Harper Carroll's banner
Harper Carroll's profile picture

Harper Carroll

@HarperSCarroll • 31,835 subscribers

AI Computer Scientist • @harpercarrollai on IG • taught AI/ML @Stanford • built @Meta • AI is less scary under the hood ↓ 10-day AI basics + more (free)

Videos

HarperSCarroll's profile picture

Google and AI are completely different, and understanding how they work changes how you use them. *To be specific: by “AI” here I mean Large Language Models, or LLMs. Google has technically always been AI – its PageRank algorithm, which decides which links to return to you, has always been a form of AI. And yes, Google is now augmented with LLMs. What we’re comparing in this post is traditional Google (using PageRank) and LLMs.* Lets break down the differences in plain English & answer some of the most commonly asked questions below (so you know when to use which tool): Q: What’s the biggest difference between Google and LLMs like ChatGPT? Google searches. LLMs predict. Google scans the internet and returns the most relevant websites using a ranking system. LLMs don’t search. They learn from massive amounts of text — and then predict what word comes next based on probability. Q: So are LLMs just looking things up? No. They’re word generators. They learn patterns in language, and then generate text that follows those patterns. That’s why they can sound confident — even when they’re wrong. Many - crucially, not all!!! - models today have been augmented with the ability to pull some data from the internet and insert it into its context window (i.e. the input into the LLM, the prediction machine) which reduces the risk of “hallucination,” (i.e. making things up) but even so, the model is still a predictor. It can (and often does) still mess up EVEN with web search added. Q: What’s the biggest tradeoff to watch out for? Hallucinations. LLMs are generators (& not a fact checkers). So they can make things up. That’s why tools like web-browsing and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) are so important. They anchor generation to real data. But they’re not foolproof. Bottom line: If Google is a librarian, LLMs are improv actors who’ve read the entire library. Sometimes brilliant. Sometimes also wrong. But when you understand *how* they think — you can use them way more effectively. Leave your questions or comments in the section below 🥰👇 & share to spread the word!! This concept is simple and yet so important. You guys rock, sending love to you all!

Harper Carroll

44,225 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag