ๆญฃๅœจๅŠ ่ฝฝ่ง†้ข‘...

่ง†้ข‘ๅŠ ่ฝฝๅคฑ่ดฅ

๐™๐™€๐™‰๐™Ž๐™„๐™Š๐™‰๐™Ž ๐˜ฝ๐™๐™„๐™‡๐˜ฟ๐™„๐™‰๐™‚ ๐™Š๐™‰ ๐™๐™ƒ๐™€ ๐™๐™Š๐˜ผ๐˜ฟ ๐™๐™Š ๐™‹๐™๐™‡ ๐˜พ๐™ƒ๐™„๐˜พ๐˜ผ๐™‚๐™Š ๐Ÿ‘€ Jena Bishop and Liz Carmouche recall a training session a few years back ahead of their PFL Chicago Womenโ€™s Flyweight World Title bout on Friday, October 16th ๐Ÿ”œ #PFLChicago | Friday, October 16th | ๐Ÿ“Wintrust Arena | ๐ŸŽŸ๏ธ

12,794 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 8 ๅคฉๅ‰ โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

4 ๆก่ฏ„่ฎบ

Nelson Cope ็š„ๅคดๅƒ
Nelson Cope8 ๅคฉๅ‰

Carmouche can defend the takedown and gets that bishop glass jaw AGAIN, personally this should be Carmouche vs Sabrina De Sousa or Paulina W.. as far as a good person is involved is laughable, bishop your arrogance has already got you smashed in the past. DITCHEVA for President

soph v, ็š„ๅคดๅƒ
soph v,8 ๅคฉๅ‰

Thanks for sharing this

Nelson Cope ็š„ๅคดๅƒ
Nelson Cope7 ๅคฉๅ‰

Jenna cried and made excuses with Ditcheva as wellโ€ฆ take her out again Lizโ€ฆ

Nelson Cope ็š„ๅคดๅƒ
Nelson Cope8 ๅคฉๅ‰

Bishop is talking about speaking publicly?? Thatโ€™s ALL she did before fighting Ditcheva and that didnโ€™t work out very well for her.. Talking publicly works both ways Bishop squad.. Carmouche for the KO 2nd round. Is your girl squad tagging Liz in a bunch of nonsense again? lol

็›ธๅ…ณ่ง†้ข‘

Ben Thompson explains how LLMs greatly diminished Nvidia's CUDA moat even as they sent the stock to the moon "So the weird thing about large language models is they were obviously incredible for Nvidia. That's why their stock went to the moon." "They have been on and off the most valuable company in the world." "It was also very bad for Nvidia. And the reason it was bad for Nvidia is that the play with CUDA is to build a developer ecosystem on top of CUDA." "But CUDA only works on Nvidia GPUs. So you get CUDA for free. It's easier to use, and it's a tremendous investment. Nvidia almost went under trying to build CUDA at a time when no one understood what they were doing or why they were wasting money on it." "And that's why Jensen Huang will get bristly, particularly when people question their rent-seeking or profit, whatever. It's like, no, they earned their spot fair and square." "Absolutely. It shouldn't be forgotten. They have earned every dollar they've gotten through 25 years of taking massive risks." "It bottomed out in October 2022. I wrote an article like three weeks before ChatGPT came out, tracing their bottoming-out history and their search for what was next." "'Nvidia in the Valley.' So, go back to this GTC. So I wrote an article at the time called 'Nvidia Waves and Moats'." "And what was interesting about that GTC was, number one, it was very boring. All the cool stuff kind of got scrubbed out." "Now, Jensen Huang has brought that stuff back, so the last few GTCs he's more talking about other things. Now it comes across as, oh, you're still looking for something beyond the LLM." "Because the problem with the LLM is it shifts the developer platform far above where Nvidia sits. All the activity is happening on top of LLMs. And so no one who's writing an AI application today is using CUDA." "Now, some people are, if you're training your own model and you're doing some low-level things or non-LLM things." "But the vast majority of the energy and all the money and the ecosystem is far removed from CUDA." "They have no idea and don't need to know or care what chips their application is running on. They're just on the OpenAI API, or the Anthropic API, or using Bedrock on Amazon, and it's sitting on Trainium, and they're using a Chinese open-source model. It's totally abstracted away, and this is why LLMs were bad for Nvidia." "Now, again, all the money they made along the way is worth it, but their moat has been tremendously diminished." "CUDA is still a moat if you need to do stuff that requires CUDA. But the vast majority of stuff, in energy, doesn't require CUDA, like in a post-LLM world."

Fireside Alpha

12,980 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 1 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

Thereโ€™s an old saying the elders tell the young: โ€œIโ€™ve forgotten more than you ever knew.โ€ The Jewish people have lost more than most nations have ever built. We are not just any people. We are one of the elders. We have outlasted empires that once thought they would last forever. Babylon. Rome. The caliphates. The Third Reich. They are chapters. We are the book. There are still only about 16 million of us in a world of eight billion. We have one small country we never stopped belonging to. The most widely read book in human history is a book about our people. We are loud. We are proud. And we will never apologize for still being here after so many tried to make sure we wouldnโ€™t be. That is why some cannot stand us. Not because we are powerful. Because we survived them. Because their civilizations rose by the sword and vanished, and we are still lighting candles on Friday night. They say we have been hated everywhere, so there must be a reason. There is a reason. We refused to disappear. We refused to become someone else. We kept the names, the language, the land, the law, and the memory. Persecution is not proof of guilt. Survival is proof of spirit. Look at what this generation just did. On October 7 they tried to break us in a single morning. They murdered. They burned. They dragged our people into tunnels. For more than two years the world watched, argued, and often looked away. Some celebrated. Some explained it away. Some told us to be quieter if we wanted to live. We did not go quiet. We fought. We buried our dead. We brought the living home. And in January of this year, the last hostage was returned to Israeli soil. Not one of ours was left behind in Gaza. That is not a talking point. That is who we are. A people that does not abandon its own. When you look into the eyes of those who came back, you see what 3,000 years looks like in a human face. Starved. Beaten. Still unbroken. They carry the same fire that walked out of Egypt, out of Spain, out of the camps, and out of the ashes of the kibbutzim. We are not the colonizers of this story. We are 16 million people who came home to the only land that was ever ours, and we built a country that values life in a region that has too often worshipped death. We did not convert continents at sword-point. We did not erase nations to plant our flag. We wrote. We argued. We remembered. We returned. The more they try to erase us, the more tightly we hold each other. Diaspora and Israel. Secular and religious. Left and right. The hate was supposed to scatter us. It keeps welding us back together. All we have ever asked of this age is the same thing we asked of every age before it: stop trying to make us extinct. Even if they succeeded, it would not unwrite us. You cannot delete the people who gave the world the idea that every human life has worth. You cannot burn the book and pretend the story was never told. Those who built their identity on our death will be remembered as a stain. We will be remembered as the ones who chose life. So here is the choice, again, in 5787. Keep feeding a holy war that has already eaten its own children. Or stop. Choose differently. Coexist. Take the wisdom we have carried across continents and millennia and build something that does not require our graves to feel righteous. History already wrote the ending of the other path. Rome is ruins. The Mongols are a lesson. The Nazis are a warning. We are still here. We are the Nation of Israel. We remember where we came from. We brought our people home. And we are not going anywhere. ืขื ื™ืฉืจืืœ ื—ื™.

Mor Edge Insight

142,979 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 27 ๅคฉๅ‰

BREAKING ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ: Stoughton Police Chief Donna McNamara has been granted an extortionary short order of notice hearing, that will take place this Friday, July 31st, at 10AM on the first floor of Norfolk Superior Court, in an effort to retain her position (after she alleges she was forced out for trying to cooperate with the FBI about the coverup of Sandra Birchmore's murder which, in turn, involves "multiple current and former" members of the Stoughton Police Department). Chief McNamara will, in turn, be able to make oral arguments to the Hon. Rosemary Connolly that, under the four-factor TRO test in Massachusetts, McNamara should be put back in her job, via court order, pending the final disposition of McNamara's current civil lawsuit (file Monday) against the town of Stoughton. Read Judge's order , granting that hearing on short notice, here (Judge's order is an endorsement on the motion and, also, the hearing in on the MassCourt's docket --2682CV00852-- for Friday) - McNamara, alleges her new lawsuit, was constructively dismissed, under false pretext, by the Stoughton Town manager because McNamara was a woman and, also, because McNamara would not stay silent about a 2024 IA investigation into the coverup of Sandra's death. Further, as I reported on Monday, McNamara alleges, in June of 2026, she told the Stoughton Town Manager that the FBI's trial prep, leading up to Matthew Farwell's October, 2026, trial for Sandra's murder (and the murder of Sandra's unborn 8-10 week old baby boy) would require McNamara to expand investigations into the aforementioned "current and former" members of the Stoughton PD. On Monday, I reported the following; Stoughton Police Chief Donna McNamara, in a new lawsuit filed today, confirmed that --as a result of ongoing FBI investigations in June of 2026 regarding Sandra Birchmore-- there may be new misconduct investigations of "current and former" Stoughton police officers. Brian Tully's State Police unit, including John Fanning and Yuri Bukhenik, cleared then-Stoughton cop Matthew Farwell for responsibility for Sandra's death in 2021 (despite a litany of evidence linking Farwell to the crime, and to a years-long grooming/abuse ring targeting Sandra involving the Stoughton Police Explorer's Program). Both Bukhenik and Fanning, of note, used to work in Stoughton as police officers before moving on to work for Norfolk District Attorney Michael Morrissey's State Police Detective Unit (as did Farwell's brother, William Farwell). Fanning, for his part, personally wrote the state police report clearing Farwell for a role in Sandra's death (and the death of Sandra's unborn 8-10 week old baby boy). In turn, at the time (in 2021), Fanning reported to his Sergeant (Bukhenik) and, also, Bukhenik's boss, Detective-Lieutenant Brian Tully. Read that new lawsuit here: Earlier in June of 2026, for more context and background, I reported; In a new motion from Matthew Farwell via the Sandra Birchmore federal docket, it has been revealed that law enforcement officers were the subject of ongoing federal investigations as recently as April of 2026. This has potential major implications regarding the state police and their initial coverup of Sandra's murder. That state police unit, detailed to the Norfolk District Attorney Michael Morrissey, included Brian Tully, John Fanning, Yuri Bukhenik, Michael Proctor and Nick Guarino. Shockingly, Fanning (who wrote the initial MSP report clearing Farwell for Sandra's murder, years before the federal government indicted Farwell) used to work as a cop in Stoughton. Stoughton was the town where the town where Farwell groomed Sandra, via the Police Explorer's program, in 2014. Farwell, alleges the federal government, murdered Sandra, and her unborn 8-10 week old baby boy, on February 1st, 2021, circa 9:27PM ET. Then, somehow, the Canton Police Department (including Kevin Albert) discovered information, between February 4-6th of 2021, that Farwell was the man captured on video at Sandra's apartment at the time of her murder, that Farwell had admitted to others that he had abused Sandra since she was a child and, further, that Farwell had stated that he was going to take care of the problem himself if Sandra insisted on carrying her unborn baby boy to term. Farwell, at the time, was under the impression he was the father of Sandra's unborn baby boy...although subsequent DNA testing determined Farwell was not the father. This new information related to the ongoing federal investigation was revealed by Farwell in a filing asking for a bill of particular ahead of Farwell's august, 2026, trial at Boston Moakley Federal courthouse. Of note, as the Proctorgate scandal unfolds (regarding abhorrent messages sent by Michael Proctor and his friends - including one where Sean Goode called Sandra Birchmore a slur for mentally disabled people soon after her murder), one of the people potentially involved in Proctor's group chat was a man named "Larry" Kennedy. This man is potentially the husband of Meg Kennedy (who was Sandra Birchmore's guidance counselor). Shockingly, Meg Kennedy's close friend is Karen Read trial witness (and someone who "did not know Michael Proctor before 2023," per her trial testimony) Jen McCabe. Read that report here - Then, on July 21st of 2026, I reported; Matthew Farwell has LOST his motion for a bill of particulars ahead of his August, 2026, federal trial for the death of Sandra Birchmore (and her unborn 8-10 week-old baby boy)...a case initially covered up by the Norfolk DA and Brian Tully/John Fanning's MSP unit. Quoting Chief Judge Casper; "Given the Courtโ€™s ruling about the sufficiency of the superseding indictment, the production of discovery and the supplemental disclosures, the Court concludes that a bill of particulars is not warranted where Farwell has been put on notice of the nature of the charges against him, will not be caught by unfair surprise at trial, or hampered in his defense or protection from double jeopardy." Link (via Kyle Sharkey): Previously, on July 9, 2026, I reported: NEW: Here is the latest document filed by the federal government in the Sandra Birchmore/Matthew Farwell case ahead of Farwell's August, 2026, trial. Sandra WAS NOT in contact with federal LEO before she was killed, but she may have attempted to make such contact if Farwell did not take Sandra's life (and the life of her unborn baby). Quoting from page 3 of the new motion from the office of U.S. Attorney for The District Of Massachusetts, Leah Foley; "Third, even if Farwell were entitled to more information about the evidence, his requests are improper because they are based on a misinterpretation of the elements of Section 1512(a)(1)(C). From the text and his emphasis on the word โ€œfederal,โ€ the premise for Request Nos. 2 through 4 appears to be that the government must prove that Farwell killed Birchmore intending to prevent a communication to a specific federal law enforcement officer. That is not the law. Section 1512(g)(2) eliminated any mens rea requirement regarding the federal status of the putative recipient of a communication that the killing prevented. See 18 U.S.C. ยง 1512(g)(2). And in Fowler, the Court held that Section 1512(a)(1)(C) โ€œcovers a defendant who kills with intent to prevent communication with law enforcement generally (i.e., with any and all law enforcement officers).โ€ Fowler, 563 U.S. at 673. Here, the Court should deny the motion because Farwell seeks evidence regarding something the government does not have to prove. Finally, while the Superseding Indictment and the tens of thousands of pages of discovery have apprised the defendant of the nature of the charges and mitigate any genuine risk of surprise at trial, the government will supplement its disclosures with the following representations regarding Request Nos. 1 and 5: ๏‚ท Request No. 1. Matthew Farwell sought to prevent communications by Sandra Birchmore, the person who contacted the Stoughton Police Department on January 20, 2021 (Superseding Indictment, ยถ 7), and any similarly situated persons to whom Birchmore made disclosures about the conduct underlying Farwellโ€™s identified federal crimes (Superseding Indictment, ยถยถ 4โ€“5, 11). Request No. 5. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (โ€œFBIโ€), including its agents and task force officers, are the federal law enforcement officers to whom at least one relevant communication would have been made." Link to filing - Farwell's trial is scheduled to begin on October 5th of 2026 at the Moakley Courthouse in Boston. Towel News will have wall-to-wall coverage of the entire trial from the courtroom (although no cameras will be permitted).

Grant Smith Ellis

70,314 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 2 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰