Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

๐™๐™–๐™ช๐™ง๐™ช๐™จ ๐˜ฝ๐™ก๐™ค๐™ค๐™™๐™ฉ๐™ช๐™จ๐™  ๐–ฒ๐—๐—‹๐–บ๐—‚๐—€๐—๐— . Hard kinks . OOC +18 แดแดษด๊œฑแด›แด‡ส€ nsfw account. ๐—Ÿ๐—ผ๐˜„-๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜€. อ

294,126 views โ€ข 1 month ago โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Dear Elon Musk, We know youโ€™re working hard to make this platform trustworthy and truly democratic. Thatโ€™s exactly why Iโ€™m bringing this to your attention: to highlight the unchecked jihadist frenzy unfolding here. Major accounts, reaching millions of views, continue to push fabricated content without restriction โ€” manipulating public opinion with extremist narratives. Meanwhile, small accounts are under heavy scrutiny, with immediate Community Notes slapped on them. Take this example: yesterday, a pro-jihad account received 18 million views for posting fake news about Israel. A small Israeli account responded satirically, using the same headline โ€” and was instantly hit with a Community Note. The result? Weโ€™re watching it play out on university campuses. Western students, defenseless against coordinated disinformation attacks from cultures where deception is a virtue, have been completely indoctrinated. Some have even set themselves on fire for the lowest of causes โ€” simply because they believed what they saw online. Below is just one example: an AI-generated fake video posted by the Iranian account Tehran Times. They forgot to remove the watermark โ€” it clearly says VEO, revealing it was made using Google VEO 3. Other accounts were smarter and removed the watermark โ€” and yet, hundreds of millions were misled. After this example, Iโ€™ve included 200 screenshots of similar accounts โ€” all from this platform โ€” and they donโ€™t even represent 1% of the accounts that freely spread just a single fake. These anti-Western accounts need fake content โ€” itโ€™s how they compensate for failure, both on the battlefield and in real life. Let them have their illusions. But our Western students deserve better protection. Community Notes is a brilliant initiative. But radicals have already found a way to outmaneuver it โ€” by overwhelming the system with so many fakes that your Notes canโ€™t keep up. Itโ€™s an effective tactic. And itโ€™s working. This requires smarter monitoring โ€” the kind that anti-Western extremists wonโ€™t bypass so easily. With deep appreciation, โ€” Just one small voice

GAZAWOOD - the PALLYWOOD saga

114,756 views โ€ข 1 year ago

The most important video on my Twitter account for anyone buying a car! This 1-hour guide will help you understand the essentialsโ€”choosing the right car, features, and techโ€”so youโ€™re not misled by salesmen. Watch this before spending your hard-earned lakhs and make a smarter choice! Timestamps: 0:00 - Welcome & Channelโ€™s Mission 0:55 - You Can't Know Everything 2:50 - My Six Cars: Three Wrong Decisions 4:10 - How Salesmen Might Misguide You 5:40 - Choosing Based on Number of Seats 8:00 - Common Cars to Consider 9:29 - Global Brands & Their Advantages 14:00 - Naturally Aspirated vs. Turbo Engines 18:00 - Hatchback, Sedan, or Compact SUV? 22:22 - Proper SUVs vs. Crossovers 24:45 - AWD, FWD, or RWD: Whatโ€™s Best for You? 26:35 - Petrol, Diesel, Hybrid, or EV: Which to Choose? 30:06 - Common Doubts About EVs 32:57 - Is Diesel a Wise Choice in 2024? 33:39 - Manual or Automatic Transmission? 34:50 - Types of Automatic Transmissions 36:10 - The Fun and Cost of DCT Gearboxes 37:00 - IMT Gearbox: A Good Option? 37:35 - Safety, Build Quality, & Global NCAP Ratings 39:24 - Prioritizing Performance 40:05 - Resale Value, Spare Parts, & Features 41:18 - Are Sedans the Best of Both Worlds? 41:55 - Why the i20 is the Perfect Automatic Car Under 10 Lakh 43:50 - City vs. Highway Driving Ratio 45:00 - Must-Have Practical & Safety Features in 2024 47:15 - Research Known Issues of the Car 48:15 - ADAS in 2024: Benefits & Known Issues 49:30 - Should You Wait 6 Months Before Buying a New Car? 50:00 - What If the Showroom Is Far from You? 50:58 - My Polo Doesnโ€™t Have Airbags: Lessons Learned 51:50 - Conclusion & Final Verdict Disclaimer: This video is based purely on my experience as a customer of 4 different brands and is not intended as expert advice or auto journalism.

Sunderdeep - Volklub

1,765,210 views โ€ข 1 year ago

We know the games Senator Marcoleta and Mike Defensor has been playing in destabilising the government under President Marcos. The government must now throw all its weight and power, and back the necessary agencies in its deeper dive into the connections between Marcoleta and Defensor. The NBI must not dillydally any longer and facilitate instead the arrest of these individuals. Uncover the source of Mike Defensorโ€™s funds and tear open all his involvement in illegal activities. How did he afford to give P30 million to Marcoleta, purportedly for contributions towards his Senate election campaign. Pursue the cases involving Defensor and his family on illegal human trafficking as recently uncovered. Seek the paper trail on how he accumulated his wealth, including his involvement and ownership in mining companies. Bear in mind, his family only had modest wealth before he entered politics and became Gloria Arroyoโ€™s DENR Secretary. Deep dive into how the 18 Marines came into play and how Defensor and Marcoleta have coordinated their actions together. How were they funded especially that Defensor have denied involvement in the past. He and Marcoleta was also the handler of Sgt Orly Guteza along with his perjured affidavit before he disappeared. Pursue Marcoleta and Defensorโ€™s cases on bribery and plunder relentlessness. Bring them to account. If in anyway the INC interferes in the just execution of our laws and engage in destabilisation, then arrest all their leaders. Throw everything and the whole weight of the government against them. This is how you make people straighten up and learn the hard way.

The King

26,942 views โ€ข 2 months ago

Wait โ€” the bank froze your life savings? Debanking exposed... Imagine waking up one day to find your bank account frozen. No warning. No explanation. No recourse. This is not a thought experiment. Itโ€™s a real situation. And itโ€™s happened not just to crypto companies and their founders, but to ordinary people who are just trying to live their lives. That includes our guest today, who learned firsthand what it means to be โ€œdebanked.โ€ In this episode, we talk about the unseen algorithms that monitor peopleโ€™s accounts, the ramifications of the Bank Secrecy Act, and how crypto and decentralized finance may offer a much-needed check โ€” and safety net โ€” against the opaque systems of traditional finance. Full episode: Timestamps: (0:00) Introduction (2:03) The Problem of Debanking (5:58) Debanking: A Personal Story (7:33) Understanding the Bank Secrecy Act (11:53) The Information Vacuum (16:55) The Impact on Crypto Companies (20:07) Addressing Skeptics (22:07) Banks: Good vs. Bad (27:35) The Scariest Moment (36:17) โ€œOperation Chokepoint 2.0โ€ (38:08) History of the Bank Secrecy Act (44:04) Security Theater (45:31) What Would You Change? (48:45) The Impact of Financial Consolidation (49:30) Crypto as Banking Solution (53:02) Is Debanking Still Happening? (58:35) Unresolved Mysteries (1:01:47) One More Debanking Story (1:08:07) Conspiracy or Coincidence? (1:09:39) It Shouldnโ€™t Be This Hard (1:11:18) Out From Under the SECโ€™s Cloud (1:14:23) The Urgent Need for Legislation (1:17:26) Possible Tech Futures (1:19:33) Advice for Founders (1:22:04) Final Thoughts w/ Katherine Minarik Emily Westerhold

a16z crypto

41,914 views โ€ข 1 year ago

New video from Shreya Shankar on data processing with LLMs at scale, an underrated topic! Shreya starts with a real use case: public defenders analyzing case files for racial bias (4:08). Hundreds of pages per defendant. Court transcripts, police reports, news articles. Running GPT-5 on everything costs a fortune. Her solution: treat LLMs like database operators. Semantic Map, Filter, Reduce (9:18). Databricks, BigQuery, and Snowflake are already shipping this as "AI SQL." She discusses how starting at 12:51: a query optimizer for LLMs. Traditional databases rewrite queries for efficiency. Shreya does the same for LLM pipelines (semantic versions of split, map, reduce that are LLM specific, along with query decomposition). For example, trivial LLM calls are replaced with Python functions. These "rewrite directives" improve both cost AND accuracy. She also talks about a cost optimization technique: Task Cascades (30:00). Instead of running GPT-5 on every document, first ask cheap questions. "Is there any lower court mentioned?" If no, the document clearly doesn't overturn a lower court. There are many other routing questions you can ask to reduce the amount of text sent to the LLM. This requires careful optimization and tuning to get right. She explains how to do this in the video. She runs through a production example that achieved 86% cost reduction while retaining 90% accuracy. --- At 41:26, Shreya shifts to HCI. She built DocWrangler, an IDE for LLM pipelines. The design is based on "Three Gulfs" (44:35): 1. Comprehension: You don't know what's in your data 2. Specification: "Only prescription meds" is hard to operationalize 3. Generalization: A prompt that works on 10 examples fails at 10,000 Users invented "throwaway pipelines" just to explore their data before doing real analysis. Pipelines with no analytical purpose: "summarize these documents," "extract key ideas." Just ways to learn what's in their data before doing the real work. DocWrangler makes this a first-class feature. --- In the last bit of the video Shreya discusses why you can't know what "good" means until you see examples. In one study, a medical analyst extracted medications from doctor-patient transcripts. As they inspected outputs, they noticed every medication appeared with a dosage. They hadn't anticipated this. Now they wanted dosages too. They also saw Tylenol and ibuprofen appearing and realized: "Actually, I only want prescription medications." Shreya calls this "criteria drift." Your evaluation criteria evolve as you see more outputs. This matters because standard ML assumes fixed metrics: define them upfront, collect labels, measure. But with LLMs on fuzzy tasks, that assumption breaks. You discover what you actually want through the process of evaluating. If you don't account for criteria drift, you end up optimizing for a stale rubric. DocWrangler and EvalGen accommodate this by placing the human in the loop thoughtfully. Chapter timestamps: (4:08) - The problem: unstructured data at scale (9:18) - Semantic operators (Map, Filter, Reduce) (12:51) - Query optimization for LLMs (18:15) - Data decomposition (chunking) (30:00) - Task Cascades (86% cost reduction) (41:26) - DocWrangler IDE (44:35) - Three Gulfs framework (51:50) - Evaluation criteria drift More links in reply

Hamel Husain

35,619 views โ€ข 7 months ago

๐Ÿšจ TIKTOK TERROR TUTORIAL: Retired Trial Attorney Tells Followers โ€œWe Only Need to Assassinate 3 or 4 Trump Officials Publiclyโ€ฆ and the Rest Will FALL IN LINEโ€ โ€” Back on Platform With Hundreds of Thousands of Followers! ๐Ÿ”ฅโ˜ ๏ธ In the ironclad logic of republicsโ€”from Madisonโ€™s Federalist No. 10 warning against factional violence to the hard-won lesson of the French Revolutionโ€™s Committee of Public Safetyโ€”targeted terror has never โ€œmade the rest fall in line.โ€ It has only birthed chaos, tyranny, and rivers of blood. Yet here we are. A retired Bay Area trial attorney and TikTok influencer (Hawk/ mdg650hawk), boasting hundreds of thousands of followers after his latest ban-and-reinstatement, calmly instructs his audience: โ€œWe would really only have to take out three or four of them publicly for the rest of them to fall in line.โ€ This is not โ€œprotected speech.โ€ This is a decapitation strategy delivered by a man who once swore an oath to uphold the Constitution he now seeks to execute by bullet instead of ballot. It meets every legal test for incitement under Brandenburg v. Ohio: directed to producing imminent lawless action against federal officialsโ€”precisely what 18 U.S.C. ยงยง 1114, 115, and 2384 were written to crush. He knows the law. He simply rejects it when it protects the wrong team. This is stochastic terrorism upgraded to an explicit tutorial. The same crowd that shrieked about โ€œthreats to democracyโ€ after every rhetorical excess now openly blueprints the murder of Cabinet officials to intimidate the rest. If a conservative had uttered a fraction of this, the FBI would have already kicked in doors. Instead? Crickets. Two-tiered โ€œjusticeโ€ isnโ€™t a conspiracy theoryโ€”itโ€™s policy. America was founded on ideas, not assassinations. On ballots, not bayonets. We do not negotiate with the logic of Robespierre or Leninโ€™s vanguard. We prosecute it. FBI FBI Director Kash Patel U.S. Secret Serviceโ€” do your job. TikTok โ€” permanent ban this account. Citizens โ€” report it, reject it, and remember: the Republic dies the day we normalize killing our way to political compliance. We choose the Constitution. Every single time. #ArrestHawk #TwoTierJustice #TikTokTerror #StopPoliticalViolence #RuleOfLaw #ProtectTheCabinet #NoAssassinations #MAGA #AmericaFirst #DefendTheRepublic What part of โ€œthis is illegalโ€ do they still not understand? Tag your reps. Demand accountability. The line has been crossed.

Tony Seruga

27,109 views โ€ข 3 months ago

EXCLUSIVE: HONG KONG ANTI-CHINA GROUPS AWASH WITH MYSTERY CASH Investigators found millions of dollars delivered to Stand News "in a clandestine manner", a court heard. The loss-making anti-China media outlet in Hong Kong suddenly went from deep debt to having millions in spare cash. The discovery, revealed in court recently, is an example of how China-hostile groups in Hong Kong acquired donations equivalent to tens of millions of US dollars between 2014 and 2020. The G-7's Financial Action Task Force warned during this period that crowdfunding donations had become the new way for clandestine funders to transfer cash around the world at high speed without being traceable, with the cash sometimes used for terrorism--which is what happened in Hong Kong. . CROWDFUNDED TERRORISM In a case in point, a mysterious woman came to visit a Hong Kong protest group called Dragon Slayers Brigade and gave them instructions on where and when to set up a crowdfunding bid. They did so โ€“ and money quickly poured into their bank account, more than they could use. After setting up a Molotov cocktail factory, obtaining an AR15 assault rifle and financing a team of staff, leader Wong Chun-keung gave himself a stress-relief break in which he spent some of the funds on football betting. โ€œI used about HK$300,000 [US$40,000] of the donations to gamble. For me, it was a way to de-stress,โ€ he told a court. The suddenly wealthy group obtained high grade explosives and planned a terrorist-level bombing in Wan Chai which would have caused massive casualties, had police not stopped them hours before they set the bombs off. . CELEBRATING VIOLENCE The anti-China Stand News carried interviews with members of the Dragon Slayers Brigade, presenting them positively and "romanticizing" their violent mission, a court heard. In fact, it has become clear that money is the key to fully understanding the protests in Hong Kong. From 2014 onwards, anti-government activists and anti-China media groups found themselves awash with cash. These tens of millions of dollars were in addition to the tens of millions handed out in Hong Kong since 1994 by the National Endowment for Democracy, a US group specializing in overseas political interference "to advance US interests". The cash is also in addition to the secret sum of US$2 million set aside for the Hong Kong protests by America's Open Technology Fund, a unit of Radio Free Asia, a Washington DC "news" outlet. And it is in addition to the millions of dollars known to have been handed out to anti-China activists by Mark Simon, a one-time US intelligence officer working for Jimmy Lai's Apple Daily. TOO MUCH, TOO FAST While most crowdfunding activities are legitimate and harmless, examples in which large sums of money are moved in a highly charged political atmosphere are suspect, particularly if the money arrives very quickly, investigators said. Hong Kong journalists watched one anti-China group in the city obtain a large sum of cash at high speed using crowdfunding in August of 2019. "A new gofundme campaign created yesterday has raised over US$1.97m in two hours this morning," amazed journalists at Hong Kong's Dimsum Daily reported. This was extraordinary, not just because of the speed, but because the group was virtually unknown. Called "Freedom Hong Kong", it supported a gathering of protesters under the slogan "Alliance of United States, United Kingdom and Hong Kong, sovereignty lies with the people". It presented itself as Hong Kong people calling for western nations to impose sanctions on their own community. This made no sense, but since the crowdfunding sites were in the US, police could not trace the origin of the funds. Hong Kong journalists noted that Freedom Hong Kong was registered in the United States. . STAND NEWS MONEY MYSTERY The donations money-transfer technique can be traced back a decade. In 2014, an anti-China media group called House News, which attracted too little advertising and was losing $600,000 a month, closed down. But six months later, it relaunched itself as Stand News. It still had almost no advertising, but was suddenly cash rich, through "donations". When the media outlet wiped its website and stopped posting material, investigators found a reserve cash account containing HK$61 million (US$8 million): an extraordinary amount of spare cash for a non-profit website without a functioning business model. . APPLE DAILY PUZZLE Similarly, Stand News' former partner Apple Daily was losing more than HK$1 million a day, sometimes twice that, during this period. That means it was losing between US$1 million to US$2 million a week, month after month, year after year. But it always had vast amounts of spare cash in its bank account. Business reporters from other Hong Kong publications openly expressed puzzlement about where Apple Daily's money came from. "We cannot help wonder if its existence were a powerful propaganda machineryโ€ฆ" said business writers at Dimsum Daily. . ANTI-CHINA PROPAGANDA Stand News overseas director was a man named Evan Fowler, who co-founded a China-hostile website called the Hong Kong Free Press, before returning to the UK to work for a hard right group called the Henry Jackson Society. In 2017, that society was revealed by the Times of London to be taking 10,000 pounds a month (more than US$13,000), delivered by Japanese contacts, to spread negative news about China to the mainstream media, including The Sunday Times, The Daily Telegraph, The Guardian and The Economist. . VIOLENCE, HOSTILITY AND CASH It's clear that the key to fully understanding the Hong Kong anti-China movement is cash, and it's easy to find multiple examples. Here are four more: 1) In another Hong Kong court case, a 17-year-old Hong Kong youth arrested for violent protests, revealed to a court that he maintained "a spare flat to keep his bombs in". Hong Kong is literally one of the most expensive places in the world โ€“ how can a 17-year-old afford a spare apartment? 2) At yet another court hearing, an anti-China activist called Wayland Chan talked about being given a company by Mark Simon, a former US intelligence agent, working for Apple Daily. Simon told him that the company was of covert nature and could be used to liaise with foreign organizations and collect funds. 3) One group using crowdfunding to attract large sums of money at speed called itself the 612 Humanitarian Relief Fund. A court heard it received HK$270 million (US$34 million) in donations between June 2019 and October 2021, and cash went to anti-China lawyers, international lobbyists, and hostile foreign organizations. Two of its trustees were directors of Stand News, and one worked with the "revolution industry", a cluster of hybrid warfare consultants which uses street protests to promote US interests. Not Hong Kong interests, US interests. 4) In yet another case, HSBC in 2019 closed the accounts of a group called Spark Alliance, which also claimed that the HK$80 million (US$10.3 million) in their account came from crowdfunding. That group presented itself as a noble foundation providing support for arrested protesters. But investigators found the account was managed by an 18-year-old involved in drug trafficking, with some cash withdrawn and spent on unrelated items. . FALSE NARRATIVE Why is the narrative you see about Hong Kong in the media so different to the truth? The western press is doing its job, which is to demonize China to manufacture consent for the US to go to war against a developing country which is daring to rise peacefully. That doesn't mean that individual western journalists are necessarily bad people. Some probably really believe that America is a wonderful country that wouldn't dream of interfering in politics outside its own borders, and that the Chinese are warlike people who will shortly invade Australia as a prelude to taking over the world. All the rest of us can do is to try to present a fairer picture of what's going on and hope the truth will spread.

Nury Vittachi

121,115 views โ€ข 1 year ago

What are these 'calamari-like' clots that embalmers keep finding? New peer-reviewed paper examines the recent phenomena of unusual white fibrous clots found by embalmers. Retired Air Force Major Thomas Havilandโ€™s peer-reviewed research exposes a persistent phenomenon that the mainstream medical establishment continues to ignore. A new peer-reviewed paper published July 1 in the International Journal of Innovative Research and Medical Science breaks down what embalmers across English-speaking countries have discovered in recent years: tough, rubbery, white fibrous clots appearing in a significant percentage of bodies long after the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccine rollout. Thomas Haviland, a retired U.S. Air Force Major, began investigating this phenomenon after watching the 2022 documentary Died Suddenly. He has since conducted annual surveys of embalmers in the United States, Canada, the UK, Australia, and New Zealand. His latest analysis of 808 responses from 2022 through 2025 found that 75% of embalmers reported seeing the unusual clots. โ€œThe embalmers are seeing these white fibrous clots in an average of 23% of their corpses,โ€ Haviland stated. A separate, more recent, 2026 survey of Tennessee embalmers showed roughly 70% still observing the clots in 18% of cases, according to Haviland. Notably, these structures differ sharply from clots seen before 2020. โ€œMany of these embalmers have 20 or 30 years of experience, never saw this phenomenon before,โ€ Haviland explained. โ€œPrior to COVID, they would see two types of clots. Whatโ€™s called grape jelly clotsโ€ฆ And they also see whatโ€™s called chicken fat clotsโ€ฆ Much, much different than these large white fibrous clots, which are really tough and rubbery and hard to break." Haviland also shared the account of an endovascular specialist and cardiologist in Jacksonville, Florida, who contacted him about removing similar clots from living patients at his lab. โ€œHe actually refers to the clots as devious clots,โ€ Haviland said. After sharing images and angiograms, the doctor emailed in March 2024 to tell Tom that he had been instructed to terminate communication immediately. โ€œSomebody, his hospital administrator probably got to him, right? Told him to shut up, stop talking about this, or else weโ€™ll go after your medical license,โ€ Haviland observed. โ€œSo itโ€™s a shame. Thatโ€™s whatโ€™s happening. People are staying silent about this when they should be speaking out.โ€ Laboratory tests on the clots, including Raman spectroscopy and others, point to the spike protein โ€” whether from the virus, modified RNA injections, or both โ€” sticking to a blood protein called fibrinogen and creating unusual structures. โ€œIt makes that fibrinogen all misfolded and twistedโ€ฆ So then it becomes almost impossible to break down the clot. It becomes this rubbery polymer instead,โ€ Haviland said. Despite repeated submissions of survey results to the FDA, CDC, and NIH, and the publication of supporting papers, major health agencies and institutions including the Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, Johns Hopkins, and Stanford have shown no interest in obtaining samples for further study. Although Havilandโ€™s initial preprint was rejected by one platform as โ€œnot novel enough,โ€ four years later, embalmers continue to report the never-before-seen clots into 2026. Haviland and others behind his research are calling for forensic pathologists and independent researchers to examine the structures directly and for congressional hearings to investigate what embalmers have been documenting for years.

Rebel News

22,984 views โ€ข 1 month ago

What I should have followed. After the holidays as Iโ€™m a brokie as the legend Andrew Tate say Iโ€™m going to need help by the Twitter lawyers after the holiday season to help out. The people that help me win the suits will generously participate in the upside. Going to let the monsters that lives on the backs and injury of hard working warriors that fall have a good Christmas spirit. After the holidays I will post many nice evidence and recordings this bipolar person will release. Donโ€™t worry I will let you fine folk put me in jail as well. Never claimed to be innocent. But the hilarious attempts to be innocent and be a part of fucking my kids future to go down with me. I give zero fucks about what happens to me. This is for my kids. Maybe the white dominated sport that is so fine and nice sit back and sweat. Iโ€™m the truth that hockey is the most toxic culture in all of sports. The players and staff know the idiot Iโ€™ve been. Lucky I have not done it alone. How come hockey never been in the news for drugs and criminal activity. Nah we just the white league that are better and behave better then all other sports. Gary get ready. What Iโ€™m coming with after you had a jolly good time the reality you will have fun suppress. But your watch dogs wonโ€™t win me and if they do tell them to come well prepared. Folks and fans Iโ€™m willing to destroy my self for truth. Letโ€™s start with the ambien and c pac use for organizations. How I did drugs my whole career and never got one single phone call when I came to USA at 18 escaping my past and I never thought I got out in a bigger criminal empire then what I came from. Research west coast family in Sweden that I grew up in since 4 years old. I thought that taking the flight away when I was 18 to just get introduced to the crazy shit called the nhl. I will admit to my crimes and wonโ€™t hide my part. Now itโ€™s about truth and people are coming with me for saving my children that had no part in it. Around the 26-27th panda lawyers come out and we are going to court with the public media which is you the people. Hate me and say to change my meds. When the nhl helped me pay the extortions against my sister and kids. I will go down with them. Dm me if youโ€™re interested to help. But I will post everything you need to knew about our fucked up sports and no lawyer can bury me with lawyers. I will eat them alive as I canโ€™t give to shits about what happens to me. My children will never see me again. If you guys think Iโ€™m that kind of man that do that like the nhl program told me with marlow and Dan Cronin the last days then give your heads a shake. Amount of 9mm on my forehead last 10 years that they knew. Look up what happened in odense Denmark last monday and that was suppressedโ€ฆ hahah. Iโ€™m the villain that will bring change. Hate me.. donโ€™t give a fuck. I love you. No matter where this goes my kids deserve to know the truth. God bless. The nhl clean up crews have been trying with me but they canโ€™t. Here is were they have forced me too. Have a good holiday and Iโ€™m lucky to be alive. I want attention or drama queen. Letโ€™s see when this is over if true. God bless America and the world. Fucj the corporate snakes. Iโ€™m going to convince my shit too. Letโ€™s see if they wanna play ball. NHL players you deserve better but are a bunch of pussies. โค๏ธ not many people with drugs charges and criminal acts compared to the other sports. Is it the white sports or is it something else. Maybe white behave better than others. We are way worse the. Others. If my account got suspended you know the white power handled business. I am sorry to relationships I did everything for. But time to have fun. The truth will come out bipolar or not. God bless. Happy holidays. My family wonโ€™t have it. Thatโ€™s on me. But Iโ€™m fighting for their future. Hate me itโ€™s ok. I deserve it. But hate them too they were equally involved โœŒ๏ธ 10-14 psychotropics they put in me to shut up. Well destroying me is a small price topay

Time is up. Not going alone. truth coming soon.

103,450 views โ€ข 1 year ago

There was a massive John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial bombshell that went under the surface last week. Not only were 17 Ring videos deleted from John's system between 12:37am and 5:08am on 1/29/22, another video of Karen and her family collecting the murder weapon after 12pm ET that day was also deleted. This means someone (probably Karen) accessed John's Ring system --access that John's niece and nephew have testified Karen possessed-- sometime in the afternoon of 1/29/22 (before search warrants were served on Karen's phone and her car, after 4pm that day, when the vehicle was located by State Police at the home of Karen's parents in Dighton). Indeed, Karen would only need knowledge of John's Ring login information --something Karen had, as evidenced by the document below-- in order to access the system remotely from any device. The fact that there was a video deleted after 12pm on 1/29/22, and that the video in question directly captured Karen and her family leaving John's home with the murder weapon, indicates at least some of the deletions in questions did not occur until Karen was released from the hospital. Karen's access to John's rings system, and the timeline of the deleted videos, thus raises the potential that Karen also deleted 17 of the 18 Ring videos from earlier that morning --between 12:37am and 5:08am, as mentioned-- while at her parents house in Dighton. In turn, this would mean Karen left specific Ring videos on the system, including a staged "bump" into John's car at at 5:08am, in anticipation of being criminally charged. Read a prior public court motion regarding Karen's access to John's ring system here - If these deletions are confirmed, Karen's prior statement during a news interview becomes an ominous double entendre. "I mean, what kind of criminal mastermind am I? Not a very good one," said Read with a smirk to the camera. Perhaps in a prescient manner, when that clip first aired in March of 2025, this is what I reported (at the time, I did not fully realize the implications of Karen also deleting another damning Ring video from after 12pm on 1/29/22); "Karen Read, as I predicted many months ago, left a single Ring video on John O'Keefe's system , from roughly 5:08am, wherein Karen may have staged a fake "bump" into John O'Keefe's car to, in real time, plant reasonable double as to the cause of Read's broken taillight." "I am actually stunned that, in that moment, Karen managed to make sure the other 17 Ring videos on John's system were deleted (from between 12:37am and 5:08am), and managed to stage a fake "bump" into John's car, as a preemptive form of artificial reasonable doubt." "Karen didn't pull it off, but her mind was certainly in overdrive that morning before Read hatched her plan to, in my view, return to Fairview Road (circa 5:23am), confirm John was indeed dead, as a result of Karen hitting John with her car at 12:31am that morning, while drunk, and then leaving John on the lawn in a blizzard." "Then, Read, after 5:35am, went to pick up Jen McCabe and Kerri Roberts, returned to John's house with the two women, told them to stop searching in John's house because "John wasn't there," left the alleged murder weapon in John's driveway, and returned to Fairview Road after 6am (in Kerri's car), whereupon Karen somehow "saw" John's body in the snow, through a blizzard, and before the three women passed the tree line of the lawn of the home where John met his lonesome and untimely end earlier that morning (as a result of what, I believe, was a fight between John and Karen, as to the breakdown of their relationship, spiraling when Karen felt she was losing control of the situation)." See that clip of Karen's "criminal mastermind" statement, and read my shockingly accurate prediction, here - Also of note, in towel's exclusive Karen Cam footage from May 8th, 2025 --when jurors in Read's re-trial were show evidence of Karen's father and brother collecting Read's Lexus from John's home in Canton after 12pm ET on 1/29/22-- prior observations by social media users --related to Bill Read leaving the courtroom within seconds of those clips being shown to jurors-- were confirmed. Read the initial reporting of Mr. Read leaving the courtroom in very seconds after clips were played here - Bill Read --already under observation by a court officer due to reports Mr. Read was staring at jurors as state witnesses were testifying over recent days-- noticeably left the front bench behind his daughter for nearly 40 minutes in the immediate aftermath of the deleted Ring videos (in particular from after 12pm that day involving Mr. Read, Karen's brother, and Karen's sister-in-law - all three of whom are on the state's witness list for the re-trial, but have yet to be called). This was the first time, throughout any proceeding, that Mr. Read left the courtroom benches during trial for an extended period of time. Interestingly, Hank Brennan announced last week in a court motion that the keeper of records for Ring will be testifying in Karen's re-trial --something that did not happen in the first trial-- which, further, suggests that Ring may have a log of when John's account was accessed, where it was accessed from and, most importantly, what videos were deleted from that account (along with when those videos were deleted). Read that motion related to Ring's upcoming testimony, between May 12 and May 16 of 2025, here - If it is indeed confirmed that Karen, or her family member, accessed John's Ring system to remove 17 of the 18 videos recorded between 12:37am and 5:08am on 1/29/22, along with another video after 12pm showing Karen's family collecting the vehicle, with a broken taillight, before taking it back to Dighton-- that is devastating evidence to Karen's defense. It has already been revealed in court papers, in that regard, that Karen was on her laptop at her parent's house around 4pm on 1/29/22 --when Karen's phone and car were collected as evidence by the police-- and, in turn, that may be the smoking gun as to Karen's consciousness of guilt if Ring records indicate videos from John's system were deleted from a remote location (in particular Dighton, Massachusetts) circa 2-4pm or so on that afternoon. Those deleted videos are no doubt very damaging to Karen, and would certainly show her taillight broken when Karen returned to John's home at 12:37am that morning --as confirmed by Karen connecting to John's home wifi at that time-- as well as that taillight being broken when Karen, her father, her brother and her sister-in-law came to collect the alleged murder weapon after 12pm ET on 1/29/22. See testimony from Karen's first trial wherein Karen admitted to one of John's friends --whom Karen tried to bait into an affair by manipulating that friend about John hugging someone on a vacation prior to John's death, until John's friend cut off the affair when he realized Karen was only trying to hurt John-- that Karen "knew where the Ring cameras were" in John's home in the weeks leading up to John's last moments alive, here - Karen, of course, was taken to the hospital (at the request of her own parents) for threatening self harm after confessing to hitting John O'Keefe, while drunk and with a BAC of 0.14-0.28 (2-4 times the legal limit) at exactly 12:32:16am ET on 1/29/22. Firefighter Katie McLaughlin, a key witness in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial, testified that she was the person who asked Karen if John had experienced any trauma in the early morning of 1/29/22, to which Karen replied, "I hit him! I hit him! I hit him!" At that point, multiple witnesses to the statement (including other first responders) realized Karen was confessing to hitting John O'Keefe with her car, while drunk with a BAC between 0.14 and 0.28, and then the Canton Police called in their supervisor. See that earthshattering testimony from Firefighter McLaughlin here - Jurors have already seen shocking videos, from Karen's own media interviews, wherein Read admits that she should not have been drunk driving in the moments before she John drove from a bar to an after party a local home. The clips, in turn, not only showed Karen admitting to her state of intoxication while driving but, at the same time, they also showed Karen ADMITTING to having up to nine drinks over just three or so hours on the evening of 1/28/22 and the early morning of 1/29/22. Indeed, see that admission by Read, as to her state of intoxication while driving in the moment's before John was allegedly struck, here - "I had been out late, I had been drinking, John was in the last general vicinity of where I saw him...within 50 feet...he's in the front yard so I'm thinking "Jesus, was I starting to pull away and did I run over his foot." "So when I found him, I was thinking, did I clip him somehow," said Read, in further footage played before jurors. Read's team fought hard to keep those pieces of footage secret from jurors, and the public, but that plan failed. Watch the previously-secret footage of Karen's admission as to potentially hitting John with her car while drunk here - Somehow making Read's situation worse, Hank Brennan than played interviews with Read wherein Karen admitted to attempting to frame one of John's dear friends, Jen McCabe, for Karen's actions. "Jen McCabe? It's me or her! Either I'm going down, Jen, or you are!" Read told a film crew, in remarks played for jurors during week 2 of Karen's re-trial as to causing John's death. See that moment here - Of note, Hank Brennan has played multiple audio and video recordings for the jury related to Karen Read admitting that Karen and John O'Keefe were in an argument in the minutes leading up to Read allegedly striking John with her car, while drunk driving. Karen was upset because the name of John's former girlfriend was mentioned on the drive to Fairview Road. See more background about that argument between a possessive, controlling, Karen Read and John O'Keefe, in the moments before John was allegedly struck by Karen's car at 12:32am on 1/29/22, here - Earlier last week, jurors were aghast at Karen mocking John's mother, Peggy O'Keefe, also in a media interview. See those moments here - Also, as a final note, I want to extend a huge thank you to super towel MrrderByMaestro for noticing the subtle moment in court this week when confirmation came down that a Ring video from John's home system -- that is obviously quite damaging to Karen Read's defense-- was deleted (along with the 17 of 18 videos deleted earlier that morning that also implicate Karen, and her broken taillight, as the cause of John's death). I believe Mr. ByMaestro to be the exemplar of noble towel service to humanity, and I thus deem him a member of Nobilis ordo Linteo (N.o.L.). As always, watch live coverage of Monday's (day 13) presentation of evidence in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial, chat with the wonderful towel friends and watch special Towel MultiCam Coverage --including the world famous Karen Cam-- via this link -

Grant Smith Ellis

101,651 views โ€ข 1 year ago

๐ŸŸขGIVEAWAY๐ŸŸข Best comments or memes about this whole circus + RT this post. 10 winners will each get $50๐Ÿ’Ž (For evidence, supporting materials, and context, read both articles and watch the video included in the article I posted yesterday) Housebets.com & Porchy pay your debts A few people told me they did not fully understand the first article because there were too many moving parts: leaderboard accounts, rewards, weekly dates, monthly bonus, Tequity, game categories, withdrawals, Provably Fair, seed changes, migration, support tickets, ledgers and founder messages. Fair enough. The evidence is already there, and I still recommend reading the full articles and, above all, watching the video, because the video shows the reward system failing live. But this text is the cleaner version: the full story explained in plain English, without assuming the reader knows anything about crypto casinos, leaderboards or lossback systems. From all the evidence Iโ€™ve gathered, the Housebets story is not a normal โ€œplayer lost moneyโ€ complaint. It looks like a full transparency failure across the whole product: leaderboard, rewards, withdrawals, game categories, Provably Fair / Tequity mapping, support, migration and founder response. Housebets sold itself as a rewards-first casino: public leaderboards, weekly/monthly bonuses, fast withdrawals, VIP treatment and Provably Fair games. But every time I asked for the records behind those systems, snapshots, ledger entries, weekly cycles, GGR/NGR, slider logs, PF seed mapping, Tequity round IDs, withdrawal approval logs, the answer became some version of โ€œforwarded to the relevant department.โ€ This started long before the public dispute. I was not some random angry player who appeared after one bad session. In January I was helping Housebets and giving product feedback. I literally told support on 27 January that I was โ€œtesting the website for George,โ€ while already dealing with a non-instant withdrawal and a 100% welcome bonus that had not applied. Support even asked me for โ€œproof about your testing job.โ€ The same chat shows the advertised 100% Welcome Bonus, the bonus not applying, and support saying the withdrawal needed internal confirmation instead of being instant. The welcome bonus issue never looked clean. Housebets advertised a 100% Welcome Bonus up to $1,000 on first deposit; I deposited, contacted support, and the bonus did not apply. Then support effectively turned a first-deposit bonus into a second-deposit workaround because the first one had not been applied properly. On 31 January I came back after another deposit and told them the bonus still had not been applied, even though I had already followed supportโ€™s instructions. Edward replied that he had โ€œforwardedโ€ the concern to the team. The same 100% welcome bonus was still being advertised in March. By April, the rewards system was already showing serious problems. I had the weekly slider at 100% lossback and told support I had lost money but the weekly did not appear. Jacky said the weekly was generated every Thursday at 00:01 UTC and gave actual internal figures: GGR $6,250, Total Bonus $6,083.99, NGR $168.31. So Housebets clearly had internal calculations when it wanted to explain why something might not pay. But when I later asked for full calculations, those same numbers suddenly became impossible to produce. Then on 18โ€“19 April, the rewards page was bugged and would not let me claim. Support could see a pending weekly bonus of $717.37, but I could not claim it from the UI. Tee said it had been forwarded to the relevant department. That $717.37 later appears in the bonus ledger as Rakeback (20 Apr) 717.37089061, so I am not saying that specific one stayed unpaid forever. The point is worse: already in April, support could see a pending weekly reward while the player-facing reward page did not work. For a casino built around rewards, that is not a small bug. That is the product. In May, the UI and account data kept failing basic trust checks. On 8 May, I deposited 400 USDT; support said it had been credited, but I could not see it, and the proposed fix was to log out, clear cookies and cache. On 16 May, I asked why total deposits and withdrawals had disappeared from the menu; support said the platform was โ€œin continuous evolution.โ€ On 17 May, I asked for my total deposits and withdrawals, and support said they did not have direct access to that consolidated summary and would email it. That full official ledger did not arrive. So when Housebets later defends itself with UI screenshots, remember: this was the same UI where deposits could be credited but invisible, totals disappeared, rewards pages bugged, and support could not access consolidated account totals. Withdrawals were also not what was advertised. On 16 May, I asked why a crypto withdrawal was pending if withdrawals were supposed to be instant. Tee answered: โ€œA few withdrawals require manual approval,โ€ then added, โ€œOur withdrawals are typically instant butโ€ฆโ€ That matters because a few days later the withdrawal delay became real damage. On 25 May, I told support before a match that I needed the funds to place a time-sensitive bet on another site in less than 20 minutes. I explained I wanted to bet around 60k at odds of 2.55. The withdrawal did not arrive in time. Later I told them the bet won and that I missed around 90k in profit because Housebets took more than two hours despite being warned before the match started. Jacky said he would raise the compensation case to the VIP team. Nobody resolved it. This was not one delayed withdrawal either. In my formal complaint I reconstructed several withdrawal delays: 23 May 02:55 โ†’ 08:03, around 5h08m; 25 May 03:05 โ†’ 08:09, around 5h04m; 17 May 03:54 โ†’ 08:02, around 4h08m; 18 May 04:46 โ†’ 08:11, around 3h25m; 16 May 05:23 โ†’ 08:12, around 2h49m. That is not โ€œinstant withdrawal.โ€ And if later marketing says withdrawals are much faster now, the obvious question is: if this was the faster version, what did slow look like? The Provably Fair / Tequity side was another major issue. On 17 May I asked support how to verify an old Blackjack round. I did not ask for a generic explanation of Provably Fair; I asked where I could see the server seed, client seed, nonce and result for previous games. Support sent me to bet history, mentioned RTP, gave a generic PF explanation and showed the current Dice seed screen. When I said that did not let me verify previous games, they told me to clear cookies/cache. After doing that, I saw a new client seed and nonce 1 even though I had not played with that seed pair. I asked if Housebets changes seeds on every login. Support could not answer and told me to contact VIP. That seed/session behaviour is important. I later recorded video evidence around the seed changing after clearing cookies/cache and asked for the exact mapping: Housebets account ID โ†’ Tequity/provider player ID โ†’ session/currency context โ†’ seed pair โ†’ server seed hash โ†’ revealed server seed โ†’ client seed โ†’ nonce/cursor โ†’ raw outcome โ†’ final result. Housebets cannot sell Provably Fair if the player cannot verify historical bets, and โ€œcontact VIPโ€ is not a verification algorithm. On 24 May, I asked for raw verification data for a specific Tequity Blackjack round: Round ID e1648d60-0da1-4433-a5ab-9ae39f5302e3, Blackjack, Tequity, bet amount 11,346 USDT, client seed O3YBZF7LBu, server seed hash starting 712875.... I asked for revealed server seed, nonce, full result JSON, card draw order and verification algorithm. I also asked about an apparent duplicate-card/deck question. Tee replied: โ€œI donโ€™t have the answers to your questions right now, but Iโ€™m forwarding your request to the relevant department.โ€ That same day, I asked for a full audit of six Dice bets of 11,400 USDT each, total 68,400 USDT. I requested bet IDs, provider round IDs, roll results, seed data, balance ledger, request/session logs, security logs, retry flags, provider records and a full technical reconciliation. Tee replied: โ€œI will forward this to the relevant department.โ€ So when I asked for raw data, the answer was not data. It was forwarding. Again. There were also many large loss clusters that required reconciliation because of those unresolved PF, Tequity, category, RTP and session questions. In my complaint I listed clusters such as 25 May 02:17โ€“02:54 Blackjack around 169,932 USDT; 16 May 12:31โ€“13:26 Dice around 90,571.92 USDT; 26 May 02:48โ€“03:58 Mines around 89,199 USDT; 24 May 06:20โ€“06:21 Dice at 68,400 USDT; 26 May 00:11โ€“01:41 Blackjack around 59,910 USDT; 25 May 22:51โ€“22:59 Dice around 59,576 USDT; and several more between 40k and 56k. I am not saying every losing cluster proves manipulation by itself. I am saying that when PF mapping, provider logs, RTP/HE, category mapping and seed/session behaviour are unresolved, these sequences need a real reconciliation. The leaderboard is where the story becomes very hard for Housebets to explain. Around 19โ€“20 May, two new accounts, elmourabut and lucasmartirini, appeared and started climbing every day at a vertiginous pace. Not normal slow leaderboard growth. Not a casual player building volume over time. They were created around that period and then started rising with huge wagering in a way that looked extremely unnatural for brand new accounts. By 29 May, I was first on both weekly and monthly leaderboards, and those two accounts were directly behind me with huge volume. In the monthly leaderboard screenshots, I was around $3.33M wagered, while elmourabut was around $1.29M and lucasmartirini around $1.08M. In the weekly leaderboard, I was around $1.096M, while those two accounts were around $635k and $578k. They were not normal accounts sitting at the bottom; they were directly behind me, applying pressure. In my formal complaint I recorded that elmourabut joined on 19 May and lucasmartirini on 20 May, that they showed zero visible withdrawals, large deposits/wagering and significant card-game volume, and I asked Housebets to confirm they were not staff, test, QA, admin, house-controlled, affiliate-controlled, internally funded, promotional, bonus-only or multi-account related accounts. This matters because a leaderboard is not passive. It is gamification. It makes players defend rank. When two new accounts appear behind you with hundreds of thousands or more than a million in volume, you are pressured to keep wagering. In my case, the disputed deposit sequence from 25 May 22:23 to 26 May 02:09 totals 91,168.375326 USDT. That sequence begins with 1,000.00 at 22:23 and continues with repeated deposits until 2,879.148969 at 02:09. The video later shows why those dates matter: there were deposits coming in, no gameplay withdrawal offsetting the sequence, a balance basically at zero, and later a leaderboard prize shown as P/L. I formally asked Housebets to confirm those two leaderboard accounts were real and eligible, and also to preserve wager logs, transaction records, balance adjustment logs, account flags, leaderboard calculation snapshots, support ticket logs, Telegram/email records and internal notes. Edward said he forwarded the request. In the same thread, he added that they were โ€œworking on fixing an issue regarding the weekly bonuses,โ€ and then said the weekly countdown was โ€œnot currently on Thursday evenings.โ€ So the leaderboard issue and the weekly bonus issue are linked in time and support context. After that, Housebets confirmed by email that elmourabut and lucasmartirini were โ€œlegitimate and eligible accounts.โ€ That email is the trap door. If they were legitimate and eligible, they should have remained in the leaderboard with their volume. If they were not, Housebets should never have confirmed them as legitimate and eligible. After that confirmation, the accounts disappeared from the leaderboard or stopped appearing in the positions their previous wagering required. I went back to support on 30 May and wrote: โ€œThere has been a material post-confirmation leaderboard change involving two accounts that Housebets had already confirmed as legitimate and eligible. I need the exact reason, timestamp, logs, and recalculation basis.โ€ Edward said the matter was flagged and that I could expect a prompt response. I am still waiting for the actual explanation. Why did they disappear? My read is simple: because every hour that passed, there was more evidence around those accounts. They had been created around the same period, they were climbing at a speed that looked anything but human, they showed no visible withdrawals in the data I could see and reported, they appeared to be generating huge volume in unclear game categories, and the games/categories tied to that volume did not even make sense from the player-facing UI. When I started asking what they were actually playing, what Card meant, whether the volume was Tequity / UnOriginals / House Games, what RTP and house edge applied, and where the logs were, the questions became uncomfortable. Keeping those accounts visible became harder than removing them. So they disappeared. The game category issue made the leaderboard even more suspicious. On 30 May, I asked support why my own stats showed almost all my volume under Slots / Tragamonedas when I did not play real slots. I told them: โ€œi dont play 3$ in unoriginals,โ€ โ€œi played all 3M in unoriginals,โ€ and โ€œive never play slots.โ€ I asked what โ€œCardโ€ was, where that game was, what RTP and house edge it had. Monica said Card was mainly Blackjack, Baccarat and Poker variants. Marcus later said the team was investigating why it showed that I mostly played slots when I had not. He could not give the exact game, RTP, HE, provider, category mapping or contribution logic. That matters because those same unclear categories were connected to leaderboard volume. If the site cannot clearly explain whether volume is Slots, Card, UnOriginals, House Games, Blackjack, Baccarat, Always 9 Baccarat or Tequity, then the leaderboard is not auditable for the player. I even asked which UnOriginals those two accounts were playing, and support told me to look at Live Bets. That is not an answer. I was not asking for gossip; I was asking what exact games generated leaderboard volume, what RTP/HE applied and whether that volume was eligible. There is also an earlier leaderboard-related precedent: Porchy had already told me in February that I would lose leaderboard places if I did not rename, because too many people were messaging support saying the site was not being fair due to my name and it โ€œdoesnโ€™t make us look good.โ€ That matters because it suggests leaderboard positioning was not treated as a sacred, untouchable system when public perception was involved. If leaderboard positions can be threatened for image reasons, then later claims that everything is purely automatic deserve scrutiny. Then Porchy made the leaderboard situation worse. Instead of producing logs or snapshots, he later said the leaderboard had โ€œabusersโ€ on it, that they were removed to help other players, and that it never affected me. Later he said they paid every single person, โ€œeven these abusers,โ€ then called me โ€œbegging for money.โ€ That creates a direct contradiction: Housebets confirmed the accounts as legitimate and eligible, then Porchy referred to leaderboard โ€œabusers.โ€ If they were abusers, why were they confirmed as legitimate and eligible? If they were eligible, why did they disappear? If they never affected me, where are the historical snapshots proving that? Once those accounts disappeared, Housebets paid the leaderboard prizes. On 1 June, the bonus ledger shows two Leaderboard entries: 5,007.46111706 and 1,001.49222341, totaling 6,008.95334047. That part was paid. But then Act Two started: the weekly and monthly rewards did not appear as separate ledger entries. The same bonus ledger shows those two 1 June entries as Leaderboard only, not Monthly Bonus, not Weekly Reload, not Lossback. The weekly timeline is a mess. On 28 May, the dashboard / UI said the weekly bonus was claimable every Thursday at 00:01 UTC, and the monthly was available on the 1st at 00:01 UTC. That same night I told support the weekly had shown as available, then reset to 6 days without paying. Later I sent screenshots and wrote: โ€œ1M wagered and 0.2$.โ€ Jacky said he had raised the issue to the technical team. So the weekly failure was reported live, not reconstructed after the fact. The next day, 29 May, Edward said they were fixing an issue regarding weekly bonuses and that the weekly countdown was โ€œnot currently on Thursday evenings.โ€ Then on 1 June, Spencer said the May weekly bonuses were 7th, 14th, 21st, and then due to migration the weekly moved to Monday, so there was one on the 25th on the new platform. He also said the 25 May weekly covered gameplay from 21โ€“24 May, and that tech was looking at that plus the monthly bonus. The ledger does show a 25 May 02:10 Rakeback entry of 1,996.08334791, which likely corresponds to that 21โ€“24 May weekly. But my major loss sequence starts about 20 hours later, on 25 May at 22:23, and continues until 26 May at 02:09. So the 25 May weekly cannot cover those losses. If weekly was still Thursday, the 25/26 losses should have been in the 28 May weekly. But the bonus ledger on 28 May shows only two tiny Rakeback entries, 0.28373945 and 0.00280958. If weekly moved to Monday because of migration, those losses should have appeared in the next weekly after 25 May. But on 1 June the ledger only shows Leaderboard entries. Then the final video shows the next Weekly Reload reaching zero, paying nothing and resetting to 6d 23h. So the same loss sequence appears to fall into no paid weekly cycle. The 4 June support conversation makes this even more ridiculous. After I recorded the weekly reset video, I asked support a very simple question: what were the last weekly dates/cycles? The dashboard / support flow again said weekly bonuses are claimable every Thursday at 00:01 UTC. Jacky confirmed: โ€œWeekly bonuses can be claimed every Thursday at 00:01 UTC in the Rewards tab,โ€ and added that if not claimed by the following Wednesday at 23:59 UTC, it expires. But when I asked for the exact last four dates, Jacky said he had to check with the relevant department. When I pressed again, he said, โ€œSorry, As I am only a CS, Let me raise your concerns to relevant department.โ€ I asked whether support did not have the information or simply could not answer. He replied: โ€œDo you have any other concerns?โ€ They use weekly cycles to decide whether to pay, but support cannot explain the weekly cycle. The monthly is missing too. The dashboard / UI said the monthly bonus is based on activity and VIP level from the previous month and is available on the 1st at 00:01 UTC. In May I had more than 3,258,023.0829 wagered according to the formal complaint data. I also have proof/video that the monthly slider was set to 50/50. On 1 June, Spencer first told me I had claimed the Monthly Bonus at 1:12am BST around the same time as the monthly leaderboard reward. I immediately said I only received leaderboard prizes. Then Spencer changed the answer: โ€œOur tech team are still actively working on issues regarding the monthly bonuses.โ€ So first the monthly was claimed, then tech was still fixing it. The ledger still shows no Monthly Bonus entry. Housebets then seems to rely on โ€œup overallโ€ as a defence. But the video and ledger show why that does not work. My weekly/monthly profile later showed around +6,008 P/L with 0 deposits, 0 wagered and around 6,008 in bonuses. That number matches exactly the two 1 June Leaderboard payments. So the UI is showing leaderboard rewards as P/L. Then support used โ€œup overallโ€ to say I was not eligible for weekly lossback. That is not a clean lossback calculation. That is using a leaderboard reward as apparent profit to deny a lossback that should be based on actual eligible losses. There were also smaller reward-confusion issues along the way. On 22 May I asked for all pending bonuses,weekly, monthly, rakeback, level-up, anything, and support said the internal team would manually verify whether everything had been credited correctly and email me. On 24 May, I asked about level-up rewards because the reward looked like $3,500 for Pearl; support clarified it was $3,500 total across all Pearl levels, $500 per level. These are not the core issues, but they are part of the same pattern: rewards marketing, unclear UI, manual verification, emails that do not arrive, and players having to chase basic explanations. Then there is the migration. On 25 May, after the delayed withdrawal, missing VIP contact and unresolved issues, support told me my account would be moved to the new platform and that this upgrade would offer a better withdrawal process and fix many issues. Before that migration, I explicitly requested that no account data, internal data, logs, balance history, bonus history, bet history, provider records or pending issues be deleted. The response: โ€œYour request has been relayed to the relevant department.โ€ Again, forwarding. But if the old data is safe, Housebets should provide the old leaderboard snapshots, old weekly states, old bonus logs, old Tequity mapping and old withdrawal approval logs. The founder response did not fix anything. When Porchy finally engaged, he did not provide the records. He framed the settlement request as โ€œso you want $100,000?โ€ and asked whether I needed it or else I was going to post on X. I had already made clear this was not money for silence; I asked for logs, snapshots, withdrawal records, calculations and a counter-calculation if Housebets disagreed. He later referred to โ€œabusers,โ€ told me I was โ€œup overall,โ€ said โ€œYou are begging for money,โ€ and suggested I โ€œjust do this to casinos.โ€ Still no ledger. Still no weekly calculation. Still no monthly entry. Still no PF/Tequity mapping. Still no leaderboard snapshots. Another player also contacted me with screenshots pointing to similar categories of issues: private deals, leaderboard payout disputes, migration/account merge problems, missing history and a tiny monthly bonus despite claimed losses. I am not using that playerโ€™s case as the foundation of my claim without his full ledger, but it matters because it suggests the same type of opacity may not be isolated: private VIP/reward deals, leaderboard eligibility, monthly bonus calculations, migration and unclear history. If Housebets has private deals that affect leaderboard eligibility or rewards, it must explain how those deals interact with public leaderboards. So the overall picture is this: Housebets sold a public leaderboard and rewards system that pressured real wagering. Two new accounts appeared directly behind me with huge volume, were confirmed as legitimate and eligible, then disappeared after I asked for logs and questioned game categories. Housebets could not explain the exact games, RTP, house edge or category mapping behind the volume. The accounts were later framed by Porchy as โ€œabusers,โ€ contradicting the earlier eligibility confirmation. Once Housebets paid me the leaderboard prizes, those prizes were shown as P/L, and that contaminated P/L was then used to claim I was โ€œup overallโ€ and not eligible for lossback. At the same time, my real 25 May 22:23 โ†’ 26 May 02:09 loss sequence of 91,168.375326 USDT appears in no clean weekly cycle. The 25 May weekly covered 21โ€“24 May according to Spencer, so it cannot cover that loss sequence. The 28 May weekly showed only tiny Rakeback entries and was already reported as broken. The 1 June ledger shows only Leaderboard entries. The later video shows Weekly Reload reaching zero, paying nothing and resetting. And when I ask support for the exact weekly calendar, they cannot answer and send it to the relevant department. The monthly is the same story. The dashboard / UI says it is based on activity and VIP. I had more than 3.25M wagered in May. Spencer first says I claimed it, then says tech is still working on monthly bonuses. The ledger shows no Monthly Bonus. If Housebets says I was not eligible, they need to show the formula, slider history, cycle, GGR/NGR, eligible loss/activity, deductions and ledger result. If they cannot, โ€œnot eligibleโ€ is just another label. And this opens another can of worms: Tequity / provider configuration. Housebets cannot hide behind โ€œthe providerโ€ whenever something goes wrong. The player does not deposit with Tequity. The player does not withdraw from Tequity. The player does not speak to Tequity support. The player does not compete in a Tequity leaderboard. The player plays on Housebets, with a Housebets wallet, Housebets UI, Housebets rewards, Housebets leaderboard and Housebets support. 1/2

Dr. W

20,491 views โ€ข 2 months ago