Mordecai Muriisa ™️'s banner
Mordecai Muriisa ™️'s profile picture

Mordecai Muriisa ™️

@MordecaiMuriisa47,639 subscribers

🎙️ Host of Mordecai Muriisa Live on YouTube. Author of the Odyssey of the Optimist on Amazon.

Shorts

A broken clock is right twice a day. Mbu Peter Pan what? Note: I’m team beekube 🍿😂🤣

A broken clock is right twice a day. Mbu Peter Pan what? Note: I’m team beekube 🍿😂🤣

43,646 просмотров

Videos

MordecaiMuriisa's profile picture

I would like to see Olara Otunnu lose his bid for UN Secretary-General. Stay with me for a second. I don’t oppose Otunnu because he is Ugandan. I don’t oppose him because I hate Uganda. And certainly not because I cannot take pride in seeing a Ugandan aspire to one of the world’s most prestigious international positions. My objection is much more fundamental. I worry that Otunnu’s bid for the UN’s top job could become an opportunity to whitewash, sanitize or soften the record of the Museveni government a government whose decades in power have been accompanied by allegations of repression, political violence, abuses and impunity. And this is where Otunnu’s own record and relationship with Uganda matter. He has been in Uganda. He has seen what has happened. He knows the political reality. Yet, when confronted with the conduct of Museveni’s government and, increasingly, the political role of his son Muhoozi, Otunnu has too often appeared to retreat into the comfort of intellectual language, diplomatic semantics and carefully constructed platitudes. For me, that is not enough. You cannot aspire to become the world’s chief diplomat while avoiding the uncomfortable truths happening in your own backyard. Uganda does not need another international figure who can make authoritarianism sound respectable. It needs people willing to name abuse, confront impunity and defend democratic principles even when doing so is politically inconvenient. So yes, I would like to see Olara Otunnu lose this particular bid. Not because he is Ugandan. But because I believe the UN Secretary-General should be someone whose commitment to human rights and accountability is beyond political ambiguity including when the uncomfortable questions involve their own country. YouTube -

Mordecai Muriisa ™️

69,940 просмотров • 29 дней назад

MordecaiMuriisa's profile picture

Joel Ssenyonyi did what many never expected. Standing before General. Museveni, and sending a message to Gen. Muhoozi Kainerugaba, top military commanders, and the country's political elite, the Leader of the Opposition could have chosen the easy path. He could have delivered a safe, emotional tribute to the late Gen. Moses Ali and walked away. Instead, he turned a moment of mourning into a powerful constitutional reminder. Although Joel Ssenyonyi's politics stood in sharp contrast to those of the late Gen. Moses Ali, he put political differences aside to acknowledge his service, leadership, and sacrifices. It was a display of statesmanship that few could criticize. But then came the part that changed the mood in the room. The lawyer in Joel Ssenyonyi took over. With Museveni and CDF Gen. Muhoozi Kainerugaba listening, he reminded Uganda's leaders that the Constitution is not optional. He stressed that the rule of law must be respected and that no one regardless of rank, office, or military power is above the law. In that moment, this was no longer just a tribute. It became a constitutional challenge delivered straight to the country's most powerful figures. While others chose emotion, Joel chose principle. While others praised the past, Joel confronted the present. His speech wasn't just about honoring a fallen general it was a reminder that the greatest tribute any nation can pay its heroes is to protect the Constitution they swore to defend. For many supporters of the Museveni regime, those words were unlikely to be comfortable. What was expected to be a solemn ceremony became, in my view, a moment of accountability, as the Leader of the Opposition used the national stage to remind Uganda's mis-leaders that power without respect for the Constitution undermines the very foundation of the state. Joel Ssenyonyi didn't simply deliver a tribute. He delivered a message the powerful could not ignore. YouTube -

Mordecai Muriisa ™️

83,952 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

MordecaiMuriisa's profile picture

During the NUP Diaspora Convention in Los Angeles, California, last week, I had the opportunity to sit down with Solomon Kampala, the son of NUP President Kyagulanyi Ssentamu Robert, alias Bobi Wine. At just 21, I was genuinely struck by the intellectual maturity and depth of thought he brought to our conversation. Solomon is young, but his reflections on Uganda’s political future go far beyond what many would expect from someone his age. We discussed whether he believes Uganda’s political climate can actually change. I also put a more personal question to him: Coming from a relatively privileged family, why involve yourself in a dangerous political struggle when you could simply stay away? That question is particularly significant given what his family has experienced. During a raid on his parents’ home, his mother was held at gunpoint by security personnel. Solomon subsequently took to social media and expressed his anger in no uncertain terms. I asked him whether, looking back, he regretted speaking out. And because he has already become increasingly engaged in Uganda’s political conversation, I had to ask the question many people will inevitably be wondering: Does Solomon Kampala see himself entering electoral politics and running for office one day? His answers offered a fascinating glimpse into how a new generation within Uganda’s opposition movement is thinking about politics, privilege, risk and the country's future. Here is our conversation. YouTube -

Mordecai Muriisa ™️

27,420 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

MordecaiMuriisa's profile picture

Kungu bulijjo musajja mugezi ate nnyo 🤣🙌🏿

Mordecai Muriisa ™️

25,702 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

MordecaiMuriisa's profile picture

Ibrahim Ssemujju Nganda may have intended to land a devastating blow on Bobi Wine, but judging by the reaction online, the attack appears to have backfired spectacularly. Speaking yesterday, Ssemujju argued that while Bobi Wine is undeniably popular, he lacks the ability to lead a political party, let alone govern a country. It was a statement that immediately ignited a firestorm on social media. But instead of joining Ssemujju's criticism, many Ugandans turned their attention to him. The first question they asked was simple: if leadership is measured by the success of a political party, what happened to the FDC? Ssemujju spent nearly two decades helping build the party, yet today it is a shadow of its former self, divided by internal conflicts and struggling to maintain its political relevance. Others pointed out an even more uncomfortable fact. If Bobi Wine lacks leadership qualities, how did Ssemujju himself lose his parliamentary seat to a candidate from the very party Bobi Wine leads? To many online commentators, that contradiction was impossible to ignore. As the criticism intensified, some accused Ssemujju of sounding less like a seasoned political analyst and more like the kind of commentator he has often criticized himself. Others suggested that what appeared to be political analysis was actually frustration with Bobi Wine's continued influence and dominance within Uganda's opposition politics. Whether those accusations are fair or not, one thing is clear: the conversation quickly stopped being about Bobi Wine's leadership and became about Ssemujju's credibility. In politics, attacks are supposed to weaken your opponent. But sometimes they achieve the opposite effect. Judging by the public reaction, Ssemujju may have discovered that criticizing Bobi Wine is one thing; convincing Ugandans of that criticism is something entirely different. Instead of putting Bobi Wine on the defensive, his remarks appear to have handed Bobi Wine's supporters fresh ammunition and left Ssemujju answering uncomfortable questions of his own. If the goal was to damage Bobi Wine politically, the internet's verdict seems clear: the attack missed its target and boomeranged right back at the man who launched it. YouTube -

Mordecai Muriisa ™️

31,540 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

MordecaiMuriisa's profile picture

After Parliament declined to approve Dr. Lawrence Muganga for the position of Minister of Internal Affairs, an interesting debate quickly emerged. A group of Banyarwanda in Masaka publicly appealed to President Museveni, arguing that if Muganga could not get the job, then another Munyarwanda should be appointed in his place. Well, it appears their wish has been granted. President Museveni has since appointed Uwitonze Kisekka Juma to the position. Let me be clear from the outset: I have absolutely no problem with Ugandans of Rwandan heritage—or any other heritage—serving in positions of leadership. Every Ugandan should have an equal opportunity to serve their country based on merit. My concern is something entirely different. What does it say about our politics if the President can be publicly pressured to reserve a particular ministry for a particular ethnic group? And if one community successfully argues that a ministry belongs to them, what stops every other tribe from demanding its own ministerial slot? Public office is not a tribal entitlement. Ministries are not ethnic trophies to be shared among communities. They are national institutions, and the people appointed to lead them are supposed to serve every Ugandan equally, regardless of tribe, religion, region, or political affiliation. In my view, the moment we begin treating Cabinet appointments as rewards for ethnic identity rather than positions of national service, we risk creating a dangerous precedent, one that could deepen divisions instead of strengthening national unity. Here is my commentary. YouTube -

Mordecai Muriisa ™️

15,999 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

MordecaiMuriisa's profile picture

After threatening to shut down NTV and the Daily Monitor, Gen. Muhoozi Kainerugaba may have expected fear and silence. Instead, Uganda's most prominent media houses appear to have called his bluff. In what many viewed as a direct challenge to the country's Chief of Defence Forces, NTV's evening news bulletin revisited a series of controversial incidents in which Muhoozi has been accused of openly boasting about kidnappings, illegal detentions and other actions that critics say violate the law. The broadcaster posed a question that is increasingly being asked across the country: Is Muhoozi Kainerugaba above the law? The Daily Monitor has also continued reporting on the controversy despite the threats, setting up a confrontation that many Ugandans never expected to see. For years, critics have accused powerful figures in government of operating with impunity, but now major media institutions appear unwilling to simply look away. The bigger question is what happens next. Will Muhoozi back down from his threats, or will he attempt to act on them? Can a military officer, regardless of rank, decide which media houses are allowed to operate and which ones are not? And what does it say about the state of Uganda when journalists and media organizations find themselves in a public standoff with the country's top military commander? To many observers, this is no longer just a dispute between Muhoozi and the media. It is becoming a test of whether the rule of law still matters, whether freedom of the press can survive political intimidation, and whether powerful individuals can be held accountable for their actions. In this commentary, I examine the growing confrontation between Muhoozi Kainerugaba and Uganda's independent media and what it means for the future of the country. YouTube -

Mordecai Muriisa ™️

22,482 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад