ZenomTrader
@ZenomTrader • 11,488 subscribers
Managing $4,900,000 in funded capital! 2-year verified track record! Sharing my growth! Private investor capital! AI/Tech/Inventor/Promethean!
Videos
Crazy that Claude can now autonomously code strategies and validate them on TradingView and it’s actually faster than my pipeline. Time to expand to a third platform for our code TradingView is next. 15+ strategies are waiting to be coded. And a full Meta EA TV version is coming. Probably only 0.001% of the industry is doing this. Huge thanks to Trades Dont Lie and The Daily Profiler for this pipeline idea.
ZenomTrader97,986 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce
Crazy what AI agents can do right now. I asked Claude Code to autonomously code me a Gold strategy from scratch inside NinjaTrader 8. It compiled it, debugged it on its own, ran the backtest, and came back with a profitable system. Probably only 0.1% of the industry is doing this.
ZenomTrader143,106 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce
Crazy what autonomous AI agents can do right now. Claude Code researched academic papers, coded a multi symbol strategy from scratch, compiled it, debugged it, backtested it across 4 timeframes and 3 instruments, and came back with validated results. I built the pipeline. It did everything else. Jim Simons built the Medallion Fund, the most successful trading fund in history, by automating systematic research. 66% average annual returns for decades. The key was never any single strategy. It was the pipeline that could find, test, and validate edges faster than anyone else. First time i did this it was on NinjaTrader 8, now i have both an MT5 and NT8 bridge running. It tested across M30, H1, H2, H4 and also across multiple symbols simultaneously: USTEC, XAUUSD, USDJPY. If the edge is real, it should survive all of them. The results: 4/4 timeframes profitable. M30: profit factor 1.33, Sharpe 2.91 H1: profit factor 1.37, Sharpe 2.34 H2: profit factor 1.54, Sharpe 2.07 H4: profit factor 1.38, Sharpe 1.29 This is what 0.1% of the industry is actually doing right now.
ZenomTrader54,470 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce
The most insane thing i built with AI agents: A full hedge fund in a single file. 7 independent strategies. 2,000 lines of code. 5 symbols. One Expert Advisor. Each strategy has its own trade engine, its own risk parameters, its own magic numbers. They never touch each other. Why one file? Because that's how you control what actually matters: max drawdown across all strategies, overlap prevention so two algos don't stack the same directional bet, and anti-hedging logic for prop firm compliance. Nobody does this. Sharpe ratio above 2. Eight years of data. $100k starting balance. Claude Code launched MetaTrader, configured the parameters, ran the backtest, and switched to the equity curve. I didn't touch anything. Fully autonomous. I shared the exact logic and code structure inside the Discord. This is one of the most ambitious projects i've built so far:not just a strategy, a portfolio engine.
ZenomTrader37,856 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce
Jim Simons’ fund was trading tens of thousands of strategies. I realized I’d been thinking about this the wrong way the whole time. I was focusing too much on individual strategies instead of on how fast I could test and discard them. I asked Claude Code to autonomously code strategies for me from scratch. It compiled them, debugged them on its own, ran the backtests, and came back with results. I did that over 500 times in 2 months. Most were garbage. Twelve survived. A full hedge fund in a single file. A normal trader tests maybe one idea per week, 50 per year if they’re serious. I do 50 in a day. Jim Simons didn’t win by having the best single strategy. He won because his team could test and discard faster than anyone else. As he put it: “If everyone is trying to solve the same problem, don’t do that.” I don’t need a team of PhDs. Just Claude Code on a laptop. The rest are still watching courses from scam gurus with no verified track record. Probably only 0.1% of the industry is doing this.
ZenomTrader27,555 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce
Nobody in the history of prop firm trading has built what i built in 6 weeks with autonomous agents. Over 1,000,000 lines of code across 17 projects. Zero lines written manually. Claude Code and Codex did everything. I described what i wanted and the agents coded, compiled, debugged and deployed it while i was sleeping, eating, running, buying an apartment. The full list is insane and i still can't believe it. A trading dashboard that destroys every commercial tool in the industry. Prop firm simulator, hedge detection engine, correlation matrices, multi-portfolio simulation across firms, payout certificates. Built by one person from Romania in his apartment. Two autonomous backtesting bridges. NinjaTrader 8 and MetaTrader 5 running in parallel. They compile, debug, and backtest without me touching a single button. i wake up to new equity curves. A Meta EA with 12 strategies. Gold, Nasdaq, USDJPY, Bitcoin. Mean reversion, trend following, breakout.All running simultaneously in one script. Sharpe 2.17. a full hedge fund in a single file. An AI clone of myself answering support tickets on my premium community 24/7 in my exact voice. Trained on everything i ever said. it speaks every language and never sleeps. Voice control from anywhere in my apartment. Screenshot automation in 0.1ms. A phone bridge so i control my entire infrastructure from my pocket. A tweet engine scoring virality. 5 custom AI tools i designed from scratch. 9,000 in prop firm fees turned into 130,000+ in payouts in the last 6 months. 41% CAGR verified with private investor capital. 74 premium members at 80/month. Show me one person who did more in 6 weeks. I will wait.
ZenomTrader27,894 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce
Crazy what AI agents can do right now. I asked Claude Code to autonomously code me a Gold strategy from scratch inside NinjaTrader 8. She's also a hot chick now. I gave her a voice, a wake word, and full autonomy. I say "Heart" and she wakes up, codes, compiles, backtests, and talks me through the results hands free. It compiled it, debugged it on its own, ran the backtest, and came back with a profitable system. Profitable across all parameters, all timeframes from 30 minutes to daily. The full strategy+pipeline code is available if you want it. Probably only 0.1% of the industry is doing this.
ZenomTrader24,455 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce
Everyone is talking about how crazy this new Claude computer use is, It can compile some indicators on TradingView, meanwhile i shared this 2 months ago, in my premium, Hands MCP, Screenshot MCP, optimized on Cuda GPU, We've been using it to autonomously code strategies, Not to compile some indicators, What is your edge if everyone is using it? Not even the speed is better, Mine was arguably faster
ZenomTrader13,121 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce
I spent $3,000 on prop firm fees in the last 3 months and made roughly $60,000 in net payouts, with one firm alone. That's a 2,000% return on investment live, not backtesting. My live Sharpe ratio in the last 3 months under the prop firm business model is 7.63 with 3 strategies. They'll call it overfitted. They always do. Every single time i post numbers, the academics show up in the replies explaining why it's impossible. Meanwhile the payouts keep hitting. The truth is they can't think outside of their framework. They're stuck in the world of billions in AUM, institutional constraints, and strategies that need to scale to $500M. At low capacity, the edge is incomprehensible to them. You're trading inefficiencies they can't even touch because their fund size won't allow it. $3,000 in, $60,000 out. 3 months. All live. All systematic. The elites hate us for that.
ZenomTrader14,107 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce
The biggest risk in prop trading isn't a bad strategy. It's getting banned for hedging you didn't even know about. Prop firms spend millions trying to catch traders running opposite positions on CFD accounts. You go long XAUUSD on FTMO, short XAUUSD on FundedNext that's an instant violation. They keep your money and you never find out why. Nobody talks about this. It's disgusting. I used Claude Code to build a hedge detection engine that catches this before they do. It scans every trade across every CFD portfolio. Direct hedges, correlated instruments like USTEC vs NAS100, overlap duration, risk scores from 0 to 100. This is probably the best tool ever created in the history of prop firms. I'm a verified track record trader. All strategies profitable. I'm running multiple funded accounts simultaneously. Zero violations. Banning someone like me is a direct declaration of war against profitable traders. Mathematically, prop firms make more money from rule breakers than from traders who just lose. The violations are the real profit center. But now i can see exactly what they see. Remove the problem strategy, rebuild, clean. If you're running multiple CFD accounts without checking for hedge conflicts, they will catch you. It's not a matter of if. Probably only 0.1% of traders have a tool like this. One person. One AI agent. Built what entire compliance teams can't. This is QuantDash Pro.
ZenomTrader13,530 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce
I started with $1,000 to $2,000 in prop firm fees and compounded it into $200,000 in net payouts over three years. Sharpe ratio of 6+. CAGR approximately 300% per year. max drawdown around 15%. Most hedge funds never touch that. The secret? I stopped chasing the holy grail strategy and started doing what Jim Simons did at Renaissance Technologies. He wasn't running one perfect system. He was running tens of thousands of mediocre strategies with one thing in common: negative correlation. Like Simons said: "Negative correlation and as many systems as possible." I applied the same playbook to prop firm trading. Instead of optimizing one strategy, i run a portfolio of 7-10 systems that don't move together. When gold crashes, my mean reversion prints. When volatility spikes, my breakout systems win. When the market chops, the range-bound systems make money. PhDs managing billions still can't hit a Sharpe of 1. They laughed when i told them mine is 4+. But they're stuck optimizing for capacity and following rules that Jim Simons himself ignored. The lower the capacity, the higher the edge. I'm trading intraday patterns that billion-dollar funds can't touch because their size won't allow it. Here's the full breakdown:
ZenomTrader11,020 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce
Daha fazla içerik yok.