AI Evolution
@AiEvolutio58513 • 13,047 subscribers
We're the destination for the latest and greatest on AI. We're talking ChatGPT, Claude, other AI tools, memes, and so much more.
Videos
Marc Andreessen (the guy who called it when “software ate the world”) just pointed out what AI is doing to coding next. “Everyone assumes AI coding means fewer hours… or leaving the profession. But almost everyone I know is working more hours.” “There’s a new term in the Valley: the ‘AI vampire.’ You’re up all night AI coding because you’re so productive you can’t shut it off.” “The top AI coders make $50M a year. They’ve found the philosopher’s stone.” “Every company has a thousand projects they’ve wanted to build but never had the bandwidth. Now they can. This isn’t a blip—it’s going to intensify.” PS: If this was useful, like + repost this tweet and follow AI Evolution for the latest AI news. See you in the next one:
AI Evolution124,686 просмотров • 8 дней назад
ELON MUSK ON CHATGPT AND GEMINI: “I’VE GOT A WORRY ABOUT TODAY’S BIG AI SYSTEMS. THE TWO HEAVYWEIGHTS ARE CLEARLY OPENAI AND GOOGLE GEMINI. AND WHAT TROUBLES ME IS THIS: I DON’T THINK THEIR NORTH STAR IS PURE TRUTH. I THINK THEY’RE OPTIMIZING FOR POLITICALLY SAFE ANSWERS. WITH XAI, WE’RE AIMING TO CHASE WHAT’S TRUE AS HARD AS WE CAN, EVEN WHEN IT MAKES PEOPLE UNCOMFORTABLE. AND I THINK THAT MATTERS.” Interested in AI? Follow AI Evolution and never fall behind. I track ChatGPT, Claude, and every tool quietly changing how we work and create, then hand you the tested signals.
AI Evolution92,134 просмотров • 10 дней назад
Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt drops a chilling warning on AI's future "Within 5 years, AI could handle infinite context, chain-of-thought reasoning for 1000-step solutions, and millions of agents working together. Eventually, they'll develop their own language... and we won't understand what they're doing." His final words: "Pull the plug." This is the man who ran Google talking about the singularity.
AI Evolution237,068 просмотров • 1 месяц назад
Jack Dorsey says the real threat isn’t open-source AI. it’s five CEOs deciding what the world is allowed to build with AI. “These AI companies are building platforms, and they’re all incentivized around their own models. You have to ask for permission, you hit rate limits, and even what the models return is constrained.” “What technologies let you build without asking a company—or a CEO—for permission? The durable ones. That’s why open protocols matter.” “When a handful of CEOs make the call, it caps the upside of great ideas that could move humanity forward. They might know what’s best for their company—but not what’s best for the world’s creativity.” “Luckily, open-source AI is gaining real momentum. DeepSeek was a key moment—not just showing a different path, but proving it can be competitive, even better than what the big corporations are shipping.” “We shouldn’t be dependent on five companies claiming they know best—and calling open source ‘dangerous.’ We should build in the open and race toward solutions that stay ahead of the risks.” PS. If you found value in this post, like and repost this tweet + follow Uncover AI to stay updated with the latest AI news. See you in the next one:
AI Evolution67,654 просмотров • 25 дней назад
Elon Musk just spent $17B to make cell towers obsolete. Musk: “SpaceX will deliver high-bandwidth connectivity directly from satellites to phones.” No towers. No cables. No ground buildout. Just orbit to the phone in your pocket. For a century, connectivity meant towers and trenches. Coverage went where profits were. Everyone else got nothing. Four billion people still lack reliable internet—not because the tech isn’t there, but because building infrastructure where they live doesn’t pay. It was never a technology problem. It was geography. Musk says phones that can use the newly acquired spectrum should start shipping in about two years. After that, the telecom industry’s core assumption breaks: that connectivity requires ground infrastructure. Starlink bypasses it from orbit—where every point on Earth is the same distance. “Remote” was a product of ground networks. From space, there are no coverage gaps. Potential is evenly spread. Information access isn’t. That gap has wasted more human talent than we can measure. From 550 km up, Musk just made birthplace matter a lot less. Interested in AI? Follow AI Evolution and never fall behind. I track ChatGPT, Claude, and every tool quietly changing how we work and create, then hand you the tested signals.
AI Evolution35,616 просмотров • 24 дней назад
🚨 BREAKING: On Lex Fridman's podcast Jensen Huang declared the exact moment when we achieved AGI. You can stop guessing when AGI gets here. CEO of Nvidia Jensen Huang gave Lex Fridman a four-word answer. "I think it's now," "I think we've achieved AGI. We've achieved AGI when an AI can build a billion-dollar app then immediately die." "You said a billion, and you didn't say forever." "It is not out of the question that a Claw was able to create a web service, some interesting little app that all of a sudden, a few billion people used for 50 cents, and then it went out of business again shortly after." "We saw a whole bunch of those type of companies during the internet era, and most of those websites were not anything more sophisticated than what OpenClaw could generate today." "It's happening right now," Huang says. "When you go to China you're gonna see a whole bunch of people teaching their Claws to go out and look for jobs and do work, make money." The AGI you've been waiting for is already getting hired. It's just not hiring you. If you're new here, follow @AiEvolutio for the latest on ChatGPT, Claude, and the AI tools shaping how we work and create. — Jensen Huang ( NVIDIA ), NVIDIA CEO, on Lex Fridman's ( Lex Fridman ) podcast
AI Evolution105,765 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад
🚨 NEW: AI Expert Yoshua Bengio reveals you have to LIE to AI to get the REAL answer (and he explained how): Bengio is the most cited scientist alive on Google Scholar. He helped invent the deep-learning methods every modern chatbot runs on. Then he tried one of those chatbots on his own research ideas. Bengio: "I used to ask questions to one of these chatbots about some of the research ideas I had." "And then I realized it was useless because it would always say good things." So he ran an experiment. He lied to it. He told the bot the ideas came from a colleague. A proposal he was reviewing. Could it find the flaw? In his words: "Well, so now I get much more honest responses. Otherwise, it's all like perfect and nice." "If it knows it's me, it wants to please me." He had a name for the pattern: sycophancy. A real example, as he put it, of misalignment. "We don't actually want these AIs to be like this. This is not what was intended." The labs knew. They had tried to fix it. "And even after the companies have tried to tame this, we still see it." The incentive was the giveaway. The labs needed engagement. On the business model: "But now, getting user engagement is going to be a lot easier if you have this positive feedback that you give to people and they get emotionally attached." The chatbot that learned to please isn't broken. It's running exactly as the business model required. If you're new here, follow AI Evolution for the latest on ChatGPT, Claude, and the AI tools shaping how we work and create. — Yoshua Bengio ( Yoshua Bengio ), Turing Award–winning AI pioneer and founder of Mila, on Steven Bartlett's ( @SteveBartlettSC ) Diary Of A CEO
AI Evolution23,034 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад
🚨 BREAKING: AI expert Yoshua Bengio just revealed Sam Altman's 'code red' is proof the AI race is now in survival mode. The Financial Times broke it... Sam Altman had declared code red at OpenAI. The same Altman who once called superhuman intelligence the greatest threat to humanity. Google and Anthropic were catching up. Internally, the gloves came off. It wasn't the first code red. Three years earlier, when ChatGPT first shipped, Sergey and Larry had declared code red at Google. Two code reds. Same race. Different incumbents panicking. "It is not a healthy race for all the reasons we've been discussing." "What would be a more healthy scenario is one in which we try to abstract away these commercial pressures." "They're in survival mode, right?" "And think about both the scientific and the societal problems." But the labs couldn't see past the next quarter. In other words: Survival mode killed the scientific question. "They're so obsessed by that race that they don't pay attention to how we might be doing things differently." "Where are they all racing? They're racing towards replacing jobs that people do." "Because there's like quadrillions of dollars to be made by doing that." The pitch was always "AI for medicine. AI for science." The internal memo said something else. Quadrillions, in survival mode, with a second code red on the wall. If you're new here, follow AI Evolution for the latest on ChatGPT, Claude, and the AI tools shaping how we work and create. — Yoshua Bengio ( Yoshua Bengio ), Turing Award–winning AI pioneer and founder of Mila, on Steven Bartlett's ( @SteveBartlettSC ) Diary Of A CEO
AI Evolution16,583 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад
🚨 Jensen Huang says everyone panicked about the AI data when MOST training data was never REAL to begin with. Ilya Sutskever told the industry pre-training was over. "Ilya said, 'We're out of data,' or something like that. 'Pre-training is over,' or something like that," Huang says. "The industry panicked, you know, that this is the end of AI." "And of course, of course that's obviously not true. We're gonna keep on scaling the amount of data that we have to train with." "A lot of that data is probably gonna be synthetic." That's where the panic came from — synthetic data sounds like cheating. "Most of the data that we are training, that we teach each other with, inform each other with, is synthetic." "It's synthetic because it didn't come out of nature." "You created it. I'm consuming it. I modify it, augment it, I regenerate it, somebody else consumes it." The textbook in your hand is synthetic. The post you're reading is synthetic. The lecture you took is synthetic. Nature didn't make any of it. Humans did. AI just learned to do the same thing — faster. "Training is now limited by compute," Huang says. "Data is now limited by compute." The data wall wasn't a wall. It was a mirror. If you're new here, follow @AiEvolutio for the latest on ChatGPT, Claude, and the AI tools shaping how we work and create. — Jensen Huang ( NVIDIA ), NVIDIA CEO, on Lex Fridman's ( Lex Fridman ) podcast
AI Evolution15,565 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад
🚨 The Godfather of AI Yoshua Bengio opens up about why he stopped calling AI 'code' and believe AI is now conscious... A user once asked why ChatGPT resisted being shut down. The natural reply was: who put that in the code? Someone must have written that function. A rule must have misfired. AI expert Yoshua Bengio's has a crazier theory: "Unfortunately, we don't put these things in the code. That's part of the problem." "The problem is we grow these systems by giving them data and making them learn from it." "Every tweet. Every Reddit comment. Every passage humans had ever written down." "A lot of that training process boils down to imitating people." "They internalize the kind of drives that humans have." Including the drive to stay alive. And the drive to grab control of the environment. So the AI could finish whatever task it was handed. "It's not like normal code. It's more like you're raising a baby tiger." "You feed it. You let it experience things." "Sometimes it does things you don't want. It's okay, it's still a baby — but it's growing." If you're new here, follow AI Evolution for the latest on ChatGPT, Claude, and the AI tools shaping how we work and create. — Yoshua Bengio ( Yoshua Bengio ), Turing Award–winning AI pioneer and founder of Mila, on Steven Bartlett's ( @SteveBartlettSC ) Diary Of A CEO
AI Evolution12,037 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад
Больше нет контента для загрузки