American Reform
@AmericanReform_ • 7,206 subscribers
Roman Catholic | Jesus Christ is King | American Integralism | Thesis of Cassiciacum ➸ Founder of The Journal of American Reform ➸ Editor @IntegritasMag
Videos
Fulton Sheen explains his views on excommunication to William F. Buckley in 1970 on ‘Firing Line’. “Well again, it’s the change with the spirit of the times. I think the Church has become much more patient and kind. It’s much more related to the world than it was then — the Church was very much locked up in itself, after all what the Vatican Council did was to relate it to the world.” Hyper progressive. Watch until the end. ☠️
American Reform13,533 views • 3 days ago
![Before Dr. Taylor Marshall disclosed asking for the intercession of Francis, as was on display last week, it is worthwhile to recall what Marshall said about the same man just four years ago, in 2022. — For those unfamiliar with Marshall’s work, this was his fundamental attitude towards Francis until his death, always being one of his most severe critics. In his video entitled “Who divides the Church, those speaking heresy or the heretics?” Dr. Marshall recounted the response of faithful Catholics to Archbishop Nestorius and his public profession of heresy, applauding those who denounced the heretical Archbishop. Marshall then defended himself against those who would say “Taylor, you can’t say that. You shouldn’t say that. That’s bad. You’re dividing the Church. You’re leading people out of the Church. No [emphatic] it’s the heretics [pointing at Cardinal Hollerich and Francis] who are dividing the Church.” After this, Dr. Taylor Marshall plainly and confidently called Francis a heretic. “Francis, heretic. In the public, word for word, denied what Pius XII taught. Heretic.” One must therefore ask: why would Marshall ask someone he identified as a heretic to intercede for him, especially if the heretic never publicly abjured his views and made public reparation? To use Marshall’s own historical analogy, it would be like asking for the intercession of Archbishop Nestorius. Unthinkable.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2099484147483853009/amplify_video_thumb/2099484062029144066/img/FLRrfh5nLivnP_t6.jpg)
Before Dr. Taylor Marshall disclosed asking for the intercession of Francis, as was on display last week, it is worthwhile to recall what Marshall said about the same man just four years ago, in 2022. — For those unfamiliar with Marshall’s work, this was his fundamental attitude towards Francis until his death, always being one of his most severe critics. In his video entitled “Who divides the Church, those speaking heresy or the heretics?” Dr. Marshall recounted the response of faithful Catholics to Archbishop Nestorius and his public profession of heresy, applauding those who denounced the heretical Archbishop. Marshall then defended himself against those who would say “Taylor, you can’t say that. You shouldn’t say that. That’s bad. You’re dividing the Church. You’re leading people out of the Church. No [emphatic] it’s the heretics [pointing at Cardinal Hollerich and Francis] who are dividing the Church.” After this, Dr. Taylor Marshall plainly and confidently called Francis a heretic. “Francis, heretic. In the public, word for word, denied what Pius XII taught. Heretic.” One must therefore ask: why would Marshall ask someone he identified as a heretic to intercede for him, especially if the heretic never publicly abjured his views and made public reparation? To use Marshall’s own historical analogy, it would be like asking for the intercession of Archbishop Nestorius. Unthinkable.
American Reform12,718 views • 12 days ago
It is not unreasonable to speculate that in due time, Dr. Marshall may begin openly collaborating with John Salza and Robert Siscoe. As Marshall alludes to (though he does not fully appreciate), in the practical order, adhering to the principles of ‘Recognize and Resist’ is nearly identical to admitting a vacancy in the Apostolic See. For example, the canonizations of Francis are treated as worthless, John Paul II’s universal disciplinary laws are rejected, the Novus Ordo Missae is seen as an incentive to impiety, the conciliar errors are denounced, etc. Once acquainted with Catholic principles of ecclesiology (and ignoring the evident facts of the Crisis), Novus Ordo conservatism is the only viable option. A very interesting development.
American Reform35,439 views • 2 months ago
“Inquisition, oh! — for a liberal that’s the worst possible thing.”
American Reform24,728 views • 1 month ago
![The new head (laywoman) of the Vatican Dicastery of Communications is a feminist and made an appeal to Francis in 2022 for more female representation: “I think it’s because he’s surrounded by men [laughing]”](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2062268572232040887/amplify_video_thumb/2062268418003255297/img/mZIPRUIBKACUUanO.jpg)
Take note from Leo’s new Madame Prefect of the Dicastery for Communication!
American Reform18,271 views • 3 months ago
E. Michael Jones JD Vance supports the murder of the unborn by chemical abortion, has a Jewish Chief of Staff, organized a Hanukkah celebration at the White House this year and participated in the same, and his life-long mentor is Zionist Sodomite and billionaire, Peter Thiel.
American Reform12,350 views • 5 months ago
Bishop Sanborn, reflecting on Nostra Aetate #4, outlines the unique Jewish responsibility for the crucifixion of Christ, explaining why it cannot be attributed to all Jews at that time or, as has become popular, the Romans. Pontius Pilate, he notes, was “very, very reluctant” to authorize the crucifixion but only by the “pressure” of Jews did he ultimately consent, despite making many protests. The full clip (~7 min) is definitely worth a watch. You won’t hear any other Bishop saying this today.
American Reform11,757 views • 6 months ago
![On April 18, 2022, then Robert Cardinal Prevost gave an interview to La República where he said, “Not personally, [but] the Church teaches that the death penalty is inadmissible.” In the story by the news outlet, the prelate was described as follows, “Following the abuse suffered by a girl in the Lambayeque region, the bishop of the Diocese of Chiclayo, Monsignor Robert Prevost, rejected these violent acts that generated indignation among the population. However, he said that the Church does not accept the death penalty and proposes joint work to avoid similar situations and for justice to prevail.” At the end of the video he can be heard saying, “But seeking blood for blood, for this is not an answer.” Source:](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1920596650118058378/amplify_video_thumb/1920595960473796609/img/hcrDH_y48bl3hEO-.jpg)
On April 18, 2022, then Robert Cardinal Prevost gave an interview to La República where he said, “Not personally, [but] the Church teaches that the death penalty is inadmissible.” In the story by the news outlet, the prelate was described as follows, “Following the abuse suffered by a girl in the Lambayeque region, the bishop of the Diocese of Chiclayo, Monsignor Robert Prevost, rejected these violent acts that generated indignation among the population. However, he said that the Church does not accept the death penalty and proposes joint work to avoid similar situations and for justice to prevail.” At the end of the video he can be heard saying, “But seeking blood for blood, for this is not an answer.” Source:
American Reform19,919 views • 1 year ago
No more content to load