Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

🗣️ “𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙢𝙥𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙝𝙞𝙡𝙡, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙘𝙖𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖 𝙨𝙝𝙖𝙙𝙤𝙬 𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙍𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙃𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙨!” Celtic find a winner DEEP into stoppage time to beat Kilmarnock 3-2, having been two goals down! ⤵️

Sky Sports Scotland

385,593 subscribers

950,334 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика Спорт

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 32

Фото профиля Mika Baur Csc 🍀

Mika Baur Csc 🍀7 месяцев назад

Let’s see fat Boyd smiling now 😎

Фото профиля Rhys McCole 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

Rhys McCole 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿7 месяцев назад

See if Kris Boyd will say things to Kapsers face. Boyd absolutely gutted 😂🍀

Фото профиля Simon Woodford

Simon Woodford7 месяцев назад

😂😂😂 refs just playing on until celtic score these days.

Фото профиля Div McALpine

Div McALpine7 месяцев назад

“This isn’t sustainable” …” can’t score last minute goals every week” …”this can’t continue”…

Фото профиля Kisu ☭

Kisu ☭7 месяцев назад

Started with the wrong team. Made changes and we controlled the 2nd half. Champions find a way to win.

Фото профиля Ciarán

Ciarán7 месяцев назад

I cannot tell you how much I love this video. This is football!

Фото профиля HNSP History News Science Politics Opinion

HNSP History News Science Politics Opinion7 месяцев назад

Fantastic recovery Celtic Gr8 finish Araujo

Фото профиля Cobey MacQuarrie

Cobey MacQuarrie7 месяцев назад

No talk of how the ball possibly wasn’t even out of play for the Celtic throw in?

Фото профиля Steven D

Steven D7 месяцев назад

Rangers will demolish these cunts at Ibrox

Фото профиля Glasgow

Glasgow7 месяцев назад

Neil McCann pov

Фото профиля Ryan🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

Ryan🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿7 месяцев назад

THATS WHY WE ARE FUCKING CHAMPIONS BABY !!!

Фото профиля RFC

RFC7 месяцев назад

Pitch invasion against Kilmarnock 😂 Pathetic

Фото профиля BOB TAYLOR

BOB TAYLOR7 месяцев назад

🤣🤣 check then out rushing the pitch.. did they just win the league?

Фото профиля Paul Marshall

Paul Marshall7 месяцев назад

Here we go again. Keep playing until Celtic score a goal. 🙄

Фото профиля Ryan Murton

Ryan Murton7 месяцев назад

I’m English but must say, Scottish fans are some of the best in Europe by far

Фото профиля RC9

RC97 месяцев назад

Running into the crowd celebrating with absolute joy, estatic and excitement because youve just won the league…. Or is it to go into 2nd😂😂😂😂

Фото профиля Jamie

Jamie7 месяцев назад

All the Huns asking 7 mins??? Couple head knocks Injuries All the subs Killie wasting a bit of time at stages Var check. Could have been 9/10 added. But yes we were awful first half.

Фото профиля Bobby85

Bobby857 месяцев назад

Going to be the worst Celtic or the worst Rangers team in living memory who win the league. The both of them are pish lol.

Фото профиля Alan Beattie

Alan Beattie7 месяцев назад

Where the Fuck did 7 fucking minutes come from FFS

Фото профиля Bob. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🍀🕊

Bob. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🍀🕊7 месяцев назад

Do we not have Neil McCann's face at this moment 😅

Фото профиля youngNUFCsmudge

youngNUFCsmudge7 месяцев назад

Easily the greatest yellow card ever

Фото профиля Shirley Rogers

Shirley Rogers7 месяцев назад

Great finish. On the run with his weaker foot, then a salsa with the support.

Фото профиля quillers@hotmail.co.uk

[email protected]7 месяцев назад

This is what it means to be Celtic! The Champions prove their mettle, we've not played like champions for much of the season but days like this are what we're all about, we found a way to win yet again. It shows how poor our contenders are when we're still in this title race.

Фото профиля terry palfrey

terry palfrey7 месяцев назад

@garydg7 I thought l was having a Heart Attack!! 😂🍀

Фото профиля gerry ohalloran

gerry ohalloran7 месяцев назад

Yellow card for celebrating with your own fans no top off no symbols just happy dayz why is this not allowed

Фото профиля Thequietman☘️

Thequietman☘️7 месяцев назад

You just can't beat. A good old fashioned injury time winner. Especially when you 2-0 down unbelievable from Celtic 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿👊🇮🇪

Фото профиля 🇬🇧

🇬🇧7 месяцев назад

You've got "gifted" and "find" mixed up.

Фото профиля JamieArmour

JamieArmour7 месяцев назад

My Mexican Mutherfuker Wow what a fucking match.

Фото профиля kate dunbar

kate dunbar7 месяцев назад

Thats what champions do st Martin knows how to make it work

Фото профиля Quinnoge

Quinnoge7 месяцев назад

@TheBaldKyogo Cheating fenian bastards😍

Фото профиля Conrad Blowtorch

Conrad Blowtorch7 месяцев назад

The Ultimate Comeback.

Фото профиля 🍀JUNGLE JIM,THE INCREDIBLE TIM🍀

🍀JUNGLE JIM,THE INCREDIBLE TIM🍀7 месяцев назад

What a finish 😎😝🍀🙌🏻GET IN🍀🍀

Похожие видео

😲 McCracken's blunder ⚡️ Palmer-Houlden's quick reply 🙌 Larkeche with the LATE winner Dundee came from two goals down to beat Kilmarnock 3-2 ⤵️

😲 McCracken's blunder ⚡️ Palmer-Houlden's quick reply 🙌 Larkeche with the LATE winner Dundee came from two goals down to beat Kilmarnock 3-2 ⤵️

Sky Sports Scotland

48,477 просмотров • 1 год назад

🩸𝐌𝐀𝐒𝐒𝐈𝐕𝐄 𝐁𝐋𝐎𝐎𝐃 𝐂𝐋𝐎𝐓𝐒🩸 🚨 Pathologist, Dr. Ryan Cole, tells Dr. Drew about the strange, foot-long clots he's been finding in mRNA injected patients—both alive and deceased—and how they can be broken down and cleared from the body using a natural enzyme called 'Nattokinase'. ""𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙩𝙞𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙣𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙨𝙚𝙚𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙨𝙚—𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙖 𝙗𝙤𝙙𝙮 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙨 𝙞𝙣 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙚𝙧𝙫𝙚 𝙞𝙩, 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙪𝙡𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙡𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙚 𝙫𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙡𝙨, 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙥𝙪𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙞𝙧 𝙣𝙚𝙚𝙙𝙡𝙚𝙨 𝙞𝙣 𝙡𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙚 𝙫𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙡𝙨—𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙗𝙖𝙘𝙠 𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙪𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙝𝙖𝙙𝙣'𝙩 𝙚𝙭𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚𝙙 𝙗𝙚𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙚. 𝘼𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙬𝙤 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙨𝙥𝙤𝙠𝙚𝙣 𝙤𝙪𝙩, 𝙗𝙪𝙩 𝙄 𝙠𝙣𝙤𝙬 𝙤𝙛 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙖𝙣𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 50 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙨𝙚𝙚𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙖𝙢𝙚, 𝙬𝙝𝙤 𝙬𝙖𝙣𝙩 𝙩𝙤 𝙠𝙚𝙚𝙥 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙞𝙧 𝙟𝙤𝙗𝙨, 𝙨𝙤 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙙𝙤𝙣'𝙩 𝙨𝙖𝙮 𝙖𝙣𝙮𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜." Sergeant News Network

🩸𝐌𝐀𝐒𝐒𝐈𝐕𝐄 𝐁𝐋𝐎𝐎𝐃 𝐂𝐋𝐎𝐓𝐒🩸 🚨 Pathologist, Dr. Ryan Cole, tells Dr. Drew about the strange, foot-long clots he's been finding in mRNA injected patients—both alive and deceased—and how they can be broken down and cleared from the body using a natural enzyme called 'Nattokinase'. ""𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙩𝙞𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙣𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙨𝙚𝙚𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙨𝙚—𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙖 𝙗𝙤𝙙𝙮 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙨 𝙞𝙣 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙚𝙧𝙫𝙚 𝙞𝙩, 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙪𝙡𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙡𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙚 𝙫𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙡𝙨, 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙥𝙪𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙞𝙧 𝙣𝙚𝙚𝙙𝙡𝙚𝙨 𝙞𝙣 𝙡𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙚 𝙫𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙡𝙨—𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙗𝙖𝙘𝙠 𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙪𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙝𝙖𝙙𝙣'𝙩 𝙚𝙭𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚𝙙 𝙗𝙚𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙚. 𝘼𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙬𝙤 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙨𝙥𝙤𝙠𝙚𝙣 𝙤𝙪𝙩, 𝙗𝙪𝙩 𝙄 𝙠𝙣𝙤𝙬 𝙤𝙛 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙖𝙣𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 50 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙨𝙚𝙚𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙖𝙢𝙚, 𝙬𝙝𝙤 𝙬𝙖𝙣𝙩 𝙩𝙤 𝙠𝙚𝙚𝙥 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙞𝙧 𝙟𝙤𝙗𝙨, 𝙨𝙤 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙙𝙤𝙣'𝙩 𝙨𝙖𝙮 𝙖𝙣𝙮𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜." Sergeant News Network

{Matt} $XRPatriot

57,519 просмотров • 3 лет назад

On this day in 2007: Thierry Henry scored the winning goal, deep into stoppage time, as Arsenal came from a goal down to beat Manchester United 2-1 at the Emirates Stadium. 👑 🔵 Rooney (53’) 🔴 van Persie (83’) 🔴 Henry (90+3’)

On this day in 2007: Thierry Henry scored the winning goal, deep into stoppage time, as Arsenal came from a goal down to beat Manchester United 2-1 at the Emirates Stadium. 👑 🔵 Rooney (53’) 🔴 van Persie (83’) 🔴 Henry (90+3’)

afcstuff

66,746 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Yesterday ex-Bungie exec Martin O’Donnell who successfully sued #Bungie for unpaid wages and stock ownership, did an interview with Act Man about Bungie's recent woes. He implied Bungie CEO Pete Parsons and the #Microsoft corporate ethos and management style he comes from, was to blame. Martin says; "𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙞𝙣 𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙥 𝙬𝙝𝙤 𝙬𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙘𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙨, 𝙘𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙖 𝙥𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙜𝙧𝙚𝙚 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩. 𝙏𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙬𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙤𝙧𝙞𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚 𝙩𝙚𝙖𝙢. 𝙎𝙤 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙄 𝙨𝙖𝙮 𝙬𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙𝙣'𝙩 𝙜𝙚𝙩 𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩 𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚, 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩'𝙨 𝙬𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙄 𝙢𝙚𝙖𝙣." "𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩 𝙣𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙡𝙚𝙛𝙩 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚." "𝙉𝙤, 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙙𝙞𝙙𝙣'𝙩." "𝙄𝙣 𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙙𝙨𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩 𝙄 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙠 𝙞𝙩 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙖 𝙝𝙪𝙜𝙚 𝙝𝙪𝙜𝙚 𝙢𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬 𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙨𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙝𝙖𝙙 𝙜𝙤𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙣 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩, 𝙩𝙤 𝙖𝙘𝙩𝙪𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙮 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙮 𝙞𝙣𝙨𝙞𝙙𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚 𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙥." Martin also believes he may have been intentionally fired just weeks before his founders stock was due to be vested, so Bungie and its leadership could save money. There were similar staff retention and shares vestment schemes as part of #Sony's acquisition of Bungie, so both would have likely saved money in a similar way with recent layoffs. Martin expands on how Pete Parsons hasn't been at Bungie for decades, and was originally a Microsoft Marketing Executive who was brought in as Studio Manager for Bungie, but left during Bungie's negotiations for independence away from Microsoft. He was not involved in any of Halo 3's production. Unbeknownst to Martin, Pete didn't actually leave the company when he left, instead went back to an executive role at Microsoft. Pete Parsons was brought back in as Marketing Head in an exec role at Bungie around 2009. Over the coming years other executives got fired while Pete eventually went on to assume the top CEO role at Bungie in 2016, just before the release of Destiny 2. Martin continues; "𝘼 𝙡𝙤𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙖𝙘𝙩 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚 𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩 𝙝𝙖𝙨𝙣'𝙩 𝙗𝙚𝙚𝙣 𝙖𝙣 𝙞𝙣𝙛𝙡𝙪𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙤𝙣 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙖 𝙙𝙚𝙘𝙖𝙙𝙚...𝙞𝙩 𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙚𝙨 𝙖 𝙡𝙤𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚 𝙨𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚𝙨 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙨 𝙩𝙤 𝙥𝙖𝙣 𝙤𝙪𝙩...𝙄 𝙠𝙣𝙤𝙬 𝙝𝙤𝙬 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙨𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙠. ...𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙠 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙘𝙤𝙧𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙥𝙥𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙛 𝙜𝙖𝙢𝙚𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙖𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙨𝙩𝙪𝙙𝙞𝙤𝙨, 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙞𝙨 𝙖 𝙥𝙖𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙨 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙖 𝙗𝙞𝙜 𝙘𝙤𝙧𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚 𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩. 𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙨𝙖𝙮 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙨𝙝𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙 𝙗𝙡𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚, 𝙬𝙚𝙡𝙡 𝙄 𝙙𝙤 𝙗𝙡𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚. 𝘽𝙪𝙩 𝙩𝙤 𝙢𝙚 𝙞𝙩'𝙨 𝙗𝙚𝙘𝙖𝙪𝙨𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙬𝙝𝙤 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙥 𝙡𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙡 𝙤𝙛 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚, 𝙬𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙖𝙩 𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙥𝙤𝙞𝙣𝙩 𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙥 𝙡𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙡 𝙤𝙛 𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩. 𝙏𝙝𝙖𝙩'𝙨 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙜𝙤𝙩 𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙙, 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩'𝙨 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙙𝙚𝙘𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙡𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚, 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙨, 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙡𝙚 𝙄𝙋, 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙝𝙤𝙬 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙥 𝙨𝙩𝙪𝙛𝙛. 𝙏𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙟𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙙𝙤 𝙞𝙩." Pretty damning stuff. I highly recommend watching the entire YouTube video linked below, but I've edited together some of the related excerpts in the video below. #PS5 #Xbox

Yesterday ex-Bungie exec Martin O’Donnell who successfully sued #Bungie for unpaid wages and stock ownership, did an interview with Act Man about Bungie's recent woes. He implied Bungie CEO Pete Parsons and the #Microsoft corporate ethos and management style he comes from, was to blame. Martin says; "𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙞𝙣 𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙥 𝙬𝙝𝙤 𝙬𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙘𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙨, 𝙘𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙖 𝙥𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙜𝙧𝙚𝙚 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩. 𝙏𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙬𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙤𝙧𝙞𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚 𝙩𝙚𝙖𝙢. 𝙎𝙤 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙄 𝙨𝙖𝙮 𝙬𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙𝙣'𝙩 𝙜𝙚𝙩 𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩 𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚, 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩'𝙨 𝙬𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙄 𝙢𝙚𝙖𝙣." "𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩 𝙣𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙡𝙚𝙛𝙩 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚." "𝙉𝙤, 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙙𝙞𝙙𝙣'𝙩." "𝙄𝙣 𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙙𝙨𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩 𝙄 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙠 𝙞𝙩 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙖 𝙝𝙪𝙜𝙚 𝙝𝙪𝙜𝙚 𝙢𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬 𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙨𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙝𝙖𝙙 𝙜𝙤𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙣 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩, 𝙩𝙤 𝙖𝙘𝙩𝙪𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙮 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙮 𝙞𝙣𝙨𝙞𝙙𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚 𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙥." Martin also believes he may have been intentionally fired just weeks before his founders stock was due to be vested, so Bungie and its leadership could save money. There were similar staff retention and shares vestment schemes as part of #Sony's acquisition of Bungie, so both would have likely saved money in a similar way with recent layoffs. Martin expands on how Pete Parsons hasn't been at Bungie for decades, and was originally a Microsoft Marketing Executive who was brought in as Studio Manager for Bungie, but left during Bungie's negotiations for independence away from Microsoft. He was not involved in any of Halo 3's production. Unbeknownst to Martin, Pete didn't actually leave the company when he left, instead went back to an executive role at Microsoft. Pete Parsons was brought back in as Marketing Head in an exec role at Bungie around 2009. Over the coming years other executives got fired while Pete eventually went on to assume the top CEO role at Bungie in 2016, just before the release of Destiny 2. Martin continues; "𝘼 𝙡𝙤𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙖𝙘𝙩 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚 𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩 𝙝𝙖𝙨𝙣'𝙩 𝙗𝙚𝙚𝙣 𝙖𝙣 𝙞𝙣𝙛𝙡𝙪𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙤𝙣 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙖 𝙙𝙚𝙘𝙖𝙙𝙚...𝙞𝙩 𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙚𝙨 𝙖 𝙡𝙤𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚 𝙨𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚𝙨 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙨 𝙩𝙤 𝙥𝙖𝙣 𝙤𝙪𝙩...𝙄 𝙠𝙣𝙤𝙬 𝙝𝙤𝙬 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙨𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙠. ...𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙠 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙘𝙤𝙧𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙥𝙥𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙛 𝙜𝙖𝙢𝙚𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙖𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙨𝙩𝙪𝙙𝙞𝙤𝙨, 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙞𝙨 𝙖 𝙥𝙖𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙨 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙖 𝙗𝙞𝙜 𝙘𝙤𝙧𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚 𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩. 𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙨𝙖𝙮 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙨𝙝𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙 𝙗𝙡𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚, 𝙬𝙚𝙡𝙡 𝙄 𝙙𝙤 𝙗𝙡𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚. 𝘽𝙪𝙩 𝙩𝙤 𝙢𝙚 𝙞𝙩'𝙨 𝙗𝙚𝙘𝙖𝙪𝙨𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙬𝙝𝙤 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙥 𝙡𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙡 𝙤𝙛 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚, 𝙬𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙖𝙩 𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙥𝙤𝙞𝙣𝙩 𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙥 𝙡𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙡 𝙤𝙛 𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩. 𝙏𝙝𝙖𝙩'𝙨 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙜𝙤𝙩 𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙙, 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩'𝙨 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙙𝙚𝙘𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙡𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚, 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙨, 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙡𝙚 𝙄𝙋, 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙝𝙤𝙬 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙥 𝙨𝙩𝙪𝙛𝙛. 𝙏𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙟𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙙𝙤 𝙞𝙩." Pretty damning stuff. I highly recommend watching the entire YouTube video linked below, but I've edited together some of the related excerpts in the video below. #PS5 #Xbox

NIB

102,984 просмотров • 2 лет назад

If Duke wins the ACC, the ACC won’t get into the College Football Playoff. 2 Group of 5 teams would be in the CFP including the winner of North Texas-Tulane and JMU if beat Troy as the 4th and 5th highest ranked conference champions. If Duke wins and JMU loses then the winner of North Texas-Tulane and UNLV if they beat Boise State would be in the CFP. If Duke wins but JMU and UNLV lose the CFP committee will see how UNBELIEVABLY flawed its current system AS ALWAYS BEEN. 5 loss Duke, Troy, Boise State, winner of Kennesaw State-Jacksonville State, winner of Miami-OH-Western Michigan would all have a chance to get in the CFP despite having 3, 4 and 5 losses ahead of BYU, Miami, Vanderbilt, Utah and potentially 3 loss Alabama. All of this could be avoided by Virginia winning the ACC championship over Duke. If Virginia loses, college football will have one of the most interesting playoffs ever with 2 dominant Group of 5 teams in it. If Virginia, JMU and UNLV lose, college football will have the biggest meltdown of all time.

If Duke wins the ACC, the ACC won’t get into the College Football Playoff. 2 Group of 5 teams would be in the CFP including the winner of North Texas-Tulane and JMU if beat Troy as the 4th and 5th highest ranked conference champions. If Duke wins and JMU loses then the winner of North Texas-Tulane and UNLV if they beat Boise State would be in the CFP. If Duke wins but JMU and UNLV lose the CFP committee will see how UNBELIEVABLY flawed its current system AS ALWAYS BEEN. 5 loss Duke, Troy, Boise State, winner of Kennesaw State-Jacksonville State, winner of Miami-OH-Western Michigan would all have a chance to get in the CFP despite having 3, 4 and 5 losses ahead of BYU, Miami, Vanderbilt, Utah and potentially 3 loss Alabama. All of this could be avoided by Virginia winning the ACC championship over Duke. If Virginia loses, college football will have one of the most interesting playoffs ever with 2 dominant Group of 5 teams in it. If Virginia, JMU and UNLV lose, college football will have the biggest meltdown of all time.

Robert Griffin III

364,750 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Brief Analysis on Brighton's Open-Play Goals vs #AFC 1-0 - Pascal Gross - Brighton go man to man. - Vuskovic baits Ode with strong body manipulation. - Lays off Kostoulas who should have been marked much tighter by Konsa. - Rice moves to Chema and opens the passing lane - Bruno misreads the play completely and should be goal-side of Gross. - Subsequent decisions allow Gross to receive in the pocket. - Simultaneously Ayari makes a fabulous out-to in run which forces Calafiori and Gabriel to drop. - That gives Gross the space to shoot and score. Simple Solution: - Bruno G has to stay goal-side. If he does, everything mentioned is null. - Or, Calafiori has to stick to his choice of blocking the shot and take an extra step forward into the path and let Gabriel deal with Ayari's underlap. 2-0 Charalampos Kostoulas - Brighton counter and Calafiori, Odegaard and Bruno are too high up and unable to track back in time. - Gomez drives and is able to find a poorly tracked Kostoulas. - Gomez was pressed too aggressively by Tzolis, allowing him to gain a yard on him and force Gabriel to drop a yard for security regarding the Gomez overlap. - Konsa has to be tighter to Kostoulas as he has taken responsibility. - Poor tracking from Konsa, poor from Tzolis to jump so aggressively, unlucky from Gabriel as he has two jobs at once due to errors from both. Simple Solution: - Shift over and let Gabriel deal with Kostoulas. Rice should press towards Gomez and let Tzolis drop into a comfortable position in the defensive line. 2v2 on the opposite flank with Timber and Konsa vs Ayar and De Cuyper. Verdict Good goals. Unlucky to concede them. Defensively poor as a collective to allow the shots. At the end of the day it was 0.11xG total for both shots. 0.05xG for Gross and 0.06xG for Kostoulas. Credit to the finishes The corner was down to lack of awareness and laziness, short analysis on that later. Shame. We move on. Retweet would be appreciated 🙏

Brief Analysis on Brighton's Open-Play Goals vs #AFC 1-0 - Pascal Gross - Brighton go man to man. - Vuskovic baits Ode with strong body manipulation. - Lays off Kostoulas who should have been marked much tighter by Konsa. - Rice moves to Chema and opens the passing lane - Bruno misreads the play completely and should be goal-side of Gross. - Subsequent decisions allow Gross to receive in the pocket. - Simultaneously Ayari makes a fabulous out-to in run which forces Calafiori and Gabriel to drop. - That gives Gross the space to shoot and score. Simple Solution: - Bruno G has to stay goal-side. If he does, everything mentioned is null. - Or, Calafiori has to stick to his choice of blocking the shot and take an extra step forward into the path and let Gabriel deal with Ayari's underlap. 2-0 Charalampos Kostoulas - Brighton counter and Calafiori, Odegaard and Bruno are too high up and unable to track back in time. - Gomez drives and is able to find a poorly tracked Kostoulas. - Gomez was pressed too aggressively by Tzolis, allowing him to gain a yard on him and force Gabriel to drop a yard for security regarding the Gomez overlap. - Konsa has to be tighter to Kostoulas as he has taken responsibility. - Poor tracking from Konsa, poor from Tzolis to jump so aggressively, unlucky from Gabriel as he has two jobs at once due to errors from both. Simple Solution: - Shift over and let Gabriel deal with Kostoulas. Rice should press towards Gomez and let Tzolis drop into a comfortable position in the defensive line. 2v2 on the opposite flank with Timber and Konsa vs Ayar and De Cuyper. Verdict Good goals. Unlucky to concede them. Defensively poor as a collective to allow the shots. At the end of the day it was 0.11xG total for both shots. 0.05xG for Gross and 0.06xG for Kostoulas. Credit to the finishes The corner was down to lack of awareness and laziness, short analysis on that later. Shame. We move on. Retweet would be appreciated 🙏

Nino Scouting

33,103 просмотров • 8 дней назад

A top 0.02% trader tells how he tracks secret whale wallets on Polymarket Euan have been trading Polymarket for just over a year now and he have turned $15k -> $370k. A lot of his edge recently has been in sort of doing deep research into potential insiders. People that loaded big money into one market either insiders or really stupid ones. You need to learn how to understand this difference by studying more and more markets and the traders in them. 1. A thing you have to really be care of Sometimes fading insiders does work but you don't want to be betting against an insider. You should always look into your counterparties essentially because sometimes they're dumb, but sometimes they're not as dumb as you might think. Make sure you’re not missing something 2. Story about the MicroStrategy insider There was one guy who was betting that there wouldn't be over a 1k BTC purchased by MicroStrategy. Euan believes that there was 3 or 4 accounts insider had. Insider bet about $700k and held about 1.5M shares. This guy previously beat the insiders in the other markets turning 10¢ bet into a winner and made $200k-$300k. 3. What you can do to find an insider? You can look at do they have transactions with gambling sites like Rubet or Stake. Have they got other accounts linked to them, have they bet on this market before or similar ones and done really well. It's all onchain, you can even find their X and see if they've got connections to a company. 4. Always check your counterparty As the site gets bigger, there's going to be more insiders, and you need to be more careful about betting size against strange accounts. If there's a ton of fresh accounts, that's very suspicious. But 90% of markets will not have insiders, so don't worry about it. 5. Advice for net new to prediction markets if someone's going to make a mistake and you look for it and you anticipate it and you get the buy on the other side their trade. That's a really smart thing to do. If you start small, make sure you have an edge first and the redeposit more if think you know what you're doing. Big shoutout to Easy for the great interview, i did a short recap and tried to highlight the most interesting moments. Watch the full version on his yt channel.

A top 0.02% trader tells how he tracks secret whale wallets on Polymarket Euan have been trading Polymarket for just over a year now and he have turned $15k -> $370k. A lot of his edge recently has been in sort of doing deep research into potential insiders. People that loaded big money into one market either insiders or really stupid ones. You need to learn how to understand this difference by studying more and more markets and the traders in them. 1. A thing you have to really be care of Sometimes fading insiders does work but you don't want to be betting against an insider. You should always look into your counterparties essentially because sometimes they're dumb, but sometimes they're not as dumb as you might think. Make sure you’re not missing something 2. Story about the MicroStrategy insider There was one guy who was betting that there wouldn't be over a 1k BTC purchased by MicroStrategy. Euan believes that there was 3 or 4 accounts insider had. Insider bet about $700k and held about 1.5M shares. This guy previously beat the insiders in the other markets turning 10¢ bet into a winner and made $200k-$300k. 3. What you can do to find an insider? You can look at do they have transactions with gambling sites like Rubet or Stake. Have they got other accounts linked to them, have they bet on this market before or similar ones and done really well. It's all onchain, you can even find their X and see if they've got connections to a company. 4. Always check your counterparty As the site gets bigger, there's going to be more insiders, and you need to be more careful about betting size against strange accounts. If there's a ton of fresh accounts, that's very suspicious. But 90% of markets will not have insiders, so don't worry about it. 5. Advice for net new to prediction markets if someone's going to make a mistake and you look for it and you anticipate it and you get the buy on the other side their trade. That's a really smart thing to do. If you start small, make sure you have an edge first and the redeposit more if think you know what you're doing. Big shoutout to Easy for the great interview, i did a short recap and tried to highlight the most interesting moments. Watch the full version on his yt channel.

Alekzz

13,175 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

In case you didn't know mode: The only player in Europe to have an "era of Tekken". The Ryan Hart Era of Tekken was between 1996 - 2012. During this lengthy 16 year period, there was no man in all of Europe who was more feared across all Tekken games than Ryan Hart. Ryan would often rack up 100+ wins or more during arcade sessions and is the only person in Tekken history to win National and European championships on every Tekken 3, 4, 5, 6 and Tekken Tag. Ryan Hart's reign of terror also extended to North America where in 2001, despite having multiple characters in his arsenal, Ryan saw the competition and decided to display the Korean style of Mishima play, which had been taught to him by Bong Bong from South Korea, and Ryan defeated every single North American player he played against, nobody from NA was able to topple him. Ryan also beat US Champion; JOP in a close deathmatch that ended 26-21 in Ryan's favour. Ryan's two single defeats at this time were at the Electric Cancel 3 tournament, where Jang SuWon from South Korea defeated Ryan 3-2 and JOP defeated Ryan 3-1 in tournament, however there was controversy around the JOP win as Ryan's RP button visibly stopped working mid tournament, combos were dropped mid flow, 112's on hit not completed, etc. However despite his 3rd place finish, Ryan had successfully began his reign of terror extension in North America. When Ryan revisited the US for Virtua Fighter on the East Coast twice, again he was dominant against all North American competition. Nobody could put a lid on Ryan's ferocity, reaction time, execution, situational awareness and clutch factor. Ryan also had the largest character usage. Ryan Hart placed Top 3 then Top 4 two years in a row at EVOLUTIONCHAMPIONSHIPSERIES, while simultaneously consistently securing Grand Finals on Tekken at the same time. (Securing Top 2 and Top 3 on two EVO main stage titles at the same time is noteworthy. The next year at EVO Ryan secured top 4 on VF and actually won Tekken at the same time while getting 5th on a third main stage EVO title.) In 2003 Ryan defeated Kim Bong Min from Korea in a 4 hour deathmatch hosted at Castel's House in front of a live audience, becoming the first person in the world to defeat a Korean Tekken champion in a deathmatch. After news of this travelled around North America, every single NA player that had previously challenged Ryan Hart and set up money matches, all rescinded their challenge, during Ryan Hart's time in NA in 2003, not a single NA player would challenge Ryan Hart. People feared Ryan and in pre EVO polls every year, Ryan Hart was always predicted an EVO Grand Final finish even before the tournament bracket had been drawn up. During the next three years in a row at Evolution Championship Series, Ryan Hart went undefeated vs NA, Japan and EU in Tekken Tag. Not a single person from North America, Japan or Europe ever beat Ryan Hart on Tekken Tag at any EVO ever. After these years EVO replaced Tekken Tag in favour of the newer Tekken 5 game, which made sense. In the Tekken Tag domain Ryan Hart went down as one of the all time kings that ever touched the game, that was literally never beaten by anybody from Japan, America or Europe on the EVO stage. Ryan Hart got to Grand Finals back to back 3 years in a row and either won it or lost to a top Korean player. He again won it in 2008, this time on Tekken 5 DR. Ryan came out of Tekken retirement for a one-off exhibition match on Tekken 7 vs RIP in 2019, which Ryan won 10-3. There have been challengers to Ryan's throne that came and went, but no player in the world has stood the test of time on multiple fighting games since the 90's like Ryan has. #EVO #Evo2025 #TEKKEN #VirtuaFighter

In case you didn't know mode: The only player in Europe to have an "era of Tekken". The Ryan Hart Era of Tekken was between 1996 - 2012. During this lengthy 16 year period, there was no man in all of Europe who was more feared across all Tekken games than Ryan Hart. Ryan would often rack up 100+ wins or more during arcade sessions and is the only person in Tekken history to win National and European championships on every Tekken 3, 4, 5, 6 and Tekken Tag. Ryan Hart's reign of terror also extended to North America where in 2001, despite having multiple characters in his arsenal, Ryan saw the competition and decided to display the Korean style of Mishima play, which had been taught to him by Bong Bong from South Korea, and Ryan defeated every single North American player he played against, nobody from NA was able to topple him. Ryan also beat US Champion; JOP in a close deathmatch that ended 26-21 in Ryan's favour. Ryan's two single defeats at this time were at the Electric Cancel 3 tournament, where Jang SuWon from South Korea defeated Ryan 3-2 and JOP defeated Ryan 3-1 in tournament, however there was controversy around the JOP win as Ryan's RP button visibly stopped working mid tournament, combos were dropped mid flow, 112's on hit not completed, etc. However despite his 3rd place finish, Ryan had successfully began his reign of terror extension in North America. When Ryan revisited the US for Virtua Fighter on the East Coast twice, again he was dominant against all North American competition. Nobody could put a lid on Ryan's ferocity, reaction time, execution, situational awareness and clutch factor. Ryan also had the largest character usage. Ryan Hart placed Top 3 then Top 4 two years in a row at EVOLUTIONCHAMPIONSHIPSERIES, while simultaneously consistently securing Grand Finals on Tekken at the same time. (Securing Top 2 and Top 3 on two EVO main stage titles at the same time is noteworthy. The next year at EVO Ryan secured top 4 on VF and actually won Tekken at the same time while getting 5th on a third main stage EVO title.) In 2003 Ryan defeated Kim Bong Min from Korea in a 4 hour deathmatch hosted at Castel's House in front of a live audience, becoming the first person in the world to defeat a Korean Tekken champion in a deathmatch. After news of this travelled around North America, every single NA player that had previously challenged Ryan Hart and set up money matches, all rescinded their challenge, during Ryan Hart's time in NA in 2003, not a single NA player would challenge Ryan Hart. People feared Ryan and in pre EVO polls every year, Ryan Hart was always predicted an EVO Grand Final finish even before the tournament bracket had been drawn up. During the next three years in a row at Evolution Championship Series, Ryan Hart went undefeated vs NA, Japan and EU in Tekken Tag. Not a single person from North America, Japan or Europe ever beat Ryan Hart on Tekken Tag at any EVO ever. After these years EVO replaced Tekken Tag in favour of the newer Tekken 5 game, which made sense. In the Tekken Tag domain Ryan Hart went down as one of the all time kings that ever touched the game, that was literally never beaten by anybody from Japan, America or Europe on the EVO stage. Ryan Hart got to Grand Finals back to back 3 years in a row and either won it or lost to a top Korean player. He again won it in 2008, this time on Tekken 5 DR. Ryan came out of Tekken retirement for a one-off exhibition match on Tekken 7 vs RIP in 2019, which Ryan won 10-3. There have been challengers to Ryan's throne that came and went, but no player in the world has stood the test of time on multiple fighting games since the 90's like Ryan has. #EVO #Evo2025 #TEKKEN #VirtuaFighter

Ryan Hart

97,170 просмотров • 1 год назад

New episode featuring Stanford professor, neurobiologist, and host of the incredibly popular Huberman Lab Podcast, Dr. Andrew Huberman (Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D.). What makes Andrew truly exceptional is his ability to translate scientific findings into practical, actionable advice, enabling listeners to leverage new understandings of biology and neurobiology to improve their lives. In this episode, Dr. Huberman showcases his truly immense knowledge of the brain's dopamine system, which is incredibly central to many modern issues of motivation and attention that many of us struggle with. The public perception of Dr. Huberman's work often focuses on his unique distillations of protocols, but what I particularly enjoyed about this conversation was finding a common thread: the benefit of having an essential life philosophy of valuing "hard effort" over outcomes, something Andrew refers to as "forward center of mass." This podcast explains down to a neurobiological level why embracing discomfort can activate our motivation circuits, elevate dopamine and other catecholamine levels, and retrain brain regions like the anterior midcingulate cortex, ultimately growing our capacity for effort and striving at a fundamental level. A big thank you to Andrew for equipping us with this knowledge, enabling us to apply these insights for individual personal and professional growth. This episode is available on X, YouTube, Spotify, and everywhere else. Links in comment. Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 2:37 - The neuromodulatory role of dopamine 4:29 - Driver of motivation vs. experiencing reward 9:35 - Why dopamine dynamics act as a "wave pool" 13:15 - Why dopamine neurons need a recovery period 18:32 - Why dopamine peaks without effort are dangerous 21:52 - The number one sign of a highly motivated individual 23:59 - Dopamine reward-prediction error 26:18 - How effort and anticipation influence dopamine release 28:21 - Does lacking motivation reflect dopamine system deficits? 33:00 - Why motivation has a 'warm-up' period 37:16 - Why to attach reward to effort itself 47:51 - Tips for fostering tenacity in children 50:05 - Visualization of negative outcomes (why to do it) 52:51 - How to overcome procrastination 58:51 - How exercise affects the dopamine system 1:03:35 - Cold exposure vs. drug highs 1:05:29 - The entrainment effect of same-time exercise 1:09:24 - Why you shouldn't rely on stimulants 1:16:52 - "Counting walls" during deliberate cold exposure 1:21:44 - Cold exposure parameters for increasing dopamine 1:24:18 - Cold plunge alternatives for replenishing dopamine 1:25:35 - Why Andrew limits most workouts to 80-85% intensity 1:28:37 - Using exercise & cold exposure as stimuli for the brain 1:31:08 - Why "hard efforts" retrain the brain to overcome 1:33:31 - tMS and ultrasound as neuromodulatory therapies 1:36:22 - What does Dr. Huberman think of Neuralink? 1:38:02 - Advantages of neuromodulation over pharmacotherapy 1:39:28 - Why non-sleep deep rest may replenish dopamine 1:49:45 - My experience trying NSDR after poor sleep 1:51:04 - The ‘body still, mind active’ state for creativity 1:54:15 - How to cultivate a healthy relationship with social media 2:00:44 - The unique psychosocial dynamics of X (formerly Twitter) 2:02:05 - Andrew's recommended daily use limit for Instagram 2:04:09 - Does Lex Fridman have a symbiotic relationship with X? 2:04:39 - Is screen time increasing the prevalence of ADHD? 2:06:20 - Why Andrew recommends setting social media constraints 2:09:32 - Is social media increasing divorce rates? 2:12:12 - How low solar angle sunlight affects the circadian rhythm 2:22:10 - Limiting the adverse effects of late-night artificial light 2:23:57 - The light bulb that mimics sunrise and sunset 2:25:09 - How to spike morning cortisol by 50% (and why that's good) 2:26:21 - What's the optimal time to view morning sunlight? 2:27:11 - Can light panels replace morning sunlight? 2:28:33 - Combatting laptop & phone use with long distance viewing 2:30:00 - Why two hours outdoors daily may prevent myopia 2:35:06 - Why Andrew recommends limiting alcohol to 0-2 drinks per week 2:43:09 - How alcohol affects the dopamine and serotonin systems 2:48:47 - Treating ADHD with drugs, supplements, & behaviors 2:53:30 - Why studies on school start age suggest ADHD is overdiagnosed 3:00:00 - Andrew's weekly workout routine 3:13:14 - Why a disciplined life is not a deprived life 3:05:43 - Andrew's diet & why his dinners are higher in carbs 3:06:39 - The science of the physiological sigh3:07:34 - Andrew's supplement routine 3:10:00 - Andrew's experimentation with peptides 3:15:10 - How Andrew processes sometimes negative feedback 3:20:30 - The volatility of interacting with internet crowds

New episode featuring Stanford professor, neurobiologist, and host of the incredibly popular Huberman Lab Podcast, Dr. Andrew Huberman (Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D.). What makes Andrew truly exceptional is his ability to translate scientific findings into practical, actionable advice, enabling listeners to leverage new understandings of biology and neurobiology to improve their lives. In this episode, Dr. Huberman showcases his truly immense knowledge of the brain's dopamine system, which is incredibly central to many modern issues of motivation and attention that many of us struggle with. The public perception of Dr. Huberman's work often focuses on his unique distillations of protocols, but what I particularly enjoyed about this conversation was finding a common thread: the benefit of having an essential life philosophy of valuing "hard effort" over outcomes, something Andrew refers to as "forward center of mass." This podcast explains down to a neurobiological level why embracing discomfort can activate our motivation circuits, elevate dopamine and other catecholamine levels, and retrain brain regions like the anterior midcingulate cortex, ultimately growing our capacity for effort and striving at a fundamental level. A big thank you to Andrew for equipping us with this knowledge, enabling us to apply these insights for individual personal and professional growth. This episode is available on X, YouTube, Spotify, and everywhere else. Links in comment. Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 2:37 - The neuromodulatory role of dopamine 4:29 - Driver of motivation vs. experiencing reward 9:35 - Why dopamine dynamics act as a "wave pool" 13:15 - Why dopamine neurons need a recovery period 18:32 - Why dopamine peaks without effort are dangerous 21:52 - The number one sign of a highly motivated individual 23:59 - Dopamine reward-prediction error 26:18 - How effort and anticipation influence dopamine release 28:21 - Does lacking motivation reflect dopamine system deficits? 33:00 - Why motivation has a 'warm-up' period 37:16 - Why to attach reward to effort itself 47:51 - Tips for fostering tenacity in children 50:05 - Visualization of negative outcomes (why to do it) 52:51 - How to overcome procrastination 58:51 - How exercise affects the dopamine system 1:03:35 - Cold exposure vs. drug highs 1:05:29 - The entrainment effect of same-time exercise 1:09:24 - Why you shouldn't rely on stimulants 1:16:52 - "Counting walls" during deliberate cold exposure 1:21:44 - Cold exposure parameters for increasing dopamine 1:24:18 - Cold plunge alternatives for replenishing dopamine 1:25:35 - Why Andrew limits most workouts to 80-85% intensity 1:28:37 - Using exercise & cold exposure as stimuli for the brain 1:31:08 - Why "hard efforts" retrain the brain to overcome 1:33:31 - tMS and ultrasound as neuromodulatory therapies 1:36:22 - What does Dr. Huberman think of Neuralink? 1:38:02 - Advantages of neuromodulation over pharmacotherapy 1:39:28 - Why non-sleep deep rest may replenish dopamine 1:49:45 - My experience trying NSDR after poor sleep 1:51:04 - The ‘body still, mind active’ state for creativity 1:54:15 - How to cultivate a healthy relationship with social media 2:00:44 - The unique psychosocial dynamics of X (formerly Twitter) 2:02:05 - Andrew's recommended daily use limit for Instagram 2:04:09 - Does Lex Fridman have a symbiotic relationship with X? 2:04:39 - Is screen time increasing the prevalence of ADHD? 2:06:20 - Why Andrew recommends setting social media constraints 2:09:32 - Is social media increasing divorce rates? 2:12:12 - How low solar angle sunlight affects the circadian rhythm 2:22:10 - Limiting the adverse effects of late-night artificial light 2:23:57 - The light bulb that mimics sunrise and sunset 2:25:09 - How to spike morning cortisol by 50% (and why that's good) 2:26:21 - What's the optimal time to view morning sunlight? 2:27:11 - Can light panels replace morning sunlight? 2:28:33 - Combatting laptop & phone use with long distance viewing 2:30:00 - Why two hours outdoors daily may prevent myopia 2:35:06 - Why Andrew recommends limiting alcohol to 0-2 drinks per week 2:43:09 - How alcohol affects the dopamine and serotonin systems 2:48:47 - Treating ADHD with drugs, supplements, & behaviors 2:53:30 - Why studies on school start age suggest ADHD is overdiagnosed 3:00:00 - Andrew's weekly workout routine 3:13:14 - Why a disciplined life is not a deprived life 3:05:43 - Andrew's diet & why his dinners are higher in carbs 3:06:39 - The science of the physiological sigh3:07:34 - Andrew's supplement routine 3:10:00 - Andrew's experimentation with peptides 3:15:10 - How Andrew processes sometimes negative feedback 3:20:30 - The volatility of interacting with internet crowds

Dr. Rhonda Patrick

334,168 просмотров • 2 лет назад

$Tom Crawshaw has been building automations for 9 years with $25 million in client revenue to his name. He just walked me through his Claude Code content system that's generating millions of views and tens of thousands of followers. Here's what I learned: 1. Skills beat Projects in Claude. Projects load every context file on every message and burn your token window. Skills work like a book where the LLM reads the table of contents and pulls only the chapter it needs for the job. Same context, fraction of the tokens. 2. He has a /content-create slash command that runs the entire pipeline. Voice profile, copywriting principles, hook generation, image direction. One command. He doesn't write anything from scratch anymore. 3. His voice profile auto-updates weekly. He wrote a script that hits the X API every 7 days, pulls his top-performing posts by engagement, and rewrites his voice profile based on what's actually working. The profile evolves on its own. 4. He distilled a master copywriter's entire body of work into a single markdown file. Grabbed every Alen Sultanic post he could find, dropped it into Claude, asked for the core principles, fed it into the skill. Now every post he writes runs through those principles automatically. 5. The hook generator scores 16 hooks per post against 7 criteria. Curiosity loops, specificity, sensory, credibility, voice match, and a couple of others. He never picks the #1 by default. Sometimes he splices the first line of one hook with the body of another. The taste is still his. 6. /insights is a native Claude Code command nobody talks about. It analyzes every session you've ever run and produces a full report on your usage patterns, where things break down, and prompts you can paste back into Claude to fix them. I had never heard of it. I'm running it tonight. 7. He spends most of his time on hooks and images. If those two suck, the body copy doesn't matter. Nobody reads it. 8. Image generation is never one-shot. He keeps a folder of reference images that have worked before and feeds them into Nano Banana/GPT Image 2 every time. Then he takes the 80-90% output and finishes it in Canva using "magic grab" to move logos and clean up text. Last mile is human every time. 9. The humanizer step is non-negotiable. Strip em dashes. Kill the "it's not X, it's Y" pattern. Cut the triple negatives. Cut "no fluff." He still has to remind Claude mid-session because it drifts. If you're not auditing for AI tells, you're shipping slop. 10. Wisprflow is the most important tool in his stack. Not a content tool. An everything tool. His test for whether you should be using it: do you talk faster than you type? You do. Everyone does. Bonus fact he dropped: QWERTY was designed 200 years ago to slow typing down so old typewriters wouldn't jam. We've been carrying that forward ever since. Voice is finally undoing it. This was an inside look at how a serious operator Tom is using Claude Code to run a content engine. The good, the bad, the iteration, all of it. I hope you enjoy this one as much as I did. Go watch it.$

Tom Crawshaw has been building automations for 9 years with $25 million in client revenue to his name. He just walked me through his Claude Code content system that's generating millions of views and tens of thousands of followers. Here's what I learned: 1. Skills beat Projects in Claude. Projects load every context file on every message and burn your token window. Skills work like a book where the LLM reads the table of contents and pulls only the chapter it needs for the job. Same context, fraction of the tokens. 2. He has a /content-create slash command that runs the entire pipeline. Voice profile, copywriting principles, hook generation, image direction. One command. He doesn't write anything from scratch anymore. 3. His voice profile auto-updates weekly. He wrote a script that hits the X API every 7 days, pulls his top-performing posts by engagement, and rewrites his voice profile based on what's actually working. The profile evolves on its own. 4. He distilled a master copywriter's entire body of work into a single markdown file. Grabbed every Alen Sultanic post he could find, dropped it into Claude, asked for the core principles, fed it into the skill. Now every post he writes runs through those principles automatically. 5. The hook generator scores 16 hooks per post against 7 criteria. Curiosity loops, specificity, sensory, credibility, voice match, and a couple of others. He never picks the #1 by default. Sometimes he splices the first line of one hook with the body of another. The taste is still his. 6. /insights is a native Claude Code command nobody talks about. It analyzes every session you've ever run and produces a full report on your usage patterns, where things break down, and prompts you can paste back into Claude to fix them. I had never heard of it. I'm running it tonight. 7. He spends most of his time on hooks and images. If those two suck, the body copy doesn't matter. Nobody reads it. 8. Image generation is never one-shot. He keeps a folder of reference images that have worked before and feeds them into Nano Banana/GPT Image 2 every time. Then he takes the 80-90% output and finishes it in Canva using "magic grab" to move logos and clean up text. Last mile is human every time. 9. The humanizer step is non-negotiable. Strip em dashes. Kill the "it's not X, it's Y" pattern. Cut the triple negatives. Cut "no fluff." He still has to remind Claude mid-session because it drifts. If you're not auditing for AI tells, you're shipping slop. 10. Wisprflow is the most important tool in his stack. Not a content tool. An everything tool. His test for whether you should be using it: do you talk faster than you type? You do. Everyone does. Bonus fact he dropped: QWERTY was designed 200 years ago to slow typing down so old typewriters wouldn't jam. We've been carrying that forward ever since. Voice is finally undoing it. This was an inside look at how a serious operator Tom is using Claude Code to run a content engine. The good, the bad, the iteration, all of it. I hope you enjoy this one as much as I did. Go watch it.

Corey Ganim

36,541 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

‼️🚨🔵 PRESSER 🔵🚨‼️ 🎙 Xabi Alonso’s Full Post-Brighton Press Conference 🌀 Reporter: Nine goals scored this week, five conceded and three wins. Did you enjoy today? 😅 Alonso 🗣️: “In the end, I enjoyed all the wins a lot. But again, there were different moments and different feelings. Ultimately, we’re happy with the result. “We value this win a lot against a very good opponent — one that has been tough for us in recent years. “There were moments when we did really well and other moments that showed this is still a process. We’re continuing to learn about ourselves and improve. Normally, it’s easier to do that after a win.” 🌀 Reporter: What can you tell us about Moisés Caicedo? Was it the same problem or something new? 🇪🇨🚑 Alonso 🗣️: “Hopefully it’s nothing serious. It wasn’t something new and it wasn’t worse than last time. He was cautious enough to stop and say that the feeling wasn’t the best. “We need to assess him during the week.” 🌀 Reporter: Pedro Neto tapped the Chelsea badge after scoring. Can you guarantee he’ll still be here after the transfer deadline? 🔵👀 Alonso 🗣️: “You know, in football, I don’t guarantee anything about anyone. “But I was very happy with Pedro. He did really well and played with a lot of energy. He’s going to be very important for the team throughout the season because he has different, special qualities. “He’s a threat one-v-one, attacks space very well and is strong and competitive. I’m happy he scored. He was very close to scoring another one. I’m very happy with Pedro.” 🌀 Reporter: Chelsea had only 25% possession today after 38% against Fulham. Is this the type of transitional Chelsea you want? 📊 Alonso 🗣️: “No. For me, every piece of data needs context. “After 30 minutes, we were 3–0 up. Probably from that moment, we played too much with the result instead of continuing to play. “The data isn’t what’s important. What matters is how you play and what you can do better. My approach isn’t to say, ‘Today we need 60% possession or 20%.’ “I never talk about those things. It’s about how we prepare and how we become more competitive. “There were different moments in the game. There were periods when we did really, really well and other moments when we could have done better.” 🌀 Reporter: When you say Chelsea started ‘playing the result’ at 3–0, was that complacency? 🧠 Alonso 🗣️: “No. I would say it’s quite normal. It happens with many teams. “Teams that have worked together and played more games together usually have a better understanding of how to manage those moments. We are still in that process. “I’m sure that in the future we’ll manage those situations better. Even at 3–1 at half-time, I told the players: ‘Guys, a two-goal lead in the Premier League — we still need to focus on playing, scoring goals and defending well.’ “Afterwards, we could have scored a fifth. Many things happened during the game.” 🌀 Reporter: Emiliano Martínez went straight into the starting XI. Did you have any concerns throwing him straight in? 🧤🇦🇷 Alonso 🗣️: “With Emi, he’s 34 years old and has experience from all around. “I spoke with him yesterday. We talked about the game and about our team, and he felt ready. I don’t have to tell him many things for him to perform. “Of course, a goalkeeper always wants a clean sheet, but I’m happy with his first impact. He had only been in the building for 48 hours. “Now we’ll have the whole week to prepare for the next game. Day by day, we’ll feel his presence because he has that charisma and aura to influence and establish a very positive connection with the rest of the team.” 🌀 Reporter: And what happens with Robert Sánchez now that he wasn’t in the squad? 🔄 Alonso 🗣️: The supplied transcript does not contain a separate answer addressing Sánchez’s future. (1/2) 👇🏾

‼️🚨🔵 PRESSER 🔵🚨‼️ 🎙 Xabi Alonso’s Full Post-Brighton Press Conference 🌀 Reporter: Nine goals scored this week, five conceded and three wins. Did you enjoy today? 😅 Alonso 🗣️: “In the end, I enjoyed all the wins a lot. But again, there were different moments and different feelings. Ultimately, we’re happy with the result. “We value this win a lot against a very good opponent — one that has been tough for us in recent years. “There were moments when we did really well and other moments that showed this is still a process. We’re continuing to learn about ourselves and improve. Normally, it’s easier to do that after a win.” 🌀 Reporter: What can you tell us about Moisés Caicedo? Was it the same problem or something new? 🇪🇨🚑 Alonso 🗣️: “Hopefully it’s nothing serious. It wasn’t something new and it wasn’t worse than last time. He was cautious enough to stop and say that the feeling wasn’t the best. “We need to assess him during the week.” 🌀 Reporter: Pedro Neto tapped the Chelsea badge after scoring. Can you guarantee he’ll still be here after the transfer deadline? 🔵👀 Alonso 🗣️: “You know, in football, I don’t guarantee anything about anyone. “But I was very happy with Pedro. He did really well and played with a lot of energy. He’s going to be very important for the team throughout the season because he has different, special qualities. “He’s a threat one-v-one, attacks space very well and is strong and competitive. I’m happy he scored. He was very close to scoring another one. I’m very happy with Pedro.” 🌀 Reporter: Chelsea had only 25% possession today after 38% against Fulham. Is this the type of transitional Chelsea you want? 📊 Alonso 🗣️: “No. For me, every piece of data needs context. “After 30 minutes, we were 3–0 up. Probably from that moment, we played too much with the result instead of continuing to play. “The data isn’t what’s important. What matters is how you play and what you can do better. My approach isn’t to say, ‘Today we need 60% possession or 20%.’ “I never talk about those things. It’s about how we prepare and how we become more competitive. “There were different moments in the game. There were periods when we did really, really well and other moments when we could have done better.” 🌀 Reporter: When you say Chelsea started ‘playing the result’ at 3–0, was that complacency? 🧠 Alonso 🗣️: “No. I would say it’s quite normal. It happens with many teams. “Teams that have worked together and played more games together usually have a better understanding of how to manage those moments. We are still in that process. “I’m sure that in the future we’ll manage those situations better. Even at 3–1 at half-time, I told the players: ‘Guys, a two-goal lead in the Premier League — we still need to focus on playing, scoring goals and defending well.’ “Afterwards, we could have scored a fifth. Many things happened during the game.” 🌀 Reporter: Emiliano Martínez went straight into the starting XI. Did you have any concerns throwing him straight in? 🧤🇦🇷 Alonso 🗣️: “With Emi, he’s 34 years old and has experience from all around. “I spoke with him yesterday. We talked about the game and about our team, and he felt ready. I don’t have to tell him many things for him to perform. “Of course, a goalkeeper always wants a clean sheet, but I’m happy with his first impact. He had only been in the building for 48 hours. “Now we’ll have the whole week to prepare for the next game. Day by day, we’ll feel his presence because he has that charisma and aura to influence and establish a very positive connection with the rest of the team.” 🌀 Reporter: And what happens with Robert Sánchez now that he wasn’t in the squad? 🔄 Alonso 🗣️: The supplied transcript does not contain a separate answer addressing Sánchez’s future. (1/2) 👇🏾

Miki Djan

241,350 просмотров • 29 дней назад

We are thinking of robots all wrong. Why a $1,500 robot is far more important to buy than a $20,000 one. And why it will pay for itself within a year. First of all, for the last eight years I've been a Silicon Valley housewife. Picking the kids up from school. Doing a variety of tasks taking care of them from feeding them to laundry. And I've already bought a $20,000 Neo from 1X and have built the most complete list on X of the robotics industry. Just to set the tone for this conversation. We must ask ourselves "what is the goal of a robot?" before we go into why typical American homeowners might want one, and shell out quite a bit of money for one, like the Neo. I grew up in Silicon Valley back when it was all orchards and the farmers taught me "pick the low hanging fruit first." What is the low hanging fruit in the American home? Laundry? Cleaning the toilets or your home? Watering the plants? Bringing you a beer? Nope. It is the preparation of food. Yesterday I got a new Posha robot, and the attached video with founder Raghav Gupta gets into depth about what the $1,500 robot does. Cooks meals. Far more time in the home is spent cooking meals than the other tasks and is far more complex than, say, folding laundry. But there is something I think everyone is missing in the discussion of robots: "what is the goal?" I've been doing consumer research talking with many around the world about these things. People tend to have a few goals: 1. Improve their lives. 2. Save them time. 3. Save them money. 4. Enable a new business. What is the best way to improve your life? Upgrade your food. This is very hard to do when both parents in a family are working their butts off to try to improve their careers. It gets worse when a single parent is trying to keep everything going. How many times have you decided to go out to eat rather than spend an hour cooking food? Doing that for a family of four in Silicon Valley costs $100+. And guarantees your family will overeat. I've done that many times while raising my kids, and often I can't say no when desert comes around. It gets worse if you take the easy route out at home. Put a pre-processed meal into the microwave, or heat up a frozen pizza. Horrible for everyone's health. But what if you could have a robot at home that cooks your meals? Then costs go down to less than $20 and ingredients get way way better. It gets worse when you consider a $20,000 humanoid. They aren't safe enough to trust around stoves yet. And their hands aren't yet dexterous enough to do that. I doubt my Neo will be allowed to cook meals over an open flame, and if so I will have to watch it to make sure it doesn't do anything wrong. (The Neo that arrives next year will be teleoperated by a human remotely and the risks that person does something, or misses oil catching on fire is just way too high). While neither robot will be able to do all food preparation (cutting chicken up into cubes, or cutting carrots or other fruits, for instance) this robot dramatically reduces the time needed for a human to make a meal and dramatically reduces the costs to do so. And, as we discuss in the video, when the Neo does arrive the Neo will be able to use this machine too, reducing time even more (and will be able to set the table and wash the dishes, saving even more time so you can answer more emails or learn more AI programs or, even, pay attention to your kids and give them a few more minutes of quality time). The robot industry should focus on the low hanging fruit first. Cooking meals is the biggest one to improve your life, save you time, and make your family healthier. It's why I bought one. And they actually make two: Your money is way better spent getting one of these than buying a humanoid. And if you do get a humanoid, like I am, they go together like peanut butter and jelly. ⚪️ sierra catalina has been saying this for years that our focus on humanoids is overblown and that specialized robots (you see my Matic Robots in the background to prove this point) are way better for most families.

We are thinking of robots all wrong. Why a $1,500 robot is far more important to buy than a $20,000 one. And why it will pay for itself within a year. First of all, for the last eight years I've been a Silicon Valley housewife. Picking the kids up from school. Doing a variety of tasks taking care of them from feeding them to laundry. And I've already bought a $20,000 Neo from 1X and have built the most complete list on X of the robotics industry. Just to set the tone for this conversation. We must ask ourselves "what is the goal of a robot?" before we go into why typical American homeowners might want one, and shell out quite a bit of money for one, like the Neo. I grew up in Silicon Valley back when it was all orchards and the farmers taught me "pick the low hanging fruit first." What is the low hanging fruit in the American home? Laundry? Cleaning the toilets or your home? Watering the plants? Bringing you a beer? Nope. It is the preparation of food. Yesterday I got a new Posha robot, and the attached video with founder Raghav Gupta gets into depth about what the $1,500 robot does. Cooks meals. Far more time in the home is spent cooking meals than the other tasks and is far more complex than, say, folding laundry. But there is something I think everyone is missing in the discussion of robots: "what is the goal?" I've been doing consumer research talking with many around the world about these things. People tend to have a few goals: 1. Improve their lives. 2. Save them time. 3. Save them money. 4. Enable a new business. What is the best way to improve your life? Upgrade your food. This is very hard to do when both parents in a family are working their butts off to try to improve their careers. It gets worse when a single parent is trying to keep everything going. How many times have you decided to go out to eat rather than spend an hour cooking food? Doing that for a family of four in Silicon Valley costs $100+. And guarantees your family will overeat. I've done that many times while raising my kids, and often I can't say no when desert comes around. It gets worse if you take the easy route out at home. Put a pre-processed meal into the microwave, or heat up a frozen pizza. Horrible for everyone's health. But what if you could have a robot at home that cooks your meals? Then costs go down to less than $20 and ingredients get way way better. It gets worse when you consider a $20,000 humanoid. They aren't safe enough to trust around stoves yet. And their hands aren't yet dexterous enough to do that. I doubt my Neo will be allowed to cook meals over an open flame, and if so I will have to watch it to make sure it doesn't do anything wrong. (The Neo that arrives next year will be teleoperated by a human remotely and the risks that person does something, or misses oil catching on fire is just way too high). While neither robot will be able to do all food preparation (cutting chicken up into cubes, or cutting carrots or other fruits, for instance) this robot dramatically reduces the time needed for a human to make a meal and dramatically reduces the costs to do so. And, as we discuss in the video, when the Neo does arrive the Neo will be able to use this machine too, reducing time even more (and will be able to set the table and wash the dishes, saving even more time so you can answer more emails or learn more AI programs or, even, pay attention to your kids and give them a few more minutes of quality time). The robot industry should focus on the low hanging fruit first. Cooking meals is the biggest one to improve your life, save you time, and make your family healthier. It's why I bought one. And they actually make two: Your money is way better spent getting one of these than buying a humanoid. And if you do get a humanoid, like I am, they go together like peanut butter and jelly. ⚪️ sierra catalina has been saying this for years that our focus on humanoids is overblown and that specialized robots (you see my Matic Robots in the background to prove this point) are way better for most families.

Robert Scoble

178,741 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Q: How do you build a great company? In the clip below, Sam Altman walks through 9 things he has seen the best founders do: #1 Get to know your users really well “The best founders do customer support themselves. They go visit their users—in the case of Airbnb they go live with them. You want to get to know your users really really well.” #2 Have a short cycle time & understand compound growth “The cycle here is basically: talk to customer to understand pain point → build product to address that → get product in front of user → see what they do → repeat cycle. This cycle is how you iterate and improve. The law of compound growth being what it is: if you can get 2% better every iteration cycle, your iteration cycle is every four hours rather than every four weeks, and you compound that over the course of a few years, you’ll be in a very very different place. Make it one of your top goals to build one of the fastest iterating companies the world has ever seen.” #3 Make a long-term commitment “Most companies have a 2-3 year time horizon. But companies are almost always a 10 year project if they work. If you think about it that way from the very beginning, you will make very different and much better decisions. I think this is the only arbitrage opportunity left in the market. Almost no one makes a fairly long-term commitment to a new project. But if you do that, you will think in a different way, you will hire different people, and it will work very well.” #4 Stay lean until everything is working really well “In the early days, when you’re experimenting and zig zagging, you’re like a fast little speed boat and want to be able to turn the whole company on a dime. You can’t do that if you’re a big company—cash burn aside, which is another problem. The flexibility of the company basically decreases with the square of the number of employees, so you want to stay really small until you’re sure things are working. Once things are working, then you can get really big.” #5 Resist the urge to hire; especially resist the urge to hire mediocre people “Vinod Khosla has a saying that I love: ‘the team you build is the company you build.’ This is really true and I never appreciated how true this was for a long time. If you build a team of great people and you have a product that people love, you’ll have a 90%+ chance of success. Those are both really hard to do, and they’re independent variables. But don’t ignore the team component. The best CEOs I know spend huge amounts of their time recruiting and retaining good talent.” #6 Relentless execution “You have to keep going, and do things perfectly, and get all of the details right. You have to care too much about every experience that a customer has with your company.” #7 Startups are about not giving up “One of the very best companies in the last YC batch applied 7 times before they got in. This is just a version of what happens in startups all of the time: you get beat down, again, and again, and again. And that last time when you get pushed down and don’t think you have enough energy to get back up—that’s the time it actually works. This is what you sign up for if you’re going to start a startup.” #8 Fiduciary duty to take care of yourself “This is a 10-year marathon and you have a fiduciary duty to your shareholders to take care of yourself. Some people treat startups like an all-nighter: they don’t take care of their health, they don’t sleep, they don’t maintain their personal relationships. It is true that startups are a bad choice for work-life balance. But you have a duty to yourself, your team, and your investors to take care of yourself.” #9 Clear mission “You don’t have to figure this out on Day 1, but all of the most successful startups I’ve been fortunate enough to be a part of pretty quickly—in the first one to two years—figure out a really important mission. It’s this mission that gets people to join them. It drives the founders. It gets the media to write about them. And even if you start off building a project that’s just interesting to you and solves a problem in your life—which is how you should start—remember that you should have a clear mission at some point… That is what will convince people to come help you, and that is how you will build this idea into a huge company with a ton of people that really love your product.” Follow Startup Archive for more tactical startup advice!

Q: How do you build a great company? In the clip below, Sam Altman walks through 9 things he has seen the best founders do: #1 Get to know your users really well “The best founders do customer support themselves. They go visit their users—in the case of Airbnb they go live with them. You want to get to know your users really really well.” #2 Have a short cycle time & understand compound growth “The cycle here is basically: talk to customer to understand pain point → build product to address that → get product in front of user → see what they do → repeat cycle. This cycle is how you iterate and improve. The law of compound growth being what it is: if you can get 2% better every iteration cycle, your iteration cycle is every four hours rather than every four weeks, and you compound that over the course of a few years, you’ll be in a very very different place. Make it one of your top goals to build one of the fastest iterating companies the world has ever seen.” #3 Make a long-term commitment “Most companies have a 2-3 year time horizon. But companies are almost always a 10 year project if they work. If you think about it that way from the very beginning, you will make very different and much better decisions. I think this is the only arbitrage opportunity left in the market. Almost no one makes a fairly long-term commitment to a new project. But if you do that, you will think in a different way, you will hire different people, and it will work very well.” #4 Stay lean until everything is working really well “In the early days, when you’re experimenting and zig zagging, you’re like a fast little speed boat and want to be able to turn the whole company on a dime. You can’t do that if you’re a big company—cash burn aside, which is another problem. The flexibility of the company basically decreases with the square of the number of employees, so you want to stay really small until you’re sure things are working. Once things are working, then you can get really big.” #5 Resist the urge to hire; especially resist the urge to hire mediocre people “Vinod Khosla has a saying that I love: ‘the team you build is the company you build.’ This is really true and I never appreciated how true this was for a long time. If you build a team of great people and you have a product that people love, you’ll have a 90%+ chance of success. Those are both really hard to do, and they’re independent variables. But don’t ignore the team component. The best CEOs I know spend huge amounts of their time recruiting and retaining good talent.” #6 Relentless execution “You have to keep going, and do things perfectly, and get all of the details right. You have to care too much about every experience that a customer has with your company.” #7 Startups are about not giving up “One of the very best companies in the last YC batch applied 7 times before they got in. This is just a version of what happens in startups all of the time: you get beat down, again, and again, and again. And that last time when you get pushed down and don’t think you have enough energy to get back up—that’s the time it actually works. This is what you sign up for if you’re going to start a startup.” #8 Fiduciary duty to take care of yourself “This is a 10-year marathon and you have a fiduciary duty to your shareholders to take care of yourself. Some people treat startups like an all-nighter: they don’t take care of their health, they don’t sleep, they don’t maintain their personal relationships. It is true that startups are a bad choice for work-life balance. But you have a duty to yourself, your team, and your investors to take care of yourself.” #9 Clear mission “You don’t have to figure this out on Day 1, but all of the most successful startups I’ve been fortunate enough to be a part of pretty quickly—in the first one to two years—figure out a really important mission. It’s this mission that gets people to join them. It drives the founders. It gets the media to write about them. And even if you start off building a project that’s just interesting to you and solves a problem in your life—which is how you should start—remember that you should have a clear mission at some point… That is what will convince people to come help you, and that is how you will build this idea into a huge company with a ton of people that really love your product.” Follow Startup Archive for more tactical startup advice!

Startup Archive

407,763 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Q: How do you build a great company? In the clip below, Sam Altman walks through 9 things he has seen the best founders do: #1 Get to know your users really well “The best founders do customer support themselves. They go visit their users—in the case of Airbnb they go live with them. You want to get to know your users really really well.” #2 Have a short cycle time & understand compound growth “The cycle here is basically: talk to customer to understand pain point → build product to address that → get product in front of user → see what they do → repeat cycle. This cycle is how you iterate and improve. The law of compound growth being what it is: if you can get 2% better every iteration cycle, your iteration cycle is every four hours rather than every four weeks, and you compound that over the course of a few years, you’ll be in a very very different place. Make it one of your top goals to build one of the fastest iterating companies the world has ever seen.” #3 Make a long-term commitment “Most companies have a 2-3 year time horizon. But companies are almost always a 10 year project if they work. If you think about it that way from the very beginning, you will make very different and much better decisions. I think this is the only arbitrage opportunity left in the market. Almost no one makes a fairly long-term commitment to a new project. But if you do that, you will think in a different way, you will hire different people, and it will work very well.” #4 Stay lean until everything is working really well “In the early days, when you’re experimenting and zig zagging, you’re like a fast little speed boat and want to be able to turn the whole company on a dime. You can’t do that if you’re a big company—cash burn aside, which is another problem. The flexibility of the company basically decreases with the square of the number of employees, so you want to stay really small until you’re sure things are working. Once things are working, then you can get really big.” #5 Resist the urge to hire; especially resist the urge to hire mediocre people “Vinod Khosla has a saying that I love: ‘the team you build is the company you build.’ This is really true and I never appreciated how true this was for a long time. If you build a team of great people and you have a product that people love, you’ll have a 90%+ chance of success. Those are both really hard to do, and they’re independent variables. But don’t ignore the team component. The best CEOs I know spend huge amounts of their time recruiting and retaining good talent.” #6 Relentless execution “You have to keep going, and do things perfectly, and get all of the details right. You have to care too much about every experience that a customer has with your company.” #7 Startups are about not giving up “One of the very best companies in the last YC batch applied 7 times before they got in. This is just a version of what happens in startups all of the time: you get beat down, again, and again, and again. And that last time when you get pushed down and don’t think you have enough energy to get back up—that’s the time it actually works. This is what you sign up for if you’re going to start a startup.” #8 Fiduciary duty to take care of yourself “This is a 10 year marathon and you have a fiduciary duty to your shareholders to take care of yourself. Some people treat startups like an all-nighter: they don’t take care of their health, they don’t sleep, they don’t maintain their personal relationships. It is true that startups are a bad choice for work-life balance. But you have a duty to yourself, your team, and your investors to take care of yourself.” #9 Clear mission “You don’t have to figure this out on Day 1, but all of the most successful startups I’ve been fortunate enough to be a part of pretty quickly—in the first one to two years—figure out a really important mission. It’s this mission that gets people to join them. It drives the founders. It gets the media to write about them. And even if you start off building a project that’s just interesting to you and solves a problem in your life—which is how you should start—remember that you should have a clear mission at some point… That is what will convince people to come help you, and that is how you will build this idea into a huge company with a ton of people that really love your product.”

Q: How do you build a great company? In the clip below, Sam Altman walks through 9 things he has seen the best founders do: #1 Get to know your users really well “The best founders do customer support themselves. They go visit their users—in the case of Airbnb they go live with them. You want to get to know your users really really well.” #2 Have a short cycle time & understand compound growth “The cycle here is basically: talk to customer to understand pain point → build product to address that → get product in front of user → see what they do → repeat cycle. This cycle is how you iterate and improve. The law of compound growth being what it is: if you can get 2% better every iteration cycle, your iteration cycle is every four hours rather than every four weeks, and you compound that over the course of a few years, you’ll be in a very very different place. Make it one of your top goals to build one of the fastest iterating companies the world has ever seen.” #3 Make a long-term commitment “Most companies have a 2-3 year time horizon. But companies are almost always a 10 year project if they work. If you think about it that way from the very beginning, you will make very different and much better decisions. I think this is the only arbitrage opportunity left in the market. Almost no one makes a fairly long-term commitment to a new project. But if you do that, you will think in a different way, you will hire different people, and it will work very well.” #4 Stay lean until everything is working really well “In the early days, when you’re experimenting and zig zagging, you’re like a fast little speed boat and want to be able to turn the whole company on a dime. You can’t do that if you’re a big company—cash burn aside, which is another problem. The flexibility of the company basically decreases with the square of the number of employees, so you want to stay really small until you’re sure things are working. Once things are working, then you can get really big.” #5 Resist the urge to hire; especially resist the urge to hire mediocre people “Vinod Khosla has a saying that I love: ‘the team you build is the company you build.’ This is really true and I never appreciated how true this was for a long time. If you build a team of great people and you have a product that people love, you’ll have a 90%+ chance of success. Those are both really hard to do, and they’re independent variables. But don’t ignore the team component. The best CEOs I know spend huge amounts of their time recruiting and retaining good talent.” #6 Relentless execution “You have to keep going, and do things perfectly, and get all of the details right. You have to care too much about every experience that a customer has with your company.” #7 Startups are about not giving up “One of the very best companies in the last YC batch applied 7 times before they got in. This is just a version of what happens in startups all of the time: you get beat down, again, and again, and again. And that last time when you get pushed down and don’t think you have enough energy to get back up—that’s the time it actually works. This is what you sign up for if you’re going to start a startup.” #8 Fiduciary duty to take care of yourself “This is a 10 year marathon and you have a fiduciary duty to your shareholders to take care of yourself. Some people treat startups like an all-nighter: they don’t take care of their health, they don’t sleep, they don’t maintain their personal relationships. It is true that startups are a bad choice for work-life balance. But you have a duty to yourself, your team, and your investors to take care of yourself.” #9 Clear mission “You don’t have to figure this out on Day 1, but all of the most successful startups I’ve been fortunate enough to be a part of pretty quickly—in the first one to two years—figure out a really important mission. It’s this mission that gets people to join them. It drives the founders. It gets the media to write about them. And even if you start off building a project that’s just interesting to you and solves a problem in your life—which is how you should start—remember that you should have a clear mission at some point… That is what will convince people to come help you, and that is how you will build this idea into a huge company with a ton of people that really love your product.”

Michael McGuiness

500,098 просмотров • 3 лет назад