All the models are solid at Three.js in Cursor.... It mostly comes down to speed and style preference. Composer 2 finished first by a mile and even made the trees sway in the wind. Opus 4.6 felt most game-like. GPT-5.4 had the most detailed UFO and terrain but took the longest.show more

Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.4 (4/9) prompt: Build a production-quality... 3D flight-tracking web app using React + Vite + Three.js (react-three-fiber + drei) that visualizes live OpenSky aircraft data on a rotatable 3D Earth, with real-time plane motion, smooth interpolation, altitude-accurate positioning, and polished lighting/post-processing. Both models did really well on this one and honestly I’m impressed with both. GPT-5.4 had the nicer post-processing out of the box. I really liked the subtle light shimmer on the airplanes when rotating the planet, and the camera work when clicking a plane felt better overall. Opus 4.6 though had a few details I liked more. It automatically went and found a much nicer Earth texture on GitHub, while with GPT-5.4 I had to reprompt it to go look for a better one. I also preferred Opus’s plane model overall, it just looked more polished, whereas GPT-5.4’s plane asset looked a bit funny. One thing I noticed with GPT-5.4 is that when you click into the plane, the camera sometimes clips through the planet, which breaks the effect a bit. Opus handled that part more cleanly. Overall this felt like a strong result from both, just with different strengths. GPT-5.4 felt better on presentation and post-processing, while Opus had better asset choices and a more premium-looking Earth/plane combo.show more

After a weekend of testing and working on something... with GPT-5.3-Codex & Opus 4.6, ChatGPT Pro + Claude Max 5x are still the best combo in my opinion Using Codex & Claude Code CLI running in tmux (the desktop apps are still a bit buggy) and they're accessible even on the go from iPhone with Termius (and VPN) Usually starting with GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh and Opus 4.6 in plan mode, discussing changes and options, and each writing their plans down to separate Markdown files Then letting GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh (or Opus 4.6) implement the changes as the first draft, then Opus 4.6 reviews them with a team of agents (works pretty well already with tmux even though still experimental) based on both prepared plans, fixes stuff, and then another review by GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh or vice versa Interesting that even Opus 4.6 still occasionally makes silly mistakes like wrong imports, partial or overly broad renaming of variables/functions, etc Fun fact, OpenAI apparently plans to use their Super Bowl ad to promote Codex - curious what that will look likeshow more

Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5.4 (High) (1/9) prompt: Build... a single-file HTML/CSS/JS (no libs) demo that uses SVG to simulate a plant growing: stem extends, leaves sprout + unfurl with springy/windy “physics”, then seamlessly loops forever. For the initial impressions I'm really impressed by GPT, for speed they both felt about the same, but gpt was still half cheaper than opus. I also much prefer the design and animation that gpt produced, physics on the leaves are super cool and it also loops pretty nicely whilst opus just fades out the plant. Still got a bunch of tests to run but this is really exciting.show more

we compared Gemini 3.1 Pro, Opus 4.7, and GPT... 5.5 to Kimi K2.6, Xiaomi Mimo v2.5, and Qwen 3.6 Max in average, closed source are faster. GPT 5.5 and Opus 4.7 the fastest. Kimi K2.6 comes after. It keeps up thanks to its native INT4 quantization. MiMo took the longest, but the refinement and aesthetic only ranks after Gemini 3.1. as if a mini Gemini. Its slow cuz it's trained for long-horizon agentic work. Claude Opus 4.7 is blooming in a very different style, probably because Anthropic trains for taste, not just accuracy.show more

I gave Kimi K3 and Opus 5 the exact... same prompt to build a car racing game. I expected Opus 5 to take the lead. Instead, Kimi K3 finished in ~25 min for ~$8.9, while Opus 5 took 19 min and cost $14. The biggest surprise wasn’t the speed or the price. Kimi K3 built the better game. Smoother controls, better physics, and a driving experience that felt ready from the start. Opus 5 looked cleaner visually but Kimi won where it actually mattered. Nearly half the cost and the better gameplay.show more

Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT 5.4 (2/7) Testing how... well these models do with cloth physics simulation, and honestly I'm quite disappointed to see how poorly GPT 5.4 performed here. Performance was pretty bad... it added all the functionality (panning, cutting, dragging the curtain) under one mouse event, causing it to glitch out a lot. The scene also looks kinda shit. Opus 4.7 pretty much nailed the prompt. First of all, the angle and scene it picked are really nice, with the lamp just creeping into the frame. The dragging, wind physics, and cutting all worked. I also had to reprompt gpt 1-2 times to properly build and remove a bunch of ugly ui cards it added on top of the 3d scene. prompt: Build a premium Vite + React interactive cloth simulation of a cozy room curtain using real particle/constraint physics, with structural + shear springs, damping, collisions, and stable real-time deformation. Users should be able to drag the curtain, add wind, and cut constraints, while the experience stays polished, visually elegant, and numerically stable.show more

Average Helldivers 2 gameplay but it's animated in the... style of Genndy Tartakovskys 2003 Clone Wars. All models made in blender by myself with Goo-engine, down to the weapons and automatons.show more

How to get Opus 5.5 to make all the... art for your Godot game All the art in this level took 16 generations, under 6 minutes and about $4 in credits > Connect SpriteCook to Claude Code > Block out the level in gray boxes > Make the hero first > Use the hero as the style reference for the tiles, backgrounds and props > Get the tileset as a Godot terrain, so the edges and corners just work > Let it pick the best of each batch and clean up stray pixels > Have it place the props and light the scene Concept a level in the morning and play it with finished art the same dayshow more

I don't think there's a single terminal ux that... handles agent swarms well With slate, you can literally use Opus 4.6 and GPT 5.4 at the exact same time But making it intuitive took a ton of work So heres a thread on how it works and how to actually use it 🧵show more

What if anatomy explorers felt alive? This 3D dog,... including the skeleton, organs and rig, was generated with ai and reacts to the cursor in real time with head tracking and tail movement. - Used GPT Images 2 for consistency - Omma AI for 3D generation and code using Three.js Lmk if you’d like to try it!show more

Homelander's speed inconsistency in the Season 5 finale was... one of the most annoying talking points for me too. Early on we see him casually yeeting to space and back in seconds, speed-blitzing people, yet in the final fight he's getting held down and can't just fly out or end it quick? It felt like they nerfed him hard for the plot. Kinda took me out of the moment. The ending was still brutal, but damn the powerscaling was all over the place.show more

The embarrasing end to the game has overshadowed a... pretty significant issue for the Commanders offense. The Giants spammed Cover-0 and the Commanders took far too long to find even the most basic of answer. I broke it all down:show more

I had early access to Sonnet 5.5, and initially,... I couldn’t tell it apart from Opus 5.5. It’s significantly cheaper than Opus, which already offers an absurd amount of usage for a low price. The substantial increase in intelligence, speed, and affordability of Anthropic 5.5 models is perhaps the most significant leap we’ve witnessed in AI.show more

It's Christmas morning: OpenAI and Anthropic shipped new models... on the same day! We tested GPT 5.3 Codex vs. Opus 4.6 head-to-head. Verdict: the models are converging. Here’s what we found 🧵show more

This is the most reliable fan i had i... had it for years and it allway cools down the area the breezes it makes when it moves back and forth feels like wind #honeywellshow more

life when you discover an open-source model that runs... 300 parallel agents, executes for 12+ hours straight, beats GPT-5.4 and opus 4.6 on multiple benchmarks... and the weights are on huggingfaceshow more

The gap between “here’s the design” and “here’s the... working app” is getting very small. Grok 4.6 took #1 on the VISTA leaderboard, beating Claude Fable 5, Opus 5, and GPT-5.6 Sol. It has to look at a real Figma design, figure out the structure, recreate the visuals, and build the functioning app from it. And it finished the benchmark at roughly $2.38 per task. That’s the kind of shortcut builders actually care about. Grok / Writer: Annette, Grok Imagine Designer: Jannéshow more

I rewatch games 4 and 5 the most but... I’ll always throw in game 1 because of how surreal it felt to be in the Finals and how crazy that atmosphere wasshow more