Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

𝙸𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐, 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚔𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚒𝚜 𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚐. 𝙷𝚊𝚟𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚎𝚗𝚘𝚞𝚐𝚑 𝚌𝚊𝚙𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚕 𝚝𝚘 𝚙𝚞𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚜𝚔𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚝𝚘 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚔 𝚒𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛. Memecoins offer some of the biggest opportunities in crypto, but they also come with extreme volatility, thin liquidity and brutal downside. A trader can have the strategy, experience and... show more

PHAZE

7,205 subscribers

12,069 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

ATS Funded is officially rebranding to Fundex. When we launched in december 2025, we had one goal: build a prop firm that actually works for traders. Three weeks ago we launched real market execution, the core infrastructure our entire ecosystem is built on. No conflict of interest, instant payouts with no cap, a monthly salary for every funded trader, and zero restrictive rules at funded stage. Fundex is the new ecosystem we're building, starting today, aiming to deliver additional products at the support of traders. If you are an existing ATS Funded user, nothing has changed, your account is exactly where you left it. Log in at using your existing credentials. Your account, balance, and funded status are exactly where you left them. 👉 Website: 👉 Trading Terminal: To celebrate this moment with the community that made it possible, we are giving away $300,000 in funded capital: 30x $10,000 accounts To enter: - Follow - RT this post - Comment "fundex" below Winners announced in 72 hours

ATS Funded is officially rebranding to Fundex. When we launched in december 2025, we had one goal: build a prop firm that actually works for traders. Three weeks ago we launched real market execution, the core infrastructure our entire ecosystem is built on. No conflict of interest, instant payouts with no cap, a monthly salary for every funded trader, and zero restrictive rules at funded stage. Fundex is the new ecosystem we're building, starting today, aiming to deliver additional products at the support of traders. If you are an existing ATS Funded user, nothing has changed, your account is exactly where you left it. Log in at using your existing credentials. Your account, balance, and funded status are exactly where you left them. 👉 Website: 👉 Trading Terminal: To celebrate this moment with the community that made it possible, we are giving away $300,000 in funded capital: 30x $10,000 accounts To enter: - Follow - RT this post - Comment "fundex" below Winners announced in 72 hours

FUNDEX

555,460 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🌏 We’ve evolved. And this is more than just a logo change. 6 months in the market: 3,000+ traders, over $315K in rewards. But more important than the numbers is the mission. 🎆 The Funded Way was built on one idea: to give traders an environment where they can grow. Transparent rules, fair rewards, and a team that’s on your side. This rebrand is a signal that we’re ready for the next level. On the horizon: an academy, a program for experienced traders, and our own trading platform. Watch the video where CEO Klim Morozov shares what matters most. Visit the website, explore the new look, and join us.

The Funded Way

37,087 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Radhe Radhe Let's discuss what should be the exit strategy in a stock? An exit strategy can be different for everybody depending upon their risk profile and conviction in a stock but still a general view is expressed here by Atul sir to mitigate the risk. Also we will be discussing how to judge the promoter /management quality, a very tough Q to answer but still with the examples (both positive and negative experiences) sir has tried to answer it. Kindly retweet it for wider reach so that everybody gets benefit of sir's experience and knowledge.

Aditya Aggarwal

18,664 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The market is bleeding — stay sharp 😎 This week’s biggest story? The crash. Altcoins got wrecked, only stablecoins held their ground. No depegs (luckily), but volatility is brutal — 20-30% swings in a day. Some coins recover, others don’t. Be careful out there. 📉 Market cycles never change. We’ve seen it before — big pumps come with big dumps. If a coin can 100x, it can also erase your deposit. This is how crypto works. Have a strategy. Stick to it. 🌍 The bigger picture? Countries hint at price wars — could shake the market even more. SEC’s crypto czar still debating a national fund ($BTC reserves in play?). EU & Asia waiting on the US before making their moves. 🎥 Check out the latest updates from Blum Chats.

The market is bleeding — stay sharp 😎 This week’s biggest story? The crash. Altcoins got wrecked, only stablecoins held their ground. No depegs (luckily), but volatility is brutal — 20-30% swings in a day. Some coins recover, others don’t. Be careful out there. 📉 Market cycles never change. We’ve seen it before — big pumps come with big dumps. If a coin can 100x, it can also erase your deposit. This is how crypto works. Have a strategy. Stick to it. 🌍 The bigger picture? Countries hint at price wars — could shake the market even more. SEC’s crypto czar still debating a national fund ($BTC reserves in play?). EU & Asia waiting on the US before making their moves. 🎥 Check out the latest updates from Blum Chats.

Blum

54,884 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

We teach our students entrepreneurship from a young age. This is an annual flea market where students bring their used toys, books and anything they don’t want to school to sell to their fellow schoolmates and even teachers. Before the market starts, we teach them how to advertise, price, negotiate and give change. This way, they can learn the art of buying and selling, get rid of things they don’t want and have fun. These are practical skills and knowledge that we should also give our children in Nigeria. Not all of them, but some of them will find their calling in business and can start at a young age. Our teachers have an instrumental role to play in teaching them, encouraging them and gaining other skills other than just teaching students what is in text books. The online world now is providing more opportunities to do business, and kids should be in this action. It will sow seeds for our future business ecosystem and add more value to our economy.

We teach our students entrepreneurship from a young age. This is an annual flea market where students bring their used toys, books and anything they don’t want to school to sell to their fellow schoolmates and even teachers. Before the market starts, we teach them how to advertise, price, negotiate and give change. This way, they can learn the art of buying and selling, get rid of things they don’t want and have fun. These are practical skills and knowledge that we should also give our children in Nigeria. Not all of them, but some of them will find their calling in business and can start at a young age. Our teachers have an instrumental role to play in teaching them, encouraging them and gaining other skills other than just teaching students what is in text books. The online world now is providing more opportunities to do business, and kids should be in this action. It will sow seeds for our future business ecosystem and add more value to our economy.

Dan Bello

38,851 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: When asked about how 3:15 PM cutoffs and closing auction price spreads are disrupting his algorithmic hedging and intraday risk management, with Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) confirming Closing Auction Session (CAS) is permanent, Shrikant Chouhan, Head of Equity Research, Kotak Securities, says, "...If we go through with the CAS-related issues which are giving some kind of uneasiness for option traders... this time option traders, they are mainly affected. The reason is that between this time gap, the prices change a lot, and because of that, most of the time on the day of expiry, especially on the day of expiry, it actually impacts option traders, those who are like writers. Broadly, we are of the view that at present SEBI is holding a lot of meetings with brokers, traders, algo traders, and they are designing their framework... they are ready to make changes as per the difficulties which traders are facing... broadly, I am of the view that it may take some time, but in the next maybe 1-2 months, definitely something will come out concrete, and based on that, again, we can see normalisation in the market... till then, option traders, especially writers or those who are using algorithms, they are trying to stay away from the market because of which volatility has also come down sharply in the market. You can see the market is falling gradually, but at the same time, intraday volatility is very low. Even if we consider Volatility Index (VIX), India's VIX index, that is also close to 11 or maybe 11.5 sort of levels, which is the lowest... it means that option traders are not active in this market. That is why I am of the view that it will take some time to come to normalcy. But eventually, definitely, we will come out with something that will help traders, option traders, I mean to say, in terms of managing their risk. It's not that they can increase their volume and all because our government is primarily focusing on controlling this particular speculative activity... they are trying to control that, and maybe because of that, I think they will come out with something which is very balanced."

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: When asked about how 3:15 PM cutoffs and closing auction price spreads are disrupting his algorithmic hedging and intraday risk management, with Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) confirming Closing Auction Session (CAS) is permanent, Shrikant Chouhan, Head of Equity Research, Kotak Securities, says, "...If we go through with the CAS-related issues which are giving some kind of uneasiness for option traders... this time option traders, they are mainly affected. The reason is that between this time gap, the prices change a lot, and because of that, most of the time on the day of expiry, especially on the day of expiry, it actually impacts option traders, those who are like writers. Broadly, we are of the view that at present SEBI is holding a lot of meetings with brokers, traders, algo traders, and they are designing their framework... they are ready to make changes as per the difficulties which traders are facing... broadly, I am of the view that it may take some time, but in the next maybe 1-2 months, definitely something will come out concrete, and based on that, again, we can see normalisation in the market... till then, option traders, especially writers or those who are using algorithms, they are trying to stay away from the market because of which volatility has also come down sharply in the market. You can see the market is falling gradually, but at the same time, intraday volatility is very low. Even if we consider Volatility Index (VIX), India's VIX index, that is also close to 11 or maybe 11.5 sort of levels, which is the lowest... it means that option traders are not active in this market. That is why I am of the view that it will take some time to come to normalcy. But eventually, definitely, we will come out with something that will help traders, option traders, I mean to say, in terms of managing their risk. It's not that they can increase their volume and all because our government is primarily focusing on controlling this particular speculative activity... they are trying to control that, and maybe because of that, I think they will come out with something which is very balanced."

ANI

37,157 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

I'm posting this not to complain about abuses, but to let you know how the Islamic ecosystem works. Just see the handle names; almost all are with Hindu names. Jihadists have created lakhs of fake accounts to use like this. It seems they use some kind of tech because they're making the same comments on different posts at the same time with different accounts. GOI should come up with something to stop this, as such things can be used in creating violence, etc. In my opinion, Aadhar verification to create a social media account should become compulsory. People can be anonymous, but they'll have to verify their documents and shouldn't be allowed to create more than 2-3 accounts. Rajeev Chandrasekhar (Parody)

I'm posting this not to complain about abuses, but to let you know how the Islamic ecosystem works. Just see the handle names; almost all are with Hindu names. Jihadists have created lakhs of fake accounts to use like this. It seems they use some kind of tech because they're making the same comments on different posts at the same time with different accounts. GOI should come up with something to stop this, as such things can be used in creating violence, etc. In my opinion, Aadhar verification to create a social media account should become compulsory. People can be anonymous, but they'll have to verify their documents and shouldn't be allowed to create more than 2-3 accounts. Rajeev Chandrasekhar (Parody)

Mr Sinha

181,063 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

.Naval: Marxism, besides denying human incentives, also has a problem where it just assumes that everything is finite and we're all just dividing up the same small set of things. Well, the cavemen didn't have color TVs, computers, cars, antibiotics, or medicine. They were not sitting around dividing up the same few things. The knowledge grows, and we create more. It also tends to assume that we can freeze frame at some point in society and say, 'Well, we have enough different kinds of sneakers, enough different kinds of housing, we just need to allocate it better.' And that is not how anything works. David Deutsch has a great definition of wealth, which he says is the set of physical transformations that we can affect. So, when you think about it that way, you realize that knowledge is not just stored capital in the classic Marxist sense (capital vs. labor), but it's also knowledge on what to do with that capital. The cavemen or Palaeolithic ancestors had access to all the same resources we did. They were living on the same Earth, and by the modern environmentalist arguments, they had a better Earth—they had more to do things with. But yet, they couldn't do anything. They were not wealthy by any stretch of the imagination. Why? Because of knowledge. Life is not a zero-sum game, it's a positive-sum game. But we are hardwired to think it's a zero-sum game because, for millions or billions of years, there was no such thing as wealth. There was no such thing as persistent knowledge creation in the environment. What you had was a small amount of resources being divided up, and most of the games were status games—'Which monkey outranks which other monkey?' And that decides which monkey gets to eat first. We played that game for a billion years. Now, we come onto a recent game where, actually, we can all eat, and the big problem is obesity. It's no longer starvation. The big problem is boredom. It's not actually work. There's enough work. So, in this environment, switching your evolved mindset from a zero-sum game to a positive-sum game where we can all win, if we create knowledge together and use the resources that we have to create more resources and more wealth, that's the game we all need to be playing now.

.Naval: Marxism, besides denying human incentives, also has a problem where it just assumes that everything is finite and we're all just dividing up the same small set of things. Well, the cavemen didn't have color TVs, computers, cars, antibiotics, or medicine. They were not sitting around dividing up the same few things. The knowledge grows, and we create more. It also tends to assume that we can freeze frame at some point in society and say, 'Well, we have enough different kinds of sneakers, enough different kinds of housing, we just need to allocate it better.' And that is not how anything works. David Deutsch has a great definition of wealth, which he says is the set of physical transformations that we can affect. So, when you think about it that way, you realize that knowledge is not just stored capital in the classic Marxist sense (capital vs. labor), but it's also knowledge on what to do with that capital. The cavemen or Palaeolithic ancestors had access to all the same resources we did. They were living on the same Earth, and by the modern environmentalist arguments, they had a better Earth—they had more to do things with. But yet, they couldn't do anything. They were not wealthy by any stretch of the imagination. Why? Because of knowledge. Life is not a zero-sum game, it's a positive-sum game. But we are hardwired to think it's a zero-sum game because, for millions or billions of years, there was no such thing as wealth. There was no such thing as persistent knowledge creation in the environment. What you had was a small amount of resources being divided up, and most of the games were status games—'Which monkey outranks which other monkey?' And that decides which monkey gets to eat first. We played that game for a billion years. Now, we come onto a recent game where, actually, we can all eat, and the big problem is obesity. It's no longer starvation. The big problem is boredom. It's not actually work. There's enough work. So, in this environment, switching your evolved mindset from a zero-sum game to a positive-sum game where we can all win, if we create knowledge together and use the resources that we have to create more resources and more wealth, that's the game we all need to be playing now.

Arjun Khemani

163,525 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

FundedNext is entering a bold new era! 🚀 Today marks a major milestone in our journey, the 3rd anniversary of FundedNext - and we’re celebrating the day by proudly unveiling our new logo ‘FN’ and an inspiring vision: “For every trader, every market.” The statement focuses on FN’s vision of a unified trading ecosystem, built for any trader, anywhere around the globe. With this new identity, FN (FundedNext) is taking its next big step, beginning with the consecutive launches of a Futures Prop Trading firm and a CFD brokerage. This is just the beginning of something bigger! FN (FundedNext) looks forward to bridging the gap between proprietary trading, brokerage, and diversified solutions, creating a seamless environment where traders can grow, connect, and trade across multiple asset classes. More opportunities, same unmatched 15% profit share from challenge phase profits, 24-hour payouts, and trader-first solutions! The next era of trading starts now—are you ready?

FundedNext

43,813 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

DROPS E38: Vanta Trading - The Best Traders Won't Be Human Arrash is the founder and CEO of Vanta Trading, a decentralized prop trading platform built on Bittensor. He spent years as a quant trader building his own strategies before deciding the entire funded-account industry needed to be rebuilt from the ground up. We talk about: - Why most "funded accounts" trade on money that doesn't exist - Why your payout was never real - How prop firms intentionally change rules and spreads before you cash out - Why the best traders of the future won't be human And much more… Timestamps: 0:00 Introduction 1:48 Founder of Vanta 3:08 Explaining Vanta to an Uber Driver 3:26 Unfair vs Fair Funding 6:37 How do they make money? 8:33 How a Legit Prop Firm Makes Money 9:43 Founder's Journey Into Entrepreneurship 10:42 Discovering Crypto & Blockchain 13:03 From LinkedIn Engineer to Quant Trader 15:22 Trading Strategies 16:13 How Trading Is Changing? 18:39 Why TradFi Should Fear Hyperliquid 19:16 Building on BitTensor 21:43 Explaining BitTensor Simply 22:03 How BitTensor Creates Value 23:17 BitTensor's Structure 24:36 BitTensor as Crypto AI 25:35 Is the BitTensor Hype Justified? 27:09 Revenue & Profitability in BitTensor 29:17 Role of TAO 29:51 Advantages & Limitations of BitTensor ecosystem 31:56 What Is Vanta? 32:26 Why No One Fixed Prop Trading Before 33:12 Is the Entire Industry a Scam? 34:17 How Prop Firms Really Make Money 35:35 How Vanta Is Different 38:33 Copy Trading Explained 39:30 Vanta's Business Model 40:28 Dark Reality Behind Funded Accounts 43:48 Long-Term Vision for Vanta 44:50 What Happens If Too Many Traders Win? 46:25 Future Belongs to AI Traders 47:59 Vanta's Endgame 49:14 Conclusion

DROPS E38: Vanta Trading - The Best Traders Won't Be Human Arrash is the founder and CEO of Vanta Trading, a decentralized prop trading platform built on Bittensor. He spent years as a quant trader building his own strategies before deciding the entire funded-account industry needed to be rebuilt from the ground up. We talk about: - Why most "funded accounts" trade on money that doesn't exist - Why your payout was never real - How prop firms intentionally change rules and spreads before you cash out - Why the best traders of the future won't be human And much more… Timestamps: 0:00 Introduction 1:48 Founder of Vanta 3:08 Explaining Vanta to an Uber Driver 3:26 Unfair vs Fair Funding 6:37 How do they make money? 8:33 How a Legit Prop Firm Makes Money 9:43 Founder's Journey Into Entrepreneurship 10:42 Discovering Crypto & Blockchain 13:03 From LinkedIn Engineer to Quant Trader 15:22 Trading Strategies 16:13 How Trading Is Changing? 18:39 Why TradFi Should Fear Hyperliquid 19:16 Building on BitTensor 21:43 Explaining BitTensor Simply 22:03 How BitTensor Creates Value 23:17 BitTensor's Structure 24:36 BitTensor as Crypto AI 25:35 Is the BitTensor Hype Justified? 27:09 Revenue & Profitability in BitTensor 29:17 Role of TAO 29:51 Advantages & Limitations of BitTensor ecosystem 31:56 What Is Vanta? 32:26 Why No One Fixed Prop Trading Before 33:12 Is the Entire Industry a Scam? 34:17 How Prop Firms Really Make Money 35:35 How Vanta Is Different 38:33 Copy Trading Explained 39:30 Vanta's Business Model 40:28 Dark Reality Behind Funded Accounts 43:48 Long-Term Vision for Vanta 44:50 What Happens If Too Many Traders Win? 46:25 Future Belongs to AI Traders 47:59 Vanta's Endgame 49:14 Conclusion

MR SHIFT 🦁

37,896 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

David Tepper on the classic trap of trading against liquidity: "i'm constructive because of the easing right now but i'm also miserable because of the levels. nothing's cheap anymore... but i'm not fighting the fed." a lot of traders blow up their accounts by trying to short all-time highs. they look at overheated sectors, see insane multiples, and bet on a crash just because things look way too expensive Tepper’s logic explains why that's a mistake: liquidity always beats valuation the market can be completely detached from reality, and a bubble can stay stretched way longer than you can stay solvent. if central banks are pumping money and cutting rates, fighting that momentum is just financial suicide your logic might tell you the prices are stupid. but the ultimate rule of survival is simple: never stand in front of the money printer bookmark and watch the talk below

David Tepper on the classic trap of trading against liquidity: "i'm constructive because of the easing right now but i'm also miserable because of the levels. nothing's cheap anymore... but i'm not fighting the fed." a lot of traders blow up their accounts by trying to short all-time highs. they look at overheated sectors, see insane multiples, and bet on a crash just because things look way too expensive Tepper’s logic explains why that's a mistake: liquidity always beats valuation the market can be completely detached from reality, and a bubble can stay stretched way longer than you can stay solvent. if central banks are pumping money and cutting rates, fighting that momentum is just financial suicide your logic might tell you the prices are stupid. but the ultimate rule of survival is simple: never stand in front of the money printer bookmark and watch the talk below

ludoonchart

207,609 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Today The Arena rolls out the next evolution of social trading! Introducing Copy Trading Here’s how it works 👇 Automatically copy any trader of Arena perps on Hyperliquid. Check the sentiment around the trader based on their recent trades and pledge a certain amount to copy trade them. Determine how much you want to pledge to copy a specific trader. When the trader puts in the trade, we calculate what percentage of their total portfolio is on the line and we mirror that percentage based on the funds you’ve pledged. Each time the trader initiates a trade, funds will automatically be deployed to copy the trade. Even if it’s the middle of the night and you’re fast asleep, never miss another profitable trade! For example, if you pledge $1,000 to copy a trader and they put 5% of their portfolio on a trade, $50 will be automatically deployed on the same trade. Traders earn fees from their copy traders after each profitable trade. The only action that will not be copied is adding additional margin, but we will still give the copy traders the option to manually add more margin very soon. If you’re a profitable trader, gain a following and get rewarded for making others money. If you are not a profitable trader, level up today by copying some of the best traders on a transparent leaderboard. Earn more, trade less. Only on The Arena ⚔️

Today The Arena rolls out the next evolution of social trading! Introducing Copy Trading Here’s how it works 👇 Automatically copy any trader of Arena perps on Hyperliquid. Check the sentiment around the trader based on their recent trades and pledge a certain amount to copy trade them. Determine how much you want to pledge to copy a specific trader. When the trader puts in the trade, we calculate what percentage of their total portfolio is on the line and we mirror that percentage based on the funds you’ve pledged. Each time the trader initiates a trade, funds will automatically be deployed to copy the trade. Even if it’s the middle of the night and you’re fast asleep, never miss another profitable trade! For example, if you pledge $1,000 to copy a trader and they put 5% of their portfolio on a trade, $50 will be automatically deployed on the same trade. Traders earn fees from their copy traders after each profitable trade. The only action that will not be copied is adding additional margin, but we will still give the copy traders the option to manually add more margin very soon. If you’re a profitable trader, gain a following and get rewarded for making others money. If you are not a profitable trader, level up today by copying some of the best traders on a transparent leaderboard. Earn more, trade less. Only on The Arena ⚔️

The Arena ⚔️

13,290 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

At the BNB Chain hackathon, CZ 🔶 BNB made several very important points about AI trading (Everything in parentheses is my own view and judgment.) He first said that AI will be involved in trading everywhere. Trading itself is already a huge market: there are 300 million users on Binance alone, and if you add the decentralized ecosystems, that number is not small either. In such a mass-market environment, many different trading strategies can work, with countless different coins, different projects, and different ways to play. But there is a big problem here: building commercial AI trading platforms for retail users is actually very hard. If a trading strategy works very well for one person, once a billion people start using the same strategy, that strategy “might still work, or might stop working.” Take copy trading / follow trading as an example: if you buy first and everyone follows you, the first buyer will perform very well, but the last person to follow may not end up with good results. So, with the exact same strategy and the exact same copy logic, the outcomes can be completely different for different people. (On top of that, every strategy also has its own capital capacity limits.) Teams that can really build strong AI are, with high probability, going to trade with their own money. In today’s world, money itself is already somewhat like a “commodity”; many people have a lot of capital, and it’s actually not that hard to raise funds. If you truly have an algorithm that can make a lot of money, it’s not hard to get money and run your own book. There is really only one situation where you would sell this algorithm to mass-market users: for example, if you charge a $10 monthly subscription and can sell it to one million users, then your $10 million monthly subscription revenue is higher than the profit you could make by trading the strategy yourself. (Here this touches one of our earlier theses: as training AI models becomes relatively easier and the supply of models increases, model companies have more incentive to open-source. By analogy, as the production process of trading strategies is increasingly simplified by AI and the supply of strategies explodes, traders will have stronger incentives to monetize by expanding their influence in other words, by “open-sourcing” their strategies.) Of course, CZ did not say that this model can never work. Another path is to build an AI trading platform that lets users tune different AI algorithms, or very easily assemble their own structures and strategies, so that what each person ends up running is different and better tailored to themselves. Some people will make money, some people will lose money, but the platform still has value because it’s very hard for most people to build an AI trading algorithm from scratch. So there are a lot of trade-offs here; it’s not as simple as saying “once AI shows up, everything automatically gets better.” (This is exactly what we presented at the hackathon: you describe your own strategy in natural language, and the AI automatically generates a workflow. The parameters in that workflow, the models used, the logical structure, the APIs it calls, and even the algorithms it invokes are all customizable. The reasons we think workflows are a good way to do this include: controllable execution paths, Lego-like modular nodes, and better visualization that makes it easier for users to build and adjust their workflows.) Finally, his conclusion was very clear: it’s not that AI will definitely make trading better, and it’s not that AI will definitely make things worse. Rather, no matter what, in the future a huge number of people will use AI to trade. This will be a very large field, and whoever can build the best algorithms will make a lot of money.

At the BNB Chain hackathon, CZ 🔶 BNB made several very important points about AI trading (Everything in parentheses is my own view and judgment.) He first said that AI will be involved in trading everywhere. Trading itself is already a huge market: there are 300 million users on Binance alone, and if you add the decentralized ecosystems, that number is not small either. In such a mass-market environment, many different trading strategies can work, with countless different coins, different projects, and different ways to play. But there is a big problem here: building commercial AI trading platforms for retail users is actually very hard. If a trading strategy works very well for one person, once a billion people start using the same strategy, that strategy “might still work, or might stop working.” Take copy trading / follow trading as an example: if you buy first and everyone follows you, the first buyer will perform very well, but the last person to follow may not end up with good results. So, with the exact same strategy and the exact same copy logic, the outcomes can be completely different for different people. (On top of that, every strategy also has its own capital capacity limits.) Teams that can really build strong AI are, with high probability, going to trade with their own money. In today’s world, money itself is already somewhat like a “commodity”; many people have a lot of capital, and it’s actually not that hard to raise funds. If you truly have an algorithm that can make a lot of money, it’s not hard to get money and run your own book. There is really only one situation where you would sell this algorithm to mass-market users: for example, if you charge a $10 monthly subscription and can sell it to one million users, then your $10 million monthly subscription revenue is higher than the profit you could make by trading the strategy yourself. (Here this touches one of our earlier theses: as training AI models becomes relatively easier and the supply of models increases, model companies have more incentive to open-source. By analogy, as the production process of trading strategies is increasingly simplified by AI and the supply of strategies explodes, traders will have stronger incentives to monetize by expanding their influence in other words, by “open-sourcing” their strategies.) Of course, CZ did not say that this model can never work. Another path is to build an AI trading platform that lets users tune different AI algorithms, or very easily assemble their own structures and strategies, so that what each person ends up running is different and better tailored to themselves. Some people will make money, some people will lose money, but the platform still has value because it’s very hard for most people to build an AI trading algorithm from scratch. So there are a lot of trade-offs here; it’s not as simple as saying “once AI shows up, everything automatically gets better.” (This is exactly what we presented at the hackathon: you describe your own strategy in natural language, and the AI automatically generates a workflow. The parameters in that workflow, the models used, the logical structure, the APIs it calls, and even the algorithms it invokes are all customizable. The reasons we think workflows are a good way to do this include: controllable execution paths, Lego-like modular nodes, and better visualization that makes it easier for users to build and adjust their workflows.) Finally, his conclusion was very clear: it’s not that AI will definitely make trading better, and it’s not that AI will definitely make things worse. Rather, no matter what, in the future a huge number of people will use AI to trade. This will be a very large field, and whoever can build the best algorithms will make a lot of money.

Tykoo

25,535 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

There’s a truth prop firms don’t tell traders… And many traders don’t even realize it. Let me spill it. To get a $100K prop firm account, you usually pay $1,500 – $2,500. A $1M account can cost $5,000 – $20,000. But here’s the catch: Most prop firms offer 1:20 – 1:50 leverage Maybe 1:100 at best. Then they add: • Daily drawdown limits • Maximum drawdown rules • Strict risk parameters So what does that really mean? Even though it says $100K account, the usable risk capital is closer to ~$5K–$7K. That’s the real buying power you’re trading with. Now think about this: Most traders on a $100K funded account withdraw around $5K – $20K during payouts. But ask yourself honestly… Have you ever seen someone withdraw $100K from a $100K account? Rare. Now consider the time cost: • Phase 1 • Phase 2 • Sometimes Phase 3 During those stages you might make great profits — but it’s all on demo. You get nothing for it. Now imagine this instead: If you took that $2,500 challenge fee And traded your own capital with the same strategy… Could you scale it to $5K, $10K, even $20K in a few months? Many traders probably could. Another truth most people don’t talk about: Some prop firms copy trades from profitable traders on the backend and make multiples of what the trader earns. So they profit from: • Challenge fees • Failed accounts • And even your winning trades Which makes you wonder… Should traders actually be paying prop firms? Or should prop firms be looking for traders for free? Just something to think about. Not financial advice. Just my personal perspective as a trader.

There’s a truth prop firms don’t tell traders… And many traders don’t even realize it. Let me spill it. To get a $100K prop firm account, you usually pay $1,500 – $2,500. A $1M account can cost $5,000 – $20,000. But here’s the catch: Most prop firms offer 1:20 – 1:50 leverage Maybe 1:100 at best. Then they add: • Daily drawdown limits • Maximum drawdown rules • Strict risk parameters So what does that really mean? Even though it says $100K account, the usable risk capital is closer to ~$5K–$7K. That’s the real buying power you’re trading with. Now think about this: Most traders on a $100K funded account withdraw around $5K – $20K during payouts. But ask yourself honestly… Have you ever seen someone withdraw $100K from a $100K account? Rare. Now consider the time cost: • Phase 1 • Phase 2 • Sometimes Phase 3 During those stages you might make great profits — but it’s all on demo. You get nothing for it. Now imagine this instead: If you took that $2,500 challenge fee And traded your own capital with the same strategy… Could you scale it to $5K, $10K, even $20K in a few months? Many traders probably could. Another truth most people don’t talk about: Some prop firms copy trades from profitable traders on the backend and make multiples of what the trader earns. So they profit from: • Challenge fees • Failed accounts • And even your winning trades Which makes you wonder… Should traders actually be paying prop firms? Or should prop firms be looking for traders for free? Just something to think about. Not financial advice. Just my personal perspective as a trader.

Bonafide Brand

26,212 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Are you ready to multiply your $DEFI tokens and get dozens of unlimited opportunities? $DEFI Staking — a key in the realm of #De_Fi! 🔥 Here's what's in store for you: • Massive 60% APR: Yes, that's right! By simply staking your $DEFI tokens, you can now earn an impressive 60% APR. • Lock-In for Extra Rewards: But wait, there's more! Users that stake tokens for longer durations, could potentially double or even triple your holdings. The longer you stake, the greater your rewards! But that's not all — stakers will also enjoy exclusive access to upcoming utility and products within the #De_Fi ecosystem. Token will be a key element to access the ecosystem that about to explode! And here's a little secret 🤫: staking $DEFI tokens might just come with some additional rewards 🪂

Are you ready to multiply your $DEFI tokens and get dozens of unlimited opportunities? $DEFI Staking — a key in the realm of #De_Fi! 🔥 Here's what's in store for you: • Massive 60% APR: Yes, that's right! By simply staking your $DEFI tokens, you can now earn an impressive 60% APR. • Lock-In for Extra Rewards: But wait, there's more! Users that stake tokens for longer durations, could potentially double or even triple your holdings. The longer you stake, the greater your rewards! But that's not all — stakers will also enjoy exclusive access to upcoming utility and products within the #De_Fi ecosystem. Token will be a key element to access the ecosystem that about to explode! And here's a little secret 🤫: staking $DEFI tokens might just come with some additional rewards 🪂

De.Fi

57,326 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Most people think you need big money to start trading. You don’t‼️ What you actually need is skill, discipline, and patience. Starting small in trading is not a disadvantage. It’s actually one of the best things that can happen to a trader. Because when the account is small, the focus shifts away from chasing money and moves toward learning the game properly. You learn risk management. You learn patience. You learn that one clean setup is better than ten emotional trades. A lot of traders blow accounts because they try to skip the process. They want the big payouts immediately. They want the fast life before building the foundation. But the market has a way of humbling anyone who moves too fast. The traders who win long term are the ones who focus on percentages, not account size. Because if you can grow $100 consistently, you can grow $10,000. If you can manage risk on 0.01 lots, you can manage risk on 10 lots. The skill doesn’t change. Only the scale does. This is why smart traders build their edge first. Once the consistency is there, capital becomes easier to access, - whether through prop firms, reinvestment, or scaling up accounts. Trading is not about one lucky trade. It’s about building a system that works over and over again. So if you’re starting small, don’t rush it. Master the process. Protect your capital. Stay disciplined. Because in trading, small beginnings with consistency will always beat big accounts with no discipline.

Most people think you need big money to start trading. You don’t‼️ What you actually need is skill, discipline, and patience. Starting small in trading is not a disadvantage. It’s actually one of the best things that can happen to a trader. Because when the account is small, the focus shifts away from chasing money and moves toward learning the game properly. You learn risk management. You learn patience. You learn that one clean setup is better than ten emotional trades. A lot of traders blow accounts because they try to skip the process. They want the big payouts immediately. They want the fast life before building the foundation. But the market has a way of humbling anyone who moves too fast. The traders who win long term are the ones who focus on percentages, not account size. Because if you can grow $100 consistently, you can grow $10,000. If you can manage risk on 0.01 lots, you can manage risk on 10 lots. The skill doesn’t change. Only the scale does. This is why smart traders build their edge first. Once the consistency is there, capital becomes easier to access, - whether through prop firms, reinvestment, or scaling up accounts. Trading is not about one lucky trade. It’s about building a system that works over and over again. So if you’re starting small, don’t rush it. Master the process. Protect your capital. Stay disciplined. Because in trading, small beginnings with consistency will always beat big accounts with no discipline.

Techriz💯📈

83,572 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Dan Loeb on the opportunities created by quants, CTAs, and pod shops: "The advantage of a fundamental investor, who doesn't make trading decisions based on computers, is that there are still a lot of market irregularities caused by some very good strategies, but collectively they create anomalies. You have quants, CTAs, pods. They have a great strategy for them and their investors, but it causes some unusual behaviors. Fundamental investors believe that, as Warren Buffett would say, if a stock goes down, you celebrate it because it's a chance to buy more at a better price. They have risk metrics which have forced selling on the way down, so they do the opposite. It might be rational for their business model, but it's not rational for long-term investors. That's where the human element comes in. To make those tough trading decisions when fundamentals are going one way and stock prices are going the other way, and to take the pain of losses in the short run."

Dan Loeb on the opportunities created by quants, CTAs, and pod shops: "The advantage of a fundamental investor, who doesn't make trading decisions based on computers, is that there are still a lot of market irregularities caused by some very good strategies, but collectively they create anomalies. You have quants, CTAs, pods. They have a great strategy for them and their investors, but it causes some unusual behaviors. Fundamental investors believe that, as Warren Buffett would say, if a stock goes down, you celebrate it because it's a chance to buy more at a better price. They have risk metrics which have forced selling on the way down, so they do the opposite. It might be rational for their business model, but it's not rational for long-term investors. That's where the human element comes in. To make those tough trading decisions when fundamentals are going one way and stock prices are going the other way, and to take the pain of losses in the short run."

Patrick OShaughnessy

236,028 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Elon Musk: Government-funded NGOs are maybe the biggest scam ever. “There was a case where we saw one person was getting $1.9 billion sent to their NGO, which basically got formed about a year ago and had really no prior activity. The whole NGO thing is a nightmare and it's a misnomer because if you have a government-funded non-governmental organization, you're simply a government-funded organization. It's an oxymoron. Basically, the government-funded NGOs are a way to do things that would be illegal if they were the government, but are somehow made legal if it's sent to a so-called nonprofit. People cash out these nonprofits, they become very wealthy through nonprofits. They pay themselves enormous sums through these nonprofits. It's a gigantic scam. Like one of the biggest, maybe the biggest scam ever.” The Joe Rogan Experience, February 28, 2025

Elon Musk: Government-funded NGOs are maybe the biggest scam ever. “There was a case where we saw one person was getting $1.9 billion sent to their NGO, which basically got formed about a year ago and had really no prior activity. The whole NGO thing is a nightmare and it's a misnomer because if you have a government-funded non-governmental organization, you're simply a government-funded organization. It's an oxymoron. Basically, the government-funded NGOs are a way to do things that would be illegal if they were the government, but are somehow made legal if it's sent to a so-called nonprofit. People cash out these nonprofits, they become very wealthy through nonprofits. They pay themselves enormous sums through these nonprofits. It's a gigantic scam. Like one of the biggest, maybe the biggest scam ever.” The Joe Rogan Experience, February 28, 2025

ELON CLIPS

40,078 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten