Megan Basham's banner
Megan Basham's profile picture

Megan Basham

@megbasham205,146 subscribers

Journalist, NYT bestselling author, @realDailyWire. Other words: @wsj @firstthingsmag @telegraph. Unabashed church lady. Aspiring matriarch. Penske material.

Shorts

Oh my gosh, this new video of Iryna Zarutska, immediately after the stabbing, while she is crying before her death is beyond horrifying. The callousness and disinterest of the riders around her is almost impossible to comprehend.

Sensitive content

Oh my gosh, this new video of Iryna Zarutska, immediately after the stabbing, while she is crying before her death is beyond horrifying. The callousness and disinterest of the riders around her is almost impossible to comprehend.

1,618,615 просмотров

To the guys telling me ballet is inherently effeminate/gay. Lol, no. I'd like to see you guys display this amount of power.

To the guys telling me ballet is inherently effeminate/gay. Lol, no. I'd like to see you guys display this amount of power.

138,130 просмотров

Call it suicidal empathy, toxic empathy, or the sin of empathy, it’s why this is happening

Call it suicidal empathy, toxic empathy, or the sin of empathy, it’s why this is happening

81,272 просмотров

Narnia has at last come to my neighborhood.

Narnia has at last come to my neighborhood.

22,996 просмотров

Paid Democrat influencer Harry Sisson has released a YouTube video that blatantly lies about the woman in the infamous Cinnabon clip. To the degree that we have any information about this woman’s political views, she appears to be a Biden/Harris supporter and pro-choice. After looking through all of her social media accounts, this is the only political post that she has made. And yet Sisson declares, without a shred of evidence, that she is a “Trump supporter.” This is the kind of thing that is inflaming our cultural tensions with deliberate lies. And he does it without a shred of embarrassment or conscience. This is vile, vile behavior that will lead to further Balkanization and violence. It’s not a game. It’s not cute. It’s not a strategy. It is leading to the destruction of our nation. I have reported the YouTube video and I hope others will join me. It has hundreds of thousands of views. And it is blatant deceit and disinformation. Video for reporting is linked below.

Paid Democrat influencer Harry Sisson has released a YouTube video that blatantly lies about the woman in the infamous Cinnabon clip. To the degree that we have any information about this woman’s political views, she appears to be a Biden/Harris supporter and pro-choice. After looking through all of her social media accounts, this is the only political post that she has made. And yet Sisson declares, without a shred of evidence, that she is a “Trump supporter.” This is the kind of thing that is inflaming our cultural tensions with deliberate lies. And he does it without a shred of embarrassment or conscience. This is vile, vile behavior that will lead to further Balkanization and violence. It’s not a game. It’s not cute. It’s not a strategy. It is leading to the destruction of our nation. I have reported the YouTube video and I hope others will join me. It has hundreds of thousands of views. And it is blatant deceit and disinformation. Video for reporting is linked below.

27,881 просмотров

The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, NBC, CBS, Church Too activists, Bob Smietana Robert Downen Julie Roys Bart Barber Adam W. Greenway Eric Geiger J.D. Greear Russell Moore David French Danny Slavich Bruce Frank Todd Unzicker Todd Benkert Rachael Denhollander Jacob Denhollander (and more) *It’s “disgusting” and “unethical” and “covering for abusers” to question our narrative. You are a very bad person and a rape apologist if you doubt our claims.* Me:

The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, NBC, CBS, Church Too activists, Bob Smietana Robert Downen Julie Roys Bart Barber Adam W. Greenway Eric Geiger J.D. Greear Russell Moore David French Danny Slavich Bruce Frank Todd Unzicker Todd Benkert Rachael Denhollander Jacob Denhollander (and more) *It’s “disgusting” and “unethical” and “covering for abusers” to question our narrative. You are a very bad person and a rape apologist if you doubt our claims.* Me:

22,797 просмотров

Okay I resolved to quit posting the same shot from our backyard but today’s sunset so good I couldn’t resist! Wait for it!

Okay I resolved to quit posting the same shot from our backyard but today’s sunset so good I couldn’t resist! Wait for it!

42,029 просмотров

Finally the thing we came to see, the joust!

Finally the thing we came to see, the joust!

10,597 просмотров

Also, the hymns were transcendent. Bag pipe player was especially wonderful moment.

Also, the hymns were transcendent. Bag pipe player was especially wonderful moment.

11,160 просмотров

Videos

megbasham's profile picture

The consideration of Keller's legacy on broader evangelical thinking is going to be ongoing and those who have a vested interest in maintaining a gloss on his reputation (think TGC or fellows from The Keller Center for Cultural Apologetics) will understandably resist inclusion of those aspects that have come in for strong critique. (I believe for good reason). It's understandable those who today work in ministries Keller founded or was connected to would resist this part of his review, and we shouldn't leave out the parts of Keller's teaching that were sound and valuable and his ability to gain a hearing with less receptive audiences. But this discussion must also include the central role he played in trying to make a progressive social gospel palatable to theologically conservative evangelicals. His promotion of Gustavo Gutierrez and liberation theology, for instance. His insistence, as in the first clip, that black men are incarcerated at higher rates because of white bias rather than higher rates of black criminality. Or his argument that negotiating for the best price on a car deal is an example of systemic racism and sexism. He calls it a form of rebellion against God. (Never mind there are many scenarios where white people would be poorer negotiators--are minorities taking advantage of them and in rebellion against God then?) Or his finding of systemic racism in missionaries raising their funding (a practice that applies to missionaries of all ethnicities) because he claims some ethnic backgrounds have access to more wealth. He includes Asians among those who are supposedly at a disadvantage here without acknowledging that Asians have higher overall median household and individual earnings than whites do. In the third video, he promotes idea of "white skin" being a "historical asset." And he argues white people have a responsibility to be conscious of the fact that this skin color advantage was earned for them through unjust practices of past generations of white people (thus, everyone with white skin bears some guilt for this even if their ancestors didn't personally participate in racial oppression). And there are many more such examples from Keller, taking ideas from liberation theology and disseminating it to the broader evangelical church. So I think it's important to acknowledge the part of his ministry that was heavily focused on social justice rather than challenging the views of his urban, progressive audience that would certainly align with that worldview. This part of Keller's preaching acted as reassurance to his minority audience that they have been wronged and are justified to some degree in embracing grievance and envy. This was some of his most influential teaching that shaped much of the evangelical landscape on how young pastors spoke and wrote about the church needing more focus on becoming champions against this alleged social injustice. So by all means, let's not throw out the meat that the Keller produced through his ministry. But these bones were a significant part of his influence and we cannot ignore it either.

Megan Basham

46,602 просмотров • 19 дней назад

megbasham's profile picture

So I recognize I have a different take than many of my colleagues in conservative media. But a couple of points I wanted to make today on Charlie's show with Andrew Kolvet and Blake Neff. 1) According to her interview with Ray Comfort, Ashley Sheatz came to Christ at 17. And as she explained in her initial testimony, after being exposed to sexual immorality from a young age while living with her single mom, she became a porn user at age 11. She was a young teenager when she began engaging in sexual sin with partners. I'd like everyone flinging the WORST labels I can imagine at her to remember--she was legally a child while having relationships with adult men years (in one case decades) older than her. I appreciate Ashley taking responsibility for her willful sinful choices, but this background suggests she was in a vulnerable, unprotected place from a young age and men took advantage of her, not the other way around. 2) Ashley Sheatz did not, as many were howling, go from being a web cam girl to being a Christian influencer. Though of course she has social media accounts where she talks about her life, background, and interests like every other modern American, her life for the past nine years has been focused on being a Christian wife and mom of three. She has been doing what the man-o-sphere says she should be doing--she's been quietly living out her faith, showing fruit in keeping with repentance. 3) If you read her full testimony it includes nightmarish situations of risking her life in pursuit of drugs. The idea that she didn't a pay price for her past sins is a claim that only someone who has never lived that hell can make. There is a reason the Bible describes it as slavery to sin. 4) Whore and promiscuous are not synonymous. One is meant to be more a general catchall term for being sexually indiscriminate. To some, it might mean any sex outside of marriage (this is what it should mean). To others, it could mean dozens of partners a year. The other is a crude term for a prostitute. Her husband did not call her a prostitute by that term or any other. In addition to that, I shared how I believe this Twitter Tempest plays into the longhouse phenomenon (which I think is absolutely real. As I have said in the past, I don't believe it goes too far to say we are living in something of a gynocracy). Thanks to Blake and Andrew for having me to discuss from a Protestant Christian perspective. I hope it adds something.

Megan Basham

109,009 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

megbasham's profile picture

Last week, Matt Chandler, megachurch pastor and head of the massive church planting network Acts 29, gave a sermon on politics. In it, he pushed the false narrative, peddled by progressives, that the only reason that the GOP took up the issue of abortion was because they "were losing elections" and "developed a strategy in the 70s to co opt us and make [Christians] their people." He goes on to say: "[The GOP] know we're easily manipulated. We are easily worked into a frenzy. We can be controlled by them. They can, and that's what they did, and they are not for us. They do not all believe what we believe. This is a strategy." He does then call out the left for their pro-abortion policies, which he calls "morally reprehensible." BUT the overall upshot of his sermon recycles the old "both sides are bad." He specifically stresses that he does not trust Trump. Where does that leave his congregation? Likely sitting out or voting third party. He leaves his hearer with the impression that the two sides are moral equivalents. It is true that prior to the 1970s, Republicans did not view the sanctity of life as part of their platform. But a generation of Christians labored and prayed and strategized and lobbied to try to get one of the major political parties to take up their cause. These were faithful brothers and sisters following Scripture's commands to "rescue those being led away to death" and to "take up the cause of fatherless and oppressed." In peddling this false left-wing narrative, Chandler is dismissing their efforts and sacrifices. In fact, I'd go so far as to say he is spitting on their legacy. The work of politics is to use the leverage you have as a voting constituency to get legislators to take up your preferred policies. There is nothing dirty or sneaky in that. It is what the political process is. We should celebrate the fact that Christian pro-lifers of a previous generation did so so successfully with the GOP. We should not denigrate their work. And remember--for decades these pro-lifers tried to get Democrats to take up their cause too and failed. That is to the Democrats' shame. We should thank God at least one party was willing to give life a seat at the table.

Megan Basham

721,454 просмотров • 1 год назад