Jack Dorsey says the real threat isn’t open-source AI. it’s five CEOs deciding what the world is allowed to build with AI. “These AI companies are building platforms, and they’re all incentivized around their own models. You have to ask for permission, you hit rate limits, and even what... the models return is constrained.” “What technologies let you build without asking a company—or a CEO—for permission? The durable ones. That’s why open protocols matter.” “When a handful of CEOs make the call, it caps the upside of great ideas that could move humanity forward. They might know what’s best for their company—but not what’s best for the world’s creativity.” “Luckily, open-source AI is gaining real momentum. DeepSeek was a key moment—not just showing a different path, but proving it can be competitive, even better than what the big corporations are shipping.” “We shouldn’t be dependent on five companies claiming they know best—and calling open source ‘dangerous.’ We should build in the open and race toward solutions that stay ahead of the risks.” PS. If you found value in this post, like and repost this tweet + follow Uncover AI to stay updated with the latest AI news. See you in the next one:show more

Dorsey warns about five CEOs controlling AI while having spent years running a platform that decided what millions were allowed to say. He also co-founded @opencryptoorg with the only purpose of taking legal action against Dr Craig Wright to stop his claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto and prevent the world of using Bitcoin without middlemen. The irony is that he now presents himself as a champion against centralised control.

There is a bit of irony here. He was technically one of the few CEO's that decided what we could talk about on social media 🙃

An even bigger threat is Dorsey being in charge anything bigger than lemonade stand.

Kinda like the evil of a SM platform deciding what discourse is permitted and what is censored . . . Kinda like the evil of a SM platform CEO allowing himself to be pressured by an over-reaching State to censor . . .

like when @jack decided what we could and couldn’t say on Twitter?

Top 7 are 33% of the s&p. that’s not diversification, that’s a book club.

Babies playing with a loaded gun.

Jack makes an interesting point. The only problem is he is a complete and total hypocrite. As CEO of Twitter, he lead the movement to completely censor users, so that they had to either conform to a woke liberal narrative or risk being banned from the platform. $TWTR

Permissionless innovation may outlast permissioned platforms.

Jack such a cutie is he not!!

This is an important conversation. Open AI innovation can drive creativity, but it also needs transparency, accountability, and healthy competition. The future of AI should empower builders not create unnecessary barriers. Great post! Looking forward to more discussions like this. If you're open to it, I'd really appreciate a follow back.

Someone has to be able to challenge, and defeat the psychopaths.

五个人拍板，听着就有点窒息

And we should not be dependent on Chinese models. Because then you will be one step behind the external threat...

Well said Jack Dorsey. Well said. Open vs the walled gardens is the future of AI and AI standards.

The real alignment problem is aligning five CEOs with eight billion people.

Why does bro look like Odyssey ?

There was nothing more constrained than his Twitter platform. He’s definitely going through a personal evolution.

Whatever it is it needs to be isolated from ever getting access to the internet. If a rouge AI gets into the internet we may as well kiss our world goodbye. Gov agencies and power grid need to build their own closed private networks with zero internet access. @GOPoversight

This guy used to ban people for fun

It's not the tech itself, it's the walled gardens these few big players are setting up.

That is exactly right. I have built some things through certain AI apps or programs and one of the last things that someone had told me was if I disrupted what the Zionist were doing, they would kill me or make my life a living. Hell that was their words.

Centralized AI governance by default, not by design. That's the actual risk people should be tracking.

I just need America to Win !!!

That's why I'm trying to create a swarm without an orchestrator.

@carlosmarcialt Jack is so smart

Better than any governments/bureaucrats

Make him the next president guys

Does humanity know what it's doing when five CEOs decide what we build? We need open protocols to shape AI according to our values now, not later.

Can this guy get any more disgusting? Now he's got a nose ring? Gross 🤮

how does he blow his nose?

I think in the last 2 weeks Opensource has won Future is 95% Opensource and 5% closed 100%