正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

🗣️ “𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙢𝙥𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙝𝙞𝙡𝙡, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙘𝙖𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖 𝙨𝙝𝙖𝙙𝙤𝙬 𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙍𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙃𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙨!” Celtic find a winner DEEP into stoppage time to beat Kilmarnock 3-2, having been two goals down! ⤵️

Sky Sports Scotland

382,710 subscribers

945,818 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治体育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

😲 McCracken's blunder ⚡️ Palmer-Houlden's quick reply 🙌 Larkeche with the LATE winner Dundee came from two goals down to beat Kilmarnock 3-2 ⤵️

😲 McCracken's blunder ⚡️ Palmer-Houlden's quick reply 🙌 Larkeche with the LATE winner Dundee came from two goals down to beat Kilmarnock 3-2 ⤵️

Sky Sports Scotland

48,477 次观看 • 1 年前

🩸𝐌𝐀𝐒𝐒𝐈𝐕𝐄 𝐁𝐋𝐎𝐎𝐃 𝐂𝐋𝐎𝐓𝐒🩸 🚨 Pathologist, Dr. Ryan Cole, tells Dr. Drew about the strange, foot-long clots he's been finding in mRNA injected patients—both alive and deceased—and how they can be broken down and cleared from the body using a natural enzyme called 'Nattokinase'. ""𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙩𝙞𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙣𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙨𝙚𝙚𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙨𝙚—𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙖 𝙗𝙤𝙙𝙮 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙨 𝙞𝙣 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙚𝙧𝙫𝙚 𝙞𝙩, 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙪𝙡𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙡𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙚 𝙫𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙡𝙨, 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙥𝙪𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙞𝙧 𝙣𝙚𝙚𝙙𝙡𝙚𝙨 𝙞𝙣 𝙡𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙚 𝙫𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙡𝙨—𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙗𝙖𝙘𝙠 𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙪𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙝𝙖𝙙𝙣'𝙩 𝙚𝙭𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚𝙙 𝙗𝙚𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙚. 𝘼𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙬𝙤 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙨𝙥𝙤𝙠𝙚𝙣 𝙤𝙪𝙩, 𝙗𝙪𝙩 𝙄 𝙠𝙣𝙤𝙬 𝙤𝙛 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙖𝙣𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 50 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙨𝙚𝙚𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙖𝙢𝙚, 𝙬𝙝𝙤 𝙬𝙖𝙣𝙩 𝙩𝙤 𝙠𝙚𝙚𝙥 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙞𝙧 𝙟𝙤𝙗𝙨, 𝙨𝙤 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙙𝙤𝙣'𝙩 𝙨𝙖𝙮 𝙖𝙣𝙮𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜." Sergeant News Network

🩸𝐌𝐀𝐒𝐒𝐈𝐕𝐄 𝐁𝐋𝐎𝐎𝐃 𝐂𝐋𝐎𝐓𝐒🩸 🚨 Pathologist, Dr. Ryan Cole, tells Dr. Drew about the strange, foot-long clots he's been finding in mRNA injected patients—both alive and deceased—and how they can be broken down and cleared from the body using a natural enzyme called 'Nattokinase'. ""𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙩𝙞𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙣𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙨𝙚𝙚𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙨𝙚—𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙖 𝙗𝙤𝙙𝙮 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙨 𝙞𝙣 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙚𝙧𝙫𝙚 𝙞𝙩, 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙪𝙡𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙡𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙚 𝙫𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙡𝙨, 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙥𝙪𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙞𝙧 𝙣𝙚𝙚𝙙𝙡𝙚𝙨 𝙞𝙣 𝙡𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙚 𝙫𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙡𝙨—𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙗𝙖𝙘𝙠 𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙪𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙝𝙖𝙙𝙣'𝙩 𝙚𝙭𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚𝙙 𝙗𝙚𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙚. 𝘼𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙬𝙤 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙨𝙥𝙤𝙠𝙚𝙣 𝙤𝙪𝙩, 𝙗𝙪𝙩 𝙄 𝙠𝙣𝙤𝙬 𝙤𝙛 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙖𝙣𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 50 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙨𝙚𝙚𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙖𝙢𝙚, 𝙬𝙝𝙤 𝙬𝙖𝙣𝙩 𝙩𝙤 𝙠𝙚𝙚𝙥 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙞𝙧 𝙟𝙤𝙗𝙨, 𝙨𝙤 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙙𝙤𝙣'𝙩 𝙨𝙖𝙮 𝙖𝙣𝙮𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜." Sergeant News Network

{Matt} $XRPatriot

57,494 次观看 • 2 年前

On this day in 2007: Thierry Henry scored the winning goal, deep into stoppage time, as Arsenal came from a goal down to beat Manchester United 2-1 at the Emirates Stadium. 👑 🔵 Rooney (53’) 🔴 van Persie (83’) 🔴 Henry (90+3’)

On this day in 2007: Thierry Henry scored the winning goal, deep into stoppage time, as Arsenal came from a goal down to beat Manchester United 2-1 at the Emirates Stadium. 👑 🔵 Rooney (53’) 🔴 van Persie (83’) 🔴 Henry (90+3’)

afcstuff

66,746 次观看 • 6 个月前

Yesterday ex-Bungie exec Martin O’Donnell who successfully sued #Bungie for unpaid wages and stock ownership, did an interview with Act Man about Bungie's recent woes. He implied Bungie CEO Pete Parsons and the #Microsoft corporate ethos and management style he comes from, was to blame. Martin says; "𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙞𝙣 𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙥 𝙬𝙝𝙤 𝙬𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙘𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙨, 𝙘𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙖 𝙥𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙜𝙧𝙚𝙚 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩. 𝙏𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙬𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙤𝙧𝙞𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚 𝙩𝙚𝙖𝙢. 𝙎𝙤 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙄 𝙨𝙖𝙮 𝙬𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙𝙣'𝙩 𝙜𝙚𝙩 𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩 𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚, 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩'𝙨 𝙬𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙄 𝙢𝙚𝙖𝙣." "𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩 𝙣𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙡𝙚𝙛𝙩 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚." "𝙉𝙤, 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙙𝙞𝙙𝙣'𝙩." "𝙄𝙣 𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙙𝙨𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩 𝙄 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙠 𝙞𝙩 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙖 𝙝𝙪𝙜𝙚 𝙝𝙪𝙜𝙚 𝙢𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬 𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙨𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙝𝙖𝙙 𝙜𝙤𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙣 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩, 𝙩𝙤 𝙖𝙘𝙩𝙪𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙮 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙮 𝙞𝙣𝙨𝙞𝙙𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚 𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙥." Martin also believes he may have been intentionally fired just weeks before his founders stock was due to be vested, so Bungie and its leadership could save money. There were similar staff retention and shares vestment schemes as part of #Sony's acquisition of Bungie, so both would have likely saved money in a similar way with recent layoffs. Martin expands on how Pete Parsons hasn't been at Bungie for decades, and was originally a Microsoft Marketing Executive who was brought in as Studio Manager for Bungie, but left during Bungie's negotiations for independence away from Microsoft. He was not involved in any of Halo 3's production. Unbeknownst to Martin, Pete didn't actually leave the company when he left, instead went back to an executive role at Microsoft. Pete Parsons was brought back in as Marketing Head in an exec role at Bungie around 2009. Over the coming years other executives got fired while Pete eventually went on to assume the top CEO role at Bungie in 2016, just before the release of Destiny 2. Martin continues; "𝘼 𝙡𝙤𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙖𝙘𝙩 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚 𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩 𝙝𝙖𝙨𝙣'𝙩 𝙗𝙚𝙚𝙣 𝙖𝙣 𝙞𝙣𝙛𝙡𝙪𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙤𝙣 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙖 𝙙𝙚𝙘𝙖𝙙𝙚...𝙞𝙩 𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙚𝙨 𝙖 𝙡𝙤𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚 𝙨𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚𝙨 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙨 𝙩𝙤 𝙥𝙖𝙣 𝙤𝙪𝙩...𝙄 𝙠𝙣𝙤𝙬 𝙝𝙤𝙬 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙨𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙠. ...𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙠 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙘𝙤𝙧𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙥𝙥𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙛 𝙜𝙖𝙢𝙚𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙖𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙨𝙩𝙪𝙙𝙞𝙤𝙨, 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙞𝙨 𝙖 𝙥𝙖𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙨 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙖 𝙗𝙞𝙜 𝙘𝙤𝙧𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚 𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩. 𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙨𝙖𝙮 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙨𝙝𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙 𝙗𝙡𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚, 𝙬𝙚𝙡𝙡 𝙄 𝙙𝙤 𝙗𝙡𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚. 𝘽𝙪𝙩 𝙩𝙤 𝙢𝙚 𝙞𝙩'𝙨 𝙗𝙚𝙘𝙖𝙪𝙨𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙬𝙝𝙤 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙥 𝙡𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙡 𝙤𝙛 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚, 𝙬𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙖𝙩 𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙥𝙤𝙞𝙣𝙩 𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙥 𝙡𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙡 𝙤𝙛 𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩. 𝙏𝙝𝙖𝙩'𝙨 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙜𝙤𝙩 𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙙, 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩'𝙨 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙙𝙚𝙘𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙡𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚, 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙨, 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙡𝙚 𝙄𝙋, 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙝𝙤𝙬 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙥 𝙨𝙩𝙪𝙛𝙛. 𝙏𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙟𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙙𝙤 𝙞𝙩." Pretty damning stuff. I highly recommend watching the entire YouTube video linked below, but I've edited together some of the related excerpts in the video below. #PS5 #Xbox

Yesterday ex-Bungie exec Martin O’Donnell who successfully sued #Bungie for unpaid wages and stock ownership, did an interview with Act Man about Bungie's recent woes. He implied Bungie CEO Pete Parsons and the #Microsoft corporate ethos and management style he comes from, was to blame. Martin says; "𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙞𝙣 𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙥 𝙬𝙝𝙤 𝙬𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙘𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙨, 𝙘𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙖 𝙥𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙜𝙧𝙚𝙚 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩. 𝙏𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙬𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙤𝙧𝙞𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚 𝙩𝙚𝙖𝙢. 𝙎𝙤 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙄 𝙨𝙖𝙮 𝙬𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙𝙣'𝙩 𝙜𝙚𝙩 𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩 𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚, 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩'𝙨 𝙬𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙄 𝙢𝙚𝙖𝙣." "𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩 𝙣𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙡𝙚𝙛𝙩 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚." "𝙉𝙤, 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙙𝙞𝙙𝙣'𝙩." "𝙄𝙣 𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙙𝙨𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩 𝙄 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙠 𝙞𝙩 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙖 𝙝𝙪𝙜𝙚 𝙝𝙪𝙜𝙚 𝙢𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬 𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙨𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙝𝙖𝙙 𝙜𝙤𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙣 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩, 𝙩𝙤 𝙖𝙘𝙩𝙪𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙮 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙮 𝙞𝙣𝙨𝙞𝙙𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚 𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙥." Martin also believes he may have been intentionally fired just weeks before his founders stock was due to be vested, so Bungie and its leadership could save money. There were similar staff retention and shares vestment schemes as part of #Sony's acquisition of Bungie, so both would have likely saved money in a similar way with recent layoffs. Martin expands on how Pete Parsons hasn't been at Bungie for decades, and was originally a Microsoft Marketing Executive who was brought in as Studio Manager for Bungie, but left during Bungie's negotiations for independence away from Microsoft. He was not involved in any of Halo 3's production. Unbeknownst to Martin, Pete didn't actually leave the company when he left, instead went back to an executive role at Microsoft. Pete Parsons was brought back in as Marketing Head in an exec role at Bungie around 2009. Over the coming years other executives got fired while Pete eventually went on to assume the top CEO role at Bungie in 2016, just before the release of Destiny 2. Martin continues; "𝘼 𝙡𝙤𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙖𝙘𝙩 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚 𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩 𝙝𝙖𝙨𝙣'𝙩 𝙗𝙚𝙚𝙣 𝙖𝙣 𝙞𝙣𝙛𝙡𝙪𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙤𝙣 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙖 𝙙𝙚𝙘𝙖𝙙𝙚...𝙞𝙩 𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙚𝙨 𝙖 𝙡𝙤𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚 𝙨𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚𝙨 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙨 𝙩𝙤 𝙥𝙖𝙣 𝙤𝙪𝙩...𝙄 𝙠𝙣𝙤𝙬 𝙝𝙤𝙬 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙨𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙠. ...𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙠 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙘𝙤𝙧𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙥𝙥𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙛 𝙜𝙖𝙢𝙚𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙖𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙨𝙩𝙪𝙙𝙞𝙤𝙨, 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙞𝙨 𝙖 𝙥𝙖𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙨 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙖 𝙗𝙞𝙜 𝙘𝙤𝙧𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚 𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩. 𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙨𝙖𝙮 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙨𝙝𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙 𝙗𝙡𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚, 𝙬𝙚𝙡𝙡 𝙄 𝙙𝙤 𝙗𝙡𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚. 𝘽𝙪𝙩 𝙩𝙤 𝙢𝙚 𝙞𝙩'𝙨 𝙗𝙚𝙘𝙖𝙪𝙨𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙬𝙝𝙤 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙥 𝙡𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙡 𝙤𝙛 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙚, 𝙬𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙖𝙩 𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙥𝙤𝙞𝙣𝙩 𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙥 𝙡𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙡 𝙤𝙛 𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙤𝙛𝙩. 𝙏𝙝𝙖𝙩'𝙨 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙜𝙤𝙩 𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙙, 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩'𝙨 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙙𝙚𝙘𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙡𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚, 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙨, 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙡𝙚 𝙄𝙋, 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙝𝙤𝙬 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙥 𝙨𝙩𝙪𝙛𝙛. 𝙏𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙟𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙙𝙤 𝙞𝙩." Pretty damning stuff. I highly recommend watching the entire YouTube video linked below, but I've edited together some of the related excerpts in the video below. #PS5 #Xbox

NIB

102,984 次观看 • 2 年前

If Duke wins the ACC, the ACC won’t get into the College Football Playoff. 2 Group of 5 teams would be in the CFP including the winner of North Texas-Tulane and JMU if beat Troy as the 4th and 5th highest ranked conference champions. If Duke wins and JMU loses then the winner of North Texas-Tulane and UNLV if they beat Boise State would be in the CFP. If Duke wins but JMU and UNLV lose the CFP committee will see how UNBELIEVABLY flawed its current system AS ALWAYS BEEN. 5 loss Duke, Troy, Boise State, winner of Kennesaw State-Jacksonville State, winner of Miami-OH-Western Michigan would all have a chance to get in the CFP despite having 3, 4 and 5 losses ahead of BYU, Miami, Vanderbilt, Utah and potentially 3 loss Alabama. All of this could be avoided by Virginia winning the ACC championship over Duke. If Virginia loses, college football will have one of the most interesting playoffs ever with 2 dominant Group of 5 teams in it. If Virginia, JMU and UNLV lose, college football will have the biggest meltdown of all time.

If Duke wins the ACC, the ACC won’t get into the College Football Playoff. 2 Group of 5 teams would be in the CFP including the winner of North Texas-Tulane and JMU if beat Troy as the 4th and 5th highest ranked conference champions. If Duke wins and JMU loses then the winner of North Texas-Tulane and UNLV if they beat Boise State would be in the CFP. If Duke wins but JMU and UNLV lose the CFP committee will see how UNBELIEVABLY flawed its current system AS ALWAYS BEEN. 5 loss Duke, Troy, Boise State, winner of Kennesaw State-Jacksonville State, winner of Miami-OH-Western Michigan would all have a chance to get in the CFP despite having 3, 4 and 5 losses ahead of BYU, Miami, Vanderbilt, Utah and potentially 3 loss Alabama. All of this could be avoided by Virginia winning the ACC championship over Duke. If Virginia loses, college football will have one of the most interesting playoffs ever with 2 dominant Group of 5 teams in it. If Virginia, JMU and UNLV lose, college football will have the biggest meltdown of all time.

Robert Griffin III

364,703 次观看 • 8 个月前

As someone who loves to read and write, I often wonder, what kind of world lives inside his mind? What kind of garden blooms in his imagination? His writing is vivid and alive. His songs bustle with meaning, layered with intention. Woozi doesn’t always portray love and life as something complicated, nor does he always simplify them into something as plain as a doodled heart or two mountains beneath the sun. Sometimes, he writes of love as sweet and simple as tasting candy. Sometimes, as irritating as longing that piles up like dust in the drawers of a bedroom. Sometimes, he speaks of life as cool and refreshing as a garden filled with flowers and swarming butterflies. Other times, as barren as a dry season without rain or a passing breeze. His words have life in them. 𝘼𝙨 𝙞𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙗𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙖𝙗𝙡𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙖𝙠, 𝙩𝙤 𝙗𝙚 𝙨𝙥𝙤𝙠𝙚𝙣 𝙩𝙤, 𝙩𝙤 𝙬𝙚𝙚𝙥, 𝙩𝙤 𝙧𝙤𝙖𝙧 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙘𝙝𝙚𝙚𝙧𝙨, 𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙛𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙤 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙡𝙡𝙣𝙚𝙨𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙖 𝙨𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙤𝙛 𝙧𝙤𝙤𝙢. His ballads soothe like a thick blanket and a warm cup of chocolate, while his other songs glow with color and spark like the city lights at night. Woozi always puts '𝙪𝙨' as the main character. In every song about heartbreak and pain, he never paints someone else as the sole villain. In every song about journeys and struggles, no one is left behind, everyone holds an equally important role. In every song of celebration, no one is excluded; everyone is celebrated. Even pets and plants receive their share of love from Woozi. This is an appreciation piece for Lee Jihoon. As someone who loves words, Woozi’s writing has touched so many important parts of my life, and perhaps the lives of others too 🥺 #WooziAppreciationDay #WOOZI_감사낮 #우지 #WOOZI

As someone who loves to read and write, I often wonder, what kind of world lives inside his mind? What kind of garden blooms in his imagination? His writing is vivid and alive. His songs bustle with meaning, layered with intention. Woozi doesn’t always portray love and life as something complicated, nor does he always simplify them into something as plain as a doodled heart or two mountains beneath the sun. Sometimes, he writes of love as sweet and simple as tasting candy. Sometimes, as irritating as longing that piles up like dust in the drawers of a bedroom. Sometimes, he speaks of life as cool and refreshing as a garden filled with flowers and swarming butterflies. Other times, as barren as a dry season without rain or a passing breeze. His words have life in them. 𝘼𝙨 𝙞𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙗𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙖𝙗𝙡𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙖𝙠, 𝙩𝙤 𝙗𝙚 𝙨𝙥𝙤𝙠𝙚𝙣 𝙩𝙤, 𝙩𝙤 𝙬𝙚𝙚𝙥, 𝙩𝙤 𝙧𝙤𝙖𝙧 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙘𝙝𝙚𝙚𝙧𝙨, 𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙛𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙤 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙡𝙡𝙣𝙚𝙨𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙖 𝙨𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙤𝙛 𝙧𝙤𝙤𝙢. His ballads soothe like a thick blanket and a warm cup of chocolate, while his other songs glow with color and spark like the city lights at night. Woozi always puts '𝙪𝙨' as the main character. In every song about heartbreak and pain, he never paints someone else as the sole villain. In every song about journeys and struggles, no one is left behind, everyone holds an equally important role. In every song of celebration, no one is excluded; everyone is celebrated. Even pets and plants receive their share of love from Woozi. This is an appreciation piece for Lee Jihoon. As someone who loves words, Woozi’s writing has touched so many important parts of my life, and perhaps the lives of others too 🥺 #WooziAppreciationDay #WOOZI_감사낮 #우지 #WOOZI

nasi.

53,169 次观看 • 1 年前

🔥 The ULTIMATE Frankball Deep Dive - WHY Tottenham's defence is locked in but the attack’s struggling? ➡️Joao Palhinha’s been a monster ball-winner ... one of the best in the league at shielding the back line... but when it comes to build-up he looks limited... very few progressive passes... not the press-resistant six Spurs need compared to a Zubimendi-type profile who moves play forward with risk and precision ➡️ Brennan Johnson’s another casualty of the new setup... he was a threat down the right where he could run onto the ball but now on the left he’s forced into build-up play... and that’s not his game - his link-up breaks under pressure ➡️ Djed Spence is slowing Spurs down too in the build up phase, always wants to shift onto his right foot... extra touches... more recycling, less verticality which is having a knock on effect on Xavi Simons who was used to Raum at Leipzig bombing on and holding the width. ➡️ Without Son Heung-min and Harry Kane the final third has lost its elite edge... less decisiveness... fewer game-changers and for a pragmatic coach like Frank who depends on clinical finishers rather than a fluid attacking system... that’s a big problem, doesn't help no Kulu or Madders either. The upside: 🔼They’re harder to beat 🔼Set-pieces look drilled (Attacking AND Defensive) 🔼Opposition getting fewer clean looks at goal... So yes... the defence is fixed... but the attack needs time for key personnel to get fit, some rejigging positions wise and possibly transfers made in January and beyond. #THFC

Pythagoras In Boots ⚽️

34,686 次观看 • 9 个月前

A top 0.02% trader tells how he tracks secret whale wallets on Polymarket Euan have been trading Polymarket for just over a year now and he have turned $15k -> $370k. A lot of his edge recently has been in sort of doing deep research into potential insiders. People that loaded big money into one market either insiders or really stupid ones. You need to learn how to understand this difference by studying more and more markets and the traders in them. 1. A thing you have to really be care of Sometimes fading insiders does work but you don't want to be betting against an insider. You should always look into your counterparties essentially because sometimes they're dumb, but sometimes they're not as dumb as you might think. Make sure you’re not missing something 2. Story about the MicroStrategy insider There was one guy who was betting that there wouldn't be over a 1k BTC purchased by MicroStrategy. Euan believes that there was 3 or 4 accounts insider had. Insider bet about $700k and held about 1.5M shares. This guy previously beat the insiders in the other markets turning 10¢ bet into a winner and made $200k-$300k. 3. What you can do to find an insider? You can look at do they have transactions with gambling sites like Rubet or Stake. Have they got other accounts linked to them, have they bet on this market before or similar ones and done really well. It's all onchain, you can even find their X and see if they've got connections to a company. 4. Always check your counterparty As the site gets bigger, there's going to be more insiders, and you need to be more careful about betting size against strange accounts. If there's a ton of fresh accounts, that's very suspicious. But 90% of markets will not have insiders, so don't worry about it. 5. Advice for net new to prediction markets if someone's going to make a mistake and you look for it and you anticipate it and you get the buy on the other side their trade. That's a really smart thing to do. If you start small, make sure you have an edge first and the redeposit more if think you know what you're doing. Big shoutout to Easy for the great interview, i did a short recap and tried to highlight the most interesting moments. Watch the full version on his yt channel.

A top 0.02% trader tells how he tracks secret whale wallets on Polymarket Euan have been trading Polymarket for just over a year now and he have turned $15k -> $370k. A lot of his edge recently has been in sort of doing deep research into potential insiders. People that loaded big money into one market either insiders or really stupid ones. You need to learn how to understand this difference by studying more and more markets and the traders in them. 1. A thing you have to really be care of Sometimes fading insiders does work but you don't want to be betting against an insider. You should always look into your counterparties essentially because sometimes they're dumb, but sometimes they're not as dumb as you might think. Make sure you’re not missing something 2. Story about the MicroStrategy insider There was one guy who was betting that there wouldn't be over a 1k BTC purchased by MicroStrategy. Euan believes that there was 3 or 4 accounts insider had. Insider bet about $700k and held about 1.5M shares. This guy previously beat the insiders in the other markets turning 10¢ bet into a winner and made $200k-$300k. 3. What you can do to find an insider? You can look at do they have transactions with gambling sites like Rubet or Stake. Have they got other accounts linked to them, have they bet on this market before or similar ones and done really well. It's all onchain, you can even find their X and see if they've got connections to a company. 4. Always check your counterparty As the site gets bigger, there's going to be more insiders, and you need to be more careful about betting size against strange accounts. If there's a ton of fresh accounts, that's very suspicious. But 90% of markets will not have insiders, so don't worry about it. 5. Advice for net new to prediction markets if someone's going to make a mistake and you look for it and you anticipate it and you get the buy on the other side their trade. That's a really smart thing to do. If you start small, make sure you have an edge first and the redeposit more if think you know what you're doing. Big shoutout to Easy for the great interview, i did a short recap and tried to highlight the most interesting moments. Watch the full version on his yt channel.

Alekzz

13,175 次观看 • 7 个月前

In case you didn't know mode: The only player in Europe to have an "era of Tekken". The Ryan Hart Era of Tekken was between 1996 - 2012. During this lengthy 16 year period, there was no man in all of Europe who was more feared across all Tekken games than Ryan Hart. Ryan would often rack up 100+ wins or more during arcade sessions and is the only person in Tekken history to win National and European championships on every Tekken 3, 4, 5, 6 and Tekken Tag. Ryan Hart's reign of terror also extended to North America where in 2001, despite having multiple characters in his arsenal, Ryan saw the competition and decided to display the Korean style of Mishima play, which had been taught to him by Bong Bong from South Korea, and Ryan defeated every single North American player he played against, nobody from NA was able to topple him. Ryan also beat US Champion; JOP in a close deathmatch that ended 26-21 in Ryan's favour. Ryan's two single defeats at this time were at the Electric Cancel 3 tournament, where Jang SuWon from South Korea defeated Ryan 3-2 and JOP defeated Ryan 3-1 in tournament, however there was controversy around the JOP win as Ryan's RP button visibly stopped working mid tournament, combos were dropped mid flow, 112's on hit not completed, etc. However despite his 3rd place finish, Ryan had successfully began his reign of terror extension in North America. When Ryan revisited the US for Virtua Fighter on the East Coast twice, again he was dominant against all North American competition. Nobody could put a lid on Ryan's ferocity, reaction time, execution, situational awareness and clutch factor. Ryan also had the largest character usage. Ryan Hart placed Top 3 then Top 4 two years in a row at EVOLUTIONCHAMPIONSHIPSERIES, while simultaneously consistently securing Grand Finals on Tekken at the same time. (Securing Top 2 and Top 3 on two EVO main stage titles at the same time is noteworthy. The next year at EVO Ryan secured top 4 on VF and actually won Tekken at the same time while getting 5th on a third main stage EVO title.) In 2003 Ryan defeated Kim Bong Min from Korea in a 4 hour deathmatch hosted at Castel's House in front of a live audience, becoming the first person in the world to defeat a Korean Tekken champion in a deathmatch. After news of this travelled around North America, every single NA player that had previously challenged Ryan Hart and set up money matches, all rescinded their challenge, during Ryan Hart's time in NA in 2003, not a single NA player would challenge Ryan Hart. People feared Ryan and in pre EVO polls every year, Ryan Hart was always predicted an EVO Grand Final finish even before the tournament bracket had been drawn up. During the next three years in a row at Evolution Championship Series, Ryan Hart went undefeated vs NA, Japan and EU in Tekken Tag. Not a single person from North America, Japan or Europe ever beat Ryan Hart on Tekken Tag at any EVO ever. After these years EVO replaced Tekken Tag in favour of the newer Tekken 5 game, which made sense. In the Tekken Tag domain Ryan Hart went down as one of the all time kings that ever touched the game, that was literally never beaten by anybody from Japan, America or Europe on the EVO stage. Ryan Hart got to Grand Finals back to back 3 years in a row and either won it or lost to a top Korean player. He again won it in 2008, this time on Tekken 5 DR. Ryan came out of Tekken retirement for a one-off exhibition match on Tekken 7 vs RIP in 2019, which Ryan won 10-3. There have been challengers to Ryan's throne that came and went, but no player in the world has stood the test of time on multiple fighting games since the 90's like Ryan has. #EVO #Evo2025 #TEKKEN #VirtuaFighter

In case you didn't know mode: The only player in Europe to have an "era of Tekken". The Ryan Hart Era of Tekken was between 1996 - 2012. During this lengthy 16 year period, there was no man in all of Europe who was more feared across all Tekken games than Ryan Hart. Ryan would often rack up 100+ wins or more during arcade sessions and is the only person in Tekken history to win National and European championships on every Tekken 3, 4, 5, 6 and Tekken Tag. Ryan Hart's reign of terror also extended to North America where in 2001, despite having multiple characters in his arsenal, Ryan saw the competition and decided to display the Korean style of Mishima play, which had been taught to him by Bong Bong from South Korea, and Ryan defeated every single North American player he played against, nobody from NA was able to topple him. Ryan also beat US Champion; JOP in a close deathmatch that ended 26-21 in Ryan's favour. Ryan's two single defeats at this time were at the Electric Cancel 3 tournament, where Jang SuWon from South Korea defeated Ryan 3-2 and JOP defeated Ryan 3-1 in tournament, however there was controversy around the JOP win as Ryan's RP button visibly stopped working mid tournament, combos were dropped mid flow, 112's on hit not completed, etc. However despite his 3rd place finish, Ryan had successfully began his reign of terror extension in North America. When Ryan revisited the US for Virtua Fighter on the East Coast twice, again he was dominant against all North American competition. Nobody could put a lid on Ryan's ferocity, reaction time, execution, situational awareness and clutch factor. Ryan also had the largest character usage. Ryan Hart placed Top 3 then Top 4 two years in a row at EVOLUTIONCHAMPIONSHIPSERIES, while simultaneously consistently securing Grand Finals on Tekken at the same time. (Securing Top 2 and Top 3 on two EVO main stage titles at the same time is noteworthy. The next year at EVO Ryan secured top 4 on VF and actually won Tekken at the same time while getting 5th on a third main stage EVO title.) In 2003 Ryan defeated Kim Bong Min from Korea in a 4 hour deathmatch hosted at Castel's House in front of a live audience, becoming the first person in the world to defeat a Korean Tekken champion in a deathmatch. After news of this travelled around North America, every single NA player that had previously challenged Ryan Hart and set up money matches, all rescinded their challenge, during Ryan Hart's time in NA in 2003, not a single NA player would challenge Ryan Hart. People feared Ryan and in pre EVO polls every year, Ryan Hart was always predicted an EVO Grand Final finish even before the tournament bracket had been drawn up. During the next three years in a row at Evolution Championship Series, Ryan Hart went undefeated vs NA, Japan and EU in Tekken Tag. Not a single person from North America, Japan or Europe ever beat Ryan Hart on Tekken Tag at any EVO ever. After these years EVO replaced Tekken Tag in favour of the newer Tekken 5 game, which made sense. In the Tekken Tag domain Ryan Hart went down as one of the all time kings that ever touched the game, that was literally never beaten by anybody from Japan, America or Europe on the EVO stage. Ryan Hart got to Grand Finals back to back 3 years in a row and either won it or lost to a top Korean player. He again won it in 2008, this time on Tekken 5 DR. Ryan came out of Tekken retirement for a one-off exhibition match on Tekken 7 vs RIP in 2019, which Ryan won 10-3. There have been challengers to Ryan's throne that came and went, but no player in the world has stood the test of time on multiple fighting games since the 90's like Ryan has. #EVO #Evo2025 #TEKKEN #VirtuaFighter

Ryan Hart

97,170 次观看 • 11 个月前

New episode featuring Stanford professor, neurobiologist, and host of the incredibly popular Huberman Lab Podcast, Dr. Andrew Huberman (Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D.). What makes Andrew truly exceptional is his ability to translate scientific findings into practical, actionable advice, enabling listeners to leverage new understandings of biology and neurobiology to improve their lives. In this episode, Dr. Huberman showcases his truly immense knowledge of the brain's dopamine system, which is incredibly central to many modern issues of motivation and attention that many of us struggle with. The public perception of Dr. Huberman's work often focuses on his unique distillations of protocols, but what I particularly enjoyed about this conversation was finding a common thread: the benefit of having an essential life philosophy of valuing "hard effort" over outcomes, something Andrew refers to as "forward center of mass." This podcast explains down to a neurobiological level why embracing discomfort can activate our motivation circuits, elevate dopamine and other catecholamine levels, and retrain brain regions like the anterior midcingulate cortex, ultimately growing our capacity for effort and striving at a fundamental level. A big thank you to Andrew for equipping us with this knowledge, enabling us to apply these insights for individual personal and professional growth. This episode is available on X, YouTube, Spotify, and everywhere else. Links in comment. Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 2:37 - The neuromodulatory role of dopamine 4:29 - Driver of motivation vs. experiencing reward 9:35 - Why dopamine dynamics act as a "wave pool" 13:15 - Why dopamine neurons need a recovery period 18:32 - Why dopamine peaks without effort are dangerous 21:52 - The number one sign of a highly motivated individual 23:59 - Dopamine reward-prediction error 26:18 - How effort and anticipation influence dopamine release 28:21 - Does lacking motivation reflect dopamine system deficits? 33:00 - Why motivation has a 'warm-up' period 37:16 - Why to attach reward to effort itself 47:51 - Tips for fostering tenacity in children 50:05 - Visualization of negative outcomes (why to do it) 52:51 - How to overcome procrastination 58:51 - How exercise affects the dopamine system 1:03:35 - Cold exposure vs. drug highs 1:05:29 - The entrainment effect of same-time exercise 1:09:24 - Why you shouldn't rely on stimulants 1:16:52 - "Counting walls" during deliberate cold exposure 1:21:44 - Cold exposure parameters for increasing dopamine 1:24:18 - Cold plunge alternatives for replenishing dopamine 1:25:35 - Why Andrew limits most workouts to 80-85% intensity 1:28:37 - Using exercise & cold exposure as stimuli for the brain 1:31:08 - Why "hard efforts" retrain the brain to overcome 1:33:31 - tMS and ultrasound as neuromodulatory therapies 1:36:22 - What does Dr. Huberman think of Neuralink? 1:38:02 - Advantages of neuromodulation over pharmacotherapy 1:39:28 - Why non-sleep deep rest may replenish dopamine 1:49:45 - My experience trying NSDR after poor sleep 1:51:04 - The ‘body still, mind active’ state for creativity 1:54:15 - How to cultivate a healthy relationship with social media 2:00:44 - The unique psychosocial dynamics of X (formerly Twitter) 2:02:05 - Andrew's recommended daily use limit for Instagram 2:04:09 - Does Lex Fridman have a symbiotic relationship with X? 2:04:39 - Is screen time increasing the prevalence of ADHD? 2:06:20 - Why Andrew recommends setting social media constraints 2:09:32 - Is social media increasing divorce rates? 2:12:12 - How low solar angle sunlight affects the circadian rhythm 2:22:10 - Limiting the adverse effects of late-night artificial light 2:23:57 - The light bulb that mimics sunrise and sunset 2:25:09 - How to spike morning cortisol by 50% (and why that's good) 2:26:21 - What's the optimal time to view morning sunlight? 2:27:11 - Can light panels replace morning sunlight? 2:28:33 - Combatting laptop & phone use with long distance viewing 2:30:00 - Why two hours outdoors daily may prevent myopia 2:35:06 - Why Andrew recommends limiting alcohol to 0-2 drinks per week 2:43:09 - How alcohol affects the dopamine and serotonin systems 2:48:47 - Treating ADHD with drugs, supplements, & behaviors 2:53:30 - Why studies on school start age suggest ADHD is overdiagnosed 3:00:00 - Andrew's weekly workout routine 3:13:14 - Why a disciplined life is not a deprived life 3:05:43 - Andrew's diet & why his dinners are higher in carbs 3:06:39 - The science of the physiological sigh3:07:34 - Andrew's supplement routine 3:10:00 - Andrew's experimentation with peptides 3:15:10 - How Andrew processes sometimes negative feedback 3:20:30 - The volatility of interacting with internet crowds

New episode featuring Stanford professor, neurobiologist, and host of the incredibly popular Huberman Lab Podcast, Dr. Andrew Huberman (Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D.). What makes Andrew truly exceptional is his ability to translate scientific findings into practical, actionable advice, enabling listeners to leverage new understandings of biology and neurobiology to improve their lives. In this episode, Dr. Huberman showcases his truly immense knowledge of the brain's dopamine system, which is incredibly central to many modern issues of motivation and attention that many of us struggle with. The public perception of Dr. Huberman's work often focuses on his unique distillations of protocols, but what I particularly enjoyed about this conversation was finding a common thread: the benefit of having an essential life philosophy of valuing "hard effort" over outcomes, something Andrew refers to as "forward center of mass." This podcast explains down to a neurobiological level why embracing discomfort can activate our motivation circuits, elevate dopamine and other catecholamine levels, and retrain brain regions like the anterior midcingulate cortex, ultimately growing our capacity for effort and striving at a fundamental level. A big thank you to Andrew for equipping us with this knowledge, enabling us to apply these insights for individual personal and professional growth. This episode is available on X, YouTube, Spotify, and everywhere else. Links in comment. Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 2:37 - The neuromodulatory role of dopamine 4:29 - Driver of motivation vs. experiencing reward 9:35 - Why dopamine dynamics act as a "wave pool" 13:15 - Why dopamine neurons need a recovery period 18:32 - Why dopamine peaks without effort are dangerous 21:52 - The number one sign of a highly motivated individual 23:59 - Dopamine reward-prediction error 26:18 - How effort and anticipation influence dopamine release 28:21 - Does lacking motivation reflect dopamine system deficits? 33:00 - Why motivation has a 'warm-up' period 37:16 - Why to attach reward to effort itself 47:51 - Tips for fostering tenacity in children 50:05 - Visualization of negative outcomes (why to do it) 52:51 - How to overcome procrastination 58:51 - How exercise affects the dopamine system 1:03:35 - Cold exposure vs. drug highs 1:05:29 - The entrainment effect of same-time exercise 1:09:24 - Why you shouldn't rely on stimulants 1:16:52 - "Counting walls" during deliberate cold exposure 1:21:44 - Cold exposure parameters for increasing dopamine 1:24:18 - Cold plunge alternatives for replenishing dopamine 1:25:35 - Why Andrew limits most workouts to 80-85% intensity 1:28:37 - Using exercise & cold exposure as stimuli for the brain 1:31:08 - Why "hard efforts" retrain the brain to overcome 1:33:31 - tMS and ultrasound as neuromodulatory therapies 1:36:22 - What does Dr. Huberman think of Neuralink? 1:38:02 - Advantages of neuromodulation over pharmacotherapy 1:39:28 - Why non-sleep deep rest may replenish dopamine 1:49:45 - My experience trying NSDR after poor sleep 1:51:04 - The ‘body still, mind active’ state for creativity 1:54:15 - How to cultivate a healthy relationship with social media 2:00:44 - The unique psychosocial dynamics of X (formerly Twitter) 2:02:05 - Andrew's recommended daily use limit for Instagram 2:04:09 - Does Lex Fridman have a symbiotic relationship with X? 2:04:39 - Is screen time increasing the prevalence of ADHD? 2:06:20 - Why Andrew recommends setting social media constraints 2:09:32 - Is social media increasing divorce rates? 2:12:12 - How low solar angle sunlight affects the circadian rhythm 2:22:10 - Limiting the adverse effects of late-night artificial light 2:23:57 - The light bulb that mimics sunrise and sunset 2:25:09 - How to spike morning cortisol by 50% (and why that's good) 2:26:21 - What's the optimal time to view morning sunlight? 2:27:11 - Can light panels replace morning sunlight? 2:28:33 - Combatting laptop & phone use with long distance viewing 2:30:00 - Why two hours outdoors daily may prevent myopia 2:35:06 - Why Andrew recommends limiting alcohol to 0-2 drinks per week 2:43:09 - How alcohol affects the dopamine and serotonin systems 2:48:47 - Treating ADHD with drugs, supplements, & behaviors 2:53:30 - Why studies on school start age suggest ADHD is overdiagnosed 3:00:00 - Andrew's weekly workout routine 3:13:14 - Why a disciplined life is not a deprived life 3:05:43 - Andrew's diet & why his dinners are higher in carbs 3:06:39 - The science of the physiological sigh3:07:34 - Andrew's supplement routine 3:10:00 - Andrew's experimentation with peptides 3:15:10 - How Andrew processes sometimes negative feedback 3:20:30 - The volatility of interacting with internet crowds

Dr. Rhonda Patrick

333,877 次观看 • 2 年前

$Tom Crawshaw has been building automations for 9 years with $25 million in client revenue to his name. He just walked me through his Claude Code content system that's generating millions of views and tens of thousands of followers. Here's what I learned: 1. Skills beat Projects in Claude. Projects load every context file on every message and burn your token window. Skills work like a book where the LLM reads the table of contents and pulls only the chapter it needs for the job. Same context, fraction of the tokens. 2. He has a /content-create slash command that runs the entire pipeline. Voice profile, copywriting principles, hook generation, image direction. One command. He doesn't write anything from scratch anymore. 3. His voice profile auto-updates weekly. He wrote a script that hits the X API every 7 days, pulls his top-performing posts by engagement, and rewrites his voice profile based on what's actually working. The profile evolves on its own. 4. He distilled a master copywriter's entire body of work into a single markdown file. Grabbed every Alen Sultanic post he could find, dropped it into Claude, asked for the core principles, fed it into the skill. Now every post he writes runs through those principles automatically. 5. The hook generator scores 16 hooks per post against 7 criteria. Curiosity loops, specificity, sensory, credibility, voice match, and a couple of others. He never picks the #1 by default. Sometimes he splices the first line of one hook with the body of another. The taste is still his. 6. /insights is a native Claude Code command nobody talks about. It analyzes every session you've ever run and produces a full report on your usage patterns, where things break down, and prompts you can paste back into Claude to fix them. I had never heard of it. I'm running it tonight. 7. He spends most of his time on hooks and images. If those two suck, the body copy doesn't matter. Nobody reads it. 8. Image generation is never one-shot. He keeps a folder of reference images that have worked before and feeds them into Nano Banana/GPT Image 2 every time. Then he takes the 80-90% output and finishes it in Canva using "magic grab" to move logos and clean up text. Last mile is human every time. 9. The humanizer step is non-negotiable. Strip em dashes. Kill the "it's not X, it's Y" pattern. Cut the triple negatives. Cut "no fluff." He still has to remind Claude mid-session because it drifts. If you're not auditing for AI tells, you're shipping slop. 10. Wisprflow is the most important tool in his stack. Not a content tool. An everything tool. His test for whether you should be using it: do you talk faster than you type? You do. Everyone does. Bonus fact he dropped: QWERTY was designed 200 years ago to slow typing down so old typewriters wouldn't jam. We've been carrying that forward ever since. Voice is finally undoing it. This was an inside look at how a serious operator Tom is using Claude Code to run a content engine. The good, the bad, the iteration, all of it. I hope you enjoy this one as much as I did. Go watch it.$

Tom Crawshaw has been building automations for 9 years with $25 million in client revenue to his name. He just walked me through his Claude Code content system that's generating millions of views and tens of thousands of followers. Here's what I learned: 1. Skills beat Projects in Claude. Projects load every context file on every message and burn your token window. Skills work like a book where the LLM reads the table of contents and pulls only the chapter it needs for the job. Same context, fraction of the tokens. 2. He has a /content-create slash command that runs the entire pipeline. Voice profile, copywriting principles, hook generation, image direction. One command. He doesn't write anything from scratch anymore. 3. His voice profile auto-updates weekly. He wrote a script that hits the X API every 7 days, pulls his top-performing posts by engagement, and rewrites his voice profile based on what's actually working. The profile evolves on its own. 4. He distilled a master copywriter's entire body of work into a single markdown file. Grabbed every Alen Sultanic post he could find, dropped it into Claude, asked for the core principles, fed it into the skill. Now every post he writes runs through those principles automatically. 5. The hook generator scores 16 hooks per post against 7 criteria. Curiosity loops, specificity, sensory, credibility, voice match, and a couple of others. He never picks the #1 by default. Sometimes he splices the first line of one hook with the body of another. The taste is still his. 6. /insights is a native Claude Code command nobody talks about. It analyzes every session you've ever run and produces a full report on your usage patterns, where things break down, and prompts you can paste back into Claude to fix them. I had never heard of it. I'm running it tonight. 7. He spends most of his time on hooks and images. If those two suck, the body copy doesn't matter. Nobody reads it. 8. Image generation is never one-shot. He keeps a folder of reference images that have worked before and feeds them into Nano Banana/GPT Image 2 every time. Then he takes the 80-90% output and finishes it in Canva using "magic grab" to move logos and clean up text. Last mile is human every time. 9. The humanizer step is non-negotiable. Strip em dashes. Kill the "it's not X, it's Y" pattern. Cut the triple negatives. Cut "no fluff." He still has to remind Claude mid-session because it drifts. If you're not auditing for AI tells, you're shipping slop. 10. Wisprflow is the most important tool in his stack. Not a content tool. An everything tool. His test for whether you should be using it: do you talk faster than you type? You do. Everyone does. Bonus fact he dropped: QWERTY was designed 200 years ago to slow typing down so old typewriters wouldn't jam. We've been carrying that forward ever since. Voice is finally undoing it. This was an inside look at how a serious operator Tom is using Claude Code to run a content engine. The good, the bad, the iteration, all of it. I hope you enjoy this one as much as I did. Go watch it.

Corey Ganim

36,120 次观看 • 3 个月前

No football has made timeline a bit boring. Let’s talk about Real Madrid. Been watching our CWC games and I’ve noticed some stuffs: 1. GULER - Guler is a vital part of our progress going into the season. He’d be so crucial in possession, but you see out of possession, he has loads of work to do. He leaves loopholes a alot. Pressing means some players will follow opponents around and sometimes CM will find themselves in the CB position, you have to act like a CB when you get there and not just leave, Guler was a bit faulty In that aspect. The video shows what I’m talking about. 2. Vini - After the first game, Vini actually pressed better from time to time in next matches, but there were few times he was walking, I’m guessing cause he was tired, I feel like he slowed his personal training down, so pressing for longer period might be a lot to him, but he has to do the work. Lastly, people thinking they should bench Vini instead of Garcia are not real. Two reasons why the coach should not try that: i. Vini is more deadly when he plays the central position than LW, yes he’s deadly on the wings, but when it comes to scoring, central is where he gets the goals. That’s where he had a Ballon D’or winning season. He’s more deadly there, playing LW makes him lazy sometimes and we know he isn’t on his day. I feel he also needs to forget about being the number one in the club, not because he can’t but because it affects his game. Just play your game, it will come if it is yours. ii. There’s really no need rushing Gonzalo Garcia, it can affect his growth, being a starter in the biggest club in the world comes with different pressure. Yes, he had a good CWC and everyone is praising him, you don’t want to know what happens when things don’t go well. I believe he should come from the bench so he can grow properly. What’s your opinion so far?!

No football has made timeline a bit boring. Let’s talk about Real Madrid. Been watching our CWC games and I’ve noticed some stuffs: 1. GULER - Guler is a vital part of our progress going into the season. He’d be so crucial in possession, but you see out of possession, he has loads of work to do. He leaves loopholes a alot. Pressing means some players will follow opponents around and sometimes CM will find themselves in the CB position, you have to act like a CB when you get there and not just leave, Guler was a bit faulty In that aspect. The video shows what I’m talking about. 2. Vini - After the first game, Vini actually pressed better from time to time in next matches, but there were few times he was walking, I’m guessing cause he was tired, I feel like he slowed his personal training down, so pressing for longer period might be a lot to him, but he has to do the work. Lastly, people thinking they should bench Vini instead of Garcia are not real. Two reasons why the coach should not try that: i. Vini is more deadly when he plays the central position than LW, yes he’s deadly on the wings, but when it comes to scoring, central is where he gets the goals. That’s where he had a Ballon D’or winning season. He’s more deadly there, playing LW makes him lazy sometimes and we know he isn’t on his day. I feel he also needs to forget about being the number one in the club, not because he can’t but because it affects his game. Just play your game, it will come if it is yours. ii. There’s really no need rushing Gonzalo Garcia, it can affect his growth, being a starter in the biggest club in the world comes with different pressure. Yes, he had a good CWC and everyone is praising him, you don’t want to know what happens when things don’t go well. I believe he should come from the bench so he can grow properly. What’s your opinion so far?!

Ngozi

19,587 次观看 • 1 年前

We are thinking of robots all wrong. Why a $1,500 robot is far more important to buy than a $20,000 one. And why it will pay for itself within a year. First of all, for the last eight years I've been a Silicon Valley housewife. Picking the kids up from school. Doing a variety of tasks taking care of them from feeding them to laundry. And I've already bought a $20,000 Neo from 1X and have built the most complete list on X of the robotics industry. Just to set the tone for this conversation. We must ask ourselves "what is the goal of a robot?" before we go into why typical American homeowners might want one, and shell out quite a bit of money for one, like the Neo. I grew up in Silicon Valley back when it was all orchards and the farmers taught me "pick the low hanging fruit first." What is the low hanging fruit in the American home? Laundry? Cleaning the toilets or your home? Watering the plants? Bringing you a beer? Nope. It is the preparation of food. Yesterday I got a new Posha robot, and the attached video with founder Raghav Gupta gets into depth about what the $1,500 robot does. Cooks meals. Far more time in the home is spent cooking meals than the other tasks and is far more complex than, say, folding laundry. But there is something I think everyone is missing in the discussion of robots: "what is the goal?" I've been doing consumer research talking with many around the world about these things. People tend to have a few goals: 1. Improve their lives. 2. Save them time. 3. Save them money. 4. Enable a new business. What is the best way to improve your life? Upgrade your food. This is very hard to do when both parents in a family are working their butts off to try to improve their careers. It gets worse when a single parent is trying to keep everything going. How many times have you decided to go out to eat rather than spend an hour cooking food? Doing that for a family of four in Silicon Valley costs $100+. And guarantees your family will overeat. I've done that many times while raising my kids, and often I can't say no when desert comes around. It gets worse if you take the easy route out at home. Put a pre-processed meal into the microwave, or heat up a frozen pizza. Horrible for everyone's health. But what if you could have a robot at home that cooks your meals? Then costs go down to less than $20 and ingredients get way way better. It gets worse when you consider a $20,000 humanoid. They aren't safe enough to trust around stoves yet. And their hands aren't yet dexterous enough to do that. I doubt my Neo will be allowed to cook meals over an open flame, and if so I will have to watch it to make sure it doesn't do anything wrong. (The Neo that arrives next year will be teleoperated by a human remotely and the risks that person does something, or misses oil catching on fire is just way too high). While neither robot will be able to do all food preparation (cutting chicken up into cubes, or cutting carrots or other fruits, for instance) this robot dramatically reduces the time needed for a human to make a meal and dramatically reduces the costs to do so. And, as we discuss in the video, when the Neo does arrive the Neo will be able to use this machine too, reducing time even more (and will be able to set the table and wash the dishes, saving even more time so you can answer more emails or learn more AI programs or, even, pay attention to your kids and give them a few more minutes of quality time). The robot industry should focus on the low hanging fruit first. Cooking meals is the biggest one to improve your life, save you time, and make your family healthier. It's why I bought one. And they actually make two: Your money is way better spent getting one of these than buying a humanoid. And if you do get a humanoid, like I am, they go together like peanut butter and jelly. ⚪️ sierra catalina has been saying this for years that our focus on humanoids is overblown and that specialized robots (you see my Matic Robots in the background to prove this point) are way better for most families.

We are thinking of robots all wrong. Why a $1,500 robot is far more important to buy than a $20,000 one. And why it will pay for itself within a year. First of all, for the last eight years I've been a Silicon Valley housewife. Picking the kids up from school. Doing a variety of tasks taking care of them from feeding them to laundry. And I've already bought a $20,000 Neo from 1X and have built the most complete list on X of the robotics industry. Just to set the tone for this conversation. We must ask ourselves "what is the goal of a robot?" before we go into why typical American homeowners might want one, and shell out quite a bit of money for one, like the Neo. I grew up in Silicon Valley back when it was all orchards and the farmers taught me "pick the low hanging fruit first." What is the low hanging fruit in the American home? Laundry? Cleaning the toilets or your home? Watering the plants? Bringing you a beer? Nope. It is the preparation of food. Yesterday I got a new Posha robot, and the attached video with founder Raghav Gupta gets into depth about what the $1,500 robot does. Cooks meals. Far more time in the home is spent cooking meals than the other tasks and is far more complex than, say, folding laundry. But there is something I think everyone is missing in the discussion of robots: "what is the goal?" I've been doing consumer research talking with many around the world about these things. People tend to have a few goals: 1. Improve their lives. 2. Save them time. 3. Save them money. 4. Enable a new business. What is the best way to improve your life? Upgrade your food. This is very hard to do when both parents in a family are working their butts off to try to improve their careers. It gets worse when a single parent is trying to keep everything going. How many times have you decided to go out to eat rather than spend an hour cooking food? Doing that for a family of four in Silicon Valley costs $100+. And guarantees your family will overeat. I've done that many times while raising my kids, and often I can't say no when desert comes around. It gets worse if you take the easy route out at home. Put a pre-processed meal into the microwave, or heat up a frozen pizza. Horrible for everyone's health. But what if you could have a robot at home that cooks your meals? Then costs go down to less than $20 and ingredients get way way better. It gets worse when you consider a $20,000 humanoid. They aren't safe enough to trust around stoves yet. And their hands aren't yet dexterous enough to do that. I doubt my Neo will be allowed to cook meals over an open flame, and if so I will have to watch it to make sure it doesn't do anything wrong. (The Neo that arrives next year will be teleoperated by a human remotely and the risks that person does something, or misses oil catching on fire is just way too high). While neither robot will be able to do all food preparation (cutting chicken up into cubes, or cutting carrots or other fruits, for instance) this robot dramatically reduces the time needed for a human to make a meal and dramatically reduces the costs to do so. And, as we discuss in the video, when the Neo does arrive the Neo will be able to use this machine too, reducing time even more (and will be able to set the table and wash the dishes, saving even more time so you can answer more emails or learn more AI programs or, even, pay attention to your kids and give them a few more minutes of quality time). The robot industry should focus on the low hanging fruit first. Cooking meals is the biggest one to improve your life, save you time, and make your family healthier. It's why I bought one. And they actually make two: Your money is way better spent getting one of these than buying a humanoid. And if you do get a humanoid, like I am, they go together like peanut butter and jelly. ⚪️ sierra catalina has been saying this for years that our focus on humanoids is overblown and that specialized robots (you see my Matic Robots in the background to prove this point) are way better for most families.

Robert Scoble

178,294 次观看 • 8 个月前

Q: How do you build a great company? In the clip below, Sam Altman walks through 9 things he has seen the best founders do: #1 Get to know your users really well “The best founders do customer support themselves. They go visit their users—in the case of Airbnb they go live with them. You want to get to know your users really really well.” #2 Have a short cycle time & understand compound growth “The cycle here is basically: talk to customer to understand pain point → build product to address that → get product in front of user → see what they do → repeat cycle. This cycle is how you iterate and improve. The law of compound growth being what it is: if you can get 2% better every iteration cycle, your iteration cycle is every four hours rather than every four weeks, and you compound that over the course of a few years, you’ll be in a very very different place. Make it one of your top goals to build one of the fastest iterating companies the world has ever seen.” #3 Make a long-term commitment “Most companies have a 2-3 year time horizon. But companies are almost always a 10 year project if they work. If you think about it that way from the very beginning, you will make very different and much better decisions. I think this is the only arbitrage opportunity left in the market. Almost no one makes a fairly long-term commitment to a new project. But if you do that, you will think in a different way, you will hire different people, and it will work very well.” #4 Stay lean until everything is working really well “In the early days, when you’re experimenting and zig zagging, you’re like a fast little speed boat and want to be able to turn the whole company on a dime. You can’t do that if you’re a big company—cash burn aside, which is another problem. The flexibility of the company basically decreases with the square of the number of employees, so you want to stay really small until you’re sure things are working. Once things are working, then you can get really big.” #5 Resist the urge to hire; especially resist the urge to hire mediocre people “Vinod Khosla has a saying that I love: ‘the team you build is the company you build.’ This is really true and I never appreciated how true this was for a long time. If you build a team of great people and you have a product that people love, you’ll have a 90%+ chance of success. Those are both really hard to do, and they’re independent variables. But don’t ignore the team component. The best CEOs I know spend huge amounts of their time recruiting and retaining good talent.” #6 Relentless execution “You have to keep going, and do things perfectly, and get all of the details right. You have to care too much about every experience that a customer has with your company.” #7 Startups are about not giving up “One of the very best companies in the last YC batch applied 7 times before they got in. This is just a version of what happens in startups all of the time: you get beat down, again, and again, and again. And that last time when you get pushed down and don’t think you have enough energy to get back up—that’s the time it actually works. This is what you sign up for if you’re going to start a startup.” #8 Fiduciary duty to take care of yourself “This is a 10-year marathon and you have a fiduciary duty to your shareholders to take care of yourself. Some people treat startups like an all-nighter: they don’t take care of their health, they don’t sleep, they don’t maintain their personal relationships. It is true that startups are a bad choice for work-life balance. But you have a duty to yourself, your team, and your investors to take care of yourself.” #9 Clear mission “You don’t have to figure this out on Day 1, but all of the most successful startups I’ve been fortunate enough to be a part of pretty quickly—in the first one to two years—figure out a really important mission. It’s this mission that gets people to join them. It drives the founders. It gets the media to write about them. And even if you start off building a project that’s just interesting to you and solves a problem in your life—which is how you should start—remember that you should have a clear mission at some point… That is what will convince people to come help you, and that is how you will build this idea into a huge company with a ton of people that really love your product.” Follow Startup Archive for more tactical startup advice!

Q: How do you build a great company? In the clip below, Sam Altman walks through 9 things he has seen the best founders do: #1 Get to know your users really well “The best founders do customer support themselves. They go visit their users—in the case of Airbnb they go live with them. You want to get to know your users really really well.” #2 Have a short cycle time & understand compound growth “The cycle here is basically: talk to customer to understand pain point → build product to address that → get product in front of user → see what they do → repeat cycle. This cycle is how you iterate and improve. The law of compound growth being what it is: if you can get 2% better every iteration cycle, your iteration cycle is every four hours rather than every four weeks, and you compound that over the course of a few years, you’ll be in a very very different place. Make it one of your top goals to build one of the fastest iterating companies the world has ever seen.” #3 Make a long-term commitment “Most companies have a 2-3 year time horizon. But companies are almost always a 10 year project if they work. If you think about it that way from the very beginning, you will make very different and much better decisions. I think this is the only arbitrage opportunity left in the market. Almost no one makes a fairly long-term commitment to a new project. But if you do that, you will think in a different way, you will hire different people, and it will work very well.” #4 Stay lean until everything is working really well “In the early days, when you’re experimenting and zig zagging, you’re like a fast little speed boat and want to be able to turn the whole company on a dime. You can’t do that if you’re a big company—cash burn aside, which is another problem. The flexibility of the company basically decreases with the square of the number of employees, so you want to stay really small until you’re sure things are working. Once things are working, then you can get really big.” #5 Resist the urge to hire; especially resist the urge to hire mediocre people “Vinod Khosla has a saying that I love: ‘the team you build is the company you build.’ This is really true and I never appreciated how true this was for a long time. If you build a team of great people and you have a product that people love, you’ll have a 90%+ chance of success. Those are both really hard to do, and they’re independent variables. But don’t ignore the team component. The best CEOs I know spend huge amounts of their time recruiting and retaining good talent.” #6 Relentless execution “You have to keep going, and do things perfectly, and get all of the details right. You have to care too much about every experience that a customer has with your company.” #7 Startups are about not giving up “One of the very best companies in the last YC batch applied 7 times before they got in. This is just a version of what happens in startups all of the time: you get beat down, again, and again, and again. And that last time when you get pushed down and don’t think you have enough energy to get back up—that’s the time it actually works. This is what you sign up for if you’re going to start a startup.” #8 Fiduciary duty to take care of yourself “This is a 10-year marathon and you have a fiduciary duty to your shareholders to take care of yourself. Some people treat startups like an all-nighter: they don’t take care of their health, they don’t sleep, they don’t maintain their personal relationships. It is true that startups are a bad choice for work-life balance. But you have a duty to yourself, your team, and your investors to take care of yourself.” #9 Clear mission “You don’t have to figure this out on Day 1, but all of the most successful startups I’ve been fortunate enough to be a part of pretty quickly—in the first one to two years—figure out a really important mission. It’s this mission that gets people to join them. It drives the founders. It gets the media to write about them. And even if you start off building a project that’s just interesting to you and solves a problem in your life—which is how you should start—remember that you should have a clear mission at some point… That is what will convince people to come help you, and that is how you will build this idea into a huge company with a ton of people that really love your product.” Follow Startup Archive for more tactical startup advice!

Startup Archive

407,717 次观看 • 2 年前

Q: How do you build a great company? In the clip below, Sam Altman walks through 9 things he has seen the best founders do: #1 Get to know your users really well “The best founders do customer support themselves. They go visit their users—in the case of Airbnb they go live with them. You want to get to know your users really really well.” #2 Have a short cycle time & understand compound growth “The cycle here is basically: talk to customer to understand pain point → build product to address that → get product in front of user → see what they do → repeat cycle. This cycle is how you iterate and improve. The law of compound growth being what it is: if you can get 2% better every iteration cycle, your iteration cycle is every four hours rather than every four weeks, and you compound that over the course of a few years, you’ll be in a very very different place. Make it one of your top goals to build one of the fastest iterating companies the world has ever seen.” #3 Make a long-term commitment “Most companies have a 2-3 year time horizon. But companies are almost always a 10 year project if they work. If you think about it that way from the very beginning, you will make very different and much better decisions. I think this is the only arbitrage opportunity left in the market. Almost no one makes a fairly long-term commitment to a new project. But if you do that, you will think in a different way, you will hire different people, and it will work very well.” #4 Stay lean until everything is working really well “In the early days, when you’re experimenting and zig zagging, you’re like a fast little speed boat and want to be able to turn the whole company on a dime. You can’t do that if you’re a big company—cash burn aside, which is another problem. The flexibility of the company basically decreases with the square of the number of employees, so you want to stay really small until you’re sure things are working. Once things are working, then you can get really big.” #5 Resist the urge to hire; especially resist the urge to hire mediocre people “Vinod Khosla has a saying that I love: ‘the team you build is the company you build.’ This is really true and I never appreciated how true this was for a long time. If you build a team of great people and you have a product that people love, you’ll have a 90%+ chance of success. Those are both really hard to do, and they’re independent variables. But don’t ignore the team component. The best CEOs I know spend huge amounts of their time recruiting and retaining good talent.” #6 Relentless execution “You have to keep going, and do things perfectly, and get all of the details right. You have to care too much about every experience that a customer has with your company.” #7 Startups are about not giving up “One of the very best companies in the last YC batch applied 7 times before they got in. This is just a version of what happens in startups all of the time: you get beat down, again, and again, and again. And that last time when you get pushed down and don’t think you have enough energy to get back up—that’s the time it actually works. This is what you sign up for if you’re going to start a startup.” #8 Fiduciary duty to take care of yourself “This is a 10 year marathon and you have a fiduciary duty to your shareholders to take care of yourself. Some people treat startups like an all-nighter: they don’t take care of their health, they don’t sleep, they don’t maintain their personal relationships. It is true that startups are a bad choice for work-life balance. But you have a duty to yourself, your team, and your investors to take care of yourself.” #9 Clear mission “You don’t have to figure this out on Day 1, but all of the most successful startups I’ve been fortunate enough to be a part of pretty quickly—in the first one to two years—figure out a really important mission. It’s this mission that gets people to join them. It drives the founders. It gets the media to write about them. And even if you start off building a project that’s just interesting to you and solves a problem in your life—which is how you should start—remember that you should have a clear mission at some point… That is what will convince people to come help you, and that is how you will build this idea into a huge company with a ton of people that really love your product.”

Q: How do you build a great company? In the clip below, Sam Altman walks through 9 things he has seen the best founders do: #1 Get to know your users really well “The best founders do customer support themselves. They go visit their users—in the case of Airbnb they go live with them. You want to get to know your users really really well.” #2 Have a short cycle time & understand compound growth “The cycle here is basically: talk to customer to understand pain point → build product to address that → get product in front of user → see what they do → repeat cycle. This cycle is how you iterate and improve. The law of compound growth being what it is: if you can get 2% better every iteration cycle, your iteration cycle is every four hours rather than every four weeks, and you compound that over the course of a few years, you’ll be in a very very different place. Make it one of your top goals to build one of the fastest iterating companies the world has ever seen.” #3 Make a long-term commitment “Most companies have a 2-3 year time horizon. But companies are almost always a 10 year project if they work. If you think about it that way from the very beginning, you will make very different and much better decisions. I think this is the only arbitrage opportunity left in the market. Almost no one makes a fairly long-term commitment to a new project. But if you do that, you will think in a different way, you will hire different people, and it will work very well.” #4 Stay lean until everything is working really well “In the early days, when you’re experimenting and zig zagging, you’re like a fast little speed boat and want to be able to turn the whole company on a dime. You can’t do that if you’re a big company—cash burn aside, which is another problem. The flexibility of the company basically decreases with the square of the number of employees, so you want to stay really small until you’re sure things are working. Once things are working, then you can get really big.” #5 Resist the urge to hire; especially resist the urge to hire mediocre people “Vinod Khosla has a saying that I love: ‘the team you build is the company you build.’ This is really true and I never appreciated how true this was for a long time. If you build a team of great people and you have a product that people love, you’ll have a 90%+ chance of success. Those are both really hard to do, and they’re independent variables. But don’t ignore the team component. The best CEOs I know spend huge amounts of their time recruiting and retaining good talent.” #6 Relentless execution “You have to keep going, and do things perfectly, and get all of the details right. You have to care too much about every experience that a customer has with your company.” #7 Startups are about not giving up “One of the very best companies in the last YC batch applied 7 times before they got in. This is just a version of what happens in startups all of the time: you get beat down, again, and again, and again. And that last time when you get pushed down and don’t think you have enough energy to get back up—that’s the time it actually works. This is what you sign up for if you’re going to start a startup.” #8 Fiduciary duty to take care of yourself “This is a 10 year marathon and you have a fiduciary duty to your shareholders to take care of yourself. Some people treat startups like an all-nighter: they don’t take care of their health, they don’t sleep, they don’t maintain their personal relationships. It is true that startups are a bad choice for work-life balance. But you have a duty to yourself, your team, and your investors to take care of yourself.” #9 Clear mission “You don’t have to figure this out on Day 1, but all of the most successful startups I’ve been fortunate enough to be a part of pretty quickly—in the first one to two years—figure out a really important mission. It’s this mission that gets people to join them. It drives the founders. It gets the media to write about them. And even if you start off building a project that’s just interesting to you and solves a problem in your life—which is how you should start—remember that you should have a clear mission at some point… That is what will convince people to come help you, and that is how you will build this idea into a huge company with a ton of people that really love your product.”

Michael McGuiness

500,098 次观看 • 2 年前

I’m 34. When I was younger, I battled to get sober, had my company raided by the government, traveled the world, and started multiple 8-figure companies. 11 lessons for 20-year-old Matt: 1. Prioritize Nature Nature's been my biggest mentor and therapist. Getting outside daily, taking my shoes off, and grounding myself has brought infinite stability to my life. 2. Never Stop Building Your Network Over the years, I've created a personal Board of Advisors. Some of my closest friends are killers across sales, writing, YouTube, community building, and strategy. I know world-class advice is just a phone call away. 3. Never Compromise Your Ethics In tough decisions where blurring the lines is an option, choose moral. NEVER compromise your ethics. It'll affect you in subconscious ways you never imagined. 4. Be Boring A lot of success comes from just saying no to cheap dopamine. And instead, focusing on the mundane: • Maximizing sleep • Guarding time for workouts • Not eating out in favor of your nutritious diet Boring's not a bad word when you're on the up. 5. Become a Self-Starter The fastest way to grow your career: Find your bosses' pain points and solve them without being asked. You put yourself on the radar - and train your entrepreneurial muscle for when you need it. 6. Learn Storytelling Early Sales, hiring, marketing - it's all storytelling. It's the highest intangible ROI skill you can learn. The first step: Study storytelling frameworks and the 7 fundamental human emotions. 7. Be Humble However hard it is on your ego, you need to swallow your pride every damn day. It's how you'll take criticism better, know when to ask for help, and know when to cut your losses. Grasping onto an image of who you are only limiting what you might become. 8. Never Skip 2 Days With whatever habit you're forming, only skip a maximum of one day. Once you skip two in a row, you've lost momentum. I've found this rule much more practical than 'never miss a day'. 9. Find Your Peak Energy State Keep trying new work environments. Experiment with working at different times. Until you find when you're most energetic, at ease, and productive. That's your competitive advantage. 10. Embrace Compounding Aim to get 1% better everyday - and be 37x better by the end of the year. It's a simple mindset hack that'll bring you a world of joy down the line. All you need is consistency. 11. Never Feel Sorry for Yourself Embrace the suck and use it as fuel to level up. You're not a victim - don't get in the habit of thinking you are one. That's a surefire way to never achieve anything. It's simple: if you've chosen the wrong road, go back and find the right one. Check out my new video below, where I break down 15 years of business experience into 11 actionable life lessons.

I’m 34. When I was younger, I battled to get sober, had my company raided by the government, traveled the world, and started multiple 8-figure companies. 11 lessons for 20-year-old Matt: 1. Prioritize Nature Nature's been my biggest mentor and therapist. Getting outside daily, taking my shoes off, and grounding myself has brought infinite stability to my life. 2. Never Stop Building Your Network Over the years, I've created a personal Board of Advisors. Some of my closest friends are killers across sales, writing, YouTube, community building, and strategy. I know world-class advice is just a phone call away. 3. Never Compromise Your Ethics In tough decisions where blurring the lines is an option, choose moral. NEVER compromise your ethics. It'll affect you in subconscious ways you never imagined. 4. Be Boring A lot of success comes from just saying no to cheap dopamine. And instead, focusing on the mundane: • Maximizing sleep • Guarding time for workouts • Not eating out in favor of your nutritious diet Boring's not a bad word when you're on the up. 5. Become a Self-Starter The fastest way to grow your career: Find your bosses' pain points and solve them without being asked. You put yourself on the radar - and train your entrepreneurial muscle for when you need it. 6. Learn Storytelling Early Sales, hiring, marketing - it's all storytelling. It's the highest intangible ROI skill you can learn. The first step: Study storytelling frameworks and the 7 fundamental human emotions. 7. Be Humble However hard it is on your ego, you need to swallow your pride every damn day. It's how you'll take criticism better, know when to ask for help, and know when to cut your losses. Grasping onto an image of who you are only limiting what you might become. 8. Never Skip 2 Days With whatever habit you're forming, only skip a maximum of one day. Once you skip two in a row, you've lost momentum. I've found this rule much more practical than 'never miss a day'. 9. Find Your Peak Energy State Keep trying new work environments. Experiment with working at different times. Until you find when you're most energetic, at ease, and productive. That's your competitive advantage. 10. Embrace Compounding Aim to get 1% better everyday - and be 37x better by the end of the year. It's a simple mindset hack that'll bring you a world of joy down the line. All you need is consistency. 11. Never Feel Sorry for Yourself Embrace the suck and use it as fuel to level up. You're not a victim - don't get in the habit of thinking you are one. That's a surefire way to never achieve anything. It's simple: if you've chosen the wrong road, go back and find the right one. Check out my new video below, where I break down 15 years of business experience into 11 actionable life lessons.

MATT GRAY

39,157 次观看 • 2 年前

THEORY: Did Fanatics’ launch of stitched NFL jerseys for 30 teams reveal 2 teams planning new uniform redesigns in 2027? Connecting the drop with facts & rumors about why the Saints & Dolphins *could* be working on new primary uniforms! 🎥👇 I transcribed my video below, but the key points to consider: - I’m not reporting a redesign, but those I could reach today said my theory makes sense - Prior to this, there was already enough signs & smoke around the Dolphins & Saints considering new uniforms - The 2026 season has been locked since before the 2025 season, this is for 2027 - No one made a mistake, this is just a product of the long uniform process TRANSCRIPT (for those who like to read 😉): I think I might have uncovered something pretty big. You might know I love talking about jerseys, uniforms, sports design, especially in football. And occasionally, I like to report a little news, break some news I find out. Well, yesterday, Fanatics officially announced what I reported back in October, that they're bringing back stitched jerseys for NFL jerseys. But I didn't get excited and start connecting some dots until I noticed that they didn't drop the stitched jerseys for every NFL team. There are two missing. And it got me thinking about everything I've ever reported and said, all my videos I've ever made, and it specifically brought me to three key facts. Fact 1: teams work on new uniform designs for multiple years. My talks and videos with the Falcons and Ravens confirm this. The reason for this, among many reasons, they need to let manufacturers know ahead of time to get the proper materials and to prepare the new designs, both the new ones and to wind down existing ones. Fact 2: that does impact distributors. Retailers are notified as early as a year out to stop ordering and selling certain jerseys if new ones will be replacing it because they don't want to be sitting there with a bunch of unsold jerseys. That brings me to Fact 3. We know that Fanatics has been the NFL's official manufacturer and distributor, the exclusive one, since 2018. Well, the two teams that did not have stitched jerseys dropped with the rest of the league? My Dolphins and the Saints. Now I want to be clear real quick: Fanatics did not mess up. They did not make a mistake. They were simply following the long-winding uniform process that multiple parties are involved in. So why does this raise flags in me that the Saints and Dolphins could be getting new uniforms in 2027? Again, we know how long the process is, but there have been multiple reports about whispers within the Saints organization about new uniform and considerations, possible changes And back in April 2025, when I first reported the Dolphins having internal and external interest in a dark uniform, they also had interest in an orange uniform. So both teams having some whispers, some reported discussions about new uniforms does tell me maybe there is fire with this smoke. And also importantly, I feel like most Dolphins and Saints fans have wanted new uniforms for a while now. Maybe the organizations are listening. Now, I'm not confirming anything. And all of this, I guess, could be a moot point if the Saints and Dolphins quickly drop stitched jerseys for retail… unless we find out it was a rushed reactionary process. Once again, I'm just connecting the dots, but what do you want to see?

THEORY: Did Fanatics’ launch of stitched NFL jerseys for 30 teams reveal 2 teams planning new uniform redesigns in 2027? Connecting the drop with facts & rumors about why the Saints & Dolphins could be working on new primary uniforms! 🎥👇 I transcribed my video below, but the key points to consider: - I’m not reporting a redesign, but those I could reach today said my theory makes sense - Prior to this, there was already enough signs & smoke around the Dolphins & Saints considering new uniforms - The 2026 season has been locked since before the 2025 season, this is for 2027 - No one made a mistake, this is just a product of the long uniform process TRANSCRIPT (for those who like to read 😉): I think I might have uncovered something pretty big. You might know I love talking about jerseys, uniforms, sports design, especially in football. And occasionally, I like to report a little news, break some news I find out. Well, yesterday, Fanatics officially announced what I reported back in October, that they're bringing back stitched jerseys for NFL jerseys. But I didn't get excited and start connecting some dots until I noticed that they didn't drop the stitched jerseys for every NFL team. There are two missing. And it got me thinking about everything I've ever reported and said, all my videos I've ever made, and it specifically brought me to three key facts. Fact 1: teams work on new uniform designs for multiple years. My talks and videos with the Falcons and Ravens confirm this. The reason for this, among many reasons, they need to let manufacturers know ahead of time to get the proper materials and to prepare the new designs, both the new ones and to wind down existing ones. Fact 2: that does impact distributors. Retailers are notified as early as a year out to stop ordering and selling certain jerseys if new ones will be replacing it because they don't want to be sitting there with a bunch of unsold jerseys. That brings me to Fact 3. We know that Fanatics has been the NFL's official manufacturer and distributor, the exclusive one, since 2018. Well, the two teams that did not have stitched jerseys dropped with the rest of the league? My Dolphins and the Saints. Now I want to be clear real quick: Fanatics did not mess up. They did not make a mistake. They were simply following the long-winding uniform process that multiple parties are involved in. So why does this raise flags in me that the Saints and Dolphins could be getting new uniforms in 2027? Again, we know how long the process is, but there have been multiple reports about whispers within the Saints organization about new uniform and considerations, possible changes And back in April 2025, when I first reported the Dolphins having internal and external interest in a dark uniform, they also had interest in an orange uniform. So both teams having some whispers, some reported discussions about new uniforms does tell me maybe there is fire with this smoke. And also importantly, I feel like most Dolphins and Saints fans have wanted new uniforms for a while now. Maybe the organizations are listening. Now, I'm not confirming anything. And all of this, I guess, could be a moot point if the Saints and Dolphins quickly drop stitched jerseys for retail… unless we find out it was a rushed reactionary process. Once again, I'm just connecting the dots, but what do you want to see?

Zach Cohen

200,601 次观看 • 1 个月前