Chris Martz's banner

Chris Martz

@ChrisMartzWX • 182,434 subscribers

Meteorologist @CFACT | Actor | Professional Pot Stirrer | “The Anti-Greta Thunberg” – NY Post | “Hollywood” - Scott Rizz | 📧 [email protected] |

Shorts

Here’s a clip from 26-years ago that Bill Nye does not want you to see. 👇 𝐁𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐍𝐲𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝟏𝟗𝟗𝟖: “Carbon is everywhere! Carbon is in every living thing... carbon is even in the air! *exhales carbon dioxide* Carbon is what makes life go! Go! Go!… Carbon is the key to life! You’ve got, got, got to respect that!” 𝐁𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐍𝐲𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟒: “We’ve created this wonderful quality of life for so many people by burning ancient carbon, ancient swamps; coal, oil, gas. We’ve just gotta stop doing that.”

Here’s a clip from 26-years ago that Bill Nye does not want you to see. 👇 𝐁𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐍𝐲𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝟏𝟗𝟗𝟖: “Carbon is everywhere! Carbon is in every living thing... carbon is even in the air! exhales carbon dioxide Carbon is what makes life go! Go! Go!… Carbon is the key to life! You’ve got, got, got to respect that!” 𝐁𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐍𝐲𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟒: “We’ve created this wonderful quality of life for so many people by burning ancient carbon, ancient swamps; coal, oil, gas. We’ve just gotta stop doing that.”

2,610,612 views

In 1995, 77.1% of global primary energy was provided by fossil fuels. As of 2024 (the latest data I could find), 76.4% still comes from fossil fuels. That's a whopping *sarc* 0.7 percentage point drop in 30 years. Governments have spent TRILLIONS of taxpayer dollars on “green” energy projects, and while growth in renewables has been enormous (particularly solar), it has barely made a dent in the global energy mix (note, these figures are based on the substitution method for fair cross-comparison, so it slightly lowers fossil fuels) because coal, oil, and natural gas consumption continue to increase year after year. If eco nuts like you actually wanted to “decarbonize” the economy, then a deregulation of and transition to nuclear fission would achieve that far faster.

In 1995, 77.1% of global primary energy was provided by fossil fuels. As of 2024 (the latest data I could find), 76.4% still comes from fossil fuels. That's a whopping sarc 0.7 percentage point drop in 30 years. Governments have spent TRILLIONS of taxpayer dollars on “green” energy projects, and while growth in renewables has been enormous (particularly solar), it has barely made a dent in the global energy mix (note, these figures are based on the substitution method for fair cross-comparison, so it slightly lowers fossil fuels) because coal, oil, and natural gas consumption continue to increase year after year. If eco nuts like you actually wanted to “decarbonize” the economy, then a deregulation of and transition to nuclear fission would achieve that far faster.

100,025 views

Since AOC is trending, I thought I would remind everyone of this wonderful gem from January 2019. “The world is going to end in 12 years if we don’t address climate change.” Seven years down. Five to go.

Since AOC is trending, I thought I would remind everyone of this wonderful gem from January 2019. “The world is going to end in 12 years if we don’t address climate change.” Seven years down. Five to go.

204,132 views

The Arctic Ocean will be ice-free by. . . 🎯 1980 🎯 1989 🎯 2000 🎯 2008 🎯 2010 🎯 2012 🎯 2013 🎯 2014 🎯 2015 🎯 2016 🎯 2017 🎯 2018 🎯 2019 🎯 2020 And now? 🎯 As early as 2027

The Arctic Ocean will be ice-free by. . . 🎯 1980 🎯 1989 🎯 2000 🎯 2008 🎯 2010 🎯 2012 🎯 2013 🎯 2014 🎯 2015 🎯 2016 🎯 2017 🎯 2018 🎯 2019 🎯 2020 And now? 🎯 As early as 2027

66,598 views

In 1995, 77.1% of global primary energy was provided by fossil fuels (coal, natural gas, and oil). As of 2024, 76.4% still comes from fossil fuels. That's a 0.7 percentage point drop in 30 years. World governments have spent TRILLIONS of dollars on “green” energy projects, and it has barely made a dent in the energy mix (note, these figures are based on the substitution method for fair comparison, so it slightly lowers fossil fuel figures). The fact is that renewable energy sources, like them or not, are largely add-ons to existing energy sources (primarily fossil fuel and nuclear power) that provide us transient savings in optimal conditions. That may change in the future with battery backup as they become cheaper, but that still won't address the fact that oil is STILL going to be needed for lubricants, plastics, fertilizers, etc. Oil is the backbone of modern society, so even if it were to no longer to be used as fuel, it will be used in another capacity and wars will be fought over it.

In 1995, 77.1% of global primary energy was provided by fossil fuels (coal, natural gas, and oil). As of 2024, 76.4% still comes from fossil fuels. That's a 0.7 percentage point drop in 30 years. World governments have spent TRILLIONS of dollars on “green” energy projects, and it has barely made a dent in the energy mix (note, these figures are based on the substitution method for fair comparison, so it slightly lowers fossil fuel figures). The fact is that renewable energy sources, like them or not, are largely add-ons to existing energy sources (primarily fossil fuel and nuclear power) that provide us transient savings in optimal conditions. That may change in the future with battery backup as they become cheaper, but that still won't address the fact that oil is STILL going to be needed for lubricants, plastics, fertilizers, etc. Oil is the backbone of modern society, so even if it were to no longer to be used as fuel, it will be used in another capacity and wars will be fought over it.

109,445 views

Global boiling is devastating Myrtle Beach today. 😜 Three inches of powder and counting. 📏☃️ Largest snowstorm since December 23-24, 1989.

Global boiling is devastating Myrtle Beach today. 😜 Three inches of powder and counting. 📏☃️ Largest snowstorm since December 23-24, 1989.

136,380 views

The Arctic Ocean will be ice-free by. . . 🎯 1980 🎯 1989 🎯 2000 🎯 2008 🎯 2010 🎯 2012 🎯 2013 🎯 2014 🎯 2015 🎯 2016 🎯 2017 🎯 2018 🎯 2019 🎯 2020 And, now, 🎯 2027 With the exception of Al Gore, the majority of these Arctic “ice-free” predictions were made by individual scientists, but they were not published in the literature per se. But they were still made and have been embarrassingly wrong. From a “peer-reviewed” perspective, the CMIP5 and CMIP6 models generally show that the first September (the month with the Northern Hemispheric sea ice minimum) with “ice-free” conditions in the Arctic (i.e., the monthly mean sea ice extent falls below 1 million km²) will occur in the 2040s, perhaps as soon as the mid-to-late 2030s. 🔗 But, if I had to make an educated guess, I would say that those ice-out dates probably won't materialize either. Time will tell. These predictions of doom do far more to undermine the public's trust in science than build it.

The Arctic Ocean will be ice-free by. . . 🎯 1980 🎯 1989 🎯 2000 🎯 2008 🎯 2010 🎯 2012 🎯 2013 🎯 2014 🎯 2015 🎯 2016 🎯 2017 🎯 2018 🎯 2019 🎯 2020 And, now, 🎯 2027 With the exception of Al Gore, the majority of these Arctic “ice-free” predictions were made by individual scientists, but they were not published in the literature per se. But they were still made and have been embarrassingly wrong. From a “peer-reviewed” perspective, the CMIP5 and CMIP6 models generally show that the first September (the month with the Northern Hemispheric sea ice minimum) with “ice-free” conditions in the Arctic (i.e., the monthly mean sea ice extent falls below 1 million km²) will occur in the 2040s, perhaps as soon as the mid-to-late 2030s. 🔗 But, if I had to make an educated guess, I would say that those ice-out dates probably won't materialize either. Time will tell. These predictions of doom do far more to undermine the public's trust in science than build it.

67,611 views

It’s simple, Joey. Because actual conservationists do not want tens of thousands of acres of forest felled just to cover the it up with solar panels when a greater number of homes can be powered by natural gas or nuclear, which require far less land. Rooftop solar is fine (if you want to spend money installing it). ✅ Littering the landscape with solar is just silly and pointless. 🙅‍♂️

It’s simple, Joey. Because actual conservationists do not want tens of thousands of acres of forest felled just to cover the it up with solar panels when a greater number of homes can be powered by natural gas or nuclear, which require far less land. Rooftop solar is fine (if you want to spend money installing it). ✅ Littering the landscape with solar is just silly and pointless. 🙅‍♂️

106,032 views

Dr. Will Happer (a friend of mine) said on Joe Rogan yesterday that climate hysteria has set back science by 50 years. 🗨️ “𝑊𝑒’𝑣𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑡 𝑏𝑎𝑐𝑘 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑢𝑠 𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑏𝑦 50 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠 𝑏𝑦 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑐 𝑓𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑠 𝑜𝑛 𝐶𝑂₂. 𝐼𝑓 𝑦𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑜𝑟𝑦 𝑑𝑜𝑒𝑠𝑛’𝑡 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝐶𝑂₂ 𝑖𝑛 𝑖𝑡, 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑡 𝑖𝑡, 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑤𝑜𝑛’𝑡 𝑔𝑒𝑡 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔.”

Dr. Will Happer (a friend of mine) said on Joe Rogan yesterday that climate hysteria has set back science by 50 years. 🗨️ “𝑊𝑒’𝑣𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑡 𝑏𝑎𝑐𝑘 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑢𝑠 𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑏𝑦 50 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠 𝑏𝑦 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑐 𝑓𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑠 𝑜𝑛 𝐶𝑂₂. 𝐼𝑓 𝑦𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑜𝑟𝑦 𝑑𝑜𝑒𝑠𝑛’𝑡 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝐶𝑂₂ 𝑖𝑛 𝑖𝑡, 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑡 𝑖𝑡, 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑤𝑜𝑛’𝑡 𝑔𝑒𝑡 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔.”

79,531 views

NBC News reports that unless we stop burning fossil fuels, we will face 𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑝ℎ𝑖𝑐 global warming within the next 10 years. 🗨️ “𝐴 𝑓𝑒𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑦 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑝ℎ𝑖𝑐 𝑤𝑎𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝐸𝑎𝑟𝑡ℎ 𝑏𝑦 𝑡ℎ𝑒 1990𝑠 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑎 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑔 𝑐𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒.” Hold on a second, this was broadcast in 1983.

NBC News reports that unless we stop burning fossil fuels, we will face 𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑝ℎ𝑖𝑐 global warming within the next 10 years. 🗨️ “𝐴 𝑓𝑒𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑦 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑝ℎ𝑖𝑐 𝑤𝑎𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝐸𝑎𝑟𝑡ℎ 𝑏𝑦 𝑡ℎ𝑒 1990𝑠 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑎 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑔 𝑐𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒.” Hold on a second, this was broadcast in 1983.

61,870 views

Jane Goodall died yesterday at age 91. She thought that the world would be a much better place if the population were 90% lower. Speaking to the World Economic Forum (WEF) in 2020, she said, 🗨 “𝑊𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑜𝑡 ℎ𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑤𝑎𝑦 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 ℎ𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑛 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑤𝑡ℎ 𝑏𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑖𝑡 𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑠 𝑠𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑠. 𝐴𝑙𝑙 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑠𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠 𝑤𝑒 𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑘𝑒𝑑 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑤𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑𝑛’𝑡 𝑏𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚 𝑖𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑤𝑎𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑖𝑧𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑤𝑎𝑠 500 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠 𝑎𝑔𝑜.” And, he she was back in 2015 advocating for population reduction in the name of environmental activism, 🗨️ “𝑀𝑦 𝑗𝑜𝑏 𝑖𝑠 𝑔𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑝𝑒𝑜𝑝𝑙𝑒 ℎ𝑜𝑝𝑒… 𝐼𝑓 𝐼’𝑚 𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑎 𝑓𝑒𝑤 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠, 𝑖𝑓 𝐼 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡 ℎ𝑎𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑔𝑖𝑐 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟, 𝐼 𝑤𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑙𝑖𝑘𝑒 𝑡𝑜—𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑎𝑛𝑦 𝑝𝑎𝑖𝑛 𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑢𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔—𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑝𝑒𝑜𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑜𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑡 𝑏𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒’𝑠 𝑡𝑜𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑢𝑠. 𝐼𝑡’𝑠 𝑎 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑤𝑒’𝑟𝑒 𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑚 𝑢𝑝.” As far as I’m concerned, she was nothing but another anti-human Malthusian.

Jane Goodall died yesterday at age 91. She thought that the world would be a much better place if the population were 90% lower. Speaking to the World Economic Forum (WEF) in 2020, she said, 🗨 “𝑊𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑜𝑡 ℎ𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑤𝑎𝑦 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 ℎ𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑛 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑤𝑡ℎ 𝑏𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑖𝑡 𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑠 𝑠𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑠. 𝐴𝑙𝑙 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑠𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠 𝑤𝑒 𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑘𝑒𝑑 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑤𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑𝑛’𝑡 𝑏𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚 𝑖𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑤𝑎𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑖𝑧𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑤𝑎𝑠 500 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠 𝑎𝑔𝑜.” And, he she was back in 2015 advocating for population reduction in the name of environmental activism, 🗨️ “𝑀𝑦 𝑗𝑜𝑏 𝑖𝑠 𝑔𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑝𝑒𝑜𝑝𝑙𝑒 ℎ𝑜𝑝𝑒… 𝐼𝑓 𝐼’𝑚 𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑎 𝑓𝑒𝑤 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠, 𝑖𝑓 𝐼 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡 ℎ𝑎𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑔𝑖𝑐 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟, 𝐼 𝑤𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑙𝑖𝑘𝑒 𝑡𝑜—𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑎𝑛𝑦 𝑝𝑎𝑖𝑛 𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑢𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔—𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑝𝑒𝑜𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑜𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑡 𝑏𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒’𝑠 𝑡𝑜𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑢𝑠. 𝐼𝑡’𝑠 𝑎 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑤𝑒’𝑟𝑒 𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑚 𝑢𝑝.” As far as I’m concerned, she was nothing but another anti-human Malthusian.

61,382 views

So, for that big announcement. I have been deep in the heart of Alabama today filming a scene for “End the Wait,” which stars my pal Dean Cain. I had a phenomenal time and can’t wait to see the movie in theaters about this time in 2026. It’s a tearjerker of a film and based on a true story.

So, for that big announcement. I have been deep in the heart of Alabama today filming a scene for “End the Wait,” which stars my pal Dean Cain. I had a phenomenal time and can’t wait to see the movie in theaters about this time in 2026. It’s a tearjerker of a film and based on a true story.

32,988 views

Videos

Anya Rossi

sweetdream.ai

SweetDream.ai•Sponsored•Livecam

Watch Anya Live

Anya is streaming live right now! Join her private show and enjoy exclusive content.

Exclusive private shows

1.2k viewers online

Private Show

Join now for exclusive access

Free preview available • Premium content

At the 69th Primetime Emmy Awards in 2017, Dolly Parton reunited with her “9 to 5” co-stars, Lily Tomlin and Jane Fonda, to present the award for Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Limited Series or Movie. Before presenting the award, Fonda and Tomlin went on an anti-Trump rant. Dolly, being classy like she always was, did not participate, just smiled, and deflected it with a joke after the other two were done rambling. Rest in peace, Dolly, we miss ya! 💔

At the 69th Primetime Emmy Awards in 2017, Dolly Parton reunited with her “9 to 5” co-stars, Lily Tomlin and Jane Fonda, to present the award for Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Limited Series or Movie. Before presenting the award, Fonda and Tomlin went on an anti-Trump rant. Dolly, being classy like she always was, did not participate, just smiled, and deflected it with a joke after the other two were done rambling. Rest in peace, Dolly, we miss ya! 💔

45,101 views • 1 day ago

American voters overwhelmingly don’t care about climate change. In a recent Pew Research poll, they found that only 3% of Americans view it as their top issue for the midterm elections. Where does it rank overall? 14th place at the bottom. Biggest issues? The economy (54%) and immigration (28%). Only 39% of American voters say that climate change is a “big problem.” As CNN’s Henry Enten reports, that figure is about the same it was a decade ago (49%).

American voters overwhelmingly don’t care about climate change. In a recent Pew Research poll, they found that only 3% of Americans view it as their top issue for the midterm elections. Where does it rank overall? 14th place at the bottom. Biggest issues? The economy (54%) and immigration (28%). Only 39% of American voters say that climate change is a “big problem.” As CNN’s Henry Enten reports, that figure is about the same it was a decade ago (49%).

16,777 views • 2 days ago

CBS News warns that if we don’t stop burning ancient carbon, 25% of Florida will soon be underwater. Oh wait, silly me, this was broadcast 43 years ago.

CBS News warns that if we don’t stop burning ancient carbon, 25% of Florida will soon be underwater. Oh wait, silly me, this was broadcast 43 years ago.

3,222,760 views • 1 year ago

Here’s a clip from 26-years ago that Bill Nye does not want you to see. 👇 𝐁𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐍𝐲𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝟏𝟗𝟗𝟖: “Carbon is everywhere! Carbon is in every living thing... carbon is even in the air! *exhales carbon dioxide* Carbon is what makes life go! Go! Go!… Carbon is the key to life! You’ve got, got, got to respect that!” 𝐁𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐍𝐲𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟒: “We’ve created this wonderful quality of life for so many people by burning ancient carbon, ancient swamps; coal, oil, gas. We’ve just gotta stop doing that.”

Here’s a clip from 26-years ago that Bill Nye does not want you to see. 👇 𝐁𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐍𝐲𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝟏𝟗𝟗𝟖: “Carbon is everywhere! Carbon is in every living thing... carbon is even in the air! exhales carbon dioxide Carbon is what makes life go! Go! Go!… Carbon is the key to life! You’ve got, got, got to respect that!” 𝐁𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐍𝐲𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟒: “We’ve created this wonderful quality of life for so many people by burning ancient carbon, ancient swamps; coal, oil, gas. We’ve just gotta stop doing that.”

2,610,612 views • 1 year ago

Get a load of this! 🤣 CNN had former children’s science TV show host, Bill Nye “The Science Guy,” on air this morning. After ranting about DOGE and Elon Musk for nearly three minutes, Nye claimed that hurricanes and floods are becoming more frequent, and that forest fires never used to occur in the Carolinas until now. 💬 “[Y]ou can pretend climate isn’t changing, and hurricanes aren’t becoming more frequent, and flooding isn’t more—there’s forest fires in the Carolinas? That didn’t used to be a thing.” Someone should inform Nye about the Clear Pond Fire in mid-April 1976 that seared 30,000 acres in Horry County, or the Gaston Fire in April 1966 that burned nearly 8,000, both of which were larger than the ongoing blaze. Bill Nye is the perfect example of where ignorance collides with arrogance.

Get a load of this! 🤣 CNN had former children’s science TV show host, Bill Nye “The Science Guy,” on air this morning. After ranting about DOGE and Elon Musk for nearly three minutes, Nye claimed that hurricanes and floods are becoming more frequent, and that forest fires never used to occur in the Carolinas until now. 💬 “[Y]ou can pretend climate isn’t changing, and hurricanes aren’t becoming more frequent, and flooding isn’t more—there’s forest fires in the Carolinas? That didn’t used to be a thing.” Someone should inform Nye about the Clear Pond Fire in mid-April 1976 that seared 30,000 acres in Horry County, or the Gaston Fire in April 1966 that burned nearly 8,000, both of which were larger than the ongoing blaze. Bill Nye is the perfect example of where ignorance collides with arrogance.

1,499,741 views • 1 year ago

This is nothing new. In February 1932, the Winter Olympics were held in Lake Placid, New York. ⛷️ Temperatures topped 50°F on several days in January that year there, and the lack of snowfall preceding the Olympics nearly resulted in its cancellation altogether. The Southeast and Mid-Atlantic states observed high temperatures in the 70s and 80s on multiple days in January and February that year. 🌡️ Some winters are cold and snowy. Some are cold and dry. Others are warm and wet, or warm and dry. It has little to do with long-term climate change. 📰 h/t Tony Heller 🇺🇸 🇯🇵

This is nothing new. In February 1932, the Winter Olympics were held in Lake Placid, New York. ⛷️ Temperatures topped 50°F on several days in January that year there, and the lack of snowfall preceding the Olympics nearly resulted in its cancellation altogether. The Southeast and Mid-Atlantic states observed high temperatures in the 70s and 80s on multiple days in January and February that year. 🌡️ Some winters are cold and snowy. Some are cold and dry. Others are warm and wet, or warm and dry. It has little to do with long-term climate change. 📰 h/t Tony Heller 🇺🇸 🇯🇵

307,464 views • 6 months ago

Ladies and gents, I made the Dan Bongino Show today. cc: Dan Bongino / thanks Jim Verdi

Ladies and gents, I made the Dan Bongino Show today. cc: Dan Bongino / thanks Jim Verdi

46,174 views • 1 month ago

Governor Ron DeSantis shot down a news reporter today who tried to get him to blame Hurricane Milton on climate change. He didn’t evade it either — he directly answered the question and cited stats to debunk the claim. Oh, and those stats Governor DeSantis cited? They were directly from my analysis of NOAA HURDAT2 data this morning. Trump and Vance should take a page out of his book and sack reporters with data and leave them speechless.

Governor Ron DeSantis shot down a news reporter today who tried to get him to blame Hurricane Milton on climate change. He didn’t evade it either — he directly answered the question and cited stats to debunk the claim. Oh, and those stats Governor DeSantis cited? They were directly from my analysis of NOAA HURDAT2 data this morning. Trump and Vance should take a page out of his book and sack reporters with data and leave them speechless.

621,900 views • 1 year ago

Al Gore warns that the Arctic could be ice-free within the next 5-7 years. 🫠 🗨️ “𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑠ℎ… 𝑆𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑔𝑔𝑒𝑠𝑡... 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 75% 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑡ℎ 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑝, 𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑚𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑡ℎ𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑏𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑙𝑦 𝑖𝑐𝑒-𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛 5-7 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠.” Just kidding. He said this 16 years ago.

Al Gore warns that the Arctic could be ice-free within the next 5-7 years. 🫠 🗨️ “𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑠ℎ… 𝑆𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑔𝑔𝑒𝑠𝑡... 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 75% 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑡ℎ 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑝, 𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑚𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑡ℎ𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑏𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑙𝑦 𝑖𝑐𝑒-𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛 5-7 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠.” Just kidding. He said this 16 years ago.

172,280 views • 7 months ago

Dr. Anthony Fauci himself said that masks are not that effective at stopping transmission. Who are you to question The Science™, you denier?

Dr. Anthony Fauci himself said that masks are not that effective at stopping transmission. Who are you to question The Science™, you denier?

21,148 views • 23 days ago

lol This is a crock of crap. Climate “scientists” cannot get their climate models to produce accurate hindcasts of 20th century global mean surface temperature (GMST) observations without having precursory knowledge of 20th century observations to calibrate them to. That's curve fitting, not science. These models also run on circular reasoning. When global climate models (GCMs) are input with the supposedly “established physics” you mentioned, the energy fluxes in and out of the Earth’s atmosphere are not balanced, which causes the models to drift into unrealistic climate states (either too hot or too cold, but usually running too hot). Rather than doing real science to try figuring out why the best physics we have don't yield correct values, scientists simply assume that fluxes were balanced before the Industrial Revolution. They then adjust any uncertain parameters (e.g., clouds and aerosol) to force energy fluxes to balance. It is then assumed that there are no natural pathways that can cause energy imbalance, so modelers input CO₂ forcing, the climate system warms, and they say, “See!? CO₂ caused the warming.” While it may prove that there is at least some effects from CO₂, all else being equal, it in no way, shape or form proves that all of the observed warming is due to CO₂. They assumed it was at the outset, then forced their GCMs to produce that result. That's circular logic, not science. We also know model outputs are just statistical curve fitting because while the GMST response to a forcing has one value, the range of uncertainty in the aerosol contribution to GMST change since 1850 is 1°C. If you take the median of the CMIP6 models shown in Figure 3.8 from IPCC AR6 WG1, the uncertainty is a whopping 125%. If you don’t know that vital piece of information about aerosol forcing, you cannot have any confidence whatsoever in anything else. Arguing with me about this is not going to go well for you, I'm afraid. If you need an explainer that isn't so jargon-filled, Dr. Roy Spencer has a good one in the video below from a presentation he gave on March 3, 2021.

lol This is a crock of crap. Climate “scientists” cannot get their climate models to produce accurate hindcasts of 20th century global mean surface temperature (GMST) observations without having precursory knowledge of 20th century observations to calibrate them to. That's curve fitting, not science. These models also run on circular reasoning. When global climate models (GCMs) are input with the supposedly “established physics” you mentioned, the energy fluxes in and out of the Earth’s atmosphere are not balanced, which causes the models to drift into unrealistic climate states (either too hot or too cold, but usually running too hot). Rather than doing real science to try figuring out why the best physics we have don't yield correct values, scientists simply assume that fluxes were balanced before the Industrial Revolution. They then adjust any uncertain parameters (e.g., clouds and aerosol) to force energy fluxes to balance. It is then assumed that there are no natural pathways that can cause energy imbalance, so modelers input CO₂ forcing, the climate system warms, and they say, “See!? CO₂ caused the warming.” While it may prove that there is at least some effects from CO₂, all else being equal, it in no way, shape or form proves that all of the observed warming is due to CO₂. They assumed it was at the outset, then forced their GCMs to produce that result. That's circular logic, not science. We also know model outputs are just statistical curve fitting because while the GMST response to a forcing has one value, the range of uncertainty in the aerosol contribution to GMST change since 1850 is 1°C. If you take the median of the CMIP6 models shown in Figure 3.8 from IPCC AR6 WG1, the uncertainty is a whopping 125%. If you don’t know that vital piece of information about aerosol forcing, you cannot have any confidence whatsoever in anything else. Arguing with me about this is not going to go well for you, I'm afraid. If you need an explainer that isn't so jargon-filled, Dr. Roy Spencer has a good one in the video below from a presentation he gave on March 3, 2021.

27,737 views • 1 month ago

Dean Cain on Newsmax yesterday: 🗨️ “It's scary if you about the fact that she [Wisconsin Secretary of State, Sarah Godlewski] doesn't realize that hail is naturally occurring event. And, actually, my pal Chris Martz, who is a young meteorologist, tore her up on X... If she can't distinguish between weather and climate change, I don't know how she's going to count the votes correctly there in Wisconsin.” cc: Dean Cain

Dean Cain on Newsmax yesterday: 🗨️ “It's scary if you about the fact that she [Wisconsin Secretary of State, Sarah Godlewski] doesn't realize that hail is naturally occurring event. And, actually, my pal Chris Martz, who is a young meteorologist, tore her up on X... If she can't distinguish between weather and climate change, I don't know how she's going to count the votes correctly there in Wisconsin.” cc: Dean Cain

77,330 views • 4 months ago

Who is old enough to remember the brutally hot summer of 1980? Where are all my Texans and Cajun Queens at?

Who is old enough to remember the brutally hot summer of 1980? Where are all my Texans and Cajun Queens at?

32,079 views • 1 month ago

20 years ago today, Al Gore’s documentary “An Inconvenient Truth” was released. So, I decided to watch it to commemorate the occasion. Here is my reaction.

20 years ago today, Al Gore’s documentary “An Inconvenient Truth” was released. So, I decided to watch it to commemorate the occasion. Here is my reaction.

52,235 views • 3 months ago

The United Nations’ climate conference, COP30, in Brazil 🇧🇷 begins in less than two weeks. Tens of thousands of acres of protected Amazon rainforest were felled earlier this year to build a four-lane highway to alleviate anticipated traffic congestion. “Saving the planet.” 🌴🪓

The United Nations’ climate conference, COP30, in Brazil 🇧🇷 begins in less than two weeks. Tens of thousands of acres of protected Amazon rainforest were felled earlier this year to build a four-lane highway to alleviate anticipated traffic congestion. “Saving the planet.” 🌴🪓

116,654 views • 9 months ago

Get a load of this! 🤣 Wisconsin Secretary of State Sarah Godlewski stated that climate change was responsible for the recent hailstorm in her neighborhood. I am a meteorologist, so I fact-checked her claims. cc: Sarah Godlewski

Get a load of this! 🤣 Wisconsin Secretary of State Sarah Godlewski stated that climate change was responsible for the recent hailstorm in her neighborhood. I am a meteorologist, so I fact-checked her claims. cc: Sarah Godlewski

56,519 views • 4 months ago

Holy smokes. 🤯 Dr. Steven Koonin, respected physicist and former Obama-era science advisor, obliterated Texas A&M’s Dr. Andrew Dessler at a panel hosted by the Civitas Institute covering the findings of the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) climate report published last July. During the Q&A session, Koonin noted that climate models, on average, produce about twice as much warming as observations show (which is a fact when models are tested against independent data that they are not artificially tuned to—that is, fudged to agree with). Koonin went on to say that the scientific community has done a disservice to the public by misleading the masses with exaggerated claims. He argued that this has stunted economic growth in parts of the world and has raised energy prices. Dessler’s response? “Yeah, no, I mean, that’s buIIshit.” Koonin snapped back and told him that he shouldn’t use that kind of language in that setting, especially as a tenured professor at a major university. Dessler replied, “I’m sorry, but it is what it is.” He then spends the next minute tripping over his words trying to spin the DOE report as “misleading,” and its authors as committing “scientific felonies” by not going through “peer-review,” and by omitting information. Koonin, being witty, replied stating that Dessler himself omitted the fact that the quality of life has only improved as the planet as gotten warmer, and that it will continue to do so in the future. * eeemotional damage * Though a federal judge recently ruled that the report was assembled and carried out illegally (a pure political move), the science could still stand and be used to rollback regulations.

Holy smokes. 🤯 Dr. Steven Koonin, respected physicist and former Obama-era science advisor, obliterated Texas A&M’s Dr. Andrew Dessler at a panel hosted by the Civitas Institute covering the findings of the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) climate report published last July. During the Q&A session, Koonin noted that climate models, on average, produce about twice as much warming as observations show (which is a fact when models are tested against independent data that they are not artificially tuned to—that is, fudged to agree with). Koonin went on to say that the scientific community has done a disservice to the public by misleading the masses with exaggerated claims. He argued that this has stunted economic growth in parts of the world and has raised energy prices. Dessler’s response? “Yeah, no, I mean, that’s buIIshit.” Koonin snapped back and told him that he shouldn’t use that kind of language in that setting, especially as a tenured professor at a major university. Dessler replied, “I’m sorry, but it is what it is.” He then spends the next minute tripping over his words trying to spin the DOE report as “misleading,” and its authors as committing “scientific felonies” by not going through “peer-review,” and by omitting information. Koonin, being witty, replied stating that Dessler himself omitted the fact that the quality of life has only improved as the planet as gotten warmer, and that it will continue to do so in the future. * eeemotional damage * Though a federal judge recently ruled that the report was assembled and carried out illegally (a pure political move), the science could still stand and be used to rollback regulations.

54,015 views • 6 months ago

Here’s what the news media doesn’t tell you about U.S. heatwaves and climate change in less than 2-minutes. 🌡️

Here’s what the news media doesn’t tell you about U.S. heatwaves and climate change in less than 2-minutes. 🌡️

144,801 views • 2 years ago