
Jessica Gonzales
@lil_disruptor • 31,902 subscribers
Crypto by Jess Youtube | CEO, Founder & AI Creative Director @ Light Labs Link in Description @ https://t.co/IxyHvImfGo
Videos

Everyone thinks Wall Street is “adopting” Bitcoin. They’re not. They’re absorbing it. Here’s the part nobody talks about 👇 • They’re not buying spot BTC… they’re wrapping it in ETFs, notes, funds, and collateral products. • Once an asset is wrapped, Wall Street controls the flows, the liquidity, and the leverage — without holding the actual keys. • Mining power is shifting to publicly traded firms, which means hashpower is becoming a capital-markets asset. • Custodians now hold massive BTC pools, giving institutions influence over the cycle without ever touching raw Bitcoin. • The endgame? Control the plumbing. Not the protocol. Bitcoin stays decentralized. But the layer around Bitcoin is slowly being built by the same giants who control every other asset class on earth. If you don’t understand this shift, you won’t understand the next decade of Bitcoin. 🎥 Full breakdown inside the episode:
Jessica Gonzales250,109 次观看 • 7 个月前

Bitcoin price crashed into the mid-80Ks and it felt violent for a reason. This wasn’t random selling. It was a leverage snap layered on top of a confidence hit. When long positioning gets crowded, price doesn’t slide. It drops until forced selling is done. Now the part that actually matters. There are two key levels deciding the mood from here: • 85–86K This is the immediate battleground. Acceptance back above it signals the panic phase is cooling. • 80–82K This is the deeper demand zone. If price trades here while forced selling exhausts, it’s where real buyers usually step in. Levels alone aren’t enough. Behavior is the tell. Watch aSOPR. When it dips below 1, it means coins are being sold at a loss, often during shakeouts where weak hands exit and stronger hands absorb supply. That’s how crashes transition into bases. The future outlook hinges on one thing. Does forced selling fade while liquidity stays supportive? If yes, volatility becomes a reset, not a breakdown. If liquidity tightens, the market takes longer to heal. I walk through the zones, the on-chain signals, and why this move fits a rotation phase, not a structural failure. Full context in today’s video 👇
Jessica Gonzales46,429 次观看 • 6 个月前
没有更多内容可加载