #Endfield #명일방주엔드필드 #明日方舟終末地 #EndfieldCreators #ZerothDirectiveCC #EndfieldCreators #ZerothDirective

◥🆂🆂🆂◤

1,004,342 次观看 • 8 个月前

GM GM GM ! (๑✪ᆺ✪๑)/❤️ 🔥𝗘𝗫𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗧𝗛🔥 ✨𝐅𝐈𝐑𝐒𝐓 — A BIG shoutout to 𝗕𝗕𝗡𝗢$ & 𝗜𝗥𝗢𝗡𝗠𝗢𝗨𝗦𝗘 for the dopest song of 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟓! 🎬𝗚𝗼 𝘀𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲 & 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄 them, see the full-quality video — links at the end of this article. ⛩️𝗜𝘁'𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗸 𝘀𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝗶𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝗹𝗲𝗱𝗴𝗲 𝘀𝗼 𝗹𝗲𝘁'𝘀 𝗱𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗶𝗻🔻 ♦️As I mentioned before, I really don’t understand how people keep falling for these infoFi scams and other post-grinding projects. 🔸I’m talking about Loudio, P33lio, Yapyo, Fukyo — you know them all. You all get RUGGED every time but still keep doing it. 🔸Do you really think Spermify ( you all know who I’m referring to ) or other web3 brands give a shit if you lose money, time, and effort? Of course not — but you should. 🔸And here’s why🔻 ~ 𝗦𝗘𝗖𝗥𝗘𝗧: The top 10 “influencers” you see as web3 gods are not grinding like you — they are paid per post. I know because I was offered the same. Also, they are not real influencers — real influencers charge thousands of $$$ per post and do not shill anything. ~ They don’t give a shit because they get paid upfront. But you shill daily for nothing — and the worst part is, you shill to your own community and followers. Do you even realize how many people lose money because you don’t think about what you’re doing? ~ What if you had to pay back every person in your community who invested in what you shilled and then lost everything? ~ 𝗚𝗥𝗢𝗪 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗙𝗞 𝗨𝗣 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗥𝗧 𝗕𝗘𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗣𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗜𝗕𝗟𝗘 𝗙𝗢𝗥 𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗬𝗢𝗨 𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗧. I’m referring to people who have communities that actually follow their calls and post — not just simple creators shilling anything. ♦️If you ever see me launch another NFT project or a coin, know that I guarantee your money back if you’re not satisfied. No shady shit — Senpai never toys with people’s funds! ♦️You’ll rarely see me post anything, because I don’t post bullshit. I don’t want to harm anyone’s wallet, so I prefer to REFUSE the $$$ — no matter the amount! ♦️ You’ll see people saying they never engage in drama — yet all their posts are nothing but attention-seeking drama. Don’t believe me? Just look around. ♦️ You’ll see “smart” mofos claiming other people aren’t organic. Mfer… NOTHING in web3 is organic. Not a single post. All the comments are in exchange for something — whether from influencers or projects. They just talk shit coz their accounts & persona are nothing and they are lazy to work for it! ♦️There’s a lot of FUD regarding girls in web3. While some girls are real gamers or content creators, keep in mind that literally 95% are managed by dudes — even if the photos or videos are real. Also, notice how many of the girls you guys goon over in web3 today just removed all their booty photos after they got followers & attention, or deleted all the photos with themselves. If anyone’s curious, DM me — there are peeps that have all their sexy pics, even if they deleted them. 🔸Now they claim to be gamer influencers, but we also have proof that they’re completely managed by dudes ( literally the guys confessing they do everything for them ). I’m not saying all web3 females are fake, but just don’t get fooled bros, ur talking to guys not girls. 💮𝗜𝗳 𝘆𝗼𝘂’𝗿𝗲 𝗮 𝘄𝗼𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗼’𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝘀 𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝗪𝗲𝗯3, 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗹𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂. 𝗞𝗲𝗲𝗽 𝗽𝘂𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 — 𝘄𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗻 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗱𝗼 𝗮𝗻𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗰𝗮𝗻, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿🧡 ♦️Why do I make these posts? Because someone has to, so people don’t get scammed, rugged, and so on! ♦️If you’re a bit confused, go read my other posts🔻 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ♦️If you see Senpai post something, you know it’s legit. ♦️If you disagree with what I said, then I’m sorry — the truth always hurts. I probably touched your little attention-whore soft spot, and that’s why you’ll never have the balls to post the truth like some of us. You’re too afraid to harm your perfect 𝗙𝗔𝗞𝗘 𝗥𝗘𝗣𝗨𝗧𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡! ♦️ BROKIES DO IT FOR THE B!TCHES! ♦️ LEGENDS HAVE B!TCHES TO DO IT FOR THEM! ♦️ I CAN RETIRE JUST WITH MY WRIST✨⌚️✨ ♦️ SENPAI WILL NOT SHILL YOUR RUGS MOFOS! 🔥𝗝𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗮 𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗹𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗲 & 𝗮𝗹𝗽𝗵𝗮: 𝘄𝗲𝗯2 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗹𝘂𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗴𝗲𝘁 $10𝗸 𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘆 𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝕏 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁. 𝗪𝗼𝗼𝗽 𝗪𝗼𝗼𝗽🔥 🌸𝑰 𝒉𝒐𝒑𝒆 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒆𝒏𝒋𝒐𝒚𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒕𝒍𝒆 𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒕 & 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒘𝒊𝒍𝒍 𝒉𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒂 𝒍𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒍𝒚 𝒘𝒆𝒆𝒌𝒆𝒏𝒅 𝒂𝒉𝒆𝒂𝒅💜 🎬𝗦𝗨𝗕𝗦𝗖𝗥𝗜𝗕𝗘 𝘁𝗼 𝗕𝗕𝗡𝗢$: 🎬𝗦𝗨𝗕𝗦𝗖𝗥𝗜𝗕𝗘 𝘁𝗼 𝗜𝗥𝗢𝗡𝗠𝗢𝗨𝗦𝗘: ⭐️𝐘𝐎𝐔 𝐂𝐀𝐍 𝐅𝐈𝐍𝐃 𝐀𝐋𝐋 𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐈𝐑 𝐒𝐎𝐂𝐈𝐀𝐋𝐒 𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐄⭐️

GM GM GM ! (๑✪ᆺ✪๑)/❤️ 🔥𝗘𝗫𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗧𝗛🔥 ✨𝐅𝐈𝐑𝐒𝐓 — A BIG shoutout to 𝗕𝗕𝗡𝗢$ & 𝗜𝗥𝗢𝗡𝗠𝗢𝗨𝗦𝗘 for the dopest song of 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟓! 🎬𝗚𝗼 𝘀𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲 & 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄 them, see the full-quality video — links at the end of this article. ⛩️𝗜𝘁'𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗸 𝘀𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝗶𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝗹𝗲𝗱𝗴𝗲 𝘀𝗼 𝗹𝗲𝘁'𝘀 𝗱𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗶𝗻🔻 ♦️As I mentioned before, I really don’t understand how people keep falling for these infoFi scams and other post-grinding projects. 🔸I’m talking about Loudio, P33lio, Yapyo, Fukyo — you know them all. You all get RUGGED every time but still keep doing it. 🔸Do you really think Spermify ( you all know who I’m referring to ) or other web3 brands give a shit if you lose money, time, and effort? Of course not — but you should. 🔸And here’s why🔻 ~ 𝗦𝗘𝗖𝗥𝗘𝗧: The top 10 “influencers” you see as web3 gods are not grinding like you — they are paid per post. I know because I was offered the same. Also, they are not real influencers — real influencers charge thousands of $$$ per post and do not shill anything. ~ They don’t give a shit because they get paid upfront. But you shill daily for nothing — and the worst part is, you shill to your own community and followers. Do you even realize how many people lose money because you don’t think about what you’re doing? ~ What if you had to pay back every person in your community who invested in what you shilled and then lost everything? ~ 𝗚𝗥𝗢𝗪 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗙𝗞 𝗨𝗣 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗥𝗧 𝗕𝗘𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗣𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗜𝗕𝗟𝗘 𝗙𝗢𝗥 𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗬𝗢𝗨 𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗧. I’m referring to people who have communities that actually follow their calls and post — not just simple creators shilling anything. ♦️If you ever see me launch another NFT project or a coin, know that I guarantee your money back if you’re not satisfied. No shady shit — Senpai never toys with people’s funds! ♦️You’ll rarely see me post anything, because I don’t post bullshit. I don’t want to harm anyone’s wallet, so I prefer to REFUSE the $$$ — no matter the amount! ♦️ You’ll see people saying they never engage in drama — yet all their posts are nothing but attention-seeking drama. Don’t believe me? Just look around. ♦️ You’ll see “smart” mofos claiming other people aren’t organic. Mfer… NOTHING in web3 is organic. Not a single post. All the comments are in exchange for something — whether from influencers or projects. They just talk shit coz their accounts & persona are nothing and they are lazy to work for it! ♦️There’s a lot of FUD regarding girls in web3. While some girls are real gamers or content creators, keep in mind that literally 95% are managed by dudes — even if the photos or videos are real. Also, notice how many of the girls you guys goon over in web3 today just removed all their booty photos after they got followers & attention, or deleted all the photos with themselves. If anyone’s curious, DM me — there are peeps that have all their sexy pics, even if they deleted them. 🔸Now they claim to be gamer influencers, but we also have proof that they’re completely managed by dudes ( literally the guys confessing they do everything for them ). I’m not saying all web3 females are fake, but just don’t get fooled bros, ur talking to guys not girls. 💮𝗜𝗳 𝘆𝗼𝘂’𝗿𝗲 𝗮 𝘄𝗼𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗼’𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝘀 𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝗪𝗲𝗯3, 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗹𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂. 𝗞𝗲𝗲𝗽 𝗽𝘂𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 — 𝘄𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗻 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗱𝗼 𝗮𝗻𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗰𝗮𝗻, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿🧡 ♦️Why do I make these posts? Because someone has to, so people don’t get scammed, rugged, and so on! ♦️If you’re a bit confused, go read my other posts🔻 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ♦️If you see Senpai post something, you know it’s legit. ♦️If you disagree with what I said, then I’m sorry — the truth always hurts. I probably touched your little attention-whore soft spot, and that’s why you’ll never have the balls to post the truth like some of us. You’re too afraid to harm your perfect 𝗙𝗔𝗞𝗘 𝗥𝗘𝗣𝗨𝗧𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡! ♦️ BROKIES DO IT FOR THE B!TCHES! ♦️ LEGENDS HAVE B!TCHES TO DO IT FOR THEM! ♦️ I CAN RETIRE JUST WITH MY WRIST✨⌚️✨ ♦️ SENPAI WILL NOT SHILL YOUR RUGS MOFOS! 🔥𝗝𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗮 𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗹𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗲 & 𝗮𝗹𝗽𝗵𝗮: 𝘄𝗲𝗯2 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗹𝘂𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗴𝗲𝘁 $10𝗸 𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘆 𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝕏 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁. 𝗪𝗼𝗼𝗽 𝗪𝗼𝗼𝗽🔥 🌸𝑰 𝒉𝒐𝒑𝒆 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒆𝒏𝒋𝒐𝒚𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒕𝒍𝒆 𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒕 & 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒘𝒊𝒍𝒍 𝒉𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒂 𝒍𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒍𝒚 𝒘𝒆𝒆𝒌𝒆𝒏𝒅 𝒂𝒉𝒆𝒂𝒅💜 🎬𝗦𝗨𝗕𝗦𝗖𝗥𝗜𝗕𝗘 𝘁𝗼 𝗕𝗕𝗡𝗢$: 🎬𝗦𝗨𝗕𝗦𝗖𝗥𝗜𝗕𝗘 𝘁𝗼 𝗜𝗥𝗢𝗡𝗠𝗢𝗨𝗦𝗘: ⭐️𝐘𝐎𝐔 𝐂𝐀𝐍 𝐅𝐈𝐍𝐃 𝐀𝐋𝐋 𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐈𝐑 𝐒𝐎𝐂𝐈𝐀𝐋𝐒 𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐄⭐️

🌸𝐒𝐄𝐍𝐏𝐀𝐈 先輩🍜

304,968 次观看 • 1 年前

Alright, here's the epic towel rant from tonight; And so that's what kind of tipped me off in real time. I was like: wait a minute. Is Judge Doolin ruling from the bench right now? And then I was like: wait a minute. He's ruling from the bench and ordering them to appoint a new prosecutor and potentially the Attorney General. Oh my word. How—what is this? I—this wasn't on my bingo card. Even now I'm just like: Oh my God, I can't believe he did that. Judge Doolin—in a good way. I'm just like: Oh my God, there is hope. And then to follow it up with: "Oh yeah, I'm thinking about a hearing on the contempt." Oh my God—you're telegraphing. You're going to have a contempt hearing after the Attorney General is potentially on the case. The other witnesses, however, are left in this position where they have this kind of not really well-funded—like kind of spastic prosecution, like the special prosecutors on the Kearney cases. Then you got the December 23rd, 2023 criminal charges against Aidan that were charged in Dedham District Court, 23rd or 26th or so. And that was for illegally—allegedly—recording Lindsey Gaetani and then submitting an edited version of the recording into court for some reason. I don't know why Aidan did that, especially apparently when there's an original version of the recording pursuant to some of the statements in court. And then also for intimidating Lindsey—for allegedly going over there on December 23rd, 2023—against Karen Read's advice and against his lawyers' advice, apparently, according to a leaked group chat message from Facebook in 2024—in May of 2024—going over to Lindsey's apartment. And then according to the affidavit from the search warrant for Karen Read's cell phone—allegedly telling Lindsey that she shouldn't cooperate with the grand jury. She should—she could remove information from her phone or something—that Aidan would get her a lawyer, but only if she agreed to meet with a lawyer only with him present, because she had, quote, "broken his trust." It just like—wild stuff. And that new grand jury, by the way, was apparently—it did go forward. And then in time it came out that it—that was about Karen and Aidan and witness intimidation and conspiracy, because Aidan Kearney—between October and November—really August and November of 2023—it started telling Lindsey Gaetani about his communications with Karen Read that included—in writing—Exhibit O to Karen Read search warrant affidavit, which says that Karen Read told Aidan Kearney that in November of 2023—November 28, 2023, to be specific—that Karen Read told Aidan Kearney that Karen Read and her team at ex parte conversations with former U.S. Attorney Josh Levy—which was right in the window of time that Jessica Leslie, the grand juror leaker, was leaking information. Leslie started leaking in August of 2022—which is the same month that Alan Jackson joined Karen Read's legal team. And Josh Levy—who was one of the U.S. Attorneys in charge of that grand jury—Leslie was leaking about four different cases: probably the Birchmore case, definitely the Read and O'Keefe case, definitely the CDL case. One more case. We can't really—the group of us journalists involved in this—can't really figure out. So right in the middle of that—November of 2023—Josh Levy is leaking ex parte grand jury information to Karen Read, which she's putting—she's telling Aidan Kearney about; he's putting it in writing. He just was trying to just show off for Lindsey, but you don't like—come on—like what is it? First day in the IC, bro? I'm not in the IC. I'm not part of the government. I'm a towel. But anyway—so Aidan's bragging to Lindsey, and I don't think that was a very good idea. I mean, she's brilliant and stuff, but like—why would you ever say that to her? Don't say that stuff. But anyway—like, why would you say—even if it's your significant other—unless they are read-in on the intel that you are sharing—why would you ever, ever, ever share that with someone? It exposes them to an incredible liability—which, if you love them, don't do it. It also exposes your own credibility to an incredible risk of liability. You will never be trusted by the intelligence community again. Pillow talk and honeypots are how they trap operatives. If you chase sex, they will compromise you. How can you not understand that? So if you get compromised by someone who's not an agent—just someone who's your partner and you're just telling them stuff about protected federal investigations—what do you think your reputation is going to be like among the intelligence community when you're doing that and they haven't even honeypotted you? You just voluntarily started putting this shit in writing. They're going to look at you like you are out of your mind. So anyway—Karen Read apparently is telling Aidan Kearney that she's having ex parte conversations with Josh Levy. Now, the grand jury that Leslie was leaking from was impaneled in May of 2022 when Rachael Rollins used to be U.S. Attorney in Boston. Now think about this. In 2020, Rachael Rollins and Aidan Kearney—Rachael Rollins, a hyper-liberal known for her soft-on-crime stance. We'll also hear Rollins hated Michael Morrissey. Anyway, Rollins worked with Turtle Boy to send a Republican operative named Rayla Campbell to Joe Kennedy Jr.'s events in the Senate race against Ed Markey so that Ed Markey could win the Senate seat. Now, interestingly enough, Rachael Rollins then got appointed to the position of U.S. Attorney right after that. And you might say: well, Grant, that's a stretch. No, no—because then within a few months, Rachael Rollins—part of the reason she gets thrown out of office by the DOJ OIG—is because she attends an event in Andover with—guess who?—Dr. Jill Biden, the wife of the then-president who appointed her. Now, what does that mean? Well, if you really think about the geopolitical implications of the 2020 Senate race between Ed Markey in Massachusetts and Joe Kennedy Jr.—well, one of the things you're going to realize is that—think about 2020. The leadership around Biden did not know that the chaos of 2024 was going to happen with Kamala and Biden not really being up to it. You're thinking ahead to 2024. Why? Who's your biggest target if you are a sitting Democrat and you're worried about a primary challenge four years from now? Well, what if JFK's—what is it—nephew or whatever it is—is in the House of Representatives? And what if JFK started his career in the House of Representatives? And what if that new young Kennedy with red hair and sort of a photogenic face? What if he is running for JFK's old Senate seat? What if he's on the same exact trajectory as JFK? Oh, we can't have that. We—as the Biden White House—cannot have Joe Kennedy Jr. beating Ed Markey for Senate. And how it got to the point that somebody talked to Rachael Rollins and she came up with the brilliant idea to reach out to Turtle Boy so that Turtle Boy would talk to Rayla Campbell to send her to Joe Kennedy Jr.'s events to help Markey—I don't know. But that's why I think Rachael Rollins became U.S. Attorney—someone who, in my opinion, was uniquely unqualified and fundamentally unethically un-predisposed to being able to run that office. Who then in turn immediately tried to interfere in the 2022 Suffolk DA primary between Kevin Hayden and Ricardo O'Rourke—because Rollins wanted to see her progressive vision continue through O'Rourke—so she worked with Daniel Medwed—the same professor who was involved with advocating the media on behalf of Karen Read's team. She worked with Daniel Medwed to get a story leaked about how a non-existent federal probe into Kevin Hayden—to increase Ricardo O'Rourke's chances in the Suffolk DA primary. Sound familiar? Oh, hell yeah. So anyway—between November of 2022 and May of 2023—you got this weird situation where Rollins knows she's getting forced out; Levy's going to take over the office. The people who take Rollins out are Josh Levy, Bill Abley, and still head of the criminal division—Dustin Chao, I think—still head of the public integrity unit, and then executive officer who is also the press secretary or the communications director of the office. Those four people—without being named; they're named by title—were the people who cooperated with the DOJ to take Rollins out—DOJ-OIG to take Rollins out. Now, why is that interesting? Well, one—because it shows that people in that office knew that Rachael Rollins had a proclivity for weaponizing leaks about non-existent federal probes to interfere in particular district attorney races and matters. Second—Rachael Rollins and Michael Morrissey had a bifurcated history of ten years. One: Rachael Rollins had this list of 25 crimes she wouldn't prosecute, and other DAs critiqued her—not just Michael Morrissey but others. Rollins—I'm pretty sure—was the one who first called Morrissey a "meatball," in fact, because of his criticism of Rollins over that issue. Rachael Rollins—I think—has a proclivity, in my opinion, to hold a bit of a grudge. When she became U.S. Attorney and she realized she was on the way out—well, maybe the Sandra Birchmore probe started back in May of 2022 because former chief of the Canton police—Ken Berkowitz—went to the FBI and told them that the FBI covered up—the MSP unit detailed to the Norfolk DA covered up Sandra Birchmore's murder—potentially because Yuri Bukhenik and John Fanning used to work in Stoughton with Matt Farwell and Robert Devine and Billy Farwell—I think they all worked there. And furthermore—that Brian Tully, the unit commander, was partners with John Fanning for 20 years. All right, and in that regard—it is very interesting, I think—that Chief Berkowitz—who may have been very offended that his unit... So Sandra Birchmore was murdered on February 1st, 2021, at 9:23 p.m. in her apartment in Canton. Okay—on February 4th, Monday in the morning—the Canton police do a wellness check after they get a call from her—Sandra's—colleagues at the school where she worked as an administrative assistant. Now the Canton police respond—on Monday, February 4th—by Wednesday, February 6th. The Canton police have collected the following evidence in order. And if you don't believe me, you can read pages—I think 97 through 101—of the Canton Police Department audit report released in April of 2025. Point by point. Number one: the Canton police confirm—via a witness who was the maintenance worker at Sandra's apartment building—that Matt Farwell was the man on camera outside Sandra's apartment in the elevator at 9:23 p.m. on February 1st—which is exactly when Sandra died. Two: that the man was Matt Farwell, and he was the same man who helped Sandra move into her apartment. Three: that when the Canton PD went to Sandra's school, they got information that Farwell was telling people that Sandra was pregnant with his child—that he had abused her since she was a child—and that he was going to quote "take care of the problem himself" if Sandra decided to carry the baby to term. All right. All of that information—by February 6th of 2021—was passed over to the MSP. John Fanning and this whole unit—I think—really then facilitate a report sometime over the next six to 12 months that exonerates Farwell and says Sandra dies from self-harm. Well, I think that's why Ken Berkowitz blew the whistle before he died of cancer—and that's why there was a grand jury impaneled in May of 2022—and it was really about the cover-up of Sandra Birchmore's murder. Well—one—it was about Sandra Birchmore's murder. Why does that make everything so interesting? Because I think that the investigation wasn't just about who killed Sandra and why—but how was it ruled a—the result of self-harm—instead of the very obvious murder that it was. Well—that starts—2022, I think—May of 2022—the grand jury. Jessica Leslie was on the grand jury—leaker—who's going to be sentenced on October 4th of 2025. I think Jessica Leslie—ladies and gentlemen—in August of 2022 somehow leaked to Karen Read—Alan Jackson—that the Norfolk DA was dirty because they covered up—and that MSP unit—because they covered up Sandra Birchmore's murder. All right—so therefore, Alan Jackson—that's the skeleton in the closet. It wasn't what the people in the house were doing. I'm still a little suspect of who they know—but I don't think that's the big deal. I don't think Jen McCabe's social life is the big deal. Nobody cares—nobody fucking cares. Sorry for cussing. The big issue is that Jen was friends with Tully. Tully's unit knew literally where the bodies were buried. And they—I think—they brought on the PI—Marty Kraft—and Kate Peter—to insulate their exposure from the coming publicity that they knew was going to be brought upon them by Alan Jackson. And so they were worried. And who would you bring in if you had covered up a murder? If you were a MSP unit—you'd bring in someone like Kate Peter. Because you can read her in on that. She's hardened. She doesn't give a fuck. She lost two of her kids—and I don't think she even fucking cared. So who the fuck's the perfect person be like: "Bruh, if that shit gets national attention, we're fucked. So you better control that fucking narrative and handle all these like different people that get too close to this—or we're going to be exposed for Birchmore." But let me bring it back to the point here—which is in 2022, the feds clearly were starting to poke around. And come 2023—I think Brian Tully's unit was desperate. Who was going to find out because of the coverage of the Read case? Could they make sure that Kate Peter got close enough to Netflix and Gretchen Voss so that they couldn't find out what was actually going on? And could the Birchmore cover-up be kept up—even in light of the national spotlight? When you think about the fact that some people may not have been loyal to the Justice for John O'Keefe movement—but were instead primarily loyal to Brian Tully's unit. And when you think about the fact that maybe Tully's unit didn't run the best investigation of Karen Read—maybe there were some flaws. But if you think about the fact that they did get her—but if you think about it in the context of: Karen knew from the jump that the MSP were dirty over Birchmore—then you understand: Karen—that's why it was going to become an incident. Everyone knew—everyone around Tully, his friends, all of them—the unit—they knew they covered up Birchmore's murder. And they knew Karen had it in her hands if she could just figure out the PR. And that's exactly what she did—to put enough pressure on them. They took her to trial anyway—and it destroyed the fucking Norfolk DA—destroyed Brian Tully's unit. It cost them dearly—and she's a tactical fucking genius. I think Brian Tully thought he was slicker than he was by using the prosecution of Aidan Kearney—not to get a genuinely—in my opinion—bad guy who was deserving of the indictment handed up by a grand jury of his peers. But because Tully wanted to know what the real target of the federal probe is. If you don't know what a backhand is, folks—a backhand is where you investigate one thing on the surface because you're dealing with a very high-level operation like the state police—who are a paramilitary intelligence-gathering operation. So you trick them. You make them think they're under investigation for John's death and the investigation of that death. But really—you're investigating them for the cover-up of Sandra Birchmore's murder. And that's exactly what I think happened to this unit. That's what I think Brian Tully was trying to figure out—from August of 2023 until about December. I think they eventually put it together—and by August of 2024, Matthew Farwell got indicted. Now—it's a question of all this as a result of today. I want to be very clear: this is what was called for. There needed to be an independent voice with power and who takes no nonsense—who came into this and said: Nope—it's out of your hands. And that's what Judge Doolin did today. Someone just needed to not either be involved with Karen Read, Aidan Kearney, or the Norfolk DA—or Kate Peter or Marty Kraft—and prosecute this. Now, all those other witnesses—I have no idea what the hell is going to happen there. But at least for Lindsey—Judge Doolin was like: enough of this nonsense. And that's why today was such a big deal in light of that historical context—because just tracing that very insidious pattern of events over the past 18 months—you can see this became a proxy war. It was Michael Morrissey on one side with his marching soldiers: Brian Tully, Kate Peter, Marty Kraft. And then it was Karen Read and the DOJ on the other side. Okay. And their soldiers were like the Free Karen Read movement and Turtle Boy and Natalie and all these other people. This was an intelligence community proxy war. And that's why I've been trying to tell people for so long: Lindsey Gaetani was not involved. She was an unwitting pawn. These two factions both took advantage of her—including Brian Tully—who was more interested in preserving his unit's reputation than actually defending the interest of the vulnerable. In my opinion, I think Brian Tully is a terrible person. Does that mean that he's a bad person for trying to hold Karen Read accountable for John O'Keefe's death? No, of course not. He's a bad person because in what fucking world do you—as a fucking state police officer—who you—you are entrusted—not just to get the bad guys—but to protect the most fucking vulnerable? One: how do you justify what happened with Sandra Birchmore? Two: how the fuck do you get it in your fucking mind that you're going to take a 15-year unredacted extraction of a fucking vulnerable victim's cell phone and release it to a fucking defendant known for promulgating exactly that material? What fucking headspace? What satanic fucking chamber do you and Kate Peter have to be drinking blood from fucking cups in to think that that's fucking okay? Fuck you. How do you even get in the headspace where doing something like that to a fucking victim becomes acceptable. The rot in that unit—whether enabled by Morrissey or whether he didn't know about it—I don't fucking know. But the point is: the rot in that unit was so deep that they lost their fucking souls. They didn't think of victims as victims. They re-victimized victims because it was a political fucking war—and these people are so hardened, I guess, that they don't understand what it means to be vulnerable. And these were police officers—detectives—people entrusted to uphold and protect the dignity of the most vulnerable—and they fucking used victims to advance some political agenda—to deal with the fact that they covered up a fucking murder. I'm done being gentle about this. Fuck these people. And I'm not saying that it was wrong for them to investigate Karen Read. I am pleased someone tried to prosecute her. I'm pissed at them because they were thinking about it from the perspective of their own liability for an unrelated case—and they fucked everything up—and introducing Kate Peter to this shit. Oh my God. It's a disgrace. It's a disgrace to the people who were hurt. It's a disgrace to the vulnerable. I frankly do not understand how Jen McCabe, Brian Tully, and Kate Peter go to bed each night. I don't get it. I don't know. Maybe there's something that shuts off the GABA-1 receptor or something and just makes you go to bed. I don't know. Never heard of such a thing. But I'm just saying: I don't know how you do it. How do you do it? But anyway—Judge Doolin—without giving a... extemporaneous, uh, bloviating cuss-based rant like I just did—instead, in my opinion, is like: fuck all of you! You're not being involved in this prosecution anymore. Someone's gonna protect this fucking woman—Lindsey Gaetani. I'm making you appoint someone! I love that man. Good for Judge Doolin. But still—we never should have gone to this point. This is incredible. With the... the... the MSP. The fact that they had a unit operating like this for so long. This is worse than what John Connolly and Whitey Bulger did. This is institutional rot that is so pervasive that it requires fundamental reform of the MSP. They're not incapable of—um, uh—solving crimes. I'm sure most of the MSP are wonderful. Anyway—my point is: I don't think the state police officers that I generally run into—or troopers—are bad people. I think most of them are wonderful. They've never been really mean to me. They do good work. They're out there protecting our roads. They stop people from speeding. They—what else do they do? They go after commercial truck violations. They investigate homicides—like, on the whole. And this is why I think we have to be careful about how we talk about this. I am not saying that the entire MSP is just rotten. I'm saying that when you have factions or sections within the institution that understand its machinations and are able to thus manipulate the bureaucratic structure and avoid accountability—you lose the confidence of everyone. And how do you think some of those good troopers feel when they have to go out there? Yes—people like me are going to smile at them and bless them and whatever—because I know they're not part of the problem. But most people look at them and they think that they're fucking hated. They don't deserve that. They literally put their lives on the line for us every day. And if we're going to give them the respect they deserve—if we're going to make the profession have the respect that it deserves—then this kind of institutional rot can't be looked at as just an embarrassment. And it can't be looked at as something that—oh, we just wish didn't happen. Maybe some guys are going to go away. No—you point at it. You scream it from the rooftops and you say: if this happens even once—then we have so failed as an institution; we must fundamentally reform from the ground up. And this wasn't just once. It was Birchmore. It was the phone extraction. It was the SA report leak over and over and over and over again. They knew the law. They were an old boys' club. They abused it. They had cover—and it was systemically enabled. And that's why I think—to save the profession of policing in Massachusetts—there needs to be a full-on unbridled discussion about how this happened—how the personalities involved were able to do what they did. And we can't be so tribalistic that because someone we support as to their views on one case, right? We cannot be so tribalistic that we just block out everything bad that they do. Or this rot will continue. And it is pernicious. It is insidious. It is invidious. It undermines the faith that citizens completely removed from this situation have in our system of government. It undermines victims' confidence in the ability to seek redress in the face of serious fucking harm—because they think the system doesn't actually care about them. It's just using them to get someone bigger. We cannot allow this to perpetuate. And the only way to fix it is to hold up situations like what happened to Birchmore—Sandra Birchmore—and what happened to Lindsey Gaetani—hold them up in the national spotlight—and say: we—the MSP—have failed you. Brian Tully failed these people. John Fanning failed these people. Nick Guarino failed these people. Yuri Bukhenik failed these people. We need to say that. We need to highlight it. We need to say: this happened even once. Therefore, we are not good enough. Not only are we not good enough—the very fact that either of these things were able to happen—the Birchmore cover-up, the phone extraction leak—is such a pervasive, systemic degradation of the faith that victims and the public have in the justice system—that our only option is to talk about this—congressional hearings. We need the State House to have congressional hearings. We need these people to answer for what they did. And we need to make sure it never happens again. And the only way you do that is by finding out what aspects of the bureaucratic structure allowed this to happen. And it's not going to be comfortable. I don't think it's going to be comfortable for anyone to talk about the fallout of any of this—but that's exactly what happened at the CCC on a smaller scale. And if this country matters—if this form of government matters—if this republic matters—then we will fix this. We will fix it together. We will address the hard questions. We will address the uncomfortable questions. We will shed our prejudices and polemical biases at the door. We will engage in no fear, no favoritism—and we will look only for the truth and nothing but it. And if you are incapable of doing that—you're contributing—either consciously or subconsciously—to the problem. It's our only option. And you can't just say: because they prosecuted Karen Read, we can't talk about anything bad that they did. That's tribalism. That's polemical. That's what drove us to this point.

Alright, here's the epic towel rant from tonight; And so that's what kind of tipped me off in real time. I was like: wait a minute. Is Judge Doolin ruling from the bench right now? And then I was like: wait a minute. He's ruling from the bench and ordering them to appoint a new prosecutor and potentially the Attorney General. Oh my word. How—what is this? I—this wasn't on my bingo card. Even now I'm just like: Oh my God, I can't believe he did that. Judge Doolin—in a good way. I'm just like: Oh my God, there is hope. And then to follow it up with: "Oh yeah, I'm thinking about a hearing on the contempt." Oh my God—you're telegraphing. You're going to have a contempt hearing after the Attorney General is potentially on the case. The other witnesses, however, are left in this position where they have this kind of not really well-funded—like kind of spastic prosecution, like the special prosecutors on the Kearney cases. Then you got the December 23rd, 2023 criminal charges against Aidan that were charged in Dedham District Court, 23rd or 26th or so. And that was for illegally—allegedly—recording Lindsey Gaetani and then submitting an edited version of the recording into court for some reason. I don't know why Aidan did that, especially apparently when there's an original version of the recording pursuant to some of the statements in court. And then also for intimidating Lindsey—for allegedly going over there on December 23rd, 2023—against Karen Read's advice and against his lawyers' advice, apparently, according to a leaked group chat message from Facebook in 2024—in May of 2024—going over to Lindsey's apartment. And then according to the affidavit from the search warrant for Karen Read's cell phone—allegedly telling Lindsey that she shouldn't cooperate with the grand jury. She should—she could remove information from her phone or something—that Aidan would get her a lawyer, but only if she agreed to meet with a lawyer only with him present, because she had, quote, "broken his trust." It just like—wild stuff. And that new grand jury, by the way, was apparently—it did go forward. And then in time it came out that it—that was about Karen and Aidan and witness intimidation and conspiracy, because Aidan Kearney—between October and November—really August and November of 2023—it started telling Lindsey Gaetani about his communications with Karen Read that included—in writing—Exhibit O to Karen Read search warrant affidavit, which says that Karen Read told Aidan Kearney that in November of 2023—November 28, 2023, to be specific—that Karen Read told Aidan Kearney that Karen Read and her team at ex parte conversations with former U.S. Attorney Josh Levy—which was right in the window of time that Jessica Leslie, the grand juror leaker, was leaking information. Leslie started leaking in August of 2022—which is the same month that Alan Jackson joined Karen Read's legal team. And Josh Levy—who was one of the U.S. Attorneys in charge of that grand jury—Leslie was leaking about four different cases: probably the Birchmore case, definitely the Read and O'Keefe case, definitely the CDL case. One more case. We can't really—the group of us journalists involved in this—can't really figure out. So right in the middle of that—November of 2023—Josh Levy is leaking ex parte grand jury information to Karen Read, which she's putting—she's telling Aidan Kearney about; he's putting it in writing. He just was trying to just show off for Lindsey, but you don't like—come on—like what is it? First day in the IC, bro? I'm not in the IC. I'm not part of the government. I'm a towel. But anyway—so Aidan's bragging to Lindsey, and I don't think that was a very good idea. I mean, she's brilliant and stuff, but like—why would you ever say that to her? Don't say that stuff. But anyway—like, why would you say—even if it's your significant other—unless they are read-in on the intel that you are sharing—why would you ever, ever, ever share that with someone? It exposes them to an incredible liability—which, if you love them, don't do it. It also exposes your own credibility to an incredible risk of liability. You will never be trusted by the intelligence community again. Pillow talk and honeypots are how they trap operatives. If you chase sex, they will compromise you. How can you not understand that? So if you get compromised by someone who's not an agent—just someone who's your partner and you're just telling them stuff about protected federal investigations—what do you think your reputation is going to be like among the intelligence community when you're doing that and they haven't even honeypotted you? You just voluntarily started putting this shit in writing. They're going to look at you like you are out of your mind. So anyway—Karen Read apparently is telling Aidan Kearney that she's having ex parte conversations with Josh Levy. Now, the grand jury that Leslie was leaking from was impaneled in May of 2022 when Rachael Rollins used to be U.S. Attorney in Boston. Now think about this. In 2020, Rachael Rollins and Aidan Kearney—Rachael Rollins, a hyper-liberal known for her soft-on-crime stance. We'll also hear Rollins hated Michael Morrissey. Anyway, Rollins worked with Turtle Boy to send a Republican operative named Rayla Campbell to Joe Kennedy Jr.'s events in the Senate race against Ed Markey so that Ed Markey could win the Senate seat. Now, interestingly enough, Rachael Rollins then got appointed to the position of U.S. Attorney right after that. And you might say: well, Grant, that's a stretch. No, no—because then within a few months, Rachael Rollins—part of the reason she gets thrown out of office by the DOJ OIG—is because she attends an event in Andover with—guess who?—Dr. Jill Biden, the wife of the then-president who appointed her. Now, what does that mean? Well, if you really think about the geopolitical implications of the 2020 Senate race between Ed Markey in Massachusetts and Joe Kennedy Jr.—well, one of the things you're going to realize is that—think about 2020. The leadership around Biden did not know that the chaos of 2024 was going to happen with Kamala and Biden not really being up to it. You're thinking ahead to 2024. Why? Who's your biggest target if you are a sitting Democrat and you're worried about a primary challenge four years from now? Well, what if JFK's—what is it—nephew or whatever it is—is in the House of Representatives? And what if JFK started his career in the House of Representatives? And what if that new young Kennedy with red hair and sort of a photogenic face? What if he is running for JFK's old Senate seat? What if he's on the same exact trajectory as JFK? Oh, we can't have that. We—as the Biden White House—cannot have Joe Kennedy Jr. beating Ed Markey for Senate. And how it got to the point that somebody talked to Rachael Rollins and she came up with the brilliant idea to reach out to Turtle Boy so that Turtle Boy would talk to Rayla Campbell to send her to Joe Kennedy Jr.'s events to help Markey—I don't know. But that's why I think Rachael Rollins became U.S. Attorney—someone who, in my opinion, was uniquely unqualified and fundamentally unethically un-predisposed to being able to run that office. Who then in turn immediately tried to interfere in the 2022 Suffolk DA primary between Kevin Hayden and Ricardo O'Rourke—because Rollins wanted to see her progressive vision continue through O'Rourke—so she worked with Daniel Medwed—the same professor who was involved with advocating the media on behalf of Karen Read's team. She worked with Daniel Medwed to get a story leaked about how a non-existent federal probe into Kevin Hayden—to increase Ricardo O'Rourke's chances in the Suffolk DA primary. Sound familiar? Oh, hell yeah. So anyway—between November of 2022 and May of 2023—you got this weird situation where Rollins knows she's getting forced out; Levy's going to take over the office. The people who take Rollins out are Josh Levy, Bill Abley, and still head of the criminal division—Dustin Chao, I think—still head of the public integrity unit, and then executive officer who is also the press secretary or the communications director of the office. Those four people—without being named; they're named by title—were the people who cooperated with the DOJ to take Rollins out—DOJ-OIG to take Rollins out. Now, why is that interesting? Well, one—because it shows that people in that office knew that Rachael Rollins had a proclivity for weaponizing leaks about non-existent federal probes to interfere in particular district attorney races and matters. Second—Rachael Rollins and Michael Morrissey had a bifurcated history of ten years. One: Rachael Rollins had this list of 25 crimes she wouldn't prosecute, and other DAs critiqued her—not just Michael Morrissey but others. Rollins—I'm pretty sure—was the one who first called Morrissey a "meatball," in fact, because of his criticism of Rollins over that issue. Rachael Rollins—I think—has a proclivity, in my opinion, to hold a bit of a grudge. When she became U.S. Attorney and she realized she was on the way out—well, maybe the Sandra Birchmore probe started back in May of 2022 because former chief of the Canton police—Ken Berkowitz—went to the FBI and told them that the FBI covered up—the MSP unit detailed to the Norfolk DA covered up Sandra Birchmore's murder—potentially because Yuri Bukhenik and John Fanning used to work in Stoughton with Matt Farwell and Robert Devine and Billy Farwell—I think they all worked there. And furthermore—that Brian Tully, the unit commander, was partners with John Fanning for 20 years. All right, and in that regard—it is very interesting, I think—that Chief Berkowitz—who may have been very offended that his unit... So Sandra Birchmore was murdered on February 1st, 2021, at 9:23 p.m. in her apartment in Canton. Okay—on February 4th, Monday in the morning—the Canton police do a wellness check after they get a call from her—Sandra's—colleagues at the school where she worked as an administrative assistant. Now the Canton police respond—on Monday, February 4th—by Wednesday, February 6th. The Canton police have collected the following evidence in order. And if you don't believe me, you can read pages—I think 97 through 101—of the Canton Police Department audit report released in April of 2025. Point by point. Number one: the Canton police confirm—via a witness who was the maintenance worker at Sandra's apartment building—that Matt Farwell was the man on camera outside Sandra's apartment in the elevator at 9:23 p.m. on February 1st—which is exactly when Sandra died. Two: that the man was Matt Farwell, and he was the same man who helped Sandra move into her apartment. Three: that when the Canton PD went to Sandra's school, they got information that Farwell was telling people that Sandra was pregnant with his child—that he had abused her since she was a child—and that he was going to quote "take care of the problem himself" if Sandra decided to carry the baby to term. All right. All of that information—by February 6th of 2021—was passed over to the MSP. John Fanning and this whole unit—I think—really then facilitate a report sometime over the next six to 12 months that exonerates Farwell and says Sandra dies from self-harm. Well, I think that's why Ken Berkowitz blew the whistle before he died of cancer—and that's why there was a grand jury impaneled in May of 2022—and it was really about the cover-up of Sandra Birchmore's murder. Well—one—it was about Sandra Birchmore's murder. Why does that make everything so interesting? Because I think that the investigation wasn't just about who killed Sandra and why—but how was it ruled a—the result of self-harm—instead of the very obvious murder that it was. Well—that starts—2022, I think—May of 2022—the grand jury. Jessica Leslie was on the grand jury—leaker—who's going to be sentenced on October 4th of 2025. I think Jessica Leslie—ladies and gentlemen—in August of 2022 somehow leaked to Karen Read—Alan Jackson—that the Norfolk DA was dirty because they covered up—and that MSP unit—because they covered up Sandra Birchmore's murder. All right—so therefore, Alan Jackson—that's the skeleton in the closet. It wasn't what the people in the house were doing. I'm still a little suspect of who they know—but I don't think that's the big deal. I don't think Jen McCabe's social life is the big deal. Nobody cares—nobody fucking cares. Sorry for cussing. The big issue is that Jen was friends with Tully. Tully's unit knew literally where the bodies were buried. And they—I think—they brought on the PI—Marty Kraft—and Kate Peter—to insulate their exposure from the coming publicity that they knew was going to be brought upon them by Alan Jackson. And so they were worried. And who would you bring in if you had covered up a murder? If you were a MSP unit—you'd bring in someone like Kate Peter. Because you can read her in on that. She's hardened. She doesn't give a fuck. She lost two of her kids—and I don't think she even fucking cared. So who the fuck's the perfect person be like: "Bruh, if that shit gets national attention, we're fucked. So you better control that fucking narrative and handle all these like different people that get too close to this—or we're going to be exposed for Birchmore." But let me bring it back to the point here—which is in 2022, the feds clearly were starting to poke around. And come 2023—I think Brian Tully's unit was desperate. Who was going to find out because of the coverage of the Read case? Could they make sure that Kate Peter got close enough to Netflix and Gretchen Voss so that they couldn't find out what was actually going on? And could the Birchmore cover-up be kept up—even in light of the national spotlight? When you think about the fact that some people may not have been loyal to the Justice for John O'Keefe movement—but were instead primarily loyal to Brian Tully's unit. And when you think about the fact that maybe Tully's unit didn't run the best investigation of Karen Read—maybe there were some flaws. But if you think about the fact that they did get her—but if you think about it in the context of: Karen knew from the jump that the MSP were dirty over Birchmore—then you understand: Karen—that's why it was going to become an incident. Everyone knew—everyone around Tully, his friends, all of them—the unit—they knew they covered up Birchmore's murder. And they knew Karen had it in her hands if she could just figure out the PR. And that's exactly what she did—to put enough pressure on them. They took her to trial anyway—and it destroyed the fucking Norfolk DA—destroyed Brian Tully's unit. It cost them dearly—and she's a tactical fucking genius. I think Brian Tully thought he was slicker than he was by using the prosecution of Aidan Kearney—not to get a genuinely—in my opinion—bad guy who was deserving of the indictment handed up by a grand jury of his peers. But because Tully wanted to know what the real target of the federal probe is. If you don't know what a backhand is, folks—a backhand is where you investigate one thing on the surface because you're dealing with a very high-level operation like the state police—who are a paramilitary intelligence-gathering operation. So you trick them. You make them think they're under investigation for John's death and the investigation of that death. But really—you're investigating them for the cover-up of Sandra Birchmore's murder. And that's exactly what I think happened to this unit. That's what I think Brian Tully was trying to figure out—from August of 2023 until about December. I think they eventually put it together—and by August of 2024, Matthew Farwell got indicted. Now—it's a question of all this as a result of today. I want to be very clear: this is what was called for. There needed to be an independent voice with power and who takes no nonsense—who came into this and said: Nope—it's out of your hands. And that's what Judge Doolin did today. Someone just needed to not either be involved with Karen Read, Aidan Kearney, or the Norfolk DA—or Kate Peter or Marty Kraft—and prosecute this. Now, all those other witnesses—I have no idea what the hell is going to happen there. But at least for Lindsey—Judge Doolin was like: enough of this nonsense. And that's why today was such a big deal in light of that historical context—because just tracing that very insidious pattern of events over the past 18 months—you can see this became a proxy war. It was Michael Morrissey on one side with his marching soldiers: Brian Tully, Kate Peter, Marty Kraft. And then it was Karen Read and the DOJ on the other side. Okay. And their soldiers were like the Free Karen Read movement and Turtle Boy and Natalie and all these other people. This was an intelligence community proxy war. And that's why I've been trying to tell people for so long: Lindsey Gaetani was not involved. She was an unwitting pawn. These two factions both took advantage of her—including Brian Tully—who was more interested in preserving his unit's reputation than actually defending the interest of the vulnerable. In my opinion, I think Brian Tully is a terrible person. Does that mean that he's a bad person for trying to hold Karen Read accountable for John O'Keefe's death? No, of course not. He's a bad person because in what fucking world do you—as a fucking state police officer—who you—you are entrusted—not just to get the bad guys—but to protect the most fucking vulnerable? One: how do you justify what happened with Sandra Birchmore? Two: how the fuck do you get it in your fucking mind that you're going to take a 15-year unredacted extraction of a fucking vulnerable victim's cell phone and release it to a fucking defendant known for promulgating exactly that material? What fucking headspace? What satanic fucking chamber do you and Kate Peter have to be drinking blood from fucking cups in to think that that's fucking okay? Fuck you. How do you even get in the headspace where doing something like that to a fucking victim becomes acceptable. The rot in that unit—whether enabled by Morrissey or whether he didn't know about it—I don't fucking know. But the point is: the rot in that unit was so deep that they lost their fucking souls. They didn't think of victims as victims. They re-victimized victims because it was a political fucking war—and these people are so hardened, I guess, that they don't understand what it means to be vulnerable. And these were police officers—detectives—people entrusted to uphold and protect the dignity of the most vulnerable—and they fucking used victims to advance some political agenda—to deal with the fact that they covered up a fucking murder. I'm done being gentle about this. Fuck these people. And I'm not saying that it was wrong for them to investigate Karen Read. I am pleased someone tried to prosecute her. I'm pissed at them because they were thinking about it from the perspective of their own liability for an unrelated case—and they fucked everything up—and introducing Kate Peter to this shit. Oh my God. It's a disgrace. It's a disgrace to the people who were hurt. It's a disgrace to the vulnerable. I frankly do not understand how Jen McCabe, Brian Tully, and Kate Peter go to bed each night. I don't get it. I don't know. Maybe there's something that shuts off the GABA-1 receptor or something and just makes you go to bed. I don't know. Never heard of such a thing. But I'm just saying: I don't know how you do it. How do you do it? But anyway—Judge Doolin—without giving a... extemporaneous, uh, bloviating cuss-based rant like I just did—instead, in my opinion, is like: fuck all of you! You're not being involved in this prosecution anymore. Someone's gonna protect this fucking woman—Lindsey Gaetani. I'm making you appoint someone! I love that man. Good for Judge Doolin. But still—we never should have gone to this point. This is incredible. With the... the... the MSP. The fact that they had a unit operating like this for so long. This is worse than what John Connolly and Whitey Bulger did. This is institutional rot that is so pervasive that it requires fundamental reform of the MSP. They're not incapable of—um, uh—solving crimes. I'm sure most of the MSP are wonderful. Anyway—my point is: I don't think the state police officers that I generally run into—or troopers—are bad people. I think most of them are wonderful. They've never been really mean to me. They do good work. They're out there protecting our roads. They stop people from speeding. They—what else do they do? They go after commercial truck violations. They investigate homicides—like, on the whole. And this is why I think we have to be careful about how we talk about this. I am not saying that the entire MSP is just rotten. I'm saying that when you have factions or sections within the institution that understand its machinations and are able to thus manipulate the bureaucratic structure and avoid accountability—you lose the confidence of everyone. And how do you think some of those good troopers feel when they have to go out there? Yes—people like me are going to smile at them and bless them and whatever—because I know they're not part of the problem. But most people look at them and they think that they're fucking hated. They don't deserve that. They literally put their lives on the line for us every day. And if we're going to give them the respect they deserve—if we're going to make the profession have the respect that it deserves—then this kind of institutional rot can't be looked at as just an embarrassment. And it can't be looked at as something that—oh, we just wish didn't happen. Maybe some guys are going to go away. No—you point at it. You scream it from the rooftops and you say: if this happens even once—then we have so failed as an institution; we must fundamentally reform from the ground up. And this wasn't just once. It was Birchmore. It was the phone extraction. It was the SA report leak over and over and over and over again. They knew the law. They were an old boys' club. They abused it. They had cover—and it was systemically enabled. And that's why I think—to save the profession of policing in Massachusetts—there needs to be a full-on unbridled discussion about how this happened—how the personalities involved were able to do what they did. And we can't be so tribalistic that because someone we support as to their views on one case, right? We cannot be so tribalistic that we just block out everything bad that they do. Or this rot will continue. And it is pernicious. It is insidious. It is invidious. It undermines the faith that citizens completely removed from this situation have in our system of government. It undermines victims' confidence in the ability to seek redress in the face of serious fucking harm—because they think the system doesn't actually care about them. It's just using them to get someone bigger. We cannot allow this to perpetuate. And the only way to fix it is to hold up situations like what happened to Birchmore—Sandra Birchmore—and what happened to Lindsey Gaetani—hold them up in the national spotlight—and say: we—the MSP—have failed you. Brian Tully failed these people. John Fanning failed these people. Nick Guarino failed these people. Yuri Bukhenik failed these people. We need to say that. We need to highlight it. We need to say: this happened even once. Therefore, we are not good enough. Not only are we not good enough—the very fact that either of these things were able to happen—the Birchmore cover-up, the phone extraction leak—is such a pervasive, systemic degradation of the faith that victims and the public have in the justice system—that our only option is to talk about this—congressional hearings. We need the State House to have congressional hearings. We need these people to answer for what they did. And we need to make sure it never happens again. And the only way you do that is by finding out what aspects of the bureaucratic structure allowed this to happen. And it's not going to be comfortable. I don't think it's going to be comfortable for anyone to talk about the fallout of any of this—but that's exactly what happened at the CCC on a smaller scale. And if this country matters—if this form of government matters—if this republic matters—then we will fix this. We will fix it together. We will address the hard questions. We will address the uncomfortable questions. We will shed our prejudices and polemical biases at the door. We will engage in no fear, no favoritism—and we will look only for the truth and nothing but it. And if you are incapable of doing that—you're contributing—either consciously or subconsciously—to the problem. It's our only option. And you can't just say: because they prosecuted Karen Read, we can't talk about anything bad that they did. That's tribalism. That's polemical. That's what drove us to this point.

Grant Smith Ellis

41,546 次观看 • 1 年前