
Dr. Jonathan N. Stea
@jonathanstea • 48,665 subscribers
🇨🇦 Clinical Psychologist. Adjunct Assistant Professor @UCalgary. Movement: @ScienceUpFirst. Bylines: @Sciam, @CBCNews, @Slate, @Globalnews, @PsychToday et al
Shorts
Videos

What it’s like for a food scientist to hear misinformation about raw milk:
Dr. Jonathan N. Stea1,198,876 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr
1:39
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.

What it’s like for a food scientist to hear misinformation about raw milk:
Dr. Jonathan N. Stea746,900 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Your first ever distance reiki session for clearing your sinuses. You’re welcome. That’ll be $300.
Dr. Jonathan N. Stea407,941 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

"Treating the root cause" is a trope abused in alternative/integrative/functional medicine to sow distrust in mainstream medicine. Ironically, a scientifically implausible “root cause” is often treated with pseudoscientific approaches (e.g., spine subluxations for all diseases; past life regressions for PTSD; balancing energy for back pain, etc.). H/t Dr. Glaucomflecken
Dr. Jonathan N. Stea115,522 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

It’s so much easier to just drink raw milk and deny science…
Dr. Jonathan N. Stea28,141 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

No one: Matt Walsh: Societally, the effects of cigarettes are actually pretty positive.
Dr. Jonathan N. Stea247,195 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

PhD in Virology from The University of Facebook By Cormac Moore
Dr. Jonathan N. Stea247,334 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

In science, you don’t “do the studies to make the proof.” But that’s exactly how RFK Jr. operates. We’ve seen it throughout his career. And we saw it clearly last May when HHS released the MAHA report with 7 hallucinated citations. The administration tried to downplay it and pretend it was no big deal. Karoline Leavitt called them “formatting issues,” but they weren’t formatting issues. They were AI-generated, hallucinated citations (references that looked real but didn’t exist). That quite literally means the report started with a conclusion and then built a case and a narrative around that conclusion, which would be a failing grade in any undergraduate research course. And that’s the pattern we keep seeing from RFK Jr. where he starts with what he wants to be true, then looks for “proof” to back it up. That’s not how science works. That’s how ideology works. And it’s exactly why the vast majority of the scientific community are sounding the alarm. - Dr. Jessica Knurick
Dr. Jonathan N. Stea68,794 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten