
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo
@RafHM • 71,936 subscribers
Historian (BA Hons, LL.B, MA, FRCGS) & Broadcaster: Royalty, British Identity, Immigration; Fellow NewCultureForum; CoEditor: Burke's World Orders of Knighthood
Videos

"There are no machete fights at Glastonbury!" Notting HELL Carnival must be taken off London's streets 2-tier policing: If an English event had the same level of violence & criminality it'd be cancelled More police were assaulted at Carnival last year than in the Southport protests So why do police & politicians allow Notting Hill Carnival to continue? Because the Carnival is a sacred festival in the Church of Diversity, Britain’s new state religion. It is a Holy Weekend that helps perpetuate the myth that diversity built Britain and that multiculturalism is an unalloyed success. We must end this ridiculous reverence of NH Carnival. It is 35 times more dangerous / criminal than similar-sized events (eg the Queen's Platinum Jubilee weekend). It’s also a great weekend for the criminals of South, North and East London because almost all of the Metropolitan police are deployed in West London. In Florida, people board up their houses and shops and flee their homes when a devastating hurricane is about to arrive. In Notting Hill they do that when the carnival arrives. That says everything. Me on GB News
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo106,995 views • 1 day ago

The Bank of England DELIBERATELY FIXED the fake "public vote" to remove ALL historical figures from bank notes & replace them with nature images Freedom of Information requests by the Telegraph reveal the decision to remove historical figures was based on a "focus group" of a mere 119 people The Bank LIED because it previously claimed the decision was based on a "public vote". In truth, however, even this vote was FIXED. Instead of having HISTORY v NATURE, the bank deliberately split the "history" category into 3 sections: historical events, historical figures, architecture & landmarks. That was the only way that "nature" could win. However, of course bank notes always combine at least two of those history categories. For example: Churchill & Parliament or Wellington & Waterloo. The Bank's actions are indefensible and questions should be asked in the House. The Bank of England has clearly been captured by progressive woke ideology. A visit to the Bank of England with its permanent exhibition on slavery makes that clear This is part of the wider war on British history. It's an attempt to create a NEW BRITAIN, based on ridiculous myths that "Diversity Built Britain" and that Britain has always been multicultural. Remember: the Bank of England issued a 50p coin (held aloft by Rishi Sunak) which was imprinted with the nonsensical statement: "Diversity Built Britain" Anyone who lived behind the Iron Curtain will find all of this eerily and scarily familiar. The pulling down of statues, the renaming of streets and schools, the rewriting of history, denigrating heroes, changing bank notes etc....these were all tactics of the communists. Severing the connection between a people and their history is the best way to demoralise a society and prepare them for the imposition of new myths. Me on GB News:
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo441,781 views • 2 months ago

Only idiots and Britain haters blame Churchill for the Bengal Famine This myth only became popular in 2010 after a ridiculous book was published by a far-left journalist with no historical training This is what REALLY happened: 1. A cyclone hit Bengal in 1942, destroying crops 2. They were already suffering from the worst rice brown spot epidemic on record 3. Normally in a famine grain would be imported from Burma, Malaya, Phillipines, Thailand etc. But WW2 ws raging and our Japanese enemy now controlled those areas 4. The Japanese had bombed Indian ports, which also destroyed grain 5. Shipping grain in was hugely dangerous because Japanese fleet was blockading the Bay of Bengal and sinking ships Remember, the Axis powers were sinking one ship every day and had sunk around a million tons of shipping in 1942. 6. On top of that local Indian speculative traders were unforgivably HOARDING grain. With inflation rife, this was classic wartime speculation as they could make (and expected to make) much more money by hoarding rather than selling immediately. 7. Local government and administrators were slow to act and initially told the UK government there was enough grain in Bengal. One can blame the democratically elected Government of Bengal, people like Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy (Minister of Civil Supplies for the newly formed Muslim League) and Sir John Herbert (the Governor of Bengal) for exacerbating conditions in the Bengal Famine. But not Churchill. What did Churchill do? Everything he could. Remember also, he was thousands of miles away in a different continent fighting the Second World War and preparing for D-Day. Yet despite all his other commitments he worked hard to save the people of Bengal. 1. When the British government found out about the famine’s severity in August 1943, they authorised around 1 million tons of grain to be shipped to India between then and December 1944. 2. Churchill pushed Australia to send wheat 3. Churchill personally requested shipping assistance from U.S. President Roosevelt in April 1944 to transport it from Australia. Roosevelt declined, stating US ships were needed for the Pacific campaign and the upcoming D-Day operations. 4. Thanks to Churchill grain arrived from Iraq (barley), and Canada as well as Australia. 5. Crucially, Churchill was responsible for appointing the man who played such a pivotal role in stopping the Bengal Famine: Field Marshal Wavell. Wavell knew India and its people extremely well and was a magician of logistics. He drafted in the army to move food supplies and halted the famine. Why are tax payers funding Helen Cammock's ignorant, anti-British propaganda at the National Portrait Gallery?
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo354,554 views • 2 months ago

The UN is a corrupt joke More slaves were held by Africans than were EVER sent across the Atlantic 7 in every 1000 Africans is a slave TODAY: 10 MILLION people It took 300 years for 10M slaves to cross the Atlantic 🤦♂️ And the Arab Slave Trade in Africans continues TODAY! So where are the protests outside the embassies & high commissions of Nigeria, Sudan, Mali, Chad etc? Utterly contemptible. This is not about slavery at all. This is an attack on Britain, America and the West. Slavery is universal and as old as man. What was unique was the Christian evangelical movement that spread across Britain, America and Western Europe that led to the West ending its BRIEF involvement in slavery. Never forget: Britain was the first country in world history to deliberately make itself poorer in the pursuit of a moral good - i.e. the vast sums it expended enforcing an end to the slave trade on land and the high seas. We must call this nonsense out. Me at Cambridge:
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo611,285 views • 5 months ago

We often ask: how did Britain get so broken? Prof. Jason Arday, the Milli Vanilli of academia, the man who HUMILIATED Britain's woke elite, may offer a partial answer. There needs to be a root and branch investigation into D.E.I. hires, not only in academia, but in companies, organisations and institutions across the UK, and also in the USA, Canada and everywhere else that has embraced this ludicrous policy of self-harm. This story is far bigger than Arday and does not end with his resignation. It is a national scandal that has exposed the corruption, incompetence and ideological capture of universities, the police, the media and the Woke Establishment. It should sound the death knell for D.E.I. programmes and the ridiculous non-subjects that feed it (eg Critical Race Theory) Leading public figures in politics, academia and the media also have serious questions to answer. The woke mind virus has addled their brains so badly that they couldn't or wouldn't see what was so blatantly obvious to everyone else. My New Culture Forum monologue:
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo88,097 views • 23 days ago

An excellent policy from Reform's Richard Tice MP 🇬🇧 Restricting social housing to British born is vital to solving UK housing crisis Foreign born pop: 2001: 8.3% 2021: 16.6% 2021-24: Boriswave Social housing is a NATIONAL asset built by BRITISH taxpayers for BRITISH people Yet successive governments have treated it as an international right. It is not. Social housing is a finite public resource. And quite simply too many people have arrived here in too short a time to allow the foreign born to occupy social housing. In 2021, 42% of the foreign born population of the UK had arrived in the previous decade alone (10 million people). 40% of Londoners are foreign born. British-born people whose families have paid in to this country must take priority over those who have come here recently. 1.3 million households are on the social housing waiting list. Of these approx. 195,000 are foreign. Reform estimates there are 540,000 foreign national households currently in social housing. If we house British nationals in those properties and remove foreign nationals from the waiting list, the waiting list will fall from 1.3 million to approx. 560,000. We would be mad not to adopt such a policy. Me on GB News:
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo15,422 views • 5 days ago

GB News exclusive: The National Lottery has given £140 MILLION to radical pro-migrant activists The majority of tickets are bought by the poorest members of the working class, the demographic most affected by illegal migration It's an outrage that their money, which they assume is going to good causes such as heritage building restoration or children's charities, is funding far-left organisations dedicated to bringing in more of the illegal migrants who have destroyed their communities. The National Lottery must not donate to highly partisan and politically divisive organisations. The lottery was set up to fund good causes that better Britain. Instead, it is funding groups that are actively working against the British national interest. It's time Parliament got involved. My debate on GB News, hosted by Martin Daubney:
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo15,669 views • 5 days ago

Someone should remind Ms. Bell Ribeiro-Addy that she is the MP for CLAPHAM not the CARIBBEAN Why is a Labour MP advocating for foreign powers that seek to BANKRUPT Britain by demanding TRILLIONS in reparations? These countries are led by incompetent & substandard leaders - many of them corrupt, too - who have run their economies into the ground. Rather than admit that, they seek to blame their ills on colonialism. The reparations grift has nothing to do with slavery. In fact, according to a reputable poll taken in 2011, a whopping 60% of Jamaicans said they would be better off if Britain had never left. Only 17% said they would be worse off. And the facts back them up. Today, the parts of the Caribbean which remain overseas territories or departments of the UK, France (Guadeloupe, Martinique etc.), the Netherlands (Aruba etc.) and the United States (Puerto Rico etc.) have significantly higher incomes and better public services than the fully independent Caribbean states. Like all former British colonies, the independent Caribbean states inherited all of the assets (infrastructure, civil service, legal system, parliament, military, police etc.) required to become a success story. Former colonies like Singapore have been fortunate to be led by competent - indeed, brilliant - leaders. The Caribbean story, however, has been one of corruption and incompetence. Rather than admit that, they sink into the corrosive politics of victimhood: blaming others for their sad predicament and seeking hand outs. The British built more than 20 hospitals in Jamaica before it achieved independence in 1962. How many hospitals has the Jamaican government built since 1962? Two. Me on GB News:
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo119,144 views • 1 month ago

What is playing out now with the Belfast attack, with Henry Nowak, is a grand symphony of gaslighting & dishonesty that is almost too stomach-churning to watch We witnessed the same after Southport, with the rape gangs....and on & on They KNOW their mass migration ideology caused these atrocities. So they choose to deflect on to right-wing politicians, GB News and what they call the "far right". The public need to understand exactly how their game is played and the poisonous ideology that underpins it. The cycle is always the same: Fury erupts across Britain, driven not by public figures (as they claim), but by the atrocity itself. You know, the mad asylum seeker wielding a bloodied knife... Footage is shared on social media, watched with our own eyes. The pure unvarnished truth that the legacy media can't spin. Figures on the right respond with natural fury - indeed, rage - that the elite's callous disregard for reality and their fellow citizens has yet again unleashed carnage. But the media and the political class can't talk about that reality. They can't talk about the incident itself. Because they would have to admit it is thanks to them that such people - such murderers - have entered the country. The BBC, The Guardian, Sky News, Labour, the Greens, the Lib Dems & many Tories, too -- What THEY CHOOSE to talk about, what they WANT YOU TO THINK the real story is about, is the anger and the choice of words of those of us who are utterly appalled and outraged by the latest atrocity -- an atrocity THEY enabled. This is gaslighting propaganda of the most repellent and unforgivable kind. With Southport, the real story was apparently not the son of a Rwandan refugee committing one of the most heinous crimes in British history. No, the real story was Nigel Farage's reaction to that orgy of slaughter against little girls. When locals rioted, James O'Brien and others labelled it the 'Farage Riots'. The small number of rioters suddenly became the story, used to dismiss the concerns of ALL protestors. "Far-right thuggery", was how Keir Starmer referred to law-abiding mothers and pensioners. Anything to avoid talking about the crime itself and the ideology that brought its perpetrator into our country. And now we see the same playing out with the Belfast attack and the murder of Henry Nowak. Newsnight misleadingly quoted Nigel Farage as saying "white rage," a revealing and vile smear for which they have had to apologise yet again. In lockstep, the media and political class rapidly converged on their narrative: this was to be a story about Nigel Farage's naughty words. THIS is what has dominated their coverage. This is what they want to talk about in Parliament, in the TV studios, and in the press. Farage's naughty words. "Just how naughty were they? Should such bad words be tolerated? Should he be arrested?" "Do we need to apply yet more censorship to protect the public against his mean, hurty words?" These people are so far beneath contempt it is difficult to find words that do them justice. This is a story not about Nigel Farage or the right, but the deeply ingrained anti-British and anti-white ideology that is destroying this nation. This is an institutionally treasonous state, and Henry Novak and Stephen Ogilvie are its latest victims. That is the real story our political and media class are attempting to bury under a mountain of pearl-clutching theatrics, lies, and misdirection. They have blood on their hands. It's about time we said it. Clip from my monologue. 👇 Full monologue linked in the second post. 1/2
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo152,924 views • 2 months ago

Dear United Nations, Oldest slave trades: 1. Africans enslaving Africans: Thousands of years to today 2. Arab slave trade: 1000+ years to today British Empire slave trade? 1555 - 1807 Should Europe claim reparations for the Barbary Slave Trade in 1M+ WHITE SLAVES? North Africans enslaved at least 1 Million white Europeans in the Barbary Slave Trade, which lasted longer than the British Empire's trans-Atlantic slave trade. If the Caribbean and Africa want reparations, why is Europe also not entitled to reparations? Where does this end? Should Italy pay reparations for slavery in the Roman Empire? Me on GB News with Jacob Rees-Mogg:
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo289,834 views • 5 months ago

Happy St. George's Day to all English folk at home & abroad🏴 I'm not ethnically English but I was born here & love this country more than any other England made the modern world. No country has had a greater or more positive impact The English must celebrate that My debate:
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo178,077 views • 4 months ago

The ban on #cousinmarriage is one explanation for the origin of The West's genius & exceptionalism I discuss this in my TRIGGERnometry interview 👇 Harvard's Prof J Heinrich argues that the Western mind evolved differently & was a global anomaly because of the 9th century Western (Catholic) Church's ban on cousin marriage. Up to that point, the structure of societies across the globe was defined by kinship clans - large extended families where your first, second, third, fourth cousins were as much part of the family as brothers and sisters. These clan societies were based upon nepotism, obedience to authority and conformity. Strangers were regard with distrust and hostility. In the West, the ban on marriage between certain degrees of consanguinity resulted in the birth of the nuclear family, which didn't exist elsewhere. Today, 75% of the world still has cousin marriages. According to Heinrich, approx. 90% of the world doesn't have the same notion of the exclusive nuclear family that we have. The birth of the Western nuclear family devoid of its external connections to clanship, directly let to the emergence of individuality and innovation. With kinship clans destroyed, the nuclear family had to rely on contact with strangers. This led to the development of high levels of social trust in the West. Social trust is one of the most important criteria for a society's economic prosperity and social cohesion. With high levels of social trust, these medieval European nuclear families were able to come together & cooperate for their mutual benefit. They achieved this, for example, by establishing guilds, confraternities, universities and charter towns. These uniquely Western institutions helped to foster the cross-pollination of ideas and skills, through which innovation exploded. The exclusively Western notion of individualism was core to this, as well. And much of that is due to Protestantism. I explain all this in greater detail in this video:
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo765,741 views • 1 year ago

The Stephen Lawrence' murder led to the Macpherson report into police "institutional racism" The Henry Nowak murder MUST lead to a similar report into police's ANTI-WHITE racism The police over-corrected to such an insane level they are now high priests of the diversity cult This is a cult that believes minorities are sacred and incapable of evil - especially racism The truth is that today's super diversity is not a strength. For victims like Henry Nowak - and far too many others - "diversity" is a death sentence.
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo128,248 views • 3 months ago

How could naturally skeptical journalists like James O'Brien & Krishnan Guru-Murthy be taken in by Jason Arday? They were mesmerised by the tale of a black boy who had overcome adversity It’s the virtue-signalling equivalent of train spotters who get excited seeing the Flying Scotsman For journalists like James O’Brien & Krishnan Guru-Murthy -- and woke academics in Cambridge and up and down the country -- Arday was their Flying Scotsman. Arday ticked every box: race ✔️ poverty ✔️ neurodivergent ✔️ illiterate ✔️ unorthodox childhood ✔️ He was the virtue signaller’s poster boy. The identity politics bingo card in human form. To see seasoned journalists, trained to detect the faintest whiff of BS, uncritically accept the bold boasts of their interviewee reveals the devastating, mind-addling effect of ideological capture - dare I say, brainwashing. Of course, people like James O’Brien have form here. Remember, O’Brien was a great champion of the convicted paedophile Carl Beech, the vile fantasist who claimed various upstanding public figures were involved in unspeakable crimes. O’Brien’s personal biases clearly cloud his judgement. O'Brien's hubris prevents him from ever acknowledging his errors. And so, even though others who have previously defended Arday have quietly removed their support (most recently the black president of Wolfson College) O'Brien remains chained to the foundering HMS Jason. What these people - and the rest of the woke establishment - don't realise, is that they are being unforgivably racist. Any white professor facing similar accusations to Arday would have been pilloried and investigated long ago. Cambridge normally has a zero tolerance attitude towards plagiarism - yet it refuses to re-examine this professor's credentials. Arday’s race is the reason the progressive left have become his Praetorian Guard. They are holding Arday to a lower standard because he is black. Surely that is, by definition, racist. Me on GB News:
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo38,094 views • 25 days ago

What's in Burnham's secret message to our nuclear subs in case the UK is wiped out? He has 4 choices Why do our Civil Service pretend to be neutral? Britain will have NO Prime Minister for 30 min. tomorrow. What happens in an emergency? I explain to M. Portillo the special rituals that will be performed tomorrow as The King appoints Andy Burnham as his 4th Prime Minister. It's a day filled with symbolism.
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo57,343 views • 1 month ago

Sharia law has no place in modern society It is the greatest threat to womens' rights in Britain & is used as a tool of oppression, victimisation & abuse Our hypocritical politicians embraced "#MeToo", preach about women's rights & lecture British men about "toxic masculinity"... whilst at the same time wilfully turning a blind eye to the rampant misogyny, oppression, sexual assault, domestic & honour based violence that exists within parts of the Muslim community - and which is enabled by some Sharia councils. Sharia councils (which are completely unregulated) have condoned wife beating, told wives to reconcile with abusive husbands and dismissed the idea of "marital rape". We live in an age of great leaps forward for humanity: Artificial Intelligence, quantum computing, driverless cars, tourist trips to space etc. etc. It is preposterous that in such an advanced age, women's lives are still being ruled by medieval laws. We are all equal under the law. One law for all. That principle must stand. Why, then, is Britain the "Sharia capital" of the West? We have more Sharia councils than anyone else and British Muslims help set up Sharia councils in other Western countries. 60%-80% of Muslim marriages in the UK are Sharia only, with no civil registration (thus denying "wives" protection from English courts). This is the highest in the Western world. Some morons will reply: "Sharia is voluntary and has no legal recognition or force in the UK". Tell that to the Muslim women who are forced to go to Sharia councils and who are forced (by their religious leaders, their husbands, their families and their wider community) to accept the rulings - rulings made by ultra-conservative / extremist / Islamist men. Many of these women aren't even aware that Sharia has no legal force or that English courts would come to a different ruling. A party that does not pledge to tackle Sharia councils is a party that condones the oppression of women. Me on GB News:
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo84,446 views • 2 months ago

This isn't about slavery at all If it was, these campaigners would be focusing on MODERN slavery 7 in every 1000 Africans is a slave today This is a cash grab by the Caribbean and an attack on Britain & The West by activists No one today is a victim of Britain's slave trade
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo537,856 views • 1 year ago

The MSM are ignoring the biggest story of the year OBR data confirms that low-skilled immigration is destroying the UK economy Each low-skilled migrant will cost the taxpayer £465k by age 81 Only 5% of migrants (1 in 20) are net contributors to the economy as high-skilled workers. They contribute £1 to the economy whereas low-skilled immigrants cost the economy £1.60. Mass immigration is not boosting economic growth, it's crippling it. By every measure - economic, cultural and social - mass immigration has been the greatest act of harm in our long island story. It's worse even than the cost of fighting the Second World War. A generation of Quisling politicians of all stripes have betrayed Britain and are complicit in our nation's civilisational decline. Those who aided and abetted in the catastrophic events of the past quarter-century must be held to account. This means not only the politicians & civil servants who pushed this false prospectus, but also their Lord Haw-Haw cheerleaders in the media. And it includes those in the CBI and big business who, without any concern for the wider societal impact, selfishly lobbied government for a never-ending supply of cheap labour. Importing cheap labour suppressed wages and enabled them to avoid the costly - but vital - investment in innovation, technology and capital infrastructure that would have reduced the need for low skill migrants in the first place. (Eg. Job mechanization/automation, robotics etc.) Never forgive. Never forget. I joined Talk to discuss 👇 Source & data:
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo518,704 views • 1 year ago

Elon Musk Bravo! Slavery's universal More Africans were kept as slaves by other Africans than crossed the Atlantic Britain's unique for being the 1st power in history to make itself poorer in pursuit of a moral good (huge sums spent to stop slavery) My speech to Cambridge University👇
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo464,713 views • 1 year ago