Rafe Heydel-Mankoo's banner
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo's profile picture

Rafe Heydel-Mankoo

@RafHM71,936 subscribers

Historian (BA Hons, LL.B, MA, FRCGS) & Broadcaster: Royalty, British Identity, Immigration; Fellow NewCultureForum; CoEditor: Burke's World Orders of Knighthood

Videos

RafHM's profile picture

The Bank of England DELIBERATELY FIXED the fake "public vote" to remove ALL historical figures from bank notes & replace them with nature images Freedom of Information requests by the Telegraph reveal the decision to remove historical figures was based on a "focus group" of a mere 119 people The Bank LIED because it previously claimed the decision was based on a "public vote". In truth, however, even this vote was FIXED. Instead of having HISTORY v NATURE, the bank deliberately split the "history" category into 3 sections: historical events, historical figures, architecture & landmarks. That was the only way that "nature" could win. However, of course bank notes always combine at least two of those history categories. For example: Churchill & Parliament or Wellington & Waterloo. The Bank's actions are indefensible and questions should be asked in the House. The Bank of England has clearly been captured by progressive woke ideology. A visit to the Bank of England with its permanent exhibition on slavery makes that clear This is part of the wider war on British history. It's an attempt to create a NEW BRITAIN, based on ridiculous myths that "Diversity Built Britain" and that Britain has always been multicultural. Remember: the Bank of England issued a 50p coin (held aloft by Rishi Sunak) which was imprinted with the nonsensical statement: "Diversity Built Britain" Anyone who lived behind the Iron Curtain will find all of this eerily and scarily familiar. The pulling down of statues, the renaming of streets and schools, the rewriting of history, denigrating heroes, changing bank notes etc....these were all tactics of the communists. Severing the connection between a people and their history is the best way to demoralise a society and prepare them for the imposition of new myths. Me on GB News:

Rafe Heydel-Mankoo

441,781 views • 2 months ago

RafHM's profile picture

Only idiots and Britain haters blame Churchill for the Bengal Famine This myth only became popular in 2010 after a ridiculous book was published by a far-left journalist with no historical training This is what REALLY happened: 1. A cyclone hit Bengal in 1942, destroying crops 2. They were already suffering from the worst rice brown spot epidemic on record 3. Normally in a famine grain would be imported from Burma, Malaya, Phillipines, Thailand etc. But WW2 ws raging and our Japanese enemy now controlled those areas 4. The Japanese had bombed Indian ports, which also destroyed grain 5. Shipping grain in was hugely dangerous because Japanese fleet was blockading the Bay of Bengal and sinking ships Remember, the Axis powers were sinking one ship every day and had sunk around a million tons of shipping in 1942. 6. On top of that local Indian speculative traders were unforgivably HOARDING grain. With inflation rife, this was classic wartime speculation as they could make (and expected to make) much more money by hoarding rather than selling immediately. 7. Local government and administrators were slow to act and initially told the UK government there was enough grain in Bengal. One can blame the democratically elected Government of Bengal, people like Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy (Minister of Civil Supplies for the newly formed Muslim League) and Sir John Herbert (the Governor of Bengal) for exacerbating conditions in the Bengal Famine. But not Churchill. What did Churchill do? Everything he could. Remember also, he was thousands of miles away in a different continent fighting the Second World War and preparing for D-Day. Yet despite all his other commitments he worked hard to save the people of Bengal. 1. When the British government found out about the famine’s severity in August 1943, they authorised around 1 million tons of grain to be shipped to India between then and December 1944. 2. Churchill pushed Australia to send wheat 3. Churchill personally requested shipping assistance from U.S. President Roosevelt in April 1944 to transport it from Australia. Roosevelt declined, stating US ships were needed for the Pacific campaign and the upcoming D-Day operations. 4. Thanks to Churchill grain arrived from Iraq (barley), and Canada as well as Australia. 5. Crucially, Churchill was responsible for appointing the man who played such a pivotal role in stopping the Bengal Famine: Field Marshal Wavell. Wavell knew India and its people extremely well and was a magician of logistics. He drafted in the army to move food supplies and halted the famine. Why are tax payers funding Helen Cammock's ignorant, anti-British propaganda at the National Portrait Gallery?

Rafe Heydel-Mankoo

354,554 views • 2 months ago

RafHM's profile picture

Someone should remind Ms. Bell Ribeiro-Addy that she is the MP for CLAPHAM not the CARIBBEAN Why is a Labour MP advocating for foreign powers that seek to BANKRUPT Britain by demanding TRILLIONS in reparations? These countries are led by incompetent & substandard leaders - many of them corrupt, too - who have run their economies into the ground. Rather than admit that, they seek to blame their ills on colonialism. The reparations grift has nothing to do with slavery. In fact, according to a reputable poll taken in 2011, a whopping 60% of Jamaicans said they would be better off if Britain had never left. Only 17% said they would be worse off. And the facts back them up. Today, the parts of the Caribbean which remain overseas territories or departments of the UK, France (Guadeloupe, Martinique etc.), the Netherlands (Aruba etc.) and the United States (Puerto Rico etc.) have significantly higher incomes and better public services than the fully independent Caribbean states. Like all former British colonies, the independent Caribbean states inherited all of the assets (infrastructure, civil service, legal system, parliament, military, police etc.) required to become a success story. Former colonies like Singapore have been fortunate to be led by competent - indeed, brilliant - leaders. The Caribbean story, however, has been one of corruption and incompetence. Rather than admit that, they sink into the corrosive politics of victimhood: blaming others for their sad predicament and seeking hand outs. The British built more than 20 hospitals in Jamaica before it achieved independence in 1962. How many hospitals has the Jamaican government built since 1962? Two. Me on GB News:

Rafe Heydel-Mankoo

119,144 views • 1 month ago

RafHM's profile picture

What is playing out now with the Belfast attack, with Henry Nowak, is a grand symphony of gaslighting & dishonesty that is almost too stomach-churning to watch We witnessed the same after Southport, with the rape gangs....and on & on They KNOW their mass migration ideology caused these atrocities. So they choose to deflect on to right-wing politicians, GB News and what they call the "far right". The public need to understand exactly how their game is played and the poisonous ideology that underpins it. The cycle is always the same: Fury erupts across Britain, driven not by public figures (as they claim), but by the atrocity itself. You know, the mad asylum seeker wielding a bloodied knife... Footage is shared on social media, watched with our own eyes. The pure unvarnished truth that the legacy media can't spin. Figures on the right respond with natural fury - indeed, rage - that the elite's callous disregard for reality and their fellow citizens has yet again unleashed carnage. But the media and the political class can't talk about that reality. They can't talk about the incident itself. Because they would have to admit it is thanks to them that such people - such murderers - have entered the country. The BBC, The Guardian, Sky News, Labour, the Greens, the Lib Dems & many Tories, too -- What THEY CHOOSE to talk about, what they WANT YOU TO THINK the real story is about, is the anger and the choice of words of those of us who are utterly appalled and outraged by the latest atrocity -- an atrocity THEY enabled. This is gaslighting propaganda of the most repellent and unforgivable kind. With Southport, the real story was apparently not the son of a Rwandan refugee committing one of the most heinous crimes in British history. No, the real story was Nigel Farage's reaction to that orgy of slaughter against little girls. When locals rioted, James O'Brien and others labelled it the 'Farage Riots'. The small number of rioters suddenly became the story, used to dismiss the concerns of ALL protestors. "Far-right thuggery", was how Keir Starmer referred to law-abiding mothers and pensioners. Anything to avoid talking about the crime itself and the ideology that brought its perpetrator into our country. And now we see the same playing out with the Belfast attack and the murder of Henry Nowak. Newsnight misleadingly quoted Nigel Farage as saying "white rage," a revealing and vile smear for which they have had to apologise yet again. In lockstep, the media and political class rapidly converged on their narrative: this was to be a story about Nigel Farage's naughty words. THIS is what has dominated their coverage. This is what they want to talk about in Parliament, in the TV studios, and in the press. Farage's naughty words. "Just how naughty were they? Should such bad words be tolerated? Should he be arrested?" "Do we need to apply yet more censorship to protect the public against his mean, hurty words?" These people are so far beneath contempt it is difficult to find words that do them justice. This is a story not about Nigel Farage or the right, but the deeply ingrained anti-British and anti-white ideology that is destroying this nation. This is an institutionally treasonous state, and Henry Novak and Stephen Ogilvie are its latest victims. That is the real story our political and media class are attempting to bury under a mountain of pearl-clutching theatrics, lies, and misdirection. They have blood on their hands. It's about time we said it. Clip from my monologue. 👇 Full monologue linked in the second post. 1/2

Rafe Heydel-Mankoo

152,924 views • 2 months ago

RafHM's profile picture

The ban on #cousinmarriage is one explanation for the origin of The West's genius & exceptionalism I discuss this in my TRIGGERnometry interview 👇 Harvard's Prof J Heinrich argues that the Western mind evolved differently & was a global anomaly because of the 9th century Western (Catholic) Church's ban on cousin marriage. Up to that point, the structure of societies across the globe was defined by kinship clans - large extended families where your first, second, third, fourth cousins were as much part of the family as brothers and sisters. These clan societies were based upon nepotism, obedience to authority and conformity. Strangers were regard with distrust and hostility. In the West, the ban on marriage between certain degrees of consanguinity resulted in the birth of the nuclear family, which didn't exist elsewhere. Today, 75% of the world still has cousin marriages. According to Heinrich, approx. 90% of the world doesn't have the same notion of the exclusive nuclear family that we have. The birth of the Western nuclear family devoid of its external connections to clanship, directly let to the emergence of individuality and innovation. With kinship clans destroyed, the nuclear family had to rely on contact with strangers. This led to the development of high levels of social trust in the West. Social trust is one of the most important criteria for a society's economic prosperity and social cohesion. With high levels of social trust, these medieval European nuclear families were able to come together & cooperate for their mutual benefit. They achieved this, for example, by establishing guilds, confraternities, universities and charter towns. These uniquely Western institutions helped to foster the cross-pollination of ideas and skills, through which innovation exploded. The exclusively Western notion of individualism was core to this, as well. And much of that is due to Protestantism. I explain all this in greater detail in this video:

Rafe Heydel-Mankoo

765,741 views • 1 year ago

RafHM's profile picture

How could naturally skeptical journalists like James O'Brien & Krishnan Guru-Murthy be taken in by Jason Arday? They were mesmerised by the tale of a black boy who had overcome adversity It’s the virtue-signalling equivalent of train spotters who get excited seeing the Flying Scotsman For journalists like James O’Brien & Krishnan Guru-Murthy -- and woke academics in Cambridge and up and down the country -- Arday was their Flying Scotsman. Arday ticked every box: race ✔️ poverty ✔️ neurodivergent ✔️ illiterate ✔️ unorthodox childhood ✔️ He was the virtue signaller’s poster boy. The identity politics bingo card in human form. To see seasoned journalists, trained to detect the faintest whiff of BS, uncritically accept the bold boasts of their interviewee reveals the devastating, mind-addling effect of ideological capture - dare I say, brainwashing. Of course, people like James O’Brien have form here. Remember, O’Brien was a great champion of the convicted paedophile Carl Beech, the vile fantasist who claimed various upstanding public figures were involved in unspeakable crimes. O’Brien’s personal biases clearly cloud his judgement. O'Brien's hubris prevents him from ever acknowledging his errors. And so, even though others who have previously defended Arday have quietly removed their support (most recently the black president of Wolfson College) O'Brien remains chained to the foundering HMS Jason. What these people - and the rest of the woke establishment - don't realise, is that they are being unforgivably racist. Any white professor facing similar accusations to Arday would have been pilloried and investigated long ago. Cambridge normally has a zero tolerance attitude towards plagiarism - yet it refuses to re-examine this professor's credentials. Arday’s race is the reason the progressive left have become his Praetorian Guard. They are holding Arday to a lower standard because he is black. Surely that is, by definition, racist. Me on GB News:

Rafe Heydel-Mankoo

38,094 views • 25 days ago

RafHM's profile picture

Sharia law has no place in modern society It is the greatest threat to womens' rights in Britain & is used as a tool of oppression, victimisation & abuse Our hypocritical politicians embraced "#MeToo", preach about women's rights & lecture British men about "toxic masculinity"... whilst at the same time wilfully turning a blind eye to the rampant misogyny, oppression, sexual assault, domestic & honour based violence that exists within parts of the Muslim community - and which is enabled by some Sharia councils. Sharia councils (which are completely unregulated) have condoned wife beating, told wives to reconcile with abusive husbands and dismissed the idea of "marital rape". We live in an age of great leaps forward for humanity: Artificial Intelligence, quantum computing, driverless cars, tourist trips to space etc. etc. It is preposterous that in such an advanced age, women's lives are still being ruled by medieval laws. We are all equal under the law. One law for all. That principle must stand. Why, then, is Britain the "Sharia capital" of the West? We have more Sharia councils than anyone else and British Muslims help set up Sharia councils in other Western countries. 60%-80% of Muslim marriages in the UK are Sharia only, with no civil registration (thus denying "wives" protection from English courts). This is the highest in the Western world. Some morons will reply: "Sharia is voluntary and has no legal recognition or force in the UK". Tell that to the Muslim women who are forced to go to Sharia councils and who are forced (by their religious leaders, their husbands, their families and their wider community) to accept the rulings - rulings made by ultra-conservative / extremist / Islamist men. Many of these women aren't even aware that Sharia has no legal force or that English courts would come to a different ruling. A party that does not pledge to tackle Sharia councils is a party that condones the oppression of women. Me on GB News:

Rafe Heydel-Mankoo

84,446 views • 2 months ago

RafHM's profile picture

The MSM are ignoring the biggest story of the year OBR data confirms that low-skilled immigration is destroying the UK economy Each low-skilled migrant will cost the taxpayer £465k by age 81 Only 5% of migrants (1 in 20) are net contributors to the economy as high-skilled workers. They contribute £1 to the economy whereas low-skilled immigrants cost the economy £1.60. Mass immigration is not boosting economic growth, it's crippling it. By every measure - economic, cultural and social - mass immigration has been the greatest act of harm in our long island story. It's worse even than the cost of fighting the Second World War. A generation of Quisling politicians of all stripes have betrayed Britain and are complicit in our nation's civilisational decline. Those who aided and abetted in the catastrophic events of the past quarter-century must be held to account. This means not only the politicians & civil servants who pushed this false prospectus, but also their Lord Haw-Haw cheerleaders in the media. And it includes those in the CBI and big business who, without any concern for the wider societal impact, selfishly lobbied government for a never-ending supply of cheap labour. Importing cheap labour suppressed wages and enabled them to avoid the costly - but vital - investment in innovation, technology and capital infrastructure that would have reduced the need for low skill migrants in the first place. (Eg. Job mechanization/automation, robotics etc.) Never forgive. Never forget. I joined Talk to discuss 👇 Source & data:

Rafe Heydel-Mankoo

518,704 views • 1 year ago