Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

“𝙒𝙃𝙊 𝘾𝘼𝙍𝙀𝙎 𝘼𝘽𝙊𝙐𝙏 𝙏𝙃𝙀 𝙎𝘾𝙃𝙀𝘿𝙐𝙇𝙀… 𝙂𝙤 𝙢𝙖𝙠𝙚 𝙖 𝙣𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙮𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙨𝙚𝙡𝙫𝙚𝙨.” - F L ⚡️ S H What are YOUR expectations for #Badgers Football heading into training camp?

14,799 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

5 Comments

EILERS's profile picture
EILERS1 year ago

@Melvingordon25 @JimMattMolly @MollyBrownESPN @_JesseNelson @KrissyBirdsall Agreed Melvin. Schedule is tough. Be tougher. No excuses. Win some games. Let’s ride.

baller007's profile picture
baller0071 year ago

@Melvingordon25 @JimMattMolly @MollyBrownESPN @_JesseNelson @KrissyBirdsall I love this dude

Antonio Blundetto's profile picture
Antonio Blundetto1 year ago

@Melvingordon25 @JimMattMolly @MollyBrownESPN @_JesseNelson @KrissyBirdsall UW will have 3 wins this season. 3 Don't be surprised when they win 3 games.

Mike Reed's profile picture
Mike Reed1 year ago

@Wi_Recruiting @Melvingordon25 @JimMattMolly @MollyBrownESPN @_JesseNelson @KrissyBirdsall

diddy's profile picture
diddy1 year ago

@Melvingordon25 @JimMattMolly @MollyBrownESPN @_JesseNelson @KrissyBirdsall Nice golf course :)

Related Videos

Hilda Baci, live. Seyi Vibez, I have come to the realize that you and Shalipopi are f@ol!sh and irr@ti@nal. What business do I have if you having a misund£rst@nding with Dapper? How would I possibly know if Dapper has been mis@ppr@pr!ating your funds? What exactly do I owe you? Why are you dr@gg!ng my name into the public space? Was I present when you and Dapper entered into a business agreement? Why are you att@cking me without provoc@t!on? Are you aware that I have the full l£gal right to sent£nce you to j@il? If Dapper gifted me a car, how does that connect to all£g@ti@ns that he is taking your money? It is evid£nt that your village people are at work, because I am certain your mother regr£ts having a son like you. Yes, I underwent a BBL, and it was funded by Dapper’s money. If the i$sue of BBL troubl£s you, I suggest you advise your us£le$s mother to do the same with your father’s money so that you can leave me alone. Why don’t you leave Dapper alone and focus on your music? You have comp£lled me to address a matter I never intended to involve myself in. I can no longer remain silent. None of your sisters are in my category. I have the financial capacity to sponsor your entire family. I have access to big names in Nigeria, and if I choose to reach out to them you gonna be, sent£nced to life impr!s@nm£nt. Even this matter regarding the BBL could have legal impl!c@tions for you. I continue to r£fer£nce j@il because if you dar£ mention my name again, you will w!tn£ss my next acti@n dapper and I are planning things about you behind the scenes and you gonna see our next st£p.

dangerous baby

12,505 views • 1 month ago

“Wake the F up Joe, It’s time to get better.” Joe Burrow Expectations may be high, but that is nothing new for Cincinnati Bengals Joe Burrow who is ready for it all this NFL season. We didn’t bring our cigars and we wore shirts that had backs, but our conversation didn’t disappoint when you get to sit with one of the coolest and smoothest, who just happens to be one of the NFL’s top quarterbacks- it’s a training camp treat! Joey B is a man of few words, so when he speaks, you better listen. 🫡 Ryan Clark Fred Taylor Channing Crowder chop it up and cover everything on and off the field surrounding the man once deemed the King of the North, looking to get back that title, lead his team deep into the post season & to another Super Bowl. Joe shares his process, giving us a glimpse inside the mindset of one of the best playing the game, ignoring personal criticisms and only answering to his own inner goals. Doing it his way, the LSU tiger turned Cincinnati Bengal has reached high peaks of success early in his NFL career with 2 trips to the AFC Championship and a Super Bowl despite being derailed by injury, but heading into 2024- the QB says he’s back and better than before 👀 Don’t let the slim shady hair and fashion walks fool ya, Joey B is committed, confident and just a guy who loves football...and darn good at it too. Tap into a new episode of our NFL Training Camp Tour in partnership with Fanatics streaming on YouTube and all audio platforms now. #nfl #afc #quarterback #bengals #cincinnati #joeburrow #

Pivot Podcast

214,110 views • 2 years ago

Kevin O’Connell tells Vikings QBs he doesn't care if they throw interceptions in training camp “There are so many things in society, not even just football nowadays, where we want to decide in a moment this guy can or can’t, this guy’s a success or failure. And it’s just not in alignment with the reality of the position or our game.” “Everything should be driven by process, and part of process is failure. Every year in training camp I give my yearly State of the Union on the first practice: ‘Just as a heads up, I’m not going to be commenting on you guys taking your stats every single day. So-and-so went 6-of-11 with two interceptions, and then we chart it for the whole training camp and decide who won or lost this position or quarterback battle.’” “I challenge the quarterbacks all the time: we’re against Brian Flores every day. This is going to be a 10-out-of-10 stress for all of us. There are going to be good days and there are going to be bad days, but I want you to be aggressive with your decision-making.” “How will we know on third-and-eight in Week 12 that you can try to fit a ball in there to Justin Jefferson on a backside in-cut? How will we know if you don’t try to do it now?” “So when you do it now, and you take the proper footwork and try to throw it into a tight window and the ball gets tipped and intercepted, let’s go back and look at it first. I’ve got no problem with the decision. What was your footwork like? Were you in your base, balance, body position? Were you playing on the timing of the play? Did you make the protection call you needed?” “If you did all those things and it was just a blade of grass different from being the best completion you had all day, now you know.” “I can finish up a practice and go to the podium and have people say, ‘So-and-so really struggled today, didn’t you think?’ And I’m like, there’s not enough time in the day for me to explain all the reasons why you’re wrong. We’re going to go in the quarterback room, we’re going to watch it, and we’re going to be better tomorrow.”

Josh Chambers

358,161 views • 1 month ago

Mob Umamusume A: Hey, hey, Rulership and Trainer! Did you hear about the festival? They say it's happening at the nearby shrine starting this evening~♪ Rulership: ...A festival, you say? Rulership in her mind: Not bad. I'm not fond of crowded places, but it's a rare opportunity. Rulership in her mind: Besides... if I share a quintessential summer experience with Trainer, our relationship will surely become rock-solid. Rulership in her mind: Heh... perfect timing on that intel. Given this momentum, naturally...! ---------A FEW MOMENT LATER---------- Late at night, as I was working on my laptop, I noticed Rulership staring at me with a stern expression. Trainer: Huh, is something wrong? Rulership: No... I'm just concerned about you overworking. It'd be trouble if my right-hand man collapsed. Working non-stop since noon drops your efficiency anyway. You should really take a breather. Trainer: A breather, huh. Hmm, I suppose you're right... Rulership: (Hey, why isn't it clicking... don't tell me they forgot about the festival entirely?! Ugh, totally off my script...!) Rulership stares at me with a distinctly moody face. Suddenly, an idea hits me. Trainer: By any chance, were you looking for someone to play video games with? Rulership: That's not it... think more logically! Why can't you figure this out...! Trainer: W-Wait, what...!? Rulership: Look, earlier today... when we were training. Was there really nothing that caught your attention? Trainer: Training? It's not... an injury, is it? Rulership: ~ggggh...! Rulership: Heh... hahaha... What is this? Is this your character trait? Like 'immune to all hints unless shot directly from the front' or something? Trainer: ... Rulership: Aaaaaggh! Fine! F-E-S-T-I-V-A-L! The festival! I'm telling you I want to go! You idiot---!! Trainer: W-Wait, what?! Why all of a sudden...!? Rulership: W-What do you mean 'why'?! Do I need a reason...? Are you really only interested in my running or my gaming skills...? It doesn't even have to be the festival... I just wanted to make memories, you know? It's summer break before training camp...! Let's go together! Come on~! Stunned by her unexpected words, I was completely taken aback. I had assumed she had zero interest. If that's the case... Trainer: You should have just told me! Rulership: ...!

Espy

145,129 views • 2 months ago

MALAYSIA rightly prides itself as an open, trading nation Ever wonder though what are some fun, quirky, unusual items entering 🇲🇾's borders? With a h/t to my sporting Ambassador friends, Comtrade & Fionne Lim, here goes: __________ Argentina Malaysia’s polo fields? Not just for show! 🇦🇷 sends M’sia their prized polo ponies to keep the game strong in Selangor, Johor & beyond __________ Australia Next time you’re munching into some roti canai at ur local mamak, u’re likely munching on a slice of 🇦🇺 Over a million tonnes of Aussie wheat roll into Malaysia each year, making up about 2/3rd of this flaky goodness😋 __________ Austria See an airport fire truck? Likely it’s rolling out from 🇦🇹’s Rosenbauer! __________ Belgium Wonder how Msian chocolates are so smooth? Thank 🇧🇪 for that! Their highly refined rice starch is the secret to the glow up __________ Brazil Brazil’s not just about football—it exports halal beef & chicken to M'sia! Who knew 🇧🇷 would develop such a niche market even from the far side of the globe? __________ China 🇨🇳’s unexpected export to Malaysia? Wigs! Mine just got snatched PS: Gen X/Y … if u don’t get this reference, pls ask your closest Gen Z-er friend 😉 __________ Czech Republic Malaysia’s cats are feasting on “Brit” brand cat food, courtesy of 🇨🇿 __________ Egypt Fresh strawberries in Malaysia? Many come from 🇪🇬...berry surprising! __________ Indonesia Msia’s big in natural gas, but guess what? M’sia also imports LNG from 🇮🇩...keeping it in the nbhd! __________ Italy [warning...another Gen Z ref coming up] 🇮🇹's not just sending over pasta & fashion. Think boujee, like helicopters, supercars, superbikes, super-yachts. Super! __________ India Sarees, spices, B'wood songs sure. But 🇮🇳’s also moving games like chess & carrom into M’sia. PS: talking of B'wood songs, check out this memorable performance by PMX showing his B'wood singing chops (from his recent India trip)! __________ Japan M’sians❤️Japan, we all know. But did you know Msia’s the only country where 🇯🇵 exports its dangerously delicious puffer fish for actual consumption? __________ Philippines Jamming to a Siti Nurhaliza tune? You may be strumming on a🎸handcrafted in Cebu, 🇵🇭 __________ Russia Art lovers, you’ve probably used “Master-class” oil paints. You may have brushed your teeth with Splat toothpaste — both from 🇷🇺! __________ Spain 🇪🇸’s quirkiest export to M’sia? One-day-old chicks ready to be raised within M’sian borders! And special spanish charcoal gives M’sian roast beef that yummy extra flavor! __________ Singapore Surprise, surprise—the little red dot’s sharpest export? Contact lenses! Gotta keep a sharp watch across that Causeway 🇸🇬 __________ South Africa CNY isn’t complete without braised abalone, and guess where it’s coming from -- 🇿🇦 has a role! __________ South Korea Kimchi & K-dramas are life (🙋‍♂️if you’ve binged *Crash Landing on You*). But did you know M’sia is one of the top importers of 🇰🇷kimchi, globally? That’s a whole lotta spicy cabbage! __________ Switzerland Got a knee or dental implant? Chances are you got some Swiss precision engineering inside you, courtesy🇨🇭 __________ Sweden Those sleek prefab houses in Kulim? Flat-packed all the way from 🇸🇪! __________ Thailand No fish tale here—the Siamese fighting fish & fancy guppies in M’sia are imports from 🇹🇭! __________ Turkey Craving hazelnuts? While Nutella might be Italian, 🇹🇷’s where the hazelnuts come from, and Msia’s getting its fair share! __________ USA Besides exporting higher interest rates (!), 🇺🇸’ also M’sia’s main soybean supplier, mostly for animal feed. Who knew soybeans had so much range? __________ That's a wrap. Some thoughts... 1. Malaysians sure have some fun & eclectic tastes😊 2. Trading is hardwired into us humans 3. And we ought to keep it that way – encouraging – not discouraging – it 🙏 PS: This list is clearly not exhaustive. So if you know any other quirky or unusual imports, um, spill the tea! END/

Apurva Sanghi

21,093 views • 2 years ago

Renowned macro strategist David Hunter joins Alex on the pod to discuss his bold forecasts for the markets and the global economy. With 50 years of Wall Street experience, David shares why he believes we're heading for the biggest financial crisis in history—a "global bust" driven by excessive leverage, soaring debt, and central bank missteps. Despite calling for a 30–40% market melt-up before the crash, David predicts a severe financial unwind that could reshape the global economic landscape. He also delves into the future of gold, silver, and commodities, the role of central banks, and how policymakers may react to unprecedented challenges. Follow David on X: David Hunter If you really enjoy our content, subscribe to Pinnacle Digest's weekly email newsletter. Economics, geopolitics, and commodities are topics we routinely cover: 𝙁𝙊𝙇𝙇𝙊𝙒 𝙋𝙄𝙉𝙉𝘼𝘾𝙇𝙀 𝘿𝙄𝙂𝙀𝙎𝙏 𝙃𝙀𝙍𝙀 ▷ Official Site: ► Facebook: ► Instagram: ► YouTube: Chapters 00:00 - Intro 00:34 - David Hunter Joins the Podcast 1:07 - The Melt-Up Prediction 1:44 - Market Timing and S&P 500 Target 5:00 - Explaining the Parabolic Melt-Up 6:18 - Using Sentiment, Fundamentals, and Technicals for S&P 500 Target 8:40 - How Will Trump Impact the Markets? 11:05 - Global Bust Explained 15:10 - Central Bank Policy Missteps 16:20 - What Causes a Recession? 17:30 - The Federal Reserve’s Balance Sheet Shrinkage 19:25 - Who or What Really Controls Interest Rates? 22:45 - How Bad Will The Market Crash? 24:00 - Massive Monetary Stimulus and Its Consequences 35:40 - Treasuries, the Dollar, and Safe Assets 37:09 - Gold, Silver, and Commodities Post-Bust 40:00 - The 2030s Depression Scenario 42:56 - Hope for the Future: Trump’s Role and Free Market Policies 46:14 - Final Thoughts and Where to Follow David Hunter 47:15 - Disclaimer & Forward-Looking Statements PLEASE READ #financialcrisis #meltup #davidhunter #FinancialMarkets #SP500 #macroinvesting #contrarian DISCLAIMER: This video podcast (the “Video”) is not investment advice. The Video is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only. All statements in the Video are to be checked and verified by the viewer. The Video may contain technical or other inaccuracies, omissions, or errors, for which Maximus Strategic Consulting Inc. ("Maximus"), owner of and the Pinnacle Digest YouTube channel, assumes no responsibility. Neither Alexander Smith nor David Hunter are financial advisors. Before investing in any securities, commodities or cryptocurrencies, you should consult with your financial advisor and a registered broker-dealer. Alexander Smith and David Hunter (the "Contributors") have made wrong predictions in the past, and they'll likely do it again. Never make an investment based solely on what you hear or see in the Video. As with all investments, investors should carefully consider their investment objectives and risk tolerance before investing. Conduct your own thorough and independent due diligence to understand the risks associated with investing in any security, cryptocurrency and commodity. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, that address activities, events or developments the Contributors expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements also include, but are not limited to, statements regarding: industry trends; inflation and deflation forecasts; future performance for individual stocks, commodities and cryptocurrencies; the future performance of stock markets and indices; monetary policy, and other estimates or expectations. Much of the Video is comprised of statements of projection. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements. Maximus and the Contributors disclaim all liability for any loss that may arise (whether direct, indirect, consequential, incidental, punitive or otherwise) from any use of the information in the Video. Information in the Video has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but Maximus and the Contributors make no representation or warranty as to the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of the content in the Video. Any opinion expressed in the Video is subject to change without notice. Sources and supplementary information:

Pinnacle Digest

45,292 views • 1 year ago

🇨🇳 WINGS OF DECEPTION: CHINA’S AIR FORCE IS BUILT TO BLUFF, NOT BATTLE China wants you to believe it owns the sky. And at first glance, why not? It’s got over 3,000 aircraft, stealth fighters that look like they were sketched by Marvel concept artists, and bombers so big they cast shadows over the Pacific. If there’s a global leaderboard for “most intimidating PowerPoint presentations,” the People’s Liberation Army Air Force wins gold. But dig even one millimeter below the polished propaganda and what you’ll find is less Top Gun, more Top Prop. Start with the J-20, the so-called “Mighty Dragon.” China’s stealth pride and joy is slick - until it isn’t. Its engines can’t sustain supersonic flight. It burns fuel like a frat house burns through cheap beer. And stealth? Only from the front. From the rear, it's as sneaky as a parade float. Oh, and it can’t carry bombs. Minor detail. Their bombers? The H-6 is a retro Soviet knockoff from the 1950s. Yes, China updated it. And yes, it's still about as survivable as a paper kite in a hurricane. Its payload matches an F-15’s - except it’s slower and easier to spot. And the pilots flying all this? Not one has seen combat. Not one. China hasn’t fought an air war since Queen was topping the charts and Iran was brand new. You know who has flown combat missions? Pretty much every U.S. pilot in a squadron. And they don’t need to check with a political commissar before deciding whether to engage. Meanwhile, China has all the support gear of a garage band trying to headline Coachella. A couple dozen refuelers. A handful of AWACS planes. A strategic airlift capacity that couldn't support a decent summer camp, let alone a cross-strait invasion. Want to seize Taiwan? Great. Just make sure your jets are back in time for lunch. And let’s not ignore the rot inside. Corruption is so baked into China’s military-industrial complex, you could cut it into slices and serve it at a banquet. Defense ministers have been purged. Rocket fuel’s been swapped for water. (No, really.) And generals get promoted less for tactical brilliance and more for clapping loudest during Xi Jinping's speeches. So what’s all this shiny junk actually for? Intimidation. China built a war machine it doesn’t expect to use. It’s the geopolitical version of flexing in the mirror before a bar fight and hoping nobody calls your bluff. The J-20 looks scary from a distance. The bombers look big on satellite images. But if the shooting starts, that illusion burns up faster than their engines do. So the next time Beijing rattles its sabers, ask this: is it brandishing a sword - or just waving a very shiny butter knife? Source: Warfronts

Mario Nawfal

1,044,008 views • 9 months ago

V2x Inc $VVX $2B Drones, Greenland, and Golden Dome for 50 cents on the dollar V2X, Inc. $VVX is a defense contractor formed by the 2022 merger of Vectrus and Vertex. The company has TTM revenue of $4.42B and rising, yet trades at a market cap less than half of that. At 11x P/E and 0.45x P/S, the market is valuing them at 45 cents for every $1 of revenue. Why is it it so cheap? The company had been focused on logistics, aerospace maintenance, training, and base operations for the U.S. military and national security clients. Currently it is being passed on by the market as a low margin services company, not a tech hardware company. Net profit margins are historically very tight (~1.8% to 2.5%). They rely on volume, not high markup. The cherry on top is that the company carries over $1.1B debt load and a PE firm has been selling shares. The market has been taking a pass. However there is a change occurring under the surface that the market may be missing. The Greenland Play. Vectrus is the blue-collar half of V2X. They operate in eye popping 329 locations/bases across 47 countries. They fully run six major bases from top to bottom. The crown jewel in this conversation is their Pituffik Base in Greenland. This is the US's only military base in Greenland. As Russia and China aggressively expand their icebreaker fleets, the Arctic is becoming the next major theater of conflict. In addition the region is the critical tracking node for ballistic missile interception. Pituffik is the U.S. military’s foothold in Greenland. V2X doesn't just clean the floors here; they manage everything from the power generation, airfield operations, civil engineering, and survival logistics in -30°F. The company is entrenched. If investment into the Arctic increases, $VVX is essential to that strategy. The Drone Hunter (Project Tempest). The Vertex side is where the high-margin re-rating happens. While the market wasn't looking, V2X deployed their Tempest counter-UAS system into active combat in Ukraine at an unheard of pace. This isn't a multi billion-dollar stationary missile system. It’s a mobile, "shoot-and-scoot" drone denial and scouting/sensing platform that fires mass produced laser-guided rockets to kill drones. They are killing cheap enemy drones with cheap rockets without being an expensive stationary target, thus helping to solve one of the biggest economic problems in modern warfare. They went from prototype to stacking battlefield killchains in months, an unheard of speed, and this was just their first contribution. The Golden Dome. As of Jan 12, they now hold a seat on the $151 Billion SHIELD contract to build the U.S. homeland missile defense shield. They are now at the table for high-end prototyping and sensor integration alongside the giants. What the market is still missing is that they didn't just get a "participation trophy." The award specifically cites V2X for "advanced analytics, rapid prototyping, and sensor integration." They are at the table to design the brain of the system. Remember, they are deeply integrated into hundreds of bases across the world. V2X isn't just a generic bidder either. They already run what will be the eyes of the Dome. Very few seem to have connected these dots. Let me give you an example of one set of these systems. The COBRA DANE & COBRA KING phased arrays. These are not "just radars." These are National Technical Means (NTM), the highest category of strategic assets the U.S. possesses. V2X currently operates and sustains these massive phased-arrays in places like Shemya, Alaska just 450 miles from Russia. These arrays are powerful enough to spot a baseball in space from 2,000 miles away. The COBRA DANE system that V2X runs in Alaska stares unblinkingly at the Kamchatka Peninsula and the Pacific Ocean. Its job is to detect Russian or Chinese ICBM launches instantly. It creates the "data lake" that the entire U.S. Missile Defense System relies on. V2X holds the contract to sustain and operate this facility. Without V2X, the U.S. goes blind in the North Pacific. The COBRA KING system is the "Mobile Eye" at Sea. It is a ship-borne dual-band radar system mounted on the USNS Howard O. Lorenzen. Unlike DANE which is fixed, KING moves. It parks off the coast of rogue nations to monitor missile tests up close. It uses X-band and S-band radars to "fingerprint" enemy warheads, determining if a missile is carrying a nuke or a decoy. V2X maintains the complex mission systems that allow this ship to feed data into the national command network. You can't build a "Golden Dome" without the data from these radars. Because V2X already manages the sensors that detect the missiles, they have a massive advantage in winning the contracts to integrate that data into the new shield. One final point on this topic is that previously the old V2X would wait 5 years for a maintenance contract. The market has not priced in that the new SHIELD approved V2X can now bid on 6-month "sprint" contracts to prototype new sensor fusion algorithms or cyber-hardened command posts. This moves them from "slow government services" to "fast defense tech." The base modernization $40B+ opportunity. The U.S. military has a massive problem. Its bases are falling apart and its networks are from the 90s. V2X holds a spot on the $12B Base Infrastructure Modernization (BIM) IDIQ. If the DOW budget spikes to $1.5T, money will likely flow into "Smart Base" initiatives. This includes upgrading 5G networks, cyber-hardening power grids, and digitizing logistics. V2X is a prime contractor for this. They don't just pour concrete; they install the digital backbone (fiber, sensors, security) that a modern base needs. Soldier Training in the modern AI and computational age. Yes, V2X is a giant here as well. In 2025, V2X won a spot on the U.S. Army's "LTRaC" (Live Training, Ranges, and Combat Training Centers) contract. V2X runs the "war games." When soldiers go to a major training center (like Fort Irwin or JRTC) to simulate fighting Russia or China, V2X provides the simulation tech, the "op-for" (opposing force) logistics, and the augmented reality systems. A massive DOW budget increase typically prioritizes Readiness. If the Army scales up exercises to deter threats, V2X gets paid more for every rotation. There is more, but I will stop here for now. (I haven't even mentioned the LOGCAP V massive Army logistics contract of which V2X is a prime holder). With V2X your getting a lot for shockingly very little. The company is finally realizing the benefits of the Vectrus/Vertex merger and the market is not paying attention. An incredible amount of capital is likely to pour into Greenland and the market is not paying attention. $1.5T is about to pour into the modernization of bases, sensors, and soldier training and the market is not paying attention. They are critical part of the Golden Dome infrastructure and the market has not realized. The debt bear case is dying. Net leverage has already dropped to ~2.6x (down from dangerous highs), and management is using record cash flow to clean up the balance sheet. The pre-planned PE return on investment selling is almost over. You are buying a company with an "Arctic Moat" (Greenland), a Golden Dome/SHIELD essential backbone, and a "Combat Tech" growth engine for 0.45x sales. It might take some time for the market to realize this. This is not a get rich quick play. But if the market wakes up even just a little and re-rates this to even a modest 0.8x sales (still a huge discount to peers), the stock doubles. I think this is an interesting multi-year play to build into. I took a position at $63.

YeahDave

79,419 views • 8 months ago

I would not wish ill health or death on anyone, including my enemies, unless I was genuinely in mortal fear for my own life. But let's be straight about this. Politicians can post their deepest sympathies, families can insist they were “good boys”, and social media can produce all the usual excuses. None of that means the rest of us have to rewrite reality. Driving a car at high speed the wrong way down a motorway, knowing innocent people could be coming towards you at 120 km/h, isn't normal driving and it isn't some innocent mistake. It is an extraordinarily reckless decision that could have killed an entirely innocent family. Does that mean I think they deserved to die? No. Do I take pleasure in their deaths? No. But I'm also not going to pretend that people repeatedly involved in serious criminality are “little angels” simply because they're dead. If the newspaper reports about their previous activities and encounters with Gardaí are accurate, they were far from angels. They were thugs whose behaviour should have resulted in meaningful intervention long before things reached this point. And yes, I'll use another unfashionable expression: Live by the sword, die by the sword. Not because I'm celebrating anybody's death, but because repeatedly choosing extreme risk, violence and criminality eventually has consequences. Tragically, sometimes those consequences are irreversible. Maybe I'm getting old. Maybe I'm becoming intolerant. But when I was growing up, there were consequences for our actions. Thankfully my parents never hit me, but discipline existed. We got the rod in school I can still remember it drying beside the paraffin heater and the strap was used in secondary school, although I missed most of that. I'm not suggesting we start beating children again. But where exactly did we go from discipline and personal responsibility to being terrified of telling children NO? When did participation become more important than achievement? When did allowing children to run around shops and restaurants like little maniacs become enlightened parenting? When I was young, if you behaved like that, your parents dealt with you. You quickly learned that other people existed and that your behaviour affected them. Manners and respect are free commodities. When I hear children telling their own parents to “f*** off”, I wonder what they're going to be like as adults. If that's the respect they have for the people who brought them into the world, fed them, clothed them and cared for them, what respect are they going to have for a teacher, Garda, employer or complete stranger? Then we wonder why workplaces increasingly need chill-out spaces and “mental health days” because ordinary pressures become too much. In my day we respected our bosses, did the job we were employed to do and were happy to have a job. Yes, society has changed, and some of those changes were unquestionably for the better. But removing consequences wasn't one of them. And I'm going to use another expression that will undoubtedly upset people: Feral scumbags. Because when young people are repeatedly stealing cars, carrying knives or machetes, attacking people and terrorising neighbourhoods, I'm considerably more interested in protecting their victims than finding another fashionable euphemism for their behaviour. And yes, perhaps we need to discuss bringing back industrial schools. Before somebody deliberately misunderstands that sentence, I don't mean resurrecting the religious institutions, brutality or abuse associated with parts of that system. I mean the basic principle of removing persistent young offenders from the streets and putting them into secure residential institutions with discipline, education, vocational training and consequences. If you're 16 or 17 and repeatedly terrorising a community, perhaps knowing that you're facing several years in a secure institution followed by the adult criminal justice system if you continue offending after 18 might make you think twice. Because whatever we're doing now clearly isn't frightening some of these young offenders. Young lads can apparently parade knives and machetes on social media as though they're fashion accessories. Communities are terrorised. People accumulate conviction after conviction. And I have seen an example of the attitude I'm talking about with my own eyes. I had reason to attend court in Loughrea, Co. Galway, around this time last year. There were three young offenders in the dock, one of them flanked by two prison officers. I was sitting in the public gallery immediately behind the legal teams. When this individual spotted me, he apparently decided that making disparaging remarks about me would be great entertainment. He laughed. He jeered. It was all great craic. What struck me particularly was how relaxed the whole thing appeared. He was joking with the prison officers beside him and, from where I was sitting, they appeared to be laughing along with some of it. The judge lost patience with him on two occasions. It didn't appear to bother him in the slightest. I obviously cannot know what was going through his head, but the impression he gave me was that he believed he was untouchable. What stayed with me wasn't the insults themselves. I've heard considerably worse. It was the complete lack of respect for the court, the judge and everyone around him. When the court adjourned for lunch, I couldn't resist a little dig of my own: “Where are we going for lunch? I really fancy a steak. I wonder what the prisoners get?” That wiped away some of the laughter. His response was to start shouting abuse at me, including calling me a “f*ing f**t”. Charming. I walked away thinking that if somebody can stand in a courtroom, in front of a judge, flanked by prison officers, and still behave as though the entire proceedings are a joke, what exactly is supposed to deter him when he's back outside? I doubt that scene was unique to one courtroom in Galway. And everybody waits for the inevitable tragedy. Then, when it finally happens, politicians express shock and sympathy and everyone asks how this could possibly have happened. Perhaps we should start asking that question before somebody dies. Call me old-fashioned. Call me intolerant. Call me whatever you like. I believe in manners. I believe in respect. I believe in personal responsibility. I believe in rehabilitation. And I believe in consequences. Because allowing feral scumbags to terrorise communities without meaningful consequences isn't compassion. It's abandoning their victims and ultimately abandoning the offenders themselves. Live by the sword, die by the sword. It's an old saying for a reason.

Keira Connolly

151,279 views • 1 month ago

#PahlaviTerrorists #فرقه_تروریستی_پهلوی Open Letter to the Honourable Pierre Poilievre December 26, 2025 OPEN LETTER: Reza Pahlavi’s network shut down your Vancouver event on February 9, 2024 cc: Chief Constable Steve Rai Vancouver Police Andrew Scheer CSIS Canada Stephen Harper Melissa Lantsman The Vancouver Sun Rebel News Canada CanAm Network Dear Mr. Poilievre, Records I recently obtained through a series of orders of the Supreme Court of British Columbia(the most recent granted on December 15, 2025) objectively establish that your Vancouver Persian community meet-and-greet on February 9, 2024 was shut down by Reza Pahlavi’s networks. I am writing this publicly because this represents a new level of atrocity by these networks. They are already notorious for coordinated attacks on Iranian pro-democracy activists, which is why they are before the Supreme Court of BC and why Reza Pahlavi faced two conclusive judgments against him on October 16, 2025. But shutting down the public event of a national political leader on the verge of elections in Canada is an escalation into direct interference with Canadian democratic life. When a Canadian federal political leader like you can be forced out of a venue through intimidation—particularly if the same actors can penetrate political communities through relationship-based access while coordinating venue tracking, harassment, and intimidation with a designated terrorist entity and against the same communities—then Canada has a sovereignty and public-safety problem, which goes beyond any partisan boundaries. On February 9, 2024, Reza Pahlavi’s networks acted through premeditated political intimidation orchestrated on the ground by two individuals: Arezou Soltani of North Vancouver and Mehdi Ahmadzadeh of Maple Ridge, who jointly led a local Pahlavi-affiliated group registered in British Columbia as Canadian Iranian Wakuppers Foundation (the “Wakuppers”). Those disclosed records from the Wakuppers’ WhatsApp group chat show: · real-time tracking of your appearance, · active efforts to locate the venue while you were speaking, · celebratory messaging after the shutdown, and · Mehdi Ahmadzadeh’s own voice message, in which he vividly describes and boasts about assaults, pushing, intimidation and dragging the attendees “into dust and blood”. You remember that night. Barely seconds after you began your remarks at: True Confections Denman, 866 Denman St, Vancouver, BC V6G 2L9, the disruption started by Hamas supporters and the scene changed instantly. The event had been anticipated as roughly a 90-minute meet-and-greet. Instead, you were forced to cut your entire remarks down to roughly 15 minutes and escorted out by your security team early. You also tried to defuse the disruption and offered a fair compromise—words to the effect of: “Let me give my remarks, and during Q&A you can ask your questions.” They refused. You then called it out on the spot—“It seems we have the Iranian regime here,” and referred to them as “IRGC supporters.” You were right, but that was not the full reality. What happened that night was not just “IRGC people showed up.” It was a coordinated operation involving collaboration between IRGC-aligned Hamas supporters on the ground and a local Pahlavi network behind the scenes, with Soltani and Ahmadzadeh operating as the on-the-ground masterminds. What you did not know prior to reading this letter—and what I only fully understood lately, following the Court-ordered disclosures—is that the shutdown was indeed orchestrated by the Pahlavi networks. Here is the blunt truth: Out of expressed hostility, they handed the location to Hamas supporters, who then arrived and executed the shutdown. They were the visible shock-troops on the ground; the venue-locating and mobilization came from the Wakuppers led by the Pahlavi operatives, Soltani and Ahmadzadeh. With all that said: · It is striking that Reza Pahlavi had previously tried to portray himself publicly as a proponent of your political rise and access to the Iranian community, and that he met with you in or about March 2023. Yet the evidence now shows that local circles aligned with him were behind the disruption and shutdown of your February 9, 2024 event. · It is also striking that the same local circle, namely, the Wakuppers, includes Mary Hakimi, the partner of Doug Horne, a former Conservative MLA—an obvious access channel into Conservative circles. Through court-ordered production, I have also obtained a photograph showing Arezou Soltani and Mehdi Ahmadzadeh in close proximity to you. I am informed they obtained backstage access to you through the Mary Hakimi / Doug Horne connection. Another matter you may not be aware of is that these same circles use MEK-labelling exactly the way the Islamic Republic does: as a weapon to intimidate, discredit, and socially isolate Iranian pro-democracy activists—and, when convenient, to smear Conservative politicians and MPs as well. To that point, the Wakuppers’ group chat content I obtained includes foul and contemptuous language directed at the Conservative Party of Canada and at senior Conservative figures, such as the Right Honourable Stephen Harper, including condemning the shutting down of the Islamic Republic’s embassyand advancing pro-IRGC narratives, in the guise of the same MEK-labelling described above. Representative portions are included as appendices by way of certified translation. I should say that all these records and relevant orders were obtained despite persistent efforts by Soltani and Ahmadzadeh—and their counsel, Nojan Kamoosi—to obstruct accountability and distort the process through false and misleading sworn materials. In my proceedings, I have had to confront multiple affidavits that were perjured and specifically designed by Nojan Kamoosi and his law firm to derail proper adjudication, prevent disclosure, and mislead the Court. I assume your office will treat this new disclosure about the February 9, 2024 shutdown as a serious public-order and democratic-integrity concern, and will coordinate with the Vancouver Police Department (and any other appropriate agencies) to ensure that the relevant records are secured and reviewed. I also formally request that your office take immediate steps to ensure the preservation of all relevant records relating to the February 9, 2024 shutdown, for the purpose of ongoing litigation, Action S-246401, against Reza Pahlavi and his network (including co-defendants Soltani and Ahmadzadeh, among others), which addresses their engagement in political violence and intimidation in Canada. This preservation request includes, without limitation: · security incident notes and internal reports; · communications with organizers and any third-party intermediaries about the incident; and · access logs and records relating to who facilitated Soltani’s and Ahmadzadeh’s backstage access to you on Feb 9, 2024; to the extent such records are within your control or can be preserved through timely requests to the relevant custodians. For ease of review, I will provide the following appendices with this open letter: Appendix A: Certified translations of relevant WhatsApp text messages involving Mary Hakimi (Doug Horne’s partner), Arezou Soltani, and Mehdi Ahmadzadeh (including venue-locating and celebratory messaging), dated Feb 9-10, 2024. Appendix B: Link to Mehdi Ahmadzadeh’s voice message of Feb 10, 2024 (as produced). Appendix C: Certified translation of Ahmadzadeh’s voice message of Feb 10, 2024. Appendix D: Photograph showing Arezou Soltani and Mehdi Ahmadzadeh in close proximity to the Honourable Pierre Poilievre (presumably taken on Feb 9, 2025). Appendix E: Photograph of Reza Pahlavi with the Honourables Pierre Poilievre and Melissa Lantsman (presumably taken in March 2023). Appendix F: Vancouver lawyer, Nojan Kamoosi of Allen / McMillan Litigation Counsel; Counsel for Soltani Appendix G: Representative certified translations showing foul language and hostile messaging directed at the Conservative Party and Conservative figures, including discussions condemning the shutting down of the Islamic Republic’s embassy. Appendix H: Affidavit #18 of Masood Masjoody in Action S-246401, Masjoody v. Pahlavi, et al., filed December 12, 2025 A copy of this letter is being provided to the Vancouver Police Department. Respectfully, Masood Masjoody, Ph.D. President and Founder of UNHRC Dossier Burnaby, British Columbia #جاوید_ایران

Masood Masjoody | مسعود مسجودی

43,127 views • 9 months ago

Today, I'm doing something different. If you want the short version, watch the video below. Nearly five years ago, J.K. Rowling wrote an infamous tweet. It began: "Dress however you please. Call yourself whatever you like." She continued: "Sleep with any consenting adult who’ll have you. Live your best life in peace and security. But force women out of their jobs for stating that sex is real?" It took off like wildfire. At the time, Rowling's words suggested that pushback against transgender people/policies was not rooted in presentation, or even one's individual conceptualization of their identity. Her issue lie with the intersection of personal identity and policy, and was further inflamed by the cancel culture that engrossed social justice political dissenters. Perhaps she had a point. I didn't entirely know what to make of it. In some respects, I still don't. But her words made me think. After a few years, an unanswered question lingered in my mind. Is what Rowling describes a solution to growing gender identity dissent? Is there a lifestyle that a transgender individual could embody that would be 'acceptable' to these dissenters, or is their dissent just a veil for true contempt and disdain for those who cross gender boundaries? I projected that question upon myself. Was there a version of myself that—by accepting certain concessions—might pass muster and find acceptance amid dissenters? Was some give-and-take by transgender people all that was needed to de-escalate our growing dissent and toxic discourse? Many progressives, including many transgender people, told me the answer was an unequivocal 'No'. I was told that gender criticals/anti-woke/conservatives/[insert favourite polarizing label here] just hate transgender people and were wholly disingenuous in their concerns. I was told that their 'concerns' were mere dog whistles used to prop up their hate for the gender diverse. I wasn't convinced... in part because I appreciated some of their concerns. I knew I needed to learn more. So, I did the only thing I knew how to do. I followed my curiosity and spent the last two years amid the individuals who were purportedly out for my blood. I connected deeply within gender critical circles, listening, learning, and trying to make sense of the intersection of gender criticality, transgender experiences, and liberalism. I sought out solutions that might temper our ever-growing toxic discourse. I learned a lot and I had the most inspiring conversations of my life. And I made some of the most genuine friendships of my lifetime. As it turns out, it's very humanizing to know someone who thinks differently than you. Thousands of people shared with me the impact I imparted to them, as I was often the first transgender person they had ever known and befriended. These friendships were humanizing for me as well, bringing a new perspective to social conservative worldviews that I hadn't previously appreciated. For those who truly held no disdain towards transgender people, I embodied precisely what they had been preaching. In tune with Rowling's call, I called myself Julia and dressed from the women's side of Target, but I held no expectations of language, pronouns, or any form of affirmation. I steered clear of any space that might even plausibly be considered a women 's segregated space, be it a washroom, a changeroom, an association or a sports league. I embodied the model transgender person that many gender criticals profess is the solution to our unrest surrounding gender identity. I've been told thousands of times that if other transgender people were like me, then all of our issues would go away. And that is where things got interesting... because for quite a few years, gender-critical communities have been forming amid common concerns of various transgender accommodations and policies. For people in these communities who held no contempt toward a trans identity, I was a key ally. To them, I was living evidence that the balance they wished to achieve in transgender policy surrounding medical transition or education or compelled speech or spaces could be embodied by a transgender person. But I unwittingly became a wedge in gender-critical communities. As it turned out, there are plenty of gender-critical individuals whose convictions go far beyond mere policy concerns. These people hold tremendous contempt and disdain for transgender people. I faced bigotry and hatred firsthand. Until a transgender person comes into the gender critical community, those who saw might see me as an ally and those enraged by my existence were often indistinguishable, even to those within various communities. But the moment I would arrive on the scene, waves would form and the motivational divide would become evident. There's something rather unsettling about watching factions form and friendships fall apart merely because you entered a conversation. I cannot overstate the love and acceptance I found amid gender-critical individuals. Many amid these circles are just tired of being labelled anti-trans ad nauseam merely for expressing policy concerns. But I also cannot overstate how surreal it is to face individuals—in many cases with international attention upon them—reign down on you directly and personally in the most dehumanizing ways I've ever encountered. On more than a few occasions I experienced the machination of anti-trans pushback in full force. There were days I received dozens of tweets that launched personal attacks against my appearance or derided my likeness in grotesque manners. There were also days when I received thousands. Death theats, stalkers, invasions on my family's personal privacy. I encountered it all. On a few occasions I also experienced the machination of trans-activist pushback. I came to realize something: on the extremity of this polarizing issue, both sides can behave just as poorly. It was enlightening to watch the extent to which people would mischaracterize me, selectively crafting what I would write to frame me in the worst possible light imaginable. It was even more enlightening to watch opposing sides do this simultaneously—each fixated on casting me as a demon of the enemy they had come to fixate upon. I suppose that's what extremism does. To the vocal extreme of the transgender activist camp, I was a gender critical: a grifter uncancelling gender criticals by lending transgender credibility. To the vocal extreme of the gender critical camp, I was no different than any other transgender activist. Regardless of my position on social transition in school, compelled speech or space usage, nothing could undo that I unapologetically defy sex-role norms which—for many—was always the underlying issue. I observed that both 'sides' cast me as their 'other', while neither side embraced a member. I suspect that's in part because the 'side' I align with are the views that resonate with mostly everyone who isn't in the trenches of these politics. The side my views represent aligned most closely with the 90% of our population who are not beholden to either extreme on gender politics. My major takeaway from my past two years: that the vast majority of people want a world where transgender people can exist and thrive, where language isn't compelled but people are kind to one another, and where the intersections of gender norms and physical reality are thoughtfully balanced. They want an education system that recognizes the role of the parent as an ideological steward but also holds good safeguards both to intervene in truly abusive situations and provides adequate psychological support for any child experiencing psychological distress. That sounds hard, and it's near impossible when your sounding board is the groupthink at either extreme. I feel incredibly fortunate to have been afforded the opportunity to hold so many powerful friendships amid the liberal-loving middle that espouses the center-end of both factions. So what am I doing now? I am doing a new video series—possibly my last. In Gender for the Rest of Us, I'll be laying out what I've learned over the past two years about the solutions that bring us to a place of de-escalated discourse on gender. I'll attempt to be moderate through and through, though I should clarify that I don't mean 'Twitter moderate' or 'gender critical moderate' or 'trans activist moderate'. I mean regular, run-of-the-mill, moderate that resonates with those who truly want to balance transgender rights with those of everyone else. What I'll be putting forward in this series is my best attempt at finding solutions—real solutions—that maintain all tenets of liberalism: equality, individual liberty, individual rights, pluralism, toleration, autonomy, bodily integrity and consent. If you find yourself on either extreme of this divide, you probably won't like much of what I have to say. That's probably for the best because solutions don't like on the extremes. In a nutshell: This series is the essay I've promised to more than a few politicians outlining how we might de-escalate gender matters. Sorry it's taken so long. Politics are exhausting. Thank you to everyone (on both sides of this complex conversation) who has engaged with me in thoughtful conversation over the past months and years. I've learned a lot and grown tremendously from the challenges people have put in front of me. Please keep the messages coming—I want to keep learning and growing! All the best, Julia

Julia Malott

13,277 views • 2 years ago

"It looked like a large piece of saran wrap. It didn't really scare me at that time until it moved and formed the arm that reached over to the other tree." ~Jan Mac The Predator Case of Lima, Ohio "If you saw in the woods some strange thing like that, like The Predator, you'd probably be leery about going back there again, too." ~Bruce Mac (In the replies, I'd love to discuss... If this thing is the same thing that Jay Stratton and Travis S Taylor (and others?) say they saw, what the hell is it and what the hell is it doing? Is it just a peak into a shadow biome that our senses usually can't perceive but every now and then, shows itself? Just a Predator-like being doing its thing? "Hi everybody, I'm just collecting acorns!" ~Pedator Fella As you watch or read, you'll ask yourself: Is what Jan Mac saw, connected to that light that showed up over the high school, and did it originate from elsewhere? Or, is it native to this planet and just trying to misdirect (by having that light pop up at the same time) and make us think it's from somewhere else? ICYMI, here's my post about the alleged Stratton/Taylor Predator experience... ) ~ David Paulides Voiceover: "The last case I want to investigate is even a little deeper down the rabbit hole. It's not about a missing hunter, but instead about a strange experience one hunter faced in Lima, Ohio. It's important to note that this isn't a connection to The Missing, it's simply an odd event that's worth looking into. And it's associated with one of the smartest people I've ever met." The Late Bruce Maccabee - Ph.D., Optical Physicist: "There's a difference, I guess, between being freaked out by things that you imagine and being freaked out by things that you actually see." ~ Jan Maccabee - Bruce's Wife: "This, I have to say, was the most (sighs) terrifying experience. But yeah, I don't know why I didn't react to it, and that bothers me. "The hunting in Ohio is awesome. We have some great, big trophy deer in Ohio, and we happen to have some of the biggest right here on our own property. "It was the most beautiful night to deer hunt. It was the second day of season, I wanted to get my, you know, rear end in the woods to hunt. I was really excited about it. "There was a band over at the high school. By the time I got to my deer stand, I could hear 'em. I was all settled in, I didn't see nothing coming down the paths. Trails, the birds, crickets, everything were normal woods sounds. When you're hunting, you have two of your most keenest senses, is your hearing and your eyesight. "All of a sudden the woods went to this dead quiet. If I had dropped a pin out of that deer stand... It cut off. No birds, no crickets, no nothing." ~~~ Others have told similar stories featuring that detail of complete silence engulfing them. Brandon Fugal: "And as I was walking around to the back of the old homesteads, it was like I entered an anechoic chamber, a soundproof room. And there was an auditory sensation. It was almost like my ears were boxed. And all of the ambient noise, to a degree, was completely muted. "And one thing that we’ve seen that is consistent is the electromagnetic. The cell phone anomalies…Erik Bard has conducted quite a bit of research into what type of acute medical episodes can accompany extreme electromagnetic, interference or events, even the auditory phenomena that I experienced. I related to you my experience of walking around the back of the old homestead and having this auditory sensation where all the ambient noise was essentially muted. And it truly felt like I stepped into a soundproof chamber of sorts. And it’s interesting. Electromagnetic phenomena at times, and that kind of interference can actually create those kind of reactions biologically." Source: ~ And this excerpt from "Skinwalkers at the Pentagon." (Like with Fugal's experience, this took place at Skinwalker Ranch) "Suddenly a cone of silence descended on Kelleher and Witt; the crickets seemed to go silent and even the faint rustling of the breeze in the trees ceased. Turning around, they saw a creature ambling towards them from the south. It was the size of a 150-pound pig and should have been making considerable noise as it walked. Yet, the cone of silence dominated the moonlit scene as the creature glided past within 30 feet of Kelleher and about 50 feet from Witt. To Kelleher, it appeared the animal had a series of dinosaur-like spines on its back and also sported a very large, flattened beaver-like tail. It noiselessly coasted past the pair and disappeared around the southwestern corner of the building, still not making a sound. Even Kelleher, who had spent hundreds of days and nights on Skinwalker Ranch and had already been exposed to his fair share of bizarre anomalies on the property, felt a distinct chill as he watched the surreal animal shuffle silently away." Longer excerpt: ~~~Back to Jan Mac and The Predator~~~ Jan: "The sun's still up. We were not calling for bad weather that night. It was a great night to hunt. Also, I felt like I had like a mote in my eye. I even took my finger and wiped my eye, like, when you get that fogginess over your eye, like it's just... I look and I'm thinking, 'What is this thing in the trees?' "It looked like a large piece of saran wrap. It's the only way I can describe it. But this thing was very wide. So I'm up fourteen foot, and it hung quite a ways down. And I'm thinking, 'What is this thing?' It didn't really scare me at that time until it moved and formed the arm that reached over to the other tree. It reached over about twelve to fourteen foot, and then it all, like a blob, like, sucked into it. And it went to the whole other tree. "I had this very euphoric feeling like, something ain't right here. Normally at that time, I'd have probably got down and stopped hunting, but for some reason I didn't." Paulides: "So, as you're sitting in your blind and you're looking across, where did the blob come from?" Jan: "I have no idea, it just appeared in the one tree. As it was moving through the woods, it went from like, tree to tree, and then it just...it disappeared. It didn't continue on. So, where it went, I don't know. It's like it just, poof, right before my eyes, vanished. "And I don't remember taking the picture, but being married to who I'm married to, Dr. Bruce Maccabee, he always said, 'If you see anything weird, get a picture.' "I don't recall, actually, when, either, that the sounds had returned. Because it's like, I don't remember. That's not me to this day. Normally, I would probably crawl down, come running in the house and say, 'You ain't gonna believe what's back there in them woods.'" Paulides: "How much longer you think you stayed in the stand?" Jan: "Umm, about half hour till sundown, when it's time to come out." ~ Bruce: "The sequence of this is: Jan goes out to hunt, we have guests show up, we're having dinner. She comes back from the hunt and says nothing about what happened. It was strange. The guests are about ready to leave. Later on, Matthew sends me an email: There was a sighting by a number of students and the faculty at the high school band practice just before dark." ~ Jan: "I'm like, 'Holy crap! Maybe it has something to do with what I saw in the woods?' And Bruce goes, 'What?' And I said, 'I forgot to tell you about what happened in those woods to me tonight!' And I'm reading this from Matthew, and then I started really getting, I get goosebumps. He said, 'This light appeared above the big stadium lights of the football field.' Had Matthew not sent that email, I'm not sure if I would have remembered even that night to say anything." ~ Paulides: "How many kids were on the field?" Matthew Pheneger - Shawnee High School, Class of 2013: "At least thirty. Thirty to forty, I would say." Paulides: "And was that the high school band?" Matthew: "Yes." Paulides: "And so, this was just before you guys went back to school?" Matthew: "Yes, band camp, late August." Paulides: "Late August. So, what time of night do you think that was?" Matthew: "Uhh, between six and seven. We were rehearsing, normally, out here about six, seven o'clock, doing our normal routine, when all of a sudden there was this bright light in the sky that just came out of nowhere. And we all just kind of stopped and looked at it as one." Paulides: "Where was the light?" Matthew: "So, the light was anywhere...it was above the tree line, for sure, just kind of hovering in the skyline. Close enough that it could catch your attention. Like it shouldn't have been there, I guess. If it was some man-made thing, it was too low to be there." Paulides: "Okay. What was the weather like that night?" Matthew: "Clear and hot. Typical, August Ohio weather." Paulides: "Okay. What color was it?" Matthew: "Candle orange. As far as I could tell, the thing had no definable edges to it. There were no like, dimensions. It was just kind of waxing and waning till it just zapped out. You know, our band director, who never stops for anything, he stopped and turned around and looked at us, and he goes, you know, 'What the hell was that?' Before I had time to even like, think about what I was seeing, it was gone. And then it was just kind of like an imprint in your mind, like I've seen something strange.” ~ Paulides: “So in your gut, are the two issues related?” Jan: “I often wonder now. All I can say is it happened within the same time frame, basically, as my experience here. Probably a half a mile over there, as the crow would fly.” ~ Bruce: “This is a Blackberry. On the back, you have the lens. It's not like the modern ones that have a camera on the front as well as a camera on the back. So I'd be taking your picture right now, but I would not be taking my picture. Something happened to that camera, I don't know what, but there's hard evidence of some weird thing that happened. She took a couple of pictures of herself before the event, which provide a fixed point of investigation, you might say. And she took another picture afterwards, So you have the camera phone doing its normal thing before and after, but right in the middle with this one photo, that something bizarre happened. “The picture she took, the resolution somehow changed for that one picture. You could manually change the cell phone to 1600 by 1200, 1024, by 760, or something like that, and 640 by 480. But it got changed to 500 by 400 or something. Numbers that don't exist. I don't know how to make it do that resolution. You'd have to get in there and rewire it somehow, or change the software. But even changing the software doesn't change the number of pixels along the edge of the sensor. I don't know how to explain this filamentary stuff. I can't imagine what this, what looks like it is well focused. I don't know what that is.” ~ Paulides: “I’ve had people write to me and say, ‘Well, what that is is Jan took a picture of her own hair.’” Jan: “My hair was back through the back of the ball cap, where it adjusts. it was tied back.” Paulides: “So there was no part of you that could have been in that frame?” Jan: “No way, no way.” ~ Bruce: “It would be possible for her to take a picture of her hair. She put her hand back there. But that wouldn't change the resolution of the camera or the byte size of the picture.” ~ Paulides: “So Jan, let me ask you, since that has happened, has it changed your life?” Jan: “Yeah, I've never been back in that woods to hunt that. I actually ended up buying a redneck deer blind. I mean, I want something surrounding me.” ~ Bruce: “You can imagine if you saw in the woods some strange thing like that, like The Predator, you'd probably be leery about going back there again, too.”

Joe Murgia

24,717 views • 1 year ago

The CIA's information war with American citizens and the operation that started it all. Project Mockingbird. This is one main aspect as to why people are so divided and brainwashed in today's society. Information has always been a crucial component to power and control. Knowledge is power, right? The only difference today from 40+ years ago is that now information flows at a rate that is absolutely mind-boggling and allows you to connect with anyone, at anytime, anywhere in the world, with real-time information 24/7 at your finger tips. So what happens when you have people who are suppose to be giving you accurate, truthful, information, and start to give you information that benefits, manipulates, and persuades the global population with mis and disinformation, protects certain corrupt people and groups by not reporting on other information, and who also lies and slanders other individuals all for the purpose to maintain power and control over the entire population, entirely on PURPOSE? You get what's called PROPAGANDA, aka, a sh*t show of so much purposeful bad and fake information, that it literally starts to persuade and mold the populations overall views and opinions on an array of various topics to fit the nefarious controllers, behind the scenes narrative or agenda. Ultimitely benefitting only them. If you take notice, these campaigns have been around for a long time, depending what side your on, your personal views and where you get your overall information will ultimately decide or be a factor of how much it has affected you or how much you are aware of the deception in the first place. Most legacy mainstream media groups are owned and operated by a small group of wealthy globalist individuals who seem to lean towards the left, and some leaning even farther left than others. These campaigns started to really pick up when Trump entered the picture in 2016. Trump was never suppose to win in the first place. Obama reinstated propaganda to be used on American citizens once again in 2013. The task to slander and attempt to destroy and imprison Trump through multiple operations and media campaigns were in full effect for the deep state to regain control of The White House. The group that these campaigns affected the most were the older groups and the younger groups. The people in the middle basically got to see both worlds play out in their lives at a crucial time period in their lives. They've seen the mainstream shift from what it once was, to an extreme lying, propaganda machine when Trump took office. The older aged crowd was so used to the regular nightly news and not as comfortable with newer technology to access alternative media sites and really just stuck with the mainstream's words and kept their faith in the MSM. Now the younger crowd literally grew up with the fully scripted, CIA, propaganda MSM because that is literally all they've ever known and haven't experienced anything else before or have anything to compare it to. Especially when your indoctrinated in a public school system that has been infiltrated itself with a majority of far-left teachers who usually end up being predators as well. That's a whole other story. The problem this CIA operation has caused was a population with people all in their own separate groups and boxes, fighting with each other over many things, instead of the people who started this mess in the first place, that aren't even true because one side has been lied to and manipulated. Brainwashed from a literal military style operation that's used to topple foreign countries during regime changes. And the worst part on top of all this is that know since Elon has started DOGE, a government efficiency operation, we are now uncovering that all these communist, Marxist, ideas, and operations and slander campaigns, and legal cases against Trump, down to these politicians luxurious lifestyles have been all funded and paid for by us, the TAXPAYERS. On the one example above, through USAID, there is proof of over $9 MILLION dollars that went to Reuters for a campaign named, " ACTIVE SOCIAL ENGINEERING DEFENSE LARGE SCALE SOCIAL DECEPTION," which is a definitive contract. There are thousands of examples just like this for all different companies, influencers, T.V. shows, Magazines, Articles, any type of media, and all of them are left leaning outlets. This has been going on for decades. Then on top off all of that, you have people who own these publishing and media companies who are not only getting paid by the taxpayers from the CIA to deceive us, but many of these owners are best friends with people like Jeffery Epstein and Ghislaine Maxell as you can also see above who is with Laurene Powell Jobs, the owner of "The Atlantic" publication, on vacation just hanging out. You wonder why the media never talks about child trafficking. Their paid to cover it up, or they're literally involved themselves... It just get's better and better. The good news is that it is now being exposed and shut down. Let's dive into the history of PROJECT MOCKINGBIRD now. The story of Project Mockingbird begins in the shadow of the Cold War, a period defined by ideological warfare between the United States and the Soviet Union. In the early 1960s, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), under the leadership of Director John McCone, launched a covert operation codenamed "Project Mockingbird." Unlike the broader, alleged "Operation Mockingbird" often cited in conspiracy circles as a sprawling media manipulation scheme, the historical Project Mockingbird was a specific, documented wiretapping effort aimed at curbing leaks of classified information. Initiated on March 12, 1963, and concluding on June 15, 1963, Project Mockingbird targeted two Washington-based journalists, Robert S. Allen and Paul J. Scott, who wrote the syndicated "Allen-Scott Report." These columnists had a knack for publishing articles laced with highly classified CIA details—information so sensitive it included Top Secret and Special Intelligence data. Their scoops, often sourced from government insiders, rattled the Kennedy administration, particularly after a July 26, 1962, New York Times article by Hanson Baldwin exposed details of a National Intelligence Estimate comparing U.S. and Soviet nuclear arsenals. President John F. Kennedy, incensed by such leaks, sought to plug the holes. The operation was a collaborative effort, greenlit by Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara, and Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency Joseph Carroll. The CIA’s Office of Security, led by Sheffield Edwards, executed the wiretapping, monitoring the journalists’ home and office phones. The surveillance results identified congressional sources, including then-Speaker of the House John McCormack, who spoke with Scott on March 26, 1963. The "Family Jewels"—a 1973 CIA document declassified in 2007—later exposed this operation, revealing its scope and raising questions about its legality. Daniel L. Pines, a CIA Assistant General Counsel, argued in a 2009 Indiana Law Journal review that the wiretapping likely violated legal bounds, as its primary aim was to trace leaks rather than gather foreign intelligence. This historical Project Mockingbird, though limited in duration and scope, planted a seed of distrust between the government, the press, and the public—a seed that would grow into a broader narrative of media manipulation. From Wiretaps to Media Empire While Project Mockingbird of 1963 was a discrete surveillance effort, it became conflated with a larger CIA program dubbed "Operation Mockingbird." This narrative emerged most prominently in Deborah Davis’s 1979 book, Katharine the Great, which claimed that the CIA, under Frank Wisner of the Office of Policy Coordination, had systematically infiltrated American media starting in the 1950s. Davis alleged that Wisner recruited Washington Post publisher Phil Graham to orchestrate a propaganda network, embedding CIA-friendly journalists in outlets like The New York Times, Newsweek, and CBS. Cord Meyer, a key CIA figure, was said to have taken the reins in 1951, expanding the operation’s reach. The Church Committee’s 1975-1976 investigation lent some credence to these claims, uncovering CIA ties to around 50 American journalists and covert funding of front groups like the National Student Association, exposed by Ramparts magazine in 1967. Carl Bernstein’s 1977 Rolling Stone article, "The CIA and the Media," further detailed how over 400 U.S. journalists had covertly worked with the CIA, often disseminating propaganda abroad that would then filter back to domestic audiences. the CIA admitted overreach. By 1976, under Director George H.W. Bush, the CIA publicly pledged to end paid relationships with U.S. journalists. Yet, skeptics argued the agency merely shifted tactics, maintaining influence through foreign media outlets that indirectly shaped American narratives. The line between historical fact and conspiracy theory blurred, setting the stage for modern reinterpretations of Mockingbird’s legacy. They claim. The Turning Point came in 2013 and the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act Fast forward to July 2, 2013, a date that marks a pivotal shift in the Mockingbird saga. Under President Barack Obama, the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act—embedded in the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)—took effect. This legislation amended the U.S. Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948, commonly known as the Smith-Mundt Act, which had long barred government-funded broadcasters like Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty—overseen by the Broadcasting Board of Governors (now the U.S. Agency for Global Media, USAGM)—from disseminating their content domestically. The original intent was to prevent the U.S. government from propagandizing its own citizens, a safeguard rooted in post-World War II fears of authoritarian overreach. The 2013 amendment, co-sponsored by Representatives Adam Smith (D-WA) and Mac Thornberry (R-TX), lifted this restriction, allowing USAGM content to be requested and accessed by Americans. Proponents hailed it as a transparency win, arguing that taxpayers deserved to see what their dollars funded—news and programming in 61 languages, reaching over 100 countries. Critics, however, saw it as a Pandora’s box. Foreign Policy reported on July 14, 2013, that the change unleashed "thousands of hours per week of government-funded radio and TV programs for domestic U.S. consumption," raising fears of legalized propaganda. The timing was notable: it followed a decade of post-9/11 media scrutiny and preceded a surge in misinformation debates. in 2024 claimed "Operation Mockingbird never ended," tying the NDAA to a supposed CIA media takeover. No hard evidence supports a direct CIA role, but the legal shift undeniably blurred lines between foreign and domestic information flows. While the USAGM insists its mission remains outward-facing—delivering uncensored news to foreign audiences lacking free press—and that its journalists adhere to strict objectivity standards, the repeal stoked speculation. Could this be a modern resurrection of Mockingbird-style influence? The answer is yes. Most projects they say they stopped just get renamed or go black and off the books so Congress doesn't even know it exists or get access to it. Be careful what you read, who you follow, and who you get your information from. Look for patterns and scripts. They're easy to find once you understand what's really going on and their tactics and techniques. Keep asking questions, cross reference everything, do your due diligence, have multiple sources, do not buy everything at face value, go deeper, think about the bigger picture or long term goals. And always remember that there are layers, optics, and timing to everything you see. 90% of everything that comes out gets run by the intelligence agencies first. Lastly, keep fighting for the truth and and continue to help others to wake up as well.

The SCIF

85,170 views • 1 year ago