Karthik ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ's banner
Karthik ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ's profile picture

Karthik ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ

@beastoftraal โ€ข 92,122 subscribers

Communications strategy consultant (see pinned tweet). Connect with me for corporate workshops on personal branding. No paid posts - my words are not for sale.

Shorts

Of course, there *is* a Vadivelu equivalent.

Of course, there *is* a Vadivelu equivalent.

236,051 views

Bajaj Finserv MD's quip that they'd make a provision on their website to not be disturbedis actually followed by, "but then make sure you never come back to us for our products and services". Seriously? Bajaj Finserv is not doing a favor to people by spam-calling them. 1/5

Bajaj Finserv MD's quip that they'd make a provision on their website to not be disturbedis actually followed by, "but then make sure you never come back to us for our products and services". Seriously? Bajaj Finserv is not doing a favor to people by spam-calling them. 1/5

115,246 views

Videos

beastoftraal's profile picture

If I say, 'Liril Soap' and 'Laaa la la la la', many people may start humming the classic Liril soap ad jingle. But the shocker is that the jingle was not original, but "inspired"! The bigger shocker was that the original jingle was also made for a lime-based soap just like HUL's Liril - Henkel's Fa! Henkel's Fa ad campaign in 1968-69 by the Dรผsseldorf-based agency Hubert Troost Werbeagentur (usually called Troost) featured the 'Laaa la la la la' song. It was composed by the German composer Klaus Doldinger. The jingle became so popular that a vinyl single of the track (Listen: was released in 1969 under the pseudonym Paul Nero Sounds (one of Doldingerโ€™s aliases for his more commercial/pop-oriented output at the time), explicitly tied to the Fa commercial: "Paul Nero Sounds (Klaus Doldinger) - Wild Freshness (FA Commercial)". It appeared on compilations like Pop-Shopping: Juicy Music From German Commercials 1960-1975. Liril's (the soap itself inspired by Fa) first ad was released in 1974, in cinema theaters. It featured Air India stewardess Karen Lunel, and was made by the agency Lintas, and directed by Kailash Surendranath. The jingle was credited to Vanraj Bhatia (even though he simply added some Indian elements like Sitar, as an interlude, the actual melody was a direct lift from the Fa ad jingle by Klaus) and was sung by Preeti Desai. That two lime-based soaps, across 2 countries, have almost similar visual devices (shots of the soap interspersed with bikini-clad woman bathing) and identical music, is no coincidence, and is probably part of the larger ethos of that time in India when Hindi film music too heavily "borrowed" from foreign sources without any credit. I should know, because I created an entire website listing original songs against many, many Indian film songs: (many of the song links may be broken but you can always Google the titles and find new uploads on YouTube). The Fa ad plays first, followed by the Liril ad. #advertising #marketing

Karthik ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ

130,231 views โ€ข 3 months ago

beastoftraal's profile picture

Dinshaw's new ad for its ice cream cone, featuring Vinod Kambli, by the agency Womb, left me dismayed. The narrative crux is the line "Jinko life mein thoda kam mila, unke liye thoda zyada". The subject of that "thoda kam mila" framing is a real, living person whose health struggles, public breakdowns and financial difficulties are well-documented and ongoing. Sure, many feel Kambli deserved more in life. But this ad film doesn't redeem that narrative. It harvests it to sell ice cream cones. The word "dildaari" (generosity) is doing particularly cynical work here. It's a loaded, noble word, implying big-heartedness, even grace. The agency's narrative applies it to the extra chocolate at the bottom of a cone!! The deflation is almost comic, and the asymmetry between the weight of the human story and the lightness of the product is utterly jarring. I can anticipate the counter: "Won't viewers empathise with Kambli? Won't younger audiences Google him and feel for him?" Perhaps. But there's a meaningful difference between empathy and sympathy. Empathy is feeling *with* someone ("I know what it's like to work hard and not get recognised"). Sympathy is feeling *for* someone ("Poor Kambli, he lost everything"). This ad pushes firmly toward sympathy, and then does this with it: 1. Kambli got less. 2. Poor Kambli. 3. Dinshaw's gives more. 4. Buy this cone. If a young person Googles Kambli and discovers he is currently battling neurological issues and financial distress, the ad's cheerful metaphor of an ice cream cone bringing him joy looks jarringly inadequate... like the brand is leveraging real-time vulnerability for a summer sale. Kambli was paid for this, yes. But the cruelest irony is that he may have needed the money, which makes the entire exercise more uncomfortable, not less. By choosing the "deserved more" arc, Dinshaw's and Womb lock him into a permanent state of failure. He isn't a collaborator in this story. He's the cautionary tale. I hope this ad doesn't normalise a template: find a fallen public figure, wrap their misfortune in warm language, sell something cheerful. #advertising #marketing

Karthik ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ

78,817 views โ€ข 3 months ago

beastoftraal's profile picture

XYXX's new ad (agency: PinkSauce Studios) is a brilliant exercise in gender-role reversal used as a comic device. But beneath the humor, it is a smart strategy to solve a unique marketing problem: how to differentiate the selling of an unsexy, utilitarian, and deeply unglamorous garment that has traditionally been sold only in one way in India - the 'macho' way? The 'macho' way of selling baniyans has always been about roping in a famous male movie star (one of the Khans, Varun Dhawan, etc.) and selling an imaginary world where men miraculously inherit a movie star's magnetism just by putting on a specific brand of baniyan. This ad takes a completely different route and forces men to think about fit and aesthetics of a garment they rarely talk about. How? By lavishing as much attention on a baniyan as women (and the world) do on a bra! By comparing it to the intense public scrutiny, "staring", judgment, and hyper-awareness surrounding women's bras, the ad forces men to look at their innerwear through a social lens. And by having a man say, 'My eyes are here' to a group of women in a public bus, the ad mines humor through subversion! Of course, I thought there was a false equivalence of scrutiny too - for women, the public policing and hyper-sexualization of bra lines or straps isn't just about "looking messy". It is tied to deeply rooted issues of modesty/moral-policing, objectification, and personal safety. For men? A visible baniyan line or a peek of fabric at the collar is just a style slip-up or a sign of being slightly old-fashioned. By equating a womanโ€™s genuine discomfort with a manโ€™s minor fashion embarrassment, is the ad trivializing a heavy social issue to sell an innerwear? In other words, is it suggesting that the gaze is symmetrical, when in reality, the power dynamic behind that gaze is completely different? But then, I don't think the ad is equating the danger or the systemic oppression. It is onlt using a universally understood cultural pain-point to create a surreal and absurd taboo-flip. If it makes men uncomfortable, thatโ€™s perhaps the point, because that discomfort may drive both social awareness and product consideration.

Karthik ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ

39,970 views โ€ข 1 month ago