
American Reform
@AmericanReform_ • 6,976 subscribers
Roman Catholic | Jesus Christ is King | American Integralism | Thesis of Cassiciacum ➸ Founder of The Journal of American Reform ➸ Editor @IntegritasMag
Videos

“Inquisition, oh! — for a liberal that’s the worst possible thing.”
American Reform23,891 просмотров • 5 дней назад

It is not unreasonable to speculate that in due time, Dr. Marshall may begin openly collaborating with John Salza and Robert Siscoe. As Marshall alludes to (though he does not fully appreciate), in the practical order, adhering to the principles of ‘Recognize and Resist’ is nearly identical to admitting a vacancy in the Apostolic See. For example, the canonizations of Francis are treated as worthless, John Paul II’s universal disciplinary laws are rejected, the Novus Ordo Missae is seen as an incentive to impiety, the conciliar errors are denounced, etc. Once acquainted with Catholic principles of ecclesiology (and ignoring the evident facts of the Crisis), Novus Ordo conservatism is the only viable option. A very interesting development.
American Reform35,439 просмотров • 20 дней назад

Take note from Leo’s new Madame Prefect of the Dicastery for Communication!
American Reform18,271 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

E. Michael Jones JD Vance supports the murder of the unborn by chemical abortion, has a Jewish Chief of Staff, organized a Hanukkah celebration at the White House this year and participated in the same, and his life-long mentor is Zionist Sodomite and billionaire, Peter Thiel.
American Reform12,350 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Bishop Sanborn, reflecting on Nostra Aetate #4, outlines the unique Jewish responsibility for the crucifixion of Christ, explaining why it cannot be attributed to all Jews at that time or, as has become popular, the Romans. Pontius Pilate, he notes, was “very, very reluctant” to authorize the crucifixion but only by the “pressure” of Jews did he ultimately consent, despite making many protests. The full clip (~7 min) is definitely worth a watch. You won’t hear any other Bishop saying this today.
American Reform11,757 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Candace Owens, you asked a good question, namely which Catholic authors would say racial intermarriage is wrong? Answer: In itself (per se), it is not wrong. It is neither forbidden by Divine or Natural Law. That said, by circumstance (per accidens), it can be. In a healthy society, it will be very uncommon, though some will choose to marry outside their race, exceptionally, and they are certainly not incapable of having happy marriages. Regardless, as a general practice—for reasons adduced below—it ought to be discouraged and stigmatized, in which the State can play a role. In the current moment, the racial suicide of the White race, the practice should be even more heavily discouraged. Of course, using strictly moral means. 🧵 Thread on X about this issue:
American Reform16,948 просмотров • 1 год назад

On April 18, 2022, then Robert Cardinal Prevost gave an interview to La República where he said, “Not personally, [but] the Church teaches that the death penalty is inadmissible.” In the story by the news outlet, the prelate was described as follows, “Following the abuse suffered by a girl in the Lambayeque region, the bishop of the Diocese of Chiclayo, Monsignor Robert Prevost, rejected these violent acts that generated indignation among the population. However, he said that the Church does not accept the death penalty and proposes joint work to avoid similar situations and for justice to prevail.” At the end of the video he can be heard saying, “But seeking blood for blood, for this is not an answer.” Source:
American Reform18,375 просмотров • 1 год назад

Very subtle, but EMJ gives the entire game away. Did you catch it?
American Reform14,805 просмотров • 1 год назад
Больше нет контента для загрузки