ะะฐะณััะทะบะฐ ะฒะธะดะตะพ...
ะะต ัะดะฐะปะพัั ะทะฐะณััะทะธัั ะฒะธะดะตะพ
โ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ฅ๐ช๐ฉ๐จ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐ค๐ฌ๐๐ง๐๐ช๐ก ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐; ๐ฉ๐๐๐ฎ ๐ฅ๐ง๐๐จ๐๐ง๐ซ๐ ๐๐ก๐ก ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ฉ ๐๐ช๐จ๐ฉ๐ค๐ข๐จ, ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ง๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ก๐ฎ ๐ฉ๐ค ๐ฉ๐๐๐๐ง ๐๐ง๐๐๐ฃ๐๐จ ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ค๐จ๐ฉ๐๐ก๐ ๐ฉ๐ค ๐ฉ๐๐๐๐ง ๐๐ฃ๐๐ข๐๐๐จ! โ โ Italian traveller Nicolao Manucci.
56,291 ะฟัะพัะผะพััะพะฒ โข 11 ะผะตัััะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด โขvia X (Twitter)
ะะพะผะผะตะฝัะฐัะธะธ: 49

History was not kind to this group who kept biggest Invaders from entering into India..

Sadly, yes!

Also despite being martial they are not tribalistic or uncouth and have a taste for finer things in life. Also along with Brahmins due to ritualistic adherence have officer level discipline and upkeep.

Agreed.

Lol kuch bhi a person with small tukdi from uzbekistan conquered India then again 25 thousand British conquered again while you being in charge

Yeah, we were โin-chargeโ but what were your ancestors doing when the Rajputs were engaged in a deadly struggle against the Muslims? Hiding in the sidelines like the cowards they were โฆ. History of every country, especially India, is a series of victories & defeats. The Mughals were defeated many a times by the Rajputs & other native powers & 38.33% of British India was ruled by native Indian rulers in form of Princely States acknowledging nominal British paramouncy. These are facts acknowledged even by foreign authorities but someone like you, whoโs suffering from stockholm syndrome & jealousy against others, can never understand this. After all, what more to expect from a guy who thinks that โsar Babur & British conquered Endia with just 25k troopsโ, claims which have been repeatedly refuted by historians.

Why should we you have divine rights to be kshtriya i mean you are decendent of gods arenโt you ? You guys enough time to rule ruling class since vedic age arenโt same kshtriyas of vedic age ?

So only Kshatriyas have the duty to fight & protect their homeland? What sort of a เคเค ideology is this? And if you truly believe it, then who are you to question their actions?

According to vedas yes

Dude, do you even understand what youโre trying to say right now? Youโre practically implying that the Vedas preach Hindus, other than Kshatriyas, to sit like ducks & just watch the invaders carry out atrocities in their motherland. Even if I were to accept this, then what right do YOU have to criticise Rajputs or evaluate their struggles?

No im implying only kshtriyas were kids of god himself must be most powerful i can criticise because we paid tax under your rule like Bhag, often 1/6th of produce ( basic history)

So paying tax gives someone the right to sit back & watch invaders steamroll your own motherland, unlike Kshatriya Rajputs who at least fought & sacrificed? That brings me back to my question โ if this is true, then what right to you have to criticise or evaluate their struggles?

you mean mugalpoot?

No my dear Nepali, Iam talking about Rajputs, the ruling race of Hindustan from whom your greatest Gurkha monarchs trace their ancestry. Wonโt argue with an uncivilised person like you, who resorts to slurs instead of arguing factually.

@Syngh_Unleashed bhai yesi post ho regularly post kro mja aata hai please ๐โค๏ธ

Sure, bro! ๐ค๐ค

They were no match for the British Empire.

I can reply by quoting British authorities themselves but did I compare the two here? Quit showing your insecurity everywhere.

Thereโs no comparison between the two. One was a glorious empire the greatest the world has ever seen by what it contributed to the world and by the achievements it gained. The other was a band of scruffy cunts who lived in hills.

@Big_Baas_ this guttersnipe knew he couldnt best me whenit came to a debate so took the cowards way out look. Sowetans win again.

@Syngh_Unleashed Itโs to be expected wena. Struggled with the art of using toilet paper so you canโt expect a health debate from that lot

@TrevBefok If your idea of a โhealthy debateโ is using profanity, that speaks more about your lot than mine โฆ.

@TrevBefok Youโve got to admit though. They were scruffy cunts.

@TrevBefok Using profanity & then claiming โvictoryโ after getting blocked, thatโs just how miserably you people cope. Though you shouldnโt use such words for your ancestors โฆ.

And some time delivered their daughter and wife to their foe..

Kindly do not confuse your incest culture with ours, my dear.

๐คข๐คฃ๐คฃ๐คฃ

Que bosta

Still living in denial?

Negaรงรฃo do que doidรฃo

I speak in terms of historical facts & just provided you the source, itโs not my problem if you still want to live in denial out of personal ego. Now get lost.

I did t deny anything, I just said it is bosta

Did we ask your opinion though? What authority do you have on history?

I am the 'History' (jajaa, you gets hurt by anything. Spare me.))

Then get lost instead of fishing for attention here.

Finally a good edit of India

Thank you :) I have collected many others but I havenโt shared them yet due to less followers. ๐ ๐

pakistani muslim rajputs lmaoooooooo

Custom โ Religion. Kindly educate yourself before commenting.

Do muslim rajpoot follow Hindu customs so fking dumb What you think customs are? How to walk in the park?

Do you even know the basic definition of โcustomโ. We are talking about Rajput customs here, which majority Muslim Rajputs still observe. Youโre just a dumb Sanghi with no actual knowledge of history.

Are these the same rajputs whose swords were locked away in their covers and heads were bowing down before the british lordship so they could keep their lineage intact ?

Nope, these are the same Rajputs who protected ๐๐ช๐ฏ๐ฅ๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ข๐ฏ for centuries, while your coward ancestors were hiding & watching from the sidelines. Their alliance with the British was merely nominal in nature, as attested in contemporary records, but youโre just a neo-intellectual trying to cope with his existential crisis by crying against others on social media.

My ancestors fought for the freedom of Hindustan while you cvck ranas were busy in bowing before kings and queens of british, my ancestors were rebelling, while your ancestor who would happily sell of their daughters were busy enjoying lavish parties, mine were dying from hunger

Do you have any facts or sources to support your claim? Or just profanity & slurs mingled with frustration, showing what a lowly background you come from. The British did not take over India overnight, where were your ancestors during the initial Islamic invasions? Are you too shamed to even reveal which community you belong to?

Is it too hard for you to understand that these travellers were either sent on diplomatic missions by other kingdoms to spot where they travelled ? Would they vilify their hosts , so that next such expeditions end before they begin ? And @grok verify the traveler and the claims.

I understand why a foreign traveller praising Rajputs is causing so much burn to you but at least have sufficient knowledge before speaking on any topic in general & history in particular. Niccolao Manucci did not come to ๐๐ช๐ฏ๐ฅ๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ข๐ฏ for carrying out any diplomatic mission, he was a soldier of fortune who served under the Mughal Empire for a considerable period of time. His hosts were the Mughals (whom he freely criticised in his memoirs), not the Rajput Rajas. Also, the Rajputs have been celebrated for their bravery & chivalry throughout the annals of ๐๐ช๐ฏ๐ฅ๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ข๐ฏ.

@grok Soldier of fortune, a nice fancy word for a mercenary.

@grok You may call him whatever you want but that wonโt make your lame logic any better.




