
Colion Noir
@MrColionNoir • 590,309 subscribers
2A Advocate | Attorney | 🎥 YouTube 2.9M | Guns ARE Common Sense Click Here ⬇️⬇️⬇️
Shorts
Videos

Why You Don’t Shoot For The Head In Self-Defense: There’s a clip going around of a guy at the range drawing from concealment and putting fast rounds on target. Then a cop standing behind him says, “Yeah… but mine were all headshots.” And that comment exposes one of the biggest misunderstandings people have about self-defense shooting. Headshots are not the flex people think they are. Anybody can hit a head if you give them enough time. But self-defense is not about taking your time and stacking perfect holes on a paper target. It’s about stopping a threat as fast as humanly possible. So I put it on a timer. Headshots vs. center mass. At close distance, the headshots were slower and messier. At ten yards, pushing for the head caused rounds to come completely off target. And in real life, a miss is not just a miss. It’s a wall. A car. A house. Or an innocent person who had nothing to do with the fight. That’s why responsible self-defense training focuses on acceptable accuracy, combat accuracy, and putting fast, effective hits into the area most likely to stop the threat. The goal is not to kill. The goal is to stop the threat and go home. Full Video:
Colion Noir2,686,004 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

“Why do you need an AR-15?” Ask the police. Because they have them. They have the rifles. They have the 30-round magazines. They have the gear politicians keep saying is too dangerous for you. And nobody asks them why they need it. Why? Because the answer is obvious: They carry it to confront violent people. But here’s the part everyone skips… Who meets that violent person first? You do. The cop shows up after the threat starts. You’re the one already there. No badge. No backup. No radio. No team. And the Supreme Court has already said police do not have a constitutional duty to protect you as an individual. So if the state keeps these tools for the people who arrive second… Why does it want to take them from the person who has to survive first? That’s the question. Drop your answer below — and send this to the person who still asks, “Why do you need that?”
Colion Noir146,846 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

Canada has almost every gun law American anti-gunners keep begging for. Magazine limits. Registration. Strict licensing. Regular citizens basically can’t carry. And when a gunman opened fire in Montreal, what was the government’s plan for everybody else? Lock your doors. Stay inside. Hide and hope. That’s it. The criminal still had a gun. The cops still had guns. The law-abiding people got a text alert telling them to wait and pray the door held. That’s the part nobody wants to admit. Gun control doesn’t make evil disappear. It just decides who’s allowed to fight back when evil shows up. So be honest: If a gunman is outside your home, your grocery store, or your kid’s park… Do you want a text alert? Or do you want the ability to defend yourself? Drop your answer below — and send this to the friend who still thinks Canada is the model America should copy. Extended Father's Day Sale: Code 2ADAD
Colion Noir138,490 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

Bull Armory built a gun that feels like it stopped respecting recoil. This Tac Comp has V6 porting and a compensator machined into the barrel. Ports first. Comp second. Recoil basically gets jumped in an alley before the gun even has a chance to move. And that’s the wild part. The gun barely moves. The only real “problem” is the concussion. It barks. You feel the blast. But after shooting it for a while, I realized the only reason I noticed the concussion so much is because the gun gives you almost nothing else to feel. No real flip. No real rise. No real shove. Just flat. Stupid flat. Texas flat. And under $3,000, this thing is clearly walking into the Staccato XC conversation with a lot of confidence. So now I want to hear from y’all: Is Bull Armory becoming one of the best values in the 2011 world… Or are you still taking the Staccato XC? Drop your answer below — and send this to the friend who thinks ports and comps on the same gun is doing too much.
Colion Noir64,083 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

Gun owners waited 14 months for suppressor approvals… Then suddenly the process gets cleaned up and people are getting approved in 48 hours? So let’s be honest — was the old wait time really about “public safety,” or was it just another way to make lawful gun ownership more frustrating, expensive, and confusing? Because if the government can process it in days now, why were law-abiding Americans forced to wait over a year before? Gun owners, I want to hear from you: Did you ever wait months for a suppressor approval? How long did yours take? Drop your wait time in the comments. Father’s Day Sale: Get 15% off at with code 2ADAD. For More Colion Noir Podcast on your favorite Podcast Platform Click here: ➡️
Colion Noir77,712 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

Trump says he’s working on national reciprocity. Carry in all 50 states. And this is about to expose a lot of people. Because if your driver’s license works when you cross state lines… Why shouldn’t your carry permit? If you’re trusted to protect your life in Texas, why does that right disappear the second you land in New York, California, or New Jersey? An imaginary line on a map should not erase your right to defend yourself. And this is where the “I support the Second Amendment, but…” crowd always tells on themselves. Because national reciprocity is the easy one. This isn’t even the AR-15 fight. This isn’t the magazine fight. This is just saying: If you went through the process, got licensed, and followed the law, your permit should be recognized nationwide. That is actual common sense. So watch who fights this. Because the people who oppose national reciprocity were never defending the Second Amendment. They were defending control. Now be honest: Should your carry permit work in all 50 states like your driver’s license? Or should every state get to decide whether your right to protect yourself disappears at the border? Drop your answer below — and send this to the person who still says, “I support the 2A, but…”
Colion Noir61,647 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

James Harden got arrested in Houston because his gun was allegedly sitting in his car without a holster. In Texas. A constitutional carry state. Same gun. Same car. Same person. But if it’s in a holster, he drives home. If it’s sitting bare on the seat, he gets booked. That’s the kind of technicality that turns a law-abiding person into a criminal overnight. And here’s the part nobody wants to answer: Does a holster actually make him safer? Or does it just give the government one more box to check before they cuff you? Because the criminals carjacking people at 3 AM in Houston are not worried about holster laws. The only people these laws usually trap are the ones trying to follow the law in the first place. So be honest… Should James Harden have been arrested over this? Or is Texas pretending to be pro-2A while still letting tiny technicalities chip away at your rights? Drop your answer below. Shop America hat here:
Colion Noir83,395 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Caught on Camera: Trackhawk Thieves Roll Up, AR Pistol Rolls Them Out They came to steal a Trackhawk — one of the most targeted Mopars in America. They thought it’d be another easy hit. Then the homeowner stepped outside with an AR pistol… and everything changed instantly. No shots fired. No fight. No hero fantasy. Just a law-abiding homeowner using the presence of force to stop a crime in seconds. This is one of the most common forms of defensive gun use in America — and the one anti-gunners refuse to acknowledge. When criminals hunt from a position of strength, good people must defend from a position of strength. 🔥 BLACK FRIDAY Extended — FAFO COLLECTION IS LIVE FAFO isn’t about looking dangerous — it’s about not being chosen as a victim. The entire FAFO drop + AKT1 Blackout in-ear Bluetooth ear pro is 20% OFF with code FAFO. 👉
Colion Noir489,118 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

The ATF Director finally answered the question a lot of gun owners have been asking: Are they actually coming after people with pistol braces? His answer was basically: not proactively… but there’s a catch. And that catch is exactly why so many gun owners don’t trust vague rules, shifting interpretations, and “case-by-case” enforcement. Because if something was bought legally, sold by an FFL, taxed, and treated as lawful at the time — how is the average person supposed to know when the government changes its mind? Watch the full answer and tell me what you think. Full podcast:
Colion Noir83,070 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

A federal court just ruled that suppressors are protected arms under the Second Amendment. Good win. But that’s not even the biggest part. The real story is what this ruling may do to magazine bans, AR bans, and every “hardware” ban anti-gun states have been protecting for years. Because the Ninth Circuit has been saying things like magazines are just accessories. Not arms. Not protected. Basically a fashion accessory for your rifle. But now the Fifth Circuit looked at suppressors and said: No. If it helps you use your firearm for lawful self-defense, it can be protected by the Second Amendment. That creates a problem. A big one. Two federal courts are now looking at the same kind of argument and reaching opposite conclusions. That’s called a circuit split. And that may be exactly what finally forces the Supreme Court to step in. So this isn’t just about suppressors. This could be the case that puts magazine bans and assault weapons bans directly on the Supreme Court’s doorstep. Now be honest: Should suppressors, magazines, and AR-15s all be protected under the Second Amendment? Or should the government get to call them “accessories” and ban them? Drop your answer below — and send this to the person who still thinks suppressors work like they do in movies.
Colion Noir51,057 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

The Supreme Court just handed gun owners a **9-0 win**. But here’s the part nobody saw coming: The ACLU was on the side of the gun owner. The gun-control groups were on the side trying to keep the ban. Read that again. This case wasn’t just about weed and guns. It was about the government trying to shut off someone’s Second Amendment rights by putting them in a category. No proof he was dangerous. No proof he hurt anyone. Just a label. And once the label sticks, the right disappears. That’s the game. Today it’s “drug user.” Tomorrow it’s whatever label they decide comes next. The Supreme Court basically said: Prove the person. Not the category. So here’s the question: Should the government be able to take your gun rights based on a label alone? Or should they have to prove you’re actually dangerous? Drop your answer below — and send this to the friend who still thinks every gun law is about “safety.” Extended 15% OFF Fathers Day sale Code : 2ADAD
Colion Noir57,397 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

An armed civilian in Tulsa shot a robber in the head… And the robber still ran across the street before collapsing. Read that again. This is why “one shot, one stop” is not a plan. This man was approached outside a convenience store by two robbers — one with a knife, one with a gun. Two on one. At night. At a gas station. That is one of the worst places to get caught slipping. But he was armed, he was aware enough to respond, and he fought back. That’s the win. But the lesson is bigger than one robbery. A headshot does not always mean instant lights out. A handgun does not hit like the movies. And when your life is on the line, betting everything on one perfect shot can get you killed. Train for reality. Not internet comments. Not movie logic. Not “just aim for the head” nonsense. Because the threat may keep moving. There may be a second attacker. And the fight may not be over when the first round goes off. So be honest: Do you train for multiple attackers and follow-up shots — or are most people still living in the “one shot ends everything” fantasy? Drop your answer below, and send this to the friend who thinks handguns work like Hollywood.
Colion Noir41,890 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

Hawaii tried to make your concealed carry permit basically worthless. You could have the permit. You could pass the process. You could legally carry. But the second you walked into a gas station, grocery store, restaurant, or parking lot on private property… Your gun became illegal unless the owner gave you permission first. That’s not a right. That’s a permission slip. The Supreme Court just struck it down 6–3. And this matters way beyond Hawaii. New York, New Jersey, Maryland, California — they’ve all been playing the same game: Give you the right on paper. Then make it illegal almost everywhere you’d actually use it. The Court just flipped the default back. You can carry unless the property owner says no. So here’s the question: Should your carry permit work by default… Or should you have to ask permission at every single door? Drop your answer below — and send this to the person who still thinks these laws are about “safety.” America HAT:
Colion Noir40,679 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

This HOA banned guns in the exact places residents may need them most. Not inside your home. Not going to and from your car. But the sidewalk? The mailbox? The parking lot? The pool? The clubhouse? That’s where they want you empty-handed. And that’s the problem. Most people don’t get attacked sitting on the couch. They get approached walking to the car. Checking the mail. Carrying groceries. Coming home at night. Standing in the parking lot with their hands full. One resident asked the perfect question: If I’m not allowed to protect myself and I get mugged, is the HOA financially responsible? You already know the answer. No. They get the policy. You get the risk. They get to feel safe on paper. You get to walk through the parking lot hoping nothing happens. So be honest: Should an HOA be allowed to ban legal carry in the common areas residents actually pay for? Or if they disarm you, should they be legally responsible for protecting you? Drop your answer below — and send this to somebody who lives in an HOA. Full Video:
Colion Noir33,515 Aufrufe • vor 21 Tagen

A Facebook Marketplace dirt bike sale ended with a man dead. And the hardest part is this: He was right. He got handed fake money. He had every reason to be angry. He had every reason to feel disrespected. But being right didn’t keep him alive. That’s the lesson. If somebody scams you, robs you, or runs off with your property, your ego is going to scream at you to chase them. Don’t. Get the plate. Get the description. Get video if you can. Call the police. Go home to your family. Because the person willing to scam you in your own driveway may also be the person willing to shoot you over nothing. And once you chase, corner, or confront them, the situation can flip fast — legally and physically. This isn’t victim blaming. This is survival. Being right is worth a lot. It is not worth dying over. Would you chase someone who just scammed you on Facebook Marketplace — or would you let it go and call police? Drop your answer below, and send this to somebody who sells anything online.
Colion Noir39,765 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

Does This Liberal Podcaster Have a Point About Getting Rid of Guns? A liberal podcaster just said something so wild I had to replay it twice: “If we got rid of every gun on Earth, no one would ever be shot again.” And he said it like he’d just solved human violence. But here’s the truth: Violence doesn’t vanish when you melt guns — it just changes tools. Humans were killing each other long before gunpowder, and they’ll keep doing it long after any utopian fantasy tries to wish it away. I break down exactly why this argument fails, and why the Second Amendment exists because of human nature… not in spite of it. Also — Black Friday is here early: 🔥 NEW FAFO Collection just dropped 🔥 20% OFF everything with code FAFO 🔥 AKT1 Blackout hearing protection included You don’t wear FAFO to intimidate. You wear it because you refuse to be a victim. 👉
Colion Noir288,523 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Your Gun Training Is Useless Past 10 Yards? A Delta Force legend — John “Shrek” McPhee — says if you shoot more than 20 rounds at the range, you’re wasting your time… and that training past 10 yards is “completely pointless.” When I first heard that, I’ll be honest — it hit me in my soul. Because I love training at distance. I love high-round-count sessions. And I definitely don’t want to believe I’ve been wasting ammo my entire adult life. But Shrek isn’t some random dude on the internet. He’s a retired Delta Force Sergeant Major — a man with more real-world experience than most of us will ever see. So the question becomes: Is he right? Are we all training wrong? Or is the truth somewhere in the middle? Whether you agree or disagree, this is one of the most important conversations in concealed-carry training. 🔥 FAFO GEAR + AKT1 Blackouts (My Everyday Range Setup) If you train, carry, or refuse to be a voluntary victim… the FAFO mindset is exactly that: quiet strength and prepared courage. Hats, hoodies, shirts, drinkware → 👉 Use code FAFO for 15% off during the Holiday Sale. AKT1 Blackouts — the “AirPods for shooters,” except they actually protect your hearing — are also available at the link. If you’re serious about training smart — not just training loud — this one is worth your time. Let’s talk about it in the comments.
Colion Noir242,645 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Connecticut just banned the Glock. Not the Glock switch. The Glock. They sold this as a law against illegal “Glock switches,” but those are already federally prohibited. The real trick is in the language: Connecticut’s law targets semiautomatic handguns with a cruciform trigger bar that can allegedly be converted with a common tool. That’s not describing a switch. That’s describing the internal design of Glock and Glock-style pistols. So instead of banning the illegal device criminals are already using, they banned the legal handgun that millions of Americans own and that police departments across the country carry every day. California already passed a version of this. Maryland did too. Now Connecticut is joining the same playbook. They can’t just say, “We’re banning one of the most popular handguns in America,” so they redefine it, dress it up in machine-gun language, and hope nobody reads past the headline. That’s the real danger. Because once they can redefine a Glock out of existence, the only question is which gun they redefine next. Shop the “America” hat at:
Colion Noir55,143 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Gun owners waited 14 months for suppressor approvals… Then suddenly the process gets cleaned up and people are getting approved in 48 hours? So let’s be honest — was the old wait time really about “public safety,” or was it just another way to make lawful gun ownership more frustrating, expensive, and confusing? Because if the government can process it in days now, why were law-abiding Americans forced to wait over a year before? Gun owners, I want to hear from you: Did you ever wait months for a suppressor approval? How long did yours take? Drop your wait time in the comments. Watch Full podcast link:
Colion Noir37,338 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat